Jump to content

User talk:Glenn Shaw: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 44: Line 44:


An article you recently created, [[Draft:Daria Trifu|Daria Trifu]], does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from [[WP:RS|reliable]], [[WP:IS|independent sources]]. <small>([[WP:42|?]])</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed ([[WP:V|verifiability]] is of [[WP:5|central importance]] on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to [[Wikipedia:Draftspace|draftspace]] (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]] and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the [[Wikipedia:AfC|Articles for Creation]] template atop the page. <span style="color:DarkGray">...</span> [[User:discospinster|<span style="color:DarkOrange">'''disco'''</span><span style="color: #556B2F">'''''spinster'''''</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:discospinster|'''<span style="color:DarkGray">talk</span>''']]</sub> 15:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
An article you recently created, [[Draft:Daria Trifu|Daria Trifu]], does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from [[WP:RS|reliable]], [[WP:IS|independent sources]]. <small>([[WP:42|?]])</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed ([[WP:V|verifiability]] is of [[WP:5|central importance]] on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to [[Wikipedia:Draftspace|draftspace]] (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]] and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the [[Wikipedia:AfC|Articles for Creation]] template atop the page. <span style="color:DarkGray">...</span> [[User:discospinster|<span style="color:DarkOrange">'''disco'''</span><span style="color: #556B2F">'''''spinster'''''</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:discospinster|'''<span style="color:DarkGray">talk</span>''']]</sub> 15:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Bruno Pischiutta|Bruno Pischiutta]] (February 18) ==
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason<!-- pluralize "reason" --><!--empty--> left by Dial911 was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in ''published'', [[WP:RS|''reliable'']], [[WP:SECONDARY|''secondary'']] sources that are ''[[Wikipedia:Identifying and using independent sources|independent]]'' of the subject—see the [[WP:BIO|guidelines on the notability of people]], [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]] and [[Help:Introduction to referencing/1]])</small>, so that the information is [[WP:V|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=How do I verify the content of your submission? Provide secondary sources that can be verified.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
{{clear}}
* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Bruno Pischiutta]] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
* If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to [[Draft:Bruno Pischiutta]], click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
* If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bruno_Pischiutta '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span> or on the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dial911&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bruno_Pischiutta '''reviewer's talk page''']</span>.
* You can also use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:Dial911|Dial911]] ([[User talk:Dial911|talk]]) 21:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->

== [[Draft:Bruno Pischiutta]] ==


[[File:Information icon4.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]

Hello, Glenn Shaw. It has been over six months since you last edited the [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] submission or [[WP:Drafts|draft]] page you started, [[Draft:Bruno Pischiutta]].

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia [[WP:mainspace|mainspace]], the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at [[WP:REFUND/G13|this link]]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;[[User:JJMC89|JJMC89]]&thinsp;<small>([[User talk:JJMC89|T]]'''·'''[[Special:Contributions/JJMC89|C]])</small> 19:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:45, 22 January 2019

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruno Pischiutta (December 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Glenn Shaw, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Global Film Studio Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daria Trifu

[edit]

Hello Glenn Shaw,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daria Trifu for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd advice continuing to use the AfC process instead of putting articles directly in mainspace, and to have a read of Wikipedia:Notability. There needs to be coverage in say newspapers for her to be notable, and currently the article does not say why she is significant - why is she important enough for an article. Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:29, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daria Trifu moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Daria Trifu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 15:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruno Pischiutta (February 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dial911 (talk) 21:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Glenn Shaw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Bruno Pischiutta.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 19:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]