User talk:Bruiz011/Looting Art: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Peer Review: new section |
m ReaderofthePack moved page Talk:Looting Art to User talk:Bruiz011/Looting Art without leaving a redirect: not ready to be live |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
•Great job including a number of references from textbooks and scholarly journals |
•Great job including a number of references from textbooks and scholarly journals |
||
•Make sure to double check for typos and grammatical errors |
•Make sure to double check for typos and grammatical errors |
||
•Try not to focus too much on the negatives |
•Try not to focus too much on the negatives, maybe include what can be done to stop looting the sites you discussed in your sandbox |
||
•maybe include what can be done to stop looting the sites you discussed in your sandbox |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:27, 7 June 2019
Peer Review
[edit]•Avoid using strong words such as "demolished" when describing what happened to the ancient sites discussed; using strong negative words conveys bias •Great job including a number of references from textbooks and scholarly journals •Make sure to double check for typos and grammatical errors •Try not to focus too much on the negatives, maybe include what can be done to stop looting the sites you discussed in your sandbox