Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Black Panther (film)/1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
delisting |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: {{al|Black Panther (film)|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Black_Panther_(film)/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • [[Talk:Black Panther (film)/GA1|Most recent review]] |
: {{al|Black Panther (film)|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Black_Panther_(film)/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • [[Talk:Black Panther (film)/GA1|Most recent review]] |
||
: '''Result''': '''Delisted''' for plagiarism concerns, and no objections to delisting after over 3 months. [[User:SNUGGUMS|<b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b>]] ([[User talk:SNUGGUMS|<b style="color:#009900">talk</b>]] / [[Special:Contributions/SNUGGUMS|<b style="color:#009900">edits</b>]]) 18:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC) |
|||
: {{GAR/current}}<br/> |
|||
<!-- Please add the rationale for reassessment below this comment. Subsequent discussion should be added below, until the reassessment is closed.--> |
<!-- Please add the rationale for reassessment below this comment. Subsequent discussion should be added below, until the reassessment is closed.--> |
||
The original GA review was not thorough, and missed a large amount of textual plagiarism (see the talk page and the most recent archive). It's got to the point that the only parts of the article that I'm convinced are clean are the [[WP:QUOTEFARM|awkwardly large volume of direct quotations]]. The original nominator and other contributors have been reluctant do the heavy lifting of sweeping the article of this plagiarism. I don't think there's anything for it at this point but GAR. [[User:Hijiri88|Hijiri 88]] (<small>[[User talk:Hijiri88|聖]][[Special:Contributions/Hijiri88|やや]]</small>) 13:01, 5 April 2019 (UTC) |
The original GA review was not thorough, and missed a large amount of textual plagiarism (see the talk page and the most recent archive). It's got to the point that the only parts of the article that I'm convinced are clean are the [[WP:QUOTEFARM|awkwardly large volume of direct quotations]]. The original nominator and other contributors have been reluctant do the heavy lifting of sweeping the article of this plagiarism. I don't think there's anything for it at this point but GAR. [[User:Hijiri88|Hijiri 88]] (<small>[[User talk:Hijiri88|聖]][[Special:Contributions/Hijiri88|やや]]</small>) 13:01, 5 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
:: {{re|Hijiri88}} '''Delist''' given the lack of care. There has been no discussion on the article talk page and only minor adjustments made to the article. I recommend closing this as a delist considering it has been going on for almost 2 months without a single response. [[User:Hurricane Noah|<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200"><b>Noah</b></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Hurricane Noah|<span style="color:#ff0000"><b>Talk</b></span>]]</sup> 15:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC) |
:: {{re|Hijiri88}} '''Delist''' given the lack of care. There has been no discussion on the article talk page and only minor adjustments made to the article. I recommend closing this as a delist considering it has been going on for almost 2 months without a single response. [[User:Hurricane Noah|<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200"><b>Noah</b></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Hurricane Noah|<span style="color:#ff0000"><b>Talk</b></span>]]</sup> 15:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC) |
||
:: |
::: {{User|Argento Surfer}} seems to have [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Black_Panther_%28film%29&type=revision&diff=902532627&oldid=902113097 addressed this].--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 19:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC) |
||
::::No, he hasn't. Nothing in the above edit implies a thorough source check to scan for plagiarism took place, and indeed the only segments of text that were edited/removed were ones I had already highlighted. This kind of IDHT is simply unacceptable. [[User:Hijiri88|Hijiri 88]] (<small>[[User talk:Hijiri88|聖]][[Special:Contributions/Hijiri88|やや]]</small>) 04:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:19, 20 July 2019
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted for plagiarism concerns, and no objections to delisting after over 3 months. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The original GA review was not thorough, and missed a large amount of textual plagiarism (see the talk page and the most recent archive). It's got to the point that the only parts of the article that I'm convinced are clean are the awkwardly large volume of direct quotations. The original nominator and other contributors have been reluctant do the heavy lifting of sweeping the article of this plagiarism. I don't think there's anything for it at this point but GAR. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 13:01, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Hijiri88: Delist given the lack of care. There has been no discussion on the article talk page and only minor adjustments made to the article. I recommend closing this as a delist considering it has been going on for almost 2 months without a single response. NoahTalk 15:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Argento Surfer (talk · contribs) seems to have addressed this.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- No, he hasn't. Nothing in the above edit implies a thorough source check to scan for plagiarism took place, and indeed the only segments of text that were edited/removed were ones I had already highlighted. This kind of IDHT is simply unacceptable. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 04:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Argento Surfer (talk · contribs) seems to have addressed this.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Hijiri88: Delist given the lack of care. There has been no discussion on the article talk page and only minor adjustments made to the article. I recommend closing this as a delist considering it has been going on for almost 2 months without a single response. NoahTalk 15:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)