Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oceanarium Bournemouth: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Oceanarium Bournemouth. using TW |
→Oceanarium Bournemouth: Closed as Draftify (XFDcloser) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
⚫ | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''Draftify'''. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 01:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
:{{la|Oceanarium Bournemouth}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oceanarium Bournemouth|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 August 13#{{anchorencode:Oceanarium Bournemouth}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Oceanarium_Bournemouth Stats]</span>) |
:{{la|Oceanarium Bournemouth}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oceanarium Bournemouth|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 August 13#{{anchorencode:Oceanarium Bournemouth}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Oceanarium_Bournemouth Stats]</span>) |
||
Line 8: | Line 13: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organisms|list of Organisms-related deletion discussions]]. <span style="background-color:lightblue">''''' [[User:Velella|Velella]] '''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue"> <sup>''[[User talk:Velella|Velella]] Talk ''</sup> </span> 10:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organisms|list of Organisms-related deletion discussions]]. <span style="background-color:lightblue">''''' [[User:Velella|Velella]] '''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue"> <sup>''[[User talk:Velella|Velella]] Talk ''</sup> </span> 10:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. <span style="background-color:lightblue">''''' [[User:Velella|Velella]] '''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue"> <sup>''[[User talk:Velella|Velella]] Talk ''</sup> </span> 10:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. <span style="background-color:lightblue">''''' [[User:Velella|Velella]] '''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue"> <sup>''[[User talk:Velella|Velella]] Talk ''</sup> </span> 10:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Comment''' These seems to be reasonably independant, at least:[https://books.google.se/books?id=ptk82Uwd_ikC&pg=PA209&dq=Bournemouth+Oceanarium&hl=sv&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjF0qTw4P_jAhWByqYKHU1KC0UQ6AEIRzAE#v=onepage&q=Bournemouth%20Oceanarium&f=false][https://books.google.se/books?id=kPLiPP1ghtYC&pg=PA132&dq=Bournemouth+Oceanarium&hl=sv&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjF0qTw4P_jAhWByqYKHU1KC0UQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=Bournemouth%20Oceanarium&f=false][https://www.mirror.co.uk/travel/uk-ireland/uks-best-seaside-town-2017-11612869]. [[User:Gråbergs Gråa Sång|Gråbergs Gråa Sång]] ([[User talk:Gråbergs Gråa Sång|talk]]) 11:43, 13 August 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' Have edited the page to remove a lot of the puffery but believe their is a COI here and not currently enough independent, quality sources to demonstrate notability [[User:Dexxtrall|Dexxtrall]] ([[User talk:Dexxtrall|talk]]) 11:55, 13 August 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' I have now decided to admit this article into the [[User:A diehard editor/Diehard Article Hospital/Oceanarium Bournemouth|Diehard Article Hospital]]. I will add high-quality spurces and probably revamp it. I will replace/recreate the page when I consider the article ready for publishing. If you want to discuss this, please go to [[User talk:A diehard editor/Diehard Article Hospital/Oceanarium Bournemouth]] <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 12:36, 13 August 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
*'''Draftify''' based on above. Currently I think the sourcing is just below the bar for notability. If the editor wants to have another go at finding better sources, then that's fine, but unless that happens within the next week, article should at least be moved out of mainspace. --<span style="font-family:Courier">[[User:Elmidae|Elmidae]]</span> <small>([[User talk:Elmidae|talk]] · [[Special:contributions/Elmidae|contribs]])</small> 13:48, 13 August 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Draftify.''' Given the COI and the fact that the article needs lots of work done, either moving it to [[Draft:Oceanarium Bournemouth]] or [[WP:TNT|"blowing it up and starting over"]] should be sufficient in solving the article's problems. [https://www.google.com/search?ei=5jhcXf-XEYWe_QbX44LADA&q=Oceanarium+Bournemouth+-wiki+-wikipedia&oq=Oceanarium+Bournemouth+-wiki+-wikipedia&gs_l=psy-ab.3...4025.6963..7125...1.2..1.356.1569.15j2j0j1......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71j0j0i22i30.TQchydqjuTM&ved=0ahUKEwj_ot-Zh5LkAhUFT98KHdexAMgQ4dUDCAo&uact=5 a quick search] turned up a few results, I think enough to pass GNG. ––[[User:Redditaddict69|<b style="color:#3399FF">Redditaddict69</b>]] [[User talk:Redditaddict69|<sup style="color:#339900">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Redditaddict69|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(contribs)</sup>]] 18:17, 20 August 2019 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 01:33, 21 August 2019
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Oceanarium Bournemouth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability. Substantial COI editing with much puffery,. Sources are mostly own web-site plus a few very local which are probably press releases. Tagging for notability and inadequate sourcing has only encouraged more puffery and peacock text. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 10:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Velella Velella Talk 10:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Velella Velella Talk 10:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment These seems to be reasonably independant, at least:[1][2][3]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:43, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Have edited the page to remove a lot of the puffery but believe their is a COI here and not currently enough independent, quality sources to demonstrate notability Dexxtrall (talk) 11:55, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I have now decided to admit this article into the Diehard Article Hospital. I will add high-quality spurces and probably revamp it. I will replace/recreate the page when I consider the article ready for publishing. If you want to discuss this, please go to User talk:A diehard editor/Diehard Article Hospital/Oceanarium Bournemouth —Preceding undated comment added 12:36, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Draftify based on above. Currently I think the sourcing is just below the bar for notability. If the editor wants to have another go at finding better sources, then that's fine, but unless that happens within the next week, article should at least be moved out of mainspace. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:48, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Draftify. Given the COI and the fact that the article needs lots of work done, either moving it to Draft:Oceanarium Bournemouth or "blowing it up and starting over" should be sufficient in solving the article's problems. a quick search turned up a few results, I think enough to pass GNG. ––Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 18:17, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.