Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 23: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 48: Line 48:


==== [[Template:2019 Netherlands Women's Quadrangular Series]] ====
==== [[Template:2019 Netherlands Women's Quadrangular Series]] ====
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
* {{Tfd links|2019 Netherlands Women's Quadrangular Series}}
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''
The table is now in the article. [[User:HawkAussie|HawkAussie]] ([[User talk:HawkAussie|talk]]) 02:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

*'''Withdraw''' Didn't realise this was already on another article so I can have this be a withdraw. [[User:HawkAussie|HawkAussie]] ([[User talk:HawkAussie|talk]]) 03:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' As mentioned, this is used both on the series article itself and [[International cricket in 2019]] as the series is considered of enough significance to be listed in the season review. [[User:Bs1jac|Bs1jac]] ([[User talk:Bs1jac|talk]]) 15:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was '''relisted'''<!-- Tfd top --> on [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 September 8#Template:2019 Netherlands Women's Quadrangular Series|2019 September 8]]. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 02:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
* {{tfd links|2019_Netherlands_Women's_Quadrangular_Series}}
* '''delete''' after merging with [[2019 Netherlands Women's Quadrangular Series ]] and transcluding using [[Help:LST|lst]] (see [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=International_cricket_in_2019&type=revision&diff=912001416&oldid=911989351 here]). there is no need for a separate template if it will be used in only two articles. [[User:Frietjes|Frietjes]] ([[User talk:Frietjes|talk]]) 15:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''</div>
* '''Keep''' per Bs1jac. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Lugnuts|Fire Walk with Me]]</sup> 16:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' Just what [[Help:LST|Labeled Section Transclusion]] should be used for. --[[User:Trialpears|Trialpears]] ([[User talk:Trialpears|talk]]) 21:25, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 16:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
* '''Delete''' per Frietjes. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 23:33, 28 August 2019 (UTC)


==== [[Template:2013–14 La Liga table]] ====
==== [[Template:2013–14 La Liga table]] ====

Latest revision as of 02:33, 8 September 2019

August 23

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Navseasoncats. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:DecadeCategoryNav with Template:Navseasoncats.
Template:Navseasoncats does a better job, more simply:

  1. Navseasoncats needs no parameters
  2. Navseasoncats displays 11 decades in the series, whereas Template:DecadeCategoryNav displays only 7.
  3. DecadeCategoryNav clutters its navbox with an extra row of extraneous links, to the raw decade. A navbox is a signpost, and clutter impedes navigation.

Navseasoncats has grown to become overwhelmingly the most-used navigation tool for years, decades, seasons, etc. Standardising on Navseasoncats where possible provides readers with consistency of navigation, which is an important goal of any computer interface. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:04, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would definitely support a merge of {{DBDecadesInCentury}}. I haven't checked {{DBCenturiesIn2ndMillennium}} properly, but at first glance it looks mergeworthy. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:57, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I guess not. I've done it now adding a note about the other nomination. --Trialpears (talk) 16:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editor doesn't know what he's doing. David Biddulph (talk) 18:49, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 September 8. Primefac (talk) 02:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY and here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, ... Frietjes (talk) 14:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 13:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These templates used to include links to about a dozen portals each. Recently the vast majority of those portals have been deleted leaving these templates pretty barren and not very useful. Currently unused. BLAIXX 12:03, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 13:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per nominator — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:25, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any of the films he has directed, don't have a Wikipedia page. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 10:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).