Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doyne Dawson: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:16, 23 September 2019

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~~ OxonAlex - talk 14:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doyne Dawson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable Person Mdriscoll03 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:AUTHOR per the standard of having multiple reviews of multiple books each. This is also an argument for passing WP:PROF in a research area where citation counts are generally uninformative. Reviews of Cities of the Gods: [1][2][3][4]. Reviews of The Origins of Western Warfare: [5][6][7]. XOR'easter (talk) 17:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the above reasons, and also because he is the only historian I'm aware of writing about group selection. cagliost (talk) 18:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The argument above for notability through WP:AUTHOR is convincing. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:46, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets the criteria at WP:AUTHOR.4meter4 (talk) 12:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Doyne Dawson]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''keep'''. <small>[[Wikipedia:NACD|(non-admin closure)]]</small> <span style="color: darkgreen"> ~~ </span> [[User:OxonAlex|<span style="color: darkgreen"><small>Oxon</small>Alex</span>]]  [[User talk:OxonAlex|<span style="color: darkgreen">- talk</span>]] 14:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
+===[[:Doyne Dawson]]===
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
 :{{la|Doyne Dawson}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doyne Dawson|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 September 16#{{anchorencode:Doyne Dawson}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Doyne_Dawson Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 9: / Line 14: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Missouri|list of Missouri-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 17:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Keep''' Passes [[WP:AUTHOR]] per the standard of having multiple reviews of multiple books each. This is also an argument for passing [[WP:PROF]] in a research area where citation counts are generally uninformative. Reviews of ''Cities of the Gods'': [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24448803][https://www.jstor.org/stable/20719482][https://www.jstor.org/stable/4351691][https://www.jstor.org/stable/2168420]. Reviews of ''The Origins of Western Warfare'': [https://www.jstor.org/stable/40108150][https://www.jstor.org/stable/24450642][https://www.jstor.org/stable/26013972]. [[User:XOR&#39;easter|XOR&#39;easter]] ([[User talk:XOR&#39;easter|talk]]) 17:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' for the above reasons, and also because he is the only historian I'm aware of writing about group selection. [[User:Cagliost|cagliost]] ([[User talk:Cagliost|talk]]) 18:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''. The argument above for notability through [[WP:AUTHOR]] is convincing. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 00:46, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''. Meets the criteria at [[WP:AUTHOR]].[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 12:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>