User talk:Triplestop: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Substing templates: {{uw-disruptblock}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info. |
No edit summary |
||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=March 2014}} |
|||
{{Edit filter manager topicon}} |
{{Edit filter manager topicon}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
| Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
== Re: uaa question == |
|||
Re [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=571574171&oldid=571478311 your message]: Personally, no, I would not, but I see another admin did block the account. I would have waited for a true saved edit before taking any action. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo|talk]]) 03:38, 5 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Filter 188 question at AN == |
|||
Hi Triplestop. There a question about [[Special:AbuseFilter/188]] at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive253#Filter 188 is not working]]. Could you please comment there? Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/64.40.54.143|64.40.54.143]] ([[User talk:64.40.54.143|talk]]) 23:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Andrew Slattery]]== |
|||
The previous deletion debates were in 2007 and 2009 respectively. The fact that the sourcing is 2013 now should make it clear that the content can't be identical, can it? [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 06:25, 19 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Hence I have removed the tag as it is incorrect. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 06:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== [[US Federal Contractor Registration]] == |
|||
There was a G5 deletion before [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=US+Federal+Contractor+Registration&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=] but I don't know of an AfD discussion about this topic. —[[User_talk:Rybec|<font color="black"><span style="background:#ccccff">rybec</span></font>]] 06:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
: [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/US_Federal_Contractor_Registration]] [[User:Triplestop|Triplestop]] ([[User talk:Triplestop#top|talk]]) 06:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::How could I have forgotten that. {{smiley|blush}} —[[User_talk:Rybec|<font color="black"><span style="background:#ccccff">rybec</span></font>]] 17:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Speedy deletion declined: [[:Jamane A Boyd Jr]] == |
|||
Hello Triplestop. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of [[:Jamane A Boyd Jr]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''G4 speedy deletion has previously been declined by another admin. Take it to AfD.''' Thank you. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 10:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== G4 speedy deletions == |
|||
Hi Triplestop. In the past half-hour or so I've had occasion to decline a number of your G4 CSD tags. Whilst I'm grateful that someone's gone to the trouble of going through old AFD discussions to check for recreations (a task that rarely gets done), please be wary of applying the <code><nowiki>{{db-repost}}</nowiki></code> tag without good reason. I appreciate that, as a non-admin, you have no way of viewing the previous versions of deleted articles, but a quick comparison of the deletion discussion with the new article will usually show whether or not the page is a recreation of an old article or an entirely new page. |
|||
For example: at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miroslav Barnyashev]] the reasoning for deletion was a lack of sources attesting to the subject's notability - the nominator even went so far as to clarify that the "only source cited is Twitter". The new article, [[Alexander Rusev]], however, contains citations to five separate sources (none of which are Twitter), which in itself means that a new AFD discussion would need to take place in order for the page to be deleted. [[Jimmy Medranda]] was deleted because at the time of the AFD he had never played in a major league game; this is readily evident from [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Medranda|the deletion discussion]] - the recreated article clearly states (and verifies with sources) that he has since made an appearance for [[Sporting Kansas City]], and therefore the previous argument for deletion is no longer valid. The article on [[Ross Jeffries]] has been deleted a number of times after AFD discussions established that previous versions were unsalvagable self-promotion, but the current version of the page is neutrally worded, referenced and (after I took the simple step of removing some excessive external links) contains no promotional material. Again, a simple comparison of the most recent AFD discussion to the newly-created page would have made this obvious. |
|||
Again, I do appreciate your efforts in finding and flagging these pages up; they could easily languish unattended for months or even years otherwise, so thank you for taking on the task. All I'm asking is that you take care to check that [[WP:G4]] really is applicable - just read the deletion discussion and ask yourself, "Does this discussion sound as though it would apply to the article I'm seeing?" If the answer's yes, then by all means tag it - but if it looks like the commentators are discussing a wholly different page, then (assuming deletion is warranted for another reason) a new AFD debate needs to take place. [[User:Yunshui|Yunshui]] [[User talk:Yunshui|<span style="font-size:110%">雲</span>]]‍[[Special:Contributions/Yunshui|<span style="font-size:110%">水</span>]] 13:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Deletion == |
|||
Thank you for your message on my deleted article. I'm working as a sub contractor and posting articles according to someone else's instructions. I really don't use WIKI or post articles....I'm just trying to complete the job I was hired for :-) My apologies for any rule violation. I don't know how many more articles there are so I guess we will see what happens. Thanks! <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Baratta0810|Baratta0810]] ([[User talk:Baratta0810|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Baratta0810|contribs]]) 18:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Speedy deletion declined: [[:Ali Fayez]] == |
|||
Hello Triplestop. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of [[:Ali Fayez]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''The player now played an international match for Iraq. I'm not 100% sure if that meets [[WP:FOOTY]], but it is sufficient to say that the article isn't substantially identical to the version deleted at AfD as required for G4.''' Thank you. [[User:Martijn Hoekstra|Martijn Hoekstra]] ([[User talk:Martijn Hoekstra|talk]]) 13:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:CSD#G4]] == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> |
|||
Triplestop - let me make this clear. As you are not an admin there is no possible way for you to verify [[Wikipedia:CSD#G4]] as a reason for Speedy Deletion. I have not seen you engage in any discussion of this, only removal of talk page notices. You MUST discuss this before resuming editing. This conduct is bad for new users. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 07:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Hi,<br> |
|||
{{unblock|1=The vast majority of my G4 taggings were successful and I have removed [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?limit=250&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Triplestop&namespace=1&tagfilter=&year=2013&month=-1 absolutely no talk page notices]. Furthermore, my last [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ido.ran&diff=prev&oldid=573843755 G4 tagging] was over 3 days ago, so the timing of this block stumps me.}} |
|||
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current [[WP:ACE2015|Arbitration Committee election]]. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia [[WP:RFAR|arbitration process]]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[WP:ARBPOL|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to [[WP:ACE2015/C|review the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/398|the voting page]]. For the Election committee, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692215842 --> |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:37, 20 February 2020
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Triplestop has not edited Wikipedia since March 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)