Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Gaikwad: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 09:48, 26 February 2020

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gaurav Gaikwad

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted page of someone who doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG and which is blatantly promotional. Templates visible at the time aside, this does not appear to be created thru AfC. Review of the links show the same press releases from his agency spammed to multiple sources. JamesG5 (talk) 07:57, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me for undeletion page, gaurav Gaikwad. @JamesG5:

Amolshinde143 (talk) 08:16, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Despite the multiple cites, these are almost all spammed press-released and some sources of, at best, extremely questionable reliability. No evidence of actually passing GNG. Hug^syrup 08:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing substantial to support WP:GNG. A Google search returns with few PR and spam articles. Not notable to have a page. The9Man | (talk) 10:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 16:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as yet another article in the spate of fake news blackhat SEO sites trying to inflate the importance of their clients. Not a single one of these sources are reliable. Praxidicae (talk) 19:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete I agree with Praxidicae. I couldnt find any reliable source mentioning he subject. All are PRs. Just for example this rajsthan times, and this asianage article are PR. Subject lacks notability. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The articles fails in our notability criteria.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 16:19, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is only one sentence long and does nothing to demonstrate the subject's notability.TH1980 (talk) 05:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Gaurav Gaikwad]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Yunshui|Yunshui]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Yunshui|<sup style="font-size:90%">雲</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Yunshui|<sub style="font-size:90%">水</sub>]] 09:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
+===[[:Gaurav Gaikwad]]===
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
 :{{la|Gaurav Gaikwad}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Gaikwad|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 February 19#{{anchorencode:Gaurav Gaikwad}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gaurav_Gaikwad Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 15: / Line 20: @@
 *'''Delete''' Nothing substantial to support [[WP:GNG]]. A Google search returns with few PR and spam articles. Not notable to have a page. [[User:The9Man|<span style="color: green">The9Man</span>]] &#124; ([[User talk:The9Man|talk]]) 10:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' fails [[WP:GNG]]. <span style="background-color:#000000;padding:2px 12px 2px 12px;font-size:10px">[[User:Tayi Arajakate|<span style="color:#FF0000">'''Tayi Arajakate'''</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Tayi Arajakate|<span style="color:#7F1734">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sub></span> 16:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' as yet another article in the spate of fake news blackhat SEO sites trying to inflate the importance of their clients. Not a single one of these sources are reliable. [[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]] ([[User talk:Praxidicae|talk]]) 19:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
+*'''delete''' I agree with Praxidicae. I couldnt find any [[wp:rs|reliable source]] mentioning he subject. All are PRs. Just for example this [https://therajasthantimes.in/ace-fashion-and-lifestyle-influencer-gaurav-gaikwad-becomes-top-blogger-of-country/ rajsthan times], and [https://www.asianage.com/entertainment/in-other-news/210919/ace-fashion-and-lifestyle-influencer-gaurav-gaikwad-becomes-top-blogger-of-country.html this asianage] article are PR. Subject lacks notability. —usernamekiran [[User talk:usernamekiran|(talk)]] 22:07, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fashion|list of Fashion-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 06:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)</small>
+* '''Delete''' The articles fails in our notability criteria.[[User:S. M. Nazmus Shakib|S. M. Nazmus Shakib]] ([[User talk:S. M. Nazmus Shakib|talk]]) 16:19, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Article is only one sentence long and does nothing to demonstrate the subject's notability.[[User:TH1980|TH1980]] ([[User talk:TH1980|talk]]) 05:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>