Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/2015 Chattanooga shootings: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
full review needed
m Fix Linter errors using AutoEd
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from July 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
{{DYKsubpage
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|monthyear=July 2015

|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
The result was: '''promoted''' by <span style="color:black">[[User:Sovereign Sentinel|sovereign]]°[[User talk:Sovereign Sentinel|sentinel]] [[Special:Contributions/Sovereign Sentinel|(contribs)]]</span> 08:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)<br />
|2=
{{DYK conditions}}
{{DYK conditions}}
====2015 Chattanooga shootings====
====2015 Chattanooga shootings====
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=2015 Chattanooga shootings|2015 Chattanooga shootings}}
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=2015 Chattanooga shootings|2015 Chattanooga shootings}}
<!--

Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.

-->
* <s>... that the '''[[2015 Chattanooga shootings|2015 shootings in Chattanooga]]''' targeting [[Military base|military installations]] killed five U.S. military personnel?</s>
* <s>... that the '''[[2015 Chattanooga shootings|2015 shootings in Chattanooga]]''' targeting [[Military base|military installations]] killed five U.S. military personnel?</s>


Line 16: Line 11:
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Mitotic cell rounding|Mitotic cell rounding]]
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Mitotic cell rounding|Mitotic cell rounding]]
<small>Created by [[User:Veggies|Veggies]] ([[User talk:Veggies|talk]]) and [[User:DisuseKid|DisuseKid]] ([[User talk:DisuseKid|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Faizan|Faizan]] ([[User talk:Faizan|talk]]) at 22:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC).</small>
<small>Created by [[User:Veggies|Veggies]] ([[User talk:Veggies|talk]]) and [[User:DisuseKid|DisuseKid]] ([[User talk:DisuseKid|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Faizan|Faizan]] ([[User talk:Faizan|talk]]) at 22:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC).</small>
<!--
* {{DYKmake|2015 Chattanooga shootings|Veggies|subpage=2015 Chattanooga shootings}}
* {{DYKmake|2015 Chattanooga shootings|DisuseKid}}
* {{DYKnom|2015 Chattanooga shootings|Faizan}}
-->


:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length and history verified. However, both hooks are dull since, as this article is a failed ITN candidate, they're more or less news hooks, not DYK hooks. So, I have proposed a new hook of my own that's a little more eyebrow-raising and verified [http://www.ibtimes.com/chattanooga-shooter-mohammod-abdulazeez-criticized-isis-stupid-group-friend-says-2016693 the reference]:
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length and history verified. However, both hooks are dull since, as this article is a failed ITN candidate, they're more or less news hooks, not DYK hooks. So, I have proposed a new hook of my own that's a little more eyebrow-raising and verified [http://www.ibtimes.com/chattanooga-shooter-mohammod-abdulazeez-criticized-isis-stupid-group-friend-says-2016693 the reference]:
Line 27: Line 17:
:::New hook will be needed, since all hooks have been struck. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 14:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
:::New hook will be needed, since all hooks have been struck. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 14:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
:'''ALT4:''' ... that the family of the perpetrator of the '''[[2015 Chattanooga shootings]]''' had tried to get him inpatient psychiatric care but a [[health insurance|health insurer]] refused to approve the expense? - [[User:Dravecky|Dravecky]] ([[User talk:Dravecky|talk]]) 17:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
:'''ALT4:''' ... that the family of the perpetrator of the '''[[2015 Chattanooga shootings]]''' had tried to get him inpatient psychiatric care but a [[health insurance|health insurer]] refused to approve the expense? - [[User:Dravecky|Dravecky]] ([[User talk:Dravecky|talk]]) 17:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
::Wow. Like ''that''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s never happened before, anywhere. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 03:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

:::It's a hook crafted to get readers to click to learn more. That's all. - [[User:Dravecky|Dravecky]] ([[User talk:Dravecky|talk]]) 05:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
::::In which case I doubt they will, since it's basically "[[Man bites dog (journalism)|dog bites man]]." [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 03:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
::::I say we go back to ALT3 and either edit the article so that the quote ''is'' used (per BlueMoonset's [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Cut_Like_Wound&diff=678780403&oldid=678476686 suggestion] when I did something similar in another recent nom) or reword that hook thus:
:::::*'''ALT5''': ... that Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez made statements critical of [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]] before he '''[[2015 Chattanooga shootings|shot and killed five U.S. military personnel in Chattanooga]]'''? [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 03:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed including new hook and its sourcing, neutrality of hook and article, and close paraphrasing. Thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 20:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed including new hook and its sourcing, neutrality of hook and article, and close paraphrasing. Thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 20:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough. ALTs 4 and 5 both short enough and sourced, but to me ALT4 is slightly more interesting, as I am from the UK, where we have the [[National Health Service]]. No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found. QPQ done and image properly licensed. Good to go.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">Laun</span>]][[User talk:Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">chba</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">ller</span>]]</span> 23:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 20:32, 4 March 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 08:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

2015 Chattanooga shootings

[edit]

Created by Veggies (talk) and DisuseKid (talk). Nominated by Faizan (talk) at 22:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC).

Length and history verified. However, both hooks are dull since, as this article is a failed ITN candidate, they're more or less news hooks, not DYK hooks. So, I have proposed a new hook of my own that's a little more eyebrow-raising and verified the reference:
  • Struck ALT3, as it does not appear anywhere in the article proper—the quote certainly doesn't—a basic DYK requirement. This is one of the many reasons we don't allow people to approve their own hooks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
New hook will be needed, since all hooks have been struck. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
ALT4: ... that the family of the perpetrator of the 2015 Chattanooga shootings had tried to get him inpatient psychiatric care but a health insurer refused to approve the expense? - Dravecky (talk) 17:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Wow. Like that's never happened before, anywhere. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
It's a hook crafted to get readers to click to learn more. That's all. - Dravecky (talk) 05:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
In which case I doubt they will, since it's basically "dog bites man." Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
I say we go back to ALT3 and either edit the article so that the quote is used (per BlueMoonset's suggestion when I did something similar in another recent nom) or reword that hook thus:
  • Full review needed including new hook and its sourcing, neutrality of hook and article, and close paraphrasing. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
New enough, long enough. ALTs 4 and 5 both short enough and sourced, but to me ALT4 is slightly more interesting, as I am from the UK, where we have the National Health Service. No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found. QPQ done and image properly licensed. Good to go.--Launchballer 23:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)