Template:Controversial: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 20:59, 4 March 2020

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

This template is used on approximately 3,500 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them.

Usage

No description.

Template parameters[Edit template data]
This template has custom formatting.
Parameter		Description	Type	Status
small	`small`	no description	Unknown	optional
category	`category`	no description	Unknown	optional

This template will categorise articles into Category:Wikipedia controversial topics. To use this template, add {{Controversial|date=December 2024}} to an article’s talk page.

Boxes:
- {{Disputed}} For disputing entire article
- {{Dispute about|what}} For disputing part of an article
- {{Disputed section}} For disputing a section in an article
- {{Disputed tag}} For disputing recent promotions or amendments of policies and guidelines
- {{Under discussion}} For use on project pages (e.g., policies and guidelines), not on articles

Inline:
- {{Dubious}}, and {{Disputed inline}} Statement
- {{Under discussion inline}} Statements on project pages

Both accuracy and POV

Boxes:
- {{Controversial}} Talk page

Disputed neutrality (POV)

Boxes:
- {{POV}} Article, {{POV section}} Section, {{POV lead}} Lead section
- {{POV map}} Map

Inline:
- {{Unbalanced opinion}} Statement
- {{POV statement}} Statement

Wiki

The above documentation is transcluded from Template:Controversial/doc.
Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox and testcases pages.
Add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<!-- {{Controversial}} begin -->{{Ambox
+<!-- {{Controversial}} begin -->{{Tmbox
 | small = {{{small|}}}
 | type  = content
 | class = tmbox-controversial
-| text  = The subject of this article is [[Wikipedia:List of controversial issues|controversial]] and content may be in [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|dispute]]. When updating the article, [[Wikipedia:Be bold|be bold, but not reckless]]. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them.<br /><small>Please supply full [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|citations]] when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.</small>
+| text  = {{#ifeq: {{{category|}}} | {{{category|-}}} |{{Check talk|category={{{category}}}}}|{{Check talk wp}}}} '''The subject of this article is [[Wikipedia:List of controversial issues|controversial]] and content may be in [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|dispute]].''' When updating the article, [[Wikipedia:Be bold|be bold, but not reckless]]. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. '''Content must be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]].''' Include [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|citations]] when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
 }}<includeonly>{{Talk other|{{DMC|||Wikipedia controversial topics}}}}</includeonly><!-- {{Controversial}} end --><noinclude>
 {{Documentation}}

v t e Citation and verifiability article maintenance templates
Sourcing	{{Circular}} {{Better sources needed}} {{Dubious}} {{Excessive citations}} {{Further reading cleanup}} {{More citations needed}} {{More citations needed section}} {{More footnotes needed}} {{No footnotes}} {{No reliable sources}} {{No significant coverage}} {{One source}} {{One source section}} {{Only primary sources}} {{NRIS only}} {{Primary sources}} {{Primary sources section}} {{Religious text primary}} {{Self-published}} {{Self-reference cleanup}} {{Self-sourcing examples}} {{Refexample section}} {{Sources exist}} {{Text-source}} {{Third-party}} {{Unreferenced}} {{Unreferenced section}} {{Unreferenced category}} {{Unreliable sources}} {{Unreliable sources section}} {{User-generated}}
BLP-specific	{{BLP unreferenced}} {{BLP unreferenced section}} {{BLP primary sources}} {{BLP self-published}} {{BLP sources}} {{BLP sources section}} {{BLP IMDb-only refimprove}} {{BLP IMDb refimprove}} {{BLP no footnotes}} {{BLP more footnotes needed}} {{BLP one source}}
Topic specific	{{Localist}} {{Media IMDb refimprove}} {{More medical citations needed}} {{More science citations needed}} {{Neologism}} {{Science review}} {{Unreferenced law}} {{Unreferenced-law section}} {{Unreferenced medical section}}
Dispute-related	{{Cite check}} {{Cite check section}} {{Content}} {{Disputed}} {{Dispute about}} {{Disputed section}} {{Disputed chem}} {{Disputed list}} {{Disputed map}} {{Expert needed}} {{Hoax}} {{Original research}} {{Original research section}} {{Speculation}} {{Speculation section}} {{Synthesis}} {{Verifiability}} {{Verify sources}}
Citation improvements	{{Citation style}} {{Citations broken}} {{Cleanup bare URLs}} {{Format footnotes}} {{Full citations needed}} {{Ibid}} {{Page numbers improve}} {{Page numbers needed}} {{Shallow references}}
General advice	Citing sources Reliable sources Maintenance template removal Citation needed Find sources Combining sources Referencing styles

Template:Controversial: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 20:59, 4 March 2020

Usage

See also

Wikipedia project pages

Templates

Disputed factual accuracy

Both accuracy and POV

Disputed neutrality (POV)

Wiki