User talk:Coffeetip: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Toontown Rewritten. (TW) |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Toontown Online == |
|||
==Your draft article, [[Draft:Toontown Rewritten]]== |
|||
Hey there, fellow wiki editor, |
|||
[[File:Information icon4.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
Hello, Coffeetip. It has been over six months since you last edited the [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] submission or [[WP:Drafts|Draft]] page you started, "[[Draft:Toontown Rewritten|Toontown Rewritten]]". |
|||
In order to avoid an edit war, I would like to discuss the section you've added to Toontown Online. I do not think that fan sites such as "Toonbook" or others deserve an entire section on an article that is about the game itself. Secondly, you haven't included any independent sources which report on the information you've added. (The site itself and interviews are not considered independent sources). This also goes for the section "Toontown Rewritten" which has been added to the article one too many times in the past. Other than in a "Reception" section which may include that a "loyal fanbase" has created fan websites due to the closure of the game, with proper sources included, in my opinion fan sites and illegal private servers should not be included in this article. If you refer to any other proper game article, it is highly unlikely that you would find any distinct mentioning of fan created websites. Otherwise, we would have to list every major/minor private server and fan website that was created about any game. I'd love to hear any of your ideas of thoughts about this. I've specifically contacted you as many of the editors adding unsourced and irrelevant information do not have accounts and are unlikely to see my message. Also please refer to the talk page of Toontown Rewritten, you can find other ways to help out Toontown Online as it directs to a link with a peer review. Thanks [[User:NightHawkCanada|NightHawkCanada]] ([[User talk:NightHawkCanada|talk]]) 09:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia [[WP:mainspace|mainspace]], the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Toontown Rewritten|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code. |
|||
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at [[WP:REFUND/G13|this link]]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. |
|||
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:JMHamo|JMHamo]] ([[User talk:JMHamo|talk]]) 11:10, 24 April 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:10, 24 April 2020
Your draft article, Draft:Toontown Rewritten
[edit]Hello, Coffeetip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Toontown Rewritten".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 11:10, 24 April 2020 (UTC)