User talk:47.137.181.252

January 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Seattle NHL team are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 06:32, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020

Hello, I'm Tymon.r. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Felix Sabates—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 20:32, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 03:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

47.137.181.252 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

"I did not make any "disruptive edits". I edited Charles Stuart (murderer) and provided a cite for my added content. This was reverted, and a message was left on my talk page falsely accusing me of vandalism. I immediately addressed the issue at Talk: Charles Stuart and made my concerns known to the user who had reverted my edit. I told this user that I was trying to reach consensus and directed him/her to the relevant article talk page. Subsequently, this user restored my original edit. It appears that consensus has been reached, but I am now accused of "disruptive editing" and blocked. Someone needs to review this successful collaborative effort, because it has been grossly misinterpreted." 47.137.181.252 (talk) 03:21, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your edits were clear violations of WP:NOR. Yamla (talk) 11:02, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Extension of block/Permanent Ban

@Berean Hunter:

Hi,

I'm no expert, but it looks like this IP Address has just been blocked for 6 months for some contentious edit warring on the Charles Stuart talk page. However, one look at some earlier edits from 2018-2019, shows that they have previous of some pretty inflammatory stuff, not least comments about Angela Merkel or this comment about Latasha Harlins on the LA riots talk page, saying that she was "a shoplifter killed in self-defence" who had nothing to do with the riots anyway, which is not only factually inaccurate (as can be seen on CCTV) but disrespectful to the memory of a 15-year old girl and shocking to read.

I'm sure that there's more that could be found, but this IP's address grammatical mistakes in English and disrespectful behaviour from earlier surely should be taken into consideration?

Regards,

Kip1234 (talk) 23:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)