Jump to content

User talk:Benevmull: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Benevmull (talk | contribs)
Your advice: new section
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:


[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 11:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 11:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for December 25==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Berlin U-Bahn rolling stock]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Subway]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Berlin_U-Bahn_rolling_stock check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Berlin_U-Bahn_rolling_stock?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are [[WP:INTDABLINK|usually incorrect]], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 11:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:Brandon Scott Jones]] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Brandon Scott Jones]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Scott Jones]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']]</sup> 22:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

== A page you started (Bread and Roses (political party)) has been reviewed! ==

Thanks for creating [[Bread and Roses (political party)]].

[[User:Doomsdayer520]] while reveiwing this page as a part of our [[WP:NPP|page curation process]] had the following comments:

{{Bq|Thank you for your new article on the Bread and Roses party.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Doomsdayer520<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And, don't forget to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> .

<small>Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.</small><!-- Template:Reviewednote-NPF -->

---<span style="font-family: Calibri">[[User:doomsdayer520|<b style="color: DarkOrchid"><small>DOOMSDAYER</small>520</b>]] ([[User talk:Doomsdayer520|Talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Doomsdayer520|Contribs]])</span> 15:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

== Your advice ==

Last week, I started a draft article on Subject-Verb Agreement in English (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Draft:Subject-Verb_Agreement_in_English#Always_Plural) on finding no site completely explaining the topic. Today, it has been declined and someone has suggested merging it with this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreement_(linguistics). I did so but it looks sort of out-of-place here. As a member of Wikiproject English, what do you think about it?

[[User:Shubhrajit Sadhukhan|Shubhrajit Sadhukhan]] ([[User talk:Shubhrajit Sadhukhan|talk]]) 14:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:42, 30 June 2020

Speedy deletion nomination of National English Honor Society

[edit]

Hello Benevmull,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged National English Honor Society for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berlin U-Bahn rolling stock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Subway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brandon Scott Jones for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brandon Scott Jones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Scott Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 22:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Bread and Roses (political party)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Bread and Roses (political party).

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on the Bread and Roses party.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your advice

[edit]

Last week, I started a draft article on Subject-Verb Agreement in English (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Draft:Subject-Verb_Agreement_in_English#Always_Plural) on finding no site completely explaining the topic. Today, it has been declined and someone has suggested merging it with this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreement_(linguistics). I did so but it looks sort of out-of-place here. As a member of Wikiproject English, what do you think about it?

Shubhrajit Sadhukhan (talk) 14:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]