Jump to content

User:Smallus Editus/Treaty of Uxbridge: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Attitudes: working draft
m Attitudes: working draft
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| class = ambox-Original_research
| class = ambox-Original_research
| small = {{{small|}}}
| small = {{{small|}}}
| issue = This {{{part|{{{1|article}}}}}} '''contains [[Wikipedia:No original research|original]]''', highly '''[[WP:SUBJECTIVE|subjective]]''' assessments.
| issue = This {{{part|{{{1|article}}}}}} contains '''[[Wikipedia:No original research|original]]''', '''[[WP:SUBJECTIVE|subjective]]''' assessments.
| fix = While you are welcome to use this information for personal edification, or modify it, it should not be included in an article in the main namespace.
| fix = You are welcome to use or modify this material, but it does not belong in the article namespace.
| talk = {{{discuss|}}}
| talk = {{{discuss|}}}
}}
}}

==Attitudes==
==Attitudes==
{{Main|Treaty of Uxbridge#Attendance}}
{{Main|Treaty of Uxbridge#Attendance}}
;Religious hard-liner: Insists that church government throughout the Three Kingdoms be episcopalian (Royalist) or presbyterian (Roundhead).
;Political hard-liner: Insists that full control over taxation and the military belongs to the King (Royalist) or Parliament (Roundhead).
;Political hard-liner: Insists that full control over taxation and the military goes to the King (Royalist) or Parliament (Roundhead).
;Political moderate: Willing to share control over the military between King and Parliament.
;Religious hard-liner: Insists that church government throughout the Three Kingdoms be episcopalian (Royalist), presbyterian (Roundhead-Covenanter), or neither (Independent).
;Moderate: Willing to compromise on these issues.
;Religious moderate: Willing to tolerate or submit to different (Protestant) religious perspectives.
There were other issues (e.g., pardon for combatants), but these two issues dominated the debates.<br/>
There were other issues (e.g., pardon for combatants, government of Ireland), but these two issues dominated the debates.<br/>
Parliamentary commissioners are in ''italics''. Scottish commissioners are in <small>small font</small>.
Parliamentary commissioners are in ''italics''. Scottish commissioners are in <small>small font</small>.
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 27: Line 29:
| <!-- political moderate / religious moderate -->
| <!-- political moderate / religious moderate -->
<div style="column-count: 2;">{{plainlist}}
<div style="column-count: 2;">{{plainlist}}
* Charles I <ref>Various sources blame the failure of talks on the king's stubbornness (c.f. [[Algernon Percy, 10th Earl of Northumberland#Conversion to the peace faction|Algernon Percy § Conversion to the peace faction]]). However, the proceedings from the event reveal a pattern of Parliament proposing absurdly one-sided measures, the King responding with proposals that meet them halfway, and Parliament refusing to budge. Given that the proceedings likely reflect the work of secretaries allied with Parliament (Thurloe and Earle), it is reasonable to suppose their reporting was not unduly biased to favor the king.<br/>{{cite book |last=Rushworth |first=John |chapter=Historical Collections: The treaty at Uxbridge, 1645 |pages=787-843 |editor-last=Browne |editor-first=D |title=Historical Collections of Private Passages of State: Volume 5, 1642-45 |year=1721 |orig-year=orig. before 1690 |location=London |via=[http://www.british-history.ac.uk British History Online] |url=http://www.british-history.ac.uk/rushworth-papers/vol5/pp787-843 |access-date=20 May 2020}}</ref>
* King Charles I <ref>Various sources blame the failure of talks on the king's intransigence. However, the [[Treaty of Uxbridge#Proposals|recorded proceedings]] reveal a pattern of Parliament proposing absurdly one-sided measures, the King responding with proposals that meet them halfway, and Parliament refusing to budge. The proceedings are likely the work of secretaries allied with Parliament (Thurloe and Earle), not likely to unduly favor the king.<br/>{{cite book |last=Rushworth |first=John |chapter=Historical Collections: The treaty at Uxbridge, 1645 |pages=787-843 |editor-last=Browne |editor-first=D |title=Historical Collections of Private Passages of State: Volume 5, 1642-45 |year=1721 |orig-year=orig. before 1690 |location=London |via=[http://www.british-history.ac.uk British History Online] |url=http://www.british-history.ac.uk/rushworth-papers/vol5/pp787-843 |access-date=20 May 2020}}</ref>
* John Ashburnham
* John Ashburnham
* Arthur Capel
* Arthur Capel
* John Colepeper
* Francis Leigh
* Francis Leigh
* Francis Seymour
* Francis Seymour
Line 40: Line 41:
* ''Philip Herbert''
* ''Philip Herbert''
* ''Denzil Holles''
* ''Denzil Holles''
* ''William Pierpont''
* ''William Pierrepont''
* ''Edmund Prideaux''
* ''Richard Vines''
* ''Bulstrode Whitelocke''
* ''Bulstrode Whitelocke''
* <small>John Campbell</small>
{{endplainlist}}</div>
{{endplainlist}}</div>
| <!-- political moderate / religious unknown -->
| <!-- political moderate / religious unknown -->
Line 53: Line 53:
* Edward Hyde
* Edward Hyde
* <small>Archibald Campbell</small>
* <small>Archibald Campbell</small>
* <small>John Campbell</small>
* <small>Alexander Henderson</small>
* <small>Alexander Henderson</small>
* <small>John Maitland</small>
* <small>John Maitland</small>
Line 63: Line 64:
| <!-- political unknown / religious unknown -->
| <!-- political unknown / religious unknown -->
<div style="column-count: 2;">{{plainlist}}
<div style="column-count: 2;">{{plainlist}}
* Orlando Bridgeman
* Thomas Gardiner
* Christopher Hatton
* Christopher Hatton
* Edward Nicholas
* Henry, Kingston
* Henry Pierrepont
* James Stewart
* ''William, Salisbury''
* ''William, Salisbury''
* ''Thomas Wenman''
* ''Thomas Wenman''
Line 82: Line 83:
* Richard Steward
* Richard Steward
* ''Stephen Marshall''
* ''Stephen Marshall''
* ''Richard Vines''
{{endplainlist}}
{{endplainlist}}
|-
|-
Line 88: Line 88:
| <!-- political hard-liner / religious moderate -->
| <!-- political hard-liner / religious moderate -->
{{plainlist}}
{{plainlist}}
* John Colepeper
* James Stewart
* Jeoffry Palmer
{{endplainlist}}
{{endplainlist}}
| <!-- political hard-liner / religious unknown -->
| <!-- political hard-liner / religious unknown -->
{{plainlist}}
{{plainlist}}
* Thomas Gardiner
* Edward Nicholas
* Jeoffry Palmer
{{endplainlist}}
{{endplainlist}}
| <!-- political hard-liner / religious hard-liner -->
| <!-- political hard-liner / religious hard-liner -->
{{plainlist}}
{{plainlist}}
* Orlando Bridgeman
* Richard Lane
* ''Edmund Prideaux''
* ''Oliver St John''
* ''Oliver St John''
* ''Henry Vane''<ref>https://archive.org/details/england05claruoft</ref>
* ''Henry Vane''<ref>https://archive.org/details/england05claruoft</ref>

Latest revision as of 22:48, 6 July 2020

Attitudes

[edit]
Political hard-liner
Insists that full control over taxation and the military belongs to the King (Royalist) or Parliament (Roundhead).
Political moderate
Willing to share control over the military between King and Parliament.
Religious hard-liner
Insists that church government throughout the Three Kingdoms be episcopalian (Royalist), presbyterian (Roundhead-Covenanter), or neither (Independent).
Religious moderate
Willing to tolerate or submit to different (Protestant) religious perspectives.

There were other issues (e.g., pardon for combatants, government of Ireland), but these two issues dominated the debates.
Parliamentary commissioners are in italics. Scottish commissioners are in small font.

  Religious
Moderate Unknown Hard-liner
Political Moderate
  • King Charles I [1]
  • John Ashburnham
  • Arthur Capel
  • Francis Leigh
  • Francis Seymour
  • William Seymour
  • Thomas Wriothesley
  • John Crew
  • Basil Feilding
  • Nathaniel Hardy
  • Philip Herbert
  • Denzil Holles
  • William Pierrepont
  • Richard Vines
  • Bulstrode Whitelocke
  • Algernon Percy
  • Edward Hyde
  • Archibald Campbell
  • John Campbell
  • Alexander Henderson
  • John Maitland
Unknown
  • Christopher Hatton
  • Edward Nicholas
  • Henry Pierrepont
  • James Stewart
  • William, Salisbury
  • Thomas Wenman
  • Robert Barclay
  • John Bolmerino
  • George Dundas
  • Charles Erskins
  • Hugh Kennedy
  • John Smith
  • Henry Hammond
  • Gilbert Sheldon
  • Richard Steward
  • Stephen Marshall
Hard-liner
  • John Colepeper
  • Jeoffry Palmer
  • Thomas Gardiner
  • Orlando Bridgeman
  • Richard Lane
  • Edmund Prideaux
  • Oliver St John
  • Henry Vane[2]
  • Archibald Johnston

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Various sources blame the failure of talks on the king's intransigence. However, the recorded proceedings reveal a pattern of Parliament proposing absurdly one-sided measures, the King responding with proposals that meet them halfway, and Parliament refusing to budge. The proceedings are likely the work of secretaries allied with Parliament (Thurloe and Earle), not likely to unduly favor the king.
    Rushworth, John (1721) [orig. before 1690]. "Historical Collections: The treaty at Uxbridge, 1645". In Browne, D (ed.). Historical Collections of Private Passages of State: Volume 5, 1642-45. London. pp. 787–843. Retrieved 20 May 2020 – via British History Online. {{cite book}}: External link in |via= (help)
  2. ^ https://archive.org/details/england05claruoft