Jump to content

User talk:LadyiTy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
LadyiTy (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
decline
 
Line 21: Line 21:
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I haven’t been abusing multiple accounts and have unfairly been blocked. I don’t think I have had a terrible experience on here and would like to continue to grow should I be unblocked.[[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) | decline = If you haven't used other accounts, you will need to give an explanation as to why others might think that you are. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I haven’t been abusing multiple accounts and have unfairly been blocked. I don’t think I have had a terrible experience on here and would like to continue to grow should I be unblocked.[[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) | decline = If you haven't used other accounts, you will need to give an explanation as to why others might think that you are. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)}}


{{unblock|Not been abusing multiple accounts, this account is my only account and I don’t know as to why I’ve been accused of having multiple accounts. [[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) 18:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|Not been abusing multiple accounts, this account is my only account and I don’t know as to why I’ve been accused of having multiple accounts. [[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) 18:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)|decline={{confirmed}} to [[User:MariaJaydHicky4eva]]. Give me a break. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 09:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)}}
Note the restoring of sock edits to [[Tulisa]]: [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Tulisa&diff=971986161&oldid=971171072] [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Tulisa&diff=968784440&oldid=968448506] [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Tulisa&diff=969743200&oldid=968956304] and genre warring on other pages as well. Obvious MariaJaydHicky sock. [[User:Sro23|Sro23]] ([[User talk:Sro23|talk]]) 18:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Note the restoring of sock edits to [[Tulisa]]: [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Tulisa&diff=971986161&oldid=971171072] [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Tulisa&diff=968784440&oldid=968448506] [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Tulisa&diff=969743200&oldid=968956304] and genre warring on other pages as well. Obvious MariaJaydHicky sock. [[User:Sro23|Sro23]] ([[User talk:Sro23|talk]]) 18:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
:{{u|Sro23}} I've been looking into her edits, she's a vandalism only account, whereas I added sources and looking through the Tulisa article the other accounts you've blocked were adding correct sourced and reliable information. [[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) 18:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
:{{u|Sro23}} I've been looking into her edits, she's a vandalism only account, whereas I added sources and looking through the Tulisa article the other accounts you've blocked were adding correct sourced and reliable information. [[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) 18:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
::I rest my case. Obvious sockpuppet. [[User:Sro23|Sro23]] ([[User talk:Sro23|talk]]) 19:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
::I rest my case. Obvious sockpuppet. [[User:Sro23|Sro23]] ([[User talk:Sro23|talk]]) 19:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
:::No, I stated my version of events which you asked for. [[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) 19:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
:::No, I stated my version of events which you asked for. [[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) 19:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px">
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|left|45px|link=|alt=Stop hand]] '''Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrator]] has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.'''
<span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">([{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=block&page=User:{{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} block log] • [{{fullurl:Special:BlockList|action=search&ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} active blocks] • [{{fullurl:Special:GlobalBlockList|ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • [[Special:Contributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|contribs]]<span class="sysop-show"> • [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|deleted contribs]]</span> • [{{fullurl:Special:AbuseLog|wpSearchUser={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} abuse filter log] • [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=newusers&user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} creation log]<span class="sysop-show"> • [[Special:BlockIP/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|change block settings]] • [{{fullurl:Special:BlockList|action=unblock&ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} unblock]</span><span class="checkuser-show"> • [{{fullurl:Special:CheckUser|user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}&reason={{urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}]], unblock request}}}} checkuser] ([{{fullurl:Special:CheckUserLog|cuSearchType=target&cuSearch={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} log])</span>) </span>
{{clear}}
----
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the ''[[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|Unblock Ticket Request System]]''. If the block is a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#CheckUser blocks|CheckUser]] or [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Oversight blocks|Oversight]] block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]].<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the [[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|unblock ticket request system]] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p></div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice -->

Latest revision as of 09:05, 12 August 2020

LadyiTy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi LadyiTy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LadyiTy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I haven’t been abusing multiple accounts and have unfairly been blocked. I don’t think I have had a terrible experience on here and would like to continue to grow should I be unblocked.LadyiTy (talk)

Decline reason:

If you haven't used other accounts, you will need to give an explanation as to why others might think that you are. 331dot (talk) 18:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LadyiTy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Not been abusing multiple accounts, this account is my only account and I don’t know as to why I’ve been accused of having multiple accounts. LadyiTy (talk) 18:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note the restoring of sock edits to Tulisa: [1] [2] [3] and genre warring on other pages as well. Obvious MariaJaydHicky sock. Sro23 (talk) 18:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sro23 I've been looking into her edits, she's a vandalism only account, whereas I added sources and looking through the Tulisa article the other accounts you've blocked were adding correct sourced and reliable information. LadyiTy (talk) 18:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I rest my case. Obvious sockpuppet. Sro23 (talk) 19:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, I stated my version of events which you asked for. LadyiTy (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.