Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dwaro: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: Replying to RoySmith (using reply-link) Tag: Reverted |
Archiving case section to w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dwaro/Archive (using spihelper.js) Tags: Replaced Manual revert |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|Dwaro}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|Dwaro}} |
||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===27 September 2020=== |
|||
{{SPI case status|close}} |
|||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Hakz77}} |
|||
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> |
|||
*'''Tools''': <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users={{urlencode:{{#titleparts:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}}}&users={{urlencode:Hakz77}} Editor interaction utility] • [https://tools.wmflabs.org/interaction-timeline?wiki=enwiki&user={{urlencode:{{#titleparts:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}}}&user={{urlencode:Hakz77}} Interaction Timeline] • [https://tools.wmflabs.org/betacommand-dev/UserCompare/{{urlencode:{{#titleparts:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}}}.html User compare report]</span> <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> |
|||
Similar interest in [[Osmocom]] as blocked sock [[User:Afvalbak]], and the account was created a few weeks after Afvalbak was blocked. The behavioral evidence could be a coincidence, so I'd like a CU check. <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']]</sup> 19:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC) <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']]</sup> 19:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
|||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
|||
*{{Endorse}} but not with a lot of enthusiasm - The short gap between when Afvalbak was blocked and Hakz77 created, and picking up editing on [[Osmocom]] seems like enough to justify CU. They also both edited [[Replicant (operating system)]], as did Dwaro. And, [https://spi-tools.toolforge.org/spi/timecard/Dwaro?users=Afvalbak&users=Hakz77 the timecards] look pretty similar. MeneerTijn is the only account in the archives that's not stale, and their behavior doesn't really fit the pattern, so I'm not too optimistic anything will come of this. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 21:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
*Everything is {{StaleIP}}, so I'm declining the check. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> '''[[User talk:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> 08:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
*:{{u|Salvio giuliano}}, From what I can see neither Hakz77 or MeneerTijn (in the archives) are stale. Am I missing something? -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 14:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
*::{{u|RoySmith}} I'm sorry, it was my mistake. I had missed the MeneerTijn account, which isn't stale, as you correctly point out. Therefore, I have restored your endorsement. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> '''[[User talk:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> 15:50, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
*{{Inprogress}} - [[User:Mz7|Mz7]] ([[User talk:Mz7|talk]]) 22:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
* I see that MeneerTijn was blocked previously as a sockpuppet of this master, but was later unblocked on appeal [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MeneerTijn&oldid=962350034], so unless I'm mistaken, my understanding is that they are currently not a part of this sock group. There is, however, archival information about Dwaro on CU wiki [https://checkuser.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:TonyBallioni/7_June_2020] that is useful here. From that I can conclude Hakz77 is {{possilikely}} to Dwaro and {{possible}} to MeneerTijn. [[User:Mz7|Mz7]] ([[User talk:Mz7|talk]]) 23:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
* {{clerknote}} Between Roy's comments at endorsement time and Mz7's findings, I don't think the evidence is strong enough to support a block. Closed without action. [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]] ([[User talk:GeneralNotability|talk]]) 23:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
*:{{u|GeneralNotability}}, Hmmm, interesting. I was thinking more like it justified a block for Hakz77, and was trying to figure out if I was going to do that on my own or seek a second opinion. I guess the second opinion beat me to it :-) I will note for the sake of future clerks that [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Hakz77&oldid=965091948 Hakz77 had declared their COI]. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 23:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
*::{{u|RoySmith}}, if you want to override my close, you're welcome to - I just don't think possilikely is enough here without fairly good behavioral evidence, but if you think it's worth a block go for it. [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]] ([[User talk:GeneralNotability|talk]]) 23:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Latest revision as of 05:06, 2 October 2020
Dwaro
Dwaro (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dwaro/Archive.