Low power: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
begin some rewrite stuff. see talk |
Narky Blert (talk | contribs) PTM moved from hatnote to SA. cat deleted per WP:DBC. ce |
||
| (47 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Low power''' may refer to: |
|||
{{cleanup-date|November 2005}} |
|||
* Radio transmitters that send out relatively little power: |
|||
** [[QRP operation]], using "the minimum power necessary to carry out the desired communications", in amateur radio. |
|||
** [[Cognitive radio]] transceivers typically automatically reduce the transmitted power to much less than the power required for reliable one-way broadcasts. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
** [[Low-power communication device]], a radio transmitter used in low-power broadcasting. |
|||
* [[Low-power electronics]], the consumption of electric power is deliberately low, e.g. notebook processors. |
|||
* [[Power (statistics)]], in which low power is due to small sample sizes or poorly designed experiments |
|||
==See also== |
|||
In [[electronics]], the term '''low-power''' means one of two things about a device: |
|||
* [[Power (disambiguation)]] |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
* Or generally, that the ''[[Power consumption|consumption]]'' of [[electric power]] is deliberately low, e.g. [[notebook processor|notebook processors]]. See also [[Transmeta]], [[ARM architecture|Acorn RISC Machine]], [[AMULET microprocessor]]. |
|||
{{disambiguation}} |
|||
== Low-power Radio == |
|||
Some people claim that low power "smart" radio is inherently superior to standard broadcast radio, although others dispute this claim. |
|||
"Technologists are increasingly discussing a related kind of gain called '[[cooperation gain]].' ... think about a party. If I need to tell you that it's time to leave, I could choose to shout that message across the room. Shouting, however, is rude. So instead, imagine I choose to whisper my message to the person standing next to me, and he whispered it to the next person, and she to the next person, and so on. This series of whispers could get my message across the room without forcing me to shout." |
|||
-- |
|||
[http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1496446,00.asp "Wireless Spectrum: Defining the 'Commons'"] by [[Lawrence Lessig]] 2003 ([http://www.cioinsight.com/print_article/0,3668,a=38467,00.asp mirror]) |
|||
"if nodes repeat each other's traffic. If I want to talk to someone across the room, I don't have to shout. I can just whisper it to someone near me, who can pass it on, and so on. ... as we add more transmitters, the total capacity goes up slightly, but we still have to face the fact that each transmitter's capacity goes down (just slower). Even better, we all end up using less energy (since we don't have to transmit as far), saving battery life." |
|||
-- |
|||
[http://logicerror.com/openSpectrum Open Spectrum: A Global Pervasive Network] by [[Aaron Swartz]] |
|||
"Every time a broadcaster receives a license, the amount of available spectrum goes down. ... New technology, however, increases bandwidth with the number of users." |
|||
-- |
|||
[http://www.greaterdemocracy.org/framing_openspectrum.html "Why Open Spectrum Matters: The End of the Broadcast Nation"] by [[David Weinberger]] |
|||
== Low Power Consumption Electronics == |
|||
The density and speed of integrated circuit computing elements has increased roughly exponentially for a period of several decades, following a trend described by [[Moore's Law]]. While it is generally accepted that this exponential improvement trend will end, it is unclear exactly how dense and fast integrated circuits will get by the time this point is reached. Working devices have been demonstrated that were fabricated with a [[MOSFET]] [[transistor]] channel length of 6.3 [[nanometre]]s using conventional semiconductor materials, and devices have been built that used [[carbon nanotube]]s as [[MOSFET]] gates, giving a channel length of approximately 1 [[nanometre]]. |
|||
The ultimate density and computing power of integrated circuits are limited primarily by power dissipation concerns. |
|||
An integrated circuit chip contains many [[capacitor|capacitive]] loads, formed both intentionally (as is the case with gate to channel capacitance) and unintentionally (between any conductors that are near each other but not electrically connected). Changing the state of the circuit causes a change in the voltage across these parasitic capacitances, which involves a change in the amount of stored energy. As the capacitive loads are charged and discharged through [[resistor|resistive]] devices, an amount of energy comparable to that stored in the capacitor is dissipated as heat. |
|||
:<math> E_\mathrm{stored} = {1 \over 2} C V^2 </math> |
|||
The result of heat dissipation on state change is to limit the amount of computation that may be performed on a given power budget. While device shrinkage can reduce some of the parasitic capacitances, the number of devices on an integrated circuit chip has increased more than enough to compensate for reduced capacitance in each individual device. |
|||
Two other approaches exist to lowering the power cost of state changes. One is to reduce the operating voltage of the circuit, or to reduce the voltage change involved in a state change (making a state change only change node voltage by a fraction of the supply voltage -- [[Low voltage differential signaling]]). This approach is limited by thermal noise within the circuit. There is a characteristic voltage proportional to the device temperature and to the [[Boltzmann constant]], which the state switching voltage must exceed in order for the circuit to be resistant to noise. This is typically on the order of 50–100 mV, for devices rated to 100 [[Celsius|degrees Celsius]] external temperature (about 4 ''kT'', where ''T'' is the device's ''internal'' temperature and ''k'' is the [[Boltzmann constant]]). |
|||
The second approach is to attempt to provide charge to the capacitive loads through paths that are not predominately resistive. This is the principle behind [[adiabatic circuit]]s. The charge is supplied either from a variable-voltage [[inductor|inductive]] power supply, or by other elements in a [[Toffoli_gate|reversible logic]] circuit. In both cases, the charge transfer must be primarily regulated by the non-resistive load. As a practical rule of thumb, this means the rate of change of a signal must be much slower than that dictated by the [[RC time constant]] of the circuit being driven. In other words, the price of reduced power consumption per unit computation is reduced absolute speed of computation. |
|||
In practice, while adiabatic circuits have been built, it has proven very difficult to use it to reduce computation power substantially in practical circuits. |
|||
Lastly, there are several techniques used to reduce the number of state changes associated with any given computation. For clocked logic circuits, the technique of [[clock gating]] is used, to avoid changing the state of functional blocks that aren't required for a given operation. As a more extreme alternative, the [[asynchronous logic]] approach implements circuits in such a way that an explicit externally supplied clock is not required. While both of these techniques are used to varying extents in integrated circuit design, the limit to practical applicability of each appears to have been reached. |
|||
== External links == |
|||
Low power radio: |
|||
* [http://www.newamerica.net/Download_Docs/pdfs/Pub_File_1555_1.pdf The Cartoon Guide to Federal Spectrum Policy] ([http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/22/2346239 discussed at Slashdot]) |
|||
* [http://www.lightreading.com/boards/message.asp?msg_id=110196 Bottleneck Blowout] |
|||
Low power consumption electronics: |
|||
* [http://enws155.eas.asu.edu:8001/confpapers/russ.ps "High-level design synthesis of a low power, VLIW processor for the IS-54 VSELP Speech Encoder"] by Russell Henning and Chaitali Chakrabarti (implies that, in general, if you know exactly what algorithm you want to run, hardware designed to specifically to run that algorithm will use less power than general-purpose hardware running that algorithm at the same speed). |
|||
* [http://www.hipeac.net/node/108 CRISP: A Scalable VLIW Processor for Low Power Multimedia Systems] by Francisco Barat 2005 |
|||
* [http://www.stanford.edu/~mbinu/pubs/loopaccel.pdf A Loop Accelerator for Low Power Embedded VLIW Processors] by Binu Mathew and Al Davis |
|||
<!-- |
|||
I'm very interested in low-power design; forgive me for dumping links about it here until there's enough to split off a "[[low power design]]" article. |
|||
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 05:28, 24 October 2005 (UTC) |
|||
--> |
|||
[[Category:Power]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:59, 18 October 2020
Low power may refer to:
- Radio transmitters that send out relatively little power:
- QRP operation, using "the minimum power necessary to carry out the desired communications", in amateur radio.
- Cognitive radio transceivers typically automatically reduce the transmitted power to much less than the power required for reliable one-way broadcasts.
- Low-power broadcasting that the power of the broadcast is less, i.e. the radio waves are not intended to travel as far as from typical transmitters.
- Low-power communication device, a radio transmitter used in low-power broadcasting.
- Low-power electronics, the consumption of electric power is deliberately low, e.g. notebook processors.
- Power (statistics), in which low power is due to small sample sizes or poorly designed experiments
See also
[edit]
This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Low power.
If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article.
If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article.