Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Finrell ausi: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Archiving case section to w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Finrell ausi/Archive (using spihelper.js) Tags: Replaced Manual revert |
|||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|Finrell ausi}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|Finrell ausi}} |
||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===22 June 2020=== |
|||
{{SPI case status|checked}} |
|||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Buckwheatflower}} |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Dangshinuskevietenese}} |
|||
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> |
|||
*'''Tools''': <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users={{urlencode:{{#titleparts:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}}} Editor interaction utility] • [https://tools.wmflabs.org/interaction-timeline?wiki=enwiki&user={{urlencode:{{#titleparts:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}}} Interaction Timeline] • [https://tools.wmflabs.org/betacommand-dev/UserCompare/{{urlencode:{{#titleparts:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}}}.html User compare report]</span> <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> |
|||
We need another sweep, as newly created SPAs have popped up at [[Kim Go-eun]] to add the [[Special:Diff/963484371|same]] [[Special:Diff/963705320|puffery]] {{np|Finrell ausi}} and his various socks had done. [[User:Explicit|<b style="color:#4169E1;">Ə</b>]][[User talk:Explicit|<small><span style="color:#3CB371;">XPLICIT</span></small>]] 00:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
|||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
|||
Please also check [[User:Lizzydarcy2008]] as they were a sleeper account that activated recently only to add disruptive edits to [[The King: Eternal Monarch]]. If not related to [[User:Finrell ausi|Finrell ausi]], they might be related to [[User:Surozee|Surozee]] (also [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CherryPie94&diff=964245141&oldid=964071982 See]) or [[User:Buckwheatflower|Buckwheatflower]]. [[User:CherryPie94|<span style="color:#ffeeee; background:#a80000; text-decoration:inherit">CherryPie94</span>]] 🍒🥧 ([[User talk:CherryPie94|talk]]) 22:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC) |
|||
From User:Lizzydarcy2008: |
|||
<br/> |
|||
May I request administrators to review my discussions about The King Eternal Monarch in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CherryPie94#Reply_to_7th_email_about_The_King_Eternal_Monarch |
|||
All I requested for was to make this page not look like another of countless bad press relating to this drama. If you notice, the only other edit I attempted years ago was of a similar nature, when I saw a similar attack on another entity, a negative remark that was not included in pages of other entities that had the same issue. I was a voracious reader of encyclopedias before the internet came along and had expected Wikipedia to have the same integrity. Instead, I am afraid it is being used to blacken entities. As long as the negativity conforms to rules, e.g. verifiable, it is allowed. There is no asking: of all the thousand information about the entity that we are trying to fit into this one page, is that information more important than the other information we are leaving out? Are we being fair to this entity? Is this negative information found in other entities that encountered the same issue? This is the reason I removed that paragraph. The rest of the conversation was trying to arrive at a compromise - leave the negative paragraph in but employ a less negative tone. In short, try to make it sound more like an encyclopedia than bad press. |
|||
Thanks and regards, |
|||
[[User:Lizzydarcy2008|Lizzydarcy2008]] ([[User talk:Lizzydarcy2008|talk]]) 17:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
|||
*{{Endorse}} - Known farm per archives. Worth a CU look for sleepers + general confirmation. [[User:TheSandDoctor|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">The</span><span style="color:#009933; font-weight:bold;">SandDoctor</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:TheSandDoctor|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 04:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC) |
|||
* The following accounts are {{confirmed}} to ''Dangshinuskevietenese'': |
|||
** {{checkuser|1=Kimyayun}} |
|||
** {{checkuser|1=Outdoort}} |
|||
* From a technical standpoint, these accounts are {{possible}} to Finrell ausi and {{unrelated}} to Buckwheatflower. [[User:Mz7|Mz7]] ([[User talk:Mz7|talk]]) 06:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC) |
|||
* Given the extremely unlikely coincidence of these users editing the same areas as confirmed socks—{{np|Dangshinuskevietenese}} following in the steps of {{np|Ionlee}} in [[Kim Go-eun]] (Korean article) and {{np|Outdoort}} following {{np|Xebralosangeles}} and {{np|Clipdeals}} in [[Kuruvi]] (Indian article)—I'll be blocking them as {{tlx|sockpuppet|Finrell ausi|proven}}. I would like to ask for second opinions on {{np|Buckwheatflower}} and the previously marked as unrelated {{np|Surozee}}; technical evidence isn't strong. There is a mountain of socks that was easy to catch, but other showings are poor despite what appears to be a concerning amount of behavioral overlap. A difficult puppeteer to squash? [[User:Explicit|<b style="color:#4169E1;">Ə</b>]][[User talk:Explicit|<small><span style="color:#3CB371;">XPLICIT</span></small>]] 07:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:06, 25 October 2020
Finrell ausi
Finrell ausi (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Finrell ausi/Archive.