It seems on your 1992 and 1997 maps that North Warwickshire, a Labour seat, is still down as Conservative. It seems that the Nuneaton seat has been cut in half, which may explain why you've not filled it in <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kaiser93|Kaiser93]] ([[User talk:Kaiser93|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kaiser93|contribs]]) 20:27, 26 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
==New white background on maps==
It seems all your maps from 1979-1997 now have a white background, but unfortunately in doing so it has affected the boundaries, parts of the UK have disappeared into the white sea! I can only recommend if you are using paint, that you just add a little bit of paint to stop it seeping into the black marked boundaries.
Please feel free to adress any edits I have made by starting a thread on this page. Discussions before 04/02/12 are archived.
By the way, on your 1992 map, Warwickshire North is still blue, it was a Labour gain! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.110.130.13|91.110.130.13]] ([[User talk:91.110.130.13|talk]]) 12:11, 6 February 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Coloursonelectionmaps ==
== ''The Right Stuff:'' January 2012 ==
<!-- for {{subst:x}} use {{subst:subst1}}x}}
You may not be at all interested in this idea but it might be worthwhile.
see [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Recursive_conversion_of_wikitext#Making_a_saved_page_containing_subst]
On quite a few of your older UK election maps, from roughly 1922-45, it does appear (I may be wrong) that the National Liberals are represented as brown on your election map, but in the results tables they are shown as a very light blue. There are a few other parties too that appear as one colour on the maps and as another in the tables. As the maps say that party colours are all corresponding, I was wondering if you would like to either quickly go over the maps in paint, or perhaps fiddle with the colours shown in the tables? Either one wouldn't be too tedious, but only if you're interested, it's obviously not a pressing issue but would be helpful for those viewing the page ;)
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:190%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Wikipedia's Newest Featured Portal: Conservatism<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 85%;">
By [[user:Lionelt|Lionelt]]<br><br>
On January 21, [[The Conservatism Portal]] was promoted to [[WP:Featured Portal|Featured Portal (FP)]] due largely to the contributions of Lionelt. This is the first Featured content produced by WikiProject Conservatism. The road to Featured class was rocky. An earlier nomination for FP failed, and in October the portal was "Kept" after being nominated for deletion.
Member [[user:Eisfbnore|Eisfbnore]] significantly contributed to the successful [[WP:Good Article|Good Article]] nomination of Norwegian journalist and newspaper editor [[Nils Vogt (journalist)|Nils Vogt]] in December. Eisfbnore also created the article. In January another Project article was promoted to [[WP:Featured Article|Featured Article]]. [[Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias]], a president of Brazil, attained Featured class with significant effort by [[user:Lecen|Lecen]]. The [[WP:RIGHT/I|Article Incubator]] saw its first graduation in November. A collaboration spearheaded by [[user:Mzk1|Mzk1]] and [[user:Trackerseal|Trackerseal]] successfully developed [[Star Parker]] to pass the notability guideline.
[[User:Kaiser93|Kaiser93]] ([[User talk:Kaiser93|talk]]) 19:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
</div></div>
-----
<!-- LEFT PANEL -->
<div style="float:left; width:49%; ">
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">PROJECT NEWS<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:190%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Project Scope Debated<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 85%;">
By [[user:Lionelt|Lionelt]]<br><br>
Another [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Conservatism#Scope (Part II): Endorsements|discussion]] addressing the project scope began in December. Nine alternatives were presented in the contentious, sometimes heated discussion. Support was divided between keeping the exitsing scope, or adopting a scope with more specificity. Some opponents of the specific scope were concerned that it was too limiting and would adversely affect project size. About twenty editors participated in the discussion.
Inclusion of the article [[Ku Klux Klan]] (KKK) was [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Conservatism/Archive 5#Ku Klux Klan|debated]]. Supporters for inclusion cited sources describing the KKK as "conservative." The article was excluded with more than 10 editors participating.
==UK General elections Feb '74 and Oct '74 maps==
[[File:Me2011.jpg|left|80px]]
The two maps used for these election pages appear to be indentical, do you have a map for Oct '74? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.110.193.174|91.110.193.174]] ([[User talk:91.110.193.174|talk]]) 19:53, 20 November 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Project membership continues to grow. There are currently 73 members. Member [[user:Goldblooded|Goldblooded]] ''(pictured)'' volunteers for the [[Conservative Party (UK)|UK Conservative Party]] and [[User:JohnChrysostom|JohnChrysostom]] is a [[Christian Democrat]]. [[user:North8000|North8000]] is interested in libertarianism. We won't tell [[WP:Libertarianism|WikiProject Libertarianism]] he's [[slumming]]. Let's stop by their talkpages and share some [[WP:Wikilove|Wikilove]].
''Click {{Plain link|{{fullurl:WP:WikiProject Conservatism|action=watch}}|here}} to keep up to date on all the happenings at WikiProject Conservatism.''
:Thanks for pointing that out. I've just managed to correct it using Windows paint. If I've left any seats out let me know because there were very few seats changing hands at that election. MWhite 20:12, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
</div></div>
<!-- RIGHT PANEL -->
<div style="float:right; width:49%;">
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">DISCUSSION REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:190%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Why is Everyone Talking About Rick Santorum?<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 85%;">
By [[user:Lionelt|Lionelt]]<br><br>
[[File:Rick Santorum by Gage Skidmore.jpg|80px|left]]
Articles about the GOP presidential candidate and staunch traditional marriage supporter have seen an explosion of discussion. On January 8 an RFC was opened [[Talk:Campaign for "santorum" neologism#RfC|(here)]] to determine if Dan Savage's website link should be included in [[Campaign for "santorum" neologism]]. The next day the [[Rick Santorum]] article itself was the subject of an RFC [[talk:Rick Santorum#BLP and inclusion/exclusion of the neologism|(here)]] to determine if including the Savage neologism was a violation of the [[WP:BLP|BLP policy]]. Soon after a third was opened [[Talk:Santorum controversy regarding homosexuality#Proposed merger of Campaign for "santorum" neologism into Santorum controversy regarding homosexuality|(here)]] at [[Santorum controversy regarding homosexuality]]. This RFC proposes merging the [[Campaign for "santorum" neologism|neologism article]] into the [[Santorum controversy regarding homosexuality|controversy article]].
== 2010 entry ==
The Abortion case [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion/Proposed decision|closed]] in November after 15 weeks of contentious arbitration. The remedies include semi-protection of all abortion articles (numbering 1,500), sanctions for some editors including members of this Project, and a provision for a discussion to determine the names of what are colloquially known as the [[pro-life]] and [[pro-choice]] articles. The Committee endorsed the "1 revert rule" for abortion articles.
In the view of another editor and me your addition to [[2010]] is better suited for [[2010 in the United Kingdom]]. If you disagree, you should take the issue to the talk page. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 20:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
</div></div>
<!-- FOOTER -->
</div>
<!-- FOOTER -->
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:People aged over 85]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|welcome page]] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard2.0|Article Wizard]].
{| style="background:none; clear:both; text-align:center; font-size:90%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; color:#444; width:100%;"
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:People aged over 85|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:People aged over 85|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-test-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:TheDude2006|TheDude2006]] ([[User talk:TheDude2006|talk]]) 21:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Mwhite, please can you reconsider this article? It is not in accordance with our style guide (specifically [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)#Out-of-date material]]), and "85" is an arbitary value. If you agree, you can blank the article. Or if you prefer I can take it to peer discussion. Thanks, [[User:Marasmusine|Marasmusine]] ([[User talk:Marasmusine|talk]]) 13:24, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
| <div style="background: #fff;margin-right: 10px;">[[File:Seattle Public Library.jpg|thumb|left|Seattle Public Library]]</div>
| style="text-align: left;" |
*'''Date''' Saturday, December 8, 2012
*'''Time''' 10 a.m. – 3 p.m.
*'''Location''' [http://www.spl.org/ Seattle Public Library] Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104
*'''Event''' An ''editathon'' on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
*'''Hashtag''' #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki.
*'''Registration''' [http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com] or use [[Wikipedia:Meetup/SeattleWLL/2012#Sign-up|on-wiki regsistration]].
Yours, [[User:Maximilianklein|Maximilianklein]] ([[User talk:Maximilianklein|talk]]) 03:26, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
|}
<!-- EdwardsBot 0409 -->
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==
Hi Mwhite, I'll take the article to peer discussion: if the concensus is to keep the article, I'll shup up! I was also wondering what your logic behind the value of 85 years was? Thanks, [[User:Marasmusine|Marasmusine]] ([[User talk:Marasmusine|talk]]) 15:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi,<br>
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for deletion]] nomination of [[:People aged over 85]] ==
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current [[WP:ACE2015|Arbitration Committee election]]. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia [[WP:RFAR|arbitration process]]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[WP:ARBPOL|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to [[WP:ACE2015/C|review the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/398|the voting page]]. For the Election committee, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692225944 -->
== US Presidential Timeline work ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[People aged over 85]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People aged over 85]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:Marasmusine|Marasmusine]] ([[User talk:Marasmusine|talk]]) 15:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your name on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Presidents/Active participants]]. The newly created presidential timelines on [[Template:US Presidential Administrations]] need work! They're pretty easy to work on! I can't do them alone! The timelines provide great reading material for many Wikipedia readers. All your contributions are greatly appreciated. [[User:Ethanbas|Ethanbas]] <sup>([[User_talk:Ethanbas|talk]])</sup> 06:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
== The Dark Knight ==
== ''The Right Stuff'' June 2018 ==
The Film project agreed that "film in 2008" was an [[WP:EGG|egg]] a not a part of the MOS. [[User:Darrenhusted|Darrenhusted]] ([[User talk:Darrenhusted|talk]]) 20:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
:Years don't get linked either, per datelinking. And there was a bot employed to delink every single date. [[User:Darrenhusted|Darrenhusted]] ([[User talk:Darrenhusted|talk]]) 20:29, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
<!-- HEADER -->
::Apparently, this has been explained to you by someone else. We're not supposed to include easter egg links like that. Links should be obvious and not require a reader to highlight them just to make sure they go to a specific page and not somewhere else. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> BIGNOLE </span>'''</small>]] [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 22:16, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
<div style="font-family:Wedding Text, Linotext, Old English Text MT, serif; font-size:58px; line-height:69px; padding-bottom:6px;">[[File:The right stuff.png|center|270px|alt=The Right Stuff|link=Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News/June 2018]]</div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
FROM THE EDITOR<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">The Right Stuff Returns<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}
Fellow members, I'm pleased to announce the return of the newsletter of [[WP:WikiProject Conservatism|WikiProject Conservatism]]. And considering the recent [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2018-04-26/From_the_editors|downsizing at ''The Signpost'']] the timing could not be better. ''The Right Stuff'' will help keep you apprised of what's happening in conservatism at Wikipedia and in the world. ''The Right Stuff'' welcomes submissions including position pieces, instructional articles, or short essays addressing important conservatism-related issues. Post submissions [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Conservatism/News|here]].
Sorry. I didn't mean to insult. I'm just trying to improve the article, just like you are. Learn how to sign your name. [[User:Geeky Randy|Geeky Randy]] ([[User talk:Geeky Randy|talk]]) 19:45, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Add the [[WT:RYT|Project Discussion]] page to your watchlist for the latest updates at WikiProject Conservatism {{Clickable button 2|Watch|url={{fullurl:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Conservatisam|action=watch}}|style=line-height: 1.5em; padding: 0 1em 0 1em}} [[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>
== Unknown American Presidents Task Force? ==
-----
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
ARBITRATION REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Russian Agents Editing at American Politics?<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}
After a ''series of unfortunate events'' largely self-created, bureaucrat and admin {{u|Andrevan}} was the subject of an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Advanced_permissions_of_Andrevan|Arbitration case]] for conduct unbecoming. Prior to the case getting underway Andrevan resigned as bureaucrat and admin. A widely discussed incident was when he suggested that some editors he described as "pro-Trump" were paid Russian agents. This resulted in a number of editors from varied quarters denouncing the allegations and voicing support for veteran editors including {{u|Winkelvi}} and the notorious {{u|MONGO}}.
Hi Mwhite148! I am thinking about starting an "Unknown Presidents" task force and I noticed that you are an active member at [[WP:USPREZ]]. I was wondering if you would like to join me in starting this task force. The following Presidents would be included:
*[[Millard Fillmore]]
*[[James Monroe]]
*[[Zachary Taylor]]
*[[Franklin Pierce]]
*[[Rutherford B Hayes]]
*[[James Garfield]]
*[[Chester A Arthur]]
*[[James Buchanan]]
Editors who faced Enforcement action include {{u|SPECIFICO}} (no action), {{u|Factchecker atyourservice}} (three month topic ban ARBAPDS), {{u|Netoholic}} (no action) and {{u|Anythingyouwant}} (indef topic ban ARBAPDS). [[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>
Our Mission: To expand the knowledge of the "Unknown Presidents." Specifically getting all these articles to GA class or higher.
Let me know what you think. Thanks!--[[User:Schwindtd|Schwindtd]] ([[User talk:Schwindtd|talk]]) 00:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
==License tagging for File:St. Matthew's Academy, Saltcoats.png==
Thanks for uploading [[:File:St. Matthew's Academy, Saltcoats.png]]. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|image copyright tags]] to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/All|this list]], click on [[:File:St. Matthew's Academy, Saltcoats.png|this link]], then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
</div><!-- RIGHT-HAND SIDE -->
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. Thank you for your cooperation. --[[User:ImageTaggingBot|ImageTaggingBot]] ([[User talk:ImageTaggingBot|talk]]) 20:05, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
<div style="float:right; width:49%;">
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
== Image you uploaded ==
IN THE MEDIA<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Breitbart Versus Wikipedia<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}
''[[Breitbart News]]'', in response to Facebook's decision to use Wikipedia as a source to fight fake news, has declared war on our beloved pedia. The [https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-breitbart-declares-war-on-wikipedia-in-facebook-s-fight-against-fake-news-1.5991915 article in ''Haaretz''] describes the Facebook arrangement as Wikipedia's "greatest test in years" as well as a "massive threat" to the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. ''Breitbart's'' targeting of Wikipedia has resulted in an "epic battle" with respect to editing at the Breitbart article. The article has also recently experienced a dramatic increase in traffic with 50,000 visitors according to ''Haaretz''. There is no love lost between ''Breitbart'' and Wikipedia where editors at the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard|Reliable Sources Noticeboard]] have criticized the news websites unreliability and have compared it to ''The Daily Mail''. [[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>
Hi there, an image you uploaded: [[:File:St. Matthew's Academy, Saltcoats.png]] needs to have its license noted. Please review the various free licenses Wikipedia accepts at [[WP:ICTIC]] and pick the one that you like best. Please also review [[WP:FILE#Using images]] on how to use image syntax. Finally, when uploading free images please upload them at Commons, for more information see [[Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons#Transferring your own images to the Commons]]. Thanks and if you have any questions feel free to ask here and leave a {{tl|tb}} on [[User talk:Stepshep|my talkpage]]. [[User:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#3333cc;">§hep</span>]][[User talk:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Helvetica;color:#3333cc;"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 22:43, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
-----
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
DISCUSSION REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Liberty and Trump and Avi, Oh my!<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}
<div id="mp-tfa-img" style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">{{main page image|President_Trump_speaking_at_Liberty_University_commencement.jpg|width=220|''President Donald Trump Speaks at Liberty University Commencement Ceremony''|title=Liberty is one of the largest Christian universities in the world and the largest private non-profit university in the United States. Described as a "bastion of the Christian right" in American politics, the university plays a prominent role in Republican politics. President Donald J. Trump gave his first college commencement speech as sitting president at Liberty University.}}<!-- copied from https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Liberty_University&oldid=844931767--> </div>There are several [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Conservatism/Article_alerts|open discussions]] at the Project:
* There is an RFC regarding [[Liberty University]] and its relationship to President Trump; see [[Talk:Liberty_University#rfctag|discussion]]
* Activist and commentator [[Avi Yemini]] is listed at AFD; see [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Avi_Yemini_(2nd_nomination)|discussion]]
}}Recently closed discussions include [[Anti-abortion movements]] which was [[Talk:Anti-abortion_movements#reqmovetag|not renamed]], and an [[Talk:Trump–Russia_dossier#RFC_on_stating_no_public_evidence_of_collusion|RFC]] at [[Trump–Russia dossier]]. [[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>
</div><div style="clear:both; width:100%;">
<div style="padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE;">'''Dear uploader:''' The media file you uploaded as [[:File:UK Election Map 2001.png]] is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.
<small>Delivered: 11:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Lionelt@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Conservatism/News/Subscribe&oldid=845519790 -->
== ''The Right Stuff:'' July 2018 ==
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion,
a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
<!-- HEADER -->
If you have any questions please see [[Help:Image page#Description of the image|Help:Image page]]. Thank you. [[User:Sfan00 IMG|Sfan00 IMG]] ([[User talk:Sfan00 IMG|talk]]) 13:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Add-desc -->
<div style="font-family:Wedding Text, Linotext, Old English Text MT, serif; font-size:58px; line-height:69px; padding-bottom:6px;">[[File:The right stuff.png|center|270px|alt=The Right Stuff|link=Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News/July 2018]]</div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
DISCUSSION REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">WikiProject Conservatism Comes Under Fire<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}
WikiProject Conservatism was a [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive985#Vote_stacking_concern|topic of discussion]] at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the [[WP:Canvassing]] guideline.
Hi, Mwhite148, you have recently been trying to standardise the opening paragraphs of those articles that relate to individual politicians. We have both discussed this at length on the Edward Heath talk page. I wonder if I could ask you to take another look at the opening paragraph for the [[Enoch Powell]] article: since you amended this, another user has expanded it to include the highly disputable claim that Powell's influence was decisive in the 1970 and February 1974 General Elections. Although he has now sourced it (to a book written by the pro-Powell journalist Simon Heffer), and although it repeats the term "arguably", I cannot help thinking that such slanted opinion-based rhetoric is unsuitable for the opening paragraph of an article like this. It also makes the paragraph too long and cumbersome (and the repetition I mentioned above is bad style). I have nothing against Powell's supporters making their claims about his alleged influence further down into the body of the text, but is it really appropriate for the beginning of an article like this? [[Special:Contributions/89.195.130.69|89.195.130.69]] ([[User talk:89.195.130.69|talk]]) 08:46, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
At one point the discussion segued to feedback about ''The Right Stuff.'' Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."
I think the information that the user has added should stay because it is believed to be true by many people. I made some slight tweaks to the opening section of [[Enoch Powell]] such as removing the second use of the word arguably and making the paragraphs neater. MWhite 15:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion.
== UK general election maps ==
''Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.''
Add the [[WT:RYT|Project Discussion]] page to your watchlist for the "latest RFCs" at WikiProject Conservatism {{Clickable button 2|Watch|url={{fullurl:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Conservatisam|action=watch}}|style=line-height: 1.5em; padding: 0 1em 0 1em}} [[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>
These maps are really impressive -- great work! I'm curious about the underlying GIS files; I'm doing a project on British elections myself, and would like to create some maps. Are these files available? Again, great stuff. [[User:Andropod|Andropod]] ([[User talk:Andropod|talk]]) 19:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
-----
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
ARTICLES REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Margaret Thatcher Makes History Again<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}
[[Margaret Thatcher]] is the first article promoted at the new [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Conservatism/Assessment/A-Team|WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review]]. Congratulations to {{u|Neveselbert}}. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Conservatism/Assessment/A-Team|here]]. [[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>
Just reiterating my question -- I'm interested in obtaining the underlying shape files (for parliamentary constituencies), not the finished product image files, and wondered if you had any advice. [[User:Andropod|Andropod]] ([[User talk:Andropod|talk]]) 14:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
</div><!-- RIGHT-HAND SIDE -->
Still interested in this. Please let me know if you are sharing the underlying shape files or not. Thank you. [[User:Andropod|Andropod]] ([[User talk:Andropod|talk]]) 22:17, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
<div style="float:right; width:49%;">
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
:I'm afraid I can't help you. The maker and subsequent discarder of these files refused to share what software he used whilst making them.MWhite 17:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
RECENT RESEARCH<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Research About AN/I<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}
''Reprinted in part from the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2018-04-26/In_focus|April 26, 2018 issue]] of The Signpost; written by {{u|Zarasophos}}''
== [[:File:2010 Election in Scotland Before and After.png]] missing description details ==
<div style="float:right;margin-left:10px">{{Graph:Chart|width=70|height=70|type=pie|legend=Satisfaction with AN/I|x=Satisfied,Not satisfied|y1=27,73|showValues=}}</div>
<div style="padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE;">'''Dear uploader:''' The media file you uploaded as [[:File:2010 Election in Scotland Before and After.png]] is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.
Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a [[Wikipedia:Community_health_initiative_on_English_Wikipedia/Research_about_Administrators%27_Noticeboard_Incidents|recent survey]] . The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a "[[Wikipedia:BOOMERANG|boomerang effect]]" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an [[Wikipedia:Community_health_initiative_on_English_Wikipedia/Research_about_Administrators%27_Noticeboard_Incidents/Quantitative_data_analysis|analysis of available quantitative data about AN/I]]. Some notable takeaways:
* 53% avoided making a report due to fearing it would not be handled appropriately
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion,
* "Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned."
a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
* "Discussions need to be clerked to keep them from raising more problems than they solve."
In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at [[Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost/2018-04-26/In_focus|''The Signpost'']] and [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive298#AN_/_ANI_boards_under_criticism|also at AN/I]]. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas [[Wikipedia_talk:Community_health_initiative_on_English_Wikipedia/Improved_tools_and_workflows_to_report_harassment|here]].
If you have any questions please see [[Help:Image page#Description of the image|Help:Image page]]. Thank you. [[User:Sfan00 IMG|Sfan00 IMG]] ([[User talk:Sfan00 IMG|talk]]) 14:51, 18 September 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Add-desc -->
[[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>
</div><div style="clear:both; width:100%;">
== September 2010 ==
<!-- FOOTER -->
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from [[:Gerry Adams]]. When removing content, please specify a reason in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk page]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Gerry_Adams&action=history page history]</span>. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> <font face="Georgia">'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]'''<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 21:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I saw [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Ed_Miliband&diff=prev&oldid=386957434 you reverted in this diff] my revert back to the original DOB, please do not alter it again with a citation. [http://www.parliamentaryrecord.com/content/profiles/mp/Ed-Miliband/Doncaster-North/729 http://www.parliamentaryrecord.com/content/profiles/mp/Ed-Miliband/Doncaster-North/729] - [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 16:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Conservatism|Discuss a story]]
OK, thanks for replying, no worries, I have asked for semi protection, regards. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 16:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:UK Election Map 2001.png]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:UK Election Map 2001.png|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 25#File:UK Election Map 2001.png|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> --[[User:Marcus Qwertyus|<font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">'''Marcus'''</font>]] [[User talk:Marcus Qwertyus|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">'''Qwertyus'''</font>]] 22:46, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
<small>Delivered: 09:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Lionelt@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Conservatism/News/Subscribe&oldid=846049468 -->
==Your recent edits==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|link=]] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button [[File:Insert-signature.png|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] ([[User talk:SineBot|talk]]) 13:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
==Labour Party edits==
Hi, I don't know what's going on, but I haven't made any edits to Labour Party, although some appear in my contributions. Is it possible to hijack someone? [[User:Jongleur100| <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 17:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, I've just done that. Cheers, [[User:Jongleur100| <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 17:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]'''  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Labour Party]]. Users who [[WP:DISRUPT|edit disruptively]] or refuse to [[WP:COLLABORATE|collaborate]] with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If unsuccessful then '''do not edit war even if you believe you are right'''. Post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If edit warring continues, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> Please re,member [[WP:BRD]], you were bold, were reversed so discuss --[[User:Snowded|<font color="#801818" face="Papyrus">'''Snowded'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Snowded#top|<font color="#708090" face="Baskerville">TALK</font>]]</sup></small> 18:03, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Glad you like my layout! [[User:Jongleur100| <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 15:28, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
==Your recent edits==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|link=]] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button [[File:Insert-signature.png|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] ([[User talk:SineBot|talk]]) 18:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
== Possible creation of 2001 Election map using 1997's? ==
Looking on the BBC Vote 2001 website at the 2001 election map, and then looking at your marvellous 1997 Election map, would it perhaps be possible to swiftly create a new map for 2001 on the wikipedia page, due to their being very little difference in the general changeover of seats between these 2 elections? I knew it can be done fairly easily, I shamelessly used paint to give it a little go :D, hope you're interested, it's the only one that sticks out, I have temporarily put a link to the BBC map in place of an image [[User:Kaiser93|Kaiser93]] ([[User talk:Kaiser93|talk]]) 21:43, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
==UK general election maps==
Your maps are amazing, I was looking for them over the internet for months but couldn't find anything useful until now. 1955 version is by far the best and I hope you will continue doing them for all post-war elections. Thank you for your work.
Thanks, I have maps going right back to 1832. I'll upload them all soon.
::I have just discovered your series of election maps for UK general elections. Like the user above, I had previously been unable to find any maps representing the votes, let alone ones that have shown boundary changes. Great work, thank you so much. [[User:Kazzi03|Kazzi03]] ([[User talk:Kazzi03|talk]]) 15:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
==Big thanks (election 1955 map)==
Thanks ever so much for the UK General election 1955 map, I've always struggled to find any political maps for the UK before the year 1983 and this was very fascinating to look at. Id love it if you'd be able to do some more, but either way, thanks again
== 1835-1895 maps ==
Hi, thanks very much for posting election maps for 1832 and 1900 onwards. Just wondering if you have maps for 1835-1895 elections? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.166.230.75|86.166.230.75]] ([[User talk:86.166.230.75|talk]]) 21:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
==[[NOtoAV]]==
With regards to [[User talk:138.38.32.171|138.38.32.171]]'s edits to the article, you should be aware that you are in violation of the [[WP:3RR|three revert rule]] as well. I assume that you had considered the user's edit to be [[WP:VAND|vandalism]]; actually, it's more like an editing dispute. You have already taken it to the talk page, so I am protecting the current revision of the article with the section included. - [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] ([[User talk:Mike Rosoft|talk]]) 05:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
{{talkback|Mike Rosoft}}
On this subject, I would just like to say that I do not appreciate the aggressive and unwarranted message that you left on my wall the other day. Now having looked at that page, it seems that you probably got me mixed up with 138.38.32.171. I would therefore ask you to be a little more careful in the future.[[Special:Contributions/195.59.149.157|195.59.149.157]] ([[User talk:195.59.149.157|talk]]) 13:26, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
==Lincoln Memorial/Legacy section==
We are currently attempting to bring the Lincoln article to FA status and are trying to establish consensus regarding images. Your consensus and opinion is needed on the [[Talk:Abraham Lincoln#Lincoln Memorial stamp|Abraham Lincoln talk page]]. -- [[User:Gwillhickers|Gwillhickers]] ([[User talk:Gwillhickers|talk]]) 01:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
== milliband ==
Hi, please follow [[WP:BRD]] and move to discussion on the talkpage, thanks. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 21:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Discussion is not posting on talk and then reverting again - please allow interested users to comment and wait for feedback. There is no deadline. Thanks [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 21:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
== Your signature ==
Hi, it seems strange that your signature does not provide a link to your talkpage, is this something your are creating or some format you have added? It is quite distracting - it it within users signature guidelines? [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 21:56, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
No worries - tomorrow it is. I will sort your signature out for you then also - Best regards. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 22:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
*Hi you are editing can we sort your signiture out please? .. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 22:25, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
: Right okay. I've decided just to leave the Ed Miliband page because I could predict any future discussions we would hold there: a piece of info is brought up, I state why I think it's important, I mention something that I believe is relevant, you argue against it. It would carry on like this and ultimately result in nothing/very little. Now, what advice can you give me on sorting my signature? Mwhite148 19:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I think its in your preferences.. see here ...going to get the link... [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 10:33, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
See here [[Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2011 June 1#no internal links in signature]] - [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 10:38, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
==CCI Notice==
Hello, Mwhite148. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations|Contributor copyright investigations]] concerning your contributions in relation to [[WP:C|Wikipedia's copyrights policy]]. The listing can be found [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations#Mwhite148|here]]. For some suggestions on responding, please see [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations#Responding_to_a_CCI_case|Responding to a CCI case]]. Thank you. <!--Template:CCI-notice--> [[User:TheGrappler|TheGrappler]] ([[User talk:TheGrappler|talk]]) 19:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
== Image copyright violations ==
Hi Mwhite148, as you have [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AContributor_copyright_investigations&action=historysubmit&diff=433258194&oldid=433255764 stated at CCI that you will comply with deletion] of the copyvio maps you uploaded, but [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations&diff=next&oldid=433258194 it seems they've been transferred to Wikimedia Commons now], could you please file the deletion requests over there, as requested by [[User:MER-C]] at CCI? [[User:TheGrappler|TheGrappler]] ([[User talk:TheGrappler|talk]]) 02:15, 15 June 2011 (UTC)`
== Suggestion for WikiProject United States to support WikiProject US Presidents ==
Greetings, It was recently suggested that [[Wikipedia:WikiProject US Presidents|WikiProject US Presidents]] might be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by [[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States|WikiProject United States]]. I have started a discussion on the projects talk page soliciting the opinions of the members of the project if this project would be interested in being supported by WikiProject United States. Please feel free to comment on your opinions about this suggestion. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 13:15, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
== update - signature ==
Hi, please see the updated link in this section above [[User talk:Mwhite148#Your signature]] - [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 10:40, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
:Thank you very much for making that inquiry. It seems to have worked. [[User:Mwhite148|Mwhite148]] ([[User talk:Mwhite148#top|talk]]) 15:21, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
::Cool. Regards. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 23:36, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
== Completely new abortion proposal and mediation==
In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles ([[Pro-life movement|pro-life/anti-abortion movement]], and [[Abortion-rights movement|pro-choice/abortion rights movement]]) to '''''completely''''' new names. The idea, which is located '''[[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-06-22/Abortion-rights movement|here]]''', is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.
The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles [[Talk:Abortion-rights movement|here]] and [[Talk:Pro-life movement|here]] can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. '''Even if your opinion is simple ''indifference''''', that opinion would be valuable to have posted.
To avoid accusations that this posting violates [[WP:CANVASS]], this posting is being made to '''every''' non-anon editor who has edited either page since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. [[User:HuskyHuskie|HuskyHuskie]] ([[User talk:HuskyHuskie|talk]]) 19:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
==July 2011 Newsletter for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States|WikiProject United States]]==
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/Newsletter/Newsletter link|July 2011}}--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 13:02, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
==September 2011 Newsletter for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States|WikiProject United States]]==
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/Newsletter/Newsletter link|September 2011}}--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 02:46, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
== UK election maps nominated for deletion ==
Hi, last year you uploaded a large number of UK Election Maps from the [http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/elections/index.jsp Vision of Britain website]. These have been nominated for deletion at [[:commons:Commons:Deletion requests/UK Election Maps by Mwhite148]], and must be re-created using one of our free blank maps. Please do not claim that you created works entirely by yourself when in fact you did not, as this kind of deception causes us to lose trust in you. If there has been some misunderstanding please explain in the deletion request. Thank you. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 00:22, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
== Scottish election ==
FYI I assessed it as B. The article is really coming along. I'd like to extend an invitation to you to join [[WP:RIGHT|WikiProject Conservatism]]. We're a great group of editors and can provide you with resources to get the article to "Good", and beyond. You can obtain more info [[WP:WikiProject Conservatism/About us|here]]. TTFN – [[user:Lionelt|Lionel]] <sup>([[user talk:Lionelt|talk]])</sup> 09:16, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
== [[Govan]] ==
Hallo! You'v made [[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Govan&diff=439370421&oldid=436935874 this]] contribution to the article about Govan. I would like to know why one have to pronounce this word as [guvan] but not [govan]? As I know “O” is never equale to “U”. [[User:Blast furnace chip worker|Blast furnace chip worker]] ([[User talk:Blast furnace chip worker|talk]]) 15:29, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
On January 21, The Conservatism Portal was promoted to Featured Portal (FP) due largely to the contributions of Lionelt. This is the first Featured content produced by WikiProject Conservatism. The road to Featured class was rocky. An earlier nomination for FP failed, and in October the portal was "Kept" after being nominated for deletion.
Member Eisfbnore significantly contributed to the successful Good Article nomination of Norwegian journalist and newspaper editor Nils Vogt in December. Eisfbnore also created the article. In January another Project article was promoted to Featured Article. Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias, a president of Brazil, attained Featured class with significant effort by Lecen. The Article Incubator saw its first graduation in November. A collaboration spearheaded by Mzk1 and Trackerseal successfully developed Star Parker to pass the notability guideline.
Another discussion addressing the project scope began in December. Nine alternatives were presented in the contentious, sometimes heated discussion. Support was divided between keeping the exitsing scope, or adopting a scope with more specificity. Some opponents of the specific scope were concerned that it was too limiting and would adversely affect project size. About twenty editors participated in the discussion.
Inclusion of the article Ku Klux Klan (KKK) was debated. Supporters for inclusion cited sources describing the KKK as "conservative." The article was excluded with more than 10 editors participating.
The Abortion case closed in November after 15 weeks of contentious arbitration. The remedies include semi-protection of all abortion articles (numbering 1,500), sanctions for some editors including members of this Project, and a provision for a discussion to determine the names of what are colloquially known as the pro-life and pro-choice articles. The Committee endorsed the "1 revert rule" for abortion articles.
Fellow members, I'm pleased to announce the return of the newsletter of WikiProject Conservatism. And considering the recent downsizing at The Signpost the timing could not be better. The Right Stuff will help keep you apprised of what's happening in conservatism at Wikipedia and in the world. The Right Stuff welcomes submissions including position pieces, instructional articles, or short essays addressing important conservatism-related issues. Post submissions here.
After a series of unfortunate events largely self-created, bureaucrat and admin Andrevan was the subject of an Arbitration case for conduct unbecoming. Prior to the case getting underway Andrevan resigned as bureaucrat and admin. A widely discussed incident was when he suggested that some editors he described as "pro-Trump" were paid Russian agents. This resulted in a number of editors from varied quarters denouncing the allegations and voicing support for veteran editors including Winkelvi and the notorious MONGO.
Breitbart News, in response to Facebook's decision to use Wikipedia as a source to fight fake news, has declared war on our beloved pedia. The article in Haaretz describes the Facebook arrangement as Wikipedia's "greatest test in years" as well as a "massive threat" to the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Breitbart's targeting of Wikipedia has resulted in an "epic battle" with respect to editing at the Breitbart article. The article has also recently experienced a dramatic increase in traffic with 50,000 visitors according to Haaretz. There is no love lost between Breitbart and Wikipedia where editors at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard have criticized the news websites unreliability and have compared it to The Daily Mail. (Discuss this story)
WikiProject Conservatism was a topic of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the WP:Canvassing guideline.
At one point the discussion segued to feedback about The Right Stuff. Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."
Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion.
Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.
Margaret Thatcher is the first article promoted at the new WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review. Congratulations to Neveselbert. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article here. (Discuss this story)
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a recent survey . The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a "boomerang effect" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an analysis of available quantitative data about AN/I. Some notable takeaways:
53% avoided making a report due to fearing it would not be handled appropriately
"Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned."
"Discussions need to be clerked to keep them from raising more problems than they solve."
In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at The Signpost and also at AN/I. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas here.
