User talk:Hamster Sandwich: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 15:37, 7 January 2021

A cup of coffee for you!

I stumbled across your suggestions at DYK for Hermes 3000 and wanted to say I quite enjoyed your suggestions for hooks. Mifter (talk) 08:11, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your kindness in saying so! I appreciate it. Regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 13:13, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "my spellcheck is not reliable!"

The Spell-Checker Song: Owed to a Spell Czech Her (Ode to a spellchecker)

Eye halve a spelling chequer.
It came with my pea sea.
It plane lee marks four my Rhea view,
Miss steaks aye Ken knot see.

Iran this Poe Em threw it.
Your shore lee glad two no.
It is core wrecked in every weigh,
My chequer tolled me sew.

A Czech her is a bless sing.
It freeze yew lodes of thyme.
It helps me right stiles ewe can reed,
And aides me when aye rime.

Eye strike a key and type a word.
And weight four it two say.
Weather eye am wrong oar write.
It shows me strait aweigh.

Each frays come posed up on my screen,
Is trussed two bee a Joule.
The check Ur pours o'er every word,
To Czech sum spelling rule.

As soon as a mist ache is maid.
It nose bee fore two long.
And eye can put the error rite.
Its rare lea ever wrong.

Bee fore a veiling cheque curs,
hour spelling mite decline.
If wee R. lacks oar have a laps,
We wood bee maid two wine.

Butt now bee cause my spelling,
Is checked with such grate flare,
There are know faults with in my cite,
Of nun eye am a wear.

Now spelling does knot phase me,
It does knot bring a tier.
My pay purrs awl due glad den,
With words sew fare too here.

2 rite with care is quite a fete,
Of witch won should bee proud;
and wee mussed dew the best week Anne,
Sew flaws argh[1] knot aloud.

Sow ewe can sea why aye dew prays.
Such soft wear four pea seize.
And why eye brake in 2 averse
With righting sure too please.

^{Attribution: I composed the above as a modification of various versions found on the web labeled "author unknown" or some such. Later I discovered this page, which appears to document the original sources, and my version is clearly a heavily modified derivative version of what is listed on that page. To whatever extent the above is my own work, I release it under the Creative Commons CC0 license. --Guy Macon}
--Guy Macon (talk) 00:59, 13 December 2018 (UTC) [ Citation Need ed ][reply]

Thank you for this, I dindt evun halve to rub it in my speel czech hir! Bust regrins, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 01:15, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Need help

I just found this page after I requested a permission, and found a (new to me) link there, to what I am guessing is a MediaWiki project that I have no idea about. Apparently, 2 years ago someone was able to edit under my name at that page. It may be because I don't have a registered account at that project, but I am unsettled by finding it there. Here is the link [[2]] Thanks, in advance. Hamster Sandwich (talk) 00:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May I assume that the last two edits I see at

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Hamster_Sandwich

are from you but the first one isn't?

I see that a meta admin reverted you:

https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Grants:IdeaLab/Arbitration_Tribunal&action=history

I have alerted him to this thread:

https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABillinghurst&type=revision&diff=18716853&oldid=18711245

Let's see what he has to say. --Guy Macon (talk) 01:13, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TY very much! Hamster Sandwich (talk) 01:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issue at metawiki, resolved there — billinghurst sDrewth 01:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1) the complainant removed a user comment to a proposal in their name, that was reverted. Subsequently it would appear that the complainant had issues in a comment in their original submission. How they put it their during their submission I can only reflect is the complainant's issue. What happened to the user's account in 2016 is beyond comment and investigation. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:29, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) Addendum. User has been advised to change their password. First step that anyone should do when they believe that there is a chance that your account has been compromised is to firstly check the email address for your account, then change your password. Use a unique, complex password, preferably of minimum of 10 characters. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:41, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for removing the comment by another editor. I inadvertently removed that comment when I found what I thought was a vexatious comment left by a red-link "Hamster Sandwich" at the foot of an infobox of some kind. I thank billingshurst for fixing all of that up, at any rate. I can't explain the addition of material to MadiaWiki in 2016 in my "red-link" name, other to state I myself did not make it/ them. Hamster Sandwich (talk) 01:38, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe a weird glitch in the software? It is plausible that someone else registered that name (who knows how long ago) and made one edit in 2016, and somehow the system didn't realize that you had already registered it in 2005. By all means change your password, in case he somehow has the same one.

In 2005 all Wikimedia sites had separate user accounts and passwords, but starting in February 2013 (completed in April 2015) the WMF forcibly renamed all clashing user accounts so that every user now had a single unified login across all Wikimedia sites. Maybe they missed one?

The fact that you could edit on meta tells me that you have unified login. Could you please check

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth?target=Hamster+Sandwich

And look for anything else on another wiki that you didn't post?

Finally, I don't see anything here that needs an English Wikipedia admin. Would you be so kind as to cut and paste this to your talk page and we can continue this discussion there? Just replace this entire thread with a link to where it was moved to. Or ask me and I can move it for you. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:05, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Password has been changed to an newer strengthened one. It seems to be one specific case of a rather nonsense edit made in a (apparently random) infobox that was ignored for two years till I found it. WELL DONE ME, eh?. I only found it when I saw a new search parameter for my past edits at a request for permissions page. Regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 05:35, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I think it might be meaningful that when I made what I thought was the removal of the footer of the info box (inadvertantly, and I have no idea how) reverting a comment on the talk page. My mistake there. The meaningful part is, that after I made that edit, I got a message welcoming me for my first edit over there. Where I had never been. Wikidata, yes, I removed some trash over there last week; but MetaWhatever, no. 05:47, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Possible solution- After racking my brain, in 2016 I had (as much as it pains me to describe someone) a skeevy hacker kid living two doors down from me. At the time we were both on the same WiFi network (coffee shop downstairs, unlimited internet $2.25 a day and a free coffee!) For what it's worth, he was just that kind of smartass. Not obnoxious, just smartass. Whatever, it was nothing that wasn't easily fixed and I have new security protocol. I am at the same risk as any other wikipedia editor in that respect. Hamster Sandwich (talk) 06:49, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Compromised account?

A glitch in the WMF software? Maybe. But, considering the fact that a number of accounts have been compromised recently, some of them admin accounts, and considering the manner in which Hamster Sandwich returned to editing (i.e. casually asking for "The Hammer" back at WP:BN), and their very odd response to being turned down (Abrupt messages concludng with "End communication"), has anyone actually looked into the possibility that this is a compromised account? Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Scatches head) He seems to have the same sense of humor he had with this post[3] from 2012, so if he is a new Hamster Sandwich (New Hamster Sandwich would be a great name for a punk band, BTW) he is doing a fine job of imitating the old one. --Guy Macon (talk) 06:44, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly think they should change the name of Dolphin to Ocean Pony. End Communication. Hamster Sandwich (talk) 06:56, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Per your request at WP:PERM, your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright. This allows you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

AGK ■ 12:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings

Hello Hamster Sandwich: From high in the Canadian Arctic I hope you enjoy the holiday season, the Winter or Summer solstice, Quviahugvik, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah or even the Saturnalia, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:00, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adapted from {{Season's Greetings}}

Your thread has been archived

Hi Hamster Sandwich! You created a thread called Newb question. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar lust

	Teahouse Barnstar
	thanks for all the help at WP:TEAHOUSE your wisdom and acceptance is really appreciated! Just don't know how to thank but you're a great editor and personally I do believe you should run for Administrator tenure seriously the level of diligence and calmness is above all again a lot of thanks!!! 182.58.245.48 (talk) 05:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My thanks to you User:182.58.245.48 for your kind words. I wouldn't run for administrator again if I were the last person on earth with a computer, but thanks all the same! As always, I encourage useful IP editors to establish "User credentials" so as to gain some currency as far as good will and recognition by your editing peers. Please do consider it. More positives than negatives involved, by far. Good luck, and happy, trouble free editing! Hamster Sandwich (talk) 05:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hermes 3000

On 7 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hermes 3000, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actor Tom Hanks has claimed that the Hermes 3000 is the one luxury item he would want to have on a desert island? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hermes 3000. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hermes 3000), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

– Ianblair23 (talk) 00:03, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TY very much, and thanks to User:Richie333 for requesting the creation of that article! Best regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 03:48, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019

Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht

Happy 2019

begin it with music and memories

Not too late, I hope ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marie von Erdődy (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please also see WP:REFB to format references correctly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marie von Erdődy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marie von Erdődy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 18:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hamster Sandwich! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 18:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Sith. New users like me appreciate the message. I would have pinged you properly, but your username is very long and takes up too many electrons. I am trying to be frugal... Electrons are a finite resource, which is why (I have surmised) is the actual reason the article you claim is not noteworthy is included in other wiki's. wiki.en should set a good example in saving these precious electrons. Well Done! Regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 12:52, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: It was because the citations weren't inline with the text. I understand now that the German WP is a bit different from here... Notability isn't the issue. It's the refs. My apologies, all 'round as necessary.

Please participate to the talk pages consultation

Hello

Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.

We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.

We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.

Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update

The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.

The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.

Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

For your efforts in joining the discussion in the initial stages that was very helpful in assessing the consensus at Crowd control in Jammu and Kashmir So you deserve a bit of the credit as well. regards. DBig Xrayᗙ 06:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marie von Erdődy has been accepted

Marie von Erdődy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 20:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Foma of the Granfalloon

An empty spot sits
Where a neighbourly door stood -
Warms smells of coffee.

It does not matter
But that does not make it less -
Feelings Arrau leaves.

I don't feel hungry
But I'd come by to say hi.

Teahouse Hosts

Hi there. I just wanted to let you know that I am doing a Teahouse 'spring clean' and have removed your name from the Teahouse Hosts list, as you've not been very active there recently. In fact, your last contribution there was 12 months ago. That doesn't mean you're not welcome to answer questions there at any time in the future, or to sign up again as a Host if your interest reawakens. All the best, Nick Moyes (talk) 15:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]