Jump to content

Talk:Scopolamine: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Relisted requested move using rmCloser
Tag: Reverted
Change to a label in the diagram: Answered edit request
 
(45 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{skip to talk}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}}
{{WikiProject Pharmacology|importance=High}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=C|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs}}
{{WikiProject Hallucinogens|class=start}}
{{WikiProject Altered States of Consciousness|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Altered States of Consciousness|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|class=C|importance=mid}}
}}
}}
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Northeastern_University/ENGW3307_Advanced_Writing_for_the_Sciences_33145_(Spring_2019) | assignments = [[User:Scarito|Scarito]] | start_date = 2019-01-09 | end_date = 2019-04-26 }}
{{Annual readership}}
{{Annual readership}}

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=Talk:Hyoscine/Archives/
|archiveprefix=Talk:Scopolamine/Archive
|header={{automatic archive navigator}}
|archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{resolved|,{{Resolved|,{{done}},{{Done}}</nowiki>
|format=Y
|format= %%i
|age=720
|age=2160|<!--90 days-->
|maxarchsize=100000
|archivebox=yes
|minkeepthreads=4
|box-advert=yes
|numberstart=1
}}
}}


== How is it produced? ==
== The article name should be "Scopolamine" ==

How is scopolamine produced for medical use? Is it derived from plants, or completely produced by chemical processes? Can someone add that to the article? [[User:Jimhoward72|Jimhoward72]] ([[User talk:Jimhoward72|talk]]) 20:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

== Unreliable sources RE: Czech torture and effects? ==

I've been trying to find any actual evidence that scopolamine was used for the explicit purpose of eliciting confessions, as well as any evidence that it actually has such effects, rather than just the standard psychoactive effects? Ever since the Vice documentary, which perpetuated claims that a single dose of dust blown in your face can turn you into a walking zombie, the information around scopolamine's use in crimes seems sketchy.

The source given here on the article, stating that it has been '''proven ''' to have been used in Czechoslovakia is from https://www.idnes.cz/, a czech tabloid. Furthermore, its sources are from witnesses who would understandably not be reliable as to the specifics. Its use as a "truth serum" seems to be debated, seemingly used more in robbings and assaults in developing countries like GHB is used in developed countries. [https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/enwiki/static/Conditioned-Reflex-Drugs-Hypnosis.pdf Contemporary CIA reports] seem to assert that its use was more likely as a sedative or to confuse people - and not as a "truth serum".

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp65-00756r000400020007-9

"There is no evidence that the Communists have effectively or extensively used amytal interviews as a means of extracting confessions, although it is quite probable that they have experimented with this maneuver. The hypnotic drug which is most frequently mentioned as a Communist tool is Scopolamine, a naturally occuring substance long known in medical science. It is one of the ingredients in the "twilight sleep" medication used by obstetricians on women in labor. It, too, has an intoxicating and befuddling effect in small doses, an effect which would be difficult to distinguish from that of the profound fatigue, sleep loss, undernourishment, anxiety and confusion produced by the usual Communist control techniques. '''In every instance in which there is direct evidence that Communist police have given hypnotic and sedative drugs to prisoners, they have administered these drugs for the purpose of calming and relaxing excited and fatigued individuals. American physicians would be likely to use these drugs in a similar manner for the same reason.'''"

I think this article needs solid sourcing, or removing the mention if none exist.

https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/stranger-than-fiction/ [[Special:Contributions/86.21.49.156|86.21.49.156]] ([[User talk:86.21.49.156|talk]]) 10:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

== Use in crime full of speculation and redundant information ==

It would be good to go through this section and clean up citations, redundant information and re-organize for readability. I tried cleaning it up a bit but it really could use a rewrite. [[User:Smarter1|Smarter1]] ([[User talk:Smarter1|talk]]) 05:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

== Change to a label in the diagram ==


{{edit COI|a}}
This article's name should be changed to "Scopolamine" because that is the preferred name internationally, including in the USA, German-speaking world, French-speaking world, and Spanish-speaking world.
<!--Don't remove anything above this line.-->
<blockquote>Alkaloid nomenclature was often the subject of heated and confusing debate, and a particular instance is relevant to the present discussion. "Hyoscine" - first prepared by Albert Ladenburg in 1880 - and "scopolamine" - first isolated by Ernst Schmidt from Scopola species in 1888 [...] - are synonyms, but a colourful controversy regarding their identity raged, especially in Germany, from their discovery until the early twentieth century. Both names continued to be used for many decades, the choice often seemingly dependent on the nationality of the writer, and by the mid-1920s, the name "hyoscine" had largely been abandoned except in England and associated countries [not including the USA!]. (Paul Foley, "Duboisia myoporoides: The Medical Career of a Native Australian Plant", ''Historical Records of Australian Science'' vol. 17(1), p. 31-69, 2006.)</blockquote>
Someone (not I) has typed in a request for a change to labeling in the diagram. This request is at the top of the Talk page, dated May 2024.
- [[User:Wwallacee|Wwallacee]] ([[User talk:Wwallacee|talk]]) 12:14, 28 December 2020 (UTC)


I may have picked the wrong wizard ... I don't have a COI, but I don't know how to make the requested change.
== Requested move 2 January 2021 ==


[[Special:Contributions/174.56.8.205|174.56.8.205]] ([[User talk:174.56.8.205|talk]]) 07:27, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
{{requested move/dated|Scopolamine}}
<!--Don't remove anything below this line-->
:I share your frustrations when it comes to the lack of replies to my topics on some talk pages. I have created numerous topics requesting support for an edit I’m not confident in performing. Though I seem to little support in the form of replies (unless it’s regarding a very active Wiki page). I know there are Wiki backlog logs for certain things waiting to be reviewed, however I haven’t found anything dedicated specifically to open talk page requests… But I digress.
:Regarding your request: I’m far from a chemical compositions expert, but I am confident if you can provide a reliable reference which supports what you’d like to alter, you should have no problem in making the change. [[User:Herenow44|Herenow44]] ([[User talk:Herenow44|talk]]) 08:12, 20 October 2024 (UTC)


:{{notdone}}This article isn't protected and you state no COI, so marking answered. If you are able to make the change with a reference, do so. Otherwise, you may wish to ask at the Tea House for the most appropriate place for assistance with content. I'm sure we have some editors with a scientific interest ''somewhere''. -[[User:OXYLYPSE|OXYLYPSE]] ([[User talk:OXYLYPSE|talk]]) 15:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
[[:Hyoscine]] → {{no redirect|Scopolamine}} – "Scopolamine" is the preferred name of the substance internationally, including in the USA, German-speaking world, French-speaking world, and Spanish-speaking world. Here is some relevant context: 'Alkaloid nomenclature was often the subject of heated and confusing debate, and a particular instance is relevant to the present discussion. "Hyoscine" - first prepared by Albert Ladenburg in 1880 - and "scopolamine" - first isolated by Ernst Schmidt from Scopola species in 1888 [...] - are synonyms, but a colourful controversy regarding their identity raged, especially in Germany, from their discovery until the early twentieth century. Both names continued to be used for many decades, the choice often seemingly dependent on the nationality of the writer, and by the mid-1920s, the name "hyoscine" had largely been abandoned except in England and associated countries [not including the USA].' (Paul Foley, "Duboisia myoporoides: The Medical Career of a Native Australian Plant", ''Historical Records of Australian Science'' vol. 17(1), p. 31-69, 2006.)&nbsp;[[User:Wwallacee|Wwallacee]] ([[User talk:Wwallacee|talk]]) 11:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC) <small>—'''''Relisting.'''''&nbsp;[[User:Jack Frost|Jack Frost]] ([[User talk:Jack Frost|talk]]) 12:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)</small>
:<small>This is a contested technical request ([[Special:Permalink/997862926|permalink]]). [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] ([[User talk:Anthony Appleyard|talk]]) 16:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)</small>
*{{ping|Wwallacee|BegbertBiggs}} queried move request [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] ([[User talk:Anthony Appleyard|talk]]) 16:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
*[[WP:NCMED]] recommends using the INN. ''[[User:BegbertBiggs|BegbertBiggs]]&nbsp;([[User talk:BegbertBiggs|talk]])'' 13:38, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:11, 23 October 2024


How is it produced?

[edit]

How is scopolamine produced for medical use? Is it derived from plants, or completely produced by chemical processes? Can someone add that to the article? Jimhoward72 (talk) 20:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable sources RE: Czech torture and effects?

[edit]

I've been trying to find any actual evidence that scopolamine was used for the explicit purpose of eliciting confessions, as well as any evidence that it actually has such effects, rather than just the standard psychoactive effects? Ever since the Vice documentary, which perpetuated claims that a single dose of dust blown in your face can turn you into a walking zombie, the information around scopolamine's use in crimes seems sketchy.

The source given here on the article, stating that it has been proven to have been used in Czechoslovakia is from https://www.idnes.cz/, a czech tabloid. Furthermore, its sources are from witnesses who would understandably not be reliable as to the specifics. Its use as a "truth serum" seems to be debated, seemingly used more in robbings and assaults in developing countries like GHB is used in developed countries. Contemporary CIA reports seem to assert that its use was more likely as a sedative or to confuse people - and not as a "truth serum".

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp65-00756r000400020007-9

"There is no evidence that the Communists have effectively or extensively used amytal interviews as a means of extracting confessions, although it is quite probable that they have experimented with this maneuver. The hypnotic drug which is most frequently mentioned as a Communist tool is Scopolamine, a naturally occuring substance long known in medical science. It is one of the ingredients in the "twilight sleep" medication used by obstetricians on women in labor. It, too, has an intoxicating and befuddling effect in small doses, an effect which would be difficult to distinguish from that of the profound fatigue, sleep loss, undernourishment, anxiety and confusion produced by the usual Communist control techniques. In every instance in which there is direct evidence that Communist police have given hypnotic and sedative drugs to prisoners, they have administered these drugs for the purpose of calming and relaxing excited and fatigued individuals. American physicians would be likely to use these drugs in a similar manner for the same reason."

I think this article needs solid sourcing, or removing the mention if none exist.

https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/stranger-than-fiction/ 86.21.49.156 (talk) 10:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use in crime full of speculation and redundant information

[edit]

It would be good to go through this section and clean up citations, redundant information and re-organize for readability. I tried cleaning it up a bit but it really could use a rewrite. Smarter1 (talk) 05:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change to a label in the diagram

[edit]

Someone (not I) has typed in a request for a change to labeling in the diagram. This request is at the top of the Talk page, dated May 2024.

I may have picked the wrong wizard ... I don't have a COI, but I don't know how to make the requested change.

174.56.8.205 (talk) 07:27, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I share your frustrations when it comes to the lack of replies to my topics on some talk pages. I have created numerous topics requesting support for an edit I’m not confident in performing. Though I seem to little support in the form of replies (unless it’s regarding a very active Wiki page). I know there are Wiki backlog logs for certain things waiting to be reviewed, however I haven’t found anything dedicated specifically to open talk page requests… But I digress.
Regarding your request: I’m far from a chemical compositions expert, but I am confident if you can provide a reliable reference which supports what you’d like to alter, you should have no problem in making the change. Herenow44 (talk) 08:12, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not doneThis article isn't protected and you state no COI, so marking answered. If you are able to make the change with a reference, do so. Otherwise, you may wish to ask at the Tea House for the most appropriate place for assistance with content. I'm sure we have some editors with a scientific interest somewhere. -OXYLYPSE (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]