Jump to content

Laser beam quality: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation)
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Lasers.jpeg|thumb|Laser beams]]
In [[laser science]], '''laser beam quality''' defines aspects of the beam illumination pattern and the merits of a particular [[laser beam]]'s propagation and transformation properties (space-bandwidth criterion). By observing and recording the beam pattern, for example, one can infer the [[spatial mode]] properties of the beam and whether or not the beam is being clipped by an obstruction; By focusing the laser beam with a [[Lens (optics)|lens]] and measuring the minimum spot size, the number of times [[diffraction limit]] or focusing quality can be computed.
In [[laser science]], '''laser beam quality''' defines aspects of the beam illumination pattern and the merits of a particular [[laser beam]]'s propagation and transformation properties (space-bandwidth criterion). By observing and recording the beam pattern, for example, one can infer the [[spatial mode]] properties of the beam and whether or not the beam is being clipped by an obstruction; By focusing the laser beam with a [[Lens (optics)|lens]] and measuring the minimum spot size, the number of times [[diffraction limit]] or focusing quality can be computed.


[[Anthony E. Siegman]] was the first to propose the formalism for a laser beam quality factor that could be measured and used to compare different beams, independent of [[wavelength]].<ref>{{cite paper |url=http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1006401 |title=Defining, measuring, and optimizing laser beam quality |first=Anthony E. |last=Siegman |journal=Proc. SPIE 1868, Laser Resonators and Coherent Optics: Modeling, Technology, and Applications |volume=2 |date=February 5, 1993 |doi=10.1117/12.150601}}</ref> The factor is called [[M squared|M<sup>2</sup>]], and it is closely related to the [[beam parameter product]]. While the M<sup>2</sup> factor does not give detail on the spatial characteristics of the beam, it does indicate how close it is to being a fundamental-mode [[Gaussian beam]]. It also determines the smallest spot size for the beam, as well as the [[beam divergence]]. M<sup>2</sup> can also give an indication of beam distortions due to, for example, power-induced [[thermal lensing]] in the [[laser gain medium]], since it will increase.
Laser beam quality studies commenced in the 1960s, following the discovery of the laser.<ref>Laser Beam Quality Metrics by T. Sean Ross</ref> The M (mode) factor was introduced to experimentally measure the presence of higher-order modes within a Gaussian-like beam. In early 1970, Larry Marshall <ref>Marshall, Larry, "Applications a la mode," Laser Focus, April 1971</ref> noted, 'Despite variations of intensity cross sections from gaussian shape, it is still convenient to define beam diameter as M times the 1/e^2 diameter of the equivalent gaussian mode'. Anthony E. Siegman significantly advanced this formalism, providing a method that could be measured and used to compare different beams, independent of [[wavelength]].<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1006401 |title=Defining, measuring, and optimizing laser beam quality |first=Anthony E. |last=Siegman |editor-first1=Anup |editor-last1=Bhowmik |journal=Proc. SPIE 1868, Laser Resonators and Coherent Optics: Modeling, Technology, and Applications |series=Laser Resonators and Coherent Optics: Modeling, Technology, and Applications |volume=2 |date=February 5, 1993 |page=2 |doi=10.1117/12.150601|bibcode=1993SPIE.1868....2S |s2cid=73623358 |doi-access= }}</ref> The factor is now called [[M squared|beam propagation ratio (M<sup>2</sup>)]], and it is closely related to the [[beam parameter product]]. While the M<sup>2</sup> factor does not give detail on the spatial characteristics of the beam, it does indicate how close it is to being a fundamental-mode [[Gaussian beam]]. It also determines the smallest spot size for the beam, as well as the [[beam divergence]]. M<sup>2</sup> can also give an indication of beam distortions due to, for example, power-induced [[thermal lensing]] in the [[laser gain medium]], since it will increase.


There are some limitations to the M<sup>2</sup> parameter as a simple quality metric. It can be difficult to measure accurately, and factors such as background noise can create large errors in M<sup>2</sup>.<ref name=Siegman_1997>{{cite paper |first=A. E. |last=Siegman |citeseerx = 10.1.1.177.3400 |title=How to (Maybe) Measure Laser Beam Quality |date=October 1997 }} Tutorial presentation at the Optical Society of America Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California</ref> Beams with power well out in the "tails" of the distribution have M<sup>2</sup> much larger than one would expect. In theory, an idealized tophat laser beam has infinite M<sup>2</sup>, although this is not true of any physically realizable tophat beam. For a pure [[Bessel beam]], one cannot even compute M<sup>2</sup>.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://webusers.fis.uniroma3.it/~ottica/sant/pubs/Max035.pdf |title=M<sup>2</sup> factor of Bessel–Gauss beams |first1=R. |last1=Borghi |first2=M. |last2=Santarsiero |journal=Optics Letters |volume=22 |issue=5 |date=March 1, 1997|doi=10.1364/ol.22.000262 |bibcode = 1997OptL...22..262B }}</ref>
There are some limitations to the M<sup>2</sup> parameter as a simple quality metric. It can be difficult to measure accurately, and factors such as background noise can create large errors in M<sup>2</sup>.<ref name=Siegman_1997>{{cite CiteSeerX |first=A. E. |last=Siegman |citeseerx = 10.1.1.177.3400 |title=How to (Maybe) Measure Laser Beam Quality |date=October 1997 }} Tutorial presentation at the Optical Society of America Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California</ref> Beams with power well out in the "tails" of the distribution have M<sup>2</sup> much larger than one would expect. In theory, an idealized [[tophat beam|tophat laser beam]] has infinite M<sup>2</sup>, although this is not true of any physically realizable tophat beam. For a pure [[Bessel beam]], one cannot even compute M<sup>2</sup>.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://webusers.fis.uniroma3.it/~ottica/sant/pubs/Max035.pdf |title=M<sup>2</sup> factor of Bessel–Gauss beams |first1=R. |last1=Borghi |first2=M. |last2=Santarsiero |journal=Optics Letters |volume=22 |issue=5 |date=March 1, 1997|pages=262–264 |doi=10.1364/ol.22.000262 |pmid=18183169 |bibcode = 1997OptL...22..262B }}</ref>


The definition of "quality" also depends on the application. While a high-quality single-mode Gaussian beam (M<sup>2</sup> close to unity) is optimum for many applications, for other applications a uniform multimode [[tophat beam]] intensity distribution is required. An example is [[laser surgery]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Current Concepts in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Oculoplastic Surgery, |editor1-first = Constance L. | editor1-last = Fry | editor2-first = Alan R. | editor2-last = Faulkner.}}</ref>
The definition of "quality" also depends on the application. While a high-quality single-mode Gaussian beam (M<sup>2</sup> close to unity) is optimum for many applications, for other applications a uniform multimode [[tophat beam]] intensity distribution is required. An example is [[laser surgery]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Current Concepts in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Oculoplastic Surgery |editor1-first = Constance L. | editor1-last = Fry | editor2-first = Alan R. | editor2-last = Faulkner.}}</ref>


Power-in-the-bucket and Strehl ratio are two other attempts to define beam quality. Both these methods use a [[Laser beam profiler]] to measure how much power is delivered to a given area. There is also no simple conversion between M<sup>2</sup>, power-in-the-bucket, and Strehl ratio.
Power-in-the-bucket and [[Strehl ratio]] are two other attempts to define beam quality. Both these methods use a [[laser beam profiler]] to measure how much power is delivered to a given area. There is also no simple conversion between M<sup>2</sup>, power-in-the-bucket, and Strehl ratio.


==M<sup>2</sup> definitions==
==M<sup>2</sup> definitions==
Line 13: Line 14:
[[Image:M2definition.gif|thumb|403px|right|M<sup>2</sup> definition]]
[[Image:M2definition.gif|thumb|403px|right|M<sup>2</sup> definition]]


The [[equation]] for the [[Beam divergence|divergence]], of a pure [[Gaussian beam|Gaussian]] TEM<sub>00</sub> unfocused beam propagating through space is given by
The [[equation]] for the [[Beam divergence|divergence]] of a pure [[Gaussian beam|Gaussian]] TEM<sub>00</sub> unfocused beam propagating through space is given by
:<math>\Theta_{00}={4\lambda \over \pi D_{00}}</math>, (1)
:<math>\Theta_{00}={4\lambda \over \pi D_{00}}</math>, (1)


Line 31: Line 32:


The multiple measurements ensure that the minimum beam diameter is found and enable a "curve fit" that improves the accuracy of the calculation by minimizing measurement error.
The multiple measurements ensure that the minimum beam diameter is found and enable a "curve fit" that improves the accuracy of the calculation by minimizing measurement error.

==See also==
*[[Laser beam profiler]]
*[[M squared]]
*[[Beam parameter product]]
*[[Strehl ratio]]
*[[Beam divergence]]
*[[Gaussian beam]
*[[Tophat beam]]


== References ==
== References ==

Latest revision as of 05:36, 19 August 2024

Laser beams

In laser science, laser beam quality defines aspects of the beam illumination pattern and the merits of a particular laser beam's propagation and transformation properties (space-bandwidth criterion). By observing and recording the beam pattern, for example, one can infer the spatial mode properties of the beam and whether or not the beam is being clipped by an obstruction; By focusing the laser beam with a lens and measuring the minimum spot size, the number of times diffraction limit or focusing quality can be computed.

Laser beam quality studies commenced in the 1960s, following the discovery of the laser.[1] The M (mode) factor was introduced to experimentally measure the presence of higher-order modes within a Gaussian-like beam. In early 1970, Larry Marshall [2] noted, 'Despite variations of intensity cross sections from gaussian shape, it is still convenient to define beam diameter as M times the 1/e^2 diameter of the equivalent gaussian mode'. Anthony E. Siegman significantly advanced this formalism, providing a method that could be measured and used to compare different beams, independent of wavelength.[3] The factor is now called beam propagation ratio (M2), and it is closely related to the beam parameter product. While the M2 factor does not give detail on the spatial characteristics of the beam, it does indicate how close it is to being a fundamental-mode Gaussian beam. It also determines the smallest spot size for the beam, as well as the beam divergence. M2 can also give an indication of beam distortions due to, for example, power-induced thermal lensing in the laser gain medium, since it will increase.

There are some limitations to the M2 parameter as a simple quality metric. It can be difficult to measure accurately, and factors such as background noise can create large errors in M2.[4] Beams with power well out in the "tails" of the distribution have M2 much larger than one would expect. In theory, an idealized tophat laser beam has infinite M2, although this is not true of any physically realizable tophat beam. For a pure Bessel beam, one cannot even compute M2.[5]

The definition of "quality" also depends on the application. While a high-quality single-mode Gaussian beam (M2 close to unity) is optimum for many applications, for other applications a uniform multimode tophat beam intensity distribution is required. An example is laser surgery.[6]

Power-in-the-bucket and Strehl ratio are two other attempts to define beam quality. Both these methods use a laser beam profiler to measure how much power is delivered to a given area. There is also no simple conversion between M2, power-in-the-bucket, and Strehl ratio.

M2 definitions

[edit]
M2 definition

The equation for the divergence of a pure Gaussian TEM00 unfocused beam propagating through space is given by

, (1)

where D00 is the diameter of the beam waist, and λ is the wavelength. Higher mode beams often start with a larger beam waist, D0, and/or have a faster divergence Θ0. In this case Equation (1) becomes

, (2)

where Θ0 and D0 are the divergence and waist of a higher mode beam and M2 is greater than 1 and is named the "Beam Propagation Ratio" per the ISO 11146 standard. When a Gaussian laser beam is focused, the focused spot diameter is defined by

, (3)

where d00 is the ideal focused spot diameter, f is the focal length of the focusing lens, and D00 is the input beam waist and is placed one focal length from the lens as shown in the figure. However, when a multimode beam is focused, Equation (3) becomes

. (4)

M2 measurement

[edit]

M2 cannot be determined from a single beam profile measurement. The ISO/DIS 11146 define that M2 should be calculated from a series of measurements as shown in the figure below.[7] M2 is measured on real beams by focusing the beam with a fixed position lens of known focal length, and then measuring the characteristics of the beam waist and divergence. These measurements can be taken with a laser beam profiler.[8]

Measurement positions for obtaining M2

The multiple measurements ensure that the minimum beam diameter is found and enable a "curve fit" that improves the accuracy of the calculation by minimizing measurement error.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Laser Beam Quality Metrics by T. Sean Ross
  2. ^ Marshall, Larry, "Applications a la mode," Laser Focus, April 1971
  3. ^ Siegman, Anthony E. (February 5, 1993). Bhowmik, Anup (ed.). "Defining, measuring, and optimizing laser beam quality". Proc. SPIE 1868, Laser Resonators and Coherent Optics: Modeling, Technology, and Applications. Laser Resonators and Coherent Optics: Modeling, Technology, and Applications. 2: 2. Bibcode:1993SPIE.1868....2S. doi:10.1117/12.150601. S2CID 73623358.
  4. ^ Siegman, A. E. (October 1997). "How to (Maybe) Measure Laser Beam Quality". CiteSeerX 10.1.1.177.3400. Tutorial presentation at the Optical Society of America Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California
  5. ^ Borghi, R.; Santarsiero, M. (March 1, 1997). "M2 factor of Bessel–Gauss beams" (PDF). Optics Letters. 22 (5): 262–264. Bibcode:1997OptL...22..262B. doi:10.1364/ol.22.000262. PMID 18183169.
  6. ^ Fry, Constance L.; Faulkner., Alan R. (eds.). Current Concepts in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Oculoplastic Surgery.
  7. ^ ISO 11146:2005(E), "Lasers and laser-related equipment — Test methods for laser beam widths, divergence angles and beam propagation ratios".
  8. ^ G. Langer et al., A webcam in Bayer-mode as a light beam profiler for the near infra-red, Optics and Lasers in Engineering 51 (2013) 571–575