Talk:COVID-19 vaccination in Australia: Difference between revisions
→Second doses: new section |
m Replacing Template:Ds/talk notice with Template:Contentious topics/talk notice. BRFA. |
||
(53 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{ |
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|covid}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| |
|||
{{WPBS| |
|||
{{WikiProject Australia |
{{WikiProject Australia|importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject COVID-19 |
{{WikiProject COVID-19|importance=mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Disaster management |
{{WikiProject Disaster management|importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Viruses |
{{WikiProject Viruses|importance=mid}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Annual readership}} |
|||
== Status numbers == |
|||
The article cites the vaccine tracker, which shows the vaccination rate at 70.8%. Yet, there are two status of 92% and 80.5%. What are these numbers? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kallax|Kallax]] ([[User talk:Kallax#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kallax|contribs]]) 22:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== flags == |
|||
:{{ping|Kallax}}, Can you please elaborate on which status numbers you are talking about? Thanks [[User:Lucifer Jatt|Lucifer Jatt]] ([[User talk:Lucifer Jatt|talk]]) 03:25, 26 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Is there any good reason we are using: |
|||
* {{tlx|ListFlag|Flag of the Australian Capital Territory.svg|28px}}<nowiki>[[Australian Capital Territory]]</nowiki>, rendering as {{ListFlag|Flag of the Australian Capital Territory.svg|28px}} [[Australian Capital Territory]] |
|||
rather than the rather simpler, shorter: |
|||
* {{tlx|flag|Australian Capital Territory}}, rendering as {{flag|Australian Capital Territory}} <br> |
|||
in the table in the [[COVID-19 vaccination in Australia#Vaccination rollout by states and territory|Vaccination rollout by states and territory]] section? <br> |
|||
The only diff I can see is the flag is a ''little'' smaller done the second way. [[user:220 of Borg|'''220''']] [[Special:Contributions/220 of Borg|''<small>of</small>'']] <sup>[[User talk:220 of Borg|''ßorg'']]</sup> 04:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: {{Ping|220 of Borg}} I've just removed the flags anyways since they violate [[MOS:FLAGRELEVANCE]] - this article has nothing to do with the actual regionality of Australia, so I don't believe sub-national flags should be used. I may be wrong though, so feel free to revert and change it to {{Tl|Flag}}. [[User:ItsPugle|ItsPugle]] <small>(please [[:Template:ping|ping]] on reply)</small> 04:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::{{ping|ItsPugle}} No, I thought that they were misplaced was likely too. They just looked messy IMHO. Too ''many'' flags used, too many flag ''templates'' too IMHO, again. <br>The 'ListFlag' version isn't used much, <200? the other, over 550,000! [[user:220 of Borg|'''220''']] [[Special:Contributions/220 of Borg|''<small>of</small>'']] <sup>[[User talk:220 of Borg|''ßorg'']]</sup> 05:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== |
== Choice of first dose scale in graph == |
||
The scale goes from zero to 12M+ in increments of 2 million. The highest population of a state or territory is ~8 million (NSW), so it's not possible to reach 10M, 12M, or 12M+ in any state or territory. --[[User:TheElysianVectorFields|The Elysian Vector Fields]] ([[User talk:TheElysianVectorFields|talk]]) 23:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
What do you think about matching the figures in the vaccine graphs to this source? -> https://covidlive.com.au/report/daily-vaccinations/aus [[User:HelperAnt|HelperAnt]] ([[User talk:HelperAnt|talk]]) 13:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:Its cumulative vaccination figures do not represent the first dose figures. I hope this will clear your concerns. [[User:Lucifer Jatt|Lucifer Jatt]] ([[User talk:Lucifer Jatt|talk]]) 04:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Second doses == |
|||
== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion == |
|||
Also do you think some of the doses included in the totals are second doses and do you think any sources are distinguishing them as first/second doses? [[User:HelperAnt|HelperAnt]] ([[User talk:HelperAnt|talk]]) 01:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC) |
|||
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: |
|||
* [[commons:File:Australian Government Digital COVID-19 Vaccination Certificate Sample 20210604.png|Australian Government Digital COVID-19 Vaccination Certificate Sample 20210604.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2023-01-12T11:37:18.179265 | Australian Government Digital COVID-19 Vaccination Certificate Sample 20210604.png --> |
|||
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Australian Government Digital COVID-19 Vaccination Certificate Sample 20210604.png|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 11:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:00, 22 March 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the COVID-19 vaccination in Australia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Status numbers
[edit]The article cites the vaccine tracker, which shows the vaccination rate at 70.8%. Yet, there are two status of 92% and 80.5%. What are these numbers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kallax (talk • contribs) 22:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Kallax:, Can you please elaborate on which status numbers you are talking about? Thanks Lucifer Jatt (talk) 03:25, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Choice of first dose scale in graph
[edit]The scale goes from zero to 12M+ in increments of 2 million. The highest population of a state or territory is ~8 million (NSW), so it's not possible to reach 10M, 12M, or 12M+ in any state or territory. --The Elysian Vector Fields (talk) 23:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Its cumulative vaccination figures do not represent the first dose figures. I hope this will clear your concerns. Lucifer Jatt (talk) 04:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- B-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- B-Class COVID-19 articles
- Mid-importance COVID-19 articles
- WikiProject COVID-19 articles
- B-Class Disaster management articles
- Low-importance Disaster management articles
- B-Class virus articles
- Mid-importance virus articles
- WikiProject Viruses articles