User talk:EdJohnston: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Generalsagar (talk | contribs) |
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) OneClickArchived "Is this an adequate source?" to User talk:EdJohnston/Archive 53 |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{checkuser topicon|cat=yes}} |
{{checkuser topicon|cat=yes}} |
||
__FORCETOC__ |
__FORCETOC__ |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
||
|counter = |
|counter = 53 |
||
|algo = old(10d) |
|algo = old(10d) |
||
|archive = User talk:EdJohnston/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = User talk:EdJohnston/Archive %(counter)d |
||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{archives|search=yes}} |
{{archives|search=yes|auto=yes}} |
||
== Request for unprotecting [[Vaticinium ex eventu]] == |
|||
Dear EdJohnston, you recently EC protected {{pagelinks|Vaticinium ex eventu}} as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive432#User%3ARusdo_reported_by_User%3ATgeorgescu_%28Result%3A_EC_protected%29 result of edit-warring]. However, the content dispute which triggered the edit war has since been resolved, and constructive editors have already [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vaticinium_ex_eventu&curid=64966350&diff=1021309984&oldid=1021301189 found themselves] unable to edit the page. Would you consider unprotecting it? Thanks, [[User:Apaugasma|Apaugasma]] ([[User talk:Apaugasma|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Apaugasma|contribs]]) 01:07, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:I'll accept your assurance that an agreement has been reached at [[Talk:Vaticinium ex eventu]], though it is not easy to figure that out. Protection has been reduced to semi. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston#top|talk]]) 01:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Revert == |
|||
Ok, I agree to make no more reverts on English wikipedia articles I have previously edited without consensus first , but I am able to revert if the changes is confirmed to be vandalism right? or will I not be able to revert any article even if I see destructive edit [[User:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:red">🐲</span> <span style="color: blue">ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:green">ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) </span>]]</sup> 19:32, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:: I was asking only , I get it no revert from me under any circumstance right? [[User:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:red">🐲</span> <span style="color: blue">ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:green">ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) </span>]]</sup> 19:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Concern with an editor == |
|||
{{user|Varenx101}} |
|||
This editor has been edit warring over 3 articles for over a week(including logging out to continue edit warring)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/106.201.124.71]. Considering this editor has chosen not to use the talk page, there is no way to understand why they are removing references and referenced information. |
|||
The 3 articles are: |
|||
*[[Maurya Empire]] |
|||
*[[List of largest empires in India]] |
|||
*[[Gupta Empire]] |
|||
Perhaps you can help with this issue? --[[User:Kansas Bear|Kansas Bear]] ([[User talk:Kansas Bear|talk]]) 01:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== about delhi dynamos redirecting odisha fc == |
|||
here's a link. Delhi Dynamos should have its page where all the records under delhi dynamos is there. odisha fc should have a separate page where only record under the name of odisha fc should be there. here's a link |
|||
https://m.timesofindia.com/sports/football/indian-super-league/top-stories/odisha-gets-its-own-isl-football-club-as-delhi-dynamos-shift-base-to-bhubaneswar/amp_articleshow/70928674.cms [[User:Imsamrat392|Imsamrat392]] ([[User talk:Imsamrat392|talk]]) 05:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Edit-warring == |
|||
*{{userlinks|Luwanglinux}} |
|||
I understood that you chose to not sanction Luwanglinux [[User_talk:Luwanglinux#You_are_risking_a_block_for_long-term_edit_warring|concomitant to his agreement of not reverting any editor on S. Asian topics]]. Hours after such a commitment, he is back to his usual ways over [[History of Manipur]]. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 10:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:It is impossible to reach a consensus by discussing with him, as {{ping|Kautilya3}} noted in the edit-war-noticeboard. He is using computer-science journals/poems/fringe non-indexed journals to push fringe views that are rejected by modern historians! [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 10:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:: The latest [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=History_of_Manipur&type=revision&diff=1021534194&oldid=1021462009#Puya_Meithaba_(_Burning_of_Puya_) addition] seems milder than what might have been there before, though it is well short of an NPOV treatment. |
|||
:: I agree that he should have agreed the content with you on the talk page before putting it into the mainspace. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 11:27, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::: I agree with {{U|Kautilya3|you}}. He has [[Puya Meithaba ( Burning of Puya )|now created a new article]], by [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Puya_Meithaba_(_Burning_of_Puya_)&diff=1021537177&oldid=1021534817 copying] the ''same'' content (check the edit summary) which I had disputed and removed over [[History of Manipur]]. I propose that this be considered as an ''indirect'' way of edit-warring. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 11:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::Since my negotiation with [[User:Luwanglinux]] on their talk page was not successful, I went ahead with a one week block, per my [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User%3ALuwanglinux_reported_by_User%3ATrangaBellam_%28Result%3A_Blocked%29 closure of the AN3 complaint]. Just today I became aware that they also have a block history. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston#top|talk]]) 16:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== A barnstar for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png|100px]] |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for the blocks and protection. '''[[User:-Zai-|<span style="color: #1ec1fc;">Zai</span>]]''' <sup>([[User talk:-Zai-|💬]] • [[Special:Contributions/-Zai-|📝]] • [[Special:UserRights/-Zai-|⚡️]])</sup> 18:35, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
== Unprotection == |
|||
Hello, back in January 2017 you semi-protected [[TVXQ]] to indefinite. However, nowadays I don't think semi is necessary anymore given the relatively low level of editing on the page. <span style="background:deepskyblue;padding:0.5px 10px;font-size:14px">[[User:Nkon21|<span style="color:azure">ɴᴋᴏɴ21</span>]] <span style="color:navy;letter-spacing:-2px">❯❯❯</span> [[User talk:Nkon21|<span style="color:#E4E4E2">talk</span>]]</span> 21:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:The page on the musical group [[TVXQ]] is still getting 30,000 views per month. You may notice from [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=TVXQ viewing the log] that the page has needed semiprotection many times in the past. I would keep the protection, but you can appeal if you want at [[WP:RFUP]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston#top|talk]]) 23:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Thankful message == |
|||
Thank you for blocking TWCZane and zack, They deserved it for abusing multiple accounts. Your a good admin. [[User:Scottlover20248|Scottlover20248]] ([[User talk:Scottlover20248|talk]]) 19:43, 12 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Was it because they all had the same name. [[User:Scottlover20248|Scottlover20248]] ([[User talk:Scottlover20248|talk]]) 19:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:It seemed likely from behavior and it was also confirmed by checkuser, See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TWCZack/Archive]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston#top|talk]]) 01:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Mindless edit warring == |
|||
Despite your warning,[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Generalsagar&diff=1022259983&oldid=1021891187] Generalsagar is still edit warring and resorting to bad faith personal attack.[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=1023075387] I think an indef page block is the least you should do for editor. [[User:Srijanx22|Srijanx22]] ([[User_talk:Srijanx22|talk]]) 11:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Update regarding Topic-Ban Observance == |
|||
== PR Edit Warring by Srijanx22 == |
|||
I once again momentarily forgot about my lede image ban and reverted a change to a picture I had uploaded as the lede image for [[Hideki Tojo]]. It literally occurred to me at the last moment before making said revert that what I was about to do might violate my topic ban. However, by the time it fully registered, the change had already been made. I have since reverted said change. While I am inclined to ask you to show leniency, I realize I asked you to dismiss a similar occurence around a month ago so I will leave it to your discretion regarding whether further sanctions are warranted. [[User:Emiya1980|Emiya1980]] ([[User talk:Emiya1980|talk]]) 03:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
This user named [[User:Srijanx22|Srijanx22]] appears to be a part of Modi's PR machinery, and is repeatedly removing [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=1023075387] the facts related to criticism of Modi holding election rallies - which in fact made the situation worse in the country. This is a fact which the readers must know. This user Srijanx22 is engaging in edit warring. |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:08, 29 December 2024
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Update regarding Topic-Ban Observance
[edit]I once again momentarily forgot about my lede image ban and reverted a change to a picture I had uploaded as the lede image for Hideki Tojo. It literally occurred to me at the last moment before making said revert that what I was about to do might violate my topic ban. However, by the time it fully registered, the change had already been made. I have since reverted said change. While I am inclined to ask you to show leniency, I realize I asked you to dismiss a similar occurence around a month ago so I will leave it to your discretion regarding whether further sanctions are warranted. Emiya1980 (talk) 03:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)