Accessibility of United States state law: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Add: date, title. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by BrownHairedGirl | Linked from User:BrownHairedGirl/Articles_with_bare_links | #UCB_webform_linked 134/2167 |
redirect to Edict of government Tag: New redirect |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT [[Edict of government#Basis in public policy]] {{R from merge}} {{R to section}} |
|||
In the [[United States]], some [[State governments of the United States|state governments]] and legal [[publishing|publishers]] claim [[copyright]] of public laws or certain publications of public laws. It has long been established that [[edicts of government]] are not to be subject to [[Copyright law of the United States|copyright]] protection in the U.S., but copyright protection for the selection and arrangement of published law may remain possible, at least in some jurisdictions.<ref name=CanStates>{{cite web|last1=Armstrong|first1=Tim|title=Can States Copyright Their Statutes?|url=https://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/04/16/can-states-copyright-their-statutes/|website=Info/Law|accessdate=12 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151108205414/http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/04/16/can-states-copyright-their-statutes/|archive-date=8 November 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name=DMLP>{{cite web|last1=Bayard|first1=Sam|title=Oregon Claims Copyright in Its Statutes -- Well, Sort Of|url=http://www.dmlp.org/blog/2008/oregon-claims-copyright-its-statutes-well-sort|website=Digital Media Law Project|accessdate=12 November 2015}}</ref> The primary incentive for state governments is the ability to charge for copies of the law or legal annotations. This is a list of the hindrances to [[accessibility]], copyright or otherwise, on the [[Code_(law)|legal codes]] of U.S. states. |
|||
==Georgia and copyright litigation== |
|||
In 2015, [[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]] sued activist [[Carl Malamud]] of [[Public.Resource.Org]] for distributing the [[Official Code of Georgia Annotated]]. Public.Resource.Org countersued, seeking a ruling that the works are public-domain material that is not subject to copyright, pointing out that the Official Code of Georgia Annotated is that state's only official code and constituted the authoritative source of law in the state. The [[United States federal district court|district court]] ruled in favor of the state, but in 2018 the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit]] reversed that ruling, holding that because the [[Georgia Legislature]] had designated the material as the "official codification" of the state laws, "The resulting work is intrinsically public domain material, belonging to the People, and, as such, must be free for publication by all. As a result, no valid copyright can subsist in these works."<ref>Kate Brumback, [https://web.archive.org/web/20181022230414/https://www.miamiherald.com/news/business/article220445415.html Court: Annotations to Georgia law not protected by copyright], Associated Press (October 22, 2018).</ref> |
|||
==Oregon's dispute with Justia== |
|||
In April 2008, [[Oregon]] asked [[Justia]] to remove copies of the Oregon code from its website, citing that the particular publication of the law, as distinguished by features like introductory paragraphs and page numbers, was copyrighted. Following negative media attention, the state issued a special waiver promising not to enforce the copyright against Justia or Public.Resource.org, but did not change its policies regarding the accessibility of its laws to others.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2008/04/oregon-publishing-our-laws-online-is-a-copyright-violation/|title = Oregon: Publishing our laws online is a copyright violation|date = 17 April 2008}}</ref> |
|||
==References== |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
[[Category:United States law]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 03:51, 23 February 2024
Redirect to:
- From a merge: This is a redirect from a page that was merged into another page. This redirect was kept in order to preserve the edit history of this page after its content was merged into the content of the target page. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated) or delete this page.
- For redirects with substantive page histories that did not result from page merges use {{R with history}} instead.
- To a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section of a page on the subject. For redirects to embedded anchors on a page, use {{R to anchor}} instead.