Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hikarunix (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Hikarunix. |
Filelakeshoe (talk | contribs) →Hikarunix: Closed as redirect (XFDcloser) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''redirect''' to [[Damn Small Linux]]. As content has been merged, this is necessary to preserve the page history. – [[user:filelakeshoe|filelakeshoe]] ([[user talk:filelakeshoe|t]] / [[special:contributions/filelakeshoe|c]]) [[user:filelakeshoe/kocour|🐱]] 09:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
===[[:Hikarunix]]=== |
===[[:Hikarunix]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} |
|||
<div class="infobox" style="width:33%">AfDs for this article: |
<div class="infobox" style="width:33%">AfDs for this article: |
||
{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hikarunix}} |
{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hikarunix}} |
||
</div> |
</div> |
||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
:{{la|1=Hikarunix}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hikarunix (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 September |
:{{la|1=Hikarunix}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hikarunix (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 September 9#{{anchorencode:Hikarunix}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Hikarunix}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Hikarunix}}) |
||
Niche Linux distribution. AfD in 2007 makes PROD not valid, so here we go. My rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (software)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 01:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC) |
Niche Linux distribution. AfD in 2007 makes PROD not valid, so here we go. My rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (software)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 01:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 01:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 01:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)</small> |
||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
|||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 03:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></div> |
|||
*'''Delete''', no significant independent coverage located on a search. 2007 really was a different time, wasn't it? Look at those "keep" comments. Anarchy. 07:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Delete''', agree, this seems to have been a maybe one person project from around 2005. Sixteen years later it never met notability levels. I added half a sentence of prose to the [[Damn Small Linux]] article cited to two sources from this one, which is probably all it mwerits: a quick mention in another article. [[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] ([[User talk:W Nowicki|talk]]) 16:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*:@[[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] In this case, maybe a redirect to the DSL article? <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 06:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::That would be fine too, considering this as using the merge process instead of a pure delete. As I recall one reason for not doing an redirect (without protection at least) would be to avoid someone with an agenda from expanding it into an article again, but that is probably not going to happen since this one is so far in the past. On the other hand, the redirect would not serve much use, since a search would turn up the mention anyway. [[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] ([[User talk:W Nowicki|talk]]) 20:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 09:10, 17 September 2021
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Damn Small Linux. As content has been merged, this is necessary to preserve the page history. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 09:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hikarunix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Niche Linux distribution. AfD in 2007 makes PROD not valid, so here we go. My rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, no significant independent coverage located on a search. 2007 really was a different time, wasn't it? Look at those "keep" comments. Anarchy. 07:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, agree, this seems to have been a maybe one person project from around 2005. Sixteen years later it never met notability levels. I added half a sentence of prose to the Damn Small Linux article cited to two sources from this one, which is probably all it mwerits: a quick mention in another article. W Nowicki (talk) 16:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @W Nowicki In this case, maybe a redirect to the DSL article? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- That would be fine too, considering this as using the merge process instead of a pure delete. As I recall one reason for not doing an redirect (without protection at least) would be to avoid someone with an agenda from expanding it into an article again, but that is probably not going to happen since this one is so far in the past. On the other hand, the redirect would not serve much use, since a search would turn up the mention anyway. W Nowicki (talk) 20:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.