Talk:Persecution of Hindus: Difference between revisions
(902 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header |search=yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Hinduism|class=B|importance=mid}} |
|||
{{Controversial}} |
|||
{{Indian English}} |
|||
{{oldafdfull|date=[[24 August]] [[2007]]|page=Persecution of Christians}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| |
|||
{{WikiProject Hinduism|importance=mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Mid|Interfaith=yes|InterfaithImp=}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject India|importance=mid|assess-date=April 2012}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Pakistan|importance=mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Bangladesh|class=C|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ipa|long}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|||
|counter = 3 |
|||
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
|algo = old(900d) |
|||
|archive = Talk:Persecution of Hindus/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
}} |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 24 December, 2021 == |
|||
Though have heard about it not much references.npov definately contested. |
|||
[[User:Calvinkrishy|Calvinkrishy]] 10:29, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC) |
|||
source news sites http://us.rediff.com/news/2005/aug/13guest1.htm |
|||
The following addition to "Mughal" section was removed without due reasoning, |
|||
==Longest and Largest Holocaust== |
|||
There are however reports of [[Akbar]] plundering temples and defacing hindu idols after his conquest of [[Chittoor]].<ref name="HinduProsecutionDetails">{{cite book|author=R. Montgomery Martin|year=1860|title=The History Of The Indian Empire - Volume I |url=https://archive.org/details/TheHistoryOfTheIndianEmpire-VolumeI/page/110/mode/2up |publisher=LONDON PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY|page=111}}</ref> Subsequent Mughal Rulers like [[Shah Jahan]] are also reported to have demolished temples, broken down hindu idols and killed Brahmins during his rule.<ref name="HinduProsecutionDetails2">{{cite book|author=R. Montgomery Martin|year=1860|title=The History Of The Indian Empire - Volume I |url=https://archive.org/details/TheHistoryOfTheIndianEmpire-VolumeI/page/110/mode/2up |publisher=LONDON PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY|page=129}}</ref> |
|||
The massacre and slaughter of Hindus has been going on since the raids of Ghazni and Ghori till today. The holocaust of Jews was inconspicuous compared to the killings of hundred of millions of Hindus for about a millennium. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/202.141.12.195|202.141.12.195]] ([[User talk:202.141.12.195|talk]]) 10:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
|||
{{Reflist-talk}} |
|||
== Semi protected edit request 01/06/2023 , Misinformation in Article == |
|||
== Needs a total rewrite == |
|||
There is much misinfo in this article ,for example much of the list of massacres shown on the incidents list , are not due to anti hindu religious violence such as the killing of bengali hindus in assam , this was done by assamese hindus and was a ethnic violence, furthermore other cases are political rather than religious like the murder of shanti kali. Most of the evidence has been blown out of proportion to make it seem like hinduphobia is rampant in india which is far from the truth .The article focuses way more on killings of hindus in india espcially historical ones which have been taken out of context and lacks information of actual relevant hinduphobia that happens in pakistan ,bangladesh and afghanistan. [[Special:Contributions/81.104.76.253|81.104.76.253]] ([[User talk:81.104.76.253|talk]]) 09:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
A secular account of the persecution and ethnic cleansing against Hindus is greatly needed, however it should be written from a neutral point of view. Things like "it is sad that" and various metaphors and analogies throughout the article need to go, and more history and worldly information needs to be included. [[User:LucaviX]] |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 22 July 2023 == |
|||
{{edit semi-protected|Persecution of Hindus|answered=y}} |
|||
: Here's some for you: |
|||
Please revert [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Persecution_of_Hindus&diff=prev&oldid=1166614787 this unexplained deletion], made with the misleading edit summary "facebook not a reliable source". [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23EE:19C8:BA81:48C:2DFF:FEC5:9914|2A00:23EE:19C8:BA81:48C:2DFF:FEC5:9914]] ([[User talk:2A00:23EE:19C8:BA81:48C:2DFF:FEC5:9914|talk]]) 20:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
http://hinduwebsite.com/history/holocaust.htm |
|||
{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp -->, with some modifications for better coherence with actual source (India Today): |
|||
: Also, you can link to Wikipedia articles on Aurangzeb, the greatest tyrant in Indian history who created a military industrial complex centered around the slaughter of hindus. However, given the fact that most wikipedia moderators are westerners, I doubt that they would extend the courtesy of the truth to a hindu. |
|||
{{tq|In September 2017, ''[[India Today]]'' reported that mass graves with bodies of 45 Hindus had been found in Rakhine, and that Hindu Rohingyas faced [[Forced conversion|forced conversions]] to Islam in Bangladeshi refugee camps at the hands of Muslim Rohingyas.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/video/hindu-rohingya-refugees-islam-bangladesh-camps-1069376-2017-09-26|title=Hindu Rohingya refugees forced to convert to Islam in Bangladesh camps|website=India Today|access-date=20 January 2019}}</ref>}} |
|||
{{talk-ref}} |
|||
[[User:Xan747|Xan747]] ([[User talk:Xan747|talk]]) 23:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 30 August 2023 == |
|||
: Also, I find it interesting that any article vilifying the haters of hinduism and exposing their agenda of destroying us is tagged as "disputed NPOV", but similar articles about the persecution of Jews and Christians with the same obvious biases are praised and displayed proudly by wikipedia moderators. It seems NPOV does not apply to the white man, only for us "Mud people". |
|||
[[Subhash Bose]] |
|||
{{Edit semi-protected|Persecution of Hindus|answered=yes}} |
|||
: I changed the tag of the article from Factual dispute to cleanup requirement. I did this because the factual accuracy of the persecution of Hindus is well documented by the CIA world human rights report (Google for it & look up Bangladesh). It is true, that the article is not of good quality and needs to be changed. I'm working on a draft with bibiliography and will post it soon. [[USer: Subhash Bose]] |
|||
Change "According to Teotónio de Souza, Hindus faced some persecution along with some fortitude under the Portuguese in Goa." to "According to P. P. Shirodkar, Hindus faced some persecution along with some fortitude under the Portuguese in Goa." The cited source is available on Google Books, that chapter of the book was written by P. P. Shirodkar and not Teotónio de Souza. The second mention of Teotónio de Souza at the end of the same paragraph also has to be changed to P. P. Shirodkar, for the same reason. [[Special:Contributions/49.15.230.55|49.15.230.55]] ([[User talk:49.15.230.55|talk]]) 08:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Pinchme123|Pinchme123]] ([[User talk:Pinchme123|talk]]) 04:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Lead changes == |
|||
== How about making it a comprehensive article == |
|||
You need to have consensus. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 09:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
The Hare Krishna movement is being subjected to religious persecution in Russia. Their requests for allocation of land for temple construction have been denied by the Russian government. To add insult to injury, vile abuses were heaped upon the person of Lord Krishna by bigoted clergman of [http://www.christianaggression.org/item_display.php?type=ARTICLES&id=1136261324 Russian Orthodox church]. Should we also include a topic on this page which talks about the operational issues faced by the sect. This would be especially relevant considering the fact that this sect has more non-Indian devotees and major operation outside India. |
|||
* ''Here is a proposed version of the lead with widely accepted information from High quality WP:RS sources. Please [[User:Kautilya3]], could you take note, and revise the lead. Thanks [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 10:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
There are numerous such instances of religious persecution of Hindus by intolerant societies. This also has a strong historical relevance because Islamic conquest of India involved massacares and extreme brutalities. The title of this article is misleading since people would assume we'll talk about all these issues, when in essence we are only talking about one report which captures these attrocities in one year. |
|||
[[Hindu]]s have experienced both historical and ongoing [[religious persecution]] and [[Social system|systematic]] violence, in the form of [[forced conversion]]s, documented [[massacre]]s, genocides, demolition and desecration of [[Hindu temple|temples]], as well as the destruction of educational centers. |
|||
Any suggestions on this would be welcome! |
|||
In the medieval period, some Muslim rulers viewed the expansion of Islamic rule in the Indian sub-continent as a religious conquest ("holy war") against the Hindus (infidels),<ref name="Jackson2003p19"/><ref name="Jackson2003c14">{{harvnb|Jackson|2003|pp=278–289}}</ref> and desecrated many [[Hindu temples]].<ref name="Jackson2003p19">{{harvnb|Jackson|2003|pp=19–22, 126–128, 139–142, 173–175, 213–215}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Eaton |first=Richard |year=2000 |title=Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States |journal=Journal of Islamic Studies |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=283–319 |jstor=26198197|doi=10.1093/jis/11.3.283}}</ref> During the [[British India| British rule]], Hindu communities lived in a relative calm until the violent [[partition of India]] in 1947, which was accompanied by communal riots and large scale displacement.<ref name=fisher-partition>{{citation|last=Fisher|first=Michael H.|year=2018|title=An Environmental History of India: From Earliest Times to the Twenty-First Century|location=Cambridge and New York|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-1-107-11162-2 |lccn=2018021693|doi=10.1017/9781316276044|s2cid=134229667 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kZVuDwAAQBAJ|quote=The partition of South Asia that produced India and West and East Pakistan resulted from years of bitter negotiations.. split roughly along religious 'communal' lines|doi-access=free}}</ref> |
|||
[[indologist]] |
|||
In modern times, thousands of [[Hindus|Hindu]] Bengalis, were killed along with other Bengalis in the 1971 [[Bangladesh genocide]] by Pakistani soldiers.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bangladesh - United States Holocaust Memorial Museum |url=https://www.ushmm.org/genocide-prevention/countries/bangladesh |access-date=2023-10-16 |website=www.ushmm.org |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=MacDermot |first1=Niall |title=The Review |url=https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/ICJ-Review-8-1972-eng.pdf |publisher=[[International Commission of Jurists]] |access-date=29 November 2023 |page=34 |date=June 1972 |quote=As far as the other three groups are concerned, namely members of the Awami League, students and Hindus, only Hindus would seem to fall within the definition of ‘ a national, ethnical, racial or religious group ’. There is overwhelming evidence that Hindus were slaughtered and their houses and villages destroyed simply because they were Hindus. The oft repeated phrase ‘ Hindus are enemies of the state ’ as a justification for the killing does not gainsay the intent to commit genocide; rather does it confirm the intention..}}</ref> In 1990, [[Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus|over 100,000 Kashmiri Hindus ]], had to flee from their homes in the Kashmir Valley for safety amid sporadic killings by militants<ref name=kapur-exodus-numbers>{{citation |last=Kapur |first=S. Paul |title=Dangerous Deterrent: Nuclear Proliferation and Conflict in South Asia |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-8047-5549-8 |publisher=Stanford University Press |pages=102–103 |quote=When the Kashmir insurgency began, roughly 130,000 to 140,000 Kashmiri Pandits, who are Hindus, lived in Kashmir Valley. By early 1990, in the face of some targeted anti-Pandit attacks and rising overall violence in the region, approximately 100,000 Pandits had fled the valley, many of them ending up in refugee camps in southern Kashmir. }}</ref>, and many Kashmiri Hindus ended up living in refugee camps in Jammu.<ref name=rai-bose-jalal-pandit-exodus1990>{{citation |last=Rai |first=Mridu |chapter=Narratives from exile: Kashmiri Pandits and their construction of the past |title=Kashmir and the Future of South Asia |editor1-last=Bose |editor1-first=Sugata |editor2-last=Jalal |editor2-first=Ayesha |publisher=Routledge |series=Routledge Contemporary South Asia Series |pages=91–115, 106 |year=2021 |isbn=9781000318845 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K20LEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA91 |quote=Beginning in January 1990, such large numbers of Kashmiri Pandits – the community of Hindus native to the valley of Kashmir – left their homeland and so precipitously that some have termed their departure an exodus. Indeed, within a few months, nearly 100,000 of the 140,000-strong community had left for neighboring Jammu, Delhi, and other parts of India. An insignificant number have returned.}}</ref> |
|||
: I second that motion and add some references to back it up: |
|||
( 1) http://www.christianaggression.org/item_display.php?type=NEWS&id=1136261415, 2)http://www.defendrussianhindus.org/). I hope that wikipedia readers will be exposed to all the fact of this horrible situation in Russia and not be blinded by the usual christian-sympathetic propaganda of the west. |
|||
[[Subhash Bose]] |
|||
* ''If anyone has any concerns, please discuss them here'' [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 09:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Report is missing == |
|||
:Jackson never says that medieval Muslim rulers were persecuting Hindus. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 11:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
The report is missing and a lot of claims are made about this report. I think it should be added and the suggestive language about the report should be repaired. --[[User:Unweasel|Unweasel]] 15:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::Well, ''[[Peter Jackson (historian)|Peter Jackson]] has mentioned (on the cited pages) that the Muslim historians of the medieval era viewed the creation and expansion of Islamic Sultanates in Hindustan as "holy war" and a religious conquest, characterizing Muslim forces as "the army of Islam" and the Hindus as infidels.'' Though, you may be right that Jackson's opinion was that these claims are exaggerated. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 04:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::: I agree that Jackson's reference alone may not be sufficient in the lead, and I can add several other more relevant references, such as [[Will Durant|Durant]], who has called the [[Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent|Muslim conquest of India]] "probably the bloodiest story in history". [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 04:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
== Remove Re-organization notice == |
|||
== Suggested merging "Anti-Hindu" into this article == |
|||
The Cleanup reorganize|date=January 2020 notice has been up since 2020. The article layout has since been imrpoved and I think this notice should be removed [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 09:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
I suggest merging the [[Anti-Hindu]] article into this, as there are some significant content overlaps between the two. Opinions? --[[User:Anirvan|Anirvan]] 22:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Sounds reasonable to me - the two cover similar material. [[User:Banno|Banno]] 23:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:No, they should be separate articles, the issues are distinct.--[[User:Vikramsingh|Vikramsingh]] 01:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Disagree. They should be separate. 'Persecution of Hindus' refers to enemies of the Hindu people. 'Anti-Hindu' refers to people who hate Hindus. There is a difference. The former implies the latter, though the latter does <u>NOT</u> necessarily imply the former.[[User:Subhash bose|Netaji]] 01:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== |
== Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2023 == |
||
{{edit semi-protected|Persecution of Hindus|answered=yes}} |
|||
(Moved from my talk page) `'[[user:mikkalai|mikka]] [[user talk:mikkalai|(t)]] 02:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
In "Bangladesh" section, please do the following. |
|||
; Action-1: |
|||
Hi, I have made some edits to the article in question. I am still working on it, adding more citations and info. I am informing you as a courtesy. I have re-added the Hinduism footer that you removed. I respectfully disagree that this article has nothing to do with Hinduism. Bear in mind that the [[Persecution of Jews]] is listed in the Judaism category and, like the Jewish people, the history of our persecution is centrally important to our religious sensibilitues as well. I request you to allow me some latitude regarding this. Thanks.[[User:Subhash bose|Netaji]] 23:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Replace the existing "see also" navigation template with the following two templates |
|||
: |
|||
Respectfully disagree with your comparison. The template in [[Persecution of Jews]] is caled "'''Jews''' and Judaism" and it covers all: jews, judaism and their history. The template in [[Persecution of Hindus]] is called "Hinduism" and hence must be confined to articles dealing with hinduism. While I understand that the topics are related, there must be order in classification. After all, everything in the world is rerlated to each other in one way or another. The "Hinduism" template is a navigation tool to navigate between the articles on the same topic, rather than to label all articles in [[:category:Hinduism]]. After all, this jobe is done by the category margker itself. Such navigational templates are placed only in articles that are listed in the template. Otherwise many wikipedia articles will be littered by such templates, since a large number of articles address many topics. `'[[user:mikkalai|mikka]] [[user talk:mikkalai|(t)]] 02:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
: |
|||
Okay, that's a good point. Hows about we keep it in the Hindu History category as it is now?[[User:Subhash bose|Netaji]] 03:10, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Of course, "History" OK. `'[[user:mikkalai|mikka]] [[user talk:mikkalai|(t)]] 19:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
{{See also| Human rights in Bangladesh#Non| l1= Persecution of Hindus & non-muslims in Bangladesh | Malaun | Bangladesh Genocide | List of massacres in Bangladesh| Freedom of religion in Bangladesh}} |
|||
== So Shri Krishna is an 'evil demon'?== |
|||
-- Added [[Freedom of religion in Bangladesh]] & [[Bangladesh Genocide]] as they are a direct relevant link, other links are sub-headings & aliases that may not be needed and even may be confusing [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 04:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Calling Shri Krishna an "evil demon" is a misinformation campaign. I was being polite. It's actually blatant defamation. How'd you like it when Noam Chomsky calls the Bible "The most genocidal book in History"? [[User:Subhash bose|Netaji]] 19:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
{{Violence against Hindus in East Pakistan and Bangladesh}} |
|||
:It is not misinformation campaign. It is a general attitude of any monoteistic religion towards what they perceive "pagan gods", possibly mixed with ignorance. Although religious disputes are very often mixed with political issues, let us not mix them in wikipedia. Also, mixing of Hindus and Krishnaites, especially hare-krishnaites is not a good idea either. I don't know how Hare Krishnna behaves in India or internationally, but in Russia it is run by a bunch of crooks embezzling psychicaly unstable people off money and property and making them peddlers of krishnaite literature thus making certain people rich. (Similar things happen with Christian sects as well, by the way, and persecution of such crooks is not called "discrimination") `'[[user:mikkalai|mikka]] [[user talk:mikkalai|(t)]] 20:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
* DONE unless argued otherwise. Please provide more relevant reasons if you re-raise the request [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] |
|||
::Sahib, you are referring to [[ISKON]] which IS an org of wierdos, granted. However, there are millions of legitimate worshippers of Shri Krishna in Hinduism. Defaming Shri Krishna is equivalent to defaming the entire Vaishnavite section of the Hindu Dharma, ergo, ignorance or not, it's defamation at worst, misinformation at best. Plus, this orthodox dude did not single out ISKON, he attacked Krishna. That's like Jyllands-Posden for Hindus (though we're not rioting over this). I mean, what if I called Christ a 'demon' because of the wierdness of the Jehovah's Witnesses?[[User:Subhash bose|Netaji]] 22:46, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
; Action-2: |
|||
::: In my text above I included the phrase "possibly mixed with ignorance". <s>I have no idea who in Russia wanted the temple.</s> (Actually, I know now; see [[Hinduism in Russia]]. Actually, it says that the temple is being constructed.) I don't know whether "true" Hindus approached the Russian Church for dialog. I don't know what kind of land plot was promised to them. If it was state-owned land, then let them shut up. The whole issue is murky and probably dshould be covered in more detail in the relevant articles, [[Hinduism in Russia]], [[Buddhism in Russia]], etc., where all details must be covered, covering all points of view. By the way, it was 2 years ago. What's heard about the issue today? |
|||
[[Malaun]] (from arabic for "accursed") is a pejorative term for [[Bengali Hindus]], most commonly used in Bangladesh by [[Bengali Muslims]].<ref name="roy18">{{cite book |last=Roy |first=Tathagata |title=My People, Uprooted |year=2002 |publisher=Ratna Prakashan |location=Kolkata |isbn=81-85709-67-X |page=18}}</ref><ref name="uscirf12042008">{{cite web |url=http://www.uscirf.gov/component/content/article/290/2318.html |title=Bangladesh: The Upcoming National Elections, Pluralism, Tolerance and the Plight of Hindu and Non-Muslim Minority - Need a New Direction |last=Dastidar |first=Sachi |date=12 April 2008 |work=Bangladesh: Religious Freedom, Extremism, Security, and the Upcoming National Elections |publisher=United States Commission on International Religious Freedom |access-date=13 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130828234152/http://uscirf.gov/component/content/article/290/2318.html |archive-date=28 August 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://hrcbm.org/news/HRCBM_UA_091202.pdf |title=Minorities Fear for Life and Security |date=12 September 2002 |publisher=HRCBM |access-date=16 October 2013}}</ref><ref name="dna04032015">{{cite news |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-the-unholy-killings-of-avijit-roy-and-govind-pansare-2065974 |title=The unholy killings of Avijit Roy and Govind Pansare |last=Chatterjee |first=Garga |date=4 March 2015 |work=Daily News and Analysis |access-date=9 March 2015}}</ref> Percentage of Muslims is continuously rising, while all [[Demographics of Bangladesh#Religion|non-muslim minorities have been continuously decreasing rapidly in Bangladesh]] due to various reasons including persecution, genocide, ethnic cleansing and rapes. Since 1951, Hindu population decreased by 15.1% in 71 years, and during the same period Muslim population increased by exactly by the same 15.1% (76% to 91.1%). Percentage of Hindus declined more than two third (over 67% drop) in 71 years, i.e. from 22% of total population of Bangladesh in 1951 to 13.5% in 1974 (8.5% decrease in 20 years),<ref name="bangladeshgov">{{cite web |url=http://hrcbmdfw.org/files/22/population_data/entry489.aspx |title=Bangladesh- Population census 1991: Religious Composition 1901–1991 |date=2 August 2016 |website=Bangladeshgov.org |access-date=2 August 2016 |archive-date=18 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160818162638/http://hrcbmdfw.org/files/22/population_data/entry489.aspx |url-status=dead }}</ref> and then to drop again to 6.9% in 2022 (further 1.6% decrease).<ref name=drop1>{{Cite web |date=August 2022 |title=Population and Housing Census 2022 Preliminary Report |url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T0uDswlsJxK3RuBbFZrdecFLIkjCT4UA/view?usp=embed_facebook |access-date=2022-10-08 |website=Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics |archive-date=8 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221008215051/https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T0uDswlsJxK3RuBbFZrdecFLIkjCT4UA/view?usp=embed_facebook |url-status=live }}</ref> Hindus and others have been regularly and systematically persecuted, such as during the [[Bangladesh genocide]], [[Bangladesh Liberation War]] and [[List of massacres in Bangladesh#List|numerous recurring massacres of civilians]]<ref name=genoc2>{{Cite news |date=14 June 2015 |title=Forkan Razakar's verdict any day |work=Dhaka Tribune |url=https://www.dhakatribune.com/uncategorized/2015/06/14/forkan-razakars-verdict-any-day}}</ref><ref name=genoc3>{{Cite web |date=25 March 2016 |title=Why is the mass sexualized violence of Bangladesh's Liberation War being ignored? |url=https://womenintheworld.com/2016/03/25/why-is-the-mass-sexualized-violence-of-bangladeshs-liberation-war-being-ignored/ |publisher=Women In The World}}</ref><ref name=genoc4>{{Cite web |title=Discovery of numerous Mass Graves, Various types of torture on Women" and "People's Attitude |url=https://www.kean.edu/~bgsg/Conference09/Papers_and_Presentations/MA_Hasan_Paper_Discovery%20of%20numerous%20Mass%20Graves,%20Various%20types.pdf |publisher=kean.edu}}</ref><ref name=genoc5>{{Cite web |title=Crimes Against Humanity in Bangladesh |url=https://scholar.smu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3945&context=til |publisher=scholar.smu.edu}}</ref><ref name=genoc1>{{cite news |date=25 March 2010 |title=Bangladesh war: The article that changed history |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-16207201}}</ref><ref name=genoc6>White, Matthew, ''[http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat2.htm#Bangladesh Death Tolls for the Major Wars and Atrocities of the Twentieth Century]''</ref><ref name=genoc7>{{Cite web |title=First Razakar camp in Khulna turns into ghost house after Liberation War |
|||
::: I am 100% sure that there is no national hatred towards India and Hindus, neither on personal, nor on state level. Traditionally India was always respected in Russia and its culture admired. It is a pity that some crooks spoil this image. `'[[user:mikkalai|mikka]] [[user talk:mikkalai|(t)]] 22:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
|url=https://www.observerbd.com/2015/12/30/128351.php |access-date=2023-04-26 |website=www.observerbd.com}}</ref> where [[Genocidal rape|rapes is also used as weapon]].<ref name=genoc8>{{cite journal |last=Sharlach |first=Lisa |year=2000 |title=Rape as Genocide: Bangladesh, the Former Yugoslavia, and Rwanda |journal=New Political Science |volume=22 |issue=1 |pages=92–93 |doi=10.1080/713687893 |s2cid=144966485}}</ref><ref name=genoc9>{{cite book |last=Sajjad |first=Tazreena |title=Plight and Fate of Women During and Following Genocide |publisher=Transaction Publishers |year=2012 |isbn=978-1-4128-4759-9 |editor-last=Totten |editor-first=Samuel |editor-link=Samuel Totten |pages=225 |chapter=The Post-Genocidal Period and its Impact on Women |orig-year=First published 2009}}</ref> Active perpetrators of genocide, ethnic cleansing and rapes of Hindus in Bangladesh include the [[Pakistani Military]],<ref name=genoc1/> [[Al-Badr (East Pakistan)|Al Badr]],<ref name=genoc10>{{cite web|last1=Mamoon|first1=Muntassir|title=Al-Badr|url=http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Al-Badr|website=Banglapedia|publisher=Bangladesh Asiatic Society|access-date=4 September 2016}}</ref><ref name=genoc11>{{cite book |last1=Sisson |first1=Richard |last2=Rose |first2=Leo E. |date=1991 |title=War and Secession: Pakistan, India, and the Creation of Bangladesh |publisher=University of California Press |page=165 |isbn=978-0-520-07665-5}}</ref> [[Al-Shams (East Pakistan)|Al Sham]],<ref name=genoc12>{{cite web|url=https://lubpak.com/archives/42543|title=Pakistan's first two militant Islamist groups, Al-Badar and Al-Shams – by Nadeem F. Paracha|work=LUBP|access-date=29 December 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151227153530/https://lubpak.com/archives/42543|archive-date=27 December 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[East Pakistan Central Peace Committee]],<ref name=genoc13>{{cite book |last=Karlekar |first=Hiranmay |date=2005 |title=Bangladesh: The Next Afghanistan? |url=https://archive.org/details/bangladeshnextaf0000karl |url-access=registration |publisher=SAGE |page=149 |isbn=978-0-7619-3401-1}}</ref> [[Razakars (Pakistan)|Razakars]],<ref name=genoc14>{{Cite news |url=https://www.thedailystar.net/frontpage/the-list-of-10789-razakars-published-1840843 |title=Govt publishes list of Razakars |date=16 December 2019 |work=The Daily Star}}</ref> [[Bangladesh Muslim League|Muslim League]],<ref name=genoc15/> [[Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami|Jamaat-e-Islami]],<ref name=genoc15/> and the [[Urdu]]-speaking [[Stranded Pakistanis in Bangladesh|Biharis]].<ref name=genoc15>{{cite news |first=Peter R. |last=Kann |date=27 July 1971 |title=East Pakistan Is Seen Gaining Independence, But It Will Take Years |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal}}</ref> |
|||
Thank you. |
|||
:::I'm sure that the Russians say the same thing about the Jewish people as well. Yet, anti-semitism in Russia and the region has become so bad that East-European Jews are emmigrating to USA and Israel in droves (90% of Ben-Gurion University faculty is Russian Jews, and 90% of the Physics Department of Texas A&M Universsity is also Russian Jews, and they told me this). I'm very sorry if this hurts your feelings (which is not my intention), but Russia has had a poor history of religious tolerance compared to Western European and American countries. Stalin executed quite a few Jews, and Soviets demolished mosques and madrassas in Kazakhstan. Even after the collapse of USSR there has been anti-semitism and racism in many parts of Russia, coupled with the rise of Neo-Nazism in Urban areas (odd, since Nazis hated Slavic people quite badly). The Orthodox bishop's attack on Shri Krishna is merely a reflection of the general intolerance, and the pogroms against Hindus are on their way... |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/119.74.238.54|119.74.238.54]] ([[User talk:119.74.238.54|talk]]) 10:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
-- Included the part directly relevant to Hindu persecution ie. the declining numbers. |
|||
:::I posted what info I found on the web. I don't know about the plight of Hindus in Russia as yet, since media will be in Russian (which I can't read). Hindus are not a nationality, they are a religion (and an ethnicity, though muslims will probably not like me for saying that). Given India's former relations with USSR, I'm sure there is positive feelings for India the NATION. However, as far as Hinduism is concerned, there is no positive feeling. Communist ideologues in Russia such as Leon Trotsky have constantly demonized, defamed, misrepresented and hated Hindus, and that has leaked into the intolerance of some elements in the Russian Orthodox church. This screed of Shri Krishna being "demonic" is a typical tactic carried out by white supremacist missionaries in India as a campaign of cultural genocide against Hindus, and I'm sure that, since the Bishop must be a well-educated man, he is not ignorant of the subject of Shri Krishna. He has clearly distorted Hindu scripture deliberately so as to malign Hindus in general, and THAT is misinformation and defamation. It is not brought out '''BY''' ignorance, it is meant '''TO''' promulgate ignorance. There is a difference, see? If he just criticized ISKON members that would be a different issue.[[User:Subhash bose|Netaji]] 23:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::::OK, I agree with this move. Move the details to [[Hinduism in Russia]] and keep summary here. That's OK. Thanks.[[User:Subhash bose|Netaji]] 23:31, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
* Can be considered DONE unless argued otherwise. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 04:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Plagiarism == |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
I will rewrite the sentence, meanwhile keep sentence in article and put a source notice.[[User:Bakasuprman|Bakaman]] <font color = "blue"><sub>[[User talk:Bakasuprman|Bakatalk]]</sub></font> 23:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Change "India" to "Post-Independence India" == |
|||
== why merge template? == |
|||
The sub-title India is very vague. It follows the Medieval India, and British India; and refers to post-Independence India. |
|||
why is there a merge template on the main page. anti-hindu is totally different from persecution of hindus. anti-hindu is like anti-jew and persecution of hindus is like persectution of jews. totally different articles. i shall remove this template if i dont see any criticism.thank you.[[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]] 12:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Therefore, the appropriate subtitle is: Post-Independence India. If anyone has any issue with that you may discuss here. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 11:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== History == |
|||
: Other major religions on WP have a clear distinction between articles dealing with general/philosophical criticisms (e.g. [[Criticism of Christianity]], [[Criticism of Judaism]], [[Criticism of Islam]]) and the literal hands-on human-rights-denying persecution of adherents (e.g. [[Persecution of Christians]], [[Persecution of Muslims]], and [[Anti-Semitism]]). I haven't found a third category like "anti-Christian" or "anti-Islamic." |
|||
: Most of the original content on the [[Anti-Hindu]] article deals with hands-on human-rights-denying persecution of Hindu adherents, and seems to duplicate this article (in worse quality, with fewer details). I think merging the two would give us a better article. -- [[User:Anirvan|Anirvan]] 22:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
False history of Aurangzeb is seems to be added in Wikipedia,must be corrected by any impartial historian to maintain credibility of Wikipedia [[Special:Contributions/223.233.83.104|223.233.83.104]] ([[User talk:223.233.83.104|talk]]) 02:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::I think i was clear in my initial post that anti-hindu is like anti-jew and persecution of hindus is like persectution of jews. if there is any duplicacy, we can remove that, but definately no merger. we dont have articles like anti-muslim or anti-christian for they never existed.(those who thought so were killed). you can refer to articles of anti-jew and persecution of jews for details.[[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]] 22:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Opening paragraphs in "Medieval India" == |
|||
::I will remove template.[[User:Bakasuprman|Bakaman]] <font color = "blue"><sub>[[User talk:Bakasuprman|Bakatalk]]</sub></font> 21:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
There is little clarity and flow in this section, in my view. |
|||
::: Nidish, I'm terribly confused. Perhaps you didn't read my comment. There ''isn't'' an article called [[Anti-Jew]], so I'm not sure why you're bringing it up as a model for [[Anti-Hindu]]. You also state that there aren't any articles about [[criticism of Christianity]] or [[criticism of Islam]], because those critics were killed; however, the articles obviously ''do'' exist. |
|||
::: If having split persecution/criticism articles is good enough for Christians ([[Persecution of Christians]]/[[Criticism of Christianity]]), Muslims ([[Persecution of Muslims]]/[[Criticism of Islam]]) and Jews ([[Anti-Semitism]]/[[Criticism of Judaism]]), then why should we establish an entirely separate system for Hinduism? |
|||
::: The scope of [[anti-Hindu]] (which isn't even a noun) is incredibly unclear, and there's substantial topical overlap with [[Persecution of Hindus]]. I suggest bringing coverage of Hinduism in line with that of other major world religions, by merging the content of any nonstandard articles into [[Persecution of Hindus]] and [[Criticism of Hinduism]]. |
|||
::: Bakaman, I'm sorry for not having replied to Nidhish earlier, and possibly having given you the impression that I agreed with his argument; I'll restore the template, because treating Hinduism as a special case just doesn't make case. [[User:Anirvan|Anirvan]] 02:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
As an example: |
|||
{{cquote|While there is a tendency to view the Muslim conquests and Muslim empires as a prolonged period of violence against Hindu culture, Durant called the Muslim conquest of India "probably the bloodiest story in history" in between the periods of wars and conquests, there were harmonious Hindu-Muslim relations in most Indian communities, and the Indian population grew during the medieval Muslim times. No populations were expelled based on their religion by either the Muslim or Hindu kings, nor were attempts made to annihilate a specific religion.}} |
|||
:::Anirav, there is no article anti-jew, but there is one on anti-semitism. Now come to christianity and islam. there are articles on criticism of christianity/islam, persecution of chrisitanity/islam and islamophobia/christianophobia. (Remember hinduphobia redirects to anti-Hindu.) anti-semitism or anti-hindu talks about the feelings, and persecution talks about actions. I dont know how can i make it more clear to you.--[[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]][[User_talk:Nidhishsinghal|(♂)]] 03:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
It says "''While there is''" which suggests the claim is more disputed than it might appear. Then it gives a historian who in fact agrees with the claim that it's the bloodiest in history. But then it ends with the a citation that disputes that particular claim. |
|||
::Anirav, we cant wait for a week for your response everytime. Please dont just come and reinsert those tags without discussion. And try reading different articles to have a feel of it, i.e. why different articles are required.--[[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]][[User_talk:Nidhishsinghal|(♂)]] 18:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
The succeeding paragraphs are similar, with over-quotations of Romila Thapar's point of view, which have little to do with historical facts. As an example, the quotation of upper caste Hindus being lumped together with lower caste Hindus, and their perception of history and persecution as a result. This could be put into a different section if needed, but as an example, the historian Durant is not an "upper caste Hindu", and there are many other western Indologists quoted throughout the article which reduce Thapar's claim to more of a viewpoint epistemology than factual. |
|||
:::I think he had made his point that different articles are not required. I certainly don't see the uniqueness of the anti-Hindu article; to compare it to the article on anti-semitism is absurd. Please do not close discussion like this. "Cant wait for a week", indeed. Why not? This article isnt going towards FA status anytime soon, you know. Probably never, given the people who edit it regularly. [[User:Hornplease|Hornplease]] 03:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
This is yet another quotation from the opening paragraphs: |
|||
::::What do you feel about [[Islamophobia]] article?? |
|||
::::And i said that a week is too much for a response. and when he came, he straightaway reinserted the template. You should provide reasons on the talk page and wait for some time(not weeks, but days) before reinserting a controversial template.--[[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]][[User_talk:Nidhishsinghal|(♂)]] 05:14, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
{{cquote|She questions what persecution means, and if it means religious conversions, she doubts that conversions can be interpreted as forms of persecution. According to Thapar, it is quite correct to mention that Muslim iconoclasts destroyed temples and the broke images of Hindus but it should also be mentioned that Muslim rulers made donations to Hindu sects during their rule.}} |
|||
::::: Again, I apologize for my prior delay. |
|||
::::: [[Anti-Semitism]] and its related articles are excellent -- well-written, balanced, and not appearing to display any particular religious biases. The [[Islamophobia]] article is something ''entirely'' different -- it's a description of a very specific neologism in wide use in current political discourse, and much of the article is about the ''term'' itself, and varying opinions about it; most of the sources are from non-Muslim academic, government, news, and political sources. It also includes a wide variety of political opinions, from both advocates and critics of the concept. There's little overlap between that article and [[Persecution of Muslims]]. |
|||
::::: You point to [[Christianophobia]] as an example to be emulated; it strikes me as a rather poorly written article, and somewhat POV. It's unfortunate if that's the best we can aspire to. |
|||
::::: [[Anti-Hindu]] is a strange hodgepodge. About half of it discusses the persecution of Hindus (hence my suggestion to merge it with this article, which is much better written); the other half consists of undocumented statements and opinions -- all of it appearing to echo one, very specific, set of political opinions (without that point of view being made clear in the text). [[User:Anirvan|Anirvan]] 07:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
The article, specifically, is about Hindu persecution. Why does it need to be mentioned in the introductory paragraphs that Muslim donations were also made to Hindu sects? It does not invalidate Hindu persecution at their hands. And why does the question of "what persecution means" need to be mentioned when there are many factual claims in the proceeding paragraphs? |
|||
::::::I fully accept that christianophobia is poorly written article, just like anti-hindu. I accept that half of the discussions are duplicated. We can remove that and try to make a better article of it. But no way is merger a solution, even if anti-hindu is not a written properly. |
|||
::::::I am providing a blueprint for the articles here. In persecution of hindus, we will talk about the actions, historic and contemporary. while in anti-hindu, we will talk about feelings or prejudices against hindus. As an example, the russian action of demolishing of krishna temple will come in persecution of hindus, while Witzels suggestion to government to ban hindus from cremating their dead will come in Hinduphobia or anti-Hindu. Fine.--[[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]][[User_talk:Nidhishsinghal|(♂)]] 12:50, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
I'm writing this to point out that there's been clear edit warring going on, based on politics. I'd like this section to be edited with consensus, and the points of view can be moved to a later section. [[User:Indosociology111|Indosociology111]] ([[User talk:Indosociology111|talk]]) 09:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::Nids, do u have any evidence for Witzel's statement? [[User:Babub|<sup>Babub</sup>→]][[User talk:Babub|<font color = "DarkBlue">Talk</font>]] 13:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:I've also changed the claim that "Hindutva allies" dub it a Hindu holocaust, when the sources had only one journalist who said so. This isn't the place for proving your political point. Not all claims about Hindu persecution are coming from "Hindutva allies", and there's an equal amount of misinformation from the "other side", if I may. [[User:Indosociology111|Indosociology111]] ([[User talk:Indosociology111|talk]]) 09:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::No, i do not have reliable source. So i did not inserted it in any of the articles. I just pointed out to such statements as prejudices, which are somewhat different from persecution. If a law is passed, then its persecution, while if scholars demand for such things, it is just Hinduphobia.--[[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]][[User_talk:Nidhishsinghal|(♂)]] 13:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::How does one clearly distinguish between criticism of Hinduism and "anti-Hindu"? Can you offer some concrete, ''verifiable'' examples of "anti-Hindu" that are neither critical of Hinduism, nor fundamentally linked to the persecution of Hindus? (Or does the apex of "anti-Hindu" over the past 5000 years really consist of unverified statements from a 20th/21st century American college professor?) [[User:Anirvan|Anirvan]] 17:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::Historically, anti-hindu can be described as the contempt of hinduism as its practices were not strictly monotheistic. Babarnama has some reference that India was a land of ''kaafirs'' (i hope you know what ''kaafir'' means). You are not exactly persecuting, till you have laws that straightaway victimize the people. |
|||
::::::::Also, Anti-Hindu has grown recently due to, say success of Hindus. If you are in a democratic country, like say UK, you wont find persecution there, just the hatred, which can be better summed up as Hinduphobia or anti-hindu. The organisations like [[Dalitstan]] and people like [[Michael Witzel]] are better summed up as hinduphobics or anti-hindus. They arent and cant persecute Hindus. I hope i am clear enough. But it is a healthy discussion. I hope you can give some good counter-argument against my views. [[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]][[User_talk:Nidhishsinghal|(♂)]] 17:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::Also remember that people like [[Kancha Ilaiah]] are anti-hindus and there user pages are directed to anti-hindu. It isnt wise if we redirect anti-hindu to persecution of hindus. If he hasnt killed anyone or victimized, he is just expressing his opinion in a democratic country. He is just an [[anti-hindu]], no way is he persecuting them.[[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]][[User_talk:Nidhishsinghal|(♂)]] 18:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::: If someone believes that Hindus are kafirs for not being monotheistic in a particular way, isn't that (by definition) linked to a particular theological critique of Hinduism? If Hindus suffered as a result of that theological conflict, that strikes me as persecution. |
|||
::::::::: Kancha Ilaiah and Dalitstan are more promising, with the huge caveat that they seem focused on caste, and their anti-Hindu sentiment needs to seen as part of a series of lower-caste responses to the caste system, with some lower caste communities embracing a liberalized Hinduism, others rejecting it altogether, and many sitting somewhere in the middle. I could easily see anti-Hindu sentiment in Dalit nationalist movements described under [[Criticism of Hinduism]]. |
|||
::::::::: There are only 4 articles in the main Wikipedia namespace that link to anti-Hindu, so I wouldn't worry too much about how people might react to redirects. We can just fix those 4 links if/when we make the change. [[User:Anirvan|Anirvan]] 20:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::Hey I thought we had already decided on this! However, I agree that the [[anti-Hindu]] article is badly written. I will do my best to fix it up, but I need to look for some sources of info first.[[Anti-Hindu]] should discuss specific polemies and accusations made against Hindus, as well as anti-Hindu conspiracy hoaxes and claims that Hindus eat people, comparisons of Hindus with animals, claims that Hindus should be exterminated etc. Persecution already discusses some of the specific actions taken against theHindu people by anti-Hindu people/regimes etc.[[User:Subhash bose|Netaji]] 01:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::Anirav, can you see anti-semitism in criticism of jews.[[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]][[User_talk:Nidhishsinghal|(♂)]] 05:55, 31 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Hi Nidish. Can you clarify your question? I'm not sure I understand. (Incidentally, my name is Anirvan, nor Anirav.) Thanks. [[User:Anirvan|Anirvan]] 06:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Sorry for the miss-spellings. I was just saying that you cant put Anti-Hindu remarks in Criticism of Hinduism. If someone says that Hinduism is a religion of violence, than he is not criticisg hindus, nor is he persecuting them. He is just affected by a negative feeling towards hindus, i.e. Hinduphobia.[[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]][[User_talk:Nidhishsinghal|(♂)]] 06:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Shall i remove the merge template, or are you still sceptical about it.[[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]][[User_talk:Nidhishsinghal|(♂)]] 15:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
I am removing the merge template for now. If you are not happy, discuss here instead of straightaway reinserting the template.[[User:Nidhishsinghal|nids]][[User_talk:Nidhishsinghal|(♂)]] 15:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Qasim doesn't really belong here== |
|||
First off, my comments are limited to Qasim and the Arab period. The source for the assertions is a POV character. The quote used is being misrepresented, yes it says Hajaj was telling him Qasim to be more brutal but it was because of a military strategy, note the bottom line where he spells out why, that people will think you are weak. |
|||
Secondly the next assertion about Brahmanabad is again a misrepresentation, if one is happy to quote from the Chachnama as seen with the earlier quote, the next quote about Brahamanabad also from the Chachname which has been "paraphrased" goes so: |
|||
:''Those of the prisoners, who belonged to the classes of artisans, traders and common folk, were let alone, as Muhammad Kásim had extended his pardon to those people. He next came to the place of execution and in his presence ordered all the men belonging to the military classes to be beheaded with swords. It is said that about 6,000 fighting men were massacred on this occasion; some say 16,000. The rest were pardoned.'' |
|||
No doubt the killing happenned but it was very targeted. Generally Qasim built his army from derserters and turn coats, and he paid and rewarded them handsomely and pulled them into his administration. A person who set aside 3% of the state revenue for the Brahmins is not the one to make a point by going after the Hindus. All that had to wait for Ghazni and Turks to come on to the scene, even his successors were too weak and ruled in alliance with local powers. There are plenty of mainstream sources to attest the same. I've taken the issue up with Hkelkar at the Qasim page as well where the matter is detailed better. I propose that you remove it.--[[User:Tigeroo|Tigeroo]] 21:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::This is part of a broader debate regarding bin-Qasim and should be discussed at length in the article. I've been a bit busy so haven't had the opportunity to scan the refs cited there yet but I will.[[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 11:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Merge with Anti-Hindu? == |
|||
Should this be merged with the [[Anti-Hindu]] article? Even though the terms could indicate different things, the content in both articles is the same. --[[User:FK65|FK65]] 20:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::This point has been discussed before.The two articles describe two different things. The [[anti-Hindu]] article describes anti-Hindu attitudes and views. This article describes '''specific acts''' against Hindus. They may be related, but are two different topics. There is ample precedent for this wrt [[anti-Semitism]] and [[Persecution of Jews]], as well as [[anti-Christian]] and [[Persecution of Christians]], [[anti-Muslim]] and [[Persecution of Muslims]].[[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 20:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:I beleive above, that this was discussed.[[User:Bakasuprman|Bakaman]] <font color = "blue"><sub>[[User talk:Bakasuprman|Bakatalk]]</sub></font> 20:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Fuller Mahmud Ghazni Utbi Quote == |
|||
The example used to illustrate the event is terrible, try reading the source. |
|||
:Account of the Affairs of Táníshar. |
|||
:It came to the ears of the Sultán, that in the country of Táníshar there were many of that peculiar species of elephant, which they call Silmán. The prince of this country was high amongst the ungrateful deceivers, and of exalted relations amongst the rebellious and the sinful. Therefore he was one who merited that they should give him to drink a cup of the wine of the strokes of Islám’s sword, and that by means of the flame of the onset of her champions, they should strike into his essence the due of wickedness, so making him to know, that to drink their turns of this cup, and their turns of this calamity is the doom of the universal Kaffir people, and that as other chiefs and deceivers of India have been sharers and partakers thereof, so his face could not be free, nor his path an asylum from the equitable sword; the Sultán thought good then to design this conquest, that thus the standard of Islám might be exalted by victory, and the figures of idols might be inverted by success in war. Accordingly he marched towards Táníshar with an army which had been educated in the chamber of the sacred war, and been trained by grace from on high, and contracted friendship with sword and spear, and obtained an acquaintance with infidel’s blood, and in the windings of those marches they passed a desert so dreadful, that a bird would not fly over its atmosphere, and a star would lose its way on its expanse, a place which nothing traversed but the wind, and on which nothing cast a shade except the Sun, without a report of water, or a vestige of habitation. But Providence granted aid, and they came out from that idolatrous and disgusting place, and arrived at (the enemy’s land). And before them they found a great river, a running stream full of water, lofty mountains, and the ground impracticable stone. Now the infidel sought his aid in those mountains, and became inspirited by their encircling assistance.''' The army of the Sultán passed that water by two fords, and engaged the idolatrous forces on two sides. And when the king-falcon, the sun, hung his claws upon the curtain of his western retirement, (the day having been matured), the men of Islám made a charge, and scattered them all about the skirt of the rocks, and they took the path of flight and preservation from the heat of that battle and onset.'''And as for those stamping elephants and serried monsters which constituted the point of their confidence, and their remaining force, they left them on the spot, the Sultán’s elephants went after them, and brought them all to the Sultán’s halter-place. '''The army spilt so much blood that the water of that river was so full, and that stream so abundantly stained with gore, that it could not be used for purification and was forbidden to drinkers,''' and if the darkness of the night had not prevented it, not one of these wretches would have escaped with life,— all through the blessing which is upon Islám, and the wondrous religion of Muhammád, unto which by the kind promise of Heaven victory is pledged, and for the manifestation of whose sayings, the standard of the glorious Kurán speaks plainly, “He unto whom He sent his Apostle to guide him, and the faith of truth to lighten all to religion, even although the idolaters hate it.” |
|||
*One look the language, it's not a clinical factual account, it is am embellished prosaic account. |
|||
*Two note why it was forbidden, because it had become "haram" from being tainted by blood spilt on a watery battleground. |
|||
*Three it was a straight up pitched bloody battle, so assertion mass-slaughter is stretching the towards a POV. |
|||
*This is a bad example found across internet sites and used by lazy or polemic academics--[[User:Tigeroo|Tigeroo]] 21:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::Well we are not talking about killing military personnel, but civilians.[[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 21:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::Could you avoid the [[WP:NOR]] here please.[[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 21:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::I am sorry the sources do not support the assertion of civilians, that claim is not verifiable from utbi as demonstrated above.--[[User:Tigeroo|Tigeroo]] 22:43, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::Also I have question who is Pradyumna Karan?? what are his credentials for such a sweeping statement that seems to not tally according to [[WP:RS]], can we find a more representative fo the academic community consensus of the charecterization. I am not disagreeing with the possible excesses of Mahmud, but can we make the section a decent one.--[[User:Tigeroo|Tigeroo]] 22:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::[http://utdirect.utexas.edu/lib/utnetcat/full.WBX?search_type=FL&search_text=KARAN+PRADYUMNA&next_action=N&next_record_brn=013968383&loc_display_type=V Click me][[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 23:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::Heres some more links: [http://www.uky.edu/AS/Geography/People/Faculty/Karan/], [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0095(195907)35%3A3%3C269%3AGOMII%3E2.0.CO%3B2-9],[http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0004-5608(196903)59%3A1%3C211%3AAMSNTT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-5].[[User:Bakasuprman|Bakaman]] <font color = "blue"><sub>[[User talk:Bakasuprman|Bakatalk]]</sub></font> 23:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Also, read "Minorities in a Changing World" by Milton Leon Barron p54. Expressly states the beheadings and the offerring to crows.23:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] |
|||
:::Thats great, I had found a few books by Karan as well and they seemed centered more around social analysis and geography rather than being rooted in history. He even got the date wrong for Mahmud in his book, making his assertions a lit shaky. I haven't ever heard the version of skulls before, though Milton Leon Barron is interesting, so while they and holt and co provide opposing views, they both seem a little extreme ended to me and I think it may be better unless we can ascertain a greater concensus of that view to instead of making sweeping assertions of their view is representative of the community, that we dilineate and attach their name to the particular view, i.e Holt et al say "xxx" Milton says "xxx" Karan says "xxx".--[[User:Tigeroo|Tigeroo]] 22:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::That may not be such a bad idea. However, we need to confirm that the scholarly sources that we are citing here are representative of either school of thought.[[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 22:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::P.S. do you mind including the page numbers for the cited books, makes it easier to thumb them because I found a reference from Saunders to Mahmud that says he linked his campaings of conquest to a jihad along side a peaceful penetration, so the matter is subtly different. Kakar Sudhir, I had read it and refrained from using it because it actual says the event was "chosen trauma" and makes no assertions or denials about the "mythology" and the charged currents surrounding the event not quite represented by the quote used to cite hundred of thousands killed.--[[User:Tigeroo|Tigeroo]] 22:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::I have the page numbers written in the citations. Hang on though, I'll check.[[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 22:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::Yep, page numbers are all there in the citations in the article.[[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 22:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Somnath casualties== |
|||
The more common estimate I have usually encountered is 50,000, (note both ealrier comment and RV comment are based soley upon the content they are cited from) of the defenders charged Mahmud's forces and were massacred (or annhilated as in crushing defeat), just trying to source them or other numbers if they exist from some reliable source. [http://persian.packhum.org/persian/pf?file=80201012&ct=114 I've found an online version of Eliot's] book which commentates on the entire Somnath affair, and it seems the 50,000 number comes from the one singular source and so of dubious authenticity though it seems to be the only one. "I" wonder if the number of defenders was not inflated to make Mahmud's force of 30,000 seem the more heroic especially since when attacking a fortress a) cavalry has a limited effectiveness and b) the attackers typically as a rule of thumb always significantly outnumber the defending force. Anyhow that's my commentary, and I will leave the link and source for your review and comments.--[[User:Tigeroo|Tigeroo]] 10:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
'''Nadir Shah , Akbar ,Battle of Talikota,Third battle of Panipat''' |
|||
This article would be incomplete without an account of- |
|||
1)Nadir shah's massacre of Hindus |
|||
2)Akbar's killing of 35000 Hindu peasants of Chittor |
|||
3)Killing of Hindus by Deccani sultans after the Battle of Talikota |
|||
4)Killing of Maratha children and women (and rape and kidnap) after third battle of Panipat by Abdali |
|||
--[[User:Johnhardcastl|Johnhardcastl]] 08:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
==Book== |
|||
* [http://www.hinduunity.org/muslimleague.htm “Muslim League Attack on Sikhs and Hindus in the Punjab 1947”, Online Book Compiled for the SGPC by S. GURBACHAN SINGH TALIB] <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/209.197.167.28|209.197.167.28]] ([[User talk:209.197.167.28|talk]]) 02:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
|||
::We can't source to Hindu Unity since it is a "hate site", even if the book is reliable. I have replaced it with the Google Books link, which is better. [[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 03:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Wow== |
|||
I had no idea.[[User:NinaEliza|NinaEliza]] 03:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::See [[Muslim League Attack on Sikhs and Hindus in the Punjab 1947]]. There is even a wikipedia article on the book, as well as the author [[Gurbachan Singh Talib]] (a Sikh Scholar). The book is reliable.[[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 03:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Baseless accusations == |
|||
There is not a single law which discriminates Hindus,or any one in that case. |
|||
SL Buddhists respect and also worship Hindu gods..The war with the LTTE is definitely not a religious one..LTTE is secular and they have a huge number of Christians ,actually the strongest support for them comes from the Tamil Christians..So the whole paragraph is [[WP:POV]] and [[WP:HOAX]].Immediate removal of this paragraph is highly recommended.Thanks--[[User:Iwazaki|Iwazaki]] 16:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Saudi Arabia== |
|||
The section on Saudi Arabia shouldn't exist. There are no Hindus that are residents of Saudi Arabia. The only Hindus that exist, are citizens of India (and other countries) who are living in Saudi Arabia under a working contract that they agreed to when they ''voluntarily'' left thier own country and ''chose'' to go to Saudi Arabia. They are not forced to live under anything, and can go back to their rightful country (of origin) if they don't like the conditions of a country that is not theirs in the first place.[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 20:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Same thing for Muslims in America yet [[Persecution of Muslims]] has long section on it.Facts supercede personal perspectives.[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 22:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::Muslims in America are either citizens, or landed immigrants. they are not ''temporary'' workers under the agreement that they there only on a temporary contract and must leave sooner or later. For example forcing refugees of a neighbouring country to go back to their country is not persecution. But forcing your own people (or citiziens) to leave is persecution.[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 23:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Where is the wikipedia rule that attests to your claim that the persecution of Hindus in SA are not allowed here? We are talking about persecution of Hindus here regardless of legal status, mentionable by [[WP:Verifiability]]. All else is [[WP:NOR]].[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 00:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC). Also, many Muslims in USA are not citizens but visitors like under worker visa. Many are members of CAIR and their complaints are mentioned in [[Persecution of Muslims]] based on CAIR reports.[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 00:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::::On the contrary, what source do you have that says the actions of the Saudi government are indeed classified as "persecution". Remember the burden of evidence lies on you (since you are arguing on the side of inclusion) and not me.[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 15:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Based on the fact that Hindus are being denied their right to practice their religion.[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 23:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Sorry, this article is not titled "Denial of right to practice one's religion", rather it is titled that "Persecution of...". Saudi Arabia is a country that has no Hindus. How can Hindus be persecuted if they don't exist?? Any Hindus that are there are only visitors or temporary workers. Once again please find a source that says there is "'''persecution'''" [of Hindus] in [[Saudi Arabia]].[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 13:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:What right? Is there international laws guaranteeing the right to religious practice? If not, is there Saudi law that guarantees that right? The answer to both is no. I find it disagreeable, but I can't claim that it's wrong for a state to declare an official religion and make it the only religion on the nation. No right is universally acknowledged that is violated by maintaining a law of 'one official religion'. Now who made the observation that this imagined right was denied? If it was you or some other WP editor, that's original research. [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 01:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::I"m not sure I fully understand your argument. Are you saying that because Islam is the official state religion of Saudi Arabia, that they are justified in persecuting Hindus and threffore do not need mentioning here? What about the section in [[Persecution of Christians]] where persecution of them in Saudi Arabia is detailed? What about [[Persecution of Jews]]? [[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 01:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::Also, by this logic, the attacks on Muslim students from Islamic countries in the United States do not count as persecution, since those Muslims are not US citizens, yet article involving the attack on Bahai student in a university in Iran are toned as a persecution of Muslims (even though the student in question wasn't even a Muslim, but was mistaken for one).[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 01:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::If the U.S. denied freedom of religion to International Muslim students (but did grant complete freedom to Muslim citizens), then yes, that is not an example of persecution. But attacks are something different. If Hindus were are attacked [physically] by mainstream Saudis (or the Saudi gov.t) then that would be persecution.[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 13:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::"The US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), an advisory panel, last month urged the US government to impose sanctions on Saudi Arabia, as well as Vietnam and Eritrea, for violating religious rights.Last year the US State Department for the first time named ally Saudi Arabia, as well as Eritrea and Vietnam, "countries of particular concern" in its annual report on religious freedom. A list that previously included China,Iran, Myanmar, North Korea and Sudan."[http://www.wwrn.org/article.php?idd=16248&sec=51&con=37] so yes, I would consider that many notable governments consider religious freedom to be universal.[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 01:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Rumpelstiltskin223, I'm still waiting for you to show me a source that says Hindus are bieng "persecuted" in Saudi Arabia.[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 02:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::See above, ten get a dictionary. [[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 10:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::That's basically [[WP:OR]]. Our job in wikipedia is to report ''persecution'' not to establish that such and such is commiting acts of ''persecution''. If a scholar says that Saudis are persecuting Hindus then quote him/her. Else, I'll remove the section.[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 23:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::Here [http://library.west.asu.edu/diversity/bannedbooks/religioustexts.cfm]. The Fletcher library at Arizona State University lists this incident under "persecution".[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 23:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Instead of wasting time bickering over this, why don't you help me expand [[Islam in Myanmar]] and [[Persecution of Muslims#Persecution in Myanmar]]? there is a lot of info on the web and nobody seems to have written anything about it on wikipedia. [[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 00:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::That's ''so'' not the answer to my question. [[WP:RS]] says "''Items that are signed are more reliable than unsigned articles because it tells whether an expert wrote it and took responsibility for it''". The link you have provided to me above suggests a list of examples of persecution, can you tell me who is the ''scholar'' compiled this list?? [[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 01:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::In fact the list contains a lot of rubbish. Under Hindu it says "Afghanistan and Bangladesh." What is that supposed to mean? No explanation, no details, no examples. An actual scholar would never compile something so misleading and empty. Again, this is so not a scholarly source. [[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 01:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::Explanation is obvious. The persecution of Hindus in Afghanistan under Taliban (forcing Hindus to wear yellow badge like Nazis did to Jews) and Bangladesh (forced conversions, rape, pogroms etc.) are so well-known and so well-reported by human rights groups that their reffing it would be redundant.[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 03:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::Now you are grasping at straws. When you have to concoct a different [[WP:NOR]] argument each time a report is sourced then you have a problem with objectivity. If you have any questions regarding the validity of an academic reference then it is best that you set up a [[WP:MEDCAB]] so that a fresh perspective from someone who has not been involved in this article can end this dispute. As it is, I think you are biased against Hindus and I'm sure you think I am biased against Muslims so best to call a mediator to the dispute. I will agree to any medcab request you file.[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 03:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::Here is another paper written by academic John Marshall (a contributor to the National Review) article in freedom house (an org that documents religious persecution)[http://web.archive.org/web/20060522223359/http://www.freedomhouse.org/religion/news/bn2005/bn-2005-00-16.htm] |
|||
so clearly freedom house regards this incident as persecution.[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 04:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Apart from you uncivil behaviour (attacks on Islam and me), thanks for the link just provided. I'll include it in the article.[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 21:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks again for providing a reliable source. Can you also provide a reliable source (sometime in the next week or two) that the follwoing is also an example of persecution: "''Hindus receive 1/16 of the amount a male Muslim receives''".[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 21:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Other== |
|||
::: Where is the section for persecution of Hindus by Hindus? Surely many Hindus have suffered due to being born on the bottom rungs of the caste ladder. What about the forced burning of brides and forcing women to wear sack cloth and shave their heads when their husbands die? [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 22:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::Sources?Burning of brides was rarely forced. Shaving heads etc was [[Purdah]], a practice more common to Muslims than Hindus. [[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 23:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::Also, many Dalits who were persecuted debate as to whether they are Hindus or not. Persecution of Dalits is discussed at length in their articles, as are reform movements and emancipation.[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 23:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Women started shaving there heads when their husbands died so they wouldn't raped by islamic invaders. That was also the time when sati became more widespread.--[[User:Dangerous-Boy|D-Boy]] 22:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Similar are the origins for [[Jauhar]].[[User:Viscious81|nids]][[User_talk:Viscious81|(♂)]] 13:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
So the entire practice began because of Persecution of Hindus from external religions. It isn't allowed now and even then they were not forced for goodness sake. '''[[User:Nobleeagle|<font color="darkblue">Noble</font><font color="darkorange">eagle</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Nobleeagle|<font color="darkred" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow"> <nowiki>[TALK]</nowiki></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Nobleeagle|<font color="darkred" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow"> <nowiki>[C]</nowiki></font>]]</sup> 03:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:: I've heard all of these excuses before, and every time they're issued they're laughed at. Occurances of sati occur in Hindu mythology where no Muslims made appearances. Sati and the persecution of widows are all practices that go back to times before Islam, and before anyone had any interest in 'invading' the Hindu countries. I'll expand on a "Persecution of Hindus by Hindus" section when I have the time to go into it. Definitely the caste system deserves mention there (or do you figure being an untouchable was a 'choice' that the system's victims embraced?), as does occasions where Hindu communities forced women to undergo sati or join one of those places where forgotten widows are left to live out their lives. [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 05:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::Laughed at by [[Lashkar-e-Toiba]] maybe, not by serious people. |
|||
:::The operative word here is "mythology". The actual rites of Sati and Jauhar did not begin in large scale until after the Islamic invasions. Furthermore, if Sati is to be mentioned here then [[Purdah]] should also be mentioned in [[Persecution of Muslims]] by Muslims. What about the [[Caste system among South Asian Muslims]]? Should that be mentioned under [[Persecution of Muslims]] by Muslims also? [[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 07:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::: The Sudras are a distinct caste, notable for how they were persecuted by the Brahmins. They would be punished if their shadow fell on a Brahmin, and could be killed from drinking off the same well as one. Their status as a persecuted people entirely rests on Hindu culture. Whether that's founded on theology or Hindu custom is irrelevant, the point is these Hindus were persecuted by Hindus. That some Dalits no longer consider themselves Hindus or argue that Dalits aren't Hindus at all doesn't take away from the fact that most Dalits are in fact Hindu. Keeping that bit of history out of here on such nonsensical grounds is lawyering. [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 16:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::That was Dalits, not Sudras. Sudra shadows were fine. Dalits debate their status as Hindus, Just ask a bunch of Dalits, not us.[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 22:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::The point is that, as long as Dalits debate about whether they are Hindu or not, we have a problem. If no such debate exists then it would be ok.[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 07:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Dalits are not the Borg, the determination of one doesn't affect that of others. As long as some (and almost all recognize Dalits as Hindus)see themselves as Hindu, they're mentionable here. If your arguement to exclude Dalits is that they don't fall into one of the defined castes (ie that they don't have a Varna), then what you're saying is that the Dalit is too untouchable to be touched even in Wikipedia. The 'debate' on whether dalits are Hindu or not won't change the fact that those Dalits who are recognized as Hindu are in fact Hindus. By the way, the RSS considers and welcomes Dalits as Hindus, so I don't see why you would object to recognizing them. [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 23:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Then by the same logic, persecution of untouchable Dalit Muslims by Arab-descended upper caste Muslims deserve mention in [[Persecution of Muslims]]. We'll put that there too. I have references. [[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 00:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::::: That's probably a reasonable thing to do. Go and include it. [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 00:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
You replaced all the text (everything supported with reliable sources) that I added, and replaced it with a long essay on reforms. The article is about persecution, but you deleted any mention of the actual persecution faced by the Dalits. Please stop with your lawyering and bad faith blanking of text. [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 02:01, 24 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Wikipedia is [[WP:NOT]] a soapbox for Islamic Fundamentalism. Please keep hatreds out of a neutral encyclopedia. I incorporated your edits and added information to contextualize the caste situation. [[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 02:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::Why are you dragging Islam into this?? Please refrain from making such statements.[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 03:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::Islam has absolutely nothing to do with Islamic Fundamentalism. Islamic Fundamentalism is a perversion of the holy Quran and the teachings of the prophet Muhammad so it is a non-issue. the issue here is the biases of Islamic Fundamentalists and their obsession with Hindus (mostly in killing them) and Castes (despite the Muslim castes themselves). [[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 03:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::: Did I even say that I am a Muslim, much less anything implying I want to spread Islam or establish shariah? This is a poor comeback for your failing to justify your editing. [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 03:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Blanking is VANDALISM== |
|||
From WP:Vandalism: Blanking |
|||
Removing all or significant parts of pages or replacing entire established pages with one's own version without first gaining consensus both constitute vandalism. Sometimes important verifiable references are deleted with no valid reason(s) given in the summary. However, significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, or where a non-frivolous explanation for the removal of apparently legitimate content is provided, linked to, or referenced in an edit summary. An example of blanking edits that could be legitimate would be edits that blank all or part of a biography of a living person. Wikipedia is especially concerned about providing accurate and non-biased information on the living, and this may be effort to remove inaccurate or biased material. Due to the possibility of unexplained good-faith content removal, template:test1a or template:blank, as appropriate, should normally be used as initial warnings for ordinary content removals not involving any circumstances that would merit stronger warnings. |
|||
Using a pretext like "Human Rights Watch is anti-hindu" doesn't justify blanking entire swaths of text, including other sourced material. Human Rights Watch is referred to by many organizations, including the UN and state governments. Whether you feel their view on an incident is biased or not doesn't take away from it being a reliable source. Since the sentences on their view of Devdasi is attributed to them (ie "according to HRW"), there is no reasonable justification for blanking that text.[[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 00:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:It's clear they were misinformed, there are numerous sources which are against them. You can't just present it as a modern debate when it isn't. The paragraph was misleading, it sounded like it was a problem that some people are trying to defend, when the HRW was in the wrong. ''' <font color="#000080">—</font> [[User:Nobleeagle|<font color="#000080">N</font><font color="#12098A">o</font><font color="#120ABA">b</font><font color="#2015E3">l</font><font color="#1364EA">e</font><font color="#2BA4EC">e</font><font color="#1364EA">a</font><font color="#2015E3">g</font><font color="#120ABA">l</font><font color="#12098A">e</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Nobleeagle|<font color="#2015E3" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow"> <nowiki>[TALK]</nowiki></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Nobleeagle|<font color="#2015E3" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow"> <nowiki>[C]</nowiki></font>]]</sup> 00:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:: Please read [[WP:OR]]. You making the determination that they are wrong is meaningless insofar as Wikipedia is concerned. If you have [[WP:RS| reliable sources]] that back your claim, present them. [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 00:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::What do you call the 10 sources that are presented in that very paragraph. Please read [[Wikipedia:Undue weight]]. I respect your additions of what you believe is true, but it is against Wikipedia policy for such a paragraph in that wording to be in the article. Let's maintain good faith in this discussion. ''' <font color="#000080">—</font> [[User:Nobleeagle|<font color="#000080">N</font><font color="#12098A">o</font><font color="#120ABA">b</font><font color="#2015E3">l</font><font color="#1364EA">e</font><font color="#2BA4EC">e</font><font color="#1364EA">a</font><font color="#2015E3">g</font><font color="#120ABA">l</font><font color="#12098A">e</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Nobleeagle|<font color="#2015E3" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow"> <nowiki>[TALK]</nowiki></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Nobleeagle|<font color="#2015E3" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow"> <nowiki>[C]</nowiki></font>]]</sup> 01:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::: So while [[Human Rights Watch]] is so unreliable a source that it doesn't merit inclusion, "hinduwebsite.com" is the cream of the crop? I included the UN's take on the devdasi system, which mirror's HRW's statements. [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 02:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I'm sorry did you take the time to read [[WP:Undue weight]] ? Let's talk about [[pedophilia]] and [[Mohammed]] shall we? Or [[purdah]]? Or slavery? while were at it. Devadasis were not common in India in the first place, and the practice of devadasi-ing was hardly sanctioned by religious scripture [[USer:BhaiSaab|.]] <b>[[User:Bakasuprman|<font color="purple">Baka</font>]][[User talk:Bakasuprman|<font color="red">man</font>]]</b> 03:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::: I produced sources from the United Nations website condemning Devadasi practice going on NOW, what more do you want? This is a flimsy excuse to delete content. Your other comments don't deserve a response. [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 03:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::I'm sorry [[user|BhaiSaab]] I wasnt aware that I was a sock of rumpelstiltskin.<b>[[User:Bakasuprman|<font color="purple">Baka</font>]][[User talk:Bakasuprman|<font color="red">man</font>]]</b> 03:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::: Ari Gadha'r baccha, ami BhaiSaab na. BhaiSaab shaheb ekjpon Pakistani, Ami Bangali. Thor user page bole thui naki Bangla'r project'e, Bangla bujos? Na beakkol'er mothon edit koros je subjecte thui kicchu janos na? Bangali'r and Pakistani's parthokko bujish na? [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 03:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Ignoring the sockpuppetry comments. I am insulted by the implication provided in that paragraph that Devadasi is somehow a religious practice sanctioned by scriptures. That paragraph blatantly says its a religious practice and implies that it's an actual part of Hinduism to have these Dalit people who you can commit crimes on. That's simply false. If you don't mean to imply such things please ATLEAST change the wording of that paragraph. ''' <font color="#000080">—</font> [[User:Nobleeagle|<font color="#000080">N</font><font color="#12098A">o</font><font color="#120ABA">b</font><font color="#2015E3">l</font><font color="#1364EA">e</font><font color="#2BA4EC">e</font><font color="#1364EA">a</font><font color="#2015E3">g</font><font color="#120ABA">l</font><font color="#12098A">e</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Nobleeagle|<font color="#2015E3" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow"> <nowiki>[TALK]</nowiki></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Nobleeagle|<font color="#2015E3" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow"> <nowiki>[C]</nowiki></font>]]</sup> 03:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
That isn't an implication, that's a direct quote from a UN document, the source is available to you. The fact of the matter is that the caste system and devadasi is part of Hindu culture and history. I'm a Muslim, and I readily acknowlege problems in Islamic history. Muslims have done terrible things, and some still do terrible things. Same with every religion. What I cannot accept is followers of a religion, or extremist religious nationalism as is in this case, using Wikipedia to censor history and wash away things that have once happened or are happening. I'm open to any mediation to deal with this problem here. [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 04:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Both systems are not sanctioned by Hindu scriptures. The Manusmriti refers to the system of varnas but not the hereditary caste system. So they are not religiously-sanctioned actions and are not done in the name of religion. And now it's there's even more "undue weight", with one long paragraph on how Hinduism is a religion that supports mistreating people and then two sentences on how this is not the case. ''' <font color="#000080">—</font> [[User:Nobleeagle|<font color="#000080">N</font><font color="#12098A">o</font><font color="#120ABA">b</font><font color="#2015E3">l</font><font color="#1364EA">e</font><font color="#2BA4EC">e</font><font color="#1364EA">a</font><font color="#2015E3">g</font><font color="#120ABA">l</font><font color="#12098A">e</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Nobleeagle|<font color="#2015E3" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow"> <nowiki>[TALK]</nowiki></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Nobleeagle|<font color="#2015E3" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow"> <nowiki>[C]</nowiki></font>]]</sup> 04:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:: This article isn't about religion, it's about persecution. Whether an atrocity is founded in scripture or practice doesn't matter. Anyway, in most religions, scripture doesn't necessarily dictate religious practice, that's not even the case with religions that have more literalist approaches to religious life, such as Islam. Many things Muslims do as a practice of religion are outside of the Qur'an. I imagine the same is true for Hinduism. Anyway, we don't have the authority to go into that level of analysis. If we had to contrast what a source says regarding what's 'religiously sanctioned', against actual scripture, we'd be engaging in original research. We'd be pretending that we're religious scholars. I found a reliable source that said something, and I edited accordingly. |
|||
Because of all the wikilawyering here, I'm having to almost quote my sources without violation copyright. The source called it 'religiously sanctioned', and that's the phrase I used. I'm open to any mediation, btw, if mediation leads to enforceable actions and presumes that WP policy actually matters. [[User:MinaretDk|MinaretDk]] 04:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 09:13, 13 June 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Persecution of Hindus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 2.5 years |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 24 August 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Semi-protected edit request on 24 December, 2021
[edit]The following addition to "Mughal" section was removed without due reasoning,
There are however reports of Akbar plundering temples and defacing hindu idols after his conquest of Chittoor.[1] Subsequent Mughal Rulers like Shah Jahan are also reported to have demolished temples, broken down hindu idols and killed Brahmins during his rule.[2]
References
- ^ R. Montgomery Martin (1860). The History Of The Indian Empire - Volume I. LONDON PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY. p. 111.
- ^ R. Montgomery Martin (1860). The History Of The Indian Empire - Volume I. LONDON PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY. p. 129.
Semi protected edit request 01/06/2023 , Misinformation in Article
[edit]There is much misinfo in this article ,for example much of the list of massacres shown on the incidents list , are not due to anti hindu religious violence such as the killing of bengali hindus in assam , this was done by assamese hindus and was a ethnic violence, furthermore other cases are political rather than religious like the murder of shanti kali. Most of the evidence has been blown out of proportion to make it seem like hinduphobia is rampant in india which is far from the truth .The article focuses way more on killings of hindus in india espcially historical ones which have been taken out of context and lacks information of actual relevant hinduphobia that happens in pakistan ,bangladesh and afghanistan. 81.104.76.253 (talk) 09:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 July 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please revert this unexplained deletion, made with the misleading edit summary "facebook not a reliable source". 2A00:23EE:19C8:BA81:48C:2DFF:FEC5:9914 (talk) 20:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Done, with some modifications for better coherence with actual source (India Today):
In September 2017, India Today reported that mass graves with bodies of 45 Hindus had been found in Rakhine, and that Hindu Rohingyas faced forced conversions to Islam in Bangladeshi refugee camps at the hands of Muslim Rohingyas.[1]
References
- ^ "Hindu Rohingya refugees forced to convert to Islam in Bangladesh camps". India Today. Retrieved 20 January 2019.
Xan747 (talk) 23:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 30 August 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "According to Teotónio de Souza, Hindus faced some persecution along with some fortitude under the Portuguese in Goa." to "According to P. P. Shirodkar, Hindus faced some persecution along with some fortitude under the Portuguese in Goa." The cited source is available on Google Books, that chapter of the book was written by P. P. Shirodkar and not Teotónio de Souza. The second mention of Teotónio de Souza at the end of the same paragraph also has to be changed to P. P. Shirodkar, for the same reason. 49.15.230.55 (talk) 08:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Lead changes
[edit]You need to have consensus. TrangaBellam (talk) 09:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Here is a proposed version of the lead with widely accepted information from High quality WP:RS sources. Please User:Kautilya3, could you take note, and revise the lead. Thanks RogerYg (talk) 10:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Hindus have experienced both historical and ongoing religious persecution and systematic violence, in the form of forced conversions, documented massacres, genocides, demolition and desecration of temples, as well as the destruction of educational centers.
In the medieval period, some Muslim rulers viewed the expansion of Islamic rule in the Indian sub-continent as a religious conquest ("holy war") against the Hindus (infidels),[1][2] and desecrated many Hindu temples.[1][3] During the British rule, Hindu communities lived in a relative calm until the violent partition of India in 1947, which was accompanied by communal riots and large scale displacement.[4]
In modern times, thousands of Hindu Bengalis, were killed along with other Bengalis in the 1971 Bangladesh genocide by Pakistani soldiers.[5][6] In 1990, over 100,000 Kashmiri Hindus , had to flee from their homes in the Kashmir Valley for safety amid sporadic killings by militants[7], and many Kashmiri Hindus ended up living in refugee camps in Jammu.[8]
- If anyone has any concerns, please discuss them here RogerYg (talk) 09:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Jackson never says that medieval Muslim rulers were persecuting Hindus. TrangaBellam (talk) 11:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Well, Peter Jackson has mentioned (on the cited pages) that the Muslim historians of the medieval era viewed the creation and expansion of Islamic Sultanates in Hindustan as "holy war" and a religious conquest, characterizing Muslim forces as "the army of Islam" and the Hindus as infidels. Though, you may be right that Jackson's opinion was that these claims are exaggerated. RogerYg (talk) 04:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I agree that Jackson's reference alone may not be sufficient in the lead, and I can add several other more relevant references, such as Durant, who has called the Muslim conquest of India "probably the bloodiest story in history". RogerYg (talk) 04:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Well, Peter Jackson has mentioned (on the cited pages) that the Muslim historians of the medieval era viewed the creation and expansion of Islamic Sultanates in Hindustan as "holy war" and a religious conquest, characterizing Muslim forces as "the army of Islam" and the Hindus as infidels. Though, you may be right that Jackson's opinion was that these claims are exaggerated. RogerYg (talk) 04:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- ^ a b Jackson 2003, pp. 19–22, 126–128, 139–142, 173–175, 213–215
- ^ Jackson 2003, pp. 278–289
- ^ Eaton, Richard (2000). "Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States". Journal of Islamic Studies. 11 (3): 283–319. doi:10.1093/jis/11.3.283. JSTOR 26198197.
- ^ Fisher, Michael H. (2018), An Environmental History of India: From Earliest Times to the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781316276044, ISBN 978-1-107-11162-2, LCCN 2018021693, S2CID 134229667,
The partition of South Asia that produced India and West and East Pakistan resulted from years of bitter negotiations.. split roughly along religious 'communal' lines
- ^ "Bangladesh - United States Holocaust Memorial Museum". www.ushmm.org. Retrieved 2023-10-16.
- ^ MacDermot, Niall (June 1972). "The Review" (PDF). International Commission of Jurists. p. 34. Retrieved 29 November 2023.
As far as the other three groups are concerned, namely members of the Awami League, students and Hindus, only Hindus would seem to fall within the definition of ' a national, ethnical, racial or religious group '. There is overwhelming evidence that Hindus were slaughtered and their houses and villages destroyed simply because they were Hindus. The oft repeated phrase ' Hindus are enemies of the state ' as a justification for the killing does not gainsay the intent to commit genocide; rather does it confirm the intention..
- ^ Kapur, S. Paul (2007), Dangerous Deterrent: Nuclear Proliferation and Conflict in South Asia, Stanford University Press, pp. 102–103, ISBN 978-0-8047-5549-8,
When the Kashmir insurgency began, roughly 130,000 to 140,000 Kashmiri Pandits, who are Hindus, lived in Kashmir Valley. By early 1990, in the face of some targeted anti-Pandit attacks and rising overall violence in the region, approximately 100,000 Pandits had fled the valley, many of them ending up in refugee camps in southern Kashmir.
- ^ Rai, Mridu (2021), "Narratives from exile: Kashmiri Pandits and their construction of the past", in Bose, Sugata; Jalal, Ayesha (eds.), Kashmir and the Future of South Asia, Routledge Contemporary South Asia Series, Routledge, pp. 91–115, 106, ISBN 9781000318845,
Beginning in January 1990, such large numbers of Kashmiri Pandits – the community of Hindus native to the valley of Kashmir – left their homeland and so precipitously that some have termed their departure an exodus. Indeed, within a few months, nearly 100,000 of the 140,000-strong community had left for neighboring Jammu, Delhi, and other parts of India. An insignificant number have returned.
Remove Re-organization notice
[edit]The Cleanup reorganize|date=January 2020 notice has been up since 2020. The article layout has since been imrpoved and I think this notice should be removed RogerYg (talk) 09:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In "Bangladesh" section, please do the following.
- Action-1
Replace the existing "see also" navigation template with the following two templates
-- Added Freedom of religion in Bangladesh & Bangladesh Genocide as they are a direct relevant link, other links are sub-headings & aliases that may not be needed and even may be confusing RogerYg (talk) 04:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- DONE unless argued otherwise. Please provide more relevant reasons if you re-raise the request RogerYg
- Action-2
Malaun (from arabic for "accursed") is a pejorative term for Bengali Hindus, most commonly used in Bangladesh by Bengali Muslims.[1][2][3][4] Percentage of Muslims is continuously rising, while all non-muslim minorities have been continuously decreasing rapidly in Bangladesh due to various reasons including persecution, genocide, ethnic cleansing and rapes. Since 1951, Hindu population decreased by 15.1% in 71 years, and during the same period Muslim population increased by exactly by the same 15.1% (76% to 91.1%). Percentage of Hindus declined more than two third (over 67% drop) in 71 years, i.e. from 22% of total population of Bangladesh in 1951 to 13.5% in 1974 (8.5% decrease in 20 years),[5] and then to drop again to 6.9% in 2022 (further 1.6% decrease).[6] Hindus and others have been regularly and systematically persecuted, such as during the Bangladesh genocide, Bangladesh Liberation War and numerous recurring massacres of civilians[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] where rapes is also used as weapon.[14][15] Active perpetrators of genocide, ethnic cleansing and rapes of Hindus in Bangladesh include the Pakistani Military,[11] Al Badr,[16][17] Al Sham,[18] East Pakistan Central Peace Committee,[19] Razakars,[20] Muslim League,[21] Jamaat-e-Islami,[21] and the Urdu-speaking Biharis.[21]
Thank you. 119.74.238.54 (talk) 10:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
-- Included the part directly relevant to Hindu persecution ie. the declining numbers.
- Can be considered DONE unless argued otherwise. RogerYg (talk) 04:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- ^ Roy, Tathagata (2002). My People, Uprooted. Kolkata: Ratna Prakashan. p. 18. ISBN 81-85709-67-X.
- ^ Dastidar, Sachi (12 April 2008). "Bangladesh: The Upcoming National Elections, Pluralism, Tolerance and the Plight of Hindu and Non-Muslim Minority - Need a New Direction". Bangladesh: Religious Freedom, Extremism, Security, and the Upcoming National Elections. United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. Archived from the original on 28 August 2013. Retrieved 13 September 2013.
- ^ "Minorities Fear for Life and Security" (PDF). HRCBM. 12 September 2002. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
- ^ Chatterjee, Garga (4 March 2015). "The unholy killings of Avijit Roy and Govind Pansare". Daily News and Analysis. Retrieved 9 March 2015.
- ^ "Bangladesh- Population census 1991: Religious Composition 1901–1991". Bangladeshgov.org. 2 August 2016. Archived from the original on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
- ^ "Population and Housing Census 2022 Preliminary Report". Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. August 2022. Archived from the original on 8 October 2022. Retrieved 2022-10-08.
- ^ "Forkan Razakar's verdict any day". Dhaka Tribune. 14 June 2015.
- ^ "Why is the mass sexualized violence of Bangladesh's Liberation War being ignored?". Women In The World. 25 March 2016.
- ^ "Discovery of numerous Mass Graves, Various types of torture on Women" and "People's Attitude" (PDF). kean.edu.
- ^ "Crimes Against Humanity in Bangladesh". scholar.smu.edu.
- ^ a b "Bangladesh war: The article that changed history". BBC News. 25 March 2010.
- ^ White, Matthew, Death Tolls for the Major Wars and Atrocities of the Twentieth Century
- ^ "First Razakar camp in Khulna turns into ghost house after Liberation War". www.observerbd.com. Retrieved 2023-04-26.
- ^ Sharlach, Lisa (2000). "Rape as Genocide: Bangladesh, the Former Yugoslavia, and Rwanda". New Political Science. 22 (1): 92–93. doi:10.1080/713687893. S2CID 144966485.
- ^ Sajjad, Tazreena (2012) [First published 2009]. "The Post-Genocidal Period and its Impact on Women". In Totten, Samuel (ed.). Plight and Fate of Women During and Following Genocide. Transaction Publishers. p. 225. ISBN 978-1-4128-4759-9.
- ^ Mamoon, Muntassir. "Al-Badr". Banglapedia. Bangladesh Asiatic Society. Retrieved 4 September 2016.
- ^ Sisson, Richard; Rose, Leo E. (1991). War and Secession: Pakistan, India, and the Creation of Bangladesh. University of California Press. p. 165. ISBN 978-0-520-07665-5.
- ^ "Pakistan's first two militant Islamist groups, Al-Badar and Al-Shams – by Nadeem F. Paracha". LUBP. Archived from the original on 27 December 2015. Retrieved 29 December 2015.
- ^ Karlekar, Hiranmay (2005). Bangladesh: The Next Afghanistan?. SAGE. p. 149. ISBN 978-0-7619-3401-1.
- ^ "Govt publishes list of Razakars". The Daily Star. 16 December 2019.
- ^ a b c Kann, Peter R. (27 July 1971). "East Pakistan Is Seen Gaining Independence, But It Will Take Years". The Wall Street Journal.
Change "India" to "Post-Independence India"
[edit]The sub-title India is very vague. It follows the Medieval India, and British India; and refers to post-Independence India. Therefore, the appropriate subtitle is: Post-Independence India. If anyone has any issue with that you may discuss here. RogerYg (talk) 11:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
History
[edit]False history of Aurangzeb is seems to be added in Wikipedia,must be corrected by any impartial historian to maintain credibility of Wikipedia 223.233.83.104 (talk) 02:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Opening paragraphs in "Medieval India"
[edit]There is little clarity and flow in this section, in my view.
As an example:
“ | While there is a tendency to view the Muslim conquests and Muslim empires as a prolonged period of violence against Hindu culture, Durant called the Muslim conquest of India "probably the bloodiest story in history" in between the periods of wars and conquests, there were harmonious Hindu-Muslim relations in most Indian communities, and the Indian population grew during the medieval Muslim times. No populations were expelled based on their religion by either the Muslim or Hindu kings, nor were attempts made to annihilate a specific religion. | ” |
It says "While there is" which suggests the claim is more disputed than it might appear. Then it gives a historian who in fact agrees with the claim that it's the bloodiest in history. But then it ends with the a citation that disputes that particular claim.
The succeeding paragraphs are similar, with over-quotations of Romila Thapar's point of view, which have little to do with historical facts. As an example, the quotation of upper caste Hindus being lumped together with lower caste Hindus, and their perception of history and persecution as a result. This could be put into a different section if needed, but as an example, the historian Durant is not an "upper caste Hindu", and there are many other western Indologists quoted throughout the article which reduce Thapar's claim to more of a viewpoint epistemology than factual.
This is yet another quotation from the opening paragraphs:
“ | She questions what persecution means, and if it means religious conversions, she doubts that conversions can be interpreted as forms of persecution. According to Thapar, it is quite correct to mention that Muslim iconoclasts destroyed temples and the broke images of Hindus but it should also be mentioned that Muslim rulers made donations to Hindu sects during their rule. | ” |
The article, specifically, is about Hindu persecution. Why does it need to be mentioned in the introductory paragraphs that Muslim donations were also made to Hindu sects? It does not invalidate Hindu persecution at their hands. And why does the question of "what persecution means" need to be mentioned when there are many factual claims in the proceeding paragraphs?
I'm writing this to point out that there's been clear edit warring going on, based on politics. I'd like this section to be edited with consensus, and the points of view can be moved to a later section. Indosociology111 (talk) 09:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've also changed the claim that "Hindutva allies" dub it a Hindu holocaust, when the sources had only one journalist who said so. This isn't the place for proving your political point. Not all claims about Hindu persecution are coming from "Hindutva allies", and there's an equal amount of misinformation from the "other side", if I may. Indosociology111 (talk) 09:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia articles that use Indian English
- B-Class Hinduism articles
- Mid-importance Hinduism articles
- B-Class Religion articles
- Mid-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- B-Class Discrimination articles
- Mid-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- B-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- B-Class Pakistan articles
- Mid-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class Bangladesh articles
- Low-importance Bangladesh articles
- WikiProject Bangladesh articles