User talk:Oddsausageparty: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Accepted |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:AN-notice--> [[User:Dormskirk|Dormskirk]] ([[User talk:Dormskirk|talk]]) 12:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC) |
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:AN-notice--> [[User:Dormskirk|Dormskirk]] ([[User talk:Dormskirk|talk]]) 12:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC) |
||
{{unblock| <p> In 2018, I abused my Wikipedia account. Now wanting to return and positively contribute to Wikipedia, I am asking for this block to be removed given the time that has lapsed. I made an enormous mistake in abusing my edit privileges and can see the damage and harm I caused. Not only did it require other administrators to spend their time to correct, but could have led to misinformation being spread. I have learnt from my mistake and can confirm I will not do this again. I am sorry and hope to prove this by making amends - I have thought of positive edits including supporting pages requiring further development around chemistry and physics which I am studying in college.</P> |
{{unblock reviewed |1= <p> In 2018, I abused my Wikipedia account. Now wanting to return and positively contribute to Wikipedia, I am asking for this block to be removed given the time that has lapsed. I made an enormous mistake in abusing my edit privileges and can see the damage and harm I caused. Not only did it require other administrators to spend their time to correct, but could have led to misinformation being spread. I have learnt from my mistake and can confirm I will not do this again. I am sorry and hope to prove this by making amends - I have thought of positive edits including supporting pages requiring further development around chemistry and physics which I am studying in college.</P> <p>Candyapple690 refers to the main sockpuppet account that I had used abusively. This belongs to my sibling and in line with Wikipedia policy, I first requested the review of that block. Having had it approved, I now wish to ask whether it may be possible for the ban for this account to be reviewed as it is the one I wish to use. I hope this makes sense, thank you for your time and consideration.</P> |accept = Accepted based on [[User talk:Candyapple690]]. Please note, you are expected and required to stick to a single account going forward. I understand you will use this account and not {{np|Candyapple690}}. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 10:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
||
<p>Candyapple690 refers to the main sockpuppet account that I had used abusively. This belongs to my sibling and in line with Wikipedia policy, I first requested the review of that block. Having had it approved, I now wish to ask whether it may be possible for the ban for this account to be reviewed as it is the one I wish to use. I hope this makes sense, thank you for your time and consideration.</P>}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 10:30, 12 January 2022
February 2018
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Canford School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Canford again
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nick Parker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 11:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Canford yet again
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at James Perowne, you may be blocked from editing. Dormskirk (talk) 12:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 12:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Oddsausageparty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
In 2018, I abused my Wikipedia account. Now wanting to return and positively contribute to Wikipedia, I am asking for this block to be removed given the time that has lapsed. I made an enormous mistake in abusing my edit privileges and can see the damage and harm I caused. Not only did it require other administrators to spend their time to correct, but could have led to misinformation being spread. I have learnt from my mistake and can confirm I will not do this again. I am sorry and hope to prove this by making amends - I have thought of positive edits including supporting pages requiring further development around chemistry and physics which I am studying in college.
Candyapple690 refers to the main sockpuppet account that I had used abusively. This belongs to my sibling and in line with Wikipedia policy, I first requested the review of that block. Having had it approved, I now wish to ask whether it may be possible for the ban for this account to be reviewed as it is the one I wish to use. I hope this makes sense, thank you for your time and consideration.
Accept reason:
Accepted based on User talk:Candyapple690. Please note, you are expected and required to stick to a single account going forward. I understand you will use this account and not Candyapple690. Yamla (talk) 10:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)