Talk:Sikorsky CH-148 Cyclone: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m 2005/1/28 Marine One contract |
→Quality of writing: new section |
||
(114 intermediate revisions by 41 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk header}} |
|||
So, does the January 28th announcement that the [[Marine One]] fleet will be replaced with the [[US101]] mean that the H-92 is no longer in contention for the Marine Corps contract? Or does the USMC maintain a separate fleet for routine use? [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] 20:56, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC) |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
|||
{{WikiProject Aviation|B-Class-1= no <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |
|||
|B-Class-2= yes <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |
|||
|B-Class-3= yes <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |
|||
|B-Class-4= yes <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |
|||
|B-Class-5= yes <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |
|||
|Rotorcraft= yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Military history|class= C|B-Class-1= no |B-Class-2= yes |B-Class-3= yes |B-Class-4= yes |B-Class-5= yes |Aviation=yes |Maritime=yes |Canadian= yes |US= yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Canada|importance= low |military=yes}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== Quality of writing == |
|||
Apparently no one has edited this article - there are sufficient mis-matches in tense to cause doubts about its accuracy. Would someone with better English skills and knowledge of the subject please clean it up. [[Special:Contributions/134.41.30.226|134.41.30.226]] ([[User talk:134.41.30.226|talk]]) 23:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:02, 5 May 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sikorsky CH-148 Cyclone article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quality of writing
[edit]Apparently no one has edited this article - there are sufficient mis-matches in tense to cause doubts about its accuracy. Would someone with better English skills and knowledge of the subject please clean it up. 134.41.30.226 (talk) 23:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class rotorcraft articles
- Rotorcraft task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- C-Class Canadian military history articles
- Canadian military history task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages