Economy of the United States: Difference between revisions
888888jdog (talk | contribs) put 'has' in the past tense within the sentence describing America's GDP rankings in 2021 |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description| |
{{Short description|None}} |
||
{{Redirect|Economy of America}} |
|||
{{Use American English|date=September 2019}} |
{{Use American English|date=September 2019}} |
||
{{Use mdy dates|date= |
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2024}} |
||
{{Infobox economy |
{{Infobox economy |
||
| country = the United States |
| country = the United States |
||
| image = |
| image = Lower_Manhattan_skyline_-_June_2017.jpg |
||
| image_size = |
| image_size = 310px |
||
| caption = [[New York City]], the world's principal [[fintech]] and [[financial center]]<ref name=NYCFintechAndFinancialCapitalWorld>{{cite web|url = https://www.longfinance.net/publications/long-finance-reports/the-global-financial-centres-index-36/|title = The Global Financial Centres Index 36|date = September 24, 2024|publisher = Long Finance|access-date = September 27, 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url = https://www.reuters.com/business/new-york-widens-lead-over-london-top-finance-centres-index-2022-03-24/ |title = New York widens lead over London in top finance centres index |website = Reuters |access-date = September 27, 2024 |last1 = Jones |first1 = Huw }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://themessenger.com/business/sorry-london-new-york-is-still-the-financial-capital-of-the-world|title=Sorry, London — New York Is Still the Financial Capital of the World|author=Laura Bratton|publisher=The Messenger|date=September 28, 2023|access-date=October 1, 2023|quote=The GDP of the New York City metropolitan area is larger than the country of South Korea...New York City was ranked as the most competitive city in the financial industry for the fifth straight year.|archive-date=October 11, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231011211612/https://themessenger.com/business/sorry-london-new-york-is-still-the-financial-capital-of-the-world|url-status=dead}}</ref> and the epicenter of the [[List of metropolitan areas by GDP over US$100 billion|world's principal metropolitan economy]]<ref name=NYCEpicenterUSMetroEconomy>{{cite web|url=https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/09/united-states-america-economic-output-new-york-la/|title=This 3D map shows the U.S. cities with the highest economic output|author=Iman Ghosh|publisher=World Economic Forum|date=September 24, 2020|access-date=March 5, 2023|quote=The New York metro area dwarfs all other cities for economic output by a large margin.}}</ref> |
|||
| caption = [[New York City]], the [[financial center]] of the United States and the financial capital of the world<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.longfinance.net/media/documents/GFCI_28_Full_Report_2020.09.25_v1.1.pdf|title=The Global Financial Centres iIndex 18|date=September 2020|publisher=Long Finance}}</ref> |
|||
| currency = [[United States dollar]] (USD) {{increase}} |
| currency = [[United States dollar]] (Sign: $; Code: USD) <br /> {{increase}} [[US Dollar Index]] |
||
| year = October 1 |
| year = October 1 – September 30 |
||
| organs = [[World Trade Organization|WTO]], [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development|OECD]] and others |
| organs = [[World Trade Organization|WTO]], [[G-20 major economies|G-20]], [[Group of Seven|G7]], [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development|OECD]], [[United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement|USMCA]], [[Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation|APEC]] and others |
||
| group = {{plainlist| |
| group = {{plainlist| |
||
* [[Developed country| |
* [[Developed country|Advanced economy]]<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2024/April/groups-and-aggregates |title=World Economic Outlook Database Groups and Aggregates Information |publisher=[[International Monetary Fund]] |website=IMF.org}}</ref> |
||
* [[World Bank high-income economy|High-income economy]]<ref>{{cite web |url=https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups |title=World Bank Country and Lending Groups |publisher=[[World Bank]] |website=datahelpdesk.worldbank.org |access-date=September 29, 2019}}</ref> |
* [[World Bank high-income economy|High-income economy]]<ref>{{cite web |url=https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups |title=World Bank Country and Lending Groups |publisher=[[World Bank]] |website=datahelpdesk.worldbank.org |access-date=September 29, 2019}}</ref> |
||
* [[Welfare state]]<ref name="US_welfare"/><ref name="Kenworthy"/> |
|||
| population = {{increase}} 332,403,650 (1-Jan-2022)<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.census.gov/popclock/?intcmp=home_pop |title=U.S. and World Population Clock |publisher=U.S.census.gov (https://www.census.gov) |access-date=2022-01-01}}</ref><ref name="Worldometer">{{Cite web|url=https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/us-population/|title = United States Population (2021) - Worldometer}}</ref> |
|||
}} |
|||
| gdp = {{increase}} $24.79 trillion (est 2022)<ref name="GDP IMF">{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2021/October|title=World Economic Outlook Database, October 2021 |date=October 2021 |website=IMF.org |publisher=[[International Monetary Fund]]|access-date=January 3, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
| population = 340,332,281 (August 30, 2023)<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.census.gov/popclock/?intcmp=home_pop |title=U.S. and World Population Clock |publisher=[[United States census]] |access-date=June 26, 2023}}</ref> |
|||
| gdp rank = {{plainlist| |
|||
| gdp = {{plainlist| |
|||
* [[List of countries by GDP (nominal)|1st (nominal; 2022)]] |
|||
*{{increase}} $29.167 trillion ([[GDP (nominal)|nominal]]; 2024)<ref name="IMFWEOUS">{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2024/October/weo-report?c=111,&s=NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,&sy=2022&ey=2027&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1 |title=Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: October 2024|publisher=[[International Monetary Fund]]|website=imf.org}}</ref> |
|||
* [[List of countries by GDP (PPP)|2nd (PPP; 2022)]]}} |
|||
*{{increase}} $29.167 trillion ([[Purchasing power parity|PPP]]; 2024)<ref name="IMFWEOUS"/> |
|||
| growth = {{plainlist| |
|||
}} |
|||
* 2.9% (2018) 2.3% (2019) |
|||
| gdp rank = {{plainlist| |
|||
* −3.5% (2020)<ref name="BEAGDP">{{cite web |title=Gross Domestic Product, 4th Quarter and Year 2020 (Advance Estimate) |url=https://www.bea.gov/news/2021/gross-domestic-product-4th-quarter-and-year-2020-advance-estimate |website=bea.gov |publisher=Bureau of Economic Analysis |access-date=August 8, 2021}}</ref> 7.39% (2021e)<ref name="IMFWEOUS2021">{{cite web |title=World Economic Outlook Update, January 2021 |url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2021/01/26/2021-world-economic-outlook-update |website=IMF.org |publisher=International Monetary Fund |access-date=March 17, 2021}}</ref>}} |
|||
* [[List of countries by GDP (nominal)|1st (nominal; 2024)]] |
|||
* [[List of countries by GDP (PPP)|2nd (PPP; 2024)]] |
|||
}} |
|||
| growth = {{plainlist| |
|||
* 2.5% (2022)<ref name="IMF_datamapper">{{cite web | url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/USA| title=IMF DataMapper - United States|work=[[International Monetary Fund]]|date=October 25, 2024}}</ref> |
|||
* 2.9% (2023)<ref name="IMF_datamapper"/> |
|||
* 2.8% (2024)<ref name="IMF_datamapper"/> (forecast) |
|||
}} |
|||
| per capita = {{plainlist| |
|||
*{{increase}} $82,715 (nominal; 2023)<ref name="IMFWEOUS"/> |
|||
*{{increase}} $82,715 (PPP; 2023)<ref name="IMFWEOUS"/> |
|||
}} |
|||
| per capita rank = {{plainlist| |
| per capita rank = {{plainlist| |
||
* [[List of countries by GDP |
* [[List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita|6th (nominal; 2024)]] |
||
* [[List of countries by GDP |
* [[List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita|9th (PPP; 2024)]] |
||
}} |
|||
| cpi = {{steady}} 69 out of 100 points (2023)<ref name="ti_2023">{{cite web |url=https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023 |title=CPI 2023 |date=30 January 2024 |publisher=[[Transparency International]] |access-date=30 January 2024 |archive-date=4 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204001659/https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023 |url-status=live }}</ref> ([[Corruption Perceptions Index#Ranking over Time|rank 24th]]) |
|||
| sectors = {{plainlist| |
| sectors = {{plainlist| |
||
* [[Primary sector of the economy|Agriculture]]: 0.9% |
* [[Primary sector of the economy|Agriculture]]: 0.9% |
||
* [[Secondary sector of the economy|Industry]]: 18.9% |
* [[Secondary sector of the economy|Industry]]: 18.9% |
||
* [[Tertiary sector of the economy|Services]]: 80.2% |
* [[Tertiary sector of the economy|Services]]: 80.2% |
||
* (2017 est.)<ref name="CIA_US">{{cite web|title= |
* (2017 est.)<ref name="CIA_US">{{cite web|title=United States|url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/|website=CIA.gov|publisher=[[Central Intelligence Agency]]|access-date=April 3, 2023}}</ref>}} |
||
| components = {{plainlist| |
| components = {{plainlist| |
||
* Household consumption: |
* Household consumption: 67.9% |
||
* Government consumption: 17.3% |
* Government consumption: 17.3% |
||
* Investment in fixed capital: 17. |
* Investment in fixed capital: 17.5% |
||
* Investment in inventories: 0. |
* Investment in inventories: 0.2% |
||
* Exports of goods and services: |
* Exports of goods and services: 11.1% |
||
* Imports of goods and services: |
* Imports of goods and services: −14% |
||
* (2023 est.)<ref name="GDP Data">{{cite web |url= https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2024-05/gdp1q24-2nd.pdf|title=Gross Domestic Product (Second Estimate), Corporate Profits (Preliminary Estimate), First Quarter 2024|website=[[Bureau of Economic Analysis]] |date=May 30, 2024 }}</ref>}} |
|||
* (2017 est.)<ref name="CIA_US" />}} |
|||
| inflation = 3% (2023)<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2023-07-12/us-inflation-falls-to-3-lowest-level-in-more-than-2-years-as-price-pressures-ease|title=U.S. inflation falls to 3%, lowest level in more than 2 years, as price pressures ease|website=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=July 12, 2023 }}</ref> |
|||
| inflationary = {{plainlist| |
|||
* 1.5% (2020 est.)<ref name="IMFWEOUS">{{cite web |title=World Economic Outlook Database, October 2020 |url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2020/October/weo-report?c=111,&s=NGDP_RPCH,NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,PCPIPCH,&sy=2018&ey=2025&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1 |website=IMF.org |publisher=International Monetary Fund |access-date=October 18, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
* 1.7% (Aug. 2019)<ref>{{cite web|title=Consumer Price Index – August 2019|date=September 12, 2019|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/12/us-consumer-price-index-august-2019.html|publisher= CNBC}}</ref>}} |
|||
| millionaires = |
|||
| poverty = {{plainlist| |
| poverty = {{plainlist| |
||
*{{ |
*{{decreasePositive}} 11.1% (2023)<ref name="PovertyCB">{{cite web|title=Poverty in the United States: 2023 |url=https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2024/demo/p60-283.html|date=September 10, 2024|publisher=[[United States Census Bureau]] |access-date=October 22, 2024}}</ref> |
||
*{{ |
*{{decreasePositive}} 36.8 million (2023)<ref name="PovertyCB" /> |
||
}} |
|||
| gini = {{plainlist| |
| gini = {{plainlist| |
||
*{{ |
*{{decreasePositive}} 46.7 {{color|red|high}} (2022, [[United States Census Bureau|USCB]])<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/visualizations/2023/demo/p60-279/figure3.pdf |publisher=United States Census Bureau |title=Income Distribution Measures and Percent Change Using Money Income and Equivalence-Adjusted Income |website=census.gov|access-date=May 14, 2024}}</ref> |
||
* |
*41.7 {{color|darkorange|medium}} (2020, [[Congressional Budget Office|CBO]])<ref>{{cite web |title=The Distribution of Household Income, 2020 |url=https://www.cbo.gov/publication/59757 |website=cbo.gov |date=November 14, 2023 |publisher=[[Congressional Budget Office]] |access-date=May 14, 2024}}</ref>}} |
||
| hdi = {{plainlist| |
| hdi = {{plainlist| |
||
* {{increase}} 0. |
* {{increase}} 0.927 {{color|darkgreen|very high}} (2022)<ref name="ushdi">{{Cite web |date=13 March 2024 |title=Human Development Report 2023/2024 |url=https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2023-24reporten.pdf|url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240313164319/https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2023-24reporten.pdf |archive-date=13 March 2024 |access-date=5 May 2024 |publisher=[[United Nations Development Programme]] |language=en}}</ref> ([[List of countries by Human Development Index|20th]]) |
||
* {{increase}} 0. |
* {{increase}} 0.823 {{color|darkgreen|very high}} [[List of countries by inequality-adjusted HDI|IHDI (27th)]] (2022)<ref name="ushdi"/>}} |
||
| labor = {{plainlist| |
| labor = {{plainlist| |
||
* |
* 161,200,000 (2023)<ref name="BLS_JobsData" /> |
||
* |
* 62.4% employment rate (2023)<ref name="BLS_JobsData" />}} |
||
| unemployment = {{plainlist| |
| unemployment = {{plainlist| |
||
* {{ |
* {{increaseNegative}} 4.2% (November 2024)<ref name="BLS_JobsData">{{cite web|url=https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t01.htm |title=Employment status of the civilian population by sex and age |publisher=[[Bureau of Labor Statistics]] |website=BLS.gov |access-date=December 6, 2024}}</ref> |
||
* {{decreasePositive}} |
* {{decreasePositive}} 13.2% youth unemployment (November 2024; 16 to 19 year-olds)<ref name="BLS_JobsData" /> |
||
* {{ |
* {{increaseNegative}} 7.1 million unemployed (November 2024)<ref name="BLS_JobsData" />}} |
||
| average gross salary = $ |
| average gross salary = [[List of American countries by monthly average wage|$5,605, monthly]]<ref name=wage2023>{{cite web | url=https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/04/taxing-wages-2024_f869da31/dbcbac85-en.pdf| title=Taxing Wages 2024|website=www.oecd.org }}</ref> (2023) |
||
| average net salary = [[List of American countries by monthly average wage|$4,246, monthly]]<ref name=wage2023/> (2023) |
|||
| gross median = {{increase}} $1,010 weekly (Q4, 2021)<ref>{{cite web |title=Usual Weekly Earnings Summary |url=https://www.bls.gov/news.release/wkyeng.nr0.htm |website=www.bls.gov |publisher=Bureau of Labor Statistics |date=January 17, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
| gross median = {{increase}} $1,041 weekly (Q2, 2022)<ref>{{cite web |title=Usual Weekly Earnings Summary |url=https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/wkyeng.pdf |website=www.bls.gov |publisher=Bureau of Labor Statistics |date=January 17, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
| occupations = {{plainlist| |
| occupations = {{plainlist| |
||
* [[Primary sector of the economy|Agriculture]]: 1.0% |
* [[Primary sector of the economy|Agriculture]]: 1.0% |
||
Line 65: | Line 78: | ||
* [[Tertiary sector of the economy|Services]]: 80% |
* [[Tertiary sector of the economy|Services]]: 80% |
||
* (FY 2018)<ref>{{cite web|title=Employment by major industry sector|url=https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/employment-by-major-industry-sector.htm|publisher=Bureau of Labor Statistics|access-date=July 5, 2018}}</ref>}} |
* (FY 2018)<ref>{{cite web|title=Employment by major industry sector|url=https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/employment-by-major-industry-sector.htm|publisher=Bureau of Labor Statistics|access-date=July 5, 2018}}</ref>}} |
||
| industries = {{hlist| [[High-technology]] | [[petroleum]] | [[steel]] | [[motor vehicles]] | [[aerospace]] | [[telecommunications]] | [[chemicals]] | [[electronics]] | [[agribusiness]] | [[food processing]] | [[information technology]] | [[artificial intelligence]] | [[consumer goods]] | [[lumber]] | [[retail]] | [[healthcare]] | [[financial services]] | [[mining]] | [[renewable energy]] | [[quantum computing]] | [[space technology]] | [[Arms industry|defence]] | [[biotechnology]] | [[Pharmaceutical industry|pharmaceutical]] }} |
|||
| edbr = {{increase}} [[Ease of doing business index#Ranking|6th (very easy, 2020)]]<ref name="World Bank and International Financial Corporation">{{cite web |url=http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploreeconomies/united-states |title=Ease of Doing Business in United States |publisher=Doingbusiness.org |access-date=2017-11-21 |df=mdy-all}}</ref> |
|||
| exports = $3.053 trillion (2023)<ref name=bea>{{cite web|title=us-international-trade-goods-and-services-december-2023 |url=https://www.bea.gov/news/2024/us-international-trade-goods-and-services-december-and-annual-2023|work=[[Bureau of Economic Analysis]]|access-date=February 8, 2024}}</ref> |
|||
| industries = {{hlist| [[Petroleum]] | [[steel]] | [[motor vehicles]] | [[aerospace]] | [[telecommunications]] | [[chemicals]] | [[electronics]] | [[food processing]] | [[information technology]] | [[consumer goods]] | [[lumber]]| [[mining]] }} |
|||
| exports = {{decrease}} $2.127 trillion (2020)<ref name=wto>{{cite web|title=U.S. trade in goods with World, Seasonally Adjusted |url=https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/Press-Release/current_press_release/ft900.pdf|work=[[United States Census Bureau]]|access-date=June 1, 2021}}</ref> |
|||
| export-goods = {{ublist|[[Agricultural]] products 10.7%| [[Fuels]] and [[mining]] products 9.4%| [[Manufacturers]] 74.8%| Others 5.1%<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/historical/SAEXP.pdf|title=Exports of goods by principal end-use category|work=Census Bureau}}</ref>}} |
| export-goods = {{ublist|[[Agricultural]] products 10.7%| [[Fuels]] and [[mining]] products 9.4%| [[Manufacturers]] 74.8%| Others 5.1%<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/historical/SAEXP.pdf|title=Exports of goods by principal end-use category|work=Census Bureau}}</ref>}} |
||
| export-partners = {{ublist|{{flag|European Union}}( |
| export-partners = {{ublist |
||
| {{flag|European Union}}(-) 18.3% |
|||
| {{flag|Canada}}(-) 17.5% |
|||
| {{flag|Mexico}}(+) 16.0% |
|||
| {{flag|China}}(-) 7.3% |
|||
| {{flag|Japan}}(-) 3.8% |
|||
||Other countries 37.1%<ref name=wto>{{cite web|title=U.S. trade in goods with World, Seasonally Adjusted |url=https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/Press-Release/current_press_release/ft900.pdf|work=[[United States Census Bureau]]|access-date=June 1, 2021}}</ref>}} |
|||
| imports = {{decrease}} $2.808 trillion (2020)<ref name=wto /> |
|||
| imports = $3.827 trillion (2023)<ref name=bea /> |
|||
| import-goods = {{ublist|[[Agricultural]] products 10.5%| [[Fuels]] and [[mining]] products 10.7%| [[Manufacturers]] 78.4%| Others 4.2%<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/historical/SAIMP.pdf|title=Imports of goods by principal end-use category|work=Census Bureau}}</ref>}} |
| import-goods = {{ublist|[[Agricultural]] products 10.5%| [[Fuels]] and [[mining]] products 10.7%| [[Manufacturers]] 78.4%| Others 4.2%<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/historical/SAIMP.pdf|title=Imports of goods by principal end-use category|work=Census Bureau}}</ref>}} |
||
| import-partners = {{ublist|{{flag| |
| import-partners = {{ublist |
||
| {{flag|European Union}}(+) 23.6% |
|||
| {{flag|Mexico}}(+) 15.4% |
|||
| {{flag|China}}(-) 13.9% |
|||
| {{flag|Canada}}(+) 13.7% |
|||
| {{flag|Japan}}(-) 4.8% |
|||
||Others 28.6%<ref name=wto />}} |
|||
| current account = {{plainlist| |
|||
| current account = {{decrease}} −$501.3 billion (2020 est.)<ref name="CIAWFUS">{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/ |title=The World Factbook |publisher=[[Central Intelligence Agency]] |website=CIA.gov |access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
* {{increaseNegative}} −$948.64 billion (2024)<ref name="IMF_Finance"/> |
|||
* {{decreasePositive}} −3.25% of GDP (2024)<ref name="IMF_Finance"/> |
|||
}} |
|||
| FDI = {{plainlist| |
| FDI = {{plainlist| |
||
* {{increase}} Inward: $ |
* {{increase}} Inward: $367 billion (2021)<ref name="UNFDI">{{cite web|title=UNCTAD 2022|url=https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tdstat47_en.pdf|access-date=January 6, 2022|website=UNCTAD}}</ref> |
||
* {{increase}} Outward: $ |
* {{increase}} Outward: $403 billion (2021)<ref name="UNFDI"/> |
||
}} |
|||
| debt = {{increaseNegative}} 128.6% of GDP (FY 2020)<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/us_debt_to_gdp|title=Federal Debt: Total Public Debt as Percent of Gross Domestic Product}}</ref> |
|||
| consumption = {{increase}} 85.2% of GDP (2023)<ref name="GDP Data" /> |
|||
| gross external debt = {{increaseNegative}} $21.3 trillion (December 2020)<ref>{{Cite web|publisher=U.S. Department of the Treasury|url=https://ticdata.treasury.gov/Publish/debta2020q3.html|title=Treasury TIC Data|access-date=2021-01-30 |df=mdy-all}}</ref> note: approximately four-fifths of US external debt is denominated in US dollars<ref name="CIAWFUS" /> |
|||
| gfcf = {{increase}} 17.7% of GDP (2023)<ref name="GDP Data" /> |
|||
| revenue = $3.42 trillion (2020)<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.usgovernmentrevenue.com/ |title=US Government Finances: Revenue, Deficit, Debt, Spending since 1792}}</ref> |
|||
| |
| yield curve = 10-year bond 5.09% (April 2024)<ref>{{cite web | url=https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IRLTLT01USM156N | title=Interest Rates: Long-Term Government Bond Yields: 10-Year: Main (Including Benchmark) for United States }}</ref> |
||
| pmi = {{plainlist| |
|||
| deficit = {{increaseNegative}} −2.9 of GDP (2016)<br />note: for the US, revenues exclude social contributions of approximately $1.0{{nbs}}trillion; expenditures exclude social benefits of approximately $2.3{{nbs}}trillion (2015 est.) |
|||
* {{increase}} 50.3 Manufacturing (Mar 2024)<ref name="auto1">{{Cite web|url=https://www.pmi.spglobal.com/|title=PMI, Purchasing Managers' Index – Manufacturing, Services|website=www.pmi.spglobal.com}}</ref> |
|||
* {{increase}} 51.4 Services (Mar 2024)<ref name="auto1"/> |
|||
}} |
|||
| debt = {{plainlist| |
|||
* {{increaseNegative}} $35.294 trillion |
|||
* {{increaseNegative}} 121% of GDP (2024)<ref name="IMF_Finance">{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2024/October/weo-report?c=111,&s=NGDP_R,NGDP_RPCH,NGDP,NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDP_D,NGDPRPC,NGDPRPPPPC,NGDPPC,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,NGAP_NPGDP,PPPSH,PPPEX,NID_NGDP,NGSD_NGDP,PCPI,PCPIPCH,PCPIE,PCPIEPCH,TM_RPCH,TMG_RPCH,TX_RPCH,TXG_RPCH,LUR,LE,LP,GGR,GGR_NGDP,GGX,GGX_NGDP,GGXCNL,GGXCNL_NGDP,GGSB,GGSB_NPGDP,GGXONLB,GGXONLB_NGDP,GGXWDN,GGXWDN_NGDP,GGXWDG,GGXWDG_NGDP,NGDP_FY,BCA,BCA_NGDPD,&sy=2022&ey=2025&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1 |title=Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: October 2024|publisher=[[International Monetary Fund]]|website=imf.org}}</ref> |
|||
}} |
|||
| gross external debt = {{increaseNegative}} $27 trillion (2023)<ref>{{cite web|publisher=U.S. Department of the Treasury|url=https://ticdata.treasury.gov/Publish/debta2022q3.html|title=Treasury TIC Data|access-date=January 30, 2022 }}</ref> |
|||
| revenue = $8.720 trillion<ref name="IMF_Finance"/><br />29.9% of GDP (2024) |
|||
| expenses = $10.945 trillion<ref name="IMF_Finance"/><br />37.5% of GDP (2024)<br />{{small|[[Government spending in the United States]]}} |
|||
| balance = –6.3% of GDP (2023)<ref name="CBO_Hist_20">{{cite web |url=https://www.cbo.gov/data/budget-economic-data#2 |title=Budget and Economic Data|publisher=[[Congressional Budget Office]]|website=cbo.gov}}</ref> |
|||
| reserves = $250 billion (2024)<ref>{{cite web|url=https://home.treasury.gov/data/us-international-reserve-position/09202024|title=U.S. International Reserve Position|website=Treasury.gov|access-date=October 22, 2024}}</ref> |
|||
| credit = {{plainlist| |
| credit = {{plainlist| |
||
* [[Standard & Poor's]]:<ref>{{cite web |title=Sovereigns rating list |publisher=Standard & Poor's |url=http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/sovereigns/ratings-list/en/eu?sectorName=null&subSectorCode=39&filter=U |access-date=August 20, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110618090608/http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/sovereigns/ratings-list/en/eu?sectorName=null&subSectorCode=39&filter=U |archive-date=June 18, 2011 |
* [[Standard & Poor's]]:<ref>{{cite web |title=Sovereigns rating list |publisher=Standard & Poor's |url=http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/sovereigns/ratings-list/en/eu?sectorName=null&subSectorCode=39&filter=U |access-date=August 20, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110618090608/http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/sovereigns/ratings-list/en/eu?sectorName=null&subSectorCode=39&filter=U |archive-date=June 18, 2011 }}</ref><ref name=guardian>{{cite news |title=How Fitch, Moody's and S&P rate each country's credit rating |date=April 15, 2011 |first1=Simon |last1=Rogers |first2=Ami |last2=Sedghi |work=The Guardian|location=London |url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/apr/30/credit-ratings-country-fitch-moodys-standard |access-date=May 28, 2011}}</ref> |
||
* AA+ (Domestic) |
* AA+ (Domestic) |
||
* AA+ (Foreign) |
* AA+ (Foreign) |
||
Line 93: | Line 131: | ||
* Aaa |
* Aaa |
||
* Outlook: Stable |
* Outlook: Stable |
||
---- |
---- |
||
* [[Fitch Group|Fitch]]:<ref>{{cite web|title=Fitch |
* [[Fitch Group|Fitch]]:<ref>{{cite web|title=Fitch Downgrades the United States' Long-Term Ratings to 'AA+' from 'AAA'; Outlook Stable|url=https://www.fitchratings.com/research/sovereigns/fitch-downgrades-united-states-long-term-ratings-to-aa-from-aaa-outlook-stable-01-08-2023|website=Fitch Ratings}}</ref> |
||
* |
* AA+ |
||
* Outlook: Stable |
* Outlook: Stable |
||
---- |
|||
| aid = ''donor'': [[Official development assistance|ODA]], $35.26 billion (2017)<ref name="oecd-aid">{{cite web|title=Development aid rises again in 2016 but flows to poorest countries dip |url=http://www.oecd.org/dac/development-aid-rises-again-in-2016-but-flows-to-poorest-countries-dip.htm |website=[[OECD]] |access-date=2017-09-25 |date=2017-04-11 |df=mdy-all}}</ref> |
|||
* Scope Ratings:<ref>{{cite web|title=Scope confirms the United States of America at AA and assigns a Negative Outlook|url=https://www.scoperatings.com/ratings-and-research/rating/EN/174598|website=Scope Ratings}}</ref> |
|||
* AA |
|||
* Outlook: Negative}} |
|||
| aid = ''donor'': [[Official development assistance|ODA]], $35.26 billion (2017)<ref name="oecd-aid">{{cite web|title=Development aid rises again in 2016 but flows to poorest countries dip |url=http://www.oecd.org/dac/development-aid-rises-again-in-2016-but-flows-to-poorest-countries-dip.htm |website=[[OECD]] |access-date=September 25, 2017 |date=April 11, 2017 }}</ref> |
|||
| cianame = united-states |
| cianame = united-states |
||
| spelling = US |
| spelling = US |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Economy of the United States}} |
{{Economy of the United States sidebar}} |
||
The '''economy of the [[United States]]''' is a [[Developed country|highly developed]] [[market economy]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/market-economy-countries |title=Market Economy Countries 2021 |publisher=World Population Review |access-date=September 12, 2021}}</ref> It is the world's largest economy by [[List of countries by GDP (nominal)|nominal GDP]] and [[List of countries by total wealth|net wealth]] and the second-largest by [[List of countries by GDP (PPP)|purchasing power parity]] (PPP) behind [[China]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=43&pr.y=19&sy=2017&ey=2017&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=512,672,914,946,612,137,614,546,311,962,213,674,911,676,193,548,122,556,912,678,313,181,419,867,513,682,316,684,913,273,124,868,339,921,638,948,514,943,218,686,963,688,616,518,223,728,516,558,918,138,748,196,618,278,624,692,522,694,622,142,156,449,626,564,628,565,228,283,924,853,233,288,632,293,636,566,634,964,238,182,662,359,960,453,423,968,935,922,128,714,611,862,321,135,243,716,248,456,469,722,253,942,642,718,643,724,939,576,644,936,819,961,172,813,132,199,646,733,648,184,915,524,134,361,652,362,174,364,328,732,258,366,656,734,654,144,336,146,263,463,268,528,532,923,944,738,176,578,534,537,536,742,429,866,433,369,178,744,436,186,136,925,343,869,158,746,439,926,916,466,664,112,826,111,542,298,967,927,443,846,917,299,544,582,941,474,446,754,666,698,668&s=PPPGDP&grp=0&a=|title=Report for Selected Country Groups and Subjects (PPP valuation of country GDP)|publisher=IMF|language=en-US|access-date=December 29, 2017}}</ref> It had the world's ninth-highest [[List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita|per capita GDP (nominal)]] and the fifteenth-highest [[List of countries by GDP per capita (PPP)|per capita GDP (PPP)]] in 2021.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2019/01/weodata/index.aspx |title=World Economic Outlook Database, April 2019 |publisher=[[International Monetary Fund]] |website=IMF.org |access-date=April 9, 2019}}</ref> The United States has the most [[technologically]] powerful and [[Science and technology in the United States|innovative]] economy in the world. Its firms are at or near the forefront in [[Science and technology in the United States|technological advances]], especially in [[artificial intelligence]], [[computers]], [[pharmaceuticals]], and [[medical]], [[aerospace]], and [[military equipment]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/ |title=United States reference resource |work=[[The World Factbook]] [[Central Intelligence Agency]] |access-date=May 31, 2019}}</ref> The [[United States dollar|U.S. dollar]] is the currency most used in [[international trade|international transactions]] and is the world's foremost [[reserve currency]], backed by its economy, its [[Military of the United States|military]], the [[petrodollar|petrodollar system]] and its linked [[eurodollar]] and large [[U.S. Treasury|U.S. treasuries market]].<ref name="federalreserve.gov">{{cite web|url=http://www.federalreserve.gov/pf/pdf/pf_4.pdf |title=The Implementation of Monetary Policy – The Federal Reserve in the International Sphere|access-date=August 24, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Zaw Thiha Tun|title=How Petrodollars Affect The U.S. Dollar |url=http://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/072915/how-petrodollars-affect-us-dollar.asp|date=July 29, 2015|access-date=October 14, 2016}}</ref> Several countries [[International use of the US dollar|use it as their official currency]] and in others it is the [[de facto currency|''de facto'' currency]].<ref name="Benjamin J. Cohen 2006, p. 17">Benjamin J. Cohen, ''The Future of Money'', Princeton University Press, 2006, {{ISBN|0691116660}}; ''cf.'' "the dollar is the de facto currency in Cambodia", Charles Agar, ''[[Frommer's]] Vietnam'', 2006, {{ISBN|0471798169}}, p. 17</ref><ref>{{cite web |url = http://www.multpl.com/us-gdp-growth-rate/table/by-year|title = US GDP Growth Rate by Year |date=March 31, 2014 |access-date=June 18, 2014 |website = multpl.com|publisher = US Bureau of Economic Analysis}}</ref> The [[List of the largest trading partners of the United States|largest U.S. trading partners]] are [[China]], the [[European Union]], [[Canada]], [[Mexico]], [[India]], [[Japan]], [[South Korea]], the [[United Kingdom]], and [[Taiwan]].<ref name="auto">{{cite web |url=https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/top/top1612yr.html|title = Top Trading Partners |date=December 2016 |access-date=July 8, 2017 |publisher=U.S. Census Bureau}}</ref> The U.S. is the world's [[List of countries by imports|largest importer]] and the [[List of countries by exports|second-largest exporter]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2019_e/wts2019_e.pdf |title=World Trade Statistical Review 2019 |work=[[World Trade Organization]] |page=100 |access-date=May 31, 2019}}</ref> It has [[free trade agreements]] with [[United States free-trade agreements|several countries]], including the [[United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement|USMCA]], Australia, South Korea, Israel and several others that are in effect or under negotiation.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements |title=United States free trade agreements |work=[[Office of the United States Trade Representative]] |access-date=May 31, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
The [[United States]] has a [[developed country|highly developed]] [[mixed economy]].<ref>[http://usa.usembassy.de/economy-conditions.htm "U.S. Economy - Basic Conditions & Resources"]. U.S. Diplomatic Mission to Germany. "The United States is said to have a mixed economy because privately owned businesses and government both play important roles." Retrieved October 24, 2011.</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20120114051146/http://infopedia.usembassy.or.kr/ENG/_f_030401.html (4)Outline of the U.S. Economy – (2)How the U.S. Economy Works]. U.S. Embassy Information Resource Center. "As a result, the American economy is perhaps better described as a 'mixed' economy, with the government playing an important role along with private enterprise. Although Americans often disagree about exactly where to draw the line between their beliefs in both free enterprise and government management, the mixed economy they have developed has been remarkably successful." Retrieved October 24, 2011.</ref><ref>{{cite book |editor-last1=Karagiannis|editor-first1=Nikolaos|editor-last2= Madjd-Sadjadi|editor-first2=Zagros|editor-last3= Sen|editor-first3=Swapan |date=2013 |title=The US Economy and Neoliberalism: Alternative Strategies and Policies|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aYKfai1RlPYC&pg=PA1|location= |publisher=[[Routledge]]|pages=1–2|isbn=978-1138904910}}</ref> It is the world's [[List of countries by GDP (nominal)|largest economy by nominal GDP]]; it is also the [[List of countries by GDP (PPP)|second largest by purchasing power parity]] (PPP), behind [[China]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2023/April/weo-report?c=111,&s=NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,&sy=2022&ey=2027&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1|title=Report for Selected Country Groups and Subjects (PPP valuation of country GDP)|publisher=IMF|language=en-US|access-date=April 20, 2022}}</ref> It has the world's [[List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita|sixth highest per capita GDP (nominal)]] and the [[List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita|eighth highest per capita GDP (PPP)]] as of 2024.<ref name="IMFWEOUS"/> The U.S. accounted for 26% of the [[global economy]] in 2023 in nominal terms, and about 15.5% in PPP terms.<ref name="IMF_datamapper"/><ref>{{Cite web |title=United States' share of global gross domestic product (GDP) adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP) |url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/270267/united-states-share-of-global-gross-domestic-product-gdp/#:~:text=In%202021%2C%20the%20United%20States,purchasing%20power%20parity%20(PPP). |website=Statiata}}</ref> The [[United States dollar|U.S. dollar]] is the currency of record most used in [[international trade|international transactions]] and is the world's [[reserve currency]], backed by a large [[U.S. Treasury|U.S. treasuries market]], its role as the reference standard for the [[petrodollar|petrodollar system]], and its linked [[eurodollar]].<ref name="federalreserve.gov">{{cite web|url=http://www.federalreserve.gov/pf/pdf/pf_4.pdf |title=The Implementation of Monetary Policy – The Federal Reserve in the International Sphere|access-date=August 24, 2010}}</ref> Several countries [[International use of the US dollar|use it as their official currency]] and in others it is the [[de facto currency|''de facto'' currency]].<ref name="Benjamin J. Cohen 2006, p. 17">Benjamin J. Cohen, ''The Future of Money'', Princeton University Press, 2006, {{ISBN|0691116660}}; ''cf.'' "the dollar is the de facto currency in Cambodia", Charles Agar, ''[[Frommer's]] Vietnam'', 2006, {{ISBN|0471798169}}, p. 17</ref> Since the end of [[World War II]], the economy has achieved relatively steady growth, [[Unemployment in the United States|low unemployment]] and inflation, and rapid advances in [[Science and technology in the United States|technology]].<ref name="CIA_US"/> |
|||
The American economy is fueled by high [[productivity]], well developed [[transportation infrastructure]], and extensive [[natural resource]]s.<ref name="Wright, Gavin 2007 p. 185">Wright, Gavin, and Jesse Czelusta, "Resource-Based Growth Past and Present", in ''Natural Resources: Neither Curse Nor Destiny'', ed. Daniel Lederman and William Maloney (World Bank, 2007), p. 185. {{ISBN|0821365452}}.</ref> Americans have the sixth highest average [[Household income|household]] and [[List of countries by average wage|employee]] income among [[OECD]] member states.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/topics/income/|title=Income|work=Better Life Index|publisher=OECD|access-date=September 28, 2019|quote=In the United States, the average household net adjusted disposable income per capita is USD 45 284 a year, much higher than the OECD average of USD 33 604 and the highest figure in the OECD.}}</ref> In 2021, they had the highest [[median household income]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Income Distribution Database |url=https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=IDD |access-date=March 4, 2023 |website=stats.oecd.org}}</ref> The U.S. has one of the world's highest [[Income inequality in the United States|income inequalities]] among the [[developed countries]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Gini Index coefficient - distribution of family income - The World Factbook |url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/gini-index-coefficient-distribution-of-family-income/country-comparison |access-date=August 24, 2022 |website=www.cia.gov}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Gray |first=Sarah |date=June 4, 2018 |title=Trump Policies Highlighted in Scathing U.N. Report On U.S. Poverty|url=http://fortune.com/2018/06/04/trump-policies-u-n-report-u-s-poverty/|work=[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]|access-date=September 13, 2018|quote="The United States has the highest rate of income inequality among Western countries", the report states.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://undocs.org/A/HRC/38/33/ADD.1|title=Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights on his mission to the United States of America|last=Alston|first=Philip|author-link=Philip Alston|date=2018 |website=[[Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights|OHCHR]]|publisher= |access-date=January 16, 2023}}</ref> The [[List of the largest trading partners of the United States|largest U.S. trading partners]] are [[Canada]], [[Mexico]], [[China]], [[Japan]], [[Germany]], [[South Korea]], the [[United Kingdom]], [[Taiwan]], [[India]], and [[Vietnam]].<ref name="auto">{{cite web |url=https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/top/top1612yr.html|title = Top Trading Partners |date=December 2016 |access-date=July 8, 2017 |publisher=U.S. Census Bureau}}</ref> The U.S. is the world's [[List of countries by imports|largest importer]] and [[List of countries by exports|second largest exporter]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2019_e/wts2019_e.pdf |title=World Trade Statistical Review 2019 |work=[[World Trade Organization]] |page=100 |access-date=May 31, 2019}}</ref> It has [[free trade agreements]] with [[United States free-trade agreements|several countries]], including Canada and Mexico (through the [[United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement|USMCA]]), Australia, South Korea, Israel, and several others that are in effect or under negotiation.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements |title=United States free trade agreements |work=[[Office of the United States Trade Representative]] |access-date=May 31, 2019}}</ref> The U.S. has a highly flexible [[United States labor law|labor market]], where the industry adheres to a hire-and-fire policy, and [[job security]] is relatively low.<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w10215/w10215.pdf | title=The effect of job security regulations on labor market flexibility: Evidence from the Colombian labor market reform |work=[[National Bureau of Economic Research]]|date=January 2004}}</ref><ref>Kugler, Adriana D.. "The Effect of Job Security Regulations on Labor Market Flexibility: Evidence from the Colombian Labor Market Reform." In Law and Employment: Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean. Edited by James J. Heckman, and Carmen Pages (eds). [[University of Chicago Press]], 2004. Chicago Scholarship Online, 2013. {{doi|10.7208/chicago/9780226322858.003.0004}}.</ref> Among OECD nations, the U.S. has a highly efficient and strong [[Social programs in the United States|social security system]]; social expenditure stood at [[Welfare state#Effects|roughly 30% of GDP]].<ref name="Kenworthy">{{Cite journal |jstor = 3005973|title = Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment|journal = Social Forces|volume = 77|issue = 3|pages = 1119–1139|last1 = Kenworthy|first1 = Lane|year = 1999|doi = 10.2307/3005973|url = http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/188.pdf|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130810134045/http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/188.pdf|archive-date = 10 August 2013|url-status = live| issn = 0037-7732 }}</ref><ref name="Bradley et al.">{{Cite journal |jstor = 3088901|title = Determinants of Relative Poverty in Advanced Capitalist Democracies|journal = American Sociological Review|volume = 68|issue = 1|pages = 22–51|last1 = Moller|first1 = Stephanie|last2 = Huber|first2 = Evelyne|last3 = Stephens|first3 = John D.|last4 = Bradley|first4 = David|last5 = Nielsen|first5 = François|year = 2003|doi = 10.2307/3088901}}</ref><ref name="US_welfare">{{Cite web | url=http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SOCX_AGG | title=Social Expenditure – Aggregated data|work=[[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]]}}</ref> |
|||
The nation's economy is fueled by abundant [[Natural resource|natural resources]], a well-developed infrastructure, and high productivity.<ref name="Wright, Gavin 2007 p. 185">Wright, Gavin, and Jesse Czelusta, "Resource-Based Growth Past and Present", in ''Natural Resources: Neither Curse Nor Destiny'', ed. Daniel Lederman and William Maloney (World Bank, 2007), p. 185. {{ISBN|0821365452}}.</ref> It has the seventh-highest total-estimated value of natural resources, valued at [[United States dollar|Int$]]45{{nbs}}trillion in 2015.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets-economy/090516/10-countries-most-natural-resources.asp|title=10 Countries With The Most Natural Resources|date=September 12, 2016|last=Anthony|first=Craig|website=[[Investopedia]]}}</ref> Americans have the highest average [[Household income|household]] and [[List of countries by average wage|employee]] income among [[OECD]] member states.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/topics/income/|title=Income|work=Better Life Index|publisher=OECD|access-date=September 28, 2019|quote=In the United States, the average household net adjusted disposable income per capita is USD 45 284 a year, much higher than the OECD average of USD 33 604 and the highest figure in the OECD.}}</ref> In 2013, they had the sixth-highest [[median household income]], down from fourth-highest in 2010.<ref name="Household Income">{{cite journal|title=Household Income|url=http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/society-at-a-glance-2014_soc_glance-2014-en|journal=Society at a Glance 2014: OECD Social Indicators|publisher=OECD Publishing|access-date=May 29, 2014|doi=10.1787/soc_glance-2014-en |date=March 18, 2014|series=Society at a Glance|isbn=9789264200722|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=autogenerated4>{{cite web |title=OECD Better Life Index |url= http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/#/11111111111 |publisher=OECD |access-date=November 25, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
The United States is the world's largest producer of [[List of countries by oil production|petroleum]] and [[List of countries by natural gas production|natural gas]].<ref name="lop">{{cite web|url=https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=36292|title=United States remains the world's top producer of petroleum and natural gas hydrocarbons|website=EIA}}</ref> In 2016, it was the world's largest trading country<ref>{{cite news |author1=Katsuhiko Hara |author2=Issaku Harada (staff writers) |url=http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/Economy/US-overtook-China-as-top-trading-nation-in-2016 |title=US overtook China as top trading nation in 2016 |newspaper=Nikkei Asian Review |date=April 13, 2017 |access-date=June 22, 2017 |location=Tokyo |archive-date=February 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224034235/https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/Economy/US-overtook-China-as-top-trading-nation-in-2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref> and [[List of countries by manufacturing output|second largest manufacturer]], with [[Manufacturing in the United States|American manufacturing]] making up a fifth of the global total.<ref name="Vargo, Frank">{{cite web |url=http://shopfloor.org/2011/03/u-s-manufacturing-remains-worlds-largest/18756 |title=U.S. Manufacturing Remains World's Largest |publisher=Shopfloor |date=March 11, 2011 |access-date=March 28, 2012 |author=Vargo, Frank |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120404234310/http://shopfloor.org/2011/03/u-s-manufacturing-remains-worlds-largest/18756 | archive-date=April 4, 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref> The U.S. not only has the largest internal market for goods, but also dominates the services trade. Total U.S. trade was $4.2{{spaces}}trillion in 2018.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres17_e/pr791_e.htm |title=Trade recovery expected in 2017 and 2018, amid policy uncertainty |publisher=World Trade Organization |date=April 12, 2017|access-date=June 22, 2017 |location=Geneva, Switzerland}}</ref> Of the world's [[Fortune Global 500|500 largest companies]], 121 are headquartered in the U.S.<ref name=":1">{{cite web|url=http://fortune.com/global500/list/filtered?hqcountry=U.S.|title=Global 500 2016|work=Fortune|access-date=June 22, 2017|archive-date=September 21, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180921142659/http://fortune.com/global500/list/filtered?hqcountry=U.S.|url-status=dead}} Number of companies data taken from the "Country" filter.</ref> The U.S. has the world's [[List of countries by the number of billionaires|highest number of billionaires]], with total wealth of $3.0{{spaces}}trillion.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/09/the-countries-with-the-largest-number-of-billionaires.html|title=The US is home to more billionaires than China, Germany and Russia combined|date=May 9, 2019|publisher=CNBC|access-date=May 9, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://hk.asiatatler.com/life/top-10-countries-with-the-most-billionaires-in-2019|title=Wealth-X's Billionaire Census 2019 report reveals insights and trends about the world's top billionaires|website=hk.asiatatler.com|access-date=May 14, 2019|archive-date=January 31, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200131114329/https://hk.asiatatler.com/life/top-10-countries-with-the-most-billionaires-in-2019|url-status=dead}}</ref> U.S. commercial banks had $22.9{{spaces}}trillion in assets in December 2022.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TLAACBW027SBOG/ |title=Total Assets, All Commercial Banks |date=January 3, 1973}}</ref> U.S. [[global assets under management]] had more than $30{{spaces}}trillion in assets.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.agefi.fr/sites/agefi.fr/files/fichiers/2016/07/bcg-doubling-down-on-data-july-2016_tcm80-2113701.pdf |title=Doubling Down on Data |website= |access-date=March 5, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/45045/1/S1900994_en.pdf |title=The asset management industry in the United States |website= |access-date=March 5, 2022}}</ref> During the [[Great Recession]] of 2008, the U.S. economy suffered a significant decline.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/great-recession-and-its-aftermath#:~:text=The%20decline%20in%20overall%20economic,recession%20since%20World%20War%20II. |title=The Great Recession and Its Aftermath |last=Weinberg |first=John |date=November 22, 2013 |website=federalreservehistory.org |publisher= |access-date=November 22, 2013}}</ref><ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/double-dip-or-just-one-big-economic-dive/2011/08/05/gIQANKAIxI_story.html Washington Post-Ezra Klein-Double Dip, or just one big economic dive-August 5, 2011]</ref> The [[American Reinvestment and Recovery Act]] was enacted by the United States Congress, and in the ensuing years the U.S. experienced the longest economic expansion on record by July 2019.<ref name=CNBC_2019-07-02 >{{ cite news | url=https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/02/this-is-now-the-longest-us-economic-expansion-in-history.html | title=This is now the longest US economic expansion in history | last=Li | first=Yun | newspaper=[[CNBC]] | date=July 2, 2019 | quote=This month marks the 121st month of the economic expansion arising out of the great financial crisis, making it the longest run on record going back to 1854. }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Estimated Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on Employment and Economic Output from October 2011 Through December 2011|url=http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/02-22-ARRA.pdf|website=A CBO Report|publisher=Congressional Budget Office|access-date=February 19, 2017|date=February 2012}}</ref><ref name="Bernanke_Recovery">{{Cite web|url=https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20121120a.htm|title=Speech by Chairman Bernanke on the economic recovery and economic policy|website=Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System}}</ref><ref name="nyt2018"/> |
|||
The [[New York Stock Exchange]] and [[Nasdaq]] are the world's [[List of stock exchanges|largest stock exchanges]] by [[market capitalization]] and [[trade volume]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.world-exchanges.org/our-work/statistics|title=Monthly Reports - World Federation of Exchanges|publisher=WFE}}</ref><ref name="sfc.hk">[http://www.sfc.hk/web/doc/EN/research/stat/a01.pdf Table A – Market Capitalization of the World's Top Stock Exchanges (As at end of June 2012)]. Securities and Exchange Commission (China).</ref> [[ |
The [[New York Stock Exchange]] and [[Nasdaq]] are the world's [[List of stock exchanges|largest stock exchanges]] by [[market capitalization]] and [[trade volume]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.world-exchanges.org/our-work/statistics|title=Monthly Reports - World Federation of Exchanges|publisher=WFE}}</ref><ref name="sfc.hk">[http://www.sfc.hk/web/doc/EN/research/stat/a01.pdf Table A – Market Capitalization of the World's Top Stock Exchanges (As at end of June 2012)]. Securities and Exchange Commission (China).</ref> The U.S. has the world's [[Gold reserve#Officially reported holdings|largest gold reserve]], with over 8,000 tonnes of gold.<ref>{{cite web |date=5 March 2024 |title=World Official Gold Holdings - International Financial Statistics, March 2024 |url=https://www.gold.org/download/file/7739/World_official_gold_holdings_as_of_Mar2024_IFS.xlsx |url-access=registration |access-date=8 March 2024 |website=World Gold Council}}</ref> In 2014, the U.S. economy was ranked first in international ranking on [[venture capital]]<ref>[http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Global_venture_capital_insights_and_trends_2014/$FILE/EY_Global_VC_insights_and_trends_report_2014.pdf Adapting and evolving{{snd}}Global venture capital insights and trends 2014] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200804135427/https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Global_venture_capital_insights_and_trends_2014/$FILE/EY_Global_VC_insights_and_trends_report_2014.pdf |date=August 4, 2020 }}. EY, 2014.</ref> and global [[research and development]] funding.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.battelle.org/docs/tpp/2014_global_rd_funding_forecast.pdf?sfvrsn=4 |title=2014 Global R&D Funding Forecast |date=December 16, 2013 |website=battelle.org |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140209171411/http://www.battelle.org/docs/tpp/2014_global_rd_funding_forecast.pdf?sfvrsn=4 |archive-date= February 9, 2014}}</ref> The U.S. spends [[List of sovereign states by research and development spending|around 3.46% of GDP]] on cutting-edge research and development across various sectors of the economy.<ref>{{cite web|title=U.S. R&D Increased by $72 Billion in 2021 to $789 Billion; Estimate for 2022 Indicates Further Increase to $886 Billion|date=January 22, 2024|work=[[National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics]] |url=https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf24317}}</ref> The U.S. has produced the world's highest number of [[List of Nobel Memorial Prize laureates in Economic Sciences|Nobel laureates in the economics]] field.<ref name="NobelLaureatesList">{{cite web|url=http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/|title=All Laureates in Economics|publisher=Nobel Foundation|access-date=2020-10-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130601161045/http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/|archive-date=2013-06-01|url-status=live}}</ref> It is also the world's fourth largest [[High tech|high-technology exporter]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=High-technology exports |url=https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.TECH.CD?most_recent_value_desc=true |access-date=2023-04-15 |website=World Bank Open Data}}</ref> The U.S. ranks second in the world by number of [[patent application]]s.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/patents-by-country |title=Country and Approximate Number of Patent Applications |publisher=World Intellectual Property Indicators 2022 - World Intellectual Property Organization |access-date=June 1, 2023}}</ref> [[Consumer spending]] comprised 68% of the U.S. economy in 2022,<ref name=consumerecon>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=ntyj "Personal consumption expenditures (PCE)/gross domestic product (GDP)"] ''FRED Graph'', Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</ref> while its [[Wage share|labor share of income]] was 44% in 2021.<ref>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/W270RE1A156NBEA "Shares of gross domestic income: Compensation of employees, paid: Wage and salary accruals: Disbursements: To persons"] ''FRED Graph'', Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</ref> The U.S. has the world's largest [[List of largest consumer markets|consumer market]].<ref name="unstats.un.org">{{Cite web|url=https://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Index|title=National Accounts - Analysis of Main Aggregates (AMA)|website=unstats.un.org}}</ref> The nation's labor market has attracted [[Immigration to the United States|immigrants from all over the world]] and its [[List of countries by net migration rate|net migration rate]] is among the highest in the world.<ref name="The World Factbook">{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2112rank.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080709064749/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2112rank.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 9, 2008 |title=Country comparison :: net migration rate |date=2014 |access-date=June 18, 2014 |website=Central Intelligence Agency |publisher=The World Factbook}}</ref> The U.S. is one of the top-performing economies in studies such as the [[Ease of Doing Business Index]], the [[Global Competitiveness Report]], and others.<ref name="World Economic Forum">{{cite web |url=http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2013-14/GCR_Rankings_2013-14.pdf |title=Rankings: Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014 |publisher=World Economic Forum |access-date=June 1, 2014}}</ref> |
||
{{Toclimit}} |
|||
The U.S. economy experienced a serious economic downturn during the [[Great Recession]], defined as lasting from December 2007 to June 2009. However, real GDP regained its pre-crisis (late 2007) peak by 2011,<ref name="FRED – Real GDP">{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1| title = FRED – Real GDP}}</ref> household net worth by Q2 2012,<ref name="FRED – Household Net Worth">{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TNWBSHNO| title = FRED – Household Net Worth}}</ref> non-farm payroll jobs by May 2014,<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS| title = FRED-Total Non-Farm Payrolls }}</ref> and the unemployment rate by September 2015.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE| title = FRED-Civilian Unemployment Rate}}</ref> Each of these variables continued into post-recession record territory following those dates, with the U.S. recovery becoming the second-longest on record by April 2018.<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/20/business/economy/economy-recovery.html ''The New York Times''. Casselbaum. "Up, Up, Up Goes the Economy". March 20, 2018].</ref> In the first two quarters of 2020,<ref name="CNBC_Q3">{{cite news |last1=Pound |first1=Jesse |title=Fed's Bullard says the recession is over but rates will 'stay low for a long time' |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/28/feds-bullard-says-the-recession-is-over-but-rates-will-stay-low-for-a-long-time.html |access-date=September 4, 2020 |work=CNBC |date=28 August 2020}}</ref> the U.S. economy entered a recession due to the [[COVID-19 pandemic]]. The [[COVID-19 recession]] has been widely described as the most severe global economic downturn since the [[Great Depression]], and "far worse" than the [[Great Recession]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/global-great-lockdown-will-dwarf-the-great-recession |title=The Great Recession Was Bad. The 'Great Lockdown' Is Worse. |website=BloombergQuint |access-date=April 15, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nysscpa.org/news/publications/the-trusted-professional/article/imf-says-%27great-lockdown%27-worst-recession-since-depression-far-worse-than-last-crisis-041420 |title=IMF Says 'Great Lockdown' Worst Recession Since Depression, Far Worse Than Last Crisis |website=nysscpa.org |access-date=April 15, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Ben Winck |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/imf-economic-outlook-great-lockdown-worst-recession-century-coronavirus-pandemic-2020-4 |title=IMF economic outlook: 'Great Lockdown' will be worst recession in century |publisher=Business Insider |date=April 14, 2020 |access-date=April 27, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Larry Elliott Economics editor |url=https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/apr/14/great-lockdown-coronavirus-to-rival-great-depression-with-3-hit-to-global-economy-says-imf |title='Great Lockdown' to rival Great Depression with 3% hit to global economy, says IMF | Business |work=The Guardian |date=April 14, 2020 |access-date=April 27, 2020}}</ref> The United States ranked the 41st highest in [[income inequality]] among 156 countries in 2017,<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2172rank.html#us| title = ''CIA World Factbook'' "Distribution of Family Income"}}</ref> and the highest compared to the rest of the [[Western world]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Gray |first=Sarah |date=June 4, 2018 |title=Trump Policies Highlighted in Scathing U.N. Report On U.S. Poverty|url=http://fortune.com/2018/06/04/trump-policies-u-n-report-u-s-poverty/|work=[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]|access-date=September 13, 2018|quote="The United States has the highest rate of income inequality among Western countries", the report states.}}</ref> |
|||
==History== |
==History== |
||
Line 116: | Line 159: | ||
===Colonial era and 18th century=== |
===Colonial era and 18th century=== |
||
{{Further|Mercantilism}} |
{{Further|Mercantilism|Colonialism|American Revolution}} |
||
The economic history of the United States began with British settlements along the Eastern seaboard in the 17th and 18th centuries. These [[Thirteen Colonies|13 colonies]] gained independence from the [[British Empire]] in the late 18th century and quickly grew from colonial economies towards an economy focused on agriculture. |
|||
The economic history of the United States began with British settlements along the [[East Coast of the United States|Eastern seaboard]] in the 17th and 18th centuries. After 1700, the United States gained population rapidly, and [[import]]s as well as [[export]]s grew along with it. Africa, Asia, and most frequently Europe, contributed to the trade of the colonies.<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 24, 2018 |title=Colonial Economy |url=https://americanhistory.si.edu/american-revolution/colonial-economy |access-date=May 20, 2022 |website=National Museum of American History |language=en |archive-date=September 13, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230913035149/https://americanhistory.si.edu/american-revolution/colonial-economy |url-status=dead }}</ref> These [[Thirteen Colonies|13 colonies]] gained independence from the [[British Empire]] in the late 18th century<ref>{{Cite web |title=Digital History |url=https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/active_learning/explorations/revolution/declaration_of_independence.cfm |access-date=May 20, 2022 |website=www.digitalhistory.uh.edu}}</ref> and quickly grew from colonial economies towards an economy focused on [[agriculture]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 24, 2018 |title=Territory Worth Contesting |url=https://americanhistory.si.edu/american-revolution/territory-worth-contesting |access-date=May 20, 2022 |website=National Museum of American History |language=en |archive-date=July 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230712081109/https://americanhistory.si.edu/american-revolution/territory-worth-contesting |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
|||
===19th century=== |
===19th century=== |
||
{{Further|Industrial Revolution in the United States}} |
|||
{{See also|List of tariffs in the United States|Protectionism in the United States|Tariff in United States history|American System (economic plan)}} |
{{See also|List of tariffs in the United States|Protectionism in the United States|Tariff in United States history|American System (economic plan)}} |
||
[[File:LOSSING(1876) p293 WASHBURN'S & MOEN MANUFACTURING CO., WORCESTER, MA.jpg|thumb|[[Washburn and Moen North Works District|Washburn and Moen Manufacturing Company]] in Worcester, Massachusetts, 1876]] |
[[File:LOSSING(1876) p293 WASHBURN'S & MOEN MANUFACTURING CO., WORCESTER, MA.jpg|thumb|[[Washburn and Moen North Works District|Washburn and Moen Manufacturing Company]] in [[Worcester, Massachusetts]], 1876]] |
||
In 180 years, the |
In 180 years, the United States grew to become a huge, integrated, and industrialized economy, which made up about a fifth of the [[world economy]]. In that process, the U.S. GDP per capita rose past that of many other countries, supplanting the [[British Empire]] at the top. The economy maintained high wages, attracting immigrants by the millions from all over the world.<ref>{{Cite web |title=19th century: Immigration Galore – Peopling of NYC: The Immigrant Experience |url=https://peopleofnyc.commons.gc.cuny.edu/19th-century-immigration-galore/ |access-date=May 20, 2022 |language=en-CAC}}</ref> In the 1820s and 1830s, mass production shifted much of the economy from artisans to factories. New government regulations strengthened patents. |
||
Early in the 19th century, more than 80 percent of Americans engaged in farming. Most of the manufacturing centered on the first stages of the transformation of raw materials, with lumber and sawmills, textiles, and boots and shoes leading the way. The rich natural resources contributed to the rapid economic expansion of the nineteenth century. Ample land allowed the number of farmers to keep growing; but activity in manufacturing, services, transportation, and other sectors grew much faster, so that by 1860 the population was only about 50 percent rural, down from over 80 percent.<ref>{{cite book |author1=Baten, Jörg |title=A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present |date=2016 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |page=88ff |isbn=978-1107507180 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xYEGswEACAAJ}}</ref> |
|||
In the 19th century, [[List of recessions in the United States|recessions]] frequently coincided with [[Financial crisis|financial crises]]. The |
In the 19th century, [[List of recessions in the United States|recessions]] frequently coincided with [[Financial crisis|financial crises]]. The Panic of 1837 was followed by a five-year depression, marked by bank failures and unprecedented unemployment.<ref>{{cite book |author1=W. J. Rorabaugh |author2=Donald T. Critchlow |author3=Paula C. Baker |title=America's Promise: A Concise History of the United States |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VL_6X5zWOokC&pg=PA210 |year=2004 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |isbn=978-0742511897 |page=210 }}{{Dead link|date=September 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Because of the great changes in the economy over the centuries, it is difficult to compare the severity of modern recessions to that of early recessions.<ref>{{cite book |year=1986 |title=Appendix A The Development and Role of the National Bureau of Economic Research's Business Cycle Chronologies |last1=Moore |first1=Geoffrey H. |last2=Zarnowitz |url=https://www.nber.org/chapters/c10035 |first2=Victor |pages=735–780 |publisher=University of Chicago Press }} in {{Harvnb|Gordon|1986|pp=743–45}}</ref> Recessions after World War II appear to have been less severe than earlier recessions, but the reasons for this are unclear.<ref>{{cite book |title=Recessions and Depressions: Understanding Business Cycles |last=Knoop |first=Todd A. |publisher=Praeger Publishers |date=July 30, 2004 |isbn=978-0275981624 |pages=166–71 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ak_PQO2NprUC}}</ref> |
||
===20th century=== |
===20th century=== |
||
[[File:NIE 1905 Petroleum - oil wells at Los Angeles.jpg|thumb|[[History of oil in California through 1930|Oil wells]] |
[[File:NIE 1905 Petroleum - oil wells at Los Angeles.jpg|thumb|[[History of oil in California through 1930|Oil wells]] in [[Los Angeles]], 1905]] |
||
[[File:B-24 Liberator Consolidated-Vultee Plant, Fort Worth Texas.jpg|thumb|[[Consolidated B-24 Liberator]]s at the Consolidated-Vultee Plant in [[Fort Worth, Texas]], 1943]] |
|||
At the beginning of the century new [[innovation]]s and improvements in existing innovations opened the door for improvements in the standard of living among American consumers. Many firms grew large by taking advantage of economies of scale and better communication to run nationwide operations. Concentration in these industries raised fears of monopoly that would drive prices higher and output lower, but many of these firms were cutting costs so fast that trends were towards lower price and more output in these industries. Many workers shared the success of these large firms, which typically offered the highest wages in the world.<ref>{{cite book|author=Baten, Jörg |title=A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present|date=2016|publisher=Cambridge University Press|page=95|isbn=978-1107507180|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xYEGswEACAAJ}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:New McDonald's restaurant in Mount Pleasant, Iowa.jpg|thumb|[[McDonald's]] restaurant in [[Mount Pleasant, Iowa]], 2008]] |
|||
At the beginning of the century, new [[innovation]]s and improvements in existing innovations opened the door for improvements in the standard of living among American consumers. Many firms grew large by taking advantage of economies of scale and better communication to run nationwide operations. Concentration in these industries raised fears of monopolies that would drive prices higher and output lower, but many of these firms were cutting costs so fast that trends were towards lower prices and more output in these industries. Many workers shared the success of these large firms, which typically offered the highest wages in the world.<ref>{{cite book|author=Baten, Jörg |title=A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present|date=2016|publisher=Cambridge University Press|page=95|isbn=978-1107507180|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xYEGswEACAAJ}}</ref> |
|||
The United States has been the world's largest national economy in terms of GDP since |
The United States has been the world's largest national economy in terms of GDP since around 1890.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtid=2&psid=3158 | title=Digital History }}</ref> For many years following the [[Great Depression]] of the 1930s, when the danger of [[recession]] appeared most serious, the government strengthened the economy by spending heavily itself or cutting taxes so that consumers would spend more and by fostering rapid growth in the money supply, which also encouraged more spending. Ideas about the best tools for stabilizing the economy changed substantially between the 1930s and the 1980s. From the [[New Deal]] era that began in 1933 to the [[Great Society]] initiatives of the 1960s, national policymakers relied principally on [[fiscal policy]] to influence the economy.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://open.lib.umn.edu/macroeconomics/chapter/17-1-the-great-depression-and-keynesian-economics/ | title=17.1 the Great Depression and Keynesian Economics | date=December 2016 }}</ref> |
||
During the world wars of the twentieth century, the United States fared better than the rest of the combatants because none of the First World War and relatively little of the Second World War were fought on American territory (and none on the then-48 states). Yet, even in the United States, the wars meant sacrifice. During the peak of Second World War activity, nearly 40 percent of U.S. GDP was devoted to war production. Decisions about large swaths of the economy were largely made for military purposes, and nearly all relevant inputs were allocated to the war effort. Many goods were rationed, prices and wages controlled, and many durable consumer goods were no longer produced. Large segments of the workforce were inducted into the military and paid half their wages; roughly half of those were sent into harm's way.<ref>{{cite book|author=Baten, Jörg |title=A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present|date=2016|publisher=Cambridge University Press|page=97f|isbn=978-1107507180|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xYEGswEACAAJ}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:B-24 Liberator Consolidated-Vultee Plant, Fort Worth Texas.jpg|thumb|[[Consolidated B-24 Liberator]]s at the Consolidated-Vultee Plant, [[Fort Worth, Texas]], 1943]] |
|||
During the world wars of the twentieth century, the United States fared better than the rest of the combatants because none of the First World War and relatively little of the Second World War was fought on American territory (and none on the then 48 states). Yet, even in the United States, the wars meant sacrifice. During the peak of Second World War activity, nearly 40 percent of U.S. GDP was devoted to war production. Decisions about large swaths of the economy were largely made for military purposes and nearly all relevant inputs were allocated to the war effort. Many goods were rationed, prices and wages controlled and many durable consumer goods were no longer produced. Large segments of the workforce were inducted into the military, paid half wages, and roughly half of those were sent into harm's way.<ref>{{cite book|author=Baten, Jörg |title=A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present|date=2016|publisher=Cambridge University Press|page=97f|isbn=978-1107507180|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xYEGswEACAAJ}}</ref> |
|||
The approach, advanced by British economist [[John Maynard Keynes]], gave elected officials a leading role in directing the economy since spending and taxes are controlled by the [[President of the United States|U.S. |
The approach, advanced by British economist [[John Maynard Keynes]], gave elected officials a leading role in directing the economy since spending and taxes are controlled by the [[President of the United States|U.S. president]] and [[Congress of the United States|Congress]]. The [[Post–World War II baby boom|"Baby Boom"]] saw a dramatic increase in fertility in the period 1942–1957; it was caused by delayed marriages and childbearing during the depression years, a surge in prosperity, a demand for suburban single-family homes (as opposed to inner city apartments), and new optimism about the future. The boom peaked around 1957 and then began to fade.<ref name="Susan Kellogg 1988">Steven Mintz and Susan Kellogg, ''Domestic Revolutions: a Social History of American Family Life'' (1988) ch 9</ref> A period of high inflation, interest rates, and unemployment after 1973 weakened confidence in fiscal policy as a tool for regulating the overall pace of economic activity.<ref name=buchanan1977>{{cite book |last=Buchanan |first=James M. |title=Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes |year=1977 |publisher=Academic Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0865972278 |pages=1–55|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6RgARQAACAAJ}}</ref> |
||
{{Citation|last=Buchanan |first=James M. |title=Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes |year=1977 |publisher=Academic Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0865972278 |pages=1–55|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6RgARQAACAAJ}}</ref> |
|||
The U.S. economy grew by an [[Annual average GDP growth|average]] of 3.8% from 1946 to 1973, while real [[median household income]] surged 74% (or 2.1% a year).<ref name=hhes>{{cite web|url=http://www2.census.gov/prod2/popscan/p60-162.pdf|title=Current Population Reports: Money Income of Households and Persons in the United States (1987)|publisher=U.S. Department of Commerce}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www2.census.gov/prod2/popscan/p60-001.pdf|title=Current Population Reports: Income of nonfarm families and individuals (1946)|publisher=U.S. Department of Commerce}}</ref> |
The U.S. economy grew by an [[Annual average GDP growth|average]] of 3.8% from 1946 to 1973, while real [[median household income]] surged by 74% (or 2.1% a year).<ref name=hhes>{{cite web|url=http://www2.census.gov/prod2/popscan/p60-162.pdf|title=Current Population Reports: Money Income of Households and Persons in the United States (1987)|publisher=U.S. Department of Commerce}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www2.census.gov/prod2/popscan/p60-001.pdf|title=Current Population Reports: Income of nonfarm families and individuals (1946)|publisher=U.S. Department of Commerce}}</ref> |
||
Since the 1970s, several [[emerging countries]] have begun to close the economic gap with the United States. In most cases, this has been due to moving the manufacture of goods formerly made in the U.S. to countries where they could be made for sufficiently less money to cover the cost of shipping plus a higher profit. In other cases, some countries have gradually learned to produce the same products and services that previously only the U.S. and a few other countries could produce. Real income growth in the U.S. has slowed. In the 1970s and 1980s, it was popular in the U.S. to believe that [[Economy of Japan|Japan's economy]] would surpass that of the U.S., but this did not occur.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://business.time.com/2011/02/14/is-china-facing-a-japanese-future/ |title=Is China facing a Japanese future?|magazine=Time |access-date=February 27, 2012|date=February 14, 2011|last1=Schuman|first1=Michael}}</ref> |
|||
The worst recession in recent decades, in terms of lost output, occurred during the [[financial crisis of 2007–08]], when GDP fell by 5.0% from the spring of 2008 to the spring of 2009. Other significant recessions took place in 1957–58, when GDP fell 3.7%, following the [[1973 oil crisis]], with a 3.1% fall from late 1973 to early 1975, and in the 1981–82 recession, when GDP dropped by 2.9%.<ref name=gcn>{{Citation|url=http://www.globalcrisisnews.com/usa/us-out-of-recession-as-economy-grows-by-3-5-percent/id=1238/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091103100949/http://www.globalcrisisnews.com/usa/us-out-of-recession-as-economy-grows-by-3-5-percent/id%3D1238/|title=Global Crisis News|publisher=GCN|date=October 30, 2009|archive-date=November 3, 2009|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref name="cnn1">{{cite web |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2008/BUSINESS/03/21/us.recession.ap/index.html |title=Worries grow of deeper U.S. recession |publisher=CNN|access-date=November 17, 2008 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080611130336/http://edition.cnn.com/2008/BUSINESS/03/21/us.recession.ap/index.html |archive-date=June 11, 2008}}</ref> Recent, mild recessions have included the 1990–91 downturn, when output fell by 1.3%, and the 2001 recession, in which GDP slid by 0.3%; the 2001 downturn lasted just eight months.<ref name="cnn1" /> The most vigorous, sustained periods of growth, on the other hand, took place from early 1961 to mid-1969, with an expansion of 53% (5.1% a year), from mid-1991 to late in 2000, at 43% (3.8% a year), and from late 1982 to mid-1990, at 37% (4% a year).<ref name=gcn /> |
|||
===21st century=== |
|||
[[File:New McDonald's restaurant in Mount Pleasant, Iowa.jpg|thumb|[[McDonald's]] restaurant in [[Mount Pleasant, Iowa]]]] |
|||
{{Further|Great Recession}} |
|||
In the 1970s and 1980s, it was popular in the U.S. to believe that [[Economy of Japan|Japan's economy]] would surpass that of the U.S., but this did not happen.<ref>{{Citation|url=http://business.time.com/2011/02/14/is-china-facing-a-japanese-future/ |title=Is China facing a Japanese future?|magazine=Time |access-date=February 27, 2012|date=February 14, 2011|last1=Schuman|first1=Michael}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Donald Trump and Mike Pence meet with automobile industry leaders.jpg|thumb|Former president [[Donald Trump]] with [[Automotive industry in the United States|automobile industry]] leaders, 2017]] |
|||
The United States economy experienced a recession in 2001 with an unusually slow jobs recovery, with the number of jobs not regaining the February 2001 level until January 2005.<ref name="Payems" /> This "jobless recovery" overlapped with the building of a [[United States housing bubble|housing bubble]] and arguably a wider debt bubble, as the ratio of household debt to GDP rose from a record level of 70% in Q1 2001 to 99% in Q1 2008. Homeowners were borrowing against their bubble-priced homes to fuel consumption, driving up their debt levels while providing an unsustainable boost to GDP. When housing prices began falling in 2006, the value of securities backed by mortgages fell dramatically, causing the equivalent of a [[bank run]] in the essentially unregulated [[shadow banking|non-depository]] banking system, which had outgrown the traditional, regulated depository banking system. Many mortgage companies and other non-depository banks (e.g., investment banks) faced a worsening crisis in 2007–2008, with the [[Subprime mortgage crisis|banking crisis]] peaking in September 2008, with the bankruptcy of [[Lehman Brothers]] and bailouts of several other financial institutions.<ref name="FCIC_1">{{cite web |url = http://fcic.law.stanford.edu/report/conclusions |title = Financial Crisis Inquiry Report-Conclusions-January 2011 |publisher = Fcic.law.stanford.edu |date=March 10, 2011 |access-date=April 22, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
The Bush administration (2001–2009) and Obama administrations (2009–2017) applied banking [[Troubled Asset Relief Program|bailout programs]] and Keynesian [[American Reinvestment and Recovery Act|stimulus]] via high government deficits, while the Federal Reserve maintained near-zero interest rates. These measures helped the economy recover, as households paid down debts in 2009–2012, the only years since 1947 where this occurred,<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?graph_id=111185| title = FRED – Household Debt Changes| date = October 1945}}</ref> presenting a significant barrier to recovery.<ref name="FCIC_1" /> Real GDP regained its pre-crisis (late 2007) peak by 2011,<ref name="FRED – Real GDP">{{Cite web|url=https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1|title=Real Gross Domestic Product|date=November 27, 2024|website=fred.stlouisfed.org}}</ref> household net worth by Q2 2012,<ref name="FRED – Household Net Worth">{{Cite web|url=https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TNWBSHNO|title=Households and Nonprofit Organizations; Net Worth, Level|date=September 12, 2024|website=fred.stlouisfed.org}}</ref> non-farm payroll jobs by May 2014,<ref name="Payems">{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS| title = FRED – Total Non-Farm Payrolls| date = January 1939}}</ref> and the unemployment rate by September 2015.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE| title = FRED – Civilian Unemployment Rate| date = January 1948}}</ref> Each of these variables continued into post-recession record territory following those dates, with the U.S. recovery becoming the second longest on record in April 2018.<ref name="nyt2018">[https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/20/business/economy/economy-recovery.html ''The New York Times''. Casselbaum. "Up, Up, Up Goes the Economy" March 20, 2018].</ref> |
|||
Since the 1970s, several [[emerging countries]] have begun to close the economic gap with the United States. In most cases, this has been due to moving the manufacture of goods formerly made in the U.S. to countries where they could be made for sufficiently less money to cover the cost of shipping plus a higher profit. In other cases, some countries have gradually learned to produce the same products and services that previously only the U.S. and a few other countries could produce. Real income growth in the U.S. has slowed. |
|||
A significant recession, as defined lost economic output, occurred during the [[financial crisis of 2007–2008]], when GDP fell by 5.0% from the spring of 2008 to the spring of 2009. Other significant recessions took place in 1957–1958, when GDP fell 3.7% following the [[1973 oil crisis]], with a 3.1% fall from late 1973 to early 1975, and in the 1981–1982 recession, when GDP dropped by 2.9%.<ref name=gcn>{{cite web |url=http://www.globalcrisisnews.com/usa/us-out-of-recession-as-economy-grows-by-3-5-percent/id=1238/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091103100949/http://www.globalcrisisnews.com/usa/us-out-of-recession-as-economy-grows-by-3-5-percent/id%3D1238/|title=Global Crisis News|publisher=GCN|date=October 30, 2009|archive-date=November 3, 2009|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="cnn1">{{cite web |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2008/BUSINESS/03/21/us.recession.ap/index.html |title=Worries grow of deeper U.S. recession |publisher=CNN|access-date=November 17, 2008 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080611130336/http://edition.cnn.com/2008/BUSINESS/03/21/us.recession.ap/index.html |archive-date=June 11, 2008}}</ref> Recent, mild recessions have included the 1990–1991 downturn, when output fell by 1.3%, and the 2001 recession, in which GDP slid by 0.3%; the 2001 downturn lasted just eight months.<ref name="cnn1" /> The most vigorous, sustained periods of growth, on the other hand, took place from early 1961 to mid-1969, with an expansion of 53% (5.1% a year), from mid-1991 to late 2000, at 43% (3.8% a year), and from late 1982 to mid-1990, at 37% (4% a year).<ref name=gcn /> |
|||
===Early 21st century=== |
|||
{{See also|Great Recession|COVID-19 recession}} |
|||
The United States economy experienced a recession in 2001 with an unusually slow jobs recovery, with the number of jobs not regaining the February 2001 level until January 2005.<ref name="Payems" /> This "jobless recovery" overlapped with the building of a [[United States housing bubble|housing bubble]] and arguably a wider debt bubble, as the ratio of household debt to GDP rose from a record level of 70% in Q1 2001 to 99% in Q1 2008. Homeowners were borrowing against their bubble-priced homes to fuel consumption, driving up their debt levels while providing an unsustainable boost to GDP. When housing prices began falling in 2006, the value of securities backed by mortgages fell dramatically, causing the equivalent of a [[bank run]] in the essentially unregulated [[shadow banking|non-depository]] banking system, which had outgrown the traditional, regulated depository banking system. Many mortgage companies and other non-depository banks (e.g., investment banks) faced a worsening crisis in 2007–2008, with the [[Subprime mortgage crisis|banking crisis]] peaking in September 2008, with the bankruptcy of [[Lehman Brothers]] and bailouts of several other financial institutions.<ref name="FCIC_1">{{cite web |url = http://fcic.law.stanford.edu/report/conclusions |title = Financial Crisis Inquiry Report-Conclusions-January 2011 |publisher = Fcic.law.stanford.edu |date=March 10, 2011 |access-date=April 22, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
Debt held by the public, a measure of national debt, has risen throughout the 21st century. Rising from 31% in 2000 to 52% in 2009, and reaching 77% of GDP in 2017, the U.S. ranked 43rd highest in debt out of 207 countries.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2186rank.html#us| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070613005546/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2186rank.html#us| url-status = dead| archive-date = June 13, 2007| title = CIA World Factbook – Debt to GDP}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Donald Trump and Mike Pence meet with automobile industry leaders.jpg|thumb|President Donald Trump with key [[Automotive industry in the United States|automobile industry]] leaders, 2017]] |
|||
The Bush administration (2001–2009) and Obama administrations (2009–2017) applied banking [[Troubled Asset Relief Program|bailout programs]] and Keynesian [[American Reinvestment and Recovery Act|stimulus]] via high government deficits, while the Federal Reserve maintained near-zero interest rates. These measures helped the economy recover, as households paid down debts in 2009–2012, the only years since 1947 where this occurred,<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?graph_id=111185| title = FRED – Household Debt Changes}}</ref> presenting a significant barrier to recovery.<ref name="FCIC_1" /> Real GDP regained its pre-crisis (late 2007) peak by 2011,<ref name="FRED – Real GDP"/> household net worth by Q2 2012,<ref name="FRED – Household Net Worth" /> non-farm payroll jobs by May 2014,<ref name="Payems">{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS| title = FRED – Total Non-Farm Payrolls}}</ref> and the unemployment rate by September 2015.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE| title = FRED – Civilian Unemployment Rate}}</ref> Each of these variables continued into post-recession record territory following those dates, with the U.S. recovery becoming the second longest on record in April 2018.<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/20/business/economy/economy-recovery.html ''The New York Times''. Casselbaum. "Up, Up, Up Goes the Economy" March 20, 2018].</ref> |
|||
====COVID-19 pandemic==== |
|||
Debt held by the public a measure of national debt, has risen throughout the 21st century, rising from 31% in 2000 to 52% in 2009 and 77% of GDP in 2017, which was ranked 43rd highest out of 207 countries. Income inequality peaked in 2007 and fell during the Great Recession, yet still ranked 41st highest among 156 countries in 2017 (i.e., 74% of countries had a more equal income distribution).<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2186rank.html#us| title = CIA World Factbook – Debt to GDP}}</ref> |
|||
{{Further||COVID-19 recession|Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States|COVID-19 recession}} |
|||
{{Update section|date=October 2021}} |
|||
In the first two quarters of 2020 amid [[Donald Trump]]'s presidency,<ref name="CNBC_Q3">{{cite news |last1=Pound |first1=Jesse |title=Fed's Bullard says the recession is over but rates will 'stay low for a long time' |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/28/feds-bullard-says-the-recession-is-over-but-rates-will-stay-low-for-a-long-time.html |access-date=September 4, 2020 |work=CNBC |date=August 28, 2020}}</ref> the U.S. economy suffered major setbacks beginning in March 2020, due to the [[COVID-19 pandemic|novel coronavirus]] and having to "shut-down" major sectors of the American economy.<ref>President Trump's statements to reporters gathered at [[Joint Base Andrews]] on 5{{spaces}}May 2020, before his departure en route to Phoenix, Arizona, {{YouTube|DYZNpBhBkws|President Donald J. Trump departs from Joint Base Andrews en route to Phoenix}}, May 5, 2020, minutes 10:06–10:14.</ref> As of March 2020, US exports of automobiles and industrial machines had plummeted as a result of the worldwide pandemic.<ref>{{cite news|last=Wiseman|first=Paul|date=May 5, 2020|title=US trade gap rises to $44.4 billion as virus slams commerce|language=en|agency=Associated Press|url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-trade-gap-rises-44-125440989.html}}</ref> Social distancing measures which took effect in March 2020, and which negatively impacted the demand for goods and services, resulted in the US [[GDP]] declining at a [[Trade-to-GDP ratio|4.8% annualized rate]] in the first quarter, the steepest pace of contraction in output since the fourth quarter of 2008.<ref>{{cite news|last=Mutikani|first=Lucia|date=May 5, 2020|title=U.S. trade deficit widens, services sector contracts amid coronavirus|language=en|publisher=Reuters|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-trade-deficit-widens-services-123754175.html}}</ref> US retails sales dropped a record 8.7% in March alone. The US airline industry had also been hit hard, seeing a sharp decline in its revenues.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Shepardson|first1=David|last2=Rucinski|first2=Tracy|date=May 6, 2020|title=Exclusive: U.S. airlines burn through $10 billion a month as traffic plummets|language=en|publisher=Reuters|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-u-airlines-burn-10-212139039.html}}</ref> The [[COVID-19 recession]] has been widely described as the most severe global economic downturn since the [[Great Depression]] and "far worse" than the [[Great Recession]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/global-great-lockdown-will-dwarf-the-great-recession |title=The Great Recession Was Bad. The 'Great Lockdown' Is Worse. |website=BloombergQuint |date=April 14, 2020 |access-date=April 15, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nysscpa.org/news/publications/the-trusted-professional/article/imf-says-%27great-lockdown%27-worst-recession-since-depression-far-worse-than-last-crisis-041420 |title=IMF Says 'Great Lockdown' Worst Recession Since Depression, Far Worse Than Last Crisis |website=nysscpa.org |access-date=April 15, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Ben Winck |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/imf-economic-outlook-great-lockdown-worst-recession-century-coronavirus-pandemic-2020-4 |title=IMF economic outlook: 'Great Lockdown' will be worst recession in century |publisher=Business Insider |date=April 14, 2020 |access-date=April 27, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|editor=Larry Elliott Economics |url=https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/apr/14/great-lockdown-coronavirus-to-rival-great-depression-with-3-hit-to-global-economy-says-imf |title='Great Lockdown' to rival Great Depression with 3% hit to global economy, says IMF | Business |work=The Guardian |date=April 14, 2020 |access-date=April 27, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:West side of Manhattan from Hudson Commons (95103p).jpg|thumb|right|250px|[[Midtown Manhattan]], the world's largest [[central business district]]<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/business/new-york-widens-lead-over-london-top-finance-centres-index-2022-03-24/ |title=New York widens lead over London in top finance centres index |website=www.reuters.com |date= March 24, 2022|access-date=June 25, 2022|last1= Jones|first1= Huw}}</ref>]] |
|||
===During the COVID-19 pandemic=== |
|||
In May 2020, [[CNN]] gave an analysis based on unemployment data that the US economy was perhaps the worst that it had been since the 1930s.<ref>{{cite news|last=Collinson|first=Stephen|date=May 7, 2020|title=Trump economy faces long-term disaster as jobs data looms|language=en|publisher=CNN|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/07/politics/donald-trump-coronavirus-economy/index.html}}</ref> By May 8, the US had reached a record 14.7 percent unemployment, with 20.5 million jobs lost in April.<ref>{{cite news|last=Ross|first=Jamie|date=May 8, 2020|title=Trump's Live Reaction to Record Unemployment: Don't Blame Me|language=en|publisher=[[Yahoo! News|Yahoo Business]]|url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-live-reaction-record-unemployment-133210016.html}}</ref> The Chairman of the [[US Federal Reserve]], [[Jerome Powell]], warned that it may take "an extended time" before the US economy fully recovers from weak economic growth, due to the pandemic, and that in the foreseeable future the US can expect "low productivity growth and stagnant incomes".<ref>{{cite news|last1=Schneider|first1=Howard|last2=Saphir|first2=Ann|date=May 13, 2020|title=In nod to grim U.S. outlook, Fed's Powell calls for more fiscal support|language=en|publisher=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-fed-powell/in-nod-to-grim-us-outlook-feds-powell-calls-for-more-fiscal-support-idUSKBN22P1FG}}</ref> By May 31, 2020, more than forty million Americans had filed for unemployment benefits.<ref>{{cite news|last=Fottrell|first=Quentin|date=May 31, 2020|title=Over 40 million people filed for unemployment since March – $1,200 stimulus checks are a mere Band-Aid for Americans|language=en|publisher=[[MarketWatch]] (for Yahoo! Finance)|url=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-how-much-trouble-laid-off-americans-are-in-and-why-1200-stimulus-checks-are-only-a-band-aid-2020-05-19?siteid=yhoof2&yptr=yahoo,}}</ref> |
|||
{{Update section|date=October 2021}}{{Main|Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States}} |
|||
At the admission of US President Donald J. Trump, the US economy suffered major setbacks beginning in March 2020, due to the outbreak of the [[novel coronavirus]] and having to "shut-down" major sectors of the American economy.<ref>President Trump's statements to reporters gathered at [[Joint Base Andrews]] on 5{{nbs}}May 2020, before his departure en route to Phoenix, Arizona, {{YouTube|DYZNpBhBkws|President Donald J. Trump departs from Joint Base Andrews en route to Phoenix}}, May 5, 2020, minutes 10:06–10:14.</ref> As of March 2020, US exports of automobiles and industrial machines had plummeted as a result of the worldwide pandemic.<ref>{{cite news|last=Wiseman|first=Paul|date=May 5, 2020|title=US trade gap rises to $44.4 billion as virus slams commerce|language=en|publisher=[[Associated Press]]|url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-trade-gap-rises-44-125440989.html}}</ref> Social distancing measures which took effect in March 2020, and which negatively impacted the demand for goods and services, resulted in the US [[GDP]] declining at a [[Trade-to-GDP ratio|4.8% annualized rate]] in the first quarter, the steepest pace of contraction in output since the fourth quarter of 2008.<ref>{{cite news|last=Mutikani|first=Lucia|date=May 5, 2020|title=U.S. trade deficit widens, services sector contracts amid coronavirus|language=en|publisher=[[Reuters]]|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-trade-deficit-widens-services-123754175.html}}</ref> US retails sales dropped a record 8.7% in March alone. The US airline industry had also been hit hard, seeing a sharp decline in its revenues.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Shepardson|first1=David|last2=Rucinski|first2=Tracy|date=May 6, 2020|title=Exclusive: U.S. airlines burn through $10 billion a month as traffic plummets|language=en|publisher=[[Reuters]]|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-u-airlines-burn-10-212139039.html}}</ref> |
|||
By June 2020, the slump in US continental flights due to the coronavirus pandemic had resulted in the US government temporarily halting service of fifteen US airlines to 75 domestic airports.<ref>{{cite news|last=Shepardson|first=David|date=June 4, 2020|title=U.S. airlines gain final approval to drop services to 75 domestic airports|language=en|publisher=Reuters|url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-finalizes-order-allowing-15-035146552.html}}</ref> ''[[The New York Times]]'' reported on June 10, 2020, that "the United States budget deficit grew to a record $1.88{{spaces}}trillion for the first eight months of this [[fiscal year]]."<ref>{{cite news|date=June 10, 2020|title=Fed Expects Unemployment Rate to Stay High: Live Updates|language=en|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/10/business/stock-market-today-coronavirus.html}}</ref> |
|||
In May 2020, [[CNN]] gave an analysis based on unemployment data that the US economy was perhaps the worst that it had been since the 1930s.<ref>{{cite news|last=Collinson|first=Stephen|date=May 7, 2020|title=Trump economy faces long-term disaster as jobs data looms|language=en|publisher=[[CNN]]|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/07/politics/donald-trump-coronavirus-economy/index.html}}</ref> By May 8, the US had reached a record 14.7 percent unemployment, with 20.5 million jobs lost in April.<ref>{{cite news|last=Ross|first=Jamie|date=May 8, 2020|title=Trump's Live Reaction to Record Unemployment: Don't Blame Me|language=en|publisher=[[Yahoo! News|Yahoo Business]]|url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-live-reaction-record-unemployment-133210016.html}}</ref> The Chairman of the [[US Federal Reserve]], [[Jerome Powell]], warned that it may take "an extended time" before the US economy fully recovers from weak economic growth, due to the pandemic, and that in the foreseeable future the US can expect "low productivity growth and stagnant incomes".<ref>{{cite news|last1=Schneider|first1=Howard|last2=Saphir|first2=Ann|date=May 13, 2020|title=In nod to grim U.S. outlook, Fed's Powell calls for more fiscal support|language=en|publisher=[[Reuters]]|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-fed-powell/in-nod-to-grim-us-outlook-feds-powell-calls-for-more-fiscal-support-idUSKBN22P1FG}}</ref> By 31 May 2020, more than forty million Americans had filed for unemployment benefits.<ref>{{cite news|last=Fottrell|first=Quentin|date=May 31, 2020|title=Over 40 million people filed for unemployment since March – $1,200 stimulus checks are a mere Band-Aid for Americans|language=en|publisher=[[MarketWatch]] (for Yahoo! Finance)|url=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-how-much-trouble-laid-off-americans-are-in-and-why-1200-stimulus-checks-are-only-a-band-aid-2020-05-19?siteid=yhoof2&yptr=yahoo,}}</ref> |
|||
The US economy recovered from the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021, growing by 5.7%, which was its best performance since [[Ronald Reagan]]'s presidency (1981–1989).<ref>{{cite web|title=US economy grew 5.7% in 2021 in rebound from 2020 recession|url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/us-economy-grew-57-2021-rebound-2020-recession-82507751|access-date=January 28, 2022|website=ABC News|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
By June 2020, the slump in US continental flights due to the coronavirus pandemic had resulted in the US government temporarily halting service of fifteen US airlines to 75 domestic airports.<ref>{{cite news|last=Shepardson|first=David|date=June 4, 2020|title=U.S. airlines gain final approval to drop services to 75 domestic airports|language=en|publisher=[[Reuters]]|url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-finalizes-order-allowing-15-035146552.html}}</ref> ''[[The New York Times]]'' reported on June 10, 2020, that "the United States budget deficit grew to a record $1.88{{nbs}}trillion for the first eight months of this [[fiscal year]]."<ref>{{cite news|date=June 10, 2020|title=Fed Expects Unemployment Rate to Stay High: Live Updates|language=en|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/10/business/stock-market-today-coronavirus.html}}</ref> |
|||
2021–2022 marked a historical [[2021–2022 inflation surge|inflation surge]] in the United States, with the [[Consumer Price Index]] inflation rate hitting 9.1% higher in June 2022 than June 2021, constituting a 41-year high inflation rate with critics blaming the [[Federal Reserve]] among other factors.<ref>{{cite web|title=Inflation Hits 9.1 Percent, Highest Level in 41 Years|url=https://reason.com/2022/07/13/inflation-hits-9-1-percent-highest-level-in-41-years/|date=July 13, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
Inflation rate reached 4.9% in April 2023, which was roughly 3% above the Federal Reserve's 2% target rate.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Aratani |first1=Lauren |title=US jobs market remains strong despite high interest rates and debt ceiling fight |url=https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jun/02/us-jobs-report-may-unemployment-rate |agency=The Guardian |date=2023}}</ref> |
|||
{{Clear}}<!-- remove unless it breaks the table below --> |
|||
==Data== |
==Data== |
||
The following table shows the main economic indicators in |
The following table shows the main economic indicators in 1980–2023 (with IMF staff estimates in 2024–2028). Inflation below 5% is in green.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2024/April/weo-report?c=111,&s=NGDP_RPCH,NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,PCPIPCH,LUR,GGXWDG_NGDP,&sy=1980&ey=2028&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1|title=Report for Selected Countries and Subjects|website=IMF}}</ref> |
||
{| class="wikitable |
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |
||
! |
!Year |
||
!GDP |
|||
!Nominal GDP<br /><small>(billions USD)</small> |
|||
<small>(in Bil. US$PPP)</small> |
|||
!GDP per capita |
|||
!GDP growth<br /><small>(real)</small> |
|||
<small>(in US$ PPP)</small> |
|||
!GDP |
|||
!Unemployment<br /><small>(in %)</small> |
|||
<small>(in Bil. US$nominal)</small> |
|||
!Budget balance<br /><small>(in % of GDP)</small><ref>{{cite web|date=2018-07-27|title=Federal Surplus or Deficit [-] as Percent of Gross Domestic Product|url=https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSGDA188S|language=en |df=mdy-all}}</ref> |
|||
!GDP per capita |
|||
!Government debt held by public<br /><small>(in % of GDP)</small><ref>[https://www.cbo.gov/about/products/budget-economic-data#2 CBO Historical Data-Retrieved April 13, 2020].</ref> |
|||
<small>(in US$ nominal)</small> |
|||
!GDP growth |
|||
<small>(real)</small> |
|||
!Inflation rate |
|||
<small>(in Percent)</small> |
|||
!Unemployment |
|||
<small>(in Percent)</small> |
|||
!Government debt |
|||
<small>(in % of GDP)</small> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1980 |
|||
|2020 (est) |
|||
|2,857.3 |
|||
|{{Decrease}}20,934.0 |
|||
|12,552.9 |
|||
|{{Decrease}}57,589 |
|||
|2,857.3 |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−3.5 % |
|||
|12,552.9 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}0.62 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Decrease}}-0.3% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}13.5% |
||
|7.2% |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}79.9 % |
|||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−n/a % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1981 |
|||
|2019 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}3,207.0 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}13,948.7 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}3,207.0 |
||
|{{Increase}}13,948.7 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}1.8 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.5% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}10.4% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}7.6% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1982 |
|||
|2018 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}3,343.8 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}14,405.0 |
||
|{{Increase}}3. |
|{{Increase}}3,343.8 |
||
|{{Increase}}14,405.0 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}2.4 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Decrease}}-1.8% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}6.2% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}9.7% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−2.4 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1983 |
|||
|2017 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}3,634.0 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}15,513.7 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}3,634.0 |
||
|{{Increase}}15,513.7 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}2.1 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}4.6% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}3.2% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}9.6% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Increase}}−2.3 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1984 |
|||
|2016 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}4,037.7 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}17,086.4 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}4,037.7 |
||
|{{Increase}}17,086.4 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}1.3 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}7.2% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}4.4% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}7.5% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−2.3 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1985 |
|||
|2015 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}4,339.0 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}18,199.3 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}4,339.0 |
||
|{{Increase}}18,199.3 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}0.1 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}4.2% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}3.5% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}7.2% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−2.2 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1986 |
|||
|2014 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}4,579.6 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}19,034.8 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}4,579.6 |
||
|{{Increase}}19,034.8 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}1.6 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}3.5% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}1.9% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}7.0% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−2.1 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1987 |
|||
|2013 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}4,855.3 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}20,001.0 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}4,855.3 |
||
|{{Increase}}20,001.0 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}1.5 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}3.5% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}3.6% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}6.2% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Increase}}−2.1 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1988 |
|||
|2012 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}5,236.4 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}21,376.0 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}5,236.4 |
||
|{{Increase}}21,376.0 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}2.1 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}4.2% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}4.1% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}5.5% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Increase}}−2.6 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1989 |
|||
|2011 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}5,641.6 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}22,814.1 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}5,641.6 |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}22,814.1 |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}3.7% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}4.8% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}5.3% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Increase}}−2.9 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1990 |
|||
|2010 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}5,963.1 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}23,848.0 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}5,963.1 |
||
|{{Increase}}23,848.0 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}1.6 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}1.9% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}5.4% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}5.6% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−2.9 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1991 |
|||
|2009 |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}6,158.1 |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}24,302.8 |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}6,158.1 |
||
|{{Increase}}24,302.8 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}−0.3 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Decrease}}-0.1% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}4.2% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}6.9% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Increase}}−2.6 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1992 |
|||
|2008 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}6,520.3 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}25,392.9 |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}6,520.3 |
||
|{{Increase}}25,392.9 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}3.8 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}3.5% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}3.0% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}7.5% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Increase}}−4.6 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1993 |
|||
|2007 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}6,858.6 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}26,364.2 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}6,858.6 |
||
|{{Increase}}26,364.2 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}2.9 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.8% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}3.0% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}6.9% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Increase}}−4.9 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1994 |
|||
|2006 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}7,287.3 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}27,674.0 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}7,287.3 |
||
|{{Increase}}27,674.0 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}3.2 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}4.0% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}2.6% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}6.1% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−5.8 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1995 |
|||
|2005 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}7,639.8 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}28,671.5 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}7,639.8 |
||
|{{Increase}}28,671.5 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}3.4 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.7% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}2.8% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}5.6% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−5.7 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1996 |
|||
|2004 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}8,073.1 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}29,947.0 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}8,073.1 |
||
|{{Increase}}29,947.0 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}2.7 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}3.8% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}2.9% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}5.4% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−5.1 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1997 |
|||
|2003 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}8,577.6 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}31,440.1 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}8,577.6 |
||
|{{Increase}}31,440.1 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}2.3 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}4.4% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.3% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}4.9% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−4.1 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1998 |
|||
|2002 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}9,062.8 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}32,833.7 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}9,062.8 |
||
|{{Increase}}32,833.7 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}1.6 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}4.5% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}1.5% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}4.5% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−4.1 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1999 |
|||
|2001 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}9,631.2 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}34,496.2 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}9,631.2 |
||
|{{Increase}}34,496.2 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}2.8 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}4.8% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.2% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}4.2% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Increase}}−3.7 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|2000 |
|2000 |
||
|{{Increase}}10, |
|{{Increase}}10,251.0 |
||
|{{Increase}}36, |
|{{Increase}}36,312.8 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}10,251.0 |
||
|{{Increase}}36,312.8 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}3.4 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}4.1% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}3.4% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}4.0% |
||
|n/a |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−3.9 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|2001 |
|||
|1999 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}10,581.9 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}37,101.5 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}10,581.9 |
||
|{{Increase}}37,101.5 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}2.2 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}1.0% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}2.8% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}4.7% |
||
|53.1% |
|||
|{{Decrease}}−3.0 % |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|2002 |
|||
|1998 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}10,929.1 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}37,945.8 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}10,929.1 |
||
|{{Increase}}37,945.8 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}1.5 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}1.7% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}1.6% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}5.8% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}55.5% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2003 |
|||
|1997 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}11,456.5 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}39,405.4 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}11,456.5 |
||
|{{Increase}}39,405.4 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}2.3 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.8% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}2.3% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}6.0% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}58.6% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2004 |
|||
|1996 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}12,217.2 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}41,641.6 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}12,217.2 |
||
|{{Increase}}41,641.6 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}2.9 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}3.9% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}2.7% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}5.5% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}66.2% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2005 |
|||
|1995 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}13,039.2 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}44,034.3 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}13,039.2 |
||
|{{Increase}}44,034.3 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}2.8 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}3.5% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}3.4% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}5.1% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}65.5% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2006 |
|||
|1994 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}13,815.6 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}46,216.9 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}13,815.6 |
||
|{{Increase}}46,216.9 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}2.6 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.8% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}3.2% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}4.6% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}64.2% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2007 |
|||
|1993 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}14,474.3 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}47,943.4 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}14,474.3 |
||
|{{Increase}}47,943.4 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}3.0 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.0% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}2.9% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Steady}}4.6% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}64.6% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2008 |
|||
|1992 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}14,769.9 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}48,470.6 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}14,769.9 |
||
|{{Increase}}48,470.6 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}3.0 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}0.1% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}3.8% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}5.8% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}73.5% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2009 |
|||
|1991 |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Decrease}}14,478.1 |
||
|{{ |
|{{Decrease}}47,102.4 |
||
|{{Decrease}} |
|{{Decrease}}14,478.1 |
||
|{{Decrease}}47,102.4 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}4.2 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Decrease}}-2.6% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}-0.3% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}9.3% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}86.7% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2010 |
|||
|1990 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}15,049.0 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}48,586.3 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}15,049.0 |
||
|{{Increase}}48,586.3 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}5.4 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.7% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}1.6% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}9.6% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}95.2% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2011 |
|||
|1989 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}15,599.7 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}50,008.1 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}15,599.7 |
||
|{{Increase}}50,008.1 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}4.8 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}1.6% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}3.1% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}8.9% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}99.5% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2012 |
|||
|1988 |
|||
| |
|{{Increase}}16,254.0 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}51,736.7 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}16,254.0 |
||
|{{Increase}}51,736.7 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}4.1 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.3% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}2.1% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}8.1% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}103.1% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2013 |
|||
|1987 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}16,880.6 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}53,363.9 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}16,880.6 |
||
|{{Increase}}53,363.9 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}3.6 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.1% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}1.5% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}7.4% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}104.3% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2014 |
|||
|1986 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}17,608.1 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}55,263.8 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}17,608.1 |
||
|{{Increase}}55,263.8 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}1.9 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.5% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}1.6% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}6.1% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}104.2% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2015 |
|||
|1985 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}18,295.0 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}57,006.9 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}18,295.0 |
||
|{{Increase}}57,006.9 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}3.5 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.9% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}0.1% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}5.2% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}104.6% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2016 |
|||
|1984 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}18,804.9 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}58,179.6 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}18,804.9 |
||
|{{Increase}}58,179.6 |
|||
|{{increaseNegative}}4.4 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}1.8% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}1.3% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}4.9% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}106.5% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2017 |
|||
|1983 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}19,612.1 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}60,292.9 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}19,612.1 |
||
|{{Increase}}60,292.9 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}3.2 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.5% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.1% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}4.4% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}105.5% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2018 |
|||
|1982 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}20,656.5 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}63,165.2 |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}20,656.5 |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}63,165.2 |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}3.0% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.4% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}3.9% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}106.8% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2019 |
|||
|1981 |
|||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}21,539.9 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}65,561.3 |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}21,539.9 |
||
|{{Increase}}65,561.3 |
|||
|{{decreasePositive}}10.4 % |
|||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}2.6% |
||
|{{Increase}} |
|{{Increase}}1.8% |
||
|{{ |
|{{DecreasePositive}}3.7% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}108% |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|2020 |
|||
|1980 |
|||
|{{Decrease}}21,354.1 |
|||
|2,862.5 |
|||
|{{Decrease}}64,461.6 |
|||
| 12,575 |
|||
|{{Decrease}} |
|{{Decrease}}21,354.1 |
||
|{{ |
|{{Decrease}}64,461.6 |
||
|{{ |
|{{Decrease}}-2.2% |
||
|{{ |
|{{Increase}}1.2% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}8.1% |
||
|{{ |
|{{IncreaseNegative}}131.8% |
||
|- |
|||
|2021 |
|||
|{{Increase}}23,681.1 |
|||
|{{Increase}}71,257.9 |
|||
|{{Increase}}23,681.1 |
|||
|{{Increase}}71,257.9 |
|||
|{{Increase}}6.1% |
|||
|{{Increase}}4.7% |
|||
|{{DecreasePositive}}5.4% |
|||
|{{DecreasePositive}}124.5% |
|||
|- |
|||
|2022 |
|||
|{{Increase}}26,006.9 |
|||
|{{Increase}}77,979.8 |
|||
|{{Increase}}26,006.9 |
|||
|{{Increase}}77,979.8 |
|||
|{{Increase}}2.5% |
|||
|{{IncreaseNegative}}8.0% |
|||
|{{DecreasePositive}}3.6% |
|||
|{{DecreasePositive}}118.6% |
|||
|- |
|||
|2023 |
|||
|{{Increase}}27,720.7 |
|||
|{{Increase}}82,715.1 |
|||
|{{Increase}}27,720.7 |
|||
|{{Increase}}82,715.1 |
|||
|{{Increase}}2.9% |
|||
|{{Increase}}4.1% |
|||
|{{Steady}}3.6% |
|||
|{{IncreaseNegative}}118.7% |
|||
|- |
|||
|2024 |
|||
|''{{Increase}}29,167.7'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}86,601.2'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}29,167.7'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}86,601.2'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}2.8%'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}2.9%'' |
|||
|''{{IncreaseNegative}}4.1%'' |
|||
|''{{IncreaseNegative}}121%'' |
|||
|- |
|||
|2025 |
|||
|''{{Increase}}30,337.1'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}89,677.8'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}30,337.1'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}89,677.8'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}2.2%'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}1.9%'' |
|||
|''{{IncreaseNegative}}4.4%'' |
|||
|''{{IncreaseNegative}}124.1%'' |
|||
|- |
|||
|2026 |
|||
|''{{Increase}}31,526.9'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}92,785.8'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}31,526.9'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}92,785.8'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}2.0%'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}2.1%'' |
|||
|''{{DecreasePositive}}4.3%'' |
|||
|''{{IncreaseNegative}}126.6%'' |
|||
|- |
|||
|2027 |
|||
|''{{Increase}}32,786.7'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}96,070.1'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}32,786.7'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}96,070.1'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}2.1%'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}2.1%'' |
|||
|''{{DecreasePositive}}4.2%'' |
|||
|''{{IncreaseNegative}}128.4%'' |
|||
|- |
|||
|2028 |
|||
|''{{Increase}}34,096.0'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}99,467.8'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}34,096.0'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}99,467.8'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}2.1%'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}2.1%'' |
|||
|''{{DecreasePositive}}4.0%'' |
|||
|''{{IncreaseNegative}}130.2%'' |
|||
|- |
|||
|2029 |
|||
|''{{Increase}}35,457.9'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}102,987.0'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}35,457.9'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}102,987.0'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}2.1%'' |
|||
|''{{Increase}}2.1%'' |
|||
|''{{Steady}}4.0%'' |
|||
|''{{IncreaseNegative}}131.7%'' |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
[[File:CPI 1914-2022.webp|thumb|center|alt=CPI 1914-2022|400px| |
|||
{{legend|#0076BA |[[Inflation]]}} |
|||
{{legend|#EE220C |[[Deflation]]}} |
|||
{{legend-line|#1DB100 solid 3px|[[Money supply|M2 money supply]] increases Year/Year}} |
|||
]] |
|||
==GDP== |
==GDP== |
||
{{Main|Economic history of the United States#1790–2006 GDP}} |
{{Main|Economic history of the United States#1790–2006 GDP}} |
||
[[File:United States GDP.webp|thumb|300px|right|United States real quarterly GDP (annualized)]] |
|||
[[File:Quarterly gross domestic product.png|right|300px|Quarterly gross domestic product]] |
|||
[[File:Presidential Comparison Real GDP - v1.png|thumb|right|300px|U.S. cumulative real (inflation-adjusted) GDP growth by US president (from Reagan to Obama) |
[[File:Presidential Comparison Real GDP - v1.png|thumb|right|300px|U.S. cumulative real (inflation-adjusted) GDP growth by US president (from Reagan to Obama)<ref>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1 FRED-Real GDP-Retrieved July 1, 2018].</ref>]] |
||
[[File:Private sector workers earnings compared to GDP.webp|thumb|300px|Private sector workers earnings compared to GDP <br /> |
|||
U.S. nominal GDP was $19.5{{nbs}}trillion in 2017. Annualized, nominal GDP reached $20.1{{nbs}}trillion in Q1 2018, the first time it exceeded $20{{nbs}}trillion. About 70% of U.S. GDP is personal consumption, with business investment 18%, government 17% (federal, state and local but excluding transfer payments such as Social Security, which is in consumption) and net exports a negative 3% due to the U.S. trade deficit.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm| title = BEA News Release{{snd}}GDP Second Quarter 2018{{snd}}July 27, 2018}}</ref> Real [[gross domestic product]], a measure of both production and income, grew by 2.3% in 2017, vs. 1.5% in 2016 and 2.9% in 2015. Real GDP grew at a quarterly annualized rate of 2.2% in Q1 2018, 4.2% in Q2 2018, 3.4% in Q3 2018 and 2.2% in Q4 2018; the Q2 rate was the best growth rate since Q3 2014, and the overall yearly GDP growth of 2.9% in 2018 was the best performance of the economy in a decade.<ref name="Real_GDP" /> In 2020, the growth rate of the GDP has started to drop as a result of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], resulting in the GDP shrinking at a quarterized annual growth rate of −5.0% in Q1 2020{{citation needed|date=August 2020}} and −32.9% in Q2 2020,{{citation needed|date=August 2020}} respectively. |
|||
Private sector workers made ~$2 trillion or about 29.6% of all money earned in Q3 2023 (before taxes) |
|||
{{legend|#8CD181|Quarterly [[GDP]] not Annualized|outline=#1DB100}} |
|||
{{legend|#73C9FF|Private Sector Workers Total Earnings|outline=#00A2FF}} |
|||
]] |
|||
U.S. nominal GDP was $19.5{{spaces}}trillion in 2017, the largest in the world. Annualized, nominal GDP reached $20.1{{spaces}}trillion in Q1 2018, the first time it exceeded $20{{spaces}}trillion. About 70% of U.S. GDP is personal consumption, with business investment 18%, government 17% (federal, state and local but excluding transfer payments such as Social Security, which is in consumption) and net exports a negative 3% due to the U.S. trade deficit.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm| title = BEA News Release{{snd}}GDP Second Quarter 2018{{snd}}July 27, 2018}}</ref> Real [[gross domestic product]], a measure of both production and income, grew by 2.3% in 2017, vs. 1.5% in 2016 and 2.9% in 2015. Real GDP grew at a quarterly annualized rate of 2.2% in Q1 2018, 4.2% in Q2 2018, 3.4% in Q3 2018, and 2.2% in Q4 2018; the Q2 rate was the best growth rate since Q3 2014, and the overall yearly GDP growth of 2.9% in 2018 was the best performance of the economy in a decade.<ref name="Real_GDP" /> In 2020, the growth rate of the GDP has started to drop as a result of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], resulting in the GDP shrinking at a quarterized annual growth rate of −5.0% in Q1 2020{{citation needed|date=August 2020}} and −32.9% in Q2 2020,{{citation needed|date=August 2020}} respectively. |
|||
As of 2014, China passed the U.S. as the largest economy in GDP terms, measured at purchasing power parity conversion rates. The U.S. |
As of 2014, China passed the U.S. as the largest economy in GDP (PPP) terms, measured at purchasing power parity conversion rates. The U.S. had the highest GDP (PPP) figures for more than a century prior to that milestone; China has more than tripled the U.S. growth rate for each of the past 40 years. As of 2017, the European Union as an aggregate had a GDP roughly 5% larger than the U.S., although the former is a political union not a country. The United States', however, remained the world's largest economy with the highest nominal GDP.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20070613003104/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2001rank.html#us CIA World Factbook-United States-Retrieved July 29, 2018].</ref> |
||
Real GDP per capita (measured in 2009 dollars) was $52,444 in 2017 and has been growing each year since 2010. It grew 3.0% per year on average in the 1960s, 2.1% in the 1970s, 2.4% in the 1980s, 2.2% in the 1990s, 0.7% in the 2000s, and 0.9% from 2010 to 2017.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/A939RX0Q048SBEA| title = FRED{{snd}}Real GDP per Capita{{snd}}Annual Average}}</ref> Reasons for slower growth since 2000 are debated by economists and may include aging demographics, slower population and growth in labor force, slower productivity growth, reduced corporate investment, greater income inequality reducing demand, lack of major innovations, and reduced labor power.<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/21/magazine/are-we-doomed-to-slow-growth.html ''The New York Times''. Adam Davidson. "Are We Doomed to Slow Growth?" February 17, 2016].</ref> The U.S. ranked 20th out of 220 countries in GDP per capita in 2017.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html#us| title = ''CIA World Factbook''. "USA Economy".}}</ref> Among the modern U.S. Presidents, Bill Clinton had the highest cumulative percent real GDP increase during his two terms, Reagan second and Obama third.<ref name="Real_GDP">{{cite web|url=https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm|title=Bureau of Economic Analysis|first=US Department of Commerce, BEA, Bureau of Economic|last=Analysis|website=bea.gov|access-date=May 7, 2018}}</ref> |
Real GDP per capita (measured in 2009 dollars) was $52,444 in 2017 and has been growing each year since 2010. It grew 3.0% per year on average in the 1960s, 2.1% in the 1970s, 2.4% in the 1980s, 2.2% in the 1990s, 0.7% in the 2000s, and 0.9% from 2010 to 2017.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/A939RX0Q048SBEA| title = FRED{{snd}}Real GDP per Capita{{snd}}Annual Average| date = January 1947}}</ref> Reasons for slower growth since 2000 are debated by economists and may include aging demographics, slower population and growth in labor force, slower productivity growth, reduced corporate investment, greater income inequality reducing demand, lack of major innovations, and reduced labor power.<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/21/magazine/are-we-doomed-to-slow-growth.html ''The New York Times''. Adam Davidson. "Are We Doomed to Slow Growth?" February 17, 2016].</ref> The U.S. ranked 20th out of 220 countries in GDP per capita in 2017.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html#us| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070613004710/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html#us| url-status = dead| archive-date = June 13, 2007| title = ''CIA World Factbook''. "USA Economy".}}</ref> Among the modern U.S. Presidents, Bill Clinton had the highest cumulative percent real GDP increase during his two terms, Reagan second and Obama third.<ref name="Real_GDP">{{cite web|url=https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm|title=Bureau of Economic Analysis|first=US Department of Commerce, BEA, Bureau of Economic|last=Analysis|website=bea.gov|access-date=May 7, 2018}}</ref> |
||
The development of the nation's GDP according to [[World Bank]]:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG/countries|title=GDP growth (annual %)|publisher=Data.worldbank.org|access-date=December 8, 2014}}</ref> U.S. real GDP grew by an average of 1.7% from 2000 to the first half of 2014, a rate around half the historical average up to 2000.<ref name="bea.gov">{{cite web|title=National Income and Product Accounts Gross Domestic Product: Second Quarter 2014 (Advance Estimate) Annual Revision: 1999 through First Quarter 2014|url=https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm|website |
The development of the nation's GDP according to [[World Bank]]:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG/countries|title=GDP growth (annual %)|publisher=Data.worldbank.org|access-date=December 8, 2014}}</ref> U.S. real GDP grew by an average of 1.7% from 2000 to the first half of 2014, a rate around half the historical average up to 2000.<ref name="bea.gov">{{cite web|title=National Income and Product Accounts Gross Domestic Product: Second Quarter 2014 (Advance Estimate) Annual Revision: 1999 through First Quarter 2014|url=https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm|website=Bureau of Economic Analysis|access-date=July 31, 2014}}</ref> |
||
{{wide image|Midtown Manhattan from Weehawken September 2021 panorama 2.jpg|600px|Panorama of Midtown Manhattan}} |
|||
==By economic sector== |
==By economic sector== |
||
===Nominal GDP sector composition=== |
===Nominal GDP sector composition=== |
||
[[File:Number of Businesses by Type (US Census Bureau 2019).png|thumb| |
[[File:Number of Businesses by Type (US Census Bureau 2019).png|thumb|550x550px|Number of businesses by type (US Census Bureau, 2019)]] |
||
Nominal GDP sector composition, 2015 (in millions of dollars) at [[Real gross domestic product|2005 constant prices]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=95|title=UNCTADstat – Table view|website=unctadstat.unctad.org|access-date=2017- |
Nominal GDP sector composition, 2015 (in millions of dollars) at [[Real gross domestic product|2005 constant prices]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=95|title=UNCTADstat – Table view|website=unctadstat.unctad.org|access-date=November 26, 2017|archive-date=October 20, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171020072414/http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=95|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
||
! width="2%" |No. |
|||
! width="95%" |Country/Economy |
|||
! width="15%" |[[Real gross domestic product|Real GDP]] |
|||
! width="10%" |Agri. |
|||
! width="10%" |Indus. |
|||
! width="10%" |Serv. |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! Country/Economy |
|||
|– |
|||
! [[Real gross domestic product|Real GDP]] |
|||
! Agri. |
|||
! Indus. |
|||
! Serv. |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''{{noflag}} World''' |
|'''{{noflag}} World''' |
||
|60,093,221 |
|60,093,221 |
||
|1,968,215 |
|1,968,215 |
||
|16,453,140 |
|16,453,140 |
||
|38,396,695 |
|38,396,695 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|1 |
|||
|{{flag|United States}} |
|{{flag|United States}} |
||
|15,160,104 |
|15,160,104 |
||
Line 627: | Line 786: | ||
|3,042,332 |
|3,042,332 |
||
|11,518,980 |
|11,518,980 |
||
|- |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
Nominal GDP Sector Composition, 2016 (in millions of dollars) at current prices.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=57&pr.y=7&sy=2016&ey=2020&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=111&s=NGDPD,NGDPDPC,PPPGDP,PPPPC&grp=0&a=|title=Report for Selected Countries and Subjects|website=imf.org|language=en-US|access-date= |
Nominal GDP Sector Composition, 2016 (in millions of dollars) at current prices.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=57&pr.y=7&sy=2016&ey=2020&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=111&s=NGDPD,NGDPDPC,PPPGDP,PPPPC&grp=0&a=|title=Report for Selected Countries and Subjects|website=imf.org|language=en-US|access-date=November 26, 2017 }}</ref> |
||
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
||
! width="2%" |No. |
|||
! width="25%" |Country/Economy |
|||
! width="15%" |[[List of countries by GDP (nominal)|Nominal GDP]] |
|||
! width="10%" |Agri. |
|||
! width="10%" |Indus. |
|||
! width="10%" |Serv. |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! Country/Economy |
|||
|1 |
|||
! [[List of countries by GDP (nominal)|Nominal GDP]] |
|||
! Agri. |
|||
! Indus. |
|||
! Serv. |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{flag|United States}} |
|{{flag|United States}} |
||
|18,624,450 |
|18,624,450 |
||
|204,868.95 |
|204,868.95 |
||
|3,613,143.3 |
|3,613,143.3 |
||
|14,806,437.75 |
|14,806,437.75 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| colspan="6" |*Percentages from [[The World Factbook|CIA World Factbook]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/|title=The World Factbook – Central Intelligence Agency|website=cia.gov|language=en|access-date= |
| colspan="6" |*Percentages from [[The World Factbook|CIA World Factbook]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/|title=The World Factbook – Central Intelligence Agency|website=cia.gov|language=en|access-date=November 26, 2017 }}</ref> |
||
|- |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
==Employment== |
==Employment== |
||
{{Further|List of largest United States–based employers globally|List of U.S. states by employment rate}} |
{{Further|List of largest United States–based employers globally|List of U.S. states by employment rate}} |
||
{{see also|JOLTS report}} |
|||
[[File:Job Growth by U.S. President - v1.png|thumb|right|300px|Job growth by US president, measured as cumulative percentage change from month after inauguration to end of term.<ref>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS Federal Reserve Economic Data-All Employees Total Non-Farm-Retrieved July 29, 2018].</ref>]] |
|||
[[File:Jobs and quits rate.webp|thumb|380px|right|[[JOLTS report]] |
|||
{{legend-line|#AA4643 solid 3px|[[Unemployment in the United States|Total unemployed people]]}} |
|||
{{legend-line|#89A54E solid 3px|Total job openings}} |
|||
{{legend-line|#4572A7 solid 3px|[[Turnover (employment)|Total quits]]}} |
|||
]] |
|||
[[File:Job Growth by U.S. President - v1.png|thumb|right|300px|Job growth by US president, measured as cumulative percentage change from month after inauguration to end of term<ref>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS Federal Reserve Economic Data-All Employees Total Non-Farm-Retrieved July 29, 2018].</ref>]] |
|||
[[File:U.S. Econonomic Trends 2014-2017 Nine Panel.png|thumb|right|300px|Panel chart illustrates nine key economic variables measured annually in 2014–2017. The years 2014–2016 were during President Obama's second term, while 2017 was during President Trump's term. Refer to citations on detail page.]] |
[[File:U.S. Econonomic Trends 2014-2017 Nine Panel.png|thumb|right|300px|Panel chart illustrates nine key economic variables measured annually in 2014–2017. The years 2014–2016 were during President Obama's second term, while 2017 was during President Trump's term. Refer to citations on detail page.]] |
||
There were approximately 160.4 million people in the U.S. labor force in 2017, the fourth largest labor force in the world behind China, India, and the European Union.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/| title = ''CIA World Factbook''. "United States.}}</ref> |
There were approximately 160.4 million people in the U.S. labor force in 2017, the fourth largest labor force in the world behind China, India, and the European Union.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/| title = ''CIA World Factbook''. "United States.| date = February 16, 2022}}</ref> |
||
The government (federal, state and local) employed 22 million in 2010.<ref name="Mcfeatters">{{cite news| url=http://napavalleyregister.com/news/opinion/editorial/article_43f9e712-b96a-11df-9e2d-001cc4c002e0.html | newspaper=Napa Valley Register | title=Saluting 154 million in workforce on Labor Day | first=Dale | last=McFeatters | date=September 6, 2010}}</ref> Small businesses are the nation's largest employer, representing 37% of American workers.<ref name="sba.gov" /> The second-largest share of employment belongs to large businesses employing 36% of the U.S. workforce.<ref name="sba.gov" /> |
The government (federal, state and local) employed 22 million in 2010.<ref name="Mcfeatters">{{cite news| url=http://napavalleyregister.com/news/opinion/editorial/article_43f9e712-b96a-11df-9e2d-001cc4c002e0.html | newspaper=Napa Valley Register | title=Saluting 154 million in workforce on Labor Day | first=Dale | last=McFeatters | date=September 6, 2010}}</ref> Small businesses are the nation's largest employer, representing 37% of American workers.<ref name="sba.gov" /> The second-largest share of employment belongs to large businesses employing 36% of the U.S. workforce.<ref name="sba.gov" /> [[White-collar worker|White collar workers]] comprise 44% of the workforce as of 2022, up from 34% in 2000.<ref>{{Cite news |date=December 4, 2022 |title=Is a white-collar recession looming? |url=https://www.economist.com/business/2022/12/04/is-a-white-collar-recession-looming | newspaper=[[The Economist]] | quote=Managerial and professional occupations now make up 44% of total employment, up from 34% in 2000, according to the BLS (see chart). }}</ref> |
||
The nation's [[private sector]] employs 85% of working Americans. [[Public sector|Government]] accounts for 14% of all U.S. workers. Over 99% of all private employing organizations in the U.S. are small businesses.<ref name="sba.gov" /> The 30 million small businesses in the U.S. account for 64% of newly created jobs (those created minus those lost).<ref name="sba.gov" /> Jobs in small businesses accounted for 70% of those created in the last decade.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if9NOcUK1F0 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/if9NOcUK1F0| archive-date= |
The nation's [[private sector]] employs 85% of working Americans. [[Public sector|Government]] accounts for 14% of all U.S. workers. Over 99% of all private employing organizations in the U.S. are small businesses.<ref name="sba.gov" /> The 30 million small businesses in the U.S. account for 64% of newly created jobs (those created minus those lost).<ref name="sba.gov" /> Jobs in small businesses accounted for 70% of those created in the last decade.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if9NOcUK1F0 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/if9NOcUK1F0| archive-date=December 11, 2021 |url-status=live|title=Obama: Small Business 'Heart' of Economy – YouTube |work=Youtube |date=March 16, 2009 |access-date=April 21, 2012}}{{cbignore}}</ref> |
||
The proportion of Americans employed by small business versus large business has remained relatively the same year by year as some small businesses become large businesses and just over half of small businesses survive for more than five years.<ref name="sba.gov" /> Amongst large businesses, several of the largest companies and employers in the world are American companies. Amongst them are [[Walmart]], which is both the largest company and the largest [[private sector]] employer in the world. Walmart employs 2.1 million people worldwide and 1.4 million in the U.S. alone.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2010/full_list/ |publisher=CNN | title=Global 500 2010: Global 500 1–100}}</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20090318030352/http://walmartstores.com/download/2230.pdf Walmart Corporate and Financial Facts].</ref> |
The proportion of Americans employed by small business versus large business has remained relatively the same year by year as some small businesses become large businesses and just over half of small businesses survive for more than five years.<ref name="sba.gov" /> Amongst large businesses, several of the largest companies and employers in the world are American companies. Amongst them are [[Walmart]], which is both the largest company and the largest [[private sector]] employer in the world. Walmart employs 2.1 million people worldwide and 1.4 million in the U.S. alone.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2010/full_list/ |publisher=CNN | title=Global 500 2010: Global 500 1–100}}</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20090318030352/http://walmartstores.com/download/2230.pdf Walmart Corporate and Financial Facts].</ref> |
||
[[File:US Census Bureau Number of Employees per Business.png|thumb|300x300px|US Census Bureau ( |
[[File:US Census Bureau Number of Employees per Business.png|thumb|300x300px|US Census Bureau (number of employees per business)]] |
||
There are nearly thirty million small businesses in the U.S.. Minorities such as [[Hispanic and Latino Americans|Hispanics]], African Americans, Asian Americans, and Native Americans (35% of the country's population),<ref>"[https:// |
There are nearly thirty million small businesses in the U.S.. Minorities such as [[Hispanic and Latino Americans|Hispanics]], African Americans, Asian Americans, and Native Americans (35% of the country's population),<ref>"[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-jun-10-la-na-census-20100611-story.html Minority population growing in the United States, census estimates show]". ''Los Angeles Times''. June 10, 2010.</ref> own 4.1 million of the nation's businesses. Minority-owned businesses generate almost $700{{spaces}}billion in revenue, and they employ almost five million workers in the U.S.<ref name="sba.gov" /><ref>{{cite web |
||
| url = http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/lauhsthl.htm |
| url = http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/lauhsthl.htm |
||
| title = Current Unemployment Rates for States and Historical Highs/Lows |
| title = Current Unemployment Rates for States and Historical Highs/Lows |
||
Line 669: | Line 831: | ||
| access-date = June 15, 2012 |
| access-date = June 15, 2012 |
||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
Americans have the highest average [[List of countries by average wage|employee]] income among |
Americans have the highest average [[List of countries by average wage|employee]] income among OECD nations.<ref name="autogenerated4">{{cite web |title=OECD Better Life Index |url=http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/#/11111111111 |access-date=November 25, 2012 |publisher=OECD}}</ref> The median household income in the U.S. as of 2008 is $52,029.<ref>[https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20100223212411/http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/acsbr08-2.pdf Median Household Income for States: 2007 and 2008], September 2009, [https://www.census.gov/ census.gov].</ref> About 284,000 working people in the U.S. have two full-time jobs and 7.6 million have part-time ones in addition to their full-time employments.<ref name="Mcfeatters" /> Out of all [[Working class in the United States|working individuals in the U.S.]], 12% belong to a labor union and most union members work for the government.<ref name="Mcfeatters" /> The decline of [[Trade unions in the United States|union membership]] in the U.S. over the last several decades parallels that of labor's share of the economy.<ref>Doree Armstrong (February 12, 2014). [http://www.washington.edu/news/2014/02/12/jake-rosenfeld-explores-the-sharp-decline-of-union-membership-influence/ Jake Rosenfeld explores the sharp decline of union membership, influence]. ''UW Today.'' See also: Jake Rosenfeld (2014) ''[http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674725119 What Unions No Longer Do].'' [[Harvard University Press]]. {{ISBN|0674725115}}</ref><ref>Keith Naughton, Lynn Doan and Jeffrey Green (February 20, 2015). [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-20/unions-poised-for-comeback-as-middle-class-wages-stall As the Rich Get Richer, Unions Are Poised for Comeback]. ''Bloomberg.'' |
||
* "A 2011 study drew a link between the decline in union membership since 1973 and expanding wage disparity. Those trends have since continued, said [[Bruce Western]], a professor of sociology at Harvard University who co-authored the study."</ref><ref>Michael Hiltzik (March 25, 2015). [https://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-imf-agrees-loss-of-union-power-20150325-column.html IMF agrees: Decline of union power has increased income inequality]. ''[[Los Angeles Times]].''</ref> The World Bank ranks the United States first in the ease of hiring and firing workers.<ref name="EDBI">{{cite web|url=http://www.doingbusiness.org/ExploreEconomies/?economyid=197|access-date=June 28, 2007|title=Doing Business in the United States (2006)|publisher=World Bank}}</ref> The United States is the only advanced economy that does not [[List of statutory minimum employment leave by country|legally guarantee its workers paid vacation]] or [[Sick leave#United States|paid sick days]], and is one of just a few countries in the world without [[paid family leave]] as a [[legal right]], with the others being [[Papua New Guinea]], [[Suriname]] and [[Liberia]].<ref>Rebecca Ray, Milla Sanes, and John Schmitt (May 2013). [http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/no-vacation-update-2013-05.pdf No-Vacation Nation Revisited]. ''[[Center for Economic and Policy Research]].''</ref><ref>Tara Siegel Bernard (February 22, 2013). [https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/23/your-money/us-trails-much-of-the-world-in-providing-paid-family-leave.html In Paid Family Leave, U.S. Trails Most of the Globe]. ''[[The New York Times]]''</ref><ref>Maxwell Strachan, Alissa Scheller, Jan Diehm (October 29, 2013). [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/29/american-exceptionalism_n_4170683.html?ncid=txtlnkushpmg00000029 15 Ways The United States Is The Best (At Being The Worst)]. ''[[The Huffington Post]].''</ref> In 2014 and again in 2020, the [[International Trade Union Confederation]] graded the U.S. a 4{{ |
* "A 2011 study drew a link between the decline in union membership since 1973 and expanding wage disparity. Those trends have since continued, said [[Bruce Western]], a professor of sociology at Harvard University who co-authored the study."</ref><ref>Michael Hiltzik (March 25, 2015). [https://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-imf-agrees-loss-of-union-power-20150325-column.html IMF agrees: Decline of union power has increased income inequality]. ''[[Los Angeles Times]].''</ref> The World Bank ranks the United States first in the ease of hiring and firing workers.<ref name="EDBI">{{cite web|url=http://www.doingbusiness.org/ExploreEconomies/?economyid=197|access-date=June 28, 2007|title=Doing Business in the United States (2006)|publisher=World Bank}}</ref> The United States is the only advanced economy that does not [[List of statutory minimum employment leave by country|legally guarantee its workers paid vacation]] or [[Sick leave#United States|paid sick days]], and is one of just a few countries in the world without [[paid family leave]] as a [[legal right]], with the others being [[Papua New Guinea]], [[Suriname]] and [[Liberia]].<ref>Rebecca Ray, Milla Sanes, and John Schmitt (May 2013). [http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/no-vacation-update-2013-05.pdf No-Vacation Nation Revisited]. ''[[Center for Economic and Policy Research]].''</ref><ref>Tara Siegel Bernard (February 22, 2013). [https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/23/your-money/us-trails-much-of-the-world-in-providing-paid-family-leave.html In Paid Family Leave, U.S. Trails Most of the Globe]. ''[[The New York Times]]''</ref><ref>Maxwell Strachan, Alissa Scheller, Jan Diehm (October 29, 2013). [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/29/american-exceptionalism_n_4170683.html?ncid=txtlnkushpmg00000029 15 Ways The United States Is The Best (At Being The Worst)]. ''[[The Huffington Post]].''</ref> In 2014 and again in 2020, the [[International Trade Union Confederation]] graded the U.S. a 4{{spaces}}out of{{spaces}}5+, its third-lowest score, on the subject of powers and [[Labor rights|rights granted to labor unions]].<ref>Ishaan Tharoor (May 20, 2014). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/05/20/map-the-worst-places-in-the-world-to-be-a-worker/ MAP: The worst places in the world to be a worker]. ''[[The Washington Post]].'' see also: [http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/survey_ra_2014_eng_v2.pdf ITUC Global Rights Index].</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1= O'Brien |first1=Fergal |last2= Schneeweiss |first2=Zoe |date=June 18, 2020 |title=U.S. Ranked Worst for Workers' Rights Among Major Economies |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-18/u-s-ranked-worst-for-workers-rights-among-major-economies |work=Bloomberg|access-date=June 19, 2020}}</ref> Similarly, a 2023 study published by [[Oxfam]] found that the United States ranks among the worst among developed countries for [[labour protection|labor protection]]s.<ref>{{cite news |last=Ghilarducci|first=Teresa |date=June 14, 2023 |title=New Study: U.S. Tops Rich Nations As Worst Place To Work|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/teresaghilarducci/2023/06/14/new-study-us-tops-rich-nations-in-worst-place-to-work/?sh=403bcced3be6|work=Forbes |location= |access-date=July 27, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.oxfamamerica.org/explore/research-publications/where-hard-work-doesnt-pay-off/|title=Where hard work doesn't pay off: An index of US labor policies compared to peer nations|last=Henderson|first= Kaitlyn |date=May 3, 2023 |website= |publisher=Oxfam |access-date=July 27, 2023 |quote=The US is falling drastically behind similar countries in mandating adequate wages, protections, and rights for millions of workers and their families. The wealthiest country in the world is near the bottom of every dimension of this index.}}</ref> Some scholars, including business theorist [[Jeffrey Pfeffer]] and political scientist Daniel Kinderman, posit that contemporary employment practices in the United States relating to the increased performance pressure from management, and the hardships imposed on employees such as toxic working environments, [[precarity]], and long hours, could be responsible for 120,000 excess deaths annually, making the workplace the fifth leading cause of death in the United States.<ref>{{cite book |last= Pfeffer|first=Jeffrey|date=2018 |title=Dying for a Paycheck: How Modern Management Harms Employee Health and Company Performance – and What We Can Do About It|publisher=HarperBusiness|page=38 |isbn=978-0062800923|author-link=Jeffrey Pfeffer}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= McGregor|first=Jena|date=March 22, 2018|title=This professor says the workplace is the fifth leading cause of death in the U.S.|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2018/03/22/this-professor-says-the-workplace-is-the-fifth-leading-cause-of-death-in-the-u-s/|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |access-date=July 5, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Kinderman|first=Daniel|date=2019|title=The Neoliberal Revolution in Industrial Relations|journal=Catalyst|volume=2|issue=4|pages=117–118|issn=2475-7365|quote=Neoliberal industrial relations reform and increased employer discretion has enabled employers to significantly increase the performance pressure, with serious repercussions for employees. In the United States, work-related issues including layoffs, job insecurity, toxic cultures, and long hours may be responsible for up to 120,000 deaths a year.}}</ref> |
||
===Unemployment=== |
===Unemployment=== |
||
{{Main|Unemployment in the United States|List of U.S. states and territories by unemployment rate}} |
{{Main|Unemployment in the United States|List of U.S. states and territories by unemployment rate}} |
||
[[File: |
[[File:U1-U6 unemployment rate.webp|thumb|450px|U1-U6 unemployment rate]] |
||
As of December 2017, the [[unemployment]] rate in the U.S. was 4.1%<ref>{{cite web|url=http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UNRATE |title=Federal Reserve Database-FRED-Data Series UNRATE |publisher=Research.stlouisfed.org |date=September 6, 2013 |access-date=October 20, 2013}}</ref> or 6.6 million people.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UNEMPLOY |title=Federal Reserve Database-FRED-Data Series Unemploy |date=January 1948 |publisher=Research.stlouisfed.org |access-date=October 20, 2013}}</ref> The government's broader U-6 unemployment rate, which includes the part-time [[underemployment|underemployed]], was 8.1%<ref>{{cite web|url=http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/U6RATE |title=Federal Reserve Database-FRED-Data Series U6RATE-March 2013 |publisher=Research.stlouisfed.org |date=September 6, 2013 |access-date=October 20, 2013}}</ref> or 8.2 million people. These figures were calculated with a civilian labor force of approximately 160.6 million people,<ref name="research.stlouisfed.org">{{cite web|url=http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CLF16OV |title=Federal Reserve Database-CLF160V Data Series|date=January 1948|publisher=Research.stlouisfed.org |access-date=October 20, 2013}}</ref> relative to a U.S. population of approximately 327 million people.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/POP |title=FRED Database – POP Data Series – U.S. Population. November 2012 |date=January 1952 |publisher=Research.stlouisfed.org |access-date=October 20, 2013}}</ref> |
As of December 2017, the [[unemployment]] rate in the U.S. was 4.1%<ref>{{cite web|url=http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UNRATE |title=Federal Reserve Database-FRED-Data Series UNRATE |publisher=Research.stlouisfed.org |date=September 6, 2013 |access-date=October 20, 2013}}</ref> or 6.6 million people.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UNEMPLOY |title=Federal Reserve Database-FRED-Data Series Unemploy |date=January 1948 |publisher=Research.stlouisfed.org |access-date=October 20, 2013}}</ref> The government's broader U-6 unemployment rate, which includes the part-time [[underemployment|underemployed]], was 8.1%<ref>{{cite web|url=http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/U6RATE |title=Federal Reserve Database-FRED-Data Series U6RATE-March 2013 |publisher=Research.stlouisfed.org |date=September 6, 2013 |access-date=October 20, 2013}}</ref> or 8.2 million people. These figures were calculated with a civilian labor force of approximately 160.6 million people,<ref name="research.stlouisfed.org">{{cite web|url=http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CLF16OV |title=Federal Reserve Database-CLF160V Data Series|date=January 1948|publisher=Research.stlouisfed.org |access-date=October 20, 2013}}</ref> relative to a U.S. population of approximately 327 million people.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/POP |title=FRED Database – POP Data Series – U.S. Population. November 2012 |date=January 1952 |publisher=Research.stlouisfed.org |access-date=October 20, 2013}}</ref> |
||
Between 2009 and 2010, following the Great Recession, the emerging problem of [[jobless recovery|jobless recoveries]] resulted in record levels of [[long-term unemployment]] with more than six million workers looking for work for more than six months as of January 2010. This particularly affected older workers.<ref name="Goodman">[https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/21/business/economy/21unemployed.html "Millions of Unemployed Face Years Without Jobs"] article by [[Peter S. Goodman]] in ''[[The New York Times]]'' February 20, 2010.</ref> A year after the recession ended in June 2009, immigrants gained 656,000 jobs in the U.S., while U.S.-born workers lost more than a million jobs, due in part to an aging country (relatively more white retirees) and demographic shifts.<ref>"[https://money.cnn.com/2010/10/29/news/economy/jobs_immigrants/ Immigrants top native born in U.S. job hunt]". [[CNNMoney.com]]. October 29, 2010.</ref> In April 2010, the official unemployment rate was 9.9%, but the government's broader [[Unemployment#United States Bureau of Labor statistics|U-6 unemployment]] rate was 17.1%.<ref>"[https://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/05/07/broader-u-6-unemployment-rate-increases-to-171-in-april/ Broader U-6 Unemployment Rate Increases to 17.1% in April]". ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]''. May 7, 2010.</ref> Between February 2008 and February 2010, the number of people working part-time for economic reasons (i.e., would prefer to work full-time) increased by 4.0 million to 8.8 million, an 83% increase in part-time workers during the two-year period.<ref name="EconPost">{{ |
Between 2009 and 2010, following the Great Recession, the emerging problem of [[jobless recovery|jobless recoveries]] resulted in record levels of [[long-term unemployment]] with more than six million workers looking for work for more than six months as of January 2010. This particularly affected older workers.<ref name="Goodman">[https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/21/business/economy/21unemployed.html "Millions of Unemployed Face Years Without Jobs"] article by [[Peter S. Goodman]] in ''[[The New York Times]]'' February 20, 2010.</ref> A year after the recession ended in June 2009, immigrants gained 656,000 jobs in the U.S., while U.S.-born workers lost more than a million jobs, due in part to an aging country (relatively more white retirees) and demographic shifts.<ref>"[https://money.cnn.com/2010/10/29/news/economy/jobs_immigrants/ Immigrants top native born in U.S. job hunt]". [[CNNMoney.com]]. October 29, 2010.</ref> In April 2010, the official unemployment rate was 9.9%, but the government's broader [[Unemployment#United States Bureau of Labor statistics|U-6 unemployment]] rate was 17.1%.<ref>"[https://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/05/07/broader-u-6-unemployment-rate-increases-to-171-in-april/ Broader U-6 Unemployment Rate Increases to 17.1% in April]". ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]''. May 7, 2010.</ref> Between February 2008 and February 2010, the number of people working part-time for economic reasons (i.e., would prefer to work full-time) increased by 4.0 million to 8.8 million, an 83% increase in part-time workers during the two-year period.<ref name="EconPost">{{cite web |title=Four million more people working part time than 2 years ago |publisher=EconPost.com |date=March 17, 2010 |url=http://econpost.com/unitedstateseconomy/four-million-more-people-working-part-time-2-years-ago |access-date=March 30, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100711052533/http://econpost.com/unitedstateseconomy/four-million-more-people-working-part-time-2-years-ago |archive-date=July 11, 2010 }}</ref> |
||
By 2013, although the unemployment rate had fallen below 8%, the record proportion of long term unemployed and continued decreasing household income remained indicative of a jobless recovery.<ref name=SchwartzJobless>{{cite news|last=Schwartz|first=Nelson|title=Recovery in U.S. Is Lifting Profits, but Not Adding Jobs|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/04/business/economy/corporate-profits-soar-as-worker-income-limps.html?pagewanted=all|access-date=March 18, 2013|newspaper=The New York Times|date=March 3, 2013}}</ref> However, the number of payroll jobs returned to its pre-recession (November 2007) level by May 2014 as the economy recovered.<ref>{{cite web| |
By 2013, although the unemployment rate had fallen below 8%, the record proportion of long term unemployed and continued decreasing household income remained indicative of a jobless recovery.<ref name=SchwartzJobless>{{cite news|last=Schwartz|first=Nelson|title=Recovery in U.S. Is Lifting Profits, but Not Adding Jobs|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/04/business/economy/corporate-profits-soar-as-worker-income-limps.html?pagewanted=all|access-date=March 18, 2013|newspaper=The New York Times |date=March 3, 2013}}</ref> However, the number of payroll jobs returned to its pre-recession (November 2007) level by May 2014 as the economy recovered.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS |title=FRED – All Employees Total Non-farm Payrolls |date=January 1939}}</ref> |
||
After being higher in the post-war period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising [[eurozone]] unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since.<ref>{{cite journal| |
After being higher in the post-war period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising [[eurozone]] unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Constance Sorrentino|author2=Joyanna Moy|title=U.S. labor market performance in international perspective|journal=Monthly Labor Review|date=June 2002 |url=http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2002/06/art2full.pdf |access-date=August 22, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Chronic Unemployment in the Euro Area: Causes and Cures|url=http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/1999/01/0599ch4.pdf |work=World Economic Outlook|publisher=International Monetary Fund|access-date=August 22, 2013|year=1999}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Unemployment|url=http://www.unc.edu/depts/europe/euroeconomics/Unemployment.php|work=Euro Economics|publisher=University of North Carolina|access-date=August 22, 2013|quote=Chart}}</ref> In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in [[Agriculture in the United States|agriculture]]. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture.<ref>Time-Life Books, Library of Nations: United States, Sixth European English language printing, 1989</ref> [[Male unemployment]] continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).<ref name="CPS06052009">{{cite web |url=http://www.bls.gov/cps/ |title=Current Population Survey |publisher=Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Government |date=June 5, 2009 |access-date=June 19, 2009}}</ref> |
||
The [[youth unemployment]] rate was 18.5% in July 2009, the highest rate in that month since 1948.<ref>"[https://web.archive.org/web/20100327214616/http://www.bls.gov/news.release/youth.nr0.htm Employment and Unemployment Among Youth Summary]". United States Department of Labor. August 27, 2009.</ref> The unemployment rate of young African Americans was 28.2% in May 2013.<ref>"[https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2013/06/07/the-unemployment-news-is-worse-for-many/ The Unemployment News Is Worse For Many]". ''[[Forbes]]''. June 7, 2013.</ref> |
The [[youth unemployment]] rate was 18.5% in July 2009, the highest rate in that month since 1948.<ref>"[https://web.archive.org/web/20100327214616/http://www.bls.gov/news.release/youth.nr0.htm Employment and Unemployment Among Youth Summary]". United States Department of Labor. August 27, 2009.</ref> The unemployment rate of young African Americans was 28.2% in May 2013.<ref>"[https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2013/06/07/the-unemployment-news-is-worse-for-many/ The Unemployment News Is Worse For Many]". ''[[Forbes]]''. June 7, 2013.</ref> |
||
The unemployment rate reached an all-time high of 14.7% in April 2020 before falling back to 11.1% in June 2020. Due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, Q2 GDP in the US fell 32.9% in 2020.<ref>{{ |
The unemployment rate reached an all-time high of 14.7% in April 2020 before falling back to 11.1% in June 2020. Due to the effects of the [[COVID-19 pandemic in the United States|COVID-19 pandemic]], Q2 GDP in the US fell 32.9% in 2020.<ref>{{cite web|title=Gross Domestic Product, 2nd Quarter 2020 (Advance Estimate) and Annual Update {{!}} U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)|url=https://www.bea.gov/news/2020/gross-domestic-product-2nd-quarter-2020-advance-estimate-and-annual-update|access-date=June 8, 2021|website=www.bea.gov}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=The U.S. economy added 4.8 million jobs in June, but fierce new headwinds have emerged|language=en-US|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/07/02/june-2020-jobs-report/|access-date=June 8, 2021|issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Cox|first=Jeff|date=July 30, 2020|title=Second-quarter GDP plunged by worst-ever 32.9% amid virus-induced shutdown|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/30/us-gdp-q2-2020-first-reading.html|access-date=June 8, 2021|website=CNBC|language=en}}</ref> The unemployment rate continued its rapid decline falling to 3.9% in 2021.<ref>{{Cite web |date=January 7, 2022 |title=The US labor market recovered rapidly in 2021 but still fell short even before Omicron wave |url=https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economic-issues-watch/us-labor-market-recovered-rapidly-2021-still-fell-short-even |access-date=April 12, 2022 |website=PIIE |language=en}}</ref> |
||
It reached 3.7% in May 2023.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Aratani |first1=Lauren |title=US jobs market remains strong despite high interest rates and debt ceiling fight |url=https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jun/02/us-jobs-report-may-unemployment-rate |agency=The Guardian |date=June 2, 2023}}</ref> |
|||
===Employment by sector=== |
===Employment by sector=== |
||
{{See also|List of largest United States–based employers globally#Employment_by_major_industry_sector|l1=Employment by |
{{See also|List of largest United States–based employers globally#Employment_by_major_industry_sector|l1=Employment by major industry sector in United States}} |
||
U.S. employment, as estimated in 2012, is divided into 79.7% in the service sector, 19.2% in the manufacturing sector, and 1.1% in the agriculture sector.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/ |title=The World Factbook (United States) |publisher=CIA.gov |date=September 25, 2013 |access-date=October 26, 2013}}</ref> |
U.S. employment, as estimated in 2012, is divided into 79.7% in the service sector, 19.2% in the manufacturing sector, and 1.1% in the agriculture sector.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/ |title=The World Factbook (United States) |publisher=CIA.gov |date=September 25, 2013 |access-date=October 26, 2013}}</ref> |
||
United States non-farm employment by industry sector February 2013.<ref name="Inflation2">{{cite web |url=http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpid1302.pdf|title=CPI Detailed Report – Data for February 2013|publisher=Bureau of Labor Statistics|access-date=June 1, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
==Income and wealth== |
==Income and wealth== |
||
[[File:Median personal income after taxes.webp|thumb|300px|Median personal income after taxes |
|||
{{legend|#FF2600|[[State income tax]]}} |
|||
{{legend|#FFD932|[[Payroll tax in the United States|Payroll tax]] [[employee]] side}} |
|||
{{legend|#B51700|[[Federal income tax]]}} |
|||
{{legend|#1DB100|[[Median income]] after tax}} |
|||
{{legend|#FF95CA|[[Payroll tax in the United States|Payroll tax]] [[employer]] side}} |
|||
]] |
|||
{{Main|Income in the United States|Affluence in the United States}} |
{{Main|Income in the United States|Affluence in the United States}} |
||
{{See also|Personal income in the United States|Household income in the United States|Income inequality in the United States|List of United States counties by per capita income}} |
{{See also|Personal income in the United States|Household income in the United States|Income inequality in the United States|List of United States counties by per capita income}} |
||
[[File:US Real Household Median Income thru 2014.png|thumb| |
[[File:US Real Household Median Income thru 2014.png|thumb|250px|U.S. real median household income (1984–2021)]] |
||
[[File:U.S. Income and Net Worth Distribution.png|thumb|250px|U.S. family pre-tax income and net worth distribution for 2013 and 2016, from the Federal Reserve [[Survey of Consumer Finances]]<ref name=fed2017sept>[[Federal Reserve Bulletin]]. September 2017, Vol. 103, No. 3. See PDF: [https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/scf17.pdf Changes in U.S. Family Finances from 2013 to 2016: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances]. Table 1 (on the left) is taken from page 4 of the PDF. Table 2 (on the right) is taken from page 13. See: [[Survey of Consumer Finances]] and [https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm more data].</ref>]] |
|||
[[File:Top 1 pct share of income 1979 2007 2014.png|thumb|450px|U.S. share of income (pre-tax and after-tax) earned by top 1% households in 1979, 2007, and 2015 (CBO data). The first date (1979) reflects the more egalitarian pre-1980 period, 2007 was the peak inequality of the post-1980 period, and the 2015 number reflects the Obama tax increases on the top 1% along with residual effects of the Great Recession.<ref name="CBO_Dist2015">{{cite web| url = https://www.cbo.gov/publication/54646| title = CBO. ''The Distribution of Household Income, 2015''}}</ref>]] |
|||
[[File:U.S. Income and Net Worth Distribution.png|thumb|450px|U.S. family pre-tax income and net worth distribution for 2013 and 2016, from the Federal Reserve [[Survey of Consumer Finances]].<ref name=fed2017sept>[[Federal Reserve Bulletin]]. September 2017, Vol. 103, No. 3. See PDF: [https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/scf17.pdf Changes in U.S. Family Finances from 2013 to 2016: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances]. Table 1 (on the left) is taken from page 4 of the PDF. Table 2 (on the right) is taken from page 13. See: [[Survey of Consumer Finances]] and [https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm more data].</ref>]] |
|||
===Income measures=== |
===Income measures=== |
||
Real (i.e., inflation-adjusted) median household income, a good measure of middle-class income, was $59,039 in 2016, a record level. However, it was just above the previous record set in 1998, indicating the purchasing power of middle-class family income has been stagnant or down for much of the past twenty years.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N| title = FRED – Real Median Household Income}}</ref> During 2013, employee compensation was $8.969{{ |
Real (i.e., inflation-adjusted) median household income, a good measure of middle-class income, was $59,039 in 2016, a record level. However, it was just above the previous record set in 1998, indicating the purchasing power of middle-class family income has been stagnant or down for much of the past twenty years.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N| title = FRED – Real Median Household Income| date = January 1984}}</ref> During 2013, employee compensation was $8.969{{spaces}}trillion, while gross private investment totals $2.781{{spaces}}trillion.<ref name="Fed Z.1">{{cite web | url=http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/z1.pdf | title=Z.1: Financial Accounts of the United States | publisher=[[Federal Reserve Board of Governors]] | date=March 6, 2014 | access-date=May 31, 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140527095440/http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/Current/z1.pdf | archive-date=May 27, 2014 | url-status=dead | df=mdy-all}}</ref> |
||
Americans have the highest average [[household income]] among OECD nations, and in 2010 had the fourth-highest [[median household income]], down from second-highest in 2007.<ref name="Household Income" /><ref name=autogenerated4 /> According to one analysis middle-class incomes in the United States fell into a tie with those in Canada in 2010, and may have fallen behind by 2014, while several other advanced economies have closed the gap in recent years.<ref>David Leonhardt and Kevin Quealy (April 22, 2014). [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/upshot/the-american-middle-class-is-no-longer-the-worlds-richest.html?_r=0 The American Middle Class Is No Longer the World's Richest]. ''[[The New York Times]].''</ref> |
Americans have the highest average [[household income]] among OECD nations, and in 2010 had the fourth-highest [[median household income]], down from second-highest in 2007.<ref name="Household Income">{{cite journal |date=March 18, 2014 |title=Household Income |url=http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/society-at-a-glance-2014_soc_glance-2014-en |journal=Society at a Glance 2014: OECD Social Indicators |series=Society at a Glance |publisher=OECD Publishing |doi=10.1787/soc_glance-2014-en |isbn=9789264200722 |access-date=May 29, 2014 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=autogenerated4 /> According to one analysis middle-class incomes in the United States fell into a tie with those in Canada in 2010, and may have fallen behind by 2014, while several other advanced economies have closed the gap in recent years.<ref>David Leonhardt and Kevin Quealy (April 22, 2014). [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/upshot/the-american-middle-class-is-no-longer-the-worlds-richest.html?_r=0 The American Middle Class Is No Longer the World's Richest]. ''[[The New York Times]].''</ref> |
||
===Income inequality=== |
===Income inequality=== |
||
{{excerpt|Income inequality in the United States}} |
|||
Income inequality has become a hotly debated topic globally. According to the ''CIA World Factbook'', U.S. income inequality ranked 41st highest among 156 countries in 2017 (i.e., 74% of countries have a more equal income distribution).<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2172rank.html#us| title = ''CIA World Factbook''. "Distribution of Family Income"}}</ref> According to the [[Congressional Budget Office]], the top 1% of income households earned about a 9% share of the pre-tax income in 1979, versus 19% in 2007 and 17% in 2014. For after-tax income, these figures were 7%, 17%, and 13%, respectively. These figures indicate the share of income earned by top earners more than doubled between 1979 and 2007, then fell somewhat following the [[Great Recession]], and the higher tax rates and re-distributive policies applied by President Barack Obama in 2013 (i.e., expiration of the [[Bush Tax Cuts]] for the top 1% and subsidies for lower income persons via the [[Affordable Care Act]]).<ref name="CBO_Dist2014">{{cite web| url = https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53597| title = CBO. ''The Distribution of Household Income, 2014''}}</ref> Recasting the 2012 income using the 1979 income distribution (representing the more egalitarian 1950–1980 period), the bottom 99% of families would have averaged about $7,100 more income.<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/13/business/rethinking-the-income-gap-and-a-college-education.html ''The New York Times''. Eduardo Porter "Rethinking the Rise of Inequality". November 13, 2013].</ref> [[Income inequality in the United States]] has grown from 2005 to 2012 in more than two out of three metropolitan areas.<ref name=Chokshi>{{cite news|last1=Chokshi|first1=Niraj|title=Income inequality seems to be rising in more than 2 in 3 metro areas|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/08/11/income-inequality-seems-to-be-rising-in-more-than-2-in-3-metro-areas/|access-date=September 13, 2014|work=[[The Washington Post]]|date=August 11, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Upper class|top 1 percent of income-earners]] accounted for 52 percent of the income gains from 2009 to 2015, where income is defined as market income excluding government transfers,<ref>[[Emmanuel Saez|Saez, Emmanuel]] (June 30, 2016). [http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2015.pdf "Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States"]. ''[[University of California, Berkeley]].''</ref> while their share of total income has more than doubled from nine percent in 1976 to twenty percent in 2011.<ref name="PikettySaez">Alvaredo, Facundo; [[Anthony B. Atkinson|Atkinson, Anthony B.]]; [[Thomas Piketty|Piketty, Thomas]]; [[Emmanuel Saez|Saez, Emmanuel]] (2013). [http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.27.3.3 "The Top 1{{nbs}}Percent in International and Historical Perspective"]. ''Journal of Economic Perspectives.''</ref> According to a 2014 OECD report, 80% of total pre-tax market income growth went to the top 10% from 1975 to 2007.<ref>[http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD2014-FocusOnTopIncomes.pdf Focus on Top Incomes and Taxation in OECD Countries: Was the crisis a game changer?] ''[[OECD]],'' May 2014.</ref> |
|||
A number of economists and others have expressed growing concern about [[Income inequality in the United States|income inequality]], calling it "deeply worrying",<ref name=Noah1>[http://www.tnr.com/blog/timothy-noah/99651/white-house-heres-why-you-have-care-about-inequality White House: Here's Why You Have To Care About Inequality] Timothy Noah | tnr.com| January 13, 2012.</ref> unjust,<ref name="Richer">{{cite news|last=Krugman|first=Paul|title=For Richer|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/20/magazine/20INEQUALITY.html?pagewanted=all|newspaper=The New York Times|date=October 20, 2002}}</ref> a danger to democracy/social stability,<ref name=Oligarchy>[https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/04/opinion/oligarchy-american-style.html?_r=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss ''The New York Times''. "Oligarchy, American Style"]. Paul Krugman. November 3, 2011.</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens |author1=Martin Gilens |author2=Benjamin I. Page |name-list-style=amp|journal=[[Perspectives on Politics]] |date=2014 |volume=12 |issue=3 |pages=564–581 |doi=10.1017/S1537592714001595 |url=http://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>[[Thomas Piketty|Piketty, Thomas]] (2014). ''[[Capital in the Twenty-First Century]].'' [[Belknap Press]]. {{ISBN|067443000X}} p. 514: *"the risk of a drift towards oligarchy is real and gives little reason for optimism about where the United States is headed."</ref> or a sign of national decline.<ref name=Packer>"The Broken Contract", By George Packer, ''[[Foreign Affairs]]'', November/December 2011</ref> Yale professor [[Robert Shiller]] has said, "The most important problem that we are facing now today, I think, is rising inequality in the United States and elsewhere in the world."<ref>{{cite news|last=Christoffersen|first=John|title=Rising inequality 'most important problem,' says Nobel-winning economist|url=https://www.stltoday.com/business/local/rising-inequality-most-important-problem-says-nobel-winning-economist/article_a5065957-05c3-5ac0-ba5b-dab91c22973a.html|access-date=October 19, 2013|newspaper=St. Louis Post-Dispatch|date=October 14, 2013}}</ref> [[Thomas Piketty]] of the [[Paris School of Economics]] argues that the post-1980 increase in inequality played a role in the 2008 crisis by contributing to the nation's financial instability.<ref>[[Thomas Piketty|Piketty, Thomas]] (2014). ''[[Capital in the Twenty-First Century]].'' [[Belknap Press]]. {{ISBN|067443000X}} pp. 297–98.</ref> In 2016, the economists Peter H. Lindert and [[Jeffrey G. Williamson]] claimed that inequality is the highest it has been since the nation's founding.<ref>Jeff Guo (July 1, 2016). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/07/01/income-inequality-today-may-be-the-highest-since-the-nations-founding/ Income inequality today may be higher today than in any other era]. ''[[The Washington Post]]''</ref> In 2018, income inequality was at the highest level ever recorded by the [[United States Census Bureau|Census Bureau]], with a Gini index of 0.485.<ref>{{cite news |last= Telford|first=Taylor|date=September 26, 2019|title=Income inequality in America is the highest it's been since census started tracking it, data shows|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/09/26/income-inequality-america-highest-its-been-since-census-started-tracking-it-data-show|work=[[The Washington Post]] |access-date=September 27, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
Others disagree, saying that the inequality issue is a political distraction from what they consider real problems like chronic unemployment and sluggish growth.<ref name=Winship>{{cite web|last1=Winship|first1=Scott|title=Overstating the Costs of Inequality|url=http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/articles/2013/03/overstating%20inequality%20costs%20winship/overstating%20inequality%20costs%20winship.pdf|website=Brookings|access-date=August 12, 2014|date=Spring 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131024141452/http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Research/Files/Articles/2013/03/overstating%20inequality%20costs%20winship/overstating%20inequality%20costs%20winship.pdf|archive-date=October 24, 2013|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Income Inequality in America: Fact and Fiction|url=http://www.economics21.org/files/e21ib_1.pdf|website=e21|publisher=Manhattan Institute|access-date=August 14, 2014|date=May 2014}}</ref> [[George Mason University]] economics professor [[Tyler Cowen]] has called inequality a "red herring",<ref>{{cite news|last1=Porter|first1=Eduardo|title=Tyler Cowen on Inequality and What Really Ails America|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/31/upshot/tyler-cowen-on-inequality-and-what-really-ails-america.html|work=The New York Times|access-date=August 12, 2014|date=July 30, 2014}}</ref> saying that factors driving its increase within a nation can simultaneously be driving its reduction globally, and arguing that redistributive policies intended to reduce inequality can do more harm than good regarding the real problem of stagnant wages.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Cowen|first1=Tyler|title=Income Inequality Is Not Rising Globally. It's Falling|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/20/upshot/income-inequality-is-not-rising-globally-its-falling-.html|work=The New York Times|access-date=August 12, 2014|date=July 19, 2014}}</ref> [[Robert Lucas Jr.]] has argued that the salient problem American living standards face is a government that has grown too much, and that recent policy shifts in the direction of European-style taxation, welfare spending, and regulation may be indefinitely putting the U.S. on a significantly lower, European level income trajectory.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Lucas Jr.|first1=Robert E.|title=The U.S. Recession of 2007–201?|url=http://econ.washington.edu/files/2013/05/millimansl.pdf|access-date=August 12, 2014|location=Lecture at the University of Washington|date=May 19, 2011|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140812204022/http://econ.washington.edu/files/2013/05/millimansl.pdf|archive-date=August 12, 2014|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Henninger|first1=Daniel|title=The Disappearing Recovery: What if the weak recovery is all the recovery we are going to get?|url=https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304911104576443953024891120?mod=djemEditorialPage_h&mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304911104576443953024891120.html%3Fmod%3DdjemEditorialPage_h|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|access-date=August 12, 2014|date=July 13, 2011}}</ref> Some researchers have disputed the accuracy of the underlying data regarding claims about inequality trends,<ref>{{cite news|last1=Stiles|first1=Andrew|title=The Full Piketty: Experts raise questions about Frenchman's data on income inequality|url=http://freebeacon.com/blog/the-full-piketty/|work=The Washington Free Beacon|access-date=August 12, 2014|date=May 28, 1014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Feldstein|first1=Martin|title=Piketty's Numbers Don't Add Up: Ignoring dramatic changes in tax rules since 1980 creates the false impression that income inequality is rising|url=https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304081804579557664176917086|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|access-date=August 12, 2014|date=May 14, 2014}}</ref> and economists Michael Bordo and Christopher M. Meissner have argued that inequality cannot be blamed for the 2008 financial crisis.<ref>{{cite web|author1=Michael Bordo|author2=Christopher M. Meissner|title=Does inequality lead to a financial crisis?|url=http://www.voxeu.org/article/does-inequality-lead-financial-crisis|publisher=Vox|access-date=August 12, 2014|date=March 24, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
According to a report by the [[Congressional Research Service]], decreased progressiveness in [[capital gains tax]]es was the largest contributor to the increase in overall income inequality in the U.S. from 1996 to 2006.<ref>{{cite book|last=Hungerford|first=Thomas L.|title=Changes in the Distribution of Income Among Tax Filers Between 1996 and 2006: The Role of Labor Income, Capital Income, and Tax Policy|publisher=Congressional Research Service|location=Washington, DC|url=http://taxprof.typepad.com/files/crs-1.pdf|access-date=January 1, 2014|format=Report 7-5700/R42131|date=December 29, 2011}}</ref> |
|||
As of 2010 The U.S. had the fourth-widest income distribution among [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development|OECD]] nations, behind Turkey, Mexico, and Chile.<ref>{{cite web|title=Inequality and Poverty|url=http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD2013-Inequality-and-Poverty-8p.pdf|publisher=OECD|access-date=July 30, 2014|date=May 2013}}</ref><ref>[http://www.compareyourcountry.org/inequality?cr=usa&cr1=oecd&lg=en&page=0 Compare your country: Income distribution and poverty]. [[OECD]].</ref><ref name="National Research Council" /> The [[Brookings Institution]] said in March 2013 that income inequality was increasing and becoming permanent, sharply reducing [[Socio-economic mobility in the United States|social mobility in the US]].<ref name="BrookingsPerm">{{cite web|title=Inequality Rising and Permanent Over Past Two Decades|url=http://www.brookings.edu/about/projects/bpea/latest-conference/2013-spring-permanent-inequality-panousi|work=Brookings Papers on Economic Activity|publisher=Brookings Institution|access-date=March 23, 2013|author=Vasia Panousi|author2=Ivan Vidangos|author3=Shanti Ramnath|author4=Jason DeBacker|author5=Bradley Heim|date=Spring 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130408151547/http://www.brookings.edu/about/projects/bpea/latest-conference/2013-spring-permanent-inequality-panousi|archive-date=April 8, 2013|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The [[OECD]] ranks the U.S. 10th in social mobility, behind the [[Nordic countries]], Australia, Canada, Germany, Spain, and France.<ref>Dave Serchuk. [https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveserchuk/2011/12/07/happy-countrysocial-mobility/ Happy Country=Social Mobility?] ''[[Forbes]].'' July 12, 2011.</ref> Of the major developed nations, only Italy and Great Britain have lower mobility.<ref>Steve Hargreaves (December 18, 2013). [https://money.cnn.com/2013/12/09/news/economy/america-economic-mobility/index.html The myth of the American Dream]. ''[[CNN]].'' 2014.</ref> This has been partly attributed to the depth of [[Poverty in the United States|American poverty]], which leaves poor children economically disadvantaged,<ref name=DeParle>DeParle, Jason (January 4, 2012). [https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/us/harder-for-americans-to-rise-from-lower-rungs.html?sq=mobility&st=cse&scp=1&pagewanted=all Harder for Americans to Rise From Lower Rungs]. ''[[The New York Times]]''.</ref> though others have observed that a relative rise in the U.S. is mathematically harder due to its higher and more widely distributed income range than in nations with artificial income compression, even if one enjoys more absolute mobility in the U.S., and have questioned how meaningful such international comparisons are.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Schneider|first1=Donald|title=A Guide to Understanding International Comparisons of Economic Mobility|url=http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/07/a-guide-to-understanding-international-comparisons-of-economic-mobility|publisher=[[The Heritage Foundation]]|access-date=August 12, 2014|date=July 29, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
There has been a widening gap between productivity and median incomes since the 1970s.<ref>Mishel, Lawrence (April 26, 2012). [http://www.epi.org/publication/ib330-productivity-vs-compensation/ The wedges between productivity and median compensation growth]. ''[[Economic Policy Institute]].''</ref> The primary cause for the gap between productivity and income growth is the decline in per capita hours worked.<ref name="Gordon 2013">{{cite journal |title=U.S. Productivity Growth: The Slowdown Has Returned After a Temporary Revival |journal=International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards |date=Spring 2013 |last=Gordon |first=Robert J. |volume=25 |pages=13–19 |url=http://faculty-web.at.northwestern.edu/economics/Gordon/SAN-to-NBER%20Baily-Sharpe%20as%20published_130327.pdf |access-date=2014-07-19 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140809065612/http://faculty-web.at.northwestern.edu/economics/Gordon/SAN-to-NBER%20Baily-Sharpe%20as%20published_130327.pdf |archive-date=August 9, 2014 |df=mdy-all}}</ref> Other causes include the rise in non-cash benefits as a share of worker compensation (which aren't counted in CPS income data), immigrants entering the labor force, statistical distortions including the use of different inflation adjusters by the BLS and CPS, productivity gains being skewed toward less labor-intensive sectors, income shifting from labor to capital, a skill gap-driven wage disparity, productivity being falsely inflated by hidden technology-driven depreciation increases and import price measurement problems, and/or a natural period of adjustment following an income surge during aberrational post-war circumstances.<ref name=Winship /><ref>{{cite web|last1=Rose|first1=Stephen|title=Does Productivity Growth Still Benefit Working Americans?: Unraveling the Income Growth Mystery to Determine How Much Median Incomes Trail Productivity Growth|url=http://www.itif.org/files/DoesProductivityGrowthStillBenefitWorkingAmericans.pdf|publisher=The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation|access-date=August 12, 2014|date=June 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_324645/lang--en/index.htm|title=Global wage growth stagnates, lags behind pre-crisis rates|date=December 5, 2014|access-date=August 10, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
According to a 2018 study by the OECD, given that the unemployed and at-risk workers get almost no government support and are further set back by a very weak [[collective bargaining]] system, the U.S. has much higher income inequality and a larger percentage of low-income workers than almost any other developed nation.<ref>{{cite news |last=Van Dam |first=Andrew |date=July 4, 2018 |title=Is it great to be a worker in the U.S.? Not compared with the rest of the developed world|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/07/04/is-it-great-to-be-a-worker-in-the-u-s-not-compared-to-the-rest-of-the-developed-world/|work=The Washington Post |access-date=July 6, 2018}}</ref> According to a 2020 study by the [[RAND Corporation]], the top 1% of U.S. income earners have taken $50{{nbs}}trillion from the bottom 90% between 1975 and 2018.<ref>{{cite news |title=The Top 1% of Americans Have Taken $50 Trillion From the Bottom 90% – And That's Made the U.S. Less Secure |url=https://time.com/5888024/50-trillion-income-inequality-america/ |work=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |date=September 14, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=The wealthiest 1% has taken $50 trillion from working Americans and redistributed it, a new study finds. Here's what that means |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/wealthiest-1-percent-stole-50-trillion-working-americans-what-means-2020-9 |work=Business Insider |date=September 18, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
===Household net worth and wealth inequality=== |
===Household net worth and wealth inequality=== |
||
{{ multiple image |total_width=450 |title=Net personal wealth in the U.S. since 1962 |
|||
{{Bar chart|float=right |
|||
| image1= 1962- Net personal wealth - average in percentile ranges - linear scale - US.svg | caption1= The average personal wealth of people in the top 1% is more than a thousand times that of people in bottom 50%.<ref name=WID_through_2021/> |
|||
| title = Net worth in the United States, 2006–2018<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TNWBSHNO| title = Federal Reserve Economic Data{{snd}}Households and Nonprofit Organizations{{snd}}Net Worth Level}}</ref> |
|||
| image2= 1962- Net personal wealth - average in percentile ranges - logarithmic scale - US.svg | caption2= The logarithmic scale shows how wealth has increased for all percentile groups, though moreso for wealthier people.<ref name=WID_through_2021>{{cite web |title=Evolution of wealth indicators, USA, 1913-2019 |url=https://wid.world/country/usa/ |website=WID.world |publisher=World Inequality Database |access-date=September 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230705011218/https://wid.world/country/usa/ |archive-date=July 5, 2023 |date=2022 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
| table_width = 20 |
|||
| bar_width = 20<!--must be an unformatted number--> |
|||
| data_max = 110,000<!--upper bound on the values in the data fields--> |
|||
| label_type = Year |
|||
| data_type = {{center|Wealth (billions in [[USD]])}} |
|||
| label1 = 2006 | data1 = 67,704 |
|||
| label2 = 2007 | data2 = 68,156 |
|||
| label3 = 2008 | data3 = 58,070 |
|||
| label4 = 2009 | data4 = 60,409 |
|||
| label5 = 2010 | data5 = 64,702 |
|||
| label6 = 2011 | data6 = 66,457 |
|||
| label7 = 2012 | data7 = 72,316 |
|||
| label8 = 2013 | data8 = 81,542 |
|||
| label9 = 2014 | data9 = 86,927 |
|||
| label10 = 2015 | data10 = 89,614 |
|||
| label11 = 2016 | data11 = 95,101 |
|||
| label12 = 2017 | data12 = 103,484 |
|||
| label13 = 2018 | data13 = 104,329 |
|||
| caption = |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
As of Q4 2017, total household net worth in the United States was a record $99{{ |
As of Q4 2017, total household net worth in the United States was a record $99{{spaces}}trillion, an increase of $5.2{{spaces}}trillion from 2016. This increase reflects both stock market and housing price gains. This measure has been setting records since Q4 2012.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?graph_id=369801| title = FRED "Household and Non-Profit net worth{{snd}}Real and Nominal"}}</ref> If divided evenly, the $99{{spaces}}trillion represents an average of $782,000 per household (for about 126.2 million households) or $302,000 per person. However, median household net worth (i.e., half of the families above and below this level) was $97,300 in 2016. The bottom 25% of families had a median net worth of zero, while the 25th to 50th percentile had a median net worth of $40,000.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm| title = Federal Reserve – Survey of Consumer Finances 2016}}</ref> |
||
Wealth inequality is more unequal than income inequality, with the top 1% households owning approximately 42% of the net worth in 2012, versus 24% in 1979.<ref>{{cite |
Wealth inequality is more unequal than income inequality, with the top 1% households owning approximately 42% of the net worth in 2012, versus 24% in 1979.<ref>{{cite news| url = http://gabriel-zucman.eu/uswealth/| title = Economist Gabriel Zucman "Wealth Inequality in the United States Since 1913"| newspaper = Gabriel Zucman | Professor of Economics| date = October 12, 2014}}</ref> According to a September 2017 report by the Federal Reserve, wealth inequality is at record highs; the top 1% controlled 38.6% of the country's wealth in 2016.<ref>{{cite news |last=Egan|first=Matt |date=September 27, 2017|title=Record inequality: The top 1% controls 38.6% of America's wealth|url=https://money.cnn.com/2017/09/27/news/economy/inequality-record-top-1-percent-wealth/index.html|work=[[CNNMoney]]|access-date=October 12, 2017}}</ref> The [[Boston Consulting Group]] posited in June 2017 report that 1% of the Americans will control 70% of country's wealth by 2021.<ref>{{cite news |last=Steverman|first=Ben |date=June 16, 2017 |title=The U.S. Is Where the Rich Are the Richest|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-16/the-u-s-is-where-the-rich-are-the-richest|work=Bloomberg |access-date=October 22, 2017}}</ref> |
||
The top 10% wealthiest possess 80% of all financial assets.<ref name="hurst34">{{ |
The top 10% wealthiest possess 80% of all financial assets.<ref name="hurst34">{{cite book |last=Hurst|first=Charles E.|title=Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and Consequences|year=2007|publisher=Pearson Education, Inc.|isbn=978-0205698295|page=34|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M0FVPwAACAAJ}}</ref> [[Wealth inequality in the United States|Wealth inequality in the U.S.]] is greater than in most developed countries other than Sweden.<ref name="Weissmann">{{cite news |date=June 23, 2021 |title=Global Wealth Databook 2021 |pages=115–118 |newspaper=Credit Suisse |url=https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/about-us/research/publications/global-wealth-databook-2021.pdf |access-date=March 4, 2022}}</ref> [[Inherited wealth]] may help explain why many Americans who have become rich may have had a "substantial head start".<ref name="Salon-20140324">{{cite web |last=Bruenig |first=Matt |title=You call this a meritocracy? How rich inheritance is poisoning the American economy |url=http://www.salon.com/2014/03/24/death_of_meritocracy_how_inheritance_is_poisoning_the_american_economy/ |date=March 24, 2014 |work=[[Salon (website)|Salon]] |access-date=August 24, 2014}}</ref><ref name="ECO-20140318">{{cite news |author=Staff |title=Inequality – Inherited wealth |url=https://www.economist.com/blogs/buttonwood/2014/03/inequality |date=March 18, 2014 |newspaper=[[The Economist]] |access-date=August 24, 2014}}</ref> In September 2012, according to the [[Institute for Policy Studies]], "over 60 percent" of the [[Forbes 400|Forbes richest 400 Americans]] "grew up in substantial privilege".<ref name="OW-20120924">{{cite web |last=Pizzigati |first=Sam |title=The 'Self-Made' Hallucination of America's Rich |url=http://inequality.org/selfmade-myth-hallucinating-rich/ |date=September 24, 2012 |work=[[Institute for Policy Studies]] |access-date=August 24, 2014}}</ref> Median household wealth fell 35% in the U.S., from $106,591 to $68,839 between 2005 and 2011, due to the [[Great Recession]], but has since recovered as indicated above.<ref>{{cite web|title=Median Household Net Worth by Quintile|url=https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/pdf/cb14-156_net_worth_graphic.pdf|website=United States Census|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140912175408/http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/pdf/cb14-156_net_worth_graphic.pdf|archive-date=September 12, 2014}}</ref> |
||
About 30% of the entire world's millionaire population resides in the United States ({{as of|2009|lc=y}}).<ref name="WorldWealthReport2010">{{cite web|url=http://www.capgemini.com/insights-and-resources/by-publication/world-wealth-report-2010/|title=World Wealth Report 2010 – Resource|date=June 18, 2010|access-date=August 10, 2017}}</ref> The [[Economist Intelligence Unit]] estimated in 2008 that there were 16,600,000 millionaires in the U.S.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.barclayswealth.com/files/volume5.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326020703/http://www.barclayswealth.com/files/volume5.pdf |archive-date=March 26, 2009 |title=Barclays Wealth Insights |url-status=dead |access-date=February 2, 2017}}. Volume 5: Evolving Fortunes. Barclays (2008). p. 7</ref> Furthermore, 34% of the world's billionaires are American (in 2011).<ref name="forbes.com" /><ref>{{cite news|last=Ody |first=Elizabeth |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-09/carlos-slim-tops-forbes-list-of-billionaires-for-second-year.html |title=Carlos Slim Tops Forbes List of Billionaires for Second Year |publisher=Bloomberg |date=March 10, 2011 |access-date=April 21, 2012}}</ref> |
About 30% of the entire world's millionaire population resides in the United States ({{as of|2009|lc=y}}).<ref name="WorldWealthReport2010">{{cite web|url=http://www.capgemini.com/insights-and-resources/by-publication/world-wealth-report-2010/|title=World Wealth Report 2010 – Resource|date=June 18, 2010|access-date=August 10, 2017|archive-date=April 6, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120406122836/http://www.capgemini.com/insights-and-resources/by-publication/world-wealth-report-2010/|url-status=dead}}</ref> The [[Economist Intelligence Unit]] estimated in 2008 that there were 16,600,000 millionaires in the U.S.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.barclayswealth.com/files/volume5.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326020703/http://www.barclayswealth.com/files/volume5.pdf |archive-date=March 26, 2009 |title=Barclays Wealth Insights |url-status=dead |access-date=February 2, 2017}}. Volume 5: Evolving Fortunes. Barclays (2008). p. 7</ref> Furthermore, 34% of the world's billionaires are American (in 2011).<ref name="forbes.com" /><ref>{{cite news|last=Ody |first=Elizabeth |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-09/carlos-slim-tops-forbes-list-of-billionaires-for-second-year.html |title=Carlos Slim Tops Forbes List of Billionaires for Second Year |publisher=Bloomberg |date=March 10, 2011 |access-date=April 21, 2012}}</ref> |
||
===Home ownership=== |
===Home ownership=== |
||
{{Further|Home-ownership in the United States}} |
{{Further|Home-ownership in the United States}} |
||
[[File: |
[[File:Cost of housing by State.webp|thumb|490px|Cost of housing by State]] |
||
The U.S. home ownership rate in Q1 2018 was 64.2%, well below the all-time peak of 69.2% set in Q4 2004 during a [[United States housing bubble|housing bubble]]. Millions of homes were lost to foreclosure during the [[Great Recession]] of 2007–2009, bringing the ownership rate to a trough of 62.9% in Q2 2016. The average ownership rate from 1965 to 2017 was 65.3%.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RHORUSQ156N| title = FRED "Homeownership rate for the United States"}}</ref> |
The U.S. home ownership rate in Q1 2018 was 64.2%, well below the all-time peak of 69.2% set in Q4 2004 during a [[United States housing bubble|housing bubble]]. Millions of homes were lost to foreclosure during the [[Great Recession]] of 2007–2009, bringing the ownership rate to a trough of 62.9% in Q2 2016. The average ownership rate from 1965 to 2017 was 65.3%.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RHORUSQ156N| title = FRED "Homeownership rate for the United States"| date = January 1965}}</ref> |
||
The average home in the United States has more than 700 square feet per person (65 square meters), which is 50%–100% more than the average in other high-income countries. Similarly, ownership rates of gadgets and amenities are relatively high compared to other countries.<ref name="Rector-Johnson">{{ |
The average home in the United States has more than 700 square feet per person (65 square meters), which is 50%–100% more than the average in other high-income countries. Similarly, ownership rates of gadgets and amenities are relatively high compared to other countries.<ref name="Rector-Johnson">{{cite web |url=http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/bg1713.cfm|title=Understanding Poverty in America|date=January 5, 2004|author1=Robert E. Rector|author2=Kirk A. Johnson|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100313053958/http://www.heritage.org/research/welfare/bg1713.cfm|archive-date=March 13, 2010}}</ref><ref name="Rector">{{cite web |url=http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/bg2064.cfm|title=How Poor Are America's Poor? Examining the "Plague" of Poverty in America|date=August 27, 2007|author=Robert Rector|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100312170900/http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/bg2064.cfm|archive-date=March 12, 2010}}</ref><ref>W. Michael Cox and Richard Alm (1999), The myths of rich and poor: why we're better off than we think. New York: Basic Books</ref> |
||
It was reported by Pew Research Center in 2016 that, for the first time in 130 years, Americans aged 18 to 34 are more likely to live with their parents than in any other housing situation.<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/money/us-money-blog/2016/may/27/housing-market-real-estate-millennials-living-at-home-with-parents Millennials aren't buying homes right now. What if they never do?] ''[[The Guardian]].'' May 27, 2016.</ref> |
It was reported by Pew Research Center in 2016 that, for the first time in 130 years, Americans aged 18 to 34 are more likely to live with their parents than in any other housing situation.<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/money/us-money-blog/2016/may/27/housing-market-real-estate-millennials-living-at-home-with-parents Millennials aren't buying homes right now. What if they never do?] ''[[The Guardian]].'' May 27, 2016.</ref> |
||
Line 766: | Line 901: | ||
In one study by ATTOM Data Solutions, in 70% of the counties surveyed, homes are increasingly unaffordable for the average U.S. worker.<ref>{{cite news |last=Min |first=Sarah |date=March 28, 2019|title=Average Americans can't afford a home in 70 percent of the country|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/housing-market-2019-americans-cant-afford-a-home-in-70-percent-of-the-country|work=[[CBS News]] |access-date=April 1, 2019}}</ref> |
In one study by ATTOM Data Solutions, in 70% of the counties surveyed, homes are increasingly unaffordable for the average U.S. worker.<ref>{{cite news |last=Min |first=Sarah |date=March 28, 2019|title=Average Americans can't afford a home in 70 percent of the country|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/housing-market-2019-americans-cant-afford-a-home-in-70-percent-of-the-country|work=[[CBS News]] |access-date=April 1, 2019}}</ref> |
||
As of 2018, the number of U.S. citizens residing in their vehicles |
As of 2018, the number of U.S. citizens residing in their vehicles increased in major cities with significantly higher than average housing costs such as [[Los Angeles]], [[Portland, Oregon|Portland]] and [[San Francisco]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Berr |first=Johnathan |date=July 31, 2018 |title=More Americans are forced to "reside" in their vehicles|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/more-americans-are-living-in-their-vehicles-amid-high-housing-prices/|work=[[CBS MoneyWatch]]|access-date=August 2, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.governing.com/topics/health-human-services/gov-homeless-shelter-car.html |first=Mattie|last=Quinn|title='It's the New Form of Affordable Housing': More People Are Living in Their Cars|magazine=[[Governing (magazine)|Governing]]|date=July 24, 2018|access-date=January 19, 2019}}</ref> |
||
According to [[CNBC]], the median sale price for a U.S. home in 2017 was US$199,200.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Martin |first1=Emmie |title=MONEY Here's how much housing prices have skyrocketed over the last 50 years |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/23/how-much-housing-prices-have-risen-since-1940.html |access-date=April 6, 2023 |work=[[CNBC]] |date=June 23, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230328034119/https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/23/how-much-housing-prices-have-risen-since-1940.html |archive-date=March 28, 2023 |language=en|url-status=live}}</ref> By February 2023, the median U.S. home sale price grew to US$392,000 according to [[Statista]].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/272776/median-price-of-existing-homes-in-the-united-states-from-2011/#:~:text=Median%20sale%20price%20of%20existing,2022%20with%20forecast%20for%202023&text=In%20the%20third%20quarter%20of,by%20the%20end%20of%202023. | title=Median home price in the U.S. 2022 and forecast until 2023 }}</ref> The US has a country-wide housing shortage caused by insufficient housing construction (which declined severely after the 2008 [[Great Recession]]), and has caused rents and home prices to rise to increasingly unaffordable levels, with one estimate of the shortage being 3.8 million units in 2019, with this shortage having gotten worse during and since the pandemic.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.fanniemae.com/research-and-insights/perspectives/us-housing-shortage | title=U.S. Housing Shortage: Everything, Everywhere, All at Once | Fannie Mae }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2022/10/26/housing-market-worsens-mortgage-interest-rates/10588515002/ | title=The US housing shortage is 'awful' and will likely get worse with no apparent end in sight | website=[[USA Today]] }}</ref> |
|||
As of January 2024, in roughly half of cities in the U.S., workers need incomes of $100,000 or more in order to purchase a home as a result of rising housing prices and interest rate hikes.<ref>{{cite news |last=Picchi|first=Aimee|date=January 12, 2024 |title=Here's why Americans are so unhappy with the economy, in 3 charts|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/economy-inflation-why-americans-are-so-unhappy-three-charts/|work=[[CBS News]] |location= |access-date=January 12, 2024}}</ref> |
|||
===Profits and wages=== |
===Profits and wages=== |
||
[[File:Wages in the United States.webp|thumb|300px|Wages in the United States |
|||
{{legend-line|#5E5E5E solid 3px|[[Nominalism|Nominal]] wages}} |
|||
{{legend|#0094EC|outline=#0076BA|[[Adjusted-for-inflation|Adjusted for inflation]] wages}} |
|||
]] |
|||
{{See also|List of U.S. states and territories by median wage and mean wage}} |
{{See also|List of U.S. states and territories by median wage and mean wage}} |
||
In 1970, [[wage]]s represented more than 51% of the U.S. GDP and profits were less than 5%. But by 2013, wages had fallen to 44% of the economy, while profits had more than doubled to 11%.<ref name=DThompson>{{cite news|last=Derek|first=Thompson|title=Corporate Profits Are Eating the Economy|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/03/corporate-profits-are-eating-the-economy/273687/|access-date=March 18, 2013|newspaper=The Atlantic|date=March 4, 2013}}</ref> Inflation-adjusted ("real") per capita [[Disposable and discretionary income|disposable personal income]] rose steadily in the U.S. from 1945 to 2008, but has since remained generally level.<ref>[http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=f3v "Real Disposable Personal Income: Per capita"] ''Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis'', 2013</ref><ref>[http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/01/25/1495171/the-rich-are-enjoying-the-recovery-while-wages-fall-for-everyone-else/ "The Rich Are Enjoying The Recovery While Wages Fall For Everyone Else"] ''ThinkProgress'', January 25, 2013.</ref> |
|||
[[Real wages]] (wages adjusted for inflation) for most workers in the United States and median incomes have either declined or remained stagnant for the last twenty to forty years.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Bergsten |first=C. Fred |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1255691875 |title=The United States vs. China : the quest for global economic leadership |date=2022 |isbn=978-1-5095-4735-7 |location=Cambridge |pages=303 |oclc=1255691875}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Lee |first=Nathaniel |title=Why American wages haven't grown despite increases in productivity |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/19/heres-how-labor-dynamism-affects-wage-growth-in-america.html |access-date=November 25, 2022 |website=CNBC |date=July 19, 2022 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=DeSilver |first=Drew |title=For most U.S. workers, real wages have barely budged in decades |url=https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/08/07/for-most-us-workers-real-wages-have-barely-budged-for-decades/ |access-date=November 25, 2022 |website=Pew Research Center |date=August 7, 2018 |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Wage Stagnation in Nine Charts |url=https://www.epi.org/publication/charting-wage-stagnation/ |access-date=November 25, 2022 |website=Economic Policy Institute |language=en-US}}</ref> A 2020 microanalysis demonstrated that in the preceding four decades labor's share of national output declined while over the same period the profit share of the same output increased.<ref>{{cite book |last=Mattei|first=Clara E.|date=2022 |title=The Capital Order: How Economists Invented Austerity and Paved the Way to Fascism|page=18|url=https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo181707138.html|location= |publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]]|isbn=978-0226818399}}</ref> |
|||
In 2005, median personal income for those over the age of 18 ranged from $3,317 for an unemployed, married [[Asian American]] female<ref name="US Census Bureau, females, 18 or older, unemployed, personal income, 2005">{{cite web|url=http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new02_067.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120205211730/http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new02_067.htm|archive-date=February 5, 2012|title=US Census Bureau, females, 18 or older, unemployed, personal income, 2005|access-date=December 8, 2006}}</ref> to $55,935 for a full-time, year-round employed Asian American male.<ref name="US Census Bureau, male, 18 or older, employed full-time year round, 2005">{{cite web|url=http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new02_037.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120205211741/http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new02_037.htm|archive-date=February 5, 2012|title=US Census Bureau, male, 18 or older, employed full-time year round, 2005|access-date=December 8, 2006}}</ref> According to the U.S. Census men tended to have higher income than women while Asians and [[White American|Whites]] earned more than [[African American]]s and [[Hispanic and Latino Americans|Hispanics]]. The overall median personal income for all individuals over the age of 18 was $24,062<ref name="US Census Bureau, 18+ age, 2005">{{cite web|url=http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new02_001.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120205211745/http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new02_001.htm|archive-date=February 5, 2012|title=US Census Bureau, 18+ age, 2005|access-date=December 8, 2006}}</ref> ($32,140 for those age 25 or above) in the year 2005.<ref name="US Census Bureau, Personal income for all sexes, races in 2005">{{cite web |url=http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new03_001.htm |title=US Census Bureau, Personal income for all sexes, races in 2005 |access-date=November 19, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070319232115/http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new03_001.htm |archive-date=March 19, 2007 |df=mdy-all}}</ref> |
|||
In 1970, [[wage]]s represented more than 51% of the U.S. GDP and profits were less than 5%. But by 2013, wages had fallen to 44% of the economy, while profits had more than doubled to 11%.<ref name="DThompson">{{cite news|last=Derek|first=Thompson|title=Corporate Profits Are Eating the Economy|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/03/corporate-profits-are-eating-the-economy/273687/|access-date=March 18, 2013|newspaper=The Atlantic|date=March 4, 2013}}</ref> Inflation-adjusted ("real") per capita [[Disposable and discretionary income|disposable personal income]] rose steadily in the U.S. from 1945 to 2008, but has since remained generally level.<ref>[http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=f3v "Real Disposable Personal Income: Per capita"] ''Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis'', 2013</ref><ref>[http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/01/25/1495171/the-rich-are-enjoying-the-recovery-while-wages-fall-for-everyone-else/ "The Rich Are Enjoying The Recovery While Wages Fall For Everyone Else"] ''ThinkProgress'', January 25, 2013.</ref> |
|||
In 2005, median personal income for those over the age of 18 ranged from $3,317 for an unemployed, married [[Asian American]] female<ref name="US Census Bureau, females, 18 or older, unemployed, personal income, 2005">{{cite web|url=http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new02_067.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120205211730/http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new02_067.htm|archive-date=February 5, 2012|title=US Census Bureau, females, 18 or older, unemployed, personal income, 2005|access-date=December 8, 2006}}</ref> to $55,935 for a full-time, year-round employed Asian American male.<ref name="US Census Bureau, male, 18 or older, employed full-time year round, 2005">{{cite web|url=http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new02_037.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120205211741/http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new02_037.htm|archive-date=February 5, 2012|title=US Census Bureau, male, 18 or older, employed full-time year round, 2005|access-date=December 8, 2006}}</ref> According to the U.S. Census men tended to have higher income than women while Asians and [[White American|Whites]] earned more than [[African American]]s and [[Hispanic and Latino Americans|Hispanics]]. The overall median personal income for all individuals over the age of 18 was $24,062<ref name="US Census Bureau, 18+ age, 2005">{{cite web|url=http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new02_001.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120205211745/http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new02_001.htm|archive-date=February 5, 2012|title=US Census Bureau, 18+ age, 2005|access-date=December 8, 2006}}</ref> ($32,140 for those age 25 or above) in the year 2005.<ref name="US Census Bureau, Personal income for all sexes, races in 2005">{{cite web |url=http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new03_001.htm |title=US Census Bureau, Personal income for all sexes, races in 2005 |access-date=November 19, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070319232115/http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new03_001.htm |archive-date=March 19, 2007 }}</ref> |
|||
As a reference point, the minimum wage rate in 2009 and 2017 was $7.25 per hour or $15,080 for the 2080 hours in a typical work year. The minimum wage is a little more than the poverty level for a single person unit and about 50% of the [[Poverty in the United States|poverty level]] for a family of four. |
As a reference point, the minimum wage rate in 2009 and 2017 was $7.25 per hour or $15,080 for the 2080 hours in a typical work year. The minimum wage is a little more than the poverty level for a single person unit and about 50% of the [[Poverty in the United States|poverty level]] for a family of four. |
||
According to an October 2014 report by the [[Pew Research Center]], [[real wages]] have been flat or falling for the last five decades for most U.S. workers, regardless of job growth.<ref>{{cite web |
According to an October 2014 report by the [[Pew Research Center]], [[real wages]] have been flat or falling for the last five decades for most U.S. workers, regardless of job growth.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/10/09/for-most-workers-real-wages-have-barely-budged-for-decades/|title=For most workers, real wages have barely budged for decades|last=Desilver|first=Drew|date=October 9, 2014|publisher=Pew Research Center|access-date=July 20, 2018|quote=But a look at five decades' worth of government wage data suggests that the better question might be, why should now be any different? For most U.S. workers, real wages{{snd}}that is, after inflation is taken into account{{snd}}have been flat or even falling for decades, regardless of whether the economy has been adding or subtracting jobs.|archive-date=August 6, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180806142636/http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/10/09/for-most-workers-real-wages-have-barely-budged-for-decades/|url-status=dead}}</ref> Bloomberg reported in July 2018 that real GDP per capita has grown substantially since the Great Recession.<ref>{{cite news |last=Smith |first=Noah |date=July 25, 2018|title=How About a Free Market for Wages?|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-07-25/states-should-ban-contracts-barring-workers-from-joining-rivals |work=Bloomberg Opinion |access-date=August 31, 2018}}</ref> |
||
An August 2017 survey by [[CareerBuilder]] found that eight out of ten U.S. workers live paycheck to paycheck. CareerBuilder spokesman Mike Erwin blamed "stagnant wages and the rising cost of everything from education to many consumer goods".<ref>{{cite news |last=Picchi |first=Aimee |date=August 24, 2017 |title=Vast number of Americans live paycheck to paycheck|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/americans-living-paycheck-to-paycheck/|work=[[CBS News]] |access-date=August 25, 2017}}</ref> According to a survey by the federal [[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]] on the financial well-being of U.S. citizens, roughly half have trouble paying bills, and more than one third have faced hardships such as not being able to afford a place to live, running out of food, or not having enough money to pay for medical care.<ref>{{cite news |last=Albrecht |first=Leslie |date=September 27, 2017 |title=One-third of American households can't afford food, shelter or medical care|url=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/one-third-of-american-households-cant-afford-food-shelter-or-medical-care-2017-09-27|work=[[Marketwatch]] |access-date=October 6, 2017}}</ref> According to journalist and author [[Alissa Quart]], the cost of living is rapidly outpacing the growth of salaries and wages, including those for traditionally secure professions such as teaching. She writes that "middle-class life is now 30% more expensive than it was 20 years ago."<ref>{{cite news |last=Getlen |first=Larry |date=July 23, 2018|title=America's middle class is slowly being 'wiped out'|url=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/americas-middle-class-is-slowly-being-wiped-out-2018-07-23|work=[[MarketWatch]]|access-date=July 29, 2018}}</ref> |
An August 2017 survey by [[CareerBuilder]] found that eight out of ten U.S. workers live paycheck to paycheck. CareerBuilder spokesman Mike Erwin blamed "stagnant wages and the rising cost of everything from education to many consumer goods".<ref>{{cite news |last=Picchi |first=Aimee |date=August 24, 2017 |title=Vast number of Americans live paycheck to paycheck|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/americans-living-paycheck-to-paycheck/|work=[[CBS News]] |access-date=August 25, 2017}}</ref> According to a survey by the federal [[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]] on the financial well-being of U.S. citizens, roughly half have trouble paying bills, and more than one third have faced hardships such as not being able to afford a place to live, running out of food, or not having enough money to pay for medical care.<ref>{{cite news |last=Albrecht |first=Leslie |date=September 27, 2017 |title=One-third of American households can't afford food, shelter or medical care|url=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/one-third-of-american-households-cant-afford-food-shelter-or-medical-care-2017-09-27|work=[[Marketwatch]] |access-date=October 6, 2017}}</ref> According to journalist and author [[Alissa Quart]], the cost of living is rapidly outpacing the growth of salaries and wages, including those for traditionally secure professions such as teaching. She writes that "middle-class life is now 30% more expensive than it was 20 years ago."<ref>{{cite news |last=Getlen |first=Larry |date=July 23, 2018|title=America's middle class is slowly being 'wiped out'|url=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/americas-middle-class-is-slowly-being-wiped-out-2018-07-23|work=[[MarketWatch]]|access-date=July 29, 2018}}</ref> |
||
In February 2019, the [[Federal Reserve Bank of New York]] reported that seven million U.S. citizens are three months or more behind on their car payments, setting a record. This is considered a red flag by economists, that Americans are struggling to pay bills in spite of a low unemployment rate.<ref>{{cite news |last= Long|first=Heather|date=February 13, 2019 |title=Record 7 million Americans are 3 months behind on car payments|url=https://www.boston.com/cars/car-news/2019/02/13/record-7-million-americans-are-3-months-behind-on-car-payments|work=boston.com |access-date=February 15, 2019}}</ref> A May 2019 poll conducted by [[NPR]] found that among rural Americans, 40% struggle to pay for healthcare, food and housing, and 49% could not |
In February 2019, the [[Federal Reserve Bank of New York]] reported that seven million U.S. citizens are three months or more behind on their car payments, setting a record. This is considered a red flag by economists, that Americans are struggling to pay bills in spite of a low unemployment rate.<ref>{{cite news |last= Long|first=Heather|date=February 13, 2019 |title=Record 7 million Americans are 3 months behind on car payments|url=https://www.boston.com/cars/car-news/2019/02/13/record-7-million-americans-are-3-months-behind-on-car-payments|work=boston.com |access-date=February 15, 2019}}</ref> A May 2019 poll conducted by [[NPR]] found that among rural Americans, 40% struggle to pay for healthcare, food and housing, and 49% could not pay cash for a $1,000 emergency, and would instead choose to borrow in order to pay for such an unexpected emergency expense.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Neel |first1=Joe|last2=Neighmond |first2=Patti |date=May 21, 2019|title=Poll: Many Rural Americans Struggle With Financial Insecurity, Access To Health Care|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/05/21/725059882/poll-many-rural-americans-struggle-with-financial-insecurity-access-to-health-ca|work=NPR |access-date=May 21, 2019}}</ref> Some experts assert that the US has experienced a "two-tier recovery", which has benefitted 60% of the population, while the other 40% on the "lower tier" have been struggling to pay bills as the result of stagnant wages, increases in the cost of housing, education and healthcare, and growing debts.<ref>{{cite news |last=Long |first=Heather|date=July 4, 2019 |title='This doesn't look like the best economy ever': 40% of Americans say they still struggle to pay bills |url=https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/this-doesnt-look-like-the-best-economy-ever-40percent-of-americans-say-they-still-struggle-to-pay-bills/ar-AADRErK?li=BBnbcA1|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |access-date=July 5, 2019}}</ref> |
||
A 2021 study by the [[National Low Income Housing Coalition]] found that workers would have to make at least $24.90 an hour to be able to afford (meaning 30% of a person's income or less) renting a standard two-bedroom home or $20.40 for a one-bedroom home anywhere in the US. The former is 3.4 times higher than the current federal minimum wage.<ref>{{cite news |last=Romo |first=Vanessa |date=July 14, 2021 |title=Rents Are Out Of Reach For Most Americans Earning Minimum Wage, A Study Says |url=https://www.npr.org/2021/07/14/1016230724/rents-are-out-of-reach-for-most-americans-earning-minimum-wage-a-study-says |work=NPR |location= |access-date=July 15, 2021}}</ref> |
A 2021 study by the [[National Low Income Housing Coalition]] found that workers would have to make at least $24.90 an hour to be able to afford (meaning 30% of a person's income or less) renting a standard two-bedroom home or $20.40 for a one-bedroom home anywhere in the US. The former is 3.4 times higher than the current federal minimum wage.<ref>{{cite news |last=Romo |first=Vanessa |date=July 14, 2021 |title=Rents Are Out Of Reach For Most Americans Earning Minimum Wage, A Study Says |url=https://www.npr.org/2021/07/14/1016230724/rents-are-out-of-reach-for-most-americans-earning-minimum-wage-a-study-says |work=NPR |location= |access-date=July 15, 2021}}</ref> |
||
The [[USCB]] reported in September 2023 that incomes fell last year by 2.3% from 2021, which is the third consecutive year incomes have declined.<ref>{{cite news |last=Picchi |first=Aimee |date=September 12, 2023 |title=America's poverty rate soared last year. Children were among the worst hit.|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/poverty-rate-census-income/|work=CBS News |location= |access-date=September 15, 2023}}</ref> |
|||
===Poverty=== |
===Poverty=== |
||
{{Main|Poverty in the United States}} |
{{Main|Poverty in the United States}} |
||
[[File:Number in Poverty and Poverty Rate 1959 to 2011. United States..PNG|thumb|upright=1.8|Number in |
[[File:Number in Poverty and Poverty Rate 1959 to 2011. United States..PNG|thumb|upright=1.8|Number in poverty and poverty rate: 1959 to 2016. United States.]] |
||
Starting in the 1980s [[relative poverty]] rates have consistently exceeded those of other wealthy nations, though analyses using a common data set for comparisons tend to find that the U.S. has a lower absolute poverty rate by market income than most other wealthy nations.<ref name="National Research Council">{{cite book |title=U.S. Health in International Perspective |url= http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13497&page=171 |publisher=National Research Council and Institute of Medicine |access-date=April 8, 2013 |author1=Woolf, Steven |author2=Aaron, Laudon |year = 2013|pages=171–72|doi = 10.17226/13497|pmid = 24006554|isbn = 978-0-309-26414-3}}</ref> [[Extreme poverty]] in the United States, meaning households living on less than $2 per day before government benefits, doubled from 1996 levels to 1.5 million households in 2011, including 2.8 million children.<ref name=NatlPovertyCtr>[http://npc.umich.edu/publications/policy_briefs/brief28/policybrief28.pdf "Extreme Poverty in the United States, 1996 to 2011"] ''National Poverty Center'', February 2012.</ref> In 2013, [[child poverty]] reached record high levels, with 16.7 million children living in [[Famine scales#Combined intensity and magnitude scales|food insecure]] households, about 35% more than 2007 levels.<ref name=WalkerBBC>{{cite news|last=Walker|first=Duncan|title=The children going hungry in America|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-21636723|access-date=March 13, 2013|newspaper=BBC News|date=March 6, 2013}}</ref> As of 2015, 44 percent of children in the United States live with low-income families.<ref>[https://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/nccp-finds-44-percent-u-s-children-live-low-income-families/ Report finds 44 percent of U.S. children live in low-income families]. ''PBS Newshour''. April 6, 2015.</ref> |
Starting in the 1980s [[relative poverty]] rates have consistently exceeded those of other wealthy nations, though analyses using a common data set for comparisons tend to find that the U.S. has a lower absolute poverty rate by market income than most other wealthy nations.<ref name="National Research Council">{{cite book |title=U.S. Health in International Perspective |url= http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13497&page=171 |publisher=National Research Council and Institute of Medicine |access-date=April 8, 2013 |author1=Woolf, Steven |author2=Aaron, Laudon |year = 2013|pages=171–72|doi = 10.17226/13497|pmid = 24006554|isbn = 978-0-309-26414-3}}</ref> [[Extreme poverty]] in the United States, meaning households living on less than $2 per day before government benefits, doubled from 1996 levels to 1.5 million households in 2011, including 2.8 million children.<ref name=NatlPovertyCtr>[http://npc.umich.edu/publications/policy_briefs/brief28/policybrief28.pdf "Extreme Poverty in the United States, 1996 to 2011"] ''National Poverty Center'', February 2012.</ref> In 2013, [[child poverty]] reached record high levels, with 16.7 million children living in [[Famine scales#Combined intensity and magnitude scales|food insecure]] households, about 35% more than 2007 levels.<ref name=WalkerBBC>{{cite news|last=Walker|first=Duncan|title=The children going hungry in America|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-21636723|access-date=March 13, 2013|newspaper=BBC News|date=March 6, 2013}}</ref> As of 2015, 44 percent of children in the United States live with low-income families.<ref>[https://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/nccp-finds-44-percent-u-s-children-live-low-income-families/ Report finds 44 percent of U.S. children live in low-income families]. ''PBS Newshour''. April 6, 2015.</ref> |
||
In 2016, 12.7% of the U.S. population [[Poverty in the United States|lived in poverty]], down from 13.5% in 2015. The poverty rate rose from 12.5% in 2007 before the [[Great Recession]] to a 15.1% peak in 2010, before falling back to just above the 2007 level. In the 1959–1962 period, the poverty rate was over 20%, but declined to the all-time low of 11.1% in 1973 following the [[War on Poverty]] begun during the Lyndon Johnson presidency.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2017/demo/p60-259.html| title = U.S. Census Bureau{{snd}}Income and Poverty in the United States 2016}}</ref> In June 2016, The IMF warned the United States that its high poverty rate needs to be tackled urgently.<ref>[https://www.bbc.com/news/business-36599316 IMF warns the US over high poverty]. BBC, June 22, 2016.</ref> |
In 2016, 12.7% of the U.S. population [[Poverty in the United States|lived in poverty]], down from 13.5% in 2015. The poverty rate rose from 12.5% in 2007 before the [[Great Recession]] to a 15.1% peak in 2010, before falling back to just above the 2007 level. In the 1959–1962 period, the poverty rate was over 20%, but declined to the all-time low of 11.1% in 1973 following the [[War on Poverty]] begun during the Lyndon Johnson presidency.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2017/demo/p60-259.html| title = U.S. Census Bureau{{snd}}Income and Poverty in the United States 2016}}</ref> In June 2016, The IMF warned the United States that its high poverty rate needs to be tackled urgently.<ref>[https://www.bbc.com/news/business-36599316 IMF warns the US over high poverty]. BBC, June 22, 2016.</ref> |
||
[[File:US |
[[File:Total US family wealth timeline by wealth group.png|thumb|250px|[[Wealth inequality in the United States]] increased from 1989 to 2013.<ref>{{cite news|title=Trends in Family Wealth, 1989 to 2013|url=https://www.cbo.gov/publication/51846|date=August 18, 2016|work=[[Congressional Budget Office]]}}</ref>]] |
||
The population in extreme-poverty neighborhoods rose by one third from 2000 to 2009.<ref name="Concentrated Poverty">Kneebone, Elizabeth; Nadeau, Carey; Berube, Alan (November 3, 2011). [http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2011/11/03-poverty-kneebone-nadeau-berube "The Re-Emergence of Concentrated Poverty: Metropolitan Trends in the 2000s"]. ''[[Brookings Institution]].''</ref> People living in such neighborhoods tend to suffer from inadequate access to quality education; higher crime rates; higher rates of physical and psychological ailment; limited access to credit and wealth accumulation; higher prices for goods and services; and constrained access to job opportunities.<ref name="Concentrated Poverty" /> As of 2013, 44% of America's poor are considered to be in "deep poverty", with an income 50% or more below the government's official poverty line.<ref>Shah, Neil (October 11, 2013).[https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304500404579127603306039292 U.S. Poverty Rate Stabilizes{{snd}}For Some]. ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' (New York).</ref> |
The population in extreme-poverty neighborhoods rose by one third from 2000 to 2009.<ref name="Concentrated Poverty">Kneebone, Elizabeth; Nadeau, Carey; Berube, Alan (November 3, 2011). [http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2011/11/03-poverty-kneebone-nadeau-berube "The Re-Emergence of Concentrated Poverty: Metropolitan Trends in the 2000s"]. ''[[Brookings Institution]].''</ref> People living in such neighborhoods tend to suffer from inadequate access to quality education; higher crime rates; higher rates of physical and psychological ailment; limited access to credit and wealth accumulation; higher prices for goods and services; and constrained access to job opportunities.<ref name="Concentrated Poverty" /> As of 2013, 44% of America's poor are considered to be in "deep poverty", with an income 50% or more below the government's official poverty line.<ref>Shah, Neil (October 11, 2013).[https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304500404579127603306039292 U.S. Poverty Rate Stabilizes{{snd}}For Some]. ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' (New York).</ref> |
||
According to the US [[Department of Housing and Urban Development]]'s Annual Homeless Assessment Report, {{As of|2017|lc=y}} there were around 554,000 homeless people in the United States on a given night,<ref name="bbc2017">{{cite web |url = https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42248999 |title = US homeless people numbers rise for first time in seven years |publisher = BBC |date=December 6, 2017}}</ref> or 0.17% of the population. Almost two thirds stayed in an emergency shelter or transitional housing program and the other third were living on the street, in an abandoned building, or another place not meant for human habitation. About 1.56 million people, or about 0.5% of the U.S. population, used an emergency shelter or a transitional housing program between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2009.<ref name=HUDhomeless2009>{{cite web|url=http://www.huduser.org/publications/pdf/5thHomelessAssessmentReport.pdf |title=HUD 5th Annual Homelessness Assessment Report to Congress, June 2010 |access-date=October 20, 2013}}</ref> Around 44% of homeless people are employed.<ref>[http://www.nationalhomeless.org/factsheets/employment.html Employment and Homelessness]. ''[[National Coalition for the Homeless]],'' July 2009.</ref> |
According to the US [[Department of Housing and Urban Development]]'s Annual Homeless Assessment Report, {{As of|2017|lc=y}} there were around 554,000 homeless people in the United States on a given night,<ref name="bbc2017">{{cite web |url = https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42248999 |title = US homeless people numbers rise for first time in seven years |publisher = BBC |date=December 6, 2017}}</ref> or 0.17% of the population. Almost two thirds stayed in an emergency shelter or transitional housing program and the other third were living on the street, in an abandoned building, or another place not meant for human habitation. About 1.56 million people, or about 0.5% of the U.S. population, used an emergency shelter or a transitional housing program between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2009.<ref name=HUDhomeless2009>{{cite web|url=http://www.huduser.org/publications/pdf/5thHomelessAssessmentReport.pdf |title=HUD 5th Annual Homelessness Assessment Report to Congress, June 2010 |access-date=October 20, 2013}}</ref> Around 44% of homeless people are employed.<ref>[http://www.nationalhomeless.org/factsheets/employment.html Employment and Homelessness] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190526022516/http://www.nationalhomeless.org/factsheets/employment.html|date=May 26, 2019}}. ''[[National Coalition for the Homeless]],'' July 2009.</ref> Homelessness increased from 2016 to 2020, along with deaths among the homeless population.<ref>{{cite web | last=McCormick | first=Erin | title='Homelessness is lethal': US deaths among those without housing are surging | website=[[The Guardian]] | date=February 7, 2022 | url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/feb/07/homelessness-is-lethal-deaths-have-risen-dramatically | access-date=June 16, 2023}}</ref> |
||
[[File:New Orleans Homeless Camp.jpg|alt=A homeless camp under a highway bridge in New Orleans, LA|thumb|A homeless camp in New Orleans, March 2023]] |
|||
The United States has one of the least extensive social safety nets in the developed world, reducing both relative poverty and absolute poverty by [[Welfare's effect on poverty|considerably less than the mean for wealthy nations]].<ref name="Sme">{{cite journal |last1= Smeeding |first1= T.M. |year=2005 |title= Public Policy: Economic Inequality and Poverty: The United States in Comparative Perspective| journal= Social Science Quarterly |volume=86 |pages=955–83 |doi= 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00331.x}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1= Kenworthy |first1= L. |year= 1999 |title= Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment| journal =Social Forces|volume = 77|issue=3|pages= 1119–39 |doi=10.1093/sf/77.3.1119|url= https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/160860/1/lis-wps-188.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author1=Bradley, D. |author2=E. Huber |author3=S. Moller |author4=F. Nielsen |author5=J.D. Stephens |name-list-style=amp|year=2003 | title = Determinants of Relative Poverty in Advanced Capitalist Democracies| journal = American Sociological Review | volume = 68 | issue = 1| pages = 22–51 | doi = 10.2307/3088901 |jstor=3088901}}</ref><ref>Kevin Drum (September 26, 2013). [https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/09/we-can-reduce-poverty-if-we-want-we-just-have-want We Can Reduce Poverty If We Want To. We Just Have To Want To.] ''[[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]].''</ref><ref>Gould, Elise and Wething, Hilary (July 24, 2012). [http://www.epi.org/publication/ib339-us-poverty-higher-safety-net-weaker/ "U.S. poverty rates higher, safety net weaker than in peer countries."] ''[[Economic Policy Institute]].''</ref> Some experts posit that those in poverty live in conditions rivaling the [[Developing country|developing world]].<ref>{{cite book |last= Temin|first=Peter|author-link=Peter Temin|date=2017 |title=The Vanishing Middle Class: Prejudice and Power in a Dual Economy|url=https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/vanishing-middle-class|publisher= [[MIT Press]]|isbn=978-0262036160}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= Alston|first=Philp|date=December 15, 2017 |title=Extreme poverty in America: read the UN special monitor's report|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/15/extreme-poverty-america-un-special-monitor-report|work=The Guardian |access-date=December 16, 2017}}</ref> A May 2018 report by the U.N. Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights found that over five million people in the United States live "in 'Third World' conditions".<ref>{{cite news |date=June 4, 2018|title="Contempt for the poor in US drives cruel policies," says UN expert|url=http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=23172&LangID=E|work=OHCHR|access-date=June 6, 2018}}</ref> Over the last three decades the poor in America have been [[Incarceration in the United States|incarcerated]] at a much higher rate than their counterparts in other developed nations, with penal confinement being "commonplace for poor men of working age".<ref>Bruce Western. [https://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/23042281?uid=3739896&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21104624536741 Poverty Politics and Crime Control in Europe and America]. ''[[Contemporary Sociology]]'' |
|||
Vol. 40, No. 3 (May 2011), pp. 283–86</ref> Some scholars contend that the shift to [[Neoliberalism|neoliberal]] social and economic policies starting in the late 1970s has expanded the penal state, retrenched the social [[welfare state]], deregulated the economy and criminalized poverty, ultimately "transforming what it means to be poor in America".<ref>Stephen Haymes, Maria Vidal de Haymes and Reuben Miller (eds), ''[http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415673440/ The Routledge Handbook of Poverty in the United States],'' (London: [[Routledge]], 2015), {{ISBN|0415673445}}, pp. [https://books.google.com/books?id=qnHfBQAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&pg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false 3], [https://books.google.com/books?id=qnHfBQAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&pg=PA346#v=onepage&q&f=false 346].</ref><ref>[[Loïc Wacquant]], ''[https://www.dukeupress.edu/Punishing-the-Poor/ Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190223135712/https://www.dukeupress.edu/Punishing-the-Poor/index-viewby%3Dtitle%26sort%3D.html |date=February 23, 2019}},'' ([[Duke University Press]], 2009), {{ISBN|082234422X}}, pp. 125–16, [https://books.google.com/books?id=NkyFsGi2erEC&lpg=PP1&pg=PT336#v=onepage&q&f=false 312]</ref><ref>Marie Gottschalk. ''[http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10731.html Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics].'' [[Princeton University Press]], 2014. {{ISBN|0691164053}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=CzDFCgAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&pg=PA10#v=onepage&q&f=false p. 10]</ref> |
|||
The United States has one of the least extensive social safety nets in the developed world, reducing both relative poverty and absolute poverty by [[Welfare's effect on poverty|considerably less than the mean for wealthy nations]].<ref name="Sme">{{cite journal |last1= Smeeding |first1= T.M. |year=2005 |title= Public Policy: Economic Inequality and Poverty: The United States in Comparative Perspective| journal= Social Science Quarterly |volume=86 |pages=955–83 |doi= 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00331.x|doi-access= free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1= Kenworthy |first1= L. |year= 1999 |title= Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment| journal =Social Forces|volume = 77|issue=3|pages= 1119–39 |doi=10.1093/sf/77.3.1119|url= https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/160860/1/lis-wps-188.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author1=Bradley, D. |author2=E. Huber |author3=S. Moller |author4=F. Nielsen |author5=J.D. Stephens |name-list-style=amp|year=2003 | title = Determinants of Relative Poverty in Advanced Capitalist Democracies| journal = American Sociological Review | volume = 68 | issue = 1| pages = 22–51 | doi = 10.2307/3088901 |jstor=3088901|s2cid=144289954 }}</ref><ref>Kevin Drum (September 26, 2013). [https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/09/we-can-reduce-poverty-if-we-want-we-just-have-want We Can Reduce Poverty If We Want To. We Just Have To Want To.] ''[[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]].''</ref><ref>Gould, Elise and Wething, Hilary (July 24, 2012). [http://www.epi.org/publication/ib339-us-poverty-higher-safety-net-weaker/ "U.S. poverty rates higher, safety net weaker than in peer countries."] ''[[Economic Policy Institute]].''</ref> Some experts posit that those in poverty live in conditions rivaling the [[Developing country|developing world]].<ref>{{cite book |last= Temin|first=Peter|author-link=Peter Temin|date=2017 |title=The Vanishing Middle Class: Prejudice and Power in a Dual Economy|url=https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/vanishing-middle-class|publisher= [[MIT Press]]|isbn=978-0262036160}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= Alston|first=Philp|date=December 15, 2017 |title=Extreme poverty in America: read the UN special monitor's report|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/15/extreme-poverty-america-un-special-monitor-report|work=The Guardian |access-date=December 16, 2017}}</ref> A May 2018 report by the U.N. Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights found that over five million people in the United States live "in 'Third World' conditions".<ref>{{cite news |date=June 4, 2018|title="Contempt for the poor in US drives cruel policies," says UN expert|url=https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2018/06/contempt-poor-us-drives-cruel-policies-says-un-expert|work=OHCHR|access-date=June 6, 2018}}</ref> Poverty is the fourth leading risk factor for premature death annually, according to a 2023 study published in ''[[JAMA]]''.<ref>{{cite news |last=Danelski |first=David |date=April 17, 2023|title=Poverty is the 4th greatest cause of U.S. deaths|url=https://news.ucr.edu/articles/2023/04/17/poverty-4th-greatest-cause-us-deaths|work=news.ucr.edu|location= |access-date=June 23, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Brady|first1=David |last2=Kohler|first2=Ulrich|last3=Zheng|first3=Hui |date=2023|title=Novel Estimates of Mortality Associated With Poverty in the US|url= |journal=The Journal of the American Medical Association|volume=183 |issue=6 |pages=504–628|doi=10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0276|pmid=37067817 |pmc=10111231 |access-date= }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Jarow|first=Oshan |date=July 14, 2023|title=Poverty is a major public health crisis. Let's treat it like one.|url=https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23792854/poverty-mortality-study-public-health-antipoverty-america-deaths-poor-life-expectancy|work=Vox |location= |access-date=September 3, 2023|quote=Their results find poverty is America’s fourth-leading risk factor for death, behind only heart disease, cancer, and smoking. A single year of poverty, defined relatively in the study as having less than 50 percent of the US median household income, is associated with 183,000 American deaths per year. Being in “cumulative poverty,” or 10 years or more of uninterrupted poverty, is associated with 295,000 annual deaths.}}</ref> Over the last three decades the poor in America have been [[Incarceration in the United States|incarcerated]] at a much higher rate than their counterparts in other developed nations, with penal confinement being "commonplace for poor men of working age".<ref>Bruce Western. [https://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/23042281?uid=3739896&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21104624536741 Poverty Politics and Crime Control in Europe and America]. ''[[Contemporary Sociology]]'' |
|||
Vol. 40, No. 3 (May 2011), pp. 283–86</ref> Some scholars contend that the shift to [[Neoliberalism|neoliberal]] social and economic policies starting in the late 1970s has expanded the penal state, retrenched the social [[welfare state]], deregulated the economy and criminalized poverty, ultimately "transforming what it means to be poor in America".<ref>Stephen Haymes, Maria Vidal de Haymes and Reuben Miller (eds), ''[http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415673440/ The Routledge Handbook of Poverty in the United States],'' (London: [[Routledge]], 2015), {{ISBN|0415673445}}, pp. [https://books.google.com/books?id=qnHfBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA3 3], [https://books.google.com/books?id=qnHfBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA346 346].</ref><ref>[[Loïc Wacquant]], ''[https://www.dukeupress.edu/Punishing-the-Poor/ Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190223135712/https://www.dukeupress.edu/Punishing-the-Poor/index-viewby%3Dtitle%26sort%3D.html |date=February 23, 2019}},'' ([[Duke University Press]], 2009), {{ISBN|082234422X}}, pp. 125–16, [https://books.google.com/books?id=NkyFsGi2erEC&pg=PT336 312]</ref><ref>Marie Gottschalk. ''[http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10731.html Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics].'' [[Princeton University Press]], 2014. {{ISBN|0691164053}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=CzDFCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA10 p. 10]</ref> |
|||
Sociologist [[Matthew Desmond]] writes in his 2023 book ''[[Poverty, by America]]'' that the US "offers some of the lowest wages in the industrialized world," which has "swelled the ranks of the working poor, most of whom are thirty-five or older."<ref>{{cite book |last=Desmond|first=Matthew |author-link=Matthew Desmond|date=2023 |title=[[Poverty, by America]]|url= |location= |publisher=Crown Publishing Group|page=62 |isbn=9780593239919}}</ref> Social scientist [[Mark Robert Rank]] asserts that the high rates of poverty in the U.S. can largely be explained as structural failures at the economic and political levels.<ref>{{cite book |last=Rank|first=Mark Robert |author-link=Mark Robert Rank|date=2023|title=The Poverty Paradox: Understanding Economic Hardship Amid American Prosperity|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hGewEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA4|location= |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|pages=4, 121 |isbn= 978-0190212636|quote=The tendency of our free market economy has been to produce a growing number of jobs that will no longer support a family. In addition, the basic nature of capitalism ensures that unemployment exists at modest levels. Both of these directly result in a shortage of economic opportunities in American society. In addition, the absence of social supports stems from failings at the political and policy levels. The United States has traditionally lacked the political desire to put in place effective policies and programs that would support the economically vulnerable. Structural failing at the economic and political levels have therefore produced a lack of opportunities and supports, resulting in high rates of American poverty. (p.121)}}</ref> |
|||
==Health care== |
==Health care== |
||
[[File:Health Insurance Coverage in the U.S. 2016 - v1.png|thumb|right|300px|U.S. health insurance coverage by source in 2016. CBO estimated ACA/Obamacare was responsible for 23 million persons covered via exchanges and Medicaid expansion.<ref name="CBO_Subsidy2016">{{cite web|url=https://www.cbo.gov/publication/51385|title=Federal Subsidies for Health Insurance Coverage for People Under Age 65|publisher=CBO|date=March 24, 2016}}</ref>]] |
[[File:Health Insurance Coverage in the U.S. 2016 - v1.png|thumb|right|300px|U.S. health insurance coverage by source in 2016. CBO estimated ACA/Obamacare was responsible for 23 million persons covered via exchanges and Medicaid expansion.<ref name="CBO_Subsidy2016">{{cite web|url=https://www.cbo.gov/publication/51385|title=Federal Subsidies for Health Insurance Coverage for People Under Age 65|publisher=CBO|date=March 24, 2016}}</ref>]] |
||
[[File:OECD life expectacy and health spending per capita 2013 v1.png|thumb|right|300px|Chart showing life expectancy at birth and health care spending per capita for OECD countries as of |
[[File:OECD life expectacy and health spending per capita 2013 v1.png|thumb|right|300px|Chart showing life expectancy at birth and health care spending per capita for OECD countries as of 2015. The U.S. is an outlier, with much higher spending but below average life expectancy.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/health-at-a-glance-19991312.htm| title = OECD Health at a Glance 2015{{snd}}Table 3.3| date = November 7, 2023}}</ref>]] |
||
[[File:Healthcare costs to GDP OECD 2015 v1.png|thumb|right|300px|Bar chart comparing healthcare costs as percentage of GDP across OECD countries]] |
[[File:Healthcare costs to GDP OECD 2015 v1.png|thumb|right|300px|Bar chart comparing healthcare costs as percentage of GDP across OECD countries]] |
||
[[File:U.S. healthcare coverage 2008-2026.png|thumb|right|300px|U.S. uninsured number (millions) and rate (%), including historical data through 2016 and two CBO forecasts (2016/Obama policy and 2018/Trump policy) through 2026. Two key reasons for more uninsured under President Trump include: 1) Eliminating the individual mandate to have health insurance; and 2) Stopping cost sharing reduction payments.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53826|title=Federal Subsidies for Health Insurance Coverage for People Under Age 65: 2018 to 2028|date=May 23, 2018|access-date=June 17, 2018}}</ref>]] |
[[File:U.S. healthcare coverage 2008-2026.png|thumb|right|300px|U.S. uninsured number (millions) and rate (%), including historical data through 2016 and two CBO forecasts (2016/Obama policy and 2018/Trump policy) through 2026. Two key reasons for more uninsured under President Trump include: 1) Eliminating the individual mandate to have health insurance; and 2) Stopping cost sharing reduction payments.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53826|title=Federal Subsidies for Health Insurance Coverage for People Under Age 65: 2018 to 2028|date=May 23, 2018|access-date=June 17, 2018}}</ref>]] |
||
Line 811: | Line 963: | ||
===Coverage=== |
===Coverage=== |
||
{{Further|Health insurance coverage in the United States}} |
{{Further|Health insurance coverage in the United States}} |
||
The American system is a mix of public and private insurance. The government provides insurance coverage for approximately 53 million elderly via [[Medicare (United States)|Medicare]], 62 million lower-income persons via [[Medicaid]], and 15 million military veterans via the [[Veteran's Administration]]. About 178 million employed by companies receive subsidized health insurance through their employer, while 52 million other persons directly purchase insurance either via the subsidized marketplace exchanges developed as part of the [[Affordable Care Act]] or directly from insurers. The private sector delivers healthcare services, with the exception of the Veteran's Administration, where doctors are employed by the government.<ref name="Census2016">{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2017/demo/p60-260.html|title=Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2016 |
The American system is a mix of public and private insurance. The government provides insurance coverage for approximately 53 million elderly via [[Medicare (United States)|Medicare]], 62 million lower-income persons via [[Medicaid]], and 15 million military veterans via the [[Veteran's Administration]]. About 178 million employed by companies receive subsidized health insurance through their employer, while 52 million other persons directly purchase insurance either via the subsidized marketplace exchanges developed as part of the [[Affordable Care Act]] or directly from insurers. The private sector delivers healthcare services, with the exception of the Veteran's Administration, where doctors are employed by the government.<ref name="Census2016">{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2017/demo/p60-260.html|title=Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2016|website=census.gov}}</ref> |
||
Multiple surveys indicate the number of uninsured fell between 2013 and 2016 due to expanded [[Medicaid]] eligibility and health insurance exchanges established due to the [[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]], also known as the "ACA" or "Obamacare". According to the [[United States Census Bureau]], in 2012 there were 45.6 million people in the US (14.8% of the under-65 population) who were without health insurance. This figure fell by 18.3 million (40%) to 27.3 million (8.6% of the under-65 population) by 2016.<ref name="Census_HistTable">{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/health-insurance/historical-series/hic.html|title=Health Insurance Historical Tables –HIC Series |
Multiple surveys indicate the number of uninsured fell between 2013 and 2016 due to expanded [[Medicaid]] eligibility and health insurance exchanges established due to the [[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]], also known as the "ACA" or "Obamacare". According to the [[United States Census Bureau]], in 2012 there were 45.6 million people in the US (14.8% of the under-65 population) who were without health insurance. This figure fell by 18.3 million (40%) to 27.3 million (8.6% of the under-65 population) by 2016.<ref name="Census_HistTable">{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/health-insurance/historical-series/hic.html|title=Health Insurance Historical Tables –HIC Series|publisher=Census}}</ref> |
||
However, under President Trump these gains in healthcare coverage have begun to reverse. The [[Commonwealth Fund]] estimated in May 2018 that the number of uninsured increased by four million from early 2016 to early 2018. The rate of those uninsured increased from 12.7% in 2016 to 15.5%. The impact was greater among lower-income adults, who had a higher uninsured rate than higher-income adults. Regionally, the South and West had higher uninsured rates than the North and East. Further, those 18 states that have not expanded Medicaid had a higher uninsured rate than those that did.<ref>{{cite |
However, under President Trump these gains in healthcare coverage have begun to reverse. The [[Commonwealth Fund]] estimated in May 2018 that the number of uninsured increased by four million from early 2016 to early 2018. The rate of those uninsured increased from 12.7% in 2016 to 15.5%. The impact was greater among lower-income adults, who had a higher uninsured rate than higher-income adults. Regionally, the South and West had higher uninsured rates than the North and East. Further, those 18 states that have not expanded Medicaid had a higher uninsured rate than those that did.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/blog/2018/apr/health-coverage-erosion |title=Commonwealth Fund – First Look at Health Insurance Coverage in 2018 Finds ACA Gains Beginning to Reverse |year=2018 |doi=10.26099/aacp-5268 |last1=Collins |first1=Sara R. |last2=Gunja |first2=Munira Z. |last3=Doty |first3=Michelle M. |last4=Bhupal |first4=Herman K. |publisher=Commonwealth Fund}}</ref> |
||
According to [[Physicians for a National Health Program]], this lack of insurance causes roughly 48,000 unnecessary deaths per year.<ref name=uninsureddeaths>{{cite web |last= Woolhandler |first= S. |date= September 12, 2012 |title= Despite slight drop in uninsured, last year's figure points to 48,000 preventable deaths |publisher= Physicians for a National Health Program |url= http://www.pnhp.org/news/2012/september/despite-slight-drop-in-uninsured-last-year%E2%80%99s-figure-points-to-48000-preventable- |access-date= September 26, 2012 |display-authors= etal |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120924021844/http://www.pnhp.org/news/2012/september/despite-slight-drop-in-uninsured-last-year%E2%80%99s-figure-points-to-48000-preventable- |archive-date=September 24, 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref> The group's methodology has been criticized by [[John C. Goodman]] for not looking at cause of death or tracking insurance status changes over time, including the time of death.<ref>{{cite |
According to [[Physicians for a National Health Program]], this lack of insurance causes roughly 48,000 unnecessary deaths per year.<ref name=uninsureddeaths>{{cite web |last= Woolhandler |first= S. |date= September 12, 2012 |title= Despite slight drop in uninsured, last year's figure points to 48,000 preventable deaths |publisher= Physicians for a National Health Program |url= http://www.pnhp.org/news/2012/september/despite-slight-drop-in-uninsured-last-year%E2%80%99s-figure-points-to-48000-preventable- |access-date= September 26, 2012 |display-authors= etal |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120924021844/http://www.pnhp.org/news/2012/september/despite-slight-drop-in-uninsured-last-year%E2%80%99s-figure-points-to-48000-preventable- |archive-date=September 24, 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref> The group's methodology has been criticized by [[John C. Goodman]] for not looking at cause of death or tracking insurance status changes over time, including the time of death.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Goodman|first=John|title=Does Lack Of Insurance Cause Premature Death?|journal=Health Affairs Forefront |url=https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20090921.002196|publisher=Health Affairs|date=September 21, 2009|doi=10.1377/forefront.20090921.002196}}</ref> A 2009 study by former [[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] policy adviser Richard Kronick found no increased mortality from being uninsured after certain risk factors were controlled for.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Kronick|first1=Richard|title=Health Insurance Coverage and Mortality Revisited|journal=Health Services Research|date=August 2009|volume=44|issue=4|pages=1211–31|doi=10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00973.x|pmid=19453392|pmc=2739025}}<!--|access-date=August 15, 2014--></ref> |
||
===Outcomes=== |
===Outcomes=== |
||
The U.S. lags in overall healthcare performance but is [[Biomedical research in the United States|a global leader in medical innovation]]. America solely developed or contributed significantly to nine of the top ten most important medical innovations since 1975 as ranked by a 2001 poll of physicians, while the EU and Switzerland together contributed to five. Since 1966, Americans have received more [[List of Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine|Nobel Prizes in Medicine]] than the rest of the world combined. From 1989 to 2002, four times more money was invested in private biotechnology companies in America than in Europe.<ref>{{cite news |last= Cowen |first=Tyler |title=Poor U.S. Scores in Health Care Don't Measure Nobels and Innovation |url= https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/05/business/05scene.html?_r=1& |access-date=October 9, 2012 |newspaper=The New York Times |date=October 5, 2006}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author1=Whitman, Glen |author2=Raad, Raymond |title=Bending the Productivity Curve: Why America Leads the World in Medical Innovation |url= http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/bending-productivity-curve-why-america-leads-world-medical-innovation |publisher=The Cato Institute |access-date=October 9, 2012}}</ref> |
The U.S. lags in overall healthcare performance but is [[Biomedical research in the United States|a global leader in medical innovation]]. America solely developed or contributed significantly to nine of the top ten most important medical innovations since 1975 as ranked by a 2001 poll of physicians, while the EU and Switzerland together contributed to five. Since 1966, Americans have received more [[List of Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine|Nobel Prizes in Medicine]] than the rest of the world combined. From 1989 to 2002, four times more money was invested in private biotechnology companies in America than in Europe.<ref>{{cite news |last= Cowen |first=Tyler |title=Poor U.S. Scores in Health Care Don't Measure Nobels and Innovation |url= https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/05/business/05scene.html?_r=1& |access-date=October 9, 2012 |newspaper=The New York Times |date=October 5, 2006}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author1=Whitman, Glen |author2=Raad, Raymond |title=Bending the Productivity Curve: Why America Leads the World in Medical Innovation |url= http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/bending-productivity-curve-why-america-leads-world-medical-innovation |publisher=The Cato Institute |access-date=October 9, 2012}}</ref> |
||
Of 17 high-income countries studied by the [[National Institutes of Health]] in 2013, the United States ranked at or near the top in obesity rate, frequency of automobile use and accidents, homicides, [[infant mortality]] rate, incidence of heart and lung disease, sexually transmitted infections, adolescent pregnancies, recreational drug or alcohol deaths, injuries, and rates of disability. Together, such lifestyle and societal factors place the U.S. at the bottom of that list for life expectancy. On average, a U.S. male can be expected to live almost four fewer years than those in the top-ranked country, though Americans who reach age 75 live longer than those who reach that age in peer nations.<ref name=nihbph>{{cite book|url=http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13497 |title="U.S. Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, Poorer Health" (2013) National Institutes of Health Committee on Population, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice |year=2013 |publisher=Books.nap.edu |doi=10.17226/13497 |pmid=24006554 |isbn=978-0-309-26414-3 |access-date=October 20, 2013|author1=National Research Council (US) |last2=Woolf |first2=S. H. |last3=Aron |first3=L. }}</ref> One consumption choice causing several of the maladies described above are cigarettes. Americans smoked 258 billion cigarettes in 2016.<ref name="CDCTobaccoFree">{{ |
Of 17 high-income countries studied by the [[National Institutes of Health]] in 2013, the United States ranked at or near the top in obesity rate, frequency of automobile use and accidents, homicides, [[infant mortality]] rate, incidence of heart and lung disease, sexually transmitted infections, adolescent pregnancies, recreational drug or alcohol deaths, injuries, and rates of disability. Together, such lifestyle and societal factors place the U.S. at the bottom of that list for life expectancy. On average, a U.S. male can be expected to live almost four fewer years than those in the top-ranked country, though Americans who reach age 75 live longer than those who reach that age in peer nations.<ref name=nihbph>{{cite book|url=http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13497 |title="U.S. Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, Poorer Health" (2013) National Institutes of Health Committee on Population, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice |year=2013 |publisher=Books.nap.edu |doi=10.17226/13497 |pmid=24006554 |isbn=978-0-309-26414-3 |access-date=October 20, 2013|author1=National Research Council (US) |last2=Woolf |first2=S. H. |last3=Aron |first3=L. }}</ref> One consumption choice causing several of the maladies described above are cigarettes. Americans smoked 258 billion cigarettes in 2016.<ref name="CDCTobaccoFree">{{cite web|url=https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/economics/econ_facts/index.htm|title=Economic Trends in Tobacco|last=CDCTobaccoFree|date=May 4, 2018|website=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention|language=en-us|access-date=June 3, 2019 }}</ref> Cigarettes cost the United States $326{{spaces}}billion each year in direct healthcare costs ($170{{spaces}}billion) and lost productivity ($156{{spaces}}billion).<ref name="CDCTobaccoFree" /> |
||
A comprehensive 2007 study by European doctors found the five-year [[cancer]] survival rate was significantly higher in the U.S. than in all 21 European nations studied, 66.3% for men versus the European mean of 47.3% and 62.9% versus 52.8% for women.<ref>{{cite news|last=Martin|first=Nicole|title=UK cancer survival rate lowest in Europe|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1560849/UK-cancer-survival-rate-lowest-in-Europe.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1560849/UK-cancer-survival-rate-lowest-in-Europe.html |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=August 19, 2013|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph|date=August 21, 2007}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Verdecchia|first=A|author2=Francisci, S |author3=Brenner, H |author4=Gatta, G |author5=Micheli, A |author6=Mangone, L |author7=Kunkler, I |author8= EUROCARE-4 Working, Group |title=Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000–02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 data|journal=The Lancet Oncology|date=September 2007|volume=8|issue=9|pages=784–96|pmid=17714993|doi=10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70246-2}}</ref> Americans undergo cancer screenings at significantly higher rates than people in other developed countries, and access [[Magnetic resonance imaging|MRI]] and [[CT scan]]s at the highest rate of any OECD nation.<ref name=Atlas>{{cite book|last=MD|first=Scott W. Atlas|title=In excellent health : setting the record straight on America's health care and charting a path for future reform|year=2011|publisher=Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University|location=Stanford, California|isbn=978-0817914448|pages=199–205|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0qExi2-3m5IC}}</ref> People in the U.S. diagnosed with [[Hypercholesterolemia|high cholesterol]] or [[hypertension]] access pharmaceutical treatments at higher rates than those diagnosed in other developed nations, and are more likely to successfully control the conditions.<ref>Atlas 2011, pp. 205–07</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Wolf-Maier|first=K.|title=Hypertension Treatment and Control in Five European Countries, Canada, and the United States|journal=Hypertension|date=November 24, 2003|volume=43|issue=1|pages=10–17|doi=10.1161/01.HYP.0000103630.72812.10|pmid=14638619|doi-access=free}}</ref> [[Diabetes mellitus|Diabetics]] are more likely to receive treatment and meet treatment targets in the U.S. than in Canada, England, or Scotland.<ref>Atlas 2011, pp. 150–56</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first1=June E. |last1=O'Neill |first2=Dave M. |last2=O'Neill |title=Health Status, Health Care and Inequality: Canada vs. the U.S |journal=Forum for Health Economics & Policy |volume=10 |issue=1 |doi=10.2202/1558-9544.1094 |year=2008 |s2cid=73172486 |url=http://www.nber.org/papers/w13429.pdf}}</ref> |
A comprehensive 2007 study by European doctors found the five-year [[cancer]] survival rate was significantly higher in the U.S. than in all 21 European nations studied, 66.3% for men versus the European mean of 47.3% and 62.9% versus 52.8% for women.<ref>{{cite news|last=Martin|first=Nicole|title=UK cancer survival rate lowest in Europe|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1560849/UK-cancer-survival-rate-lowest-in-Europe.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1560849/UK-cancer-survival-rate-lowest-in-Europe.html |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=August 19, 2013|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph|date=August 21, 2007}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Verdecchia|first=A|author2=Francisci, S |author3=Brenner, H |author4=Gatta, G |author5=Micheli, A |author6=Mangone, L |author7=Kunkler, I |author8= EUROCARE-4 Working, Group |title=Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000–02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 data|journal=The Lancet Oncology|date=September 2007|volume=8|issue=9|pages=784–96|pmid=17714993|doi=10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70246-2}}</ref> Americans undergo cancer screenings at significantly higher rates than people in other developed countries, and access [[Magnetic resonance imaging|MRI]] and [[CT scan]]s at the highest rate of any OECD nation.<ref name=Atlas>{{cite book|last=MD|first=Scott W. Atlas|title=In excellent health : setting the record straight on America's health care and charting a path for future reform|year=2011|publisher=Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University|location=Stanford, California|isbn=978-0817914448|pages=199–205|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0qExi2-3m5IC}}</ref> People in the U.S. diagnosed with [[Hypercholesterolemia|high cholesterol]] or [[hypertension]] access pharmaceutical treatments at higher rates than those diagnosed in other developed nations, and are more likely to successfully control the conditions.<ref>Atlas 2011, pp. 205–07</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Wolf-Maier|first=K.|title=Hypertension Treatment and Control in Five European Countries, Canada, and the United States|journal=Hypertension|date=November 24, 2003|volume=43|issue=1|pages=10–17|doi=10.1161/01.HYP.0000103630.72812.10|pmid=14638619|doi-access=free}}</ref> [[Diabetes mellitus|Diabetics]] are more likely to receive treatment and meet treatment targets in the U.S. than in Canada, England, or Scotland.<ref>Atlas 2011, pp. 150–56</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first1=June E. |last1=O'Neill |first2=Dave M. |last2=O'Neill |title=Health Status, Health Care and Inequality: Canada vs. the U.S |journal=Forum for Health Economics & Policy |volume=10 |issue=1 |doi=10.2202/1558-9544.1094 |year=2008 |s2cid=73172486 |url=http://www.nber.org/papers/w13429.pdf}}</ref> |
||
Line 831: | Line 983: | ||
{{Further|Health care prices in the United States}} |
{{Further|Health care prices in the United States}} |
||
U.S. healthcare costs are considerably higher than other countries as a share of GDP, among other measures. According to the |
U.S. healthcare costs are considerably higher than other countries as a share of GDP, among other measures. According to the OECD, U.S. healthcare costs in 2015 were 16.9% GDP, over 5% GDP higher than the next most expensive OECD country.<ref name="OECD1">{{cite web| url = http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SHA| title = OECD Statistical Database{{snd}}Health expenditure and financing}}</ref> A gap of 5% GDP represents $1{{spaces}}trillion, about $3,000 per person or one-third higher relative to the next most expensive country.<ref name="CDC1">{{cite web|url=https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/health-expenditures.htm|title=FastStats|date=July 18, 2017|website=cdc.gov}}</ref> |
||
The high cost of health care in the United States is attributed variously to technological advance, administration costs, drug pricing, suppliers charging more for medical equipment, the receiving of more medical care than people in other countries, the high wages of doctors, government regulations, the impact of lawsuits, and third party payment systems insulating consumers from the full cost of treatments.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Conover|first1=Christopher J.|title=Health Care Regulation A $169 Billion Hidden Tax|url=http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa527.pdf|publisher=Cato Institute|access-date=September 2, 2014|date=October 4, 2004}}</ref><ref name=Cutler>{{cite web|title=Why Does Health Care Cost so Much in America? Ask Harvard's David Cutler|url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/why-does-health-care-cost-so-m/|website=Public Broadcasting Service|date=November 19, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Lawler|first1=Joseph|title=Health Care Economist John Goodman on Market-Based Health Care|url=http://www.realclearpolicy.com/blog/2012/09/19/health_care_economist_john_goodman_on_health_care_markets_290.html|publisher=Real Clear Policy|access-date=September 2, 2014|date=September 19, 2012}}</ref> The lowest prices for pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and payments to physicians are in government plans. Americans tend to receive more medical care than people do in other countries, which is a notable contributor to higher costs. In the United States, a person is more likely to receive open heart surgery after a heart attack than in other countries. Medicaid pays less than Medicare for many prescription drugs due to the fact Medicaid discounts are set by law, whereas Medicare prices are negotiated by private insurers and drug companies.<ref name=Cutler /><ref>{{cite news|title=Medicaid Pays Less Than Medicare for Many Prescription Drugs, U.S. Report Finds|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/16/us/16drug.html| |
The high cost of health care in the United States is attributed variously to technological advance, administration costs, drug pricing, suppliers charging more for medical equipment, the receiving of more medical care than people in other countries, the high wages of doctors, government regulations, the impact of lawsuits, and third party payment systems insulating consumers from the full cost of treatments.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Conover|first1=Christopher J.|title=Health Care Regulation A $169 Billion Hidden Tax|url=http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa527.pdf|publisher=Cato Institute|access-date=September 2, 2014|date=October 4, 2004}}</ref><ref name=Cutler>{{cite web|title=Why Does Health Care Cost so Much in America? Ask Harvard's David Cutler|url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/why-does-health-care-cost-so-m/|website=Public Broadcasting Service|date=November 19, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Lawler|first1=Joseph|title=Health Care Economist John Goodman on Market-Based Health Care|url=http://www.realclearpolicy.com/blog/2012/09/19/health_care_economist_john_goodman_on_health_care_markets_290.html|publisher=Real Clear Policy|access-date=September 2, 2014|date=September 19, 2012}}</ref> The lowest prices for pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and payments to physicians are in government plans. Americans tend to receive more medical care than people do in other countries, which is a notable contributor to higher costs. In the United States, a person is more likely to receive open heart surgery after a heart attack than in other countries. Medicaid pays less than Medicare for many prescription drugs due to the fact Medicaid discounts are set by law, whereas Medicare prices are negotiated by private insurers and drug companies.<ref name=Cutler /><ref>{{cite news|title=Medicaid Pays Less Than Medicare for Many Prescription Drugs, U.S. Report Finds|work=The New York Times |date=August 16, 2011 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/16/us/16drug.html|last1=Pear |first1=Robert }}</ref> Government plans often pay less than overhead, resulting in healthcare providers shifting the cost to the privately insured through higher prices.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Dobson|first1=A.|last2=DaVanzo|first2=J.|last3=Sen|first3=N.|title=The Cost-Shift Payment 'Hydraulic': Foundation, History, And Implications|journal=Health Affairs|date=January 1, 2006|volume=25|issue=1|pages=22–33|doi=10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.22|pmid=16403741|doi-access=free}}<!--|access-date=September 2, 2014--></ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Pope|first1=Christopher|title=Legislating Low Prices: Cutting Costs or Care?|url=http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/08/legislating-low-prices-cutting-costs-or-care|publisher=The Heritage Foundation|access-date=September 2, 2014|date=August 9, 2013}}</ref> |
||
==Composition of economic sectors== |
==Composition of economic sectors== |
||
Line 840: | Line 992: | ||
[[File:Wheat harvest.jpg|thumb|A [[wheat]] harvest in [[Idaho]]]] |
[[File:Wheat harvest.jpg|thumb|A [[wheat]] harvest in [[Idaho]]]] |
||
The United States is the world's second-largest manufacturer, with a 2013 industrial output of US$2.4{{ |
The United States is the world's second-largest manufacturer, with a 2013 industrial output of US$2.4{{spaces}}trillion. Its manufacturing output is greater than of Germany, France, India, and Brazil combined.<ref name="imt">{{cite web|title=Manufacturing Output by Country|url=http://news.thomasnet.com/IMT/2013/03/14/china-widens-lead-as-worlds-largest-manufacturer/|publisher=imt|access-date=April 4, 2014|archive-date=July 27, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130727123309/http://news.thomasnet.com/IMT/2013/03/14/china-widens-lead-as-worlds-largest-manufacturer/|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
Its main industries include petroleum, steel, automobiles, construction machinery, aerospace, agricultural machinery, telecommunications, chemicals, electronics, food processing, consumer goods, lumber, and |
Its main industries include financials, information technology, petroleum, steel, automobiles, construction machinery, aerospace, agricultural machinery, telecommunications, chemicals, electronics, food processing, consumer goods, lumber, mining and armaments. |
||
The U.S. leads the world in [[List of aircraft manufacturers|airplane manufacturing]],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/aviation_worldbook.html |title= |
The U.S. leads the world in [[List of aircraft manufacturers|airplane manufacturing]],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/aviation_worldbook.html |title=World Book at NASA |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100731165241/http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/aviation_worldbook.html |archive-date=July 31, 2010 |access-date=March 5, 2022}}{{full citation needed|date=August 2010}}</ref> which represents a large portion of U.S. industrial output. American companies such as [[Boeing]], [[Cessna]] (see: [[Textron]]), [[Lockheed Martin]] (see: [[Skunk Works]]), and [[General Dynamics]] produce a majority of the world's civilian and military aircraft in factories across the United States. |
||
The manufacturing sector of the U.S. economy has experienced substantial job losses over the past several years.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2007-04-20-4155011268_x.htm |title=Factory jobs: 3 million lost since 2000 |author=Martin Crutsinger |date=April 20, 2007 |agency=Associated Press |work=USA Today |access-date=March 4, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=http://prospect.org/article/cost-free-trade |title=The Cost of Free Trade |author=Michael Lind |date=December 1, 2011 |journal=The American Prospect |access-date=March 3, 2012}}</ref> In January 2004, the number of such jobs stood at 14.3 million, down by 3.0 million jobs (17.5%) since July 2000 and about 5.2 million since the historical peak in 1979. Employment in manufacturing was its lowest since July 1950.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=5078&type=0|title=What Accounts for the Decline in Manufacturing Employment?|date=February 18, 2004|access-date=August 10, 2017}}</ref> The number of steel workers fell from 500,000 in 1980 to 224,000 in 2000.<ref>"''[https://books.google.com/books?id=iOgfSDKecCcC&pg=PA4557 Congressional Record V. 148, Pt. 4, April 11, 2002 to April 24, 2002]''". [[United States Government Printing Office]].</ref> |
The manufacturing sector of the U.S. economy has experienced substantial job losses over the past several years.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2007-04-20-4155011268_x.htm |title=Factory jobs: 3 million lost since 2000 |author=Martin Crutsinger |date=April 20, 2007 |agency=Associated Press |work=USA Today |access-date=March 4, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=http://prospect.org/article/cost-free-trade |title=The Cost of Free Trade |author=Michael Lind |date=December 1, 2011 |journal=The American Prospect |access-date=March 3, 2012}}</ref> In January 2004, the number of such jobs stood at 14.3 million, down by 3.0 million jobs (17.5%) since July 2000 and about 5.2 million since the historical peak in 1979. Employment in manufacturing was its lowest since July 1950.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=5078&type=0|title=What Accounts for the Decline in Manufacturing Employment?|date=February 18, 2004|access-date=August 10, 2017}}</ref> The number of steel workers fell from 500,000 in 1980 to 224,000 in 2000.<ref>"''[https://books.google.com/books?id=iOgfSDKecCcC&pg=PA4557 Congressional Record V. 148, Pt. 4, April 11, 2002 to April 24, 2002]''". [[United States Government Printing Office]].</ref> |
||
[[File:Survival rate of US start-ups, 1977–2012.svg|thumb|Statistics released by the U.S. Census Bureau showed that, in 2008, the number of business 'deaths' began overtaking the number of business 'births' and that the trend continued at least through 2012.<ref>{{Cite book|title=UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030|publisher=UNESCO Publishing|year=2015|isbn=978-9231001291|location=Paris|page=141|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SDHwCgAAQBAJ}}</ref>]] |
[[File:Survival rate of US start-ups, 1977–2012.svg|thumb|Statistics released by the U.S. Census Bureau showed that, in 2008, the number of business 'deaths' began overtaking the number of business 'births' and that the trend continued at least through 2012.<ref>{{Cite book|title=UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030|publisher=UNESCO Publishing|year=2015|isbn=978-9231001291|location=Paris|page=141|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SDHwCgAAQBAJ}}</ref>]] |
||
The U.S. produces approximately 18% of the world's manufacturing output, a share that has declined as other nations developed competitive manufacturing industries.<ref name="greyhill">{{cite web|title=Manufacturing Output by Country|url=http://greyhill.com/blog/2011/10/5/manufacturing-output-by-country.html|publisher=Greyhill Advisors|access-date=October 5, 2011}}</ref> The job loss during this continual volume growth is the result of multiple factors including increased productivity, trade, and secular economic trends.<ref>{{cite web|title=What Accounts for the Decline in Manufacturing Employment?|url=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=5078&type=0|publisher=Congressional Budget Office|access-date=October 5, 2011}}</ref> In addition, growth in telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, aircraft, heavy machinery and other industries along with declines in low end, low skill industries such as clothing, toys, and other simple manufacturing have resulted in some U.S. jobs being more highly skilled and better paying. There has been much debate within the United States on whether the decline in manufacturing jobs are related to American unions, lower foreign wages, or both.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://prospect.org/article/back-china |title=Back from China? |author=Harold Meyerson |date=November 29, 2011 |journal=The American Prospect |access-date=March 4, 2012}}</ref><ref name="Pope_2012">{{cite news |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-18/america-s-dirty-war-against-manufacturing-part-1-carl-pope.html |title=America's Dirty War Against Manufacturing: Part 1 |author=Carl Pope |author-link=Carl Pope (environmentalist) |date=January 18–20, 2012 |newspaper=Bloomberg |access-date=January 22, 2012}} [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-19/america-s-dirty-war-against-manufacturing-part-2-carl-pope.html Part 2]. [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-20/america-s-dirty-war-on-manufacturing-part-3-commentary-by-carl-pope.html Part 3].</ref><ref name="btb 22.01.2012">{{cite web |url=http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/hasnt-anyone-at-the-nyt-heard-of-exchange-rates |title=Hasn't Anyone at the NYT Heard of Exchange Rates? |author=Dean Baker |author-link=Dean Baker |date=January 22, 2012 |work=Beat the Press |publisher=Center for Economic and Policy Research |access-date=January 22, 2012}}</ref> |
The U.S. produces approximately 18% of the world's manufacturing output, a share that has declined as other nations developed competitive manufacturing industries.<ref name="greyhill">{{cite web|title=Manufacturing Output by Country|url=http://greyhill.com/blog/2011/10/5/manufacturing-output-by-country.html|publisher=Greyhill Advisors|access-date=October 5, 2011}}</ref> The job loss during this continual volume growth is the result of multiple factors including increased productivity, trade, and secular economic trends.<ref>{{cite web|title=What Accounts for the Decline in Manufacturing Employment?|url=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=5078&type=0|publisher=Congressional Budget Office|access-date=October 5, 2011}}</ref> In addition, growth in telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, aircraft, heavy machinery and other industries along with declines in low end, low skill industries such as clothing, toys, and other simple manufacturing have resulted in some U.S. jobs being more highly skilled and better paying. There has been much debate within the United States on whether the decline in manufacturing jobs are related to American unions, lower foreign wages, or both.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://prospect.org/article/back-china |title=Back from China? |author=Harold Meyerson |date=November 29, 2011 |journal=The American Prospect |access-date=March 4, 2012}}</ref><ref name="Pope_2012">{{cite news |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-18/america-s-dirty-war-against-manufacturing-part-1-carl-pope.html |title=America's Dirty War Against Manufacturing: Part 1 |author=Carl Pope |author-link=Carl Pope (environmentalist) |date=January 18–20, 2012 |newspaper=Bloomberg |access-date=January 22, 2012}} [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-19/america-s-dirty-war-against-manufacturing-part-2-carl-pope.html Part 2]. [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-20/america-s-dirty-war-on-manufacturing-part-3-commentary-by-carl-pope.html Part 3].</ref><ref name="btb 22.01.2012">{{cite web |url=http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/hasnt-anyone-at-the-nyt-heard-of-exchange-rates |title=Hasn't Anyone at the NYT Heard of Exchange Rates? |author=Dean Baker |author-link=Dean Baker |date=January 22, 2012 |work=Beat the Press |publisher=Center for Economic and Policy Research |access-date=January 22, 2012 |archive-date=April 3, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150403000757/http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/hasnt-anyone-at-the-nyt-heard-of-exchange-rates |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
||
Products include [[Wheat production in the United States|wheat]], corn, other [[Food grain|grains]], fruits, vegetables, [[Cotton production in the United States|cotton]]; beef, pork, poultry, dairy products, [[forest products]], and fish. |
Products include [[Wheat production in the United States|wheat]], corn, other [[Food grain|grains]], fruits, vegetables, [[Cotton production in the United States|cotton]]; beef, pork, poultry, dairy products, [[forest products]], and fish. |
||
Line 853: | Line 1,005: | ||
==Energy, transportation, and telecommunications== |
==Energy, transportation, and telecommunications== |
||
{{Main|Energy in the United States|Transportation in the United States|Internet in the United States}} |
{{Main|Energy in the United States|Transportation in the United States|Internet in the United States}} |
||
[[File:Map of current Interstates.svg|thumb|The [[Interstate Highway System]] extends {{convert|46876|mi|km}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=Interstate FAQ (Question #3) |publisher=Federal Highway Administration |year=2006 |url= |
[[File:Map of current Interstates.svg|thumb|The [[Interstate Highway System]] extends {{convert|46876|mi|km}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=Interstate FAQ (Question #3) |publisher=Federal Highway Administration |year=2006 |url=https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/interstate/faq.cfm |access-date=March 4, 2009}}</ref>]] |
||
[[File:Houston Ship Channel Barbours Cut.jpg|thumb|The [[Port of Houston]], one of the largest ports in the United States |
[[File:Houston Ship Channel Barbours Cut.jpg|thumb|The [[Port of Houston]], one of the largest ports in the United States]] |
||
===Transportation=== |
===Transportation=== |
||
====Road==== |
====Road==== |
||
The U.S. economy is heavily dependent on road transport for moving people and goods. Personal transportation is dominated by automobiles, which operate on a network of four million miles (6.4 million km) of public roads,<ref>{{cite web|title=Public Road and Street Mileage in the United States by Type of Surface|url=http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_04.html|website=United States Department of Transportation|access-date=January 13, 2015|archive-date=January 2, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150102141414/http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_04.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> including one of the world's [[National Highway System (United States)|longest highway systems]] at 57,000 miles (91,700{{ |
The U.S. economy is heavily dependent on road transport for moving people and goods. Personal transportation is dominated by automobiles, which operate on a network of four million miles (6.4 million km) of public roads,<ref>{{cite web|title=Public Road and Street Mileage in the United States by Type of Surface|url=http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_04.html|website=United States Department of Transportation|access-date=January 13, 2015|archive-date=January 2, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150102141414/http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_04.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> including one of the world's [[National Highway System (United States)|longest highway systems]] at 57,000 miles (91,700{{spaces}}km).<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.newgeography.com/content/002003-china-expressway-system-exceed-us-interstates |title=China Expressway System to Exceed US Interstates |work=New Geography |location =Grand Forks, ND |date=January 22, 2011 |access-date=September 16, 2011}}</ref> The world's second-largest automobile market,<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/jan/08/china-us-car-sales-overtakes |title=China overtakes US in car sales |newspaper=The Guardian |date=January 8, 2010 |access-date=July 10, 2011 |location=London}}</ref> the United States has the highest rate of per-capita vehicle ownership in the world, with 765 vehicles per 1,000 Americans.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/tra_mot_veh-transportation-motor-vehicles |title=Motor vehicles statistics – countries compared worldwide |publisher=NationMaster |access-date=July 10, 2011}}</ref> About 40% of [[Passenger vehicles in the United States|personal vehicles]] are vans, [[Sport utility vehicle|SUVs]], or light trucks.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.bts.gov/publications/highlights_of_the_2001_national_household_travel_survey/html/section_01.html|title= Household, Individual, and Vehicle Characteristics|publisher= U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics|work= 2001 National Household Travel Survey|access-date= August 15, 2007|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070929125403/http://www.bts.gov/publications/highlights_of_the_2001_national_household_travel_survey/html/section_01.html |archive-date=September 29, 2007|url-status= dead|df= mdy-all}}</ref> |
||
====Rail==== |
====Rail==== |
||
[[Mass transit in the United States|Mass transit accounts for 9% of total U.S. work trips]].<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.policy.rutgers.edu/vtc/documents/TOD.Euro-Style_Planning-Renne-Wells.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140924071956/http://www.policy.rutgers.edu/vtc/documents/TOD.Euro-Style_Planning-Renne-Wells.pdf |author1=Renne, John L. |author2=Wells, Jan S. |title= Emerging European-Style Planning in the United States: Transit-Oriented Development |page=2 |year=2003 |publisher = Rutgers University |access-date=June 11, 2007|archive-date=September 24, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kbenfield/natgeo_surveys_countries_trans.html|title=NatGeo surveys countries' transit use: guess who comes in last|last=Benfield|first=Kaid|publisher=Natural Resources Defense Council|date=May 18, 2009|access-date=January 6, 2015|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150120234533/http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kbenfield/natgeo_surveys_countries_trans.html|archive-date=January 20, 2015 |
[[Mass transit in the United States|Mass transit accounts for 9% of total U.S. work trips]].<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.policy.rutgers.edu/vtc/documents/TOD.Euro-Style_Planning-Renne-Wells.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140924071956/http://www.policy.rutgers.edu/vtc/documents/TOD.Euro-Style_Planning-Renne-Wells.pdf |author1=Renne, John L. |author2=Wells, Jan S. |title= Emerging European-Style Planning in the United States: Transit-Oriented Development |page=2 |year=2003 |publisher = Rutgers University |access-date=June 11, 2007|archive-date=September 24, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kbenfield/natgeo_surveys_countries_trans.html|title=NatGeo surveys countries' transit use: guess who comes in last|last=Benfield|first=Kaid|publisher=Natural Resources Defense Council|date=May 18, 2009|access-date=January 6, 2015|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150120234533/http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kbenfield/natgeo_surveys_countries_trans.html|archive-date=January 20, 2015}}</ref> [[Rail transportation in the United States|Transport of goods by rail]] is extensive, though relatively low numbers of passengers (approximately 31 million annually) use intercity rail to travel, partially due to the low population density throughout much of the nation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-15 |title= Intercity Passenger Rail: National Policy and Strategies Needed to Maximize Public Benefits from Federal Expenditures |date=November 13, 2006 |publisher=U.S. Government Accountability Office |access-date=June 20, 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/08/economist-explains-18 |title=The Economist Explains: Why Americans Don't Ride Trains |date=August 29, 2013 |newspaper=[[The Economist]] |access-date=May 12, 2015}}</ref> However, ridership on [[Amtrak]], the national intercity passenger rail system, grew by almost 37% between 2000 and 2010.<ref>{{cite web|title=Amtrak Ridership Records |url= http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1249227805921&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobhead |publisher=Amtrak |date=June 8, 2011|access-date=February 29, 2012}}</ref> Also, [[Light rail in the United States|light rail development]] has increased in recent years.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.metaefficient.com/trains/master-2.html |title=3 Reasons Light Rail Is an Efficient Transportation Option for U.S. Cities |author=McGill, Tracy |work= MetaEfficient |date=January 1, 2011 |access-date=June 14, 2013}}</ref> The state of [[California]] is currently constructing the nation's first [[California High-Speed Rail|high-speed rail system]]. |
||
====Airline==== |
====Airline==== |
||
The [[List of airlines of the United States|civil airline industry]] is entirely privately owned and has been largely [[Airline Deregulation Act|deregulated since 1978]], while [[List of airports in the United States|most major airports]] are publicly owned.<ref>{{cite web|title=Privatization|url=http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/privatization|website=downsizinggovernment.org|publisher=Cato Institute|access-date=December 27, 2014}}</ref> The three largest airlines in the world by passengers carried are U.S.-based; [[American Airlines]] is number one after its 2013 acquisition by U.S. [[US Airways|Airways]].<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.iata.org/publications/pages/wats-passenger-carried.aspx|title= Scheduled Passengers Carried|publisher= International Air Transport Association (IATA)|year= 2011|access-date= February 17, 2012|url-status= dead|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131113175503/http://www.iata.org/publications/pages/wats-passenger-carried.aspx|archive-date= November 13, 2013 |
The [[List of airlines of the United States|civil airline industry]] is entirely privately owned and has been largely [[Airline Deregulation Act|deregulated since 1978]], while [[List of airports in the United States|most major airports]] are publicly owned.<ref>{{cite web|title=Privatization|url=http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/privatization|website=downsizinggovernment.org|publisher=Cato Institute|access-date=December 27, 2014}}</ref> The three largest airlines in the world by passengers carried are U.S.-based; [[American Airlines]] is number one after its 2013 acquisition by U.S. [[US Airways|Airways]].<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.iata.org/publications/pages/wats-passenger-carried.aspx|title= Scheduled Passengers Carried|publisher= International Air Transport Association (IATA)|year= 2011|access-date= February 17, 2012|url-status= dead|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131113175503/http://www.iata.org/publications/pages/wats-passenger-carried.aspx|archive-date= November 13, 2013 }}</ref> Of the world's thirty busiest passenger airports, twelve are in the United States, including the busiest, [[Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport]].<ref>{{cite web |url =http://www.aci.aero/News/Releases/Most-Recent/2014/03/31/Preliminary-World-Airport-Traffic-and-Rankings-2013--High-Growth-Dubai-Moves-Up-to-7th-Busiest-Airport- |title =Preliminary World Airport Traffic and Rankings 2013 – High Growth Dubai Moves Up to 7th Busiest Airport – March 31, 2014 |publisher=Airports Council International |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140401052319/http://www.aci.aero/News/Releases/Most-Recent/2014/03/31/Preliminary-World-Airport-Traffic-and-Rankings-2013--High-Growth-Dubai-Moves-Up-to-7th-Busiest-Airport- |archive-date=April 1, 2014 |date=March 31, 2014 |access-date=May 17, 2014 |url-status= live}}</ref> |
||
===Energy=== |
===Energy=== |
||
[[File:Countries by Natural Gas Proven Reserves (2014).svg|thumb|Countries by [[List of countries by natural gas proven reserves|natural gas proven reserves]] (2014). The U.S. holds the world's fourth largest [[natural gas]] reserves.]] |
[[File:Countries by Natural Gas Proven Reserves (2014).svg|thumb|Countries by [[List of countries by natural gas proven reserves|natural gas proven reserves]] (2014). The U.S. holds the world's fourth largest [[natural gas]] reserves.]] |
||
The US is the second-largest [[energy development|energy]] consumer in total use.<ref>{{cite web|last=Barr |first=Robert |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/43327793 |title=China surpasses US as top energy consumer – Business – Oil & energy – NBC News |work=NBC News |access-date=April 21, 2012}}</ref> The U.S. ranks seventh in energy consumption per capita after Canada and a number of other countries.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20061013182222/http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/tablee1c.xls World Per Capita Total Primary Energy Consumption,1980–2005] (MS Excel format)</ref><ref>World Resources Institute "[https://web.archive.org/web/20041212020102/http://earthtrends.wri.org/text/energy-resources/variable-351.html Energy Consumption: Consumption per capita]" (2001). Nations with higher per-capita consumption are: Qatar, Iceland, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Luxembourg and Canada. Except for Canada, these are small countries with a prominent energy-intensive industry such as oil refining or [[steelmaking]].</ref> The majority of this energy is derived from [[fossil fuel]]s: in 2005, it was estimated that 40% of the nation's energy came from petroleum, 23% [[Coal power in the United States|from coal]], and 23% from natural gas. [[Nuclear power]] supplied 8.4% and [[renewable energy]] supplied 6.8%, which was mainly from hydroelectric dams although other renewables are included.<ref>US Dept. of Energy, "[http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/pages/sec1_3.pdf Annual Energy Report]" (July 2006), Energy Flow diagram</ref> |
The US is the second-largest [[energy development|energy]] consumer in total use.<ref>{{cite web|last=Barr |first=Robert |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/43327793 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200215010044/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/43327793 |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 15, 2020 |title=China surpasses US as top energy consumer – Business – Oil & energy – NBC News |work=NBC News |date=June 8, 2011 |access-date=April 21, 2012}}</ref> The U.S. ranks seventh in energy consumption per capita after Canada and a number of other countries.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20061013182222/http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/tablee1c.xls World Per Capita Total Primary Energy Consumption,1980–2005] (MS Excel format)</ref><ref>World Resources Institute "[https://web.archive.org/web/20041212020102/http://earthtrends.wri.org/text/energy-resources/variable-351.html Energy Consumption: Consumption per capita]" (2001). Nations with higher per-capita consumption are: Qatar, Iceland, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Luxembourg and Canada. Except for Canada, these are small countries with a prominent energy-intensive industry such as oil refining or [[steelmaking]].</ref> The majority of this energy is derived from [[fossil fuel]]s: in 2005, it was estimated that 40% of the nation's energy came from petroleum, 23% [[Coal power in the United States|from coal]], and 23% from natural gas. [[Nuclear power]] supplied 8.4% and [[renewable energy]] supplied 6.8%, which was mainly from hydroelectric dams although other renewables are included.<ref>US Dept. of Energy, "[http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/pages/sec1_3.pdf Annual Energy Report]" (July 2006), Energy Flow diagram</ref> |
||
American dependence on [[List of countries by oil imports|oil imports]] grew from 24% in 1970 to 65% by the end of 2005.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.forbes.com/home/energyspecial/2005/11/15/energy-oil-exxonmobil-cx_pt_1116energy_tertzakian.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060214225748/http://www.forbes.com/home/energyspecial/2005/11/15/energy-oil-exxonmobil-cx_pt_1116energy_tertzakian.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 14, 2006 |title=The U.S. Senate's Oil Spill |work=Forbes |date=November 15, 2005 |access-date=April 21, 2012 |first=Peter |last=Tertzakian}}</ref> [[Transportation in the United States|Transportation]] has the highest [[Oil consumption|consumption rates]], accounting for approximately 69% of the oil used in the United States in 2006,<ref name="btstable4-3"> |
American dependence on [[List of countries by oil imports|oil imports]] grew from 24% in 1970 to 65% by the end of 2005.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.forbes.com/home/energyspecial/2005/11/15/energy-oil-exxonmobil-cx_pt_1116energy_tertzakian.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060214225748/http://www.forbes.com/home/energyspecial/2005/11/15/energy-oil-exxonmobil-cx_pt_1116energy_tertzakian.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 14, 2006 |title=The U.S. Senate's Oil Spill |work=Forbes |date=November 15, 2005 |access-date=April 21, 2012 |first=Peter |last=Tertzakian}}</ref> [[Transportation in the United States|Transportation]] has the highest [[Oil consumption|consumption rates]], accounting for approximately 69% of the oil used in the United States in 2006,<ref name="btstable4-3">{{cite web |url=http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_04_03.html |title=Domestic Demand for Refined Petroleum Products by Sector |publisher=U.S. [[Bureau of Transportation Statistics]] |access-date=August 23, 2014}}</ref> and 55% of oil use worldwide as documented in the [[Hirsch report]]. |
||
{{Citation |url=http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_04_03.html |title=Domestic Demand for Refined Petroleum Products by Sector |publisher=U.S. [[Bureau of Transportation Statistics]] |access-date=August 23, 2014}}</ref> and 55% of oil use worldwide as documented in the [[Hirsch report]]. |
|||
In 2013, the United States imported 2.808 billion barrels of [[crude oil]], compared to 3.377 billion barrels in 2010.<ref>"[https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/historical/petr.txt U.S. Imports of Crude Oil]". U.S. Census Bureau.</ref> While the U.S. is the largest importer of fuel, ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' reported in 2011 that the country was about to become a net fuel exporter for the first time in 62 years. The paper reported expectations that this would continue until 2020.<ref>{{cite news|last=Pleven |first=Liam |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203441704577068670488306242 |title=The Wall Street Journal |date=November 30, 2011 |access-date=April 21, 2012}}</ref> In fact, petroleum was the major export from the country in 2011.<ref>{{Cite news | first=Chris | last=Kahn | title=In a first, gas and other fuels top U.S. exports | url=http://www.floridatoday.com/usatoday/article/52298812?odyssey=mod_sectionstories | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120311011059/http://www.floridatoday.com/usatoday/article/52298812?odyssey=mod_sectionstories | archive-date=March 11, 2012| newspaper=[[Florida Today]] | location=Melbourne, FL | page= 4A | date=December 31, 2011}}</ref> |
In 2013, the United States imported 2.808 billion barrels of [[crude oil]], compared to 3.377 billion barrels in 2010.<ref>"[https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/historical/petr.txt U.S. Imports of Crude Oil]". U.S. Census Bureau.</ref> While the U.S. is the largest importer of fuel, ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' reported in 2011 that the country was about to become a net fuel exporter for the first time in 62 years. The paper reported expectations that this would continue until 2020.<ref>{{cite news|last=Pleven |first=Liam |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203441704577068670488306242 |title=The Wall Street Journal |date=November 30, 2011 |access-date=April 21, 2012}}</ref> In fact, petroleum was the major export from the country in 2011.<ref>{{Cite news | first=Chris | last=Kahn | title=In a first, gas and other fuels top U.S. exports | url=http://www.floridatoday.com/usatoday/article/52298812?odyssey=mod_sectionstories | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120311011059/http://www.floridatoday.com/usatoday/article/52298812?odyssey=mod_sectionstories | archive-date=March 11, 2012| newspaper=[[Florida Today]] | location=Melbourne, FL | page= 4A | date=December 31, 2011}}</ref> |
||
===Telecommunications=== |
===Telecommunications=== |
||
[[Internet]] was developed in the U.S. and the country hosts many of the world's largest hubs.<ref>[http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_ipto.htm "IPTO – Information Processing Techniques Office"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140702210822/http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_ipto.htm |date=July 2, 2014}}, ''The Living Internet'', Bill Stewart (ed), January 2000.</ref> |
|||
The [[Internet]] was developed in the U.S. and the country hosts many of the world's largest hubs.<ref>[http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_ipto.htm "IPTO – Information Processing Techniques Office"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140702210822/http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_ipto.htm |date=July 2, 2014}}, ''The Living Internet'', Bill Stewart (ed), January 2000.</ref> |
|||
==International trade== |
==International trade== |
||
{{Main|Foreign trade of the United States|List of tariffs in the United States|Tariff in United States history}} |
{{Main|Foreign trade of the United States|List of tariffs in the United States|Tariff in United States history}} |
||
{{See also|List of exports of the United States|List of the largest trading partners of the United States|List of imports of the United States|List of U.S. states and territories by exports and imports}} |
{{See also|List of exports of the United States|List of the largest trading partners of the United States|List of imports of the United States|List of U.S. states and territories by exports and imports}} |
||
[[File:Protectionist measures taken 2008–2013 according to Global Trade Alert.png|thumb|[[Protectionist]] measures since 2008 by country |
[[File:Protectionist measures taken 2008–2013 according to Global Trade Alert.png|thumb|[[Protectionist]] measures since 2008 by country<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.globaltradealert.org/|title=Global Trade Alert – Independent monitoring of policies that affect world trade|work=globaltradealert.org}}</ref>]] |
||
The United States is the world's second-largest trading nation.<ref>{{cite news|title=China overtakes US as world's largest goods trader|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7c2dbd70-79a6-11e3-b381-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2q8OrFdV3|newspaper=Financial Times|access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> There is a large amount of U.S. dollars in circulation all around the planet; about 60% of funds used in international trade are U.S. dollars. The dollar is also used as the standard unit of currency in international markets for commodities such as gold and petroleum.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/node/21553424|title=Free exchange: Petrodollar profusion | |
The United States is the world's second-largest trading nation.<ref>{{cite news|title=China overtakes US as world's largest goods trader|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7c2dbd70-79a6-11e3-b381-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2q8OrFdV3|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210211242/https://www.ft.com/content/7c2dbd70-79a6-11e3-b381-00144feabdc0#axzz2q8OrFdV3|archive-date=December 10, 2022|url-access=subscription|url-status=live|newspaper=Financial Times|access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> There is a large amount of U.S. dollars in circulation all around the planet; about 60% of funds used in international trade are U.S. dollars. The dollar is also used as the standard unit of currency in international markets for commodities such as gold and petroleum.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/node/21553424|title=Free exchange: Petrodollar profusion |newspaper=The Economist}}</ref> |
||
The [[North American Free Trade Agreement]], or [[NAFTA]], created one of the [[Trade bloc#Most active regional blocs|largest trade blocs in the world]] in 1994.<ref>{{cite web |title=North American Free Trade Agreement {{!}} History, Purpose, & Provisions |url=https://www.britannica.com/event/North-American-Free-Trade-Agreement |website=Encyclopedia Britannica |access-date=March 24, 2020 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) {{!}} United States Trade Representative |url=https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/north-american-free-trade-agreement-nafta |website=ustr.gov |access-date=March 24, 2020}}</ref> |
The [[North American Free Trade Agreement]], or [[NAFTA]], created one of the [[Trade bloc#Most active regional blocs|largest trade blocs in the world]] in 1994.<ref>{{cite web |title=North American Free Trade Agreement {{!}} History, Purpose, & Provisions |url=https://www.britannica.com/event/North-American-Free-Trade-Agreement |website=Encyclopedia Britannica |access-date=March 24, 2020 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) {{!}} United States Trade Representative |url=https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/north-american-free-trade-agreement-nafta |website=ustr.gov |access-date=March 24, 2020 |archive-date=May 8, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200508182542/https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/north-american-free-trade-agreement-nafta |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
||
Since 1976, the U.S. has sustained merchandise trade deficits with other nations, and since 1982, [[current account deficit]]s. The nation's long-standing surplus in its [[trade in services]] was maintained, however, and reached a record US$231{{ |
Since 1976, the U.S. has sustained merchandise trade deficits with other nations, and since 1982, [[current account deficit]]s. The nation's long-standing surplus in its [[trade in services]] was maintained, however, and reached a record US$231{{spaces}}billion in 2013.<ref name="Exports-Imports">{{cite web|url=https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/international/trade/2015/pdf/trad1214.pdf|title=U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services|publisher=BEA|date=February 5, 2015|access-date=March 9, 2018|archive-date=September 6, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170906091430/https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/international/trade/2015/pdf/trad1214.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
The U.S. [[trade deficit]] increased from $502{{ |
The U.S. [[trade deficit]] increased from $502{{spaces}}billion in 2016 to $552{{spaces}}billion in 2017, an increase of $50{{spaces}}billion or 10%.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?graph_id=474908&rn=8252| title = FRED – Trade Balance, Goods and Services, Balance of Payments Basis| date = January 1992}}</ref> During 2017, total imports were $2.90{{spaces}}trillion, while exports were $2.35{{spaces}}trillion. The net deficit in goods was $807{{spaces}}billion, while the net surplus in services was $255{{spaces}}billion.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/historical/index.html| title = U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services{{snd}}Historical Series}}</ref> |
||
Americas ten [[List of the largest trading partners of the United States|largest trading partners]] are China, Canada, Mexico, Japan, Germany, South Korea, United Kingdom, France, India and Taiwan.<ref name="auto" /> The goods trade deficit with China rose from $347{{ |
Americas ten [[List of the largest trading partners of the United States|largest trading partners]] are China, Canada, Mexico, Japan, Germany, South Korea, United Kingdom, France, India and Taiwan.<ref name="auto" /> The goods trade deficit with China rose from $347{{spaces}}billion in 2016 to $376{{spaces}}billion in 2017, an increase of $30{{spaces}}billion or 8%. In 2017, the U.S. had a goods trade deficit of $71{{spaces}}billion with Mexico and $17{{spaces}}billion with Canada.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/index.html| title = Census – Foreign Trade – Balance by Partner Country}}</ref> |
||
According to the [[ |
According to the [[globalization index|KOF index of globalization]]{{clarify|reason=What is "KOF"?|date=February 2023}} and the [[globalization index]] by A.T. Kearney/Foreign Policy Magazine, the U.S. has a relatively high degree of [[globalization]].{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}} U.S. workers send a third of all [[remittances]] in the world.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.finfacts.com/irelandbusinessnews/publish/article_10001284.shtml |title=IMF: US accounts for one-third of annual remittances to Developing Countries of $100bn |publisher=Finfacts.com |access-date=April 21, 2012}}{{subst:dead link}}</ref> |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
!colspan="10"|<big> Balance of trade 2014 (goods only)</big><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.businessinsider.com/balance-of-goods-us-trading-partners-from-goldman-sachs-2017-5|title=This chart shows how America stacks up in trade with everyone in the world|website=Business Insider|access-date=March 20, 2018 }}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! !! China !! Euro area !! Japan !! Mexico !! Pacific !! Canada !! Middle East !! Latin America !! style="background: #91A3B0"| Total by product |
|||
!colspan="10"|<big> Balance of Trade 2014 (goods only)</big><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.businessinsider.com/balance-of-goods-us-trading-partners-from-goldman-sachs-2017-5|title=This chart shows how America stacks up in trade with everyone in the world|website=Business Insider|access-date=2018-03-20 |df=mdy-all}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Computer''' || style="background: #FA6E79"| −151.9 || 3.4 || −8.0 || −11.0 ||style="background: #FA6E79"| −26.1 || style="background: #A4C639"| 20.9 || 5.8 || 12.1 || style="background: red"| {{center|'''−155.0'''}} |
|||
! !! China !! Euro Area !! Japan !! Mexico !! Pacific !! Canada !! Middle East !! Lat. America !! style="background: #91A3B0"| Total by Product |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Oil, gas, minerals''' || 1.9 || 6.4 || 2.4 || style="background: #FA6E79"| −20.8 || 1.1 || style="background: #FA6E79"|−79.8 || style="background: #FA6E79"|−45.1 || style="background: #FA6E79"|−15.9 || style="background: red"| {{center|'''−149.7'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Transportation''' || 10.9 || style="background: #FA6E79"|−30.9 || style="background: #FA6E79"| −46.2 || style="background: #FA6E79"| −59.5 || −0.5 || −6.1 || style="background: #A4C639"| 17.1 || 8.8 ||style="background: red"| {{center|'''−106.3'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Apparel''' || style="background: #FA6E79"| −56.3 || −4.9 || 0.6 || −4.2 || −6.3 || 2.5 || −0.3 || −1.1 ||style="background: red"| {{center|'''−69.9'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Electrical equipment''' || style="background: #FA6E79"| −35.9 || −2.4 || −4.0 || −8.5 || −3.3 || 10.0 || 1.8 || 2.0 || style="background: red"|{{center|'''−40.4'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Misc. manufacturing''' || style="background: #FA6E79"| −35.3 || 4.9 || 2.7 || −2.8 || −1.4 || 5.8 || −1.5 || 1.8 || style="background: red"| {{center|'''−25.8'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Furniture''' ||style="background: #FA6E79"|−18.3 || −1.2 || 0.0 || −1.6 || −2.1 || 0.4 || 0.2 || 0.0 || style="background: red"|{{center|'''−22.6'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Machinery''' ||style="background: #FA6E79"|−19.9 || style="background: #FA6E79"| −27.0 || style="background: #FA6E79"| −18.8 || 3.9 || 7.6 || style="background: #A4C639"| 18.1 || 4.5 || 9.1 || style="background: red"|{{center|'''−22.4'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Primary metals''' || −3.1 || 3.1 || −1.8 || 1.0 || 1.9 || −8.9 || −0.9 || −10.4 ||style="background: red"| {{center|'''−19.1'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Fabricated metals''' || style="background: #FA6E79"|−17.9 || −5.9 || −3.5 || 2.8 || −4.3 || 7.3 || 1.2 || 1.9 || style="background: red"|{{center|'''−18.5'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Plastics''' || style="background: #FA6E79"| −15.7 || −1.9 || −2.0 || 5.7 || −4.1 || 2.6 || −0.1 || 0.5 || style="background: red"|{{center|'''−15.0'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Textile''' || −12.3 || −1.1 || −0.3 || 2.8 || −4.6 || 1.5 || −0.9 || 0.2 || style="background: red"|{{center|'''−14.7'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Beverages, tobacco''' || 1.3 || −9.9 || 0.6 || −3.3 || 0.0 || 1.0 || 0.2 || −0.6 || style="background: red"|{{center|'''−10.6'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Nonmetallic minerals''' || −6.1 || −1.9 || −0.4 || −1.2 || 0.1 || 1.9 || −0.5 || −0.8 || style="background: red"|{{center|'''−8.9'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Paper''' || −2.7 || 1.2 || 1.1 || 4.3 || 1.2 || −9.8 || 0.9 || −1.9 || style="background: red"|{{center|'''−5.8'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| ''' |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Chemical''' || −3.9 || style="background: #FA6E79"| −39.5 || −1.5 || style="background: #A4C639"| 19.1 || 3.2 || 4.6 || −2.4 ||style="background: #A4C639"| 15.8 || style="background: red"|{{center|'''−4.7'''}} |
||
|- |
|||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Chemical''' || −3.9 || style="background: #FA6E79"| −39.5 || −1.5 || style="background: #A4C639"| 19.1 || 3.2 || 4.6 || −2.4 ||style="background: #A4C639"| 15.8 || style="background: red"|{{center|'''-4.7'''}} |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Food''' || 0.7 || −3.6 || 6.1 || 4.9 || 0.9 || 0.1 || 1.4 || −1.1 || style="background: green"|{{center|'''9.5'''}} |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Food''' || 0.7 || −3.6 || 6.1 || 4.9 || 0.9 || 0.1 || 1.4 || −1.1 || style="background: green"|{{center|'''9.5'''}} |
||
Line 939: | Line 1,090: | ||
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Petroleum''' || 0.6 || −1.2 || 0.1 ||style="background: #A4C639"| 16.6 || −2.0 || −0.1 || 0.6 || style="background: #A4C639"| 18.3 || style="background: green"|{{center|'''32.9'''}} |
| style="background: #91A3B0"| '''Petroleum''' || 0.6 || −1.2 || 0.1 ||style="background: #A4C639"| 16.6 || −2.0 || −0.1 || 0.6 || style="background: #A4C639"| 18.3 || style="background: green"|{{center|'''32.9'''}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! Total by |
! Total by country/area || style="background: red"| −346.1 || style="background: red"| −106.1 || style="background: red"|−65.6 || style="background: red"| −54.9 || style="background: red"| −33.0 || style="background: red"| −29.0 || style="background: red"| −15.1 ||style="background: green"| 32.3 || |
||
|} |
|} |
||
==Financial position== |
==Financial position== |
||
{{Main|Financial position of the United States}} |
{{Main|Financial position of the United States}} |
||
[[File:US Federal Debt Held By Public as of Feb. 2023.png|thumb|upright=1.2|The amount of [[National debt of the United States|U.S. public debt]], measured as a percentage of GDP, held by the public since 1900]] |
|||
U.S. household and non-profit net worth exceeded $100{{nbs}}trillion for the first time in Q1 2018; it has been setting records since Q4 2012.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TNWBSHNO| title = FRED – Household and Non-Profit Net Worth}}</ref> The U.S. federal government or "national debt" was $21.1{{nbs}}trillion in May 2018, just over 100% GDP.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/mspd/mspd.htm| title = Treasury Direct – Monthly Statement of the Public Debt}}</ref> Using a subset of the national debt called "debt held by the public", U.S. debt was approximately 77% GDP in 2017. By this measure, the U.S. ranked 43rd highest among 2017 nations.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/| title = CIA World Factbook – USA}}</ref> Debt held by the public rose considerably as a result of the [[Great Recession]] and its aftermath. It is expected to continue rising as the country ages towards 100% GDP by 2028.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53651| title = CBO. Budget & Economic Outlook 2018–2028}}</ref> |
|||
The [[U.S. public debt]] was $909{{spaces}}billion in 1980, an amount equal to 33% of America's gross domestic product (GDP); by 1990, that number had more than tripled to $3.2{{spaces}}trillion{{snd}}56% of GDP.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20100201131532/http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2010/assets/hist.pdf FY 2010 Budget Historical Tables. pp. 127–28].</ref> In 2001 the national debt was $5.7{{spaces}}trillion; however, the [[debt-to-GDP ratio]] remained at 1990 levels.<ref>"[https://web.archive.org/web/20070214085759/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article742188.ece US spends its way to 28 Eiffel towers: made out of pure gold]". ''The Times''. March 17, 2006.</ref> Debt levels rose quickly in the following decade, and on January 28, 2010, the U.S. debt ceiling was raised to $14.3{{spaces}}trillion.<ref>"[https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60R5DK20100128?type=politicsNews Senate backs increase in debt limit to $14.3{{spaces}}trillion]". Reuters. January 28, 2010.</ref> Based on the 2010 [[United States federal budget]], total national debt will grow to nearly 100% of GDP, versus a level of approximately 80% in early 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy10/pdf/summary.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111010084418/http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy10/pdf/summary.pdf|archive-date=October 10, 2011 |title=2010 Budget-Summary Tables S-13 and S-14 |access-date=July 21, 2014}}</ref> The White House estimates that the government's tab for servicing the debt will exceed $700{{spaces}}billion a year in 2019,<ref>"[http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/12/15/2771641.htm?site=thedrum Debt has become America's life blood]". Abc.net.au. December 15, 2009.</ref> up from $202{{spaces}}billion in 2009.<ref>"[https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/23/business/23rates.html?_r=1 Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government]". ''The New York Times''. November 22, 2009.</ref> |
|||
U.S. household and non-profit net worth exceeded $100{{spaces}}trillion for the first time in Q1 2018; it has been setting records since Q4 2012.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TNWBSHNO| title = FRED – Household and Non-Profit Net Worth| date = October 1945}}</ref> The U.S. federal government or "national debt" was $21.1{{spaces}}trillion in May 2018, just over 100% GDP.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/mspd/mspd.htm| title = Treasury Direct – Monthly Statement of the Public Debt| access-date = June 19, 2018| archive-date = February 13, 2020| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200213153409/https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/mspd/mspd.htm| url-status = dead}}</ref> Using a subset of the national debt called "debt held by the public", U.S. debt was approximately 77% GDP in 2017. By this measure, the U.S. ranked 43rd highest among 2017 nations.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/| title = CIA World Factbook – USA| date = February 16, 2022}}</ref> Debt held by the public rose considerably as a result of the [[Great Recession]] and its aftermath. It is expected to continue rising as the country ages towards 100% GDP by 2028.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53651| title = CBO. Budget & Economic Outlook 2018–2028| date = April 9, 2018}}</ref> In February 2024, the total federal government debt grew to $34.4 trillion after having grown by approximately $1 trillion in both of two separate 100-day periods since the previous June.<ref>{{cite news|last=Fox|first=Michelle|date=March 1, 2024|title=The U.S. national debt is rising by $1 trillion about every 100 days|publisher=CNBC|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/01/the-us-national-debt-is-rising-by-1-trillion-about-every-100-days.html}}</ref> |
|||
The [[U.S. public debt]] was $909{{nbs}}billion in 1980, an amount equal to 33% of America's gross domestic product (GDP); by 1990, that number had more than tripled to $3.2{{nbs}}trillion{{snd}}56% of GDP.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20100201131532/http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2010/assets/hist.pdf FY 2010 Budget Historical Tables. pp. 127–28].</ref> In 2001 the national debt was $5.7{{nbs}}trillion; however, the [[debt-to-GDP ratio]] remained at 1990 levels.<ref>"[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article742188.ece US spends its way to 28 Eiffel towers: made out of pure gold]". ''The Times''. March 17, 2006.</ref> Debt levels rose quickly in the following decade, and on January 28, 2010, the U.S. debt ceiling was raised to $14.3{{nbs}}trillion.<ref>"[https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60R5DK20100128?type=politicsNews Senate backs increase in [[debt limit]] to $14.3{{nbs}}trillion]". Reuters. January 28, 2010.</ref> Based on the 2010 [[United States federal budget]], total national debt will grow to nearly 100% of GDP, versus a level of approximately 80% in early 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy10/pdf/summary.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111010084418/http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy10/pdf/summary.pdf|archive-date=October 10, 2011 |title=2010 Budget-Summary Tables S-13 and S-14 |access-date=July 21, 2014}}</ref> The White House estimates that the government's tab for servicing the debt will exceed $700{{nbs}}billion a year in 2019,<ref>"[http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/12/15/2771641.htm?site=thedrum Debt has become America's life blood]". Abc.net.au. December 15, 2009.</ref> up from $202{{nbs}}billion in 2009.<ref>"[https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/23/business/23rates.html?_r=1 Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government]". ''The New York Times''. November 22, 2009.</ref> |
|||
The U.S. Treasury statistics indicate that, at the end of 2006, non-US citizens and institutions held 44% of federal debt held by the public.<ref>"[http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy08/pdf/spec.pdf Analytical Perspectives of the FY 2008 Budget] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100107153657/http://www.gpoaccess.gov//usbudget/fy08/pdf/spec.pdf |date=January 7, 2010}}".</ref> {{As of|2014}}, China, holding $1.26{{ |
The U.S. Treasury statistics indicate that, at the end of 2006, non-US citizens and institutions held 44% of federal debt held by the public.<ref>"[http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy08/pdf/spec.pdf Analytical Perspectives of the FY 2008 Budget] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100107153657/http://www.gpoaccess.gov//usbudget/fy08/pdf/spec.pdf |date=January 7, 2010}}".</ref> {{As of|2014}}, China, holding $1.26{{spaces}}trillion in [[treasury bond]]s, is the largest foreign financier of the U.S. public debt.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.treasury.gov/ticdata/Publish/mfh.txt|title=Major Foreign Holders of Treasury Securities|date=July 2014|publisher=United States Department of the Treasury|access-date=August 23, 2014|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017031710/http://www.treasury.gov/ticdata/Publish/mfh.txt|archive-date=October 17, 2015}}</ref> |
||
The overall financial position of the United States as of 2014 includes $269.6{{ |
The overall financial position of the United States as of 2014 includes $269.6{{spaces}}trillion of assets owned by households, businesses, and governments within its borders, representing more than 15.7 times the annual gross domestic product of the United States. Debts owed during this same period amounted to $145.8{{spaces}}trillion, about 8.5 times the annual gross domestic product.<ref name="2014Q1flowoffunds"> |
||
{{cite web |
{{cite web |
||
|url = http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/z1.pdf |
|url = http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/z1.pdf |
||
|title = Z.1 Financial Accounts of the United States – Flow of Funds, Balance Sheets, and Integrated Macroeconomic Accounts – First Quarter 2014 |
|title = Z.1 Financial Accounts of the United States – Flow of Funds, Balance Sheets, and Integrated Macroeconomic Accounts – First Quarter 2014 |
||
|author = Federal Reserve |
|author = Federal Reserve |
||
|date = 2014 |
|date = June 5, 2014 |
||
|access-date = July 3, 2010 |
|access-date = July 3, 2010 |
||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100702134328/http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/Z1/current/z1.pdf |
|||
|archive-date = July 2, 2010 |
|archive-date = July 2, 2010 |
||
|url-status = dead |
|||
|df = mdy-all |
|df = mdy-all |
||
|author-link = Federal Reserve |
|author-link = Federal Reserve |
||
Line 967: | Line 1,120: | ||
|title = Z.1 Financial Accounts of the United States – Flow of Funds, Balance Sheets, and Integrated Macroeconomic Accounts – Historical Annual Tables 2005–2013 |
|title = Z.1 Financial Accounts of the United States – Flow of Funds, Balance Sheets, and Integrated Macroeconomic Accounts – Historical Annual Tables 2005–2013 |
||
|author = Federal Reserve |
|author = Federal Reserve |
||
|date = 2014 |
|date = June 5, 2014 |
||
|url-status = dead |
|url-status = dead |
||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140813015931/http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/Current/annuals/a2005-2013.pdf |
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140813015931/http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/Current/annuals/a2005-2013.pdf |
||
|archive-date = August 13, 2014 |
|archive-date = August 13, 2014 |
||
|df = mdy-all |
|||
|author-link = Federal Reserve |
|author-link = Federal Reserve |
||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
Since 2010, the U.S. Treasury has been obtaining [[ |
Since 2010, the U.S. Treasury has been obtaining [[negative real interest rate]]s on government debt.<ref>Saint Louis Federal Reserve (2012) [http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/DFII5 "5-Year Treasury Inflation-Indexed Security, Constant Maturity"] FRED Economic Data chart from government debt auctions (the x-axis at y=0 represents the inflation rate over the life of the security)</ref> Such low rates, outpaced by the [[inflation]] rate, occur when the market believes that there are no alternatives with sufficiently low risk, or when popular institutional investments such as insurance companies, [[pension]]s, or bond, money market, and balanced [[mutual fund]]s are required or choose to invest sufficiently large sums in Treasury securities to hedge against risk.<ref name="liquidation" /><ref>David Wessel (August 8, 2012) [https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390444900304577577192417116440 "When Interest Rates Turn Upside Down"] ''The Wall Street Journal'' ([http://www.htisec.com/en/research/shownews.jsp?newsType=DJ&newsid=c-20120808DN019794 full text] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130120020448/http://www.htisec.com/en/research/shownews.jsp?newsType=DJ&newsid=c-20120808DN019794 |date=January 20, 2013}})</ref> American economist [[Lawrence Summers]] argues that at such low rates, government debt borrowing saves taxpayer money, and improves creditworthiness.<ref>Lawrence Summers (June 3, 2012) [https://web.archive.org/web/20120605042224/http://blogs.reuters.com/lawrencesummers/2012/06/03/breaking-the-negative-feedback-loop/ "Breaking the negative feedback loop"] ''Reuters''</ref> |
||
In the late 1940s through the early 1970s, the US and UK both reduced their debt burden by about 30% to 40% of GDP per decade by taking advantage of negative real interest rates, but there is no guarantee that government debt rates will continue to stay so low.<ref name="liquidation">Carmen M. Reinhart and M. Belen Sbrancia (March 2011) [http://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2011/res2/pdf/crbs.pdf "The Liquidation of Government Debt"] National Bureau of Economic Research working paper No. 16893</ref><ref>William H. Gross (May 2, 2011) [http://www.pimco.com/EN/insights/pages/the-caine-mutiny-part-2.aspx "The Caine Mutiny (Part 2)"] ''PIMCO Investment Outlook''</ref> In January 2012, the U.S. Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association unanimously recommended that government debt be allowed to auction even lower, at negative absolute interest rates.<ref>U.S. Treasury (January 31, 2012) [http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/tg1404.aspx "Minutes of the Meeting of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association"]</ref> |
In the late 1940s through the early 1970s, the US and UK both reduced their debt burden by about 30% to 40% of GDP per decade by taking advantage of negative real interest rates, but there is no guarantee that government debt rates will continue to stay so low.<ref name="liquidation">Carmen M. Reinhart and M. Belen Sbrancia (March 2011) [http://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2011/res2/pdf/crbs.pdf "The Liquidation of Government Debt"] National Bureau of Economic Research working paper No. 16893</ref><ref>William H. Gross (May 2, 2011) [http://www.pimco.com/EN/insights/pages/the-caine-mutiny-part-2.aspx "The Caine Mutiny (Part 2)"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121013181717/http://www.pimco.com/EN/Insights/Pages/The-Caine-Mutiny-Part-2.aspx |date=October 13, 2012 }} ''PIMCO Investment Outlook''</ref> In January 2012, the U.S. Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association unanimously recommended that government debt be allowed to auction even lower, at negative absolute interest rates.<ref>U.S. Treasury (January 31, 2012) [http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/tg1404.aspx "Minutes of the Meeting of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association"]</ref> |
||
==Currency and central bank== |
==Currency and central bank== |
||
{{Main|United States dollar|Federal Reserve}} |
{{Main|United States dollar|Federal Reserve}} |
||
[[File:Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building.jpg|thumb|right|The [[Federal Reserve]] is the central banking system of the United States]] |
[[File:Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building.jpg|thumb|right|The [[Federal Reserve]] is the central banking system of the United States.]] |
||
The United States dollar is the unit of currency of the United States. The U.S. dollar is the currency most used in international transactions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.federalreserve.gov/pf/pdf/pf_4.pdf |title=The Implementation of Monetary Policy – The Federal Reserve in the International Sphere |access-date=April 21, 2012}}</ref> Several countries [[Dollarization|use it as their official currency]], and in many others it is the [[de facto currency]].<ref>Benjamin J. Cohen, ''The Future of Money'', Princeton University Press, 2006, {{ISBN|0691116660}}; ''cf.'' "the dollar is the de facto currency in Cambodia", Charles Agar, ''Frommer's Vietnam'', 2006, {{ISBN|0471798169}}, p. 17</ref> |
The United States dollar is the unit of currency of the United States. The U.S. dollar is the currency most used in international transactions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.federalreserve.gov/pf/pdf/pf_4.pdf |title=The Implementation of Monetary Policy – The Federal Reserve in the International Sphere |access-date=April 21, 2012}}</ref> Several countries [[Dollarization|use it as their official currency]], and in many others it is the [[de facto currency]].<ref>Benjamin J. Cohen, ''The Future of Money'', Princeton University Press, 2006, {{ISBN|0691116660}}; ''cf.'' "the dollar is the de facto currency in Cambodia", Charles Agar, ''Frommer's Vietnam'', 2006, {{ISBN|0471798169}}, p. 17</ref> |
||
The federal government attempts to use both [[monetary policy]] (control of the money supply through mechanisms such as changes in interest rates) and [[fiscal policy]] (taxes and spending) to maintain low inflation, high economic growth, and low unemployment. |
The federal government attempts to use both [[monetary policy]] (control of the money supply through mechanisms such as changes in interest rates) and [[fiscal policy]] (taxes and spending) to maintain low inflation, high economic growth, and low unemployment. An independent [[central bank]], known as the [[Federal Reserve]], was formed in 1913 to provide a stable currency and [[monetary policy]]. The U.S. dollar has been regarded as one of the more stable currencies in the world and many nations back their own currency with U.S. dollar reserves.<ref name="federalreserve.gov" /><ref name="Benjamin J. Cohen 2006, p. 17" /> |
||
The U.S. dollar has maintained its position as the world's primary reserve currency, although it is gradually being challenged in that role.<ref>"[https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/stephanieflanders/2009/01/biggest_game_in_town.html Biggest game in town]". BBC News. January 29, 2009.</ref> Almost two thirds of currency reserves held around the world are held in U.S. dollars, compared to around 25% for the next most popular currency, the [[euro]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/cofer/eng/cofer.pdf |title=Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER) – June 30, 2011 |access-date=April 21, 2012}}</ref> Rising U.S. national debt and [[quantitative easing]] has caused some to predict that the U.S. dollar will lose its status as the world's reserve currency; however, these predictions have not come to fruition.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://money.cnn.com/2011/02/10/markets/dollar/index.htm | title=IMF calls for dollar alternative | publisher=CNN |date=February 10, 2011 |access-date=March 28, 2012 | author=Rooney, Ben}}</ref> |
The U.S. dollar has maintained its position as the world's primary reserve currency, although it is gradually being challenged in that role.<ref>"[https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/stephanieflanders/2009/01/biggest_game_in_town.html Biggest game in town]". BBC News. January 29, 2009.</ref> Almost two thirds of currency reserves held around the world are held in U.S. dollars, compared to around 25% for the next most popular currency, the [[euro]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/cofer/eng/cofer.pdf |title=Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER) – June 30, 2011 |access-date=April 21, 2012}}</ref> Rising U.S. national debt and [[quantitative easing]] has caused some to predict that the U.S. dollar will lose its status as the world's reserve currency; however, these predictions have not yet come to fruition.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://money.cnn.com/2011/02/10/markets/dollar/index.htm | title=IMF calls for dollar alternative | publisher=CNN |date=February 10, 2011 |access-date=March 28, 2012 | author=Rooney, Ben}}</ref> |
||
==Climate change== |
|||
{{excerpt|Climate change in the United States|Socioeconomic impacts}} |
|||
==Corruption== |
==Corruption== |
||
{{Main|Corruption in the United States}} |
{{Main|Corruption in the United States}} |
||
In 2019, the United States was ranked 23rd on the [[Transparency International]] [[Corruption Perceptions Index]] with a score of 69 out of 100.<ref>{{ |
In 2019, the United States was ranked 23rd on the [[Transparency International]] [[Corruption Perceptions Index]] with a score of 69 out of 100.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.transparency.org/cpi2019|title=2019 - Cpi|date=January 24, 2020|access-date=April 18, 2020|archive-date=March 27, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200327160133/https://www.transparency.org/cpi2019|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
This is a decrease from its score in 2018 which was 71 out of 100.<ref>{{ |
This is a decrease from its score in 2018 which was 71 out of 100.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.transparency.org/cpi2018|title=2018 - Cpi|date=January 29, 2019|access-date=April 19, 2020|archive-date=April 27, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190427092026/https://www.transparency.org/cpi2018|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
==Law and government== |
==Law and government== |
||
The United States ranked 4th in the [[ease of doing business index]] in 2012, 18th in the [[Economic Freedom of the World]] index by the [[Fraser Institute]] in 2012, 10th in the [[Index of Economic Freedom]] by ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' and [[The Heritage Foundation]] in 2012, 15th in the 2014 [[Global Enabling Trade Report]],<ref>{{cite web|title=Enabling Trade Index 2014|url=http://widgets.weforum.org/global-enabling-trade-report-2014/|website=World Economic Forum}}</ref> and 3rd on the [[Global Competitiveness Report]].<ref>{{cite web|title=2014 Global Competitiveness Report|url=http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2014-15.pdf}}</ref> |
The United States ranked 4th in the [[ease of doing business index]] in 2012, 18th in the [[Economic Freedom of the World]] index by the [[Fraser Institute]] in 2012, 10th in the [[Index of Economic Freedom]] by ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' and [[The Heritage Foundation]] in 2012, 15th in the 2014 [[Global Enabling Trade Report]],<ref>{{cite web|title=Enabling Trade Index 2014|url=http://widgets.weforum.org/global-enabling-trade-report-2014/|website=World Economic Forum}}</ref> and 3rd on the [[Global Competitiveness Report]].<ref>{{cite web|title=2014 Global Competitiveness Report|url=http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2014-15.pdf}}</ref> |
||
According to the 2014 [[Index of Economic Freedom]], released by ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' and [[The Heritage Foundation]], the U.S. has dropped out of the top ten most economically free countries. The U.S. has been on a steady seven-year economic freedom decline and is the only country to do so.<ref name="US economic freedom">{{cite web|title=2014 Index of Economic Freedom – United States|url=http://www.heritage.org/index/country/unitedstates|publisher=Heritage Foundation|access-date=January 14, 2014}}</ref> The index measures each nation's commitment to free enterprise on a scale of 0 to 100. Countries losing economic freedom and receiving low index scores are at risk of economic stagnation, high unemployment rates, and diminishing social conditions.<ref name="wsj miller">{{cite news|last=Terry|first=Miller|title=America's Dwindling Economic Freedom Regulation, taxes and debt knock the U.S. out of the world's top 10|url=https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303848104579308811265028066?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702303848104579308811265028066.html|access-date=January 14, 2014|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|date=January 13, 2014}}</ref><ref name="Index of economic freedom">{{cite web|title=2014 Index of Economic Freedom|url=http://www.heritage.org/index/ranking|publisher=Heritage Foundation|access-date=January 14, 2014}}</ref> The 2014 Index of Economic Freedom gave the United States a score of 75.5 and is listed as the twelfth-freest economy in world. It dropped two rankings and its score is half a point lower than in 2013.<ref name="US economic freedom" /> |
According to the 2014 [[Index of Economic Freedom]], released by ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' and [[The Heritage Foundation]], the U.S. has dropped out of the top ten most economically free countries. The U.S. has been on a steady seven-year economic freedom decline and is the only country to do so.<ref name="US economic freedom">{{cite web|title=2014 Index of Economic Freedom – United States|url=http://www.heritage.org/index/country/unitedstates|publisher=Heritage Foundation|access-date=January 14, 2014|archive-date=March 20, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120320134206/http://www.heritage.org/index/country/unitedstates|url-status=dead}}</ref> The index measures each nation's commitment to free enterprise on a scale of 0 to 100. Countries losing economic freedom and receiving low index scores are at risk of economic stagnation, high unemployment rates, and diminishing social conditions.<ref name="wsj miller">{{cite news|last=Terry|first=Miller|title=America's Dwindling Economic Freedom Regulation, taxes and debt knock the U.S. out of the world's top 10|url=https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303848104579308811265028066?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702303848104579308811265028066.html|access-date=January 14, 2014|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|date=January 13, 2014}}</ref><ref name="Index of economic freedom">{{cite web|title=2014 Index of Economic Freedom|url=http://www.heritage.org/index/ranking|publisher=Heritage Foundation|access-date=January 14, 2014|archive-date=November 17, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101117114939/http://www.heritage.org/Index/ranking|url-status=dead}}</ref> The 2014 Index of Economic Freedom gave the United States a score of 75.5 and is listed as the twelfth-freest economy in world. It dropped two rankings and its score is half a point lower than in 2013.<ref name="US economic freedom" /> |
||
Economist [[Alan S. Blinder]] criticizes democratic government regulation of the U.S. economy as too short-sighted (targeting either the next election or the next news cycle rather than making difficult choices that favor long-term benefits despite short-term pain) and favoring policies that sound good and avoiding those that sound bad, regardless of merit when examined rigorously by economists.<ref>{{cite book |title=Advice and Dissent: Why America Suffers When Economics and Politics Collide |author=Alan S. Blinder |publisher=Basic Books |year=2018 |isbn=978-0465094172}}</ref> |
|||
===Regulations=== |
===Regulations=== |
||
{{Main|United States administrative law}} |
{{Main|United States administrative law}} |
||
[[File:BankingCrises.svg|thumb|Number of countries having a banking crisis in each year since 1800. This is based on ''This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.reinhartandrogoff.com|title=This Time is Different | |
[[File:BankingCrises.svg|thumb|Number of countries having a banking crisis in each year since 1800. This is based on ''This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly''<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.reinhartandrogoff.com/|title=This Time is Different |author1=Carmen M. Reinhart|author2=Kenneth S. Rogoff|publisher=Anchor Media Works|website=reinhartandrogoff.com}}</ref> which covers only seventy countries. The general upward trend might be attributed to many factors. One of these is a gradual increase in the percent of people who receive money for their labor. The dramatic feature of this graph is the virtual absence of banking crises during the period of the [[Bretton Woods agreement]], 1945 to 1971. This analysis is similar to Figure 10.1 in Reinhart and Rogoff (2009). For more details see the help file for "bankingCrises" in the Ecdat package available from the [[R (programming language)|Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).]] ]] |
||
The [[Federal government of the United States|U.S. federal government]] regulates private enterprise in numerous ways. Regulation falls into two general categories. |
The [[Federal government of the United States|U.S. federal government]] regulates private enterprise in numerous ways. Regulation falls into two general categories. |
||
Some efforts seek, either directly or indirectly, to control prices. Traditionally, the government has sought to create state-regulated [[monopoly|monopolies]] such as electric utilities while allowing prices in the level that would ensure them normal profits. At times, the government has extended economic control to other kinds of industries as well. In the years following the Great Depression, it devised a complex system to stabilize prices for agricultural goods, which tend to fluctuate wildly in response to rapidly changing supply and demand. A number of other |
Some efforts seek, either directly or indirectly, to control prices. Traditionally, the government has sought to create state-regulated [[monopoly|monopolies]] such as electric utilities while allowing prices in the level that would ensure them normal profits. At times, the government has extended economic control to other kinds of industries as well. In the years following the Great Depression, it devised a complex system to stabilize prices for agricultural goods, which tend to fluctuate wildly in response to rapidly changing supply and demand. A number of other industries—trucking and, later, airlines—successfully sought regulation themselves to limit what they considered as harmful price-cutting, a process called [[regulatory capture]].<ref name="ReferenceA">Regulation and Control in the U.S. Economy: About.com</ref> |
||
Another form of economic regulation, [[Competition law|antitrust law]], seeks to strengthen market forces so that direct regulation is unnecessary. The |
Another form of economic regulation, [[Competition law|antitrust law]], seeks to strengthen market forces so that direct regulation is unnecessary. The government—and, sometimes, private parties—have used antitrust law to prohibit practices or mergers that would unduly limit competition.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> |
||
[[Bank regulation in the United States]] is highly fragmented compared to other [[Group of Ten (economic)|G10]] countries where most countries have only one bank regulator. In the U.S., banking is regulated at both the federal and state level. The U.S. also has one of the most highly regulated banking environments in the world; however, many of the regulations are not soundness related, but are instead focused on privacy, disclosure, fraud prevention, anti-money laundering, anti-terrorism, anti-[[usury]] lending, and promoting lending to lower-income segments. |
[[Bank regulation in the United States]] is highly fragmented compared to other [[Group of Ten (economic)|G10]] countries where most countries have only one bank regulator. In the U.S., banking is regulated at both the federal and state level. The U.S. also has one of the most highly regulated banking environments in the world; however, many of the regulations are not soundness related, but are instead focused on privacy, disclosure, fraud prevention, anti-money laundering, anti-terrorism, anti-[[usury]] lending, and promoting lending to lower-income segments. |
||
Line 1,015: | Line 1,173: | ||
American attitudes about regulation changed substantially during the final three decades of the 20th century. Beginning in the 1970s, policy makers grew increasingly convinced that economic regulation protected companies at the expense of consumers in industries such as airlines and trucking. At the same time, technological changes spawned new competitors in some industries, such as telecommunications, that once were considered natural monopolies. Both developments led to a succession of laws easing regulation.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> |
American attitudes about regulation changed substantially during the final three decades of the 20th century. Beginning in the 1970s, policy makers grew increasingly convinced that economic regulation protected companies at the expense of consumers in industries such as airlines and trucking. At the same time, technological changes spawned new competitors in some industries, such as telecommunications, that once were considered natural monopolies. Both developments led to a succession of laws easing regulation.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> |
||
While leaders of America's two most influential political parties generally favored economic [[deregulation]] during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, there was less agreement concerning regulations designed to achieve social goals. Social regulation had assumed growing importance in the years following the Depression and World War II, and again in the 1960s and 1970s. During the 1980s, the government relaxed labor, consumer and environmental rules based on the idea that such regulation interfered with [[free enterprise]], increased the costs of doing business, and thus contributed to inflation. The response to such changes is mixed; many Americans continued to voice concerns about specific events or trends, prompting the government to issue new regulations in some areas, including environmental protection.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> |
While leaders of America's two most influential political parties generally favored economic [[deregulation]] during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, there was less agreement concerning regulations designed to achieve social goals. Social regulation had assumed growing importance in the years following the Depression and World War II, and again in the 1960s and 1970s. During the 1980s, the government relaxed labor, consumer and [[Environmental policy of the United States|environmental rules]] based on the idea that such regulation interfered with [[free enterprise]], increased the costs of doing business, and thus contributed to inflation. The response to such changes is mixed; many Americans continued to voice concerns about specific events or trends, prompting the government to issue new regulations in some areas, including environmental protection.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> |
||
Where legislative channels have been unresponsive, some citizens have turned to the courts to address social issues more quickly. For instance, in the 1990s, individuals, and eventually the government itself, sued tobacco companies over the health risks of cigarette smoking. The 1998 [[Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement]] provided states with long-term payments to cover medical costs to treat smoking-related illnesses.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> |
Where legislative channels have been unresponsive, some citizens have turned to the courts to address social issues more quickly. For instance, in the 1990s, individuals, and eventually the government itself, sued tobacco companies over the health risks of cigarette smoking. The 1998 [[Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement]] provided states with long-term payments to cover medical costs to treat smoking-related illnesses.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> |
||
Between 2000 and 2008, economic regulation in the United States saw the most rapid expansion since the early 1970s. The number of new pages in the Federal Registry, a proxy for economic regulation, rose from 64,438 new pages in 2001 to 78,090 in new pages in 2007, a record amount of regulation. Economically significant regulations, defined as regulations which cost more than $100{{ |
Between 2000 and 2008, economic regulation in the United States saw the most rapid expansion since the early 1970s. The number of new pages in the Federal Registry, a proxy for economic regulation, rose from 64,438 new pages in 2001 to 78,090 in new pages in 2007, a record amount of regulation. Economically significant regulations, defined as regulations which cost more than $100{{spaces}}million a year, increased by 70%. Spending on regulation increased by 62% from $26.4{{spaces}}billion to $42.7{{spaces}}billion.<ref name="bushregulation">{{cite magazine|title=Bush's Regulatory Kiss-Off – Obama's assertions to the contrary, the 43rd president was the biggest regulator since Nixon|url=http://www.reason.com/news/show/130328.html|magazine=Reason magazine|date=January 2009|access-date=February 12, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090902085717/http://www.reason.com/news/show/130328.html|archive-date=September 2, 2009|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
===Taxation=== |
===Taxation=== |
||
Line 1,026: | Line 1,184: | ||
[[Taxation in the United States]] is a complex system which may involve payment to at least four different levels of government and many methods of taxation. Taxes are levied by the [[Federal government of the United States|federal government]], by the [[State governments of the United States|state governments]], and often by [[Local government in the United States|local governments]], which may include [[Counties of the United States|counties]], municipalities, [[Township (United States)|township]], [[school district]]s, and other [[Special district (United States)|special-purpose districts]], which include fire, utility, and transit districts.<ref>{{cite news |title=America's Aversion to Taxes |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/15/business/economy/slipping-behind-because-of-an-aversion-to-taxes.html?_r=1&src=recg |quote=In 1965, taxes collected by federal, state and municipal governments amounted to 24.7 percent of the nation's output. In 2010, they amounted to 24.8 percent. Excluding Chile and Mexico, the United States raises less tax revenue, as a share of the economy, than every other industrial country. |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |date=August 14, 2012 |access-date=August 15, 2012 |first=Eduardo |last=Porter}}</ref> |
[[Taxation in the United States]] is a complex system which may involve payment to at least four different levels of government and many methods of taxation. Taxes are levied by the [[Federal government of the United States|federal government]], by the [[State governments of the United States|state governments]], and often by [[Local government in the United States|local governments]], which may include [[Counties of the United States|counties]], municipalities, [[Township (United States)|township]], [[school district]]s, and other [[Special district (United States)|special-purpose districts]], which include fire, utility, and transit districts.<ref>{{cite news |title=America's Aversion to Taxes |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/15/business/economy/slipping-behind-because-of-an-aversion-to-taxes.html?_r=1&src=recg |quote=In 1965, taxes collected by federal, state and municipal governments amounted to 24.7 percent of the nation's output. In 2010, they amounted to 24.8 percent. Excluding Chile and Mexico, the United States raises less tax revenue, as a share of the economy, than every other industrial country. |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |date=August 14, 2012 |access-date=August 15, 2012 |first=Eduardo |last=Porter}}</ref> |
||
Forms of taxation include taxes on [[Income tax in the United States|income]], [[Property tax in the United States|property]], [[Sales tax in the United States|sales]], imports, payroll, estates and gifts, as well as various fees. When taxation by all government levels taken into consideration, the [[List of countries by tax revenue as percentage of GDP|total taxation as percentage of GDP]] was approximately a quarter of GDP in 2011.<ref>{{ |
Forms of taxation include taxes on [[Income tax in the United States|income]], [[Property tax in the United States|property]], [[Sales tax in the United States|sales]], imports, payroll, estates and gifts, as well as various fees. When taxation by all government levels taken into consideration, the [[List of countries by tax revenue as percentage of GDP|total taxation as percentage of GDP]] was approximately a quarter of GDP in 2011.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.heritage.org/index/country/unitedstates |title=Index of Economic Freedom: United States |publisher=Index of Economic Freedom |access-date=February 12, 2012 |archive-date=March 20, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120320134206/http://www.heritage.org/index/country/unitedstates |url-status=dead }}</ref> Share of [[black market]] in the U.S. economy is very low compared to other countries.<ref name="Trans-Atlantic Comparisons 3-2">{{cite news |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,628389-2,00.html |work=Der Spiegel |title=Is the US Really a Nation of God-Fearing Darwin-Haters? |date=June 6, 2009}}</ref> |
||
Although a federal [[wealth tax]] is prohibited by the [[United States Constitution]] unless the receipts are distributed to the States by their populations, state and local government property tax amount to a wealth tax on [[real estate]], and because [[Capital gains tax in the United States|capital gains]] are taxed on nominal instead of inflation-adjusted profits, the capital gains tax amounts to a wealth tax on the inflation rate.<ref name=YglesiasWealth>{{cite news|last=Yglesias|first=Matthew|title=America Does Tax Wealth, Just Not Very Intelligently|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/03/06/america_s_wealth_tax_it_s_called_property_taxes_and_they_re_not_very_smart.html|access-date=March 18, 2013|newspaper=Slate|date=March 6, 2013}}</ref> |
Although a federal [[wealth tax]] is prohibited by the [[United States Constitution]] unless the receipts are distributed to the States by their populations, state and local government property tax amount to a wealth tax on [[real estate]], and because [[Capital gains tax in the United States|capital gains]] are taxed on nominal instead of inflation-adjusted profits, the capital gains tax amounts to a wealth tax on the inflation rate.<ref name=YglesiasWealth>{{cite news|last=Yglesias|first=Matthew|title=America Does Tax Wealth, Just Not Very Intelligently|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/03/06/america_s_wealth_tax_it_s_called_property_taxes_and_they_re_not_very_smart.html|access-date=March 18, 2013|newspaper=Slate|date=March 6, 2013}}</ref> |
||
U.S. taxation is generally [[Progressive tax|progressive]], especially at the federal level, and is among the most progressive in the developed world.<ref name="CBO 2010" /><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Prasad |first1=M. |last2=Deng|first2= Y. |title=Taxation and the worlds of welfare |journal= Socio-Economic Review |date=April 2, 2009 |volume=7 |issue=3 |pages=431–57 |doi= 10.1093/ser/mwp005 |url=http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/480.pdf}}</ref><ref name=Dylan47>{{cite news |last=Matthews |first=Dylan |title=Other countries don't have a "47%" |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/09/19/other-countries-dont-have-a-47/ | |
U.S. taxation is generally [[Progressive tax|progressive]], especially at the federal level, and is among the most progressive in the developed world.<ref name = "CBO 2010">{{cite web|url=http://cbo.gov/publication/44604|title=The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2010|publisher=The US Congressional Budget Office (CBO)|date=December 4, 2013|access-date=August 13, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Prasad |first1=M. |last2=Deng|first2= Y. |title=Taxation and the worlds of welfare |journal= Socio-Economic Review |date=April 2, 2009 |volume=7 |issue=3 |pages=431–57 |doi= 10.1093/ser/mwp005 |url=http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/480.pdf}}</ref><ref name=Dylan47>{{cite news |last=Matthews |first=Dylan |title=Other countries don't have a "47%" |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/09/19/other-countries-dont-have-a-47/ |newspaper=The Washington Post |access-date=October 29, 2013 |date=September 19, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Stephen |first=Ohlemacher |title=Tax bills for rich families approach 30-year high |url= http://seattletimes.com/html/politics/2020475301_apustaxingtherich.html|access-date=April 3, 2013|newspaper=The Seattle Times |agency=Associated Press |date=March 3, 2013}}</ref> There is debate over whether taxes should be more or less progressive.<ref name=YglesiasWealth /><ref name=BairParity>{{cite news|last=Bair|first=Sheila|title=Grand Old Parity|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/27/opinion/republicans-must-bridge-the-income-gap.html|access-date=March 18, 2013|newspaper=The New York Times|date=February 26, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Hodge|first1=Scott A.|title=The Case for a Single-Rate Tax: Why Our Progressive Tax Code is Inconsistent with the Changing Face of American Taxpayers|url=http://taxfoundation.org/article/case-single-rate-tax-why-our-progressive-tax-code-inconsistent-changing-face-american-taxpayers|publisher=Tax Foundation|access-date=August 13, 2014|date=April 29, 2005|archive-date=December 22, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222115717/http://taxfoundation.org/article/case-single-rate-tax-why-our-progressive-tax-code-inconsistent-changing-face-american-taxpayers|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Frank|first1=Robert|title=The Price of Taxing the Rich: The top 1% of earners fill the coffers of states like California and New York during a boom – and leave them starved for revenue in a bust|url=https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704604704576220491592684626|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|access-date=August 13, 2014|date=March 26, 2011}}</ref> |
||
According to the [[Tax Justice Network]] in 2022, the US fuels more global [[Financial Secrecy Index|financial secrecy]] than [[Banking in Switzerland|Switzerland]], Cayman and Bermuda combined.<ref name="SWI swissinfo.ch 2022">{{cite web | title=Switzerland ranked second-worst global facilitator of tax avoidance | website=SWI swissinfo.ch | date=May 18, 2022 | url=https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/business/switzerland-ranked-second-worst-global-facilitator-of-tax-avoidance/47603522 | access-date=June 28, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
===Expenditure=== |
===Expenditure=== |
||
{{Main|United States federal budget|Government spending in the United States|National debt of the United States}} |
{{Main|United States federal budget|Government spending in the United States|National debt of the United States}} |
||
{{See also|Social programs in the United States|Social Security (United States)}} |
|||
[[File:2020 US Federal Budget Infographic.png|thumb|400px|right|CBO: U.S. Federal spending and revenue components for fiscal year 2020. Major expenditure categories are healthcare, Social Security, and defense; income and payroll taxes are the primary revenue sources.]] |
|||
[[File:CBO Deficit - Baseline Comparison - April 2018.png|thumb|right|350px|Congressional Budget Office (CBO) baseline scenario comparisons: June 2017 (essentially the deficit trajectory that President Trump inherited from President Obama), April 2018 (which reflects Trump's tax cuts and spending bills), and April 2018 alternate scenario (which assumes extension of the Trump tax cuts, among other current policy extensions).<ref name="CBO_BOE2018">{{cite web| url = https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53651| title = CBO Budget and Economic Outlook 2018–2028}}</ref>]] |
[[File:2023 US Federal Budget Infographic.png|thumb|400px|right|CBO: U.S. Federal spending and revenue components for fiscal year 2023. Major expenditure categories are healthcare, Social Security, and defense; income and payroll taxes are the primary revenue sources.]] |
||
[[File:CBO Deficit - Baseline Comparison - April 2018.png|thumb|right|350px|Congressional Budget Office (CBO) baseline scenario comparisons: June 2017 (essentially the deficit trajectory that President Trump inherited from President Obama), April 2018 (which reflects Trump's tax cuts and spending bills), and April 2018 alternate scenario (which assumes extension of the Trump tax cuts, among other current policy extensions).<ref name="CBO_BOE2018">{{cite web| url = https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53651| title = CBO Budget and Economic Outlook 2018–2028| date = April 9, 2018}}</ref>]] |
|||
The United States public-sector spending amounts to about 38% of GDP (federal is around 21%, state and local the remainder).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https:// |
The United States public-sector spending amounts to about 38% of GDP (federal is around 21%, state and local the remainder).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/general-government-spending.html|title=General government spending|website=OECD}}</ref> Each level of government provides many direct services. The federal government, for example, is responsible for national defense, research that often leads to the development of new products, conducts space exploration, and runs numerous programs designed to help workers develop workplace skills and find jobs (including higher education). Government spending has a significant effect on local and regional economies, and on the overall pace of economic activity. |
||
[[Politics of the United States|State governments]], meanwhile, are responsible for the construction and maintenance of most highways. State, county, or city governments play the leading role in financing and operating public schools. Local governments are primarily responsible for police and fire protection. In 2016, U.S. state and local governments owed $3{{ |
[[Politics of the United States|State governments]], meanwhile, are responsible for the construction and maintenance of most highways. State, county, or city governments play the leading role in financing and operating public schools. Local governments are primarily responsible for police and fire protection. In 2016, U.S. state and local governments owed $3{{spaces}}trillion and have another $5{{spaces}}trillion in unfunded liabilities.<ref>{{cite news |title=Debt Myths, Debunked |url=https://www.usnews.com/opinion/economic-intelligence/articles/2016-12-01/myths-and-facts-about-the-us-federal-debt |work=U.S. News |date=December 1, 2016}}</ref> |
||
The [[United States welfare state|welfare system in the United States]] began in the 1930s, during the Great Depression, with the passage of the [[New Deal]]. The welfare system was later expanded in the 1960s through [[Great Society]] legislation, which included [[Medicare (United States)|Medicare]], [[Medicaid]], the [[Older Americans Act]] and federal education funding. |
The [[United States welfare state|welfare system in the United States]] began in the 1930s, during the Great Depression, with the passage of the [[New Deal]]. The welfare system was later expanded in the 1960s through [[Great Society]] legislation, which included [[Medicare (United States)|Medicare]], [[Medicaid]], the [[Older Americans Act]] and federal education funding. |
||
Overall, federal, state, and local spending accounted for almost 28% of gross domestic product in 1998.<ref>{{ |
Overall, federal, state, and local spending accounted for almost 28% of gross domestic product in 1998.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy01/guide01.html|title=U.S. Budget 2001|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120112170429/http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy01/guide01.html|archive-date=January 12, 2012}}</ref> |
||
===Federal budget and debt=== |
===Federal budget and debt=== |
||
{{Further|United States federal budget}} |
{{Further|United States federal budget}} |
||
During FY2017, the federal government spent $3.98{{ |
During FY2017, the federal government spent $3.98{{spaces}}trillion on a budget or cash basis, up $128{{spaces}}billion or 3.3% vs. FY2016 spending of $3.85{{spaces}}trillion. Major categories of FY 2017 spending included: Healthcare such as Medicare and Medicaid ($1,077B or 27% of spending), Social Security ($939B or 24%), non-defense discretionary spending used to run federal Departments and Agencies ($610B or 15%), Defense Department ($590B or 15%), and interest ($263B or 7%).<ref name="CBO_BOE2018" /> |
||
During FY2017, the federal government collected approximately $3.32{{ |
During FY2017, the federal government collected approximately $3.32{{spaces}}trillion in tax revenue, up $48{{spaces}}billion or 1.5% versus FY2016. Primary receipt categories included individual income taxes ($1,587{{spaces}}billion or 48% of total receipts), Social Security/Social Insurance taxes ($1,162{{spaces}}billion or 35%), and corporate taxes ($297{{spaces}}billion or 9%). Other revenue types included excise, estate and gift taxes. FY 2017 revenues were 17.3% of [[gross domestic product]] (GDP), versus 17.7% in FY 2016. Tax revenues averaged approximately 17.4% GDP over the 1980–2017 period.<ref name="CBO_BOE2018" /> |
||
The federal budget deficit (i.e., expenses greater than revenues) was $665{{ |
The federal budget deficit (i.e., expenses greater than revenues) was $665{{spaces}}billion in FY2017, versus $585{{spaces}}billion in 2016, an increase of $80{{spaces}}billion or 14%. The budget deficit was 3.5% GDP in 2017, versus 3.2% GDP in 2016. The budget deficit is forecast to rise to $804{{spaces}}billion in FY 2018, due significantly to the [[Tax Cuts and Jobs Act]] and other spending bills. An aging country and healthcare inflation are other drivers of deficits and debt over the long-run.<ref name="CBO_BOE2018" /> |
||
Debt held by the public, a measure of national debt, was approximately $14.7{{ |
Debt held by the public, a measure of national debt, was approximately $14.7{{spaces}}trillion or 77% of GDP in 2017, ranked the 43rd highest out of 207 countries.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2186rank.html#us| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070613005546/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2186rank.html#us| url-status = dead| archive-date = June 13, 2007| title = CIA World Factbook-Debt to GDP}}</ref> This debt, as a percent of GDP, is roughly equivalent to those of many western European nations.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/is-rising-u-s-debt-inviting-trouble-ask-japan/19469343/|access-date=May 18, 2010|title=Is Rising U.S. Debt Inviting Trouble? Ask Japan|publisher=Daily Finance|first=Vishesh|last=Kumar}}</ref> |
||
==Business culture== |
==Business culture== |
||
A central feature of the U.S. economy is the economic freedom afforded to the private sector by allowing the private sector to make the majority of economic decisions in determining the direction and scale of what the U.S. economy produces. This is enhanced by relatively low levels of regulation and government involvement,<ref>{{ |
A central feature of the U.S. economy is the economic freedom afforded to the private sector by allowing the private sector to make the majority of economic decisions in determining the direction and scale of what the U.S. economy produces. This is enhanced by relatively low levels of regulation and government involvement,<ref>{{cite web |first=Jack |last=Anderson |url=https://www.forbes.com/global/2006/0522/032.html |title=Tax Misery & Reform Index |work=Forbes |date=May 22, 2006 |access-date=November 17, 2008}}</ref> as well as a court system that generally protects [[Right to property|property rights]] and enforces contracts. Today, the United States is home to 29.6 million small businesses, thirty percent of the world's millionaires, forty percent of the world's billionaires, and 139 of the world's 500 largest companies.<ref name="sba.gov">{{cite web|url=http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/sbfaq.pdf |title=Office of Advocacy – Frequently Asked Questions – How important are small businesses to the U.S. economy? |publisher=SBA.gov |access-date=April 21, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101202170306/http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/sbfaq.pdf |archive-date=December 2, 2010}}</ref><ref name="forbes.com">{{cite news| url=https://www.forbes.com/wealth/billionaires | title=Forbes | date=March 14, 2011}}</ref><ref name="Global 500 2010: Countries">{{cite news| url=https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2010/countries/US.html |publisher=CNN | title=Global 500 2010: Countries}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Extra/WhereTheMillionairesAreNow.aspx |title=Where the millionaires are now |publisher=MSN |date=October 22, 2007 |access-date=April 21, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927143337/http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Extra/WhereTheMillionairesAreNow.aspx |archive-date=September 27, 2011 |url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
[[File:Boeing 787-10 rollout with President Trump (32335755473) (cropped).jpg|thumb|[[Boeing]] CEO [[Dennis Muilenburg]] at the [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner|787-10 Dreamliner]] rollout ceremony]] |
[[File:Boeing 787-10 rollout with President Trump (32335755473) (cropped).jpg|thumb|[[Boeing]] CEO [[Dennis Muilenburg]] at the [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner|787-10 Dreamliner]] rollout ceremony]] |
||
From its emergence as an independent nation, the United States has encouraged science and innovation. In the early 20th century, the research developed through informal cooperation between U.S. industry and academia grew rapidly and by the late 1930s exceeded the size of that taking place in Britain (although the quality of U.S. research was not yet on par with British and German research at the time). After World War II, federal spending on defense R&D and antitrust policy played a significant role in U.S. innovation.<ref>{{cite book|author1=Walker, William|title=National innovation systems : a comparative analysis|date=1993|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0195076172|editor1-last=Nelson|editor1-first=Richard R.|location=New York|pages=61–64|chapter=National Innovation Systems: Britain|ref=Walker1993|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YFDGjgxc2CYC&pg=PA61}}<!--Author profile: https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/intrel/people/index.php/wbw.html--></ref> |
From its emergence as an independent nation, the United States has encouraged science and innovation. In the early 20th century, the research developed through informal cooperation between U.S. industry and academia grew rapidly and by the late 1930s exceeded the size of that taking place in Britain (although the quality of U.S. research was not yet on par with British and German research at the time). After World War II, federal spending on defense R&D and antitrust policy played a significant role in U.S. innovation.<ref>{{cite book|author1=Walker, William|title=National innovation systems : a comparative analysis|date=1993|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0195076172|editor1-last=Nelson|editor1-first=Richard R.|location=New York|pages=61–64|chapter=National Innovation Systems: Britain|ref=Walker1993|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YFDGjgxc2CYC&pg=PA61}}<!--Author profile: https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/intrel/people/index.php/wbw.html--></ref> |
||
The United States is rich in mineral resources and fertile farm soil, and it is fortunate to have a moderate climate. It also has extensive coastlines on both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, as well as on the Gulf of Mexico. Rivers flow from far within the continent and the [[Great Lakes]] (the five large inland lakes along the Canadian border) provide additional shipping access. These extensive waterways have helped shape the country's economic growth over the years and helped bind America's fifty individual states together in a single economic unit.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://usinfo.state.gov/infousa/government/forpolicy/chap2.html| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081114043907/http://usinfo.state.gov/infousa/government/forpolicy/chap2.html| url-status = dead| archive-date = |
The United States is rich in mineral resources and fertile farm soil, and it is fortunate to have a moderate climate. It also has extensive coastlines on both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, as well as on the Gulf of Mexico. Rivers flow from far within the continent and the [[Great Lakes]] (the five large inland lakes along the Canadian border) provide additional shipping access. These extensive waterways have helped shape the country's economic growth over the years and helped bind America's fifty individual states together in a single economic unit.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://usinfo.state.gov/infousa/government/forpolicy/chap2.html| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081114043907/http://usinfo.state.gov/infousa/government/forpolicy/chap2.html| url-status = dead| archive-date = November 14, 2008| title = U.S. Department of state: How the U.S. Economy Works}}</ref> |
||
The number of workers and, more importantly, their productivity help determine the health of the U.S. economy. [[Consumer spending]] in the U.S. rose to about 62% of GDP in 1960, where it stayed until about 1981, and has since risen to 71% in 2013.<ref name=consumerecon /> Throughout its history, the United States has experienced steady growth in the labor force, a phenomenon that is both cause and effect of almost constant economic expansion. Until shortly after World War I, most workers were immigrants from Europe, their immediate descendants, or African Americans who were mostly slaves taken from Africa, or their descendants.<ref>"''[https://books.google.com/books?id=EB29BrnCMm4C&pg=PA280 Trends in International Migration 2002: Continuous Reporting System on Migration]''". Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2003). OECD Publishing. p. 280. {{ISBN|9264199497}}</ref> |
The number of workers and, more importantly, their productivity help determine the health of the U.S. economy. [[Consumer spending]] in the U.S. rose to about 62% of GDP in 1960, where it stayed until about 1981, and has since risen to 71% in 2013.<ref name=consumerecon /> Throughout its history, the United States has experienced steady growth in the labor force, a phenomenon that is both cause and effect of almost constant economic expansion. Until shortly after World War I, most workers were immigrants from Europe, their immediate descendants, or African Americans who were mostly slaves taken from Africa, or their descendants.<ref>"''[https://books.google.com/books?id=EB29BrnCMm4C&pg=PA280 Trends in International Migration 2002: Continuous Reporting System on Migration]''". Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2003). OECD Publishing. p. 280. {{ISBN|9264199497}}</ref> |
||
Line 1,067: | Line 1,228: | ||
==Demographic shift== |
==Demographic shift== |
||
{{See also|Demographics of the United States}} |
{{See also|Demographics of the United States}} |
||
Beginning in the late 20th century, many Latin Americans immigrated, followed by large numbers of Asians after the removal of nation-origin based [[Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965|immigration quotas]].<ref>{{ |
Beginning in the late 20th century, many Latin Americans immigrated, followed by large numbers of Asians after the removal of nation-origin based [[Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965|immigration quotas]].<ref>{{cite web |
||
|url=https://www.boston.com:80/news/politics/2008/articles/2008/11/11/obama_victory_took_root_in_kennedy_inspired_immigration_act/?page=full |
|url=https://www.boston.com:80/news/politics/2008/articles/2008/11/11/obama_victory_took_root_in_kennedy_inspired_immigration_act/?page=full |
||
|title=Obama victory took root in Kennedy-inspired Immigration Act |
|title=Obama victory took root in Kennedy-inspired Immigration Act |
||
Line 1,078: | Line 1,239: | ||
Labor mobility has also been important to the capacity of the American economy to adapt to changing conditions. When immigrants flooded labor markets on the East Coast, many workers moved inland, often to farmland waiting to be tilled. Similarly, economic opportunities in industrial, northern cities attracted black Americans from [[Southern United States|southern]] farms in the first half of the 20th century, in what was known as the [[Great Migration (African American)|Great Migration]]. |
Labor mobility has also been important to the capacity of the American economy to adapt to changing conditions. When immigrants flooded labor markets on the East Coast, many workers moved inland, often to farmland waiting to be tilled. Similarly, economic opportunities in industrial, northern cities attracted black Americans from [[Southern United States|southern]] farms in the first half of the 20th century, in what was known as the [[Great Migration (African American)|Great Migration]]. |
||
In the United States, the corporation has emerged as an association of owners, known as stockholders, who form a business enterprise governed by a complex set of rules and customs. Brought on by the process of [[mass production]], corporations, such as [[General Electric]], have been instrumental in shaping the United States |
In the United States, the corporation has emerged as an association of owners, known as stockholders, who form a business enterprise governed by a complex set of rules and customs. Brought on by the process of [[mass production]], corporations, such as [[General Electric]], have been instrumental in shaping the United States. Today in the era of [[globalization]], American investors and corporations have influence all over the world. The American government is also included among the major investors in the American economy. Government investments have been directed towards public works of scale (such as from the [[Hoover Dam]]), military-industrial contracts, and the financial industry. |
||
===Aging=== |
===Aging=== |
||
The U.S. population is aging, which has significant economic implications for GDP growth, productivity, innovation, inequality, and national debt, according to several studies. The average worker in 2019 was aged 42, vs. 38 in 2000. By 2030, about 59% of adults over 16 will be in the labor force, vs. 62% in 2015. One study estimated that aging since 2000 has reduced productivity between 0.25% and 0.7% per year. Since GDP growth is a function of productivity (output per worker) and the number of workers, both trends slow the GDP growth rate. Older workers save more, which pushes interests rates down, offsetting some of the GDP growth reduction but reducing the Federal Reserve's ability to address a recession by lowering interest rates. Means of addressing the aging trend include immigration (which theoretically brings in younger workers) and higher fertility rates, which can be encouraged by incentives to have more children (e.g., tax breaks, subsidies, and more generous paid leave).<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/15/sunday-review/work-age-economy.html?|title=This Economy Is Not Aging Gracefully |last=Porter |first=Eduardo |date=June 15, 2019 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=June 15, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
The U.S. population is [[Aging of the United States|aging]], which has significant economic implications for GDP growth, productivity, innovation, inequality, and national debt, according to several studies. The average worker in 2019 was aged 42, vs. 38 in 2000. By 2030, about 59% of adults over 16 will be in the labor force, vs. 62% in 2015. One study estimated that aging since 2000 has reduced productivity between 0.25% and 0.7% per year. Since GDP growth is a function of productivity (output per worker) and the number of workers, both trends slow the GDP growth rate. Older workers save more, which pushes interests rates down, offsetting some of the GDP growth reduction but reducing the Federal Reserve's ability to address a recession by lowering interest rates. Means of addressing the aging trend include immigration (which theoretically brings in younger workers) and higher fertility rates, which can be encouraged by incentives to have more children (e.g., tax breaks, subsidies, and more generous paid leave).<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/15/sunday-review/work-age-economy.html?|title=This Economy Is Not Aging Gracefully |last=Porter |first=Eduardo |date=June 15, 2019 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=June 15, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Congressional Budget Office]] estimated in May 2019 that mandatory spending (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security) will continue growing relative to the size of the economy (GDP) as the population ages. The population aged 65 or older is projected to rise by one-third from 2019-2029. Mandatory program spending (outlays) in 2019 were 12.7% of GDP and are projected to average 14.4% GDP from 2025-2029.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cbo.gov/publication/55151|title= Updated Budget Projections: 2019 to 2029|date=May 2, 2019 |work=[[Congressional Budget Office]] |access-date=June 15, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Congressional Budget Office]] estimated in May 2019 that mandatory spending (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security) will continue growing relative to the size of the economy (GDP) as the population ages. The population aged 65 or older is projected to rise by one-third from 2019–2029. Mandatory program spending (outlays) in 2019 were 12.7% of GDP and are projected to average 14.4% GDP from 2025–2029.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cbo.gov/publication/55151|title= Updated Budget Projections: 2019 to 2029|date=May 2, 2019 |work=[[Congressional Budget Office]] |access-date=June 15, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
==Entrepreneurship== |
==Entrepreneurship== |
||
{{See also|Technological and industrial history of the United States}} |
{{See also|Technological and industrial history of the United States}} |
||
[[File:Government and State-Owned Enterprises to GDP for United States.png|thumb|Percent of U.S. economy from [[ |
[[File:Government and State-Owned Enterprises to GDP for United States.png|thumb|Percent of U.S. economy from [[state-owned enterprise]]s or [[government-sponsored enterprise]]s.]] |
||
[[File:PyramidParthenon.jpg|thumb|Tennessee in 1897. The U.S. was a leader in the adoption of [[lightbulb|electric lighting]]]] |
[[File:PyramidParthenon.jpg|thumb|Tennessee in 1897. The U.S. was a leader in the adoption of [[lightbulb|electric lighting]].]] |
||
The United States has been a leader in technological innovation since the late 19th century and scientific research since the mid-20th century. In 1876, [[Alexander Graham Bell]] was awarded the first U.S. [[Invention of the telephone|patent for the telephone]]. [[Thomas Edison]]'s laboratory developed the [[phonograph]], the first [[Incandescent light bulb|long-lasting light bulb]], and the first viable [[Kinetoscope|movie camera]]. Edison's company would also pioneer ([[direct current]] based) electric power delivery and market it around the world, followed on by companies such as [[Westinghouse Electric Corporation]] which would rapidly develop [[alternating current]] power delivery. In the early 20th century, the automobile companies of [[Ransom E. Olds]] and [[Henry Ford]] popularized the [[assembly line]]. The [[Wright brothers]], in 1903, made the [[Wright Flyer|first sustained and controlled heavier-than-air powered flight]].<ref>{{cite web |author=Benedetti, François |url=http://www.fai.org/news_archives/fai/000295.asp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070912065254/http://www.fai.org/news_archives/fai/000295.asp |archive-date=September 12, 2007 |title=100 Years Ago, the Dream of Icarus Became Reality |publisher=Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI) |date=December 17, 2003 |access-date=August 15, 2007}}</ref> |
The United States has been a leader in technological innovation since the late 19th century and scientific research since the mid-20th century. In 1876, [[Alexander Graham Bell]] was awarded the first U.S. [[Invention of the telephone|patent for the telephone]]. [[Thomas Edison]]'s laboratory developed the [[phonograph]], the first [[Incandescent light bulb|long-lasting light bulb]], and the first viable [[Kinetoscope|movie camera]]. Edison's company would also pioneer ([[direct current]] based) electric power delivery and market it around the world, followed on by companies such as [[Westinghouse Electric Corporation]] which would rapidly develop [[alternating current]] power delivery. In the early 20th century, the automobile companies of [[Ransom E. Olds]] and [[Henry Ford]] popularized the [[assembly line]]. The [[Wright brothers]], in 1903, made the [[Wright Flyer|first sustained and controlled heavier-than-air powered flight]].<ref>{{cite web |author=Benedetti, François |url=http://www.fai.org/news_archives/fai/000295.asp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070912065254/http://www.fai.org/news_archives/fai/000295.asp |archive-date=September 12, 2007 |title=100 Years Ago, the Dream of Icarus Became Reality |publisher=Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI) |date=December 17, 2003 |access-date=August 15, 2007}}</ref> |
||
[[File:Steve Jobs and Bill Gates (522695099).jpg|thumb|[[Steve Jobs]] and [[Bill Gates]] are two of the |
[[File:Steve Jobs and Bill Gates (522695099).jpg|thumb|[[Steve Jobs]] and [[Bill Gates]] are two of the most well-known American entrepreneurs.]] |
||
American society highly emphasizes entrepreneurship and business. [[Entrepreneurship]] is the act of being an entrepreneur, which can be defined as "one who undertakes [[innovation]]s, finance and business acumen in an effort to transform innovations into economic goods". This may result in new organizations or may be part of revitalizing mature organizations in response to a perceived opportunity.<ref name="ReferenceB">Shane, Scott "A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: the Individual-Opportunity Nexus", Edward Elgar</ref> American entrepreneurs are even engaged in public services delivery through [[Public-private partnerships in the United States|public-private partnerships]]. |
American society highly emphasizes entrepreneurship and business. [[Entrepreneurship]] is the act of being an entrepreneur, which can be defined as "one who undertakes [[innovation]]s, finance and business acumen in an effort to transform innovations into economic goods". This may result in new organizations or may be part of revitalizing mature organizations in response to a perceived opportunity.<ref name="ReferenceB">Shane, Scott "A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: the Individual-Opportunity Nexus", Edward Elgar</ref> American entrepreneurs are even engaged in public services delivery through [[Public-private partnerships in the United States|public-private partnerships]]. |
||
The most obvious form of entrepreneurship refers to the process and engagement of starting new businesses (referred to as [[ |
The most obvious form of entrepreneurship refers to the process and engagement of starting new businesses (referred to as [[startup company|startup companies]]); however, in recent years, the term has been extended to include social and political forms of entrepreneurial activity. When entrepreneurship is describing activities within a firm or large organization it is referred to as intra-preneurship and may include corporate venturing, when large entities spin-off organizations.<ref name="ReferenceB" /> |
||
According to Paul Reynolds, entrepreneurship scholar and creator of the [[Global Entrepreneurship Monitor]], "by the time they reach their retirement years, half of all working men in the United States probably have a period of self-employment of one or more years; one in four may have engaged in self-employment for six or more years. Participating in a new business creation is a common activity among U.S. workers over the course of their careers."<ref>Reynolds, Paul D. "Entrepreneurship in the United States", Springer, 2007, {{ISBN|978-0387456676}}</ref> And in recent years, business creation has been documented by scholars such as [[David Audretsch]] to be a major driver of economic growth in both the United States and Western Europe.{{ |
According to Paul Reynolds, entrepreneurship scholar and creator of the [[Global Entrepreneurship Monitor]], "by the time they reach their retirement years, half of all working men in the United States probably have a period of self-employment of one or more years; one in four may have engaged in self-employment for six or more years. Participating in a new business creation is a common activity among U.S. workers over the course of their careers."<ref>Reynolds, Paul D. "Entrepreneurship in the United States", Springer, 2007, {{ISBN|978-0387456676}}</ref> And in recent years, business creation has been documented by scholars such as [[David Audretsch]] to be a major driver of economic growth in both the United States and Western Europe.{{citation needed|date=August 2019}} |
||
[[File:Survival rate of US start-ups, 1977–2012.svg|thumb|Survival rate of U.S. start-ups, 1977–2012. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Business Dynamic Statistics, Published by Gallup, reproduced in UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030, Figure 5.7, p. 143]] |
[[File:Survival rate of US start-ups, 1977–2012.svg|thumb|Survival rate of U.S. start-ups, 1977–2012. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Business Dynamic Statistics, Published by Gallup, reproduced in UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030, Figure 5.7, p. 143]] |
||
==Venture capital investment== |
==Venture capital investment== |
||
[[File:US VC funding.png|300px|right|Quarterly U.S. venture capital investments, 1995–2017]] |
[[File:US VC funding.png|300px|right|Quarterly U.S. venture capital investments, 1995–2017]] |
||
[[Venture capital]], as an industry, originated in the United States, which it still dominates.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.briskfox.com/open/years/2009_q1/do_v_c44780.php|title=Mandelson, Peter. "There is no Google, or Amazon, or Microsoft or Apple in the UK, Mandelson tells BVCA." BriskFox Financial News, March 11, 2009|publisher=Briskfox.com|access-date=April 21, 2012}}</ref> According to the National Venture Capital Association 11% of private sector jobs come from venture capital backed companies and venture capital backed revenue accounts for 21% of U.S. GDP.<ref>{{cite book|url=http://www.nvca.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=255&Itemid=103|title=Venture Impact|publisher=IHS Global Insight|year=2009|isbn=978-0978501570|edition=5|page=2|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140630170428/http://www.nvca.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=255&Itemid=103|archive-date=June 30, 2014}}</ref> |
[[Venture capital]], as an industry, originated in the United States, which it still dominates.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.briskfox.com/open/years/2009_q1/do_v_c44780.php|title=Mandelson, Peter. "There is no Google, or Amazon, or Microsoft or Apple in the UK, Mandelson tells BVCA." BriskFox Financial News, March 11, 2009|publisher=Briskfox.com|access-date=April 21, 2012|archive-date=November 3, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191103173518/http://www.briskfox.com/open/years/2009_q1/do_v_c44780.php|url-status=dead}}</ref> According to the National Venture Capital Association 11% of private sector jobs come from venture capital backed companies and venture capital backed revenue accounts for 21% of U.S. GDP.<ref>{{cite book|url=http://www.nvca.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=255&Itemid=103|title=Venture Impact|publisher=IHS Global Insight|year=2009|isbn=978-0978501570|edition=5|page=2|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140630170428/http://www.nvca.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=255&Itemid=103|archive-date=June 30, 2014}}</ref> |
||
Total U.S. investment in venture capital amounted to $48.3{{ |
Total U.S. investment in venture capital amounted to $48.3{{spaces}}billion in 2014, for 4,356 deals. This represented "an increase of 61% in dollars and a 4% increase in deals over the prior year", reported the National Venture Capital Association. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development estimates that venture capital investment in the United States had fully recovered by 2014 to pre-recession levels. The National Venture Capital Association has reported that, in 2014, venture capital investment in the life sciences was at its highest level since 2008: in biotechnology, $6.0{{spaces}}billion was invested in 470 deals and, in life sciences overall, $8.6{{spaces}}billion in 789 deals (including biotechnology and medical devices). Two thirds (68%) of the investment in biotechnology went to first-time/early-stage development deals and the remainder to the expansion stage of development (14%), seed-stage companies (11%) and late-stage companies (7%). However, it was the software industry which invested in the greatest number of deals overall: 1,799, for an investment of $19.8{{spaces}}billion. Second came internet-specific companies, garnering US$11.9{{spaces}}billion in investment through 1,005 deals. Many of these companies are based in the state of California, which alone concentrates 28% of U.S. research.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|url=http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002354/235406e.pdf|title=United States of America. In: UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030|last1=Stewart|first1=Shannon|last2=Springs|first2=Stacy|publisher=UNESCO|year=2015|isbn=978-9231001291|location=Paris|pages=129–55}}</ref> |
||
Some new American businesses raise investments from [[angel investor]]s (venture capitalists). In 2010 healthcare/medical accounted for the largest share of angel investments, with 30% of total angel investments (vs. 17% in 2009), followed by software (16% vs. 19% in 2007), biotech (15% vs. 8% in 2009), industrial/energy (8% vs. 17% in 2009), retail (5% vs. 8% in 2009) and IT services (5%).<ref>{{cite web|last=Sohl|first=Jeffrey|title=Full Year 2009 Angel Market Trends|url=http://wsbe.unh.edu/files/2009_Angel_Market_Press_Release.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130120034841/http://wsbe.unh.edu/files/2009_Angel_Market_Press_Release.pdf|archive-date=January 20, 2013|publisher=University of New Hampshire Center for Venture Research|access-date=September 27, 2011|date=March 31, 2010}}</ref> {{clarify|In this article, we really need total amount of dollars/annually|date=February 2012}} |
Some new American businesses raise investments from [[angel investor]]s (venture capitalists). In 2010 healthcare/medical accounted for the largest share of angel investments, with 30% of total angel investments (vs. 17% in 2009), followed by software (16% vs. 19% in 2007), biotech (15% vs. 8% in 2009), industrial/energy (8% vs. 17% in 2009), retail (5% vs. 8% in 2009) and IT services (5%).<ref>{{cite web|last=Sohl|first=Jeffrey|title=Full Year 2009 Angel Market Trends|url=http://wsbe.unh.edu/files/2009_Angel_Market_Press_Release.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130120034841/http://wsbe.unh.edu/files/2009_Angel_Market_Press_Release.pdf|archive-date=January 20, 2013|publisher=University of New Hampshire Center for Venture Research|access-date=September 27, 2011|date=March 31, 2010}}</ref> {{clarify|In this article, we really need total amount of dollars/annually|date=February 2012}} |
||
Americans are "venturesome consumers" who are unusually willing to try new products of all sorts, and to pester manufacturers to improve their products.<ref>{{ |
Americans are "venturesome consumers" who are unusually willing to try new products of all sorts, and to pester manufacturers to improve their products.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.economist.com/node/13216037|newspaper=The Economist|title=The United States of Entrepreneurs|date=March 12, 2009}}</ref> |
||
==Mergers and acquisitions== |
==Mergers and acquisitions== |
||
Since 1985 there have been three major waves of M&A in the U.S. (see graph "Mergers and Acquisitions in the U.S. since 1985"). 2017 has been the most active year in terms of number of deals (12,914), whereas 2015 cumulated to the biggest overall value of deals ($24{{nbs}}billion). |
|||
Since 1985 there have been three major waves of M&A in the U.S. (see graph "Mergers and Acquisitions in the U.S. since 1985"). 2017 has been the most active year in terms of number of deals (12,914), whereas 2015 cumulated to the biggest overall value of deals ($24{{spaces}}billion). |
|||
The biggest merger deal in U.S. history was the acquisition of Time Warner by America Online Inc. in 2000, where the bid was over $164{{nbs}}billion. Since 2000 acquisitions of U.S. companies by Chinese investors increased by 368%. The other way round{{snd}}U.S. companies acquiring Chinese Companies{{snd}}showed a decrease of 25%, with a short upwards trend until 2007.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://imaa-institute.org/m-and-a-us-united-states/|title=M&A US – Mergers & Acquisitions in the United States|work=IMAA-Institute|access-date=2018-02-22|language=en-US |df=mdy-all}}</ref> |
|||
The biggest merger deal in U.S. history was the acquisition of Time Warner by America Online Inc. in 2000, where the bid was over $164{{spaces}}billion. Since 2000 acquisitions of U.S. companies by Chinese investors increased by 368%. The other way round—U.S. companies acquiring Chinese Companies—showed a decrease of 25%, with a short upwards trend until 2007.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://imaa-institute.org/m-and-a-us-united-states/|title=M&A US – Mergers & Acquisitions in the United States|work=IMAA-Institute|access-date=February 22, 2018|language=en-US }}</ref> |
|||
==Research and development== |
==Research and development== |
||
Line 1,120: | Line 1,283: | ||
[[File:GERD GDP ratio in the USA, 2002–2013.svg|thumb|Gross domestic expenditure on R&D in the U.S. as a percentage of GDP, 2002–2013. Other countries are given for comparison. Source: UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030]] |
[[File:GERD GDP ratio in the USA, 2002–2013.svg|thumb|Gross domestic expenditure on R&D in the U.S. as a percentage of GDP, 2002–2013. Other countries are given for comparison. Source: UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030]] |
||
The U.S. invests more funds in research and development (R&D) in absolute terms than the other G7 nations combined: 17.2% more in 2012. Since 2000, gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) in the U.S. has increased by 31.2%, enabling it to maintain its share of GERD among the G7 nations at 54.0% (54.2% in 2000).<ref name=":0" /> |
The U.S. invests more funds in research and development (R&D) in absolute terms than the other G7 nations combined: 17.2% more in 2012. Since 2000, gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) in the U.S. has increased by 31.2%, enabling it to maintain its share of GERD among the G7 nations at 54.0% (54.2% in 2000).<ref name=":0" /> |
||
[[File:R&D by country.webp|thumb|center|{{center|R&D by country]]}} |
|||
===Impact of recession on research spending=== |
===Impact of recession on research spending=== |
||
Generally speaking, U.S. investment in R&D rose with the economy in the first years of the century before receding slightly during the economic recession then rising again as growth resumed. At its peak in 2009, GERD amounted to US$406{{ |
Generally speaking, U.S. investment in R&D rose with the economy in the first years of the century before receding slightly during the economic recession then rising again as growth resumed. At its peak in 2009, GERD amounted to US$406{{spaces}}billion (2.82% of GDP). Despite the recession, it was still at 2.79% in 2012 and will slide only marginally to 2.73% in 2013, according to provisional data, and should remain at a similar level in 2014.<ref name=":0" /> |
||
The federal government is the primary funder of basic research, at 52.6% in 2012; state governments, universities and other non-profits funded 26%. Experimental development, on the other hand, is primarily funded by industry: 76.4% to the federal government's 22.1% in 2012.<ref name=":0" /> |
The federal government is the primary funder of basic research, at 52.6% in 2012; state governments, universities and other non-profits funded 26%. Experimental development, on the other hand, is primarily funded by industry: 76.4% to the federal government's 22.1% in 2012.<ref name=":0" /> |
||
Line 1,129: | Line 1,293: | ||
===Business spending on research=== |
===Business spending on research=== |
||
Business enterprises contributed 59.1 % of U.S. GERD in 2012, down from 69.0 % in 2000. Private non-profits and foreign entities each contribute a small fraction of total R&D, 3.3% and 3.8%, respectively.<ref name=":0" /> [[File:R&D budget by US agency, 1994–2014.svg|thumb|US research and development budget by government agency, 1994–2014. Source: UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030, Figure 5.4, based on data from American Association for the Advancement of Science]]The |
Business enterprises contributed 59.1 % of U.S. GERD in 2012, down from 69.0 % in 2000. Private non-profits and foreign entities each contribute a small fraction of total R&D, 3.3% and 3.8%, respectively.<ref name=":0" /> [[File:R&D budget by US agency, 1994–2014.svg|thumb|US research and development budget by government agency, 1994–2014. Source: UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030, Figure 5.4, based on data from American Association for the Advancement of Science]]The United States has historically been a leader in business R&D and innovation. The economic recession of 2008–2009 has had a lasting impact, however. While the major performers of R&D largely maintained their commitments, the pain of the U.S. recession was felt mainly by small businesses and start-ups. Statistics released by the U.S. Census Bureau showed that, in 2008, the number of business 'deaths' began overtaking the number of business 'births' and that the trend continued at least through 2012. From 2003 to 2008, business research spending had followed a generally upward trajectory. In 2009, the curve inverted, as expenditure fell by 4% over the previous year then again in 2010, albeit by 1–2% this time. Companies in high-opportunity industries like health care cut back less than those in more mature industries, such as fossil fuels. The largest cutbacks in R&D spending were in agriculture production: −3.5% compared to the average R&D to net sales ratio. The chemicals and allied products industry and electronic equipment industry, on the other hand, showed R&D to net sales ratios that were 3.8% and 4.8% higher than average. Although the amount of R&D spending increased in 2011, it was still below the level of 2008 expenditure. By 2012, the growth rate of business-funded R&D had recovered. Whether this continues will be contingent on the pursuit of economic recovery and growth, levels of federal research funding and the general business climate.<ref name=":0" /> |
||
===Research spending at the state level=== |
===Research spending at the state level=== |
||
Line 1,135: | Line 1,299: | ||
The level of research spending varies considerably from one state to another. Six states (New Mexico, Maryland, Massachusetts, Washington, California and Michigan) each devoted 3.9% or more of their GDP to R&D in 2010, together contributing 42% of national research expenditure. In 2010, more than one quarter of R&D was concentrated in California (28.1%), ahead of Massachusetts (5.7%), New Jersey (5.6%), Washington State (5.5%), Michigan (5.4%), Texas (5.2%), Illinois (4.8%), New York (3.6%) and Pennsylvania (3.5%). Seven states (Arkansas, Nevada, Oklahoma, Louisiana, South Dakota and Wyoming) devoted less than 0.8% of GDP to R&D.<ref name=":0" /> |
The level of research spending varies considerably from one state to another. Six states (New Mexico, Maryland, Massachusetts, Washington, California and Michigan) each devoted 3.9% or more of their GDP to R&D in 2010, together contributing 42% of national research expenditure. In 2010, more than one quarter of R&D was concentrated in California (28.1%), ahead of Massachusetts (5.7%), New Jersey (5.6%), Washington State (5.5%), Michigan (5.4%), Texas (5.2%), Illinois (4.8%), New York (3.6%) and Pennsylvania (3.5%). Seven states (Arkansas, Nevada, Oklahoma, Louisiana, South Dakota and Wyoming) devoted less than 0.8% of GDP to R&D.<ref name=":0" /> |
||
[[File:Science and engineering in the USA by state, 2010.svg|thumb|Science and engineering in the U.S. by state. Source: UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030, Figure 5.6, based on data from American Association for the Advancement of Science]] |
[[File:Science and engineering in the USA by state, 2010.svg|thumb|Science and engineering in the U.S. by state. Source: UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030, Figure 5.6, based on data from American Association for the Advancement of Science]] |
||
[[File:San Francisco from the Marin Headlands in August 2022 (cropped2).jpg|thumb|265px|[[San Francisco]] is one of the world's largest [[financial center]]s.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Global Financial Centres Index 31|url=https://www.longfinance.net/programmes/financial-centre-futures/global-financial-centres-index/gfci-31-explore-data/gfci-31-rank/|access-date=August 14, 2022 |website=Longfinance.net}}</ref>]] |
|||
California is home to Silicon Valley, the name given to the area hosting the leading corporations and start-ups in information technology. This state also hosts dynamic biotechnology clusters in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles and San Diego. The main biotechnology clusters outside California are the cities of Boston/Cambridge, Massachusetts, Maryland, suburban Washington, DC, New York, Seattle, Philadelphia, and Chicago. California supplies 13.7% of all jobs in science and engineering across the country, more than any other state. Some 5.7% of Californians are employed in these fields. This high share reflects a potent combination of academic excellence and a strong business focus on R&D: the prestigious Stanford University and University of California rub shoulders with Silicon Valley, for instance. In much the same way, Route 128 around Boston in the state of Massachusetts is not only home to numerous high-tech firms and corporations but also hosts the renowned Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.<ref name=":0" /> |
California is home to Silicon Valley, the name given to the area hosting the leading corporations and start-ups in information technology. This state also hosts dynamic biotechnology clusters in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles and San Diego. The main biotechnology clusters outside California are the cities of Boston/Cambridge, Massachusetts, Maryland, suburban Washington, DC, New York, Seattle, Philadelphia, and Chicago. California supplies 13.7% of all jobs in science and engineering across the country, more than any other state. Some 5.7% of Californians are employed in these fields. This high share reflects a potent combination of academic excellence and a strong business focus on R&D: the prestigious Stanford University and University of California rub shoulders with Silicon Valley, for instance. In much the same way, Route 128 around Boston in the state of Massachusetts is not only home to numerous high-tech firms and corporations but also hosts the renowned Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.<ref name=":0" /> |
||
New Mexico's high research intensity can be explained by the fact that it hosts the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Maryland's position may reflect the concentration of federally funded research institutions there. Washington State has a high concentration of high-tech firms like Microsoft, Amazon and Boeing and the engineering functions of most automobile manufacturers are located in the state of Michigan.<ref name=":0" /> |
New Mexico's high research intensity can be explained by the fact that it hosts the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Maryland's position may reflect the concentration of federally funded research institutions there. Washington State has a high concentration of high-tech firms like [[Microsoft]], [[Amazon (company)|Amazon]] and Boeing and the engineering functions of most automobile manufacturers are located in the state of Michigan.<ref name=":0" /> |
||
===Research spending by multinational corporations=== |
===Research spending by multinational corporations=== |
||
Line 1,147: | Line 1,312: | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki> R&D intensity is defined as R&D expenditure divided by net sales. |
<nowiki>*</nowiki> R&D intensity is defined as R&D expenditure divided by net sales. |
||
<nowiki>**</nowiki> Although incorporated in the Netherlands, Airbus's principal manufacturing facilities are located in France, Germany, Spain and the UK. |
<nowiki>**</nowiki> Although incorporated in the Netherlands, Airbus's principal manufacturing facilities are located in France, Germany, Spain and the UK. |
||
Source: ''UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030'' (2015), Table 9.3, based on Hernández ''et |
Source: ''UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030'' (2015), Table 9.3, based on Hernández ''et al.'' (2014) ''EU R&D Scoreboard: the 2014 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard''. [[European Commission]]: Brussels, Table 2.2. |
||
===Exports of high-tech goods and patents=== |
===Exports of high-tech goods and patents=== |
||
Line 1,155: | Line 1,320: | ||
The United States is a post-industrial country. Imports of high-tech products far exceed exports. However, the United States' technologically skilled workforce produces a large volume of patents and can still profit from the license or sale of these patents. Within the United States' scientific industries active in research, 9.1% of products and services are concerned with the licensing of intellectual property rights.<ref name=":0" /> |
The United States is a post-industrial country. Imports of high-tech products far exceed exports. However, the United States' technologically skilled workforce produces a large volume of patents and can still profit from the license or sale of these patents. Within the United States' scientific industries active in research, 9.1% of products and services are concerned with the licensing of intellectual property rights.<ref name=":0" /> |
||
When it comes to trade in intellectual property, the United States remains unrivalled. Income from royalties and licensing amounted to $129.2{{ |
When it comes to trade in intellectual property, the United States remains unrivalled. Income from royalties and licensing amounted to $129.2{{spaces}}billion in 2013, the highest in the world. Japan comes a distant second, with receipts of $31.6{{spaces}}billion in 2013. The United States' payments for use of intellectual property amounted to $39.0{{spaces}}billion in 2013, exceeded only by Ireland ($46.4{{spaces}}billion).<ref name=":0" /> |
||
==Notable companies and markets== |
==Notable companies and markets== |
||
{{See also|Forbes 500|Fortune 500}} |
{{See also|Forbes 500|Fortune 500}} |
||
{{Further|List of largest companies in the United States by revenue}} |
{{Further|List of largest companies in the United States by revenue}} |
||
[[File:Walmart exterior.jpg|thumb|right|A typical Walmart discount department store (location: [[Laredo, Texas]]) |
[[File:Walmart exterior.jpg|thumb|right|A typical Walmart discount department store (location: [[Laredo, Texas]])]] |
||
America's largest companies are ranked every year by revenue in the ''[[Fortune 500]]''. Between 2000 and 2022's edition of the list, the top spot on the Fortune 500 was occupied by either the auto manufacturer [[General Motors]] (GM), the oil and gas giant [[ExxonMobil]], or the retailer [[Walmart]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hoover |first=Gary |date=June 26, 2022 |title=2022 UPDATED Largest Companies Charts |url=https://americanbusinesshistory.org/2022-updated-largest-companies-charts/ |access-date=February 9, 2023 |website=Business History - The American Business History Center |language=en-US}}</ref> The US is also home of many of the world's largest companies by [[market capitalization]]; {{As of|2023|February|9|df=US}}, the largest American companies by market cap are [[Apple Inc.|Apple]], [[Microsoft]], [[Google]] (through holding company [[Alphabet Inc.|Alphabet]]), [[Amazon (company)|Amazon]], [[Berkshire Hathaway]], [[Tesla, Inc.|Tesla]], [[Nvidia]], [[Visa Inc.|Visa]], ExxonMobil, and [[Meta Platforms]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Companies ranked by Market Cap - CompaniesMarketCap.com |url=https://companiesmarketcap.com/ |access-date=February 9, 2023 |website=companiesmarketcap.com |language=en-us}}</ref> Moreover, many of these companies are the most valuable brands, with many of the largest companies by revenue and market cap on the annual ranking of most valuable brands by [[Forbes]] being joined by [[The Coca-Cola Company|Coca-Cola]], [[The Walt Disney Company]], and [[McDonald's]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=The 2020 World's Most Valuable Brands |url=https://www.forbes.com/the-worlds-most-valuable-brands/ |access-date=February 9, 2023 |website=Forbes |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
In 2011, the 20 [[List of companies by revenue|largest U.S.-based companies by revenue]] were [[Walmart]], [[ExxonMobil]], [[Chevron Corporation|Chevron]], [[ConocoPhillips]], [[Fannie Mae]], [[General Electric]], [[Berkshire Hathaway]], [[General Motors]], [[Ford Motor Company]], [[Hewlett-Packard]], [[AT&T Inc.|AT&T]], [[Cargill]], [[McKesson Corporation]], [[Bank of America]], [[Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation]], [[Apple Inc.]], [[Verizon]], [[JPMorgan Chase]], and [[Cardinal Health]]. |
|||
Some industries within America are defined by a few major companies, often deriving terms such as "Big Three" or "Big Four". Examples of this phenomenon include the Big Three credit reporting agencies ([[Equifax]], [[Experian]], and [[TransUnion]]), the [[Big Three (automobile manufacturers)|Big Three automobile makers]] ([[Ford Motor Company|Ford]], [[General Motors]], and [[Stellantis]]), the [[Big Four accounting firms]] ([[Deloitte]], [[Ernst & Young]], [[KPMG]], and [[PwC]]), and the Big Four communications carriers ([[Verizon Communications|Verizon]], [[AT&T]], [[T-Mobile US|T-Mobile]]/[[Sprint Corporation|Sprint]], and [[Dish Network]]).<ref>{{Cite news |title=How to protect yourself against the theft of your identity |newspaper=The Economist |url=https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2017/09/14/how-to-protect-yourself-against-the-theft-of-your-identity |access-date=February 10, 2023 |issn=0013-0613}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Big 4 wireless carriers spent $100B on 5G spectrum: Was it worth it? |url=https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/big-4-wireless-carriers-spent-100b-on-5g-spectrum-was-it-worth-it-68488095 |access-date=February 10, 2023 |website=www.spglobal.com |language=en-us}}</ref> |
|||
In 2013, eight of the world's ten [[List of corporations by market capitalization|largest companies by market capitalization]] were American: Apple Inc., [[ExxonMobil]], [[Berkshire Hathaway]], [[Walmart]], [[General Electric]], [[Microsoft]], [[IBM]], and [[Chevron Corporation]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ft.com/indepth/ft500|title=FT 500 2013|work=ft.com|date=June 19, 2015}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Energy in the United States|American energy industry]] is among the largest and consists of large companies in [[Petroleum industry|oil, natural gas]], [[Coal mining in the United States|coal]], and renewable energy sources. America's largest energy companies by market are in oil and gas, with ExxonMobil being joined by [[Chevron Corporation|Chevron]], [[ConocoPhillips]], and [[Schlumberger]]; British oil companies [[BP]] and [[Shell plc|Shell]] also have significant presence in the United States and trade on both the [[London Stock Exchange]] and [[New York Stock Exchange]]. Many large American petroleum companies, as well as BP, can trace some origin back to [[Standard Oil]], a former monopoly run by [[John D. Rockefeller]]. In coal, the $30 billion industry is dominated by [[Peabody Energy]], which is the largest coal company in the world with almost $23 billion in revenue for 2021. Much of the nation's coal mining occurs in Wyoming and Appalachian states like West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=The 10 Largest Coal Mining Companies In The United States – Zippia |date=July 26, 2022 |url=https://www.zippia.com/advice/largest-coal-mining-companies/ |access-date=February 10, 2023 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Desjardins |first=Jeff |date=November 24, 2017 |title=Chart: The Evolution of Standard Oil |url=https://www.visualcapitalist.com/chart-evolution-standard-oil/ |access-date=February 10, 2023 |website=Visual Capitalist |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
According to [[Fortune Global 500]] 2011, the [[List of largest employers|ten largest U.S. employers]] were [[Walmart]], [[United States Postal Service|U.S. Postal Service]], [[IBM]], [[United Parcel Service|UPS]], [[McDonald's]], [[Target Corporation]], [[Kroger]], [[The Home Depot]], [[General Electric]], and [[Sears Holdings]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://fortune.com/global500/2011/|title=Global 500 |work=Fortune}}</ref> |
|||
Apple Inc., [[Google]], IBM, [[McDonald's]], and Microsoft are the world's five most valuable brands in an index published by Millward Brown.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-brand-idUSTRE74800D20110509|title=Apple usurps Google as world's most valuable brand|date=May 9, 2011|access-date=August 10, 2017|newspaper=Reuters}}</ref> |
|||
A 2012 Deloitte report published in ''STORES'' magazine indicated that of the world's top 250 largest retailers by retail sales revenue in fiscal year 2010, 32% of those retailers were based in the United States, and those 32% accounted for 41% of the total retail sales revenue of the top 250.<ref>Deloitte, ''Switching Channels: Global Powers of Retailing 2012'', ''STORES'', January 2012, G20.</ref> |
A 2012 Deloitte report published in ''STORES'' magazine indicated that of the world's top 250 largest retailers by retail sales revenue in fiscal year 2010, 32% of those retailers were based in the United States, and those 32% accounted for 41% of the total retail sales revenue of the top 250.<ref>Deloitte, ''Switching Channels: Global Powers of Retailing 2012'', ''STORES'', January 2012, G20.</ref> |
||
[[Amazon (company)|Amazon]] is the world's largest online retailer.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/walterloeb/2013/07/24/alibaba-a-threat-to-amazon-ebay-walmart-and-everyone-else/ |title=Alibaba Is A Threat To Amazon, eBay, Walmart And Everyone Else |magazine=Forbes.com |access-date=December 16, 2013 |first=Walter |last=Loeb}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2013/04/23/wal-mart-vs-amazon-worlds-biggest-e-commerce-battle-could-boil-down-to-vegetables/ |title=Wal-Mart Vs. Amazon: World's Biggest E-Commerce Battle Could Boil Down To Vegetables |magazine=Forbes.com |date=April 23, 2013 |access-date=December 16, 2013 |first=Clare |last=O'Connor}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Jopson|first=Barney|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/61828252-ac1d-11e0-b85c-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1RxkefD8m|title=Amazon urges California referendum on online tax|work=Financial Times|date=July 12, 2011|access-date=August 4, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714230245/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/61828252-ac1d-11e0-b85c-00144feabdc0.html |archive-date=July 14, 2011 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
America is the foremost country in the world when it comes to semiconductor production. In 2011, half of the world's 20 largest semiconductor manufacturers by sales were based in America. More recently, Congress under the [[presidency of Joe Biden]] passed a bipartisan bill, the [[CHIPS and Science Act]], which bolstered semiconductor production. Some of America's largest semiconductor firms and chip companies are [[Broadcom Inc.|Broadcom]], [[Intel]], [[AMD]], and [[Qualcomm]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.isuppli.com/PublishingImages/Press%20Releases/2011-12-01_Market_Share_Table1.jpg |title=IHS iSuppli Semiconductor preliminary rankings for 2011 |access-date=April 21, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131214152106/http://www.isuppli.com/PublishingImages/Press%20Releases/2011-12-01_Market_Share_Table1.jpg|archive-date=December 14, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Top 10 Semiconductor Manufacturers in the U.S. - IndustrySelect® |url=https://www.industryselect.com/blog/top-10-semiconductor-manufacturers-in-the-us |access-date=February 10, 2023 |website=www.industryselect.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=House |first=The White |date=August 9, 2022 |title=FACT SHEET: CHIPS and Science Act Will Lower Costs, Create Jobs, Strengthen Supply Chains, and Counter China |url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/08/09/fact-sheet-chips-and-science-act-will-lower-costs-create-jobs-strengthen-supply-chains-and-counter-china/ |access-date=February 10, 2023 |website=The White House |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
Many of the United States' largest firms by market cap are technology companies. These companies are dominated by the [[Big Tech|Big Five tech giants]] (Apple, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Meta), though numerous software firms also dominate the American technology industry. These firms range from hardware manufacturers like [[Dell Technologies]], [[IBM]], [[Hewlett-Packard]], and [[Cisco]], to software and computing infrastructure programmers like [[Oracle Corporation|Oracle]], [[Salesforce]], [[Adobe Inc.|Adobe]], and [[Intuit]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Girardin |first=McKayla |date=September 22, 2022 |title=Top Tech Companies in 2022 |url=https://www.theforage.com/blog/companies/what-companies-in-technology-field |access-date=February 10, 2023 |website=Forage |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Top 1000 Technology Companies United States 2023 |url=https://disfold.com/united-states/sector/technology/companies/ |access-date=February 10, 2023 |website=Disfold Data |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
Most of the [[List of wealthiest charitable foundations|world's largest charitable foundations]] were founded by Americans. |
|||
American producers create nearly all of [[List of highest-grossing films|the world's highest-grossing films]]. Many of [[List of best-selling music artists|the world's best-selling music artists]] are based in the United States. |
In film, American producers create nearly all of [[List of highest-grossing films|the world's highest-grossing films]]. Many of [[List of best-selling music artists|the world's best-selling music artists]] are based in the United States. Some of America's largest media companies are The Walt Disney Company, [[Warner Bros. Discovery]], [[Netflix]], [[Comcast]], [[Paramount Global]], and [[Fox Corporation|Fox]]. |
||
==Finance== |
==Finance== |
||
Line 1,182: | Line 1,343: | ||
{{Further|List of largest banks}} |
{{Further|List of largest banks}} |
||
[[File:NYC NYSE.jpg|thumb|The [[New York Stock Exchange]] is the largest stock exchange in the world.]] |
[[File:NYC NYSE.jpg|thumb|The [[New York Stock Exchange]] is the largest stock exchange in the world.]] |
||
Measured by [[market capitalization|value]] of its listed companies' [[Security (finance)|securities]], the [[New York Stock Exchange]] is more than three times larger than any other stock exchange in the world.<ref name="world-exchanges.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.world-exchanges.org/statistics/ytd-monthly|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111106005313/http://www.world-exchanges.org/statistics/ytd-monthly|archive-date=November 6, 2011 |title=WFE – YTD Monthly |date=November 6, 2011 |access-date=June 8, 2014}}</ref> As of October 2008, the combined [[Market capitalization|capitalization]] of all domestic NYSE listed companies was US$10.1{{ |
Measured by [[market capitalization|value]] of its listed companies' [[Security (finance)|securities]], the [[New York Stock Exchange]] is more than three times larger than any other stock exchange in the world.<ref name="world-exchanges.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.world-exchanges.org/statistics/ytd-monthly|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111106005313/http://www.world-exchanges.org/statistics/ytd-monthly|archive-date=November 6, 2011 |title=WFE – YTD Monthly |date=November 6, 2011 |access-date=June 8, 2014}}</ref> As of October 2008, the combined [[Market capitalization|capitalization]] of all domestic NYSE listed companies was US$10.1{{spaces}}trillion.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nyxdata.com/nysedata/default.aspx?tabid=115 |title=> Data Products > NYSE > Facts & Figures |publisher=NYXdata |access-date=April 21, 2012 |archive-date=February 28, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090228111716/http://www.nyxdata.com/nysedata/Default.aspx?tabid=115 |url-status=dead }}</ref> [[NASDAQ]] is another American [[stock exchange]] and the world's third-largest exchange after the [[New York Stock Exchange]] and Japan's [[Tokyo Stock Exchange]]. However, NASDAQ's [[Market value|trade value]] is larger than Japan's TSE.<ref name="world-exchanges.org" /> NASDAQ is the largest [[Electronic visual display|electronic screen-based]] [[Share capital|equity securities]] trading market in the U.S. With approximately 3,800 companies and corporations, it has more trading volume per hour than any other stock exchange.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nasdaq.com/newsroom/stats/Performance_Report.stm#item_2 |title=NASDAQ Performance Report|access-date=February 15, 2007 |date=January 12, 2007 |work=NASDAQ Newsroom |publisher=The Nasdaq Stock Market|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070210233035/http://www.nasdaq.com/newsroom/stats/Performance_Report.stm|archive-date=February 10, 2007}}</ref> |
||
Because of the influential role that the U.S. stock market plays in [[international finance]], a [[New York University]] study in late 2014 interprets that in the short run, stocks that affect the willingness to bear risk independently of macroeconomic fundamentals explain most of the variation in the U.S. stock market. In the long run, the U.S. stock market is profoundly affected by shocks that reallocate the rewards of a given level of production between workers and shareholders. Productivity shocks, however, play a small role in historical stock market fluctuations at all horizons in the U.S. stock market.<ref>[http://www.econ.nyu.edu/user/ludvigsons/osf.pdf Origins of Stock Market Fluctuations]. [[New York University]], December 16, 2014.</ref> |
Because of the influential role that the U.S. stock market plays in [[international finance]], a [[New York University]] study in late 2014 interprets that in the short run, stocks that affect the willingness to bear risk independently of macroeconomic fundamentals explain most of the variation in the U.S. stock market. In the long run, the U.S. stock market is profoundly affected by shocks that reallocate the rewards of a given level of production between workers and shareholders. Productivity shocks, however, play a small role in historical stock market fluctuations at all horizons in the U.S. stock market.<ref>[http://www.econ.nyu.edu/user/ludvigsons/osf.pdf Origins of Stock Market Fluctuations] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923233200/http://www.econ.nyu.edu/user/ludvigsons/osf.pdf |date=September 23, 2015 }}. [[New York University]], December 16, 2014.</ref> |
||
The U.S. [[finance industry]] comprised only 10% of total non-farm business profits in 1947, but it grew to 50% by 2010. Over the same period, finance industry income as a proportion of GDP rose from 2.5% to 7.5%, and the finance industry's proportion of all corporate income rose from 10% to 20%. The mean earnings per employee hour in finance relative to all other sectors has closely mirrored the share of total U.S. income earned by the top 1% income earners since 1930. The mean salary in New York City's finance industry rose from $80,000 in 1981 to $360,000 in 2011, while average New York City salaries rose from $40,000 to $70,000. In 1988, there were about 12,500 U.S. banks with less than $300{{ |
The U.S. [[finance industry]] comprised only 10% of total non-farm business profits in 1947, but it grew to 50% by 2010. Over the same period, finance industry income as a proportion of GDP rose from 2.5% to 7.5%, and the finance industry's proportion of all corporate income rose from 10% to 20%. The mean earnings per employee hour in finance relative to all other sectors has closely mirrored the share of total U.S. income earned by the top 1% income earners since 1930. The mean salary in New York City's finance industry rose from $80,000 in 1981 to $360,000 in 2011, while average New York City salaries rose from $40,000 to $70,000. In 1988, there were about 12,500 U.S. banks with less than $300{{spaces}}million in deposits, and about 900 with more deposits, but by 2012, there were only 4,200 banks with less than $300{{spaces}}million in deposits in the U.S., and over 1,800 with more. |
||
Top ten U.S. banks by assets<ref name="money.msn.com">[http://money.msn.com/ Stock quotes, investing & personal finance, news – MSN Money] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130506025118/http://money.msn.com/ |date=May 6, 2013}}. Money.msn.com (December 31, 1999).</ref><ref name="secdatabase.com">secdatabase.com</ref><ref>[http://www.goldmansachs.com/investor-relations/index.html Investor Relations]. Goldman Sachs |
Top ten U.S. banks by assets<ref name="money.msn.com">[http://money.msn.com/ Stock quotes, investing & personal finance, news – MSN Money] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130506025118/http://money.msn.com/ |date=May 6, 2013}}. Money.msn.com (December 31, 1999).</ref><ref name="secdatabase.com">secdatabase.com</ref><ref>[http://www.goldmansachs.com/investor-relations/index.html Investor Relations]. Goldman Sachs.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.usbank.com/cgi_w/cfm/about/investor/index.cfm|title=Financial and investor information from U.S. Bank|website=usbank.com|access-date=May 6, 2013|archive-date=October 12, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181012182518/https://www.usbank.com/cgi_w/cfm/about/investor/index.cfm|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|1|| JP Morgan Chase |
|1|| JP Morgan Chase |
||
|- |
|||
|2||Bank of America |
|2||Bank of America |
||
|- |
|||
|3||Citigroup |
|3||Citigroup |
||
|- |
|||
|4||Wells Fargo |
|4||Wells Fargo |
||
|- |
|||
|5||Goldman Sachs |
|5||Goldman Sachs |
||
|- |
|||
|6||Morgan Stanley |
|6||Morgan Stanley |
||
|- |
|||
|7||U.S. Bancorp |
|7||U.S. Bancorp |
||
|- |
|||
|8||Bank of NY Mellon |
|8||Bank of NY Mellon |
||
|- |
|||
|9||HSBC North American Holdings |
|9||HSBC North American Holdings |
||
|- |
|||
|10||Capital One Financial |
|10||Capital One Financial |
||
|} |
|||
A 2012 [[International Monetary Fund]] study concluded that the U.S. financial sector has grown so large that it is slowing [[economic growth]]. New York University economist [[Thomas Philippon]] supported those findings, estimating that the U.S. spends $300{{ |
A 2012 [[International Monetary Fund]] study concluded that the U.S. financial sector has grown so large that it is slowing [[economic growth]]. New York University economist [[Thomas Philippon]] supported those findings, estimating that the U.S. spends $300{{spaces}}billion too much on financial services per year, and that the sector needs to shrink by 20%. Harvard University and University of Chicago economists agreed, calculating in 2014 that workers in research and development add $5 to the GDP for each dollar they earn, but finance industry workers cause the GDP to shrink by $0.60 for every dollar they are paid.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Tankersley|first1=Jim|title=A black hole for our best and brightest|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/business/2014/12/16/a-black-hole-for-our-best-and-brightest/|access-date=December 23, 2014|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=December 16, 2014}}</ref> A study by the [[Bank for International Settlements]] reached similar conclusions, saying the finance industry impedes economic growth and research and development based industries.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Cecchetti|first1=Stephen G|last2=Kharroubi|first2=Enisse|title=Why does financial sector growth crowd out real economic growth?|url=http://www.bis.org/publ/work490.pdf|website=BIS Working Papers No 490|publisher=Bank for International Settlements|access-date=September 20, 2015}}</ref> |
||
==Historical statistics== |
==Historical statistics== |
||
{{main|Economic history of the United States}} |
|||
===GDP=== |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:Contributions to Percent Change in Real GDP (the US 1930-1946).png|Contributions to Percent Change in Real GDP (1930–1946), source [[Bureau of Economic Analysis]] |
|||
File:Contributions to Percent Change in Real GDP (the US 1947-1973).png|Contributions to Percent Change in Real GDP (1947–1973), source [[Bureau of Economic Analysis]] |
|||
File:Contributions to Percent Change in Real GDP (the US 1974-1990).png|Contributions to Percent Change in Real GDP (1974–1990), source [[Bureau of Economic Analysis]] |
|||
File:Contributions to Percent Change in Real GDP (the US 1991-).png|Contributions to Percent Change in Real GDP (1991–2008), source [[Bureau of Economic Analysis]] |
|||
File:US GDP per capita change.PNG|GDP per capita growth. |
|||
File:United States GDP per capita.png|Real GDP per capita in the United States |
|||
File:Historical GDP growth of the United States.png|Historical growth of the U.S. economy from 1961–2015 |
|||
File:GDP per person in the United States.png|GDP per person in the United States |
|||
File:US Real Gross Private Domestic Investment and Real Corporate Profits After Tax.png|US Gross Private Domestic Investment and Corporate Profits After Tax as shares of Gross Domestic Product |
|||
File:US share of world GDP since 1980.jpg|US share of [[Gross world product|world GDP]] (%) since 1980.<br />US share of world GDP (nominal) peaked in 1985 with 32.74% of global GDP (nominal). The second-highest share was 32.24% in 2001.<br />US share of world GDP (PPP) peaked in 1999 with 23.78% of global GDP (PPP). The share has been declining each year since then. |
|||
File:U.S. in global economy.png|U.S. in global economy |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
===Employment=== |
|||
{{Main|Unemployment in the United States}} |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:US employment 1995-2012.png|The Percentage of the U.S. working age population employed, 1995–2012. |
|||
File:Us unemployment rates 1950 2005.png|Official U.S. unemployment rate, 1950–2005 |
|||
File:United States Mean Duration of Unemployment.jpg|United States mean duration of unemployment 1948–2010. |
|||
File:Average annual hours worked.png|Average annual hours worked |
|||
File:EmploymentUSbranchFredgr.png|All employees, private industries, by branches |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Manufacturing=== |
|||
{{Main|Manufacturing in the United States|Economy of the United States by sector}} |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:U.S. manufacturing employment.png|U.S. manufacturing employment |
|||
File:US manufacturing industry's share of nominal GDP.png|U.S. manufacturing industry's share of nominal GDP |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Income=== |
|||
{{Main|Income in the United States|Affluence in the United States}} |
|||
{{See also|Personal income in the United States|Household income in the United States|Income inequality in the United States|List of United States counties by per capita income}} |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:U.S. Change in real income versus selected goods and services v1.png|U.S. Change in real income versus selected goods and services v1 |
|||
File:Mean Quintile Household Income (1967-2015).png|Mean Quintile Household Income (1967-2015)<ref>https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44705.pdf</ref> |
|||
File:U.S. real median household income, 1967-2014.png|U.S. real median household income, 1967-2014<ref name="hbs.edu">http://www.hbs.edu/competitiveness/Documents/problems-unsolved-and-a-nation-divided.pdf</ref> |
|||
File:Real family income indexed to 1973, across the distribution 1947-2014.png|Real family income indexed to 1973, across the distribution 1947-2014<ref name="hbs.edu" /> |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Compensation=== |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:Realcompenstionusa.png|Real compensation per hour in the U.S. (1947–2018). |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Wage=== |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:US Real Wages 1964-2004.gif|Historical graph of [[real wages]] in the U.S. from 1964 to 2005. |
|||
File:Median Real Wages by Educational Attainment.png|Median Real Wages by Educational Attainment.png<ref>https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45090.pdf</ref> |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Productivity=== |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:Productivity and Real Median Family Income Growth 1947-2009.png|Productivity and real median family income growth, 1947–2009. |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Inequality=== |
|||
{{Main|Income inequality in the United States|Poverty in the United States}} |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:Top 1% fiscal income share.png|Top 1% fiscal income share |
|||
File:The US Gini Coefficient for Household Income (1967 - 2007 ).png|[[Gini Coefficient]] for Household Income (1967–2007), source [[United States Chamber of Commerce]] |
|||
File:U.S. Income Shares of Top 1% and 0.1% 1913-2013.png|U.S. Income Shares of Top 1% and 0.1% 1913–2013 |
|||
File:Income inequality panel - v1.png|Income inequality panel{{snd}}v1 |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Health spending=== |
|||
{{Main|Health care in the United States}} |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:Life expectancy vs healthcare spending.jpg|Life expectancy compared to healthcare spending from 1970 to 2008, in the U.S. and the next 19 most wealthy countries by total GDP.<ref name=Kenworthy2011>{{cite web|last= Kenworthy|first= Lane|date= July 10, 2011|title= America's inefficient health-care system: another look|publisher= Consider the Evidence (blog)|url= http://lanekenworthy.net/2011/07/10/americas-inefficient-health-care-system-another-look/ |access-date=September 11, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
File:Health spending as a share of GDP.png|Health spending as a share of GDP |
|||
File:International Comparison - Healthcare spending as % GDP.png|International Comparison{{nbs}}Healthcare spending as % GDP |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Tariff rates=== |
|||
{{Main|List of tariffs in the United States|Tariff in United States history|Protectionism in the United States}} |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:Average Tariff Rates in USA (1821-2016).png|Average tariff rates in USA (1821–2016) |
|||
File:Average tariff rates (France, UK, US).png|Average tariff rates (France, UK, US) |
|||
File:Average Tariff Rates for Selected Countries (1913-2007).png|Average tariff rates for selected countries (1913–2007) |
|||
File:Average Tariff Rates on manufactured products.png|Average tariff rates on manufactured products |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Trade balance=== |
|||
{{Main|Foreign trade of the United States}} |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:U.S. Trade Balance (1895–2015) and Trade Policies.png|U.S. trade balance and trade policy (1895–2015) |
|||
File:Imports vs exports & net imports.png|Imports vs exports & net imports |
|||
File:US Trade Balance from 1960.svg|US trade balance (from 1960) |
|||
File:Merchandise exports (1870-1992).png|Merchandise exports (1870–1992) |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Inflation=== |
|||
[[File:US Historical Inflation Ancient.svg|thumb|left|United States historical inflation rate, 1666–2019.]] |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
===Federal tax=== |
|||
{{Main|Taxation in the United States}} |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:US federal effective tax rates by income percentile and component.gif|U.S. federal effective tax rates by income percentile and component as projected for 2014 by the [[Tax Policy Center]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Effective tax rates: income, payroll, corporate and estate taxes combined|url=http://pgpf.org/Chart-Archive/0102_tax-rates|publisher=Peter G. Peterson Foundation|access-date=November 3, 2013|date=July 1, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=T13-0174 – Average Effective Federal Tax Rates by Filing Status; by Expanded Cash Income Percentile, 2014|url=http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?DocID=3933|publisher=Tax Policy Center|access-date=November 3, 2013|date=July 25, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141211105316/http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?DocID=3933|archive-date=December 11, 2014|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref> |
|||
File:Average US Federal Tax Rates 1979 to 2013.png|CBO estimates of historical effective federal tax rates broken down by income level.<ref name = "CBO 2010">{{cite web|url=http://cbo.gov/publication/44604|title=The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2010|publisher=The US Congressional Budget Office (CBO)|date=December 4, 2013|access-date=August 13, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Government spending=== |
|||
{{Main|United States federal budget}} |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:Total government spending on all levels (United States).png|Federal, state, and local government spending as a % of GDP history |
|||
File:Revenue and Expense to GDP Chart 1993 - 2012.png|Revenue and expense as % GDP |
|||
File:Military Expenditures 2018 SIPRI.png|A pie chart showing global military expenditures by country for 2018, in US${{nbs}}billions, according to SIPRI. |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Debt=== |
|||
{{Main|National debt of the United States}} |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:Debt in the United States.jpg|Debt in the United States |
|||
File:US-assets.jpg|[[Asset]]s of the United States as a fraction of [[Gross domestic product|GDP]] 1960–2008 |
|||
File:US-liabilities.jpg|[[Liability (accounting)|Liabilities]] of the United States as a fraction of [[Gross domestic product|GDP]] 1960–2009 |
|||
File:US federal government debt ceiling from 1990 to 2013.png|Development of U.S. federal [[United States debt ceiling|government debt ceiling]] from 1990 to January 2012.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/budget/historicals|title=Table 7.3 – Statutory Limits on Federal Debt: 1940–Current|publisher= [[Office of Management and Budget]]|access-date=December 25, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
File:U.S. Total Deficits vs. National Debt Increases 2001-2010.png|Deficit and debt increases 2001–2016. |
|||
File:USDebt.png|U.S. public net debt and the total public debt |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===Deficit=== |
|||
<gallery mode="packed" widths="200px"> |
|||
File:Annual Federal Deficit as a percent of GDP.pdf|Annual federal deficit as a percent of GDP |
|||
File:TwinE.PNG|"Twin deficit" (1960–2006) |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
==List of state and territory economies== |
==List of state and territory economies== |
||
Line 1,344: | Line 1,387: | ||
* [[Economy of Connecticut]] |
* [[Economy of Connecticut]] |
||
* [[Economy of Delaware]] |
* [[Economy of Delaware]] |
||
* [[Washington, D.C.#Economy|Economy of the District of Columbia]] |
|||
* [[Economy of Florida]] |
* [[Economy of Florida]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Georgia (U.S. state)#Economy|Economy of Georgia]] |
||
* [[Economy of Hawaii]] |
* [[Economy of Hawaii]] |
||
* [[Economy of Idaho]] |
* [[Economy of Idaho]] |
||
Line 1,368: | Line 1,410: | ||
* [[Economy of New Jersey]] |
* [[Economy of New Jersey]] |
||
* [[Economy of New Mexico]] |
* [[Economy of New Mexico]] |
||
* [[Economy of New York]] |
* [[Economy of New York (state)]] |
||
* [[Economy of North Carolina]] |
* [[Economy of North Carolina]] |
||
* [[Economy of North Dakota]] |
* [[Economy of North Dakota]] |
||
Line 1,383: | Line 1,425: | ||
* [[Economy of Vermont]] |
* [[Economy of Vermont]] |
||
* [[Economy of Virginia]] |
* [[Economy of Virginia]] |
||
* [[Economy of Washington]] |
* [[Washington, D.C.#Economy|Economy of Washington, D.C.]] |
||
* [[Economy of Washington (state)]] |
|||
* [[Economy of West Virginia]] |
* [[Economy of West Virginia]] |
||
* [[Economy of Wisconsin]] |
* [[Economy of Wisconsin]] |
||
Line 1,404: | Line 1,447: | ||
* [[Job creation index]] |
* [[Job creation index]] |
||
* [[Labor unions in the United States]] |
* [[Labor unions in the United States]] |
||
* [[Unemployment insurance in the United States]] |
|||
* [[List of industry trade groups in the United States]] |
* [[List of industry trade groups in the United States]] |
||
* [[Washington Consensus]] |
* [[Washington Consensus]] |
||
* [[World oil market chronology from 2003]] |
* [[World oil market chronology from 2003]] |
||
* [[Work–life balance]] |
|||
* [[Work–life balance in the United States]] |
|||
* [[Work–family balance in the United States]] |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Line 1,413: | Line 1,460: | ||
===Sources=== |
===Sources=== |
||
{{Commons category}} |
|||
{{Wikiquote}} |
|||
{{Refbegin}} |
{{Refbegin}} |
||
* {{Free-content attribution |
* {{Free-content attribution |
||
Line 1,424: | Line 1,473: | ||
| license = CC-BY-SA IGO 3.0 |
| license = CC-BY-SA IGO 3.0 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
* {{cite book |last1=Gordon |first1=Robert J. |title=The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change |date=1986 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |isbn=0-226-30452-3 |url=https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/american-business-cycle-continuity-and-change}} |
|||
{{Refend}} |
{{Refend}} |
||
{{Economy of the United States}} |
|||
==External links== |
|||
{{Commons category}} |
|||
{{Wikiquote}} |
|||
<!--{{No more links}} |
|||
Propose additions or replacements on the article's talk page, or submit your link to the relevant category at the Open Directory Project (dmoz.org) and link there using {{Dmoz}}. |
|||
See [[Wikipedia:External links]] and [[Wikipedia:Spam]] for details.--> |
|||
* [http://www.bls.gov/ Bureau of Labor Statistics] |
|||
* [https://www.bea.gov/ Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis] |
|||
* [http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/petroleu.html#IntlTrade Energy Information Administration] |
|||
* [http://www.oecd.org/unitedstates/ OECD] |
|||
* [https://ig.ft.com/sites/numbers/economies/us U.S. economy at a glance] |
|||
* [https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/USA/Year/LTST/TradeFlow/EXPIMP/Partner/by-country U.S. Exports and Imports] |
|||
{{Navboxes |
|||
|list= |
|||
{{United States topics}} |
|||
{{North America in topic|Economy of}} |
{{North America in topic|Economy of}} |
||
{{Economy of the United States by jurisdiction}} |
|||
{{Free trade agreements of the United States}} |
|||
{{World Trade Organization}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Portal bar|United States|Economics|Business and economics}} |
{{Portal bar|United States|Economics|Business and economics}} |
||
{{Authority control}} |
{{Authority control}} |
Latest revision as of 12:53, 24 December 2024
Currency | United States dollar (Sign: $; Code: USD) US Dollar Index |
---|---|
October 1 – September 30 | |
Trade organizations | WTO, G-20, G7, OECD, USMCA, APEC and others |
Country group | |
Statistics | |
Population | 340,332,281 (August 30, 2023)[9] |
GDP | |
GDP rank | |
GDP growth | |
GDP per capita | |
GDP per capita rank | |
GDP by sector |
|
GDP by component |
|
3% (2023)[14] | |
Population below poverty line | |
| |
69 out of 100 points (2023)[19] (rank 24th) | |
Labor force | |
Labor force by occupation |
|
Unemployment | |
Average gross salary | $5,605, monthly[22] (2023) |
$4,246, monthly[22] (2023) | |
Final consumption expenditure | 85.2% of GDP (2023)[13] |
Gross capital formation | 17.7% of GDP (2023)[13] |
10-year bond 5.09% (April 2024)[23] | |
Main industries |
|
External | |
Exports | $3.053 trillion (2023)[25] |
Export goods |
|
Main export partners | |
Imports | $3.827 trillion (2023)[25] |
Import goods |
|
Main import partners | |
FDI stock | |
Gross external debt | $27 trillion (2023)[31] |
Public finances | |
| |
–6.3% of GDP (2023)[32] | |
Revenues | $8.720 trillion[30] 29.9% of GDP (2024) |
Expenses | $10.945 trillion[30] 37.5% of GDP (2024) Government spending in the United States |
Economic aid | donor: ODA, $35.26 billion (2017)[33] |
$250 billion (2024)[39] | |
All values, unless otherwise stated, are in US dollars. |
This article is part of a series on the |
Economy of the United States |
---|
The United States has a highly developed mixed economy.[40][41][42] It is the world's largest economy by nominal GDP; it is also the second largest by purchasing power parity (PPP), behind China.[43] It has the world's sixth highest per capita GDP (nominal) and the eighth highest per capita GDP (PPP) as of 2024.[10] The U.S. accounted for 26% of the global economy in 2023 in nominal terms, and about 15.5% in PPP terms.[11][44] The U.S. dollar is the currency of record most used in international transactions and is the world's reserve currency, backed by a large U.S. treasuries market, its role as the reference standard for the petrodollar system, and its linked eurodollar.[45] Several countries use it as their official currency and in others it is the de facto currency.[46] Since the end of World War II, the economy has achieved relatively steady growth, low unemployment and inflation, and rapid advances in technology.[12]
The American economy is fueled by high productivity, well developed transportation infrastructure, and extensive natural resources.[47] Americans have the sixth highest average household and employee income among OECD member states.[48] In 2021, they had the highest median household income.[49] The U.S. has one of the world's highest income inequalities among the developed countries.[50][51][52] The largest U.S. trading partners are Canada, Mexico, China, Japan, Germany, South Korea, the United Kingdom, Taiwan, India, and Vietnam.[53] The U.S. is the world's largest importer and second largest exporter.[54] It has free trade agreements with several countries, including Canada and Mexico (through the USMCA), Australia, South Korea, Israel, and several others that are in effect or under negotiation.[55] The U.S. has a highly flexible labor market, where the industry adheres to a hire-and-fire policy, and job security is relatively low.[56][57] Among OECD nations, the U.S. has a highly efficient and strong social security system; social expenditure stood at roughly 30% of GDP.[8][58][7]
The United States is the world's largest producer of petroleum and natural gas.[59] In 2016, it was the world's largest trading country[60] and second largest manufacturer, with American manufacturing making up a fifth of the global total.[61] The U.S. not only has the largest internal market for goods, but also dominates the services trade. Total U.S. trade was $4.2 trillion in 2018.[62] Of the world's 500 largest companies, 121 are headquartered in the U.S.[63] The U.S. has the world's highest number of billionaires, with total wealth of $3.0 trillion.[64][65] U.S. commercial banks had $22.9 trillion in assets in December 2022.[66] U.S. global assets under management had more than $30 trillion in assets.[67][68] During the Great Recession of 2008, the U.S. economy suffered a significant decline.[69][70] The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act was enacted by the United States Congress, and in the ensuing years the U.S. experienced the longest economic expansion on record by July 2019.[71][72][73][74]
The New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq are the world's largest stock exchanges by market capitalization and trade volume.[75][76] The U.S. has the world's largest gold reserve, with over 8,000 tonnes of gold.[77] In 2014, the U.S. economy was ranked first in international ranking on venture capital[78] and global research and development funding.[79] The U.S. spends around 3.46% of GDP on cutting-edge research and development across various sectors of the economy.[80] The U.S. has produced the world's highest number of Nobel laureates in the economics field.[81] It is also the world's fourth largest high-technology exporter.[82] The U.S. ranks second in the world by number of patent applications.[83] Consumer spending comprised 68% of the U.S. economy in 2022,[84] while its labor share of income was 44% in 2021.[85] The U.S. has the world's largest consumer market.[86] The nation's labor market has attracted immigrants from all over the world and its net migration rate is among the highest in the world.[87] The U.S. is one of the top-performing economies in studies such as the Ease of Doing Business Index, the Global Competitiveness Report, and others.[88]
History
[edit]Colonial era and 18th century
[edit]The economic history of the United States began with British settlements along the Eastern seaboard in the 17th and 18th centuries. After 1700, the United States gained population rapidly, and imports as well as exports grew along with it. Africa, Asia, and most frequently Europe, contributed to the trade of the colonies.[89] These 13 colonies gained independence from the British Empire in the late 18th century[90] and quickly grew from colonial economies towards an economy focused on agriculture.[91]
19th century
[edit]In 180 years, the United States grew to become a huge, integrated, and industrialized economy, which made up about a fifth of the world economy. In that process, the U.S. GDP per capita rose past that of many other countries, supplanting the British Empire at the top. The economy maintained high wages, attracting immigrants by the millions from all over the world.[92] In the 1820s and 1830s, mass production shifted much of the economy from artisans to factories. New government regulations strengthened patents.
Early in the 19th century, more than 80 percent of Americans engaged in farming. Most of the manufacturing centered on the first stages of the transformation of raw materials, with lumber and sawmills, textiles, and boots and shoes leading the way. The rich natural resources contributed to the rapid economic expansion of the nineteenth century. Ample land allowed the number of farmers to keep growing; but activity in manufacturing, services, transportation, and other sectors grew much faster, so that by 1860 the population was only about 50 percent rural, down from over 80 percent.[93]
In the 19th century, recessions frequently coincided with financial crises. The Panic of 1837 was followed by a five-year depression, marked by bank failures and unprecedented unemployment.[94] Because of the great changes in the economy over the centuries, it is difficult to compare the severity of modern recessions to that of early recessions.[95] Recessions after World War II appear to have been less severe than earlier recessions, but the reasons for this are unclear.[96]
20th century
[edit]At the beginning of the century, new innovations and improvements in existing innovations opened the door for improvements in the standard of living among American consumers. Many firms grew large by taking advantage of economies of scale and better communication to run nationwide operations. Concentration in these industries raised fears of monopolies that would drive prices higher and output lower, but many of these firms were cutting costs so fast that trends were towards lower prices and more output in these industries. Many workers shared the success of these large firms, which typically offered the highest wages in the world.[97]
The United States has been the world's largest national economy in terms of GDP since around 1890.[98] For many years following the Great Depression of the 1930s, when the danger of recession appeared most serious, the government strengthened the economy by spending heavily itself or cutting taxes so that consumers would spend more and by fostering rapid growth in the money supply, which also encouraged more spending. Ideas about the best tools for stabilizing the economy changed substantially between the 1930s and the 1980s. From the New Deal era that began in 1933 to the Great Society initiatives of the 1960s, national policymakers relied principally on fiscal policy to influence the economy.[99]
During the world wars of the twentieth century, the United States fared better than the rest of the combatants because none of the First World War and relatively little of the Second World War were fought on American territory (and none on the then-48 states). Yet, even in the United States, the wars meant sacrifice. During the peak of Second World War activity, nearly 40 percent of U.S. GDP was devoted to war production. Decisions about large swaths of the economy were largely made for military purposes, and nearly all relevant inputs were allocated to the war effort. Many goods were rationed, prices and wages controlled, and many durable consumer goods were no longer produced. Large segments of the workforce were inducted into the military and paid half their wages; roughly half of those were sent into harm's way.[100]
The approach, advanced by British economist John Maynard Keynes, gave elected officials a leading role in directing the economy since spending and taxes are controlled by the U.S. president and Congress. The "Baby Boom" saw a dramatic increase in fertility in the period 1942–1957; it was caused by delayed marriages and childbearing during the depression years, a surge in prosperity, a demand for suburban single-family homes (as opposed to inner city apartments), and new optimism about the future. The boom peaked around 1957 and then began to fade.[101] A period of high inflation, interest rates, and unemployment after 1973 weakened confidence in fiscal policy as a tool for regulating the overall pace of economic activity.[102]
The U.S. economy grew by an average of 3.8% from 1946 to 1973, while real median household income surged by 74% (or 2.1% a year).[103][104]
Since the 1970s, several emerging countries have begun to close the economic gap with the United States. In most cases, this has been due to moving the manufacture of goods formerly made in the U.S. to countries where they could be made for sufficiently less money to cover the cost of shipping plus a higher profit. In other cases, some countries have gradually learned to produce the same products and services that previously only the U.S. and a few other countries could produce. Real income growth in the U.S. has slowed. In the 1970s and 1980s, it was popular in the U.S. to believe that Japan's economy would surpass that of the U.S., but this did not occur.[105]
21st century
[edit]The United States economy experienced a recession in 2001 with an unusually slow jobs recovery, with the number of jobs not regaining the February 2001 level until January 2005.[106] This "jobless recovery" overlapped with the building of a housing bubble and arguably a wider debt bubble, as the ratio of household debt to GDP rose from a record level of 70% in Q1 2001 to 99% in Q1 2008. Homeowners were borrowing against their bubble-priced homes to fuel consumption, driving up their debt levels while providing an unsustainable boost to GDP. When housing prices began falling in 2006, the value of securities backed by mortgages fell dramatically, causing the equivalent of a bank run in the essentially unregulated non-depository banking system, which had outgrown the traditional, regulated depository banking system. Many mortgage companies and other non-depository banks (e.g., investment banks) faced a worsening crisis in 2007–2008, with the banking crisis peaking in September 2008, with the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and bailouts of several other financial institutions.[107]
The Bush administration (2001–2009) and Obama administrations (2009–2017) applied banking bailout programs and Keynesian stimulus via high government deficits, while the Federal Reserve maintained near-zero interest rates. These measures helped the economy recover, as households paid down debts in 2009–2012, the only years since 1947 where this occurred,[108] presenting a significant barrier to recovery.[107] Real GDP regained its pre-crisis (late 2007) peak by 2011,[109] household net worth by Q2 2012,[110] non-farm payroll jobs by May 2014,[106] and the unemployment rate by September 2015.[111] Each of these variables continued into post-recession record territory following those dates, with the U.S. recovery becoming the second longest on record in April 2018.[74]
A significant recession, as defined lost economic output, occurred during the financial crisis of 2007–2008, when GDP fell by 5.0% from the spring of 2008 to the spring of 2009. Other significant recessions took place in 1957–1958, when GDP fell 3.7% following the 1973 oil crisis, with a 3.1% fall from late 1973 to early 1975, and in the 1981–1982 recession, when GDP dropped by 2.9%.[112][113] Recent, mild recessions have included the 1990–1991 downturn, when output fell by 1.3%, and the 2001 recession, in which GDP slid by 0.3%; the 2001 downturn lasted just eight months.[113] The most vigorous, sustained periods of growth, on the other hand, took place from early 1961 to mid-1969, with an expansion of 53% (5.1% a year), from mid-1991 to late 2000, at 43% (3.8% a year), and from late 1982 to mid-1990, at 37% (4% a year).[112]
Debt held by the public, a measure of national debt, has risen throughout the 21st century. Rising from 31% in 2000 to 52% in 2009, and reaching 77% of GDP in 2017, the U.S. ranked 43rd highest in debt out of 207 countries.[114]
COVID-19 pandemic
[edit]This section needs to be updated.(October 2021) |
In the first two quarters of 2020 amid Donald Trump's presidency,[115] the U.S. economy suffered major setbacks beginning in March 2020, due to the novel coronavirus and having to "shut-down" major sectors of the American economy.[116] As of March 2020, US exports of automobiles and industrial machines had plummeted as a result of the worldwide pandemic.[117] Social distancing measures which took effect in March 2020, and which negatively impacted the demand for goods and services, resulted in the US GDP declining at a 4.8% annualized rate in the first quarter, the steepest pace of contraction in output since the fourth quarter of 2008.[118] US retails sales dropped a record 8.7% in March alone. The US airline industry had also been hit hard, seeing a sharp decline in its revenues.[119] The COVID-19 recession has been widely described as the most severe global economic downturn since the Great Depression and "far worse" than the Great Recession.[120][121][122][123]
In May 2020, CNN gave an analysis based on unemployment data that the US economy was perhaps the worst that it had been since the 1930s.[125] By May 8, the US had reached a record 14.7 percent unemployment, with 20.5 million jobs lost in April.[126] The Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, warned that it may take "an extended time" before the US economy fully recovers from weak economic growth, due to the pandemic, and that in the foreseeable future the US can expect "low productivity growth and stagnant incomes".[127] By May 31, 2020, more than forty million Americans had filed for unemployment benefits.[128]
By June 2020, the slump in US continental flights due to the coronavirus pandemic had resulted in the US government temporarily halting service of fifteen US airlines to 75 domestic airports.[129] The New York Times reported on June 10, 2020, that "the United States budget deficit grew to a record $1.88 trillion for the first eight months of this fiscal year."[130]
The US economy recovered from the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021, growing by 5.7%, which was its best performance since Ronald Reagan's presidency (1981–1989).[131]
2021–2022 marked a historical inflation surge in the United States, with the Consumer Price Index inflation rate hitting 9.1% higher in June 2022 than June 2021, constituting a 41-year high inflation rate with critics blaming the Federal Reserve among other factors.[132] Inflation rate reached 4.9% in April 2023, which was roughly 3% above the Federal Reserve's 2% target rate.[133]
Data
[edit]The following table shows the main economic indicators in 1980–2023 (with IMF staff estimates in 2024–2028). Inflation below 5% is in green.[134]
Year | GDP
(in Bil. US$PPP) |
GDP per capita
(in US$ PPP) |
GDP
(in Bil. US$nominal) |
GDP per capita
(in US$ nominal) |
GDP growth
(real) |
Inflation rate
(in Percent) |
Unemployment
(in Percent) |
Government debt
(in % of GDP) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1980 | 2,857.3 | 12,552.9 | 2,857.3 | 12,552.9 | -0.3% | 13.5% | 7.2% | n/a |
1981 | 3,207.0 | 13,948.7 | 3,207.0 | 13,948.7 | 2.5% | 10.4% | 7.6% | n/a |
1982 | 3,343.8 | 14,405.0 | 3,343.8 | 14,405.0 | -1.8% | 6.2% | 9.7% | n/a |
1983 | 3,634.0 | 15,513.7 | 3,634.0 | 15,513.7 | 4.6% | 3.2% | 9.6% | n/a |
1984 | 4,037.7 | 17,086.4 | 4,037.7 | 17,086.4 | 7.2% | 4.4% | 7.5% | n/a |
1985 | 4,339.0 | 18,199.3 | 4,339.0 | 18,199.3 | 4.2% | 3.5% | 7.2% | n/a |
1986 | 4,579.6 | 19,034.8 | 4,579.6 | 19,034.8 | 3.5% | 1.9% | 7.0% | n/a |
1987 | 4,855.3 | 20,001.0 | 4,855.3 | 20,001.0 | 3.5% | 3.6% | 6.2% | n/a |
1988 | 5,236.4 | 21,376.0 | 5,236.4 | 21,376.0 | 4.2% | 4.1% | 5.5% | n/a |
1989 | 5,641.6 | 22,814.1 | 5,641.6 | 22,814.1 | 3.7% | 4.8% | 5.3% | n/a |
1990 | 5,963.1 | 23,848.0 | 5,963.1 | 23,848.0 | 1.9% | 5.4% | 5.6% | n/a |
1991 | 6,158.1 | 24,302.8 | 6,158.1 | 24,302.8 | -0.1% | 4.2% | 6.9% | n/a |
1992 | 6,520.3 | 25,392.9 | 6,520.3 | 25,392.9 | 3.5% | 3.0% | 7.5% | n/a |
1993 | 6,858.6 | 26,364.2 | 6,858.6 | 26,364.2 | 2.8% | 3.0% | 6.9% | n/a |
1994 | 7,287.3 | 27,674.0 | 7,287.3 | 27,674.0 | 4.0% | 2.6% | 6.1% | n/a |
1995 | 7,639.8 | 28,671.5 | 7,639.8 | 28,671.5 | 2.7% | 2.8% | 5.6% | n/a |
1996 | 8,073.1 | 29,947.0 | 8,073.1 | 29,947.0 | 3.8% | 2.9% | 5.4% | n/a |
1997 | 8,577.6 | 31,440.1 | 8,577.6 | 31,440.1 | 4.4% | 2.3% | 4.9% | n/a |
1998 | 9,062.8 | 32,833.7 | 9,062.8 | 32,833.7 | 4.5% | 1.5% | 4.5% | n/a |
1999 | 9,631.2 | 34,496.2 | 9,631.2 | 34,496.2 | 4.8% | 2.2% | 4.2% | n/a |
2000 | 10,251.0 | 36,312.8 | 10,251.0 | 36,312.8 | 4.1% | 3.4% | 4.0% | n/a |
2001 | 10,581.9 | 37,101.5 | 10,581.9 | 37,101.5 | 1.0% | 2.8% | 4.7% | 53.1% |
2002 | 10,929.1 | 37,945.8 | 10,929.1 | 37,945.8 | 1.7% | 1.6% | 5.8% | 55.5% |
2003 | 11,456.5 | 39,405.4 | 11,456.5 | 39,405.4 | 2.8% | 2.3% | 6.0% | 58.6% |
2004 | 12,217.2 | 41,641.6 | 12,217.2 | 41,641.6 | 3.9% | 2.7% | 5.5% | 66.2% |
2005 | 13,039.2 | 44,034.3 | 13,039.2 | 44,034.3 | 3.5% | 3.4% | 5.1% | 65.5% |
2006 | 13,815.6 | 46,216.9 | 13,815.6 | 46,216.9 | 2.8% | 3.2% | 4.6% | 64.2% |
2007 | 14,474.3 | 47,943.4 | 14,474.3 | 47,943.4 | 2.0% | 2.9% | 4.6% | 64.6% |
2008 | 14,769.9 | 48,470.6 | 14,769.9 | 48,470.6 | 0.1% | 3.8% | 5.8% | 73.5% |
2009 | 14,478.1 | 47,102.4 | 14,478.1 | 47,102.4 | -2.6% | -0.3% | 9.3% | 86.7% |
2010 | 15,049.0 | 48,586.3 | 15,049.0 | 48,586.3 | 2.7% | 1.6% | 9.6% | 95.2% |
2011 | 15,599.7 | 50,008.1 | 15,599.7 | 50,008.1 | 1.6% | 3.1% | 8.9% | 99.5% |
2012 | 16,254.0 | 51,736.7 | 16,254.0 | 51,736.7 | 2.3% | 2.1% | 8.1% | 103.1% |
2013 | 16,880.6 | 53,363.9 | 16,880.6 | 53,363.9 | 2.1% | 1.5% | 7.4% | 104.3% |
2014 | 17,608.1 | 55,263.8 | 17,608.1 | 55,263.8 | 2.5% | 1.6% | 6.1% | 104.2% |
2015 | 18,295.0 | 57,006.9 | 18,295.0 | 57,006.9 | 2.9% | 0.1% | 5.2% | 104.6% |
2016 | 18,804.9 | 58,179.6 | 18,804.9 | 58,179.6 | 1.8% | 1.3% | 4.9% | 106.5% |
2017 | 19,612.1 | 60,292.9 | 19,612.1 | 60,292.9 | 2.5% | 2.1% | 4.4% | 105.5% |
2018 | 20,656.5 | 63,165.2 | 20,656.5 | 63,165.2 | 3.0% | 2.4% | 3.9% | 106.8% |
2019 | 21,539.9 | 65,561.3 | 21,539.9 | 65,561.3 | 2.6% | 1.8% | 3.7% | 108% |
2020 | 21,354.1 | 64,461.6 | 21,354.1 | 64,461.6 | -2.2% | 1.2% | 8.1% | 131.8% |
2021 | 23,681.1 | 71,257.9 | 23,681.1 | 71,257.9 | 6.1% | 4.7% | 5.4% | 124.5% |
2022 | 26,006.9 | 77,979.8 | 26,006.9 | 77,979.8 | 2.5% | 8.0% | 3.6% | 118.6% |
2023 | 27,720.7 | 82,715.1 | 27,720.7 | 82,715.1 | 2.9% | 4.1% | 3.6% | 118.7% |
2024 | 29,167.7 | 86,601.2 | 29,167.7 | 86,601.2 | 2.8% | 2.9% | 4.1% | 121% |
2025 | 30,337.1 | 89,677.8 | 30,337.1 | 89,677.8 | 2.2% | 1.9% | 4.4% | 124.1% |
2026 | 31,526.9 | 92,785.8 | 31,526.9 | 92,785.8 | 2.0% | 2.1% | 4.3% | 126.6% |
2027 | 32,786.7 | 96,070.1 | 32,786.7 | 96,070.1 | 2.1% | 2.1% | 4.2% | 128.4% |
2028 | 34,096.0 | 99,467.8 | 34,096.0 | 99,467.8 | 2.1% | 2.1% | 4.0% | 130.2% |
2029 | 35,457.9 | 102,987.0 | 35,457.9 | 102,987.0 | 2.1% | 2.1% | 4.0% | 131.7% |
GDP
[edit]U.S. nominal GDP was $19.5 trillion in 2017, the largest in the world. Annualized, nominal GDP reached $20.1 trillion in Q1 2018, the first time it exceeded $20 trillion. About 70% of U.S. GDP is personal consumption, with business investment 18%, government 17% (federal, state and local but excluding transfer payments such as Social Security, which is in consumption) and net exports a negative 3% due to the U.S. trade deficit.[136] Real gross domestic product, a measure of both production and income, grew by 2.3% in 2017, vs. 1.5% in 2016 and 2.9% in 2015. Real GDP grew at a quarterly annualized rate of 2.2% in Q1 2018, 4.2% in Q2 2018, 3.4% in Q3 2018, and 2.2% in Q4 2018; the Q2 rate was the best growth rate since Q3 2014, and the overall yearly GDP growth of 2.9% in 2018 was the best performance of the economy in a decade.[137] In 2020, the growth rate of the GDP has started to drop as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in the GDP shrinking at a quarterized annual growth rate of −5.0% in Q1 2020[citation needed] and −32.9% in Q2 2020,[citation needed] respectively.
As of 2014, China passed the U.S. as the largest economy in GDP (PPP) terms, measured at purchasing power parity conversion rates. The U.S. had the highest GDP (PPP) figures for more than a century prior to that milestone; China has more than tripled the U.S. growth rate for each of the past 40 years. As of 2017, the European Union as an aggregate had a GDP roughly 5% larger than the U.S., although the former is a political union not a country. The United States', however, remained the world's largest economy with the highest nominal GDP.[138]
Real GDP per capita (measured in 2009 dollars) was $52,444 in 2017 and has been growing each year since 2010. It grew 3.0% per year on average in the 1960s, 2.1% in the 1970s, 2.4% in the 1980s, 2.2% in the 1990s, 0.7% in the 2000s, and 0.9% from 2010 to 2017.[139] Reasons for slower growth since 2000 are debated by economists and may include aging demographics, slower population and growth in labor force, slower productivity growth, reduced corporate investment, greater income inequality reducing demand, lack of major innovations, and reduced labor power.[140] The U.S. ranked 20th out of 220 countries in GDP per capita in 2017.[141] Among the modern U.S. Presidents, Bill Clinton had the highest cumulative percent real GDP increase during his two terms, Reagan second and Obama third.[137]
The development of the nation's GDP according to World Bank:[142] U.S. real GDP grew by an average of 1.7% from 2000 to the first half of 2014, a rate around half the historical average up to 2000.[143]
By economic sector
[edit]Nominal GDP sector composition
[edit]Nominal GDP sector composition, 2015 (in millions of dollars) at 2005 constant prices[144]
Country/Economy | Real GDP | Agri. | Indus. | Serv. |
---|---|---|---|---|
World | 60,093,221 | 1,968,215 | 16,453,140 | 38,396,695 |
United States | 15,160,104 | 149,023 | 3,042,332 | 11,518,980 |
Nominal GDP Sector Composition, 2016 (in millions of dollars) at current prices.[145]
Country/Economy | Nominal GDP | Agri. | Indus. | Serv. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States | 18,624,450 | 204,868.95 | 3,613,143.3 | 14,806,437.75 | |
*Percentages from CIA World Factbook[146] |
Employment
[edit]There were approximately 160.4 million people in the U.S. labor force in 2017, the fourth largest labor force in the world behind China, India, and the European Union.[148] The government (federal, state and local) employed 22 million in 2010.[149] Small businesses are the nation's largest employer, representing 37% of American workers.[150] The second-largest share of employment belongs to large businesses employing 36% of the U.S. workforce.[150] White collar workers comprise 44% of the workforce as of 2022, up from 34% in 2000.[151]
The nation's private sector employs 85% of working Americans. Government accounts for 14% of all U.S. workers. Over 99% of all private employing organizations in the U.S. are small businesses.[150] The 30 million small businesses in the U.S. account for 64% of newly created jobs (those created minus those lost).[150] Jobs in small businesses accounted for 70% of those created in the last decade.[152]
The proportion of Americans employed by small business versus large business has remained relatively the same year by year as some small businesses become large businesses and just over half of small businesses survive for more than five years.[150] Amongst large businesses, several of the largest companies and employers in the world are American companies. Amongst them are Walmart, which is both the largest company and the largest private sector employer in the world. Walmart employs 2.1 million people worldwide and 1.4 million in the U.S. alone.[153][154]
There are nearly thirty million small businesses in the U.S.. Minorities such as Hispanics, African Americans, Asian Americans, and Native Americans (35% of the country's population),[155] own 4.1 million of the nation's businesses. Minority-owned businesses generate almost $700 billion in revenue, and they employ almost five million workers in the U.S.[150][156] Americans have the highest average employee income among OECD nations.[157] The median household income in the U.S. as of 2008 is $52,029.[158] About 284,000 working people in the U.S. have two full-time jobs and 7.6 million have part-time ones in addition to their full-time employments.[149] Out of all working individuals in the U.S., 12% belong to a labor union and most union members work for the government.[149] The decline of union membership in the U.S. over the last several decades parallels that of labor's share of the economy.[159][160][161] The World Bank ranks the United States first in the ease of hiring and firing workers.[162] The United States is the only advanced economy that does not legally guarantee its workers paid vacation or paid sick days, and is one of just a few countries in the world without paid family leave as a legal right, with the others being Papua New Guinea, Suriname and Liberia.[163][164][165] In 2014 and again in 2020, the International Trade Union Confederation graded the U.S. a 4 out of 5+, its third-lowest score, on the subject of powers and rights granted to labor unions.[166][167] Similarly, a 2023 study published by Oxfam found that the United States ranks among the worst among developed countries for labor protections.[168][169] Some scholars, including business theorist Jeffrey Pfeffer and political scientist Daniel Kinderman, posit that contemporary employment practices in the United States relating to the increased performance pressure from management, and the hardships imposed on employees such as toxic working environments, precarity, and long hours, could be responsible for 120,000 excess deaths annually, making the workplace the fifth leading cause of death in the United States.[170][171][172]
Unemployment
[edit]As of December 2017, the unemployment rate in the U.S. was 4.1%[173] or 6.6 million people.[174] The government's broader U-6 unemployment rate, which includes the part-time underemployed, was 8.1%[175] or 8.2 million people. These figures were calculated with a civilian labor force of approximately 160.6 million people,[176] relative to a U.S. population of approximately 327 million people.[177]
Between 2009 and 2010, following the Great Recession, the emerging problem of jobless recoveries resulted in record levels of long-term unemployment with more than six million workers looking for work for more than six months as of January 2010. This particularly affected older workers.[178] A year after the recession ended in June 2009, immigrants gained 656,000 jobs in the U.S., while U.S.-born workers lost more than a million jobs, due in part to an aging country (relatively more white retirees) and demographic shifts.[179] In April 2010, the official unemployment rate was 9.9%, but the government's broader U-6 unemployment rate was 17.1%.[180] Between February 2008 and February 2010, the number of people working part-time for economic reasons (i.e., would prefer to work full-time) increased by 4.0 million to 8.8 million, an 83% increase in part-time workers during the two-year period.[181]
By 2013, although the unemployment rate had fallen below 8%, the record proportion of long term unemployed and continued decreasing household income remained indicative of a jobless recovery.[182] However, the number of payroll jobs returned to its pre-recession (November 2007) level by May 2014 as the economy recovered.[183]
After being higher in the post-war period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since.[184][185][186] In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in agriculture. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture.[187] Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).[188]
The youth unemployment rate was 18.5% in July 2009, the highest rate in that month since 1948.[189] The unemployment rate of young African Americans was 28.2% in May 2013.[190]
The unemployment rate reached an all-time high of 14.7% in April 2020 before falling back to 11.1% in June 2020. Due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, Q2 GDP in the US fell 32.9% in 2020.[191][192][193] The unemployment rate continued its rapid decline falling to 3.9% in 2021.[194] It reached 3.7% in May 2023.[195]
Employment by sector
[edit]U.S. employment, as estimated in 2012, is divided into 79.7% in the service sector, 19.2% in the manufacturing sector, and 1.1% in the agriculture sector.[196]
Income and wealth
[edit]Income measures
[edit]Real (i.e., inflation-adjusted) median household income, a good measure of middle-class income, was $59,039 in 2016, a record level. However, it was just above the previous record set in 1998, indicating the purchasing power of middle-class family income has been stagnant or down for much of the past twenty years.[198] During 2013, employee compensation was $8.969 trillion, while gross private investment totals $2.781 trillion.[199]
Americans have the highest average household income among OECD nations, and in 2010 had the fourth-highest median household income, down from second-highest in 2007.[200][157] According to one analysis middle-class incomes in the United States fell into a tie with those in Canada in 2010, and may have fallen behind by 2014, while several other advanced economies have closed the gap in recent years.[201]
Income inequality
[edit]This article is part of a series on |
Income in the United States of America |
---|
United States portal |
Income inequality has fluctuated considerably in the United States since measurements began around 1915, moving in an arc between peaks in the 1920s and 2000s, with a 30-year period of relatively lower inequality between 1950 and 1980.
The U.S. has the highest level of income inequality among its (post-)industrialized peers.[202] When measured for all households, U.S. income inequality is comparable to other developed countries before taxes and transfers, but is among the highest after taxes and transfers, meaning the U.S. shifts relatively less income from higher income households to lower income households. In 2016, average market income was $15,600 for the lowest quintile and $280,300 for the highest quintile. The degree of inequality accelerated within the top quintile, with the top 1% at $1.8 million, approximately 30 times the $59,300 income of the middle quintile.[203]
The economic and political impacts of inequality may include slower GDP growth, reduced income mobility, higher poverty rates, greater usage of household debt leading to increased risk of financial crises, and political polarization.[204][205] Causes of inequality may include executive compensation increasing relative to the average worker, financialization, greater industry concentration, lower unionization rates, lower effective tax rates on higher incomes, and technology changes that reward higher educational attainment.[206]
Measurement is debated, as inequality measures vary significantly, for example, across datasets[207][208] or whether the measurement is taken based on cash compensation (market income) or after taxes and transfer payments. The Gini coefficient is a widely accepted statistic that applies comparisons across jurisdictions, with a zero indicating perfect equality and 1 indicating maximum inequality. Further, various public and private data sets measure those incomes, e.g., from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO),[203] the Internal Revenue Service, and Census.[209] According to the Census Bureau, income inequality reached then record levels in 2018, with a Gini of 0.485,[210] Since then the Census Bureau have given values of 0.488 in 2020 and 0.494 in 2021, per pre-tax money income.[211]
U.S. tax and transfer policies are progressive and therefore reduce effective income inequality, as rates of tax generally increase as taxable income increases. As a group, the lowest earning workers, especially those with dependents, pay no income taxes and may actually receive a small subsidy from the federal government (from child credits and the Earned Income Tax Credit).[212] The 2016 U.S. Gini coefficient was .59 based on market income, but was reduced to .42 after taxes and transfers, according to Congressional Budget Office (CBO) figures. The top 1% share of market income rose from 9.6% in 1979 to a peak of 20.7% in 2007, before falling to 17.5% by 2016. After taxes and transfers, these figures were 7.4%, 16.6%, and 12.5%, respectively.[203]Household net worth and wealth inequality
[edit]As of Q4 2017, total household net worth in the United States was a record $99 trillion, an increase of $5.2 trillion from 2016. This increase reflects both stock market and housing price gains. This measure has been setting records since Q4 2012.[214] If divided evenly, the $99 trillion represents an average of $782,000 per household (for about 126.2 million households) or $302,000 per person. However, median household net worth (i.e., half of the families above and below this level) was $97,300 in 2016. The bottom 25% of families had a median net worth of zero, while the 25th to 50th percentile had a median net worth of $40,000.[215]
Wealth inequality is more unequal than income inequality, with the top 1% households owning approximately 42% of the net worth in 2012, versus 24% in 1979.[216] According to a September 2017 report by the Federal Reserve, wealth inequality is at record highs; the top 1% controlled 38.6% of the country's wealth in 2016.[217] The Boston Consulting Group posited in June 2017 report that 1% of the Americans will control 70% of country's wealth by 2021.[218]
The top 10% wealthiest possess 80% of all financial assets.[219] Wealth inequality in the U.S. is greater than in most developed countries other than Sweden.[220] Inherited wealth may help explain why many Americans who have become rich may have had a "substantial head start".[221][222] In September 2012, according to the Institute for Policy Studies, "over 60 percent" of the Forbes richest 400 Americans "grew up in substantial privilege".[223] Median household wealth fell 35% in the U.S., from $106,591 to $68,839 between 2005 and 2011, due to the Great Recession, but has since recovered as indicated above.[224]
About 30% of the entire world's millionaire population resides in the United States (as of 2009[update]).[225] The Economist Intelligence Unit estimated in 2008 that there were 16,600,000 millionaires in the U.S.[226] Furthermore, 34% of the world's billionaires are American (in 2011).[227][228]
Home ownership
[edit]The U.S. home ownership rate in Q1 2018 was 64.2%, well below the all-time peak of 69.2% set in Q4 2004 during a housing bubble. Millions of homes were lost to foreclosure during the Great Recession of 2007–2009, bringing the ownership rate to a trough of 62.9% in Q2 2016. The average ownership rate from 1965 to 2017 was 65.3%.[229]
The average home in the United States has more than 700 square feet per person (65 square meters), which is 50%–100% more than the average in other high-income countries. Similarly, ownership rates of gadgets and amenities are relatively high compared to other countries.[230][231][232]
It was reported by Pew Research Center in 2016 that, for the first time in 130 years, Americans aged 18 to 34 are more likely to live with their parents than in any other housing situation.[233]
In one study by ATTOM Data Solutions, in 70% of the counties surveyed, homes are increasingly unaffordable for the average U.S. worker.[234]
As of 2018, the number of U.S. citizens residing in their vehicles increased in major cities with significantly higher than average housing costs such as Los Angeles, Portland and San Francisco.[235][236]
According to CNBC, the median sale price for a U.S. home in 2017 was US$199,200.[237] By February 2023, the median U.S. home sale price grew to US$392,000 according to Statista.[238] The US has a country-wide housing shortage caused by insufficient housing construction (which declined severely after the 2008 Great Recession), and has caused rents and home prices to rise to increasingly unaffordable levels, with one estimate of the shortage being 3.8 million units in 2019, with this shortage having gotten worse during and since the pandemic.[239][240]
As of January 2024, in roughly half of cities in the U.S., workers need incomes of $100,000 or more in order to purchase a home as a result of rising housing prices and interest rate hikes.[241]
Profits and wages
[edit]Real wages (wages adjusted for inflation) for most workers in the United States and median incomes have either declined or remained stagnant for the last twenty to forty years.[242][243][244][245] A 2020 microanalysis demonstrated that in the preceding four decades labor's share of national output declined while over the same period the profit share of the same output increased.[246]
In 1970, wages represented more than 51% of the U.S. GDP and profits were less than 5%. But by 2013, wages had fallen to 44% of the economy, while profits had more than doubled to 11%.[247] Inflation-adjusted ("real") per capita disposable personal income rose steadily in the U.S. from 1945 to 2008, but has since remained generally level.[248][249]
In 2005, median personal income for those over the age of 18 ranged from $3,317 for an unemployed, married Asian American female[250] to $55,935 for a full-time, year-round employed Asian American male.[251] According to the U.S. Census men tended to have higher income than women while Asians and Whites earned more than African Americans and Hispanics. The overall median personal income for all individuals over the age of 18 was $24,062[252] ($32,140 for those age 25 or above) in the year 2005.[253]
As a reference point, the minimum wage rate in 2009 and 2017 was $7.25 per hour or $15,080 for the 2080 hours in a typical work year. The minimum wage is a little more than the poverty level for a single person unit and about 50% of the poverty level for a family of four.
According to an October 2014 report by the Pew Research Center, real wages have been flat or falling for the last five decades for most U.S. workers, regardless of job growth.[254] Bloomberg reported in July 2018 that real GDP per capita has grown substantially since the Great Recession.[255]
An August 2017 survey by CareerBuilder found that eight out of ten U.S. workers live paycheck to paycheck. CareerBuilder spokesman Mike Erwin blamed "stagnant wages and the rising cost of everything from education to many consumer goods".[256] According to a survey by the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on the financial well-being of U.S. citizens, roughly half have trouble paying bills, and more than one third have faced hardships such as not being able to afford a place to live, running out of food, or not having enough money to pay for medical care.[257] According to journalist and author Alissa Quart, the cost of living is rapidly outpacing the growth of salaries and wages, including those for traditionally secure professions such as teaching. She writes that "middle-class life is now 30% more expensive than it was 20 years ago."[258]
In February 2019, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported that seven million U.S. citizens are three months or more behind on their car payments, setting a record. This is considered a red flag by economists, that Americans are struggling to pay bills in spite of a low unemployment rate.[259] A May 2019 poll conducted by NPR found that among rural Americans, 40% struggle to pay for healthcare, food and housing, and 49% could not pay cash for a $1,000 emergency, and would instead choose to borrow in order to pay for such an unexpected emergency expense.[260] Some experts assert that the US has experienced a "two-tier recovery", which has benefitted 60% of the population, while the other 40% on the "lower tier" have been struggling to pay bills as the result of stagnant wages, increases in the cost of housing, education and healthcare, and growing debts.[261]
A 2021 study by the National Low Income Housing Coalition found that workers would have to make at least $24.90 an hour to be able to afford (meaning 30% of a person's income or less) renting a standard two-bedroom home or $20.40 for a one-bedroom home anywhere in the US. The former is 3.4 times higher than the current federal minimum wage.[262]
The USCB reported in September 2023 that incomes fell last year by 2.3% from 2021, which is the third consecutive year incomes have declined.[263]
Poverty
[edit]Starting in the 1980s relative poverty rates have consistently exceeded those of other wealthy nations, though analyses using a common data set for comparisons tend to find that the U.S. has a lower absolute poverty rate by market income than most other wealthy nations.[264] Extreme poverty in the United States, meaning households living on less than $2 per day before government benefits, doubled from 1996 levels to 1.5 million households in 2011, including 2.8 million children.[265] In 2013, child poverty reached record high levels, with 16.7 million children living in food insecure households, about 35% more than 2007 levels.[266] As of 2015, 44 percent of children in the United States live with low-income families.[267]
In 2016, 12.7% of the U.S. population lived in poverty, down from 13.5% in 2015. The poverty rate rose from 12.5% in 2007 before the Great Recession to a 15.1% peak in 2010, before falling back to just above the 2007 level. In the 1959–1962 period, the poverty rate was over 20%, but declined to the all-time low of 11.1% in 1973 following the War on Poverty begun during the Lyndon Johnson presidency.[268] In June 2016, The IMF warned the United States that its high poverty rate needs to be tackled urgently.[269]
The population in extreme-poverty neighborhoods rose by one third from 2000 to 2009.[271] People living in such neighborhoods tend to suffer from inadequate access to quality education; higher crime rates; higher rates of physical and psychological ailment; limited access to credit and wealth accumulation; higher prices for goods and services; and constrained access to job opportunities.[271] As of 2013, 44% of America's poor are considered to be in "deep poverty", with an income 50% or more below the government's official poverty line.[272]
According to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development's Annual Homeless Assessment Report, as of 2017[update] there were around 554,000 homeless people in the United States on a given night,[273] or 0.17% of the population. Almost two thirds stayed in an emergency shelter or transitional housing program and the other third were living on the street, in an abandoned building, or another place not meant for human habitation. About 1.56 million people, or about 0.5% of the U.S. population, used an emergency shelter or a transitional housing program between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2009.[274] Around 44% of homeless people are employed.[275] Homelessness increased from 2016 to 2020, along with deaths among the homeless population.[276]
The United States has one of the least extensive social safety nets in the developed world, reducing both relative poverty and absolute poverty by considerably less than the mean for wealthy nations.[277][278][279][280][281] Some experts posit that those in poverty live in conditions rivaling the developing world.[282][283] A May 2018 report by the U.N. Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights found that over five million people in the United States live "in 'Third World' conditions".[284] Poverty is the fourth leading risk factor for premature death annually, according to a 2023 study published in JAMA.[285][286][287] Over the last three decades the poor in America have been incarcerated at a much higher rate than their counterparts in other developed nations, with penal confinement being "commonplace for poor men of working age".[288] Some scholars contend that the shift to neoliberal social and economic policies starting in the late 1970s has expanded the penal state, retrenched the social welfare state, deregulated the economy and criminalized poverty, ultimately "transforming what it means to be poor in America".[289][290][291]
Sociologist Matthew Desmond writes in his 2023 book Poverty, by America that the US "offers some of the lowest wages in the industrialized world," which has "swelled the ranks of the working poor, most of whom are thirty-five or older."[292] Social scientist Mark Robert Rank asserts that the high rates of poverty in the U.S. can largely be explained as structural failures at the economic and political levels.[293]
Health care
[edit]Parts of this article (those related to uninsured statistics) need to be updated.(October 2016) |
Coverage
[edit]The American system is a mix of public and private insurance. The government provides insurance coverage for approximately 53 million elderly via Medicare, 62 million lower-income persons via Medicaid, and 15 million military veterans via the Veteran's Administration. About 178 million employed by companies receive subsidized health insurance through their employer, while 52 million other persons directly purchase insurance either via the subsidized marketplace exchanges developed as part of the Affordable Care Act or directly from insurers. The private sector delivers healthcare services, with the exception of the Veteran's Administration, where doctors are employed by the government.[297]
Multiple surveys indicate the number of uninsured fell between 2013 and 2016 due to expanded Medicaid eligibility and health insurance exchanges established due to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as the "ACA" or "Obamacare". According to the United States Census Bureau, in 2012 there were 45.6 million people in the US (14.8% of the under-65 population) who were without health insurance. This figure fell by 18.3 million (40%) to 27.3 million (8.6% of the under-65 population) by 2016.[298]
However, under President Trump these gains in healthcare coverage have begun to reverse. The Commonwealth Fund estimated in May 2018 that the number of uninsured increased by four million from early 2016 to early 2018. The rate of those uninsured increased from 12.7% in 2016 to 15.5%. The impact was greater among lower-income adults, who had a higher uninsured rate than higher-income adults. Regionally, the South and West had higher uninsured rates than the North and East. Further, those 18 states that have not expanded Medicaid had a higher uninsured rate than those that did.[299]
According to Physicians for a National Health Program, this lack of insurance causes roughly 48,000 unnecessary deaths per year.[300] The group's methodology has been criticized by John C. Goodman for not looking at cause of death or tracking insurance status changes over time, including the time of death.[301] A 2009 study by former Clinton policy adviser Richard Kronick found no increased mortality from being uninsured after certain risk factors were controlled for.[302]
Outcomes
[edit]The U.S. lags in overall healthcare performance but is a global leader in medical innovation. America solely developed or contributed significantly to nine of the top ten most important medical innovations since 1975 as ranked by a 2001 poll of physicians, while the EU and Switzerland together contributed to five. Since 1966, Americans have received more Nobel Prizes in Medicine than the rest of the world combined. From 1989 to 2002, four times more money was invested in private biotechnology companies in America than in Europe.[303][304]
Of 17 high-income countries studied by the National Institutes of Health in 2013, the United States ranked at or near the top in obesity rate, frequency of automobile use and accidents, homicides, infant mortality rate, incidence of heart and lung disease, sexually transmitted infections, adolescent pregnancies, recreational drug or alcohol deaths, injuries, and rates of disability. Together, such lifestyle and societal factors place the U.S. at the bottom of that list for life expectancy. On average, a U.S. male can be expected to live almost four fewer years than those in the top-ranked country, though Americans who reach age 75 live longer than those who reach that age in peer nations.[305] One consumption choice causing several of the maladies described above are cigarettes. Americans smoked 258 billion cigarettes in 2016.[306] Cigarettes cost the United States $326 billion each year in direct healthcare costs ($170 billion) and lost productivity ($156 billion).[306]
A comprehensive 2007 study by European doctors found the five-year cancer survival rate was significantly higher in the U.S. than in all 21 European nations studied, 66.3% for men versus the European mean of 47.3% and 62.9% versus 52.8% for women.[307][308] Americans undergo cancer screenings at significantly higher rates than people in other developed countries, and access MRI and CT scans at the highest rate of any OECD nation.[309] People in the U.S. diagnosed with high cholesterol or hypertension access pharmaceutical treatments at higher rates than those diagnosed in other developed nations, and are more likely to successfully control the conditions.[310][311] Diabetics are more likely to receive treatment and meet treatment targets in the U.S. than in Canada, England, or Scotland.[312][313]
According to a 2018 study of 2016 data by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, the U.S. was ranked 27th in the world for healthcare and education, down from 6th in 1990.[314]
Cost
[edit]U.S. healthcare costs are considerably higher than other countries as a share of GDP, among other measures. According to the OECD, U.S. healthcare costs in 2015 were 16.9% GDP, over 5% GDP higher than the next most expensive OECD country.[315] A gap of 5% GDP represents $1 trillion, about $3,000 per person or one-third higher relative to the next most expensive country.[316]
The high cost of health care in the United States is attributed variously to technological advance, administration costs, drug pricing, suppliers charging more for medical equipment, the receiving of more medical care than people in other countries, the high wages of doctors, government regulations, the impact of lawsuits, and third party payment systems insulating consumers from the full cost of treatments.[317][318][319] The lowest prices for pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and payments to physicians are in government plans. Americans tend to receive more medical care than people do in other countries, which is a notable contributor to higher costs. In the United States, a person is more likely to receive open heart surgery after a heart attack than in other countries. Medicaid pays less than Medicare for many prescription drugs due to the fact Medicaid discounts are set by law, whereas Medicare prices are negotiated by private insurers and drug companies.[318][320] Government plans often pay less than overhead, resulting in healthcare providers shifting the cost to the privately insured through higher prices.[321][322]
Composition of economic sectors
[edit]The United States is the world's second-largest manufacturer, with a 2013 industrial output of US$2.4 trillion. Its manufacturing output is greater than of Germany, France, India, and Brazil combined.[323] Its main industries include financials, information technology, petroleum, steel, automobiles, construction machinery, aerospace, agricultural machinery, telecommunications, chemicals, electronics, food processing, consumer goods, lumber, mining and armaments.
The U.S. leads the world in airplane manufacturing,[324] which represents a large portion of U.S. industrial output. American companies such as Boeing, Cessna (see: Textron), Lockheed Martin (see: Skunk Works), and General Dynamics produce a majority of the world's civilian and military aircraft in factories across the United States.
The manufacturing sector of the U.S. economy has experienced substantial job losses over the past several years.[325][326] In January 2004, the number of such jobs stood at 14.3 million, down by 3.0 million jobs (17.5%) since July 2000 and about 5.2 million since the historical peak in 1979. Employment in manufacturing was its lowest since July 1950.[327] The number of steel workers fell from 500,000 in 1980 to 224,000 in 2000.[328]
The U.S. produces approximately 18% of the world's manufacturing output, a share that has declined as other nations developed competitive manufacturing industries.[330] The job loss during this continual volume growth is the result of multiple factors including increased productivity, trade, and secular economic trends.[331] In addition, growth in telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, aircraft, heavy machinery and other industries along with declines in low end, low skill industries such as clothing, toys, and other simple manufacturing have resulted in some U.S. jobs being more highly skilled and better paying. There has been much debate within the United States on whether the decline in manufacturing jobs are related to American unions, lower foreign wages, or both.[332][333][334]
Products include wheat, corn, other grains, fruits, vegetables, cotton; beef, pork, poultry, dairy products, forest products, and fish.
Energy, transportation, and telecommunications
[edit]Transportation
[edit]Road
[edit]The U.S. economy is heavily dependent on road transport for moving people and goods. Personal transportation is dominated by automobiles, which operate on a network of four million miles (6.4 million km) of public roads,[336] including one of the world's longest highway systems at 57,000 miles (91,700 km).[337] The world's second-largest automobile market,[338] the United States has the highest rate of per-capita vehicle ownership in the world, with 765 vehicles per 1,000 Americans.[339] About 40% of personal vehicles are vans, SUVs, or light trucks.[340]
Rail
[edit]Mass transit accounts for 9% of total U.S. work trips.[341][342] Transport of goods by rail is extensive, though relatively low numbers of passengers (approximately 31 million annually) use intercity rail to travel, partially due to the low population density throughout much of the nation.[343][344] However, ridership on Amtrak, the national intercity passenger rail system, grew by almost 37% between 2000 and 2010.[345] Also, light rail development has increased in recent years.[346] The state of California is currently constructing the nation's first high-speed rail system.
Airline
[edit]The civil airline industry is entirely privately owned and has been largely deregulated since 1978, while most major airports are publicly owned.[347] The three largest airlines in the world by passengers carried are U.S.-based; American Airlines is number one after its 2013 acquisition by U.S. Airways.[348] Of the world's thirty busiest passenger airports, twelve are in the United States, including the busiest, Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport.[349]
Energy
[edit]The US is the second-largest energy consumer in total use.[350] The U.S. ranks seventh in energy consumption per capita after Canada and a number of other countries.[351][352] The majority of this energy is derived from fossil fuels: in 2005, it was estimated that 40% of the nation's energy came from petroleum, 23% from coal, and 23% from natural gas. Nuclear power supplied 8.4% and renewable energy supplied 6.8%, which was mainly from hydroelectric dams although other renewables are included.[353]
American dependence on oil imports grew from 24% in 1970 to 65% by the end of 2005.[354] Transportation has the highest consumption rates, accounting for approximately 69% of the oil used in the United States in 2006,[355] and 55% of oil use worldwide as documented in the Hirsch report.
In 2013, the United States imported 2.808 billion barrels of crude oil, compared to 3.377 billion barrels in 2010.[356] While the U.S. is the largest importer of fuel, The Wall Street Journal reported in 2011 that the country was about to become a net fuel exporter for the first time in 62 years. The paper reported expectations that this would continue until 2020.[357] In fact, petroleum was the major export from the country in 2011.[358]
Telecommunications
[edit]The Internet was developed in the U.S. and the country hosts many of the world's largest hubs.[359]
International trade
[edit]The United States is the world's second-largest trading nation.[361] There is a large amount of U.S. dollars in circulation all around the planet; about 60% of funds used in international trade are U.S. dollars. The dollar is also used as the standard unit of currency in international markets for commodities such as gold and petroleum.[362]
The North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, created one of the largest trade blocs in the world in 1994.[363][364]
Since 1976, the U.S. has sustained merchandise trade deficits with other nations, and since 1982, current account deficits. The nation's long-standing surplus in its trade in services was maintained, however, and reached a record US$231 billion in 2013.[365]
The U.S. trade deficit increased from $502 billion in 2016 to $552 billion in 2017, an increase of $50 billion or 10%.[366] During 2017, total imports were $2.90 trillion, while exports were $2.35 trillion. The net deficit in goods was $807 billion, while the net surplus in services was $255 billion.[367]
Americas ten largest trading partners are China, Canada, Mexico, Japan, Germany, South Korea, United Kingdom, France, India and Taiwan.[53] The goods trade deficit with China rose from $347 billion in 2016 to $376 billion in 2017, an increase of $30 billion or 8%. In 2017, the U.S. had a goods trade deficit of $71 billion with Mexico and $17 billion with Canada.[368]
According to the KOF index of globalization[clarification needed] and the globalization index by A.T. Kearney/Foreign Policy Magazine, the U.S. has a relatively high degree of globalization.[citation needed] U.S. workers send a third of all remittances in the world.[369]
Balance of trade 2014 (goods only)[370] | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
China | Euro area | Japan | Mexico | Pacific | Canada | Middle East | Latin America | Total by product | |
Computer | −151.9 | 3.4 | −8.0 | −11.0 | −26.1 | 20.9 | 5.8 | 12.1 | −155.0
|
Oil, gas, minerals | 1.9 | 6.4 | 2.4 | −20.8 | 1.1 | −79.8 | −45.1 | −15.9 | −149.7
|
Transportation | 10.9 | −30.9 | −46.2 | −59.5 | −0.5 | −6.1 | 17.1 | 8.8 | −106.3
|
Apparel | −56.3 | −4.9 | 0.6 | −4.2 | −6.3 | 2.5 | −0.3 | −1.1 | −69.9
|
Electrical equipment | −35.9 | −2.4 | −4.0 | −8.5 | −3.3 | 10.0 | 1.8 | 2.0 | −40.4
|
Misc. manufacturing | −35.3 | 4.9 | 2.7 | −2.8 | −1.4 | 5.8 | −1.5 | 1.8 | −25.8
|
Furniture | −18.3 | −1.2 | 0.0 | −1.6 | −2.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | −22.6
|
Machinery | −19.9 | −27.0 | −18.8 | 3.9 | 7.6 | 18.1 | 4.5 | 9.1 | −22.4
|
Primary metals | −3.1 | 3.1 | −1.8 | 1.0 | 1.9 | −8.9 | −0.9 | −10.4 | −19.1
|
Fabricated metals | −17.9 | −5.9 | −3.5 | 2.8 | −4.3 | 7.3 | 1.2 | 1.9 | −18.5
|
Plastics | −15.7 | −1.9 | −2.0 | 5.7 | −4.1 | 2.6 | −0.1 | 0.5 | −15.0
|
Textile | −12.3 | −1.1 | −0.3 | 2.8 | −4.6 | 1.5 | −0.9 | 0.2 | −14.7
|
Beverages, tobacco | 1.3 | −9.9 | 0.6 | −3.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | −0.6 | −10.6
|
Nonmetallic minerals | −6.1 | −1.9 | −0.4 | −1.2 | 0.1 | 1.9 | −0.5 | −0.8 | −8.9
|
Paper | −2.7 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 4.3 | 1.2 | −9.8 | 0.9 | −1.9 | −5.8
|
Chemical | −3.9 | −39.5 | −1.5 | 19.1 | 3.2 | 4.6 | −2.4 | 15.8 | −4.7
|
Food | 0.7 | −3.6 | 6.1 | 4.9 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.4 | −1.1 | 9.5
|
Agriculture | 17.8 | 6.2 | 7.3 | −3.0 | 5.7 | −0.8 | 2.8 | −6.5 | 29.5
|
Petroleum | 0.6 | −1.2 | 0.1 | 16.6 | −2.0 | −0.1 | 0.6 | 18.3 | 32.9
|
Total by country/area | −346.1 | −106.1 | −65.6 | −54.9 | −33.0 | −29.0 | −15.1 | 32.3 |
Financial position
[edit]The U.S. public debt was $909 billion in 1980, an amount equal to 33% of America's gross domestic product (GDP); by 1990, that number had more than tripled to $3.2 trillion – 56% of GDP.[371] In 2001 the national debt was $5.7 trillion; however, the debt-to-GDP ratio remained at 1990 levels.[372] Debt levels rose quickly in the following decade, and on January 28, 2010, the U.S. debt ceiling was raised to $14.3 trillion.[373] Based on the 2010 United States federal budget, total national debt will grow to nearly 100% of GDP, versus a level of approximately 80% in early 2009.[374] The White House estimates that the government's tab for servicing the debt will exceed $700 billion a year in 2019,[375] up from $202 billion in 2009.[376]
U.S. household and non-profit net worth exceeded $100 trillion for the first time in Q1 2018; it has been setting records since Q4 2012.[377] The U.S. federal government or "national debt" was $21.1 trillion in May 2018, just over 100% GDP.[378] Using a subset of the national debt called "debt held by the public", U.S. debt was approximately 77% GDP in 2017. By this measure, the U.S. ranked 43rd highest among 2017 nations.[379] Debt held by the public rose considerably as a result of the Great Recession and its aftermath. It is expected to continue rising as the country ages towards 100% GDP by 2028.[380] In February 2024, the total federal government debt grew to $34.4 trillion after having grown by approximately $1 trillion in both of two separate 100-day periods since the previous June.[381]
The U.S. Treasury statistics indicate that, at the end of 2006, non-US citizens and institutions held 44% of federal debt held by the public.[382] As of 2014[update], China, holding $1.26 trillion in treasury bonds, is the largest foreign financier of the U.S. public debt.[383]
The overall financial position of the United States as of 2014 includes $269.6 trillion of assets owned by households, businesses, and governments within its borders, representing more than 15.7 times the annual gross domestic product of the United States. Debts owed during this same period amounted to $145.8 trillion, about 8.5 times the annual gross domestic product.[384][385]
Since 2010, the U.S. Treasury has been obtaining negative real interest rates on government debt.[386] Such low rates, outpaced by the inflation rate, occur when the market believes that there are no alternatives with sufficiently low risk, or when popular institutional investments such as insurance companies, pensions, or bond, money market, and balanced mutual funds are required or choose to invest sufficiently large sums in Treasury securities to hedge against risk.[387][388] American economist Lawrence Summers argues that at such low rates, government debt borrowing saves taxpayer money, and improves creditworthiness.[389]
In the late 1940s through the early 1970s, the US and UK both reduced their debt burden by about 30% to 40% of GDP per decade by taking advantage of negative real interest rates, but there is no guarantee that government debt rates will continue to stay so low.[387][390] In January 2012, the U.S. Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association unanimously recommended that government debt be allowed to auction even lower, at negative absolute interest rates.[391]
Currency and central bank
[edit]The United States dollar is the unit of currency of the United States. The U.S. dollar is the currency most used in international transactions.[392] Several countries use it as their official currency, and in many others it is the de facto currency.[393]
The federal government attempts to use both monetary policy (control of the money supply through mechanisms such as changes in interest rates) and fiscal policy (taxes and spending) to maintain low inflation, high economic growth, and low unemployment. An independent central bank, known as the Federal Reserve, was formed in 1913 to provide a stable currency and monetary policy. The U.S. dollar has been regarded as one of the more stable currencies in the world and many nations back their own currency with U.S. dollar reserves.[45][46]
The U.S. dollar has maintained its position as the world's primary reserve currency, although it is gradually being challenged in that role.[394] Almost two thirds of currency reserves held around the world are held in U.S. dollars, compared to around 25% for the next most popular currency, the euro.[395] Rising U.S. national debt and quantitative easing has caused some to predict that the U.S. dollar will lose its status as the world's reserve currency; however, these predictions have not yet come to fruition.[396]
Climate change
[edit]The Fifth National Climate Assessment states that climate change impacts communities over all the territory of the United States. The impacts differ from state to state. The human and economic toll is high. Scientists now can say with relatively high confidence how much climate change impacted a specific meteorological event. The impacts mentioned in the report include, increase in frequency and magnitude of heat waves, droughts, floods, hurricanes and more.[397]
An article in Science predicts that the Southern states, such as Texas, Florida, and the Deep South will be economically affected by climate change more severely than northern states (some of which would even gain benefits), but that economic impacts of climate change would likely exacerbate preexisting economic inequality in the country.[398][399] In September 2020, a subcommittee of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission issued a report that concluded that climate change poses systemic risks to the U.S. financial system,[400][401][402] while the Financial Stability Oversight Council released a report in October 2021 that identified climate change as an emerging and increasing threat to the stability of the U.S. financial system.[403][404][405]
A 2021 survey of 1,422 members of the American Economic Association found that 86 percent of professional economists generally agreed with the statement: "Climate change poses a major risk to the US economy."[406][407] In September 2023, the U.S. Treasury Department issued a report in consultation with the Financial Literacy and Education Commission found that 13% of Americans experienced financial hardship in 2022 due to the effects of climate change after $176 billion in weather disasters.[408][409][410] In April 2024, Consumer Reports announced the release of a report commissioned from ICF International that estimated that climate change could cost Americans born in 2024 nearly $500,000 over their lifetimes.[411][412][413]Corruption
[edit]In 2019, the United States was ranked 23rd on the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index with a score of 69 out of 100.[414] This is a decrease from its score in 2018 which was 71 out of 100.[415]
Law and government
[edit]The United States ranked 4th in the ease of doing business index in 2012, 18th in the Economic Freedom of the World index by the Fraser Institute in 2012, 10th in the Index of Economic Freedom by The Wall Street Journal and The Heritage Foundation in 2012, 15th in the 2014 Global Enabling Trade Report,[416] and 3rd on the Global Competitiveness Report.[417]
According to the 2014 Index of Economic Freedom, released by The Wall Street Journal and The Heritage Foundation, the U.S. has dropped out of the top ten most economically free countries. The U.S. has been on a steady seven-year economic freedom decline and is the only country to do so.[418] The index measures each nation's commitment to free enterprise on a scale of 0 to 100. Countries losing economic freedom and receiving low index scores are at risk of economic stagnation, high unemployment rates, and diminishing social conditions.[419][420] The 2014 Index of Economic Freedom gave the United States a score of 75.5 and is listed as the twelfth-freest economy in world. It dropped two rankings and its score is half a point lower than in 2013.[418]
Economist Alan S. Blinder criticizes democratic government regulation of the U.S. economy as too short-sighted (targeting either the next election or the next news cycle rather than making difficult choices that favor long-term benefits despite short-term pain) and favoring policies that sound good and avoiding those that sound bad, regardless of merit when examined rigorously by economists.[421]
Regulations
[edit]The U.S. federal government regulates private enterprise in numerous ways. Regulation falls into two general categories.
Some efforts seek, either directly or indirectly, to control prices. Traditionally, the government has sought to create state-regulated monopolies such as electric utilities while allowing prices in the level that would ensure them normal profits. At times, the government has extended economic control to other kinds of industries as well. In the years following the Great Depression, it devised a complex system to stabilize prices for agricultural goods, which tend to fluctuate wildly in response to rapidly changing supply and demand. A number of other industries—trucking and, later, airlines—successfully sought regulation themselves to limit what they considered as harmful price-cutting, a process called regulatory capture.[423]
Another form of economic regulation, antitrust law, seeks to strengthen market forces so that direct regulation is unnecessary. The government—and, sometimes, private parties—have used antitrust law to prohibit practices or mergers that would unduly limit competition.[423]
Bank regulation in the United States is highly fragmented compared to other G10 countries where most countries have only one bank regulator. In the U.S., banking is regulated at both the federal and state level. The U.S. also has one of the most highly regulated banking environments in the world; however, many of the regulations are not soundness related, but are instead focused on privacy, disclosure, fraud prevention, anti-money laundering, anti-terrorism, anti-usury lending, and promoting lending to lower-income segments.
Since the 1970s, government has also exercised control over private companies to achieve social goals, such as improving the public's health and safety or maintaining a healthy environment. For example, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration provides and enforces standards for workplace safety, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency provides standards and regulations to maintain air, water, and land resources. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulates what drugs may reach the market, and also provides standards of disclosure for food products.[423]
American attitudes about regulation changed substantially during the final three decades of the 20th century. Beginning in the 1970s, policy makers grew increasingly convinced that economic regulation protected companies at the expense of consumers in industries such as airlines and trucking. At the same time, technological changes spawned new competitors in some industries, such as telecommunications, that once were considered natural monopolies. Both developments led to a succession of laws easing regulation.[423]
While leaders of America's two most influential political parties generally favored economic deregulation during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, there was less agreement concerning regulations designed to achieve social goals. Social regulation had assumed growing importance in the years following the Depression and World War II, and again in the 1960s and 1970s. During the 1980s, the government relaxed labor, consumer and environmental rules based on the idea that such regulation interfered with free enterprise, increased the costs of doing business, and thus contributed to inflation. The response to such changes is mixed; many Americans continued to voice concerns about specific events or trends, prompting the government to issue new regulations in some areas, including environmental protection.[423]
Where legislative channels have been unresponsive, some citizens have turned to the courts to address social issues more quickly. For instance, in the 1990s, individuals, and eventually the government itself, sued tobacco companies over the health risks of cigarette smoking. The 1998 Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement provided states with long-term payments to cover medical costs to treat smoking-related illnesses.[423]
Between 2000 and 2008, economic regulation in the United States saw the most rapid expansion since the early 1970s. The number of new pages in the Federal Registry, a proxy for economic regulation, rose from 64,438 new pages in 2001 to 78,090 in new pages in 2007, a record amount of regulation. Economically significant regulations, defined as regulations which cost more than $100 million a year, increased by 70%. Spending on regulation increased by 62% from $26.4 billion to $42.7 billion.[424]
Taxation
[edit]Taxation in the United States is a complex system which may involve payment to at least four different levels of government and many methods of taxation. Taxes are levied by the federal government, by the state governments, and often by local governments, which may include counties, municipalities, township, school districts, and other special-purpose districts, which include fire, utility, and transit districts.[425]
Forms of taxation include taxes on income, property, sales, imports, payroll, estates and gifts, as well as various fees. When taxation by all government levels taken into consideration, the total taxation as percentage of GDP was approximately a quarter of GDP in 2011.[426] Share of black market in the U.S. economy is very low compared to other countries.[427]
Although a federal wealth tax is prohibited by the United States Constitution unless the receipts are distributed to the States by their populations, state and local government property tax amount to a wealth tax on real estate, and because capital gains are taxed on nominal instead of inflation-adjusted profits, the capital gains tax amounts to a wealth tax on the inflation rate.[428]
U.S. taxation is generally progressive, especially at the federal level, and is among the most progressive in the developed world.[429][430][431][432] There is debate over whether taxes should be more or less progressive.[428][433][434][435]
According to the Tax Justice Network in 2022, the US fuels more global financial secrecy than Switzerland, Cayman and Bermuda combined.[436]
Expenditure
[edit]The United States public-sector spending amounts to about 38% of GDP (federal is around 21%, state and local the remainder).[438] Each level of government provides many direct services. The federal government, for example, is responsible for national defense, research that often leads to the development of new products, conducts space exploration, and runs numerous programs designed to help workers develop workplace skills and find jobs (including higher education). Government spending has a significant effect on local and regional economies, and on the overall pace of economic activity.
State governments, meanwhile, are responsible for the construction and maintenance of most highways. State, county, or city governments play the leading role in financing and operating public schools. Local governments are primarily responsible for police and fire protection. In 2016, U.S. state and local governments owed $3 trillion and have another $5 trillion in unfunded liabilities.[439]
The welfare system in the United States began in the 1930s, during the Great Depression, with the passage of the New Deal. The welfare system was later expanded in the 1960s through Great Society legislation, which included Medicare, Medicaid, the Older Americans Act and federal education funding.
Overall, federal, state, and local spending accounted for almost 28% of gross domestic product in 1998.[440]
Federal budget and debt
[edit]During FY2017, the federal government spent $3.98 trillion on a budget or cash basis, up $128 billion or 3.3% vs. FY2016 spending of $3.85 trillion. Major categories of FY 2017 spending included: Healthcare such as Medicare and Medicaid ($1,077B or 27% of spending), Social Security ($939B or 24%), non-defense discretionary spending used to run federal Departments and Agencies ($610B or 15%), Defense Department ($590B or 15%), and interest ($263B or 7%).[437]
During FY2017, the federal government collected approximately $3.32 trillion in tax revenue, up $48 billion or 1.5% versus FY2016. Primary receipt categories included individual income taxes ($1,587 billion or 48% of total receipts), Social Security/Social Insurance taxes ($1,162 billion or 35%), and corporate taxes ($297 billion or 9%). Other revenue types included excise, estate and gift taxes. FY 2017 revenues were 17.3% of gross domestic product (GDP), versus 17.7% in FY 2016. Tax revenues averaged approximately 17.4% GDP over the 1980–2017 period.[437]
The federal budget deficit (i.e., expenses greater than revenues) was $665 billion in FY2017, versus $585 billion in 2016, an increase of $80 billion or 14%. The budget deficit was 3.5% GDP in 2017, versus 3.2% GDP in 2016. The budget deficit is forecast to rise to $804 billion in FY 2018, due significantly to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and other spending bills. An aging country and healthcare inflation are other drivers of deficits and debt over the long-run.[437]
Debt held by the public, a measure of national debt, was approximately $14.7 trillion or 77% of GDP in 2017, ranked the 43rd highest out of 207 countries.[441] This debt, as a percent of GDP, is roughly equivalent to those of many western European nations.[442]
Business culture
[edit]A central feature of the U.S. economy is the economic freedom afforded to the private sector by allowing the private sector to make the majority of economic decisions in determining the direction and scale of what the U.S. economy produces. This is enhanced by relatively low levels of regulation and government involvement,[443] as well as a court system that generally protects property rights and enforces contracts. Today, the United States is home to 29.6 million small businesses, thirty percent of the world's millionaires, forty percent of the world's billionaires, and 139 of the world's 500 largest companies.[150][227][444][445]
From its emergence as an independent nation, the United States has encouraged science and innovation. In the early 20th century, the research developed through informal cooperation between U.S. industry and academia grew rapidly and by the late 1930s exceeded the size of that taking place in Britain (although the quality of U.S. research was not yet on par with British and German research at the time). After World War II, federal spending on defense R&D and antitrust policy played a significant role in U.S. innovation.[446]
The United States is rich in mineral resources and fertile farm soil, and it is fortunate to have a moderate climate. It also has extensive coastlines on both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, as well as on the Gulf of Mexico. Rivers flow from far within the continent and the Great Lakes (the five large inland lakes along the Canadian border) provide additional shipping access. These extensive waterways have helped shape the country's economic growth over the years and helped bind America's fifty individual states together in a single economic unit.[447]
The number of workers and, more importantly, their productivity help determine the health of the U.S. economy. Consumer spending in the U.S. rose to about 62% of GDP in 1960, where it stayed until about 1981, and has since risen to 71% in 2013.[84] Throughout its history, the United States has experienced steady growth in the labor force, a phenomenon that is both cause and effect of almost constant economic expansion. Until shortly after World War I, most workers were immigrants from Europe, their immediate descendants, or African Americans who were mostly slaves taken from Africa, or their descendants.[448]
Demographic shift
[edit]Beginning in the late 20th century, many Latin Americans immigrated, followed by large numbers of Asians after the removal of nation-origin based immigration quotas.[449] The promise of high wages brings many highly skilled workers from around the world to the United States, as well as millions of illegal immigrants seeking work in the informal economy. More than 13 million people officially entered the United States during the 1990s alone.[450]
Labor mobility has also been important to the capacity of the American economy to adapt to changing conditions. When immigrants flooded labor markets on the East Coast, many workers moved inland, often to farmland waiting to be tilled. Similarly, economic opportunities in industrial, northern cities attracted black Americans from southern farms in the first half of the 20th century, in what was known as the Great Migration.
In the United States, the corporation has emerged as an association of owners, known as stockholders, who form a business enterprise governed by a complex set of rules and customs. Brought on by the process of mass production, corporations, such as General Electric, have been instrumental in shaping the United States. Today in the era of globalization, American investors and corporations have influence all over the world. The American government is also included among the major investors in the American economy. Government investments have been directed towards public works of scale (such as from the Hoover Dam), military-industrial contracts, and the financial industry.
Aging
[edit]The U.S. population is aging, which has significant economic implications for GDP growth, productivity, innovation, inequality, and national debt, according to several studies. The average worker in 2019 was aged 42, vs. 38 in 2000. By 2030, about 59% of adults over 16 will be in the labor force, vs. 62% in 2015. One study estimated that aging since 2000 has reduced productivity between 0.25% and 0.7% per year. Since GDP growth is a function of productivity (output per worker) and the number of workers, both trends slow the GDP growth rate. Older workers save more, which pushes interests rates down, offsetting some of the GDP growth reduction but reducing the Federal Reserve's ability to address a recession by lowering interest rates. Means of addressing the aging trend include immigration (which theoretically brings in younger workers) and higher fertility rates, which can be encouraged by incentives to have more children (e.g., tax breaks, subsidies, and more generous paid leave).[451]
The Congressional Budget Office estimated in May 2019 that mandatory spending (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security) will continue growing relative to the size of the economy (GDP) as the population ages. The population aged 65 or older is projected to rise by one-third from 2019–2029. Mandatory program spending (outlays) in 2019 were 12.7% of GDP and are projected to average 14.4% GDP from 2025–2029.[452]
Entrepreneurship
[edit]The United States has been a leader in technological innovation since the late 19th century and scientific research since the mid-20th century. In 1876, Alexander Graham Bell was awarded the first U.S. patent for the telephone. Thomas Edison's laboratory developed the phonograph, the first long-lasting light bulb, and the first viable movie camera. Edison's company would also pioneer (direct current based) electric power delivery and market it around the world, followed on by companies such as Westinghouse Electric Corporation which would rapidly develop alternating current power delivery. In the early 20th century, the automobile companies of Ransom E. Olds and Henry Ford popularized the assembly line. The Wright brothers, in 1903, made the first sustained and controlled heavier-than-air powered flight.[453]
American society highly emphasizes entrepreneurship and business. Entrepreneurship is the act of being an entrepreneur, which can be defined as "one who undertakes innovations, finance and business acumen in an effort to transform innovations into economic goods". This may result in new organizations or may be part of revitalizing mature organizations in response to a perceived opportunity.[454] American entrepreneurs are even engaged in public services delivery through public-private partnerships.
The most obvious form of entrepreneurship refers to the process and engagement of starting new businesses (referred to as startup companies); however, in recent years, the term has been extended to include social and political forms of entrepreneurial activity. When entrepreneurship is describing activities within a firm or large organization it is referred to as intra-preneurship and may include corporate venturing, when large entities spin-off organizations.[454]
According to Paul Reynolds, entrepreneurship scholar and creator of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, "by the time they reach their retirement years, half of all working men in the United States probably have a period of self-employment of one or more years; one in four may have engaged in self-employment for six or more years. Participating in a new business creation is a common activity among U.S. workers over the course of their careers."[455] And in recent years, business creation has been documented by scholars such as David Audretsch to be a major driver of economic growth in both the United States and Western Europe.[citation needed]
Venture capital investment
[edit]Venture capital, as an industry, originated in the United States, which it still dominates.[456] According to the National Venture Capital Association 11% of private sector jobs come from venture capital backed companies and venture capital backed revenue accounts for 21% of U.S. GDP.[457]
Total U.S. investment in venture capital amounted to $48.3 billion in 2014, for 4,356 deals. This represented "an increase of 61% in dollars and a 4% increase in deals over the prior year", reported the National Venture Capital Association. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development estimates that venture capital investment in the United States had fully recovered by 2014 to pre-recession levels. The National Venture Capital Association has reported that, in 2014, venture capital investment in the life sciences was at its highest level since 2008: in biotechnology, $6.0 billion was invested in 470 deals and, in life sciences overall, $8.6 billion in 789 deals (including biotechnology and medical devices). Two thirds (68%) of the investment in biotechnology went to first-time/early-stage development deals and the remainder to the expansion stage of development (14%), seed-stage companies (11%) and late-stage companies (7%). However, it was the software industry which invested in the greatest number of deals overall: 1,799, for an investment of $19.8 billion. Second came internet-specific companies, garnering US$11.9 billion in investment through 1,005 deals. Many of these companies are based in the state of California, which alone concentrates 28% of U.S. research.[458]
Some new American businesses raise investments from angel investors (venture capitalists). In 2010 healthcare/medical accounted for the largest share of angel investments, with 30% of total angel investments (vs. 17% in 2009), followed by software (16% vs. 19% in 2007), biotech (15% vs. 8% in 2009), industrial/energy (8% vs. 17% in 2009), retail (5% vs. 8% in 2009) and IT services (5%).[459] [clarification needed]
Americans are "venturesome consumers" who are unusually willing to try new products of all sorts, and to pester manufacturers to improve their products.[460]
Mergers and acquisitions
[edit]Since 1985 there have been three major waves of M&A in the U.S. (see graph "Mergers and Acquisitions in the U.S. since 1985"). 2017 has been the most active year in terms of number of deals (12,914), whereas 2015 cumulated to the biggest overall value of deals ($24 billion).
The biggest merger deal in U.S. history was the acquisition of Time Warner by America Online Inc. in 2000, where the bid was over $164 billion. Since 2000 acquisitions of U.S. companies by Chinese investors increased by 368%. The other way round—U.S. companies acquiring Chinese Companies—showed a decrease of 25%, with a short upwards trend until 2007.[461]
Research and development
[edit]The U.S. invests more funds in research and development (R&D) in absolute terms than the other G7 nations combined: 17.2% more in 2012. Since 2000, gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) in the U.S. has increased by 31.2%, enabling it to maintain its share of GERD among the G7 nations at 54.0% (54.2% in 2000).[458]
Impact of recession on research spending
[edit]Generally speaking, U.S. investment in R&D rose with the economy in the first years of the century before receding slightly during the economic recession then rising again as growth resumed. At its peak in 2009, GERD amounted to US$406 billion (2.82% of GDP). Despite the recession, it was still at 2.79% in 2012 and will slide only marginally to 2.73% in 2013, according to provisional data, and should remain at a similar level in 2014.[458]
The federal government is the primary funder of basic research, at 52.6% in 2012; state governments, universities and other non-profits funded 26%. Experimental development, on the other hand, is primarily funded by industry: 76.4% to the federal government's 22.1% in 2012.[458]
While U.S. investment in R&D is high, it failed to reach President Obama's target of 3% of GDP by the end of his presidency in 2016. Between 2009 and 2012, the United States' world share of research expenditure receded slightly from 30.5% to 28.1%. Several countries now devote more than 4% of GDP to R&D (Israel, Japan and the Republic of Korea) and others plan to raise their own GERD/GDP ratio to 4% by 2020 (Finland and Sweden).[458]
Business spending on research
[edit]Business enterprises contributed 59.1 % of U.S. GERD in 2012, down from 69.0 % in 2000. Private non-profits and foreign entities each contribute a small fraction of total R&D, 3.3% and 3.8%, respectively.[458]
The United States has historically been a leader in business R&D and innovation. The economic recession of 2008–2009 has had a lasting impact, however. While the major performers of R&D largely maintained their commitments, the pain of the U.S. recession was felt mainly by small businesses and start-ups. Statistics released by the U.S. Census Bureau showed that, in 2008, the number of business 'deaths' began overtaking the number of business 'births' and that the trend continued at least through 2012. From 2003 to 2008, business research spending had followed a generally upward trajectory. In 2009, the curve inverted, as expenditure fell by 4% over the previous year then again in 2010, albeit by 1–2% this time. Companies in high-opportunity industries like health care cut back less than those in more mature industries, such as fossil fuels. The largest cutbacks in R&D spending were in agriculture production: −3.5% compared to the average R&D to net sales ratio. The chemicals and allied products industry and electronic equipment industry, on the other hand, showed R&D to net sales ratios that were 3.8% and 4.8% higher than average. Although the amount of R&D spending increased in 2011, it was still below the level of 2008 expenditure. By 2012, the growth rate of business-funded R&D had recovered. Whether this continues will be contingent on the pursuit of economic recovery and growth, levels of federal research funding and the general business climate.[458]
Research spending at the state level
[edit]The level of research spending varies considerably from one state to another. Six states (New Mexico, Maryland, Massachusetts, Washington, California and Michigan) each devoted 3.9% or more of their GDP to R&D in 2010, together contributing 42% of national research expenditure. In 2010, more than one quarter of R&D was concentrated in California (28.1%), ahead of Massachusetts (5.7%), New Jersey (5.6%), Washington State (5.5%), Michigan (5.4%), Texas (5.2%), Illinois (4.8%), New York (3.6%) and Pennsylvania (3.5%). Seven states (Arkansas, Nevada, Oklahoma, Louisiana, South Dakota and Wyoming) devoted less than 0.8% of GDP to R&D.[458]
California is home to Silicon Valley, the name given to the area hosting the leading corporations and start-ups in information technology. This state also hosts dynamic biotechnology clusters in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles and San Diego. The main biotechnology clusters outside California are the cities of Boston/Cambridge, Massachusetts, Maryland, suburban Washington, DC, New York, Seattle, Philadelphia, and Chicago. California supplies 13.7% of all jobs in science and engineering across the country, more than any other state. Some 5.7% of Californians are employed in these fields. This high share reflects a potent combination of academic excellence and a strong business focus on R&D: the prestigious Stanford University and University of California rub shoulders with Silicon Valley, for instance. In much the same way, Route 128 around Boston in the state of Massachusetts is not only home to numerous high-tech firms and corporations but also hosts the renowned Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.[458]
New Mexico's high research intensity can be explained by the fact that it hosts the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Maryland's position may reflect the concentration of federally funded research institutions there. Washington State has a high concentration of high-tech firms like Microsoft, Amazon and Boeing and the engineering functions of most automobile manufacturers are located in the state of Michigan.[458]
Research spending by multinational corporations
[edit]The federal government and most of the 50 states that make up the United States offer tax credits to particular industries and companies to encourage them to engage in research and development (R&D). Congress usually renews a tax credit every few years. According to a survey by The Wall Street Journal in 2012, companies do not factor in these credits when making decisions about investing in R&D, since they cannot rely on these credits being renewed.[458]
In 2014, four U.S. multinational corporations figured in the Top 50 for the volume of expenditure on R&D: Microsoft, Intel, Johnson & Johnson and Google. Several have figured in the Top 20 for at least ten years: Intel, Microsoft, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer and IBM. Google was included in this table for the first time in 2013.[458]
Global top 50 companies by R&D volume and intensity, 2014 * R&D intensity is defined as R&D expenditure divided by net sales. ** Although incorporated in the Netherlands, Airbus's principal manufacturing facilities are located in France, Germany, Spain and the UK. Source: UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030 (2015), Table 9.3, based on Hernández et al. (2014) EU R&D Scoreboard: the 2014 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. European Commission: Brussels, Table 2.2.
Exports of high-tech goods and patents
[edit]Until 2010, the United States was a net exporter of pharmaceuticals but, since 2011, it has become a net importer of these goods.
The United States is a post-industrial country. Imports of high-tech products far exceed exports. However, the United States' technologically skilled workforce produces a large volume of patents and can still profit from the license or sale of these patents. Within the United States' scientific industries active in research, 9.1% of products and services are concerned with the licensing of intellectual property rights.[458]
When it comes to trade in intellectual property, the United States remains unrivalled. Income from royalties and licensing amounted to $129.2 billion in 2013, the highest in the world. Japan comes a distant second, with receipts of $31.6 billion in 2013. The United States' payments for use of intellectual property amounted to $39.0 billion in 2013, exceeded only by Ireland ($46.4 billion).[458]
Notable companies and markets
[edit]America's largest companies are ranked every year by revenue in the Fortune 500. Between 2000 and 2022's edition of the list, the top spot on the Fortune 500 was occupied by either the auto manufacturer General Motors (GM), the oil and gas giant ExxonMobil, or the retailer Walmart.[463] The US is also home of many of the world's largest companies by market capitalization; As of February 9, 2023[update], the largest American companies by market cap are Apple, Microsoft, Google (through holding company Alphabet), Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway, Tesla, Nvidia, Visa, ExxonMobil, and Meta Platforms.[464] Moreover, many of these companies are the most valuable brands, with many of the largest companies by revenue and market cap on the annual ranking of most valuable brands by Forbes being joined by Coca-Cola, The Walt Disney Company, and McDonald's.[465]
Some industries within America are defined by a few major companies, often deriving terms such as "Big Three" or "Big Four". Examples of this phenomenon include the Big Three credit reporting agencies (Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion), the Big Three automobile makers (Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis), the Big Four accounting firms (Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG, and PwC), and the Big Four communications carriers (Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile/Sprint, and Dish Network).[466][467] The American energy industry is among the largest and consists of large companies in oil, natural gas, coal, and renewable energy sources. America's largest energy companies by market are in oil and gas, with ExxonMobil being joined by Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and Schlumberger; British oil companies BP and Shell also have significant presence in the United States and trade on both the London Stock Exchange and New York Stock Exchange. Many large American petroleum companies, as well as BP, can trace some origin back to Standard Oil, a former monopoly run by John D. Rockefeller. In coal, the $30 billion industry is dominated by Peabody Energy, which is the largest coal company in the world with almost $23 billion in revenue for 2021. Much of the nation's coal mining occurs in Wyoming and Appalachian states like West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky.[63][468][469]
A 2012 Deloitte report published in STORES magazine indicated that of the world's top 250 largest retailers by retail sales revenue in fiscal year 2010, 32% of those retailers were based in the United States, and those 32% accounted for 41% of the total retail sales revenue of the top 250.[470]
America is the foremost country in the world when it comes to semiconductor production. In 2011, half of the world's 20 largest semiconductor manufacturers by sales were based in America. More recently, Congress under the presidency of Joe Biden passed a bipartisan bill, the CHIPS and Science Act, which bolstered semiconductor production. Some of America's largest semiconductor firms and chip companies are Broadcom, Intel, AMD, and Qualcomm.[471][472][473]
Many of the United States' largest firms by market cap are technology companies. These companies are dominated by the Big Five tech giants (Apple, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Meta), though numerous software firms also dominate the American technology industry. These firms range from hardware manufacturers like Dell Technologies, IBM, Hewlett-Packard, and Cisco, to software and computing infrastructure programmers like Oracle, Salesforce, Adobe, and Intuit.[474][475]
In film, American producers create nearly all of the world's highest-grossing films. Many of the world's best-selling music artists are based in the United States. Some of America's largest media companies are The Walt Disney Company, Warner Bros. Discovery, Netflix, Comcast, Paramount Global, and Fox.
Finance
[edit]Measured by value of its listed companies' securities, the New York Stock Exchange is more than three times larger than any other stock exchange in the world.[476] As of October 2008, the combined capitalization of all domestic NYSE listed companies was US$10.1 trillion.[477] NASDAQ is another American stock exchange and the world's third-largest exchange after the New York Stock Exchange and Japan's Tokyo Stock Exchange. However, NASDAQ's trade value is larger than Japan's TSE.[476] NASDAQ is the largest electronic screen-based equity securities trading market in the U.S. With approximately 3,800 companies and corporations, it has more trading volume per hour than any other stock exchange.[478]
Because of the influential role that the U.S. stock market plays in international finance, a New York University study in late 2014 interprets that in the short run, stocks that affect the willingness to bear risk independently of macroeconomic fundamentals explain most of the variation in the U.S. stock market. In the long run, the U.S. stock market is profoundly affected by shocks that reallocate the rewards of a given level of production between workers and shareholders. Productivity shocks, however, play a small role in historical stock market fluctuations at all horizons in the U.S. stock market.[479]
The U.S. finance industry comprised only 10% of total non-farm business profits in 1947, but it grew to 50% by 2010. Over the same period, finance industry income as a proportion of GDP rose from 2.5% to 7.5%, and the finance industry's proportion of all corporate income rose from 10% to 20%. The mean earnings per employee hour in finance relative to all other sectors has closely mirrored the share of total U.S. income earned by the top 1% income earners since 1930. The mean salary in New York City's finance industry rose from $80,000 in 1981 to $360,000 in 2011, while average New York City salaries rose from $40,000 to $70,000. In 1988, there were about 12,500 U.S. banks with less than $300 million in deposits, and about 900 with more deposits, but by 2012, there were only 4,200 banks with less than $300 million in deposits in the U.S., and over 1,800 with more.
Top ten U.S. banks by assets[480][481][482][483]
1 | JP Morgan Chase |
2 | Bank of America |
3 | Citigroup |
4 | Wells Fargo |
5 | Goldman Sachs |
6 | Morgan Stanley |
7 | U.S. Bancorp |
8 | Bank of NY Mellon |
9 | HSBC North American Holdings |
10 | Capital One Financial |
A 2012 International Monetary Fund study concluded that the U.S. financial sector has grown so large that it is slowing economic growth. New York University economist Thomas Philippon supported those findings, estimating that the U.S. spends $300 billion too much on financial services per year, and that the sector needs to shrink by 20%. Harvard University and University of Chicago economists agreed, calculating in 2014 that workers in research and development add $5 to the GDP for each dollar they earn, but finance industry workers cause the GDP to shrink by $0.60 for every dollar they are paid.[484] A study by the Bank for International Settlements reached similar conclusions, saying the finance industry impedes economic growth and research and development based industries.[485]
Historical statistics
[edit]List of state and territory economies
[edit]State and federal district economies
[edit]- Economy of Alabama
- Economy of Alaska
- Economy of Arizona
- Economy of Arkansas
- Economy of California
- Economy of Colorado
- Economy of Connecticut
- Economy of Delaware
- Economy of Florida
- Economy of Georgia
- Economy of Hawaii
- Economy of Idaho
- Economy of Illinois
- Economy of Indiana
- Economy of Iowa
- Economy of Kansas
- Economy of Kentucky
- Economy of Louisiana
- Economy of Maine
- Economy of Maryland
- Economy of Massachusetts
- Economy of Michigan
- Economy of Minnesota
- Economy of Mississippi
- Economy of Missouri
- Economy of Montana
- Economy of Nebraska
- Economy of Nevada
- Economy of New Hampshire
- Economy of New Jersey
- Economy of New Mexico
- Economy of New York (state)
- Economy of North Carolina
- Economy of North Dakota
- Economy of Ohio
- Economy of Oklahoma
- Economy of Oregon
- Economy of Pennsylvania
- Economy of Rhode Island
- Economy of South Carolina
- Economy of South Dakota
- Economy of Tennessee
- Economy of Texas
- Economy of Utah
- Economy of Vermont
- Economy of Virginia
- Economy of Washington, D.C.
- Economy of Washington (state)
- Economy of West Virginia
- Economy of Wisconsin
- Economy of Wyoming
Territory economies
[edit]- Economy of American Samoa
- Economy of Guam
- Economy of the Northern Mariana Islands
- Economy of Puerto Rico
- Economy of the United States Virgin Islands
See also
[edit]- Bretton Woods system
- Energy policy of the United States
- Financial position of the United States
- Historical Statistics of the United States
- Job creation index
- Labor unions in the United States
- Unemployment insurance in the United States
- List of industry trade groups in the United States
- Washington Consensus
- World oil market chronology from 2003
- Work–life balance
- Work–life balance in the United States
- Work–family balance in the United States
References
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^ "The Global Financial Centres Index 36". Long Finance. September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 27, 2024.
- ^ Jones, Huw. "New York widens lead over London in top finance centres index". Reuters. Retrieved September 27, 2024.
- ^ Laura Bratton (September 28, 2023). "Sorry, London — New York Is Still the Financial Capital of the World". The Messenger. Archived from the original on October 11, 2023. Retrieved October 1, 2023.
The GDP of the New York City metropolitan area is larger than the country of South Korea...New York City was ranked as the most competitive city in the financial industry for the fifth straight year.
- ^ Iman Ghosh (September 24, 2020). "This 3D map shows the U.S. cities with the highest economic output". World Economic Forum. Retrieved March 5, 2023.
The New York metro area dwarfs all other cities for economic output by a large margin.
- ^ "World Economic Outlook Database Groups and Aggregates Information". IMF.org. International Monetary Fund.
- ^ "World Bank Country and Lending Groups". datahelpdesk.worldbank.org. World Bank. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
- ^ a b "Social Expenditure – Aggregated data". Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- ^ a b Kenworthy, Lane (1999). "Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment" (PDF). Social Forces. 77 (3): 1119–1139. doi:10.2307/3005973. ISSN 0037-7732. JSTOR 3005973. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 10, 2013.
- ^ "U.S. and World Population Clock". United States census. Retrieved June 26, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e "Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: October 2024". imf.org. International Monetary Fund.
- ^ a b c d "IMF DataMapper - United States". International Monetary Fund. October 25, 2024.
- ^ a b "United States". CIA.gov. Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved April 3, 2023.
- ^ a b c "Gross Domestic Product (Second Estimate), Corporate Profits (Preliminary Estimate), First Quarter 2024" (PDF). Bureau of Economic Analysis. May 30, 2024.
- ^ "U.S. inflation falls to 3%, lowest level in more than 2 years, as price pressures ease". Los Angeles Times. July 12, 2023.
- ^ a b "Poverty in the United States: 2023". United States Census Bureau. September 10, 2024. Retrieved October 22, 2024.
- ^ "Income Distribution Measures and Percent Change Using Money Income and Equivalence-Adjusted Income" (PDF). census.gov. United States Census Bureau. Retrieved May 14, 2024.
- ^ "The Distribution of Household Income, 2020". cbo.gov. Congressional Budget Office. November 14, 2023. Retrieved May 14, 2024.
- ^ a b "Human Development Report 2023/2024" (PDF). United Nations Development Programme. March 13, 2024. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 13, 2024. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
- ^ "CPI 2023". Transparency International. January 30, 2024. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e "Employment status of the civilian population by sex and age". BLS.gov. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved December 6, 2024.
- ^ "Employment by major industry sector". Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved July 5, 2018.
- ^ a b "Taxing Wages 2024" (PDF). www.oecd.org.
- ^ "Interest Rates: Long-Term Government Bond Yields: 10-Year: Main (Including Benchmark) for United States".
- ^ a b "PMI, Purchasing Managers' Index – Manufacturing, Services". www.pmi.spglobal.com.
- ^ a b "us-international-trade-goods-and-services-december-2023". Bureau of Economic Analysis. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- ^ "Exports of goods by principal end-use category" (PDF). Census Bureau.
- ^ a b "U.S. trade in goods with World, Seasonally Adjusted" (PDF). United States Census Bureau. Retrieved June 1, 2021.
- ^ "Imports of goods by principal end-use category" (PDF). Census Bureau.
- ^ a b "UNCTAD 2022" (PDF). UNCTAD. Retrieved January 6, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e "Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: October 2024". imf.org. International Monetary Fund.
- ^ "Treasury TIC Data". U.S. Department of the Treasury. Retrieved January 30, 2022.
- ^ "Budget and Economic Data". cbo.gov. Congressional Budget Office.
- ^ "Development aid rises again in 2016 but flows to poorest countries dip". OECD. April 11, 2017. Retrieved September 25, 2017.
- ^ "Sovereigns rating list". Standard & Poor's. Archived from the original on June 18, 2011. Retrieved August 20, 2011.
- ^ a b Rogers, Simon; Sedghi, Ami (April 15, 2011). "How Fitch, Moody's and S&P rate each country's credit rating". The Guardian. London. Retrieved May 28, 2011.
- ^ Riley, Charles (August 2, 2017). "Moody's affirms Aaa rating, lowers outlook". CNN.
- ^ "Fitch Downgrades the United States' Long-Term Ratings to 'AA+' from 'AAA'; Outlook Stable". Fitch Ratings.
- ^ "Scope confirms the United States of America at AA and assigns a Negative Outlook". Scope Ratings.
- ^ "U.S. International Reserve Position". Treasury.gov. Retrieved October 22, 2024.
- ^ "U.S. Economy - Basic Conditions & Resources". U.S. Diplomatic Mission to Germany. "The United States is said to have a mixed economy because privately owned businesses and government both play important roles." Retrieved October 24, 2011.
- ^ (4)Outline of the U.S. Economy – (2)How the U.S. Economy Works. U.S. Embassy Information Resource Center. "As a result, the American economy is perhaps better described as a 'mixed' economy, with the government playing an important role along with private enterprise. Although Americans often disagree about exactly where to draw the line between their beliefs in both free enterprise and government management, the mixed economy they have developed has been remarkably successful." Retrieved October 24, 2011.
- ^ Karagiannis, Nikolaos; Madjd-Sadjadi, Zagros; Sen, Swapan, eds. (2013). The US Economy and Neoliberalism: Alternative Strategies and Policies. Routledge. pp. 1–2. ISBN 978-1138904910.
- ^ "Report for Selected Country Groups and Subjects (PPP valuation of country GDP)". IMF. Retrieved April 20, 2022.
- ^ "United States' share of global gross domestic product (GDP) adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP)". Statiata.
- ^ a b "The Implementation of Monetary Policy – The Federal Reserve in the International Sphere" (PDF). Retrieved August 24, 2010.
- ^ a b Benjamin J. Cohen, The Future of Money, Princeton University Press, 2006, ISBN 0691116660; cf. "the dollar is the de facto currency in Cambodia", Charles Agar, Frommer's Vietnam, 2006, ISBN 0471798169, p. 17
- ^ Wright, Gavin, and Jesse Czelusta, "Resource-Based Growth Past and Present", in Natural Resources: Neither Curse Nor Destiny, ed. Daniel Lederman and William Maloney (World Bank, 2007), p. 185. ISBN 0821365452.
- ^ "Income". Better Life Index. OECD. Retrieved September 28, 2019.
In the United States, the average household net adjusted disposable income per capita is USD 45 284 a year, much higher than the OECD average of USD 33 604 and the highest figure in the OECD.
- ^ "Income Distribution Database". stats.oecd.org. Retrieved March 4, 2023.
- ^ "Gini Index coefficient - distribution of family income - The World Factbook". www.cia.gov. Retrieved August 24, 2022.
- ^ Gray, Sarah (June 4, 2018). "Trump Policies Highlighted in Scathing U.N. Report On U.S. Poverty". Fortune. Retrieved September 13, 2018.
"The United States has the highest rate of income inequality among Western countries", the report states.
- ^ Alston, Philip (2018). "Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights on his mission to the United States of America". OHCHR. Retrieved January 16, 2023.
- ^ a b "Top Trading Partners". U.S. Census Bureau. December 2016. Retrieved July 8, 2017.
- ^ "World Trade Statistical Review 2019" (PDF). World Trade Organization. p. 100. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
- ^ "United States free trade agreements". Office of the United States Trade Representative. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
- ^ "The effect of job security regulations on labor market flexibility: Evidence from the Colombian labor market reform" (PDF). National Bureau of Economic Research. January 2004.
- ^ Kugler, Adriana D.. "The Effect of Job Security Regulations on Labor Market Flexibility: Evidence from the Colombian Labor Market Reform." In Law and Employment: Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean. Edited by James J. Heckman, and Carmen Pages (eds). University of Chicago Press, 2004. Chicago Scholarship Online, 2013. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226322858.003.0004.
- ^ Moller, Stephanie; Huber, Evelyne; Stephens, John D.; Bradley, David; Nielsen, François (2003). "Determinants of Relative Poverty in Advanced Capitalist Democracies". American Sociological Review. 68 (1): 22–51. doi:10.2307/3088901. JSTOR 3088901.
- ^ "United States remains the world's top producer of petroleum and natural gas hydrocarbons". EIA.
- ^ Katsuhiko Hara; Issaku Harada (staff writers) (April 13, 2017). "US overtook China as top trading nation in 2016". Nikkei Asian Review. Tokyo. Archived from the original on February 24, 2021. Retrieved June 22, 2017.
- ^ Vargo, Frank (March 11, 2011). "U.S. Manufacturing Remains World's Largest". Shopfloor. Archived from the original on April 4, 2012. Retrieved March 28, 2012.
- ^ "Trade recovery expected in 2017 and 2018, amid policy uncertainty". Geneva, Switzerland: World Trade Organization. April 12, 2017. Retrieved June 22, 2017.
- ^ a b "Global 500 2016". Fortune. Archived from the original on September 21, 2018. Retrieved June 22, 2017. Number of companies data taken from the "Country" filter.
- ^ "The US is home to more billionaires than China, Germany and Russia combined". CNBC. May 9, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
- ^ "Wealth-X's Billionaire Census 2019 report reveals insights and trends about the world's top billionaires". hk.asiatatler.com. Archived from the original on January 31, 2020. Retrieved May 14, 2019.
- ^ "Total Assets, All Commercial Banks". January 3, 1973.
- ^ "Doubling Down on Data" (PDF). Retrieved March 5, 2022.
- ^ "The asset management industry in the United States" (PDF). Retrieved March 5, 2022.
- ^ Weinberg, John (November 22, 2013). "The Great Recession and Its Aftermath". federalreservehistory.org. Retrieved November 22, 2013.
- ^ Washington Post-Ezra Klein-Double Dip, or just one big economic dive-August 5, 2011
- ^ Li, Yun (July 2, 2019). "This is now the longest US economic expansion in history". CNBC.
This month marks the 121st month of the economic expansion arising out of the great financial crisis, making it the longest run on record going back to 1854.
- ^ "Estimated Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on Employment and Economic Output from October 2011 Through December 2011" (PDF). A CBO Report. Congressional Budget Office. February 2012. Retrieved February 19, 2017.
- ^ "Speech by Chairman Bernanke on the economic recovery and economic policy". Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
- ^ a b The New York Times. Casselbaum. "Up, Up, Up Goes the Economy" March 20, 2018.
- ^ "Monthly Reports - World Federation of Exchanges". WFE.
- ^ Table A – Market Capitalization of the World's Top Stock Exchanges (As at end of June 2012). Securities and Exchange Commission (China).
- ^ "World Official Gold Holdings - International Financial Statistics, March 2024". World Gold Council. March 5, 2024. Retrieved March 8, 2024.
- ^ Adapting and evolving – Global venture capital insights and trends 2014 Archived August 4, 2020, at the Wayback Machine. EY, 2014.
- ^ "2014 Global R&D Funding Forecast" (PDF). battelle.org. December 16, 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 9, 2014.
- ^ "U.S. R&D Increased by $72 Billion in 2021 to $789 Billion; Estimate for 2022 Indicates Further Increase to $886 Billion". National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. January 22, 2024.
- ^ "All Laureates in Economics". Nobel Foundation. Archived from the original on June 1, 2013. Retrieved October 14, 2020.
- ^ "High-technology exports". World Bank Open Data. Retrieved April 15, 2023.
- ^ "Country and Approximate Number of Patent Applications". World Intellectual Property Indicators 2022 - World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved June 1, 2023.
- ^ a b "Personal consumption expenditures (PCE)/gross domestic product (GDP)" FRED Graph, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- ^ "Shares of gross domestic income: Compensation of employees, paid: Wage and salary accruals: Disbursements: To persons" FRED Graph, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- ^ "National Accounts - Analysis of Main Aggregates (AMA)". unstats.un.org.
- ^ "Country comparison :: net migration rate". Central Intelligence Agency. The World Factbook. 2014. Archived from the original on July 9, 2008. Retrieved June 18, 2014.
- ^ "Rankings: Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014" (PDF). World Economic Forum. Retrieved June 1, 2014.
- ^ "Colonial Economy". National Museum of American History. May 24, 2018. Archived from the original on September 13, 2023. Retrieved May 20, 2022.
- ^ "Digital History". www.digitalhistory.uh.edu. Retrieved May 20, 2022.
- ^ "Territory Worth Contesting". National Museum of American History. May 24, 2018. Archived from the original on July 12, 2023. Retrieved May 20, 2022.
- ^ "19th century: Immigration Galore – Peopling of NYC: The Immigrant Experience". Retrieved May 20, 2022.
- ^ Baten, Jörg (2016). A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. p. 88ff. ISBN 978-1107507180.
- ^ W. J. Rorabaugh; Donald T. Critchlow; Paula C. Baker (2004). America's Promise: A Concise History of the United States. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 210. ISBN 978-0742511897.[permanent dead link ]
- ^ Moore, Geoffrey H.; Zarnowitz, Victor (1986). Appendix A The Development and Role of the National Bureau of Economic Research's Business Cycle Chronologies. University of Chicago Press. pp. 735–780. in Gordon 1986, pp. 743–45
- ^ Knoop, Todd A. (July 30, 2004). Recessions and Depressions: Understanding Business Cycles. Praeger Publishers. pp. 166–71. ISBN 978-0275981624.
- ^ Baten, Jörg (2016). A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. p. 95. ISBN 978-1107507180.
- ^ "Digital History".
- ^ "17.1 the Great Depression and Keynesian Economics". December 2016.
- ^ Baten, Jörg (2016). A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. p. 97f. ISBN 978-1107507180.
- ^ Steven Mintz and Susan Kellogg, Domestic Revolutions: a Social History of American Family Life (1988) ch 9
- ^ Buchanan, James M. (1977). Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press. pp. 1–55. ISBN 978-0865972278.
- ^ "Current Population Reports: Money Income of Households and Persons in the United States (1987)" (PDF). U.S. Department of Commerce.
- ^ "Current Population Reports: Income of nonfarm families and individuals (1946)" (PDF). U.S. Department of Commerce.
- ^ Schuman, Michael (February 14, 2011). "Is China facing a Japanese future?". Time. Retrieved February 27, 2012.
- ^ a b "FRED – Total Non-Farm Payrolls". January 1939.
- ^ a b "Financial Crisis Inquiry Report-Conclusions-January 2011". Fcic.law.stanford.edu. March 10, 2011. Retrieved April 22, 2013.
- ^ "FRED – Household Debt Changes". October 1945.
- ^ "Real Gross Domestic Product". fred.stlouisfed.org. November 27, 2024.
- ^ "Households and Nonprofit Organizations; Net Worth, Level". fred.stlouisfed.org. September 12, 2024.
- ^ "FRED – Civilian Unemployment Rate". January 1948.
- ^ a b "Global Crisis News". GCN. October 30, 2009. Archived from the original on November 3, 2009.
- ^ a b "Worries grow of deeper U.S. recession". CNN. Archived from the original on June 11, 2008. Retrieved November 17, 2008.
- ^ "CIA World Factbook – Debt to GDP". Archived from the original on June 13, 2007.
- ^ Pound, Jesse (August 28, 2020). "Fed's Bullard says the recession is over but rates will 'stay low for a long time'". CNBC. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
- ^ President Trump's statements to reporters gathered at Joint Base Andrews on 5 May 2020, before his departure en route to Phoenix, Arizona, President Donald J. Trump departs from Joint Base Andrews en route to Phoenix on YouTube, May 5, 2020, minutes 10:06–10:14.
- ^ Wiseman, Paul (May 5, 2020). "US trade gap rises to $44.4 billion as virus slams commerce". Associated Press.
- ^ Mutikani, Lucia (May 5, 2020). "U.S. trade deficit widens, services sector contracts amid coronavirus". Reuters.
- ^ Shepardson, David; Rucinski, Tracy (May 6, 2020). "Exclusive: U.S. airlines burn through $10 billion a month as traffic plummets". Reuters.
- ^ "The Great Recession Was Bad. The 'Great Lockdown' Is Worse". BloombergQuint. April 14, 2020. Retrieved April 15, 2020.
- ^ "IMF Says 'Great Lockdown' Worst Recession Since Depression, Far Worse Than Last Crisis". nysscpa.org. Retrieved April 15, 2020.
- ^ Ben Winck (April 14, 2020). "IMF economic outlook: 'Great Lockdown' will be worst recession in century". Business Insider. Retrieved April 27, 2020.
- ^ Larry Elliott Economics, ed. (April 14, 2020). "'Great Lockdown' to rival Great Depression with 3% hit to global economy, says IMF | Business". The Guardian. Retrieved April 27, 2020.
- ^ Jones, Huw (March 24, 2022). "New York widens lead over London in top finance centres index". www.reuters.com. Retrieved June 25, 2022.
- ^ Collinson, Stephen (May 7, 2020). "Trump economy faces long-term disaster as jobs data looms". CNN.
- ^ Ross, Jamie (May 8, 2020). "Trump's Live Reaction to Record Unemployment: Don't Blame Me". Yahoo Business.
- ^ Schneider, Howard; Saphir, Ann (May 13, 2020). "In nod to grim U.S. outlook, Fed's Powell calls for more fiscal support". Reuters.
- ^ Fottrell, Quentin (May 31, 2020). "Over 40 million people filed for unemployment since March – $1,200 stimulus checks are a mere Band-Aid for Americans". MarketWatch (for Yahoo! Finance).
- ^ Shepardson, David (June 4, 2020). "U.S. airlines gain final approval to drop services to 75 domestic airports". Reuters.
- ^ "Fed Expects Unemployment Rate to Stay High: Live Updates". The New York Times. June 10, 2020.
- ^ "US economy grew 5.7% in 2021 in rebound from 2020 recession". ABC News. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
- ^ "Inflation Hits 9.1 Percent, Highest Level in 41 Years". July 13, 2022.
- ^ Aratani, Lauren (2023). "US jobs market remains strong despite high interest rates and debt ceiling fight". The Guardian.
- ^ "Report for Selected Countries and Subjects". IMF.
- ^ FRED-Real GDP-Retrieved July 1, 2018.
- ^ "BEA News Release – GDP Second Quarter 2018 – July 27, 2018".
- ^ a b Analysis, US Department of Commerce, BEA, Bureau of Economic. "Bureau of Economic Analysis". bea.gov. Retrieved May 7, 2018.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ CIA World Factbook-United States-Retrieved July 29, 2018.
- ^ "FRED – Real GDP per Capita – Annual Average". January 1947.
- ^ The New York Times. Adam Davidson. "Are We Doomed to Slow Growth?" February 17, 2016.
- ^ "CIA World Factbook. "USA Economy"". Archived from the original on June 13, 2007.
- ^ "GDP growth (annual %)". Data.worldbank.org. Retrieved December 8, 2014.
- ^ "National Income and Product Accounts Gross Domestic Product: Second Quarter 2014 (Advance Estimate) Annual Revision: 1999 through First Quarter 2014". Bureau of Economic Analysis. Retrieved July 31, 2014.
- ^ "UNCTADstat – Table view". unctadstat.unctad.org. Archived from the original on October 20, 2017. Retrieved November 26, 2017.
- ^ "Report for Selected Countries and Subjects". imf.org. Retrieved November 26, 2017.
- ^ "The World Factbook – Central Intelligence Agency". cia.gov. Retrieved November 26, 2017.
- ^ Federal Reserve Economic Data-All Employees Total Non-Farm-Retrieved July 29, 2018.
- ^ "CIA World Factbook. "United States". February 16, 2022.
- ^ a b c McFeatters, Dale (September 6, 2010). "Saluting 154 million in workforce on Labor Day". Napa Valley Register.
- ^ a b c d e f g "Office of Advocacy – Frequently Asked Questions – How important are small businesses to the U.S. economy?" (PDF). SBA.gov. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 2, 2010. Retrieved April 21, 2012.
- ^ "Is a white-collar recession looming?". The Economist. December 4, 2022.
Managerial and professional occupations now make up 44% of total employment, up from 34% in 2000, according to the BLS (see chart).
- ^ "Obama: Small Business 'Heart' of Economy – YouTube". Youtube. March 16, 2009. Archived from the original on December 11, 2021. Retrieved April 21, 2012.
- ^ "Global 500 2010: Global 500 1–100". CNN.
- ^ Walmart Corporate and Financial Facts.
- ^ "Minority population growing in the United States, census estimates show". Los Angeles Times. June 10, 2010.
- ^ "Current Unemployment Rates for States and Historical Highs/Lows". BLS. June 2012. Retrieved June 15, 2012.
- ^ a b "OECD Better Life Index". OECD. Retrieved November 25, 2012.
- ^ Median Household Income for States: 2007 and 2008, September 2009, census.gov.
- ^ Doree Armstrong (February 12, 2014). Jake Rosenfeld explores the sharp decline of union membership, influence. UW Today. See also: Jake Rosenfeld (2014) What Unions No Longer Do. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674725115
- ^ Keith Naughton, Lynn Doan and Jeffrey Green (February 20, 2015). As the Rich Get Richer, Unions Are Poised for Comeback. Bloomberg.
- "A 2011 study drew a link between the decline in union membership since 1973 and expanding wage disparity. Those trends have since continued, said Bruce Western, a professor of sociology at Harvard University who co-authored the study."
- ^ Michael Hiltzik (March 25, 2015). IMF agrees: Decline of union power has increased income inequality. Los Angeles Times.
- ^ "Doing Business in the United States (2006)". World Bank. Retrieved June 28, 2007.
- ^ Rebecca Ray, Milla Sanes, and John Schmitt (May 2013). No-Vacation Nation Revisited. Center for Economic and Policy Research.
- ^ Tara Siegel Bernard (February 22, 2013). In Paid Family Leave, U.S. Trails Most of the Globe. The New York Times
- ^ Maxwell Strachan, Alissa Scheller, Jan Diehm (October 29, 2013). 15 Ways The United States Is The Best (At Being The Worst). The Huffington Post.
- ^ Ishaan Tharoor (May 20, 2014). MAP: The worst places in the world to be a worker. The Washington Post. see also: ITUC Global Rights Index.
- ^ O'Brien, Fergal; Schneeweiss, Zoe (June 18, 2020). "U.S. Ranked Worst for Workers' Rights Among Major Economies". Bloomberg. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
- ^ Ghilarducci, Teresa (June 14, 2023). "New Study: U.S. Tops Rich Nations As Worst Place To Work". Forbes. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
- ^ Henderson, Kaitlyn (May 3, 2023). "Where hard work doesn't pay off: An index of US labor policies compared to peer nations". Oxfam. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
The US is falling drastically behind similar countries in mandating adequate wages, protections, and rights for millions of workers and their families. The wealthiest country in the world is near the bottom of every dimension of this index.
- ^ Pfeffer, Jeffrey (2018). Dying for a Paycheck: How Modern Management Harms Employee Health and Company Performance – and What We Can Do About It. HarperBusiness. p. 38. ISBN 978-0062800923.
- ^ McGregor, Jena (March 22, 2018). "This professor says the workplace is the fifth leading cause of death in the U.S." The Washington Post. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
- ^ Kinderman, Daniel (2019). "The Neoliberal Revolution in Industrial Relations". Catalyst. 2 (4): 117–118. ISSN 2475-7365.
Neoliberal industrial relations reform and increased employer discretion has enabled employers to significantly increase the performance pressure, with serious repercussions for employees. In the United States, work-related issues including layoffs, job insecurity, toxic cultures, and long hours may be responsible for up to 120,000 deaths a year.
- ^ "Federal Reserve Database-FRED-Data Series UNRATE". Research.stlouisfed.org. September 6, 2013. Retrieved October 20, 2013.
- ^ "Federal Reserve Database-FRED-Data Series Unemploy". Research.stlouisfed.org. January 1948. Retrieved October 20, 2013.
- ^ "Federal Reserve Database-FRED-Data Series U6RATE-March 2013". Research.stlouisfed.org. September 6, 2013. Retrieved October 20, 2013.
- ^ "Federal Reserve Database-CLF160V Data Series". Research.stlouisfed.org. January 1948. Retrieved October 20, 2013.
- ^ "FRED Database – POP Data Series – U.S. Population. November 2012". Research.stlouisfed.org. January 1952. Retrieved October 20, 2013.
- ^ "Millions of Unemployed Face Years Without Jobs" article by Peter S. Goodman in The New York Times February 20, 2010.
- ^ "Immigrants top native born in U.S. job hunt". CNNMoney.com. October 29, 2010.
- ^ "Broader U-6 Unemployment Rate Increases to 17.1% in April". The Wall Street Journal. May 7, 2010.
- ^ "Four million more people working part time than 2 years ago". EconPost.com. March 17, 2010. Archived from the original on July 11, 2010. Retrieved March 30, 2010.
- ^ Schwartz, Nelson (March 3, 2013). "Recovery in U.S. Is Lifting Profits, but Not Adding Jobs". The New York Times. Retrieved March 18, 2013.
- ^ "FRED – All Employees Total Non-farm Payrolls". January 1939.
- ^ Constance Sorrentino; Joyanna Moy (June 2002). "U.S. labor market performance in international perspective" (PDF). Monthly Labor Review. Retrieved August 22, 2013.
- ^ "Chronic Unemployment in the Euro Area: Causes and Cures" (PDF). World Economic Outlook. International Monetary Fund. 1999. Retrieved August 22, 2013.
- ^ "Unemployment". Euro Economics. University of North Carolina. Retrieved August 22, 2013.
Chart
- ^ Time-Life Books, Library of Nations: United States, Sixth European English language printing, 1989
- ^ "Current Population Survey". Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Government. June 5, 2009. Retrieved June 19, 2009.
- ^ "Employment and Unemployment Among Youth Summary". United States Department of Labor. August 27, 2009.
- ^ "The Unemployment News Is Worse For Many". Forbes. June 7, 2013.
- ^ "Gross Domestic Product, 2nd Quarter 2020 (Advance Estimate) and Annual Update | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)". www.bea.gov. Retrieved June 8, 2021.
- ^ "The U.S. economy added 4.8 million jobs in June, but fierce new headwinds have emerged". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved June 8, 2021.
- ^ Cox, Jeff (July 30, 2020). "Second-quarter GDP plunged by worst-ever 32.9% amid virus-induced shutdown". CNBC. Retrieved June 8, 2021.
- ^ "The US labor market recovered rapidly in 2021 but still fell short even before Omicron wave". PIIE. January 7, 2022. Retrieved April 12, 2022.
- ^ Aratani, Lauren (June 2, 2023). "US jobs market remains strong despite high interest rates and debt ceiling fight". The Guardian.
- ^ "The World Factbook (United States)". CIA.gov. September 25, 2013. Retrieved October 26, 2013.
- ^ Federal Reserve Bulletin. September 2017, Vol. 103, No. 3. See PDF: Changes in U.S. Family Finances from 2013 to 2016: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances. Table 1 (on the left) is taken from page 4 of the PDF. Table 2 (on the right) is taken from page 13. See: Survey of Consumer Finances and more data.
- ^ "FRED – Real Median Household Income". January 1984.
- ^ "Z.1: Financial Accounts of the United States" (PDF). Federal Reserve Board of Governors. March 6, 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 27, 2014. Retrieved May 31, 2014.
- ^ "Household Income". Society at a Glance 2014: OECD Social Indicators. Society at a Glance. OECD Publishing. March 18, 2014. doi:10.1787/soc_glance-2014-en. ISBN 9789264200722. Retrieved May 29, 2014.
- ^ David Leonhardt and Kevin Quealy (April 22, 2014). The American Middle Class Is No Longer the World's Richest. The New York Times.
- ^ United Press International (UPI), June 22, 2018, "U.N. Report: With 40M in Poverty, U.S. Most Unequal Developed Nation"
- ^ a b c "The Distribution of Household Income, 2016". www.cbo.gov. Congressional Budget Office. July 2019. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
- ^ Krueger, Alan (January 12, 2012). "Chairman Alan Krueger Discusses the Rise and Consequences of Inequality at the Center for American Progress". whitehouse.gov – via National Archives.
- ^ Stewart, Alexander J.; McCarty, Nolan; Bryson, Joanna J. (2020). "Polarization under rising inequality and economic decline". Science Advances. 6 (50): eabd4201. arXiv:1807.11477. Bibcode:2020SciA....6.4201S. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd4201. PMC 7732181. PMID 33310855. S2CID 216144890.
- ^ Porter, Eduardo (November 12, 2013). "Rethinking the Rise of Inequality". NYT.
- ^ "Why the gap between worker pay and productivity might be a myth". July 23, 2015.
- ^ Rose, Stephen J. (December 2018). "Measuring Income Inequality in the US: Methodological Issues" (PDF). Urban Institute. Retrieved May 25, 2019.
- ^ "Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States" (PDF). NBER. December 1, 2018. Retrieved October 19, 2019.
- ^ Taylor, Telford (September 26, 2019). "Income inequality in America is the highest it's been since census started tracking it, data shows". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 26, 2019.
- ^ Semega, Jessica; Kollar, Melissa (September 13, 2022). "2021 Income Inequality Increased for First Time Since 2011". census.gov. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
- ^ "The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2010". The US Congressional Budget Office (CBO). December 4, 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2014.
- ^ a b "Evolution of wealth indicators, USA, 1913-2019". WID.world. World Inequality Database. 2022. Archived from the original on July 5, 2023. Retrieved September 6, 2023.
- ^ "FRED "Household and Non-Profit net worth – Real and Nominal"".
- ^ "Federal Reserve – Survey of Consumer Finances 2016".
- ^ "Economist Gabriel Zucman "Wealth Inequality in the United States Since 1913"". Gabriel Zucman | Professor of Economics. October 12, 2014.
- ^ Egan, Matt (September 27, 2017). "Record inequality: The top 1% controls 38.6% of America's wealth". CNNMoney. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
- ^ Steverman, Ben (June 16, 2017). "The U.S. Is Where the Rich Are the Richest". Bloomberg. Retrieved October 22, 2017.
- ^ Hurst, Charles E. (2007). Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and Consequences. Pearson Education, Inc. p. 34. ISBN 978-0205698295.
- ^ "Global Wealth Databook 2021" (PDF). Credit Suisse. June 23, 2021. pp. 115–118. Retrieved March 4, 2022.
- ^ Bruenig, Matt (March 24, 2014). "You call this a meritocracy? How rich inheritance is poisoning the American economy". Salon. Retrieved August 24, 2014.
- ^ Staff (March 18, 2014). "Inequality – Inherited wealth". The Economist. Retrieved August 24, 2014.
- ^ Pizzigati, Sam (September 24, 2012). "The 'Self-Made' Hallucination of America's Rich". Institute for Policy Studies. Retrieved August 24, 2014.
- ^ "Median Household Net Worth by Quintile" (PDF). United States Census. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 12, 2014.
- ^ "World Wealth Report 2010 – Resource". June 18, 2010. Archived from the original on April 6, 2012. Retrieved August 10, 2017.
- ^ "Barclays Wealth Insights" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 26, 2009. Retrieved February 2, 2017.. Volume 5: Evolving Fortunes. Barclays (2008). p. 7
- ^ a b "Forbes". March 14, 2011.
- ^ Ody, Elizabeth (March 10, 2011). "Carlos Slim Tops Forbes List of Billionaires for Second Year". Bloomberg. Retrieved April 21, 2012.
- ^ "FRED "Homeownership rate for the United States"". January 1965.
- ^ Robert E. Rector; Kirk A. Johnson (January 5, 2004). "Understanding Poverty in America". Archived from the original on March 13, 2010.
- ^ Robert Rector (August 27, 2007). "How Poor Are America's Poor? Examining the "Plague" of Poverty in America". Archived from the original on March 12, 2010.
- ^ W. Michael Cox and Richard Alm (1999), The myths of rich and poor: why we're better off than we think. New York: Basic Books
- ^ Millennials aren't buying homes right now. What if they never do? The Guardian. May 27, 2016.
- ^ Min, Sarah (March 28, 2019). "Average Americans can't afford a home in 70 percent of the country". CBS News. Retrieved April 1, 2019.
- ^ Berr, Johnathan (July 31, 2018). "More Americans are forced to "reside" in their vehicles". CBS MoneyWatch. Retrieved August 2, 2018.
- ^ Quinn, Mattie (July 24, 2018). "'It's the New Form of Affordable Housing': More People Are Living in Their Cars". Governing. Retrieved January 19, 2019.
- ^ Martin, Emmie (June 23, 2017). "MONEY Here's how much housing prices have skyrocketed over the last 50 years". CNBC. Archived from the original on March 28, 2023. Retrieved April 6, 2023.
- ^ "Median home price in the U.S. 2022 and forecast until 2023".
- ^ "U.S. Housing Shortage: Everything, Everywhere, All at Once | Fannie Mae".
- ^ "The US housing shortage is 'awful' and will likely get worse with no apparent end in sight". USA Today.
- ^ Picchi, Aimee (January 12, 2024). "Here's why Americans are so unhappy with the economy, in 3 charts". CBS News. Retrieved January 12, 2024.
- ^ Bergsten, C. Fred (2022). The United States vs. China : the quest for global economic leadership. Cambridge. p. 303. ISBN 978-1-5095-4735-7. OCLC 1255691875.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Lee, Nathaniel (July 19, 2022). "Why American wages haven't grown despite increases in productivity". CNBC. Retrieved November 25, 2022.
- ^ DeSilver, Drew (August 7, 2018). "For most U.S. workers, real wages have barely budged in decades". Pew Research Center. Retrieved November 25, 2022.
- ^ "Wage Stagnation in Nine Charts". Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved November 25, 2022.
- ^ Mattei, Clara E. (2022). The Capital Order: How Economists Invented Austerity and Paved the Way to Fascism. University of Chicago Press. p. 18. ISBN 978-0226818399.
- ^ Derek, Thompson (March 4, 2013). "Corporate Profits Are Eating the Economy". The Atlantic. Retrieved March 18, 2013.
- ^ "Real Disposable Personal Income: Per capita" Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 2013
- ^ "The Rich Are Enjoying The Recovery While Wages Fall For Everyone Else" ThinkProgress, January 25, 2013.
- ^ "US Census Bureau, females, 18 or older, unemployed, personal income, 2005". Archived from the original on February 5, 2012. Retrieved December 8, 2006.
- ^ "US Census Bureau, male, 18 or older, employed full-time year round, 2005". Archived from the original on February 5, 2012. Retrieved December 8, 2006.
- ^ "US Census Bureau, 18+ age, 2005". Archived from the original on February 5, 2012. Retrieved December 8, 2006.
- ^ "US Census Bureau, Personal income for all sexes, races in 2005". Archived from the original on March 19, 2007. Retrieved November 19, 2006.
- ^ Desilver, Drew (October 9, 2014). "For most workers, real wages have barely budged for decades". Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on August 6, 2018. Retrieved July 20, 2018.
But a look at five decades' worth of government wage data suggests that the better question might be, why should now be any different? For most U.S. workers, real wages – that is, after inflation is taken into account – have been flat or even falling for decades, regardless of whether the economy has been adding or subtracting jobs.
- ^ Smith, Noah (July 25, 2018). "How About a Free Market for Wages?". Bloomberg Opinion. Retrieved August 31, 2018.
- ^ Picchi, Aimee (August 24, 2017). "Vast number of Americans live paycheck to paycheck". CBS News. Retrieved August 25, 2017.
- ^ Albrecht, Leslie (September 27, 2017). "One-third of American households can't afford food, shelter or medical care". Marketwatch. Retrieved October 6, 2017.
- ^ Getlen, Larry (July 23, 2018). "America's middle class is slowly being 'wiped out'". MarketWatch. Retrieved July 29, 2018.
- ^ Long, Heather (February 13, 2019). "Record 7 million Americans are 3 months behind on car payments". boston.com. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
- ^ Neel, Joe; Neighmond, Patti (May 21, 2019). "Poll: Many Rural Americans Struggle With Financial Insecurity, Access To Health Care". NPR. Retrieved May 21, 2019.
- ^ Long, Heather (July 4, 2019). "'This doesn't look like the best economy ever': 40% of Americans say they still struggle to pay bills". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
- ^ Romo, Vanessa (July 14, 2021). "Rents Are Out Of Reach For Most Americans Earning Minimum Wage, A Study Says". NPR. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
- ^ Picchi, Aimee (September 12, 2023). "America's poverty rate soared last year. Children were among the worst hit". CBS News. Retrieved September 15, 2023.
- ^ Woolf, Steven; Aaron, Laudon (2013). U.S. Health in International Perspective. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. pp. 171–72. doi:10.17226/13497. ISBN 978-0-309-26414-3. PMID 24006554. Retrieved April 8, 2013.
- ^ "Extreme Poverty in the United States, 1996 to 2011" National Poverty Center, February 2012.
- ^ Walker, Duncan (March 6, 2013). "The children going hungry in America". BBC News. Retrieved March 13, 2013.
- ^ Report finds 44 percent of U.S. children live in low-income families. PBS Newshour. April 6, 2015.
- ^ "U.S. Census Bureau – Income and Poverty in the United States 2016".
- ^ IMF warns the US over high poverty. BBC, June 22, 2016.
- ^ "Trends in Family Wealth, 1989 to 2013". Congressional Budget Office. August 18, 2016.
- ^ a b Kneebone, Elizabeth; Nadeau, Carey; Berube, Alan (November 3, 2011). "The Re-Emergence of Concentrated Poverty: Metropolitan Trends in the 2000s". Brookings Institution.
- ^ Shah, Neil (October 11, 2013).U.S. Poverty Rate Stabilizes – For Some. The Wall Street Journal (New York).
- ^ "US homeless people numbers rise for first time in seven years". BBC. December 6, 2017.
- ^ "HUD 5th Annual Homelessness Assessment Report to Congress, June 2010" (PDF). Retrieved October 20, 2013.
- ^ Employment and Homelessness Archived May 26, 2019, at the Wayback Machine. National Coalition for the Homeless, July 2009.
- ^ McCormick, Erin (February 7, 2022). "'Homelessness is lethal': US deaths among those without housing are surging". The Guardian. Retrieved June 16, 2023.
- ^ Smeeding, T.M. (2005). "Public Policy: Economic Inequality and Poverty: The United States in Comparative Perspective". Social Science Quarterly. 86: 955–83. doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00331.x.
- ^ Kenworthy, L. (1999). "Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment" (PDF). Social Forces. 77 (3): 1119–39. doi:10.1093/sf/77.3.1119.
- ^ Bradley, D.; E. Huber; S. Moller; F. Nielsen & J.D. Stephens (2003). "Determinants of Relative Poverty in Advanced Capitalist Democracies". American Sociological Review. 68 (1): 22–51. doi:10.2307/3088901. JSTOR 3088901. S2CID 144289954.
- ^ Kevin Drum (September 26, 2013). We Can Reduce Poverty If We Want To. We Just Have To Want To. Mother Jones.
- ^ Gould, Elise and Wething, Hilary (July 24, 2012). "U.S. poverty rates higher, safety net weaker than in peer countries." Economic Policy Institute.
- ^ Temin, Peter (2017). The Vanishing Middle Class: Prejudice and Power in a Dual Economy. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262036160.
- ^ Alston, Philp (December 15, 2017). "Extreme poverty in America: read the UN special monitor's report". The Guardian. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
- ^ ""Contempt for the poor in US drives cruel policies," says UN expert". OHCHR. June 4, 2018. Retrieved June 6, 2018.
- ^ Danelski, David (April 17, 2023). "Poverty is the 4th greatest cause of U.S. deaths". news.ucr.edu. Retrieved June 23, 2023.
- ^ Brady, David; Kohler, Ulrich; Zheng, Hui (2023). "Novel Estimates of Mortality Associated With Poverty in the US". The Journal of the American Medical Association. 183 (6): 504–628. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0276. PMC 10111231. PMID 37067817.
- ^ Jarow, Oshan (July 14, 2023). "Poverty is a major public health crisis. Let's treat it like one". Vox. Retrieved September 3, 2023.
Their results find poverty is America's fourth-leading risk factor for death, behind only heart disease, cancer, and smoking. A single year of poverty, defined relatively in the study as having less than 50 percent of the US median household income, is associated with 183,000 American deaths per year. Being in "cumulative poverty," or 10 years or more of uninterrupted poverty, is associated with 295,000 annual deaths.
- ^ Bruce Western. Poverty Politics and Crime Control in Europe and America. Contemporary Sociology Vol. 40, No. 3 (May 2011), pp. 283–86
- ^ Stephen Haymes, Maria Vidal de Haymes and Reuben Miller (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Poverty in the United States, (London: Routledge, 2015), ISBN 0415673445, pp. 3, 346.
- ^ Loïc Wacquant, Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity Archived February 23, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, (Duke University Press, 2009), ISBN 082234422X, pp. 125–16, 312
- ^ Marie Gottschalk. Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics. Princeton University Press, 2014. ISBN 0691164053 p. 10
- ^ Desmond, Matthew (2023). Poverty, by America. Crown Publishing Group. p. 62. ISBN 9780593239919.
- ^ Rank, Mark Robert (2023). The Poverty Paradox: Understanding Economic Hardship Amid American Prosperity. Oxford University Press. pp. 4, 121. ISBN 978-0190212636.
The tendency of our free market economy has been to produce a growing number of jobs that will no longer support a family. In addition, the basic nature of capitalism ensures that unemployment exists at modest levels. Both of these directly result in a shortage of economic opportunities in American society. In addition, the absence of social supports stems from failings at the political and policy levels. The United States has traditionally lacked the political desire to put in place effective policies and programs that would support the economically vulnerable. Structural failing at the economic and political levels have therefore produced a lack of opportunities and supports, resulting in high rates of American poverty. (p.121)
- ^ "Federal Subsidies for Health Insurance Coverage for People Under Age 65". CBO. March 24, 2016.
- ^ "OECD Health at a Glance 2015 – Table 3.3". November 7, 2023.
- ^ "Federal Subsidies for Health Insurance Coverage for People Under Age 65: 2018 to 2028". May 23, 2018. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ "Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2016". census.gov.
- ^ "Health Insurance Historical Tables –HIC Series". Census.
- ^ Collins, Sara R.; Gunja, Munira Z.; Doty, Michelle M.; Bhupal, Herman K. (2018). "Commonwealth Fund – First Look at Health Insurance Coverage in 2018 Finds ACA Gains Beginning to Reverse". Commonwealth Fund. doi:10.26099/aacp-5268.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ Woolhandler, S.; et al. (September 12, 2012). "Despite slight drop in uninsured, last year's figure points to 48,000 preventable deaths". Physicians for a National Health Program. Archived from the original on September 24, 2012. Retrieved September 26, 2012.
- ^ Goodman, John (September 21, 2009). "Does Lack Of Insurance Cause Premature Death?". Health Affairs Forefront. Health Affairs. doi:10.1377/forefront.20090921.002196.
- ^ Kronick, Richard (August 2009). "Health Insurance Coverage and Mortality Revisited". Health Services Research. 44 (4): 1211–31. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00973.x. PMC 2739025. PMID 19453392.
- ^ Cowen, Tyler (October 5, 2006). "Poor U.S. Scores in Health Care Don't Measure Nobels and Innovation". The New York Times. Retrieved October 9, 2012.
- ^ Whitman, Glen; Raad, Raymond. "Bending the Productivity Curve: Why America Leads the World in Medical Innovation". The Cato Institute. Retrieved October 9, 2012.
- ^ National Research Council (US); Woolf, S. H.; Aron, L. (2013). "U.S. Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, Poorer Health" (2013) National Institutes of Health Committee on Population, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice. Books.nap.edu. doi:10.17226/13497. ISBN 978-0-309-26414-3. PMID 24006554. Retrieved October 20, 2013.
- ^ a b CDCTobaccoFree (May 4, 2018). "Economic Trends in Tobacco". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved June 3, 2019.
- ^ Martin, Nicole (August 21, 2007). "UK cancer survival rate lowest in Europe". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved August 19, 2013.
- ^ Verdecchia, A; Francisci, S; Brenner, H; Gatta, G; Micheli, A; Mangone, L; Kunkler, I; EUROCARE-4 Working, Group (September 2007). "Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000–02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 data". The Lancet Oncology. 8 (9): 784–96. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70246-2. PMID 17714993.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ MD, Scott W. Atlas (2011). In excellent health : setting the record straight on America's health care and charting a path for future reform. Stanford, California: Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University. pp. 199–205. ISBN 978-0817914448.
- ^ Atlas 2011, pp. 205–07
- ^ Wolf-Maier, K. (November 24, 2003). "Hypertension Treatment and Control in Five European Countries, Canada, and the United States". Hypertension. 43 (1): 10–17. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000103630.72812.10. PMID 14638619.
- ^ Atlas 2011, pp. 150–56
- ^ O'Neill, June E.; O'Neill, Dave M. (2008). "Health Status, Health Care and Inequality: Canada vs. the U.S" (PDF). Forum for Health Economics & Policy. 10 (1). doi:10.2202/1558-9544.1094. S2CID 73172486.
- ^ McDonald, Andy (September 28, 2018). "U.S. Drops To 27th In The World For Education And Health Care". The Huffington Post. Retrieved October 6, 2018.
- ^ "OECD Statistical Database – Health expenditure and financing".
- ^ "FastStats". cdc.gov. July 18, 2017.
- ^ Conover, Christopher J. (October 4, 2004). "Health Care Regulation A $169 Billion Hidden Tax" (PDF). Cato Institute. Retrieved September 2, 2014.
- ^ a b "Why Does Health Care Cost so Much in America? Ask Harvard's David Cutler". Public Broadcasting Service. November 19, 2013.
- ^ Lawler, Joseph (September 19, 2012). "Health Care Economist John Goodman on Market-Based Health Care". Real Clear Policy. Retrieved September 2, 2014.
- ^ Pear, Robert (August 16, 2011). "Medicaid Pays Less Than Medicare for Many Prescription Drugs, U.S. Report Finds". The New York Times.
- ^ Dobson, A.; DaVanzo, J.; Sen, N. (January 1, 2006). "The Cost-Shift Payment 'Hydraulic': Foundation, History, And Implications". Health Affairs. 25 (1): 22–33. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.22. PMID 16403741.
- ^ Pope, Christopher (August 9, 2013). "Legislating Low Prices: Cutting Costs or Care?". The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved September 2, 2014.
- ^ "Manufacturing Output by Country". imt. Archived from the original on July 27, 2013. Retrieved April 4, 2014.
- ^ "World Book at NASA". Archived from the original on July 31, 2010. Retrieved March 5, 2022.[full citation needed]
- ^ Martin Crutsinger (April 20, 2007). "Factory jobs: 3 million lost since 2000". USA Today. Associated Press. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
- ^ Michael Lind (December 1, 2011). "The Cost of Free Trade". The American Prospect. Retrieved March 3, 2012.
- ^ "What Accounts for the Decline in Manufacturing Employment?". February 18, 2004. Retrieved August 10, 2017.
- ^ "Congressional Record V. 148, Pt. 4, April 11, 2002 to April 24, 2002". United States Government Printing Office.
- ^ UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. 2015. p. 141. ISBN 978-9231001291.
- ^ "Manufacturing Output by Country". Greyhill Advisors. Retrieved October 5, 2011.
- ^ "What Accounts for the Decline in Manufacturing Employment?". Congressional Budget Office. Retrieved October 5, 2011.
- ^ Harold Meyerson (November 29, 2011). "Back from China?". The American Prospect. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
- ^ Carl Pope (January 18–20, 2012). "America's Dirty War Against Manufacturing: Part 1". Bloomberg. Retrieved January 22, 2012. Part 2. Part 3.
- ^ Dean Baker (January 22, 2012). "Hasn't Anyone at the NYT Heard of Exchange Rates?". Beat the Press. Center for Economic and Policy Research. Archived from the original on April 3, 2015. Retrieved January 22, 2012.
- ^ "Interstate FAQ (Question #3)". Federal Highway Administration. 2006. Retrieved March 4, 2009.
- ^ "Public Road and Street Mileage in the United States by Type of Surface". United States Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on January 2, 2015. Retrieved January 13, 2015.
- ^ "China Expressway System to Exceed US Interstates". New Geography. Grand Forks, ND. January 22, 2011. Retrieved September 16, 2011.
- ^ "China overtakes US in car sales". The Guardian. London. January 8, 2010. Retrieved July 10, 2011.
- ^ "Motor vehicles statistics – countries compared worldwide". NationMaster. Retrieved July 10, 2011.
- ^ "Household, Individual, and Vehicle Characteristics". 2001 National Household Travel Survey. U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Archived from the original on September 29, 2007. Retrieved August 15, 2007.
- ^ Renne, John L.; Wells, Jan S. (2003). "Emerging European-Style Planning in the United States: Transit-Oriented Development" (PDF). Rutgers University. p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 24, 2014. Retrieved June 11, 2007.
- ^ Benfield, Kaid (May 18, 2009). "NatGeo surveys countries' transit use: guess who comes in last". Natural Resources Defense Council. Archived from the original on January 20, 2015. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
- ^ "Intercity Passenger Rail: National Policy and Strategies Needed to Maximize Public Benefits from Federal Expenditures". U.S. Government Accountability Office. November 13, 2006. Retrieved June 20, 2007.
- ^ "The Economist Explains: Why Americans Don't Ride Trains". The Economist. August 29, 2013. Retrieved May 12, 2015.
- ^ "Amtrak Ridership Records". Amtrak. June 8, 2011. Retrieved February 29, 2012.
- ^ McGill, Tracy (January 1, 2011). "3 Reasons Light Rail Is an Efficient Transportation Option for U.S. Cities". MetaEfficient. Retrieved June 14, 2013.
- ^ "Privatization". downsizinggovernment.org. Cato Institute. Retrieved December 27, 2014.
- ^ "Scheduled Passengers Carried". International Air Transport Association (IATA). 2011. Archived from the original on November 13, 2013. Retrieved February 17, 2012.
- ^ "Preliminary World Airport Traffic and Rankings 2013 – High Growth Dubai Moves Up to 7th Busiest Airport – March 31, 2014". Airports Council International. March 31, 2014. Archived from the original on April 1, 2014. Retrieved May 17, 2014.
- ^ Barr, Robert (June 8, 2011). "China surpasses US as top energy consumer – Business – Oil & energy – NBC News". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 15, 2020. Retrieved April 21, 2012.
- ^ World Per Capita Total Primary Energy Consumption,1980–2005 (MS Excel format)
- ^ World Resources Institute "Energy Consumption: Consumption per capita" (2001). Nations with higher per-capita consumption are: Qatar, Iceland, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Luxembourg and Canada. Except for Canada, these are small countries with a prominent energy-intensive industry such as oil refining or steelmaking.
- ^ US Dept. of Energy, "Annual Energy Report" (July 2006), Energy Flow diagram
- ^ Tertzakian, Peter (November 15, 2005). "The U.S. Senate's Oil Spill". Forbes. Archived from the original on February 14, 2006. Retrieved April 21, 2012.
- ^ "Domestic Demand for Refined Petroleum Products by Sector". U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Retrieved August 23, 2014.
- ^ "U.S. Imports of Crude Oil". U.S. Census Bureau.
- ^ Pleven, Liam (November 30, 2011). "The Wall Street Journal". Retrieved April 21, 2012.
- ^ Kahn, Chris (December 31, 2011). "In a first, gas and other fuels top U.S. exports". Florida Today. Melbourne, FL. p. 4A. Archived from the original on March 11, 2012.
- ^ "IPTO – Information Processing Techniques Office" Archived July 2, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, The Living Internet, Bill Stewart (ed), January 2000.
- ^ "Global Trade Alert – Independent monitoring of policies that affect world trade". globaltradealert.org.
- ^ "China overtakes US as world's largest goods trader". Financial Times. Archived from the original on December 10, 2022. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
- ^ "Free exchange: Petrodollar profusion". The Economist.
- ^ "North American Free Trade Agreement | History, Purpose, & Provisions". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
- ^ "North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) | United States Trade Representative". ustr.gov. Archived from the original on May 8, 2020. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
- ^ "U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services" (PDF). BEA. February 5, 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 6, 2017. Retrieved March 9, 2018.
- ^ "FRED – Trade Balance, Goods and Services, Balance of Payments Basis". January 1992.
- ^ "U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services – Historical Series".
- ^ "Census – Foreign Trade – Balance by Partner Country".
- ^ "IMF: US accounts for one-third of annual remittances to Developing Countries of $100bn". Finfacts.com. Retrieved April 21, 2012.{{subst:dead link}}
- ^ "This chart shows how America stacks up in trade with everyone in the world". Business Insider. Retrieved March 20, 2018.
- ^ FY 2010 Budget Historical Tables. pp. 127–28.
- ^ "US spends its way to 28 Eiffel towers: made out of pure gold". The Times. March 17, 2006.
- ^ "Senate backs increase in debt limit to $14.3 trillion". Reuters. January 28, 2010.
- ^ "2010 Budget-Summary Tables S-13 and S-14" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 10, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2014.
- ^ "Debt has become America's life blood". Abc.net.au. December 15, 2009.
- ^ "Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government". The New York Times. November 22, 2009.
- ^ "FRED – Household and Non-Profit Net Worth". October 1945.
- ^ "Treasury Direct – Monthly Statement of the Public Debt". Archived from the original on February 13, 2020. Retrieved June 19, 2018.
- ^ "CIA World Factbook – USA". February 16, 2022.
- ^ "CBO. Budget & Economic Outlook 2018–2028". April 9, 2018.
- ^ Fox, Michelle (March 1, 2024). "The U.S. national debt is rising by $1 trillion about every 100 days". CNBC.
- ^ "Analytical Perspectives of the FY 2008 Budget Archived January 7, 2010, at the Wayback Machine".
- ^ "Major Foreign Holders of Treasury Securities". United States Department of the Treasury. July 2014. Archived from the original on October 17, 2015. Retrieved August 23, 2014.
- ^ Federal Reserve (June 5, 2014). "Z.1 Financial Accounts of the United States – Flow of Funds, Balance Sheets, and Integrated Macroeconomic Accounts – First Quarter 2014" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 2, 2010. Retrieved July 3, 2010.
- ^ Federal Reserve (June 5, 2014). "Z.1 Financial Accounts of the United States – Flow of Funds, Balance Sheets, and Integrated Macroeconomic Accounts – Historical Annual Tables 2005–2013" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 13, 2014.
- ^ Saint Louis Federal Reserve (2012) "5-Year Treasury Inflation-Indexed Security, Constant Maturity" FRED Economic Data chart from government debt auctions (the x-axis at y=0 represents the inflation rate over the life of the security)
- ^ a b Carmen M. Reinhart and M. Belen Sbrancia (March 2011) "The Liquidation of Government Debt" National Bureau of Economic Research working paper No. 16893
- ^ David Wessel (August 8, 2012) "When Interest Rates Turn Upside Down" The Wall Street Journal (full text Archived January 20, 2013, at the Wayback Machine)
- ^ Lawrence Summers (June 3, 2012) "Breaking the negative feedback loop" Reuters
- ^ William H. Gross (May 2, 2011) "The Caine Mutiny (Part 2)" Archived October 13, 2012, at the Wayback Machine PIMCO Investment Outlook
- ^ U.S. Treasury (January 31, 2012) "Minutes of the Meeting of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association"
- ^ "The Implementation of Monetary Policy – The Federal Reserve in the International Sphere" (PDF). Retrieved April 21, 2012.
- ^ Benjamin J. Cohen, The Future of Money, Princeton University Press, 2006, ISBN 0691116660; cf. "the dollar is the de facto currency in Cambodia", Charles Agar, Frommer's Vietnam, 2006, ISBN 0471798169, p. 17
- ^ "Biggest game in town". BBC News. January 29, 2009.
- ^ "Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER) – June 30, 2011" (PDF). Retrieved April 21, 2012.
- ^ Rooney, Ben (February 10, 2011). "IMF calls for dollar alternative". CNN. Retrieved March 28, 2012.
- ^ Nilsen, Ella (November 14, 2023). "No place in the US is safe from the climate crisis, but a new report shows where it's most severe". CNN. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
- ^ Hsiang, Solomon; Kopp, Robert; Jina, Amir; Rising, James; Delgado, Michael; Mohan, Shashank; Rasmussen, D. J.; Muir-Wood, Robert; Wilson, Paul; Oppenheimer, Michael; Larsen, Kate (June 30, 2017). "Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States". Science. 356 (6345): 1362–1369. Bibcode:2017Sci...356.1362H. doi:10.1126/science.aal4369. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 28663496. S2CID 217546780.
- ^ Heidari, Hadi; Arabi, Mazdak; Warziniack, Travis; Kao, Shih-Chieh (June 2021). "Shifts in hydroclimatology of US megaregions in response to climate change". Environmental Research Communications. 3 (6): 065002. Bibcode:2021ERCom...3f5002H. doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ac0617. ISSN 2515-7620. S2CID 235367031.
- ^ Egan, Matt (September 9, 2020). "US report warns climate change could create economic chaos". CNN. Retrieved May 14, 2024.
- ^ "CFTC's Climate-Related Market Risk Subcommittee Releases Report" (Press release). Commodity Futures Trading Commission. September 9, 2020. Retrieved May 14, 2024.
- ^ Managing Climate Risk in the U.S. Financial System (PDF) (Report). Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 2020. p. ii. ISBN 978-0578748412. Retrieved May 14, 2024.
- ^ Newburger, Emma (October 21, 2021). "U.S. government agency in charge of financial stability weighs in on climate change risks". CNBC. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
- ^ "Financial Stability Oversight Council Identifies Climate Change as an Emerging and Increasing Threat to Financial Stability" (Press release). U.S. Treasury Department. October 21, 2021. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
- ^ Report on Climate-Related Financial Risk 2021 (PDF) (Report). U.S. Treasury Department. October 21, 2021. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
- ^ Geide-Stevenson, Doris; La Parra-Perez, Alvaro (2022). Consensus among economists 2020 – A sharpening of the picture. Western Economic Association International Annual Conference. Retrieved October 13, 2023.
- ^ Hillyer, Jack; Licea, Mark; Lee, Juhohn; Jacobson, Lindsey (March 17, 2024). "Economists discuss the effects of climate change on the U.S. economy". CNBC. Retrieved May 20, 2024.
- ^ The Impact of Climate Change on American Household Finances (PDF) (Report). U.S. Treasury Department. September 29, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2024.
- ^ "U.S. Department of the Treasury Releases Report on Climate Change and Household Finances" (Press release). U.S. Treasury Department. September 29, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2024.
- ^ "FACT SHEET: The Impact of Climate Change on American Household Finances" (Press release). U.S. Treasury Department. September 29, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2024.
- ^ Medintz, Scott (April 16, 2024). "Climate Change Could Cost Each American Born Today $500,000". Consumer Reports. Retrieved June 9, 2024.
- ^ Harto, Chris; Grose, Alexandra. "Consumer Reports: As Earth Day arrives, the lifetime cost of climate change for a baby born in the U.S. in 2024 could be nearly $500,000" (Press release). Consumer Reports. Retrieved June 9, 2024.
- ^ Cost of Climate Change to an American Born in 2024 (PDF) (Report). Consumer Reports. February 23, 2024. Retrieved June 9, 2024.
- ^ "2019 - Cpi". January 24, 2020. Archived from the original on March 27, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2020.
- ^ "2018 - Cpi". January 29, 2019. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 19, 2020.
- ^ "Enabling Trade Index 2014". World Economic Forum.
- ^ "2014 Global Competitiveness Report" (PDF).
- ^ a b "2014 Index of Economic Freedom – United States". Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on March 20, 2012. Retrieved January 14, 2014.
- ^ Terry, Miller (January 13, 2014). "America's Dwindling Economic Freedom Regulation, taxes and debt knock the U.S. out of the world's top 10". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 14, 2014.
- ^ "2014 Index of Economic Freedom". Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on November 17, 2010. Retrieved January 14, 2014.
- ^ Alan S. Blinder (2018). Advice and Dissent: Why America Suffers When Economics and Politics Collide. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0465094172.
- ^ Carmen M. Reinhart; Kenneth S. Rogoff. "This Time is Different". reinhartandrogoff.com. Anchor Media Works.
- ^ a b c d e f Regulation and Control in the U.S. Economy: About.com
- ^ "Bush's Regulatory Kiss-Off – Obama's assertions to the contrary, the 43rd president was the biggest regulator since Nixon". Reason magazine. January 2009. Archived from the original on September 2, 2009. Retrieved February 12, 2012.
- ^ Porter, Eduardo (August 14, 2012). "America's Aversion to Taxes". The New York Times. Retrieved August 15, 2012.
In 1965, taxes collected by federal, state and municipal governments amounted to 24.7 percent of the nation's output. In 2010, they amounted to 24.8 percent. Excluding Chile and Mexico, the United States raises less tax revenue, as a share of the economy, than every other industrial country.
- ^ "Index of Economic Freedom: United States". Index of Economic Freedom. Archived from the original on March 20, 2012. Retrieved February 12, 2012.
- ^ "Is the US Really a Nation of God-Fearing Darwin-Haters?". Der Spiegel. June 6, 2009.
- ^ a b Yglesias, Matthew (March 6, 2013). "America Does Tax Wealth, Just Not Very Intelligently". Slate. Retrieved March 18, 2013.
- ^ "The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2010". The US Congressional Budget Office (CBO). December 4, 2013. Retrieved August 13, 2014.
- ^ Prasad, M.; Deng, Y. (April 2, 2009). "Taxation and the worlds of welfare" (PDF). Socio-Economic Review. 7 (3): 431–57. doi:10.1093/ser/mwp005.
- ^ Matthews, Dylan (September 19, 2012). "Other countries don't have a "47%"". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 29, 2013.
- ^ Stephen, Ohlemacher (March 3, 2013). "Tax bills for rich families approach 30-year high". The Seattle Times. Associated Press. Retrieved April 3, 2013.
- ^ Bair, Sheila (February 26, 2013). "Grand Old Parity". The New York Times. Retrieved March 18, 2013.
- ^ Hodge, Scott A. (April 29, 2005). "The Case for a Single-Rate Tax: Why Our Progressive Tax Code is Inconsistent with the Changing Face of American Taxpayers". Tax Foundation. Archived from the original on December 22, 2015. Retrieved August 13, 2014.
- ^ Frank, Robert (March 26, 2011). "The Price of Taxing the Rich: The top 1% of earners fill the coffers of states like California and New York during a boom – and leave them starved for revenue in a bust". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 13, 2014.
- ^ "Switzerland ranked second-worst global facilitator of tax avoidance". SWI swissinfo.ch. May 18, 2022. Retrieved June 28, 2022.
- ^ a b c d "CBO Budget and Economic Outlook 2018–2028". April 9, 2018.
- ^ "General government spending". OECD.
- ^ "Debt Myths, Debunked". U.S. News. December 1, 2016.
- ^ "U.S. Budget 2001". Archived from the original on January 12, 2012.
- ^ "CIA World Factbook-Debt to GDP". Archived from the original on June 13, 2007.
- ^ Kumar, Vishesh. "Is Rising U.S. Debt Inviting Trouble? Ask Japan". Daily Finance. Retrieved May 18, 2010.
- ^ Anderson, Jack (May 22, 2006). "Tax Misery & Reform Index". Forbes. Retrieved November 17, 2008.
- ^ "Global 500 2010: Countries". CNN.
- ^ "Where the millionaires are now". MSN. October 22, 2007. Archived from the original on September 27, 2011. Retrieved April 21, 2012.
- ^ Walker, William (1993). "National Innovation Systems: Britain". In Nelson, Richard R. (ed.). National innovation systems : a comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 61–64. ISBN 978-0195076172.
- ^ "U.S. Department of state: How the U.S. Economy Works". Archived from the original on November 14, 2008.
- ^ "Trends in International Migration 2002: Continuous Reporting System on Migration". Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2003). OECD Publishing. p. 280. ISBN 9264199497
- ^ Peter S. Canellos (November 11, 2008). "Obama victory took root in Kennedy-inspired Immigration Act". The Boston Globe. Retrieved November 14, 2008.
- ^ Jeanette Altarriba; Roberto R. Heredia (2007). An Introduction to Bilingualism: Principles and Processes. Taylor & Francis. p. 212. ISBN 978-0203927823.
- ^ Porter, Eduardo (June 15, 2019). "This Economy Is Not Aging Gracefully". The New York Times. Retrieved June 15, 2019.
- ^ "Updated Budget Projections: 2019 to 2029". Congressional Budget Office. May 2, 2019. Retrieved June 15, 2019.
- ^ Benedetti, François (December 17, 2003). "100 Years Ago, the Dream of Icarus Became Reality". Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI). Archived from the original on September 12, 2007. Retrieved August 15, 2007.
- ^ a b Shane, Scott "A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: the Individual-Opportunity Nexus", Edward Elgar
- ^ Reynolds, Paul D. "Entrepreneurship in the United States", Springer, 2007, ISBN 978-0387456676
- ^ "Mandelson, Peter. "There is no Google, or Amazon, or Microsoft or Apple in the UK, Mandelson tells BVCA." BriskFox Financial News, March 11, 2009". Briskfox.com. Archived from the original on November 3, 2019. Retrieved April 21, 2012.
- ^ Venture Impact (5 ed.). IHS Global Insight. 2009. p. 2. ISBN 978-0978501570. Archived from the original on June 30, 2014.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Stewart, Shannon; Springs, Stacy (2015). United States of America. In: UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030 (PDF). Paris: UNESCO. pp. 129–55. ISBN 978-9231001291.
- ^ Sohl, Jeffrey (March 31, 2010). "Full Year 2009 Angel Market Trends" (PDF). University of New Hampshire Center for Venture Research. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 20, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2011.
- ^ "The United States of Entrepreneurs". The Economist. March 12, 2009.
- ^ "M&A US – Mergers & Acquisitions in the United States". IMAA-Institute. Retrieved February 22, 2018.
- ^ "The Global Financial Centres Index 31". Longfinance.net. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ Hoover, Gary (June 26, 2022). "2022 UPDATED Largest Companies Charts". Business History - The American Business History Center. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ "Companies ranked by Market Cap - CompaniesMarketCap.com". companiesmarketcap.com. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ "The 2020 World's Most Valuable Brands". Forbes. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ "How to protect yourself against the theft of your identity". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ "Big 4 wireless carriers spent $100B on 5G spectrum: Was it worth it?". www.spglobal.com. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ "The 10 Largest Coal Mining Companies In The United States – Zippia". July 26, 2022. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ Desjardins, Jeff (November 24, 2017). "Chart: The Evolution of Standard Oil". Visual Capitalist. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ Deloitte, Switching Channels: Global Powers of Retailing 2012, STORES, January 2012, G20.
- ^ "IHS iSuppli Semiconductor preliminary rankings for 2011". Archived from the original on December 14, 2013. Retrieved April 21, 2012.
- ^ "Top 10 Semiconductor Manufacturers in the U.S. - IndustrySelect®". www.industryselect.com. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ House, The White (August 9, 2022). "FACT SHEET: CHIPS and Science Act Will Lower Costs, Create Jobs, Strengthen Supply Chains, and Counter China". The White House. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ Girardin, McKayla (September 22, 2022). "Top Tech Companies in 2022". Forage. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ "Top 1000 Technology Companies United States 2023". Disfold Data. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ a b "WFE – YTD Monthly". November 6, 2011. Archived from the original on November 6, 2011. Retrieved June 8, 2014.
- ^ "> Data Products > NYSE > Facts & Figures". NYXdata. Archived from the original on February 28, 2009. Retrieved April 21, 2012.
- ^ "NASDAQ Performance Report". NASDAQ Newsroom. The Nasdaq Stock Market. January 12, 2007. Archived from the original on February 10, 2007. Retrieved February 15, 2007.
- ^ Origins of Stock Market Fluctuations Archived September 23, 2015, at the Wayback Machine. New York University, December 16, 2014.
- ^ Stock quotes, investing & personal finance, news – MSN Money Archived May 6, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Money.msn.com (December 31, 1999).
- ^ secdatabase.com
- ^ Investor Relations. Goldman Sachs.
- ^ "Financial and investor information from U.S. Bank". usbank.com. Archived from the original on October 12, 2018. Retrieved May 6, 2013.
- ^ Tankersley, Jim (December 16, 2014). "A black hole for our best and brightest". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 23, 2014.
- ^ Cecchetti, Stephen G; Kharroubi, Enisse. "Why does financial sector growth crowd out real economic growth?" (PDF). BIS Working Papers No 490. Bank for International Settlements. Retrieved September 20, 2015.
Sources
[edit]- This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC-BY-SA IGO 3.0. Text taken from UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030, 141–143, UNESCO Publishing.
- Gordon, Robert J. (1986). The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-30452-3.