Jump to content

I.Q. (film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Witteafval (talk | contribs)
Added Ebert review quotation
 
(43 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
| story = Andy Breckman
| story = Andy Breckman
| starring = {{Plainlist|
| starring = {{Plainlist|
* [[Meg Ryan]]
* [[Tim Robbins]]
* [[Tim Robbins]]
* [[Meg Ryan]]
* [[Walter Matthau]]
* [[Walter Matthau]]
* [[Charles Durning]]}}
* [[Charles Durning]]}}
Line 17: Line 17:
| editing = [[Jill Bilcock]]
| editing = [[Jill Bilcock]]
| distributor = [[Paramount Pictures]]
| distributor = [[Paramount Pictures]]
| released = December 25, 1994
| released = {{Film date|1994|12|25}}
| runtime = 96 minutes
| runtime = 96 minutes
| country = United States
| country = United States
| language = English<br>German
| language = English<br>German
| budget = $25 million
| budget = $25 million
| gross = $47 million<ref name=SI>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Screen International]]|date=August 30, 1996|pages=14-15|title=Planet Hollywood}}</ref>
| gross = $47 million<ref name=SI>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Screen International]]|date=August 30, 1996|pages=14–15|title=Planet Hollywood}}</ref>
}}
}}
'''''I.Q.''''' is a 1994 American [[romantic comedy]] film directed by [[Fred Schepisi]] and starring [[Tim Robbins]], [[Meg Ryan]], and [[Walter Matthau]]. The original music score was composed by [[Jerry Goldsmith]]. The film centers on a mechanic and a Princeton doctoral candidate who fall in love, thanks to the candidate's uncle, [[Albert Einstein]].
'''''I.Q.''''' is a 1994 American [[romantic comedy]] film directed by [[Fred Schepisi]] and starring [[Tim Robbins]], [[Meg Ryan]] and [[Walter Matthau]]. The original music score is composed by [[Jerry Goldsmith]]. The film, set in the mid-1950s, centers on a mechanic and a [[Princeton University]] doctoral candidate who fall in love thanks to the candidate's uncle, [[Albert Einstein]].


==Plot==
== Plot ==
{{Long plot|date=October 2024}}<!-- Word count is 950+ ...Per WP:FILMPLOT, plot summaries for feature films should be between 400 to 700 words.-->
An easy-going garage mechanic, Ed Walters ([[Tim Robbins]]), meets Catherine Boyd ([[Meg Ryan]]), a successful [[Princeton University]] [[mathematics]] doctoral candidate, as she comes into the garage, accompanied by her resistant and critical [[English people|English]] fiancé, acerbic experimental [[psychology]] [[professor]] James Moreland ([[Stephen Fry]]). There is an immediate "electric" connection which Ed recognizes as he [[Love at first sight|falls in love with her at first sight]], but she does not reciprocate.
Princeton [[mathematics]] doctoral candidate Catherine Boyd and her hyper-critical British fiancé, experimental [[psychology]] [[professor]] James Moreland, enter a nearby garage after their car breaks down. Ed Walters, a science-fiction hobbyist mechanic, falls in love with Catherine [[Love at first sight|at first sight]] and is blatantly enthralled by her, which she pointedly ignores.


Inside the garage, Ed excitedly tells his fellow mechanics that he envisions their future together, their marriage and kids. Catherine comes in and, rattled by Ed's attention, jumbles her words, but he understands her perfectly. Finding a watch that Catherine accidentally left, Ed goes to her address, coming face to face with [[Albert Einstein]], Catherine's uncle. Albert and his mischievous friends, scientists Nathan Liebknecht, [[Kurt Gödel]] and [[Boris Podolsky]], accept Ed as a friend after he answers a philosophical question about time and retrieves one of their [[badminton]] rackets from a tree.
Ed sees his future, briefly, and Catherine is a major part of it; they are married, and have children together. "How long will all of this take?" asks Catherine, referring to the car repair, and Ed, thinking about their future life together, replies, "That's up to you". His life purpose has suddenly been decided by a force of nature greater than himself.


Ed tells them that when he and Catherine met, time slowed down and he had a moment of clarity. The scientists see him as someone better suited for her. Ed takes Einstein to the university on his motorcycle to find Catherine. Although unsuccessful in getting a date with her, he makes her laugh. At a university dinner, James and Catherine discuss their differing views. He describes an academic and intellectual experience for their honeymoon. In contrast, she describes a sensual one in Hawaii. James pulls her aside, berating her, so she accuses him of not loving her. Catherine arrives home and tells Albert about James's plan for them: He will be a full professor at Stanford, while she is resigned to being a homemaker and full-time mother.
Finding a watch she left at the garage, Ed travels to her address and finds himself face to face with [[Albert Einstein]] ([[Walter Matthau]]), who is Catherine's uncle.<ref name="Ny times IQ movie">{{cite web|title=FILM VIEW; At the Cineplex It's Dumb, Dumber, Dumbest|url=https://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review.html?res=990CE0DA143FF93BA35752C0A963958260|work=New York Times|access-date=2013-08-08|author=Caryn James|date=January 8, 1995}}</ref>


The four scientists have Ed's garage transform their car into a convertible, brainstorming about how Ed can pique Catherine's interest. Ed, who barely got through high school, jokingly asks to "borrow their brains", inspiring them to give him a makeover and portray him as a hidden genius. They take a paper about cold fusion that Albert wrote in 1925 but never published because he could not get the math to work, and they pose it as a concept developed by Ed. Catherine finds Ed apparently discussing his idea of a nuclear fusion space shuttle engine with them. She talks him into presenting its paper at a symposium at Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study.
Albert—portrayed as a fun-loving genius—and his mischievous friends, fellow scientists Nathan Liebknecht ([[Joseph Maher]]), [[Kurt Gödel]] ([[Lou Jacobi]]), and [[Boris Podolsky]] ([[Gene Saks]]), quickly accept Ed as a friend and see Ed as someone who would be better suited for Catherine. The four of them bring their communal vehicle to Ed's garage to have it modified as a convertible, and chat with Ed about how to attract Catherine's interest. An amused suggestion by Ed to "borrow their brains" inspires them to try to help Ed look and sound like a scientist (i.e., a "[[child prodigy|wunderkind]]" in [[physics]]) temporarily, in order to garner Catherine's attention for Ed, while at the same time trying to convince Catherine that life is not all about the mind, but is also about the heart. James's heart is virtually non-existent (as seen in his casual cruelty in his treatment of test subjects and limited awareness of humanity), while Ed's heart is adventurous and virtually limitless.


Ed stumbles through his memorized presentation, and they get away with it. At a reception afterward, the scientists bring Catherine and Ed together alone under the stars. When James arrives, Albert feigns a heart attack, asking Catherine and Ed to drive him home for his pills, then produces them from his pocket. The three stop at a café to get out of the rain. Catherine senses Ed's feelings for her and tries to leave, but Albert distracts her. Playing a waltz on the [[jukebox]], he has Ed cut in. They briefly dance but suddenly leave when she remembers that James is expecting her.
Einstein sees bringing Ed and Catherine together as his most enduring legacy to his niece, because she was of the mistaken opinion that her only contribution to the world was to be through her children, and that she therefore must marry a total intellectual because then she will produce genius children, like himself. Einstein realizes that Ed loves Catherine for herself, and will help her blossom into her full potential as a person full of life and spirit; a fellow world traveler with mutual interests as varied as the Boyd's Comet and the Seven Sacred Pools on Maui, which James belittled.


James challenges Ed in front of the press to do a very public set of intelligence tests. After solving the manual puzzles quickly, Ed is subjected to 50 questions on advanced physics. The four scientists in the audience easily solve the questions and prompt him with the answers. As a result, he is rated with an [[Intelligence quotient|I.Q.]] of 186. The discovery of genius Ed is published in the newspapers and cinema newsreels, pleasing Catherine. However, going over calculations in Ed's (actually Albert's) paper, she sees something that is off and approaches her uncle. Albert causes her to doubt her suspicions to protect the ruse. Catherine becomes distraught, but before she leaves, Ed insists that she is more intelligent than she believes.
Catherine eventually sees through the "intellectual Ed" ruse Einstein and his cohorts had temporarily created in order to get her to give Ed some attention, but falls for Ed anyway, just as Einstein had hoped. A smiling Albert Einstein uses a small telescope to spy happily on the two young moonstruck lovers as they take delight in the return of Boyd's Comet and in each other's company. The film ends with both Catherine and Albert saying "Wahoo!", just as Einstein had earlier in the film while riding on Ed's motorcycle.

Uncle Albert arranges for a small sailing excursion with James, Catherine, Ed and himself, but the scientists detain James so that he does not show. Albert, steering the boat, sneakily knocks her off balance so that she falls into Ed's lap. Catherine, struggling to come to grips with her feelings, finally says that she loves him, and they kiss.

At the garage, Ed admits to his co-workers that he still has not told Catherine the truth. At the same time, she realizes that it was all a lie. [[Dwight D. Eisenhower|President Eisenhower]] arrives, pleased with the supposed nuclear fusion engine that will overtake a rumored project similar to a Russian project. On his motorcycle, Ed catches up with the presidential motorcade and meets Catherine in a field. She scolds him but realizes that the president and his staff believe that he is proposing. Flustered, she tells him to kiss her. He does and tells her that she had [[Love at first sight|fallen in love with him at first sight]] also, but that they had to devise the ruse to convince her. Catherine slaps him and returns to the motorcade.

Realizing that she has learned of the ruse, Albert admits to Catherine that she has finally seen through the "intellectual Ed" ruse. He congratulates her on mathematically disproving his theory of 30 years ago, something that he could not do because he is terrible at math. This further reinforces Catherine's self-confidence. At the symposium, James accuses Albert Einstein and Ed Walters of fraud, but Albert turns the tables on him. He says that "Operation Red Cabbage" was their plan to prove that the Russians were lying about their nuclear fusion advances in space, and that Catherine Boyd and Ed Walters were key in proving it.

Albert is rushed to the hospital for a real emergency and asks Catherine at his bedside to listen to her heart and not let her head keep her from love. Ed arrives, apologizes to Catherine and leaves, telling her that he hopes that one day, she will realize that she is extraordinary. A comet is due on the night of April 1. Catherine goes to Stargazers' Field to view it and sees Ed already there. They watch the comet together and Catherine admits that she has fallen for Ed.


==Cast==
==Cast==
Line 58: Line 67:


==Dramatic alterations==
==Dramatic alterations==
For dramatic reasons, ''I.Q.'' fictionalizes the lives of certain real people. [[Albert Einstein]] did not have a niece by the name of Catherine Boyd. [[Kurt Gödel]] was famously shy and reclusive,<ref>{{cite journal|title=Gödel's universe|author=Davis, Martin|journal=Nature|date=May 4, 2005|volume=435|issue=7038|doi=10.1038/435019a|pages=19–20|bibcode=2005Natur.435...19D|doi-access=free}}</ref> unlike his fictional counterpart in this film. The movie gives the impression that Einstein and his friends are all around the same age, when in fact, they were between 17 and 30 years younger than Einstein. The real-life [[Louis Bamberger]] died in 1944, before the film's set period.
For dramatic reasons, ''I.Q.'' fictionalizes the lives of certain real people. Albert Einstein did not have a niece by the name of Catherine Boyd. Kurt Gödel was famously shy and reclusive,<ref>{{cite journal|title=Gödel's universe|author=Davis, Martin|journal=Nature|date=May 4, 2005|volume=435|issue=7038|doi=10.1038/435019a|pages=19–20|bibcode=2005Natur.435...19D|doi-access=free}}</ref> unlike his fictional counterpart in this film. The movie gives the impression that Einstein and his friends are all around the same age, when in fact, they were between 17 and 30 years younger than Einstein.{{citation needed|date=October 2024}} The real [[Louis Bamberger]] died in 1944, before the film's set period.


The characters in the film listen to [[Little Richard]]'s [[Tutti Frutti (song)|"Tutti-Fruitti,"]] which was released in November 1955, while Albert Einstein died in April of that year.
The characters in the film listen to [[Little Richard]]'s "[[Tutti Frutti (song)|Tutti-Frutti]]", which was released in November 1955, although Albert Einstein died the previous April.

While some viewers believe Robbins' character can be seen impersonating Don [[Vito Corleone]], portrayed by [[Marlon Brando]], from ''[[The Godfather]]'', which was released in 1972, he was actually impersonating the character of Johnny Strabler (also played by [[Marlon Brando]]), from ''[[The Wild One]]'', a 1953 American [[film noir]], whose persona became a cultural icon of the 1950s.


==Production==
==Production==
The director, Fred Schepisi, later said that, while he liked the film, it was not what it could have been:
Director Fred Schepisi later said that although he liked the film, it was not what it could have been:


<blockquote>The problem was there were two other producers, there was a studio and there was Tim Robbins and they were all contributing, and Tim Robbins was being difficult because he said in the '90s nobody would like a character who has a woman fall in love with him because of a lie. That's the whole premise of the film. And it's all right for him to know that and believe it, but he should spend the whole time trying to say, "Hey, I'm lying to you," and be constantly frustrated. Because of that attitude, he pulled the film this way, he pulled it that way while we were writing and it just felt messy. And nobody ever understood the value of those four scientists, and I like the cast that I had, but the other three scientists apart from Walter Matthau were originally going to be [[Peter Ustinov]], [[Barry Humphries]] and [[John Cleese]]. I wanted them all the way through, but nobody understood how strong they would be. Nobody understood that with a garage and the scientists and this other guy, if you could just stay within that world, if you kept your two lovers together all the time under pressure and you do lots of silly things - there were a couple of wonderfully silly things when they were trying to prove his theory and they kept blowing things up - it had that whimsy about it that would have kept the lovers together and under tension. If they want subplots, they up the stakes and all this formulaic crap - and that's the problem.<ref>[http://www.signis.net/malone/tiki-index.php?page=Fred+Schepisi&bl "Interview with Fred Schepisi", ''Signis'', 22 December 1998] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131014034842/http://www.signis.net/malone/tiki-index.php?page=Fred+Schepisi&bl |date=14 October 2013 }} access 20 November 2012</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>The problem was there were two other producers, there was a studio and there was Tim Robbins and they were all contributing, and Tim Robbins was being difficult because he said in the '90s nobody would like a character who has a woman fall in love with him because of a lie. That's the whole premise of the film. And it's all right for him to know that and believe it, but he should spend the whole time trying to say, "Hey, I'm lying to you," and be constantly frustrated. Because of that attitude, he pulled the film this way, he pulled it that way while we were writing and it just felt messy. And nobody ever understood the value of those four scientists, and I like the cast that I had, but the other three scientists apart from Walter Matthau were originally going to be [[Peter Ustinov]], [[Barry Humphries]] and [[John Cleese]]. I wanted them all the way through, but nobody understood how strong they would be. Nobody understood that with a garage and the scientists and this other guy, if you could just stay within that world, if you kept your two lovers together all the time under pressure and you do lots of silly things—there were a couple of wonderfully silly things when they were trying to prove his theory and they kept blowing things up—it had that whimsy about it that would have kept the lovers together and under tension. If they want subplots, they up the stakes and all this formulaic crap - and that's the problem.<ref>[http://www.signis.net/malone/tiki-index.php?page=Fred+Schepisi&bl "Interview with Fred Schepisi", ''Signis'', 22 December 1998] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131014034842/http://www.signis.net/malone/tiki-index.php?page=Fred+Schepisi&bl |date=14 October 2013 }} access 20 November 2012</ref></blockquote>


==Reception==
==Release and reception==
''I.Q.'' opened in theaters on Christmas Day. It grossed $3,131,201 during its opening weekend, ranking eighth at the US box office.<ref>{{cite news|title= Dumb' Laughs = a Smart Payoff : Box office: Jim Carrey vehicle pulls a 'Gump,' taking in $16.2 million on an otherwise slow film-going weekend. |work= [[The Los Angeles Times]]|url= http://articles.latimes.com/1994-12-21/entertainment/ca-11325_1_richie-rich/2|access-date=2010-12-31}}</ref> By the time the film closed, it had grossed $26,381,221 in the United States and Canada.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=iq.htm | title=I.Q. (1994) - Box Office Mojo | publisher=[[Box Office Mojo]] | access-date=2010-05-24}}</ref> It grossed $47 million worldwide.<ref name=SI/>
''I.Q.'' opened in theaters on [[Christmas]] Day. It grossed $3,131,201 during its opening weekend, ranking eighth at the US box office.<ref>{{cite news|title= Dumb' Laughs = a Smart Payoff : Box office: Jim Carrey vehicle pulls a 'Gump,' taking in $16.2 million on an otherwise slow film-going weekend. |work= [[The Los Angeles Times]]|url= https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-12-21-ca-11325-story.html|access-date=2010-12-31}}</ref> By the time that the film closed, it had grossed $26,381,221 in the United States and Canada.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=iq.htm | title=I.Q. (1994) - Box Office Mojo | publisher=[[Box Office Mojo]] | access-date=2010-05-24}}</ref> It grossed $47 million worldwide.<ref name=SI/>


The film received mixed reviews from critics, as ''I.Q.'' holds a 44% rating on [[Rotten Tomatoes]] from 27 reviews.<ref>{{Citation|title=I.Q. (1994)|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/iq|language=en|access-date=2022-01-15}}</ref>
The film received mixed reviews from critics. On [[Rotten Tomatoes]], ''I.Q.'' holds a 47% rating, based on 30 reviews.<ref>{{Citation|title=I.Q. (1994)|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/iq|language=en|access-date=2025-01-07}}</ref>


In Roger Ebert's 3 1/2 star review of the film gave glowing praise of Walter Matthau's performance: "Matthau as Einstein is a stroke of casting genius. He looks uncannily like the great mathematician. Whether he acts like him I am not in a position to say, but he certainly doesn't act like himself: He has left all his Matthauisms behind, and created this performance from scratch, and it's one of the year's genuine comic gems. He deserves an Oscar nomination.[https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/iq-1994]
[[Roger Ebert]] of the ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'' gave the film 3½ stars out of 4, with glowing praise of Walter Matthau's performance. "Matthau as Einstein is a stroke of casting genius. He looks uncannily like the great mathematician. Whether he acts like him I am not in a position to say, but he certainly doesn't act like himself: He has left all his Matthauisms behind, and created this performance from scratch, and it's one of the year's genuine comic gems. He deserves an [[Academy Awards|Oscar]] nomination."<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/iq-1994 | title=I.Q. Movie review & film summary (1994) &#124; Roger Ebert }}</ref>


== Year-end lists ==
=== Year-end lists ===
* 9th&nbsp;– David Elliott, ''[[The San Diego Union-Tribune]]''<ref>{{cite news|last=Elliott|first=David|date=December 25, 1994|title=On the big screen, color it a satisfying time|newspaper=[[The San Diego Union-Tribune]]|edition=1, 2|page=E=8}}</ref>
* 9th&nbsp;– David Elliott, ''[[The San Diego Union-Tribune]]''<ref>{{cite news|last=Elliott|first=David|date=December 25, 1994|title=On the big screen, color it a satisfying time|newspaper=[[The San Diego Union-Tribune]]|edition=1, 2|page=E=8}}</ref>
* "The second 10" (not ranked)&nbsp;– Sean P. Means, ''[[The Salt Lake Tribune]]''<ref>{{cite news|last=P. Means|first=Sean|date=January 1, 1995|title='Pulp and Circumstance' After the Rise of Quentin Tarantino, Hollywood Would Never Be the Same|newspaper=The Salt Lake Tribune|page=E1|edition=Final}}</ref>
* "The second 10" (not ranked)&nbsp;– Sean P. Means, ''[[The Salt Lake Tribune]]''<ref>{{cite news|last=P. Means|first=Sean|date=January 1, 1995|title='Pulp and Circumstance' After the Rise of Quentin Tarantino, Hollywood Would Never Be the Same|newspaper=The Salt Lake Tribune|page=E1|edition=Final}}</ref>

==See also==
* [[List of films about mathematicians]]


==References==
==References==
Line 84: Line 94:


==External links==
==External links==
* {{imdb title|0110099|I.Q.}}
* {{IMDb title|0110099|I.Q.}}
* {{Amg movie|133563|I.Q.}}
* {{mojo title|iq|I.Q.}}
* {{mojo title|iq|I.Q.}}
* {{rotten-tomatoes|iq|I.Q.}}
* {{rotten-tomatoes|iq|I.Q.}}
Line 96: Line 105:
[[Category:1994 romantic comedy films]]
[[Category:1994 romantic comedy films]]
[[Category:American romantic comedy films]]
[[Category:American romantic comedy films]]
[[Category:American films]]
[[Category:English-language films]]
[[Category:Films directed by Fred Schepisi]]
[[Category:Films directed by Fred Schepisi]]
[[Category:Cultural depictions of Albert Einstein]]
[[Category:Cultural depictions of Albert Einstein]]
Line 108: Line 115:
[[Category:Films with screenplays by Andy Breckman]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by Andy Breckman]]
[[Category:Cultural depictions of Dwight D. Eisenhower]]
[[Category:Cultural depictions of Dwight D. Eisenhower]]
[[Category:1990s English-language films]]
[[Category:1990s American films]]
[[Category:English-language romantic comedy films]]

Latest revision as of 01:45, 8 January 2025

I.Q.
Theatrical release poster
Directed byFred Schepisi
Screenplay byAndy Breckman
Michael J. Leeson
Story byAndy Breckman
Produced byFred Schepisi
Carol Baum
Neil A. Machlis (co-producer)
Starring
CinematographyIan Baker
Edited byJill Bilcock
Music byJerry Goldsmith
Distributed byParamount Pictures
Release date
  • December 25, 1994 (1994-12-25)
Running time
96 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguagesEnglish
German
Budget$25 million
Box office$47 million[1]

I.Q. is a 1994 American romantic comedy film directed by Fred Schepisi and starring Tim Robbins, Meg Ryan and Walter Matthau. The original music score is composed by Jerry Goldsmith. The film, set in the mid-1950s, centers on a mechanic and a Princeton University doctoral candidate who fall in love thanks to the candidate's uncle, Albert Einstein.

Plot

[edit]

Princeton mathematics doctoral candidate Catherine Boyd and her hyper-critical British fiancé, experimental psychology professor James Moreland, enter a nearby garage after their car breaks down. Ed Walters, a science-fiction hobbyist mechanic, falls in love with Catherine at first sight and is blatantly enthralled by her, which she pointedly ignores.

Inside the garage, Ed excitedly tells his fellow mechanics that he envisions their future together, their marriage and kids. Catherine comes in and, rattled by Ed's attention, jumbles her words, but he understands her perfectly. Finding a watch that Catherine accidentally left, Ed goes to her address, coming face to face with Albert Einstein, Catherine's uncle. Albert and his mischievous friends, scientists Nathan Liebknecht, Kurt Gödel and Boris Podolsky, accept Ed as a friend after he answers a philosophical question about time and retrieves one of their badminton rackets from a tree.

Ed tells them that when he and Catherine met, time slowed down and he had a moment of clarity. The scientists see him as someone better suited for her. Ed takes Einstein to the university on his motorcycle to find Catherine. Although unsuccessful in getting a date with her, he makes her laugh. At a university dinner, James and Catherine discuss their differing views. He describes an academic and intellectual experience for their honeymoon. In contrast, she describes a sensual one in Hawaii. James pulls her aside, berating her, so she accuses him of not loving her. Catherine arrives home and tells Albert about James's plan for them: He will be a full professor at Stanford, while she is resigned to being a homemaker and full-time mother.

The four scientists have Ed's garage transform their car into a convertible, brainstorming about how Ed can pique Catherine's interest. Ed, who barely got through high school, jokingly asks to "borrow their brains", inspiring them to give him a makeover and portray him as a hidden genius. They take a paper about cold fusion that Albert wrote in 1925 but never published because he could not get the math to work, and they pose it as a concept developed by Ed. Catherine finds Ed apparently discussing his idea of a nuclear fusion space shuttle engine with them. She talks him into presenting its paper at a symposium at Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study.

Ed stumbles through his memorized presentation, and they get away with it. At a reception afterward, the scientists bring Catherine and Ed together alone under the stars. When James arrives, Albert feigns a heart attack, asking Catherine and Ed to drive him home for his pills, then produces them from his pocket. The three stop at a café to get out of the rain. Catherine senses Ed's feelings for her and tries to leave, but Albert distracts her. Playing a waltz on the jukebox, he has Ed cut in. They briefly dance but suddenly leave when she remembers that James is expecting her.

James challenges Ed in front of the press to do a very public set of intelligence tests. After solving the manual puzzles quickly, Ed is subjected to 50 questions on advanced physics. The four scientists in the audience easily solve the questions and prompt him with the answers. As a result, he is rated with an I.Q. of 186. The discovery of genius Ed is published in the newspapers and cinema newsreels, pleasing Catherine. However, going over calculations in Ed's (actually Albert's) paper, she sees something that is off and approaches her uncle. Albert causes her to doubt her suspicions to protect the ruse. Catherine becomes distraught, but before she leaves, Ed insists that she is more intelligent than she believes.

Uncle Albert arranges for a small sailing excursion with James, Catherine, Ed and himself, but the scientists detain James so that he does not show. Albert, steering the boat, sneakily knocks her off balance so that she falls into Ed's lap. Catherine, struggling to come to grips with her feelings, finally says that she loves him, and they kiss.

At the garage, Ed admits to his co-workers that he still has not told Catherine the truth. At the same time, she realizes that it was all a lie. President Eisenhower arrives, pleased with the supposed nuclear fusion engine that will overtake a rumored project similar to a Russian project. On his motorcycle, Ed catches up with the presidential motorcade and meets Catherine in a field. She scolds him but realizes that the president and his staff believe that he is proposing. Flustered, she tells him to kiss her. He does and tells her that she had fallen in love with him at first sight also, but that they had to devise the ruse to convince her. Catherine slaps him and returns to the motorcade.

Realizing that she has learned of the ruse, Albert admits to Catherine that she has finally seen through the "intellectual Ed" ruse. He congratulates her on mathematically disproving his theory of 30 years ago, something that he could not do because he is terrible at math. This further reinforces Catherine's self-confidence. At the symposium, James accuses Albert Einstein and Ed Walters of fraud, but Albert turns the tables on him. He says that "Operation Red Cabbage" was their plan to prove that the Russians were lying about their nuclear fusion advances in space, and that Catherine Boyd and Ed Walters were key in proving it.

Albert is rushed to the hospital for a real emergency and asks Catherine at his bedside to listen to her heart and not let her head keep her from love. Ed arrives, apologizes to Catherine and leaves, telling her that he hopes that one day, she will realize that she is extraordinary. A comet is due on the night of April 1. Catherine goes to Stargazers' Field to view it and sees Ed already there. They watch the comet together and Catherine admits that she has fallen for Ed.

Cast

[edit]

Dramatic alterations

[edit]

For dramatic reasons, I.Q. fictionalizes the lives of certain real people. Albert Einstein did not have a niece by the name of Catherine Boyd. Kurt Gödel was famously shy and reclusive,[2] unlike his fictional counterpart in this film. The movie gives the impression that Einstein and his friends are all around the same age, when in fact, they were between 17 and 30 years younger than Einstein.[citation needed] The real Louis Bamberger died in 1944, before the film's set period.

The characters in the film listen to Little Richard's "Tutti-Frutti", which was released in November 1955, although Albert Einstein died the previous April.

Production

[edit]

Director Fred Schepisi later said that although he liked the film, it was not what it could have been:

The problem was there were two other producers, there was a studio and there was Tim Robbins and they were all contributing, and Tim Robbins was being difficult because he said in the '90s nobody would like a character who has a woman fall in love with him because of a lie. That's the whole premise of the film. And it's all right for him to know that and believe it, but he should spend the whole time trying to say, "Hey, I'm lying to you," and be constantly frustrated. Because of that attitude, he pulled the film this way, he pulled it that way while we were writing and it just felt messy. And nobody ever understood the value of those four scientists, and I like the cast that I had, but the other three scientists apart from Walter Matthau were originally going to be Peter Ustinov, Barry Humphries and John Cleese. I wanted them all the way through, but nobody understood how strong they would be. Nobody understood that with a garage and the scientists and this other guy, if you could just stay within that world, if you kept your two lovers together all the time under pressure and you do lots of silly things—there were a couple of wonderfully silly things when they were trying to prove his theory and they kept blowing things up—it had that whimsy about it that would have kept the lovers together and under tension. If they want subplots, they up the stakes and all this formulaic crap - and that's the problem.[3]

Reception

[edit]

I.Q. opened in theaters on Christmas Day. It grossed $3,131,201 during its opening weekend, ranking eighth at the US box office.[4] By the time that the film closed, it had grossed $26,381,221 in the United States and Canada.[5] It grossed $47 million worldwide.[1]

The film received mixed reviews from critics. On Rotten Tomatoes, I.Q. holds a 47% rating, based on 30 reviews.[6]

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gave the film 3½ stars out of 4, with glowing praise of Walter Matthau's performance. "Matthau as Einstein is a stroke of casting genius. He looks uncannily like the great mathematician. Whether he acts like him I am not in a position to say, but he certainly doesn't act like himself: He has left all his Matthauisms behind, and created this performance from scratch, and it's one of the year's genuine comic gems. He deserves an Oscar nomination."[7]

Year-end lists

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Planet Hollywood". Screen International. August 30, 1996. pp. 14–15.
  2. ^ Davis, Martin (May 4, 2005). "Gödel's universe". Nature. 435 (7038): 19–20. Bibcode:2005Natur.435...19D. doi:10.1038/435019a.
  3. ^ "Interview with Fred Schepisi", Signis, 22 December 1998 Archived 14 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine access 20 November 2012
  4. ^ "Dumb' Laughs = a Smart Payoff : Box office: Jim Carrey vehicle pulls a 'Gump,' taking in $16.2 million on an otherwise slow film-going weekend". The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2010-12-31.
  5. ^ "I.Q. (1994) - Box Office Mojo". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 2010-05-24.
  6. ^ I.Q. (1994), retrieved 2025-01-07
  7. ^ "I.Q. Movie review & film summary (1994) | Roger Ebert".
  8. ^ Elliott, David (December 25, 1994). "On the big screen, color it a satisfying time". The San Diego Union-Tribune (1, 2 ed.). p. E=8.
  9. ^ P. Means, Sean (January 1, 1995). "'Pulp and Circumstance' After the Rise of Quentin Tarantino, Hollywood Would Never Be the Same". The Salt Lake Tribune (Final ed.). p. E1.
[edit]