Same-sex marriage: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
Where MOS:TIES cannot be determined, the template should be removed |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Marriage of persons of the same sex}} |
{{short description|Marriage of persons of the same sex or gender}} |
||
{{redirect2|Marriage equality|gay marriage|other uses|marriage equality (disambiguation)|and|gay marriage (disambiguation)}} |
{{redirect2|Marriage equality|gay marriage|other uses|marriage equality (disambiguation)|and|gay marriage (disambiguation)}} |
||
{{pp- |
{{pp-semi-indef}} |
||
{{pp-move}} |
|||
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2019}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2019}} |
||
{{Same-sex unions}} |
{{Same-sex unions}} |
||
{{ |
{{LGBTQ sidebar|rights}} |
||
<!--- *** Please consider achieving consensus on the talk (discussion) page first before editing the introduction. *** --->{{Discrimination sidebar}} |
|||
[[File:Wedding in New Orleans, November 11, 2017.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Two men marry, surrounded by wedding party, in [[New Orleans]], United States on 11 November 2017]] |
|||
<!--- *** Please consider achieving consensus on the talk (discussion) page first before editing the introduction. *** ---> |
|||
'''Same-sex marriage''', also known as '''gay marriage''', is the [[marriage]] of two people of the same legal [[Legal sex and gender|sex]]. {{As of|2024|post=,}} marriage between same-sex couples is legally performed and recognized in 36 countries, with a total population of 1.5<!--counting 1,532.722 M, including Nepal and Thailand but not Israel, 2023 UN data, out of 7,795.311M world (deducting 250M for systemic over-count in China) --> billion people (20%<!--19.66% including Nepal and Thailand--> of the world's population). The most recent jurisdictions to legalize same-sex marriage are [[Same-sex marriage in Greece|Greece]] and [[Same-sex marriage in Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten|Aruba and Curaçao]] in the Netherlands. Two more countries, [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Liechtenstein|Liechtenstein]] and [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Thailand|Thailand]], are set to begin performing same-sex marriages in January 2025. |
|||
'''Sameem-sex marriage''', also known as '''gay sameem marriage''', is the [[marriage]] of two people of the sameem legal [[sex]] or gender. There are records of marriage between people of the sameem sex dating back to the [[1st century|first century]]. In the modern era, marriage equality for sameem-sex couples was first legally acknowledged in the [[Netherlands]] on [[Same-sex marriage in the Netherlands|1 April 2001]], after royal assent was given by [[Queen Beatrix]].<ref name="bloomberg-2014-12-04">{{cite web |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-12-04/gay-marriage-same-sex-partners-can-wed-in-many-countries |title=In 14 years, same-sex marriage has spread round the world |first=Caroline |last=Winter |publisher=Bloomberg |date=December 4, 2014 |access-date=2022-02-20 |archive-date=13 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220113164339/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-12-04/gay-marriage-same-sex-partners-can-wed-in-many-countries |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
Same-sex marriage is legally recognized in a large majority of the world's [[developed country|developed countries]]; notable exceptions are [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Italy|Italy]], [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Japan|Japan]], [[Recognition of same-sex unions in South Korea|South Korea]] and the [[Recognition of same-sex unions in the Czech Republic|Czech Republic]]. [[Same-sex adoption|Adoption rights]] are not necessarily covered, though most states with same-sex marriage allow those couples to jointly adopt as other married couples can. Some countries, such as [[Nigeria]] and [[Russia]], restrict advocacy for same-sex marriage.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=VERPOEST |first=LIEN |date=2017 |title=The End of Rhetorics: LGBT policies in Russia and the European Union |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26531664 |journal=Studia Diplomatica |volume=68 |issue=4 |pages=3–20 |jstor=26531664 |issn=0770-2965}}</ref> A few of these are among the 35 countries (as of 2023) that constitutionally define marriage to prevent marriage between couples of the same sex, with most of those provisions enacted in recent decades as a preventative measure. Other countries have constitutionally mandated [[Islamic law]], which is generally interpreted as prohibiting marriage between same-sex couples.{{citation needed|date=June 2024}} In six of the former and most of the latter, homosexuality itself [[criminalization of homosexuality|is criminalized]]. |
|||
There are records of marriage between men dating back to the [[1st century|first century]].<ref name="WilliamsRoman2">Williams, CA., ''Roman Homosexuality: Second Edition'', Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 280, p. 284.</ref> [[Michael McConnell and Jack Baker]]<ref name="auto">{{Cite news|last1=Padnani|first1=Amisha|author1-link=Amy Padnani|last2=Fang|first2=Celina|date=June 26, 2015|title=Same-Sex Marriage: Landmark Decisions and Precedents|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/06/26/us/samesex-marriage-landmarks.html|access-date=|issn=}}</ref><ref name="auto1">{{Cite web|last=Baume|first=Matt|date=March 1, 2019|title=Meet the Gay Men Whose 1971 Marriage Was Finally Recognized|url=https://www.advocate.com/people/2019/3/01/meet-gay-men-whose-1971-marriage-was-finally-recognized|access-date=|website=The Advocate|language=en}}</ref> are the first same sex couple in modern recorded history<ref name="auto2">[[StoryCorps]] Archive (September 12, 2017). {{Cite web|url=https://archive.storycorps.org/interviews/dda002648/|title=Michael McConnell, Jack Baker, and Lisa Vecoli}} |
|||
The application of [[marriage law]] equally to same-sex and opposite-sex couples (called '''marriage equality''') has varied by jurisdiction, and has come about through legislative change to marriage law, court rulings based on constitutional guarantees of equality, recognition that marriage of same-sex couples is allowed by existing marriage law,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.koco.com/news/oklahomanews/around-oklahoma/samesex-oklahoma-couple-marries-legally-under-tribal-law/-/12530084/22553184/-/101ihp0z/-/index.html |title=Same-sex Oklahoma couple marries legally under tribal law |publisher=KOCO |date=26 September 2013 |access-date=22 October 2013 |archive-date=22 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131022022830/http://www.koco.com/news/oklahomanews/around-oklahoma/samesex-oklahoma-couple-marries-legally-under-tribal-law/-/12530084/22553184/-/101ihp0z/-/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref> and by direct popular vote (via [[referendum]]s and [[initiative]]s). The recognition of same-sex marriage is considered to be a [[human rights|human right]] and a [[civil rights|civil right]] as well as a political, social, and religious issue.<ref>Multiple sources: |
|||
* Michael McConnell (75) and husband Jack Baker (75) talk with friend Lisa Vecoli (55) about having the first same-sex marriage legally recognized by a U.S. civil government in 1971, why they chose to get married, and what the response to their marriage was like. |
|||
*{{cite news|title=Inter-American Human Rights Court backs same-sex marriage|journal=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-42633891|date=10 January 2018|access-date=6 April 2018|archive-date=6 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190506205552/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-42633891|url-status=live}} |
|||
* JB describes the decades-long (46-year) process from the denial of their marriage license in 1971 until a second request that same year in [[Blue Earth County, Minnesota|Blue Earth County]], [[Minnesota]], was "declared to be in all respects valid" by Order of Gregory J. Anderson, Judge of District Court.</ref> known to obtain a [[marriage license]],<ref name="National Archives">Newsletter, "Hidden Treasures from the Stacks", ''The National Archives at Kansas City'', p. 6 (September 2013). |
|||
*{{cite web|title=Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015)|url=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/576/14-556/opinion3.html|publisher=[[Justia]]|date=26 June 2015|access-date=6 April 2018|archive-date=11 April 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180411174416/https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/576/14-556/opinion3.html|url-status=live}} |
|||
* [https://www.archives.gov/files/kansas-city/press/newsletter/2013-september.pdf#page=6 Available online.]</ref> have their marriage solemnized, which occurred on September 3, 1971, in [[Minnesota]],<ref name="3Sept1971">Source: Blue Earth County |
|||
*{{cite news|last=Smith|first=Susan K.|title=Marriage a Civil Right, not Sacred Rite|url=http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/susan_k_smith/2009/07/marriage_a_civil_right_not_sacred_rite.html|access-date=20 September 2012|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=30 July 2009|archive-date=3 October 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121003083717/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/susan_k_smith/2009/07/marriage_a_civil_right_not_sacred_rite.html|url-status=dead}} |
|||
* Certificate 434960: [https://moms.mn.gov/ Minnesota Official Marriage System] |
|||
*{{cite web|title=Decision in Perry v. Schwarzenegger|url=https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cand/09cv2292/files/09cv2292-ORDER.pdf|access-date=6 August 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130316191210/https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cand/09cv2292/files/09cv2292-ORDER.pdf|archive-date=16 March 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref> The most prominent supporters of same-sex marriage are human rights and civil rights organizations as well as the medical and scientific communities, while the most prominent opponents are [[fundamentalism|religious fundamentalist]] groups. [[#Public opinion|Polls consistently show]] continually rising support for the recognition of same-sex marriage in all developed democracies and in some developing democracies. |
|||
:* Applicants: James Michael McConnell and Pat Lyn McConnell |
|||
:* Date of Marriage: September 3, 1971 |
|||
* Certified Copy: [https://www.blueearthcountymn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4933/Application-for-Certified-Copy-of-Marriage-Certificate Marriage Certificate]</ref> and have it legally recognized by any form of government.<ref name=ruling>"The September 3, 1971 marriage of James Michael McConnell and Pat Lyn McConnell, a/k/a Richard John Baker, has never been dissolved or annulled by judicial decree and no grounds currently exist on which to invalidate the marriage." |
|||
* Sources: CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by Assistant Chief Judge Gregory Anderson, Fifth Judicial District, (page 4); |
|||
* Copy: [https://www.mncourts.gov/Help-Topics/Self-Help-Centers/Self-Help-Centers-Contact.aspx Minnesota Judicial Branch], File Number 07-CV-16-4559, "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Partial Summary Judgment" from Blue Earth County District Court in re James Michael McConnell et al. v. Blue Earth County et al. (September 18, 2018); |
|||
* [https://www.lib.umn.edu/sites/www.lib.umn.edu/files/2021-09/McConnellvBlueEarthCounty-17-Sept-2018-ConclusionsofLaw_ORDER.pdf#page=4 Available online] from ''U of M Libraries''; |
|||
* McConnell Files, "America’s First Gay Marriage" (binder #4), Tretter Collection in GLBT Studies, ''U of M Libraries''.</ref><ref name="epilogue">Michael McConnell, with Jack Baker, as told to Gail Langer Karwoski, "[https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/the-wedding-heard-around-the-world The Wedding Heard Heard 'Round the World: America's First Gay Marriage] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150826235010/https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/the-wedding-heard-around-the-world |date=August 26, 2015 }}". University of Minnesota Press (2016). Reprint, "With A New Epilogue" (2020).</ref> The first law providing for marriage equality between same-sex and opposite-sex couples was [[Same-sex marriage in the Netherlands|passed in the continental Netherlands]] in 2000 and took effect on 1 April 2001.<ref name="bloomberg-2014-12-04">{{Cite web |last=Winter |first=Caroline |date=December 4, 2014 |title=In 14 years, same-sex marriage has spread round the world |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-12-04/gay-marriage-same-sex-partners-can-wed-in-many-countries |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220113164339/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-12-04/gay-marriage-same-sex-partners-can-wed-in-many-countries |archive-date=13 January 2022 |access-date=2022-02-20 |publisher=Bloomberg}}</ref> The application of [[marriage law]] equally to same-sex and opposite-sex couples has varied by jurisdiction, and has come about through legislative change to marriage law, court rulings based on constitutional guarantees of equality, recognition that marriage of same-sex couples is allowed by existing marriage law, and by direct popular vote, such as through [[referendum]]s and [[Popular initiative|initiative]]s.<ref>{{Cite web |date=26 September 2013 |title=Same-sex Oklahoma couple marries legally under tribal law |url=http://www.koco.com/news/oklahomanews/around-oklahoma/samesex-oklahoma-couple-marries-legally-under-tribal-law/-/12530084/22553184/-/101ihp0z/-/index.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131022022830/http://www.koco.com/news/oklahomanews/around-oklahoma/samesex-oklahoma-couple-marries-legally-under-tribal-law/-/12530084/22553184/-/101ihp0z/-/index.html |archive-date=22 October 2013 |access-date=22 October 2013 |publisher=KOCO}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=19 June 2022 |title=Clela Rorex, former Boulder County Clerk who issued first same-sex marriage license in 1975 dies at 78 |url=https://www.coloradodaily.com/2022/06/19/former-boulder-county-clerk-who-issued-first-same-sex-marriage-license-in-1975-dies-at-78/}}</ref> The most prominent supporters of same-sex marriage are the world's major medical and [[Scientific community|scientific communities]],<ref name="science" /><ref name="amici" /><ref name="cpa2006" /> along with [[human rights]] and [[civil rights]] organizations,<ref name="bbc" /> while its most prominent opponents are [[fundamentalism|religious fundamentalist]] groups.<ref name="religion" /> [[#Public opinion|Polls consistently show]] continually rising support for the recognition of same-sex marriage in all developed democracies and in many developing countries. |
|||
Scientific studies show that the financial, psychological, and physical well-being of gay people are enhanced by marriage, and that the children of same-sex parents benefit from being raised by married same-sex couples within a marital union that is recognized by law and supported by societal institutions.<ref>Multiple sources: |
Scientific studies show that the financial, psychological, and physical well-being of gay people are enhanced by marriage, and that the children of same-sex parents benefit from being raised by married same-sex couples within a marital union that is recognized by law and supported by societal institutions. At the same time, no harm is done to the institution of marriage among heterosexuals.<ref>Molly Ball, 2024 May 13, ''Wall Street Journal'', [https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-20-years-of-same-sex-marriage-changed-america/ar-BB1mhZ6p How 20 Years of Same-Sex Marriage Changed America]</ref> Social science research indicates that the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage stigmatizes and invites public discrimination against gay and lesbian people, with research repudiating the notion that either civilization or viable social orders depend upon restricting marriage to heterosexuals.<ref>Multiple sources: |
||
*{{ |
*{{Cite web |publisher=[[American Psychological Association]] |year=2004 |title=Resolution on Sexual Orientation and Marriage |url=http://www.apa.org/about/governance/council/policy/gay-marriage.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511190536/http://www.apa.org/about/governance/council/policy/gay-marriage.pdf |archive-date=11 May 2011 |access-date=10 November 2010}} |
||
*{{cite web|url=http:// |
*{{cite web|url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus29.pdf|title=Brief of the American Psychological Association, The California Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy as amici curiae in support of plaintiff-appellees – Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Case No. 09-CV-2292 VRW (Honorable Vaughn R. Walker)|access-date=5 November 2010|archive-date=13 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150413160709/http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus29.pdf|url-status=live}} |
||
*{{cite web|title=Marriage of Same-Sex Couples – 2006 Position Statement |url=http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/Practice_Page/Marriage_SameSex_Couples_PositionStatement.pdf|publisher=[[Canadian Psychological Association]]|access-date=28 September 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120707191052/http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/Practice_Page/Marriage_SameSex_Couples_PositionStatement.pdf|archive-date=7 July 2012}} |
|||
*{{cite web|url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus29.pdf|title=Brief of the American Psychological Association, The California Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy as amici curiae in support of plaintiff-appellees – Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Case No. 09-CV-2292 VRW (Honorable Vaughn R. Walker)|access-date=5 November 2010|archive-date=25 July 2014|archive-url=https://www.webcitation.org/6RKz9Wyf8?url=http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus29.pdf|url-status=live}} |
|||
*{{Cite journal|vauthors=Pawelski JG, Perrin EC, Foy JM |display-authors=etal |title=The effects of marriage, civil union, and domestic partnership laws on the health and well-being of children|journal=[[Pediatrics (journal)|Pediatrics]]|volume=118|issue=1|pages=349–64|date=July 2006|pmid=16818585|doi=10.1542/peds.2006-1279|s2cid=219194821 |doi-access= |issn=0031-4005}} |
|||
*{{cite web|title=Marriage of Same-Sex Couples – 2006 Position Statement|url=http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/Practice_Page/Marriage_SameSex_Couples_PositionStatement.pdf|publisher=[[Canadian Psychological Association]]|access-date=28 September 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120707191052/http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/Practice_Page/Marriage_SameSex_Couples_PositionStatement.pdf|archive-date=7 July 2012}} |
|||
*{{Cite journal |url=http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/349 |title=The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children |journal=Pediatrics |volume=118 |issue=1 |pages=349–364 |access-date=7 July 2017 |doi=10.1542/peds.2006-1279 |pmid=16818585 |year=2006 |last1=Pawelski |first1=J. G. |last2=Perrin |first2=E. C. |last3=Foy |first3=J. M. |last4=Allen |first4=C. E. |last5=Crawford |first5=J. E. |last6=Del Monte |first6=M. |last7=Kaufman |first7=M. |last8=Klein |first8=J. D. |last9=Smith |first9=K. |last10=Springer |first10=S. |last11=Tanner |first11=J. L. |last12=Vickers |first12=D. L. |s2cid=219194821 |doi-access= |archive-date=1 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501125053/http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/349 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Brief of Amici Curiae American Anthropological Association et al., supporting plaintiffs-appellees and urging affirmance – Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Case No. 09-CV-2292 VRW (Honorable Vaughn R. Walker) |url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus39.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101226182234/http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus39.pdf |archive-date=26 December 2010 |access-date=5 November 2010}}</ref><ref name="aaa" /> Same-sex marriage can provide those in committed same-sex relationships with relevant government services and make financial demands on them comparable to that required of those in opposite-sex marriages, and also gives them legal protections such as inheritance and hospital visitation rights.<ref>Handbook of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Administration and Policy — Page 13, Wallace Swan – 2004</ref> Opposition is based on claims such as that homosexuality is unnatural and abnormal, that the recognition of same-sex unions will promote homosexuality in society, and that children are better off when raised by opposite-sex couples. These claims are refuted by [[Biology and sexual orientation|scientific studies]], which show that homosexuality is a natural and normal variation in human sexuality, that [[sexual orientation]] is not a choice, and that children of same-sex couples fare just as well as the children of opposite-sex couples.<ref name="science">Multiple sources: |
|||
*{{Cite journal|vauthors=Pawelski JG, Perrin EC, Foy JM |display-authors=etal |title=The effects of marriage, civil union, and domestic partnership laws on the health and well-being of children|journal=[[Pediatrics (journal)|Pediatrics]]|volume=118|issue=1|pages=349–64|date=July 2006|pmid=16818585|doi=10.1542/peds.2006-1279|doi-access=free}} |
|||
*{{Cite web |last=Coghlan |first=Andy |date=16 June 2008 |title=Gay brains structured like those of the opposite sex |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14146-gay-brains-structured-like-those-of-the-opposite-sex |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429012045/https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14146-gay-brains-structured-like-those-of-the-opposite-sex/ |archive-date=29 April 2019 |access-date=5 April 2018 |website=[[New Scientist]]}} |
|||
*{{Cite journal |url=http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/349 |title=The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children |journal=Pediatrics |volume=118 |issue=1 |pages=349–364 |access-date=7 July 2017 |doi=10.1542/peds.2006-1279 |pmid=16818585 |year=2006 |last1=Pawelski |first1=J. G. |last2=Perrin |first2=E. C. |last3=Foy |first3=J. M. |last4=Allen |first4=C. E. |last5=Crawford |first5=J. E. |last6=Del Monte |first6=M. |last7=Kaufman |first7=M. |last8=Klein |first8=J. D. |last9=Smith |first9=K. |last10=Springer |first10=S. |last11=Tanner |first11=J. L. |last12=Vickers |first12=D. L. |doi-access=free |archive-date=1 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501125053/http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/349 |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Social science]] research indicates that the exclusion of homosexuals from marriage stigmatizes and invites public discrimination against them, with research also repudiating the notion that either civilization or viable social orders depend upon restricting marriage to heterosexuals.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus39.pdf|title=Brief of Amici Curiae American Anthropological Association et al., supporting plaintiffs-appellees and urging affirmance – Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Case No. 09-CV-2292 VRW (Honorable Vaughn R. Walker)|access-date=5 November 2010|archive-date=26 December 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101226182234/http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus39.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="aaa"/> Same-sex marriage can provide those in committed same-sex relationships with relevant government services and make financial demands on them comparable to that required of those in opposite-sex marriages, and also gives them legal protections such as inheritance and hospital visitation rights.<ref>Handbook of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Administration and Policy — Page 13, Wallace Swan – 2004</ref> Opposition to same-sex marriage is based on claims such as that homosexuality is unnatural and abnormal, that children are better off when raised by opposite-sex couples, that same-sex couples cannot procreate, and that the recognition of same-sex unions will promote homosexuality in society.<ref name="thoughtco">{{cite web | url=https://www.thoughtco.com/moral-and-religious-arguments-250095 | title=Common Arguments Against Gay Marriage | date=16 July 2017 | access-date=26 September 2017 | author=Cline, Austin | archive-date=14 April 2019 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190414074528/https://www.thoughtco.com/moral-and-religious-arguments-250095 | url-status=live }}</ref> The former two claims are refuted by [[Biology and sexual orientation|scientific studies]], which show that homosexuality is a natural and normal variation in human sexuality, and that [[sexual orientation]] is not a choice. Many studies have shown that children of same-sex couples fare just as well as the children of opposite-sex couples; some studies have shown benefits to being raised by same-sex couples.<ref name="science">Multiple sources: |
|||
*{{cite book|first1=Mary Ann |last1=Lamanna |first2=Agnes |last2=Riedmann |first3=Susan D. |last3=Stewart |title=Marriages, Families, and Relationships: Making Choices in a Diverse Society |publisher=[[Cengage Learning]] |isbn=978-1305176898 |year=2014 |page=82 |access-date=11 February 2016 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fofaAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA82 |quote=[T]he APA says that sexual orientation is not a choice [...]. ([[American Psychological Association]], 2010).|archive-date=30 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161130141623/https://books.google.com/books?id=fofaAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA82|url-status=live}} |
|||
*{{cite web|first=Andy|last=Coghlan|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14146-gay-brains-structured-like-those-of-the-opposite-sex|title=Gay brains structured like those of the opposite sex|work=[[New Scientist]]|date=16 June 2008|access-date=5 April 2018|archive-date=29 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429012045/https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14146-gay-brains-structured-like-those-of-the-opposite-sex/|url-status=live}} |
|||
*{{cite journal |url=http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/349.full |title=The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children |journal=[[Pediatrics (journal)|Pediatrics]] |year=2006 |doi=10.1542/peds.2006-1279 |access-date=2 November 2013 |last1=Pawelski |first1=J. G. |last2=Perrin |first2=E. C. |last3=Foy |first3=J. M. |last4=Allen |first4=C. E. |last5=Crawford |first5=J. E. |last6=Del Monte |first6=M. |last7=Kaufman |first7=M. |last8=Klein |first8=J. D. |last9=Smith |first9=K. |last10=Springer |first10=S. |last11=Tanner |first11=J. L. |last12=Vickers |first12=D. L. |volume=118 |issue=1 |pages=349–364 |pmid=16818585 |s2cid=219194821 |doi-access=|archive-date=29 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429011707/https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/349.full|url-status=live}} |
|||
*{{cite web|url=https://www.americananthro.org/ConnectWithAAA/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=2602|title=Statement on Marriage and the Family|publisher=[[American Anthropological Association]]|access-date=9 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191228200229/https://www.americananthro.org/ConnectWithAAA/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=2602|archive-date=28 December 2019|url-status=dead}} |
|||
*{{cite web|author1=[[American Medical Association]] |author2=[[American Academy of Pediatrics]] |author3=[[American Psychological Association]] |author4=[[American Psychiatric Association]] |author5=[[American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy]] |author6=[[National Association of Social Workers]] |author7=[[American Psychoanalytic Association]] |author8=[[American Academy of Family Physicians]] |display-authors=etal |title=Brief of [medical organizations] as ''Amici Curiae'' in Support of Petitioners |website=[[supremecourt.gov]] |url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/ObergefellHodges/AmicusBriefs/14-556_American_Psychological_Association.pdf |access-date=5 April 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190412074914/https://www.supremecourt.gov/ObergefellHodges/AmicusBriefs/14-556_American_Psychological_Association.pdf|archive-date=12 April 2019|url-status=dead}} |
|||
*{{cite book|author1=Mary Ann Lamanna|first2=Agnes|last2=Riedmann|author3=Susan D Stewart|title=Marriages, Families, and Relationships: Making Choices in a Diverse Society|publisher=[[Cengage Learning]]|isbn=978-1305176898|year=2014|page=82|access-date=11 February 2016|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fofaAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA82|quote=[T]he APA says that sexual orientation is not a choice [...]. ([[American Psychological Association]], 2010).|archive-date=30 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161130141623/https://books.google.com/books?id=fofaAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA82|url-status=live}} |
|||
*{{cite journal|url=http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/349.full|title=The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children|journal=[[Pediatrics (journal)|Pediatrics]]|year=2006|doi=10.1542/peds.2006-1279|access-date=2 November 2013|last1=Pawelski|first1=J. G.|last2=Perrin|first2=E. C.|last3=Foy|first3=J. M.|last4=Allen|first4=C. E.|last5=Crawford|first5=J. E.|last6=Del Monte|first6=M.|last7=Kaufman|first7=M.|last8=Klein|first8=J. D.|last9=Smith|first9=K.|last10=Springer|first10=S.|last11=Tanner|first11=J. L.|last12=Vickers|first12=D. L.|volume=118|issue=1|pages=349–364|pmid=16818585|doi-access=free|archive-date=29 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429011707/https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/349.full|url-status=live}} |
|||
*{{cite web|author=[[American Medical Association]], [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], [[American Psychological Association]], [[American Psychiatric Association]], [[American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy]], [[National Association of Social Workers]], [[American Psychoanalytic Association]], [[American Academy of Family Physicians]]|display-authors=etal|url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/ObergefellHodges/AmicusBriefs/14-556_American_Psychological_Association.pdf|title=Brief of [medical organizations] as ''Amici Curiae'' in Support of Petitioners|website=[[supremecourt.gov]]|access-date=5 April 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190412074914/https://www.supremecourt.gov/ObergefellHodges/AmicusBriefs/14-556_American_Psychological_Association.pdf|archive-date=12 April 2019|url-status=dead}} |
|||
*{{cite news|first=Annie|last=Davis|url=https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/oct/23/children-raised-by-same-sex-parents-do-as-well-as-their-peers-study-shows|title=Children raised by same-sex parents do as well as their peers, study shows|work=[[The Guardian]]|date=22 October 2017|access-date=28 March 2018|archive-date=29 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429010814/https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/oct/23/children-raised-by-same-sex-parents-do-as-well-as-their-peers-study-shows|url-status=live}} |
|||
*{{cite news|first=Lindsey|last=Bever|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/07/07/children-of-same-sex-couples-are-happier-and-healthier-than-peers-research-shows|title=Children of same-sex couples are happier and healthier than peers, research shows|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=7 July 2014|access-date=12 December 2018|archive-date=4 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190504054558/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/07/07/children-of-same-sex-couples-are-happier-and-healthier-than-peers-research-shows/|url-status=live}} |
*{{cite news|first=Lindsey|last=Bever|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/07/07/children-of-same-sex-couples-are-happier-and-healthier-than-peers-research-shows|title=Children of same-sex couples are happier and healthier than peers, research shows|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=7 July 2014|access-date=12 December 2018|archive-date=4 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190504054558/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/07/07/children-of-same-sex-couples-are-happier-and-healthier-than-peers-research-shows/|url-status=live}} |
||
*{{cite journal |url=https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/349.full |title=The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children |last1=Pawelski |first1=James G. |last2=Perrin |first2=Ellen C. |last3=Foy |first3=Jane M. |last4=Allen |first4=Carole E. |last5=Crawford |first5=James E. |last6=Del Monte |first6=Mark |last7=Kaufman |first7=Miriam |last8=Klein |first8=Jonathan D. |last9=Smith |first9=Karen |last10=Springer |first10=Sarah |last11=Tanner |first11=J. Lane |last12=Vickers |first12=Dennis L. |quote=In fact, growing up with parents who are lesbian or gay may confer some advantages to children. |date=July 2006 |access-date=16 June 2019 |journal=[[Pediatrics (journal)|Pediatrics]] |publisher=[[American Academy of Pediatrics]] |volume=118 |issue=1 |pages=349–64 |pmid=16818585 |doi=10.1542/peds.2006-1279 |s2cid=219194821 |doi-access= |archive-date=1 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501125053/http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/349 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
*{{cite web|url=https://www.aamft.org/Consumer_Updates/Same-sex_Parents_and_Their_Children.aspx|title=Same-sex Parents and Their Children|access-date=16 June 2019|publisher=[[American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy]]|quote=Most research studies show that children with two moms or two dads fare just as well as children with heterosexual parents... Where research differences have been found, they have sometimes favored same-sex parents.|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190616203540/https://www.aamft.org/Consumer_Updates/Same-sex_Parents_and_Their_Children.aspx|archive-date=16 June 2019|url-status=dead}} |
|||
*{{cite web |url=https://www.mother.ly/news/lesbian-parents-impact-kids-mental-health?rebelltitem=1#rebelltitem1 |title=Major long-term study:Kids with lesbian parents grow up to be happy adults |last=Marcoux |first=Heather |date=23 July 2018 |access-date=16 June 2019 |quote=The researchers note that the kids in same-sex homes actually reported fewer difficulties than those born to heterosexual couples. }}{{Dead link|date=February 2020 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} |
|||
*{{cite journal |url=https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/349.full |title=The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children |last1=Pawelski |first1=James G. |last2=Perrin |first2=Ellen C. |last3=Foy |first3=Jane M. |last4=Allen |first4=Carole E. |last5=Crawford |first5=James E. |last6=Del Monte |first6=Mark |last7=Kaufman |first7=Miriam |last8=Klein |first8=Jonathan D. |last9=Smith |first9=Karen |last10=Springer |first10=Sarah |last11=Tanner |first11=J. Lane |last12=Vickers |first12=Dennis L. |quote=In fact, growing up with parents who are lesbian or gay may confer some advantages to children. |date=July 2006 |access-date=16 June 2019 |journal=[[Pediatrics (journal)|Pediatrics]] |publisher=[[American Academy of Pediatrics]] |volume=118 |issue=1 |pages=349–64 |pmid=16818585 |doi=10.1542/peds.2006-1279 |doi-access=free |archive-date=1 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501125053/http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/349 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
{{TOC limit|3}} |
{{TOC limit|3}} |
||
==Terminology== |
==Terminology== |
||
===Alternative terms=== |
===Alternative terms=== |
||
[[File:Wedding in New Orleans, November 11, 2017.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Two men marry, surrounded by wedding party, in [[New Orleans]], United States on 11 November 2017]] |
|||
Some proponents of the legal recognition of same-sex marriage—such as [[Marriage Equality USA]] (founded in 1998), [[Freedom to Marry]] (founded in 2003), and [[Canadians for Equal Marriage]]—have long used the terms ''marriage equality'' and ''equal marriage'' to signal that their goal was for same-sex marriage to be recognized on equal ground with opposite-sex marriage.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gardenstateequality.org/issues/marriageequality/|title=Marriage Equality|publisher=Garden State Equality|access-date=24 July 2012|archive-date=26 July 2014|archive-url=https://www.webcitation.org/6RMM60e5u?url=http://www.gardenstateequality.org/issues/marriageequality/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.freedomtomarry.org/pages/marriage-101#faq3|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100216021129/http://www.freedomtomarry.org/pages/marriage-101#faq3|url-status=dead|archive-date=16 February 2010|title=Marriage 101|publisher=[[Freedom to Marry]]|access-date=28 September 2012}}</ref><ref name="Pratt">{{cite news|url=http://docs.newsbank.com/openurl?ctx_ver=z39.88-2004&rft_id=info:sid/iw.newsbank.com:AWNB:AENN&rft_val_format=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rft_dat=13F21B414EDA8168&svc_dat=InfoWeb:aggregated5&req_dat=0FB3382EE6AD1E46|title=Albany area real estate and the Marriage Equality Act|date=29 May 2012|work=Albany Examiner|access-date=25 December 2012|author=Pratt, Patricia|quote=On July 24, 2011 the Marriage Equality Act became a law in New York State forever changing the state's legal view of what a married couple is.}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Vote on Illinois marriage equality bill coming in January: sponsors|url=http://chicagophoenix.com/2012/12/13/illinois-marriage-equality-vote-january|access-date=23 December 2012|newspaper=Chicago Phoenix|date=13 December 2012|archive-date=26 December 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121226111510/http://chicagophoenix.com/2012/12/13/illinois-marriage-equality-vote-january/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Commission endorses marriage and adoption equality|url=http://www.hrc.co.nz/human-rights-environment/sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity/commission-endorses-marriage-and-adoption-equality|publisher=Human Right Commission New Zealand|access-date=23 December 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121202132031/http://www.hrc.co.nz/human-rights-environment/sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity/commission-endorses-marriage-and-adoption-equality|archive-date=2 December 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Mulholland|first=Helene|title=Ed Miliband calls for gay marriage equality|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/sep/27/ed-miliband-gay-wedding-equality|access-date=23 December 2012|newspaper=The Guardian|location=London, UK|date=27 September 2012|archive-date=28 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928234116/http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/sep/27/ed-miliband-gay-wedding-equality|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Ring">{{cite news|url=http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2012/12/20/newt-gingrich-accepts-marriage-equality-inevitable|title=Newt Gingrich: Marriage Equality Inevitable, OK|author=Ring, Trudy|work=The Advocate|location=Los Angeles|date=20 December 2012|quote=He [Newt Gingrich] noted to HuffPo that he not only has a lesbian half-sister, LGBT rights activist Candace Gingrich, but has gay friends who've gotten married in Iowa, where their unions are legal. Public opinion has shifted in favor of marriage equality, he said, and the Republican Party could end up on the wrong side of history if it continues to go against the tide.|access-date=25 December 2012|archive-date=23 December 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121223062417/http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2012/12/20/newt-gingrich-accepts-marriage-equality-inevitable|url-status=live}}</ref> The [[Associated Press]] recommends the use of ''same-sex marriage'' over ''gay marriage''.<ref>{{Cite tweet |user=apstylebook |number=1095408455479902211 |title=The term same-sex marriage is preferred over gay marriage. In places where it’s legal, same-sex marriage is no different than other marriages, so the term should be used only when germane and needed to distinguish from marriages between heterosexual couples. #APStyleChat}}</ref> |
|||
Some proponents of the legal recognition of same-sex marriage—such as [[Marriage Equality USA]] (founded in 1998), [[Freedom to Marry]] (founded in 2003), [[Canadians for Equal Marriage]], and [[List of LGBT-related organizations and conferences#Japan|Marriage for All Japan]] - used the terms ''marriage equality'' and ''equal marriage'' to signal that their goal was for same-sex marriage to be recognized on equal ground with opposite-sex marriage.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Marriage Equality |url=http://www.gardenstateequality.org/issues/marriageequality/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141018065055/http://www.gardenstateequality.org/issues/marriageequality/ |archive-date=18 October 2014 |access-date=24 July 2012 |publisher=Garden State Equality}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Marriage 101 |url=http://www.freedomtomarry.org/pages/marriage-101#faq3 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100216021129/http://www.freedomtomarry.org/pages/marriage-101#faq3 |archive-date=16 February 2010 |access-date=28 September 2012 |publisher=[[Freedom to Marry]]}}</ref><ref name="Pratt">{{Cite news |last=Pratt, Patricia |date=29 May 2012 |title=Albany area real estate and the Marriage Equality Act |work=Albany Examiner |url=http://docs.newsbank.com/openurl?ctx_ver=z39.88-2004&rft_id=info:sid/iw.newsbank.com:AWNB:AENN&rft_val_format=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rft_dat=13F21B414EDA8168&svc_dat=InfoWeb:aggregated5&req_dat=0FB3382EE6AD1E46 |access-date=25 December 2012 |quote=On July 24, 2011 the Marriage Equality Act became a law in New York State forever changing the state's legal view of what a married couple is.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=13 December 2012 |title=Vote on Illinois marriage equality bill coming in January: sponsors |work=Chicago Phoenix |url=http://chicagophoenix.com/2012/12/13/illinois-marriage-equality-vote-january |url-status=live |access-date=23 December 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121226111510/http://chicagophoenix.com/2012/12/13/illinois-marriage-equality-vote-january/ |archive-date=26 December 2012}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Mulholland |first=Helene |date=27 September 2012 |title=Ed Miliband calls for gay marriage equality |work=The Guardian |location=London, UK |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/sep/27/ed-miliband-gay-wedding-equality |url-status=live |access-date=23 December 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928234116/http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/sep/27/ed-miliband-gay-wedding-equality |archive-date=28 September 2013}}</ref><ref name="Ring">{{Cite news |last=Ring, Trudy |date=20 December 2012 |title=Newt Gingrich: Marriage Equality Inevitable, OK |work=The Advocate |location=Los Angeles |url=http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2012/12/20/newt-gingrich-accepts-marriage-equality-inevitable |url-status=live |access-date=25 December 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121223062417/http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2012/12/20/newt-gingrich-accepts-marriage-equality-inevitable |archive-date=23 December 2012 |quote=He [Newt Gingrich] noted to HuffPo that he not only has a lesbian half-sister, LGBT rights activist [[Candace Gingrich]], but has gay friends who've gotten married in Iowa, where their unions are legal. Public opinion has shifted in favor of marriage equality, he said, and the Republican Party could end up on the wrong side of history if it continues to go against the tide.}}</ref> The [[Associated Press]] recommends the use of ''same-sex marriage'' over ''gay marriage''.<ref>{{Cite tweet |number=1095408455479902211 |user=APStylebook |title=The term same-sex marriage is preferred over gay marriage. In places where it's legal, same-sex marriage is no different from other marriages, so the term should be used only when germane and needed to distinguish from marriages between heterosexual couples. #APStyleChat |author=APStylebook |date=12 February 2019 |access-date=13 December 2022 |language=en |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221019190133/https://twitter.com/apstylebook/status/1095408455479902211 |archive-date=19 October 2022 |url-status=live}}</ref> In deciding whether to use the term ''gay marriage'', it may also be noted that not everyone in a same-sex marriage is gay – for example, some are bisexual – and therefore using the term ''gay marriage'' is sometimes considered erasure of such people.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://news.gallup.com/poll/329975/one-lgbt-americans-married-sex-spouse.aspx|title=One in 10 LGBT Americans Married to Same-Sex Spouse|date=24 February 2021|website=Gallup }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://consciousstyleguide.com/when-bisexual-people-marry/|title=When Bisexual People Marry|first=Karen|last=Yin|date=8 March 2016 |website=Conscious Style Guide}}</ref> |
|||
===Use of the term ''marriage''=== |
===Use of the term ''marriage''=== |
||
Anthropologists have struggled to determine a definition of [[marriage]] that absorbs commonalities of the [[social construct]] across cultures around the world.<ref name=Fedorak>{{ |
Anthropologists have struggled to determine a definition of [[marriage]] that absorbs commonalities of the [[Social constructionism|social construct]] across cultures around the world.<ref name="Fedorak">{{Cite book |last=Fedorak |first=Shirley A. |title=Anthropology matters! |publisher=[[University of Toronto Press]] |year=2008 |isbn=978-1442601086 |location=[Toronto], Ont. |pages=Ch. 11; p. 174}}</ref><ref name="Gough">{{Cite journal |last=Gough |first=Kathleen E. |date=Jan–Jun 1959 |title=The Nayars and the Definition of Marriage |journal=The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland |volume=89 |issue=1 |pages=23–34 |doi=10.2307/2844434 |jstor=2844434}}</ref> Many proposed definitions have been criticized for failing to recognize the existence of same-sex marriage in some cultures, including those of more than 30 [[Ethnic groups in Africa|African peoples]], such as the [[Kikuyu people|Kikuyu]] and [[Nuer people|Nuer]].<ref name=Gough/><ref name="Africa">{{Cite book |last1=Murray |first1=Stephen O. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZjbESL6YWU0C&q=%22Woman-woman+marriage+in+Africa%22&pg=PA255 |title=Boy-wives and female husbands : studies of African homosexualities |last2=Roscoe, Will |publisher=St. Martin's |year=2001 |isbn=978-0312238292 |edition=1st pbk. |location=New York |access-date=28 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210204174244/https://books.google.com/books?id=ZjbESL6YWU0C&q=%22Woman-woman+marriage+in+Africa%22&pg=PA255 |archive-date=4 February 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Kikuyu">{{Cite journal |last1=Njambi |first1=Wairimu |last2=O'Brien, William |date=Spring 2001 |title=Revisiting "Woman-Woman Marriage": Notes on Gikuyu Women |url=http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/nwsa_journal/v012/12.1njambi.html |url-status=live |journal=[[NWSA Journal]] |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=1–23 |doi=10.1353/nwsa.2000.0015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120113015023/http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=%2Fjournals%2Fnwsa_journal%2Fv012%2F12.1njambi.html |archive-date=13 January 2012 |access-date=28 September 2012 |s2cid=144520611}}</ref> |
||
With several countries revising their marriage laws to recognize same-sex couples in the 21st century, all major English dictionaries have revised their definition of the word marriage to either drop gender specifications or supplement them with secondary definitions to include gender-neutral language or explicit recognition of same-sex unions.<ref>{{ |
With several countries revising their marriage laws to recognize same-sex couples in the 21st century, all major English dictionaries have revised their definition of the word marriage to either drop gender specifications or supplement them with secondary definitions to include gender-neutral language or explicit recognition of same-sex unions.<ref>{{Cite news |date=24 May 2004 |title=Dictionaries take lead in redefining modern marriage |work=[[The Washington Times]] |url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/may/24/20040524-103201-1169r |url-status=live |access-date=25 September 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120918034452/http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/may/24/20040524-103201-1169r/ |archive-date=18 September 2012}}</ref><ref name="ABA">{{Cite web |title=Webster Makes It Official: Definition of Marriage Has Changed |url=http://www.abajournal.com/news/webster_makes_it_official_definition_of_marriage_has_changed |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150427004101/http://www.abajournal.com/news/webster_makes_it_official_definition_of_marriage_has_changed |archive-date=27 April 2015 |access-date=28 September 2012 |publisher=[[American Bar Association]]}}</ref> The ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'' has recognized same-sex marriage since 2000.<ref name="slate">{{Cite news |last=Redman |first=Daniel |date=7 April 2009 |title=Noah Webster Gives His Blessing: Dictionaries recognize same-sex marriage—who knew? |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2215628 |url-status=live |access-date=28 September 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110917032021/http://www.slate.com/id/2215628/ |archive-date=17 September 2011}}</ref> |
||
Opponents of same-sex marriage who want marriage to be restricted to pairings of a man and a woman, such as [[ |
Opponents of same-sex marriage who want marriage to be restricted to pairings of a man and a woman, such as [[the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]], the [[Catholic Church]], and the [[Southern Baptist Convention]], use the term ''traditional marriage'' to mean opposite-sex marriage.<ref name="religion">{{Cite web |date=13 August 2008 |title=The Divine Institution of Marriage |url=https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/the-divine-institution-of-marriage |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190611071837/https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/the-divine-institution-of-marriage |archive-date=11 June 2019 |access-date=28 September 2012 |publisher=[[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]]}}</ref> |
||
==History== |
==History== |
||
{{Main|History of same-sex unions |
{{Main|History of same-sex unions}} |
||
{{For timeline}} |
|||
{{Broader|History of homosexuality}} |
|||
===Ancient=== |
===Ancient=== |
||
{{further|Homosexuality in ancient Rome}} |
|||
A reference to marriage between same-sex couples appears in the [[Sifra]], which was written in the 3rd century CE. The [[Book of Leviticus]] prohibited homosexual relations, and the Hebrews were warned not to "follow the acts of the land of Egypt or the acts of the land of Canaan" (Lev. 18:22, 20:13). The Sifra clarifies what these ambiguous "acts" were, and that they included marriage between same-sex couples: "A man would marry a man and a woman a woman, a man would marry a woman and her daughter, and a woman would be married to two men."<ref>Rabbi Joel Roth. [https://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/sites/default/files/assets/public/halakhah/teshuvot/19912000/roth_homosexual.pdf Homosexuality] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170824192248/https://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/sites/default/files/assets/public/halakhah/teshuvot/19912000/roth_homosexual.pdf |date=24 August 2017 }} ''rabbinicalassembly.org'' 1992.</ref> |
A reference to marriage between same-sex couples appears in the [[Sifra]], which was written in the 3rd century CE. The [[Book of Leviticus]] prohibited homosexual relations, and the Hebrews were warned not to "follow the acts of the land of Egypt or the acts of the land of Canaan" (Lev. 18:22, 20:13). The Sifra clarifies what these ambiguous "acts" were, and that they included marriage between same-sex couples: "A man would marry a man and a woman a woman, a man would marry a woman and her daughter, and a woman would be married to two men."<ref>Rabbi Joel Roth. [https://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/sites/default/files/assets/public/halakhah/teshuvot/19912000/roth_homosexual.pdf Homosexuality] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170824192248/https://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/sites/default/files/assets/public/halakhah/teshuvot/19912000/roth_homosexual.pdf |date=24 August 2017 }} ''rabbinicalassembly.org'' 1992.</ref> |
||
A few scholars believe that in the early [[Roman Empire]] some male couples were celebrating [[Marriage in ancient Rome|traditional marriage rites]] in the presence of friends. Male–male weddings are reported by sources that mock them; the feelings of the participants are not recorded.<ref>Martial 1.24 and 12.42; Juvenal 2.117–42. Williams, ''Roman Homosexuality'', pp. 28, 280; Karen K. Hersh, ''The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity'' (Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 36; [[Caroline Vout]], ''Power and Eroticism in Imperial Rome'' (Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 151ff.</ref> Various ancient sources state that the emperor [[Nero]] celebrated two public weddings with males, once taking the role of the bride (with a [[freedman]] [[Pythagoras (freedman)|Pythagoras]]), and once the groom (with [[Sporus]]); there may have been a third in which he was the bride.<ref>[[Suetonius]], [[Tacitus]], [[Dio Cassius]], and [[Aurelius Victor]] are the sources cited by Williams, ''Roman Homosexuality'', p. 279.</ref> In the early 3rd century AD, the emperor [[Elagabalus]] is reported to have been the bride in a wedding to his male partner. Other mature men at his court had husbands, or said they had husbands in imitation of the emperor.<ref>Williams, ''Roman Homosexuality'', pp. 278–279, citing Dio Cassius and [[Aelius Lampridius]].</ref> [[Roman law]] did not recognize marriage between males, but one of the grounds for disapproval expressed in Juvenal's satire is that celebrating the rites would lead to expectations for such marriages to be registered officially.<ref name="auto4">Williams, ''Roman Homosexuality'', p. 280.</ref> As the empire was becoming Christianized in the 4th century, legal prohibitions against marriage between males began to appear.<ref name="auto4"/> |
|||
What is arguably the first historical mention of the performance of marriages between same-sex couples occurred during the early [[Roman Empire]] according to controversial<ref name="Shaw">Shaw criticizes Boswell's methodology and conclusions as disingenuous {{cite magazine|last=Shaw|first=Brent|author-link=Brent Shaw|date=July 1994|title=A Groom of One's Own?|magazine=[[The New Republic]]|pages=43–48|url=http://www.learnedhand.com/shaw_boswell.htm|access-date=25 June 2009|archive-url=https://archive.today/20060507014622/http://www.learnedhand.com/shaw_boswell.htm|archive-date=7 May 2006}}</ref> historian [[John Boswell]].<ref name=boswell>{{cite book|last=Boswell|first=John|title=Same-sex unions in premodern Europe|year=1995|publisher=Vintage Books|location=New York|isbn=978-0-679-75164-9|pages=80–85|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iRL9cXA1m1IC|access-date=28 October 2020|archive-date=21 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200721182232/https://books.google.com/books?id=iRL9cXA1m1IC|url-status=live}}</ref> These were usually reported in a critical or satirical manner.<ref>{{cite web|last=Frier|first=Bruce|title=Roman Same-Sex Weddings from the Legal Perspective|url=http://www.umich.edu/~classics/news/newsletter/winter2004/weddings.html|publisher=[[University of Michigan]]|access-date=25 September 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111230041201/http://www.umich.edu/~classics/news/newsletter/winter2004/weddings.html|archive-date=30 December 2011}}</ref> |
|||
===Contemporary=== |
|||
Child emperor [[Elagabalus]] referred to his [[quadriga|chariot]] driver, a blond slave from [[Caria]] named [[Hierocles (charioteer)|Hierocles]], as his husband.<ref>Bunson, M., ''Encyclopedia of the Roman Empire'', Infobase Publishing, 2009, p. 259.</ref> He also married an athlete named Zoticus in a lavish public ceremony in Rome amidst the rejoicings of the citizens.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/80*.html |title=Cassius Dio — Epitome of Book 80 |website=Penelope.uchicago.edu |access-date=7 July 2017 |archive-date=26 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210826093127/https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/80%2A.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Herodian |url=http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/herodian_05_book5.htm |title=Herodian of Antioch, History of the Roman Empire (1961) pp.135-152. Book 5 |website=Tertullian.org |access-date=7 July 2017 |archive-date=29 April 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429011348/http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/herodian_05_book5.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=scarre>{{cite book|last=Scarre|first=Chris|title=Chronicles of the Roman Emperors|year=1995|publisher=Thames and Hudson Ltd|location=London|isbn=978-0-500-05077-4|page=151|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=s1tspwAACAAJ|access-date=28 October 2020|archive-date=4 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210204174837/https://books.google.com/books?id=s1tspwAACAAJ|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:NewlyMarriedCoupleAtCourthouse.jpg|thumb|Newly married couple in [[Minnesota]] shortly after the federal legalization of [[same-sex marriage in the United States]], 2015]] |
|||
[[Michael McConnell and Jack Baker]]<ref name="auto"/><ref name="auto1"/> are the first same sex couple in modern recorded history<ref name="auto2"/> known to obtain a [[marriage license]],<ref name="National Archives"/> have their marriage solemnized, which occurred on September 3, 1971, in [[Minnesota]],<ref name="3Sept1971"/> and have it legally recognized by any form of government.<ref name="ruling" /><ref name="epilogue"/> Historians variously trace the beginning of the modern movement in support of same-sex marriage to anywhere from around the 1980s to the 1990s. During the 1980s in the [[United States of America|United States]], the [[HIV/AIDS in the United States|AIDS epidemic]] led to increased attention on the legal aspects of same-sex relationships.<ref>{{Cite news |date=March–April 2013 |title=How Same-Sex Marriage Came to Be |url=http://harvardmagazine.com/2013/03/how-same-sex-marriage-came-to-be |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502173822/https://harvardmagazine.com/2013/03/how-same-sex-marriage-came-to-be |archive-date=2 May 2019 |access-date=28 March 2015 |website=[[Harvard Magazine]]}}</ref> [[Andrew Sullivan]] made the first case for same sex marriage in a major American journal in 1989,<ref name=intelligent>{{cite web|url=http://www.moreintelligentlife.com/story/andrew-sullivan-thinking-out-loud|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090425202254/http://www.moreintelligentlife.com/story/andrew-sullivan-thinking-out-loud|archive-date=25 April 2009 |title=Andrew Sullivan: Thinking. Out. Loud. |newspaper=Intelligent Life |date=Spring 2009 |access-date=24 October 2013|first=Johann |last=Hari}}</ref> published in ''The New Republic''.<ref name="groom">{{cite news|last=Sullivan|first=Andrew|title=Here Comes the Groom|url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/11/gay_marriage_votes_and_andrew_sullivan_his_landmark_1989_essay_making_a.html|access-date=24 October 2013|newspaper=Slate|date=9 November 2012}}</ref> |
|||
In 1989, Denmark became the first country to legally recognize a relationship for same-sex couples, establishing [[registered partnership]]s, which gave those in same-sex relationships "most rights of married heterosexuals, but not the right to adopt or obtain joint custody of a child".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Rule |first=Sheila |date=2 October 1989 |title=Rights for Gay Couples in Denmark |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/02/world/rights-for-gay-couples-in-denmark.html |url-status=live |access-date=19 August 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304080523/http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/02/world/rights-for-gay-couples-in-denmark.html |archive-date=4 March 2016}}</ref> In 2001, the [[Same-sex marriage in the Netherlands|continental Netherlands]] became the first country to broaden marriage laws to include same-sex couples.<ref name="bloomberg-2014-12-04" /><ref>{{Cite news |date=26 May 2009 |title=Same-sex marriage around the world |work=CBC News |location=Toronto |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/same-sex-marriage-around-the-world-1.799137 |url-status=live |access-date=6 October 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101125125134/http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/05/26/f-same-sex-timeline.html |archive-date=25 November 2010}}</ref> Since then, same-sex marriage has been established by law in 34 other countries, including most of the [[Americas]] and [[Western Europe]]. Yet its spread has been uneven — [[Same-sex marriage in South Africa|South Africa]] is the only country in [[LGBT rights in Africa|Africa]] to take the step; [[Same-sex marriage in Taiwan|Taiwan]] and [[Same-sex marriage in Thailand|Thailand]] are the only ones in [[LGBT rights in Asia|Asia]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=28 April 2021 |title=The Dutch went first in 2001; who has same-sex marriage now? |url=https://apnews.com/article/europe-africa-netherlands-job-cohen-western-europe-e08b053af367028737c9c41c492cc568 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210821101311/https://apnews.com/article/europe-africa-netherlands-job-cohen-western-europe-e08b053af367028737c9c41c492cc568 |archive-date=21 August 2021 |access-date=21 August 2021 |website=[[Associated Press]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Sangwongwanich |first=Pathom |date=June 18, 2024 |title=Thai Same-Sex Marriage Bill Clears Final Hurdle With Senate Nod |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-06-18/thai-same-sex-marriage-bill-clears-final-hurdle-with-senate-nod?srnd=all |access-date=2024-06-18 |website=www.bloomberg.com}}</ref> |
|||
The first Roman emperor to have married a man was [[Nero]], who is reported to have married two other males on different occasions. The first was with one of Nero's own [[Freedman|freedmen]], [[Pythagoras (freedman)|Pythagoras]], with whom Nero took the role of the bride.<ref>Williams, CA., ''Roman Homosexuality: Second Edition'', Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 284.</ref> Later, as a groom, Nero married [[Sporus]], a young boy, to replace his wife [[Poppaea Sabina]] following her death,<ref name="dio-history-LXII-28">Nero missed her so greatly that, on learning of a woman who resembled her, he sent for her and kept her; but later he caused a boy of the freedmen, whom he used to call Sporus, ... "he formally "married" Sporus, and assigned the boy a regular dowry according to contract;" q.v., Suetonius ''Nero'' 28; Dio Cassius '' Epitome '' 62.28</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/62.html |title=Bill Thayer's Web Site |website=Penelope.uchicago.edu |access-date=7 July 2017}}</ref> and married him in a very public ceremony with all the solemnities of matrimony, after which Sporus was forced to pretend to be the female concubine that Nero had killed and act as though they were really married.<ref name="dio-history-LXII-28"/> A friend gave the "bride" away as required by law. The marriage was celebrated in both Greece and Rome in extravagant public ceremonies.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/62*.html |title=Cassius Dio — Epitome of Book 62 |website=Penelope.uchicago.edu |access-date=7 July 2017 |archive-date=11 October 2013 |archive-url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20131011215112/http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/62*.html |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
<!---Please add references in the main article before or after adding information to this table---> |
|||
==Timeline== |
|||
''Conubium'' existed only between a ''civis Romanus'' and a ''civis Romana'' (that is, between a male Roman citizen and a female Roman citizen), so that a marriage between two Roman males (or with a slave) would have no legal standing in Roman law (apart, presumably, from the arbitrary will of the emperor in the two aforementioned cases).<ref>Corbett, ''The Roman Law of Marriage'' (Oxford, 1969), pp. 24–28; Treggiari, ''Roman Marriage'' (Oxford, 1991), pp. 43–49.; "Marriages where the partners had ''conubium'' were marriages valid in Roman law (''iusta matrimonia'')" [Treggiari, p. 49]. Compare Ulpian (''Tituli Ulpiani'') 5.3–5: "''Conubium'' is the capacity to marry a wife in Roman law. Roman citizens have ''conubium'' with Roman citizens, but with Latins and foreigners only if the privilege was granted. There is no ''conubium'' with slaves"; compare also Gaius (''Institutionum'' 1:55–56, 67, 76–80).</ref> Furthermore, according to Susan Treggiari, "''matrimonium'' was then an institution involving a mother, ''mater''. The idea implicit in the word is that a man took a woman in marriage, ''in matrimonium ducere'', so that he might have children by her."<ref>Treggiari, ''Roman Marriage'' (Oxford, 1991), p. 5.</ref> |
|||
{{main|Timeline of same-sex marriage}} |
|||
The summary table below lists in chronological order the sovereign states (the [[United Nations member states]] and [[Taiwan]]) that have legalized same-sex marriage. As of 2024, 38 states have legalized in some capacity.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Theil |first1=Michele |title=This map shows you where same-sex marriage is legal around the world – and there's a long way to go |url=https://www.thepinknews.com/2024/02/16/this-map-shows-you-where-same-sex-marriage-is-legal-around-the-world-and-theres-a-long-way-to-go/ |website=PinkNews |date=16 February 2024 |access-date=16 February 2024}}</ref> |
|||
Dates are when marriages between same-sex couples began to be officially certified, or when local laws were passed if marriages were already legal under higher authority. |
|||
In 342 AD, Christian emperors [[Constantius II]] and [[Constans]] issued a law in the [[Theodosian Code]] (''C. Th.'' 9.7.3) prohibiting [[Homosexuality in ancient Rome|marriage between same-sex couples in Rome]] and ordering execution for those so married.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Kuefler|first=Mathew|year=2007|title=The Marriage Revolution in Late Antiquity: The Theodosian Code and Later Roman Marriage Law|journal=Journal of Family History|volume=32|pages=343–370|doi=10.1177/0363199007304424|issue=4|s2cid=143807895}}</ref> Professor Fontaine of Cornell University Classics Department has pointed out that there is no provision for marriage between same-sex couples in Roman Law, and the text from 342 CE is corrupt, "marries a woman" might be "goes to bed in a dishonorable manner with a man" as a condemnation of homosexual behavior between men.<ref>Eidolon, 2015, Michael Fontaine, Associate Professor of Classics and Assistant Dean, Cornell University "nubit…feminam" for "cubit...infamen," and the Law does not provide for it."</ref> The [[Boxer Codex]], dated 1590, records the normality and acceptance of same-sex marriage in the native cultures of the [[Philippines]] prior to colonization.<ref>George Bryan Souza. The Boxer Codex: Transcription and Translation of an Illustrated Late Sixteenth-Century Spanish Manuscript Concerning the Geography, History and ... (European Expansion and Indigenous Response) Annotated Edition. Brill; Annotated edition (November 20, 2015). [https://books.google.com/books?id=LF_UgEGu0dEC&pg=PA148#v=onepage&q&f=false 148] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814094110/https://books.google.com/books?id=LF_UgEGu0dEC&pg=PA148#v=onepage&q&f=false |date=14 August 2021 }}</ref> |
|||
===Contemporary=== |
|||
[[File:NewlyMarriedCoupleAtCourthouse.jpg|thumb|Newly married couple in [[Minnesota]] shortly after the legalization of [[same-sex marriage in the United States]]]] |
|||
Historians variously trace the beginning of the modern movement in support of same-sex marriage to anywhere from around the 1980s to the 1990s. In [[United States of America]] same-sex marriage became an official request of gay rights movement after the [[Second National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights]] in [[1987]].<ref>{{cite web|title=How Same-Sex Marriage Came to Be|url=http://harvardmagazine.com/2013/03/how-same-sex-marriage-came-to-be|website=[[Harvard Magazine]]|date=March–April 2013|access-date=28 March 2015|archive-date=2 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502173822/https://harvardmagazine.com/2013/03/how-same-sex-marriage-came-to-be|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=The secret history of same-sex marriage|url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/jan/23/-sp-secret-history-same-sex-marriage|work=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=26 July 2015|date=23 January 2015|archive-date=2 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502182628/https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/jan/23/-sp-secret-history-same-sex-marriage|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
In 1989, Denmark became the first country to legally recognize a relationship for same-sex couples, establishing [[registered partnership]]s, which gave those in same-sex relationships "most rights of married heterosexuals, but not the right to adopt or obtain joint custody of a child".<ref>{{cite news|last=Rule|first=Sheila|title=Rights for Gay Couples in Denmark|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/02/world/rights-for-gay-couples-in-denmark.html|access-date=19 August 2013|newspaper=New York Times|date=2 October 1989|archive-date=4 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304080523/http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/02/world/rights-for-gay-couples-in-denmark.html|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2001, the [[Same-sex marriage in the Netherlands|metropolitan Netherlands]] became the first country to broaden marriage laws to include same-sex couples after royal assent was given by [[Queen Beatrix]].<ref name="bloomberg-2014-12-04" /><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/same-sex-marriage-around-the-world-1.799137|title=Same-sex marriage around the world|work=CBC News|location=Toronto|date=26 May 2009|access-date=6 October 2009|archive-date=25 November 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101125125134/http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/05/26/f-same-sex-timeline.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Since then, same-sex marriage has been established by law in 28 other countries, including most of the [[Americas]] and [[Western Europe]]. Yet its spread has been uneven — [[Same-sex marriage in South Africa|South Africa]] is the only country in [[LGBT rights in Africa|Africa]] to take the step; [[Same-sex marriage in Taiwan|Taiwan]] is the only one in [[LGBT rights in Asia|Asia]].<ref>{{cite web|url = https://apnews.com/article/europe-africa-netherlands-job-cohen-western-europe-e08b053af367028737c9c41c492cc568|title = The Dutch went first in 2001; who has same-sex marriage now?|website = [[Associated Press]]|date = 28 April 2021|access-date = 21 August 2021|archive-date = 21 August 2021|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210821101311/https://apnews.com/article/europe-africa-netherlands-job-cohen-western-europe-e08b053af367028737c9c41c492cc568|url-status = live}}</ref> |
|||
===Timeline=== |
|||
{{main|Timeline of same-sex marriage}} |
|||
Dates are when marriages between same-sex couples began to be officially certified. Marriage between same-sex couples is still not performed locally in some polities that recognize it when performed in other jurisdictions (e.g. several Mexican states). |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 122: | Line 125: | ||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Iowa|Iowa]] (27 April) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Iowa|Iowa]] (27 April) |
||
* {{flagicon|Sweden}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Sweden|Sweden]]''' (1 May) |
* {{flagicon|Sweden}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Sweden|Sweden]]''' (1 May) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Coquille Indian Tribe|Coquille Indian Tribe]] (20 May) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Vermont|Vermont]] (1 September) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Vermont|Vermont]] (1 September) |
||
{{endflatlist}} |
{{endflatlist}} |
||
Line 131: | Line 134: | ||
* [[Same-sex marriage in the District of Columbia|District of Columbia]] (3 March) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in the District of Columbia|District of Columbia]] (3 March) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Mexico City|Mexican Federal District]] (4 March) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Mexico City|Mexican Federal District]] (4 March) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation|Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation]] (29 April) |
||
* {{flagicon|Portugal}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Portugal|Portugal]]''' (5 June) |
* {{flagicon|Portugal}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Portugal|Portugal]]''' (5 June) |
||
* {{flagicon|Iceland}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Iceland|Iceland]]''' (27 June) |
* {{flagicon|Iceland}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Iceland|Iceland]]''' (27 June) |
||
Line 140: | Line 143: | ||
|{{flatlist}} |
|{{flatlist}} |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in New York|New York]] (24 July) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in New York|New York]] (24 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Suquamish Tribe|Suquamish Tribe]] (1 August) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Alagoas|Alagoas]] (7 December) |
|||
{{endflatlist}} |
{{endflatlist}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
!2012 |
!2012 |
||
|{{flatlist}} |
|{{flatlist}} |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Alagoas|Alagoas]] (6 January) |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Quintana Roo|Quintana Roo]] (3 May) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Quintana Roo|Quintana Roo]] (3 May) |
||
* {{flagicon|Denmark}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Denmark|Denmark]]''' (15 June) |
* {{flagicon|Denmark}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Denmark|Denmark]]''' (15 June) |
||
Line 155: | Line 158: | ||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|Brazilian Federal District]] (1 December) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|Brazilian Federal District]] (1 December) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Washington state|Washington]] (6 December) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Washington state|Washington]] (6 December) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe|Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe]] (9 December) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|Piauí]] (15 December) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|Piauí]] (15 December) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Maine|Maine]] (29 December) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Maine|Maine]] (29 December) |
||
Line 165: | Line 168: | ||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|São Paulo]] (16 February) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|São Paulo]] (16 February) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|Ceará]] (15 March) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|Ceará]] (15 March) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians|Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians]] (15 March) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|Paraná]] (26 March) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|Paraná]] (26 March) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|Mato Grosso do Sul]] (2 April) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|Mato Grosso do Sul]] (2 April) |
||
Line 171: | Line 174: | ||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Santa Catarina|Santa Catarina]] (29 April) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Santa Catarina|Santa Catarina]] (29 April) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|Paraíba]] (29 April) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil#Statewide|Paraíba]] (29 April) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians|Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians]] (8 May) |
||
* {{flagicon|Brazil}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Brazil|Brazil]]''' [nationwide] (16 May) |
* {{flagicon|Brazil}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Brazil|Brazil]]''' [nationwide] (16 May) |
||
* {{flagicon|France}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in France|France]]''' (18 May) |
* {{flagicon|France}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in France|France]]''' (18 May) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel|Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel]] (24 June) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in California|California]] (28 June) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in California|California]] (28 June) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Delaware|Delaware]] (1 July) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Delaware|Delaware]] (1 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Minnesota|Minnesota]] (1 August) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Minnesota|Minnesota]] (1 August) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Rhode Island|Rhode Island]] (1 August) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Rhode Island|Rhode Island]] (1 August) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Grand Portage Band of Chippewa|Grand Portage Band of Chippewa]] (1 August) |
||
* {{flagicon|Uruguay}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Uruguay|Uruguay]]''' (5 August) |
* {{flagicon|Uruguay}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Uruguay|Uruguay]]''' (5 August) |
||
* {{flagicon|New Zealand}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in New Zealand|New Zealand]]''' (19 August) |
* {{flagicon|New Zealand}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in New Zealand|New Zealand]]''' (19 August) |
||
Line 189: | Line 192: | ||
* [[Taos County, New Mexico]] (28 August) |
* [[Taos County, New Mexico]] (28 August) |
||
* [[Los Alamos County, New Mexico]] (4 September) |
* [[Los Alamos County, New Mexico]] (4 September) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation|Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation]] (5 September) |
||
* [[Grant County, New Mexico]] (9 September) |
* [[Grant County, New Mexico]] (9 September) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes|Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes]] (18 October<!--3rd license since repeal of DOMA, first public marriage-->) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in New Jersey|New Jersey]] (21 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in New Jersey|New Jersey]] (21 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Blue Lake Rancheria|Blue Lake Rancheria]] (1 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe|Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe]] (15 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Hawaii|Hawaii]] (2 December) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Hawaii|Hawaii]] (2 December) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in New Mexico|New Mexico]] [statewide] (19 December) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in New Mexico|New Mexico]] [statewide] (19 December) |
||
Line 202: | Line 205: | ||
|{{flatlist}} |
|{{flatlist}} |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Illinois#Lawsuits|Cook County, Illinois]] (21 February) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Illinois#Lawsuits|Cook County, Illinois]] (21 February) |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} {{flagicon|Wales}} |
* {{flagicon|England}} {{flagicon|Wales}} [[Same-sex marriage in the United Kingdom|England and Wales]] (13 March) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands|South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands]] (13 March) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands|South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands]] (13 March) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Oregon|Oregon]] (19 May) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Oregon|Oregon]] (19 May) |
||
Line 209: | Line 212: | ||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Akrotiri and Dhekelia|Akrotiri and Dhekelia]] (3 June) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Akrotiri and Dhekelia|Akrotiri and Dhekelia]] (3 June) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in the British Indian Ocean Territory|British Indian Ocean Territory]] (3 June) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in the British Indian Ocean Territory|British Indian Ocean Territory]] (3 June) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Puyallup Tribe of Indians|Puyallup Tribe of Indians]] (9 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa|Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa]] (16 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians|Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians]] (10 August) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Coahuila|Coahuila]] (17 September) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Coahuila|Coahuila]] (17 September) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Oklahoma|Oklahoma]] (6 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Oklahoma|Oklahoma]] (6 October) |
||
Line 218: | Line 221: | ||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Indiana|Indiana]] (6 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Indiana|Indiana]] (6 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Wisconsin|Wisconsin]] (6 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Wisconsin|Wisconsin]] (6 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa|Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa]] (6 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Colorado|Colorado]] (7 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Colorado|Colorado]] (7 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in West Virginia|West Virginia]] (9 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in West Virginia|West Virginia]] (9 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Nevada|Nevada]] (9 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Nevada|Nevada]] (9 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Tribes|Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Tribes]] (9 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in North Carolina|North Carolina]] (10 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in North Carolina|North Carolina]] (10 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Alaska|Alaska]] (12 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Alaska|Alaska]] (12 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Idaho|Idaho]] (15 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Idaho|Idaho]] (15 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Arizona|Arizona]] (17 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Arizona|Arizona]] (17 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation|Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation]] (17 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Pascua Yaqui Tribe|Pascua Yaqui Tribe]] (17 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community|Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community]] (17 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#San Carlos Apache Tribe|San Carlos Apache Tribe]] (17 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Yavapai-Apache Nation|Yavapai-Apache Nation]] (17 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Wyoming|Wyoming]] (21 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Wyoming|Wyoming]] (21 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Missouri#State of Missouri v. Florida|St. Louis, Missouri]] (5 November) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Missouri#State of Missouri v. Florida|St. Louis, Missouri]] (5 November) |
||
Line 238: | Line 241: | ||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Kansas|Douglas County, Kansas]] (12 November) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Kansas|Douglas County, Kansas]] (12 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Kansas|Sedgwick County, Kansas]] (12 November) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Kansas|Sedgwick County, Kansas]] (12 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Eastern Shoshone Tribe|Eastern Shoshone Tribe]] (14 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Northern Arapaho Tribe|Northern Arapaho Tribe]] (14 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Montana|Montana]] (19 November) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Montana|Montana]] (19 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Blackfeet Nation|Blackfeet Nation]] (19 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in South Carolina|South Carolina]] (20 November) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in South Carolina|South Carolina]] (20 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Keweenaw Bay Indian Community|Keweenaw Bay Indian Community]] (13 December) |
||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} |
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Same-sex marriage in Scotland|Scotland]] (16 December) |
||
{{endflatlist}} |
{{endflatlist}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 252: | Line 255: | ||
* [[Pareto v. Ruvin|Miami-Dade County, Florida]] (5 January) |
* [[Pareto v. Ruvin|Miami-Dade County, Florida]] (5 January) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Florida|Florida]] [statewide] (6 January) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Florida|Florida]] [statewide] (6 January) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska|Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska]] (24 February) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in the Pitcairn Islands|Pitcairn Islands]] (14 May) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in the Pitcairn Islands|Pitcairn Islands]] (14 May) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians|Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians]] (15 May) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Guam|Guam]] (9 June) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Guam|Guam]] (9 June) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin|Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin]] (10 June) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Chihuahua|Chihuahua]] (12 June) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Chihuahua|Chihuahua]] (12 June) |
||
* {{flagicon|United States}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in the United States|United States]]''' [nationwide] (26 June) |
* {{flagicon|United States}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in the United States|United States]]''' [nationwide] (26 June) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in the Northern Mariana Islands|Northern Mariana Islands]] (30 June) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in the Northern Mariana Islands|Northern Mariana Islands]] (30 June) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians|Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians]] (7 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in the United States Virgin Islands|United States Virgin Islands]] (9 July) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in the United States Virgin Islands|United States Virgin Islands]] (9 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Puerto Rico|Puerto Rico]] (13 July) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Puerto Rico|Puerto Rico]] (13 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Mexico#Querétaro|Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro]] (21 July) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Mexico#Querétaro|Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro]] (21 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Hannahville Indian Community|Hannahville Indian Community]] (3 August) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#White Mountain Apache Tribe|White Mountain Apache Tribe]] (9 September) |
|||
* {{flagicon|Ireland}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in the Republic of Ireland|Ireland]]''' (16 November) |
* {{flagicon|Ireland}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in the Republic of Ireland|Ireland]]''' (16 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon|Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon]] (18 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Nayarit|Nayarit]] (23 December) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Nayarit|Nayarit]] (23 December) |
||
{{endflatlist}} |
{{endflatlist}} |
||
Line 272: | Line 276: | ||
!2016 |
!2016 |
||
|{{flatlist}} |
|{{flatlist}} |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Stockbridge-Munsee Community Band of Mohican Indians|Stockbridge-Munsee Community Band of Mohican Indians]] (2 February) |
||
* {{flagicon|Greenland}} [[Same-sex marriage in Greenland|Greenland]] (1 April) |
* {{flagicon|Greenland}} [[Same-sex marriage in Greenland|Greenland]] (1 April) |
||
* {{flagicon|Colombia}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Colombia|Colombia]]''' (28 April) |
* {{flagicon|Colombia}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Colombia|Colombia]]''' (28 April) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Tulalip Tribes of Washington|Tulalip Tribes of Washington]] (6 May) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Jalisco|Jalisco]] [statewide] (12 May) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Jalisco|Jalisco]] [statewide] (12 May) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Campeche|Campeche]] (20 May) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Campeche|Campeche]] (20 May) |
||
Line 284: | Line 288: | ||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Mexico#Puebla|San Pedro Cholula, Puebla]] (18 September) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Mexico#Puebla|San Pedro Cholula, Puebla]] (18 September) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in the British Antarctic Territory|British Antarctic Territory]] (13 October) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in the British Antarctic Territory|British Antarctic Territory]] (13 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin|Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin]] (3 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Cherokee Nation|Cherokee Nation]] (9 December) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Gibraltar|Gibraltar]] (15 December) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Gibraltar|Gibraltar]] (15 December) |
||
{{endflatlist}} |
{{endflatlist}} |
||
Line 301: | Line 305: | ||
<!-- *** Please check discussion on talk page before adding Slovenia! *** --> |
<!-- *** Please check discussion on talk page before adding Slovenia! *** --> |
||
* {{flagicon|Finland}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Finland|Finland]]''' (1 March) |
* {{flagicon|Finland}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Finland|Finland]]''' (1 March) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Osage Nation|Osage Nation]] (20 March) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Prairie Island Indian Community|Prairie Island Indian Community]] (22 March) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in the Falkland Islands|Falkland Islands]] (29 April) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in the Falkland Islands|Falkland Islands]] (29 April) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Guernsey|Guernsey]] (2 May) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Guernsey|Guernsey]] (2 May) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Bermuda|Bermuda]] (5 May, repealed 1 June 2018) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Bermuda|Bermuda]] (5 May, repealed 1 June 2018) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin|Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin]] (5 June) |
||
* {{flagicon|Faroe Islands}} [[Same-sex marriage in the Faroe Islands|Faroe Islands]] (1 July) |
* {{flagicon|Faroe Islands}} [[Same-sex marriage in the Faroe Islands|Faroe Islands]] (1 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha#Tristan da Cunha|Tristan da Cunha]] (4 August) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha#Tristan da Cunha|Tristan da Cunha]] (4 August) |
||
* {{flagicon|Malta}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Malta|Malta]]''' (1 September) |
* {{flagicon|Malta}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Malta|Malta]]''' (1 September) |
||
* {{flagicon|Germany}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Germany|Germany]]''' (1 October) |
* {{flagicon|Germany}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Germany|Germany]]''' (1 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Ak-Chin Indian Community|Ak-Chin Indian Community]] (25 October) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Baja California|Baja California]] (3 November) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Baja California|Baja California]] (3 November) |
||
* {{flagicon|Australia}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Australia|Australia]]''' (9 December) |
* {{flagicon|Australia}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Australia|Australia]]''' (9 December) |
||
Line 324: | Line 328: | ||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Jersey|Jersey]] (1 July) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Jersey|Jersey]] (1 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Oaxaca|Oaxaca]] (26 August) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Oaxaca|Oaxaca]] (26 August) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Ponca Tribe of Nebraska|Ponca Tribe of Nebraska]] (27 August) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Bermuda|Bermuda]] (23 November, repealed 14 March 2022) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Bermuda|Bermuda]] (23 November, repealed 14 March 2022) |
||
{{endflatlist}} |
{{endflatlist}} |
||
Line 341: | Line 345: | ||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Zacatecas|Miguel Auza, Zacatecas]] (by 5 July) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Zacatecas|Miguel Auza, Zacatecas]] (by 5 July) |
||
* {{flagicon|Ecuador}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Ecuador|Ecuador]]''' (8 July) |
* {{flagicon|Ecuador}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Ecuador|Ecuador]]''' (8 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Oglala Sioux Tribe|Oglala Sioux Tribe]] (8 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Bay Mills Indian Community|Bay Mills Indian Community]] (8 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Colorado River Indian Tribes|Colorado River Indian Tribes]] (8 August) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Aguascalientes|Aguascalientes]] (16 August) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Aguascalientes|Aguascalientes]] (16 August) |
||
{{endflatlist}} |
{{endflatlist}} |
||
Line 353: | Line 357: | ||
* {{flagicon|Costa Rica}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Costa Rica|Costa Rica]]''' (26 May) |
* {{flagicon|Costa Rica}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Costa Rica|Costa Rica]]''' (26 May) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Zacatecas|Fresnillo, Zacatecas]] (3 July) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Zacatecas|Fresnillo, Zacatecas]] (3 July) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage |
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians of North Dakota|Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians]] (6 August) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Tlaxcala|Tlaxcala]] (25 December) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Tlaxcala|Tlaxcala]] (25 December) |
||
{{endflatlist}} |
{{endflatlist}} |
||
Line 363: | Line 367: | ||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Querétaro|Querétaro]] [statewide] (13 November) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Querétaro|Querétaro]] [statewide] (13 November) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Guanajuato|Guanajuato]] (20 December) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Guanajuato|Guanajuato]] (20 December) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Zacatecas|Zacatecas]] [statewide] (30 December) |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Zacatecas|Zacatecas]] [statewide] (30 December) <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.congresozac.gob.mx/coz/images/uploads/20220112131924.pdf |title=Archived copy |website=www.congresozac.gob.mx |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220114195358/https://www.congresozac.gob.mx/coz/images/uploads/20220112131924.pdf |archive-date=14 January 2022 |url-status=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.congresozac.gob.mx/63/ley&cual=104 |title=Archived copy |website=www.congresozac.gob.mx |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220114195321/https://www.congresozac.gob.mx/63/ley%26cual%3D104 |archive-date=14 January 2022 |url-status=}}</ref> |
|||
{{endflatlist}} |
{{endflatlist}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 370: | Line 373: | ||
|{{flatlist}} |
|{{flatlist}} |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Yucatán|Yucatán]] (4 March) |
* [[Same-sex marriage in Yucatán|Yucatán]] (4 March) |
||
* {{flagicon|Chile}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Chile|Chile]]''' (10 March) |
* {{flagicon|Chile}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Chile|Chile]]''' (10 March) |
||
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska|Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska]] (11 April) |
|||
* {{flagicon|Switzerland}} '''''[[Same-sex marriage in Switzerland|Switzerland]]''' (1 July)'' |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Chickasaw Nation|Chickasaw Nation]] (18 April) |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians|Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians]] (25 May) |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Veracruz|Veracruz]] (13 June) |
|||
* {{flagicon|Switzerland}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Switzerland|Switzerland]]''' (1 July) |
|||
* {{flagicon|Slovenia}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Slovenia|Slovenia]]''' (8 or 9 July) |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Durango|Durango]] (19 September) |
|||
* {{flagicon|Cuba}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Cuba|Cuba]]''' (27 September) |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Tabasco|Tabasco]] (27 October) |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in the State of Mexico|State of Mexico]] (2 November) |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Tamaulipas|Tamaulipas]] (19 November) |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe|Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe]] (21 December) |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in Guerrero|Guerrero]] [statewide; final jurisdiction in {{flagicon|Mexico}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Mexico|Mexico]]'''] (31 December) |
|||
{{endflatlist}} |
|||
|- |
|||
!2023 |
|||
|{{flatlist}} |
|||
* {{flagicon|Andorra}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Andorra|Andorra]]''' (17 February) |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi|Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi]] (16 March) |
|||
* [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States#Choctaw Nation|Choctaw Nation]] (23 May) |
|||
{{endflatlist}} |
|||
|- |
|||
!2024 |
|||
|{{flatlist}} |
|||
* {{flagicon|Estonia}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Estonia|Estonia]]''' (1 January) |
|||
* {{flagicon|Greece}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Greece|Greece]]''' (16 February) |
|||
* {{flagicon|Aruba}} [[Same-sex marriage in Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten|Aruba]] (12 July) |
|||
* {{flagicon|Curacao}} [[Same-sex marriage in Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten|Curaçao]] (12 July) |
|||
{{endflatlist}} |
|||
|- |
|||
!''2025'' |
|||
|{{flatlist}} |
|||
* ''{{flagicon|Liechtenstein}} '''[[Same-sex marriage in Liechtenstein|Liechtenstein]]''' (1 January)'' |
|||
* ''{{Flagicon|Thailand}} '''[[Recognition of same-sex unions in Thailand|Thailand]]''' (22 or 23 January)'' |
|||
{{endflatlist}} |
{{endflatlist}} |
||
<!-- |- |
|||
!Pending |
|||
| --> |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
==Same-sex marriage around the world== |
==Same-sex marriage around the world== |
||
{{Main|Legal status of same-sex marriage|Same-sex union legislation|Recognition of same-sex unions by country }} |
{{Main|Legal status of same-sex marriage|Same-sex union legislation|Recognition of same-sex unions by country }} |
||
Note: for this section, "same-sex marriage" means marriage specifically between couples of the same sex. |
|||
Same-sex marriage is legally performed and recognized |
Same-sex marriage is legally performed and recognized in 36 countries: [[Same-sex marriage in Andorra|Andorra]], [[Same-sex marriage in Argentina|Argentina]], [[Same-sex marriage in Australia|Australia]],{{efn|name=australia|text=Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in continental Australia and in the non-self-governing possessions of [[Norfolk Island]], [[Christmas Island]] and the [[Cocos Islands]], which follow Australian law.}} [[Same-sex marriage in Austria|Austria]], [[Same-sex marriage in Belgium|Belgium]], [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil|Brazil]], [[Same-sex marriage in Canada|Canada]], [[Same-sex marriage in Chile|Chile]], [[Same-sex marriage in Colombia|Colombia]], [[Same-sex marriage in Costa Rica|Costa Rica]], [[Same-sex marriage in Cuba|Cuba]], [[Same-sex marriage in Denmark|Denmark]],{{efn|name=denmark|text=Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in continental Denmark, the [[Same-sex marriage in the Faroe Islands|Faroe Islands]] and [[Same-sex marriage in Greenland|Greenland]], which together make up the [[Realm of Denmark]].}} [[Same-sex marriage in Ecuador|Ecuador]],{{efn|name=ecuador|text=Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized throughout Ecuador, but such couples are not considered married for purposes of adoption and may not adopt children.}} [[Same-sex marriage in Estonia|Estonia]], [[Same-sex marriage in Finland|Finland]], [[Same-sex marriage in France|France]],{{efn|name=france|text=Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in metropolitan France and in all [[Overseas France|French overseas regions and possessions]], which follow a single legal code.}} [[Same-sex marriage in Germany|Germany]], [[Same-sex marriage in Greece|Greece]], [[Same-sex marriage in Iceland|Iceland]], [[Same-sex marriage in the Republic of Ireland|Ireland]], [[Same-sex marriage in Luxembourg|Luxembourg]], [[Same-sex marriage in Malta|Malta]], [[Same-sex marriage in Mexico|Mexico]],{{efn|name=mexico|text=Same-sex marriage is available in all jurisdictions, though the process is not everywhere as straightforward as it is for opposite-sex marriage and does not always include adoption rights.}} the [[Same-sex marriage in the Netherlands|Netherlands]],{{efn|name=netherlands|text=Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in [[Same-sex marriage in the Netherlands|the continental Netherlands]], the Caribbean municipalities of [[Same-sex marriage in Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba|Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba]], and the constituent countries of [[Same-sex marriage in Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten|Aruba and Curaçao]], but not yet in Sint Maarten.}} [[Same-sex marriage in New Zealand|New Zealand]],{{efn|name=nz|text=Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in [[New Zealand|New Zealand proper]], but not in its possession of [[LGBT rights in Tokelau|Tokelau]], nor in the [[LGBT rights in the Cook Islands|Cook Islands]] and [[LGBT rights in Niue|Niue]], which make up the [[Realm of New Zealand]].}} [[Same-sex marriage in Norway|Norway]], [[Same-sex marriage in Portugal|Portugal]], [[Same-sex marriage in Slovenia|Slovenia]], [[Same-sex marriage in South Africa|South Africa]], [[Same-sex marriage in Spain|Spain]], [[Same-sex marriage in Sweden|Sweden]], [[Same-sex marriage in Switzerland|Switzerland]], [[Same-sex marriage in Taiwan|Taiwan]], the [[Same-sex marriage in the United Kingdom|United Kingdom]],{{efn|name=uk|text= Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in all parts of the United Kingdom and in [[Recognition of same-sex unions in the British Overseas Territories|its non-Caribbean possessions]], but not in its Caribbean possessions, namely [[LGBT rights in Anguilla|Anguilla]], [[LGBT rights in Bermuda|Bermuda]], the [[LGBT rights in the British Virgin Islands|British Virgin Islands]], the [[LGBT rights in the Cayman Islands|Cayman Islands]], [[LGBT rights in Montserrat|Montserrat]] and the [[LGBT rights in the Turks and Caicos Islands|Turks and Caicos Islands]].}} the [[Same-sex marriage in the United States|United States]],{{efn|name=usa|text=Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in all [[Same-sex marriage law in the United States by state|fifty states]] of the US and in the [[Same-sex marriage in the District of Columbia|District of Columbia]], in all overseas territories except [[Same-sex marriage in American Samoa|American Samoa]] (recognition only), and in all [[Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States|tribal nations]] that do not have their own marriage laws, as well as in most nations that do. The largest of the dozen or so known exceptions among the federal reservations are [[LGBT rights in the Navajo Nation|Navajo]] and [[Gila River Indian Community|Gila River]], and the largest among the shared-sovereignty Oklahoma Tribal Statistical Areas are the [[Creek Nation|Creek]] and [[Citizen Potawatomi]]. These polities ban same-sex marriage and do not recognize marriages from other jurisdictions, though members may still marry under state law and be accorded all the rights of marriage under state and federal law.}} and [[Same-sex marriage in Uruguay|Uruguay]].<ref name="HRC">{{cite web |title=Marriage Equality Around the World |url=https://www.hrc.org/resources/marriage-equality-around-the-world |website=[[Human Rights Campaign]] |access-date=3 February 2024}}</ref> Same-sex marriage performed remotely or abroad is recognized with full marital rights by [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Israel|Israel]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2018 |title=Information for couples marrying outside the Rabbinate |url=http://rackmancenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Marriage-Outside-the-Rabbinate-Halperin-Kaddari-et-al-Rackman-Study-2018.pdf |access-date=November 10, 2023 |website=Rackman Center}}</ref> |
||
[[File:World marriage-equality laws |
[[File:World marriage-equality laws.svg|thumb|center|upright=3| |
||
{{legend|#025|Marriage open to same-sex couples (rings: individual cases)}} |
{{legend|#025|Marriage open to same-sex couples (rings: individual cases)}} |
||
{{legend|#90C|Same-sex marriage recognized with full rights when performed remotely or abroad}} |
|||
{{legend|#06F|Civil unions or domestic partnerships}} |
|||
{{legend|#71C837|Legislation or binding domestic court ruling establishing same-sex marriage, but marriage is not yet provided for}} |
{{legend|#71C837|Legislation or binding domestic court ruling establishing same-sex marriage, but marriage is not yet provided for}} |
||
{{legend|#06F|Civil unions or domestic partnerships}} |
|||
{{legend|#90C|Same-sex marriage recognized with full rights when performed in certain other jurisdictions}} |
|||
{{legend|#9CF| |
{{legend|#9CF|Unregistered cohabitation or legal guardianship}} |
||
{{legend striped|#9CF|#EEE| |
{{legend striped|#9CF|#EEE|Nonbinding certification|up=yes}} |
||
{{legend|#CAF|Limited recognition of marriage performed in certain other jurisdictions (residency rights for spouses)}} |
{{legend|#CAF|Limited recognition of marriage performed in certain other jurisdictions (residency rights for spouses)}} |
||
{{legend|#C6E9AF|Country subject to an international court ruling to recognize same-sex marriage}} |
{{legend|#C6E9AF|Country subject to an international court ruling to recognize same-sex marriage}} |
||
{{legend|#EEE| |
{{legend|#EEE|No legal recognition of same-sex unions}} |
||
]] |
]] |
||
Same-sex marriage is under [[Same-sex union legislation|consideration by the legislature]] or the courts in [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Andorra|Andorra]],<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lgbt-rights-civilliberties-factbox/factbox-andorra-set-to-become-latest-nation-to-legalize-gay-marriage-idUSKBN21A3AL |title=Factbox: Andorra set to become latest nation to legalize gay marriage |website=[[Reuters]] |access-date=24 July 2020 |archive-date=24 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200724122205/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lgbt-rights-civilliberties-factbox/factbox-andorra-set-to-become-latest-nation-to-legalize-gay-marriage-idUSKBN21A3AL |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Cuba|Cuba]],<ref>[https://cadenanoticias.com/internacional/2021/12/congreso-de-cuba-aprueba-matrimonio-igualitario-pasa-a-consulta-popuar Congreso de Cuba aprueba matrimonio igualitario; pasa a consulta popuar] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211222074922/https://cadenanoticias.com/internacional/2021/12/congreso-de-cuba-aprueba-matrimonio-igualitario-pasa-a-consulta-popuar |date=22 December 2021 }}, 21 Diciembre de 2021</ref> [[Same-sex marriage in Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten|Curaçao]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thedailyherald.sx/islands/exclusion-of-same-sex-marriage-violates-the-principle-of-equality|title='Exclusion of same-sex marriage violates the principle of equality'|access-date=16 September 2021|archive-date=16 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210916045011/https://www.thedailyherald.sx/islands/exclusion-of-same-sex-marriage-violates-the-principle-of-equality|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Recognition of same-sex unions in the Czech Republic|the Czech Republic]],<ref>{{cite news |title=Czech lawmakers give nod to same-sex marriage, final vote uncertain |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/czech-lawmakers-give-nod-same-sex-marriage-final-vote-uncertain-2021-04-29/ |access-date=16 September 2021 |work=Reuters |date=29 April 2021 |language=en |archive-date=13 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210813000144/https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/czech-lawmakers-give-nod-same-sex-marriage-final-vote-uncertain-2021-04-29/ |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Recognition of same-sex unions in India|India]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-04-02 |title=NCP’s Supriya Sule brings Bill to legalise same-sex marriage |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ncps-supriya-sule-brings-bill-to-legalise-same-sex-marriage-7848768/ |access-date=2022-04-02 |website=The Indian Express |language=en}}</ref> [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Japan|Japan]],<ref>{{cite news|url = https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-03/japan-opposition-parties-submit-bill-to-allow-same-sex-marriage|title = Japan Opposition Parties Submit Same-Sex Marriage Bill|newspaper = Bloomberg.com|date = 3 June 2019|access-date = 24 July 2020|archive-date = 13 June 2019|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190613165252/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-03/japan-opposition-parties-submit-bill-to-allow-same-sex-marriage|url-status = live}}</ref> [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Liechtenstein|Liechtenstein]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.volksblatt.li/nachrichten/Liechtenstein/Politik/vb/288858/ehe-fur-alle-breite-zustimmung-jedoch-nicht-ohne-offentliche-diskussion|title="Ehe für alle": Breite Zustimmung, jedoch nicht ohne öffentliche Diskussion - Liechtenstein - Liechtensteiner Volksblatt, die Tageszeitung für Liechtenstein|access-date=1 October 2021|archive-date=30 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210930052802/https://www.volksblatt.li/nachrichten/Liechtenstein/Politik/vb/288858/ehe-fur-alle-breite-zustimmung-jedoch-nicht-ohne-offentliche-diskussion|url-status=live}}</ref> various states in Mexico (e.g. Durango,<ref>{{cite web|url = https://notigram.com/durango/local/proyectan-votacion-de-matrimonio-lgbt-antes-de-finalizar-ano-prd-20210924-621928|title = Proyectan votación de Matrimonio LGBT antes de finalizar el año: PRD|date = 24 September 2021|access-date = 25 September 2021|archive-date = 25 September 2021|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210925224132/https://notigram.com/durango/local/proyectan-votacion-de-matrimonio-lgbt-antes-de-finalizar-ano-prd-20210924-621928|url-status = live}}</ref> Tamaulipas and Veracruz), the [[LGBT rights in the Navajo Nation|Navajo Nation]],<ref>[https://www.daily-times.com/story/news/local/navajo-nation/2022/03/23/delegates-sponsor-bill-legalize-same-sex-marriage-navajo-nation/7135151001/]</ref> and [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Peru|Peru]].<ref>{{cite tweet|number=1451690595731316738|user=larepublica_pe|title=Presentan proyecto de ley para el matrimonio igualitario ante el CongresoLa norma implica la modificatoria del ar…|date=22 October 2021}}</ref> [[Civil union]]s, as a first step toward marriage, have been considered in a number of countries, including [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Thailand|Thailand]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://prachatai.com/english/node/8634|title=Marriage law amendments now up for public consultation|access-date=24 July 2020|archive-date=6 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806235135/https://prachatai.com/english/node/8634|url-status=live}}</ref> and [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Barbados|Barbados]] since 2020, [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Serbia|Serbia]] since 2021<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210208080841/http://javnerasprave.euprava.gov.rs/javna-rasprava/257 Јавне консултације за израду текста Нацрта закона о истополним заједницама]</ref> and [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Latvia|Latvia]] since 2022. |
|||
Same-sex marriage will begin to be performed by [[Same-sex marriage in Liechtenstein|Liechtenstein]] and [[Same-sex marriage in Thailand|Thailand]] in January 2025, and is under [[Same-sex union legislation|consideration by the legislature]] or the courts in [[Recognition of same-sex unions in El Salvador|El Salvador]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.elsalvador.com/noticias/nacional/sala-de-lo-constitucional-resolveria-demanda-sobre-matrimonio-igualitario-en-los-primeros-tres-meses-de-2020/674550/2020/|title=Sala de lo Constitucional resolvería demanda sobre matrimonio igualitario en los primeros tres messes de 2020|work=elsalvador.com|date=6 January 2020|language=es}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= https://observador.cr/bukele-busca-que-se-apruebe-el-aborto-terapeutico-y-la-union-homosexual/|title= Bukele busca que se apruebe el aborto terapéutico y la unión homosexual|work=El Observador|date=18 August 2021|language=es}}</ref> [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Italy|Italy]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://tg.la7.it/politica/diritti-matrimonio-egualitario-opinioni-a-confronto-scalfarotto-vs-bonaldi-vs-centinaio-09-03-2023-180977|title=Diritti: matrimonio "egualitario". Opinioni a confronto: Scalfarotto vs Bonaldi vs Centinaio|date=9 March 2023|access-date=10 March 2023|archive-date=10 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230310113805/https://tg.la7.it/politica/diritti-matrimonio-egualitario-opinioni-a-confronto-scalfarotto-vs-bonaldi-vs-centinaio-09-03-2023-180977|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.corriere.it/politica/23_marzo_10/da-zaia-centinaio-cosi-lega-cambia-diritti-lgbt-perche-pesa-l-effetto-francesca-a2e451f8-bf1b-11ed-a204-070182f2d425.shtml|title=Da Zaia a Centinaio: la Lega ora cambia sui diritti lgbt (e c'entra "l'effetto Francesca")|date=10 March 2023|access-date=10 March 2023|archive-date=10 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230310104916/https://www.corriere.it/politica/23_marzo_10/da-zaia-centinaio-cosi-lega-cambia-diritti-lgbt-perche-pesa-l-effetto-francesca-a2e451f8-bf1b-11ed-a204-070182f2d425.shtml|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Japan|Japan]],<ref>{{cite web |title=Japan opposition party submits bill for same-sex marriage |url=https://english.kyodonews.net/news/2023/03/61f05630333c-japan-opposition-party-submits-bill-for-same-sex-marriage.html|publisher=[[Kyodo News]]|date=6 March 2023|accessdate=31 May 2023}}</ref> [[Same-sex marriage in Nepal|Nepal]],{{efn|name=nepal|text=Nepal is waiting for a final decision by its supreme court, but meanwhile all local governments are ordered to temporarily register same-sex marriages in a separate record. In April 2024 the National ID and Civil Registration Department issued a circular to all local governments that they register such marriages. However, simply being registered does not grant same-sex couples the legal rights of marriage, and registered same-sex couples cannot inherit property, get tax subsidies, make spousal medical decisions, adopt children etc.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dw.com/en/nepal-same-sex-couples-face-hurdles-on-road-to-recognition/a-69620274|title=Nepal: Same-sex couples face hurdles on road to recognition|work=DW|date=2024-07-10|first=Swechhya|last=Raut}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://kathmandupost.com/national/2023/12/03/how-court-laid-the-ground-for-same-sex-marriage-in-nepal|title=How court laid the ground for same-sex marriage in Nepal|first=Binod|last=Ghimire|date=2023-12-03|work=The Kathmandu Post}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.apcom.org/long-road-lasting-marriage-equality-nepal/|title=The Long Road to Lasting Marriage Equality in Nepal|work=APCOM|first=Manisha|last=Dhakal}}</ref>}} and [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Venezuela|Venezuela]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=24 February 2022 |title=Diputada plantea iniciativa para el matrimonio civil igualitario en la Asamblea Nacional |url=https://elacarigueno.com/ini/diputada-plantea-iniciativa-para-el-matrimonio-civil-igualitario-en-la-asamblea-nacional/ |website=El Acarigueño |language=es |access-date=17 April 2022 |archive-date=20 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220520104213/https://elacarigueno.com/ini/diputada-plantea-iniciativa-para-el-matrimonio-civil-igualitario-en-la-asamblea-nacional/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
|||
On 12 March 2015, the [[European Parliament]] passed a non-binding resolution encouraging EU institutions and member states to "[reflect] on the recognition of same-sex marriage or same-sex civil union as a political, social and human and civil rights issue".<ref>{{cite web|title=UKIP and Tories abstain on EU motion to recognise same-sex marriage|url=http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/03/13/ukip-and-tories-abstain-on-eu-motion-to-recognise-same-sex-marriage/|access-date=26 July 2015|website=PinkNews|date=13 March 2015|archive-date=9 August 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150809064225/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/03/13/ukip-and-tories-abstain-on-eu-motion-to-recognise-same-sex-marriage/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Texts adopted - Thursday, 12 March 2015 - Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2013 and the EU policy on the matter - P8_TA-PROV(2015)0076|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2015-0076+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN|access-date=26 July 2015|archive-date=7 August 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150807122729/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FTEXT+TA+P8-TA-2015-0076+0+DOC+XML+V0%2F%2FEN&language=EN|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2013 and the EU policy on the matter|url=http://www.votewatch.eu/en/term8-annual-report-on-human-rights-and-democracy-in-the-world-2013-and-the-eu-policy-on-the-matter-motion-8.html|access-date=26 July 2015|archive-date=8 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150508143007/http://www.votewatch.eu/en/term8-annual-report-on-human-rights-and-democracy-in-the-world-2013-and-the-eu-policy-on-the-matter-motion-8.html|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2018, the [[Inter-American Court of Human Rights]] ruled that all signatory countries must allow same-sex marriage. |
|||
[[Civil union]]s are being considered in a number of countries, including [[LGBT rights in Kosovo|Kosovo]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/kosovo-promises-to-introduce-same-sex-unions-in-may/|title=Kosovo promises to introduce same-sex unions in May|first1=Alice|last1=Taylor|first2=Nick|last2=Alipour|date=26 April 2024|website=www.euractiv.com}}</ref> [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Lithuania|Lithuania]],<ref>{{Cite web |title=Lithuanian MPs propose civil union as compromise on same-sex partnership |url=https://www.baltictimes.com/lithuanian_mps_propose_civil_union_as_compromise_on_same-sex_partnership/ |access-date=2022-05-23 |website=www.baltictimes.com}}</ref> [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Peru|Peru]],<ref>{{Cite news |date=23 October 2021 |title=Presentan proyecto de ley sobre el matrimonio igualitario entre personas del mismo sexo |newspaper=El Comercio |url=https://elcomercio.pe/politica/congreso/congreso-de-la-republica-presentan-proyecto-de-ley-sobre-el-matrimonio-igualitario-entre-personas-del-mismo-sexo-juntos-por-el-peru-somos-peru-partido-morado-nndc-noticia/?ref=ecr |access-date=2022-06-28 |publisher=elcomercio.pe}}</ref> [[Recognition of same-sex unions in the Philippines|the Philippines]],<ref>{{Cite web|title=Padilla wants same-sex unions institutionalized |url=https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/841251/padilla-wants-same-sex-unions-institutionalized/story/ |first=Hana|last=Bordey|website=GMA News Online|date=11 August 2022}}</ref> [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Poland|Poland]],<ref>[https://www.firstpost.com/world/poland-introduces-bill-to-legalise-same-sex-civil-unions-13826932.html]</ref> and [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Ukraine|Ukraine]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kholodnova |first=Anna |date=2 August 2022 |title=Zelensky responded to the petition on the legalization of same-sex marriages in Ukraine. |url=https://babel.ua/en/news/82388-zelensky-responded-to-the-petition-on-the-legalization-of-same-sex-marriages-in-ukraine |website=Бабель}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Lavers |first=Michael K. |date=2023-03-07 |title=Ukrainian MP introduces bill to legally recognize same-sex couples |url=https://www.washingtonblade.com/2023/03/07/ukrainian-mp-introduces-bill-to-legally-recognize-same-sex-couples/,%20https://www.washingtonblade.com/2023/03/07/ukrainian-mp-introduces-bill-to-legally-recognize-same-sex-couples/ |access-date=2023-03-08 |website=www.washingtonblade.com |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
On 12 March 2015, the [[European Parliament]] passed a non-binding resolution encouraging EU institutions and member states to "[reflect] on the recognition of same-sex marriage or same-sex civil union as a political, social and human and civil rights issue".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Duffy |first=Nick |date=13 March 2015 |title=UKIP and Tories abstain on EU motion to recognise same-sex marriage |url=http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/03/13/ukip-and-tories-abstain-on-eu-motion-to-recognise-same-sex-marriage/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150809064225/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/03/13/ukip-and-tories-abstain-on-eu-motion-to-recognise-same-sex-marriage/ |archive-date=9 August 2015 |access-date=26 July 2015 |website=PinkNews}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Texts adopted – Thursday, 12 March 2015 – Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2013 and the EU policy on the matter |url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2015-0076+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150807122729/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FTEXT+TA+P8-TA-2015-0076+0+DOC+XML+V0%2F%2FEN&language=EN |archive-date=7 August 2015 |access-date=26 July 2015 |publisher=European Parliament}}</ref> |
|||
In response to the international spread of same-sex marriage, a number of countries have enacted preventative [[Same-sex union legislation#Bans|constitutional bans]], with the most recent being [[ |
In response to the international spread of same-sex marriage, a number of countries have enacted preventative [[Same-sex union legislation#Bans|constitutional bans]], with the most recent being [[LGBTQ rights in Mali|Mali]] and [[LGBT rights in Tuvalu|Tuvalu]] in 2023, and [[2024 Gabonese constitutional referendum|Gabon]] in 2024. In other countries, such restrictions and limitations are effected through legislation. Even before same-sex marriage was first legislated, some countries had constitutions that specified that marriage was between a man and a woman. |
||
[[File:Constitutional bans on same-sex unions by country.svg|thumb|center| |
[[File:Constitutional bans on same-sex unions by country.svg|thumb|center|upright=3| |
||
{{legend|#D40000|Same-sex marriage [[Same-sex union legislation#Bans|banned]] by secular constitution}} |
{{legend|#D40000|Same-sex marriage [[Same-sex union legislation#Bans|banned]] by secular constitution}} |
||
{{legend|#800000|Same-sex marriage banned by constitutionally mandated |
{{legend|#800000|Same-sex marriage banned by constitutionally mandated religious law}} |
||
{{legend striped|#800000|#DCDCDC|Same-sex marriage banned for Muslims|up=yes}} |
|||
{{legend|#CCCCCC|No constitutional ban}} |
{{legend|#CCCCCC|No constitutional ban}} |
||
]] |
]] |
||
Line 411: | Line 445: | ||
==== European Court of Human Rights ==== |
==== European Court of Human Rights ==== |
||
In 2010, the [[European Court of Human Rights]] (ECHR) ruled in ''[[Schalk and Kopf v Austria]]'', a case involving an Austrian same-sex couple who were denied the right to marry.<ref name="CASE OF SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA">{{ |
In 2010, the [[European Court of Human Rights]] (ECHR) ruled in ''[[Schalk and Kopf v Austria]]'', a case involving an Austrian same-sex couple who were denied the right to marry.<ref name="CASE OF SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA">{{Cite web |title=HUDOC – European Court of Human Rights |url=http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-99605 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150911221342/http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-99605 |archive-date=11 September 2015 |access-date=26 July 2015}}</ref> The court found, by a vote of 4 to 3, that their human rights had not been violated.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Buyse |first=Antoine |date=24 June 2010 |title=Strasbourg court rules that states are not obliged to allow gay marriage |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/law/2010/jun/24/european-court-of-human-rights-civil-partnerships |url-status=live |access-date=8 November 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131213205714/http://www.theguardian.com/law/2010/jun/24/european-court-of-human-rights-civil-partnerships |archive-date=13 December 2013}}</ref> The court further stated that same-sex unions are not protected under art. 12 of ECHR ("Right to marry"), which exclusively protects the right to marry of opposite-sex couples (without regard if the sex of the partners is the result of birth or of sex change), but they are protected under art. 8 of ECHR ("Right to respect for private and family life") and art. 14 ("Prohibition of discrimination").<ref>{{Cite book |last=Avram |first=Marieta |title=Drept civil Familia |date=2016 |publisher=Editura Hamangiu |isbn=978-606-27-0609-8 |location=Bucharest |language=Romanian |trans-title=Civil law Family}}</ref> |
||
{{blockquote|text=The Court acknowledged that a number of Contracting States had extended marriage to same-sex partners, but went on to say that this reflected their own vision of the role of marriage in their societies and did not flow from an interpretation of the fundamental right as laid down by the Contracting States in the Convention in 1950. The Court concluded that it fell within the State’s margin of appreciation as to how to regulate the effects of the change of gender on pre-existing marriages.|author=European Court of Human Rights, Schalk and Kopf v Austria<ref name="CASE OF SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA"/>}} |
|||
[[Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights]] states that: "Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family, according to the national laws governing the exercise of this right",<ref>{{Cite web |title=European Convention on Human Rights |url=http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140703060501/http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf |archive-date=3 July 2014 |access-date=25 July 2015 |website=ECHR.coe.int |publisher=European Court of Human Rights}}</ref> not limiting marriage to those in a heterosexual relationship. However, the ECHR stated in ''Schalk and Kopf v Austria'' that this provision was intended to limit marriage to heterosexual relationships, as it used the term "men and women" instead of "everyone".<ref name="CASE OF SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA" /> Nevertheless, the court accepted and is considering cases concerning same-sex marriage recognition, e.g. ''Andersen v Poland''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-218104 |website=ECHR |access-date=21 July 2022 |language=English|title=HUDOC - European Court of Human Rights }}</ref> In 2021, the court ruled in ''[[Fedotova and Others v. Russia]]''—followed by later judgements concerning other member states—that countries must provide some sort of legal recognition to same-sex couples, although not necessarily marriage.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Palazzo |first1=Nausica |title=Fedotova and Others v. Russia : Dawn of a new era for European LGBTQ families? |journal=Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law |date=April 2023 |volume=30 |issue=2 |pages=216–228 |doi=10.1177/1023263X231195455|s2cid=261655476 }}</ref> |
|||
British Judge Sir [[Nicolas Bratza]], then head of the European Court of Human Rights, delivered a speech in 2012 that signaled the court was ready to declare same-sex marriage a "human right", as soon as enough countries fell into line.<ref>{{cite news|last=Booker|first=Christopher|date=9 February 2013|title=Gay marriage: the French connection|newspaper=The Telegraph|location=London|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/9859036/Gay-marriage-the-French-connection.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/9859036/Gay-marriage-the-French-connection.html |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=8 November 2013}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Clarke|first=Jamie|date=6 June 2013|title=Gay marriage politically, rather than ethically motivated|url=http://www.sosogay.co.uk/2013/gay-marriage-politically-rather-than-ethically-motivated|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131006084549/http://sosogay.co.uk/2013/gay-marriage-politically-rather-than-ethically-motivated|archive-date=6 October 2013|access-date=8 November 2013|website=So So Gay|publisher=So So Gay Ltd}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|year=2013|title=Sir Nicholas Bratza|url=http://www.pcc.org.uk/news/index.html?article=ODYzMQ==|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20131108001904/http://www.pcc.org.uk/news/index.html?article=ODYzMQ==|archive-date=8 November 2013|access-date=8 November 2013|website=Press Complaints Commission|publisher=Press Complaints Commission}}</ref> |
|||
[[Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights]] states that: "Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family, according to the national laws governing the exercise of this right",<ref>{{cite web|title=European Convention on Human Rights|url=http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140703060501/http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf|archive-date=3 July 2014|access-date=25 July 2015|website=ECHR.coe.int|publisher=European Court of Human Rights}}</ref> not limiting marriage to those in a heterosexual relationship. However, the ECHR stated in ''Schalk and Kopf v Austria'' that this provision was intended to limit marriage to heterosexual relationships, as it used the term "men and women" instead of "everyone".<ref name="CASE OF SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA"/> |
|||
==== European Union ==== |
==== European Union ==== |
||
{{further|Coman and Others v General Inspectorate for Immigration and Ministry of the Interior}} |
{{further|Coman and Others v General Inspectorate for Immigration and Ministry of the Interior}} |
||
On 5 June 2018, the [[European Court of Justice]] ruled, in a case from [[Same-sex marriage in Romania|Romania]], that, under the specific conditions of the couple in question, married same-sex couples have the same residency rights as other married couples in an EU country, even if that country does not permit or recognize same-sex marriage.<ref>{{Cite web |
On 5 June 2018, the [[European Court of Justice]] ruled, in a case from [[Same-sex marriage in Romania|Romania]], that, under the specific conditions of the couple in question, married same-sex couples have the same residency rights as other married couples in an EU country, even if that country does not permit or recognize same-sex marriage.<ref>{{Cite web |title=EU court backs residency rights for gay couple in Romania |url=https://apnews.com/561b1bb4ecff48b598eb1c2c20db2735 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612142617/https://apnews.com/561b1bb4ecff48b598eb1c2c20db2735 |archive-date=12 June 2018 |access-date=6 June 2018 |website=[[Associated Press]]|date=5 June 2018 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=5 June 2018 |title=Same-sex spouses have EU residence rights, top court rules – BBC |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44366898 |url-status=live |access-date=6 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190508223531/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44366898 |archive-date=8 May 2019}}</ref> However, the ruling was not implemented in Romania and on 14 September 2021 the [[European Parliament]] passed a resolution calling on the [[European Commission]] to ensure that the ruling is respected across the EU.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Texts adopted – LGBTIQ rights in the EU – Tuesday, 14 September 2021 |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0366_EN.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210916211040/https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0366_EN.html |archive-date=16 September 2021 |access-date=16 September 2021 |website=European Parliament |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=14 September 2021 |title=MEPs condemn failure to respect rights of same-sex partners in EU |language=en |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/14/meps-condemn-failure-respect-rights-same-sex-partners-eu |url-status=live |access-date=16 September 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210914132153/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/14/meps-condemn-failure-respect-rights-same-sex-partners-eu |archive-date=14 September 2021}}</ref> |
||
==== Inter-American Court of Human Rights ==== |
==== Inter-American Court of Human Rights ==== |
||
[[File:María Alexandra Chávez y Michelle Pamela Avilés - Primer matrimonio entre dos mujeres en Ecuador.jpg|thumb|right|Alexandra Chávez and Michelle Avilés, the first same-sex couple to marry in Ecuador]] |
|||
On 8 January 2018, the [[Inter-American Court of Human Rights]] (IACHR) ruled that the [[American Convention on Human Rights]] mandates and requires the legal recognition of same-sex marriage. The landmark ruling was fully binding on [[Same-sex marriage in Costa Rica|Costa Rica]] and set binding precedent in the other signatory countries. The Court recommended that governments issue temporary decrees recognizing same-sex marriage until new legislation is brought in. Among states without universal same-sex marriage, the ruling applies to [[LGBT rights in Barbados|Barbados]], [[LGBT rights in Bolivia|Bolivia]], the [[LGBT rights in the Dominican Republic|Dominican Republic]], [[LGBT rights in El Salvador|El Salvador]], [[LGBT rights in Guatemala|Guatemala]], [[LGBT rights in Haiti|Haiti]], [[LGBT rights in Honduras|Honduras]], [[Same-sex marriage in Mexico|Mexico]], [[LGBT rights in Nicaragua|Nicaragua]], [[LGBT rights in Panama|Panama]], [[LGBT rights in Paraguay|Paraguay]], [[LGBT rights in Peru|Peru]] and [[LGBT rights in Suriname|Suriname]]. |
|||
On 8 January 2018, the [[Inter-American Court of Human Rights]] (IACHR) issued an advisory opinion that states party to the American Convention on Human Rights should grant same-sex couples accession to all existing domestic legal systems of family registration, including marriage, along with all rights that derive from marriage. The Court recommended that governments issue temporary decrees recognizing same-sex marriage until new legislation is brought in. They also said that it was inadmissible and discriminatory for a separate legal provision to be established (such as [[civil union]]s) instead of same-sex marriage.<ref>{{Cite web |date=25 January 2018 |title=Major Advance for Marriage Equality and Gender Identity Rights in Latin America |work=San Francisco Bay Times |url=http://sfbaytimes.com/major-advance-marriage-equality-gender-identity-rights-latin-america/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180129141726/http://sfbaytimes.com/major-advance-marriage-equality-gender-identity-rights-latin-america/ |archive-date=29 January 2018 |access-date=13 April 2018 |publisher=Sfbaytimes.com}}</ref> |
|||
The Court said that governments "must recognize and guarantee all the rights that are derived from a family bond between people of the same sex". They also said that it was inadmissible and discriminatory for a separate legal provision to be established (such as [[civil union]]s) instead of same-sex marriage. The Court demanded that governments "guarantee access to all existing forms of domestic legal systems, including the right to marriage, in order to ensure the protection of all the rights of families formed by same-sex couples without discrimination". Recognizing the difficulty in passing such laws in countries where there is strong opposition to same-sex marriage, it recommended that governments pass temporary decrees until new legislation is brought in.<ref>{{cite web|date=25 January 2018|title="Major Advance for Marriage Equality and Gender Identity Rights in Latin America". ''San Francisco Bay Times'', 2018 January 29|url=http://sfbaytimes.com/major-advance-marriage-equality-gender-identity-rights-latin-america/|access-date=13 April 2018|publisher=Sfbaytimes.com|archive-date=29 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180129141726/http://sfbaytimes.com/major-advance-marriage-equality-gender-identity-rights-latin-america/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
The ruling has directly led to the legal recognition of same-sex marriage in Costa Rica and Ecuador. In the wake of the ruling, lawsuits regarding same-sex marriage have also been filed in Bolivia, Honduras,<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://wockner.blogspot.com/2018/06/worldwide-marriage-equality-watch-list.html?m=1 |title=Worldwide Marriage Equality Watch List |access-date=5 October 2018 |archive-date=4 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220304003345/https://wockner.blogspot.com/2018/06/worldwide-marriage-equality-watch-list.html?m=1 |url-status=live }}</ref> Panama,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.washingtonblade.com/2018/02/16/panama-supreme-court-judge-withdraws-draft-ruling-marriage/ |title=Panama Supreme Court judge withdraws draft ruling against marriage |access-date=18 August 2018 |archive-date=29 April 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429010712/https://www.washingtonblade.com/2018/02/16/panama-supreme-court-judge-withdraws-draft-ruling-marriage/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Paraguay (to recognize marriages performed abroad),<ref>{{cite news|date=12 January 2018|title=LGTBI anuncia presión a Corte para aceptar unión igualitaria y habrá 'guerra'|publisher=Hoy (Paraguay)|url=http://www.hoy.com.py/nacionales/lgtbi-anuncia-presin-a-corte-para-aceptar-unin-igualitaria-y-habr-guerra|access-date=14 January 2018|archive-date=28 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328004935/https://www.hoy.com.py/nacionales/lgtbi-anuncia-presin-a-corte-para-aceptar-unin-igualitaria-y-habr-guerra|url-status=live}}</ref> and Peru,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://rpp.pe/lima/actualidad/tribunal-constitucional-debate-reconocimiento-de-matrimonio-gay-noticia-1130829 |title=Tribunal Constitucional debate reconocimiento de matrimonio gay realizado en México |access-date=18 August 2018 |archive-date=29 April 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429011556/https://rpp.pe/lima/actualidad/tribunal-constitucional-debate-reconocimiento-de-matrimonio-gay-noticia-1130829 |url-status=live }}</ref> all of which are under the jurisdiction of the IACHR. |
|||
===International organizations=== |
|||
The terms of employment of the staff of [[international organizations]] (not [[Business|commercial]]) in most cases are not governed by the laws of the country where their offices are located. Agreements with the host country safeguard these organizations' impartiality. |
|||
Despite their relative independence, few organizations recognize same-sex partnerships without condition. The agencies of the [[United Nations]] recognize same-sex marriages if the country of citizenship of the employees in question recognizes the marriage.<ref>{{cite web|title=UN Secretary-General Bulletin|url=http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/522/40/PDF/N0452240.pdf|publisher=United Nations|access-date=25 September 2012|archive-date=12 January 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120112161154/http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/522/40/PDF/N0452240.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> In some cases, these organizations do offer a limited selection of the benefits normally provided to mixed-sex married couples to de facto partners or [[domestic partner]]s of their staff, but even individuals who have entered into a mixed-sex civil union in their home country are not guaranteed full recognition of this union in all organizations. However, the [[World Bank]] does recognize domestic partners.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTHRJOBS/0,,contentMDK:20522360~menuPK:1353209~pagePK:64262408~piPK:64262191~theSitePK:1058433,00.html|title=Jobs — Compensation & Benefits|publisher=The World Bank Group|access-date=8 March 2007|archive-date=7 March 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070307114604/http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTHRJOBS/0,,contentMDK:20522360~menuPK:1353209~pagePK:64262408~piPK:64262191~theSitePK:1058433,00.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
==Other arrangements== |
==Other arrangements== |
||
===Civil unions=== |
===Civil unions=== |
||
{{Main|Civil union}} |
{{Main|Civil union}} |
||
[[File:New York City Proposition 8 Protest outside LDS temple 20.jpg|thumb|upright|Many advocates, such as this November 2008 protester at a demonstration in [[New York City]] against [[California Proposition 8 (2008)|California Proposition 8]], reject the notion of [[civil unions]], describing them as inferior to the legal recognition of same-sex marriage.<ref name=Towleroad>{{ |
[[File:New York City Proposition 8 Protest outside LDS temple 20.jpg|thumb|upright|Many advocates, such as this November 2008 protester at a demonstration in [[New York City]] against [[California Proposition 8 (2008)|California Proposition 8]], reject the notion of [[civil unions]], describing them as inferior to the legal recognition of same-sex marriage.<ref name="Towleroad">{{Cite web |last=Towle |first=Andy |date=13 November 2008 |title=NYC Protest and Civil Rights March Opposing Proposition 8 |url=http://www.towleroad.com/2008/11/we-did-it.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090213224331/http://www.towleroad.com/2008/11/we-did-it.html |archive-date=13 February 2009 |access-date=28 September 2012 |publisher=[[Towleroad]]}}</ref>]] |
||
Civil union, [[civil partnership]], [[domestic partnership]], [[registered partnership]], unregistered partnership, and unregistered cohabitation statuses offer varying legal benefits of marriage. As of {{date}}, countries that have an alternative form of legal recognition other than marriage on a national level are: [[Recognition of same-sex unions in |
Civil union, [[civil partnership]], [[domestic partnership]], [[registered partnership]], unregistered partnership, and unregistered cohabitation statuses offer varying legal benefits of marriage. As of {{date}}, countries that have an alternative form of legal recognition other than marriage on a national level are: [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Bolivia|Bolivia]], [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Croatia|Croatia]], [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Cyprus|Cyprus]], the [[Recognition of same-sex unions in the Czech Republic|Czech Republic]], [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Hungary|Hungary]], [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Italy|Italy]], [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Latvia|Latvia]], [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Liechtenstein|Liechtenstein]], [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Monaco|Monaco]], [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Montenegro|Montenegro]] and [[LGBT rights in San Marino|San Marino]].<ref name="countries and states legal">{{Cite web |last=Pearson |first=Mary |title=Where is Gay Marriage Legal? |url=http://christiangays.com/marriage/legal.shtml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120301004148/http://christiangays.com/marriage/legal.shtml |archive-date=1 March 2012 |access-date=20 February 2012 |publisher=christiangays.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Williams |first=Steve |title=Which Countries Have Legalized Gay Marriage? |url=http://www.care2.com/causes/which-countries-have-legalized-gay-marriage.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429011118/https://www.care2.com/causes/which-countries-have-legalized-gay-marriage.html |archive-date=29 April 2019 |access-date=20 February 2012 |publisher=Care2.com (news.bbc.co.uk as source)}}</ref> Same-sex marriage performed remotely or abroad is recognized with full marital rights by [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Israel|Israel]]. [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Poland|Poland]] offers more limited rights. Additionally, various cities and counties in [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Cambodia|Cambodia]] and [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Japan|Japan]] offer same-sex couples varying levels of benefits, which include hospital visitation rights and others. |
||
Additionally, |
Additionally, eighteen countries that have legally recognized same-sex marriage also have an alternative form of recognition for same-sex couples, usually available to heterosexual couples as well: [[Same-sex marriage in Argentina|Argentina]], [[Same-sex marriage in Australia|Australia]], [[Same-sex marriage in Austria|Austria]], [[Same-sex marriage in Belgium|Belgium]], [[Same-sex marriage in Brazil|Brazil]], [[Same-sex marriage in Chile|Chile]], [[Same-sex marriage in Colombia|Colombia]], [[Same-sex marriage in Ecuador|Ecuador]], [[Same-sex marriage in France|France]], [[Recognition of same-sex unions in Greece|Greece]], [[Same-sex marriage in Luxembourg|Luxembourg]], [[Same-sex marriage in Malta|Malta]], the [[Same-sex marriage in the Netherlands|Netherlands]], [[Same-sex marriage in Portugal|Portugal]], [[Same-sex marriage in South Africa|South Africa]], [[Same-sex marriage in Spain|Spain]], the [[Same-sex marriage in the United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] and [[Same-sex marriage in Uruguay|Uruguay]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Loi du 9 juillet 2004 relative aux effets légaux de certains partenariats. – Legilux |url=http://eli.legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2004/07/09/n3 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160911061405/http://eli.legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2004/07/09/n3 |archive-date=11 September 2016 |access-date=7 July 2017 |website=Eli.legilux.public.lu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=12 March 2007 |title=Loi n° 99-944 du 15 novembre 1999 relative au pacte civil de solidarité |url=http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do;jsessionid=0F15B99854A4FE47659F950BE42DF000.tpdjo05v_3?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000005628705&dateTexte=vig |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190816215959/https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do;jsessionid=0F15B99854A4FE47659F950BE42DF000.tpdjo05v_3?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000005628705&dateTexte=vig |archive-date=16 August 2019 |access-date=7 July 2017 |website=Legifrance.gouv.fr |language=fr}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=WETTEN, DECRETEN, ORDONNANTIES EN VERORDENINGEN LOIS, DECRETS, ORDONNANCES ET REGLEMENTS |url=http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/mopdf/2000/03/02_1.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429011144/http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/mopdf/2000/03/02_1.pdf |archive-date=29 April 2019 |access-date=7 July 2017 |website=Ejustice.jkust.fgov.be}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Civil Partnership Act 2004 |url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/33/contents |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429011336/http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/33/contents |archive-date=29 April 2019 |access-date=5 July 2017 |website=Legislation.gov.uk}}</ref> |
||
They are also available in parts of the United States ([[Arizona]]{{ |
They are also available in parts of the United States ([[Arizona]],{{efn|Legally available in the Arizona municipalities of Bisbee, Clarkdale, Cottonwood, Jerome, Sedona and Tucson.}} [[Same-sex marriage in California|California]], [[Same-sex marriage in Colorado|Colorado]], [[Same-sex marriage in Hawaii|Hawaii]], [[Same-sex marriage in Illinois|Illinois]], [[Same-sex marriage in New Jersey|New Jersey]], [[Same-sex marriage in Nevada|Nevada]] and [[Same-sex marriage in Oregon|Oregon]]) and Canada.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Same-Sex Marriage, Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships |url=http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/human-services/same-sex-marriage-overview.aspx |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130610003023/http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/human-services/same-sex-marriage-overview.aspx |archive-date=10 June 2013 |access-date=20 February 2012 |publisher=National Conference of State Legislatures}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Ramstack, Tom |date=11 January 2010 |title=Congress Considers Outcome of D.C. Gay Marriage Legislation |work=AHN |url=http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7017501996?Congress%20Considers%20Outcome%20of%20D.C.%20Gay%20Marriage%20Legislation |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100620042439/http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7017501996?Congress%20Considers%20Outcome%20of%20D.C.%20Gay%20Marriage%20Legislation |archive-date=20 June 2010}}</ref> |
||
===Non-sexual same-sex marriage=== |
===Non-sexual same-sex marriage=== |
||
Line 451: | Line 474: | ||
====Nigeria==== |
====Nigeria==== |
||
{{main| |
{{main|Recognition of same-sex unions in Nigeria}} |
||
Among the [[Igbo people]] and probably other peoples in the south of the country, there are circumstances where a marriage between women is considered appropriate, such as when a woman has no child and her husband dies, and she takes a wife to perpetuate her inheritance and family lineage.<ref name=NigeriaTribune>{{ |
Among the [[Igbo people]] and probably other peoples in the south of the country, there are circumstances where a marriage between women is considered appropriate, such as when a woman has no child and her husband dies, and she takes a wife to perpetuate her inheritance and family lineage.<ref name="NigeriaTribune">{{Cite web |last=Igwe |first=Leo |date=19 June 2009 |title=Tradition of same gender marriage in Igboland |url=http://www.tribune.com.ng/19062009/opinion.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100111010506/http://www.tribune.com.ng/19062009/opinion.html |archive-date=11 January 2010 |website=Nigerian Tribune}}</ref> |
||
== Studies == |
== Studies == |
||
The [[American Anthropological Association]] stated on 26 February 2004:{{blockquote|text=The results of more than a century of anthropological research on households, kinship relationships, and families, across cultures and through time, provide no support whatsoever for the view that either civilization or viable social orders depend upon marriage as an exclusively heterosexual institution. Rather, anthropological research supports the conclusion that a vast array of family types, including families built upon same-sex partnerships, can contribute to stable and humane societies.<ref name="aaa">{{ |
The [[American Anthropological Association]] stated on 26 February 2004:{{blockquote|text=The results of more than a century of anthropological research on households, kinship relationships, and families, across cultures and through time, provide no support whatsoever for the view that either civilization or viable social orders depend upon marriage as an exclusively heterosexual institution. Rather, anthropological research supports the conclusion that a vast array of family types, including families built upon same-sex partnerships, can contribute to stable and humane societies.<ref name="aaa">{{Cite web |last=American Anthropological Association |author-link=American Anthropological Association |year=2004 |title=Statement on Marriage and the Family |url=http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/Statement-on-Marriage-and-the-family.cfm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150912104755/http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/Statement-on-Marriage-and-the-Family.cfm |archive-date=12 September 2015 |access-date=18 September 2015}}</ref>}} |
||
Research findings from 1998 to 2015 from the [[University of Virginia]], [[Michigan State University]], [[Florida State University]], the [[University of Amsterdam]], the [[New York State Psychiatric Institute]], [[Stanford University]], the [[University of California-San Francisco]], the [[University of California-Los Angeles]], [[Tufts University]], [[Boston Medical Center]], the Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health, and independent researchers also support the findings of this study.<ref>{{ |
Research findings from 1998 to 2015 from the [[University of Virginia]], [[Michigan State University]], [[Florida State University]], the [[University of Amsterdam]], the [[New York State Psychiatric Institute]], [[Stanford University]], the [[University of California-San Francisco]], the [[University of California-Los Angeles]], [[Tufts University]], [[Boston Medical Center]], the Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health, and independent researchers also support the findings of this study.<ref>{{Cite news |date=26 June 2015 |title=Same-sex marriage and children's well-being: Research roundup |work=Journalist's Resource |url=http://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/gender-society/same-sex-marriage-children-well-being-research-roundup |url-status=live |access-date=29 December 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160102172415/http://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/gender-society/same-sex-marriage-children-well-being-research-roundup |archive-date=2 January 2016}}</ref>{{vague|date=February 2021}} |
||
The overall socio-economic and health effects of legal access to same-sex marriage around the world have been summarized by Badgett and co-authors.<ref>{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1002/pam.22587|title = A review of the effects of legal access to same-sex marriage |journal = Journal of Policy Analysis and Management|year = 2024|last1=Badgett|first1=M.V. Lee|last2=Carpenter|first2=Christopher S.|last3=Lee|first3=Maxine J.|last4=Sansone|first4 = Dario|doi-access=free|hdl=10871/135707|hdl-access=free}}</ref> The review found that sexual minority individuals took-up legal marriage when it became available to them (but at lower rates than different-sex couples). There is instead no evidence that same-sex marriage legalization affected different-sex marriages. On the health side, same-sex marriage legalization increased health insurance coverage for individuals in same-sex couples (in the US), and it led to improvements in sexual health among men who have sex with men, while there is mixed evidence on mental health effects among sexual minorities. In addition, the study found mixed evidence on a range of downstream social outcomes such as attitudes toward LGBTQ+ people and employment choices of sexual minorities. |
|||
=== Adolescence === |
|||
A study of nationwide data from across the United States from January 1999 to December 2015 revealed that the rate of attempted suicide among school students in grades 9–12 declined by 7% and the rate of attempted suicide among high schoolers of a minority sexual orientation in grades 9–12 declined by 14% in states that established same-sex marriage, resulting in about 134,000 fewer attempting suicide each year in the United States. The researchers took advantage of the gradual manner in which same-sex marriage was established in the United States (expanding from one state in 2004 to all fifty states in 2015) to compare the rate of attempted suicide among youth in each state over the time period studied. Once same-sex marriage was established in a particular state, the reduction in the rate of attempted suicide among youth in that state became permanent. No reduction in the rate of attempted suicide among teenage youth occurred in a particular state until that state recognized same-sex marriage.<ref name="JAMA">{{Cite journal|last1=Raifman|first1=Julia|last2=Moscoe|first2=Ellen|last3=Austin|first3=S. Bryn|last4=McConnell|first4=Margaret|year=2017|title=Difference-in-Differences Analysis of the Association Between State Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Adolescent Suicide Attempts|journal=JAMA Pediatrics|volume=171|issue=4|pages=350–356|doi=10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4529|pmc=5848493|pmid=28241285}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=20 February 2017|title=Same-Sex Marriage Legalization Linked to Reduction in Suicide Attempts Among High School Students|url=https://www.jhsph.edu/news/news-releases/2017/same-sex-marriage-legalization-linked-to-reduction-in-suicide-attempts-among-high-school-students.html|website=[[Johns Hopkins University]]|access-date=8 June 2018|archive-date=29 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429010934/https://www.jhsph.edu/news/news-releases/2017/same-sex-marriage-legalization-linked-to-reduction-in-suicide-attempts-among-high-school-students.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The lead researcher of the study stated that "laws that have the greatest impact on gay adults may make gay kids feel more hopeful for the future".<ref>{{cite web|date=20 February 2017|title=Study: Teen suicide attempts fell as same-sex marriage was legalized|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2017/02/20/teen-suicide-down-as-same-sex-marriage-legalized-study/98179684/|website=[[USA Today]]|access-date=3 April 2018|archive-date=14 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190414064358/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2017/02/20/teen-suicide-down-as-same-sex-marriage-legalized-study/98179684/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=20 February 2017|title=Same-sex marriage laws linked to fewer youth suicide attempts, new study says|url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/same-sex-marriage-fewer-youth-suicide|website=[[PBS]]|access-date=19 April 2018|archive-date=29 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429011545/https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/same-sex-marriage-fewer-youth-suicide|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=23 February 2017|title=Same-sex marriage laws tied to fewer teen suicide attempts|journal=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-pediatrics-suicide-lgbt/same-sex-marriage-laws-tied-to-fewer-teen-suicide-attempts-idUSKBN1612SP|access-date=8 June 2018|archive-date=14 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190414064401/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-pediatrics-suicide-lgbt/same-sex-marriage-laws-tied-to-fewer-teen-suicide-attempts-idUSKBN1612SP|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
===Parenting=== |
|||
{{main|LGBT parenting}} |
|||
[[File:Stephaniehaynes family.jpg|thumb|Lesbian couple with children]] |
|||
Professional organizations of psychologists have concluded that children stand to benefit from the well-being that results when their parents' relationship is recognized and supported by society's institutions, e.g. civil marriage. For example, the [[Canadian Psychological Association]] (CPA) stated in 2006 that "parents' financial, psychological and physical well-being is enhanced by marriage and that children benefit from being raised by two parents within a legally-recognized union."<ref name="cpa2006" /> The CPA has stated that the stress encountered by gay and lesbian parents and their children are more likely the result of the way society treats them than because of any deficiencies in fitness to parent.<ref name="cpa2006" /> |
|||
The [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] concluded in 2006, in an analysis published in the journal ''[[Pediatrics (journal)|Pediatrics]]'':{{blockquote|There is ample evidence to show that children raised by same-gender parents fare as well as those raised by heterosexual parents. More than 25 years of research have documented that there is no relationship between parents' sexual orientation and any measure of a child's emotional, psychosocial, and behavioral adjustment... The rights, benefits, and protections of civil marriage can further strengthen these families.<ref name="aap2006"/>}} |
|||
===Health=== |
===Health=== |
||
{{as of|2006}}, the data of current psychological and other social science studies on same-sex marriage in comparison to mixed-sex marriage indicate that same-sex and mixed-sex relationships do not differ in their essential psychosocial dimensions; that a parent's sexual orientation is unrelated to their ability to provide a healthy and nurturing family environment; and that marriage bestows substantial psychological, social, and health benefits. Same-sex parents and carers and their children are likely to benefit in numerous ways from legal recognition of their families, and providing such recognition through marriage will bestow greater benefit than civil unions or domestic partnerships.<ref name="aap2006" /><ref name="autogenerated4">Herek, Gregory M. "Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: A social science perspective." ''American Psychologist,'' Vol 61(6), September 2006, pp. 607–21.</ref>{{update inline|date=December 2023}} Studies in the United States have correlated legalization of same-sex marriage to lower rates of HIV infection,<ref>{{Cite web |author=Elaine Justice |title=Study Links Gay Marriage Bans to Rise in HIV infections |url=http://www.emory.edu/home/news/releases/2009/06/study-links-gay-marriage-bans-to-rise-in-hiv-rate.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100409072056/http://www.emory.edu/home/news/releases/2009/06/study-links-gay-marriage-bans-to-rise-in-hiv-rate.html |archive-date=9 April 2010 |access-date=5 November 2010 |publisher=Emory University}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Peng |first=Handie |title=The Effect of Same-Sex Marriage Laws on Public Health and Welfare |journal=Userwww.service.emory.edu |url=https://emory.academia.edu/HandiePeng/Papers/430809/The_Effects_of_Same-Sex_Marriage_Laws_on_Public_Health_and_Welfare |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120220025915/http://emory.academia.edu/HandiePeng/Papers/430809/The_Effects_of_Same-Sex_Marriage_Laws_on_Public_Health_and_Welfare |archive-date=20 February 2012 |access-date=11 February 2012}}</ref> psychiatric disorders,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hasin |first=Deborah |title=Lesbian, gay, bisexual individuals risk psychiatric disorders from discriminatory policies |url=http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-03/cums-lgb030210.php |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130227012518/http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-03/cums-lgb030210.php |archive-date=27 February 2013 |access-date=20 September 2012 |publisher=[[Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health]]}}</ref><ref name="psychtoday">{{Cite news |last=Mustanski |first=Brian |date=22 March 2010 |title=New study suggests bans on gay marriage hurt mental health of LGB people |work=[[Psychology Today]] |url=http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-sexual-continuum/201003/new-study-suggests-bans-gay-marriage-hurt-mental-health-lgb-people |access-date=8 November 2010}}</ref> and [[Suicide among LGBT youth|suicide rate in the LGBT population]].<ref name="JAMA">{{Cite journal |last1=Raifman |first1=Julia |last2=Moscoe |first2=Ellen |last3=Austin |first3=S. Bryn |last4=McConnell |first4=Margaret |year=2017 |title=Difference-in-Differences Analysis of the Association Between State Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Adolescent Suicide Attempts|journal=JAMA Pediatrics |volume=171 |issue=4 |pages=350–356 |doi=10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4529 |pmc=5848493 |pmid=28241285}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=20 February 2017 |title=Same-Sex Marriage Legalization Linked to Reduction in Suicide Attempts Among High School Students |url=https://www.jhsph.edu/news/news-releases/2017/same-sex-marriage-legalization-linked-to-reduction-in-suicide-attempts-among-high-school-students.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429010934/https://www.jhsph.edu/news/news-releases/2017/same-sex-marriage-legalization-linked-to-reduction-in-suicide-attempts-among-high-school-students.html |archive-date=29 April 2019 |access-date=8 June 2018 |website=[[Johns Hopkins University]]}}</ref> |
|||
The [[American Psychological Association]] stated in 2004: "Denial of access to marriage to same-sex couples may especially harm people who also experience discrimination based on age, race, ethnicity, disability, gender and gender identity, religion, socioeconomic status and so on." It has also averred that same-sex couples who may only enter into a civil union, as opposed to a marriage, "are denied equal access to all the benefits, rights, and privileges provided by federal law to those of married couples", which has adverse effects on the well-being of same-sex partners.<ref name="psychological">{{cite web|author=American Psychological Association|author-link=American Psychological Association|year=2004|title=Resolution on Sexual Orientation and Marriage|url=http://www.apa.org/about/governance/council/policy/gay-marriage.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511190536/http://www.apa.org/about/governance/council/policy/gay-marriage.pdf|archive-date=11 May 2011|access-date=10 November 2010}}</ref> |
|||
{{as of|2006}}, the data of current psychological and other social science studies on same-sex marriage in comparison to mixed-sex marriage indicate that same-sex and mixed-sex relationships do not differ in their essential psychosocial dimensions; that a parent's sexual orientation is unrelated to their ability to provide a healthy and nurturing family environment; and that marriage bestows substantial psychological, social, and health benefits. Same-sex parents and carers and their children are likely to benefit in numerous ways from legal recognition of their families, and providing such recognition through marriage will bestow greater benefit than civil unions or domestic partnerships.<ref name="aap2006" /><ref name="autogenerated4">Herek, Gregory M. "Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: A social science perspective." ''American Psychologist,'' Vol 61(6), September 2006, pp. 607–21.</ref> |
|||
In 2009, a pair of economists at [[Emory University]] tied the passage of state bans on same-sex marriage in the United States to an increase in the rates of HIV infection.<ref>{{cite web|author=Contact: Elaine Justice: 404.727.0643|title=Study Links Gay Marriage Bans to Rise in HIV infections|url=http://www.emory.edu/home/news/releases/2009/06/study-links-gay-marriage-bans-to-rise-in-hiv-rate.html|access-date=5 November 2010|publisher=Emory University|archive-date=9 April 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100409072056/http://www.emory.edu/home/news/releases/2009/06/study-links-gay-marriage-bans-to-rise-in-hiv-rate.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Peng|first=Handie|title=The Effect of Same-Sex Marriage Laws on Public Health and Welfare|url=https://emory.academia.edu/HandiePeng/Papers/430809/The_Effects_of_Same-Sex_Marriage_Laws_on_Public_Health_and_Welfare|journal=Userwww.service.emory.edu|access-date=11 February 2012|archive-date=20 February 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120220025915/http://emory.academia.edu/HandiePeng/Papers/430809/The_Effects_of_Same-Sex_Marriage_Laws_on_Public_Health_and_Welfare|url-status=live}}</ref> The study linked the passage of a same-sex marriage ban in a state to an increase in the annual HIV rate within that state of roughly 4 cases per 100,000 population.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Francis|first1=AM|last2=Mialon|first2=HM|author8=Andrew M. Francis, Hugo M. Mialon|date=March 2010|title=Tolerance and HIV|url=http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~hmialon/Tolerance_and_HIV.pdf|journal=Journal of Health Economics|volume=29|issue=2|pages=250–267|doi=10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.11.016|pmid=20036431|access-date=19 July 2010|archive-date=14 June 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100614181704/http://userwww.service.emory.edu/%7Ehmialon/Tolerance_and_HIV.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2010, a [[Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health]] study examining the effects of institutional discrimination on the psychiatric health of lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) individuals found an increase in psychiatric disorders, including a more than doubling of [[anxiety disorders]], among the LGB population living in states that instituted bans on same-sex marriage. According to the author, the study highlighted the importance of abolishing institutional forms of discrimination, including those leading to disparities in the mental health and well-being of LGB individuals. Institutional discrimination is characterized by societal-level conditions that limit the opportunities and access to resources by socially disadvantaged groups.<ref>{{cite web|last=Hasin|first=Deborah|title=Lesbian, gay, bisexual individuals risk psychiatric disorders from discriminatory policies|url=http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-03/cums-lgb030210.php|access-date=20 September 2012|publisher=[[Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health]]|archive-date=27 February 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130227012518/http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-03/cums-lgb030210.php|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="psychtoday">{{cite news|last=Mustanski|first=Brian|date=22 March 2010|title=New study suggests bans on gay marriage hurt mental health of LGB people|newspaper=[[Psychology Today]]|url=http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-sexual-continuum/201003/new-study-suggests-bans-gay-marriage-hurt-mental-health-lgb-people|access-date=8 November 2010}}</ref> |
|||
==Issues== |
==Issues== |
||
{{See also|LGBT rights opposition}} |
{{See also|LGBT rights opposition}} |
||
While few societies have recognized same-sex unions as marriages, the [[history of same-sex unions|historical and anthropological record]] reveals a large range of attitudes towards same-sex unions ranging from praise, through full acceptance and integration, sympathetic toleration, indifference, prohibition and discrimination, to persecution and physical annihilation.{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} Opponents of same-sex marriages have argued that same-sex marriage, while doing good for the couples that participate in them and the children they are raising,<ref name="Laurie">{{ |
While few societies have recognized same-sex unions as marriages,{{update inline|date=January 2024}} the [[history of same-sex unions|historical and anthropological record]] reveals a large range of attitudes towards same-sex unions ranging from praise, through full acceptance and integration, sympathetic toleration, indifference, prohibition and discrimination, to persecution and physical annihilation.{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} Opponents of same-sex marriages have argued that same-sex marriage, while doing good for the couples that participate in them and the children they are raising,<ref name="Laurie">{{Cite web |last=Laurie |first=Timothy |date=3 June 2015 |title=Bigotry or biology: the hard choice for an opponent of marriage equality |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-06-03/laurie-bigotry-or-biology/6514156 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150604151718/http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-06-03/laurie-bigotry-or-biology/6514156 |archive-date=4 June 2015 |access-date=4 June 2015 |publisher=The Drum}}</ref> undermines a right of children to be raised by their biological mother and father.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Blankenhorn |first=David |date=19 September 2008 |title=Protecting marriage to protect children |work=Los Angeles Times |url=https://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-blankenhorn19-2008sep19,0,6057126.story |url-status=live |access-date=6 October 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090904154130/http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-blankenhorn19-2008sep19,0,6057126.story |archive-date=4 September 2009}}</ref> Some supporters of same-sex marriages take the view that the government should have no role in regulating personal relationships,<ref name="findlaw1">{{Cite web |title=See discussion of prenuptial and postmarital agreements at Findlaw |url=http://family.findlaw.com/marriage/marriage-agreements |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101025170627/http://family.findlaw.com/marriage/marriage-agreements/ |archive-date=25 October 2010 |access-date=5 November 2010 |publisher=Family.findlaw.com}}</ref> while others argue that same-sex marriages would provide social benefits to same-sex couples.{{efn|1=Dale Carpenter is a prominent spokesman for this view. For a better understanding of this view, see Carpenter's writings at {{Cite web |title=Dale Carpenter |url=http://www.indegayforum.org/staff/show/91.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061117201231/http://www.indegayforum.org/staff/show/91.html |archive-date=17 November 2006 |access-date=31 October 2006 |website=Independent Gay Forum}} }} The debate regarding same-sex marriages includes debate based upon social viewpoints as well as debate based on majority rules, religious convictions, economic arguments, health-related concerns, and a variety of other issues.{{citation needed|date=July 2017}} |
||
===Parenting=== |
===Parenting=== |
||
{{Main|LGBT parenting|Same-sex marriage and the family}} |
{{Main|LGBT parenting|Same-sex marriage and the family}} |
||
[[File: |
[[File:P051702-149695.jpg|thumb|Gay couple with a child]] |
||
Scientific literature indicates that parents' financial, psychological and physical well-being is enhanced by marriage and that children benefit from being raised by two parents within a legally recognized union (either a mixed-sex or same-sex union). As a result, professional scientific associations have argued for same-sex marriage to be legally recognized as it will be beneficial to the children of same-sex parents or carers.<ref name="amici">{{ |
Scientific literature indicates that parents' financial, psychological and physical well-being is enhanced by marriage and that children benefit from being raised by two parents within a legally recognized union (either a mixed-sex or same-sex union). As a result, professional scientific associations have argued for same-sex marriage to be legally recognized as it will be beneficial to the children of same-sex parents or carers.<ref name="amici">{{Cite web |title=Brief of the American Psychological Association, The California Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy as amici curiae in support of plaintiff-appellees – Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Case No. 09-CV-2292 VRW (Honorable Vaughn R. Walker) |url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus29.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150413160709/http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus29.pdf |archive-date=13 April 2015 |access-date=5 November 2010}}</ref><ref name="cpa2006">{{Cite web |year=2006 |title=Marriage of Same-Sex Couples – 2006 Position Statement Canadian Psychological Association |url=http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/Marriage%20of%20Same-Sex%20Couples%20Position%20Statement%20-%20October%202006%20(1).pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090419195945/http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/Marriage%20of%20Same-Sex%20Couples%20Position%20Statement%20-%20October%202006%20%281%29.pdf |archive-date=19 April 2009}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |display-authors=etal |vauthors=Pawelski JG, Perrin EC, Foy JM |date=July 2006 |title=The effects of marriage, civil union, and domestic partnership laws on the health and well-being of children |journal=[[Pediatrics (journal)|Pediatrics]] |volume=118 |issue=1 |pages=349–64 |doi=10.1542/peds.2006-1279 |pmid=16818585 |s2cid=219194821 |doi-access=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Lamb |first=Michael |title=Expert Affidavit for U.S. District Court (D. Mass. 2009) |url=http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/pedersen-v-opm/2011-09-14-pedersen-lamb-rebuttal-afffidavit.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924022457/http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/pedersen-v-opm/2011-09-14-pedersen-lamb-rebuttal-afffidavit.pdf |archive-date=24 September 2015 |access-date=24 July 2012 |publisher=Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders}}</ref><ref name="AAP-Discovery">{{Cite web |date=22 March 2013 |title=Pediatricians: Gay Marriage Good for Kids' Health |url=http://news.discovery.com/human/health/pediatricians-gay-marriage-is-good-for-kids-health-130322.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141112053402/http://news.discovery.com/human/health/pediatricians-gay-marriage-is-good-for-kids-health-130322.htm |archive-date=12 November 2014 |access-date=11 April 2013 |publisher=news.discovery.com}}</ref> |
||
Scientific research has been generally consistent in showing that lesbian and gay parents are as fit and capable as heterosexual parents, and their children are as psychologically healthy and well-adjusted as children reared by heterosexual parents.<ref name=cpa2006/><ref name="AAP-Discovery" /><ref name="apsp">{{Cite web |title=Elizabeth Short, Damien W. Riggs, Amaryll Perlesz, Rhonda Brown, Graeme Kane: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Parented Families – A Literature Review prepared for The Australian Psychological Society |url=http://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/LGBT-Families-Lit-Review.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110304014530/http://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/LGBT-Families-Lit-Review.pdf |archive-date=4 March 2011 |access-date=5 November 2010}}</ref><ref name="amici2010">{{Cite web |title=Brief of the American Psychological Association, The California Psychological Association, The American Psychiatric Association, and The American Association of Marriage and Family Therapy as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff-Appellees |url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus29.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150413160709/http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus29.pdf |archive-date=13 April 2015 |access-date=28 September 2012 |publisher=[[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]]}}</ref> According to scientific literature reviews, there is no evidence to the contrary.<ref name="aap2006">{{Cite journal |last1=Pawelski |first1=J.G. |last2=Perrin |first2=E.C. |last3=Foy |first3=J.M. |last4=Allen |first4=C.E. |last5=Crawford |first5=J.E. |last6=Del Monte |first6=M. |last7=Kaufman |first7=M. |last8=Klein |first8=J.D. |last9=Smith |first9=K. |last10=Springer |first10=S. |last11=Tanner |first11=J.L. |last12=Vickers |first12=D.L. |year=2006 |title=The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children |journal=Pediatrics |volume=118 |issue=1 |pages=349–64 |doi=10.1542/peds.2006-1279 |pmid=16818585 |s2cid=219194821 |doi-access=}}</ref><ref name="herek">{{Cite journal |last=Herek, GM |date=September 2006 |title=Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: a social science perspective |url=http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/AP_06_pre.PDF |url-status=dead |journal=The American Psychologist |volume=61 |issue=6 |pages=607–21 |doi=10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.607 |pmid=16953748 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100610164736/http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/AP_06_pre.PDF |archive-date=10 June 2010}}</ref><ref name="How Does the Gender of Parents Matter?">{{Cite journal |last1=Biblarz, Timothy J. |last2=Stacey, Judith |date=February 2010 |title=How Does the Gender of Parents Matter? |url=http://www.famigliearcobaleno.org/public/documenti/file/How-Does-the-Gender-of-Parents-Matter.pdf |url-status=dead |journal=Journal of Marriage and Family |volume=72 |issue=1 |pages=3–22 |citeseerx=10.1.1.593.4963 |doi=10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130512111336/http://www.famigliearcobaleno.org/public/documenti/file/How-Does-the-Gender-of-Parents-Matter.pdf |archive-date=12 May 2013}}</ref><ref name="cpa2005">{{Cite web |title=Brief presented to the Legislative House of Commons Committee on Bill C38 by the Canadian Psychological Association – 2 June 2005. |url=http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/UserFiles/Documents/advocacy/brief.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121013225547/http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/advocacy/brief.pdf |archive-date=13 October 2012 |access-date=7 August 2018}}</ref>{{update inline|date=December 2023}} |
|||
Compared to heterosexual couples, same-sex couples have a greater need for [[adoption]] or [[assisted reproductive technology]] to become parents. Lesbian couples often use [[artificial insemination]] to achieve pregnancy, and [[reciprocal in vitro fertilization]] (where one woman provides the egg and the other gestates the child) is becoming more popular in the 2020s, although many couples cannot afford it. [[Surrogacy]] is an option for wealthier gay male couples, but the cost is prohibitive. Other same-sex couples adopt children or raise the children from earlier opposite-sex relationships.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Goldberg |first1=Abbie E. |title=LGBTQ-parent families: Diversity, intersectionality, and social context |journal=Current Opinion in Psychology |date=February 2023 |volume=49 |pages=101517 |doi=10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101517|pmid=36502588 |s2cid=253665001 |url=https://commons.clarku.edu/faculty_psychology/4 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Leal |first1=Daniela |last2=Gato |first2=Jorge |last3=Coimbra |first3=Susana |last4=Freitas |first4=Daniela |last5=Tasker |first5=Fiona |title=Social Support in the Transition to Parenthood Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Persons: A Systematic Review |journal=Sexuality Research and Social Policy |date=December 2021 |volume=18 |issue=4 |pages=1165–1179 |doi=10.1007/s13178-020-00517-y|hdl=10216/132451 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> |
|||
Scientific research has been generally consistent in showing that lesbian and gay parents are as fit and capable as heterosexual parents, and their children are as psychologically healthy and well-adjusted as children reared by heterosexual parents.<ref name=cpa2006/><ref name="AAP-Discovery" /><ref name=apsp>{{cite web |url=http://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/LGBT-Families-Lit-Review.pdf |title=Elizabeth Short, Damien W. Riggs, Amaryll Perlesz, Rhonda Brown, Graeme Kane: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Parented Families – A Literature Review prepared for The Australian Psychological Society |access-date=5 November 2010 |archive-date=4 March 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110304014530/http://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/LGBT-Families-Lit-Review.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name=amici2010>{{cite web|title=Brief of the American Psychological Association, The California Psychological Association, The American Psychiatric Association, and The American Association of Marriage and Family Therapy as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff-Appellees|url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus29.pdf|publisher=[[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]]|access-date=28 September 2012|archive-date=25 July 2014|archive-url=https://www.webcitation.org/6RKz9Wyf8?url=http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus29.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> According to scientific literature reviews, there is no evidence to the contrary.<ref name="aap2006">{{Cite journal|last1=Pawelski|first1=J.G.|last2=Perrin|first2=E.C.|last3=Foy|first3=J.M.|last4=Allen|first4=C.E.|last5=Crawford|first5=J.E.|last6=Del Monte|first6=M.|last7=Kaufman|first7=M.|last8=Klein|first8=J.D.|last9=Smith|first9=K.|last10=Springer|first10=S.|last11=Tanner|first11=J.L.|last12=Vickers|first12=D.L.|title=The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children|doi=10.1542/peds.2006-1279|journal=Pediatrics|volume=118|issue=1|pages=349–64|year=2006|pmid=16818585|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="herek">{{cite journal|author=Herek, GM |title=Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: a social science perspective |journal=The American Psychologist |volume=61 |issue=6 |pages=607–21 |date=September 2006 |pmid=16953748 |doi=10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.607 |url=http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/AP_06_pre.PDF |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100610164736/http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/AP_06_pre.PDF |archive-date=10 June 2010 }}</ref><ref name="How Does the Gender of Parents Matter?">{{cite journal|url=http://www.famigliearcobaleno.org/public/documenti/file/How-Does-the-Gender-of-Parents-Matter.pdf|title=How Does the Gender of Parents Matter?|author1=Biblarz, Timothy J.|author2=Stacey, Judith|journal=Journal of Marriage and Family|date=February 2010|volume=72|issue=1|pages=3–22|doi=10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130512111336/http://www.famigliearcobaleno.org/public/documenti/file/How-Does-the-Gender-of-Parents-Matter.pdf|archive-date=12 May 2013|citeseerx=10.1.1.593.4963}}</ref><ref name=cpa2005>{{cite web |url=http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/UserFiles/Documents/advocacy/brief.pdf |title=Brief presented to the Legislative House of Commons Committee on Bill C38 by the Canadian Psychological Association – 2 June 2005. |access-date=7 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121013225547/http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/advocacy/brief.pdf |archive-date=13 October 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
|||
====Adoption==== |
====Adoption==== |
||
{{main|LGBT adoption}} |
{{main|LGBT adoption}} |
||
[[File:World same-sex adoption laws.svg| |
[[File:World same-sex adoption laws.svg|center|thumb|upright=3|Legal status of adoption by same-sex couples around the world: {{legend|#800080|Joint adoption allowed}} |
||
{{legend|#ba75ff|Second-parent (stepchild) adoption allowed |
{{legend|#ba75ff|Second-parent (stepchild) adoption allowed}} |
||
{{legend|#CCCCCC|No laws allowing adoption by same-sex couples and no same-sex marriage}} |
{{legend|#CCCCCC|No laws allowing adoption by same-sex couples and no same-sex marriage}} |
||
{{legend|#E4D69D|Same-sex marriage but adoption by married same-sex couples not allowed}} |
{{legend|#E4D69D|Same-sex marriage but adoption by married same-sex couples not allowed}} |
||
]] |
]] |
||
All states that allow same-sex marriage also allow the joint [[adoption]] of children by |
All states that allow same-sex marriage also allow the joint [[adoption]] of children by those couples with the exception of Ecuador and a third of states in Mexico, though such restrictions have been ruled unconstitutional in Mexico. In addition, Bolivia, Croatia, Israel and Liechtenstein, which do not recognize same-sex marriage, nonetheless permit joint adoption by same-sex couples. Some additional states do not recognize same-sex marriage but allow stepchild adoption by couples in civil unions, namely the Czech Republic and San Marino.{{citation needed|date=December 2023}} |
||
As of 2010, more than 16,000 same-sex couples were raising an estimated 22,000 adopted children in the United States,<ref>{{cite web|title=LGBT Adoption Statistics|url=http://www.lifelongadoptions.com/lgbt-adoption/lgbt-adoption-statistics|website=lifelongadoptions.com|access-date=13 February 2016|archive-date=29 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429011127/https://www.lifelongadoptions.com/lgbt-adoption/lgbt-adoption-statistics|url-status=live}}</ref> 4% of all adopted children.<ref>{{cite web|title=Families are created with love|url=http://gayadoption.org/facts-supporting-gay-adoption|website=gayadoption.org|access-date=13 February 2016|archive-date=6 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306081250/http://gayadoption.org/facts-supporting-gay-adoption/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
====Surrogacy and IVF treatment==== |
|||
{{main|Assisted reproductive technology}} |
|||
A gay or bisexual man has the option of [[surrogacy]], the process in which a woman bears a child for another person through [[artificial insemination]] or carries another woman's surgically implanted [[fertilized egg]] to birth. A lesbian or bisexual woman has the option of artificial insemination.<ref>The Fertility Sourcebook, Third Edition – Page 245, M. Sara Rosenthal – 2002</ref><ref>An Introduction to Family Social Work – Page 348, Donald Collins, Catheleen Jordan, Heather Coleman – 2009</ref> Whether these arrangements are legal are subject to controversy in several jurisdictions.<ref>{{cite web|title=Same-sex couples seeking IVF on the NHS face discrimination|url=https://vardags.com/family-law/same-sex-discrimination-fertility|access-date=2021-09-20|website=vardags.com|language=en|archive-date=20 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210920212715/https://vardags.com/family-law/same-sex-discrimination-fertility|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
===Transgender and intersex people=== |
===Transgender and intersex people=== |
||
Line 508: | Line 515: | ||
The legal status of same-sex marriage may have implications for the marriages of couples in which one or both parties are [[transgender]], depending on how sex is defined within a jurisdiction. Transgender and [[intersex]] individuals may be prohibited from marrying partners of the "opposite" sex or permitted to marry partners of the "same" sex due to legal distinctions.{{citation needed|date=February 2021}} In any legal jurisdiction where marriages are defined without distinction of a requirement of a male and female, these complications do not occur. In addition, some legal jurisdictions recognize a legal and official change of gender, which would allow a transgender male or female to be legally married in accordance with an adopted gender identity.<ref>Bockting, Walter, Autumn Benner, and Eli Coleman. "Gay and Bisexual Identity Development Among Female-to-Male Transsexuals in North America: Emergence of a Transgender Sexuality." ''Archives of Sexual Behavior'' 38.5 (October 2009): 688–701. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. 29 September 2009</ref> |
The legal status of same-sex marriage may have implications for the marriages of couples in which one or both parties are [[transgender]], depending on how sex is defined within a jurisdiction. Transgender and [[intersex]] individuals may be prohibited from marrying partners of the "opposite" sex or permitted to marry partners of the "same" sex due to legal distinctions.{{citation needed|date=February 2021}} In any legal jurisdiction where marriages are defined without distinction of a requirement of a male and female, these complications do not occur. In addition, some legal jurisdictions recognize a legal and official change of gender, which would allow a transgender male or female to be legally married in accordance with an adopted gender identity.<ref>Bockting, Walter, Autumn Benner, and Eli Coleman. "Gay and Bisexual Identity Development Among Female-to-Male Transsexuals in North America: Emergence of a Transgender Sexuality." ''Archives of Sexual Behavior'' 38.5 (October 2009): 688–701. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. 29 September 2009</ref> |
||
In the United Kingdom, the ''[[Gender Recognition Act 2004]]'' allows a person who has lived in their chosen gender for at least two years to receive a gender recognition certificate officially recognizing their new gender. Because in the United Kingdom marriages were until recently only for mixed-sex couples and civil partnerships are only for same-sex couples, a person had to dissolve their civil partnership before obtaining a gender recognition certificate{{citation needed|date=February 2020}}, and the same was formerly true for marriages in England and Wales, and still is in other territories. Such people are then free to enter or re-enter civil partnerships or marriages in accordance with their newly recognized gender identity. In Austria, a similar provision requiring transsexual people to divorce before having their legal sex marker corrected was found to be unconstitutional in 2006.<ref>{{ |
In the United Kingdom, the ''[[Gender Recognition Act 2004]]'' allows a person who has lived in their chosen gender for at least two years to receive a gender recognition certificate officially recognizing their new gender. Because in the United Kingdom marriages were until recently only for mixed-sex couples and civil partnerships are only for same-sex couples, a person had to dissolve their civil partnership before obtaining a gender recognition certificate{{citation needed|date=February 2020}}, and the same was formerly true for marriages in England and Wales, and still is in other territories. Such people are then free to enter or re-enter civil partnerships or marriages in accordance with their newly recognized gender identity. In Austria, a similar provision requiring transsexual people to divorce before having their [[legal sex]] marker corrected was found to be unconstitutional in 2006.<ref>{{Cite web |date=5 July 2006 |title=Austria gets first same-sex marriage |url=http://www.365gay.com/Newscon06/07/070506austria.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071017161302/http://365gay.com/Newscon06/07/070506austria.htm |archive-date=17 October 2007 |access-date=20 July 2008 |publisher=365gay.com}}</ref> In Quebec, prior to the legalization of same-sex marriage, only unmarried people could apply for legal change of gender. With the advent of same-sex marriage, this restriction was dropped. A similar provision including sterilization also existed in Sweden, but was phased out in 2013.<ref>{{Cite web |date=11 January 2013 |title=Sweden ends forced sterilization of trans |url=http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/sweden-ends-forced-sterilization-trans110113 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612234631/https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/sweden-ends-forced-sterilization-trans110113/ |archive-date=12 June 2018 |access-date=10 October 2017 |website=gaystarnews.com}}</ref> In the United States, transgender and intersex marriages was subject to legal complications.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Deborah |first=Anthony |date=Spring 2012 |title=CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE: TRANSSEXUAL MARRIAGE AND THE DISCONNECT BETWEEN SEX AND LEGAL SEX. |journal=Texas Journal of Women & the Law |volume=21 |issue=2}}</ref> As definitions and enforcement of marriage are defined by the states, these complications vary from state to state,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Schwartz |first=John |date=18 September 2009 |title=U.S. Defends Marriage Law |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/19/us/19brfs-USDEFENDSMAR_BRF.html |url-status=live |access-date=29 September 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714172436/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/19/us/19brfs-USDEFENDSMAR_BRF.html |archive-date=14 July 2014}}</ref> as some of them prohibit legal changes of gender.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Movement Advancement Project {{!}} Equality Maps |url=http://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190422164047/http://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps |archive-date=22 April 2019 |access-date=2019-04-19 |website=www.lgbtmap.org |language=en}}</ref> |
||
===Divorce=== |
===Divorce=== |
||
{{Main|Divorce of same-sex couples}} |
{{Main|Divorce of same-sex couples}} |
||
In the United States |
In the United States before the case of ''[[Obergefell v. Hodges]]'', couples in same-sex marriages could only obtain a divorce in jurisdictions that recognized same-sex marriages, with some exceptions.<ref>{{Cite web |author=Matthew S. Coleman |date=16 September 2015 |title=Obergefell v. Hodges |url=http://www.einhornharris.com/familylawblog/obergefell-v-hodges |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151224103921/http://www.einhornharris.com/familylawblog/obergefell-v-hodges/ |archive-date=24 December 2015 |access-date=8 November 2015 |publisher=Einhorn Harris}}</ref> |
||
===Judicial and legislative=== |
===Judicial and legislative=== |
||
{{Main|Conflict of marriage laws#Same-sex marriage}} |
{{Main|Conflict of marriage laws#Same-sex marriage}} |
||
There are differing positions regarding the manner in which same-sex marriage has been introduced into democratic jurisdictions. A "[[direct democracy|majority rules]]" position holds that same-sex marriage is valid, or void and illegal, based upon whether it has been accepted by a simple majority of voters or of their elected representatives.<ref>{{ |
There are differing positions regarding the manner in which same-sex marriage has been introduced into democratic jurisdictions. A "[[direct democracy|majority rules]]" position holds that same-sex marriage is valid, or void and illegal, based upon whether it has been accepted by a simple majority of voters or of their elected representatives.<ref name="USA Today">{{Cite news |last=Leff |first=Lisa |date=4 December 2008 |title=Poll: Calif. gay marriage ban driven by religion |work=USA Today |agency=Associated Press |url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2008-12-04-gay-poll_N.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081208080418/http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2008-12-04-gay-poll_N.htm |archive-date=8 December 2008}} archived here.</ref> |
||
In contrast, a [[civil rights]] view holds that the institution can be validly created through the ruling of an impartial judiciary carefully examining the questioning and finding that the right to marry regardless of the gender of the participants is guaranteed under the civil rights laws of the jurisdiction.<ref>{{ |
In contrast, a [[civil rights]] view holds that the institution can be validly created through the ruling of an impartial judiciary carefully examining the questioning and finding that the right to marry regardless of the gender of the participants is guaranteed under the civil rights laws of the jurisdiction.<ref name="bbc">{{Cite news |last=Mirchandani, Rajesh |date=12 November 2008 |title=Divisions persist over gay marriage ban |work=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7723645.stm |url-status=live |access-date=18 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140428173747/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7723645.stm |archive-date=28 April 2014}}</ref> |
||
==Public opinion== |
==Public opinion== |
||
{{See also|Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States|Public opinion of same-sex marriage in Australia}} |
|||
[[File:Public Support of Same-Sex Marriage.svg|center|thumb|upright=3|Public opinion of same-sex marriage. Fraction in favor:<ref>For ease of comparison, only 'yes' and 'no' responses are counted. For old polling data, support figures have been adjusted upward @1%/year.</ref> |
|||
{{col-begin}} |
{{col-begin}} |
||
{{col-break}} |
{{col-break}} |
||
{{legend|#58006e|5⁄6+}} |
{{legend|#58006e|5⁄6+}} |
||
{{legend|#b000dc|2⁄3+}} |
{{legend|#b000dc|2⁄3+}} |
||
{{legend|#dd55ff|1⁄2+}} |
|||
{{col-break}} |
{{col-break}} |
||
{{legend|#dd55ff|1⁄2+}} |
|||
{{legend|#f5cdff|1⁄3+}} |
{{legend|#f5cdff|1⁄3+}} |
||
{{col-break}} |
|||
{{legend|#fcefff|1⁄6+}} |
{{legend|#fcefff|1⁄6+}} |
||
{{legend|#e0e0e0|<1⁄6}} |
{{legend|#e0e0e0|<1⁄6}} |
||
{{col-break}} |
|||
{{legend|#f0f0f0|no polls}} |
{{legend|#f0f0f0|no polls}} |
||
{{col-end}} |
{{col-end}} |
||
]] |
]] |
||
{{See also|Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States|Public opinion of same-sex marriage in Australia}} |
|||
Numerous polls and studies on the issue have been conducted. A trend of increasing support for same-sex marriage has been revealed across many countries of the world, often driven in large part by a generational difference in support. Polling that was conducted in developed democracies in this century shows a majority of people in support of same-sex marriage. Support for same-sex marriage has increased across every age group, political ideology, religion, gender, race and region of various developed countries in the world.<ref name="Gallup2011">{{ |
Numerous polls and studies on the issue have been conducted. A trend of increasing support for same-sex marriage has been revealed across many countries of the world, often driven in large part by a generational difference in support. Polling that was conducted in developed democracies in this century shows a majority of people in support of same-sex marriage. Support for same-sex marriage has increased across every age group, political ideology, religion, gender, race and region of various developed countries in the world.<ref name="Gallup2011">{{Cite web |last=Newport |first=Frank |date=20 May 2011 |title=For First Time, Majority of Americans Favor Legal Gay Marriage |url=http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/First-Time-Majority-Americans-Favor-Legal-Gay-Marriage.aspx |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140729043935/http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/First-Time-Majority-Americans-Favor-Legal-Gay-Marriage.aspx |archive-date=29 July 2014 |access-date=25 September 2012 |publisher=[[The Gallup Organization|Gallup]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Public Opinion: Nationally |url=http://www.australianmarriageequality.com/wp/who-supports-equality/a-majority-of-australians-support-marriage-equality |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110303043929/http://www.australianmarriageequality.com/wp/who-supports-equality/a-majority-of-australians-support-marriage-equality/ |archive-date=3 March 2011 |access-date=25 September 2012 |publisher=australianmarriageequality.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Gay Life in Estonia |url=http://www.globalgayz.com/europe/estonia/gay-life-in-estonia |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120716100828/http://www.globalgayz.com/europe/estonia/gay-life-in-estonia |archive-date=16 July 2012 |access-date=25 September 2012 |publisher=globalgayz.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Jowit |first=Juliette |date=12 June 2012 |title=Gay marriage gets ministerial approval |work=[[The Guardian]] |location=London |url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2012/jun/12/gay-marriage-receive-ministerial-approval |url-status=live |access-date=25 September 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190506173542/https://www.theguardian.com/society/2012/jun/12/gay-marriage-receive-ministerial-approval |archive-date=6 May 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=24 February 2011 |title=Most Irish people support gay marriage, poll says |work=PinkNews |url=http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2011/02/24/most-irish-people-support-gay-marriage-poll-says |url-status=dead |access-date=25 September 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130926032112/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2011/02/24/most-irish-people-support-gay-marriage-poll-says |archive-date=26 September 2013}}</ref>{{update inline|date=December 2021}} |
||
Various detailed polls and studies on same-sex marriage that were conducted in several countries show that support for same-sex marriage significantly increases with higher levels of education and is also significantly stronger among younger generations, with a clear trend of continually increasing support.<ref name="Pew Survey 2023">{{cite web|url=https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/06/13/how-people-in-24-countries-view-same-sex-marriage/|title=How people in 24 countries view same-sex marriage|access-date=12 December 2023}}</ref> |
|||
Various detailed polls and studies on same-sex marriage that were conducted in several countries show that support for same-sex marriage significantly increases with higher levels of education and is also significantly stronger among younger generations, with a clear trend of continually increasing support.<ref>{{cite web|title=Survey – Generations at Odds: The Millennial Generation and the Future of Gay and Lesbian Rights|url=http://publicreligion.org/research/2011/08/generations-at-odds|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121025004814/http://publicreligion.org/research/2011/08/generations-at-odds|archive-date=25 October 2012|access-date=25 September 2012|publisher=[[Public Religion Research Institute]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=18 November 2003|title=Pew Forum: Part 2: Gay Marriage|url=http://www.pewforum.org/PublicationPage.aspx?id=647|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120910053311/http://www.pewforum.org/PublicationPage.aspx?id=647|archive-date=10 September 2012|access-date=25 September 2012|publisher=[[Pew Research Center]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Poirier|first=Justine|title=Same-Sex Marriage: Let's Make a Change|url=http://www.montrealites.ca/justice/same-sex-marriage-lets-make-a-change.html|access-date=25 September 2012|publisher=Montréalités Justice|archive-date=25 July 2014|archive-url=https://www.webcitation.org/6RKz2QrJe?url=http://www.montrealites.ca/justice/same-sex-marriage-lets-make-a-change.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=16 March 2010|title=Data Points: Support for Legal Same-Sex Marriage|newspaper=The Chronicle of Higher Education|url=http://chronicle.com/article/Chart-Support-for-Legal/64683/|access-date=25 September 2012|archive-date=25 July 2014|archive-url=https://www.webcitation.org/6RKz35whW?url=http://chronicle.com/article/Chart-Support-for-Legal/64683/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="auto">{{cite web|title=Support for Same‐Sex Marriage in Latin America|url=http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/I0844.enrevised.pdf|access-date=25 September 2012|publisher=[[Vanderbilt University]]|archive-date=25 July 2014|archive-url=https://www.webcitation.org/6RKz498TK?url=http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/I0844.enrevised.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>{{update inline|date=December 2021}} |
|||
;Greater support with youth |
|||
[[Pew Research]] polling results from 32 countries found 21 with statistically higher support for same-sex marriage among those under 35 than among those over 35 in 2022–2023. Countries with the greatest absolute difference are placed to the left in the following chart. Countries without a significant generational difference are placed to the right.<ref name="Pew Survey 2023"/> |
|||
<div style="overflow:auto"> |
|||
{{ #invoke:Chart | bar-chart |
|||
| height = 400 |
|||
| width = 1200 |
|||
| stack = 1 |
|||
| group 1 = 33 : 52 : 37 : 34 : 52 : 43 : 35 : 57 : 54 : 64 : 48 : 47 : 59 : 62 : 71 : 73 : 34 : 20 : 5 : 90 : 15 : 89 : 87 : 82 : 80 : 79 : 74 : 53 : 36 : 31 : 5 : 2 |
|||
| group 2 = 42 : 29 : 28 : 27 : 26 : 24 : 24 : 22 : 22 : 20 : 19 : 17 : 15 : 13 : 11 : 8 : 8 : 7 : 7 : 6 : 5 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 |
|||
| x legends = <small>Taiw</small> : <small>Mex</small> : <small>Sing</small> : <small>ROK</small> : <small>HK</small> : <small>Gre</small> : <small>Pol</small> : <small>Viet</small> : <small>Thai</small> : <small>Jap</small> : <small>Cam</small> : <small>Braz</small> : <small>USA</small> : <small>Arg</small> : <small>Ital</small> : <small>Oz</small> : <small>S. Af.</small> : <small>Sri Lanka</small> : <small>Keny</small> : <small>Swed</small> : <small>Malay</small> : <small>Neth</small> : <small>Spa</small> : <small>Fran</small> : <small>Germ</small> : <small>Cana</small> : <small>UK</small> : <small>India</small> : <small>Isra</small> : <small>Hung</small> : <small>Indo</small> : <small>Nigeria</small> |
|||
| colors = navy : blue |
|||
| group names = over 35 : additional support from those under 35 |
|||
}} |
|||
</div> |
|||
A 2016 survey by the [[Varkey Foundation]] found similarly high support of same-sex marriage (63%) among 18–21-year-olds in an online survey of 18 countries around the world.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.varkeyfoundation.org/media/4487/global-young-people-report-single-pages-new.pdf|title=What the world's young people think and feel.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://aifs.gov.au/research/family-matters/no-100/who-supports-equal-rights-same-sex-couples|title=Who supports equal rights for same-sex couples? |website=Australian Institute of Family Studies}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=Jun 2, 2015 |title=Age is decisive factor when it comes to supporting same-sex marriage: LAPOP |url=https://news.vanderbilt.edu/2015/06/02/age-is-decisive-factor-when-it-comes-to-supporting-same-sex-marriage-lapop/ |access-date=2023-12-26 |website=Vanderbilt University |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
{{ #invoke:Chart | bar-chart |
|||
| height = 300 |
|||
| width = 800 |
|||
| stack = 1 |
|||
| group 1 = 82 : 81 : 77 : 77 : 74 : 74 : 73 : 73 : 71 : 59 : 54 : 54 : 53 : 53 : 50 : 47 : 33 : 16 |
|||
| x legends = <small>Germ</small> : <small>Cana</small> : <small>Oz</small> : <small>UK</small> : <small>NZ</small> : <small>Fran</small> : <small>Ital</small> : <small>Arg</small> : <small>USA</small> : <small>Braz</small> : <small>Chin</small> : <small>S. Af.</small> : <small>India</small> : <small>Jap</small> : <small>Isra</small> : <small>ROK</small> : <small>Turk</small> : <small>Nigeria</small> |
|||
| colors = navy |
|||
| group names = 18–21 year-olds |
|||
}} |
|||
(The sampling error is approx. 4% for Nigeria and 3% for the other countries. Because of legal constraints, the question on same-sex marriage was not asked in the survey countries of Russia and Indonesia.) |
|||
{{Same-sex marriage opinion polls worldwide}} |
{{Same-sex marriage opinion polls worldwide}} |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
{{Portal| |
{{Portal|LGBTQ|Human sexuality|Law}} |
||
* [[LGBT rights by country or territory]] |
* [[LGBT rights by country or territory]] |
||
* [[List of same-sex married couples]] |
* [[List of same-sex married couples]] |
||
* [[Religion and sexuality]] |
* [[Religion and sexuality]] |
||
* [[Legal status of same-sex marriage]] |
|||
* [[Societal attitudes toward homosexuality]] |
|||
{{clear}} |
{{clear}} |
||
==Notes== |
==Notes== |
||
{{notelist}} |
{{notelist|35em}} |
||
{{reflist|group=note}} |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist|colwidth=30em}} |
||
==Bibliography== |
==Bibliography== |
||
{{refbegin|30em}} |
{{refbegin|30em}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Boswell |first=John |title=The Marriage of Likeness: Same-sex Unions in Pre-modern Europe |publisher=Simon Harper and Collins |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-00-255508-1 |location=New York |author-link=John Boswell (historian)}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Boswell |first=John |url=https://archive.org/details/samesexunionsinp00bosw |title=Same-sex Unions in Premodern Europe |publisher=Villard Books |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-679-43228-9 |location=New York |author-link=John Boswell}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Brownson |first=James V. |url=https://archive.org/details/biblegendersexua0000brow |title=Bible, Gender, Sexuality: Reforming the Church's Debate on Same-Sex Relationships |publisher=[[Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company]] |year=2013 |isbn=978-0-8028-6863-3 |url-access=registration}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Calò |first=Emanuele |title=Matrimonio à la carte — Matrimoni, convivenze registrate e divorzi dopo l'intervento comunitario |publisher=Giuffrè |year=2009 |location=Milano}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Caramagno |first=Thomas C. |title=Irreconcilable Differences? Intellectual Stalemate in the Gay Rights Debate |publisher=Praeger |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-275-97721-4 |location=Westport, CT}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Cere |first=Daniel |url=https://archive.org/details/divorcingmarriag0000unse |title=Divorcing Marriage: Unveiling the Dangers in Canada's New Social Experiment |publisher=McGill-Queen's University Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-7735-2895-6 |location=Montreal |author-link=Daniel Cere |url-access=registration}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Chauncey |first=George |url=https://archive.org/details/whymarriagehisto0000chau |title=Why Marriage?: The History Shaping Today's Debate over Gay Equality |publisher=Basic Books |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-465-00957-2 |location=New York |author-link=George Chauncey |url-access=registration}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Dobson |first=James C. |url=https://archive.org/details/marriageunderfir00dobs |title=Marriage Under Fire |publisher=Multnomah |year=2004 |isbn=978-1-59052-431-2 |location=Sisters, Or. |author-link=James Dobson}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |title=The Meaning of Marriage: Family, State, Market, And Morals |publisher=Spence Publishing Company |year=2006 |isbn=978-1-890626-64-8 |editor-last=George |editor-first=Robert P. |location=Dallas |editor-last2=Elshtain |editor-first2=Jean Bethke |editor-link2=Jean Bethke Elshtain}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |title=Our Families, Our Values: Snapshots of Queer Kinship |publisher=The Harrington Park Press, An Imprint of the Haworth Press, Inc. |year=2008 |isbn=978-1-56023-910-9 |editor-last=Goss |editor-first=Robert E. |editor-link=Robert Goss |location=New York, NY |editor-last2=Strongheart |editor-first2=Amy Adams Squire}} |
||
* {{Cite book| |
* {{Cite book |last1=Greenwich, Alex |title=Yes Yes Yes: Australia's Journey to Marriage Equality |last2=Robinson, Shirleene |publisher=NewSouth Books |year=2018 |isbn=9781742235998 |location=Australia}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Larocque |first=Sylvain |title=Gay Marriage: The Story of a Canadian Social Revolution |publisher=James Lorimer & Company |year=2006 |isbn=978-1-55028-927-5 |location=Toronto}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |title=Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty: Emerging Conflicts |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-7425-6326-1 |editor-last=Laycock |editor-first=Douglas |editor-link=Douglas Laycock |location=Lanham, MD |editor-last2=Picarello |editor-first2=Anthony Jr. |editor-last3=Wilson |editor-first3=Robin Fretwell}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Moats |first=David |url=https://archive.org/details/civilwarsbattlef00moat |title=Civil Wars: A Battle For Gay Marriage |publisher=Harcourt, Inc. |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-15-101017-2 |location=New York, NY}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Oliver |first=Marilyn Tower |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XXIFAAAACAAJ |title=Gay and lesbian rights: a struggle |publisher=Enslow Publishers |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-89490-958-0 |access-date=28 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210204174006/https://books.google.com/books?id=XXIFAAAACAAJ |archive-date=4 February 2021 |url-status=live}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Rauch |first=Jonathan |title=Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good for Gays, Good for Straights, and Good for America |title-link=Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good for Gays, Good for Straights, and Good for America |publisher=Henry Holt and Company, LLC |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-8050-7815-2 |location=New York, NY |author-link=Jonathan Rauch}} |
||
* {{Cite book|title=How Powerful We Are : Behind the scenes with one of Australia's leading activists |
* {{Cite book |last=Rugg, Sally |title=How Powerful We Are : Behind the scenes with one of Australia's leading activists |publisher=Hachette Australia |year=2019 |isbn=9780733642227 |location=Australia |oclc=1103918151}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last1=Smart |first1=Carol |title=Same sex marriages: new generations, new relationships. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences |last2=Heaphy |first2=Brian |last3=Einarsdottir |first3=Anna |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |year=2013 |isbn=9780230300231 |location=Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Spedale |first=Darren |url=https://archive.org/details/gaymarriageforbe0000eskr |title=Gay Marriage: For Better or For Worse? What We've Learned From the Evidence |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-19-518751-9 |location=New York |author-link=Darren Spedale}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |title=Same-Sex Marriage: Pro and Con — A Reader, Revised Updated Edition |publisher=Vintage Books, a division of Random House, Inc. |year=2004 |isbn=978-1-4000-7866-0 |editor-last=Sullivan |editor-first=Andrew |editor-link=Andrew Sullivan |location=New York, NY}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Truluck |first=Rembert S. |title=Steps to Recovery from Bible Abuse |publisher=Chi Rho Press, Inc. |year=2000 |isbn=978-1-888493-16-0 |location=Gaithersburg, MD |author-link=Rembert S. Truluck}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book |last=Wolfson |first=Evan |url=https://archive.org/details/whymarriagematte00wolf |title=Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality, and Gay People's Right to Marry |publisher=Simon & Schuster |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-7432-6459-4 |location=New York |author-link=Evan Wolfson |url-access=registration}} |
||
{{refend}} |
{{refend}} |
||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{sister project links|auto=yes}} |
|||
{{Wikimedia}} |
|||
* {{Curlie|Society/Gay,_Lesbian,_and_Bisexual/Law/Marriage_and_Domestic_Partnership}} |
|||
<!--======================== {{No more links}} ============================ |
<!--======================== {{No more links}} ============================ |
||
| PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS IN ADDING MORE LINKS TO THIS ARTICLE. Wikipedia | |
| PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS IN ADDING MORE LINKS TO THIS ARTICLE. Wikipedia | |
||
Line 602: | Line 640: | ||
{{Marriage amendments}} |
{{Marriage amendments}} |
||
{{Types of marriages}} |
{{Types of marriages}} |
||
{{ |
{{LGBTQ|state=collapsed|rights=expanded}} |
||
{{Discrimination}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
{{Authority control}} |
||
[[Category:Same-sex marriage| ]] |
[[Category:Same-sex marriage| ]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:LGBTQ-related legislation]] |
Latest revision as of 08:51, 3 December 2024
Part of the LGBTQ rights series |
LGBTQ portal |
Part of a series on |
LGBTQ topics |
---|
LGBTQ portal |
Part of a series on |
Discrimination |
---|
Same-sex marriage, also known as gay marriage, is the marriage of two people of the same legal sex. As of 2024,[update] marriage between same-sex couples is legally performed and recognized in 36 countries, with a total population of 1.5 billion people (20% of the world's population). The most recent jurisdictions to legalize same-sex marriage are Greece and Aruba and Curaçao in the Netherlands. Two more countries, Liechtenstein and Thailand, are set to begin performing same-sex marriages in January 2025.
Same-sex marriage is legally recognized in a large majority of the world's developed countries; notable exceptions are Italy, Japan, South Korea and the Czech Republic. Adoption rights are not necessarily covered, though most states with same-sex marriage allow those couples to jointly adopt as other married couples can. Some countries, such as Nigeria and Russia, restrict advocacy for same-sex marriage.[1] A few of these are among the 35 countries (as of 2023) that constitutionally define marriage to prevent marriage between couples of the same sex, with most of those provisions enacted in recent decades as a preventative measure. Other countries have constitutionally mandated Islamic law, which is generally interpreted as prohibiting marriage between same-sex couples.[citation needed] In six of the former and most of the latter, homosexuality itself is criminalized.
There are records of marriage between men dating back to the first century.[2] Michael McConnell and Jack Baker[3][4] are the first same sex couple in modern recorded history[5] known to obtain a marriage license,[6] have their marriage solemnized, which occurred on September 3, 1971, in Minnesota,[7] and have it legally recognized by any form of government.[8][9] The first law providing for marriage equality between same-sex and opposite-sex couples was passed in the continental Netherlands in 2000 and took effect on 1 April 2001.[10] The application of marriage law equally to same-sex and opposite-sex couples has varied by jurisdiction, and has come about through legislative change to marriage law, court rulings based on constitutional guarantees of equality, recognition that marriage of same-sex couples is allowed by existing marriage law, and by direct popular vote, such as through referendums and initiatives.[11][12] The most prominent supporters of same-sex marriage are the world's major medical and scientific communities,[13][14][15] along with human rights and civil rights organizations,[16] while its most prominent opponents are religious fundamentalist groups.[17] Polls consistently show continually rising support for the recognition of same-sex marriage in all developed democracies and in many developing countries.
Scientific studies show that the financial, psychological, and physical well-being of gay people are enhanced by marriage, and that the children of same-sex parents benefit from being raised by married same-sex couples within a marital union that is recognized by law and supported by societal institutions. At the same time, no harm is done to the institution of marriage among heterosexuals.[18] Social science research indicates that the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage stigmatizes and invites public discrimination against gay and lesbian people, with research repudiating the notion that either civilization or viable social orders depend upon restricting marriage to heterosexuals.[19][20][21] Same-sex marriage can provide those in committed same-sex relationships with relevant government services and make financial demands on them comparable to that required of those in opposite-sex marriages, and also gives them legal protections such as inheritance and hospital visitation rights.[22] Opposition is based on claims such as that homosexuality is unnatural and abnormal, that the recognition of same-sex unions will promote homosexuality in society, and that children are better off when raised by opposite-sex couples. These claims are refuted by scientific studies, which show that homosexuality is a natural and normal variation in human sexuality, that sexual orientation is not a choice, and that children of same-sex couples fare just as well as the children of opposite-sex couples.[13]
Terminology
Alternative terms
Some proponents of the legal recognition of same-sex marriage—such as Marriage Equality USA (founded in 1998), Freedom to Marry (founded in 2003), Canadians for Equal Marriage, and Marriage for All Japan - used the terms marriage equality and equal marriage to signal that their goal was for same-sex marriage to be recognized on equal ground with opposite-sex marriage.[23][24][25][26][27][28] The Associated Press recommends the use of same-sex marriage over gay marriage.[29] In deciding whether to use the term gay marriage, it may also be noted that not everyone in a same-sex marriage is gay – for example, some are bisexual – and therefore using the term gay marriage is sometimes considered erasure of such people.[30][31]
Use of the term marriage
Anthropologists have struggled to determine a definition of marriage that absorbs commonalities of the social construct across cultures around the world.[32][33] Many proposed definitions have been criticized for failing to recognize the existence of same-sex marriage in some cultures, including those of more than 30 African peoples, such as the Kikuyu and Nuer.[33][34][35]
With several countries revising their marriage laws to recognize same-sex couples in the 21st century, all major English dictionaries have revised their definition of the word marriage to either drop gender specifications or supplement them with secondary definitions to include gender-neutral language or explicit recognition of same-sex unions.[36][37] The Oxford English Dictionary has recognized same-sex marriage since 2000.[38]
Opponents of same-sex marriage who want marriage to be restricted to pairings of a man and a woman, such as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Catholic Church, and the Southern Baptist Convention, use the term traditional marriage to mean opposite-sex marriage.[17]
History
Ancient
A reference to marriage between same-sex couples appears in the Sifra, which was written in the 3rd century CE. The Book of Leviticus prohibited homosexual relations, and the Hebrews were warned not to "follow the acts of the land of Egypt or the acts of the land of Canaan" (Lev. 18:22, 20:13). The Sifra clarifies what these ambiguous "acts" were, and that they included marriage between same-sex couples: "A man would marry a man and a woman a woman, a man would marry a woman and her daughter, and a woman would be married to two men."[39]
A few scholars believe that in the early Roman Empire some male couples were celebrating traditional marriage rites in the presence of friends. Male–male weddings are reported by sources that mock them; the feelings of the participants are not recorded.[40] Various ancient sources state that the emperor Nero celebrated two public weddings with males, once taking the role of the bride (with a freedman Pythagoras), and once the groom (with Sporus); there may have been a third in which he was the bride.[41] In the early 3rd century AD, the emperor Elagabalus is reported to have been the bride in a wedding to his male partner. Other mature men at his court had husbands, or said they had husbands in imitation of the emperor.[42] Roman law did not recognize marriage between males, but one of the grounds for disapproval expressed in Juvenal's satire is that celebrating the rites would lead to expectations for such marriages to be registered officially.[43] As the empire was becoming Christianized in the 4th century, legal prohibitions against marriage between males began to appear.[43]
Contemporary
Michael McConnell and Jack Baker[3][4] are the first same sex couple in modern recorded history[5] known to obtain a marriage license,[6] have their marriage solemnized, which occurred on September 3, 1971, in Minnesota,[7] and have it legally recognized by any form of government.[8][9] Historians variously trace the beginning of the modern movement in support of same-sex marriage to anywhere from around the 1980s to the 1990s. During the 1980s in the United States, the AIDS epidemic led to increased attention on the legal aspects of same-sex relationships.[44] Andrew Sullivan made the first case for same sex marriage in a major American journal in 1989,[45] published in The New Republic.[46]
In 1989, Denmark became the first country to legally recognize a relationship for same-sex couples, establishing registered partnerships, which gave those in same-sex relationships "most rights of married heterosexuals, but not the right to adopt or obtain joint custody of a child".[47] In 2001, the continental Netherlands became the first country to broaden marriage laws to include same-sex couples.[10][48] Since then, same-sex marriage has been established by law in 34 other countries, including most of the Americas and Western Europe. Yet its spread has been uneven — South Africa is the only country in Africa to take the step; Taiwan and Thailand are the only ones in Asia.[49][50]
Timeline
The summary table below lists in chronological order the sovereign states (the United Nations member states and Taiwan) that have legalized same-sex marriage. As of 2024, 38 states have legalized in some capacity.[51]
Dates are when marriages between same-sex couples began to be officially certified, or when local laws were passed if marriages were already legal under higher authority.
Same-sex marriage around the world
Same-sex marriage is legally performed and recognized in 36 countries: Andorra, Argentina, Australia,[a] Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Denmark,[b] Ecuador,[c] Estonia, Finland, France,[d] Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico,[e] the Netherlands,[f] New Zealand,[g] Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, the United Kingdom,[h] the United States,[i] and Uruguay.[52] Same-sex marriage performed remotely or abroad is recognized with full marital rights by Israel.[53]
Same-sex marriage will begin to be performed by Liechtenstein and Thailand in January 2025, and is under consideration by the legislature or the courts in El Salvador,[54][55] Italy,[56][57] Japan,[58] Nepal,[j] and Venezuela.[62]
Civil unions are being considered in a number of countries, including Kosovo,[63] Lithuania,[64] Peru,[65] the Philippines,[66] Poland,[67] and Ukraine.[68][69]
On 12 March 2015, the European Parliament passed a non-binding resolution encouraging EU institutions and member states to "[reflect] on the recognition of same-sex marriage or same-sex civil union as a political, social and human and civil rights issue".[70][71]
In response to the international spread of same-sex marriage, a number of countries have enacted preventative constitutional bans, with the most recent being Mali and Tuvalu in 2023, and Gabon in 2024. In other countries, such restrictions and limitations are effected through legislation. Even before same-sex marriage was first legislated, some countries had constitutions that specified that marriage was between a man and a woman.
International court rulings
European Court of Human Rights
In 2010, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled in Schalk and Kopf v Austria, a case involving an Austrian same-sex couple who were denied the right to marry.[72] The court found, by a vote of 4 to 3, that their human rights had not been violated.[73] The court further stated that same-sex unions are not protected under art. 12 of ECHR ("Right to marry"), which exclusively protects the right to marry of opposite-sex couples (without regard if the sex of the partners is the result of birth or of sex change), but they are protected under art. 8 of ECHR ("Right to respect for private and family life") and art. 14 ("Prohibition of discrimination").[74]
Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights states that: "Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family, according to the national laws governing the exercise of this right",[75] not limiting marriage to those in a heterosexual relationship. However, the ECHR stated in Schalk and Kopf v Austria that this provision was intended to limit marriage to heterosexual relationships, as it used the term "men and women" instead of "everyone".[72] Nevertheless, the court accepted and is considering cases concerning same-sex marriage recognition, e.g. Andersen v Poland.[76] In 2021, the court ruled in Fedotova and Others v. Russia—followed by later judgements concerning other member states—that countries must provide some sort of legal recognition to same-sex couples, although not necessarily marriage.[77]
European Union
On 5 June 2018, the European Court of Justice ruled, in a case from Romania, that, under the specific conditions of the couple in question, married same-sex couples have the same residency rights as other married couples in an EU country, even if that country does not permit or recognize same-sex marriage.[78][79] However, the ruling was not implemented in Romania and on 14 September 2021 the European Parliament passed a resolution calling on the European Commission to ensure that the ruling is respected across the EU.[80][81]
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
On 8 January 2018, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) issued an advisory opinion that states party to the American Convention on Human Rights should grant same-sex couples accession to all existing domestic legal systems of family registration, including marriage, along with all rights that derive from marriage. The Court recommended that governments issue temporary decrees recognizing same-sex marriage until new legislation is brought in. They also said that it was inadmissible and discriminatory for a separate legal provision to be established (such as civil unions) instead of same-sex marriage.[82]
Other arrangements
Civil unions
Civil union, civil partnership, domestic partnership, registered partnership, unregistered partnership, and unregistered cohabitation statuses offer varying legal benefits of marriage. As of 3 December 2024, countries that have an alternative form of legal recognition other than marriage on a national level are: Bolivia, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Montenegro and San Marino.[84][85] Same-sex marriage performed remotely or abroad is recognized with full marital rights by Israel. Poland offers more limited rights. Additionally, various cities and counties in Cambodia and Japan offer same-sex couples varying levels of benefits, which include hospital visitation rights and others.
Additionally, eighteen countries that have legally recognized same-sex marriage also have an alternative form of recognition for same-sex couples, usually available to heterosexual couples as well: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, France, Greece, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, the United Kingdom and Uruguay.[86][87][88][89]
They are also available in parts of the United States (Arizona,[k] California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Nevada and Oregon) and Canada.[90][91]
Non-sexual same-sex marriage
Kenya
Female same-sex marriage is practiced among the Gikuyu, Nandi, Kamba, Kipsigis, and to a lesser extent neighboring peoples. About 5–10% of women are in such marriages. However, this is not seen as homosexual, but is instead a way for families without sons to keep their inheritance within the family.[92]
Nigeria
Among the Igbo people and probably other peoples in the south of the country, there are circumstances where a marriage between women is considered appropriate, such as when a woman has no child and her husband dies, and she takes a wife to perpetuate her inheritance and family lineage.[93]
Studies
The American Anthropological Association stated on 26 February 2004:
The results of more than a century of anthropological research on households, kinship relationships, and families, across cultures and through time, provide no support whatsoever for the view that either civilization or viable social orders depend upon marriage as an exclusively heterosexual institution. Rather, anthropological research supports the conclusion that a vast array of family types, including families built upon same-sex partnerships, can contribute to stable and humane societies.[21]
Research findings from 1998 to 2015 from the University of Virginia, Michigan State University, Florida State University, the University of Amsterdam, the New York State Psychiatric Institute, Stanford University, the University of California-San Francisco, the University of California-Los Angeles, Tufts University, Boston Medical Center, the Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health, and independent researchers also support the findings of this study.[94][vague]
The overall socio-economic and health effects of legal access to same-sex marriage around the world have been summarized by Badgett and co-authors.[95] The review found that sexual minority individuals took-up legal marriage when it became available to them (but at lower rates than different-sex couples). There is instead no evidence that same-sex marriage legalization affected different-sex marriages. On the health side, same-sex marriage legalization increased health insurance coverage for individuals in same-sex couples (in the US), and it led to improvements in sexual health among men who have sex with men, while there is mixed evidence on mental health effects among sexual minorities. In addition, the study found mixed evidence on a range of downstream social outcomes such as attitudes toward LGBTQ+ people and employment choices of sexual minorities.
Health
As of 2006[update], the data of current psychological and other social science studies on same-sex marriage in comparison to mixed-sex marriage indicate that same-sex and mixed-sex relationships do not differ in their essential psychosocial dimensions; that a parent's sexual orientation is unrelated to their ability to provide a healthy and nurturing family environment; and that marriage bestows substantial psychological, social, and health benefits. Same-sex parents and carers and their children are likely to benefit in numerous ways from legal recognition of their families, and providing such recognition through marriage will bestow greater benefit than civil unions or domestic partnerships.[96][97][needs update] Studies in the United States have correlated legalization of same-sex marriage to lower rates of HIV infection,[98][99] psychiatric disorders,[100][101] and suicide rate in the LGBT population.[102][103]
Issues
While few societies have recognized same-sex unions as marriages,[needs update] the historical and anthropological record reveals a large range of attitudes towards same-sex unions ranging from praise, through full acceptance and integration, sympathetic toleration, indifference, prohibition and discrimination, to persecution and physical annihilation.[citation needed] Opponents of same-sex marriages have argued that same-sex marriage, while doing good for the couples that participate in them and the children they are raising,[104] undermines a right of children to be raised by their biological mother and father.[105] Some supporters of same-sex marriages take the view that the government should have no role in regulating personal relationships,[106] while others argue that same-sex marriages would provide social benefits to same-sex couples.[l] The debate regarding same-sex marriages includes debate based upon social viewpoints as well as debate based on majority rules, religious convictions, economic arguments, health-related concerns, and a variety of other issues.[citation needed]
Parenting
Scientific literature indicates that parents' financial, psychological and physical well-being is enhanced by marriage and that children benefit from being raised by two parents within a legally recognized union (either a mixed-sex or same-sex union). As a result, professional scientific associations have argued for same-sex marriage to be legally recognized as it will be beneficial to the children of same-sex parents or carers.[14][15][107][108][109]
Scientific research has been generally consistent in showing that lesbian and gay parents are as fit and capable as heterosexual parents, and their children are as psychologically healthy and well-adjusted as children reared by heterosexual parents.[15][109][110][111] According to scientific literature reviews, there is no evidence to the contrary.[96][112][113][114][needs update]
Compared to heterosexual couples, same-sex couples have a greater need for adoption or assisted reproductive technology to become parents. Lesbian couples often use artificial insemination to achieve pregnancy, and reciprocal in vitro fertilization (where one woman provides the egg and the other gestates the child) is becoming more popular in the 2020s, although many couples cannot afford it. Surrogacy is an option for wealthier gay male couples, but the cost is prohibitive. Other same-sex couples adopt children or raise the children from earlier opposite-sex relationships.[115][116]
Adoption
All states that allow same-sex marriage also allow the joint adoption of children by those couples with the exception of Ecuador and a third of states in Mexico, though such restrictions have been ruled unconstitutional in Mexico. In addition, Bolivia, Croatia, Israel and Liechtenstein, which do not recognize same-sex marriage, nonetheless permit joint adoption by same-sex couples. Some additional states do not recognize same-sex marriage but allow stepchild adoption by couples in civil unions, namely the Czech Republic and San Marino.[citation needed]
Transgender and intersex people
This article or section possibly contains synthesis of material that does not verifiably mention or relate to the main topic. (May 2017) |
The legal status of same-sex marriage may have implications for the marriages of couples in which one or both parties are transgender, depending on how sex is defined within a jurisdiction. Transgender and intersex individuals may be prohibited from marrying partners of the "opposite" sex or permitted to marry partners of the "same" sex due to legal distinctions.[citation needed] In any legal jurisdiction where marriages are defined without distinction of a requirement of a male and female, these complications do not occur. In addition, some legal jurisdictions recognize a legal and official change of gender, which would allow a transgender male or female to be legally married in accordance with an adopted gender identity.[117]
In the United Kingdom, the Gender Recognition Act 2004 allows a person who has lived in their chosen gender for at least two years to receive a gender recognition certificate officially recognizing their new gender. Because in the United Kingdom marriages were until recently only for mixed-sex couples and civil partnerships are only for same-sex couples, a person had to dissolve their civil partnership before obtaining a gender recognition certificate[citation needed], and the same was formerly true for marriages in England and Wales, and still is in other territories. Such people are then free to enter or re-enter civil partnerships or marriages in accordance with their newly recognized gender identity. In Austria, a similar provision requiring transsexual people to divorce before having their legal sex marker corrected was found to be unconstitutional in 2006.[118] In Quebec, prior to the legalization of same-sex marriage, only unmarried people could apply for legal change of gender. With the advent of same-sex marriage, this restriction was dropped. A similar provision including sterilization also existed in Sweden, but was phased out in 2013.[119] In the United States, transgender and intersex marriages was subject to legal complications.[120] As definitions and enforcement of marriage are defined by the states, these complications vary from state to state,[121] as some of them prohibit legal changes of gender.[122]
Divorce
In the United States before the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, couples in same-sex marriages could only obtain a divorce in jurisdictions that recognized same-sex marriages, with some exceptions.[123]
Judicial and legislative
There are differing positions regarding the manner in which same-sex marriage has been introduced into democratic jurisdictions. A "majority rules" position holds that same-sex marriage is valid, or void and illegal, based upon whether it has been accepted by a simple majority of voters or of their elected representatives.[124]
In contrast, a civil rights view holds that the institution can be validly created through the ruling of an impartial judiciary carefully examining the questioning and finding that the right to marry regardless of the gender of the participants is guaranteed under the civil rights laws of the jurisdiction.[16]
Public opinion
5⁄6+ 2⁄3+ | 1⁄2+ 1⁄3+ | 1⁄6+ <1⁄6 | no polls |
Numerous polls and studies on the issue have been conducted. A trend of increasing support for same-sex marriage has been revealed across many countries of the world, often driven in large part by a generational difference in support. Polling that was conducted in developed democracies in this century shows a majority of people in support of same-sex marriage. Support for same-sex marriage has increased across every age group, political ideology, religion, gender, race and region of various developed countries in the world.[126][127][128][129][130][needs update]
Various detailed polls and studies on same-sex marriage that were conducted in several countries show that support for same-sex marriage significantly increases with higher levels of education and is also significantly stronger among younger generations, with a clear trend of continually increasing support.[131]
- Greater support with youth
Pew Research polling results from 32 countries found 21 with statistically higher support for same-sex marriage among those under 35 than among those over 35 in 2022–2023. Countries with the greatest absolute difference are placed to the left in the following chart. Countries without a significant generational difference are placed to the right.[131]
- over 35
- additional support from those under 35
A 2016 survey by the Varkey Foundation found similarly high support of same-sex marriage (63%) among 18–21-year-olds in an online survey of 18 countries around the world.[132][133][134]
(The sampling error is approx. 4% for Nigeria and 3% for the other countries. Because of legal constraints, the question on same-sex marriage was not asked in the survey countries of Russia and Indonesia.)
- Opinion polls for same-sex marriage by country
Country | Pollster | Year | For[m] | Against[m] | Neither[n] | Margin of error |
Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Albania | IPSOS | 2023 | 26% |
73% (74%) |
1% | [135] | |
Andorra | Institut d'Estudis Andorrans | 2013 | 70% (79%) |
19% (21%) |
11% | [136] | |
Antigua and Barbuda | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 12% | – | – | [137] | |
Argentina | Ipsos | 2024 | 69% (81%) |
16% [9% support some rights] (19%) |
15% not sure | ±5% | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 67% (72%) |
26% (28%) |
7% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Armenia | Pew Research Center | 2015 | 3% (3%) |
96% (97%) |
1% | ±3% | [140] [141] |
Aruba | 2021 | 46% |
[142] | ||||
Australia | Ipsos | 2024 | 64% (73%) |
25% [13% support some rights] (28%) |
12% not sure | ±3.5% | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 75% (77%) |
23% | 2% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Austria | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 65% (68%) |
30% (32%) |
5% | [143] | |
Bahamas | AmericasBarometer | 2015 | 11% | – | – | [144] | |
Belarus | Pew Research Center | 2015 | 16% (16%) |
81% (84%) |
3% | ±4% | [140] [141] |
Belgium | Ipsos | 2024 | 69% (78%) |
19% [9% support some rights] (22%) |
12% not sure | ±5% | [138] |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 79% | 19% | 2% not sure | [143] | ||
Belize | AmericasBarometer | 2014 | 8% | – | – | [144] | |
Bolivia | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 35% | 65% | – | ±1.0% | [137] |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | IPSOS | 2023 | 26% (27%) |
71% (73%) |
3% | [135] | |
Brazil | Ipsos (more urban/educated than representative) | 2024 | 51% (62%) |
31% [17% support some rights] (38%) |
18% not sure | ±3.5% [o] | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 52% (57%) |
40% (43%) |
8% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Bulgaria | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 17% (18%) |
75% (82%) |
8% | [143] | |
Cambodia | Pew Research Center | 2023 | 57% (58%) |
42% | 1% | [139] | |
Canada | Ipsos | 2024 | 65% (75%) |
22% [10% support some rights] (25%) |
13% not sure | ±3.5% | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 79% (84%) |
15% (16%) |
6% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Chile | Cadem | 2024 | 77% (82%) |
22% (18%) |
2% | ±3.6% | [145] |
China | Ipsos (more urban/educated than representative) | 2021 | 43% (52%) |
39% [20% support some rights] (48%) |
18% not sure | ±3.5% [o] | [146] |
Colombia | Ipsos (more urban/educated than representative) | 2024 | 46% (58%) |
33% [19% support some rights] (42%) |
21% | ±5% [o] | [138] |
Costa Rica | CIEP | 2018 | 35% | 64% | 1% | [147] | |
Croatia | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 42% (45%) |
51% (55%) |
7% | [143] | |
Cuba | Apretaste | 2019 | 63% | 37% | – | [148] | |
Cyprus | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 50% (53%) |
44% (47%) |
6% | [143] | |
Czech Republic | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 60% | 34% | 6% | [143] | |
Denmark | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 93% | 5% | 2% | [143] | |
Dominica | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 10% | 90% | – | ±1.1% | [137] |
Dominican Republic | CDN 37 | 2018 | 45% | 55% | - | [149] | |
Ecuador | AmericasBarometer | 2019 | 23% (31%) |
51% (69%) |
26% | [150] | |
El Salvador | Universidad Francisco Gavidia | 2021 | 82.5% | – | [151] | ||
Estonia | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 41% (45%) |
51% (55%) |
8% | [143] | |
Finland | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 76% (81%) |
18% (19%) |
6% | [143] | |
France | Ipsos | 2024 | 62% (70%) |
26% [16% support some rights] (30%) |
12% not sure | ±3.5% | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 82% (85%) |
14% (15%) |
4% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 79% (85%) |
14 (%) (15%) |
7% | [143] | ||
Georgia | Women's Initiatives Supporting Group | 2021 | 10% (12%) |
75% (88%) |
15% | [152] | |
Germany | Ipsos | 2024 | 73% (83%) |
18% [10% support some rights] (20%) |
12% not sure | ±3.5% | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 80% (82%) |
18% | 2% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 84% (87%) |
13%< | 3% | [143] | ||
Greece | Pew Research Center | 2023 | 48% (49%) |
49% (51%) |
3% | ±3.6% | [139] |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 57% (59%) |
40% (41%) |
3% | [143] | ||
Grenada | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 12% | 88% | – | ±1.4%c | [137] |
Guatemala | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 23% | 77% | – | ±1.1% | [137] |
Guyana | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 21% | 79% | – | ±1.3% | [144] |
Haiti | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 5% | 95% | – | ±0.3% | [137] |
Honduras | CID Gallup | 2018 | 17% (18%) |
75% (82%) |
8% | [153] | |
Hong Kong | Pew Research Center | 2023 | 58% (59%) |
40% (41%) |
2% | [139] | |
Hungary | Ipsos | 2024 | 44% (56%) |
35% [18% support some rights] (44%) |
21% not sure | ±5% | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 31% (33%) |
64% (67%) |
5% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 42% (45%) |
52% (55%) |
6% | [143] | ||
Iceland | Gallup | 2006 | 89% | 11% | – | [154] | |
India | Pew Research Center | 2023 | 53% (55%) |
43% (45%) |
4% | ±3.6% | [139] |
Indonesia | Pew Research Center | 2023 | 5% | 92% (95%) |
3% | ±3.6% | [139] |
Ireland | Ipsos (more urban/educated than representative) | 2024 | 68% (76%) |
21% [8% support some rights] (23%) |
10% | ±5%[o] | [138] |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 86% (91%) |
9% | 5% | [143] | ||
Israel | Pew Research Center | 2023 | 36% (39%) |
56% (61%) |
8% | ±3.6% | [139] |
Italy | Ipsos | 2024 | 58% (66%) |
29% [19% support some rights] (33%) |
12% not sure | ±3.5% | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 73% (75%) |
25% | 2% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 69% (72%) |
27% (28%) |
4% | [143] | ||
Jamaica | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 16% | 84% | – | ±1.0% | [137] |
Japan | Kyodo News | 2023 | 64% (72%) |
25% (28%) |
11% | [155] | |
Asahi Shimbun | 2023 | 72% (80%) |
18% (20%) |
10% | [156] | ||
Ipsos | 2024 | 42% (54%) |
31% [25% support some rights] (40%) |
22% not sure | ±3.5% | [138] | |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 68% (72%) |
26% (28%) |
6% | ±2.75% | [139] | |
Kazakhstan | Pew Research Center | 2016 | 7% (7%) |
89% (93%) |
4% | [140] [141] | |
Kenya | Pew Research Center | 2023 | 9% | 90% (91%) |
1% | ±3.6% | [139] |
Kosovo | IPSOS | 2023 | 20% (21%) |
77% (79%) |
3% | [135] | |
Latvia | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 36% | 59% | 5% | [143] | |
Liechtenstein | Liechtenstein Institut | 2021 | 72% | 28% | 0% | [157] | |
Lithuania | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 39% | 55% | 6% | [143] | |
Luxembourg | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 84% | 13% | 3% | [143] | |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 17% | 82% (83%) |
1% | [139] | ||
Malta | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 74% | 24% | 2% | [143] | |
Mexico | Ipsos (more urban/educated than representative) | 2024 | 55% | 29% [16% support some rights] | 17% not sure | ±3.5%[o] | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 63% (66%) |
32% (34%) |
5% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Moldova | Europa Libera Moldova | 2022 | 14% | 86% | [158] | ||
Montenegro | IPSOS | 2023 | 36% (37%) |
61% (63%) |
3% | [135] | |
Mozambique (3 cities) | Lambda | 2017 | 28% (32%) |
60% (68%) |
12% | [159] | |
Netherlands | Ipsos | 2024 | 77% | 15% [8% support some rights] | 8% not sure | ±5% | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 89% (90%) |
10% | 1% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 94% | 5% | 2% | [143] | ||
New Zealand | Ipsos | 2023 | 70% (78%) |
20% [11% support some rights] (22%) |
9% | ±3.5% | [160] |
Nicaragua | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 25% | 75% | – | ±1.0% | [137] |
Nigeria | Pew Research Center | 2023 | 2% | 97% (98%) |
1% | ±3.6% | [139] |
North Macedonia | IPSOS | 2023 | 20% (21%) |
78% (80%) |
2% | [135] | |
Norway | Pew Research Center | 2017 | 72% (79%) |
19% (21%) |
9% | [140] [141] | |
Panama | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 22% | 78% | – | ±1.1% | [137] |
Paraguay | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 26% | 74% | – | ±0.9% | [137] |
Peru | Ipsos (more urban/educated than representative) | 2024 | 36% |
44% [30% support some rights] | 20% | ±5% [o] | [138] |
Philippines | SWS | 2018 | 22% (26%) |
61% (73%) |
16% | [161] | |
Poland | Ipsos | 2024 | 51% (54%) |
43% (46%) |
6% | [162] | |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 41% (43%) |
54% (57%) |
5% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
United Surveys by IBRiS | 2024 | 50% (55%) |
41% (45%) |
9% | [163] | ||
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 50% | 45% | 5% | [143] | ||
Portugal | Ipsos | 2023 | 80% (84%) |
15% [11% support some rights] (16%) |
5% | [160] | |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 81% | 14% | 5% | [143] | ||
Romania | Ipsos | 2023 | 25% (30%) |
59% [26% support some rights] (70%) |
17% | ±3.5% | [160] |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 25% | 69% | 6% | [143] | ||
Russia | Ipsos (more urban/educated than representative) | 2021 | 17% (21%) |
64% [12% support some rights] (79%) |
20% not sure | ±4.8% [o] | [146] |
FOM | 2019 | 7% (8%) |
85% (92%) |
8% | ±3.6% | [164] | |
Saint Kitts and Nevis | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 9% | 91% | – | ±1.0% | [137] |
Saint Lucia | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 11% | 89% | – | ±0.9% | [137] |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | AmericasBarometer | 2017 | 4% | 96% | – | ±0.6% | [137] |
Serbia | IPSOS | 2023 | 24% (25%) |
73% (75%) |
3% | [135] | |
Singapore | Ipsos (more urban/educated than representative) | 2024 | 33% | 46% [21% support some rights] | 21% | ±5% [o] | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 45% (47%) |
51% (53%) |
4% | [139] | ||
Slovakia | Focus | 2024 | 36% (38%) |
60% (62%) |
4% | [165] | |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 37% | 56% | 7% | [143] | ||
Slovenia | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 62% (64%) |
37% (36%) |
2% | [143] | |
South Africa | Ipsos (more urban/educated than representative) | 2024 | 53% | 32% [14% support some rights] | 13% | ±5% [o] | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 38% (39%) |
59% (61%) |
3% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
South Korea | Ipsos | 2024 | 36% | 37% [16% support some rights] | 27% not sure | ±5% | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 41% (42%) |
56% (58%) |
3% | [139] | ||
Spain | Ipsos | 2024 | 73% (80%) |
19% [13% support some rights] (21%) |
9% not sure | ±3.5% | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 87% (90%) |
10% | 3% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 88% (91%) |
9% (10%) |
3% | [143] | ||
Sri Lanka | Pew Research Center | 2023 | 23% (25%) |
69% (75%) |
8% | [139] | |
Suriname | AmericasBarometer | 2014 | 18% | – | – | [144] | |
Sweden | Ipsos | 2024 | 78% (84%) |
15% [8% support some rights] (16%) |
7% not sure | ±5% | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 92% (94%) |
6% | 2% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Eurobarometer | 2023 | 94% | 5% | 1% | [143] | ||
Switzerland | Ipsos | 2023 | 54% (61%) |
34% [16% support some rights] (39%) |
13% not sure | ±3.5% | [160] |
Taiwan | CNA | 2023 | 63% | 37% | [166] | ||
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 45% (51%) |
43% (49%) |
12% | [139] | ||
Thailand | Ipsos (more urban/educated than representative) | 2024 | 58% | 29% [20% support some rights] | 12% not sure | ±5%[o] | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 60% (65%) |
32% (35%) |
8% | [139] | ||
Trinidad and Tobago | AmericasBarometer | 2014 | 16% | – | – | [144] | |
Turkey | Ipsos (more urban/educated than representative) | 2024 | 18% (26%) |
52% [19% support some rights] (74%) |
30% not sure | ±5% [o] | [138] |
Ukraine | Rating | 2023 | 37% (47%) |
42% (53%) |
22% | ±1.5% | [167] |
United Kingdom | YouGov | 2023 | 77% (84%) |
15% (16%) |
8% | [168] | |
Ipsos | 2024 | 66% (73%) |
24% [11% support some rights] (27%) |
10% not sure | ±3.5% | [138] | |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 74% (77%) |
22% (23%) |
4% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
United States | Ipsos | 2024 | 51% (62%) |
32% [14% support some rights] (39%) |
18% not sure | ±3.5% | [138] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 63% (65%) |
34% (35%) |
3% | ±3.6% | [139] | |
Uruguay | LatinoBarómetro | 2023 | 78% (80%) |
20% | 2% | [169] | |
Venezuela | Equilibrium Cende | 2023 | 55% (63%) |
32% (37%) |
13% | [170] | |
Vietnam | Pew Research Center | 2023 | 65% (68%) |
30% (32%) |
5% | [160] |
See also
- LGBT rights by country or territory
- List of same-sex married couples
- Religion and sexuality
- Legal status of same-sex marriage
- Societal attitudes toward homosexuality
Notes
- ^ Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in continental Australia and in the non-self-governing possessions of Norfolk Island, Christmas Island and the Cocos Islands, which follow Australian law.
- ^ Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in continental Denmark, the Faroe Islands and Greenland, which together make up the Realm of Denmark.
- ^ Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized throughout Ecuador, but such couples are not considered married for purposes of adoption and may not adopt children.
- ^ Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in metropolitan France and in all French overseas regions and possessions, which follow a single legal code.
- ^ Same-sex marriage is available in all jurisdictions, though the process is not everywhere as straightforward as it is for opposite-sex marriage and does not always include adoption rights.
- ^ Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in the continental Netherlands, the Caribbean municipalities of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, and the constituent countries of Aruba and Curaçao, but not yet in Sint Maarten.
- ^ Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in New Zealand proper, but not in its possession of Tokelau, nor in the Cook Islands and Niue, which make up the Realm of New Zealand.
- ^ Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in all parts of the United Kingdom and in its non-Caribbean possessions, but not in its Caribbean possessions, namely Anguilla, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Montserrat and the Turks and Caicos Islands.
- ^ Same-sex marriage is performed and recognized by law in all fifty states of the US and in the District of Columbia, in all overseas territories except American Samoa (recognition only), and in all tribal nations that do not have their own marriage laws, as well as in most nations that do. The largest of the dozen or so known exceptions among the federal reservations are Navajo and Gila River, and the largest among the shared-sovereignty Oklahoma Tribal Statistical Areas are the Creek and Citizen Potawatomi. These polities ban same-sex marriage and do not recognize marriages from other jurisdictions, though members may still marry under state law and be accorded all the rights of marriage under state and federal law.
- ^ Nepal is waiting for a final decision by its supreme court, but meanwhile all local governments are ordered to temporarily register same-sex marriages in a separate record. In April 2024 the National ID and Civil Registration Department issued a circular to all local governments that they register such marriages. However, simply being registered does not grant same-sex couples the legal rights of marriage, and registered same-sex couples cannot inherit property, get tax subsidies, make spousal medical decisions, adopt children etc.[59][60][61]
- ^ Legally available in the Arizona municipalities of Bisbee, Clarkdale, Cottonwood, Jerome, Sedona and Tucson.
- ^ Dale Carpenter is a prominent spokesman for this view. For a better understanding of this view, see Carpenter's writings at "Dale Carpenter". Independent Gay Forum. Archived from the original on 17 November 2006. Retrieved 31 October 2006.
- ^ a b Because some polls do not report 'neither', those that do are listed with simple yes/no percentages in parentheses, so their figures can be compared.
- ^ Comprises: Neutral; Don't know; No answer; Other; Refused.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k [+ more urban/educated than representative]
References
- ^ VERPOEST, LIEN (2017). "The End of Rhetorics: LGBT policies in Russia and the European Union". Studia Diplomatica. 68 (4): 3–20. ISSN 0770-2965. JSTOR 26531664.
- ^ Williams, CA., Roman Homosexuality: Second Edition, Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 280, p. 284.
- ^ a b Padnani, Amisha; Fang, Celina (26 June 2015). "Same-Sex Marriage: Landmark Decisions and Precedents". The New York Times.
- ^ a b Baume, Matt (1 March 2019). "Meet the Gay Men Whose 1971 Marriage Was Finally Recognized". The Advocate.
- ^ a b StoryCorps Archive (September 12, 2017). "Michael McConnell, Jack Baker, and Lisa Vecoli".
- Michael McConnell (75) and husband Jack Baker (75) talk with friend Lisa Vecoli (55) about having the first same-sex marriage legally recognized by a U.S. civil government in 1971, why they chose to get married, and what the response to their marriage was like.
- JB describes the decades-long (46-year) process from the denial of their marriage license in 1971 until a second request that same year in Blue Earth County, Minnesota, was "declared to be in all respects valid" by Order of Gregory J. Anderson, Judge of District Court.
- ^ a b Newsletter, "Hidden Treasures from the Stacks", The National Archives at Kansas City, p. 6 (September 2013).
- ^ a b Source: Blue Earth County
- Certificate 434960: Minnesota Official Marriage System
- Applicants: James Michael McConnell and Pat Lyn McConnell
- Date of Marriage: September 3, 1971
- Certified Copy: Marriage Certificate
- ^ a b "The September 3, 1971 marriage of James Michael McConnell and Pat Lyn McConnell, a/k/a Richard John Baker, has never been dissolved or annulled by judicial decree and no grounds currently exist on which to invalidate the marriage."
- Sources: CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by Assistant Chief Judge Gregory Anderson, Fifth Judicial District, (page 4);
- Copy: Minnesota Judicial Branch, File Number 07-CV-16-4559, "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Partial Summary Judgment" from Blue Earth County District Court in re James Michael McConnell et al. v. Blue Earth County et al. (September 18, 2018);
- Available online from U of M Libraries;
- McConnell Files, "America’s First Gay Marriage" (binder #4), Tretter Collection in GLBT Studies, U of M Libraries.
- ^ a b Michael McConnell, with Jack Baker, as told to Gail Langer Karwoski, "The Wedding Heard Heard 'Round the World: America's First Gay Marriage Archived August 26, 2015, at the Wayback Machine". University of Minnesota Press (2016). Reprint, "With A New Epilogue" (2020).
- ^ a b Winter, Caroline (4 December 2014). "In 14 years, same-sex marriage has spread round the world". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 13 January 2022. Retrieved 20 February 2022.
- ^ "Same-sex Oklahoma couple marries legally under tribal law". KOCO. 26 September 2013. Archived from the original on 22 October 2013. Retrieved 22 October 2013.
- ^ "Clela Rorex, former Boulder County Clerk who issued first same-sex marriage license in 1975 dies at 78". 19 June 2022.
- ^ a b Multiple sources:
- Coghlan, Andy (16 June 2008). "Gay brains structured like those of the opposite sex". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 29 April 2019. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- Lamanna, Mary Ann; Riedmann, Agnes; Stewart, Susan D. (2014). Marriages, Families, and Relationships: Making Choices in a Diverse Society. Cengage Learning. p. 82. ISBN 978-1305176898. Archived from the original on 30 November 2016. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
[T]he APA says that sexual orientation is not a choice [...]. (American Psychological Association, 2010).
- Pawelski, J. G.; Perrin, E. C.; Foy, J. M.; Allen, C. E.; Crawford, J. E.; Del Monte, M.; Kaufman, M.; Klein, J. D.; Smith, K.; Springer, S.; Tanner, J. L.; Vickers, D. L. (2006). "The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children". Pediatrics. 118 (1): 349–364. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1279. PMID 16818585. S2CID 219194821. Archived from the original on 29 April 2019. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
- American Medical Association; American Academy of Pediatrics; American Psychological Association; American Psychiatric Association; American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy; National Association of Social Workers; American Psychoanalytic Association; American Academy of Family Physicians; et al. "Brief of [medical organizations] as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners" (PDF). supremecourt.gov. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- Bever, Lindsey (7 July 2014). "Children of same-sex couples are happier and healthier than peers, research shows". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 4 May 2019. Retrieved 12 December 2018.
- Pawelski, James G.; Perrin, Ellen C.; Foy, Jane M.; Allen, Carole E.; Crawford, James E.; Del Monte, Mark; Kaufman, Miriam; Klein, Jonathan D.; Smith, Karen; Springer, Sarah; Tanner, J. Lane; Vickers, Dennis L. (July 2006). "The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children". Pediatrics. 118 (1). American Academy of Pediatrics: 349–64. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1279. PMID 16818585. S2CID 219194821. Archived from the original on 1 May 2011. Retrieved 16 June 2019.
In fact, growing up with parents who are lesbian or gay may confer some advantages to children.
- ^ a b "Brief of the American Psychological Association, The California Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy as amici curiae in support of plaintiff-appellees – Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Case No. 09-CV-2292 VRW (Honorable Vaughn R. Walker)" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 April 2015. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
- ^ a b c "Marriage of Same-Sex Couples – 2006 Position Statement Canadian Psychological Association" (PDF). 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 April 2009.
- ^ a b Mirchandani, Rajesh (12 November 2008). "Divisions persist over gay marriage ban". BBC News. Archived from the original on 28 April 2014. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
- ^ a b "The Divine Institution of Marriage". The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 13 August 2008. Archived from the original on 11 June 2019. Retrieved 28 September 2012.
- ^ Molly Ball, 2024 May 13, Wall Street Journal, How 20 Years of Same-Sex Marriage Changed America
- ^ Multiple sources:
- "Resolution on Sexual Orientation and Marriage" (PDF). American Psychological Association. 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 10 November 2010.
- "Brief of the American Psychological Association, The California Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy as amici curiae in support of plaintiff-appellees – Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Case No. 09-CV-2292 VRW (Honorable Vaughn R. Walker)" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 April 2015. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
- "Marriage of Same-Sex Couples – 2006 Position Statement" (PDF). Canadian Psychological Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 July 2012. Retrieved 28 September 2012.
- Pawelski JG, Perrin EC, Foy JM, et al. (July 2006). "The effects of marriage, civil union, and domestic partnership laws on the health and well-being of children". Pediatrics. 118 (1): 349–64. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1279. ISSN 0031-4005. PMID 16818585. S2CID 219194821.
- Pawelski, J. G.; Perrin, E. C.; Foy, J. M.; Allen, C. E.; Crawford, J. E.; Del Monte, M.; Kaufman, M.; Klein, J. D.; Smith, K.; Springer, S.; Tanner, J. L.; Vickers, D. L. (2006). "The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children". Pediatrics. 118 (1): 349–364. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1279. PMID 16818585. S2CID 219194821. Archived from the original on 1 May 2011. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
- ^ "Brief of Amici Curiae American Anthropological Association et al., supporting plaintiffs-appellees and urging affirmance – Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Case No. 09-CV-2292 VRW (Honorable Vaughn R. Walker)" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 December 2010. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
- ^ a b American Anthropological Association (2004). "Statement on Marriage and the Family". Archived from the original on 12 September 2015. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
- ^ Handbook of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Administration and Policy — Page 13, Wallace Swan – 2004
- ^ "Marriage Equality". Garden State Equality. Archived from the original on 18 October 2014. Retrieved 24 July 2012.
- ^ "Marriage 101". Freedom to Marry. Archived from the original on 16 February 2010. Retrieved 28 September 2012.
- ^ Pratt, Patricia (29 May 2012). "Albany area real estate and the Marriage Equality Act". Albany Examiner. Retrieved 25 December 2012.
On July 24, 2011 the Marriage Equality Act became a law in New York State forever changing the state's legal view of what a married couple is.
- ^ "Vote on Illinois marriage equality bill coming in January: sponsors". Chicago Phoenix. 13 December 2012. Archived from the original on 26 December 2012. Retrieved 23 December 2012.
- ^ Mulholland, Helene (27 September 2012). "Ed Miliband calls for gay marriage equality". The Guardian. London, UK. Archived from the original on 28 September 2013. Retrieved 23 December 2012.
- ^ Ring, Trudy (20 December 2012). "Newt Gingrich: Marriage Equality Inevitable, OK". The Advocate. Los Angeles. Archived from the original on 23 December 2012. Retrieved 25 December 2012.
He [Newt Gingrich] noted to HuffPo that he not only has a lesbian half-sister, LGBT rights activist Candace Gingrich, but has gay friends who've gotten married in Iowa, where their unions are legal. Public opinion has shifted in favor of marriage equality, he said, and the Republican Party could end up on the wrong side of history if it continues to go against the tide.
- ^ APStylebook [@APStylebook] (12 February 2019). "The term same-sex marriage is preferred over gay marriage. In places where it's legal, same-sex marriage is no different from other marriages, so the term should be used only when germane and needed to distinguish from marriages between heterosexual couples. #APStyleChat" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 19 October 2022. Retrieved 13 December 2022 – via Twitter.
- ^ "One in 10 LGBT Americans Married to Same-Sex Spouse". Gallup. 24 February 2021.
- ^ Yin, Karen (8 March 2016). "When Bisexual People Marry". Conscious Style Guide.
- ^ Fedorak, Shirley A. (2008). Anthropology matters!. [Toronto], Ont.: University of Toronto Press. pp. Ch. 11, p. 174. ISBN 978-1442601086.
- ^ a b Gough, Kathleen E. (January–June 1959). "The Nayars and the Definition of Marriage". The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 89 (1): 23–34. doi:10.2307/2844434. JSTOR 2844434.
- ^ Murray, Stephen O.; Roscoe, Will (2001). Boy-wives and female husbands : studies of African homosexualities (1st pbk. ed.). New York: St. Martin's. ISBN 978-0312238292. Archived from the original on 4 February 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2020.
- ^ Njambi, Wairimu; O'Brien, William (Spring 2001). "Revisiting "Woman-Woman Marriage": Notes on Gikuyu Women". NWSA Journal. 12 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1353/nwsa.2000.0015. S2CID 144520611. Archived from the original on 13 January 2012. Retrieved 28 September 2012.
- ^ "Dictionaries take lead in redefining modern marriage". The Washington Times. 24 May 2004. Archived from the original on 18 September 2012. Retrieved 25 September 2012.
- ^ "Webster Makes It Official: Definition of Marriage Has Changed". American Bar Association. Archived from the original on 27 April 2015. Retrieved 28 September 2012.
- ^ Redman, Daniel (7 April 2009). "Noah Webster Gives His Blessing: Dictionaries recognize same-sex marriage—who knew?". Slate. Archived from the original on 17 September 2011. Retrieved 28 September 2012.
- ^ Rabbi Joel Roth. Homosexuality Archived 24 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine rabbinicalassembly.org 1992.
- ^ Martial 1.24 and 12.42; Juvenal 2.117–42. Williams, Roman Homosexuality, pp. 28, 280; Karen K. Hersh, The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity (Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 36; Caroline Vout, Power and Eroticism in Imperial Rome (Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 151ff.
- ^ Suetonius, Tacitus, Dio Cassius, and Aurelius Victor are the sources cited by Williams, Roman Homosexuality, p. 279.
- ^ Williams, Roman Homosexuality, pp. 278–279, citing Dio Cassius and Aelius Lampridius.
- ^ a b Williams, Roman Homosexuality, p. 280.
- ^ "How Same-Sex Marriage Came to Be". Harvard Magazine. March–April 2013. Archived from the original on 2 May 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2015.
- ^ Hari, Johann (Spring 2009). "Andrew Sullivan: Thinking. Out. Loud". Intelligent Life. Archived from the original on 25 April 2009. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
- ^ Sullivan, Andrew (9 November 2012). "Here Comes the Groom". Slate. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
- ^ Rule, Sheila (2 October 1989). "Rights for Gay Couples in Denmark". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 19 August 2013.
- ^ "Same-sex marriage around the world". CBC News. Toronto. 26 May 2009. Archived from the original on 25 November 2010. Retrieved 6 October 2009.
- ^ "The Dutch went first in 2001; who has same-sex marriage now?". Associated Press. 28 April 2021. Archived from the original on 21 August 2021. Retrieved 21 August 2021.
- ^ Sangwongwanich, Pathom (18 June 2024). "Thai Same-Sex Marriage Bill Clears Final Hurdle With Senate Nod". www.bloomberg.com. Retrieved 18 June 2024.
- ^ Theil, Michele (16 February 2024). "This map shows you where same-sex marriage is legal around the world – and there's a long way to go". PinkNews. Retrieved 16 February 2024.
- ^ "Marriage Equality Around the World". Human Rights Campaign. Retrieved 3 February 2024.
- ^ "Information for couples marrying outside the Rabbinate" (PDF). Rackman Center. 2018. Retrieved 10 November 2023.
- ^ "Sala de lo Constitucional resolvería demanda sobre matrimonio igualitario en los primeros tres messes de 2020". elsalvador.com (in Spanish). 6 January 2020.
- ^ "Bukele busca que se apruebe el aborto terapéutico y la unión homosexual". El Observador (in Spanish). 18 August 2021.
- ^ "Diritti: matrimonio "egualitario". Opinioni a confronto: Scalfarotto vs Bonaldi vs Centinaio". 9 March 2023. Archived from the original on 10 March 2023. Retrieved 10 March 2023.
- ^ "Da Zaia a Centinaio: la Lega ora cambia sui diritti lgbt (e c'entra "l'effetto Francesca")". 10 March 2023. Archived from the original on 10 March 2023. Retrieved 10 March 2023.
- ^ "Japan opposition party submits bill for same-sex marriage". Kyodo News. 6 March 2023. Retrieved 31 May 2023.
- ^ Raut, Swechhya (10 July 2024). "Nepal: Same-sex couples face hurdles on road to recognition". DW.
- ^ Ghimire, Binod (3 December 2023). "How court laid the ground for same-sex marriage in Nepal". The Kathmandu Post.
- ^ Dhakal, Manisha. "The Long Road to Lasting Marriage Equality in Nepal". APCOM.
- ^ "Diputada plantea iniciativa para el matrimonio civil igualitario en la Asamblea Nacional". El Acarigueño (in Spanish). 24 February 2022. Archived from the original on 20 May 2022. Retrieved 17 April 2022.
- ^ Taylor, Alice; Alipour, Nick (26 April 2024). "Kosovo promises to introduce same-sex unions in May". www.euractiv.com.
- ^ "Lithuanian MPs propose civil union as compromise on same-sex partnership". www.baltictimes.com. Retrieved 23 May 2022.
- ^ "Presentan proyecto de ley sobre el matrimonio igualitario entre personas del mismo sexo". El Comercio. elcomercio.pe. 23 October 2021. Retrieved 28 June 2022.
- ^ Bordey, Hana (11 August 2022). "Padilla wants same-sex unions institutionalized". GMA News Online.
- ^ [1]
- ^ Kholodnova, Anna (2 August 2022). "Zelensky responded to the petition on the legalization of same-sex marriages in Ukraine". Бабель.
- ^ Lavers, Michael K. (7 March 2023). "Ukrainian MP introduces bill to legally recognize same-sex couples". www.washingtonblade.com. Retrieved 8 March 2023.
- ^ Duffy, Nick (13 March 2015). "UKIP and Tories abstain on EU motion to recognise same-sex marriage". PinkNews. Archived from the original on 9 August 2015. Retrieved 26 July 2015.
- ^ "Texts adopted – Thursday, 12 March 2015 – Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2013 and the EU policy on the matter". European Parliament. Archived from the original on 7 August 2015. Retrieved 26 July 2015.
- ^ a b "HUDOC – European Court of Human Rights". Archived from the original on 11 September 2015. Retrieved 26 July 2015.
- ^ Buyse, Antoine (24 June 2010). "Strasbourg court rules that states are not obliged to allow gay marriage". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 December 2013. Retrieved 8 November 2013.
- ^ Avram, Marieta (2016). Drept civil Familia [Civil law Family] (in Romanian). Bucharest: Editura Hamangiu. ISBN 978-606-27-0609-8.
- ^ "European Convention on Human Rights" (PDF). ECHR.coe.int. European Court of Human Rights. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 July 2014. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
- ^ "HUDOC - European Court of Human Rights". ECHR. Retrieved 21 July 2022.
- ^ Palazzo, Nausica (April 2023). "Fedotova and Others v. Russia : Dawn of a new era for European LGBTQ families?". Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 30 (2): 216–228. doi:10.1177/1023263X231195455. S2CID 261655476.
- ^ "EU court backs residency rights for gay couple in Romania". Associated Press. 5 June 2018. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 6 June 2018.
- ^ "Same-sex spouses have EU residence rights, top court rules – BBC". BBC News. 5 June 2018. Archived from the original on 8 May 2019. Retrieved 6 June 2018.
- ^ "Texts adopted – LGBTIQ rights in the EU – Tuesday, 14 September 2021". European Parliament. Archived from the original on 16 September 2021. Retrieved 16 September 2021.
- ^ "MEPs condemn failure to respect rights of same-sex partners in EU". The Guardian. 14 September 2021. Archived from the original on 14 September 2021. Retrieved 16 September 2021.
- ^ "Major Advance for Marriage Equality and Gender Identity Rights in Latin America". San Francisco Bay Times. Sfbaytimes.com. 25 January 2018. Archived from the original on 29 January 2018. Retrieved 13 April 2018.
- ^ Towle, Andy (13 November 2008). "NYC Protest and Civil Rights March Opposing Proposition 8". Towleroad. Archived from the original on 13 February 2009. Retrieved 28 September 2012.
- ^ Pearson, Mary. "Where is Gay Marriage Legal?". christiangays.com. Archived from the original on 1 March 2012. Retrieved 20 February 2012.
- ^ Williams, Steve. "Which Countries Have Legalized Gay Marriage?". Care2.com (news.bbc.co.uk as source). Archived from the original on 29 April 2019. Retrieved 20 February 2012.
- ^ "Loi du 9 juillet 2004 relative aux effets légaux de certains partenariats. – Legilux". Eli.legilux.public.lu. Archived from the original on 11 September 2016. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
- ^ "Loi n° 99-944 du 15 novembre 1999 relative au pacte civil de solidarité". Legifrance.gouv.fr (in French). 12 March 2007. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
- ^ "WETTEN, DECRETEN, ORDONNANTIES EN VERORDENINGEN LOIS, DECRETS, ORDONNANCES ET REGLEMENTS" (PDF). Ejustice.jkust.fgov.be. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 April 2019. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
- ^ "Civil Partnership Act 2004". Legislation.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 29 April 2019. Retrieved 5 July 2017.
- ^ "Same-Sex Marriage, Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships". National Conference of State Legislatures. Archived from the original on 10 June 2013. Retrieved 20 February 2012.
- ^ Ramstack, Tom (11 January 2010). "Congress Considers Outcome of D.C. Gay Marriage Legislation". AHN. Archived from the original on 20 June 2010.
- ^ Gender and Language in Sub-Saharan Africa, 2013:35
- ^ Igwe, Leo (19 June 2009). "Tradition of same gender marriage in Igboland". Nigerian Tribune. Archived from the original on 11 January 2010.
- ^ "Same-sex marriage and children's well-being: Research roundup". Journalist's Resource. 26 June 2015. Archived from the original on 2 January 2016. Retrieved 29 December 2015.
- ^ Badgett, M.V. Lee; Carpenter, Christopher S.; Lee, Maxine J.; Sansone, Dario (2024). "A review of the effects of legal access to same-sex marriage". Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. doi:10.1002/pam.22587. hdl:10871/135707.
- ^ a b Pawelski, J.G.; Perrin, E.C.; Foy, J.M.; Allen, C.E.; Crawford, J.E.; Del Monte, M.; Kaufman, M.; Klein, J.D.; Smith, K.; Springer, S.; Tanner, J.L.; Vickers, D.L. (2006). "The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children". Pediatrics. 118 (1): 349–64. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1279. PMID 16818585. S2CID 219194821.
- ^ Herek, Gregory M. "Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: A social science perspective." American Psychologist, Vol 61(6), September 2006, pp. 607–21.
- ^ Elaine Justice. "Study Links Gay Marriage Bans to Rise in HIV infections". Emory University. Archived from the original on 9 April 2010. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
- ^ Peng, Handie. "The Effect of Same-Sex Marriage Laws on Public Health and Welfare". Userwww.service.emory.edu. Archived from the original on 20 February 2012. Retrieved 11 February 2012.
- ^ Hasin, Deborah. "Lesbian, gay, bisexual individuals risk psychiatric disorders from discriminatory policies". Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. Archived from the original on 27 February 2013. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
- ^ Mustanski, Brian (22 March 2010). "New study suggests bans on gay marriage hurt mental health of LGB people". Psychology Today. Retrieved 8 November 2010.
- ^ Raifman, Julia; Moscoe, Ellen; Austin, S. Bryn; McConnell, Margaret (2017). "Difference-in-Differences Analysis of the Association Between State Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Adolescent Suicide Attempts". JAMA Pediatrics. 171 (4): 350–356. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4529. PMC 5848493. PMID 28241285.
- ^ "Same-Sex Marriage Legalization Linked to Reduction in Suicide Attempts Among High School Students". Johns Hopkins University. 20 February 2017. Archived from the original on 29 April 2019. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
- ^ Laurie, Timothy (3 June 2015). "Bigotry or biology: the hard choice for an opponent of marriage equality". The Drum. Archived from the original on 4 June 2015. Retrieved 4 June 2015.
- ^ Blankenhorn, David (19 September 2008). "Protecting marriage to protect children". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 4 September 2009. Retrieved 6 October 2009.
- ^ "See discussion of prenuptial and postmarital agreements at Findlaw". Family.findlaw.com. Archived from the original on 25 October 2010. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
- ^ Pawelski JG, Perrin EC, Foy JM, et al. (July 2006). "The effects of marriage, civil union, and domestic partnership laws on the health and well-being of children". Pediatrics. 118 (1): 349–64. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1279. PMID 16818585. S2CID 219194821.
- ^ Lamb, Michael. "Expert Affidavit for U.S. District Court (D. Mass. 2009)" (PDF). Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 24 July 2012.
- ^ a b "Pediatricians: Gay Marriage Good for Kids' Health". news.discovery.com. 22 March 2013. Archived from the original on 12 November 2014. Retrieved 11 April 2013.
- ^ "Elizabeth Short, Damien W. Riggs, Amaryll Perlesz, Rhonda Brown, Graeme Kane: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Parented Families – A Literature Review prepared for The Australian Psychological Society" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2011. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
- ^ "Brief of the American Psychological Association, The California Psychological Association, The American Psychiatric Association, and The American Association of Marriage and Family Therapy as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff-Appellees" (PDF). United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 April 2015. Retrieved 28 September 2012.
- ^ Herek, GM (September 2006). "Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: a social science perspective" (PDF). The American Psychologist. 61 (6): 607–21. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.607. PMID 16953748. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 June 2010.
- ^ Biblarz, Timothy J.; Stacey, Judith (February 2010). "How Does the Gender of Parents Matter?" (PDF). Journal of Marriage and Family. 72 (1): 3–22. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.593.4963. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 May 2013.
- ^ "Brief presented to the Legislative House of Commons Committee on Bill C38 by the Canadian Psychological Association – 2 June 2005" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 October 2012. Retrieved 7 August 2018.
- ^ Goldberg, Abbie E. (February 2023). "LGBTQ-parent families: Diversity, intersectionality, and social context". Current Opinion in Psychology. 49: 101517. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101517. PMID 36502588. S2CID 253665001.
- ^ Leal, Daniela; Gato, Jorge; Coimbra, Susana; Freitas, Daniela; Tasker, Fiona (December 2021). "Social Support in the Transition to Parenthood Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Persons: A Systematic Review". Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 18 (4): 1165–1179. doi:10.1007/s13178-020-00517-y. hdl:10216/132451.
- ^ Bockting, Walter, Autumn Benner, and Eli Coleman. "Gay and Bisexual Identity Development Among Female-to-Male Transsexuals in North America: Emergence of a Transgender Sexuality." Archives of Sexual Behavior 38.5 (October 2009): 688–701. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. 29 September 2009
- ^ "Austria gets first same-sex marriage". 365gay.com. 5 July 2006. Archived from the original on 17 October 2007. Retrieved 20 July 2008.
- ^ "Sweden ends forced sterilization of trans". gaystarnews.com. 11 January 2013. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 10 October 2017.
- ^ Deborah, Anthony (Spring 2012). "CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE: TRANSSEXUAL MARRIAGE AND THE DISCONNECT BETWEEN SEX AND LEGAL SEX". Texas Journal of Women & the Law. 21 (2).
- ^ Schwartz, John (18 September 2009). "U.S. Defends Marriage Law". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 29 September 2009.
- ^ "Movement Advancement Project | Equality Maps". www.lgbtmap.org. Archived from the original on 22 April 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2019.
- ^ Matthew S. Coleman (16 September 2015). "Obergefell v. Hodges". Einhorn Harris. Archived from the original on 24 December 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2015.
- ^ Leff, Lisa (4 December 2008). "Poll: Calif. gay marriage ban driven by religion". USA Today. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 8 December 2008. archived here.
- ^ For ease of comparison, only 'yes' and 'no' responses are counted. For old polling data, support figures have been adjusted upward @1%/year.
- ^ Newport, Frank (20 May 2011). "For First Time, Majority of Americans Favor Legal Gay Marriage". Gallup. Archived from the original on 29 July 2014. Retrieved 25 September 2012.
- ^ "Public Opinion: Nationally". australianmarriageequality.com. Archived from the original on 3 March 2011. Retrieved 25 September 2012.
- ^ "Gay Life in Estonia". globalgayz.com. Archived from the original on 16 July 2012. Retrieved 25 September 2012.
- ^ Jowit, Juliette (12 June 2012). "Gay marriage gets ministerial approval". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 6 May 2019. Retrieved 25 September 2012.
- ^ "Most Irish people support gay marriage, poll says". PinkNews. 24 February 2011. Archived from the original on 26 September 2013. Retrieved 25 September 2012.
- ^ a b "How people in 24 countries view same-sex marriage". Retrieved 12 December 2023.
- ^ "What the world's young people think and feel" (PDF).
- ^ "Who supports equal rights for same-sex couples?". Australian Institute of Family Studies.
- ^ "Age is decisive factor when it comes to supporting same-sex marriage: LAPOP". Vanderbilt University. 2 June 2015. Retrieved 26 December 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f "Attitudes towards LGBTIQ+ people in the Western Balkans" (PDF). ERA – LGBTI Equal Rights Association for the Western Balkans and Turke. June 2023.
- ^ "Un 70% d'andorrans aprova el matrimoni homosexual". Diari d'Andorra (in Catalan). 7 July 2013.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m "Cultura polítical de la democracia en la República Dominicana y en las Américas, 2016/17" (PDF). Vanderbilt University (in Spanish). 13 November 2017. p. 132.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x LGBT+ PRIDE 2024 (PDF). Ipsos. 1 May 2024. Retrieved 8 June 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae "How people in 24 countries view same-sex marriage". 27 November 2023. Retrieved 12 December 2023.
- ^ a b c d "Religious Belief and National Belonging in Central and Eastern Europe" (PDF). Pew. Retrieved 11 May 2017.
- ^ a b c d "Religious belief and national belonging in Central and Eastern Europe - Appendix A: Methodology". Pew Research Center. 10 May 2017. Retrieved 26 August 2017.
- ^ "Bevolking Aruba pro geregistreerd partnerschap zelfde geslacht". Antiliaans Dagblad (in Dutch). 26 February 2021.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa "Discrimination in the European Union". TNS. European Commission. Retrieved 8 June 2024. The question was whether same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe.
- ^ a b c d e "Barómetro de las Américas: Actualidad – 2 de junio de 2015" (PDF). Vanderbilt University. 2 July 2015.
- ^ "63% está de acuerdo con la creación de una AFP Estatal que compita con las actuales AFPs privadas". Retrieved 10 June 2024.
- ^ a b LGBT+ PRIDE 2021 GLOBAL SURVEY (PDF). Ipsos. 16 June 2021. Retrieved 12 June 2023.
- ^ https://www.ciep.ucr.ac.cr/images/INFORMESUOP/EncuestaEnero/Informe-encuesta-ENERO-2018.pdf [dead link ]
- ^ "Encuesta: Un 63,1% de los cubanos quiere matrimonio igualitario en la Isla". Diario de Cuba (in Spanish). 18 July 2019.
- ^ Guzman, Samuel (5 February 2018). "Encuesta de CDN sobre matrimonio homosexual en RD recibe más de 300 mil votos - CDN - El Canal de Noticias de los Dominicanos" [CDN survey on homosexual marriage in DR receives more than 300 thousand votes] (in Spanish).
- ^ America's Barometer Topical Brief #034, Disapproval of Same-Sex Marriage in Ecuador: A Clash of Generations?, 23 July 2019. Counting ratings 1–3 as 'disapprove', 8–10 as 'approve', and 4–7 as neither.
- ^ "Partido de Bukele se "consolida" en preferencias electorales en El Salvador". 21 January 2021.
- ^ "წინარწმენიდან თანასწორობამდე (From Prejudice to Equality), part 2" (PDF). WISG. 2022.
- ^ "Más del 70% de los hondureños rechaza el matrimonio homosexual". Diario La Prensa (in Spanish). 17 May 2018.
- ^ "Litlar breytingar á viðhorfi til giftinga samkynhneigðra" (PDF) (in Icelandic). Gallup. September 2006.
- ^ Staff (13 February 2023). "64% favor recognizing same-sex marriage in Japan: Kyodo poll". Kyodo News. Retrieved 13 February 2023.
- ^ Isoda, Kazuaki (21 February 2023). "Survey: 72% of voters in favor of legalizing gay marriages". The Asahi Shimbun. Retrieved 27 February 2023.
- ^ Vogt, Desiree (March 2021). "Rückhalt für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare". Liechtensteiner Vaterland (in German).
- ^ "Sondaj: chișinăuienii au devenit mai toleranți față de comunitatea LGBT". Radio Europa Liberă Moldova (in Romanian). 18 May 2022.
- ^ "Most Mozambicans against homosexual violence, study finds". MambaOnline - Gay South Africa online. 4 June 2018., (full report)
- ^ a b c d e LGBT+ PRIDE 2023 GLOBAL SURVEY (PDF). Ipsos. 1 June 2023. Retrieved 12 June 2023.
- ^ "First Quarter 2018 Social Weather Survey: 61% of Pinoys oppose, and 22% support, a law that will allow the civil union of two men or two women". 29 June 2018. Retrieved 6 January 2019.
- ^ "(Nie)dzielące związki: Polki i Polacy o prawach par jednopłciowych". More in Common. Retrieved 27 September 2024.
- ^ Mikołajczyk, Marek (24 April 2024). "Tak dla związków partnerskich, nie dla adopcji [SONDAŻ DGP]". Dziennik Gazeta Prawna. Retrieved 25 April 2024.
- ^ "Отношение к сексменьшинствам" (in Russian). ФОМ. June 2019.
- ^ "Polovici slovenských občanov neprekážajú registrované partnerstvá pre páry rovnakého pohlavia". 27 March 2024.
- ^ Strong, Matthew (19 May 2023). "Support for gay marriage surges in Taiwan 4 years after legalization". Taiwan News. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- ^ "Соціологічне дослідження до Дня Незалежності: УЯВЛЕННЯ ПРО ПАТРІОТИЗМ ТА МАЙБУТНЄ УКРАЇНИ (16-20 серпня 2023) Назад до списку". 24 August 2023.
- ^ Simons, Ned (4 February 2023). "It's Ten Years Since MPs Voted For Gay Marriage, But Is There A 'Backlash'?". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
- ^ "Opinión sobre el matrimonio igualitario" [Opinion on equal marriage]. LatinoBarómetro. 10 June 2024.
- ^ Crónica Uno, Encuesta refleja que mayoría de venezolanos apoya igualdad de derechos para la población LGBTIQ, 2 March, 2023
Bibliography
- Boswell, John (1995). The Marriage of Likeness: Same-sex Unions in Pre-modern Europe. New York: Simon Harper and Collins. ISBN 978-0-00-255508-1.
- Boswell, John (1994). Same-sex Unions in Premodern Europe. New York: Villard Books. ISBN 978-0-679-43228-9.
- Brownson, James V. (2013). Bible, Gender, Sexuality: Reforming the Church's Debate on Same-Sex Relationships. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. ISBN 978-0-8028-6863-3.
- Calò, Emanuele (2009). Matrimonio à la carte — Matrimoni, convivenze registrate e divorzi dopo l'intervento comunitario. Milano: Giuffrè.
- Caramagno, Thomas C. (2002). Irreconcilable Differences? Intellectual Stalemate in the Gay Rights Debate. Westport, CT: Praeger. ISBN 978-0-275-97721-4.
- Cere, Daniel (2004). Divorcing Marriage: Unveiling the Dangers in Canada's New Social Experiment. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. ISBN 978-0-7735-2895-6.
- Chauncey, George (2004). Why Marriage?: The History Shaping Today's Debate over Gay Equality. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-00957-2.
- Dobson, James C. (2004). Marriage Under Fire. Sisters, Or.: Multnomah. ISBN 978-1-59052-431-2.
- George, Robert P.; Elshtain, Jean Bethke, eds. (2006). The Meaning of Marriage: Family, State, Market, And Morals. Dallas: Spence Publishing Company. ISBN 978-1-890626-64-8.
- Goss, Robert E.; Strongheart, Amy Adams Squire, eds. (2008). Our Families, Our Values: Snapshots of Queer Kinship. New York, NY: The Harrington Park Press, An Imprint of the Haworth Press, Inc. ISBN 978-1-56023-910-9.
- Greenwich, Alex; Robinson, Shirleene (2018). Yes Yes Yes: Australia's Journey to Marriage Equality. Australia: NewSouth Books. ISBN 9781742235998.
- Larocque, Sylvain (2006). Gay Marriage: The Story of a Canadian Social Revolution. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company. ISBN 978-1-55028-927-5.
- Laycock, Douglas; Picarello, Anthony Jr.; Wilson, Robin Fretwell, eds. (2008). Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty: Emerging Conflicts. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. ISBN 978-0-7425-6326-1.
- Moats, David (2004). Civil Wars: A Battle For Gay Marriage. New York, NY: Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 978-0-15-101017-2.
- Oliver, Marilyn Tower (1998). Gay and lesbian rights: a struggle. Enslow Publishers. ISBN 978-0-89490-958-0. Archived from the original on 4 February 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2020.
- Rauch, Jonathan (2004). Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good for Gays, Good for Straights, and Good for America. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company, LLC. ISBN 978-0-8050-7815-2.
- Rugg, Sally (2019). How Powerful We Are : Behind the scenes with one of Australia's leading activists. Australia: Hachette Australia. ISBN 9780733642227. OCLC 1103918151.
- Smart, Carol; Heaphy, Brian; Einarsdottir, Anna (2013). Same sex marriages: new generations, new relationships. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780230300231.
- Spedale, Darren (2006). Gay Marriage: For Better or For Worse? What We've Learned From the Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-518751-9.
- Sullivan, Andrew, ed. (2004). Same-Sex Marriage: Pro and Con — A Reader, Revised Updated Edition. New York, NY: Vintage Books, a division of Random House, Inc. ISBN 978-1-4000-7866-0.
- Truluck, Rembert S. (2000). Steps to Recovery from Bible Abuse. Gaithersburg, MD: Chi Rho Press, Inc. ISBN 978-1-888493-16-0.
- Wolfson, Evan (2004). Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality, and Gay People's Right to Marry. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-7432-6459-4.