Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fictional characters: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notifying of requested move using Move+
 
(162 intermediate revisions by 56 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header |wp=yes|search=yes |archive_age=6 |archive_units=months |archive_bot=MiszaBot II}}
{{Talk header |wp=yes|search=yes }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=project}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 6
|counter = 7
|minthreadsleft = 5
|minthreadsleft = 5
|algo = old(60d)
|algo = old(60d)
|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fictional characters/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fictional characters/Archive %(counter)d
}}{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes
}}
}}
{{shortcut|WT:CHAR|WT:FCHAR}}
{{shortcut|WT:CHAR|WT:FCHAR}}
{{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=project}}
{{to do}}
{{to do}}
==FAR Notice==
== [[:List of fictional characters with disabilities]] has an [[WP:RFC|RFC]]==


== Good article reassessment for [[Fleance]] ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>'''[[:List of fictional characters with disabilities]]''' has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the '''[[Talk:List_of_fictional_characters_with_disabilities#RfC_on_how_this_article_should_deal_with_characters'_sexuality,_gender_identities,_and_other_identities|discussion page]]'''.<!-- Template:Rfc notice--> Thank you.[[User:A._C._Santacruz|A. C. Santacruz]] &#8258; [[User talk:A._C._Santacruz|Please ping me!]] 11:23, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
[[Fleance]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Fleance/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 17:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

== "[[:Joker persona]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Joker_persona&redirect=no Joker persona]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Joker persona}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote -->
-- [[Special:Contributions/65.92.246.77|65.92.246.77]] ([[User talk:65.92.246.77|talk]]) 22:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)


== Requested move at [[Talk:List of Pokémon#Requested move 9 October 2024]] ==
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of feature films with LGBT characters]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:List of Pokémon#Requested move 9 October 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:Web-julio|Web-julio]] ([[User talk:Web-julio|talk]]) 23:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)


== Requested move at [[Talk:Carl Johnson (Grand Theft Auto)#Requested move 16 October 2024]] ==
Hello! Advising the project of this AfD which may be of interest to members of the project. Thank you.--[[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 14:31, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Carl Johnson (Grand Theft Auto)#Requested move 16 October 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:Yovt|𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝]] ([[User talk:Yovt|𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝]]) 22:20, 16 October 2024 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for [[Norman Osborn]] ==
== Clark Kent (DC Extended Universe) ==
[[Norman Osborn]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Norman Osborn/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 01:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)


== FAR for Tom Swift ==
There is a request to move [[Clark Kent (DC Extended Universe)]] to [[Superman (DC Extended Universe)]]. The discussion can be found here: [[Talk:Clark Kent (DC Extended Universe)#Requested move 10 February 2022]]. [[User:Erik|Erik]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Erik|talk]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) <sup>([[Template:Reply to|ping me]])</sup> 13:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)


I have nominated [[Tom Swift]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Tom Swift/archive1|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]]. 🍕[[User:Boneless Pizza!|<span style="background:orange;border-radius:9999px;padding:1px 8px;color:white;"><span style="font-weight:bold">B</span>P!</span>]]🍕 ([[User talk:Boneless Pizza!|🔔]]) 22:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:Diana Walter]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Diana Walter]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].


== Requested move at [[Talk:Knull (character)#Requested move 26 October 2024]] ==
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Walter]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Knull (character)#Requested move 26 October 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:Trailblazer101|Trailblazer101]] ([[User talk:Trailblazer101|talk]]) 06:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for [[Tyrion Lannister]] ==
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
[[Tyrion Lannister]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Tyrion Lannister/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 21:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> —[[User:Mahagaja|Mahāgaja]] · [[User talk:Mahagaja|''talk'']] 12:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)


== FAR for [[Bart Simpson]] ==
== Requested move at [[Talk:Bruce Wayne (DC Extended Universe)#Requested move 15 March 2022]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Bruce Wayne (DC Extended Universe)#Requested move 15 March 2022]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —&nbsp;[[User:Shibbolethink|<span style="color: black">Shibboleth</span><span style="color: maroon">ink</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shibbolethink|♔]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink|♕]])</sup> 22:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


I have nominated [[Bart Simpson]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Bart Simpson/archive1|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]]. 🍕[[User:Boneless Pizza!|<span style="background:orange;border-radius:9999px;padding:1px 8px;color:white;"><span style="font-weight:bold">B</span>P!</span>]]🍕 ([[User talk:Boneless Pizza!|🔔]]) 06:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
== Redirecting articles on [mostly] minor ''[[The Wire]]'' characters ==


== Discussion on [[Talk:List of fictional pansexual characters]] ==
There are a whole bunch of articles on ''[[The Wire]]'' characters that include nothing other than in-universe information and make no claims to notability. They are basically long descriptions of everything the character does in the show, i.e., the kind of stuff that belongs on a different wiki (like thewire.fandom.com) but not here. I believe the majority of these should be blanked and redirected to [[List of The Wire characters]] or one of the pages under it.


There is presently a discussion [[Talk:List of fictional pansexual characters#Is an image showing characters wearing clothes "resembling the pansexual pride flag" enough to say the characters are pansexual?|here]] as to whether an image, released by an official account, showing characters wearing clothes "resembling the pansexual pride flag" is enough to say that said characters are pansexual. Your comments in this discussion would be greatly appreciated. [[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 16:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
I started blanking and redirecting a few, but this was contested by another editor (see [[User talk:Interstatefive#Your_revert]]) per [[WP:PAGEBLANKING]]. So, following that editor's recommendation, I then went ahead and PRODded all the articles in question, but that was also contested by another editor (see [[User talk:61.18.156.43#Mass Proposed Deletion of articles]]), who recommended that this should be discussed in a bundled AfD. I have no problem with opening an AfD for that, but I can't for procedural reasons (I can't create an AfD page without registering an account, and I don't want to do that), so I figured I'd try to start the discussion here instead; if anyone sees this and agrees that an AfD is warranted, I hope they will create one [and feel free to directly copy whatever I've compiled here]). Alternatively, it could just be discussed here or at one of the article's talk pages.


== Discussion at [[Talk:List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2020–present]] ==
The articles in question fall into several categories, shown below (ordered from most to least warranting of blanking-and-redirecting):
*Articles with only in-universe content
**[[Stan Valchek]]
**[[Kenard]]
**[[Leander Sydnor]]
**[[Beadie Russell]]
**[[Ervin Burrell]]
**[[Howard "Bunny" Colvin]]
**[[Rhonda Pearlman]]
**[[Kima Greggs]]
**[[Slim Charles]]
**[[Poot (The Wire)]]
**[[Bodie Broadus]]
**[[Chris Partlow]]
**[[Monk Metcalf]]
**[[Brother Mouzone]]
**[[Butchie]]
**[[The Greek]]
**[[Nick Sobotka]]
**[[Spiros Vondas]]
**[[Sergei Malatov]]
**[[Frank Sobotka]]
**[[Clarence Royce]]
**[[Michael Lee (The Wire)]]
**[[Norman Wilson (The Wire)]]
**[[Dukie Weems]]
**[[Augustus Haynes]]
*Articles where the only out-of-universe content is behind-the-scenes trivia, but nothing that makes a claim about notability
**[[Avon Barksdale]]
**[[Ziggy Sobotka]]
**[[Johnny Weeks]]
**[[Bubbles (The Wire)]]
**[[Bunk Moreland]]
**[[Cedric Daniels]]
**[[William Rawls]]
**[[Jay Landsman (The Wire)]]
**[[Roland Pryzbylewski]]
**[[Wee-Bey Brice]]
**[[Proposition Joe]]
**[[Dennis "Cutty" Wise]]
**[[Clay Davis]]
**[[Alma Gutierrez]]
**[[Scott Templeton]]
**[[Stringer Bell]]
*Articles that make only a very negligible claim to notability (e.g. one random article that included them in a list of popular characters; the bar I've used here is if an article only has one reference talking about the critical reaction to the character or any other not-in-universe stuff other "origins of the character" sort of stuff [the latter of which I don't consider useful for establishing notability under most circumstances])
**[[Lester Freamon]]
**[[Ellis Carver]]
**[[Herc]]
**[[D'Angelo Barksdale]]
**[[Tommy Carcetti]]
**[[Namond Brice]]
**[[Randy Wagstaff]]


Presently a discussion is going on, which may be of interest to this WikiProject, at [[Talk:List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2020–present#Splitting off 2020-2024 entries into new article when 2025 begins?]] about whether to split off the 2020-2024 entries of LGBTQ+ characters in January 2025 or to leave the article as is. Your contributions would be appreciated. Thanks! [[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
So far the only person who I've seen object to redirecting these on content-based grounds (as opposed to the other two editors above I mentioned, who only objected to the procedure with which I was going about it but didn't express any opposition in principle to redirecting these) is [[User:Premeditated Chaos]], who reverted one of the prods (on the article [[Kima Greggs]]) and [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Kima_Greggs&diff=1081569819&oldid=1081563695 said] "there's enough critical commentary available about the character in academic sources for a clear claim of notability", i.e., the article can be improved to a level that will meet the inclusion threshold. On this I beg to differ; I have not done a comprehensive literature search, but I skimmed the first few pages of Google Scholar and Google books and, while I found a lot of books and articles analyzing ''The Wire'' and many of these happen to mention this character, it doesn't look like any are specifically ''about'' this character.


== FAR for [[Tasha Yar]] ==
Beyond that, I have not yet seen anyone actually suggesting these articles should be kept. There was an AfD on this nine years ago ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alma Gutierrez]]) and not one person spoke up in favor of keeping; all anyone said was that it should be discussed somewhere other than AfD. (One participant was in favor of merging them all, as I am proposing here, and two participants just said it should be discussed somewhere other than AfD.)


I have nominated [[Tasha Yar]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Tasha Yar/archive1|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]]. 🍕[[User:Boneless Pizza!|<span style="background:orange;border-radius:9999px;padding:1px 8px;color:white;"><span style="font-weight:bold">B</span>P!</span>]]🍕 ([[User talk:Boneless Pizza!|🔔]]) 02:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Ultimately I guess what we have here is a philosophical disagreement on [[meta:Inclusionism|Inclusionism]] (i.e., "some of these topics might merit inclusion, and the onus is on someone else to prove which ones don't") vs. [[meta:Deletionism|Deletionism]] (i.e., "these topics have not been demonstrated to merit inclusion so they should be deleted except where someone can demonstrate on an article-by-article basis which ones merit inclusion), which I don't really want to get into, but I guess one of the other of these views is necessarily informing what people think of what to do with these articles (it's obvious which camp I'm in).


== Requested move at [[Talk:Mac Gargan#Requested move 27 November 2024]] ==
Anyway, I don't think redirecting all of these is necessarily contrary to the spirit of inclusionism anyway; it mostly entails just deleting a lot of unencyclopedic in-universe junk that shouldn't be here anyway, and someone with more time on their hands could always come back in later and re-create (i.e. un-redirect) some of these articles with actually encyclopedic stuff the second time around. I don't think any Wikipedian of any philosophical bent could possibly object to removing almost all the content of a trash page like [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Bodie_Broadus&oldid=1081607762 this]; the only real question is what the form of that removal should take, i.e., wholesale blanking-and-redirecting, vs. removing almost all the content but leaving the article there as a stub with a very brief synopsis and a big pile of cleanup tags at the top. Either way, I'm sure everyone agrees that most of the content in all of these articles needs to go. [[Special:Contributions/61.18.156.43|61.18.156.43]] ([[User talk:61.18.156.43|talk]]) 03:23, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Mac Gargan#Requested move 27 November 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:Trailblazer101|Trailblazer101]] ([[User talk:Trailblazer101|talk]]) 18:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/61.18.156.43|61.18.156.43]] ([[User talk:61.18.156.43|talk]]) 03:23, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
: The Wire is considered to be one of the greatest television shows of all time, #2 behind The Sopranos. These standalone articles were quite helpful for me to understand the plot when I was watching the show. I don't see why you want to remove information that readers can utilize and access. Hard disagree with your proposal. The show is significant enough to have standalone articles. [[User:LJF2019|<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">LJF2019</span></span></i></b>]] [[User talk:LJF2019|<sup><i><span style="color:#2C3539">talk</span></i></sup>]] 19:29, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
::[[WP:N|Notability]] is not inherited. Subjects that don't meet notability guidelines independent of the works they are associated with do not have the necessary level of coverage to produce a article that is verifiable to our standards. All topics, including all TV shows, are subject to the the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]]. <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']]</sup> 20:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
::Echoing Rosguill: the fact that a show is great does not mean that every trivial character from the show gets a standalone article. And the fact that an article was helpful doesn't mean it meets the inclusion criteria (see [[WP:ITSUSEFUL]]). [[Special:Contributions/61.18.156.43|61.18.156.43]] ([[User talk:61.18.156.43|talk]]) 00:46, 18 April 2022 (UTC)


== Requested move at [[Talk:Spot (character)#Requested move 1 December 2024]] ==
:Quick update: when I posted this proposal I also notified several editors who had objected to my redirects before. While none of them have replied here, a few replied on their talk pages, so I am noting those replies here for the sake of keeping all the discussion in one place. One user [[User_talk:Toddst1#Mass_proposed_deletion_of_The_Wire_character_articles|said]] he agrees the articles are bad, but did not address the substantive question (whether they should be redirected, turned into stubs, or left alone). Another [[User_talk:Premeditated_Chaos#Mass_proposed_redirecting_of_The_Wire_character_articles|said]] that, while they probably agree with redirecting the articles on minor characters, the ones on major characters (specifically [[Kima Greggs]]) have the potential to pass GNG and thus should be tagged for cleanup but not redirected. I agree with the latter editor so I started redirecting the articles on minor characters (the division between "major" and "minor" is of course subjective) but intend to skip Kima Greggs and instead turn that article into a short stub with cleanup tags. [[Special:Contributions/61.18.156.43|61.18.156.43]] ([[User talk:61.18.156.43|talk]]) 00:52, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Spot (character)#Requested move 1 December 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:Trailblazer101|Trailblazer101]] ([[User talk:Trailblazer101|talk]]) 20:24, 1 December 2024 (UTC)


== Requested move at [[Talk:Count von Count#Requested move 27 November 2024]] ==
@{{maroon|61.etc}}: I'd say you prettty much have your answer. The editors that have contributed to those pages, along with the ones that reverted your blank-and-redirect edits, plus the "''{{tq|several editors who had objected to}}'' [your] ''{{tq|redirects before}}''", along with ediors here in favour of those pages, and, all the editors that have ''not'' shown up to to support you, demonstrates a consensus to keep those pages. (Plus all the implied consensus that built up since they were created.) Might be time to [[WP:DTS|let this go]].<p>On a side note, you wrote: "''{{tq|I can't create an AfD page without registering an account, and I don't want to do that}}''"... why not? You've only made 144 edits with this account (all to ''The Wire'' character pages, but clearly you have more than 144 edits worth of experience, so what is all this about? - ''[[User:Thewolfchild|<span style="color: black">wolf</span>]]'' 15:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Count von Count#Requested move 27 November 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:Raladic|Raladic]] ([[User talk:Raladic|talk]]) 05:24, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
:Thanks for your reply. Does anyone actually have a ''reason'' these articles should be kept (i.e., evidence that they meet the GNG, which we presumably are all deeply familiar with), or just complaints about procedure? As far as I can tell, out of the three editors who have said anything whatsoever about the content of the pages here, one ([[User:LJF2019]]) said they should stay [but for reasons that are explicitly contra [[WP:AVOID]]], and two ([[User talk:Rosguill]] and me) said or at least implied that they should go, so I don't see any consensus to keep (if anything, there is perhaps no consensus either way, partly because hardly anyone will even respond to the issue).
:Regarding your side note, (1) you are wrong (if you look back in the contribs of this account you will see edits to other topics; the only reason there are a lot of edits to this topic is because (a) there are a lot of articles about it, and (b) this is the only topic anyone objected to my edits about); and (2) the reasons I do or do not want to register an account are patently irrelevant to whether or not these articles are encyclopedic, so I see no reason for either of us to discuss them here. Whether someone is logged in to an account or not has no bearing on a content disagreement (or is Wikipedia no longer "the encyclopedia that anyone can edit"?) [[Special:Contributions/61.18.156.43|61.18.156.43]] ([[User talk:61.18.156.43|talk]]) 17:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:24, 4 December 2024

Good article reassessment for Fleance

[edit]

Fleance has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Joker persona has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9 § Joker persona until a consensus is reached. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 22:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:List of Pokémon#Requested move 9 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Web-julio (talk) 23:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Carl Johnson (Grand Theft Auto)#Requested move 16 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 22:20, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Norman Osborn

[edit]

Norman Osborn has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Tom Swift

[edit]

I have nominated Tom Swift for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 22:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Knull (character)#Requested move 26 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Trailblazer101 (talk) 06:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Tyrion Lannister

[edit]

Tyrion Lannister has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Bart Simpson for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 06:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is presently a discussion here as to whether an image, released by an official account, showing characters wearing clothes "resembling the pansexual pride flag" is enough to say that said characters are pansexual. Your comments in this discussion would be greatly appreciated. Historyday01 (talk) 16:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Presently a discussion is going on, which may be of interest to this WikiProject, at Talk:List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2020–present#Splitting off 2020-2024 entries into new article when 2025 begins? about whether to split off the 2020-2024 entries of LGBTQ+ characters in January 2025 or to leave the article as is. Your contributions would be appreciated. Thanks! Historyday01 (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Tasha Yar

[edit]

I have nominated Tasha Yar for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 02:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Mac Gargan#Requested move 27 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Spot (character)#Requested move 1 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:24, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Count von Count#Requested move 27 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 05:24, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]