Jump to content

Talk:The Weather Network: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Canada}}, {{WikiProject Television}}, {{WikiProject Weather}}.
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Weather Network, The|1=
{{WikiProject Canada|class=C|importance=Low|tvshow=yes}}
{{WikiProject Canada|importance=Low|tvshow=yes}}
{{WikiProject Television|class=C|importance=Low|listas=Weather Network, The|television-stations=yes|television-stations-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Television|importance=Low|television-stations=yes|television-stations-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Weather|class=C|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Weather|importance=Low}}
}}
}}
{{Photo requested|television programs|of=historical screenshots}}
{{Photo requested|television programs|of=historical screenshots}}


==comment==
==comment==
I think we should make a new article for the list of past hosts. It is getting really long! [[Special:Contributions/217.45.203.34|217.45.203.34]] ([[User talk:217.45.203.34|talk]]) 11:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
I think we should make a new article for the list of past hosts. It is getting really long! Shannon Fernando is exemplary. Props and kudos from the anti-dichotomist (binarist) camp. I just put in a critical observation right under their noses. Dave P. Vernon BC[[Special:Contributions/217.45.203.34|217.45.203.34]] ([[User talk:217.45.203.34|talk]]) 11:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


Could you PLEASE DISAMBIGUATE HOSTS, past and present when updating your lists???
Could you PLEASE DISAMBIGUATE HOSTS, past and present when updating your lists???
Line 47: Line 47:


Does anybody have any sources, for this? Weather Network has recently, been employing ''attractive women'', for ratings. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 14:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Does anybody have any sources, for this? Weather Network has recently, been employing ''attractive women'', for ratings. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 14:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
:lol. Very funny. Not here though. OUR WORK IS DONE HERE. ENOUGH GOOD PEOPLE HAVE SEEN THE OTHER ALTERNATIVES; AND THE SCUM HAVE LOST THEIR "MIS-EDUCATIONAL" OPPORTUNITIES. ta taah! AHHHH THE BRILLIANCE OF ACCUWEATHER SPECTRUMOLOGY AND MULTIFACETED SCIENTIFIC APPROACH AND =BURYING= NETWORKIAN ARROGANCE AND BINARISM--- SORRY KIM SORRY MEI- YOU LOSE!!! NOW WE'LL SEE WHAT HAPPENS.[[Special:Contributions/24.36.115.4|24.36.115.4]] ([[User talk:24.36.115.4|talk]]) 21:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
:lol. Very funny. Not here though. - [[Special:Contributions/24.36.115.4|24.36.115.4]] ([[User talk:24.36.115.4|talk]]) 21:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
== External links modified ==

Latest revision as of 00:50, 29 February 2024

comment

[edit]

I think we should make a new article for the list of past hosts. It is getting really long! Shannon Fernando is exemplary. Props and kudos from the anti-dichotomist (binarist) camp. I just put in a critical observation right under their noses. Dave P. Vernon BC217.45.203.34 (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you PLEASE DISAMBIGUATE HOSTS, past and present when updating your lists??? Some of those links could start some urban legends!! Bacl-presby 17:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Twn07 02 12.jpg

[edit]

Image:Twn07 02 12.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Candice Ola.JPG

[edit]

Image:Candice Ola.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale has been added. dhett (talk contribs) 07:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LF 07.jpg

[edit]

Image:LF 07.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sex Appeal

[edit]

Does anybody have any sources, for this? Weather Network has recently, been employing attractive women, for ratings. GoodDay (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lol. Very funny. Not here though. - 24.36.115.4 (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on The Weather Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]