Television licensing in the United Kingdom: Difference between revisions
→The future of the licence fee: Corrected the finding Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary |
||
(89 intermediate revisions by 63 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{short description|Annual licence to receive live television}} |
||
{{for|licensing for broadcasting rights|broadcast license}} |
{{for|licensing for broadcasting rights|broadcast license}} |
||
{{hatnote|This article includes information on |
{{hatnote|This article includes information on television licensing on the [[Isle of Man]] and the [[Channel Islands]] which is regulated by the [[United Kingdom|United Kingdom's]] television licensing authority.}} |
||
{{ |
{{Use British English|date=May 2024}} |
||
{{Use dmy dates|date= |
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2023}} |
||
<!-- |
<!-- |
||
Spelling help to editors: |
Spelling help to editors: |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
- TV licensing |
- TV licensing |
||
--> |
--> |
||
[[File:TV licence (3714001810).png|thumb|280px|alt=A white and blue letter detailing the confirmation and payments towards someone's TV licence.|A British TV licence]] |
|||
In the [[British Islands]], any household watching or recording television transmissions at the same time they are being broadcast is required by law to hold a [[television licence]]. This applies regardless of transmission method, including [[Terrestrial television|terrestrial]], [[Satellite television|satellite]], [[Cable television|cable]], or for BBC iPlayer internet streaming. The television licence is the instrument used to raise revenue to fund the [[BBC]] |
In the [[United Kingdom]] and the [[British Islands]], any household watching or recording television transmissions at the same time they are being broadcast is required by law to hold a [[television licence]]. This applies regardless of transmission method, including [[Terrestrial television|terrestrial]], [[Satellite television|satellite]], [[Cable television|cable]], or for [[BBC iPlayer]] internet streaming. The television licence is the instrument used to raise revenue to fund the [[BBC]] and [[S4C]]. |
||
Businesses, hospitals, schools and a range of other organisations are also required by law to hold television licences to watch and record live |
Businesses, hospitals, schools and a range of other organisations are also required by law to hold television licences to watch and record live television broadcasts.<ref name="business">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/business-and-organisations/tv-in-the-workplace-policy-aud24 |title=Businesses and organisations |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|access-date=14 March 2014}}</ref> The licence, originally a radio licence, was introduced in November 1923 using powers under the [[Wireless Telegraphy Act 1904]], and cost 10 shillings per annum. The licence was extended to televisions at a cost of £2 in June 1946. The radio part was abolished in February 1971.<ref>{{cite web |title=Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport - First Report. 5 BBC Funding |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmcumeds/82/8208.htm |website=Publications & records |publisher=UK Parliament |access-date=23 October 2020}}</ref> A television licence is also required to receive [[video on demand]] programme services provided by the BBC via its [[iPlayer]] service. |
||
Since April |
Since 1 April 2024, the annual cost has been £169.50 for a colour licence and £57.00 for a black and white licence. Income from the licence is primarily used to fund the television, radio and online services of the BBC. The total income from licence fees was £3.83 billion in 2017–18,<ref name="Financial Statements">{{cite web|url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/insidethebbc/reports/pdf/bbc_annualreport_201718.pdf|title=BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18|publisher=BBC|access-date= 18 September 2017}}</ref> of which £655.3 million or 17.1% was provided by the government through concessions for those over the age of 75 (this subsidy has now been phased out). Thus, the licence fee made up the bulk (75.7%) of the BBC's total income of £5.0627 billion in 2017–2018.<ref name="Financial Statements" /> |
||
In May 2016, the government's [[white paper]] announced that the licence fee would rise with inflation for the first five years of the [[BBC Charter|Charter]] period, from 1 April 2017. |
In May 2016, the government's [[white paper]] announced that the licence fee would rise with inflation for the first five years of the [[BBC Charter|Charter]] period, from 1 April 2017. |
||
The number of licences issued peaked at 26.2 million in 2018. As of 2022-2023, there were over 24 million active television licences.<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-licences-facts-and-figures-AB18 | title=Licences facts and figures | website=www.tvlicensing.co.uk}}</ref> |
|||
==Operation of the licensing system== |
==Operation of the licensing system== |
||
===Licence fee collection and use=== |
===Licence fee collection and use=== |
||
The |
The television licence fee is collected by the [[BBC]] and primarily used to fund the radio, television and online services of the BBC itself. Licence fee collection is the responsibility of the BBC's Finance and Business division.<ref name="Trust statement 2013" /> |
||
[[File:BBC Logo 2021.svg|200px|thumb|right| The BBC also operates as the TV Licensing Authority in the UK, as one of its trade names]] |
|||
[[File:BBC Logo 2021.svg|thumb|upright=0.5|The BBC also operates as the TV Licensing Authority in the UK, as one of its trade names.]] |
|||
Although the money is raised for its own use and collected by the BBC itself, the BBC does not directly use the collected fees. The money received is first paid into the government's [[Consolidated Fund]]. It is subsequently included in the 'vote' for the [[Department of Culture, Media and Sport]] in that year's [[Appropriation Act]], and passed back to the BBC for the running of the BBC's own services (free from [[Television commercial|commercial advertisements]]). The money also finances programming for [[S4C]] and the [[BBC World Service]], and included the running costs of [[BBC Monitoring]] at Caversham until it was relocated to London and the property sold in May 2018. |
Although the money is raised for its own use and collected by the BBC itself, the BBC does not directly use the collected fees. The money received is first paid into the government's [[Consolidated Fund]]. It is subsequently included in the 'vote' for the [[Department of Culture, Media and Sport]] in that year's [[Appropriation Act]], and passed back to the BBC for the running of the BBC's own services (free from [[Television commercial|commercial advertisements]]). The money also finances programming for [[S4C]] and the [[BBC World Service]], and included the running costs of [[BBC Monitoring]] at Caversham until it was relocated to London and the property sold in May 2018. |
||
===Legal framework=== |
===Legal framework=== |
||
In 1991, the BBC assumed the role of |
In 1991, the BBC assumed the role of television licensing authority with responsibility for the collection and enforcement of the licence fee.<ref name="legal framework">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-legal-framework-AB16|title=Legal framework |access-date=20 October 2014 |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]}}</ref> |
||
|access-date=20 October 2014 |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]}}</ref> |
|||
The BBC is authorised by the [[Communications Act 2003]] to collect and enforce the |
The BBC is authorised by the [[Communications Act 2003]] to collect and enforce the television licence fee. Section 363 of the Act makes it against the law to install or use a television receiver to watch or record any television programmes as they are being broadcast without a television licence. Section 365 of the same Act requires the payment of the television licence fee to the BBC.<ref name="legal framework" /> |
||
The licence fee is formally set by the [[Department for Culture, Media and Sport|Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport]] by the use of [[statutory instruments]]. The relevant statutory instruments are the Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004<ref name= |
The licence fee is formally set by the [[Department for Culture, Media and Sport|Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport]] by the use of [[statutory instruments]]. The relevant statutory instruments are the Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004<ref name="Regulations 2004">{{cite web |url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/692/contents/made|title= The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004|access-date=4 November 2014 |website=Legislation.gov.uk}}</ref> and amendments since that time such as the Communications (Television Licensing) (Amendment) Regulations 2010.<ref name="regulations 2010">{{cite web|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/640/pdfs/uksi_20100640_en.pdf|title=SI 2010/640 ''The Communications (Television Licensing) (Amendment) Regulations 2010''|publisher=HM Stationery Office|access-date=18 January 2013}}</ref> As well as prescribing the fees, the regulations also define "television receiver" for the purposes of the law. |
||
For people living in the Channel Islands and Isle of Man, |
For people living in the Channel Islands and Isle of Man, the television licensing law is extended to their areas by [[Order in Council|Orders in Council]] made by agreement with their own governments.<ref name="Ask script channel">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/copy_of_ask_help_script#incoming-571034|title=Copy of Ask Help script|date=16 August 2014|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |page=376|access-date=12 February 2015}}</ref><ref name="Perry">{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/403561/15_02_12_Consultation_document_-_TV_Licence_Enforcement_Review__2_.pdf|title=TV Licence Enforcement Review|publisher=Department for Media Culture & Sport|access-date=16 February 2015}}</ref><ref name="Tynwald">{{cite web|url=http://www.tynwald.org.im/business/pp/Reports/2011-PP-0108.pdf|title=SELECT COMMITTEE OF TYNWALD ON THE TELEVISION LICENCE FEE REPORT 2010/11|publisher=Tynwald, Isle of Man|access-date=17 February 2015}}</ref> |
||
As part of its [[#Licence fee enforcement|enforcement]] regime, the BBC is authorised to carry out surveillance using powers defined by the [[Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000]] and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (British Broadcasting Corporation) Order 2001. The BBC is permitted by the order to use surveillance equipment to detect unlicensed use of television receivers.<ref name= |
As part of its [[#Licence fee enforcement|enforcement]] regime, the BBC is authorised to carry out surveillance using powers defined by the [[Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000]] and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (British Broadcasting Corporation) Order 2001. The BBC is permitted by the order to use surveillance equipment to detect unlicensed use of television receivers.<ref name="RIPA TV">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-administering-the-licence-fee-AB20 |title=Administering the licence fee |access-date=7 May 2015 |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]}}</ref> |
||
As the public body responsible for issuing |
As the public body responsible for issuing television licences, licensing information held by the BBC and on the BBC's behalf by television licensing contractors is subject to the [[Freedom of Information Act 2000]]. The BBC withholds some information on licence enforcement using exemptions under the Act; in particular, under section 31, which permits the withholding of information on crime prevention grounds and under section 43(2), which allows the BBC to retain information judged commercially sensitive.<ref name="FOI Act">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/freedom-of-information-act-foi-AB14 |title=Freedom of Information Act |access-date=7 May 2015 |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]}}</ref> |
||
===Reclassification as a tax=== |
===Reclassification as a tax=== |
||
In January 2006, the [[Office for National Statistics]] (ONS) changed the classification of the licence fee from a service charge to a tax.<ref name="Select Committee 20060303">{{cite web |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldbbc/128/128i.pdf |title=Further Issues for BBC Charter Review |access-date=15 August 2008 |work=House of Lords Session Report |publisher=The Stationery Office Limited |date=3 March 2006 |
In January 2006, the [[Office for National Statistics]] (ONS) changed the classification of the licence fee from a service charge to a tax.<ref name="Select Committee 20060303">{{cite web |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldbbc/128/128i.pdf |title=Further Issues for BBC Charter Review |access-date=15 August 2008 |work=House of Lords Session Report |publisher=The Stationery Office Limited |date=3 March 2006}}</ref> Explaining the change, the ONS said: "in line with the definition of a tax, the licence fee is a compulsory payment which is not paid solely for access to BBC services. A licence is required to receive ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5, satellite, or cable". A briefing paper from the House of Commons Library described the licence fee as a [[hypothecated tax]] (i.e. one raised for a particular defined purpose).<ref name="hypothecated">{{cite web |last1=Seely |first1=Antony |title=Research Briefing SN01480: Hypothecated taxation |url=https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01480/ |publisher=House of Commons Library |access-date=19 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220120141436/https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01480/ |archive-date=20 January 2022 |page=8 |date=27 September 2011 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
BBC services. A licence is required to receive ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5, satellite, or cable". A briefing paper from the House of Commons Library described the licence fee as a [[hypothecated tax]] (i.e. one raised for a particular defined purpose).<ref name="hypothecated">{{cite web |last1=Seely |first1=Antony |title=Research Briefing SN01480: Hypothecated taxation |url=https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01480/ |publisher=House of Commons Library |access-date=19 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220120141436/https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01480/ |archive-date=20 January 2022 |page=8 |date=27 September 2011 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
===TV Licensing Management Team=== |
===TV Licensing Management Team=== |
||
The TV Licence Management Team, which is part of the [[BBC Finance & Business|Finance and Business]] division of the BBC, oversees the |
The TV Licence Management Team, which is part of the [[BBC Finance & Business|Finance and Business]] division of the BBC, oversees the television licensing system.<ref name="about us">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-about-tv-licensing-AB15|title=About TV Licensing |access-date=23 April 2015 |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]}}</ref> The TV Licence Management Team is based in the BBC buildings at [[White City Place]] in London. The majority of television licensing administration and enforcement activities are carried out under contract by private companies. The TV Licence Management Team oversees the performance of the contractors. |
||
|access-date=23 April 2015 |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]}}</ref> The TV Licence Management Team is based in the BBC buildings at [[White City Place]] in London. The majority of TV licensing administration and enforcement activities are carried out under contract by private companies. The TV Licence Management Team oversees the performance of the contractors. |
|||
===''TV Licensing'' brand=== |
===''TV Licensing'' brand=== |
||
The BBC pursues its licence fee collection and enforcement under the trading name ''TV Licensing'', but contracts much of the task to commercial organisations.<ref name="Who we are">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/who-we-are-AB4|title=Who we are |
The BBC pursues its licence fee collection and enforcement under the trading name ''TV Licensing'', but contracts much of the task to commercial organisations.<ref name="Who we are">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/who-we-are-AB4|title=Who We Are |access-date=20 October 2014 |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]}}</ref> ''TV Licensing'' is a trademark of the BBC used under licence by companies contracted by the BBC that administer the television licensing system.<ref name="Who we are" /> Concerning the relationship of the BBC brand with the TV Licensing brand, the BBC's position is stated as: "The TV Licensing brand is separate from the BBC brand. No link between the two brands should be made in customer facing communications, in particular, use of the BBC name and logo".<ref name="TVL letters" /> However, it also states that the rules for internal communications and communications with suppliers are different: "the name BBC TV Licensing may also be used within department names or job titles for BBC employees".<ref name="TVL letters" /> |
||
|access-date=20 October 2014 |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]}}</ref> ''TV Licensing'' is a trademark of the BBC used under licence by companies contracted by the BBC that administer the television licensing system.<ref name="Who we are"/> Concerning the relationship of the BBC brand with the TV Licensing brand, the BBC's position is stated as: "The TV Licensing brand is separate from the BBC brand. No link between the two brands should be made in customer facing communications, in particular, use of the BBC name and logo".<ref name="TVL letters"/> However, it also states that the rules for internal communications and communications with suppliers are different: "the name BBC TV Licensing may also be used within department names or job titles for BBC employees".<ref name="TVL letters"/> |
|||
===TV Licensing contractors and subcontractors=== |
|||
===Television Licensing contractors and subcontractors=== |
|||
====Capita==== |
====Capita==== |
||
A major contractor is [[Capita]].<ref name="IPPR"/> Capita is responsible for the administration and enforcement of the |
A major contractor is [[Capita]].<ref name="IPPR" /> Capita is responsible for the administration and enforcement of the television licence fee.<ref name="Who we are" /><ref name="capita">{{cite web |url=http://www.capita-dis.co.uk/case-study/bbcs-tv-licensing-service |title=The BBC's TV Licensing Service|access-date=2 September 2014 |publisher=Capita}}</ref> |
||
It is expected that Capita will earn £1.10bn |
It is expected that Capita will earn between £1.10bn and £1.55bn from its contract with the BBC if it runs its maximum 15 years from July 2012.<ref name="Trust statement 2013">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/ss/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheadername1=content-type&blobheadervalue1=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1370006220586&ssbinary=true |title=British Broadcasting Corporation Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2013 |access-date=22 April 2015 |publisher=The Stationery Office}}</ref> |
||
[[File:India Mill, Darwen - geograph.org.uk - 975474.jpg|thumb|right|Capita's TV Licensing Headquarters is based at India Mill, Darwen, Lancashire.]] |
|||
[[File:India Mill, Darwen - geograph.org.uk - 975474.jpg|thumb|upright|Capita's TV Licensing Headquarters is based at India Mill, Darwen, Lancashire.]] |
|||
The services carried out by Capita on behalf of the BBC include dealing with TV licence queries, processing TV licence applications and payments and the |
|||
maintenance of the licence database.<ref name="capita BBC">{{cite web|url=http://www.capita-its.co.uk/Documents/TV%20Licensing%20Case%20Study.pdf|title=BBC – Television Licensing|access-date=12 May 2015|publisher=The Capita Group plc}}{{Dead link|date=April 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Enforcement tasks include visiting addresses, identifying people watching TV without a licence, taking statements, and achieving prosecutions of TV licence evaders.<ref name="Visiting proc" /><ref name="TVL Briefing"/><ref name="Capita Court Presenters">{{cite web|title=Case Law Relating to TV Licensing|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/case_law_relating_to_tv_licensin#incoming-703629|website=Whatdotheyknow.com|date=4 August 2015|publisher=Whatdotheyknow|access-date=17 September 2015}}</ref> TV Licensing debt collection is carried out by Akinika,<ref name=akinika>{{cite web|title=About akinika|url=https://www.akinika.co.uk/about-akinika.html|website=www.akinika.co.uk|publisher=akinika|access-date=20 October 2015}}</ref> which is a debt collection agency owned by Capita.<ref name="Capita debt collection">{{cite web|title=Debt recovery|url=http://www.capita.co.uk/what-we-do/services/debt-and-legal-services/debt-recovery|website=www.capita.co.uk|publisher=Capita Plc|access-date=20 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160115105034/http://www.capita.co.uk/what-we-do/services/debt-and-legal-services/debt-recovery|archive-date=15 January 2016|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> |
|||
The services carried out by Capita on behalf of the BBC include dealing with television licence queries, processing television licence applications and payments and the maintenance of the licence database.<ref name="capita BBC">{{cite web|url=http://www.capita-its.co.uk/Documents/TV%20Licensing%20Case%20Study.pdf|title=BBC – Television Licensing|access-date=12 May 2015|publisher=The Capita Group plc}}{{Dead link|date=April 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> Enforcement tasks include visiting addresses, identifying people watching TV without a licence, taking statements and achieving prosecutions of television licence evaders.<ref name="Visiting proc" /><ref name="TVL Briefing" /><ref name="Capita Court Presenters">{{cite web|title=Case Law Relating to TV Licensing|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/case_law_relating_to_tv_licensin#incoming-703629|website=Whatdotheyknow.com|date=4 August 2015|access-date=17 September 2015}}</ref> TV Licensing debt collection is carried out by Akinika,<ref name=akinika>{{cite web|title=About akinika|url=https://www.akinika.co.uk/about-akinika.html|website=Akinika.co.uk|publisher=Akinika|access-date=20 October 2015}}</ref> which is a debt collection agency owned by Capita.<ref name="Capita debt collection">{{cite web |title=Debt Recovery |url=http://www.capita.co.uk/what-we-do/services/debt-and-legal-services/debt-recovery |website=Capita.co.uk |publisher=Capita Plc |access-date=20 October 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160115105034/http://www.capita.co.uk/what-we-do/services/debt-and-legal-services/debt-recovery |archive-date=15 January 2016}}</ref> |
|||
Capita's TV Licensing headquarters is at India Mill, in Darwen, Lancashire.<ref name="Darwen">{{cite web |url=http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/10056325.New_jobs_at_Darwen_TV_licence_HQ/?ref=rc|title=New jobs at Darwen TV licence HQ |access-date=20 January 2014 |publisher=www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk}}</ref> Capita employs a number of subcontractors for part of its TV Licensing operations – one important one being [[Computer Sciences Corporation]] which provides and modernises the required IT infrastructure.<ref name="Trust statement 2013"/> Since 2004, Capita has undertaken a proportion of TV licensing administration at locations outside of the UK and "has progressively increased the amount of work processed overseas each year".<ref name="Trust statement 2013"/> However, as of 2013, Capita has not set up any overseas call centres to carry out TV Licensing work and it would need the BBC's permission to do so in the future.<ref name="Trust statement 2013"/> Some of Capita's TV Licensing work is carried out in Mumbai, India<ref name="Mumbai">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/6309617.stm|title=TV licensing staff go on strike|date=29 January 2007|access-date=28 August 2014 |publisher=BBC}}</ref> but after reportage in ''[[Panorama (British TV programme)|Panorama]]'' about scammers from India, the Indian office of Capita was closed permanently. |
|||
Capita's TV Licensing headquarters is at India Mill, in Darwen, Lancashire.<ref name="Darwen">{{cite news |url=http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/10056325.New_jobs_at_Darwen_TV_licence_HQ/?ref=rc|title=New jobs at Darwen TV licence HQ |access-date=20 January 2014 |newspaper=Lancashire Telegraph}}</ref> Capita employs a number of subcontractors for part of its TV Licensing operations – one important one being [[Computer Sciences Corporation]] which provides and modernises the required IT infrastructure.<ref name="Trust statement 2013" /> Since 2004, Capita has undertaken a proportion of television licensing administration at locations outside of the UK and "has progressively increased the amount of work processed overseas each year".<ref name="Trust statement 2013" /> However, {{As of|2013|lc=on|post=,}} Capita has not set up any overseas call centres to carry out television licensing work and it would need the BBC's permission to do so in the future.<ref name="Trust statement 2013" /> Some of Capita's television licensing work is carried out in Mumbai, India<ref name="Mumbai">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/6309617.stm|title=TV licensing staff go on strike|date=29 January 2007|access-date=28 August 2014 |publisher=BBC}}</ref> but after reportage in ''[[Panorama (British TV programme)|Panorama]]'' about scammers from India, the Indian office of Capita was closed permanently. |
|||
==== Proximity London Limited==== |
|||
====Proximity London Limited==== |
|||
Marketing and printing services, including reminder letters and licence distribution, are carried out by Proximity London Limited.<ref name="proximity">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2010/03_march/11/licence.shtml|title=BBC appoints Proximity to deliver TV Licensing direct marketing|access-date=2 September 2014|publisher=BBC}}</ref> |
Marketing and printing services, including reminder letters and licence distribution, are carried out by Proximity London Limited.<ref name="proximity">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2010/03_march/11/licence.shtml|title=BBC appoints Proximity to deliver TV Licensing direct marketing|access-date=2 September 2014|publisher=BBC}}</ref> |
||
====Havas Media==== |
====Havas Media==== |
||
Media services are contracted to [[Havas Media]].<ref name="about us"/> |
Media services are contracted to [[Havas Media]].<ref name="about us" /> |
||
====Other contractors==== |
====Other contractors==== |
||
Other contractors involved in |
Other contractors involved in television licensing include [[PayPoint]] which provides over-the-counter services in the UK, and the post offices which provide the same services in the [[Isle of Man Post Office|Isle of Man]] and Channel Islands.<ref name="Trust statement 2013" /> Also involved are: AMV BBDO<ref name="proximity" /> which provides advertising services, and Fishburn Communications<ref name="Fishburn">{{cite web|url=http://www.thisisfishburn.com/our-work/bbc|title=BBC|access-date=10 September 2014|publisher=Fishburn}}</ref> which carries out public relations. |
||
===Duration of a television licence=== |
|||
A television licence, once issued, is normally valid for a maximum of 12 months. The period of its validity depends on the exact day of the month it is purchased; this is because television licences always expire at the end of a calendar month. If a licence were to be obtained in September 2014, for example, it would expire on 31 August 2015. Thus the period of validity would vary between 11 and 12 months depending how early in the month it was bought.<ref name="Duration">{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ25|author=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|title=How long does a TV Licence last?|access-date=8 August 2014}}</ref> If an existing licence is renewed on time, the new licence will last the full 12 months. |
|||
The BBC sometimes issues 'short dated' licences in situations when a licence is renewed after the expiry date of the previous licence. The BBC does this as it assumes that television was being watched in the interim period between expiry and renewal. Short dated licences are set to expire 12 months after the previous expiry date.<ref name="Trust report 2011">{{cite web|title=British Broadcasting Corporation Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2011|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/247334/1234.pdf|website=www.gov.uk|publisher=UK Government|access-date=25 August 2015}}</ref> |
|||
===Duration of a TV licence=== |
|||
A TV licence, once issued, is normally valid for a maximum of 12 months. The period of its validity depends on the exact day of the month it is purchased; this is because TV licences always expire at the end of a calendar month. If a licence were to be obtained in September 2014, for example, it would expire on 31 August 2015. Thus the period of validity would vary between 11 and 12 months depending how early in the month it was bought.<ref name="Duration">{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ25|author=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|title=How long does a TV Licence last?|access-date=8 August 2014}}</ref> If an existing licence is renewed on time, the new licence will last the full 12 months. |
|||
If a television licence is no longer needed for an address, it is possible to cancel a licence and apply for a partial refund.<ref name="cancel">{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7|author=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|title=Cancellations and refunds|access-date=8 August 2014}}</ref> The amount refunded will depend on the time left to the expiry date. Normally only full quarters (that is three consecutive calendar months) of unexpired licence period are refunded.<ref name="legislation and policy" /> |
|||
The BBC sometimes issues 'short dated' licences in situations when a licence is renewed after the expiry date of the previous licence. The BBC does this as it assumes that TV was being watched in the interim period between expiry and renewal. Short dated licences are set to expire 12 months after the previous expiry date.<ref name="Trust report 2011">{{cite web|title=British Broadcasting Corporation Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2011|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/247334/1234.pdf|website=www.gov.uk|publisher=UK Government|access-date=25 August 2015}}</ref> |
|||
The BBC may also revoke a licence under certain circumstances.<ref name="legislation and policy">{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/legislation-and-policy-AB9|publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|title=Legislation and policy|access-date=8 August 2014}}</ref> |
|||
If a UK resident aged 74 years wishes to purchase a TV Licence, they can apply for a short-term TV Licence to cover the time until they reach 75 when they become eligible for a free licence in the UK. Short-term licences for 74-year-olds are also available on the Isle of Man and [[Bailiwick of Guernsey|Guernsey]]. |
|||
If a TV licence is no longer needed for an address it is possible to cancel a licence and apply for a partial refund.<ref name="cancel">{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7|author=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|title=Cancellations and refunds|access-date=8 August 2014}}</ref> The amount refunded will depend on the time left to the expiry date. Normally only full quarters (that is three consecutive calendar months) of unexpired licence period are refunded.<ref name="legislation and policy"/> |
|||
The BBC may also revoke a licence under certain circumstances.<ref name="legislation and policy">{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/legislation-and-policy-AB9|author=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|title=Legislation and policy|access-date=8 August 2014}}</ref> |
|||
===Cost of a licence=== |
===Cost of a licence=== |
||
The level of the fee is decided following periodic negotiations between the UK Government and the |
The level of the fee is decided following periodic negotiations between the UK Government and the BBC.<ref name="negotiations">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/our_work/strategy/licence_fee/licence_fee.html |title= Licence Fee |access-date=29 April 2013 |publisher=BBC Trust |date=May 2012}}</ref> Before 1988, increases in the licence fee happened at irregular intervals, sometimes a few years passing between changes. From 1988 to 2010, the licence fee was increased annually each April.<ref name="Ask script3">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/copy_of_ask_help_script#incoming-571034|title=Copy of Ask Help script|date=16 August 2014|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |page=429|access-date=6 November 2014}}</ref> |
||
Between April 2010 and April 2017 the licence fee remained constant at £145.50 per year.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-11572171|title=TV licence frozen for six years|work=BBC News|date=20 October 2010}}</ref> As of 1 April |
Between April 2010 and April 2017 the licence fee remained constant at £145.50 per year.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-11572171|title=TV licence frozen for six years|work=BBC News|date=20 October 2010}}</ref> As of 1 April 2021, it costs £159 for a colour licence and £53.50 for a black and white television licence. |
||
===Payment methods=== |
===Payment methods=== |
||
Line 104: | Line 99: | ||
* [[BACS]] electronic transfer. Annual payments for renewal licences only. |
* [[BACS]] electronic transfer. Annual payments for renewal licences only. |
||
[[File:Smith Street Post Office, St. Peter Port, Guernsey.jpg|thumb |
[[File:Smith Street Post Office, St. Peter Port, Guernsey.jpg|thumb|A post office in Guernsey. Unlike in the UK, television licences may still be purchased at post offices in Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man.]] |
||
The payment methods mean that the licence fee is paid for either completely or partially in advance. Annual payments require complete payment in advance. For monthly direct debit, a new licence is paid off in 6 monthly installments of just over £24 a month. Renewal licences are paid for in 12 monthly installments starting 6 months before expiry of the licence in force i.e. starting 6 months before the renewal date.<ref name="Payment methods"/> Quarterly payments made using direct debit carry an additional cost of £5.00 per year, or £1.25 a quarter, which is included in the licence fee total. This addition is described as "a small charge" in the generic letter issued by TV Licensing to those paying by direct debit, and on the TV Licensing website it is justified with: "By paying quarterly the majority of your licence is paid for as you use it. This differs from our other instalment schemes, where at least half of the licence fee is collected in advance. As a result, quarterly payments incur a small premium of £1.25 per quarter which is included in your payment."<ref name="Payment methods" /> Typically, direct debit schemes in the UK for major utilities or publicly provided services operate in a reverse way, granting a discount to direct debit payers. |
|||
The payment methods mean that the licence fee is paid for either completely or partially in advance. Annual payments require complete payment in advance. For monthly direct debit, a new licence is paid off in 6 monthly instalments of just over £24 a month. Renewal licences are paid for in 12 monthly instalments starting 6 months before expiry of the licence in force i.e. starting 6 months before the renewal date.<ref name="Payment methods" /> Quarterly payments made using direct debit carry an additional cost of £5.00 per year, or £1.25 a quarter, which is included in the licence fee total. This addition is described as "a small charge" in the generic letter issued by TV Licensing to those paying by direct debit, and on the TV Licensing website it is justified with: "By paying quarterly the majority of your licence is paid for as you use it. This differs from our other instalment schemes, where at least half of the licence fee is collected in advance. As a result, quarterly payments incur a small premium of £1.25 per quarter which is included in your payment."<ref name="Payment methods" /> Typically, direct debit schemes in the UK for major utilities or publicly provided services operate in a reverse way, granting a discount to direct debit payers. |
|||
In the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, over the counter services are provided by the Post Office rather than by PayPoint outlets.<ref name="PayPoint">{{cite web|url=https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/pay-for-your-tv-licence/payment-methods/paypoint-pay5|author=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|title=PayPoint|access-date=3 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150602143223/https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/pay-for-your-tv-licence/payment-methods/paypoint-pay5|archive-date=2 June 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
In the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, over the counter services are provided by the Post Office rather than by PayPoint outlets.<ref name="PayPoint">{{cite web|url=https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/pay-for-your-tv-licence/payment-methods/paypoint-pay5|author=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|title=PayPoint|access-date=3 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150602143223/https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/pay-for-your-tv-licence/payment-methods/paypoint-pay5|archive-date=2 June 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
===Concessions=== |
===Concessions=== |
||
====Over 75s==== |
|||
Between November 2000 and April 2018, TV licences were provided to people over the age of 75, through full funding by central government.<ref name="HoC Briefing 2019">{{Cite web|last=Woodhouse|first=John|date=13 June 2019|title=Free TV licences for the over-75s|url=https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN04955|publisher=House of Commons Library}}</ref> This concession covered the whole household, so that even if just one member of the household was over 75, then a free television licence could be applied for to cover all the residents.<ref>{{cite web|title=Over 75 TV Licence|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/for-your-home/aged-74-and-over-aud3|access-date=31 July 2017|website=TV Licensing}}</ref> Following a 2016 funding agreement between the [[Second Cameron ministry|Conservative government]] and the BBC, this funding was phased out between April 2018 and April 2020, after which time no further government funding was available for the scheme:<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/about/how_we_govern/2016/agreement.pdf|title=Broadcasting An Agreement Between Her Majesty's Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the British Broadcasting Corporation|date=December 2016|website=downloads.bbc.co.uk/|publisher=UK Government|page=33}}</ref> Free television licences based solely on age ended in August 2020 (previously planned to be June 2020 but extended as of the Coronavirus pandemic).<ref name="HoC Briefing 2019" /> It has been estimated that if full funding had been maintained, it would have contributed £745m to the BBC's 2020–21 budget.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jul/06/bbc-pay-cost-free-tv-licences-over-75s-fee-deal|title=BBC to take on £750m cost of subsidy for over-75s in licence fee deal|newspaper=The Guardian|access-date=26 April 2016}}</ref> The BBC held a [[public consultation]] in November 2018 to decide whether the concession to the over-75s should continue after 2020 and, if so, in what form.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-46274054|title=BBC launches consultation on TV licence fee for over-75s|work=BBC News|date=20 November 2018|access-date=27 November 2018}}</ref> The response to the BBC's questionnaire, 48% were in favour of retaining the existing concessionary system, 37% preferred reforming the concession and 17% preferred the option of abolition of the concession.<ref name="AGE-RELATED TV LICENCE POLICY">{{cite web |title=Age-Related TV Licence Policy |url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/reports/consultation/age/decision-document.pdf |website=bbc.co.uk |publisher=BBC |access-date=19 June 2019}}</ref> |
|||
The BBC discontinued the full concession, but continued to offer free licences on a [[Means-testing|means-tested]] basis;<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://bbc.com/aboutthebbc//reports/consultation/age-related-tv-licence-policy|title=BBC Board decision on licence fees for older people|date=2019|website=bbc.com|access-date=1 July 2019}}</ref> from August 2020, most over 75s were required to pay the full licence fee, but households where one person receives a [[pension credit]] benefit will continue to be eligible for a free licence.<ref>{{cite news |title=Blanket free TV licence for over-75s scrapped |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48583487 |access-date=11 June 2019 |date=10 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190611121401/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48583487 |archive-date=11 June 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
====Over 75s ==== |
|||
Between November 2000 and April 2018, TV licences were provided to people over the age of 75, through full funding by central government.<ref name="HoC Briefing 2019">{{Cite journal|last=Woodhouse|first=John|date=2019-06-13|title=Free TV licences for the over-75s|url=https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN04955|publisher=House of Commons Library}}</ref> This concession covered the whole household, so that even if just one member of the household was over 75, then a free TV licence could be applied for to cover all the residents.<ref>{{cite web|title=Over 75 TV Licence|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/for-your-home/aged-74-and-over-aud3|access-date=31 July 2017|website=TV Licensing}}</ref> Following a 2016 funding agreement between the [[Second Cameron ministry|Conservative government]] and the BBC, this funding was phased out between April 2018 and April 2020, after which time no further government funding was available for the scheme:<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/about/how_we_govern/2016/agreement.pdf|title=Broadcasting An Agreement Between Her Majesty's Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the British Broadcasting Corporation|date=December 2016|website=downloads.bbc.co.uk/|publisher=UK Government|page=33}}</ref> Free TV licences based solely on age ended in August 2020 (previously planned to be June 2020 but extended as of the Coronavirus pandemic).<ref name="HoC Briefing 2019" /> It has been estimated that if full funding had been maintained, it would have contributed £745m to the BBC's 2020–21 budget.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jul/06/bbc-pay-cost-free-tv-licences-over-75s-fee-deal|title=BBC to take on £750m cost of subsidy for over-75s in licence fee deal|newspaper=The Guardian|access-date=26 April 2016}}</ref> The BBC held a [[public consultation]] in November 2018 to decide whether the concession to the over-75s should continue after 2020 and, if so, in what form.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-46274054|title=BBC launches consultation on TV licence fee for over-75s|work=BBC News|date=20 November 2018|access-date=27 November 2018}}</ref> The response to the BBC's questionnaire, 48% were in favour of retaining the existing concessionary system, 37% preferred reforming the concession and 17% preferred the option of abolition of the concession.<ref name="AGE-RELATED TV LICENCE POLICY">{{cite web |title=Age-Related TV Licence Policy |url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/reports/consultation/age/decision-document.pdf |website=bbc.co.uk |publisher=BBC |access-date=19 June 2019}}</ref> |
|||
The BBC discontinued the full concession, but continued to offer free licences on a [[Means-testing|means-tested]] basis;<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://bbc.com/aboutthebbc//reports/consultation/age-related-tv-licence-policy|title=BBC Board decision on licence fees for older people|date=2019|website=bbc.com|access-date=2019-07-01}}</ref> from August 2020, most over 75s were required to pay the full licence fee, but households where one person receives a [[pension credit]] benefit will continue to be eligible for a free licence.<ref>{{cite news |title=Blanket free TV licence for over-75s scrapped |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48583487 |access-date=11 June 2019 |date=10 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190611121401/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48583487 |archive-date=11 June 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
====Crown dependencies==== |
====Crown dependencies==== |
||
On the [[Isle of Man]], a free |
On the [[Isle of Man]], a free television licence scheme was funded by the [[Department of Social Care (Isle of Man)|Isle of Man Department of Social Care]].<ref name=Concessions>{{cite web|title=Useful information|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ3|website=TV Licensing|publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|access-date=28 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150928215242/http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ3|archive-date=28 September 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> The BBC maintained the free licence scheme for all over 75s until 31 December 2020. |
||
<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-isle-of-man-53355673 |work=BBC News |title=TV licences free for over-75s on Isle of Man until 2021 |date=10 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/reports/consultation/age/isle-of-man.pdf |title=Age-Related TV Licence Fee Concession: Isle of Man |date=26 May 2020 |publisher=BBC}}</ref> From 1 January 2021, this was replaced by a scheme whereby the BBC funds free |
<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-isle-of-man-53355673 |work=BBC News |title=TV licences free for over-75s on Isle of Man until 2021 |date=10 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/reports/consultation/age/isle-of-man.pdf |title=Age-Related TV Licence Fee Concession: Isle of Man |date=26 May 2020 |publisher=BBC}}</ref> From 1 January 2021, this was replaced by a scheme whereby the BBC funds free television licences for the 500 over 75s in receipt of Income Support and the Isle of Man Government is funding free television licences for 2021 for the remaining 4,500 at a cost of around £800,000.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-isle-of-man-54748463 |title=Isle of Man treasury to fund TV licences for over-75s in 2021 |date=30 October 2020 |website=BBC News}}</ref><ref name=bbcnewscd/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/reports/consultation/age/isle-of-man-2.pdf |title=Age-Related TV Licence Fee Concession: Isle of Man |date=15 October 2020 |publisher=BBC}}</ref><ref name=cdfaq>{{cite web |url=https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ2 |title=Can I get a free over 75 TV Licence if I live in the Isle of Man, the Bailiwick of Jersey or the Bailiwick of Guernsey? |website=TV Licensing}}</ref> |
||
There are schemes for elderly residents of the [[Channel Islands]], but they vary in detail and eligibility. |
There are schemes for elderly residents of the [[Channel Islands]], but they vary in detail and eligibility. |
||
* Residents of Guernsey and Alderney who are over 75 and are in receipt of Income Support are entitled to a free television licence funded by the BBC, whereas those under 75 but over pensionable age have a free licence funded by the States of Guernsey.<ref name=bbcnewscd>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-guernsey-54695398 |title=Licence fee: BBC to fund some over-75s licence fees in Crown Dependencies |date=26 October 2020 |website=[[BBC News]]}}</ref><ref name=guernseyscheme>{{cite web |url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/reports/consultation/age/guernsey-2.pdf |title=Age-Related TV Licence Fee Concession: Bailiwick of Guernsey |date=15 October 2020 |publisher=BBC}}</ref><ref name=cdfaq/> Residents of [[Sark]] |
* Residents of Guernsey and Alderney who are over 75 and are in receipt of Income Support are entitled to a free television licence funded by the BBC, whereas those under 75 but over pensionable age have a free licence funded by the States of Guernsey.<ref name=bbcnewscd>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-guernsey-54695398 |title=Licence fee: BBC to fund some over-75s licence fees in Crown Dependencies |date=26 October 2020 |website=[[BBC News]]}}</ref><ref name=guernseyscheme>{{cite web |url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/reports/consultation/age/guernsey-2.pdf |title=Age-Related TV Licence Fee Concession: Bailiwick of Guernsey |date=15 October 2020 |publisher=BBC}}</ref><ref name=cdfaq/> Residents of [[Sark]] who are over the age of 75 are entitled to a free TV licence if they are receiving financial support from the ''Procureur des Pauvres''.<ref name=bbcnewscd/><ref name=guernseyscheme/><ref name=cdfaq/> |
||
* |
* In Jersey, concessionary licences continue to be available on a means-tested basis under the Social Security (Television Licence Benefit) (Jersey) Regulations 2011, but are now funded by the BBC rather than the [[Government of Jersey]].<ref name=bbcnewscd/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/reports/consultation/age/jersey.pdf |title=Age-Related TV Licence Fee Concession: Bailiwick of Jersey |date=15 October 2020 |publisher=BBC}}</ref><ref name=cdfaq/> |
||
====Blind or severely sight impaired concessions==== |
====Blind or severely sight impaired concessions==== |
||
Licences are half price for the [[legally blind]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/easy-read/EA15/|title=Half price licence for the blind or severely sight impaired|work=TV Licensing Website Easy Read Guide|access-date=20 March 2012}}{{Dead link|date=October 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> To qualify for the concession, a blind or severely sight-impaired person must apply to the TV Licensing Blind Concession Group with proof of impairment, either a copy of the document of blind registration or a certificate from an ophthalmologist.<ref name=Concessions/> The concessionary |
Licences are half price for the [[legally blind]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/easy-read/EA15/|title=Half price licence for the blind or severely sight impaired|work=TV Licensing Website Easy Read Guide|access-date=20 March 2012}}{{Dead link|date=October 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> To qualify for the concession, a blind or severely sight-impaired person must apply to the TV Licensing Blind Concession Group with proof of impairment, either a copy of the document of blind registration or a certificate from an ophthalmologist.<ref name=Concessions/> The concessionary television licence covers television use by the whole household. |
||
====Residential care homes==== |
====Residential care homes==== |
||
Line 131: | Line 126: | ||
===Total licence sales=== |
===Total licence sales=== |
||
Television licence sales figures were quoted by the BBC to be 25.562 million in the year 2014–15, including 4.502 million concessionary licences for the over 75s,<ref name="BBC Trust 2015">{{cite web|title=British Broadcasting Corporation Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2015|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/ss/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheadername1=content-type&blobheadervalue1=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1370006280827&ssbinary=true|website=www.tvlicensing.co.uk|publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|access-date=6 October 2015}}</ref> which were paid for by the UK government. The equivalent figures for the year 2013–14 were 25.478 million total licences including 4.328 million licences for the over 75s.<ref name="Trust statement 2014">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/ss/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheadername1=content-type&blobheadervalue1=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1370006211387&ssbinary=true|title=British Broadcasting Corporation Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2014 |access-date=3 October 2014 |publisher=The Stationery Office}}</ref> In 2014–15, the BBC estimated that there were 26.916 million licensable properties in the UK (defined as premises where live television was being watched),<ref name="BBC Trust 2015" /> indicating that if the BBC estimates are correct, around 95% of properties are correctly licensed. The total income generated from licence fees was £3.8302 billion in 2017–18.<ref name="Financial Statements" /> |
|||
In 2014–15, the BBC estimated that there were 26.916 million licensable properties in the UK (defined as premises where live TV was being watched),<ref name="BBC Trust 2015"/> indicating that if the BBC estimates are correct, around 95% of properties are correctly licensed. |
|||
The total income generated from licence fees was £3.8302 billion in 2017–18.<ref name="Financial Statements"/> |
|||
The vast majority of |
The vast majority of television licences are for colour television. For example, there were 10,461 black and white television licences in force on 31 August 2014, compared to 25,460,801 colour television licences. The BBC has also stated that during the financial year 2013–14, a total of 41,483 blind concessionary (half-price) licences were issued in the UK of which 29 were blind concessionary black and white licences.<ref name="Black and White">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/active_tv_licenses#incoming-567857 |title=Active TV Licenses|date=4 September 2014|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=25 April 2015}}</ref> |
||
====Channel Islands==== |
====Channel Islands==== |
||
In January 2012, there were 36,261 colour licences in force in Jersey<ref name="evasion spreadsheet">{{Cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/evasion_rate_spreadsheet#comment-30327|title=Evasion rate spreadsheet - a Freedom of Information request to British Broadcasting Corporation|date= |
In January 2012, there were 36,261 colour licences in force in Jersey<ref name="evasion spreadsheet">{{Cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/evasion_rate_spreadsheet#comment-30327|title=Evasion rate spreadsheet - a Freedom of Information request to British Broadcasting Corporation|date=26 July 2012|access-date=22 September 2016}}</ref> as compared to 77,480 addresses (residential properties, businesses and other premises) on the TV Licensing database for the island (at the end of December 2011).<ref name="Total Channel">{{Cite web |url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/number_of_tv_licences_in_the_cha#incoming-871552|title=Number of TV licences in the Channel Islands - a Freedom of Information request to British Broadcasting Corporation|date=23 August 2016|access-date=22 September 2016}}</ref> This would suggest around 53% of Jersey addresses did not have a television licence at the beginning of 2012. |
||
other premises) on the TV Licensing database for the island (at the end of December 2011).<ref name="Total Channel">{{Cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/number_of_tv_licences_in_the_cha#incoming-871552|title=Number of TV licences in the Channel Islands - a Freedom of Information request to British Broadcasting Corporation|date=2016-08-23|access-date=2016-09-22}}</ref> This would suggest around 53% of Jersey addresses did not have a TV licence at the beginning of 2012. |
|||
The comparable figures for Guernsey are 23,673 licences in force in January 2012<ref name="evasion spreadsheet"/> and 40,263 addresses on the database at the end of December 2011.<ref name="Total Channel"/> Thus there were around 41% unlicensed properties in Guernsey at the beginning of 2012. |
The comparable figures for Guernsey are 23,673 licences in force in January 2012<ref name="evasion spreadsheet" /> and 40,263 addresses on the database at the end of December 2011.<ref name="Total Channel" /> Thus there were around 41% unlicensed properties in Guernsey at the beginning of 2012. |
||
==History== |
==History== |
||
{{Main|Television licensing in the United Kingdom (historical)}} |
{{Main|Television licensing in the United Kingdom (historical)}} |
||
{{See also|British Broadcasting Company|BBC}} |
{{See also|British Broadcasting Company|BBC}} |
||
[[File:TV Licence 1946-2012 at NPV.png|thumb|upright=1.2|TV Licence 1946–2016 at 2015 prices]] |
|||
When television broadcasts in the UK were resumed after a break due to the Second World War, it was decided to introduce a television licence fee to fund the service. When first introduced on 1 June 1946, the licence covering the monochrome-only single-channel BBC television service cost £2 (equivalent to £{{formatnum:{{Inflation|UK|2|1946|{{Inflation-year|UK}}|r=2}}}} as of {{Inflation-year|UK}}).{{Inflation-fn|UK|df=y}} The licence was originally issued by the [[General Post Office]] (GPO), which was then the regulator of public communications within the UK. The GPO also issued licences for home radio receivers powered by mains electricity<ref name="radio licence">{{cite web|url=http://www.radiolicence.org.uk/index.html|title=The history of the UK radio licence|access-date=5 August 2014|website=RadioLicence.org.uk|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140528074002/http://radiolicence.org.uk/index.html|archive-date=28 May 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref> as well as non removable vehicle mounted radios and was mandated by laws beginning with the [[Wireless Telegraphy Act 1904]], to administer the licensing system; however, the television licence also covered radio reception. |
|||
The BBC started regular colour television broadcasts in the summer of 1967.<ref name="history of bbc">{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/historyofthebbc/wherenext/index.shtml |title=Where Next?|access-date=5 August 2014 |work=BBC Web Site |publisher=BBC}}</ref> On 1 January 1968, a "colour supplement" of £5 was added to the existing £5 monochrome licence fee; the £10 colour fee was the equivalent of £{{formatnum:{{Inflation|UK|10|1968|{{Inflation-year|UK}}|r=2}}}} in {{Inflation-year|UK}}. On 1 April 2019 it rose to £154.50 for colour television and £52 for monochrome television.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/faqs/general/licence_fee |title=Where can I find information about the licence fee?|website=BBC FAQs|date=1 April 2019}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:TV Licence 1946-2012 at NPV.png|500px|right|TV Licence 1946–2016 at 2015 prices]] When television broadcasts in the UK were resumed after a break due to the Second World War, it was decided to introduce a television licence fee to fund the service. When first introduced on 1 June 1946, the licence covering the monochrome-only single-channel BBC television service cost £2 (equivalent to £{{formatnum:{{Inflation|UK|2|1946|{{Inflation-year|UK}}|r=2}}}} as of {{Inflation-year|UK}}).{{Inflation-fn|UK|df=y}} The licence was originally issued by the [[General Post Office]] (GPO), which was then the regulator of public communications within the UK. The GPO also issued licences for home radio receivers powered by mains electricity<ref name="radio licence">{{cite web|url=http://www.radiolicence.org.uk/index.html|title=The history of the UK radio licence|access-date=5 August 2014|publisher=www.radiolicence.org.uk|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140528074002/http://radiolicence.org.uk/index.html|archive-date=28 May 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref> as well as non removable vehicle mounted radios and was mandated by laws beginning with the [[Wireless Telegraphy Act 1904]], to administer the licensing system; however, the TV licence also covered radio reception. |
|||
The radio-only licence was abolished on 1 February 1971, when it was £1-5s-0d (£1.25 in decimal UK currency) or the equivalent of £{{formatnum:{{Inflation|UK|1.25|1968|{{Inflation-year|UK}}|r=2}}}} at {{Inflation-year|UK}} prices.<ref name="Ask script3" /> |
|||
On 1 April 1991, the BBC took over the administration of television licensing in the UK, assuming the responsibility of licence fee collection and enforcement.<ref name="legal framework" /><ref name="legal framework2">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/legal_framework_of_licence_fee_e#incoming-185647 |title=Legal framework of Licence Fee enforcement activity|date=16 June 2011|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=30 December 2014}}</ref> Since this date, the BBC has been the [[statutory authority]] for issuing television licences (before April 1991, the statutory authority was the UK [[Home Office]]), although the UK Government retains certain powers and responsibilities with regards to television licences.<ref name="legal framework2" /> |
|||
The BBC started regular colour TV broadcasts in the summer of 1967.<ref name= "history of bbc">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/historyofthebbc/wherenext/index.shtml|title=Where Next?|access-date=5 August 2014 |work=BBC Web Site |publisher=BBC}}</ref> On 1 January 1968, a "colour supplement" of £5 was added to the existing £5 monochrome licence fee; the £10 colour fee was the equivalent of £{{formatnum:{{Inflation|UK|10|1968|{{Inflation-year|UK}}|r=2}}}} in {{Inflation-year|UK}}. The licence fee increases with inflation; on 1 April 2019 it rose to £154.50 for colour TV and £52 for monochrome TV.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/faqs/general/licence_fee |title=Where can I find information about the licence fee?|website=BBC FAQs|date=1 April 2019 }}</ref> |
|||
The radio-only licence was abolished on 1 February 1971, when it was £1-5s-0d (£1.25 in decimal UK currency) or the equivalent of £{{formatnum:{{Inflation|UK|1.25|1968|{{Inflation-year|UK}}|r=2}}}} at {{Inflation-year|UK}} prices.<ref name="Ask script3"/> |
|||
In July 2002, the BBC awarded [[Capita]] the contract to manage the television licensing system, replacing the Post Office (which had been renamed "Consignia" at this time).<ref name="capita contract">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2002/02_february/08/capitasigns.shtml|title=Capita Signs BBC contract for TV Licensing Account |publisher=BBC|access-date=7 April 2015}}</ref> |
|||
On 1 April 1991, the BBC took over the administration of television licensing in the UK, assuming the responsibility of licence fee collection and enforcement.<ref name="legal framework"/><ref name="legal framework2">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/legal_framework_of_licence_fee_e#incoming-185647 |title=Legal framework of Licence Fee enforcement activity|date=16 June 2011|publisher=www.whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=30 December 2014}}</ref> Since this date, the BBC has been the [[statutory authority]] for issuing television licences (before April 1991, the statutory authority was the UK [[Home Office]]), although the UK Government retains certain powers and responsibilities with regards to TV licences.<ref name="legal framework2"/> |
|||
In January 2006 the Office of National Statistics classified the licence fee as a tax;<ref name="Select Committee 20060303" /> previously it had been classified as a service charge. This was reversed in the 2016 charter renewal. |
|||
In July 2002, the BBC awarded [[Capita]] the contract to manage the TV Licensing system, replacing the Post Office (which had been renamed "Consignia" at this time).<ref name="capita contract">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2002/02_february/08/capitasigns.shtml|title=Capita Signs BBC contract for TV Licensing Account |publisher=BBC|access-date=7 April 2015}}</ref> |
|||
From 2000 to 2009, the number of licences rose from 22.8 million to 24.9 million.<ref>{{cite web |title=FOI: Licences facts and figures |website=TV Licensing UK |url=https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-licences-facts-and-figures-AB18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100721121025/https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-licences-facts-and-figures-AB18 |archive-date=21 July 2010 |url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
In January 2006 the Office of National Statistics classified the licence fee as a tax;<ref name="Select Committee 20060303"/> previously it had been classified as a service charge. |
|||
==Licence fee expenditure== |
==Licence fee expenditure== |
||
{{ |
{{further|BBC}} |
||
The [[BBC Trust]] |
The [[BBC Trust]] gave the following information for expenditure of licence fee income during the year 2009–10 of £3.56 billion<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/licencefee/ |title=How the licence fee was spent in 2009/2010 |access-date=8 April 2011 |work=BBC Web Site |publisher=BBC Trust}}</ref> (expressed here in percentage terms): |
||
*66% – All |
* 66% – All television |
||
*17% – National and local radio |
* 17% – National and local radio |
||
*6% – Online e.g. BBC websites, iPlayer |
* 6% – Online e.g. BBC websites, iPlayer |
||
*11% – Other e.g. transmission and licence fee collection costs |
* 11% – Other e.g. transmission and licence fee collection costs{{efn|During 2007–2008, the BBC stated that 3.6% of the licence fee was spent on collection.<ref name="bbctrust2009" />}} |
||
Since April 2014, the [[BBC World Service]] on radio and [[BBC Arabic Television]] have been funded from the licence fee. Prior to this date they were funded by a grant from the government's [[Foreign and Commonwealth Office]]. The World Service cost the BBC £268 million in the 2017–18 financial year.<ref name="Financial Statements"/> |
Since April 2014, the [[BBC World Service]] on radio and [[BBC Arabic Television]] have been funded from the licence fee. Prior to this date they were funded by a grant from the government's [[Foreign and Commonwealth Office]]. The World Service cost the BBC £268 million in the 2017–18 financial year.<ref name="Financial Statements" /> |
||
The BBC also paid in 2017–18 contributions to: broadband rollout (£80 million); partial funding of the Welsh channel (£74.8 million), [[S4C]] (which is also funded by the [[Department of Culture, Media and Sport]]); and a contribution towards the costs of local |
The BBC also paid in 2017–18 contributions to: broadband rollout (£80 million); partial funding of the Welsh channel (£74.8 million), [[S4C]] (which is also funded by the [[Department of Culture, Media and Sport]]); and a contribution towards the costs of local television (£4.7 million).<ref name="Financial Statements" /> |
||
[[BBC World News]] and the BBC's other international television channels are operated commercially and will continue to not receive licence fee money. The revenues they generate supplement the licence fee in financing British services. |
[[BBC World News]] and the BBC's other international television channels are operated commercially and will continue to not receive licence fee money. The revenues they generate supplement the licence fee in financing British services. |
||
In addition, the [[BBC Alba]] [[Scottish Gaelic|Gaelic |
In addition, the [[BBC Alba]] [[Scottish Gaelic|Gaelic-language]] television service is predominantly funded by [[MG Alba]], an organisation funded by the [[Scottish Government]]. |
||
==Television licence legal requirements== |
|||
(*) During 2007–2008, the BBC stated that 3.6% of the licence fee was spent on collection.<ref name= "bbctrust2009" /> |
|||
===When a licence is required=== |
|||
According to section 363 of the [[Communications Act 2003]], a television licence must be obtained for any device that is "installed or used"<ref>{{cite web |title=Communications Act 2003, Section 363(1)|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/section/363|publisher=The National Archives|access-date=28 February 2018}}</ref> for "receiving a television programme at the same time (or virtually the same time) as it is received by members of the public".<ref name="commregs">{{cite web|title=The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004, Regulation 9|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/692/regulation/9/made|publisher=The National Archives|access-date=28 February 2018}}</ref> |
|||
== TV licence legal requirements== |
|||
===When a TV licence is required=== |
|||
According to section 363 of the [[Communications Act 2003]], a TV licence must be obtained for any device that is "installed or used"<ref>{{cite web|title=Communications Act 2003, Section 363(1)|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/section/363|publisher=The National Archives|access-date=28 February 2018}}</ref> for "receiving a television programme at the same time (or virtually the same time) as it is received by members of the public".<ref name="commregs">{{cite web|title=The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004, Regulation 9|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/692/regulation/9/made|publisher=The National Archives|access-date=28 February 2018}}</ref> |
|||
According to TV Licensing, "You need a TV Licence to use any television receiving equipment such as a TV set, digital box, DVD or video recorder, PC, laptop or mobile phone to watch or record television programmes as they're being shown on TV".<ref name="TVLInterpretation">{{cite web|author=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|title=Do I need a TV Licence?|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/information/index.jsp#link1|access-date=3 August 2008}}</ref> Portable televisions and similar equipment such as laptops and mobile phones powered by internal batteries are covered for use anywhere under a licence held for their owner's residence.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8285474.stm | work=BBC News | title=Firms issued TV licence warning | date=1 October 2009 | access-date=25 May 2010 | first=Harriet | last=Oliver}}</ref> |
According to TV Licensing, "You need a TV Licence to use any television receiving equipment such as a TV set, digital box, DVD or video recorder, PC, laptop or mobile phone to watch or record television programmes as they're being shown on TV".<ref name="TVLInterpretation">{{cite web|author=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|title=Do I need a TV Licence?|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/information/index.jsp#link1|access-date=3 August 2008}}</ref> Portable televisions and similar equipment such as laptops and mobile phones powered by internal batteries are covered for use anywhere under a licence held for their owner's residence.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8285474.stm | work=BBC News | title=Firms issued TV licence warning | date=1 October 2009 | access-date=25 May 2010 | first=Harriet | last=Oliver}}</ref> |
||
On 1 September 2016 the conditions under which a television licence is required changed to include receiving [[video on demand]] programme services provided by the BBC, |
On 1 September 2016 the conditions under which a television licence is required changed to include receiving [[video on demand]] programme services provided by the BBC, on the [[iPlayer]] catch-up service.<ref name="iPlayer">{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/bbc-iplayer-and-the-tv-licence|title=Official TV Licensing website - BBC iPlayer and the TV Licence|website=www.tvlicensing.co.uk}}</ref> This was made possible by The Communications (Television Licensing) (Amendment) Regulations 2016.<ref>[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/704/made The Communications (Television Licensing) (Amendment) Regulations 2016], S.I. 2016 No. 704, Regulation 9: Modification of the Communications Act 2003</ref> |
||
However, there are a few [[#Exceptions to the TV licensing regime|exceptional cases]] when live |
However, there are a few [[#Exceptions to the TV licensing regime|exceptional cases]] when live television may be watched without a licence. |
||
===When a |
===When a licence is not required=== |
||
It is not necessary to have a |
It is not necessary to have a television licence for the purpose of:<ref name="TVLExclusion1">{{cite web|url=http://tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ15 |title=Videos, DVDs and games consoles |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|access-date=12 July 2011}}</ref><ref name="TVLExclusion2">{{cite web|url=http://tvlicensing.metafaq.com/templates/tvlicensing/main/answerPage?_mftvst:answerRef=$http://api.transversal.com/mfapi/objectref/EntryStore/Entry/http://www.metafaq.com/mfapi/Metafaq/Clients/tvlicensing/Modules/licensingInfo/Topics/general:140079:2&_mftvst:moduleID=$licensingInfo&_mftvst:topicID=$general&id=RAF8SPHD1QGDDDFNJCH8M5Q0B4|title=TV Licensing – CCTV}}{{Dead link|date=April 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref name="TVLExclusion3">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-administering-the-tv-licensing-system-part-1-AB19/ |title=FOI: Administering the TV Licensing system part 1 |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|access-date=11 July 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120723004004/http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-administering-the-tv-licensing-system-part-1-AB19/ |archive-date=23 July 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
||
* |
* Operating a digital box used with a [[High fidelity|hi-fi]] system or another device that can only be used to produce sounds<ref name="TVLInterpretation" /> |
||
* |
* Installing and using a television set solely as a closed-circuit TV monitor<ref name="CCTV">{{cite web|url= http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ110/|title=What if we only have Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) at our premises?|publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|access-date=27 February 2013}}</ref> |
||
* |
* Using a television to play pre-recorded DVDs or videos (although to record live programmes it is necessary to hold a licence)<ref name="TVLExclusion1" /> |
||
* |
* Using a television as a digital radio receiver<ref name="TVLExclusion3" /> |
||
* |
* Using a digital box to listen to radio through a TV<ref name="TVL Digibox">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licence_requirements_radio_re#comment-47647|title=TV Licence Requirements: Radio Reception via Television Equipment|date=21 October 2011|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=20 October 2014}}</ref> |
||
* |
* Using a television as a monitor for a computer or games console<ref name="TVLExclusion1" /> |
||
* |
* Watching [[video on demand#Catch-up TV|catch up TV]] services when the programme is not live<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/technology--devices-and-online-top8/ |title=TV Licensing – Technology – devices and online |access-date=5 April 2013 |author=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|date=5 April 2013 |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]}}</ref> except when using BBC iPlayer service to receive BBC channel catch-up programmes<ref name="iPlayer" /> |
||
* |
* Watching [[S4C]] catch-up programmes on BBC iPlayer |
||
* Listening to BBC radio programmes over the Internet via [[BBC Sounds]] |
|||
A (free) licence is required for non-exempt premises even when no fee is payable, e.g. premises with residents over 75. |
A (free) licence is required for non-exempt premises even when no fee is payable, e.g. premises with residents over 75. |
||
Line 204: | Line 197: | ||
A recorded programme watched on unlicensed equipment is outside the scope of the Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004, because it is not "received at the same time (or virtually the same time) as it is received by members of the public,"<ref name="commregs" /><ref name="BBCMobilePhones" /> although such recordings may infringe [[copyright]]. |
A recorded programme watched on unlicensed equipment is outside the scope of the Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004, because it is not "received at the same time (or virtually the same time) as it is received by members of the public,"<ref name="commregs" /><ref name="BBCMobilePhones" /> although such recordings may infringe [[copyright]]. |
||
TV Licensing offers the following advice to those who have a |
TV Licensing offers the following advice to those who have a television but 'who wish to make it clear that they do not need a licence':<ref name="TV checks">{{cite web|url= http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN01148.pdf|title=Television Licence Checks|publisher=House of Commons Library|access-date=2 September 2013}}</ref> |
||
* |
* Remove the television from the aerial. |
||
* |
* Cover the aerial socket so that it can't be used. |
||
* |
* Ensure that when channels on the television are selected no television signal is received. |
||
However, TV Licensing also says that it is not compulsory to follow this advice. To listen to digital radio on a TV, for example, it would be necessary to attach the TV to an aerial and tune the TV to different channels. The BBC has made it clear that it is legal to listen to digital radio using a TV without holding a TV licence.<ref name="TVLExclusion3"/> |
|||
However, TV Licensing also says that it is not compulsory to follow this advice. To listen to digital radio on a television, for example, it would be necessary to attach the television to an aerial and tune the television to different channels. The BBC has made it clear that it is legal to listen to digital radio using a television without holding a television licence.<ref name="TVLExclusion3" /> |
|||
According to [[Ofcom]], TV transmissions over the Internet are a grey area<ref>{{cite web|author=The Digital TV Group|date=28 February 2005|title=BBC 'to lose in internet TV loophole'|url=http://dtg.org.uk/news/news.html?class=countries&subclass=193&id=695|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160115105036/http://dtg.org.uk/news/news.html?class=countries&subclass=193&id=695|url-status=dead|archive-date=15 January 2016|access-date=18 June 2006}}</ref> which in future might make fees based on television possession redundant. In 2005, a Green Paper by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport<ref name="review2005" /> included suggestions of "either a compulsory levy on all households or even on ownership of PCs as well as TVs".<ref>{{cite news|author=The Times|date=5 March 2005|title=Computer tax set to replace TV licence fee|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1508650,00.html|access-date=18 June 2006 | location=London}}</ref> However, TV Licensing later stated that use of any device (including a computer or mobile phone) receiving transmissions at or about the same time as they appear on TV requires a licence.<ref name="TVLInterpretation" /><ref name="BBCMobilePhones">{{cite news|author=BBC News|date=13 February 2006|title=Fine warning over TV on mobiles|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4708170.stm|access-date=18 June 2006}}</ref> The BBC is aware that new technology represents a threat to its revenue. A 2012 BBC report stated "there is a continued threat to the growth in TV Licence sales from the increasing number of people consuming television in a way that does not need to be licensed".<ref name="Television Licence Fee Trust Statement">{{cite web |url=http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/hc1213/hc03/0383/0383.pdf |title=British Broadcasting Corporation Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2012 |access-date=11 January 2013 |publisher=The Stationery Office Limited |date= 16 July 2012 }}</ref> |
|||
According to [[Ofcom]], television transmissions over the Internet are a grey area<ref>{{cite web|author=The Digital TV Group|date=28 February 2005|title=BBC 'to lose in internet TV loophole'|url=http://dtg.org.uk/news/news.html?class=countries&subclass=193&id=695|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160115105036/http://dtg.org.uk/news/news.html?class=countries&subclass=193&id=695|url-status=dead|archive-date=15 January 2016|access-date=18 June 2006}}</ref> which in future might make fees based on television possession redundant. In 2005, a Green Paper by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport<ref name="review2005" /> included suggestions of "either a compulsory levy on all households or even on ownership of PCs as well as TVs".<ref>{{cite news|author=The Times|date=5 March 2005|title=Computer tax set to replace TV licence fee|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1508650,00.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060109031204/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1508650,00.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=9 January 2006|access-date=18 June 2006 | location=London}}</ref> However, TV Licensing later stated that use of any device (including a computer or mobile phone) receiving transmissions at or about the same time as they appear on television requires a licence.<ref name="TVLInterpretation" /><ref name="BBCMobilePhones">{{cite news|author=BBC News|date=13 February 2006|title=Fine warning over TV on mobiles|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4708170.stm|access-date=18 June 2006}}</ref> The BBC is aware that new technology represents a threat to its revenue. A 2012 BBC report stated "there is a continued threat to the growth in television licence sales from the increasing number of people consuming television in a way that does not need to be licensed".<ref name="Television Licence Fee Trust Statement">{{cite web |url=http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/hc1213/hc03/0383/0383.pdf |title=British Broadcasting Corporation Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2012 |access-date=11 January 2013 |publisher=The Stationery Office Limited |date= 16 July 2012 }}</ref> |
|||
Televisions receiving a transmission from outside the British Islands (e.g. broadcast from Germany, Italy, Greece, Turkey and the Netherlands via the [[Astra 1A|Astra satellite]], on which many channels are [[free-to-air]]) did not need a licence<ref name="Visiting proc"/> until the Communications Act 2003, which required a TV licence for the reception of television from any source. |
|||
Televisions receiving a transmission from outside the British Islands (e.g. broadcast from Germany, Italy, Greece, Turkey and the Netherlands via the [[Astra 1A|Astra satellite]], on which many channels are [[free-to-air]]) did not need a licence<ref name="Visiting proc" /> until the Communications Act 2003, which required a television licence for the reception of television from any source. |
|||
In 2012, more than 400,000 households informed the BBC that they did not need a TV licence.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/10124350/More-than-400000-do-not-need-TV-licence.html|title=More than 400,000 'do not need' TV licence |
|||
|access-date=23 July 2013|newspaper=The Telegraph|location=London|first=Rosa|last=Silverman|date=17 June 2013}}</ref> According to the BBC, the average number of addresses in the UK with a No Licence Needed (NLN) status in the 2013 calendar year was 1,879,877.<ref name="NLN">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/number_of_no_licence_needed_decl#incoming-514399|title=Number of 'No Licence Needed' declarations in 2013 |
|||
In 2012, more than 400,000 households informed the BBC that they did not need a television licence.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/10124350/More-than-400000-do-not-need-TV-licence.html |title=More than 400,000 'Do not Need' TV Licence |access-date=23 July 2013 |newspaper=The Telegraph |location=London |first=Rosa |last=Silverman |date=17 June 2013}}</ref> According to the BBC, the average number of addresses in the UK with a No Licence Needed (NLN) status in the 2013 calendar year was 1,879,877.<ref name="NLN">{{cite web |url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/number_of_no_licence_needed_decl#incoming-514399|title=Number of 'No Licence Needed' declarations in 2013 |date=7 April 2014 |website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=24 July 2014}}</ref> In June 2013, 5,043 NLN declarations were made to the BBC on the grounds that the address was only watching catch up television.<ref name="NLN" /> |
|||
|date=7 April 2014 |
|||
|publisher=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=24 July 2014}}</ref> In June 2013, 5,043 NLN declarations were made to the BBC on the grounds that the address was only watching catch up TV.<ref name="NLN"/> |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|+ Use of |
|+ Use of digital set-top boxes, video recorders and television licensing requirements according to the BBC<ref name="TVL Digibox" /> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! Equipment in use !! Can television programmes be recorded? !! What is it used with? !! Licence required |
! Equipment in use !! Can television programmes be recorded? !! What is it used with? !! Licence required |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Digital box || No || Colour |
| Digital box || No || Colour television || Colour |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Digital box || No || Black and White |
| Digital box || No || Black and White television || Mono |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Digital box || All boxes || External sound receiver or radio only through |
| Digital box || All boxes || External sound receiver or radio only through television || No licence required |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Digital box or personal video recorder (PVR) |
| Digital box or personal video recorder (PVR) || Yes || Colour or black and white television || Colour |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[VCR]] – standalone, has an analogue tuner so cannot record contemporary digital |
| [[VCR]] – standalone, has an analogue tuner so cannot record contemporary digital television || No || Colour or black and white TV || No licence required |
||
|} |
|} |
||
===Exceptions to the |
===Exceptions to the television licensing regime=== |
||
There are a few exceptions to the television licensing regime where live television may be watched without a television licence being held for that property. These cases are: |
|||
There are a few exceptions to the TV licensing regime where live TV may be watched without a TV licence being held for that property. These cases are: |
|||
* Crown immunity. According to the BBC: "neither the Communications Act 2003 nor the Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004 bind the Crown. Thus, the Crown is not subject to the TV Licensing regime."<ref name="Crown Immunity">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/exemptions_tv_licence#incoming-654950|title=Exemptions - TV Licence|date=28 April 2015| |
* Crown immunity. According to the BBC: "neither the Communications Act 2003 nor the Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004 bind the Crown. Thus, the Crown is not subject to the TV Licensing regime."<ref name="Crown Immunity">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/exemptions_tv_licence#incoming-654950|title=Exemptions - TV Licence|date=28 April 2015|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=1 June 2015}}</ref> Prison authorities can assert Crown immunity to allow prisoners to watch TV without a TV licence.<ref name="HMP">{{cite web |url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licence_in_prisons#incoming-654468 |title=TV Licence in Prisons |date=12 April 2015 |website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=3 June 2015}}</ref> In 2012, the BBC recognised that the UK Parliament is exempt from the television licensing regime, and so the Parliamentary Estate stopped purchasing television licences from this date.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/foi/foi-and-eir/commons-foi-disclosures/estates-information/tv-licenses/|title=TV Licenses (2014)|website=UK Parliament|access-date=20 May 2019}}</ref> |
||
* Events of national importance. The BBC can grant a dispensation for the temporary use of |
* Events of national importance. The BBC can grant a dispensation for the temporary use of television sets away from the licensed address in what it calls 'exceptional circumstances'. One example of this was the screening of the Queen's Diamond Jubilee celebrations in 2012. There are well defined criteria for when this exception is valid.<ref name="Nat importance">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/copy_of_ask_help_script#incoming-571034|title=Copy of Ask Help script|date=16 August 2014|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |page=766|access-date=1 June 2015}}</ref> |
||
* Foreign ships. According to the BBC: 'Foreign Ships will not need a licence'<ref name="foreign ships">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/copy_of_ask_help_script#incoming-571034|title=Copy of Ask Help script|date=16 August 2014| |
* Foreign ships. According to the BBC: 'Foreign Ships will not need a licence'<ref name="foreign ships">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/copy_of_ask_help_script#incoming-571034|title=Copy of Ask Help script|date=16 August 2014|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |page=727|access-date=1 June 2015}}</ref> |
||
===Number of licences required per address=== |
===Number of licences required per address=== |
||
A licence is required to watch live |
A licence is required to watch live television transmissions anywhere, including residential and business premises.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/5081350.stm |title=Q&A: The TV licence and your PC |access-date=20 July 2008 |work=BBC Web Site |publisher=BBC |date=15 June 2006 }}</ref> |
||
For residential premises, only one licence is required per household per address, regardless of the number of licensed devices or the number of members of the household.<ref>[http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ108/ Do I need a TV Licence for every TV in my household?], TV Licensing, 2011</ref> However, the licence itself is always held in the name of an individual.<ref name= |
For residential premises, only one licence is required per household per address, regardless of the number of licensed devices or the number of members of the household.<ref>[http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ108/ Do I need a TV Licence for every TV in my household?], TV Licensing, 2011</ref> However, the licence itself is always held in the name of an individual.<ref name="FS50165472">{{cite web |url=http://www.ico.org.uk/~/media/documents/decisionnotices/2009/FS_50165472.ashx |title=Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Decision Notice |access-date=20 November 2013 |publisher=ICO |date=31 March 2009}}</ref> |
||
A rented property in multiple occupation by a joint [[tenancy]] agreement is considered by TV Licensing as one household and requires only one licence, but a rented property with multiple, separate tenancy agreements is not considered a single household and each tenant may require a separate licence.<ref>[http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ35/ Do I need a licence if I live in a shared house and it's not my TV?], TV Licensing, 2011</ref> For example, a [[house in multiple occupation]] may have private bedrooms and shared communal areas: if five occupants share such a property with individual tenancy agreements then they may require up to five television licences if each private room contains a television receiver, while a similar property housing five occupants under a joint tenancy agreement may require only one television licence.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/for-your-home/students-aud1/#Box1 |title=Students |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|date=27 August 2009 |access-date=12 July 2011}}</ref> |
A rented property in multiple occupation by a joint [[tenancy]] agreement is considered by TV Licensing as one household and requires only one licence, but a rented property with multiple, separate tenancy agreements is not considered a single household and each tenant may require a separate licence.<ref>[http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ35/ Do I need a licence if I live in a shared house and it's not my TV?], TV Licensing, 2011</ref> For example, a [[house in multiple occupation]] may have private bedrooms and shared communal areas: if five occupants share such a property with individual tenancy agreements then they may require up to five television licences if each private room contains a television receiver, while a similar property housing five occupants under a joint tenancy agreement may require only one television licence.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/for-your-home/students-aud1/#Box1 |title=Students |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|date=27 August 2009 |access-date=12 July 2011}}</ref> |
||
===Television use away from home=== |
===Television use away from home=== |
||
Use of television in a [[mobile home|static caravan]] is covered by the licence held for the user's main address, provided there is no simultaneous use of television at both places, and the use of television in a [[travel trailer|touring caravan]] is always covered by the user's main home licence. |
Use of television in a [[mobile home|static caravan]] is covered by the licence held for the user's main address, provided there is no simultaneous use of television at both places, and the use of television in a [[travel trailer|touring caravan]] is always covered by the user's main home licence. The use of a device to watch television (including a laptops or mobile phone), which is powered solely by its own internal batteries is covered for any address by the user's main home licence, but requires a separate licence if it is plugged into the mains or other external power source, such as a car battery.<ref>{{cite web |title=Terms and Conditions (of TV Licence) |url=https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/terms-and-conditions-top11 |website=TV Licensing |access-date=28 June 2024}}</ref> |
||
Students during term-time may not need a separate |
Students during term-time may not need a separate television licence if one is held at their permanent home-address if they watch television on a device powered solely by its own internal batteries. Specifically:<ref name="students">{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/for-your-home/students-aud1|title=Students |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|access-date=3 February 2015}}</ref> |
||
* The out-of-term address must be covered by a |
* The out-of-term address must be covered by a television licence |
||
* Any |
* Any television receiving equipment used must be powered solely by its own internal batteries |
||
* The |
* The television equipment must not be connected to an aerial or plugged into the mains. |
||
People living exclusively in a mobile dwelling such as a touring caravan or a constantly cruising canal boat, who do not have a static address, are not legally able to watch a television as they cannot purchase a licence without one. |
People living exclusively in a mobile dwelling such as a touring caravan or a constantly cruising canal boat, who do not have a static address, are not legally able to watch a television as they cannot purchase a licence without one.{{citation needed|date=June 2024}} |
||
==Licence fee enforcement== |
==Licence fee enforcement== |
||
===Television licence evaders=== |
|||
A person who watches or records live television without being in possession of a television licence is referred to by the BBC as a 'TV licence evader'.<ref name="Trust statement 2013" /> Each year the BBC estimates the evasion rate (expressed as a percentage of total 'licensable properties') and publishes the value in its Annual Report and Accounts. |
|||
The basic formula for estimating the evasion rate is:<ref name="Trust report 2011" /> |
|||
===TV licence evaders=== |
|||
A person who watches or records live TV without being in possession of a TV licence is referred to by the BBC as a 'TV licence evader'.<ref name="Trust statement 2013"/> Each year the BBC estimates the evasion rate (expressed as a percentage of total 'licensable properties') and publishes the value in its Annual Report and Accounts. |
|||
::<math>1-\frac{L}{{{(Ho)}{(PR)}+{NDL}}}</math> |
|||
The basic formula for estimating the evasion rate is:<ref name="Trust report 2011"/> |
|||
::<math>1-\frac{L}{{{(Ho)}{(PR)}+{NDL}}}</math> |
|||
where: |
where: |
||
''{{serif|L}}'': number of |
''{{serif|L}}'': number of television Licences in force |
||
''{{serif|Ho}}'': number of domestic households |
''{{serif|Ho}}'': number of domestic households |
||
''{{serif|PR}}'': penetration rate of |
''{{serif|PR}}'': penetration rate of televisions into households |
||
''{{serif|NDL}}'': non-domestic licences required |
''{{serif|NDL}}'': non-domestic licences required |
||
The figure for the number of licences in force is taken from the [[#LASSY database|BBC's database]]. The other variables used to calculate the evasion rates are estimates. The data for the number of domestic households is taken from the [[Department of Communities and Local Government]] figures. The [[Broadcasters' Audience Research Board]] survey is used to estimate the rate of penetration of |
The figure for the number of licences in force is taken from the [[#LASSY database|BBC's database]]. The other variables used to calculate the evasion rates are estimates. The data for the number of domestic households is taken from the [[Department of Communities and Local Government]] figures. The [[Broadcasters' Audience Research Board]] survey is used to estimate the rate of penetration of television sets into domestic households. Non-domestic licences include licences required for students, military accommodation, hotels and businesses. Various sources are used to estimate this figure.<ref name="Trust statement 2013" /> |
||
The most recent published figures for 2018–19 state that the evasion rate is between 6 and 7%.<ref name="TVL Annual Report 2018/19">{{cite web|title=TV Licensing Annual Review 2018/19|url=https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/ss/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheadername1=content-type&blobheadervalue1=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1370006520458&ssbinary=true|website= |
The most recent published figures for 2018–19 state that the evasion rate is between 6 and 7%.<ref name="TVL Annual Report 2018/19">{{cite web|title=TV Licensing Annual Review 2018/19|url=https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/ss/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheadername1=content-type&blobheadervalue1=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1370006520458&ssbinary=true |website=TvLicensing.co.uk |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|access-date=5 April 2020}}</ref> For the year 2005–6, TV Licensing reported that they "reduced estimated evasion to a record low of 4.7%".<ref name="TVL2005/6">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/pdfs/AnnualReview_en2006.pdf?r_exit_link=d_pdf_download |title=TV Licensing Annual Review, 2005/6 |publisher=Tvlicensing.co.uk |access-date=12 July 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718224946/http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/pdfs/AnnualReview_en2006.pdf?r_exit_link=d_pdf_download |archive-date=18 July 2011 |url-status=dead}}</ref> However, this figure rose during the following year to 5.1%<ref name="TVL2006/7" /> and remained at 5.1% during 2007–8.<ref name="BBCTrustReview" /> For the year 2010–2011 the evasion rate is stated as 5.2%.<ref name="TVL2010/11">{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/resources/library/BBC/OUR_PERFORMANCE/TVL_Annual_Review_Eng_2011.pdf|title=2010/11 Annual Review|website=TvLicensing.co.uk|access-date=12 July 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130722155857/http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/resources/library/BBC/OUR_PERFORMANCE/TVL_Annual_Review_Eng_2011.pdf|archive-date=22 July 2013}}</ref> According to the BBC "the published rate of evasion has increased marginally to 5.5% in 2012/13".<ref name="Trust statement 2013" /> The evasion rate is far from uniform across the UK, with Scotland having a far higher rate than the UK as a whole.<ref name="Scotland evasion">{{cite news|url=http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/revealed-britains-capital-for-tv-licence-1032982 |title=Revealed: Britain's capital for TV licence fee evasion is.. Glasgow |newspaper=Daily Record |access-date=7 November 2012}}</ref> |
||
One reason given by the BBC for evasion is lack of money in a household. For example, in the BBC Full Financial Statement 2012–13 the BBC says: 'as household budgets come under pressure, we are starting to see an increase in licence fee evasion |
One reason given by the BBC for evasion is lack of money in a household. For example, in the BBC Full Financial Statement 2012–13 the BBC says: 'as household budgets come under pressure, we are starting to see an increase in licence fee evasion rates over their prior year level'.<ref name="Financial Statements2013">{{cite web |url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/annualreport/pdf/2012-13/bbc-full-financial-statements-2012-13.pdf |title=BBC Full Financial Statements 2012/13 |publisher=BBC |access-date=23 July 2014}}</ref> However, this is not the only reason given for TV licence evasion, since according to a submission made by the BBC to the Information Commissioner's Office: 'the BBC said that it is also aware that a growing number of individuals deliberately evade the licence fee due to dissatisfaction with the BBC'.<ref name="ICO">{{cite web |url=http://www.ico.org.uk/~/media/documents/decisionnotices/2008/FS_50154106.ashx |title=Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Decision Notice |publisher=Information Commissioner's Office|access-date=29 July 2013}}</ref> |
||
rates over their prior year level'.<ref name="Financial Statements2013">{{cite web|url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/annualreport/pdf/2012-13/bbc-full-financial-statements-2012-13.pdf|title=BBC Full Financial Statements 2012/13|publisher=BBC|access-date= 23 July 2014}}</ref> However, this is not the only reason given for TV licence evasion, since according to a submission made by the BBC to the Information Commissioner's Office: 'the BBC said that it is also aware that a growing number of individuals deliberately evade the licence fee due to dissatisfaction with the BBC'.<ref name= "ICO">{{cite web|url=http://www.ico.org.uk/~/media/documents/decisionnotices/2008/FS_50154106.ashx |title=Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Decision Notice |publisher=Information Commissioner's Office|access-date=29 July 2013}}</ref> |
|||
According to a [[National Audit Office (United Kingdom)|National Audit Office]] report from 2002: "Areas with high evasion rates are most likely to have, for example, a higher than average proportion of younger people, low income households, and students and single parent families, and a level of [[County Court (England and Wales)|County Court]] judgments 50 per cent above the national average".<ref name= |
According to a [[National Audit Office (United Kingdom)|National Audit Office]] report from 2002: "Areas with high evasion rates are most likely to have, for example, a higher than average proportion of younger people, low income households, and students and single parent families, and a level of [[County Court (England and Wales)|County Court]] judgments 50 per cent above the national average".<ref name="NAO" /> However, according to the BBC, 'evasion is spread across all socioeconomic groups'.<ref name="TVL2006/7" /> The BBC has also claimed that the 'TV Licensing evader profile' could be characterised by the distribution by [[social grade]] of 1.3m properties that were not licensed on 31 March 2007. The profile was given as follows: AB 20.1%, C1 29.1%, C2 13.6%, D 18.9%, E 18.3%.<ref name="TVL2006/7" /> |
||
The [[Broadcasters' Audience Research Board]] estimated that of June 2004, 2.3% of UK households do not have television,<ref name="BBC16FEB2006"> |
The [[Broadcasters' Audience Research Board]] estimated that of June 2004, 2.3% of UK households do not have television,<ref name="BBC16FEB2006">{{Cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2006/SR2006000097_Population_without_Television.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080528025124/http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2006/SR2006000097_Population_without_Television.pdf|url-status=dead|title=BBC response to Freedom of Information Request, 16/02/2006|archivedate=28 May 2008}}</ref> and in September 2008, the BBC reported that some one million people do not need a television licence.<ref name="BBCTrustReview" /> Alleged excuses given by householders for not having a licence include loss of mail, being "too busy" and suffering from [[polymorphous light eruption]] (sun allergy).<ref name="bbc licence excuses">{{cite news | url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14975564 | title=TV licence excuses include postman affairs and sunlight | publisher=[[BBC News]] | date=20 September 2011 | access-date=20 September 2011 | quote=The top ten excuses as defined by TV Licensing were: "Since I had a bit of a fling with the postman I haven't been receiving my mail so I didn't get my TV Licence reminder"; [...] "I never got the reminders because my two-year-old hides all my post in her toy box"; [...] "I'm getting married and am too busy picking flowers, colours and things to buy a TV Licence."; "I cannot go out to buy a licence because I am allergic to the sun."}}</ref> The results of market research carried out on self-identified evaders concluded that roughly half were 'opportunistic delayers' who were [[gaming the system|playing the system]] to avoid immediate payment and that the others were 'deliberate evaders' who were trying to 'cheat the system'. Nearly one fifth of respondents claimed never to have bought a television licence. |
||
In compiling these figures however, no reference is made to the number of people who do not require a licence |
In compiling these figures however, no reference is made to the number of people who do not require a licence and who have not voluntarily replied to invitations to declare this. Instead, it is assumed they are also counted as 'evaders', despite lack of any evidence of wrongdoing on their part.<ref name="NAO" /> |
||
===LASSY database=== |
===LASSY database=== |
||
Since it is not possible to prevent a person buying and using |
Since it is not possible to prevent a person buying and using television receiving equipment, the television licence system is enforced by first identifying television licence evaders and then attempting to sell them a licence and in some cases, prosecuting them.<ref name="Visiting proc" /> The critical method of detecting television licence evaders is through the use of a database system known as ''LASSY'',<ref name="NatAud2002">{{cite web|author=National Audit Office|date=15 May 2002|title=The BBC: Collecting the television licence fee|url=http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/0102/the_bbc_collecting_the_televi.aspx|access-date=18 June 2006}}</ref> which contains 29.5 million<ref name="TVL2006/7">{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/ss/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheadername1=content-type&blobheadervalue1=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1370006225058&ssbinary=true |title=TV Licensing Annual Review, 2006/7 |publisher=Tvlicensing.co.uk |access-date=12 July 2011}}</ref> addresses. LASSY is an acronym of 'Licence Administration and Support System'.<ref name="bbctrust2009" /> According to the National Audit Office: "The database holds records of potentially licensable properties and basic details (such as the name of the licence holder and the licence expiry date) of those for which valid licences are held".<ref name="NAO" /> This database is routinely updated with licence holders' details. Until 25 June 2013, dealers in television receiving equipment were required by law to provide TV Licensing with identifying information about everyone who buys or rents such equipment.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/business-and-organisations/tv-dealers-aud18/?WT.mc_id=r033|title=Official TV Licensing website - TV dealers|website=www.tvlicensing.co.uk}}</ref> However this requirement has been lifted by the [[Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013]].<ref name="Enterprise Bill">{{cite web|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2012-2013/0007/en/13007en.pdf|title=Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill |publisher=UK Parliament|access-date=4 July 2013}}</ref> TV Licensing maintains permanent contact with every address in the database that is recorded as not having a TV licence<ref name="BBC04AUG2006">{{Cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2006/SR2006000443_Cost_of_TV_Licence_Notice_Letters.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080528025143/http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2006/SR2006000443_Cost_of_TV_Licence_Notice_Letters.pdf|url-status=dead|title=BBC response to Freedom of Information Request, 04/08/2006|archivedate=28 May 2008}}</ref> until a licence is purchased for that address or until TV Licensing confirm that the household does not need a licence. If it is confirmed that a household does not watch or record live television, the address is put into the NLCC (No Licence Needed Claim Confirmed) category. Residential properties put into this category are not visited or contacted for a period of two years from the time that the claim was confirmed. Business properties on the other hand, are exempted from visits or mailings for three years after confirmation.<ref name="Visiting proc" /> |
||
===TV Licensing letters and telephone calls=== |
===TV Licensing letters and telephone calls=== |
||
TV Licensing may make initial contact by letter<ref name="TVL letters">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/wording_and_approval_of_tv_licen#incoming-247162|title=Wording and Approval of TV Licensing Letters |
TV Licensing may make initial contact by letter<ref name="TVL letters">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/wording_and_approval_of_tv_licen#incoming-247162|title=Wording and Approval of TV Licensing Letters |
||
|date=24 December 2011 |
|date=24 December 2011 |
||
| |
|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=16 January 2014}}</ref> or by phone with occupants of addresses for which there is no current licence.<ref name="bbctrust2009" /> During the financial year 2012–13, approximately 21.5 million letters were sent to unlicensed addresses. The average postage cost to post one standard TV Licensing letter in the financial year 2012–13 was stated to be £0.2059.<ref name="TVL letters number">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/letters_sent_out#incoming-476482|title=Letters sent out|date=January 2014|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=18 November 2014}}</ref> The methods by which an occupant can reply are in writing, by telephone or by filling in an online form. If there is no reply to the first letter and a television licence is not bought by the occupant, then TV Licensing continues to write regularly to the address and "the tone of the letters progressively becomes stronger to encourage a reply".<ref name="TVLExclusion3" /> For example, one of its standard letters includes the phrase: "Official warning: We have opened an investigation". This warning was included in 940,615 letters sent in January/February 2013.<ref name="warning letters">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/the_bbcs_use_of_the_term_investi#incoming-377031|title=The BBC's use of the term "Investigation" |date=18 February 2013 |website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=16 January 2014}}</ref> Another standard letter states: 'Dear Sir/Madam, you have not responded to our previous letters. We want to ensure you have the information you may need before a hearing is set at your local court.'<ref name="TVL letter2">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licensing_written_corresponde#incoming-515623|title=TV Licensing Written Correspondence|date=20 March 2014|website=Whatdotheyknow.com|access-date=8 September 2014}}</ref> More than 3 million letters containing this phrase were sent in 2011.<ref name="TVL letter3">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tvl_frequency_of_use_of_misleadi#incoming-244987|title=TVL: Frequency of use of misleading court threats|date=17 December 2011|website=Whatdotheyknow.com|access-date=8 September 2014}}</ref> |
||
|date=18 February 2013 |
|||
|publisher=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=16 January 2014}}</ref> Another standard letter states: 'Dear Sir/Madam, you have not responded to our previous letters. We want to ensure you have the information you may need before a hearing is set at your local court.'<ref name="TVL letter2">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licensing_written_corresponde#incoming-515623|title=TV Licensing Written Correspondence|date=20 March 2014|publisher=Whatdotheyknow.com|access-date=8 September 2014}}</ref> More than 3 million letters containing this phrase were sent in 2011.<ref name="TVL letter3">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tvl_frequency_of_use_of_misleadi#incoming-244987|title=TVL: Frequency of use of misleading court threats|date=17 December 2011|publisher=Whatdotheyknow.com|access-date=8 September 2014}}</ref> |
|||
Three basic tones of voice are used in TV Licensing letters: "Customer Service", "Collections" and "Enforcement".<ref name="TVL letters"/> According to the BBC: "Customer service is the brand experience we create for customers who are currently licensed, unknowingly unlicensed or who |
Three basic tones of voice are used in TV Licensing letters: "Customer Service", "Collections" and "Enforcement".<ref name="TVL letters" /> According to the BBC: "Customer service is the brand experience we create for customers who are currently licensed, unknowingly unlicensed or who don't need a licence", whereas "Collections is the brand experience we create for those customers whose television licence has expired and whom TV Licensing wants to motivate to renew." Finally, the enforcement tone is used for households who have been unlicensed for a longer period. This period is not specified in freely available documents but TV Licensing suggests it could be used, for example, for the third and fourth renewal reminder.<ref name="TVL letters" /> Each of these 'tones' involves letters with a different colour palette. For example, green is used in 'Customer Service' letters and red may be used in 'Collections' and 'Enforcement' letters. In all cases, the vocabulary and format used in the letters is strictly defined.<ref name="TVL letters" /> |
||
If a business or household is not obliged to have a |
If a business or household is not obliged to have a television licence then TV Licensing will request written confirmation of this, even though no such information is required to be given in law.<ref name="BBC08FEB2006">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2007/SR2007000351_Search_Warrant_Procedure.pdf|title=Freedom of Information Request - RFI2007000351 |date=13 April 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080413163408/http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2007/SR2007000351_Search_Warrant_Procedure.pdf|archive-date=13 April 2008}}</ref><ref>Confirmed by [[Shaun Woodward]] (Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Department for Culture, Media and Sport) in response to a request for clarification from a constituent [https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2006-05-15b.69812.h#g69812.r0]</ref> |
||
According to the BBC, it is not possible to opt out of receiving TVL mailings since they 'are not advertising or marketing material'.<ref name="Ask script opt out">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/copy_of_ask_help_script#incoming-571034|title=Copy of Ask Help script|date=16 August 2014| |
According to the BBC, it is not possible to opt out of receiving TVL mailings since they 'are not advertising or marketing material'.<ref name="Ask script opt out">{{cite web |url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/copy_of_ask_help_script#incoming-571034|title=Copy of Ask Help script |date=16 August 2014 |website=Whatdotheyknow.com |page=246 |access-date=8 April 2015}}</ref> Similarly, householders who do not have a licence cannot exclude themselves from unsolicited calls from TV Licensing by registering with the [[Telephone Preference Service]].<ref name="Ask script opt out tel">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/copy_of_ask_help_script#incoming-571034|title=Copy of Ask Help script|date=16 August 2014|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |page=320|access-date=10 April 2015}}</ref> |
||
In 2014, a householder invoiced TV Licensing £40 as a 'processing fee' for 'opening, reading and filing' a TV Licensing letter. Because TV Licensing did not pay the charge, the householder took the claim to the County Court, eventually winning the case and receiving the fee plus other costs incurred.<ref name="TVL sued">{{cite web|url=http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licensing_successfully_sued|title=TV Licensing successfully sued |
In 2014, a householder invoiced TV Licensing £40 as a 'processing fee' for 'opening, reading and filing' a TV Licensing letter. Because TV Licensing did not pay the charge, the householder took the claim to the County Court, eventually winning the case and receiving the fee plus other costs incurred.<ref name="TVL sued">{{cite web|url=http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licensing_successfully_sued|title=TV Licensing successfully sued |date=22 December 2014 |website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=16 April 2015}}</ref> |
||
|date=22 December 2014 |
|||
|publisher=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=16 April 2015}}</ref> |
|||
=== |
===Enquiry officer visits=== |
||
If a colour |
If a colour television licence is not purchased for an address, TV Licensing agents—known as "visiting officers", "enquiry officers" or "enforcement officers"—make unannounced visits to the address. In August 2013, there were reported to be 334 enquiry officers,<ref name="radiotimes">{{cite magazine |url=http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2013-09-27/do-tv-detector-vans-exist-leaked-document-suggests-they-could-be-a-ruse |title=Do TV Detector Vans Exist? |magazine=Radio Times |access-date=31 October 2013}}</ref> all employees of the BBC's main enforcement contractor, Capita. Enquiry officers make around four million visits a year to households in the UK and Crown dependencies.{{Citation needed|date=December 2019}} Each week an enquiry officer may upload a number of unlicensed addresses onto their "handheld device".<ref name="VO - the role">{{cite web |url=https://www.capita.com/careers/your-career-at-capita-tv-licensing/frequently-asked-questions |title=Frequently asked questions {{pipe}} Capita |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=9 January 2020 |website=www.capita.com |publisher=[[Capita]] |access-date=30 January 2021 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200225195504/http://visitingofficers.co.uk/the-role |archive-date=25 February 2020}}</ref> The enquiry officer is only allowed to visit the addresses on this list, which are normally within a thirty-minute travelling distance from their home postcode. Enquiry officers do not visit addresses in their own postcode, however.<ref name="VO - the role" /> |
||
Although TV Licensing enforces the BBC's statutory obligation to ensure that every address where a television licence is required is correctly licensed, its agents have no special right of access and, like any other member of the public, rely on an implied right of access to reach the front door. A householder may withdraw the implied right of access to TV Licensing personnel by contacting the BBC and informing them that this right has been revoked; the BBC says they respect such requests (although could still seek a warrant to search the property), except in Scotland.<ref name="WOIRA Scotland">{{cite web|title=Policy Change for Scottish Residents regarding access withdrawal|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/policy_change_for_scottish_resid#incoming-651942|website=WhatDoTheyKnow|date=14 April 2015 |
Although TV Licensing enforces the BBC's statutory obligation to ensure that every address where a television licence is required is correctly licensed, its agents have no special right of access and, like any other member of the public, rely on an implied right of access to reach the front door. A householder may withdraw the implied right of access to TV Licensing personnel by contacting the BBC and informing them that this right has been revoked; the BBC says they respect such requests (although could still seek a warrant to search the property), except in Scotland.<ref name="WOIRA Scotland">{{cite web|title=Policy Change for Scottish Residents regarding access withdrawal|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/policy_change_for_scottish_resid#incoming-651942|website=WhatDoTheyKnow|date=14 April 2015|access-date=18 August 2015}}</ref> As of March 2014, 7,299 households had withdrawn the implied right of access.{{Citation needed|date=December 2019}} This figure had increased to over 20,000 by December 2015.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/implied_right#incoming-759168|title=Implied Right - a Freedom of Information request to British Broadcasting Corporation|date=27 December 2015|website=WhatDoTheyKnow|access-date=12 December 2016}}</ref> |
||
Upon visiting a property, enquiry officers ask a set of predetermined questions to whoever answers the door when they visit. |
Upon visiting a property, enquiry officers ask a set of predetermined questions to whoever answers the door when they visit.<ref name="Visiting proc">{{cite web |url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/information_about_tv_licensing_i#incoming-498625|title=Information about TV Licensing induction and training |date=6 July 2013 |website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=6 May 2015}}</ref> They first try to find out if the person who responds to the enquiry officer is an "appropriate person" to interview (i.e. an adult who lives at the property). They then try to find out if that person has been receiving television without a licence. If they suspect that this is the case, they issue an unofficial{{efn|A regular member of the public cannot issue an official caution.{{cn|date=December 2023}} }} caution to the person that whatever they say may be used against them in court. They then take a prosecution statement and ask the interviewee to sign it. The enquiry officer may ask permission to enter the property and may examine any television receiving equipment found there. According to the visiting procedures: 'circumstantial evidence of use should be noted on the Record of Interview whenever visible (e.g. sky dish, aerial lead plugged into television, remote control on settee) as this provides supporting evidence for potential prosecution and may be vital if the confession should later be challenged.'.<ref name="Visiting proc" /> However, the occupant is well within his/her rights not to answer any questions (remaining silent) and is under no obligation to allow entry into the property. |
||
If an agent has evidence that television is being watched or recorded illegally but is denied entry by the occupants so that they cannot verify the suspicion, then TV Licensing may apply to a [[magistrate]] for a [[search warrant]].<ref name="TVL2006/7" /> The BBC states that a search warrant would never be applied for solely on the basis of non-cooperation with TV Licensing<ref name="BBC25AUG2006">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2006/SR2006000476_TV_Licence_Search_Warrants.pdf|title= |
If an agent has evidence that television is being watched or recorded illegally but is denied entry by the occupants so that they cannot verify the suspicion, then TV Licensing may apply to a [[magistrate]] for a [[search warrant]].<ref name="TVL2006/7" /> The BBC states that a search warrant would never be applied for solely on the basis of non-cooperation with TV Licensing<ref name="BBC25AUG2006">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2006/SR2006000476_TV_Licence_Search_Warrants.pdf|title=Freedom of Information Request - RFI2006000476|date=13 April 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080413163405/http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2006/SR2006000476_TV_Licence_Search_Warrants.pdf|archive-date=13 April 2008}}</ref><ref name="BBC13APR2007">{{Cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2007/SR2007000351_Search_Warrant_Procedure.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080528025108/http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2007/SR2007000351_Search_Warrant_Procedure.pdf|url-status=dead|title=BBC response to Freedom of Information Request, 13/04/2007|archivedate=28 May 2008}}</ref> and that in the event of being denied access to unlicensed property will use detection equipment rather than a search warrant.<ref name="BBC18SEP2007">{{Cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2007/SR2007000748_Legislation_for_TV_licence.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080528025110/http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2007/SR2007000748_Legislation_for_TV_licence.pdf|url-status=dead|title=BBC response to Freedom of Information Request, 18/09/2007|archivedate=28 May 2008}}</ref> |
||
===Detection technology=== |
===Detection technology=== |
||
====TV detector vans==== |
====TV detector vans==== |
||
[[File:BLW TV Detector Van.jpg|thumb |
{{main|TV detector van}} |
||
[[File:BLW TV Detector Van.jpg|thumb|A [[Leyland Sherpa]] television detector van]] |
|||
[[File:Dodge detector van.JPG|thumb|A [[Dodge]] television detector van]] |
|||
{{Main|TV detector van}} |
|||
[[TV detector van]]s have in the past featured heavily in TV Licensing publicity,<ref name="colombo">{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/films/1964to1979/filmpage_tv.htm |title=TV Licence – Columbo |publisher=The National Archives |access-date=27 September 2012}}</ref> highlighting that technology capable of detecting signals from operating TV sets could be employed.<ref name="press release 2003">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2003/06_june/24/licensing_detector_vans.shtml |title=Press Office – New generation of television detector vans |publisher=BBC |access-date=12 July 2011}}</ref> Detector vans date from the 1950s, when the Post Office converted [[Hillman Minx]] and [[Morris Oxford MO|Morris Oxford]] estate cars, which had large aerials attached to their roofs.{{citation needed|date=December 2019}} Subsequently [[Commer]]s were introduced. In the 1980s, vans were supplied by [[Dodge]] and [[British Leyland|Leyland]]. In the 1990s, [[Ford Transit]]s were introduced. In 2003, TVL launched its tenth generation of detector vans. It was stated that these vans had removable branding so that they could operate covertly.<ref name="new generation">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2003/06_june/24/licensing_detector_vans.shtml|title=New generation of television detector vans hit the streets|publisher=BBC|access-date=3 June 2014}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Dodge detector van.JPG|thumb|right|A [[Dodge]] television detector van]] |
|||
Few technical details of the detectors used have been released. In a press release from 2003, the BBC stated that:<ref name="press release 2003"/> "the new vans are so powerful they can tell if a TV is in use in as little as 20 seconds". It was also stated that the equipment has a range of up to 60 metres and "can pinpoint the actual room that the television set is in." However, on TV Licensing's own site in 2015, no information on range or accuracy of the equipment is given. It instead says that there are "a range of detection tools at our disposal in our vans". It is also stated that the available equipment has been developed in secrecy and that "engineers working on specific detection methods work in isolation – so not even they know how the other detection methods work."<ref name= "How do they work">{{cite web|url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ73/|title=How do the detector vans work? |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]|access-date=21 October 2013}}</ref> |
|||
[[TV detector van]]s have in the past featured heavily in TV Licensing publicity,<ref name="colombo">{{cite web |url=http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/films/1964to1979/filmpage_tv.htm |title=TV Licence – Columbo |publisher=The National Archives |access-date=27 September 2012}}</ref> highlighting that technology capable of detecting signals from operating television sets could be employed.<ref name="press release 2003">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2003/06_june/24/licensing_detector_vans.shtml |title=Press Office – New generation of television detector vans |publisher=BBC |access-date=12 July 2011}}</ref> Detector vans date from the 1950s, when the Post Office converted [[Hillman Minx]] and [[Morris Oxford MO|Morris Oxford]] estate cars, which had large aerials attached to their roofs.{{citation needed|date=December 2019}} Subsequently [[Commer]]s were introduced. In the 1980s, vans were supplied by [[Dodge]] and [[British Leyland|Leyland]]. In the 1990s, [[Ford Transit]]s were introduced. In 2003, TVL launched its tenth generation of detector vans. It was stated that these vans had removable branding so that they could operate covertly.<ref name="new generation">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2003/06_june/24/licensing_detector_vans.shtml|title=New generation of television detector vans hit the streets|publisher=BBC|access-date=3 June 2014}}</ref> |
|||
Although no technical details of the TV detectors used in these vans have been made public, it is thought that they operate by detecting electromagnetic radiation given off by a TV.<ref name="New Scientist TV Detectors">{{cite magazine|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14719887.500-deceptor-vans.html|title=Deceptor vans|magazine=New Scientist|access-date=19 May 2014}}</ref> The most common suggested method is the detection of a signal from the TV's [[local oscillator]].<ref name="US patent - local oscillator">{{Cite web |url=http://www.patents.com/us-5404161.html |title=US Patent # 5,404,161. Tuned signal detector for use with a radio frequency receiver - Patents.com |last1=Douglass |first1=Ralph G. |last2=Furman |first2=Arthur R. |date=4 April 1995<!--Patent granted--> |website=Patents.com |publisher=[[United States Patent and Trademark Office|USPTO]] |access-date=17 November 2015 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170926042317/http://www.patents.com/us-5404161.html |archive-date=26 September 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,404,161.PN.&OS=PN/5,404,161&RS=PN/5,404,161 |title=United States Patent: 5404161 |last1=Douglass |first1=Ralph G. |last2=Furman |first2=Arthur R. |date=4 April 1995<!--Patent granted--> |website=www.uspto.gov |publisher=[[United States Patent and Trademark Office|USPTO]] |access-date=30 January 2021}}</ref> |
|||
Few technical details of the detectors used have been released. In a press release from 2003, the BBC stated that:<ref name="press release 2003" /> "the new vans are so powerful they can tell if a television is in use in as little as 20 seconds". It was also stated that the equipment has a range of up to {{convert|60|m}} and "can pinpoint the actual room that the television set is in". However, on TV Licensing's own site in 2015, no information on range or accuracy of the equipment is given. It instead says that there are "a range of detection tools at our disposal in our vans". It is also stated that the available equipment has been developed in secrecy and that "engineers working on specific detection methods work in isolation – so not even they know how the other detection methods work."<ref name="How do they work">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ73/ |title=How do the detector vans work? |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]] |access-date=21 October 2013}}</ref> |
|||
It has been suggested in the media that TV detector vans do not actually exist. An 2013 article in the ''[[Radio Times]]'' reported that a leaked BBC document on the collection of the licence fee "makes no mention of detector vans – but it does contain plenty of other facts and figures".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2013-09-27/do-tv-detector-vans-exist-leaked-document-suggests-they-could-be-a-ruse|title=Do TV detector vans exist? Leaked document suggests they could be a ruse}}</ref> |
|||
Although no technical details of the television detectors used in these vans have been made public, it is thought that they operate by detecting electromagnetic radiation given off by a television.<ref name="New Scientist TV Detectors">{{cite magazine|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14719887.500-deceptor-vans.html|title=Deceptor vans|magazine=New Scientist|access-date=19 May 2014}}</ref> The most common suggested method is the detection of a signal from the TV's [[local oscillator]].<ref name="US patent - local oscillator">{{Cite web |url=http://www.patents.com/us-5404161.html |title=US Patent # 5,404,161. Tuned signal detector for use with a radio frequency receiver - Patents.com |last1=Douglass |first1=Ralph G. |last2=Furman |first2=Arthur R. |date=4 April 1995<!--Patent granted--> |website=Patents.com |publisher=[[United States Patent and Trademark Office|USPTO]] |access-date=17 November 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170926042317/http://www.patents.com/us-5404161.html |archive-date=26 September 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,404,161.PN.&OS=PN/5,404,161&RS=PN/5,404,161 |title=United States Patent: 5404161 |last1=Douglass |first1=Ralph G. |last2=Furman |first2=Arthur R. |date=4 April 1995<!--Patent granted--> |website=www.uspto.gov |publisher=[[United States Patent and Trademark Office|USPTO]] |access-date=30 January 2021}}</ref> |
|||
It has been suggested in the media that television detector vans do not actually exist. A 2013 article in the ''[[Radio Times]]'' reported that a leaked BBC document on the collection of the licence fee "makes no mention of detector vans – but it does contain plenty of other facts and figures".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.radiotimes.com/|title=Home|website=Radio Times}}</ref> |
|||
====Hand-held detectors==== |
====Hand-held detectors==== |
||
Hand-held |
Hand-held television detectors have also been developed by the BBC.<ref name="TVL2006/7" /> In the ''Birmingham Mail'' for the same year{{when|date=January 2022}}, the detectors were described as 'little bigger than a torch', weighing {{Convert | 280 | g | 0 | abbr = on}}, which made a beeping noise when they detect a television.<ref name="handheld">{{cite news |url=http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/new-weapon-to-catch-tv-licence-43362|title=New weapon to catch TV licence cheats|newspaper=Birmingham Mail |date= 1 August 2007|access-date= 9 January 2015}}</ref> |
||
The company Buckman Hardy Associates has made such equipment for the BBC in the past<ref name="BHA">{{cite web|author=Buckman Hardy Associates|title=EXAMPLES OF PREVIOUS PROJECTS|url=http://www.buckman-hardy.co.uk/project_portfolio.html|access-date=18 June 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080203093515/http://www.buckman-hardy.co.uk/project_portfolio.html|archive-date=3 February 2008|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> but the equipment shown in the publicity campaigns run in 2007 was all made by the BBC itself.<ref name="Hand held 2007 campaign">{{cite web|title=Hand-held TV detectors|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/hand_held_tv_detectors|website=Whatdotheyknow|date=24 July 2013|publisher=WhatDoTheyKnow|access-date=7 July 2015}}</ref> |
|||
The company Buckman Hardy Associates has made such equipment for the BBC in the past<ref name="BHA">{{cite web|publisher=Buckman Hardy Associates|title=Examples of Previous Projects |url=http://www.buckman-hardy.co.uk/project_portfolio.html|access-date=18 June 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080203093515/http://www.buckman-hardy.co.uk/project_portfolio.html|archive-date=3 February 2008 }}</ref> but the equipment shown in the publicity campaigns run in 2007 was all made by the BBC itself.<ref name="Hand held 2007 campaign">{{cite web |title=Hand-held TV detectors |url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/hand_held_tv_detectors|date=24 July 2013|website=WhatDoTheyKnow|access-date=7 July 2015}}</ref> |
|||
====Optical detectors==== |
====Optical detectors==== |
||
In 2013, it was revealed that the BBC had used optical |
In 2013, it was revealed that the BBC had used optical television detectors to apply for a search warrant. Although few technical details were given, it was stated in an application for a search warrant that: "the optical detector in the detector van uses a large lens to collect that light and focus it on to an especially sensitive device, which converts fluctuating light signals into electrical signals, which can be electronically analysed. If a receiver is being used to watch broadcast programmes then a positive reading is returned." The BBC stated that this was strong evidence that a set was "receiving a possible broadcast".<ref name="optical">{{cite web |url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/statements_involving_tv_detector |title=Statements involving TV Detector evidence |date=7 January 2013 |website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=18 December 2013}}</ref> |
||
====Legal use of detection technology==== |
====Legal use of detection technology==== |
||
The BBC states that such technology used in conjunction with targeted advertising acts as a [[deterrence (psychological)|deterrent]]: its use may make it easier for TV Licensing agents to establish that an offence is likely to be taking place but they would still need to secure further evidence for successful prosecution.<ref name="NatAud2002"/><ref name="BBC14MAR2007" /> Furthermore, such technology is restricted in its use by the meaning of "surveillance and covert human intelligence sources" in the [[Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000]]<ref name="TVL2006/7" /> and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (British Broadcasting Corporation) Order 2001.<ref name="BBC08AUG2006"> |
The BBC states that such technology used in conjunction with targeted advertising acts as a [[deterrence (psychological)|deterrent]]: its use may make it easier for TV Licensing agents to establish that an offence is likely to be taking place but they would still need to secure further evidence for successful prosecution.<ref name="NatAud2002" /><ref name="BBC14MAR2007" /> Furthermore, such technology is restricted in its use by the meaning of "surveillance and covert human intelligence sources" in the [[Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000]]<ref name="TVL2006/7" /> and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (British Broadcasting Corporation) Order 2001.<ref name="BBC08AUG2006">{{Cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2006/SR2006000444_Number_of_Licence-Fee_Evaders.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080413163411/http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2006/SR2006000444_Number_of_Licence-Fee_Evaders.pdf|url-status=dead|title=BBC response to Freedom of Information Request, 08/08/2006|archivedate=13 April 2008}}</ref><ref name="Statute2001/1057">{{cite web|url=http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2001/20011057.htm |title=Home Office – The Regulation of Investigatory Powers (British Broadcasting Corporation) Order 2001 |publisher=Opsi.gov.uk |date=4 July 2011 |access-date=12 July 2011}}</ref> |
||
Like other public bodies that undertake covert surveillance, the BBC is subject to the scrutiny of the Office of Surveillance Commissioners, which inspects the BBC every other year.<ref name="OSC">{{cite web|url=https://osc.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/OSC-Annual-Report-2012-13.pdf|title=Annual Report of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner|publisher=The Stationery Office|access-date=30 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160115105034/https://osc.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/OSC-Annual-Report-2012-13.pdf|archive-date=15 January 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> A number of official inspection reports on the BBC's detection methods have been made available following freedom of information requests<ref name="OSC inspection">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/office_of_the_surveillance_commi#incoming-436439|title=Office of the Surveillance Commissioner's Report, 2008 |date=25 August 2013 | |
Like other public bodies that undertake covert surveillance, the BBC is subject to the scrutiny of the Office of Surveillance Commissioners, which inspects the BBC every other year.<ref name="OSC">{{cite web|url=https://osc.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/OSC-Annual-Report-2012-13.pdf|title=Annual Report of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner|publisher=The Stationery Office|access-date=30 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160115105034/https://osc.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/OSC-Annual-Report-2012-13.pdf|archive-date=15 January 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> A number of official inspection reports on the BBC's detection methods have been made available following freedom of information requests<ref name="OSC inspection">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/office_of_the_surveillance_commi#incoming-436439|title=Office of the Surveillance Commissioner's Report, 2008 |date=25 August 2013 |website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=12 January 2014}}</ref> These reports give an outline of the process of authorisation of the use of detection equipment. Briefly, applications for authorisation are made in the name of the Detection Manager of Capita. Correspondence between TV Licensing and the affected householder may be attached to the completed application forms which pass via a quality control 'gatekeeper' to the authorising officers (AOs) at the BBC. In 2012 there were two designated AOs at the BBC. To be authorised, an application must be shown to be 'necessary and proportionate'. AOs sometimes reject applications. Once approved, the authorisation lasts for a duration of eight weeks. |
||
TV Licensing states "detection equipment will only be used if other less intrusive and more cost effective routes have been exhausted",<ref name="TVL Our Roles">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/our-roles-and-responsibilities-AB3|title=Our roles and responsibilities|access-date=30 October 2014 |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]}}</ref> and the BBC has stated that "Detection technology is generally used to obtain search warrants".<ref name="BBC14MAR2007"> |
TV Licensing states "detection equipment will only be used if other less intrusive and more cost effective routes have been exhausted",<ref name="TVL Our Roles">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/our-roles-and-responsibilities-AB3|title=Our roles and responsibilities|access-date=30 October 2014 |publisher=TV Licensing Authority, a division of [[BBC]]}}</ref> and the BBC has stated that "Detection technology is generally used to obtain search warrants".<ref name="BBC14MAR2007">{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2007/SR2007000205_Detection_of_TV_Usage.pdf |title=BBC response to Freedom of Information Request |date=14 March 2007 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080528025115/http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2007/SR2007000205_Detection_of_TV_Usage.pdf |archivedate=28 May 2008}}</ref> |
||
In a reply to a FOI request in 2011, the BBC stated "I can confirm that TVL has not, to date, used detection evidence in Court". The BBC also wrote that such evidence "is unnecessary" because "TVL uses detection evidence when applying for search warrants. If, following service of the warrant an individual is found to be evading payment of the TV Licence, then the evidence obtained via the search warrant is used in court, not the detection evidence.<ref name="evidence in court">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/evidence_from_tv_detection_equip#outgoing-109179|title=Evidence from TV Detection Equipment|date=29 December 2010}}</ref> |
|||
In a reply to a FOI request in 2011, the BBC stated "I can confirm that TVL has not, to date, used detection evidence in Court". The BBC also wrote that such evidence "is unnecessary" because "TVL uses detection evidence when applying for search warrants. If, following service of the warrant an individual is found to be evading payment of the TV Licence, then the evidence obtained via the search warrant is used in court, not the detection evidence.<ref name="evidence in court">{{cite web |url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/evidence_from_tv_detection_equip#outgoing-109179 |title=Evidence from TV Detection Equipment|date=29 December 2010}}</ref> |
|||
===Search warrants=== |
===Search warrants=== |
||
In some cases, TV Licensing may apply to a magistrate (or a sheriff in Scotland) for a search warrant as part of the enforcement process.<ref name="FOI: Administering the TV Licensing system part 2">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-administering-the-tv-licensing-system-part-2-AB20 |title=FOI: Administering the TV Licensing system part 2 |publisher=Tvlicensing.co.uk |access-date=14 August 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120730190145/http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-administering-the-tv-licensing-system-part-2-AB20/ |archive-date=30 July 2012 |url-status=dead |
In some cases, TV Licensing may apply to a magistrate (or a sheriff in Scotland) for a search warrant as part of the enforcement process.<ref name="FOI: Administering the TV Licensing system part 2">{{cite web |url=http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-administering-the-tv-licensing-system-part-2-AB20 |title=FOI: Administering the TV Licensing system part 2 |publisher=Tvlicensing.co.uk |access-date=14 August 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120730190145/http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-administering-the-tv-licensing-system-part-2-AB20/ |archive-date=30 July 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref> According to TV Licensing, such an application may only be made "when there is good reason to believe that an offence has been committed, evidence of the commission of that offence is likely to be found, and conditions regarding access to the property warrant the granting of a search warrant".<ref name="FOI: Administering the TV Licensing system part 2" /> The same source also states that "The BBC contracts Capita Business Services Ltd to carry out television licensing enforcement activities, including applying for and executing search warrants." The BBC's contractor uses powers granted by Section 366 of the Communications Act 2003 to apply for and exercise search warrants.<ref name="section 366">{{cite web|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/section/366 |title=Communications Act 2003 |website=Legislation.gov.uk |access-date=13 February 2014}}</ref> The Act specifies that the search warrant is valid for a month after being granted. According to the BBC, such warrants are usually executed in the presence of police officers.<ref name="FOI: Administering the TV Licensing system part 2" /> The TV Licensing Visiting Procedures state: 'To minimise the impact on normal operations Enforcement Managers accompanied by an EO should in normal circumstances execute search warrants. On no account must the warrant be executed without two officers being present. Normally the two officers must be accompanied by a Police Officer'.<ref name="Visiting proc" /> The warrant provides an authorisation to search a premises, and to examine and test any television receiver found. However, there is no power to seize any apparatus.<ref name="search warrant powers">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/request_for_documents_and_clarif#incoming-498605|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |title= Request for documents and clarification of Visiting Procedures|date=17 September 2013 |access-date=28 March 2014}}</ref> According to the BBC Search Warrant Policy "force must not be used by TV Licensing to gain entry to a property".<ref name="Warrant Policy">{{cite web |url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licensing_search_warrant_info#incoming-524768 |title=TV licensing Search warrant information |date=5 May 2014 |website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=12 August 2014 }}</ref> |
||
|publisher=www.legislation.gov.uk|access-date=13 February 2014}}</ref> The Act specifies that the search warrant is valid for a month after being granted. According to the BBC, such warrants are usually executed in the presence of police officers.<ref name="FOI: Administering the TV Licensing system part 2"/> The TV Licensing Visiting Procedures state: 'To minimise the impact on normal operations Enforcement Managers accompanied by an EO should in normal circumstances execute search warrants. On no account must the warrant be executed without two officers being present. Normally the two officers must be accompanied by a Police Officer'.<ref name="Visiting proc"/> The warrant provides an authorisation to search a premises, and to examine and test any television receiver found. However, there is no power to seize any apparatus.<ref name="search warrant powers">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/request_for_documents_and_clarif#incoming-498605|publisher=Whatdotheyknow.com |title= Request for documents and clarification of Visiting Procedures|date=17 September 2013 |access-date=28 March 2014}}</ref> According to the BBC Search Warrant Policy "force must not be used by TV Licensing to gain entry to a property".<ref name="Warrant Policy">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licensing_search_warrant_info#incoming-524768|title=TV licensing Search warrant information |
|||
|date=5 May 2014 |
|||
|publisher=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=12 August 2014}}</ref> |
|||
Data on the number of search warrants executed per year in the whole of the UK are not collated or held centrally by the various judicial bodies of the state. However, the BBC, itself, holds the information some of which has become available due to FOI requests.<ref name="Monthly Packs">{{cite web|title=Monthly Performance Pack|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/monthly_performance_pack_2#comment-70446 |
Data on the number of search warrants executed per year in the whole of the UK are not collated or held centrally by the various judicial bodies of the state. However, the BBC, itself, holds the information some of which has become available due to FOI requests.<ref name="Monthly Packs">{{cite web|title=Monthly Performance Pack|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/monthly_performance_pack_2#comment-70446|date=2 January 2016|website=WhatDoTheyKnow|access-date=13 July 2016}}</ref> For example, in the financial year 2014–15, TV Licensing applied for 256 warrants to serve in the UK. 167 warrants were granted by the courts of which 115 were executed. In the same year in Scotland no warrants were applied for or served, whilst in Northern Ireland 12 warrants were granted and 7 executed in that year.<ref name="Monthly Packs" /> |
||
Some idea of the frequency at which warrants are used may also be taken from the result of a recent FOI request.<ref name="Sheffield warrants">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/instances_of_evidence_submitted |title=Instances of evidence submitted for TVL to obtain search warrants |date=10 November 2013 | |
Some idea of the frequency at which warrants are used may also be taken from the result of a recent FOI request.<ref name="Sheffield warrants">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/instances_of_evidence_submitted |title=Instances of evidence submitted for TVL to obtain search warrants |date=10 November 2013 |website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=24 February 2014}}</ref> It was revealed that Sheffield Magistrates granted TV Licensing a total of six search warrants in the years 2011, 2012 and 2013, whilst in Northampton (including Wellingborough and Kettering) only two were granted in this period. |
||
Information provided by the [[Scottish Court Service]] suggests that TV Licensing search warrant applications in Scotland are virtually non-existent. In their response to a FOI request the Scottish Court Service confirmed that no search warrant applications were made to courts in Scotland's two largest cities, [[Glasgow]] and [[Edinburgh]], in the three-and-a-half years between 1 January 2011 and 21 July 2014.<ref name="SCS29JULY14">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/220893/response/544139/attach/2/FoI+Jones+summary+warrants+Jul14.pdf|title=TV Licensing Search Warrant Applications - a Freedom of Information request to Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service|date=21 July 2014}}</ref> |
Information provided by the [[Scottish Court Service]] suggests that TV Licensing search warrant applications in Scotland are virtually non-existent. In their response to a FOI request the Scottish Court Service confirmed that no search warrant applications were made to courts in Scotland's two largest cities, [[Glasgow]] and [[Edinburgh]], in the three-and-a-half years between 1 January 2011 and 21 July 2014.<ref name="SCS29JULY14">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/220893/response/544139/attach/2/FoI+Jones+summary+warrants+Jul14.pdf|title=TV Licensing Search Warrant Applications - a Freedom of Information request to Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service|date=21 July 2014}}</ref> |
||
===Prosecution and fiscal fines=== |
===Prosecution and fiscal fines=== |
||
In 2014, 204,018 people were prosecuted or fined for TV licence offences: 185,580 in England and Wales<ref name="Wigan Prosecutions">{{cite news|last1=Nowell|first1=Andrew|title=TV licence fines branded unfair|url=http://www.wigantoday.net/news/local/tv-licence-fines-branded-unfair-1-7386890|access-date=9 September 2015|work=Wigan Today|date=31 July 2015}}</ref> (173,044 in England and 12,536 in Wales), 4,905 people in Northern Ireland and 15 in the Isle of Man.<ref name="IOM Prosecutions">{{cite news|last1=Darbyshire|first1=Adrian|title=Record number prosecuted for TV licence evasion|url=http://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/isle-of-man-news/record-number-prosecuted-for-tv-licence-evasion-1-7437885|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150906182430/http://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/isle-of-man-news/record-number-prosecuted-for-tv-licence-evasion-1-7437885|url-status=dead|archive-date=6 September 2015|access-date=9 September 2015|work=IOM Today|date=2 September 2015}}</ref> In Scotland, there were 13,486 cases disposed of via an out of court fine and 32 prosecuted via the courts in 2013–2014.<ref name=heraldscotland.com>{{cite news|title=No-one jailed in Scotland for failing to pay TV licence compared to scores in England|url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13584077.No_one_jailed_in_Scotland_for_failing_to_pay_TV_licence_compared_to_scores_in_England/|access-date=9 September 2015|work=Herald Scotland|date=9 August 2015}}</ref> There have been no prosecutions for TV licence offences in Jersey since 2009, all cases having been resolved at [[Courts of Jersey#Parish Hall Enquiry|Parish Hall Enquiry]]. Putting these numbers in perspective, it would appear there are more prosecutions and convictions per capita in Wales than in any other country in the UK.{{citation needed|date=September 2015}} |
In 2014, 204,018 people were prosecuted or fined for TV licence offences: 185,580 in England and Wales<ref name="Wigan Prosecutions">{{cite news|last1=Nowell|first1=Andrew|title=TV licence fines branded unfair|url=http://www.wigantoday.net/news/local/tv-licence-fines-branded-unfair-1-7386890|access-date=9 September 2015|work=Wigan Today|date=31 July 2015|archive-date=30 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150930141548/http://www.wigantoday.net/news/local/tv-licence-fines-branded-unfair-1-7386890|url-status=dead}}</ref> (173,044 in England and 12,536 in Wales), 4,905 people in Northern Ireland and 15 in the Isle of Man.<ref name="IOM Prosecutions">{{cite news|last1=Darbyshire|first1=Adrian|title=Record number prosecuted for TV licence evasion|url=http://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/isle-of-man-news/record-number-prosecuted-for-tv-licence-evasion-1-7437885|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150906182430/http://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/isle-of-man-news/record-number-prosecuted-for-tv-licence-evasion-1-7437885|url-status=dead|archive-date=6 September 2015|access-date=9 September 2015|work=IOM Today|date=2 September 2015}}</ref> In Scotland, there were 13,486 cases disposed of via an out of court fine and 32 prosecuted via the courts in 2013–2014.<ref name=heraldscotland.com>{{cite news|title=No-one jailed in Scotland for failing to pay TV licence compared to scores in England|url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13584077.No_one_jailed_in_Scotland_for_failing_to_pay_TV_licence_compared_to_scores_in_England/|access-date=9 September 2015|work=Herald Scotland|date=9 August 2015}}</ref> There have been no prosecutions for TV licence offences in Jersey since 2009, all cases having been resolved at [[Courts of Jersey#Parish Hall Enquiry|Parish Hall Enquiry]]. Putting these numbers in perspective, it would appear there are more prosecutions and convictions per capita in Wales than in any other country in the UK.{{citation needed|date=September 2015}} |
||
Around 70% of TV licence evaders are female.<ref name="Derby Tel Prosecutions">{{cite news|title=1,500 Derbyshire people sign petition to scrap TV licence fee|url=http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/1-500-Derbyshire-people-sign-petition-scrap-TV/story-26582024-detail/story.html|access-date=9 September 2015|work=Derby Telegraph|date=27 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150827175147/http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/1-500-Derbyshire-people-sign-petition-scrap-TV/story-26582024-detail/story.html|archive-date=27 August 2015|url-status=dead |
Around 70% of TV licence evaders are female.<ref name="Derby Tel Prosecutions">{{cite news|title=1,500 Derbyshire people sign petition to scrap TV licence fee|url=http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/1-500-Derbyshire-people-sign-petition-scrap-TV/story-26582024-detail/story.html|access-date=9 September 2015|work=Derby Telegraph|date=27 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150827175147/http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/1-500-Derbyshire-people-sign-petition-scrap-TV/story-26582024-detail/story.html|archive-date=27 August 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> This 30%-70% male/female ratio is pretty much constant across the whole of the UK and is at odds with statistics for other small crimes .<ref name="MOJ bulletin">{{cite web|title=Criminal Court Statistics Quarterly, England and Wales July to September 2014|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/388367/bulletin-july-to-september-2014.pdf|website=www.gov.uk|publisher=Ministry of Justice|access-date=11 September 2015}}</ref>{{rp|Table B4a}} This gender imbalance has not always been the case. In 1980, there were roughly similar numbers of men and women proceeded against for TV licence evasion. Since then the proportion of female to male defendants has risen steadily.<ref name=radstats>{{cite journal|last1=Gordon|first1=David|title=Television, crime and poverty|journal=Radical Statistics|date=1994|volume=57|pages=3–8|url=https://www.radstats.org.uk/no057/gordonpantazis.pdf|access-date=10 November 2015}}</ref> |
||
In 2014, 24,025 prosecutions that were commenced by the BBC did not result in conviction (over one-in-ten cases in England and Wales).{{citation needed|date=December 2019}} |
In 2014, 24,025 prosecutions that were commenced by the BBC did not result in conviction (over one-in-ten cases in England and Wales).{{citation needed|date=December 2019}} |
||
Licence evaders are liable for prosecution and a fine of up to £1,000 in the UK.<ref name="UKGOV">{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/tv-licence|title=TV Licence| |
Licence evaders are liable for prosecution and a fine of up to £1,000 in the UK.<ref name="UKGOV">{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/tv-licence|title=TV Licence|website=Gov.uk|access-date=20 February 2014}}</ref> However, because the licensing regime covers six different jurisdictions, the legal processes and penalties for the crime of TV licence evasion differ markedly across the British Islands. The average fine is £170 in England and Wales,{{citation needed|date=December 2019}} £70 in Jersey, £80 in Northern Ireland, £75 in Scotland (out-of-court disposal)<ref name="heraldscotland.com" /> and £200 in the Isle of Man.<ref name="IOM Prosecutions" /> |
||
Television licence evasion is not punishable by a period of imprisonment ''per se'', but if convicted evaders refuse to pay the fine they were ordered to pay, or are incapable of paying it, a period of imprisonment may be imposed as a "last resort". The length of stay is decided by the amount owed. In England and Wales, five people were given an average of 19 days in 2018<ref name="DCMS Consultation 2020">{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/consultation-on-decriminalising-tv-licence-evasion/consultation-on-decriminalising-tv-licence-evasion|title=Consultation on decriminalising TV licence evasion|publisher=UK Government|access-date=5 April 2020}}</ref> (compared to 20 days in 2014, 32 in 2013 and 51 in 2012).<ref name="heraldscotland.com" /> There were no custodial sentences imposed during the five-year period 2009–10 to 2013–14 in Scotland or in Jersey. |
|||
The British Government proposed decriminalising licence evasion, but the proposition was turned down by a House of Lords vote by 178 to 175 in February 2015.<ref name=RTS>{{cite web|title=House of Lords blocks attempt to decriminalise licence fee non-payment|url=https://rts.org.uk/article/house-lords-blocks-attempt-decriminalise-licence-fee-non-payment|website=rts.org.uk|date=6 February 2015|publisher=Royal Television Society|access-date=9 September 2015}}</ref> Behavioural research conducted for the BBC predicted that if |
The British Government proposed decriminalising licence evasion, but the proposition was turned down by a House of Lords vote by 178 to 175 in February 2015.<ref name=RTS>{{cite web|title=House of Lords blocks attempt to decriminalise licence fee non-payment|url=https://rts.org.uk/article/house-lords-blocks-attempt-decriminalise-licence-fee-non-payment|website=rts.org.uk|date=6 February 2015|publisher=Royal Television Society|access-date=9 September 2015}}</ref> Behavioural research conducted for the BBC predicted that if television licence evasion was decriminalised and the £1,000 maximum fine was replaced by a civil penalty of over £300, evasion rates would increase. The same report recommended to the [[Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport|DCMS]] that the current system should remain<ref name="Perry Review">{{cite web|title=TV Licence Fee Enforcement Review|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/445212/166926_Perry_Review_Text-L-PB.pdf|website=Gov.uk|publisher=Department for Media Culture & Sport|access-date=9 September 2015}}</ref> while [[Nicky Morgan|Baroness Morgan]] admitted decriminalisation "would have an impact on BBC funding."<ref name="iNews TV Licence Fee">{{cite web |url=https://inews.co.uk/news/media/tv-licence-fee-jail-threat-dropped-bbc-decriminalisation-1385286 |title=TV licence fee: Jail threat to be dropped |date=5 February 2020 |publisher=JPIMedia Publications |access-date=5 April 2020}}</ref> |
||
====England and Wales==== |
====England and Wales==== |
||
[[File:Pontefract Magistrates' Court.JPG|thumb |
[[File:Pontefract Magistrates' Court.JPG|thumb|Pontefract Magistrates' Court. In England and Wales, cases involving TV licence evasion are held at magistrates' courts.]] |
||
In England and Wales, prosecutions are the responsibility of the BBC and are carried out by its contractor, Capita, in magistrates' courts<ref name="TVL Briefing"/> In England and Wales TV Licensing has a maximum of 26 weeks to lay information to court after receiving information regarding unlicensed use of a TV from its enquiry officers.<ref name="Prosecution flow">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licensing_prosecution_time_li#incoming-533065|title=TV Licensing Prosecution Time Limits|date=28 May 2014|publisher=whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=18 March 2015}}</ref> During this period, and a maximum of 24 hours before a decision to prosecute a householder is taken, TV Licensing will check if a licence has been purchased. The decision to prosecute usually takes place 12–14 weeks from receiving the enquiry officer's report. TV Licensing serves documents on defendants four to six weeks prior to a court hearing. A final check to see if a TV licence has been purchased is made a maximum of two days before the hearing. |
|||
In England and Wales, prosecutions are the responsibility of the BBC and are carried out by its contractor, Capita, in magistrates' courts<ref name="TVL Briefing" /> In England and Wales TV Licensing has a maximum of 26 weeks to lay information to court after receiving information regarding unlicensed use of a TV from its enquiry officers.<ref name="Prosecution flow">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licensing_prosecution_time_li#incoming-533065|title=TV Licensing Prosecution Time Limits|date=28 May 2014|website=whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=18 March 2015}}</ref> During this period, and a maximum of 24 hours before a decision to prosecute a householder is taken, TV Licensing will check if a licence has been purchased. The decision to prosecute usually takes place 12–14 weeks from receiving the enquiry officer's report. TV Licensing serves documents on defendants four to six weeks prior to a court hearing. A final check to see if a TV licence has been purchased is made a maximum of two days before the hearing. |
|||
Licence fee evasion makes up around one-tenth of all cases prosecuted in magistrates' courts<ref name="Full Fact Licence Fee">{{cite web|url=https://fullfact.org/news/do-tv-licence-offences-account-one-ten-court-cases/ |title=Do TV licence offences account for one in ten court cases |date=22 August 2013 |publisher=Full Fact |access-date=5 April 2020}}</ref> and 0.3% of court time.<ref name="Perry reference BBC">{{cite news| url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50800128 |title=BBC: TV licence fee decriminalisation being considered |work=BBC News |date=15 December 2019 |access-date=5 April 2020}}</ref> Proceedings for TV Licence evasion form a high percentage of all prosecutions carried out against women – over a third of all cases against women in England and Wales in 2013 were for this offence.<ref name="Number of TV prosecutions">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/numbers_of_prosecutions_for_tv_l#incoming-543026|title=Numbers of prosecutions for TV licensing issues|date=2 July 2014|publisher=whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=29 July 2014}}</ref> By comparison, TV licence evasion made up around 5% of prosecutions against men in 2013 in England and Wales.<ref name="Number of TV prosecutions"/> |
|||
Licence fee evasion makes up around one-tenth of all cases prosecuted in magistrates' courts<ref name="Full Fact Licence Fee">{{cite web|url=https://fullfact.org/news/do-tv-licence-offences-account-one-ten-court-cases/ |title=Do TV licence offences account for one in ten court cases |date=22 August 2013 |publisher=Full Fact |access-date=5 April 2020}}</ref> and 0.3% of court time.<ref name="Perry reference BBC">{{cite news| url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50800128 |title=BBC: TV licence fee decriminalisation being considered |work=BBC News |date=15 December 2019 |access-date=5 April 2020}}</ref> Proceedings for TV Licence evasion form a high percentage of all prosecutions carried out against women – over a third of all cases against women in England and Wales in 2013 were for this offence.<ref name="Number of TV prosecutions">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/numbers_of_prosecutions_for_tv_l#incoming-543026|title=Numbers of prosecutions for TV licensing issues|date=2 July 2014|website=whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=29 July 2014}}</ref> By comparison, TV licence evasion made up around 5% of prosecutions against men in 2013 in England and Wales.<ref name="Number of TV prosecutions" /> |
|||
The maximum [[fine (penalty)|fine]] for this offence of up to £1,000 is frequently publicised by TV Licensing to maximise deterrence.<ref name="press office">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/keyfacts/stories/licencefee2.shtml|title=TV Licence Fee: briefing|publisher=BBC|access-date=20 February 2014}}</ref> In reality, magistrates rarely impose the maximum fines allowed to them by law. For example, during the year 2005–6, the average fine including costs was approximately £153<ref name="BBC270407">[https://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2007/SR2007000374_Prosecution_Statistics_05_06.pdf BBC Response to Freedom of Information Request, 27/04/2007] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080528025129/http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2007/SR2007000374_Prosecution_Statistics_05_06.pdf |date=28 May 2008 }}</ref> (slightly more than the cost of a licence). According to a 2013 TV Licensing briefing document, the level of fines and costs imposed by magistrates' courts vary considerably between different regions of England and Wales.<ref name="TVL Briefing"/> In North Wales average fines and costs were stated to be £108.90 whilst offenders in the English Midlands area of "Black Country, Staffordshire & West Mercia" were required to pay £197.70. |
|||
The maximum [[fine (penalty)|fine]] for this offence of up to £1,000 is frequently publicised by TV Licensing to maximise deterrence.<ref name="press office">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/keyfacts/stories/licencefee2.shtml|title=TV Licence Fee: briefing|publisher=BBC|access-date=20 February 2014}}</ref> In reality, magistrates rarely impose the maximum fines allowed to them by law. For example, during the year 2005–6, the average fine including costs was approximately £153<ref name="BBC270407">{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2007/SR2007000374_Prosecution_Statistics_05_06.pdf |title=BBC Response to Freedom of Information Request, 27/04/2007 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080528025129/http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/freedom_of_information/selected_requests_and_responses/2007/SR2007000374_Prosecution_Statistics_05_06.pdf |archivedate=28 May 2008}}</ref> (slightly more than the cost of a licence). According to a 2013 TV Licensing briefing document, the level of fines and costs imposed by magistrates' courts vary considerably between different regions of England and Wales.<ref name="TVL Briefing" /> In North Wales average fines and costs were stated to be £108.90 whilst offenders in the English Midlands area of "Black Country, Staffordshire & West Mercia" were required to pay £197.70. |
|||
Magistrates take into account the financial situation of the defendant when imposing fines.<ref name="magistrates sentencing">{{cite web|url=http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/MCSG_Update9_October_2012.pdf|title=Magistrates' Court Sentencing Guidelines|publisher=Sentencing Guidelines Council|access-date=4 March 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140304163220/http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/MCSG_Update9_October_2012.pdf|archive-date=4 March 2014|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> They also take into account: whether it is a first offence; if a TV licence has been purchased and the length of time a defendant was unlicensed. The following are regarded as 'factors indicating lower culpability' which can result in mitigation of the sentence:<ref name="magistrates sentencing"/> |
|||
Magistrates take into account the financial situation of the defendant when imposing fines.<ref name="magistrates sentencing">{{cite web|url=http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/MCSG_Update9_October_2012.pdf|title=Magistrates' Court Sentencing Guidelines |publisher=Sentencing Guidelines Council |access-date=4 March 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140304163220/http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/MCSG_Update9_October_2012.pdf |archive-date=4 March 2014 |url-status=dead}}</ref> They also take into account: whether it is a first offence; if a television licence has been purchased and the length of time a defendant was unlicensed. The following are regarded as 'factors indicating lower culpability' which can result in mitigation of the sentence:<ref name="magistrates sentencing" /> |
|||
* Accidental oversight or belief licence held |
* Accidental oversight or belief licence held |
||
* Confusion of responsibility |
* Confusion of responsibility |
||
* Licence immediately obtained |
* Licence immediately obtained |
||
A guilty plea may also result in a lower fine. |
A guilty plea may also result in a lower fine. |
||
According to TV Licensing: "many evaders claim that an enquiry officer told them they would not be prosecuted if they bought a licence". However, it is also pointed out that "it is a disciplinary offence for an enquiry officer to say or suggest this".<ref name="TVL Briefing"/> Nevertheless, the same TV Licensing briefing does say that: "first-time evaders may escape prosecution if they purchase a licence immediately".<ref name="TVL Briefing">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licensing_briefing_court_trai|title=TV Licensing briefing – court training time, costs and information|date=4 September 2013| |
According to TV Licensing: "many evaders claim that an enquiry officer told them they would not be prosecuted if they bought a licence". However, it is also pointed out that "it is a disciplinary offence for an enquiry officer to say or suggest this".<ref name="TVL Briefing" /> Nevertheless, the same TV Licensing briefing does say that: "first-time evaders may escape prosecution if they purchase a licence immediately".<ref name="TVL Briefing">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licensing_briefing_court_trai|title=TV Licensing briefing – court training time, costs and information|date=4 September 2013|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=20 February 2014}}</ref> |
||
The UK government has stated that: "Most TV licensing cases that are heard by magistrates courts are uncontested and the case is therefore often resolved in the defendant's absence."<ref name="uncontested">{{cite web|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm140324/text/140324w0004.htm|title=Daily Hansard – Written Answers|publisher=UK Parliament|access-date=7 April 2014}}</ref> |
The UK government has stated that: "Most TV licensing cases that are heard by magistrates courts are uncontested and the case is therefore often resolved in the defendant's absence."<ref name="uncontested">{{cite web|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm140324/text/140324w0004.htm|title=Daily Hansard – Written Answers|publisher=UK Parliament|access-date=7 April 2014}}</ref> |
||
The [[Magistrates' Association]] has been calling for the decriminalisation of |
The [[Magistrates' Association]] has been calling for the decriminalisation of television licence evasion for nearly twenty years, concerned that evaders are punished disproportionately.<ref name="prosecutions2">{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9154568/Thousands-in-court-every-week-for-not-having-a-TV-licence.html|title=Thousands in court every week for not having a TV licence|newspaper=www.telegraph.co.uk|access-date=22 March 2013|location=London|date=20 March 2012}}</ref> The [[Adam Smith Institute]] has published a report calling for the BBC to give up the licence fee. One of the reasons given is the licence fee criminalises poor people, in particular women with children living on welfare. The report claims that such people could be liable to be re-prosecuted almost immediately unless they dispose of their TVs.<ref name="Adam Smith">{{cite web |url=https://static1.squarespace.com/enwiki/static/56eddde762cd9413e151ac92/t/57b2f058e4fcb5df8e527254/1471344733469/BBCreport%282%29.pdf |title=Global Player or Subsidy Junkie? Decision Time for the BBC |publisher=Adam Smith Institute |access-date=5 April 2020 }}</ref> In fact, a National Audit Office report from 2002 stated that "significant numbers of offenders do not buy a licence following conviction".<ref name="NAO">{{cite web|url=http://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2002/05/0102821.pdf|title=The BBC: Collecting the television licence fee|publisher=National Audit Office|access-date=7 November 2013}}</ref> |
||
TV Licensing is managed as a sales operation<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.capita.co.uk/about-us/Pages/BBCTVLicensing.aspx |title=Managing TV licensing for the BBC |publisher=Capita |access-date=28 January 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120311223854/http://www.capita.co.uk/about-us/Pages/BBCTVLicensing.aspx |archive-date=11 March 2012 |url-status=dead |
TV Licensing is managed as a sales operation<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.capita.co.uk/about-us/Pages/BBCTVLicensing.aspx |title=Managing TV licensing for the BBC |publisher=Capita |access-date=28 January 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120311223854/http://www.capita.co.uk/about-us/Pages/BBCTVLicensing.aspx |archive-date=11 March 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref> and its officers are motivated by commission payments.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/1473/tvleo.gif|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120818205420/http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/1473/tvleo.gif|url-status=dead|archive-date=18 August 2012|title=Job Advertisement |publisher=Capita|access-date=28 January 2012}}</ref> In 2005, a TV Licensing officer was found guilty of [[false accounting]] and [[perverting the course of justice]] after he deliberately [[forgery|forged]] the confessions of four people to obtain commission payments.<ref>{{cite web|author=WalesOnline|date=24 September 2005|title=TV licence worker guilty of pay scam|url=https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/tv-licence-worker-guilty-pay-2379161}}</ref> In April 2012 an Essex man convicted of TV licence evasion had his conviction overturned when TV Licensing were unable to confirm the validity of video evidence they presented in the original trial.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thurrockgazette.co.uk/news/9867463.Man_wins_TV_licence_battle/ |title=Man wins TV licence battle |date=12 August 2012 |publisher=Thurrock Gazette|access-date=18 August 2012}}</ref> |
||
According to TV Licensing, 30% of those prosecuted for |
According to TV Licensing, 30% of those prosecuted for television licence evasion in 2012 were found to have satellite or cable subscriptions.<ref name="TVL Briefing" /> |
||
In 2018, there were a total of 129,446 cases in England and Wales where |
In 2018, there were a total of 129,446 cases in England and Wales where television licence evasion was the principal offence. Of these, 121,203 people were convicted.<ref name="E&W stats 2018">{{cite web |title=Criminal Justice System statistics quarterly: December 2018 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-december-2018 |website=www.gov.uk |publisher=Ministry of Justice |access-date=19 June 2019}}</ref> |
||
Although those found guilty of |
Although those found guilty of television licence evasion cannot be sent to prison for that offence, if they default on their fine, they can be imprisoned. For example, in 2018, five people were imprisoned in England and Wales for defaulting on fines imposed for television licence evasion.<ref name="DCMS Consultation 2020" /> |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|+ Number of offences under Wireless Telegraphy Acts in England and Wales<ref name=CJS>{{cite web|title=Criminal justice statistics quarterly: December 2013 - Outcomes by offence spreadsheet|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-statistics-quarterly-december-2013|website=www.gov.uk|publisher=UK Government|access-date=1 October 2015}}</ref><br>(overwhelmingly made up of |
|+ Number of offences under Wireless Telegraphy Acts in England and Wales<ref name=CJS>{{cite web|title=Criminal justice statistics quarterly: December 2013 - Outcomes by offence spreadsheet|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-statistics-quarterly-december-2013|website=www.gov.uk|date=30 June 2014 |publisher=UK Government|access-date=1 October 2015}}</ref><br />(overwhelmingly made up of television licensing cases)<ref name="Perry Review" /> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
! !! 2009 !! 2010 !! 2011 !! 2012 !! 2013 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| '''Number of proceedings''' || 166,944 || 164,462 || 170,650 || 193,049 || 178,332 |
| '''Number of proceedings''' || 166,944 || 164,462 || 170,650 || 193,049 || 178,332 |
||
Line 412: | Line 398: | ||
====Northern Ireland==== |
====Northern Ireland==== |
||
In Northern Ireland, prosecutions are the responsibility of the BBC and are carried out by its contractor, Capita, in magistrates' courts.<ref name="Northern Ireland">{{cite web|url=http://www.courtsni.gov.uk/en-GB/Publications/Public_Consultation/Documents/Costs%20in%20criminal%20cases%20(magistrates’%20courts)%20-%20Summary%20of%20responses%20to%20the%20consultation/Summary%20of%20responses%20to%20costs%20consultation.pdf|title=Magistrates' Courts Rules Committee Costs in criminal cases (magistrates' courts)|publisher=Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service |access-date=22 July 2014}}</ref> The prosecution process is very similar to that of England and Wales.<ref name="Prosecution flow"/> |
In Northern Ireland, prosecutions are the responsibility of the BBC and are carried out by its contractor, Capita, in magistrates' courts.<ref name="Northern Ireland">{{cite web|url=http://www.courtsni.gov.uk/en-GB/Publications/Public_Consultation/Documents/Costs%20in%20criminal%20cases%20(magistrates’%20courts)%20-%20Summary%20of%20responses%20to%20the%20consultation/Summary%20of%20responses%20to%20costs%20consultation.pdf|title=Magistrates' Courts Rules Committee Costs in criminal cases (magistrates' courts)|publisher=Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service |access-date=22 July 2014}}</ref> The prosecution process is very similar to that of England and Wales.<ref name="Prosecution flow" /> |
||
In 2008, 5,272 people in Northern Ireland were prosecuted for non-payment of the television licence fee of which 4,118 were fined. The corresponding figures for 2007 were 5,901 people prosecuted and 4,464 fines imposed.<ref name="NI prosecutions">{{cite web|title=Parliamentary Business|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm100203/text/100203w0016.htm|website=www.parliament.uk|publisher=UK Government|access-date=11 August 2015}}</ref> |
In 2008, 5,272 people in Northern Ireland were prosecuted for non-payment of the television licence fee of which 4,118 were fined. The corresponding figures for 2007 were 5,901 people prosecuted and 4,464 fines imposed.<ref name="NI prosecutions">{{cite web|title=Parliamentary Business|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm100203/text/100203w0016.htm|website=www.parliament.uk|publisher=UK Government|access-date=11 August 2015}}</ref> |
||
====Scotland==== |
====Scotland==== |
||
[[File:Old Courthouse, Kilmarnock - geograph.org.uk - 1610366.jpg|thumb |
[[File:Old Courthouse, Kilmarnock - geograph.org.uk - 1610366.jpg|thumb|Procurator Fiscal's Office in Kilmarnock. In Scotland, the decision to prosecute television licensing cases is taken by the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Office. Very few cases come to court in Scotland.]] |
||
In Scotland, the [[Crown Office|Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Office]] undertakes prosecutions for TV licence evasion.<ref name="Procurator">{{cite web|url=http://www.copfs.gov.uk/involved-in-a-case/involved-in-a-case|title=Involved in a case|publisher=Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Office |access-date=21 July 2014}}</ref> Very few cases in Scotland come to court. |
|||
In Scotland, the [[Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service|Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Office]] undertakes prosecutions for TV licence evasion.<ref name="Procurator">{{cite web|url=http://www.copfs.gov.uk/involved-in-a-case/involved-in-a-case|title=Involved in a case|publisher=Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Office |access-date=21 July 2014}}</ref> Very few cases in Scotland come to court. |
|||
Instead of prosecution, in Scotland, TV licence fee evaders are usually asked by the Procurator Fiscal to pay a [[fiscal fine]] and a small number are simply given a warning. For example, in 2013–2014, just ten cases reached the courts whereas 12,969 people were asked to pay a fiscal fine, no action was taken in 275 cases, and 174 people were sent a warning. In addition, two people were asked to pay compensation and one person was offered the chance to pay a combination of fiscal fine and compensation.<ref name="fiscal fines">{{cite web|url=http://www.copfs.gov.uk/foi/responses-we-have-made-to-foi-requests/839-tv-licence-fiscal-fines|title=TV Licence – Fiscal Fines |publisher=COPFS|access-date=21 October 2014}}</ref> In 2013–14, almost all of the fiscal fines (12,603 out of 12,969) were at the level 2 rate of £75.<ref name="fiscal fines"/> In 2014–15, 13% of all fiscal fines in Scotland were issued for Communications Act offences, stated to be mainly TV licensing offences. The total number of fiscal fines imposed for these offences was 4,874.<ref name="Fiscal fines 2014-15">{{cite web |title=CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN SCOTLAND 2014-15 |url=https://www.gov.scot/publications/criminal-proceedings-scotland-2014-15/pages/19/ |website=www.gov.scot |publisher=Scottish Government |access-date=28 March 2019}}</ref> In 2015–16, 7,962 fiscal fines were issued for Communications Act offences, of which 72% were issued to women.<ref name="Fiscal fines 2015-16">{{cite web |title=CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN SCOTLAND 2015-16 |url=https://www.gov.scot/publications/criminal-proceedings-scotland-2015-16/pages/37/ |website=www.gov.scot |publisher=Scottish Government |access-date=28 March 2019}}</ref> In 2016–17, there were a total of 4,799 fiscal fines imposed for Communications Act offences.<ref name="Fiscal fines 2016-17">{{cite web |title=CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN SCOTLAND 2016-17 |url=https://www.gov.scot/publications/criminal-proceedings-scotland-2016-17/pages/51/|website=www.gov.scot |publisher=Scottish Government |access-date=28 March 2019}}</ref> |
|||
Instead of prosecution, in Scotland, television licence fee evaders are usually asked by the Procurator Fiscal to pay a [[fiscal fine]] and a small number are simply given a warning. For example, in 2013–2014, just ten cases reached the courts whereas 12,969 people were asked to pay a fiscal fine, no action was taken in 275 cases and 174 people were sent a warning. In addition, two people were asked to pay compensation and one person was offered the chance to pay a combination of fiscal fine and compensation.<ref name="fiscal fines">{{cite web|url=http://www.copfs.gov.uk/foi/responses-we-have-made-to-foi-requests/839-tv-licence-fiscal-fines|title=TV Licence – Fiscal Fines |publisher=COPFS|access-date=21 October 2014}}</ref> In 2013–14, almost all of the fiscal fines (12,603 out of 12,969) were at the level 2 rate of £75.<ref name="fiscal fines" /> In 2014–15, 13% of all fiscal fines in Scotland were issued for Communications Act offences, stated to be mainly television licensing offences. The total number of fiscal fines imposed for these offences was 4,874.<ref name="Fiscal fines 2014-15">{{cite web |title=Criminal Proceedings in Scotland 2014-15 |url=https://www.gov.scot/publications/criminal-proceedings-scotland-2014-15/pages/19/ |website=www.gov.scot |publisher=Scottish Government |access-date=28 March 2019}}</ref> In 2015–16, 7,962 fiscal fines were issued for Communications Act offences, of which 72% were issued to women.<ref name="Fiscal fines 2015-16">{{cite web |title=Criminal Proceedings in Scotland 2015-16 |url=https://www.gov.scot/publications/criminal-proceedings-scotland-2015-16/pages/37/ |website=www.gov.scot |publisher=Scottish Government |access-date=28 March 2019}}</ref> In 2016–17, there were a total of 4,799 fiscal fines imposed for Communications Act offences.<ref name="Fiscal fines 2016-17">{{cite web |title=Criminal Proceedings in Scotland 2016-17 |url=https://www.gov.scot/publications/criminal-proceedings-scotland-2016-17/pages/51/|website=www.gov.scot |publisher=Scottish Government |access-date=28 March 2019}}</ref> |
|||
In the years 2016–17 and 2017–18, prosecutions against suspected licence fee evaders were reduced to single figures. In 2016–17, 5 people were prosecuted of which 4 were found guilty. In the following year there were 6 prosecutions resulting in 5 guilty verdicts.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gov.scot/publications/foi-201900001045/|title=Criminal proceedings regarding TV Licence evasion: FOI release|date=15 May 2019|website=www.gov.scot|access-date=2019-06-04}}</ref> |
|||
In the years 2016–17 and 2017–18, prosecutions against suspected licence fee evaders were reduced to single figures. In 2016–17, 5 people were prosecuted of which 4 were found guilty. In the following year there were 6 prosecutions resulting in 5 guilty verdicts.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gov.scot/publications/foi-201900001045/|title=Criminal proceedings regarding TV Licence evasion: FOI release|date=15 May 2019|website=www.gov.scot|access-date=4 June 2019}}</ref> |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|+ Outcomes of TV licensing charges reported to the Procurator Fiscal.<ref name="fiscal fines"/> |
|+ Outcomes of TV licensing charges reported to the Procurator Fiscal.<ref name="fiscal fines" /> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
! !! 2010-11 !! 2011-12 !! 2012-13 !! 2013-14 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| '''No action''' || 498 || 865 || 599 || 275 |
| '''No action''' || 498 || 865 || 599 || 275 |
||
Line 439: | Line 426: | ||
====Isle of Man==== |
====Isle of Man==== |
||
On the Isle of Man, prosecutions are prepared by Capita on behalf of the BBC<ref name="Ask script IOM">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/copy_of_ask_help_script#incoming-571034|title=Copy of Ask Help script|date=16 August 2014| |
On the Isle of Man, prosecutions are prepared by Capita on behalf of the BBC<ref name="Ask script IOM">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/copy_of_ask_help_script#incoming-571034|title=Copy of Ask Help script|date=16 August 2014|website=Whatdotheyknow.com |page=994|access-date=30 October 2014}}</ref> although they use Manx qualified lawyers<ref name=Tynwald/> in the Magistrates' Court. The maximum fine is £1,000. |
||
In a submission to [[Tynwald]] (the Isle of Man Government) regarding prosecution for non-payment of the BBC licence fee in the Crown dependencies, the BBC stated 59 cases were laid to court in the Isle of Man between 2007 and 2009, although "these figures include cases where no further action may have been taken (e.g. because a writ was not served or the case was withdrawn)".<ref name="Tynwald" /> |
|||
In a submission to [[Tynwald]] (the Isle of Man Government) regarding prosecution for non-payment of the BBC licence fee in the Crown dependencies, the BBC stated 59 cases were laid to court in the Isle of Man between 2007 and 2009 although "these figures include cases where no further action may have been taken (e.g. because a writ was not served or the case was withdrawn)".<ref name=Tynwald/> |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|+ Number of offences prosecuted of "no television/radio licence" recorded by the Constabulary of the Isle of Man<ref name="IOM Chief Constable's Annual Reports">{{cite web|title=Isle of Man Constabulary|url=https://www.gov.im/about-the-government/departments/home-affairs/isle-of-man-constabulary/|publisher=Isle of Man Government|access-date=28 September 2016}}</ref> |
|+ Number of offences prosecuted of "no television/radio licence" recorded by the Constabulary of the Isle of Man<ref name="IOM Chief Constable's Annual Reports">{{cite web|title=Isle of Man Constabulary|url=https://www.gov.im/about-the-government/departments/home-affairs/isle-of-man-constabulary/|publisher=Isle of Man Government|access-date=28 September 2016}}</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
! !! 2011–12 !! 2012–13 !! 2013–14 !! 2014–15 !! 2015–16 !! 2016–17 !! 2017–18 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| '''Number of prosecutions''' || 0|| 0 || 93 || 0 || 119 || 68 || 14 |
| '''Number of prosecutions''' || 0|| 0 || 93 || 0 || 119 || 68 || 14 |
||
Line 456: | Line 444: | ||
Initial investigations into licence fee evasion are carried out by Capita employees as in the UK. However, prosecutions are carried out by police and law officers. According to the States of Guernsey: "it appears the TV Licensing Inspectors visit the island once every three to four years, therefore offences are usually reported to us following these visits."<ref name="Guernsey 2015">{{cite web|title=Request regarding TV licence evasion|url=https://gov.gg/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=108544&p=0|website=gov.ge|publisher=States of Guernsey|access-date=16 April 2018}}</ref> In June 2013, Capita's television licensing enforcement officers visited Guernsey where according to the BBC, they found "130 people illegally watching TV without a licence".<ref name="Guernsey enforcement">{{cite news|title=Guernsey residents face TV licence fines|work=BBC News|date=22 July 2013|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-guernsey-23404873|access-date=28 July 2015}}</ref> The Guernsey Police Annual Report 2014 states that no offences of "television receiver without a licence – install/use" were recorded in 2014 as opposed to two such cases in 2013.<ref name="Guernsey Police Report">{{cite web|title=Bailiwick of Guernsey Law Enforcement Annual Report for 2014|url=http://www.guernsey.police.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=96146&p=0|publisher=Guernsey Police|access-date=9 July 2015}}</ref> |
Initial investigations into licence fee evasion are carried out by Capita employees as in the UK. However, prosecutions are carried out by police and law officers. According to the States of Guernsey: "it appears the TV Licensing Inspectors visit the island once every three to four years, therefore offences are usually reported to us following these visits."<ref name="Guernsey 2015">{{cite web|title=Request regarding TV licence evasion|url=https://gov.gg/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=108544&p=0|website=gov.ge|publisher=States of Guernsey|access-date=16 April 2018}}</ref> In June 2013, Capita's television licensing enforcement officers visited Guernsey where according to the BBC, they found "130 people illegally watching TV without a licence".<ref name="Guernsey enforcement">{{cite news|title=Guernsey residents face TV licence fines|work=BBC News|date=22 July 2013|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-guernsey-23404873|access-date=28 July 2015}}</ref> The Guernsey Police Annual Report 2014 states that no offences of "television receiver without a licence – install/use" were recorded in 2014 as opposed to two such cases in 2013.<ref name="Guernsey Police Report">{{cite web|title=Bailiwick of Guernsey Law Enforcement Annual Report for 2014|url=http://www.guernsey.police.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=96146&p=0|publisher=Guernsey Police|access-date=9 July 2015}}</ref> |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|+ Number of offences of "television receiver without a licence – install/use"<br>recorded by the police in Guernsey<ref name="Guernsey Police Reports">{{cite web|title=Publications|url=http://www.guernsey.police.uk/article/6078/Publications|publisher=Guernsey Police|access-date=28 July 2015}}</ref> |
|+ Number of offences of "television receiver without a licence – install/use"<br />recorded by the police in Guernsey<ref name="Guernsey Police Reports">{{cite web|title=Publications|url=http://www.guernsey.police.uk/article/6078/Publications|publisher=Guernsey Police|access-date=28 July 2015}}</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
! !! 2005 !! 2006 !! 2007 !! 2008 !! 2009 !! 2010 !! 2011 !! 2012 !! 2013 !! 2014 !! 2015 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| '''Number of offences''' || 18 || 15 || 10 || 0 || 0 || 9 || 0 || 0 || 2 || 0 || Offence not listed |
| '''Number of offences''' || 18 || 15 || 10 || 0 || 0 || 9 || 0 || 0 || 2 || 0 || Offence not listed |
||
Line 464: | Line 452: | ||
====Jersey==== |
====Jersey==== |
||
According to the States of Jersey government: "Enforcement in Jersey is initiated by the TV Licensing function of the BBC which passes information onto the Jersey Police who then conduct their own investigation. A fine for a |
According to the States of Jersey government: "Enforcement in Jersey is initiated by the TV Licensing function of the BBC which passes information onto the Jersey Police who then conduct their own investigation. A fine for a television licensing offence can only be levied following successful prosecution at the Magistrate's Court: the Centenier does not have the power to summarily levy a fine for a television licensing offence at a Parish Hall Enquiry."<ref name="Jersey 2015">{{cite web|title=Television licence offence prosecutions and convictions (FOI)|url=https://www.gov.je/Government/Pages/StatesReports.aspx?ReportID=1592|website=gov.je|publisher=States of Jersey|access-date=16 April 2018}}</ref> |
||
The maximum fines for this offence in Jersey is £500.<ref name="channel"/> Prosecutions are carried out by the [[Centenier]]. According to the BBC: "in the case of Jersey we can say that between 2007 and 2009 41 cases were laid to court".<ref name=Tynwald/> In a response to a freedom of information request, the [[States of Jersey Police]] stated: "in 2014 there were fourteen prosecutions for having |
The maximum fines for this offence in Jersey is £500.<ref name="channel" /> Prosecutions are carried out by the [[Centenier]]. According to the BBC: "in the case of Jersey we can say that between 2007 and 2009 41 cases were laid to court".<ref name=Tynwald/> In a response to a freedom of information request, the [[States of Jersey Police]] stated: "in 2014 there were fourteen prosecutions for having 'no TV licence'. All received cautions at the [[Courts of Jersey#Parish Hall Enquiry|Parish Hall]]. Of the 14, eight were male and six were female. There were no prosecutions in 2015."<ref name="Jersey Police 2016">{{cite web|title=Freedom of Information|url=http://www.jersey.police.uk/media/385374/tv-licences-250516.pdf|website=www.jersey.police.uk/|publisher=States of Jersey Police|access-date=27 September 2016}}</ref> There were no prosections in 2016.<ref name="Jersey 2016">{{cite web|title=Television licensing prosecutions (FOI)|url=https://www.gov.je/Government/Pages/StatesReports.aspx?ReportID=2811|website=gov.je|publisher=States of Jersey|access-date=16 April 2018}}</ref> |
||
==== Enforcement overview==== |
==== Enforcement overview==== |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|+ Enforcement overview<ref name="Perry"/><br>(note the BBC contracts most of its enforcement work to Capita) |
|+ Enforcement overview<ref name="Perry" /><br />(note the BBC contracts most of its enforcement work to Capita) |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
! !! England & Wales !! Scotland !! Northern Ireland !! Isle of Man !! Guernsey !! Jersey |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| '''Investigating authority''' |
| '''Investigating authority''' |
||
Line 480: | Line 468: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| '''Legislation''' |
| '''Legislation''' |
||
| Communications Act 2003;<br>Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 || Communications Act 2003;<br>Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 || Communications Act 2003;<br>Police and Criminal Evidence Order 1989 || Communications (Isle of Man) Order 2003;<br>Police Powers and Procedures Act 1998 || Communications (Balliwick of Guernsey) Order 2004;<br>Police Powers and Criminal Evidence (Balliwick of Guernsey) 2003 || Broadcasting & Communications (Jersey) Order 2004;<br>Police Powers and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003 |
| Communications Act 2003;<br />Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 || Communications Act 2003;<br />Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 || Communications Act 2003;<br />Police and Criminal Evidence Order 1989 || Communications (Isle of Man) Order 2003;<br />Police Powers and Procedures Act 1998 || Communications (Balliwick of Guernsey) Order 2004;<br />Police Powers and Criminal Evidence (Balliwick of Guernsey) 2003 || Broadcasting & Communications (Jersey) Order 2004;<br />Police Powers and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| '''Maximum fine''' |
| '''Maximum fine''' |
||
Line 494: | Line 482: | ||
In 2004, the BBC reported that "Almost 70% of people in the UK want changes to the way the BBC is funded", following an [[ICM (polling)|ICM]] poll for their current affairs programme ''[[Panorama (TV series)|Panorama]]'', which showed that 31% were in favour of the existing licence fee system, 36% said the BBC should be paid for by a subscription and 31% wanted advertising to pay for the programmes.<ref name=ICMpoll>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/3537567.stm |title=Majority 'want change to TV fee' |access-date=14 August 2008 |work=BBC News |publisher=BBC |date=6 March 2004 }}</ref> |
In 2004, the BBC reported that "Almost 70% of people in the UK want changes to the way the BBC is funded", following an [[ICM (polling)|ICM]] poll for their current affairs programme ''[[Panorama (TV series)|Panorama]]'', which showed that 31% were in favour of the existing licence fee system, 36% said the BBC should be paid for by a subscription and 31% wanted advertising to pay for the programmes.<ref name=ICMpoll>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/3537567.stm |title=Majority 'want change to TV fee' |access-date=14 August 2008 |work=BBC News |publisher=BBC |date=6 March 2004 }}</ref> |
||
In August 2008, the ''Guardian'' newspaper reported that "The BBC is facing an uphill battle to maintain support for the licence fee", stating that according to an [[Ipsos MORI]] poll the newspaper had commissioned, 41% agreed and 37% disagreed that the licence fee is an "appropriate funding mechanism". When asked whether the licence fee is "good value for money",however, 47% disagreed, with more than half of them disagreeing strongly. The poll also showed that there is no longer a majority believing that the licence fee assured them of distinctive programming not available elsewhere |
In August 2008, the ''Guardian'' newspaper reported that "The BBC is facing an uphill battle to maintain support for the licence fee", stating that according to an [[Ipsos MORI]] poll the newspaper had commissioned, 41% agreed and 37% disagreed that the licence fee is an "appropriate funding mechanism". When asked whether the licence fee is "good value for money", however, 47% disagreed, with more than half of them disagreeing strongly. The poll also showed that there is no longer a majority believing that the licence fee assured them of distinctive programming not available elsewhere — which, the newspaper said, had long been one of the arguments for its existence: 41% of the population disagreed with only 30% agreeing. The poll also showed that opinion was split by a growing north–south and socio-economic divide.<ref name="Guardian2008-08-18">{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2008/aug/18/bbc.television3 |title=Broadcasting: Survey blow to BBC as public question case for licence fee |access-date=18 August 2008 |author=Owen Gibson |date=18 August 2008 |newspaper=The Guardian | location=London}}</ref> |
||
In September 2009, the ''Guardian'' reported an ICM poll showing an increase in support for the licence fee to 43%; "The fee is backed by 43%, against 24% who think advertising should foot the bill and 30% who think people should pay to subscribe if they want to see BBC programmes. In 2004, only 31% backed the licence fee, 12 points lower than today.".<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/sep/04/bbc-icm-poll-james-murdoch |title=Public rejects Murdoch view of BBC, says ICM poll |access-date=20 December 2010 | |
In September 2009, the ''Guardian'' reported an ICM poll showing an increase in support for the licence fee to 43%; "The fee is backed by 43%, against 24% who think advertising should foot the bill and 30% who think people should pay to subscribe if they want to see BBC programmes. In 2004, only 31% backed the licence fee, 12 points lower than today.".<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/sep/04/bbc-icm-poll-james-murdoch |title=Public rejects Murdoch view of BBC, says ICM poll |access-date=20 December 2010 |location=London |work=The Guardian |first=Julian |last=Glover |date=4 September 2009}}</ref> |
||
In 2013, according to an ICM poll for the ''Sunday Telegraph'', 70% stated that the BBC licence fee should be abolished or cut. 49% of those polled believed the fee should be scrapped altogether.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10423117/BBC-licence-fee-should-be-cut-or-scrapped-poll-finds.html|title=BBC licence fee should be cut or scrapped, poll finds|first=Tim|last=Ross|date=2 November 2013|via=www.telegraph.co.uk}}</ref> |
In 2013, according to an ICM poll for the ''Sunday Telegraph'', 70% stated that the BBC licence fee should be abolished or cut. 49% of those polled believed the fee should be scrapped altogether.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10423117/BBC-licence-fee-should-be-cut-or-scrapped-poll-finds.html|title=BBC licence fee should be cut or scrapped, poll finds|first=Tim|last=Ross|date=2 November 2013|via=www.telegraph.co.uk}}</ref> |
||
In December 2019, a [[Savanta ComRes]] poll indicated that 2 out of 3 want the BBC licence fee abolished or reformed.<ref name="telegraph.co.uk">[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/12/28/three-quarters-want-bbc-licence-fee-abolished-poll-finds/ |
In December 2019, a [[Savanta ComRes]] poll indicated that 2 out of 3 want the BBC licence fee abolished or reformed.<ref name="telegraph.co.uk">{{cite news |title=Three-quarters want BBC licence fee abolished, poll finds |website=[[The Daily Telegraph]] |date=28 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230322173716/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/12/28/three-quarters-want-bbc-licence-fee-abolished-poll-finds/ |archive-date=2023-03-22 |url-status=live |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/12/28/three-quarters-want-bbc-licence-fee-abolished-poll-finds/ |last1=Bodkin |first1=Henry }}</ref> A few days later, a Public First poll conducted for [[BBC Radio 4|BBC Radio 4's]] ''[[Today (BBC Radio 4)|Today Programme]]'' found that 74% of respondents want the licence fee abolished.<ref name="telegraph.co.uk" /> |
||
In February 2020, a [[Savanta ComRes|ComRes]] poll for the Sunday Express found that 61% of respondents want the BBC Licence Fee abolished.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1246055/bbc-news-licence-fee-poll|title = BBC crisis as poll finds 60 percent want to SCRAP licence fee|date = 23 February 2020}}</ref> The same survey showed that 63% of people polled felt the BBC is an "important part of British culture" and the BBC questioned whether the results were skewed by not explaining what cuts would ensue.<ref name="Press Gazette article">{{cite web |url=https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/bbc-hits-back-poll-showing-majority-of-uk-adults-support-scrapping-bbc-licence-fee/ |title=BBC hits back at poll showing majority of UK adults support scrapping BBC licence fee |date=24 February 2020 |publisher=Press Gazette |access-date=5 April 2020}}</ref> |
In February 2020, a [[Savanta ComRes|ComRes]] poll for the Sunday Express found that 61% of respondents want the BBC Licence Fee abolished.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1246055/bbc-news-licence-fee-poll|title = BBC crisis as poll finds 60 percent want to SCRAP licence fee|date = 23 February 2020}}</ref> The same survey showed that 63% of people polled felt the BBC is an "important part of British culture" and the BBC questioned whether the results were skewed by not explaining what cuts would ensue.<ref name="Press Gazette article">{{cite web |url=https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/bbc-hits-back-poll-showing-majority-of-uk-adults-support-scrapping-bbc-licence-fee/ |title=BBC hits back at poll showing majority of UK adults support scrapping BBC licence fee |date=24 February 2020 |publisher=Press Gazette |access-date=5 April 2020}}</ref> |
||
In March 2020, Press Gazette magazine ran a poll showing that 53% of its readers backed the compulsory licence fee model, while 47% were in favour of scrapping it.<ref name="Press Gazette survey">{{cite web |url=https://pressgazette.co.uk/press-gazette-reader-poll-shows-47-favour-scrapping-licence-fee/ |title=Press Gazette reader poll shows 47 per cent favour BBC scrapping licence fee |date=11 March 2020 |publisher=Press Gazette |access-date=5 April 2020}}</ref> |
In March 2020, Press Gazette magazine ran a poll showing that 53% of its readers backed the compulsory licence fee model, while 47% were in favour of scrapping it.<ref name="Press Gazette survey">{{cite web |url=https://pressgazette.co.uk/press-gazette-reader-poll-shows-47-favour-scrapping-licence-fee/ |title=Press Gazette reader poll shows 47 per cent favour BBC scrapping licence fee |date=11 March 2020 |publisher=Press Gazette |access-date=5 April 2020}}</ref> |
||
In August 2020, The Daily Express ran a poll showing that 97% of its readers backed scrapping the TV licence.<ref name="Express">{{cite web |url=https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1329069/bbc-tv-licence-fee-Defund-The-BBC-scrapped-poll-result |title=Daily Express reader poll shows 97 per cent readers backed scrapping the TV licence |publisher=Daily Express |access-date=31 August 2020}}</ref> |
|||
===Views of official bodies and policy institutes=== |
===Views of official bodies and policy institutes=== |
||
Previous inquiries, such as the parliamentary [[Peacock Committee]] in 1986 and the internal [[Gavyn Davies|Davies committee]] in 2000, recommended continuing the licence fee, with conditions. In 2001, an [[Ofcom]] report found that the vast majority of those it interviewed, including owners of digital television equipment, supported the principle of a licence fee to fund public service television and radio. The advantages of such funding listed by those interviewed included diversity, high quality, education, innovation, entertainment, information, original productions, [[Cultural pluralism|pluralism]], accessibility, inclusion of minorities and free access.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ofcom.org.uk/enwiki/static/archive/itc/research/public_service_broadcasting.pdf |title=Public Service Broadcasting: What Viewers Want |access-date=13 August 2008 |work=ITC Research Publication |publisher=Independent Television Commission |date=January 2001 }}</ref> Another reason given in a response to Ofcom by the National Union of Journalists was that the licence fee allows the BBC to "retain independence" from both commercial and political pressures.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://media.gn.apc.org/creatorsrights/bbc-nuj-ofcom.html |title=Ofcom Review of Public Service Broadcasting: Response by National Union of Journalists |access-date=13 August 2008 |work=Creators' Rights Alliance web site |publisher=Creators' Rights Alliance <!--|date=Undated, after 5 December 2003--> |archive-date=6 January 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110106172322/http://media.gn.apc.org/creatorsrights/bbc-nuj-ofcom.html |
Previous inquiries, such as the parliamentary [[Peacock Committee]] in 1986 and the internal [[Gavyn Davies|Davies committee]] in 2000, recommended continuing the licence fee, with conditions. In 2001, an [[Ofcom]] report found that the vast majority of those it interviewed, including owners of digital television equipment, supported the principle of a licence fee to fund public service television and radio. The advantages of such funding listed by those interviewed included diversity, high quality, education, innovation, entertainment, information, original productions, [[Cultural pluralism|pluralism]], accessibility, inclusion of minorities and free access.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ofcom.org.uk/enwiki/static/archive/itc/research/public_service_broadcasting.pdf |title=Public Service Broadcasting: What Viewers Want |access-date=13 August 2008 |work=ITC Research Publication |publisher=Independent Television Commission |date=January 2001 }}</ref> Another reason given in a response to Ofcom by the National Union of Journalists was that the licence fee allows the BBC to "retain independence" from both commercial and political pressures.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://media.gn.apc.org/creatorsrights/bbc-nuj-ofcom.html |title=Ofcom Review of Public Service Broadcasting: Response by National Union of Journalists |access-date=13 August 2008 |work=Creators' Rights Alliance web site |publisher=Creators' Rights Alliance <!--|date=Undated, after 5 December 2003--> |archive-date=6 January 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110106172322/http://media.gn.apc.org/creatorsrights/bbc-nuj-ofcom.html}}</ref> |
||
Nonetheless, having surveyed public opinion during December 2003, a finding of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport was that "the way the licence fee is set and collected raised issues about fairness".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbccharterreview.org.uk/publications/CR_PUBS/pub_wysabbc.html |title=What you said about the BBC |work=Review of the BBC's Royal Charter |access-date=12 August 2008 |publisher=Department for Culture, Media and Sport |date=July 2004 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081026051044/http://www.bbccharterreview.org.uk/publications/CR_PUBS/pub_wysabbc.html |archive-date=26 October 2008 |url-status=dead |
Nonetheless, having surveyed public opinion during December 2003, a finding of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport was that "the way the licence fee is set and collected raised issues about fairness".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbccharterreview.org.uk/publications/CR_PUBS/pub_wysabbc.html |title=What you said about the BBC |work=Review of the BBC's Royal Charter |access-date=12 August 2008 |publisher=Department for Culture, Media and Sport |date=July 2004 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081026051044/http://www.bbccharterreview.org.uk/publications/CR_PUBS/pub_wysabbc.html |archive-date=26 October 2008 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Further criticisms, embodied in a 2005 [[Green Paper]],<ref name="review2005">{{cite news |date=2005 |title=Review of the BBC's Royal Charter (Green Paper) |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/02_03_05_bbcgreen.pdf |access-date=18 June 2006 |publisher=BBC News}}</ref> included cost, value for money, whether or not the BBC should be publicly funded, the high cost of collection and enforcement and the [[#Licence fee enforcement|methods used]]. |
||
Meanwhile, in 2004, the [[Institute for Public Policy Research]] criticised the |
Meanwhile, in 2004, the [[Institute for Public Policy Research]] criticised the television licence fee for its regressive impact, pointing out that it represents a much higher proportion of income for poor households, that evaders are most likely to be single parents, lone tenants, pensioners and the economically inactive and that the difficulties they have in paying the licence fee are compounded by the penalties enforced for non-payment.<ref name="IPPR">{{cite web |url=http://www.ippr.org.uk/pressreleases/archive.asp?id=762&fID=60 |title=BBC Review should consider licence fee concessions |access-date=13 August 2008 |work=Press Release |publisher=Institute for Public Policy Research |date=27 December 2003 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080629022755/http://www.ippr.org.uk/pressreleases/archive.asp?id=762&fID=60 |archive-date=29 June 2008}}</ref> |
||
Other technologies for receiving visual media, such as [[mobile phones]] and computers connected to the Internet, has led to questions over whether or not a licence fee based on television receiver ownership can continue to be justified when a television receiver is no longer the sole medium over which the BBC distributes its content;<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=3719919 |title=Reforming the BBC |access-date=16 August 2008 |date=3 March 2005 |newspaper=The Economist |
Other technologies for receiving visual media, such as [[mobile phones]] and computers connected to the Internet, has led to questions over whether or not a licence fee based on television receiver ownership can continue to be justified when a television receiver is no longer the sole medium over which the BBC distributes its content;<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=3719919 |title=Reforming the BBC |access-date=16 August 2008 |date=3 March 2005 |newspaper=The Economist}}</ref> and these technological changes led the Department for Culture, Media and Sport to state in 2005 that the collection of a fixed charge based on television ownership may become difficult to sustain.<ref name="review2005" /> |
||
In 2006, the [[House of Lords]] [[Select committee (United Kingdom)|select committee]] on [[BBC Charter Review]] criticised the reclassification of the licence fee as a tax, pointing out that the BBC was in consequence reclassified as a central government body, with "significant implications for the BBC's independence".<ref name="Select Committee 20060303"/> |
In 2006, the [[House of Lords]] [[Select committee (United Kingdom)|select committee]] on [[BBC Charter Review]] criticised the reclassification of the licence fee as a tax, pointing out that the BBC was in consequence reclassified as a central government body, with "significant implications for the BBC's independence".<ref name="Select Committee 20060303" /> |
||
In a debate in the UK Parliament in October 2013, the licence fee was referred to as 'a flat-rate poll tax' and as 'probably the UK's most regressive tax'<ref name="Parliament debate">{{cite web |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm131021/debtext/131021-0002.htm#1310215000001|title=Future of the BBC |
In a debate in the UK Parliament in October 2013, the licence fee was referred to as 'a flat-rate poll tax' and as 'probably the UK's most regressive tax'.<ref name="Parliament debate">{{cite web |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm131021/debtext/131021-0002.htm#1310215000001|title=Future of the BBC |access-date=17 December 2013 |publisher=UK Parliament |date= 21 October 2013}}</ref> |
||
|access-date=17 December 2013 |publisher=UK Parliament |date= 21 October 2013 }}</ref> |
|||
Some critics{{who|date=March 2014}} claim that the licensing system interferes with the freedom to receive information and contend that this is a contravention of Article 10 of the [[European Convention on Human Rights]] (the right to [[freedom of expression]]).<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article811195.ece |title=Mean fields: Naked into the TV courtroom |access-date=15 September 2008 |author=Jonathan Miller |date=12 January 2003 |work=Sunday Times |publisher=Times Newspapers Ltd | location=London}}</ref> In a case dealing with the German [[Television licence#Germany|radio licence]], the [[ECHR]] in Application No. 26907/95 stated "Such an undertaking cannot be successfully accomplished unless it is grounded in the principle of [[Cultural pluralism|pluralism]], of which the State is the ultimate guarantor." and "The interference complained of was, therefore, [[necessary in a democratic society]]. |
Some critics{{who|date=March 2014}} claim that the licensing system interferes with the freedom to receive information and contend that this is a contravention of Article 10 of the [[European Convention on Human Rights]] (the right to [[freedom of expression]]).<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article811195.ece |title=Mean fields: Naked into the TV courtroom |access-date=15 September 2008 |author=Jonathan Miller |date=12 January 2003 |work=Sunday Times |publisher=Times Newspapers Ltd | location=London}}{{dead link|date=September 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> In a case dealing with the German [[Television licence#Germany|radio licence]], the [[European Court of Human Rights|ECHR]] in Application No. 26907/95 stated "Such an undertaking cannot be successfully accomplished unless it is grounded in the principle of [[Cultural pluralism|pluralism]], of which the State is the ultimate guarantor." and "The interference complained of was, therefore, [[necessary in a democratic society]]. There is, accordingly, no appearance of a violation of the applicant's right under Article 10 (Art. 10)."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://echr.ketse.com/doc/26907.95-en-19960412/view/|title=KRETZSCHMAR v. GERMANY|first=KETSE|last=LTD.|website=echr.ketse.com}}</ref> |
||
===Media views=== |
===Media views=== |
||
The television licence fee system has been variously criticised, commented upon and defended by the press.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.newstatesman.com/200208260006 |title=Kill the licence fee |access-date=14 August 2008 |author=David Cox |date=26 August 2002 |magazine=New Statesman}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/hutton/story/0,,1025975,00.html |date=28 July 2003 |title=So who really hates the BBC? |access-date=18 August 2007 |first=Roy |last=Greenslade|newspaper=The Guardian}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/comment/story/0,3604,1045292,00.html|date=19 September 2003 |title=BBC Needs a Bullywatch |access-date=18 August 2007 |first=Polly |last=Toynbee |newspaper=The Guardian}}</ref> In 2010, the journalist [[Charles Moore (journalist)|Charles Moore]] was fined by a magistrates' court for watching TV without a licence. Moore had refused to pay in protest at the BBC's unwillingness to dismiss [[Jonathan Ross]] in the wake of his involvement in [[The Russell Brand Show prank telephone calls row|''The Russell Brand Show'' prank telephone calls]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/may/11/charles-moore-fined-tv-licence|title = Charles Moore fined for Jonathan Ross-inspired TV licence boycott|website=[[TheGuardian.com]] |date=11 May 2010}}</ref> Later, Moore was to describe the BBC licence fee as "the most regressive and most ruthlessly collected of all government imposts".<ref>{{cite web |title=Here's an answer to the BBC licence fee: don't pay it! |website=[[The Daily Telegraph]] |date=10 November 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220511101828/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/9668776/Heres-an-answer-to-the-BBC-licence-fee-dont-pay-it.html |archive-date=2022-05-11 |url-status=live |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/9668776/Heres-an-answer-to-the-BBC-licence-fee-dont-pay-it.html}}</ref> In 2014, [[Nick Ross]], a BBC presenter, stated that the licence fee was unfair and should be abolished.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/entertainment-arts-26731916/nick-ross-calls-for-end-to-bbc-licence-fee|title=Nick Ross: Scrap BBC licence fee|work=BBC News|date=25 March 2014}}</ref> |
|||
The television licence fee system has been variously criticised, commented upon and defended by the press.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.newstatesman.com/200208260006 |title=Kill the licence fee |access-date=14 August 2008 |author=David Cox |date=26 August 2002 |magazine=New Statesman}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/hutton/story/0,,1025975,00.html |
|||
|date=28 July 2003|title=So who really hates the BBC? |access-date=18 August 2007 |author= Roy Greenslade|newspaper=The Guardian | location=London}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/comment/story/0,3604,1045292,00.html|date=19 September 2003 |
|||
|title=BBC needs a Bullywatch |access-date=18 August 2007 |author= Polly Toynbee|newspaper=The Guardian | location=London}}</ref> In 2010, the journalist [[Charles Moore (journalist)|Charles Moore]] was fined by a magistrates' court for watching TV without a licence. Moore had refused to pay in protest at the BBC's unwillingness to dismiss [[Jonathan Ross]] in the wake of his involvement in [[The Russell Brand Show prank telephone calls row|''The Russell Brand Show'' prank telephone calls]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/may/11/charles-moore-fined-tv-licence|title = Charles Moore fined for Jonathan Ross-inspired TV licence boycott|website = [[TheGuardian.com]]|date = 11 May 2010}}</ref> Later, Moore was to describe the BBC licence fee as "the most regressive and most ruthlessly collected of all government imposts.”<ref>[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/9668776/Heres-an-answer-to-the-BBC-licence-fee-dont-pay-it.html The Daily Telegraph]</ref> In 2014, [[Nick Ross]], a BBC presenter, stated that the licence fee was unfair and should be abolished.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/entertainment-arts-26731916/nick-ross-calls-for-end-to-bbc-licence-fee|title=Nick Ross: Scrap BBC licence fee|work=BBC News|date=25 March 2014}}</ref> |
|||
=== Gender disparity === |
=== Gender disparity === |
||
A review by the TV Licensing Agency published in 2017 considered the gender disparity in |
A review by the TV Licensing Agency published in 2017 considered the gender disparity in television licence prosecutions. 72% of prosecutions for television licence evasion in 2017 were against women. Television licence evasion is the most common offence for which women are prosecuted in the UK. Although the review found that "There is no evidence of any discriminatory enforcement practices on the part of TV Licensing"<ref>{{cite web |title=Gender Disparity report - TV Licensing|url=https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/gender-disparity-AB23 |access-date=6 March 2022 |website=TvLicensing.co.uk}}</ref> commentators have highlighted the ongoing factors of poverty, debt and working in the home which combine to make it more likely that women will be charged with this crime than men.<ref>{{cite web |last=Gil |first=Natalie |title=Why TV Licences Are An Unlikely Feminist Issue |url=https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/2019/07/237240/tv-licence-evasion-women |access-date=6 March 2022 |website=Refinery29.com}}</ref> Women in the UK are nearly ten times more likely to be convicted than men<ref>{{Cite web |date=28 November 2020 |title=Almost Third of Women's Convictions Are for not Paying TV Licence Fee |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tv-licence-fee-women-convictions-b1763192.html |access-date=6 March 2022 |website=The Independent }}</ref> and this leads to suggestions that the BBC may be guilty of "indirect gender discrimination".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Hymas |first=Charles |date=26 November 2020 |title=Almost one third of female convictions in UK for TV licence fee evasion, MoJ figures show |work=The Telegraph |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/11/26/third-female-convictions-uk-due-tv-licence-fee-evasion-moj-stats/ |access-date=6 March 2022 |issn=0307-1235}}</ref> In 2020, in the light of a threatened judicial review the BBC agreed to follow up on the 2017 report and consider the structural sex discrimination which might exist in the scheme leading to this skewed level of prosecutions.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Urwin |first=Rosamund |title=BBC to review TV licence prosecutions after accusation of bias against women |newspaper=[[The Times]] |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/bbc-to-review-why-women-make-up-76-of-licence-fee-convictions-70tkv3pmn |access-date=6 March 2022 |issn=0140-0460}}</ref> |
||
===Websites and blogs=== |
===Websites and blogs=== |
||
There are a number of websites that campaign against the |
There are a number of websites that campaign against the television licence.<ref name="web campaigns">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/bbc_monitoring_of_third_party_we#incoming-312027|title=BBC Monitoring of Third-Party Websites|date=18 August 2012|website=Whatdotheyknow.com|access-date=4 February 2014}}</ref> The BBC monitors the Internet for references to TV Licensing.<ref name="you tube takedowns">{{cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/youtube_material_takedown_reques#incoming-477082|title=YouTube material takedown requests|date=3 January 2014|website=Whatdotheyknow.com|access-date=4 February 2014}}</ref> According to the BBC "searches are carried out for the purpose of identifying external information relating to TV Licensing such that, where appropriate, we can respond and assist licence fee payers or correct inaccurate information as well as flag up customer complaints." Part of this monitoring 'flags up' critical comments about TV Licensing. An internal briefing note released by the BBC in response to a freedom of information request names the ''TV Licensing Blog'' as TV Licensing's "most prevalent activist"<ref name="web campaigns" /> who has "built a significant following both for his blog and for his @TVLicensingblog Twitter feed (over 900 followers)". The BBC also monitors YouTube videos of enquiry officers and YouTube videos critical of TV Licensing<ref name="you tube takedowns" /> as well as social media such as Facebook<ref name="facebook">{{cite web |url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/monitoring_of_active_resistance#incoming-535107 |title=Monitoring of active resistance to the Licence Fee |date=4 June 2014 |website=Whatdotheyknow.com |access-date=11 August 2014 }}</ref> and Twitter. |
||
In June 2020, a campaign called "Defund the BBC" was founded by James Yucel, a student at Glasgow University, supported by political commentator and activist [[Darren Grimes]]. The group was featured on [[Dan Wootton|Dan Wootton's]] [[Talkradio]] show and currently has over 100,000 Twitter followers.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1294308/BBC-News-Campaign-Defund-the-BBC-licence-fee-payments |title=New campaign to 'Defund the BBC' sees explosion in support after launch |publisher=[[Daily Express]] |access-date=7 July 2020 |date=11 June 2020}}</ref> |
In June 2020, a campaign called "Defund the BBC" was founded by James Yucel, a student at Glasgow University, supported by political commentator and activist [[Darren Grimes]]. The group was featured on [[Dan Wootton|Dan Wootton's]] [[Talkradio]] show and currently has over 100,000 Twitter followers.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1294308/BBC-News-Campaign-Defund-the-BBC-licence-fee-payments |title=New campaign to 'Defund the BBC' sees explosion in support after launch |publisher=[[Daily Express]] |access-date=7 July 2020 |date=11 June 2020}}</ref> |
||
===Opinions on collection and enforcement methods=== |
===Opinions on collection and enforcement methods=== |
||
In September 2008, the BBC's governing body, the BBC Trust, launched a review of TV Licensing's methods,<ref name= |
In September 2008, the BBC's governing body, the BBC Trust, launched a review of TV Licensing's methods,<ref name="bbctrust2009">{{cite web |url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/review_report_research/tvl/tvl_report.pdf |title=Trust review of licence fee collection |access-date=5 May 2015 |publisher=BBC Trust |date= March 2009 }}</ref> following complaints about "heavy-handed" and "intimidating" tactics<ref name="BBCTrustReview">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7603258.stm |title=Review of TV licence fee tactics |access-date=8 September 2008 |date=8 September 2008 |work=BBC News Web Site |publisher=BBC}}</ref> and during December 2008, it was reported by the press that the chairman of the all-party Commons Culture, Media and Sport committee had accused TV Licensing of behaving "like the [[Gestapo]]", employing "tactics that are outrageous", saying: "The tactics used by TV Licensing in their letters are intimidatory and cause genuine distress. Their records are not always correct, but they write letters that assume members of the public are criminals".<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/3741846/BBC-sacks-contractor-over-licence-fee-warning-letters-containing-false-statistics.html |title=BBC sacks contractor over licence fee warning letters containing false statistics |access-date=18 December 2008 |author=Alex Singleton |date=14 December 2008 |work=The Daily Telegraph |location=London}}</ref> |
||
In 2008, |
In 2008, former BBC television personality [[Noel Edmonds]] stated that he had stopped paying his television licence in a protest at the tone of BBC adverts aimed at television licence evaders.<ref name="Noel Edmonds">{{cite news|url=https://www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/noel-edmonds-i-wont-pay-tv-licence-because-of-threatening-bbc-adverts-6820313.html|title=Noel Edmonds: 'I won't pay TV licence because of 'threatening' BBC adverts |newspaper=London Evening Standard |access-date=18 April 2013}}</ref> |
||
===Isle of Man=== |
===Isle of Man=== |
||
The licensing system remains controversial in the Isle of Man due to the fact that the licence fee remains the same as in the UK and Channel Islands, even though the BBC provides neither a local television news service for the Isle of Man (similar to [[BBC Channel Islands News|BBC Channel Islands]]) nor any BBC [[BBC Local Radio|local radio]] or national radio opt-out station. |
The licensing system remains controversial in the Isle of Man due to the fact that the licence fee remains the same as in the UK and Channel Islands, even though the BBC provides neither a local television news service for the Isle of Man (similar to [[BBC Channel Islands News|BBC Channel Islands]]) nor any BBC [[BBC Local Radio|local radio]] or national radio opt-out station. The BBC has sought to redress the lack of coverage by improving its [[BBC News Online|online news service]] for the Isle of Man, with permanent BBC staff based at the [[Manx Radio]] studios in [[Douglas, Isle of Man|Douglas]]. A [[Select committee (United Kingdom)|select committee]] of [[Tynwald]] was established in 2009 to investigate the value for money of the licensing system for the Isle of Man and the feasibility of the Isle of Man withdrawing from it. |
||
== |
==Future of the licence fee== |
||
The current Royal Charter for the BBC expires on 31 December 2027<ref name="Charter">{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bbc-charter-and-framework-agreement|title=BBC Charter and Framework Agreement|publisher=GOV.UK |access-date=16 January 2016}}</ref> and the TV licence fee itself was fixed at £145.50 until March 2017.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/77800/Lyons_BBC.pdf|title=BBC Funding Settlement |publisher=UK Government|access-date=24 June 2013}}</ref> The fee was due to increase in line with inflation for five years until 2021/22;<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.itv.com/news/update/2016-05-12/bbc-licence-fee-to-rise-in-line-with-inflation/|title=BBC licence fee to rise 'in line with inflation'|newspaper=ITV News|access-date=16 January 2017}}</ref> from the price £147.<ref name="guardian-freezeraise">{{cite web|title=Television licence fee increases to £147 in first rise since 2010|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/mar/01/television-licence-fee-increases-147|website=The Guardian|date=March 2017 |access-date=16 May 2017}}</ref><ref name="bbc-uklicinflat">{{cite news |title=TV licence fee to rise to £147 in April, government announces|work=BBC News|date=March 2017 |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-39130964 |access-date=17 May 2017 }}</ref> In 2021, the fee was fixed at £159 until 1 April 2024, when it rises to £169.50.<ref>{{Cite web |title=MSN |url=https://www.msn.com/ |access-date=2024-03-26 |website=www.msn.com}}</ref> |
|||
In March 2024, the [[Director-General of the BBC|Director General]] announced that the BBC would carry out a review of the licence fee, with a focus on reforms.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2024-03-26 |title=BBC to explore how to reform licence fee, director general says |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-68654318 |access-date=2024-03-26 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/2023/12/tv-licence-fee-rise-april-2024/#:~:text=The%20annual%20cost%20of%20a,the%20fee%20since%20April%202021.|title=TV licence fee to rise by £10.50 a year to £169.50 | MSE News}}</ref> |
|||
The current Royal Charter for the BBC expires on 31 December 2027<ref name= "Charter">{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bbc-charter-and-framework-agreement|title=BBC Charter and Framework Agreement|publisher=GOV.UK |access-date=16 January 2016}}</ref> and the TV licence fee itself was fixed at £145.50 until March 2017.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/77800/Lyons_BBC.pdf|title=BBC Funding Settlement |publisher=UK Government|access-date=24 June 2013}}</ref> After this time, the fee will increase in line with inflation for five years until 2022;<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.itv.com/news/update/2016-05-12/bbc-licence-fee-to-rise-in-line-with-inflation/|title=BBC licence fee to rise 'in line with inflation'|newspaper=ITV News|access-date=2017-01-16}}</ref> the price was raised to £147.<ref name="guardian-freezeraise">{{cite web|title=Television licence fee increases to £147 in first rise since 2010|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/mar/01/television-licence-fee-increases-147|website=The Guardian|date=March 2017|access-date=16 May 2017}}</ref><ref name="bbc-uklicinflat">{{cite news|title=TV licence fee to rise to £147 in April, government announces|work=BBC News|date=March 2017|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-39130964|access-date=17 May 2017}}</ref> |
|||
The government stated that "while the current licence fee collection system is in operation, the current system of criminal deterrence and prosecution should be maintained".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/553380/InformationSheet-Funding_2016_09_15.pdf|title=BBC Charter Review 2016 Information Sheet - Funding|website=GOV.UK|publisher=UK Government|access-date=16 January 2017}}</ref> |
The government stated that "while the current licence fee collection system is in operation, the current system of criminal deterrence and prosecution should be maintained".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/553380/InformationSheet-Funding_2016_09_15.pdf|title=BBC Charter Review 2016 Information Sheet - Funding|website=GOV.UK|publisher=UK Government|access-date=16 January 2017}}</ref> |
||
In June 2019, it was announced that free |
In June 2019, it was announced that free television licences for all over-75s that were funded by the Government as part of the 2017 agreement, would be abolished in June 2020. |
||
The TV Licensing website |
The TV Licensing website stated that "From 1 June 2020, there will be a new scheme. Under the new scheme, anyone aged 75 or over who receives Pension Credit will still be eligible for a free TV Licence which the BBC will pay for. Households where there is no one aged 75 or over that receives Pension Credit will need to buy a licence if one is needed." This was delayed to 1 August 2020, in part due to the [[COVID-19 pandemic]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/for-your-home/aged-74-and-over-aud3?wt.mc_id=75_age75_tag |title=Over 75 TV Licence - TV Licensing |website=TvLicensing.co.uk |publisher=TV Licensing |access-date=30 January 2021 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923163448/https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/age?wt.mc_id=bbc_pr_o75_english |archive-date=23 September 2020}}</ref> |
||
During the [[2019 United Kingdom general election|2019 general election campaign]], [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Prime Minister]] [[Boris Johnson]] said the government would consider decriminalising non-payment of the television licence, a move which the BBC warned could cost it £200 million a year.<ref>{{cite web|title=BBC: TV licence fee decriminalisation being considered |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50800128|website=[[BBC News]] |date=15 December 2019 |access-date=7 July 2020}}</ref> |
During the [[2019 United Kingdom general election|2019 general election campaign]], then [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Prime Minister]] [[Boris Johnson]] said the government would consider decriminalising non-payment of the television licence, a move which the BBC warned could cost it £200 million a year.<ref>{{cite web|title=BBC: TV licence fee decriminalisation being considered |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50800128|website=[[BBC News]] |date=15 December 2019 |access-date=7 July 2020}}</ref> |
||
In January 2022, the [[Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport]] [[Nadine Dorries]] announced plans to terminate the licence after the current charter expires.<ref>{{cite web|title=Nadine Dorries on Twitter: "This license fee ... |url=https://twitter.com/NadineDorries/status/1482622722228240387?|website=[[Twitter]] |date=16 January 2022 |access-date=17 January 2022}}</ref> |
In January 2022, the then [[Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport]] [[Nadine Dorries]] announced plans to terminate the licence after the current charter expires.<ref>{{cite web |title=Nadine Dorries on Twitter: "This license fee ... |url=https://twitter.com/NadineDorries/status/1482622722228240387? |website=[[Twitter]] |date=16 January 2022 |access-date=17 January 2022}}</ref> |
||
==Notes== |
==Notes== |
||
The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004<ref name="commregs"/> gives the following definition: |
The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004<ref name="commregs" /> gives the following definition: |
||
* |
*"Television receiver" means any apparatus installed or used for the purpose of receiving (whether by means of wireless telegraphy or otherwise) any television programme service, whether or not it is installed or used for any other purpose. |
||
* |
*Any reference to receiving a television programme service includes a reference to receiving by any means any programme included in that service, where that programme is received at the same time (or virtually the same time) as it is received by members of the public by virtue of its being broadcast or distributed as part of that service. |
||
==Notelist== |
|||
{{notelist}} |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{ |
{{reflist}} |
||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{ |
{{Commons category}} |
||
*[https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7 TV licence cancellation] |
|||
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20140517015815/http://broadcastingfee.com/ Broadcasting Fee Association] - international organisation for television licence fee collecting organisations |
|||
*[https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/ TV Licensing (United Kingdom)] |
*[https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/ TV Licensing (United Kingdom)] |
||
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20060824004958/http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/nm/index/your_world/communications/television_licences.htm Citizens Advice Bureau TV Licence Guide] |
|||
*[http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/foi/classes/disclosure_logs/rfi20110540_tvl_officers_training.pdf Enforcement information released by the BBC after FOI request] |
|||
*[http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/our_work/govs/barwise06.pdf The BBC Licence Fee Bid – report for the BBC Board of Governors, April 2006] |
|||
{{portalbar|Television|United Kingdom}} |
|||
{{BBC}} |
{{BBC}} |
||
{{portalbar|Television|United Kingdom}} |
|||
[[Category:1946 in British television]] |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Television Licensing In The United Kingdom}} |
|||
[[Category:BBC]] |
[[Category:BBC]] |
||
[[Category:Law of the United Kingdom]] |
[[Category:Law of the United Kingdom]] |
||
[[Category:Licensing]] |
[[Category:Licensing]] |
||
[[Category:Taxation in the United Kingdom]] |
[[Category:Taxation in the United Kingdom]] |
||
[[Category:Television terminology]] |
|||
[[Category:1946 in British television]] |
|||
[[Category:Telecommunications-related introductions in 1946]] |
[[Category:Telecommunications-related introductions in 1946]] |
||
[[Category:Television terminology]] |
Latest revision as of 07:25, 8 December 2024
In the United Kingdom and the British Islands, any household watching or recording television transmissions at the same time they are being broadcast is required by law to hold a television licence. This applies regardless of transmission method, including terrestrial, satellite, cable, or for BBC iPlayer internet streaming. The television licence is the instrument used to raise revenue to fund the BBC and S4C.
Businesses, hospitals, schools and a range of other organisations are also required by law to hold television licences to watch and record live television broadcasts.[1] The licence, originally a radio licence, was introduced in November 1923 using powers under the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1904, and cost 10 shillings per annum. The licence was extended to televisions at a cost of £2 in June 1946. The radio part was abolished in February 1971.[2] A television licence is also required to receive video on demand programme services provided by the BBC via its iPlayer service.
Since 1 April 2024, the annual cost has been £169.50 for a colour licence and £57.00 for a black and white licence. Income from the licence is primarily used to fund the television, radio and online services of the BBC. The total income from licence fees was £3.83 billion in 2017–18,[3] of which £655.3 million or 17.1% was provided by the government through concessions for those over the age of 75 (this subsidy has now been phased out). Thus, the licence fee made up the bulk (75.7%) of the BBC's total income of £5.0627 billion in 2017–2018.[3]
In May 2016, the government's white paper announced that the licence fee would rise with inflation for the first five years of the Charter period, from 1 April 2017.
The number of licences issued peaked at 26.2 million in 2018. As of 2022-2023, there were over 24 million active television licences.[4]
Operation of the licensing system
[edit]Licence fee collection and use
[edit]The television licence fee is collected by the BBC and primarily used to fund the radio, television and online services of the BBC itself. Licence fee collection is the responsibility of the BBC's Finance and Business division.[5]
Although the money is raised for its own use and collected by the BBC itself, the BBC does not directly use the collected fees. The money received is first paid into the government's Consolidated Fund. It is subsequently included in the 'vote' for the Department of Culture, Media and Sport in that year's Appropriation Act, and passed back to the BBC for the running of the BBC's own services (free from commercial advertisements). The money also finances programming for S4C and the BBC World Service, and included the running costs of BBC Monitoring at Caversham until it was relocated to London and the property sold in May 2018.
Legal framework
[edit]In 1991, the BBC assumed the role of television licensing authority with responsibility for the collection and enforcement of the licence fee.[6]
The BBC is authorised by the Communications Act 2003 to collect and enforce the television licence fee. Section 363 of the Act makes it against the law to install or use a television receiver to watch or record any television programmes as they are being broadcast without a television licence. Section 365 of the same Act requires the payment of the television licence fee to the BBC.[6]
The licence fee is formally set by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport by the use of statutory instruments. The relevant statutory instruments are the Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004[7] and amendments since that time such as the Communications (Television Licensing) (Amendment) Regulations 2010.[8] As well as prescribing the fees, the regulations also define "television receiver" for the purposes of the law.
For people living in the Channel Islands and Isle of Man, the television licensing law is extended to their areas by Orders in Council made by agreement with their own governments.[9][10][11]
As part of its enforcement regime, the BBC is authorised to carry out surveillance using powers defined by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (British Broadcasting Corporation) Order 2001. The BBC is permitted by the order to use surveillance equipment to detect unlicensed use of television receivers.[12]
As the public body responsible for issuing television licences, licensing information held by the BBC and on the BBC's behalf by television licensing contractors is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The BBC withholds some information on licence enforcement using exemptions under the Act; in particular, under section 31, which permits the withholding of information on crime prevention grounds and under section 43(2), which allows the BBC to retain information judged commercially sensitive.[13]
Reclassification as a tax
[edit]In January 2006, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) changed the classification of the licence fee from a service charge to a tax.[14] Explaining the change, the ONS said: "in line with the definition of a tax, the licence fee is a compulsory payment which is not paid solely for access to BBC services. A licence is required to receive ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5, satellite, or cable". A briefing paper from the House of Commons Library described the licence fee as a hypothecated tax (i.e. one raised for a particular defined purpose).[15]
TV Licensing Management Team
[edit]The TV Licence Management Team, which is part of the Finance and Business division of the BBC, oversees the television licensing system.[16] The TV Licence Management Team is based in the BBC buildings at White City Place in London. The majority of television licensing administration and enforcement activities are carried out under contract by private companies. The TV Licence Management Team oversees the performance of the contractors.
TV Licensing brand
[edit]The BBC pursues its licence fee collection and enforcement under the trading name TV Licensing, but contracts much of the task to commercial organisations.[17] TV Licensing is a trademark of the BBC used under licence by companies contracted by the BBC that administer the television licensing system.[17] Concerning the relationship of the BBC brand with the TV Licensing brand, the BBC's position is stated as: "The TV Licensing brand is separate from the BBC brand. No link between the two brands should be made in customer facing communications, in particular, use of the BBC name and logo".[18] However, it also states that the rules for internal communications and communications with suppliers are different: "the name BBC TV Licensing may also be used within department names or job titles for BBC employees".[18]
Television Licensing contractors and subcontractors
[edit]Capita
[edit]A major contractor is Capita.[19] Capita is responsible for the administration and enforcement of the television licence fee.[17][20]
It is expected that Capita will earn between £1.10bn and £1.55bn from its contract with the BBC if it runs its maximum 15 years from July 2012.[5]
The services carried out by Capita on behalf of the BBC include dealing with television licence queries, processing television licence applications and payments and the maintenance of the licence database.[21] Enforcement tasks include visiting addresses, identifying people watching TV without a licence, taking statements and achieving prosecutions of television licence evaders.[22][23][24] TV Licensing debt collection is carried out by Akinika,[25] which is a debt collection agency owned by Capita.[26]
Capita's TV Licensing headquarters is at India Mill, in Darwen, Lancashire.[27] Capita employs a number of subcontractors for part of its TV Licensing operations – one important one being Computer Sciences Corporation which provides and modernises the required IT infrastructure.[5] Since 2004, Capita has undertaken a proportion of television licensing administration at locations outside of the UK and "has progressively increased the amount of work processed overseas each year".[5] However, as of 2013,[update] Capita has not set up any overseas call centres to carry out television licensing work and it would need the BBC's permission to do so in the future.[5] Some of Capita's television licensing work is carried out in Mumbai, India[28] but after reportage in Panorama about scammers from India, the Indian office of Capita was closed permanently.
Proximity London Limited
[edit]Marketing and printing services, including reminder letters and licence distribution, are carried out by Proximity London Limited.[29]
Havas Media
[edit]Media services are contracted to Havas Media.[16]
Other contractors
[edit]Other contractors involved in television licensing include PayPoint which provides over-the-counter services in the UK, and the post offices which provide the same services in the Isle of Man and Channel Islands.[5] Also involved are: AMV BBDO[29] which provides advertising services, and Fishburn Communications[30] which carries out public relations.
Duration of a television licence
[edit]A television licence, once issued, is normally valid for a maximum of 12 months. The period of its validity depends on the exact day of the month it is purchased; this is because television licences always expire at the end of a calendar month. If a licence were to be obtained in September 2014, for example, it would expire on 31 August 2015. Thus the period of validity would vary between 11 and 12 months depending how early in the month it was bought.[31] If an existing licence is renewed on time, the new licence will last the full 12 months.
The BBC sometimes issues 'short dated' licences in situations when a licence is renewed after the expiry date of the previous licence. The BBC does this as it assumes that television was being watched in the interim period between expiry and renewal. Short dated licences are set to expire 12 months after the previous expiry date.[32]
If a television licence is no longer needed for an address, it is possible to cancel a licence and apply for a partial refund.[33] The amount refunded will depend on the time left to the expiry date. Normally only full quarters (that is three consecutive calendar months) of unexpired licence period are refunded.[34]
The BBC may also revoke a licence under certain circumstances.[34]
Cost of a licence
[edit]The level of the fee is decided following periodic negotiations between the UK Government and the BBC.[35] Before 1988, increases in the licence fee happened at irregular intervals, sometimes a few years passing between changes. From 1988 to 2010, the licence fee was increased annually each April.[36] Between April 2010 and April 2017 the licence fee remained constant at £145.50 per year.[37] As of 1 April 2021, it costs £159 for a colour licence and £53.50 for a black and white television licence.
Payment methods
[edit]The BBC allows the following forms of payment of the licence fee:[38]
- Direct debit. Payments may be made annually, quarterly or monthly.
- Debit or credit card. Annual payment.
- PayPoint. Annual payments may be made at PayPoint outlets (usually situated in shops) by cash or debit card.
- TV Licensing payment card. Holders of this card will have a payment plan showing when and how much they need to pay. Payments may be made weekly or monthly at PayPoint outlets. Payments may also be made online, by phone or by text message (with credit or debit card).
- TV Licensing savings card. This is a way for a licence fee holder to save for a subsequent licence. If enough money for the new licence is saved up, a new licence is sent automatically. Otherwise the balance has to be paid for.
- Cheque and postal orders. Annual payments may be made by post by these methods.
- BACS electronic transfer. Annual payments for renewal licences only.
The payment methods mean that the licence fee is paid for either completely or partially in advance. Annual payments require complete payment in advance. For monthly direct debit, a new licence is paid off in 6 monthly instalments of just over £24 a month. Renewal licences are paid for in 12 monthly instalments starting 6 months before expiry of the licence in force i.e. starting 6 months before the renewal date.[38] Quarterly payments made using direct debit carry an additional cost of £5.00 per year, or £1.25 a quarter, which is included in the licence fee total. This addition is described as "a small charge" in the generic letter issued by TV Licensing to those paying by direct debit, and on the TV Licensing website it is justified with: "By paying quarterly the majority of your licence is paid for as you use it. This differs from our other instalment schemes, where at least half of the licence fee is collected in advance. As a result, quarterly payments incur a small premium of £1.25 per quarter which is included in your payment."[38] Typically, direct debit schemes in the UK for major utilities or publicly provided services operate in a reverse way, granting a discount to direct debit payers.
In the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, over the counter services are provided by the Post Office rather than by PayPoint outlets.[39]
Concessions
[edit]Over 75s
[edit]Between November 2000 and April 2018, TV licences were provided to people over the age of 75, through full funding by central government.[40] This concession covered the whole household, so that even if just one member of the household was over 75, then a free television licence could be applied for to cover all the residents.[41] Following a 2016 funding agreement between the Conservative government and the BBC, this funding was phased out between April 2018 and April 2020, after which time no further government funding was available for the scheme:[42] Free television licences based solely on age ended in August 2020 (previously planned to be June 2020 but extended as of the Coronavirus pandemic).[40] It has been estimated that if full funding had been maintained, it would have contributed £745m to the BBC's 2020–21 budget.[43] The BBC held a public consultation in November 2018 to decide whether the concession to the over-75s should continue after 2020 and, if so, in what form.[44] The response to the BBC's questionnaire, 48% were in favour of retaining the existing concessionary system, 37% preferred reforming the concession and 17% preferred the option of abolition of the concession.[45]
The BBC discontinued the full concession, but continued to offer free licences on a means-tested basis;[46] from August 2020, most over 75s were required to pay the full licence fee, but households where one person receives a pension credit benefit will continue to be eligible for a free licence.[47]
Crown dependencies
[edit]On the Isle of Man, a free television licence scheme was funded by the Isle of Man Department of Social Care.[48] The BBC maintained the free licence scheme for all over 75s until 31 December 2020. [49][50] From 1 January 2021, this was replaced by a scheme whereby the BBC funds free television licences for the 500 over 75s in receipt of Income Support and the Isle of Man Government is funding free television licences for 2021 for the remaining 4,500 at a cost of around £800,000.[51][52][53][54]
There are schemes for elderly residents of the Channel Islands, but they vary in detail and eligibility.
- Residents of Guernsey and Alderney who are over 75 and are in receipt of Income Support are entitled to a free television licence funded by the BBC, whereas those under 75 but over pensionable age have a free licence funded by the States of Guernsey.[52][55][54] Residents of Sark who are over the age of 75 are entitled to a free TV licence if they are receiving financial support from the Procureur des Pauvres.[52][55][54]
- In Jersey, concessionary licences continue to be available on a means-tested basis under the Social Security (Television Licence Benefit) (Jersey) Regulations 2011, but are now funded by the BBC rather than the Government of Jersey.[52][56][54]
Blind or severely sight impaired concessions
[edit]Licences are half price for the legally blind.[57] To qualify for the concession, a blind or severely sight-impaired person must apply to the TV Licensing Blind Concession Group with proof of impairment, either a copy of the document of blind registration or a certificate from an ophthalmologist.[48] The concessionary television licence covers television use by the whole household.
Residential care homes
[edit]Those aged over 60 and in residential care homes (including nursing homes, public-sector sheltered housing and almshouses) qualify for Accommodation for Residential Care (ARC) licences for £7.50 a year.
Total licence sales
[edit]Television licence sales figures were quoted by the BBC to be 25.562 million in the year 2014–15, including 4.502 million concessionary licences for the over 75s,[58] which were paid for by the UK government. The equivalent figures for the year 2013–14 were 25.478 million total licences including 4.328 million licences for the over 75s.[59] In 2014–15, the BBC estimated that there were 26.916 million licensable properties in the UK (defined as premises where live television was being watched),[58] indicating that if the BBC estimates are correct, around 95% of properties are correctly licensed. The total income generated from licence fees was £3.8302 billion in 2017–18.[3]
The vast majority of television licences are for colour television. For example, there were 10,461 black and white television licences in force on 31 August 2014, compared to 25,460,801 colour television licences. The BBC has also stated that during the financial year 2013–14, a total of 41,483 blind concessionary (half-price) licences were issued in the UK of which 29 were blind concessionary black and white licences.[60]
Channel Islands
[edit]In January 2012, there were 36,261 colour licences in force in Jersey[61] as compared to 77,480 addresses (residential properties, businesses and other premises) on the TV Licensing database for the island (at the end of December 2011).[62] This would suggest around 53% of Jersey addresses did not have a television licence at the beginning of 2012.
The comparable figures for Guernsey are 23,673 licences in force in January 2012[61] and 40,263 addresses on the database at the end of December 2011.[62] Thus there were around 41% unlicensed properties in Guernsey at the beginning of 2012.
History
[edit]When television broadcasts in the UK were resumed after a break due to the Second World War, it was decided to introduce a television licence fee to fund the service. When first introduced on 1 June 1946, the licence covering the monochrome-only single-channel BBC television service cost £2 (equivalent to £104.79 as of 2023).[63] The licence was originally issued by the General Post Office (GPO), which was then the regulator of public communications within the UK. The GPO also issued licences for home radio receivers powered by mains electricity[64] as well as non removable vehicle mounted radios and was mandated by laws beginning with the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1904, to administer the licensing system; however, the television licence also covered radio reception.
The BBC started regular colour television broadcasts in the summer of 1967.[65] On 1 January 1968, a "colour supplement" of £5 was added to the existing £5 monochrome licence fee; the £10 colour fee was the equivalent of £219.06 in 2023. On 1 April 2019 it rose to £154.50 for colour television and £52 for monochrome television.[66] The radio-only licence was abolished on 1 February 1971, when it was £1-5s-0d (£1.25 in decimal UK currency) or the equivalent of £27.38 at 2023 prices.[36]
On 1 April 1991, the BBC took over the administration of television licensing in the UK, assuming the responsibility of licence fee collection and enforcement.[6][67] Since this date, the BBC has been the statutory authority for issuing television licences (before April 1991, the statutory authority was the UK Home Office), although the UK Government retains certain powers and responsibilities with regards to television licences.[67]
In July 2002, the BBC awarded Capita the contract to manage the television licensing system, replacing the Post Office (which had been renamed "Consignia" at this time).[68]
In January 2006 the Office of National Statistics classified the licence fee as a tax;[14] previously it had been classified as a service charge. This was reversed in the 2016 charter renewal.
From 2000 to 2009, the number of licences rose from 22.8 million to 24.9 million.[69]
Licence fee expenditure
[edit]The BBC Trust gave the following information for expenditure of licence fee income during the year 2009–10 of £3.56 billion[70] (expressed here in percentage terms):
- 66% – All television
- 17% – National and local radio
- 6% – Online e.g. BBC websites, iPlayer
- 11% – Other e.g. transmission and licence fee collection costs[a]
Since April 2014, the BBC World Service on radio and BBC Arabic Television have been funded from the licence fee. Prior to this date they were funded by a grant from the government's Foreign and Commonwealth Office. The World Service cost the BBC £268 million in the 2017–18 financial year.[3]
The BBC also paid in 2017–18 contributions to: broadband rollout (£80 million); partial funding of the Welsh channel (£74.8 million), S4C (which is also funded by the Department of Culture, Media and Sport); and a contribution towards the costs of local television (£4.7 million).[3]
BBC World News and the BBC's other international television channels are operated commercially and will continue to not receive licence fee money. The revenues they generate supplement the licence fee in financing British services.
In addition, the BBC Alba Gaelic-language television service is predominantly funded by MG Alba, an organisation funded by the Scottish Government.
Television licence legal requirements
[edit]When a licence is required
[edit]According to section 363 of the Communications Act 2003, a television licence must be obtained for any device that is "installed or used"[72] for "receiving a television programme at the same time (or virtually the same time) as it is received by members of the public".[73]
According to TV Licensing, "You need a TV Licence to use any television receiving equipment such as a TV set, digital box, DVD or video recorder, PC, laptop or mobile phone to watch or record television programmes as they're being shown on TV".[74] Portable televisions and similar equipment such as laptops and mobile phones powered by internal batteries are covered for use anywhere under a licence held for their owner's residence.[75]
On 1 September 2016 the conditions under which a television licence is required changed to include receiving video on demand programme services provided by the BBC, on the iPlayer catch-up service.[76] This was made possible by The Communications (Television Licensing) (Amendment) Regulations 2016.[77]
However, there are a few exceptional cases when live television may be watched without a licence.
When a licence is not required
[edit]It is not necessary to have a television licence for the purpose of:[78][79][80]
- Operating a digital box used with a hi-fi system or another device that can only be used to produce sounds[74]
- Installing and using a television set solely as a closed-circuit TV monitor[81]
- Using a television to play pre-recorded DVDs or videos (although to record live programmes it is necessary to hold a licence)[78]
- Using a television as a digital radio receiver[80]
- Using a digital box to listen to radio through a TV[82]
- Using a television as a monitor for a computer or games console[78]
- Watching catch up TV services when the programme is not live[83] except when using BBC iPlayer service to receive BBC channel catch-up programmes[76]
- Watching S4C catch-up programmes on BBC iPlayer
- Listening to BBC radio programmes over the Internet via BBC Sounds
A (free) licence is required for non-exempt premises even when no fee is payable, e.g. premises with residents over 75.
A recorded programme watched on unlicensed equipment is outside the scope of the Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004, because it is not "received at the same time (or virtually the same time) as it is received by members of the public,"[73][84] although such recordings may infringe copyright.
TV Licensing offers the following advice to those who have a television but 'who wish to make it clear that they do not need a licence':[85]
- Remove the television from the aerial.
- Cover the aerial socket so that it can't be used.
- Ensure that when channels on the television are selected no television signal is received.
However, TV Licensing also says that it is not compulsory to follow this advice. To listen to digital radio on a television, for example, it would be necessary to attach the television to an aerial and tune the television to different channels. The BBC has made it clear that it is legal to listen to digital radio using a television without holding a television licence.[80]
According to Ofcom, television transmissions over the Internet are a grey area[86] which in future might make fees based on television possession redundant. In 2005, a Green Paper by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport[87] included suggestions of "either a compulsory levy on all households or even on ownership of PCs as well as TVs".[88] However, TV Licensing later stated that use of any device (including a computer or mobile phone) receiving transmissions at or about the same time as they appear on television requires a licence.[74][84] The BBC is aware that new technology represents a threat to its revenue. A 2012 BBC report stated "there is a continued threat to the growth in television licence sales from the increasing number of people consuming television in a way that does not need to be licensed".[89]
Televisions receiving a transmission from outside the British Islands (e.g. broadcast from Germany, Italy, Greece, Turkey and the Netherlands via the Astra satellite, on which many channels are free-to-air) did not need a licence[22] until the Communications Act 2003, which required a television licence for the reception of television from any source.
In 2012, more than 400,000 households informed the BBC that they did not need a television licence.[90] According to the BBC, the average number of addresses in the UK with a No Licence Needed (NLN) status in the 2013 calendar year was 1,879,877.[91] In June 2013, 5,043 NLN declarations were made to the BBC on the grounds that the address was only watching catch up television.[91]
Equipment in use | Can television programmes be recorded? | What is it used with? | Licence required |
---|---|---|---|
Digital box | No | Colour television | Colour |
Digital box | No | Black and White television | Mono |
Digital box | All boxes | External sound receiver or radio only through television | No licence required |
Digital box or personal video recorder (PVR) | Yes | Colour or black and white television | Colour |
VCR – standalone, has an analogue tuner so cannot record contemporary digital television | No | Colour or black and white TV | No licence required |
Exceptions to the television licensing regime
[edit]There are a few exceptions to the television licensing regime where live television may be watched without a television licence being held for that property. These cases are:
- Crown immunity. According to the BBC: "neither the Communications Act 2003 nor the Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004 bind the Crown. Thus, the Crown is not subject to the TV Licensing regime."[92] Prison authorities can assert Crown immunity to allow prisoners to watch TV without a TV licence.[93] In 2012, the BBC recognised that the UK Parliament is exempt from the television licensing regime, and so the Parliamentary Estate stopped purchasing television licences from this date.[94]
- Events of national importance. The BBC can grant a dispensation for the temporary use of television sets away from the licensed address in what it calls 'exceptional circumstances'. One example of this was the screening of the Queen's Diamond Jubilee celebrations in 2012. There are well defined criteria for when this exception is valid.[95]
- Foreign ships. According to the BBC: 'Foreign Ships will not need a licence'[96]
Number of licences required per address
[edit]A licence is required to watch live television transmissions anywhere, including residential and business premises.[97]
For residential premises, only one licence is required per household per address, regardless of the number of licensed devices or the number of members of the household.[98] However, the licence itself is always held in the name of an individual.[99]
A rented property in multiple occupation by a joint tenancy agreement is considered by TV Licensing as one household and requires only one licence, but a rented property with multiple, separate tenancy agreements is not considered a single household and each tenant may require a separate licence.[100] For example, a house in multiple occupation may have private bedrooms and shared communal areas: if five occupants share such a property with individual tenancy agreements then they may require up to five television licences if each private room contains a television receiver, while a similar property housing five occupants under a joint tenancy agreement may require only one television licence.[101]
Television use away from home
[edit]Use of television in a static caravan is covered by the licence held for the user's main address, provided there is no simultaneous use of television at both places, and the use of television in a touring caravan is always covered by the user's main home licence. The use of a device to watch television (including a laptops or mobile phone), which is powered solely by its own internal batteries is covered for any address by the user's main home licence, but requires a separate licence if it is plugged into the mains or other external power source, such as a car battery.[102]
Students during term-time may not need a separate television licence if one is held at their permanent home-address if they watch television on a device powered solely by its own internal batteries. Specifically:[103]
- The out-of-term address must be covered by a television licence
- Any television receiving equipment used must be powered solely by its own internal batteries
- The television equipment must not be connected to an aerial or plugged into the mains.
People living exclusively in a mobile dwelling such as a touring caravan or a constantly cruising canal boat, who do not have a static address, are not legally able to watch a television as they cannot purchase a licence without one.[citation needed]
Licence fee enforcement
[edit]Television licence evaders
[edit]A person who watches or records live television without being in possession of a television licence is referred to by the BBC as a 'TV licence evader'.[5] Each year the BBC estimates the evasion rate (expressed as a percentage of total 'licensable properties') and publishes the value in its Annual Report and Accounts.
The basic formula for estimating the evasion rate is:[32]
where:
L: number of television Licences in force
Ho: number of domestic households
PR: penetration rate of televisions into households
NDL: non-domestic licences required
The figure for the number of licences in force is taken from the BBC's database. The other variables used to calculate the evasion rates are estimates. The data for the number of domestic households is taken from the Department of Communities and Local Government figures. The Broadcasters' Audience Research Board survey is used to estimate the rate of penetration of television sets into domestic households. Non-domestic licences include licences required for students, military accommodation, hotels and businesses. Various sources are used to estimate this figure.[5]
The most recent published figures for 2018–19 state that the evasion rate is between 6 and 7%.[104] For the year 2005–6, TV Licensing reported that they "reduced estimated evasion to a record low of 4.7%".[105] However, this figure rose during the following year to 5.1%[106] and remained at 5.1% during 2007–8.[107] For the year 2010–2011 the evasion rate is stated as 5.2%.[108] According to the BBC "the published rate of evasion has increased marginally to 5.5% in 2012/13".[5] The evasion rate is far from uniform across the UK, with Scotland having a far higher rate than the UK as a whole.[109] One reason given by the BBC for evasion is lack of money in a household. For example, in the BBC Full Financial Statement 2012–13 the BBC says: 'as household budgets come under pressure, we are starting to see an increase in licence fee evasion rates over their prior year level'.[110] However, this is not the only reason given for TV licence evasion, since according to a submission made by the BBC to the Information Commissioner's Office: 'the BBC said that it is also aware that a growing number of individuals deliberately evade the licence fee due to dissatisfaction with the BBC'.[111]
According to a National Audit Office report from 2002: "Areas with high evasion rates are most likely to have, for example, a higher than average proportion of younger people, low income households, and students and single parent families, and a level of County Court judgments 50 per cent above the national average".[112] However, according to the BBC, 'evasion is spread across all socioeconomic groups'.[106] The BBC has also claimed that the 'TV Licensing evader profile' could be characterised by the distribution by social grade of 1.3m properties that were not licensed on 31 March 2007. The profile was given as follows: AB 20.1%, C1 29.1%, C2 13.6%, D 18.9%, E 18.3%.[106]
The Broadcasters' Audience Research Board estimated that of June 2004, 2.3% of UK households do not have television,[113] and in September 2008, the BBC reported that some one million people do not need a television licence.[107] Alleged excuses given by householders for not having a licence include loss of mail, being "too busy" and suffering from polymorphous light eruption (sun allergy).[114] The results of market research carried out on self-identified evaders concluded that roughly half were 'opportunistic delayers' who were playing the system to avoid immediate payment and that the others were 'deliberate evaders' who were trying to 'cheat the system'. Nearly one fifth of respondents claimed never to have bought a television licence. In compiling these figures however, no reference is made to the number of people who do not require a licence and who have not voluntarily replied to invitations to declare this. Instead, it is assumed they are also counted as 'evaders', despite lack of any evidence of wrongdoing on their part.[112]
LASSY database
[edit]Since it is not possible to prevent a person buying and using television receiving equipment, the television licence system is enforced by first identifying television licence evaders and then attempting to sell them a licence and in some cases, prosecuting them.[22] The critical method of detecting television licence evaders is through the use of a database system known as LASSY,[115] which contains 29.5 million[106] addresses. LASSY is an acronym of 'Licence Administration and Support System'.[71] According to the National Audit Office: "The database holds records of potentially licensable properties and basic details (such as the name of the licence holder and the licence expiry date) of those for which valid licences are held".[112] This database is routinely updated with licence holders' details. Until 25 June 2013, dealers in television receiving equipment were required by law to provide TV Licensing with identifying information about everyone who buys or rents such equipment.[116] However this requirement has been lifted by the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013.[117] TV Licensing maintains permanent contact with every address in the database that is recorded as not having a TV licence[118] until a licence is purchased for that address or until TV Licensing confirm that the household does not need a licence. If it is confirmed that a household does not watch or record live television, the address is put into the NLCC (No Licence Needed Claim Confirmed) category. Residential properties put into this category are not visited or contacted for a period of two years from the time that the claim was confirmed. Business properties on the other hand, are exempted from visits or mailings for three years after confirmation.[22]
TV Licensing letters and telephone calls
[edit]TV Licensing may make initial contact by letter[18] or by phone with occupants of addresses for which there is no current licence.[71] During the financial year 2012–13, approximately 21.5 million letters were sent to unlicensed addresses. The average postage cost to post one standard TV Licensing letter in the financial year 2012–13 was stated to be £0.2059.[119] The methods by which an occupant can reply are in writing, by telephone or by filling in an online form. If there is no reply to the first letter and a television licence is not bought by the occupant, then TV Licensing continues to write regularly to the address and "the tone of the letters progressively becomes stronger to encourage a reply".[80] For example, one of its standard letters includes the phrase: "Official warning: We have opened an investigation". This warning was included in 940,615 letters sent in January/February 2013.[120] Another standard letter states: 'Dear Sir/Madam, you have not responded to our previous letters. We want to ensure you have the information you may need before a hearing is set at your local court.'[121] More than 3 million letters containing this phrase were sent in 2011.[122]
Three basic tones of voice are used in TV Licensing letters: "Customer Service", "Collections" and "Enforcement".[18] According to the BBC: "Customer service is the brand experience we create for customers who are currently licensed, unknowingly unlicensed or who don't need a licence", whereas "Collections is the brand experience we create for those customers whose television licence has expired and whom TV Licensing wants to motivate to renew." Finally, the enforcement tone is used for households who have been unlicensed for a longer period. This period is not specified in freely available documents but TV Licensing suggests it could be used, for example, for the third and fourth renewal reminder.[18] Each of these 'tones' involves letters with a different colour palette. For example, green is used in 'Customer Service' letters and red may be used in 'Collections' and 'Enforcement' letters. In all cases, the vocabulary and format used in the letters is strictly defined.[18]
If a business or household is not obliged to have a television licence then TV Licensing will request written confirmation of this, even though no such information is required to be given in law.[123][124]
According to the BBC, it is not possible to opt out of receiving TVL mailings since they 'are not advertising or marketing material'.[125] Similarly, householders who do not have a licence cannot exclude themselves from unsolicited calls from TV Licensing by registering with the Telephone Preference Service.[126]
In 2014, a householder invoiced TV Licensing £40 as a 'processing fee' for 'opening, reading and filing' a TV Licensing letter. Because TV Licensing did not pay the charge, the householder took the claim to the County Court, eventually winning the case and receiving the fee plus other costs incurred.[127]
Enquiry officer visits
[edit]If a colour television licence is not purchased for an address, TV Licensing agents—known as "visiting officers", "enquiry officers" or "enforcement officers"—make unannounced visits to the address. In August 2013, there were reported to be 334 enquiry officers,[128] all employees of the BBC's main enforcement contractor, Capita. Enquiry officers make around four million visits a year to households in the UK and Crown dependencies.[citation needed] Each week an enquiry officer may upload a number of unlicensed addresses onto their "handheld device".[129] The enquiry officer is only allowed to visit the addresses on this list, which are normally within a thirty-minute travelling distance from their home postcode. Enquiry officers do not visit addresses in their own postcode, however.[129]
Although TV Licensing enforces the BBC's statutory obligation to ensure that every address where a television licence is required is correctly licensed, its agents have no special right of access and, like any other member of the public, rely on an implied right of access to reach the front door. A householder may withdraw the implied right of access to TV Licensing personnel by contacting the BBC and informing them that this right has been revoked; the BBC says they respect such requests (although could still seek a warrant to search the property), except in Scotland.[130] As of March 2014, 7,299 households had withdrawn the implied right of access.[citation needed] This figure had increased to over 20,000 by December 2015.[131]
Upon visiting a property, enquiry officers ask a set of predetermined questions to whoever answers the door when they visit.[22] They first try to find out if the person who responds to the enquiry officer is an "appropriate person" to interview (i.e. an adult who lives at the property). They then try to find out if that person has been receiving television without a licence. If they suspect that this is the case, they issue an unofficial[b] caution to the person that whatever they say may be used against them in court. They then take a prosecution statement and ask the interviewee to sign it. The enquiry officer may ask permission to enter the property and may examine any television receiving equipment found there. According to the visiting procedures: 'circumstantial evidence of use should be noted on the Record of Interview whenever visible (e.g. sky dish, aerial lead plugged into television, remote control on settee) as this provides supporting evidence for potential prosecution and may be vital if the confession should later be challenged.'.[22] However, the occupant is well within his/her rights not to answer any questions (remaining silent) and is under no obligation to allow entry into the property.
If an agent has evidence that television is being watched or recorded illegally but is denied entry by the occupants so that they cannot verify the suspicion, then TV Licensing may apply to a magistrate for a search warrant.[106] The BBC states that a search warrant would never be applied for solely on the basis of non-cooperation with TV Licensing[132][133] and that in the event of being denied access to unlicensed property will use detection equipment rather than a search warrant.[134]
Detection technology
[edit]TV detector vans
[edit]TV detector vans have in the past featured heavily in TV Licensing publicity,[135] highlighting that technology capable of detecting signals from operating television sets could be employed.[136] Detector vans date from the 1950s, when the Post Office converted Hillman Minx and Morris Oxford estate cars, which had large aerials attached to their roofs.[citation needed] Subsequently Commers were introduced. In the 1980s, vans were supplied by Dodge and Leyland. In the 1990s, Ford Transits were introduced. In 2003, TVL launched its tenth generation of detector vans. It was stated that these vans had removable branding so that they could operate covertly.[137]
Few technical details of the detectors used have been released. In a press release from 2003, the BBC stated that:[136] "the new vans are so powerful they can tell if a television is in use in as little as 20 seconds". It was also stated that the equipment has a range of up to 60 metres (200 ft) and "can pinpoint the actual room that the television set is in". However, on TV Licensing's own site in 2015, no information on range or accuracy of the equipment is given. It instead says that there are "a range of detection tools at our disposal in our vans". It is also stated that the available equipment has been developed in secrecy and that "engineers working on specific detection methods work in isolation – so not even they know how the other detection methods work."[138]
Although no technical details of the television detectors used in these vans have been made public, it is thought that they operate by detecting electromagnetic radiation given off by a television.[139] The most common suggested method is the detection of a signal from the TV's local oscillator.[140][141]
It has been suggested in the media that television detector vans do not actually exist. A 2013 article in the Radio Times reported that a leaked BBC document on the collection of the licence fee "makes no mention of detector vans – but it does contain plenty of other facts and figures".[142]
Hand-held detectors
[edit]Hand-held television detectors have also been developed by the BBC.[106] In the Birmingham Mail for the same year[when?], the detectors were described as 'little bigger than a torch', weighing 280 g (10 oz), which made a beeping noise when they detect a television.[143]
The company Buckman Hardy Associates has made such equipment for the BBC in the past[144] but the equipment shown in the publicity campaigns run in 2007 was all made by the BBC itself.[145]
Optical detectors
[edit]In 2013, it was revealed that the BBC had used optical television detectors to apply for a search warrant. Although few technical details were given, it was stated in an application for a search warrant that: "the optical detector in the detector van uses a large lens to collect that light and focus it on to an especially sensitive device, which converts fluctuating light signals into electrical signals, which can be electronically analysed. If a receiver is being used to watch broadcast programmes then a positive reading is returned." The BBC stated that this was strong evidence that a set was "receiving a possible broadcast".[146]
Legal use of detection technology
[edit]The BBC states that such technology used in conjunction with targeted advertising acts as a deterrent: its use may make it easier for TV Licensing agents to establish that an offence is likely to be taking place but they would still need to secure further evidence for successful prosecution.[115][147] Furthermore, such technology is restricted in its use by the meaning of "surveillance and covert human intelligence sources" in the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000[106] and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (British Broadcasting Corporation) Order 2001.[148][149] Like other public bodies that undertake covert surveillance, the BBC is subject to the scrutiny of the Office of Surveillance Commissioners, which inspects the BBC every other year.[150] A number of official inspection reports on the BBC's detection methods have been made available following freedom of information requests[151] These reports give an outline of the process of authorisation of the use of detection equipment. Briefly, applications for authorisation are made in the name of the Detection Manager of Capita. Correspondence between TV Licensing and the affected householder may be attached to the completed application forms which pass via a quality control 'gatekeeper' to the authorising officers (AOs) at the BBC. In 2012 there were two designated AOs at the BBC. To be authorised, an application must be shown to be 'necessary and proportionate'. AOs sometimes reject applications. Once approved, the authorisation lasts for a duration of eight weeks.
TV Licensing states "detection equipment will only be used if other less intrusive and more cost effective routes have been exhausted",[152] and the BBC has stated that "Detection technology is generally used to obtain search warrants".[147]
In a reply to a FOI request in 2011, the BBC stated "I can confirm that TVL has not, to date, used detection evidence in Court". The BBC also wrote that such evidence "is unnecessary" because "TVL uses detection evidence when applying for search warrants. If, following service of the warrant an individual is found to be evading payment of the TV Licence, then the evidence obtained via the search warrant is used in court, not the detection evidence.[153]
Search warrants
[edit]In some cases, TV Licensing may apply to a magistrate (or a sheriff in Scotland) for a search warrant as part of the enforcement process.[154] According to TV Licensing, such an application may only be made "when there is good reason to believe that an offence has been committed, evidence of the commission of that offence is likely to be found, and conditions regarding access to the property warrant the granting of a search warrant".[154] The same source also states that "The BBC contracts Capita Business Services Ltd to carry out television licensing enforcement activities, including applying for and executing search warrants." The BBC's contractor uses powers granted by Section 366 of the Communications Act 2003 to apply for and exercise search warrants.[155] The Act specifies that the search warrant is valid for a month after being granted. According to the BBC, such warrants are usually executed in the presence of police officers.[154] The TV Licensing Visiting Procedures state: 'To minimise the impact on normal operations Enforcement Managers accompanied by an EO should in normal circumstances execute search warrants. On no account must the warrant be executed without two officers being present. Normally the two officers must be accompanied by a Police Officer'.[22] The warrant provides an authorisation to search a premises, and to examine and test any television receiver found. However, there is no power to seize any apparatus.[156] According to the BBC Search Warrant Policy "force must not be used by TV Licensing to gain entry to a property".[157]
Data on the number of search warrants executed per year in the whole of the UK are not collated or held centrally by the various judicial bodies of the state. However, the BBC, itself, holds the information some of which has become available due to FOI requests.[158] For example, in the financial year 2014–15, TV Licensing applied for 256 warrants to serve in the UK. 167 warrants were granted by the courts of which 115 were executed. In the same year in Scotland no warrants were applied for or served, whilst in Northern Ireland 12 warrants were granted and 7 executed in that year.[158]
Some idea of the frequency at which warrants are used may also be taken from the result of a recent FOI request.[159] It was revealed that Sheffield Magistrates granted TV Licensing a total of six search warrants in the years 2011, 2012 and 2013, whilst in Northampton (including Wellingborough and Kettering) only two were granted in this period.
Information provided by the Scottish Court Service suggests that TV Licensing search warrant applications in Scotland are virtually non-existent. In their response to a FOI request the Scottish Court Service confirmed that no search warrant applications were made to courts in Scotland's two largest cities, Glasgow and Edinburgh, in the three-and-a-half years between 1 January 2011 and 21 July 2014.[160]
Prosecution and fiscal fines
[edit]In 2014, 204,018 people were prosecuted or fined for TV licence offences: 185,580 in England and Wales[161] (173,044 in England and 12,536 in Wales), 4,905 people in Northern Ireland and 15 in the Isle of Man.[162] In Scotland, there were 13,486 cases disposed of via an out of court fine and 32 prosecuted via the courts in 2013–2014.[163] There have been no prosecutions for TV licence offences in Jersey since 2009, all cases having been resolved at Parish Hall Enquiry. Putting these numbers in perspective, it would appear there are more prosecutions and convictions per capita in Wales than in any other country in the UK.[citation needed]
Around 70% of TV licence evaders are female.[164] This 30%-70% male/female ratio is pretty much constant across the whole of the UK and is at odds with statistics for other small crimes .[165]: Table B4a This gender imbalance has not always been the case. In 1980, there were roughly similar numbers of men and women proceeded against for TV licence evasion. Since then the proportion of female to male defendants has risen steadily.[166]
In 2014, 24,025 prosecutions that were commenced by the BBC did not result in conviction (over one-in-ten cases in England and Wales).[citation needed]
Licence evaders are liable for prosecution and a fine of up to £1,000 in the UK.[167] However, because the licensing regime covers six different jurisdictions, the legal processes and penalties for the crime of TV licence evasion differ markedly across the British Islands. The average fine is £170 in England and Wales,[citation needed] £70 in Jersey, £80 in Northern Ireland, £75 in Scotland (out-of-court disposal)[163] and £200 in the Isle of Man.[162]
Television licence evasion is not punishable by a period of imprisonment per se, but if convicted evaders refuse to pay the fine they were ordered to pay, or are incapable of paying it, a period of imprisonment may be imposed as a "last resort". The length of stay is decided by the amount owed. In England and Wales, five people were given an average of 19 days in 2018[168] (compared to 20 days in 2014, 32 in 2013 and 51 in 2012).[163] There were no custodial sentences imposed during the five-year period 2009–10 to 2013–14 in Scotland or in Jersey.
The British Government proposed decriminalising licence evasion, but the proposition was turned down by a House of Lords vote by 178 to 175 in February 2015.[169] Behavioural research conducted for the BBC predicted that if television licence evasion was decriminalised and the £1,000 maximum fine was replaced by a civil penalty of over £300, evasion rates would increase. The same report recommended to the DCMS that the current system should remain[170] while Baroness Morgan admitted decriminalisation "would have an impact on BBC funding."[171]
England and Wales
[edit]In England and Wales, prosecutions are the responsibility of the BBC and are carried out by its contractor, Capita, in magistrates' courts[23] In England and Wales TV Licensing has a maximum of 26 weeks to lay information to court after receiving information regarding unlicensed use of a TV from its enquiry officers.[172] During this period, and a maximum of 24 hours before a decision to prosecute a householder is taken, TV Licensing will check if a licence has been purchased. The decision to prosecute usually takes place 12–14 weeks from receiving the enquiry officer's report. TV Licensing serves documents on defendants four to six weeks prior to a court hearing. A final check to see if a TV licence has been purchased is made a maximum of two days before the hearing.
Licence fee evasion makes up around one-tenth of all cases prosecuted in magistrates' courts[173] and 0.3% of court time.[174] Proceedings for TV Licence evasion form a high percentage of all prosecutions carried out against women – over a third of all cases against women in England and Wales in 2013 were for this offence.[175] By comparison, TV licence evasion made up around 5% of prosecutions against men in 2013 in England and Wales.[175]
The maximum fine for this offence of up to £1,000 is frequently publicised by TV Licensing to maximise deterrence.[176] In reality, magistrates rarely impose the maximum fines allowed to them by law. For example, during the year 2005–6, the average fine including costs was approximately £153[177] (slightly more than the cost of a licence). According to a 2013 TV Licensing briefing document, the level of fines and costs imposed by magistrates' courts vary considerably between different regions of England and Wales.[23] In North Wales average fines and costs were stated to be £108.90 whilst offenders in the English Midlands area of "Black Country, Staffordshire & West Mercia" were required to pay £197.70.
Magistrates take into account the financial situation of the defendant when imposing fines.[178] They also take into account: whether it is a first offence; if a television licence has been purchased and the length of time a defendant was unlicensed. The following are regarded as 'factors indicating lower culpability' which can result in mitigation of the sentence:[178]
- Accidental oversight or belief licence held
- Confusion of responsibility
- Licence immediately obtained
A guilty plea may also result in a lower fine.
According to TV Licensing: "many evaders claim that an enquiry officer told them they would not be prosecuted if they bought a licence". However, it is also pointed out that "it is a disciplinary offence for an enquiry officer to say or suggest this".[23] Nevertheless, the same TV Licensing briefing does say that: "first-time evaders may escape prosecution if they purchase a licence immediately".[23]
The UK government has stated that: "Most TV licensing cases that are heard by magistrates courts are uncontested and the case is therefore often resolved in the defendant's absence."[179]
The Magistrates' Association has been calling for the decriminalisation of television licence evasion for nearly twenty years, concerned that evaders are punished disproportionately.[180] The Adam Smith Institute has published a report calling for the BBC to give up the licence fee. One of the reasons given is the licence fee criminalises poor people, in particular women with children living on welfare. The report claims that such people could be liable to be re-prosecuted almost immediately unless they dispose of their TVs.[181] In fact, a National Audit Office report from 2002 stated that "significant numbers of offenders do not buy a licence following conviction".[112]
TV Licensing is managed as a sales operation[182] and its officers are motivated by commission payments.[183] In 2005, a TV Licensing officer was found guilty of false accounting and perverting the course of justice after he deliberately forged the confessions of four people to obtain commission payments.[184] In April 2012 an Essex man convicted of TV licence evasion had his conviction overturned when TV Licensing were unable to confirm the validity of video evidence they presented in the original trial.[185]
According to TV Licensing, 30% of those prosecuted for television licence evasion in 2012 were found to have satellite or cable subscriptions.[23]
In 2018, there were a total of 129,446 cases in England and Wales where television licence evasion was the principal offence. Of these, 121,203 people were convicted.[186]
Although those found guilty of television licence evasion cannot be sent to prison for that offence, if they default on their fine, they can be imprisoned. For example, in 2018, five people were imprisoned in England and Wales for defaulting on fines imposed for television licence evasion.[168]
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of proceedings | 166,944 | 164,462 | 170,650 | 193,049 | 178,332 |
Found guilty | 148,867 | 142,386 | 149,239 | 164,932 | 153,369 |
Average fine | £167 | £171 | £169 | £169 | £170 |
Northern Ireland
[edit]In Northern Ireland, prosecutions are the responsibility of the BBC and are carried out by its contractor, Capita, in magistrates' courts.[188] The prosecution process is very similar to that of England and Wales.[172]
In 2008, 5,272 people in Northern Ireland were prosecuted for non-payment of the television licence fee of which 4,118 were fined. The corresponding figures for 2007 were 5,901 people prosecuted and 4,464 fines imposed.[189]
Scotland
[edit]In Scotland, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Office undertakes prosecutions for TV licence evasion.[190] Very few cases in Scotland come to court.
Instead of prosecution, in Scotland, television licence fee evaders are usually asked by the Procurator Fiscal to pay a fiscal fine and a small number are simply given a warning. For example, in 2013–2014, just ten cases reached the courts whereas 12,969 people were asked to pay a fiscal fine, no action was taken in 275 cases and 174 people were sent a warning. In addition, two people were asked to pay compensation and one person was offered the chance to pay a combination of fiscal fine and compensation.[191] In 2013–14, almost all of the fiscal fines (12,603 out of 12,969) were at the level 2 rate of £75.[191] In 2014–15, 13% of all fiscal fines in Scotland were issued for Communications Act offences, stated to be mainly television licensing offences. The total number of fiscal fines imposed for these offences was 4,874.[192] In 2015–16, 7,962 fiscal fines were issued for Communications Act offences, of which 72% were issued to women.[193] In 2016–17, there were a total of 4,799 fiscal fines imposed for Communications Act offences.[194]
In the years 2016–17 and 2017–18, prosecutions against suspected licence fee evaders were reduced to single figures. In 2016–17, 5 people were prosecuted of which 4 were found guilty. In the following year there were 6 prosecutions resulting in 5 guilty verdicts.[195]
2010-11 | 2011-12 | 2012-13 | 2013-14 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
No action | 498 | 865 | 599 | 275 |
Warning | 832 | 536 | 2219 | 174 |
Fiscal fine | 9522 | 12665 | 16403 | 12969 |
Court proceedings | 9 | 35 | 17 | 10 |
Isle of Man
[edit]On the Isle of Man, prosecutions are prepared by Capita on behalf of the BBC[196] although they use Manx qualified lawyers[11] in the Magistrates' Court. The maximum fine is £1,000.
In a submission to Tynwald (the Isle of Man Government) regarding prosecution for non-payment of the BBC licence fee in the Crown dependencies, the BBC stated 59 cases were laid to court in the Isle of Man between 2007 and 2009, although "these figures include cases where no further action may have been taken (e.g. because a writ was not served or the case was withdrawn)".[11]
2011–12 | 2012–13 | 2013–14 | 2014–15 | 2015–16 | 2016–17 | 2017–18 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of prosecutions | 0 | 0 | 93 | 0 | 119 | 68 | 14 |
In its response to the UK Government's TV Licence Fee Enforcement Review, published in 2015, the Isle of Man Government 'agreed that it is supportive of the decriminalisation of non-payment of the TV licence fee'.[198]
Guernsey
[edit]The maximum fine for licence fee evasion in Guernsey is £2,000.[199] Initial investigations into licence fee evasion are carried out by Capita employees as in the UK. However, prosecutions are carried out by police and law officers. According to the States of Guernsey: "it appears the TV Licensing Inspectors visit the island once every three to four years, therefore offences are usually reported to us following these visits."[200] In June 2013, Capita's television licensing enforcement officers visited Guernsey where according to the BBC, they found "130 people illegally watching TV without a licence".[201] The Guernsey Police Annual Report 2014 states that no offences of "television receiver without a licence – install/use" were recorded in 2014 as opposed to two such cases in 2013.[202]
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of offences | 18 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | Offence not listed |
Jersey
[edit]According to the States of Jersey government: "Enforcement in Jersey is initiated by the TV Licensing function of the BBC which passes information onto the Jersey Police who then conduct their own investigation. A fine for a television licensing offence can only be levied following successful prosecution at the Magistrate's Court: the Centenier does not have the power to summarily levy a fine for a television licensing offence at a Parish Hall Enquiry."[204] The maximum fines for this offence in Jersey is £500.[199] Prosecutions are carried out by the Centenier. According to the BBC: "in the case of Jersey we can say that between 2007 and 2009 41 cases were laid to court".[11] In a response to a freedom of information request, the States of Jersey Police stated: "in 2014 there were fourteen prosecutions for having 'no TV licence'. All received cautions at the Parish Hall. Of the 14, eight were male and six were female. There were no prosecutions in 2015."[205] There were no prosections in 2016.[206]
Enforcement overview
[edit]England & Wales | Scotland | Northern Ireland | Isle of Man | Guernsey | Jersey | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigating authority | BBC | BBC but decision to prosecute taken by a procurator fiscal | BBC | BBC | BBC passes cases to an inspector in the Guernsey prosecution unit, with the evidence reviewed by law officers | BBC initially, information passed to police who conduct their own investigation |
Prosecuting authority | BBC | Procurator fiscal | BBC | BBC (using Manx lawyers) | Police and law officers | Centenier |
Legislation | Communications Act 2003; Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 |
Communications Act 2003; Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 |
Communications Act 2003; Police and Criminal Evidence Order 1989 |
Communications (Isle of Man) Order 2003; Police Powers and Procedures Act 1998 |
Communications (Balliwick of Guernsey) Order 2004; Police Powers and Criminal Evidence (Balliwick of Guernsey) 2003 |
Broadcasting & Communications (Jersey) Order 2004; Police Powers and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003 |
Maximum fine | £1,000 | £1,000 | £1,000 | £1,000 | £2,000 | £500 |
Case heard by | Magistrates' court | Sheriff court | District judge | Magistrates' Court | Magistrates' court | Magistrates' court |
Opinions on the licence fee
[edit]Opinion polls
[edit]In 2004, the BBC reported that "Almost 70% of people in the UK want changes to the way the BBC is funded", following an ICM poll for their current affairs programme Panorama, which showed that 31% were in favour of the existing licence fee system, 36% said the BBC should be paid for by a subscription and 31% wanted advertising to pay for the programmes.[207]
In August 2008, the Guardian newspaper reported that "The BBC is facing an uphill battle to maintain support for the licence fee", stating that according to an Ipsos MORI poll the newspaper had commissioned, 41% agreed and 37% disagreed that the licence fee is an "appropriate funding mechanism". When asked whether the licence fee is "good value for money", however, 47% disagreed, with more than half of them disagreeing strongly. The poll also showed that there is no longer a majority believing that the licence fee assured them of distinctive programming not available elsewhere — which, the newspaper said, had long been one of the arguments for its existence: 41% of the population disagreed with only 30% agreeing. The poll also showed that opinion was split by a growing north–south and socio-economic divide.[208]
In September 2009, the Guardian reported an ICM poll showing an increase in support for the licence fee to 43%; "The fee is backed by 43%, against 24% who think advertising should foot the bill and 30% who think people should pay to subscribe if they want to see BBC programmes. In 2004, only 31% backed the licence fee, 12 points lower than today.".[209]
In 2013, according to an ICM poll for the Sunday Telegraph, 70% stated that the BBC licence fee should be abolished or cut. 49% of those polled believed the fee should be scrapped altogether.[210]
In December 2019, a Savanta ComRes poll indicated that 2 out of 3 want the BBC licence fee abolished or reformed.[211] A few days later, a Public First poll conducted for BBC Radio 4's Today Programme found that 74% of respondents want the licence fee abolished.[211]
In February 2020, a ComRes poll for the Sunday Express found that 61% of respondents want the BBC Licence Fee abolished.[212] The same survey showed that 63% of people polled felt the BBC is an "important part of British culture" and the BBC questioned whether the results were skewed by not explaining what cuts would ensue.[213]
In March 2020, Press Gazette magazine ran a poll showing that 53% of its readers backed the compulsory licence fee model, while 47% were in favour of scrapping it.[214]
Views of official bodies and policy institutes
[edit]Previous inquiries, such as the parliamentary Peacock Committee in 1986 and the internal Davies committee in 2000, recommended continuing the licence fee, with conditions. In 2001, an Ofcom report found that the vast majority of those it interviewed, including owners of digital television equipment, supported the principle of a licence fee to fund public service television and radio. The advantages of such funding listed by those interviewed included diversity, high quality, education, innovation, entertainment, information, original productions, pluralism, accessibility, inclusion of minorities and free access.[215] Another reason given in a response to Ofcom by the National Union of Journalists was that the licence fee allows the BBC to "retain independence" from both commercial and political pressures.[216]
Nonetheless, having surveyed public opinion during December 2003, a finding of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport was that "the way the licence fee is set and collected raised issues about fairness".[217] Further criticisms, embodied in a 2005 Green Paper,[87] included cost, value for money, whether or not the BBC should be publicly funded, the high cost of collection and enforcement and the methods used.
Meanwhile, in 2004, the Institute for Public Policy Research criticised the television licence fee for its regressive impact, pointing out that it represents a much higher proportion of income for poor households, that evaders are most likely to be single parents, lone tenants, pensioners and the economically inactive and that the difficulties they have in paying the licence fee are compounded by the penalties enforced for non-payment.[19]
Other technologies for receiving visual media, such as mobile phones and computers connected to the Internet, has led to questions over whether or not a licence fee based on television receiver ownership can continue to be justified when a television receiver is no longer the sole medium over which the BBC distributes its content;[218] and these technological changes led the Department for Culture, Media and Sport to state in 2005 that the collection of a fixed charge based on television ownership may become difficult to sustain.[87]
In 2006, the House of Lords select committee on BBC Charter Review criticised the reclassification of the licence fee as a tax, pointing out that the BBC was in consequence reclassified as a central government body, with "significant implications for the BBC's independence".[14]
In a debate in the UK Parliament in October 2013, the licence fee was referred to as 'a flat-rate poll tax' and as 'probably the UK's most regressive tax'.[219]
Some critics[who?] claim that the licensing system interferes with the freedom to receive information and contend that this is a contravention of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to freedom of expression).[220] In a case dealing with the German radio licence, the ECHR in Application No. 26907/95 stated "Such an undertaking cannot be successfully accomplished unless it is grounded in the principle of pluralism, of which the State is the ultimate guarantor." and "The interference complained of was, therefore, necessary in a democratic society. There is, accordingly, no appearance of a violation of the applicant's right under Article 10 (Art. 10)."[221]
Media views
[edit]The television licence fee system has been variously criticised, commented upon and defended by the press.[222][223][224] In 2010, the journalist Charles Moore was fined by a magistrates' court for watching TV without a licence. Moore had refused to pay in protest at the BBC's unwillingness to dismiss Jonathan Ross in the wake of his involvement in The Russell Brand Show prank telephone calls.[225] Later, Moore was to describe the BBC licence fee as "the most regressive and most ruthlessly collected of all government imposts".[226] In 2014, Nick Ross, a BBC presenter, stated that the licence fee was unfair and should be abolished.[227]
Gender disparity
[edit]A review by the TV Licensing Agency published in 2017 considered the gender disparity in television licence prosecutions. 72% of prosecutions for television licence evasion in 2017 were against women. Television licence evasion is the most common offence for which women are prosecuted in the UK. Although the review found that "There is no evidence of any discriminatory enforcement practices on the part of TV Licensing"[228] commentators have highlighted the ongoing factors of poverty, debt and working in the home which combine to make it more likely that women will be charged with this crime than men.[229] Women in the UK are nearly ten times more likely to be convicted than men[230] and this leads to suggestions that the BBC may be guilty of "indirect gender discrimination".[231] In 2020, in the light of a threatened judicial review the BBC agreed to follow up on the 2017 report and consider the structural sex discrimination which might exist in the scheme leading to this skewed level of prosecutions.[232]
Websites and blogs
[edit]There are a number of websites that campaign against the television licence.[233] The BBC monitors the Internet for references to TV Licensing.[234] According to the BBC "searches are carried out for the purpose of identifying external information relating to TV Licensing such that, where appropriate, we can respond and assist licence fee payers or correct inaccurate information as well as flag up customer complaints." Part of this monitoring 'flags up' critical comments about TV Licensing. An internal briefing note released by the BBC in response to a freedom of information request names the TV Licensing Blog as TV Licensing's "most prevalent activist"[233] who has "built a significant following both for his blog and for his @TVLicensingblog Twitter feed (over 900 followers)". The BBC also monitors YouTube videos of enquiry officers and YouTube videos critical of TV Licensing[234] as well as social media such as Facebook[235] and Twitter.
In June 2020, a campaign called "Defund the BBC" was founded by James Yucel, a student at Glasgow University, supported by political commentator and activist Darren Grimes. The group was featured on Dan Wootton's Talkradio show and currently has over 100,000 Twitter followers.[236]
Opinions on collection and enforcement methods
[edit]In September 2008, the BBC's governing body, the BBC Trust, launched a review of TV Licensing's methods,[71] following complaints about "heavy-handed" and "intimidating" tactics[107] and during December 2008, it was reported by the press that the chairman of the all-party Commons Culture, Media and Sport committee had accused TV Licensing of behaving "like the Gestapo", employing "tactics that are outrageous", saying: "The tactics used by TV Licensing in their letters are intimidatory and cause genuine distress. Their records are not always correct, but they write letters that assume members of the public are criminals".[237]
In 2008, former BBC television personality Noel Edmonds stated that he had stopped paying his television licence in a protest at the tone of BBC adverts aimed at television licence evaders.[238]
Isle of Man
[edit]The licensing system remains controversial in the Isle of Man due to the fact that the licence fee remains the same as in the UK and Channel Islands, even though the BBC provides neither a local television news service for the Isle of Man (similar to BBC Channel Islands) nor any BBC local radio or national radio opt-out station. The BBC has sought to redress the lack of coverage by improving its online news service for the Isle of Man, with permanent BBC staff based at the Manx Radio studios in Douglas. A select committee of Tynwald was established in 2009 to investigate the value for money of the licensing system for the Isle of Man and the feasibility of the Isle of Man withdrawing from it.
Future of the licence fee
[edit]The current Royal Charter for the BBC expires on 31 December 2027[239] and the TV licence fee itself was fixed at £145.50 until March 2017.[240] The fee was due to increase in line with inflation for five years until 2021/22;[241] from the price £147.[242][243] In 2021, the fee was fixed at £159 until 1 April 2024, when it rises to £169.50.[244]
In March 2024, the Director General announced that the BBC would carry out a review of the licence fee, with a focus on reforms.[245][246]
The government stated that "while the current licence fee collection system is in operation, the current system of criminal deterrence and prosecution should be maintained".[247]
In June 2019, it was announced that free television licences for all over-75s that were funded by the Government as part of the 2017 agreement, would be abolished in June 2020.
The TV Licensing website stated that "From 1 June 2020, there will be a new scheme. Under the new scheme, anyone aged 75 or over who receives Pension Credit will still be eligible for a free TV Licence which the BBC will pay for. Households where there is no one aged 75 or over that receives Pension Credit will need to buy a licence if one is needed." This was delayed to 1 August 2020, in part due to the COVID-19 pandemic.[248]
During the 2019 general election campaign, then Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the government would consider decriminalising non-payment of the television licence, a move which the BBC warned could cost it £200 million a year.[249]
In January 2022, the then Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Nadine Dorries announced plans to terminate the licence after the current charter expires.[250]
Notes
[edit]The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004[73] gives the following definition:
- "Television receiver" means any apparatus installed or used for the purpose of receiving (whether by means of wireless telegraphy or otherwise) any television programme service, whether or not it is installed or used for any other purpose.
- Any reference to receiving a television programme service includes a reference to receiving by any means any programme included in that service, where that programme is received at the same time (or virtually the same time) as it is received by members of the public by virtue of its being broadcast or distributed as part of that service.
Notelist
[edit]- ^ During 2007–2008, the BBC stated that 3.6% of the licence fee was spent on collection.[71]
- ^ A regular member of the public cannot issue an official caution.[citation needed]
References
[edit]- ^ "Businesses and organisations". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- ^ "Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport - First Report. 5 BBC Funding". Publications & records. UK Parliament. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
- ^ a b c d e "BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18" (PDF). BBC. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
- ^ "Licences facts and figures". www.tvlicensing.co.uk.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "British Broadcasting Corporation Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2013". The Stationery Office. Retrieved 22 April 2015.
- ^ a b c "Legal framework". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 20 October 2014.
- ^ "The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
- ^ "SI 2010/640 The Communications (Television Licensing) (Amendment) Regulations 2010" (PDF). HM Stationery Office. Retrieved 18 January 2013.
- ^ "Copy of Ask Help script". Whatdotheyknow.com. 16 August 2014. p. 376. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
- ^ a b "TV Licence Enforcement Review" (PDF). Department for Media Culture & Sport. Retrieved 16 February 2015.
- ^ a b c d "SELECT COMMITTEE OF TYNWALD ON THE TELEVISION LICENCE FEE REPORT 2010/11" (PDF). Tynwald, Isle of Man. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
- ^ "Administering the licence fee". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 7 May 2015.
- ^ "Freedom of Information Act". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 7 May 2015.
- ^ a b c "Further Issues for BBC Charter Review" (PDF). House of Lords Session Report. The Stationery Office Limited. 3 March 2006. Retrieved 15 August 2008.
- ^ Seely, Antony (27 September 2011). "Research Briefing SN01480: Hypothecated taxation". House of Commons Library. p. 8. Archived from the original on 20 January 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
- ^ a b "About TV Licensing". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 23 April 2015.
- ^ a b c "Who We Are". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 20 October 2014.
- ^ a b c d e f "Wording and Approval of TV Licensing Letters". Whatdotheyknow.com. 24 December 2011. Retrieved 16 January 2014.
- ^ a b "BBC Review should consider licence fee concessions". Press Release. Institute for Public Policy Research. 27 December 2003. Archived from the original on 29 June 2008. Retrieved 13 August 2008.
- ^ "The BBC's TV Licensing Service". Capita. Retrieved 2 September 2014.
- ^ "BBC – Television Licensing" (PDF). The Capita Group plc. Retrieved 12 May 2015.[permanent dead link ]
- ^ a b c d e f g "Information about TV Licensing induction and training". Whatdotheyknow.com. 6 July 2013. Retrieved 6 May 2015.
- ^ a b c d e f "TV Licensing briefing – court training time, costs and information". Whatdotheyknow.com. 4 September 2013. Retrieved 20 February 2014.
- ^ "Case Law Relating to TV Licensing". Whatdotheyknow.com. 4 August 2015. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
- ^ "About akinika". Akinika.co.uk. Akinika. Retrieved 20 October 2015.
- ^ "Debt Recovery". Capita.co.uk. Capita Plc. Archived from the original on 15 January 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2015.
- ^ "New jobs at Darwen TV licence HQ". Lancashire Telegraph. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
- ^ "TV licensing staff go on strike". BBC. 29 January 2007. Retrieved 28 August 2014.
- ^ a b "BBC appoints Proximity to deliver TV Licensing direct marketing". BBC. Retrieved 2 September 2014.
- ^ "BBC". Fishburn. Retrieved 10 September 2014.
- ^ TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. "How long does a TV Licence last?". Retrieved 8 August 2014.
- ^ a b "British Broadcasting Corporation Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2011" (PDF). www.gov.uk. UK Government. Retrieved 25 August 2015.
- ^ TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. "Cancellations and refunds". Retrieved 8 August 2014.
- ^ a b "Legislation and policy". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 8 August 2014.
- ^ "Licence Fee". BBC Trust. May 2012. Retrieved 29 April 2013.
- ^ a b "Copy of Ask Help script". Whatdotheyknow.com. 16 August 2014. p. 429. Retrieved 6 November 2014.
- ^ "TV licence frozen for six years". BBC News. 20 October 2010.
- ^ a b c TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. "TV Licensing – All payment methods". Retrieved 31 July 2014.
- ^ TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. "PayPoint". Archived from the original on 2 June 2015. Retrieved 3 June 2015.
- ^ a b Woodhouse, John (13 June 2019). "Free TV licences for the over-75s". House of Commons Library.
- ^ "Over 75 TV Licence". TV Licensing. Retrieved 31 July 2017.
- ^ "Broadcasting An Agreement Between Her Majesty's Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the British Broadcasting Corporation" (PDF). downloads.bbc.co.uk/. UK Government. December 2016. p. 33.
- ^ "BBC to take on £750m cost of subsidy for over-75s in licence fee deal". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 April 2016.
- ^ "BBC launches consultation on TV licence fee for over-75s". BBC News. 20 November 2018. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
- ^ "Age-Related TV Licence Policy" (PDF). bbc.co.uk. BBC. Retrieved 19 June 2019.
- ^ "BBC Board decision on licence fees for older people". bbc.com. 2019. Retrieved 1 July 2019.
- ^ "Blanket free TV licence for over-75s scrapped". 10 June 2019. Archived from the original on 11 June 2019. Retrieved 11 June 2019.
- ^ a b "Useful information". TV Licensing. TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Archived from the original on 28 September 2015. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
- ^ "TV licences free for over-75s on Isle of Man until 2021". BBC News. 10 July 2020.
- ^ "Age-Related TV Licence Fee Concession: Isle of Man" (PDF). BBC. 26 May 2020.
- ^ "Isle of Man treasury to fund TV licences for over-75s in 2021". BBC News. 30 October 2020.
- ^ a b c d "Licence fee: BBC to fund some over-75s licence fees in Crown Dependencies". BBC News. 26 October 2020.
- ^ "Age-Related TV Licence Fee Concession: Isle of Man" (PDF). BBC. 15 October 2020.
- ^ a b c d "Can I get a free over 75 TV Licence if I live in the Isle of Man, the Bailiwick of Jersey or the Bailiwick of Guernsey?". TV Licensing.
- ^ a b "Age-Related TV Licence Fee Concession: Bailiwick of Guernsey" (PDF). BBC. 15 October 2020.
- ^ "Age-Related TV Licence Fee Concession: Bailiwick of Jersey" (PDF). BBC. 15 October 2020.
- ^ "Half price licence for the blind or severely sight impaired". TV Licensing Website Easy Read Guide. Retrieved 20 March 2012.[permanent dead link ]
- ^ a b "British Broadcasting Corporation Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2015". www.tvlicensing.co.uk. TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
- ^ "British Broadcasting Corporation Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2014". The Stationery Office. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
- ^ "Active TV Licenses". Whatdotheyknow.com. 4 September 2014. Retrieved 25 April 2015.
- ^ a b "Evasion rate spreadsheet - a Freedom of Information request to British Broadcasting Corporation". 26 July 2012. Retrieved 22 September 2016.
- ^ a b "Number of TV licences in the Channel Islands - a Freedom of Information request to British Broadcasting Corporation". 23 August 2016. Retrieved 22 September 2016.
- ^ UK Retail Price Index inflation figures are based on data from Clark, Gregory (2017). "The Annual RPI and Average Earnings for Britain, 1209 to Present (New Series)". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved 7 May 2024.
- ^ "The history of the UK radio licence". RadioLicence.org.uk. Archived from the original on 28 May 2014. Retrieved 5 August 2014.
- ^ "Where Next?". BBC Web Site. BBC. Retrieved 5 August 2014.
- ^ "Where can I find information about the licence fee?". BBC FAQs. 1 April 2019.
- ^ a b "Legal framework of Licence Fee enforcement activity". Whatdotheyknow.com. 16 June 2011. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
- ^ "Capita Signs BBC contract for TV Licensing Account". BBC. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
- ^ "FOI: Licences facts and figures". TV Licensing UK. Archived from the original on 21 July 2010.
- ^ "How the licence fee was spent in 2009/2010". BBC Web Site. BBC Trust. Retrieved 8 April 2011.
- ^ a b c d "Trust review of licence fee collection" (PDF). BBC Trust. March 2009. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
- ^ "Communications Act 2003, Section 363(1)". The National Archives. Retrieved 28 February 2018.
- ^ a b c "The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004, Regulation 9". The National Archives. Retrieved 28 February 2018.
- ^ a b c TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. "Do I need a TV Licence?". Retrieved 3 August 2008.
- ^ Oliver, Harriet (1 October 2009). "Firms issued TV licence warning". BBC News. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- ^ a b "Official TV Licensing website - BBC iPlayer and the TV Licence". www.tvlicensing.co.uk.
- ^ The Communications (Television Licensing) (Amendment) Regulations 2016, S.I. 2016 No. 704, Regulation 9: Modification of the Communications Act 2003
- ^ a b c "Videos, DVDs and games consoles". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ "TV Licensing – CCTV".[permanent dead link ]
- ^ a b c d "FOI: Administering the TV Licensing system part 1". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Archived from the original on 23 July 2012. Retrieved 11 July 2012.
- ^ "What if we only have Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) at our premises?". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 27 February 2013.
- ^ a b "TV Licence Requirements: Radio Reception via Television Equipment". Whatdotheyknow.com. 21 October 2011. Retrieved 20 October 2014.
- ^ TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC (5 April 2013). "TV Licensing – Technology – devices and online". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
- ^ a b BBC News (13 February 2006). "Fine warning over TV on mobiles". Retrieved 18 June 2006.
- ^ "Television Licence Checks" (PDF). House of Commons Library. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
- ^ The Digital TV Group (28 February 2005). "BBC 'to lose in internet TV loophole'". Archived from the original on 15 January 2016. Retrieved 18 June 2006.
- ^ a b c "Review of the BBC's Royal Charter (Green Paper)" (PDF). BBC News. 2005. Retrieved 18 June 2006.
- ^ The Times (5 March 2005). "Computer tax set to replace TV licence fee". London. Archived from the original on 9 January 2006. Retrieved 18 June 2006.
- ^ "British Broadcasting Corporation Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2012" (PDF). The Stationery Office Limited. 16 July 2012. Retrieved 11 January 2013.
- ^ Silverman, Rosa (17 June 2013). "More than 400,000 'Do not Need' TV Licence". The Telegraph. London. Retrieved 23 July 2013.
- ^ a b "Number of 'No Licence Needed' declarations in 2013". Whatdotheyknow.com. 7 April 2014. Retrieved 24 July 2014.
- ^ "Exemptions - TV Licence". Whatdotheyknow.com. 28 April 2015. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
- ^ "TV Licence in Prisons". Whatdotheyknow.com. 12 April 2015. Retrieved 3 June 2015.
- ^ "TV Licenses (2014)". UK Parliament. Retrieved 20 May 2019.
- ^ "Copy of Ask Help script". Whatdotheyknow.com. 16 August 2014. p. 766. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
- ^ "Copy of Ask Help script". Whatdotheyknow.com. 16 August 2014. p. 727. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
- ^ "Q&A: The TV licence and your PC". BBC Web Site. BBC. 15 June 2006. Retrieved 20 July 2008.
- ^ Do I need a TV Licence for every TV in my household?, TV Licensing, 2011
- ^ "Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Decision Notice". ICO. 31 March 2009. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
- ^ Do I need a licence if I live in a shared house and it's not my TV?, TV Licensing, 2011
- ^ "Students". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. 27 August 2009. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ "Terms and Conditions (of TV Licence)". TV Licensing. Retrieved 28 June 2024.
- ^ "Students". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 3 February 2015.
- ^ "TV Licensing Annual Review 2018/19". TvLicensing.co.uk. TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
- ^ "TV Licensing Annual Review, 2005/6" (PDF). Tvlicensing.co.uk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ a b c d e f g "TV Licensing Annual Review, 2006/7". Tvlicensing.co.uk. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ a b c "Review of TV licence fee tactics". BBC News Web Site. BBC. 8 September 2008. Retrieved 8 September 2008.
- ^ "2010/11 Annual Review" (PDF). TvLicensing.co.uk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 July 2013. Retrieved 12 July 2012.
- ^ "Revealed: Britain's capital for TV licence fee evasion is.. Glasgow". Daily Record. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
- ^ "BBC Full Financial Statements 2012/13" (PDF). BBC. Retrieved 23 July 2014.
- ^ "Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Decision Notice". Information Commissioner's Office. Retrieved 29 July 2013.
- ^ a b c d "The BBC: Collecting the television licence fee" (PDF). National Audit Office. Retrieved 7 November 2013.
- ^ "BBC response to Freedom of Information Request, 16/02/2006" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 May 2008.
- ^ "TV licence excuses include postman affairs and sunlight". BBC News. 20 September 2011. Retrieved 20 September 2011.
The top ten excuses as defined by TV Licensing were: "Since I had a bit of a fling with the postman I haven't been receiving my mail so I didn't get my TV Licence reminder"; [...] "I never got the reminders because my two-year-old hides all my post in her toy box"; [...] "I'm getting married and am too busy picking flowers, colours and things to buy a TV Licence."; "I cannot go out to buy a licence because I am allergic to the sun."
- ^ a b National Audit Office (15 May 2002). "The BBC: Collecting the television licence fee". Retrieved 18 June 2006.
- ^ "Official TV Licensing website - TV dealers". www.tvlicensing.co.uk.
- ^ "Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill" (PDF). UK Parliament. Retrieved 4 July 2013.
- ^ "BBC response to Freedom of Information Request, 04/08/2006" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 May 2008.
- ^ "Letters sent out". Whatdotheyknow.com. January 2014. Retrieved 18 November 2014.
- ^ "The BBC's use of the term "Investigation"". Whatdotheyknow.com. 18 February 2013. Retrieved 16 January 2014.
- ^ "TV Licensing Written Correspondence". Whatdotheyknow.com. 20 March 2014. Retrieved 8 September 2014.
- ^ "TVL: Frequency of use of misleading court threats". Whatdotheyknow.com. 17 December 2011. Retrieved 8 September 2014.
- ^ "Freedom of Information Request - RFI2007000351" (PDF). 13 April 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 April 2008.
- ^ Confirmed by Shaun Woodward (Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Department for Culture, Media and Sport) in response to a request for clarification from a constituent [1]
- ^ "Copy of Ask Help script". Whatdotheyknow.com. 16 August 2014. p. 246. Retrieved 8 April 2015.
- ^ "Copy of Ask Help script". Whatdotheyknow.com. 16 August 2014. p. 320. Retrieved 10 April 2015.
- ^ "TV Licensing successfully sued". Whatdotheyknow.com. 22 December 2014. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
- ^ "Do TV Detector Vans Exist?". Radio Times. Retrieved 31 October 2013.
- ^ a b "Frequently asked questions | Capita". www.capita.com. Capita. 9 January 2020. Archived from the original on 25 February 2020. Retrieved 30 January 2021.
- ^ "Policy Change for Scottish Residents regarding access withdrawal". WhatDoTheyKnow. 14 April 2015. Retrieved 18 August 2015.
- ^ "Implied Right - a Freedom of Information request to British Broadcasting Corporation". WhatDoTheyKnow. 27 December 2015. Retrieved 12 December 2016.
- ^ "Freedom of Information Request - RFI2006000476" (PDF). 13 April 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 April 2008.
- ^ "BBC response to Freedom of Information Request, 13/04/2007" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 May 2008.
- ^ "BBC response to Freedom of Information Request, 18/09/2007" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 May 2008.
- ^ "TV Licence – Columbo". The National Archives. Retrieved 27 September 2012.
- ^ a b "Press Office – New generation of television detector vans". BBC. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ "New generation of television detector vans hit the streets". BBC. Retrieved 3 June 2014.
- ^ "How do the detector vans work?". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
- ^ "Deceptor vans". New Scientist. Retrieved 19 May 2014.
- ^ Douglass, Ralph G.; Furman, Arthur R. (4 April 1995). "US Patent # 5,404,161. Tuned signal detector for use with a radio frequency receiver - Patents.com". Patents.com. USPTO. Archived from the original on 26 September 2017. Retrieved 17 November 2015.
- ^ Douglass, Ralph G.; Furman, Arthur R. (4 April 1995). "United States Patent: 5404161". www.uspto.gov. USPTO. Retrieved 30 January 2021.
- ^ "Home". Radio Times.
- ^ "New weapon to catch TV licence cheats". Birmingham Mail. 1 August 2007. Retrieved 9 January 2015.
- ^ "Examples of Previous Projects". Buckman Hardy Associates. Archived from the original on 3 February 2008. Retrieved 18 June 2006.
- ^ "Hand-held TV detectors". WhatDoTheyKnow. 24 July 2013. Retrieved 7 July 2015.
- ^ "Statements involving TV Detector evidence". Whatdotheyknow.com. 7 January 2013. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
- ^ a b "BBC response to Freedom of Information Request" (PDF). 14 March 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 May 2008.
- ^ "BBC response to Freedom of Information Request, 08/08/2006" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 April 2008.
- ^ "Home Office – The Regulation of Investigatory Powers (British Broadcasting Corporation) Order 2001". Opsi.gov.uk. 4 July 2011. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ "Annual Report of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner" (PDF). The Stationery Office. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 January 2016. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
- ^ "Office of the Surveillance Commissioner's Report, 2008". Whatdotheyknow.com. 25 August 2013. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
- ^ "Our roles and responsibilities". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 30 October 2014.
- ^ "Evidence from TV Detection Equipment". 29 December 2010.
- ^ a b c "FOI: Administering the TV Licensing system part 2". Tvlicensing.co.uk. Archived from the original on 30 July 2012. Retrieved 14 August 2012.
- ^ "Communications Act 2003". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 13 February 2014.
- ^ "Request for documents and clarification of Visiting Procedures". Whatdotheyknow.com. 17 September 2013. Retrieved 28 March 2014.
- ^ "TV licensing Search warrant information". Whatdotheyknow.com. 5 May 2014. Retrieved 12 August 2014.
- ^ a b "Monthly Performance Pack". WhatDoTheyKnow. 2 January 2016. Retrieved 13 July 2016.
- ^ "Instances of evidence submitted for TVL to obtain search warrants". Whatdotheyknow.com. 10 November 2013. Retrieved 24 February 2014.
- ^ "TV Licensing Search Warrant Applications - a Freedom of Information request to Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service" (PDF). 21 July 2014.
- ^ Nowell, Andrew (31 July 2015). "TV licence fines branded unfair". Wigan Today. Archived from the original on 30 September 2015. Retrieved 9 September 2015.
- ^ a b Darbyshire, Adrian (2 September 2015). "Record number prosecuted for TV licence evasion". IOM Today. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 9 September 2015.
- ^ a b c "No-one jailed in Scotland for failing to pay TV licence compared to scores in England". Herald Scotland. 9 August 2015. Retrieved 9 September 2015.
- ^ "1,500 Derbyshire people sign petition to scrap TV licence fee". Derby Telegraph. 27 May 2015. Archived from the original on 27 August 2015. Retrieved 9 September 2015.
- ^ "Criminal Court Statistics Quarterly, England and Wales July to September 2014" (PDF). www.gov.uk. Ministry of Justice. Retrieved 11 September 2015.
- ^ Gordon, David (1994). "Television, crime and poverty" (PDF). Radical Statistics. 57: 3–8. Retrieved 10 November 2015.
- ^ "TV Licence". Gov.uk. Retrieved 20 February 2014.
- ^ a b "Consultation on decriminalising TV licence evasion". UK Government. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
- ^ "House of Lords blocks attempt to decriminalise licence fee non-payment". rts.org.uk. Royal Television Society. 6 February 2015. Retrieved 9 September 2015.
- ^ a b "TV Licence Fee Enforcement Review" (PDF). Gov.uk. Department for Media Culture & Sport. Retrieved 9 September 2015.
- ^ "TV licence fee: Jail threat to be dropped". JPIMedia Publications. 5 February 2020. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
- ^ a b "TV Licensing Prosecution Time Limits". whatdotheyknow.com. 28 May 2014. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
- ^ "Do TV licence offences account for one in ten court cases". Full Fact. 22 August 2013. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
- ^ "BBC: TV licence fee decriminalisation being considered". BBC News. 15 December 2019. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
- ^ a b "Numbers of prosecutions for TV licensing issues". whatdotheyknow.com. 2 July 2014. Retrieved 29 July 2014.
- ^ "TV Licence Fee: briefing". BBC. Retrieved 20 February 2014.
- ^ "BBC Response to Freedom of Information Request, 27/04/2007" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 May 2008.
- ^ a b "Magistrates' Court Sentencing Guidelines" (PDF). Sentencing Guidelines Council. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2014. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
- ^ "Daily Hansard – Written Answers". UK Parliament. Retrieved 7 April 2014.
- ^ "Thousands in court every week for not having a TV licence". www.telegraph.co.uk. London. 20 March 2012. Retrieved 22 March 2013.
- ^ "Global Player or Subsidy Junkie? Decision Time for the BBC" (PDF). Adam Smith Institute. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
- ^ "Managing TV licensing for the BBC". Capita. Archived from the original on 11 March 2012. Retrieved 28 January 2012.
- ^ "Job Advertisement". Capita. Archived from the original on 18 August 2012. Retrieved 28 January 2012.
- ^ WalesOnline (24 September 2005). "TV licence worker guilty of pay scam".
- ^ "Man wins TV licence battle". Thurrock Gazette. 12 August 2012. Retrieved 18 August 2012.
- ^ "Criminal Justice System statistics quarterly: December 2018". www.gov.uk. Ministry of Justice. Retrieved 19 June 2019.
- ^ "Criminal justice statistics quarterly: December 2013 - Outcomes by offence spreadsheet". www.gov.uk. UK Government. 30 June 2014. Retrieved 1 October 2015.
- ^ "Magistrates' Courts Rules Committee Costs in criminal cases (magistrates' courts)" (PDF). Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service. Retrieved 22 July 2014.
- ^ "Parliamentary Business". www.parliament.uk. UK Government. Retrieved 11 August 2015.
- ^ "Involved in a case". Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Office. Retrieved 21 July 2014.
- ^ a b c "TV Licence – Fiscal Fines". COPFS. Retrieved 21 October 2014.
- ^ "Criminal Proceedings in Scotland 2014-15". www.gov.scot. Scottish Government. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
- ^ "Criminal Proceedings in Scotland 2015-16". www.gov.scot. Scottish Government. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
- ^ "Criminal Proceedings in Scotland 2016-17". www.gov.scot. Scottish Government. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
- ^ "Criminal proceedings regarding TV Licence evasion: FOI release". www.gov.scot. 15 May 2019. Retrieved 4 June 2019.
- ^ "Copy of Ask Help script". Whatdotheyknow.com. 16 August 2014. p. 994. Retrieved 30 October 2014.
- ^ "Isle of Man Constabulary". Isle of Man Government. Retrieved 28 September 2016.
- ^ "Isle of Man Government Response to Consultation on TV Licence Enforcement" (PDF). www.gov.uk. UK government. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
- ^ a b "Administering the licence fee". TV Licensing Authority, a division of BBC. Retrieved 3 February 2015.
- ^ "Request regarding TV licence evasion". gov.ge. States of Guernsey. Retrieved 16 April 2018.
- ^ "Guernsey residents face TV licence fines". BBC News. 22 July 2013. Retrieved 28 July 2015.
- ^ "Bailiwick of Guernsey Law Enforcement Annual Report for 2014". Guernsey Police. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
- ^ "Publications". Guernsey Police. Retrieved 28 July 2015.
- ^ "Television licence offence prosecutions and convictions (FOI)". gov.je. States of Jersey. Retrieved 16 April 2018.
- ^ "Freedom of Information" (PDF). www.jersey.police.uk/. States of Jersey Police. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
- ^ "Television licensing prosecutions (FOI)". gov.je. States of Jersey. Retrieved 16 April 2018.
- ^ "Majority 'want change to TV fee'". BBC News. BBC. 6 March 2004. Retrieved 14 August 2008.
- ^ Owen Gibson (18 August 2008). "Broadcasting: Survey blow to BBC as public question case for licence fee". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 18 August 2008.
- ^ Glover, Julian (4 September 2009). "Public rejects Murdoch view of BBC, says ICM poll". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 20 December 2010.
- ^ Ross, Tim (2 November 2013). "BBC licence fee should be cut or scrapped, poll finds" – via www.telegraph.co.uk.
- ^ a b Bodkin, Henry (28 December 2019). "Three-quarters want BBC licence fee abolished, poll finds". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 22 March 2023.
- ^ "BBC crisis as poll finds 60 percent want to SCRAP licence fee". 23 February 2020.
- ^ "BBC hits back at poll showing majority of UK adults support scrapping BBC licence fee". Press Gazette. 24 February 2020. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
- ^ "Press Gazette reader poll shows 47 per cent favour BBC scrapping licence fee". Press Gazette. 11 March 2020. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
- ^ "Public Service Broadcasting: What Viewers Want" (PDF). ITC Research Publication. Independent Television Commission. January 2001. Retrieved 13 August 2008.
- ^ "Ofcom Review of Public Service Broadcasting: Response by National Union of Journalists". Creators' Rights Alliance web site. Creators' Rights Alliance. Archived from the original on 6 January 2011. Retrieved 13 August 2008.
- ^ "What you said about the BBC". Review of the BBC's Royal Charter. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. July 2004. Archived from the original on 26 October 2008. Retrieved 12 August 2008.
- ^ "Reforming the BBC". The Economist. 3 March 2005. Retrieved 16 August 2008.
- ^ "Future of the BBC". UK Parliament. 21 October 2013. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
- ^ Jonathan Miller (12 January 2003). "Mean fields: Naked into the TV courtroom". Sunday Times. London: Times Newspapers Ltd. Retrieved 15 September 2008.[dead link ]
- ^ LTD., KETSE. "KRETZSCHMAR v. GERMANY". echr.ketse.com.
- ^ David Cox (26 August 2002). "Kill the licence fee". New Statesman. Retrieved 14 August 2008.
- ^ Greenslade, Roy (28 July 2003). "So who really hates the BBC?". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 August 2007.
- ^ Toynbee, Polly (19 September 2003). "BBC Needs a Bullywatch". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 August 2007.
- ^ "Charles Moore fined for Jonathan Ross-inspired TV licence boycott". TheGuardian.com. 11 May 2010.
- ^ "Here's an answer to the BBC licence fee: don't pay it!". The Daily Telegraph. 10 November 2012. Archived from the original on 11 May 2022.
- ^ "Nick Ross: Scrap BBC licence fee". BBC News. 25 March 2014.
- ^ "Gender Disparity report - TV Licensing". TvLicensing.co.uk. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
- ^ Gil, Natalie. "Why TV Licences Are An Unlikely Feminist Issue". Refinery29.com. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
- ^ "Almost Third of Women's Convictions Are for not Paying TV Licence Fee". The Independent. 28 November 2020. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
- ^ Hymas, Charles (26 November 2020). "Almost one third of female convictions in UK for TV licence fee evasion, MoJ figures show". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
- ^ Urwin, Rosamund. "BBC to review TV licence prosecutions after accusation of bias against women". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
- ^ a b "BBC Monitoring of Third-Party Websites". Whatdotheyknow.com. 18 August 2012. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- ^ a b "YouTube material takedown requests". Whatdotheyknow.com. 3 January 2014. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- ^ "Monitoring of active resistance to the Licence Fee". Whatdotheyknow.com. 4 June 2014. Retrieved 11 August 2014.
- ^ "New campaign to 'Defund the BBC' sees explosion in support after launch". Daily Express. 11 June 2020. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
- ^ Alex Singleton (14 December 2008). "BBC sacks contractor over licence fee warning letters containing false statistics". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
- ^ "Noel Edmonds: 'I won't pay TV licence because of 'threatening' BBC adverts". London Evening Standard. Retrieved 18 April 2013.
- ^ "BBC Charter and Framework Agreement". GOV.UK. Retrieved 16 January 2016.
- ^ "BBC Funding Settlement" (PDF). UK Government. Retrieved 24 June 2013.
- ^ "BBC licence fee to rise 'in line with inflation'". ITV News. Retrieved 16 January 2017.
- ^ "Television licence fee increases to £147 in first rise since 2010". The Guardian. March 2017. Retrieved 16 May 2017.
- ^ "TV licence fee to rise to £147 in April, government announces". BBC News. March 2017. Retrieved 17 May 2017.
- ^ "MSN". www.msn.com. Retrieved 26 March 2024.
- ^ "BBC to explore how to reform licence fee, director general says". BBC News. 26 March 2024. Retrieved 26 March 2024.
- ^ "TV licence fee to rise by £10.50 a year to £169.50 | MSE News".
- ^ "BBC Charter Review 2016 Information Sheet - Funding" (PDF). GOV.UK. UK Government. Retrieved 16 January 2017.
- ^ "Over 75 TV Licence - TV Licensing". TvLicensing.co.uk. TV Licensing. Archived from the original on 23 September 2020. Retrieved 30 January 2021.
- ^ "BBC: TV licence fee decriminalisation being considered". BBC News. 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
- ^ "Nadine Dorries on Twitter: "This license fee ..." Twitter. 16 January 2022. Retrieved 17 January 2022.