Typographical error: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(135 intermediate revisions by 89 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Mistake made in typing printed material}} |
{{Short description|Mistake made in typing printed material}} |
||
{{pp|small=yes}} |
|||
{{Redirect|Fat finger|the trading mistake|Fat-finger error}} |
|||
{{Redirect|Typo}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[File:Titivillus.jpg|thumb|[[Titivillus]] is a [[demon]] said to introduce errors into the work of scribes. This is a 14th century illustration of Titivillus at a scribe's desk.]] |
|||
⚫ | A '''typographical error''' (often shortened to '''typo'''), also called a '''misprint''', is a mistake (such as a spelling or [[transposition error]]) made in the [[typing]] of printed or electronic material.<ref>{{cite web | title=Typo - Definition | url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/typo | publisher=Merriam-Webster | work=[[Webster's Dictionary|Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary]] | access-date=2012-01-03 | archive-date=2013-07-19 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130719024138/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/typo | url-status=live }}</ref> Historically, this referred to mistakes in manual [[typesetting]]. Technically, the term includes errors due to mechanical failure or slips of the hand or finger,<ref>{{cite web | url=http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=Typographical+error&sub=Search+WordNet&o2=&o0=1&o7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&h= | title=Wordnet definition | publisher=[[Princeton University]] | work=[[Wordnet]] | access-date=2007-11-12 | archive-date=2016-03-04 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304222243/http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=Typographical+error&sub=Search+WordNet&o2=&o0=1&o7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&h= | url-status=live }}</ref> but excludes ''errors of ignorance'', such as [[Orthography|spelling errors]], or changing and misuse of words such as "than" and "then". Before the arrival of [[printing]], the '''copyist's mistake''' or '''scribal error''' was the equivalent for [[manuscript]]s. Most typos involve simple duplication, omission, transposition, or substitution of a small number of characters. |
||
[[Fat-finger error|"Fat finger" typing]] (especially in the financial sector) is a [[slang]] term referring to an unwanted secondary action when typing. When a finger is bigger than the touch zone, with [[touchscreen]]s or [[keyboard (computing)|keyboard]]s, there can be inaccuracy and one may hit two keys in a single keystroke. An example is ''[[wikt:buckled|buckled]]'' instead of ''[[wikt:bucked|bucked]]'', due to the "L" key being next to the "K" key on the [[QWERTY|QWERTY keyboard]], the [[Keyboard layout#QWERTY|most common keyboard]] for [[Latin-script alphabet]]s. |
|||
==Marking typos== |
==Marking typos== |
||
===Typesetting=== |
|||
[[File:Spelling Correction Example.jpg|thumb|right|[[Correction fluid]] is used to correct typographical errors after the document is printed.]] |
|||
Historically, the process of converting a [[manuscript]] to a printed document required a [[typesetter]] to copy the text and print a first "galley proof" (familiarly, "a proof"). It may contain typographical errors ("printer's errors"), as a result of human error during typesetting. Traditionally, a [[proofreader]] compares the manuscript with the corresponding typeset portion, and then marks any errors (sometimes called "line edits") using [[List of proofreader's marks|standard proofreaders' marks]]. |
|||
⚫ | When using a [[typewriter]] without [[correction tape]], typos were commonly [[overstrike| |
||
===Typing=== |
|||
⚫ | In computer forums, sometimes |
||
[[File:Spelling Correction Example.jpg|thumb|right|[[Correction fluid]] was often used to correct typographical errors as (or after) the document was typed. The fluid was painted over the error and, when dry the correct spelling was written on the new surface. Exceptionally, printing errors were painted out and a handwritten correction applied.]] |
|||
⚫ | When using a [[typewriter]] without [[correction tape]], typos were commonly [[overstrike|struck out]] with another character such as a [[strikethrough]]. This saved the typist the trouble of retyping the entire page to eliminate the error, but as evidence of the typo remained, it was not aesthetically pleasing. [[Correction fluid]] was invented to hide the original mark and allow the typist to correct the error almost invisibly. [[Word processing]] software all but eliminated the need for this solution. |
||
===Social media=== |
|||
⚫ | In [[instant messaging]], users often send messages in haste and only |
||
⚫ | In computer forums, sometimes "^H" (a visual representation of the [[ASCII]] [[backspace]] character) was used to "[[epanorthosis|erase]]" intentional typos: "Be nice to this fool^H^H^H^Hgentleman, he's visiting from corporate HQ."<ref>[http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/writing-style.html Chapter 5. Hacker Writing Style] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130906014019/http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/writing-style.html |date=2013-09-06 }}, The [[Jargon File]], version 4.4.7</ref> |
||
⚫ | In [[instant messaging]], users often send messages in haste and only afterward notice the typo. It is common practice to correct the typo by sending a subsequent message in which an [[asterisk]] (*) is placed before (or after) the correct word.<ref>{{cite book|last=Magnan|first=Sally Sieloff|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dbYbGsgJclgC&q=asterisk&pg=PA260|title=Mediating discourse online|publisher=[[John Benjamins Publishing Company]]|year=2008|isbn=978-90-272-0519-3|series=AILA Applied Linguistics Series|page=260}}</ref> |
||
⚫ | In formal prose, it is sometimes necessary to quote text containing typos or other doubtful words. In such cases, the author will write "[''[[sic]]'']" to indicate that an error was in the original quoted source rather than in the transcription.<ref |
||
===Textual analysis=== |
|||
⚫ | In formal prose, it is sometimes necessary to quote text containing typos or other doubtful words. In such cases, the author will write "[''[[sic]]'']" to indicate that an error was in the original quoted source rather than in the transcription.<ref>{{cite book|last=Wilson|first=Kenneth G.|url=http://www.bartleby.com/68/67/5467.html|title=The Columbia Guide to Standard American English.|publisher=[[Columbia University Press]]|year=1993|chapter=sic (adv.)|access-date=2007-11-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071211191251/http://www.bartleby.com/68/67/5467.html|archive-date=11 December 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
==Scribal errors== |
==Scribal errors== |
||
Scribal errors |
Scribal errors receive a lot of attention in the context of [[textual criticism]]. Many of these mistakes are not specific to manuscripts and can be referred to as typos. Some classifications include [[homeoteleuton]] and homeoarchy (skipping a line due to the similarity of the ending or beginning), [[haplography]] (copying once what appeared twice), [[dittography]] (copying twice what appeared once), contamination (introduction of extraneous elements), metathesis (reversing the order of some elements), unwitting mistranscription of similar elements, mistaking similar looking letters, the substitution of [[homophones]], fission and fusion (joining or separating words).<ref>Paul D. Wegner, [https://books.google.com/books?id=SIMsY6b2n2gC&pg=PA48 ''A Student's Guide to Textual Criticism of the Bible: Its History, Methods, and Results''], InterVarsity Press, 2006, p. 48.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ualberta.ca/~sreimer/ms-course/course/scbl-err.htm|title=Manuscript Studies: Textual analysis (Scribal error)|website=www.ualberta.ca|access-date=2 May 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160404214516/http://www.ualberta.ca/~sreimer/ms-course/course/scbl-err.htm|archive-date=4 April 2016}}</ref> |
||
== Biblical errors == |
== Biblical errors == |
||
{{main|Bible errata}} |
|||
[[File:Marked_Wicked_bible.jpg|thumb|right|The [[Wicked Bible]]]] |
[[File:Marked_Wicked_bible.jpg|thumb|right|The [[Wicked Bible]]]] |
||
[[File:Judas Bible2.jpg|thumb|right|The [[Judas Bible]] in St. Mary's Church, [[Totnes]], |
[[File:Judas Bible2.jpg|thumb|right|The [[Judas Bible]] in St. Mary's Church, [[Totnes]], Devon, UK]] |
||
The [[Wicked Bible]] omits the word "not" in the [[Ten Commandments|commandment]], "[[thou shalt not commit adultery]]". |
|||
The [[Judas Bible]] is a copy of the second [[folio]] edition of the authorized version, printed by [[Robert Barker (printer)|Robert Barker]], printer to [[ |
The [[Judas Bible]] is a copy of the second [[folio]] edition of the authorized version, printed by [[Robert Barker (printer)|Robert Barker]], printer to [[James VI and I]], in 1613, and given to the church for the use of the Mayor of Totnes. This edition is known as the ''Judas Bible'' because in [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 26:36 "[[Judas]]" appears instead of "[[Jesus]]". In this copy, the mistake is corrected with a slip of paper pasted over the misprint. |
||
== |
==Intentional typos== |
||
Certain typos, or kinds of typos, have acquired widespread notoriety and are occasionally used deliberately for humorous purposes. For instance, the British newspaper ''[[The Guardian]]'' is sometimes referred to as ''The Grauniad'' due to its reputation for frequent typesetting errors in the era before computer typesetting.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://education.guardian.co.uk/old/schools/story/0,,367177,00.html | title=Internet know-how: Spelling | author=Taylor, Ros | date=2000-09-12 | access-date=2007-11-12 | work=[[Guardian Unlimited]] }}</ref> |
Certain typos, or kinds of typos, have acquired widespread notoriety and are occasionally used deliberately for humorous purposes. For instance, the British newspaper ''[[The Guardian]]'' is sometimes referred to as ''The Grauniad'' due to its reputation for frequent typesetting errors in the era before computer typesetting.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://education.guardian.co.uk/old/schools/story/0,,367177,00.html | title=Internet know-how: Spelling | author=Taylor, Ros | date=2000-09-12 | access-date=2007-11-12 | work=[[Guardian Unlimited]] | archive-date=2008-06-29 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080629094358/http://education.guardian.co.uk/old/schools/story/0,,367177,00.html | url-status=live }}</ref> This usage began as a running joke in the satirical magazine ''[[Private Eye]]''.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940CE3DD1F3CF935A25751C0A96E958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all | title=Confession as Strength At a British Newspaper | work=[[The New York Times]] | date=1998-02-16 | access-date=2007-11-12 | author=Lyall, Sarah | archive-date=2007-12-14 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071214223819/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940CE3DD1F3CF935A25751C0A96E958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all | url-status=live }}</ref> The magazine continues to refer to ''The Guardian'' by this name. |
||
Typos are common on |
Typos are common on [[social media]], and some—such as "[[teh]]", "[[pwned]]", and "[[Wikt:ZOMG|zomg]]"—have become [[in-joke]]s among Internet groups and subcultures. [[P0rn]] is not a typo but an example of [[obfuscation]], where people make a word harder for filtering software to understand while retaining its meaning to human readers.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/rhodri-marsden-cyberclinic-6230686.html | title=What do these strange web words mean? | author=Marsden, Rhodri | work=[[The Independent]] | date=2006-10-18 | access-date=22 December 2016 | archive-date=2016-12-23 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161223010554/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/rhodri-marsden-cyberclinic-6230686.html | url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
[[Fictitious entry#Maps|In mapping, it was common practice to include deliberate errors so that copyright theft could be identified.]]<ref>{{cite web |title=The case of Sandy Island; mapping error or copyright trap? |url=https://www.vicchi.org/2012/11/26/the-case-of-sandy-island-mapping-error-or-copyright-trap/ |date=November 26, 2012 |access-date=16 March 2023 |website=Vicchi |archive-date=16 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230316202912/https://www.vicchi.org/2012/11/26/the-case-of-sandy-island-mapping-error-or-copyright-trap/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
===Typosquatting=== |
===Typosquatting=== |
||
{{main|Typosquatting}} |
{{main|Typosquatting}} |
||
Typosquatting is a form of [[cybersquatting]] |
Typosquatting is a form of [[cybersquatting]] that relies on typographical errors made by users of the Internet.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-502915.html?legacy=zdnn | title='Typosquatters' turn flubs into cash | date=2000-09-23 | author=Sullivan, Bob | publisher=[[ZDNet]] | access-date=2007-11-12 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071024032834/http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-502915.html?legacy=zdnn <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 2007-10-24}}</ref> Typically, the cybersquatter will register a likely typo of a frequently-accessed [[uniform resource locator|website address]] in the hope of receiving traffic when internet users mistype that address into a [[web browser]]. Deliberately introducing typos into a web page, or into its [[metadata]], can also draw unwitting visitors when they enter these typos in [[Internet search engine]]s. |
||
An example of this is <code>gogole.com</code> instead of <code>google.com</code> which could potentially be harmful |
An example of this is <code>gogole.com</code> instead of <code>[[Google|google.com]]</code> which could potentially be harmful to the user. |
||
===Typos in online auctions=== |
===Typos in online auctions=== |
||
Since the emergence and popularization of [[online auction]] sites such as [[eBay]], misspelled auction searches have quickly become lucrative for people searching for deals.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.king5.com/business/stories/NW_070104BUBebaytipEL.2b7cc3d91.html | title=How finding mistakes can net great deals on eBay | date=2004-07-01 |
Since the emergence and popularization of [[online auction]] sites such as [[eBay]], misspelled auction searches have quickly become lucrative for people searching for deals.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.king5.com/business/stories/NW_070104BUBebaytipEL.2b7cc3d91.html | title=How finding mistakes can net great deals on eBay | date=2004-07-01 | publisher=[[KING-TV]] | work=King5 | access-date=2007-11-12 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071220190352/http://www.king5.com/business/stories/NW_070104BUBebaytipEL.2b7cc3d91.html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 2007-12-20}}</ref> The concept on which these searches are based is that, if an individual posts an auction and misspells its description and/or title, regular searches will not find this auction. However, a search that includes misspelled alterations of the original search term in such a way as to create misspellings, transpositions, omissions, double strikes, and wrong key errors would find most misspelled auctions. The resulting effect is that there are far fewer bids than there would be under normal circumstances, allowing the searcher to obtain the item for less. A series of third-party websites have sprung up allowing people to find these items.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/24/business/media/24typo.html |url-access=subscription | title=Help for eBay Shoppers Who Can't Spell | date=2008-11-23 | author=Douglas Quenqua | newspaper=The New York Times | access-date=2017-02-25 | archive-date=2017-11-14 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171114092924/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/24/business/media/24typo.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=typos%20ebay&st=cse | url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
==Atomic typos== |
==Atomic typos== |
||
Another kind of typo—informally called an "'''atomic typo'''"—is a typo that happens to result in a correctly spelled word that is different from the intended one. Since it is spelled correctly, a simple [[spellchecker]] cannot find the mistake. |
Another kind of typo—informally called an "'''atomic typo'''"—is a typo that happens to result in a correctly spelled word that is different from the intended one. Since it is spelled correctly, a simple [[spellchecker]] cannot find the mistake. The term was used at least as early as 1995 by Robert Terry.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Hanif|first1=C. B.|date=August 10, 1995|title=Hurricane Coverage Kicks Up Dust|page=14|newspaper=The Palm Beach Post|url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/16845952/atomic_typo/|access-date=January 25, 2018|via=[[Newspapers.com]]|archive-date=January 25, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180125193601/https://www.newspapers.com/clip/16845952/atomic_typo/|url-status=live}} {{Open access}}</ref> |
||
Examples include: |
|||
A few illustrative examples include: <!--Please do not extend this list. It is just a selection for illustrative purposes, not an exhaustive list. --> |
|||
* "now" instead of "not",<ref>{{cite web |last1=Callan |first1=Tim |title=The now vs. not typo |url=http://timcallan.com/blog/2011/04/23/the-now-vs-not-typo/ |website=Tim Callan on Marketing and Technology |access-date=2021-08-13 |date=2011-04-23}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Karr |first1=Phyllis Ann |title=Frostflower and Thorn |date=2012 |publisher=Wildside Press |isbn=9781479490028 |page=415 |url=https:// |
* "now" instead of "not",<ref>{{cite web |last1=Callan |first1=Tim |title=The now vs. not typo |url=http://timcallan.com/blog/2011/04/23/the-now-vs-not-typo/ |website=Tim Callan on Marketing and Technology |access-date=2021-08-13 |date=2011-04-23 |archive-date=2021-08-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814023831/http://timcallan.com/blog/2011/04/23/the-now-vs-not-typo/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Karr |first1=Phyllis Ann |title=Frostflower and Thorn |date=2012 |publisher=Wildside Press |isbn=9781479490028 |page=415 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Fab0AAAAQBAJ&dq=now+not+typo&pg=PA415 |access-date=2023-03-20 |archive-date=2023-04-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230404002257/https://books.google.com/books?id=Fab0AAAAQBAJ&dq=now+not+typo&pg=PA415 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
⚫ | |||
* " |
* "unclear" instead of "nuclear" |
||
⚫ | |||
* "[[Sudan]]" instead of "[[wiktionary:sedan|sedan]]" (leading to a diplomatic incident in 2005 between Sudan and the United States regarding [[Sedan (nuclear test)|a nuclear test code-named Sedan]]) |
* "[[Sudan]]" instead of "[[wiktionary:sedan|sedan]]" (leading to a diplomatic incident in 2005 between Sudan and the United States regarding [[Sedan (nuclear test)|a nuclear test code-named Sedan]]) |
||
* "Untied States" instead of "[[United States]]." and |
|||
* " |
* {{notatypo|"Untied States"}} instead of "United States" |
||
* " |
* "the" instead of "they" |
||
and many more. For any of these, the converse is also true. |
|||
* "shot" instead of "shoot." |
|||
(Any of these would work the other way around). |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
* {{Annotated link |Clerical error}} |
* {{Annotated link |Clerical error}} |
||
* {{Annotated link |Errata}} |
|||
*[[Comparison of web browsers]] – Native spell checkers are indicated in the table "Browser features". |
|||
* {{Annotated link |Fat-finger error}} |
* {{Annotated link |Fat-finger error}} |
||
* {{Annotated link |Human error}} |
* {{Annotated link |Human error}} |
||
* {{Annotated link |Obelism}} |
|||
** {{Annotated link |Obelus}} |
|||
* {{Annotated link |Orthography}} |
* {{Annotated link |Orthography}} |
||
* {{Annotated link |Scrivener's error}} |
* {{Annotated link |Scrivener's error}} |
||
* {{Annotated link |Titivillus}} |
|||
* {{Annotated link |Transcription error}} |
* {{Annotated link |Transcription error}} |
||
* [[Typography]]{{snd}} the art and technique of arranging type to make written language legible, readable and appealing when displayed. Typographers design pages; traditionally, typesetters "set" the type to accord with that design. |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist|30em}} |
{{Reflist|30em}} |
||
{{commonscat|Typographic errors}} |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20130629235239/http://www.chinapost.com.tw/commentary/the-china-post/special-to-the-china-post/2012/09/30/356026/Spell-checkers.htm "Spell checkers developing 'atomic typo' capabilities"] - OpEd in the ''China Post'', [[Taiwan]], September 30, 2012.{{deadlink|date=January 2018}} |
|||
*[http://www.bookerrata.com/ BookErrata.com] |
*[http://www.bookerrata.com/ BookErrata.com] |
||
*[https://themillions.com/2022/08/how-many-errorrs-are-in-this-essay.html "How Many Errorrs are in this Essay?"] on famous typos, in ''[[The Millions]]'' |
|||
[[Category:Error]] |
[[Category:Error]] |
Latest revision as of 12:00, 1 December 2024
A typographical error (often shortened to typo), also called a misprint, is a mistake (such as a spelling or transposition error) made in the typing of printed or electronic material.[1] Historically, this referred to mistakes in manual typesetting. Technically, the term includes errors due to mechanical failure or slips of the hand or finger,[2] but excludes errors of ignorance, such as spelling errors, or changing and misuse of words such as "than" and "then". Before the arrival of printing, the copyist's mistake or scribal error was the equivalent for manuscripts. Most typos involve simple duplication, omission, transposition, or substitution of a small number of characters.
"Fat finger" typing (especially in the financial sector) is a slang term referring to an unwanted secondary action when typing. When a finger is bigger than the touch zone, with touchscreens or keyboards, there can be inaccuracy and one may hit two keys in a single keystroke. An example is buckled instead of bucked, due to the "L" key being next to the "K" key on the QWERTY keyboard, the most common keyboard for Latin-script alphabets.
Marking typos
Typesetting
Historically, the process of converting a manuscript to a printed document required a typesetter to copy the text and print a first "galley proof" (familiarly, "a proof"). It may contain typographical errors ("printer's errors"), as a result of human error during typesetting. Traditionally, a proofreader compares the manuscript with the corresponding typeset portion, and then marks any errors (sometimes called "line edits") using standard proofreaders' marks.
Typing
When using a typewriter without correction tape, typos were commonly struck out with another character such as a strikethrough. This saved the typist the trouble of retyping the entire page to eliminate the error, but as evidence of the typo remained, it was not aesthetically pleasing. Correction fluid was invented to hide the original mark and allow the typist to correct the error almost invisibly. Word processing software all but eliminated the need for this solution.
Social media
In computer forums, sometimes "^H" (a visual representation of the ASCII backspace character) was used to "erase" intentional typos: "Be nice to this fool^H^H^H^Hgentleman, he's visiting from corporate HQ."[3]
In instant messaging, users often send messages in haste and only afterward notice the typo. It is common practice to correct the typo by sending a subsequent message in which an asterisk (*) is placed before (or after) the correct word.[4]
Textual analysis
In formal prose, it is sometimes necessary to quote text containing typos or other doubtful words. In such cases, the author will write "[sic]" to indicate that an error was in the original quoted source rather than in the transcription.[5]
Scribal errors
Scribal errors receive a lot of attention in the context of textual criticism. Many of these mistakes are not specific to manuscripts and can be referred to as typos. Some classifications include homeoteleuton and homeoarchy (skipping a line due to the similarity of the ending or beginning), haplography (copying once what appeared twice), dittography (copying twice what appeared once), contamination (introduction of extraneous elements), metathesis (reversing the order of some elements), unwitting mistranscription of similar elements, mistaking similar looking letters, the substitution of homophones, fission and fusion (joining or separating words).[6][7]
Biblical errors
The Wicked Bible omits the word "not" in the commandment, "thou shalt not commit adultery".
The Judas Bible is a copy of the second folio edition of the authorized version, printed by Robert Barker, printer to James VI and I, in 1613, and given to the church for the use of the Mayor of Totnes. This edition is known as the Judas Bible because in Matthew 26:36 "Judas" appears instead of "Jesus". In this copy, the mistake is corrected with a slip of paper pasted over the misprint.
Intentional typos
Certain typos, or kinds of typos, have acquired widespread notoriety and are occasionally used deliberately for humorous purposes. For instance, the British newspaper The Guardian is sometimes referred to as The Grauniad due to its reputation for frequent typesetting errors in the era before computer typesetting.[8] This usage began as a running joke in the satirical magazine Private Eye.[9] The magazine continues to refer to The Guardian by this name.
Typos are common on social media, and some—such as "teh", "pwned", and "zomg"—have become in-jokes among Internet groups and subcultures. P0rn is not a typo but an example of obfuscation, where people make a word harder for filtering software to understand while retaining its meaning to human readers.[10]
In mapping, it was common practice to include deliberate errors so that copyright theft could be identified.[11]
Typosquatting
Typosquatting is a form of cybersquatting that relies on typographical errors made by users of the Internet.[12] Typically, the cybersquatter will register a likely typo of a frequently-accessed website address in the hope of receiving traffic when internet users mistype that address into a web browser. Deliberately introducing typos into a web page, or into its metadata, can also draw unwitting visitors when they enter these typos in Internet search engines.
An example of this is gogole.com
instead of google.com
which could potentially be harmful to the user.
Typos in online auctions
Since the emergence and popularization of online auction sites such as eBay, misspelled auction searches have quickly become lucrative for people searching for deals.[13] The concept on which these searches are based is that, if an individual posts an auction and misspells its description and/or title, regular searches will not find this auction. However, a search that includes misspelled alterations of the original search term in such a way as to create misspellings, transpositions, omissions, double strikes, and wrong key errors would find most misspelled auctions. The resulting effect is that there are far fewer bids than there would be under normal circumstances, allowing the searcher to obtain the item for less. A series of third-party websites have sprung up allowing people to find these items.[14]
Atomic typos
Another kind of typo—informally called an "atomic typo"—is a typo that happens to result in a correctly spelled word that is different from the intended one. Since it is spelled correctly, a simple spellchecker cannot find the mistake. The term was used at least as early as 1995 by Robert Terry.[15]
A few illustrative examples include:
- "now" instead of "not",[16][17]
- "unclear" instead of "nuclear"
- "you" instead of "your"
- "Sudan" instead of "sedan" (leading to a diplomatic incident in 2005 between Sudan and the United States regarding a nuclear test code-named Sedan)
- "Untied States" instead of "United States"
- "the" instead of "they"
and many more. For any of these, the converse is also true.
See also
- Clerical error – Mistake in clerical work, e.g. data entry
- Errata – Correction of a published text
- Fat-finger error – Keyboard input error
- Human error – Action with unintended consequences
- Obelism – Editors' marks on manuscripts
- Obelus – Historical annotation mark or symbol
- Orthography – Set of conventions for written language
- Scrivener's error – Clerical error in a legal document
- Titivillus – Demon who introduces errors into texts
- Transcription error – Data entry error
- Typography – the art and technique of arranging type to make written language legible, readable and appealing when displayed. Typographers design pages; traditionally, typesetters "set" the type to accord with that design.
References
- ^ "Typo - Definition". Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 2013-07-19. Retrieved 2012-01-03.
- ^ "Wordnet definition". Wordnet. Princeton University. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- ^ Chapter 5. Hacker Writing Style Archived 2013-09-06 at the Wayback Machine, The Jargon File, version 4.4.7
- ^ Magnan, Sally Sieloff (2008). Mediating discourse online. AILA Applied Linguistics Series. John Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 260. ISBN 978-90-272-0519-3.
- ^ Wilson, Kenneth G. (1993). "sic (adv.)". The Columbia Guide to Standard American English. Columbia University Press. Archived from the original on 11 December 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- ^ Paul D. Wegner, A Student's Guide to Textual Criticism of the Bible: Its History, Methods, and Results, InterVarsity Press, 2006, p. 48.
- ^ "Manuscript Studies: Textual analysis (Scribal error)". www.ualberta.ca. Archived from the original on 4 April 2016. Retrieved 2 May 2018.
- ^ Taylor, Ros (2000-09-12). "Internet know-how: Spelling". Guardian Unlimited. Archived from the original on 2008-06-29. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- ^ Lyall, Sarah (1998-02-16). "Confession as Strength At a British Newspaper". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2007-12-14. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- ^ Marsden, Rhodri (2006-10-18). "What do these strange web words mean?". The Independent. Archived from the original on 2016-12-23. Retrieved 22 December 2016.
- ^ "The case of Sandy Island; mapping error or copyright trap?". Vicchi. November 26, 2012. Archived from the original on 16 March 2023. Retrieved 16 March 2023.
- ^ Sullivan, Bob (2000-09-23). "'Typosquatters' turn flubs into cash". ZDNet. Archived from the original on 2007-10-24. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- ^ "How finding mistakes can net great deals on eBay". King5. KING-TV. 2004-07-01. Archived from the original on 2007-12-20. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- ^ Douglas Quenqua (2008-11-23). "Help for eBay Shoppers Who Can't Spell". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2017-11-14. Retrieved 2017-02-25.
- ^ Hanif, C. B. (August 10, 1995). "Hurricane Coverage Kicks Up Dust". The Palm Beach Post. p. 14. Archived from the original on January 25, 2018. Retrieved January 25, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Callan, Tim (2011-04-23). "The now vs. not typo". Tim Callan on Marketing and Technology. Archived from the original on 2021-08-14. Retrieved 2021-08-13.
- ^ Karr, Phyllis Ann (2012). Frostflower and Thorn. Wildside Press. p. 415. ISBN 9781479490028. Archived from the original on 2023-04-04. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
External links
- BookErrata.com
- "How Many Errorrs are in this Essay?" on famous typos, in The Millions