Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anju Tamang: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 00:24, 30 May 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 00:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anju Tamang

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and India. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm leaning towards keeping this. Has significant coverage in a variety of independent media sources including but not limited to My Khel, The Darjeeling Chronicle and Khel Now. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:37, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Also lean towards keep, seem to be a number of hits per her international career. Govvy (talk) 22:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Spiderone. Giant Snowman 21:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly passes GNG, BEFORE has not been fulfilled again.--Ortizesp (talk) 04:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Does seem to have enough coverage to pass WP:GNG in independant sources. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep can see sufficient coverage around. --Angelo (talk) 22:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete KhelNow is a a media engagement platform which allows fans/users to contribute different kinds of content, including reviews, photos, videos, events, comments, and more. Mykhel is a subsidiary of Oneindia, a content farm. Darjeeling Chronicle is a sort of citizen newspaper and the article is written in an avuncular or enthusiast tone, not in any journalistic manner. Cannot find other sources from a quick inspection of search results. Hemantha (talk) 03:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that KhelNow is suspect. The MyKhel article is written by a professional journalist so I think is okay for establishing the bare minimum for GNG. There's a reasonably sized article about her on MSN although it's mostly just repeating quotes from her. There is also The Bridge, which appears to be RS and Ommcom News. I'd be interested to see if anything better exists in Sikkimese or any other of the hundreds of languages of India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MyKhel profile links would definitely claim that their authors are professional but I don't think they (or Oneindia) have themselves ever described their work as journalism. There is some discussion in WP:RSN about Oneindia and I'd like to specifically point you to this which has comments illustrating their quality.

I had seen the article from The Bridge and discounted it as it appeared to be essentially an interview. IANS (which is the source for Ommcom) is a private wire service and unreliable. Hemantha (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - ~~This user's recent nominations are nothing short of racist, and~~ Tamang is ~~another woman footballer this user has targeted despite clearly~~ meeting GNG. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 04:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retracting accusation, but I stand by my keep vote, as I feel Tamang meets GNG. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 17:03, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to retract. You were calling an apple an apple (telling the truth), and there is no rule against that. 172.58.30.248 (talk) 05:44, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as having sufficient sources. --StellarNerd (talk) 07:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Anju Tamang]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''keep'''. [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 00:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
+===[[:Anju Tamang]]===
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
 :{{la|1=Anju Tamang}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anju Tamang|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 22#{{anchorencode:Anju Tamang}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1083062372/cur|edits since nomination]])
@@ Line 11: / Line 16: @@
 *'''Keep''' - I'm leaning towards keeping this. Has significant coverage in a variety of independent media sources including but not limited to [https://www.mykhel.com/football/fifa-u17-womens-wc-afc-asian-cup-will-encourage-young-girls-pursue-career-in-football-anju-tamang-174351.html My Khel], [https://thedarjeelingchronicle.com/anju-tamang-football/ The Darjeeling Chronicle] and [https://khelnow.com/football/indian-football-anju-tamang-farming Khel Now]. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 19:37, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' Also lean towards keep, seem to be a number of hits per her international career. [[User:Govvy|Govvy]] ([[User talk:Govvy|talk]]) 22:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
+*<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/West Bengal|list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 08:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Keep''' per Spiderone. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 21:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' clearly passes GNG, BEFORE has not been fulfilled again.--[[User:Ortizesp|Ortizesp]] ([[User talk:Ortizesp|talk]]) 04:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' Does seem to have enough coverage to pass [[WP:GNG]] in independant sources. -[[User:Kj cheetham|Kj cheetham]] ([[User talk:Kj cheetham|talk]]) 20:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' can see sufficient coverage around. --[[User:Angelo.romano|Angelo]] ([[User talk:Angelo.romano|talk]]) 22:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' KhelNow is [https://khelnow.com/about-us/ a]  {{tq|a media engagement platform}} [https://khelnow.com/content-guidelines/ which] {{tq|allows fans/users to contribute different kinds of content, including reviews, photos, videos, events, comments, and more}}. Mykhel is a [https://www.mykhel.com/aboutus.html subsidiary of Oneindia], a content farm. Darjeeling Chronicle is a sort of [https://thedarjeelingchronicle.com/about-us/ citizen newspaper] and the article is written in an avuncular or enthusiast tone, not in any journalistic manner. Cannot find other sources from a quick inspection of search results. [[User:Hemantha|Hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|talk]]) 03:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
+::I agree that KhelNow is suspect. The MyKhel article is written by [https://www.mykhel.com/authors/avinash-sharma.html a professional journalist] so I think is okay for establishing the bare minimum for GNG. There's a reasonably sized article about her on [https://www.msn.com/en-in/sports/topstories/anju-tamang-says-india-womens-football-team-mentally-and-physically-stronger-in-build-up-to-2022-afc-asian-cup/ar-AANN404 MSN] although it's mostly just repeating quotes from her. There is also [https://thebridge.in/featured/football-anju-tamang-dreams-of-telling-her-father-stop-farming-take-rest/?infinitescroll=1 The Bridge], which appears to be RS and [https://ommcomnews.com/india-news/india-football-forward-anju-enjoys-working-in-agriculture-field Ommcom News]. I'd be interested to see if anything better exists in Sikkimese or any other of the hundreds of languages of India. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 19:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
+:::MyKhel profile links would definitely claim that their authors are professional but I don't think [https://www.mykhel.com/aboutus.html they] (or Oneindia) have themselves ever described their work as journalism. There is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=oneindia&prefix=Wikipedia%3AReliable+sources%2FNoticeboard&fulltext=Search+the+noticeboard+archives&fulltext=Search&ns0=1 some discussion in WP:RSN about Oneindia] and I'd like to specifically point you to [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_376#Wanted_to_know_whether_these_websites_are_reliable_sources|this]] which has comments illustrating their quality. {{pb}} I had seen the article from The Bridge and discounted it as it appeared to be essentially an interview. IANS (which is the source for Ommcom) is a private wire service and unreliable. [[User:Hemantha|Hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|talk]]) 13:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' - {{strikethrough|This user's recent nominations are nothing short of racist, and}} Tamang is {{strikethrough|another woman footballer this user has targeted despite clearly}} meeting GNG. [[User:Davidlofgren1996|Davidlofgren1996]] ([[User talk:Davidlofgren1996|talk]]) 04:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
+::Retracting accusation, but I stand by my keep vote, as I feel Tamang meets GNG. [[User:Davidlofgren1996|Davidlofgren1996]] ([[User talk:Davidlofgren1996|talk]]) 17:03, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
+:::There is no need to retract.  You were calling an apple an apple (telling the truth), and there is no rule against that. [[Special:Contributions/172.58.30.248|172.58.30.248]] ([[User talk:172.58.30.248|talk]]) 05:44, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
+* '''Keep''', as having sufficient sources. --[[User:StellarNerd|StellarNerd]] ([[User talk:StellarNerd|talk]]) 07:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>