User talk:DeCausa: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
CandyStalnak (talk | contribs) →Stop this: new section |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:DeCausa/Archive 10) (bot |
||
| (289 intermediate revisions by 72 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}} |
{{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo=old( |
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo=old(30d) | archive=User talk:DeCausa/Archive %(counter)d | counter=10| maxarchivesize=75K | archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}} | minthreadsleft=3 | minthreadstoarchive=1 }} |
||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == |
|||
== Reverting Darin Treaty == |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
:Yes, per edit summary. The territories you added aren't in the body of the article: per [[WP:LEAD]], the information should already be in the article not new information. So naming those territories is unsourced. Also, because it's a short article, having a longer lead makes it very repetitive. Unless the article is expanded the lead should only be a sentence or two. Lastly, if you have issues with an editor's edit you should raise it on the article talk page first so that other interested editors can join in. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 07:09, 9 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
Okay, last thing, saudi-iran relations, How did you concluded that Saudi is still conservative ? [[User:Aziz bm|Aziz bm]] ([[User talk:Aziz bm|talk]]) 07:11, 9 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Stop editing your original posts after I've replied to them. I'm not going to reply to that or the other questions here. Post them on the relevant article talk page. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 07:13, 9 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
Okay. [[User:Aziz bm|Aziz bm]] ([[User talk:Aziz bm|talk]]) 07:14, 9 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
</div> |
|||
:By the way I see you've recently come off a long block for tendentious editing and moving pages without consensus. The edits of yours I reverted today are similar. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 07:21, 9 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 --> |
|||
==empire== |
|||
That’s why I’m starting to use talk page recently [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Saudi_Mabahith#Renaming_the_article], I don’t want to get blocked again for the same reason [[User:Aziz bm|Aziz bm]] ([[User talk:Aziz bm|talk]]) 07:42, 9 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
I see your point, but at least the concept of "Empire of Charles V" in history books and scolarship always includes the HRE; basically "empire" in this context does not necessarily mean direct rule or hereditary possession, just like the Holy Roman Empire is called an Empire even it lacks these aspects. If the term "Habsburg Empire" is problematic to have when including the HRE then I think it could be removed altogheter, in fact it's an anachronistic concept. |
|||
== Jesus Article == |
|||
Regarding the other point I think it's better to use the Burgundian terminology for a couple of reasons. |
|||
Once again [[User:Username|User:Neplota]] is unnecessarily editing the [[Jesus]] article when the topic has been discussed extensively at [[Talk:Jesus/Archive 134]]. Once again thank you for your help in reverting but I am just letting you know that I expect this to continue as I have even warned the user yet they continue to edit without consensus. Thank you. [[User:Thebighomie123|Thebighomie123]] ([[User talk:Thebighomie123|talk]]) 13:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
1)Again it's the one used at the time, whereas the 'Habsburg Netherlands' terminology is anachronistic; during the reign of Charles V the Low Countries/Netherlands were called either just Low Countries/Netherlands or Burgundian [[Burgundian inheritance in the Low Countries|inheritance]], lands, states, [[Burgundian Circle|circle]] etc. |
|||
== Thanks == |
|||
2)It's the Burgundian terminology that encompassed a larger territory even beyond that area (such as Franche-Comté).[[Special:Contributions/2A01:E11:17:40B0:F548:E24:DD85:70BE|2A01:E11:17:40B0:F548:E24:DD85:70BE]] ([[User talk:2A01:E11:17:40B0:F548:E24:DD85:70BE|talk]]) 09:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks for all your thoughtful and helpful advice about the AN stuff, much appreciated, and I really mean that. But I also have a request, just a request, not a requirement. Please consider deleting "Step away, indeed." The comment works fine without it, and I expect that that last sentence will be used against me. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 21:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Firstly, if you want to continue this discussion it should take place on the article talk page, not here. Secondly, I don't agree that reliable sources treat the HRE states as part of his empire. They don't. Your two points on "Burgundian terminology" are also incorrect. What the territory was called at the time is neither here nor there. It's what contemporary scholarly sources call it that counts. Furthermore, Franche-Comté was not part of the Burgundian Netherlands and is irrelevant. the [[Habsburg Netherlands]] includes areas not within [[Burgundian Netherlands]] and it's simply incorrect to use the latter. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 23:35, 16 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Done. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 21:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for January 1 == |
|||
== [[List in rulers of Wales|Page move]] == |
|||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[English claims to the French throne]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Louis X]]. |
|||
I think you mean "List of rulers in Wales"? <span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine','Georgia','Times',serif">'''[[User:Peter Ormond|<span style="color:#113680"> Peter Ormond </span>]][[User talk:Peter Ormond|<span style="background:#d9cc6c; color:white; padding:2px;">💬</span>]]'''</span> 21:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes, you're right. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 21:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
== Important Note == |
|||
Good Morning @[[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] |
|||
someone recently made edits on both Saudi Arabia and Flag of Saudi Arabia, placing the main flag as variant while the other as main, I request your kind consideration to revert the edits as the flag is currently on a dispute situation and there's ongoing discussion over this issue on Wikimedia talk page which means any edits may affect the process. |
|||
Kind Regards [[Special:Contributions/91.25.189.139|91.25.189.139]] ([[User talk:91.25.189.139|talk]]) 09:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:The RFC can be found [[commons:File talk:Flag of Saudi Arabia.svg|here]]. Your input would be appreciated! [[User:HapHaxion|<b style="font-family: Tw Cen MT; color: FireBrick">HapHaxion</b>]] <sub>([[User talk:HapHaxion|talk]] / [[Special:Contribs/HapHaxion|contribs]])</sub> 18:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::{{ping|HapHaxion}} thanks. I'm not really familiar with Commons policies and don't really participate there. The thread at [[Talk:Saudi Arabia]] is independent of any discussion or consensus at Commons and it's here that any binding decision on what flag should be used for the KSA article at en.wp will be made rather than at Commons. You're welcome to take anything I say there to Commons if you think it's of any use. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 02:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Mozart == |
|||
I have no intention to enter ''any'' infobox discussion, but keep watching. What I saw in 2021 was [[Ian Fleming]] and [[Stanley Kubrick]], with the [[Talk:Ian Fleming/Archive 5|closure of Fleming]] much to my liking. -- [[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:35, 3 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== George VI, Elizabeth II & Charles III == |
|||
Howdy. I don't like having "Head of the Commonwealth" at the top of Charles III's infobox, anymore then you do. But that was the RFC result of George VI & Elizabeth II. PS - If you want to open another RFC on that topic, I wouldn't object. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 22:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== [[:Reign of Elizabeth II]] == |
|||
AfD with pleasure, but please finish the job. 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 21:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Give us a chance! In the middle of doing it. I hate impenetrable WP processes!!!! [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 21:35, 18 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::Now done. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 21:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::Might I suggest the use of Twinkle? All becomes simple then. |
|||
:::I respect your choice to nominate it for deletion. I've left a comment at the discussion and will remain neutral 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 21:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::Thanks. In 12 years I think I've probably nominated for deletion 3 times. When you do something regularly on WP it's all fine but as soon as you don't it feels like you have to spend a whole evening to work it all out. I never understand why everything has to be so clunky. Take the point on Twinkle - will remember to look at it when I do it next time...in 3 years. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 21:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Manual AfD is a swine! |
|||
:::::I do commend to you nominating poor material for deletion. We have more rubbish than you can shake a stick at. A challenge when you do very few is getting the rationale right, but that ought never to matter, because others will likely propose further additions to it |
|||
:::::This one's rationale looks fine to me. Watching and waiting will be fun. I genuinely have no opinion either way. 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 21:53, 18 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Stop this == |
|||
{{stop}} stop this. You've been told multiple times |
|||
You wrote this. This is not true. Please provide diffs of your claim. |
|||
On the other hand, you reverted without talk page discussion. Please do not do this. It is wrong and hostile. [[User:CandyStalnak|CandyStalnak]] ([[User talk:CandyStalnak|talk]]) 19:14, 6 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:46, 1 January 2025
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
empire
[edit]I see your point, but at least the concept of "Empire of Charles V" in history books and scolarship always includes the HRE; basically "empire" in this context does not necessarily mean direct rule or hereditary possession, just like the Holy Roman Empire is called an Empire even it lacks these aspects. If the term "Habsburg Empire" is problematic to have when including the HRE then I think it could be removed altogheter, in fact it's an anachronistic concept.
Regarding the other point I think it's better to use the Burgundian terminology for a couple of reasons.
1)Again it's the one used at the time, whereas the 'Habsburg Netherlands' terminology is anachronistic; during the reign of Charles V the Low Countries/Netherlands were called either just Low Countries/Netherlands or Burgundian inheritance, lands, states, circle etc.
2)It's the Burgundian terminology that encompassed a larger territory even beyond that area (such as Franche-Comté).2A01:E11:17:40B0:F548:E24:DD85:70BE (talk) 09:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Firstly, if you want to continue this discussion it should take place on the article talk page, not here. Secondly, I don't agree that reliable sources treat the HRE states as part of his empire. They don't. Your two points on "Burgundian terminology" are also incorrect. What the territory was called at the time is neither here nor there. It's what contemporary scholarly sources call it that counts. Furthermore, Franche-Comté was not part of the Burgundian Netherlands and is irrelevant. the Habsburg Netherlands includes areas not within Burgundian Netherlands and it's simply incorrect to use the latter. DeCausa (talk) 23:35, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 1
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited English claims to the French throne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis X.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)