Jump to content

User talk:Defcool1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Defcool1 (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 1115182170 by Bloom6132 (talk)
October 2022: tpa revoked
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
Please note, it is [[WP:MOS|standard practice]] to always place a comma after the year when writing it in MDY format... ex: "I wrote a message on July 31, 2022, to Defcool1." If you need any help or have any questions, feel free to ask. Happy editing! - [[User:Adolphus79|Adolphus79]] ([[User talk:Adolphus79|talk]]) 04:58, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Please note, it is [[WP:MOS|standard practice]] to always place a comma after the year when writing it in MDY format... ex: "I wrote a message on July 31, 2022, to Defcool1." If you need any help or have any questions, feel free to ask. Happy editing! - [[User:Adolphus79|Adolphus79]] ([[User talk:Adolphus79|talk]]) 04:58, 31 July 2022 (UTC)


{{Admin help|answered=yes}}
== September 2022 ==
You requested admin help, but don't say what it is you want help with. I would highly advise you to heed the warnings you have been given. Keep in mind that removing a warning or any communication from this page is considered an acknowledgement that it was read and understood. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 10:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


:The questions I would like to ask have not been addressed on Wikipedia. What is your opinion on double spacing sentences? [[User:Defcool1|Defcool1]] ([[User talk:Defcool1#top|talk]]) 06:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]]. I noticed that you recently removed content from [[:Bill Plante]]&nbsp;without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your [[User:Defcool1/sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Bloom6132|my talk page]]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 -->
::I do not have this page watchlisted, so I didn't know you were asking me a question. If you are asking what I think about double spacing articles, I don't see a benefit to doing so. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:10, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
[[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 04:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
:::Not to be lengthy, much of this is about Bloom. The user participates in Wiki Bowl and best guess is they use double spacing (intermittently and haphazardly) to increase the number of edits and the article size.

:::Bloom is inconsistent in both spacing (at times using both in a single article) and in other ways. The expanded articles often have too much information. [[User:Defcool1|Defcool1]] ([[User talk:Defcool1#top|talk]]) 18:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Bill Plante]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].
::::That's something you would need to take up with whomever runs "WikiBowl"(never heard of it). You can also attempt to discuss your concerns with that user, and if nothing changes, go to [[WP:ANI]] with your concerns. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

:::::I suppose you could bring it to ANI. You also could get involved without ANI providing it's something you're inclined to do. I have no issue with the Bowl. I only mentioned it as a motive Bloom may have.
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 07:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
:::::Are you able to see qualities Bloom has? Bringing copious amounts of information to articles is not all bad however these articles are padded. The spacing is certainly another problem. There are others. [[User:Defcool1|Defcool1]] ([[User talk:Defcool1#top|talk]]) 19:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
::::::I am not as deeply involved in this as you are, and I don't think it is wise on my part to let you bring me into this further. If you want to take this further, with all due respect, you need to bring it to ANI. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 20:27, 18 October 2022 (UTC)


== October 2022 ==
== October 2022 ==
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 00:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock -->
:Why is Drmies answering a question I asked ScottishFinnishRadish?[[User:Defcool1|Defcool1]] ([[User talk:Defcool1#top|talk]]) 01:02, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


{{unblock reviewed |1=If I am able to show incompetence or a misunderstanding by one or two admins I should be unblocked [[User:Defcool1|Defcool1]] ([[User talk:Defcool1#top|talk]]) 01:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC) |decline = Doesn't work that way. The issue here is your behavior, not the admins', and whatever the latter might have been the former is enough to justify the block. — [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 06:23, 20 October 2022 (UTC)}}.
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Bill Plante]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].
::You did not answer my question. I am prepared to show you are incompetent. At the least you misunderstood the situation. There is no reason for your actions or the double spacing and other problems that you, Drmies, and other admins choose to not see.[[User:Defcool1|Defcool1]] ([[User talk:Defcool1#top|talk]]) 01:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

:::What was the question? All this started with some nonsense over having two spaces after a period, and [[User:Bloom6132]] pointed you towards [[MOS:DOUBLESPACE]]--that should have been the end of it. Next, you are accusing that editor of padding articles to score points--"the user participates in Wiki Bowl and best guess is they use double spacing (intermittently and haphazardly) to increase the number of edits and the article size", which really is a ridiculous accusation, and you posted stuff like that on [[Talk:Bill Plante]] as well (including insults like "Find a new crusade, maybe someone will join"). You also, and this goes to another one of your complaints, said "Admins don't have much interest in resolving the question of why or whether double spacing sentences is proper"--if they don't have much interest in that, they are doing their job, since it's not an admin's job to adjudicate on content matters or change the MOS according to one editor's whims. In other words, you don't get it. Finally, I didn't "answer" the question you asked on [User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish]]; I merely removed your inappropriate question that had been answered already. So, who all do you wish to prove incompetent? Daniel Case too? Don't answer that: I don't think many will be interested in furthering this time sink along. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 14:39, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->
::::For the time being let's stick with germane topics and not whether I'm finding 2 and maybe 4 admins that should be fired right away and their mops taken... Bloom is a menace. It has nothing to do with FA (Feature Articles) and GA (Good Articles) and maybe little to do with Wiki Bowls. You admins should focus on improving the site. Double spacing sentences is not that. One of the admins here agreed with me that double spacing is not a good thing. It's also not a tool. What is gained by that sort of padding and also Bloom's style which isn't MOS in any galaxy is borderline silly. Go ahead and don't unblock me, Bloom is a special, prime, and chief example of what is very wrong with Wikipedia. I and others will not allow this site to fall apart. PS, your founders don't get along. Get some clues.[[User:Defcool1|Defcool1]] ([[User talk:Defcool1#top|talk]]) 00:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

*TPA revoked.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 00:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Dave Barrow]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->
—[[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 05:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:43, 21 October 2022

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Defcool1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! - Adolphus79 (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commas after years in dates

[edit]

Please note, it is standard practice to always place a comma after the year when writing it in MDY format... ex: "I wrote a message on July 31, 2022, to Defcool1." If you need any help or have any questions, feel free to ask. Happy editing! - Adolphus79 (talk) 04:58, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You requested admin help, but don't say what it is you want help with. I would highly advise you to heed the warnings you have been given. Keep in mind that removing a warning or any communication from this page is considered an acknowledgement that it was read and understood. 331dot (talk) 10:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The questions I would like to ask have not been addressed on Wikipedia. What is your opinion on double spacing sentences? Defcool1 (talk) 06:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I do not have this page watchlisted, so I didn't know you were asking me a question. If you are asking what I think about double spacing articles, I don't see a benefit to doing so. 331dot (talk) 18:10, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not to be lengthy, much of this is about Bloom. The user participates in Wiki Bowl and best guess is they use double spacing (intermittently and haphazardly) to increase the number of edits and the article size.
Bloom is inconsistent in both spacing (at times using both in a single article) and in other ways. The expanded articles often have too much information. Defcool1 (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's something you would need to take up with whomever runs "WikiBowl"(never heard of it). You can also attempt to discuss your concerns with that user, and if nothing changes, go to WP:ANI with your concerns. 331dot (talk) 18:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose you could bring it to ANI. You also could get involved without ANI providing it's something you're inclined to do. I have no issue with the Bowl. I only mentioned it as a motive Bloom may have.
Are you able to see qualities Bloom has? Bringing copious amounts of information to articles is not all bad however these articles are padded. The spacing is certainly another problem. There are others. Defcool1 (talk) 19:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not as deeply involved in this as you are, and I don't think it is wise on my part to let you bring me into this further. If you want to take this further, with all due respect, you need to bring it to ANI. 331dot (talk) 20:27, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why is Drmies answering a question I asked ScottishFinnishRadish?Defcool1 (talk) 01:02, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Defcool1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If I am able to show incompetence or a misunderstanding by one or two admins I should be unblocked Defcool1 (talk) 01:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Doesn't work that way. The issue here is your behavior, not the admins', and whatever the latter might have been the former is enough to justify the block. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

You did not answer my question. I am prepared to show you are incompetent. At the least you misunderstood the situation. There is no reason for your actions or the double spacing and other problems that you, Drmies, and other admins choose to not see.Defcool1 (talk) 01:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What was the question? All this started with some nonsense over having two spaces after a period, and User:Bloom6132 pointed you towards MOS:DOUBLESPACE--that should have been the end of it. Next, you are accusing that editor of padding articles to score points--"the user participates in Wiki Bowl and best guess is they use double spacing (intermittently and haphazardly) to increase the number of edits and the article size", which really is a ridiculous accusation, and you posted stuff like that on Talk:Bill Plante as well (including insults like "Find a new crusade, maybe someone will join"). You also, and this goes to another one of your complaints, said "Admins don't have much interest in resolving the question of why or whether double spacing sentences is proper"--if they don't have much interest in that, they are doing their job, since it's not an admin's job to adjudicate on content matters or change the MOS according to one editor's whims. In other words, you don't get it. Finally, I didn't "answer" the question you asked on [User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish]]; I merely removed your inappropriate question that had been answered already. So, who all do you wish to prove incompetent? Daniel Case too? Don't answer that: I don't think many will be interested in furthering this time sink along. Drmies (talk) 14:39, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For the time being let's stick with germane topics and not whether I'm finding 2 and maybe 4 admins that should be fired right away and their mops taken... Bloom is a menace. It has nothing to do with FA (Feature Articles) and GA (Good Articles) and maybe little to do with Wiki Bowls. You admins should focus on improving the site. Double spacing sentences is not that. One of the admins here agreed with me that double spacing is not a good thing. It's also not a tool. What is gained by that sort of padding and also Bloom's style which isn't MOS in any galaxy is borderline silly. Go ahead and don't unblock me, Bloom is a special, prime, and chief example of what is very wrong with Wikipedia. I and others will not allow this site to fall apart. PS, your founders don't get along. Get some clues.Defcool1 (talk) 00:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]