Jump to content

Talk:CR Vasco da Gama: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Class Reassessment: new section
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{Football}}, {{WPBrazil}}.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talkheader}}
{{Talkheader}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Football|importance=high|Brazil=yes}}
{{WikiProject Brazil|importance=low}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 60K
|maxarchivesize = 60K
Line 8: Line 12:
}}
}}
{{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}}
{{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
{{Football|class=start|importance=high|Brazil=yes}}
* <nowiki>[[Portuguese Brazilians#Portuguese immigration to Brazil|Portuguese immigrants]]</nowiki>
{{WPBrazil|class=start|importance=low}}
}}

<BR>
<BR>
<div style="border: solid #228b22 3px; padding: 10px; background-color: #FFFFBD;">
<div style="border: solid #228b22 3px; padding: 10px; background-color: #FFFFBD;">

Latest revision as of 04:38, 31 January 2024


Help to improve articles related to Brazil in Simple English Wikipedia. If you are not fluent in English, that is the right place.



[edit]

I'm removing the images without a clear copyright status. I've contacted the uploader about that, but he didn't reply.

Is this fair use?

I believe that all images available at http://www.crvascodagama.com/fotos/thumbnails.php?album=3 are free domain, as there is no mention about copyright. However, I sent a message to Vasco to clarify this aspect, but I have no answer. It seems that they do no answer most of the e-mails received.

Special Mention?

[edit]

Does it seem to anyone else tht this statement is a bit random and perhaps point of view? There doesn't seem to be anything on it in the text about vasco's role in apparently "eradicating" the racism. Also it's worded a bit opinionated, and un-encyclopaedically. I recon this statement should be removed.

Acctually the influence of Vasco was not only avoinding the influence of racism in the acceptance of players in field, but about prejudice in general, as poor white people were also not allowed to play in the official league. I explained a little about it in the topic racism just above, with the "historic answer". Unfortunatelly I couldn't find any source in english language, but the fact is well documented in portuguese, and it would be quite easy to be checked even by a non-portuguese speaker, using some automatic translator.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Class Reassessment

[edit]

is this article good enough for C-class?? It has improved a great amount in the past year. 2601:6C5:8100:6D80:FD94:B264:C572:7F09 (talk) 02:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]