Talk:Quasar: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 21:40, 18 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quasar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Physics High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Top‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Record for the most distant known quasar

Hi there, in the quasars article it says: "31.7 billion light-years away" but in the linked article about UHZ1 it says "UHZ1 is at a distance of 13.2 billion light-years" Could it be a Typo? Bye! 2A02:2454:8628:E300:DD04:6F54:9840:36F (talk) 06:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It could also be that 31.7 billion ly is how far away it is now due to its motion away from us and the expansion of the universe, as opposed to the distance its light has traveled to reach us (13.2 billion ly). See, for example, https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/02/23/if-the-universe-is-13-8-billion-years-old-how-can-we-see-46-billion-light-years-away/. A graph there does indeed show a current distance of roughly 30 billion ly for something at z=9.6, which corresponds to something we currently see at 13.2 billion ly. If this is the case it would be good explain it in the article. DKMell (talk) 18:49, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that there are different distance measures in cosmology, and a statement like this lacks essential information if it doesn't specify whether the listed distance is a luminosity distance, a light-travel time distance, etc. In general I think it is better not to list distances in this way at all, but instead to specify the look-back time, or the age of the universe when the light we currently observe from the object was emitted. Aldebarium (talk) 21:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Talk header}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
-{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Science|class=B|subpage=Physics}}
-{{WikiProject Physics|class=B|importance=High}}
+{{WikiProject Physics|importance=High}}
-{{WikiProject Astronomy|object=yes|class=B|importance=top}}
+{{WikiProject Astronomy|object=yes|importance=top}}
+}}
 {{Technical|date=September 2010}}
 {{User:MiszaBot/config
@@ Line 25: / Line 26: @@
 |bot=MiszaBot|age=180}}
+== Record for the most distant known quasar ==
-== The discovery of quasars ==
-https://www.astron-soc.in/bulletin/13March/001412013.pdf
+Hi there,
-Bull. Astr. Soc. India (2013) 41, 1–17 The discovery of quasars K. I. Kellermann
+in the quasars article it says: "31.7 billion light-years away" but in the linked article about UHZ1 it says "UHZ1 is at a distance of 13.2 billion light-years"
-National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 520 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22901, US.
+Could it be a Typo?
-A good historical perspective. I'd like to add a link to the article but not sure where. Hope an editor can do the necessary.  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/115.135.199.33|115.135.199.33]] ([[User talk:115.135.199.33#top|talk]]) 14:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+Bye! [[Special:Contributions/2A02:2454:8628:E300:DD04:6F54:9840:36F|2A02:2454:8628:E300:DD04:6F54:9840:36F]] ([[User talk:2A02:2454:8628:E300:DD04:6F54:9840:36F|talk]]) 06:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
+: It could also be that 31.7 billion ly is how far away it is ''now'' due to its motion away from us and the expansion of the universe, as opposed to the distance its light has traveled to reach us (13.2 billion ly). See, for example, https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/02/23/if-the-universe-is-13-8-billion-years-old-how-can-we-see-46-billion-light-years-away/. A graph there does indeed show a current distance of roughly 30 billion ly for something at z=9.6, which corresponds to something we currently see at 13.2 billion ly. If this is the case it would be good explain it in the article. [[User:DKMell|DKMell]] ([[User talk:DKMell|talk]]) 18:49, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
+: The problem is that there are different distance measures in cosmology, and a statement like this lacks essential information if it doesn't specify whether the listed distance is a luminosity distance, a light-travel time distance, etc. In general I think it is better not to list distances in this way at all, but instead to specify the look-back time, or the age of the universe when the light we currently observe from the object was emitted. [[User:Aldebarium|Aldebarium]] ([[User talk:Aldebarium|talk]]) 21:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)