Jump to content

Anti-consumerism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
(119 intermediate revisions by 55 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Opposition to excessive systemic buying and use of material possessions}}
{{Short description|Sociopolitical ideology involving intentionally and meaningfully reducing consumption}}
{{For|anti-consumer business practices|Unfair business practices|Anti-competitive practices}}
{{Anti-consumerism}}
{{Anti-consumerism}}[[File:City in Motion (Unsplash).jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|Photograph of [[Times Square]], showing the prevalence of advertisements]]
'''Anti-consumerism''' is a [[sociopolitical]] [[ideology]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Anticomsumerism movement |url=https://www.britannica.com/money/anticonsumerism-movement |access-date=2024-10-03 | website=www.britannica.com |language=en-GB}}</ref> It has been described as "''intentionally'' and ''meaningfully'' excluding or cutting goods from one's consumption routine or reusing once-acquired goods with the goal of avoiding consumption".<ref name=":1" /> The ideology is opposed to [[consumerism]], being a social and economic order in which the aspirations of many individuals include the acquisition of goods and services beyond those necessary for survival or traditional displays of status.<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite book |last=Stearns |first=Peter |title=Consumerism in World History |date=2001 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=9780415244091}}</ref>


'''Anti-consumerism''' is a [[sociopolitical]] [[ideology]] that is opposed to [[consumerism]], the continual buying and consuming of material possessions. Anti-consumerism is concerned with the private actions of business corporations in pursuit of financial and economic goals at the expense of the [[public welfare]], especially in matters of [[environmental protection]], [[social stratification]], and [[ethics]] in the governing of a society. In politics, anti-consumerism overlaps with [[environmental activism]], [[anti-globalization]], and [[animal-rights]] activism; moreover, a conceptual variation of anti-consumerism is ''[[post-consumerism]]'', living in a material way that transcends consumerism.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.postconsumers.com |title=Postconsumers |publisher=Postconsumers |date=2018-06-13 |access-date=2018-10-18}}</ref>
Anti-consumerism is concerned with the actions of individuals, as well as businesses where they act in pursuit of financial and economic goals at the expense of the perceived [[Common good|public good]]. Commonly, anti-consumerism is connected with concern for [[environmental protection]], [[anti-globalization]], and [[animal-rights]]. ''[[Post-consumerism]]'', the prioritization of [[well-being]] over material prosperity, is a related ideology.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.postconsumers.com |title=Postconsumers |publisher=Postconsumers |date=2018-06-13 |access-date=2018-10-18}}</ref>

Anti-consumerism arose in response to the problems caused by the long-term mistreatment of human consumers and of the animals consumed, and from the incorporation of [[consumer education]] to school [[curriculum|curricula]]; examples of anti-consumerism are the book ''[[No Logo]]'' (2000) by [[Naomi Klein]], and documentary films such as ''[[The Corporation (2003 film)|The Corporation]]'' (2003), by [[Mark Achbar]] and [[Jennifer Abbott]], and ''[[Surplus (film)|Surplus: Terrorized into Being Consumers]]'' (2003), by [[Erik Gandini]]; each made [[anti-corporate activism]] popular as an ideologically accessible form of civil and political action.

The criticism of [[economic materialism]] as a dehumanizing behaviour that is destructive to Earth, as [[biosphere|human habitat]], comes from [[religion]] and [[social activism]]. The religious criticism asserts that materialist consumerism interferes with the connection between the individual and God, and so is an inherently [[immoral]] style of life; thus the German historian [[Oswald Spengler]] (1880–1936) said that, "Life in America is exclusively economic in structure, and lacks depth."<ref name="ReferenceA">Stearns, Peter. ''Consumerism in World History''. Routledge</ref> From the Roman Catholic perspective, [[Thomas Aquinas]] said that, "Greed is a sin against God, just as all mortal sins, in as much as man condemns things eternal for the sake of temporal things";<ref>{{Cite book|last=Aquinas|first=Saint Thomas|title=Summa Theologica: Complete English in Five Volumes|publisher=Ave Maria Press|year=1981|isbn=9780870610639|volume=3|pages=1680}}</ref> in that vein, [[Francis of Assisi]], [[Ammon Hennacy]], and [[Mohandas Gandhi]] said that spiritual inspiration guided them towards [[simple living]].

From the secular perspective, social activism indicates that from consumerist [[materialism]] derive [[crime]] (which originates from the [[poverty]] of [[economic inequality]]), industrial [[pollution]] and the consequent [[environmental degradation]], and [[war]] as a business.

About the societal discontent born of [[malaise]] and [[hedonism]], [[Pope Benedict XVI]] said in 2008 that the philosophy of materialism offers no purpose for human existence,<ref>{{cite news |title=Our world has grown weary of greed: Pope |url=https://www.iol.co.za/mercury/news/world/our-world-has-grown-weary-of-greed-pope-408709 |access-date=2 January 2022 |work=[[Independent Online (South Africa)|Independent Online]] |date=17 July 2008|language=en}}</ref> and in 2011 specifically attacked the [[commercialization of Christmas]];<ref>{{cite web |title=Pope Benedict XVI attacks Christmas consumerism at Mass |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-16328318 |website=BBC News |date=25 December 2011}}</ref> likewise, the writer [[Georges Duhamel]] said that "American materialism [is] a beacon of mediocrity that threatened to eclipse French civilization".<ref name="ReferenceA"/>


==Background==
==Background==
{{Unreferenced section|date=July 2019}}
Anti-consumerism originated from criticism of consumption, starting with [[Thorstein Veblen]], who, in the book ''[[Theory of the Leisure Class|The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions]]'' (1899), indicated that [[consumerism]] dates from the [[cradle of civilization]]. The term ''consumerism'' also denotes economic policies associated with [[Keynesian economics]], and the belief that the free choice of consumers should dictate the economic structure of a society (cf. [[producerism]]).


Anti-consumerism originated from criticism of consumption, arguably starting with [[Thorstein Veblen]], who, in the book ''[[Theory of the Leisure Class|The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions]]'' (1899), suggested that [[consumerism]] dates from the [[cradle of civilization]]. The term ''consumerism'' also denotes economic policies associated with [[Keynesian economics]], and the belief that the free choice of consumers should dictate the economic structure of a society (cf. [[producerism]]). Modern political anti-consumerism developed in the 2000's.<ref name=":1">{{cite web |url= https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/mar.21319 |title= ''What we know about anticonsumption: An attempt to nail jelly to the wall'' (Section 2.1: The concept of anticonsumption)|last= Makri |first= Katerina |date= February 28, 2020 |website= Wiley Online Library |publisher= |access-date= 2024-02-29|quote=}}</ref>
==Politics and society==
{{more citations needed section|date=May 2019}}
[[File:Anticonsumismo.JPG|thumb|250px|An anti-consumerist [[stencil graffiti]] saying "Consuming consumes you"]]
Many [[anti-corporate activist]]s believe the rise of large-business corporations poses a threat to the legitimate authority of [[nation states]] and the public sphere.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Conversi|first=Daniele|date=2012|title=Majoritarian democracy and globalization versus ethnic diversity?|journal=Democratization|volume=19|issue=4|pages=789–811|doi=10.1080/13510347.2011.626947|s2cid=146288346}}</ref> They feel corporations are invading people's [[privacy]], manipulating politics and governments, and creating false needs in consumers. They state evidence such as invasive advertising [[adware]], [[spam (electronic)|spam]], [[telemarketing]], child-targeted advertising, aggressive [[guerrilla marketing]], massive corporate campaign contributions in political elections, interference in the policies of sovereign nation states ([[Ken Saro-Wiwa]]), and news stories about [[corporate corruption]] ([[Enron]], for example).<ref>Clinard, M. B. (1990) Corporate corruption: The abuse of power. Greenwood Publishing</ref>


Anti-consumerism can be seen as an extension of postmodern society, supporting a "decentralized culture", rejecting a hegemonic cultural imperialism of globalisation and consumption, and responding to negative impacts of consumption on the environment.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370267039 |title=Human existence and identity in modern age: a socio-philosophical reflection |date=2019 |publisher=Peter Lang |isbn=978-3-631-78260-6 |editor-last=Yaldır |editor-first=Hülya |location=Berlin Bern Bruxelles New York Oxford Warszawa Wien |chapter=Illusion and Awareness in Consumption Culture from the Perspective of Anti-Consumerism |editor-last2=Ashraf |editor-first2=Mirza Iqbal}}</ref> Further, it has been observed that: "While almost all contemporary critics [of consumerism] and activists talk of the need for an environmentally sustainable mode of living, many also focus intently on how the consumerism driving overconsumption undermines our sense of well being and happiness; contributes to a culture of overwork, haste and instantaneous gratification; underscores a bland cultural homogenization of life; and fragments communities and social relationships."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Humphery |first=Kim |url=https://www.worldcat.org/title/320316172 |title=Excess: anti-consumerism in the West |date=2010 |publisher=Polity |isbn=978-0-7456-4540-7 |location=Cambridge ; Malden, MA |oclc=320316172}}</ref>
Anti-consumerism protesters point out that the main responsibility of a corporation is to answer only to [[shareholders]], giving [[human rights]] and other issues almost no consideration.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/corporate-human-rights-obligations-controversial-but-necessary|title=Corporate Human Rights Obligations: Controversial but necessary {{!}} Business & Human Rights Resource Centre|last=Carrillo-Santarelli|first=Nicolás|website=www.business-humanrights.org|language=en|access-date=2019-07-01}}</ref> The management does have a primary responsibility to their shareholders, since any [[philanthropic]] activities that do not directly serve the business could be deemed to be a [[Position of trust|breach of trust]]. This sort of financial responsibility means that multi-national corporations will pursue strategies to intensify labor and reduce costs. For example, they will attempt to find low wage economies with laws which are conveniently lenient on human rights, the [[natural environment]], [[trade union]] organization and so on (see, for example, [[Nike, Inc.#Human rights concerns|Nike]]).


Predictors of anti-consumerist attitudes and behaviors at an individual level include concerns about environmental pollution or disruption of ecological balance, a desire to live a simple life, and a belief that a search for happiness should come from internal factors.<ref name=":0" />
An important contribution to the critique of consumerism has been made by French philosopher [[Bernard Stiegler]], arguing modern capitalism is governed by consumption rather than production, and the advertising techniques used to create [[consumer behaviour]] amount to the destruction of psychic and collective [[individuation]]. The diversion of libidinal energy toward the consumption of consumer products, he argues, results in an addictive cycle of consumption, leading to hyper-consumption, the exhaustion of desire, and the reign of symbolic misery.


==Development and expression==
In art, [[Banksy]], an influential British graffiti master, painter, activist, filmmaker and all-purpose provocateur,<ref name="Kakutani">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/18/books/banksy-the-man-behind-the-wall-by-will-ellsworth-jones.html|title='Banksy: The Man Behind the Wall,' by Will Ellsworth-Jones|last=Kakutani|first=Michiko|date=2013-02-17|work=The New York Times|access-date=2018-03-16|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> has created satirical and provocative works about the consumerist society (notable examples include "Napalm", also known as "Can't Beat That Feelin'", an attack on [[Walt Disney Pictures]] and [[McDonald's]],<ref>{{Citation|title=Banksy Napalm/Can't Beat That Feeling (Hexagon Gallery)|url=https://hexagongallery.com/catalog/artist/banksy/napalm-cant-beat-that-feeling/|language=en|access-date=2021-09-01}}</ref> and "Death By [[Swoosh]]", directed at [[Nike, Inc.|Nike]]<ref>{{Citation|title=Banksy Nike Canvas Print Or Poster (Canvas Art Rocks)|url=https://us.canvasartrocks.com/products/banksy-nike-canvas-print-or-poster|language=en|access-date=2021-09-01}}</ref>). Working undercover, the secretive street artist challenges social ideas and goads viewers into rethinking their surroundings, to acknowledge the absurdities of closely held preconceptions.<ref name="Kakutani"/> In an essay contained in his 2004 book ''Cut It Out'', he writes, "You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don't owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don't even start asking for theirs."{{Citation needed|date=April 2021}} After 2003, Banksy wrote the ''New Yorker'' by e-mail: "I give away thousands of paintings for free. I don't think it's possible to make art about world poverty and trouser all the cash." Banksy believes that there is a consumerist shift in art, and for the first time, the bourgeois world of art belongs to the people. On his [http://www.banksy.co.uk/menu.asp website], he provides high-resolution images of his work for free downloading.
[[File:Anticonsumismo.JPG|thumb|250px|A Portuguese anti-consumerist [[stencil graffiti]] saying "Consuming consumes you"]]


=== Significant works ===
Anti-Consumerism from a sustainability perspective also ties into the social and political understanding of the term, as ideas surrounding this perspective are rooted in sustainability efforts. Practicing anti-consumerism can mean voluntarily simplifying and minimizing one's lifestyle; this can be in efforts to exist more sustainably in a consumer culture.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=SEEGEBARTH |first1=BARBARA |title=The Sustainability Roots of Anti-Consumption Lifestyles and Initial Insights Regarding Their Effects on Consumers' Well-Being|journal=[[The Journal of Consumer Affairs]]|date=Spring 2016 |volume=50 |page=68 |doi=10.1111/joca.12077 |url=https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/business/about/our-research/research-groups/icar/2016-icar/4%20Seegabarth%20et%20al%20JOCA%202016%20Sustainability%20roots.pdf}}</ref> These lifestyle changes, which include choosing paper bags over plastic bags when shopping, are also in line with anti-corporate activism and green consumerism -- both large contributors to the ethical market.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Gunkel |first=Christian |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/919201704 |title=Politicizing consumer choice : ethical dimensions of consumerism in the United States |date=December 23, 2014 |publisher=Peter Lang |isbn=978-3-631-65475-0 |language=English |oclc=919201704}}</ref>
An important contribution to the critique of consumerism has been made by French philosopher [[Bernard Stiegler]], arguing modern capitalism is governed by consumption rather than production, and the advertising techniques used to create [[consumer behaviour]] amount to the destruction of psychic and collective [[individuation]].<ref>Stiegler, B. (2011a) Interviewed by Lemmens, P. ‘”This System Does Not Produce PleasureAnymore”: An Interview with Bernard Stiegler’ in Krisis Journal, 1:33-42


</ref> The diversion of libidinal energy toward the consumption of consumer products, he argues, results in an addictive cycle of consumption, leading to hyper-consumption, the exhaustion of desire, and the reign of symbolic misery.<ref>Stiegler, B. (2011) "Pharmacology of Desire Drive Based Capitalism And Libidinal Dis-Economy" https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/9114/1/s12.pdf</ref>
===Conspicuous consumption===
{{Main|Conspicuous consumption}}{{See also|Individual action on climate change}}{{See also|individual action on climate change#less consumption of goods and services}}{{blockquote|It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that prevents us from living freely and nobly.|sign=[[Bertrand Russell]]<ref>''The Routledge Dictionary of Quotations'', by Robert Andrews, [[Routledge]], 1987, {{ISBN|0-7102-0729-8}}, pg 212</ref>|title=|source=}}


Examples of anti-consumerist works include the book ''[[No Logo]]'' (2000) by [[Naomi Klein]], and documentary films such as ''[[The Corporation (2003 film)|The Corporation]]'' (2003), by [[Mark Achbar]] and [[Jennifer Abbott]], and ''[[Surplus (film)|Surplus: Terrorized into Being Consumers]]'' (2003), by [[Erik Gandini]].
{{blockquote|Trying to reduce environmental pollution without reducing consumerism is like combating drug trafficking without reducing the drug addiction.| sign=[[Jorge Majfud]]<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Majfud |first1=Jorge |title=The Pandemic of Consumerism |journal=[[UN Chronicle]] |volume=46 |issue=3–4 |date=August 2009 |page=85 |url=https://www.un.org/wcm/content/site/chronicle/home/archive/issues2009/toprotectsucceedinggenerations/pid/21570 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130719034751/http://www.un.org/wcm/content/site/chronicle/home/archive/issues2009/toprotectsucceedinggenerations/pid/21570 |archive-date=19 July 2013 }}<!-- Note: this "sidebar" article is missing from this issue on the new UN Chronicle website. --></ref>}}


=== Religion ===
In many critical contexts,{{Citation needed|date=February 2009}} the term describes the tendency of people to identify strongly with products or services they consume, especially with commercial [[brand]] names and obvious [[status symbol|status-enhancing]] appeal, such as a brand of expensive automobiles or [[jewelry]]. It is a pejorative term which most people deny, having some more specific excuse or [[rationalization (psychology)|rationalization]] for consumption other than the idea that they are "compelled to consume". A culture that has a high amount of consumerism is referred to as a [[consumer culture]].
Anti-consumerist beliefs are in some cases connected with [[religion|religious]] beliefs. A religious criticism asserts that materialist consumerism interferes with the connection between the individual and God, and so is an inherently [[immoral]] style of life; thus the German historian [[Oswald Spengler]] (1880–1936) said that, "Life in America is exclusively economic in structure, and lacks depth."<ref name="ReferenceA" /> From the Roman Catholic perspective, [[Thomas Aquinas]] said that, "Greed is a sin against God, just as all mortal sins, in as much as man condemns things eternal for the sake of temporal things";<ref>{{Cite book |last=Aquinas |first=Saint Thomas |title=Summa Theologica: Complete English in Five Volumes |publisher=Ave Maria Press |year=1981 |isbn=9780870610639 |volume=3 |pages=1680}}</ref> in that vein, [[Francis of Assisi]], [[Ammon Hennacy]], and [[Mohandas Gandhi]] said that spiritual inspiration guided them towards [[simple living]].


=== Protest ===
To those who embrace the idea of consumerism, these products are not seen as valuable in themselves, but rather as social signals that allow them to identify like-minded people through consumption and display of similar products. Few would yet go so far, though, as to admit that their relationships with a product or brand name could be substitutes for healthy human relationships that sometimes lack in a dysfunctional modern [[society]].
Anti-consumerist messages are often raised in [[protest]]s, including in the broader context of [[environmentalism]] and [[anti-corporate activism]]. A notable anti-consumerist protest community is [[Reverend Billy and the Church of Stop Shopping]].


In the context of [[protest art]], [[Banksy]], an influential British graffitist, painter, activist and filmmaker,<ref name="Kakutani">{{Cite news |last=Kakutani |first=Michiko |date=2013-02-17 |title='Banksy: The Man Behind the Wall,' by Will Ellsworth-Jones |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/18/books/banksy-the-man-behind-the-wall-by-will-ellsworth-jones.html |access-date=2018-03-16 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> has created satirical and provocative works about the consumerist society. Examples include "Napalm", an attack on [[Walt Disney Pictures]] and [[McDonald's]], and "[[Show Me the Monet (painting)|Show Me the Monet]]", among many others.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-06-20 |title=Graffiti, Consumerism and Capitalism - Banksy Explained |url=https://banksyexplained.com/issue/graffiti-consumerism-and-capitalism/,%20https://banksyexplained.com/issue/graffiti-consumerism-and-capitalism/ |access-date=2024-05-19 |language=en-US}}</ref> In his 2004 book ''Cut It Out'', Banksy writes, "You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don't owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don't even start asking for theirs."<ref>{{cite web  |author=<!--Not stated-->  |date=  |title= Banksy: Quotes |url= https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/28811.Banksy |access-date= 2024-02-29 |website= GoodReads |publisher=  |quote=}}</ref>
The older term ''conspicuous consumption'' described the [[United States]] in the 1960s, but was soon linked to larger debates about [[media influence]], [[culture jamming]], and its corollary [[productivism]].
[[File:BarsStencil.jpg|thumb|Anti-consumerist [[stencil]] art]]
The term and concept of ''conspicuous consumption'' originated at the turn of the 20th century in the writing of economist [[Thorstein Veblen]]. The term describes an apparently irrational and confounding form of economic behaviour. Veblen's scathing proposal that this unnecessary consumption is a form of status display is made in darkly humorous observations like the following, from his 1899 book, ''The Theory of the Leisure Class'':
{{blockquote |It is true of dress in even a higher degree than of most other items of consumption, that people will undergo a very considerable degree of privation in the comforts or the necessaries of life in order to afford what is considered a decent amount of wasteful consumption; so that it is by no means an uncommon occurrence, in an inclement climate, for people to go ill clad in order to appear well dressed.<ref>[[The Theory of the Leisure Class]], 1899</ref>}}


=== Individual and community responses ===
In 1955, economist [[Victor Lebow]] stated (as quoted by [[William E. Rees (academic)|William Rees]], 2009):
Practicing anti-consumerism can mean voluntarily simplifying and minimizing one's lifestyle; this can be in efforts to exist more sustainably in a consumer culture.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=SEEGEBARTH |first1=BARBARA |title=The Sustainability Roots of Anti-Consumption Lifestyles and Initial Insights Regarding Their Effects on Consumers' Well-Being|journal=[[The Journal of Consumer Affairs]]|date=Spring 2016 |volume=50 |page=68 |doi=10.1111/joca.12077 |url=https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/business/about/our-research/research-groups/icar/2016-icar/4%20Seegabarth%20et%20al%20JOCA%202016%20Sustainability%20roots.pdf}}</ref> These lifestyle changes, which include choosing paper bags over plastic bags when shopping, are also in line with anti-corporate activism and green consumerism—both large contributors to the ethical market.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Gunkel |first=Christian |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/919201704 |title=Politicizing consumer choice : ethical dimensions of consumerism in the United States |date=December 23, 2014 |publisher=Peter Lang |isbn=978-3-631-65475-0 |language=English |oclc=919201704}}</ref> [[Degrowth]], [[Commons|commoning]] and other movements aim to collectively address sustainability issues through practices and approaches that radically reduce consumption and replace consumer culture with new ethics and values.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Nelson |first=Anitra |date=2024-01-31 |title=Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction |url=https://commonslibrary.org/degrowth-as-a-concept-and-practice-introduction/ |access-date=2024-02-20 |website=The Commons Social Change Library |language=en-AU}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Smith |first=E. T. |date=2024-01-23 |title=Practising Commoning |url=https://commonslibrary.org/practising-commoning/ |access-date=2024-02-20 |website=The Commons Social Change Library |language=en-AU}}</ref>
{{blockquote |Our enormously productive economy demands that we make consumption our way of life, that we convert the buying and use of goods into rituals, that we seek our spiritual satisfaction and our ego satisfaction in consumption. We need things consumed, burned up, worn out, replaced, and discarded at an ever-increasing rate.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.fondationtrudeau.ca/sites/default/files/u5/pages_de_trudeaupapers2009_-_text_from_william_e._rees.pdf |title=William E. Rees |publisher=Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation |access-date=8 October 2021}}</ref>}}


=== Modern Development ===
According to archaeologists, evidence of conspicuous consumption up to several millennia ago has been found, suggesting that such behavior is inherent to humans.<ref>{{cite book
The modern development of anti-consumerism is closely tied to the global environmental crisis, particularly the urgency surrounding climate change. As the world faces environmental degradation and the depletion of natural resources, anti-consumerist movements have gained momentum. These movements advocate for reducing overconsumption, promoting conscious consumption, and addressing waste, especially the growing plastic problem.
|last1= Renfrew |first1= Colin |author-link1= Colin Renfrew
|last2= Bahn |first2= Peter
|title= Archaeology: Theories, methods and practice
|edition= 5th |year= 2008
|publisher= [[Thames & Hudson]] |location= London |isbn= 978-0-500-28719-4 |oclc= 181139910
|chapter= <!-- Please give the page or chapter numbers. -->
}}</ref>


A key argument for these movements is the need for both personal and systemic changes. Many activists, such as [[George Monbiot]], emphasize that overconsumption is a root cause of global crises like climate change, biodiversity loss, and environmental degradation<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |date=2021-05-17 |title=Consumerism is global crisis |url=https://theecologist.org/2021/may/17/consumerism-global-crisis |access-date=2024-12-13 |website=theecologist.org |language=en}}</ref> Efforts like upcycling and reducing plastic waste are part of broader campaigns aimed at creating sustainable consumption patterns. Moreover, critics of unchecked consumerism argue that solving these issues requires more than individual action; it also necessitates economic restructuring to lessen dependence on constant consumer spending<ref name=":3" />
=== Collaborative Consumption ===
One crucial aspect of this movement is the call for "voluntary simplicity," which advocates for reducing material needs to reduce environmental impact. This is reflected in policies from international bodies like the United Nations, which has highlighted the importance of sustainable consumption in its development goals<ref name=":4">{{Cite web |title=Anti-Consumption in a World in Crisis {{!}} AACSB |url=https://www.aacsb.edu/insights/articles/2022/11/anti-consumption-in-a-world-in-crisis |access-date=2024-12-13 |website=www.aacsb.edu |language=en}}</ref> By embracing a mindset of reducing consumption, both individuals and institutions can significantly lower emissions and resource use, addressing environmental challenges more effectively than through green technologies alone.<ref name=":4" />
[[Collaborative consumption]] describes the way that consumers of a good engage in shared consumption either through temporary rentals or second-hand purchases. Anti-consumerism opposes the continuous consumption of material possessions in part because of the unsustainability that individuals who seek the experience of consumer culture without the desire of long-term possession.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Guzzetti |first1=Alice |last2=Crespi |first2=Roberta |last3=Belvedere |first3=Valeria |date=January 2021 |title="Please don't buy!": Consumers attitude to alternative luxury consumption |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsc.2390 |journal=Strategic Change |language=en |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=67–78 |doi=10.1002/jsc.2390 |s2cid=234233497 |issn=1086-1718}}</ref>


To sum up, the modern anti-consumerism movement is driven by the urgent need to address the environmental crisis and the recognition that true sustainability requires changes at both the individual and systemic levels.
Collaborative consumption is understood as anti-consumption<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ozanne |first1=Lucie K. |last2=Ballantine |first2=Paul W. |date=November 2010 |title=Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? An examination of toy library users |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cb.334 |journal=Journal of Consumer Behaviour |volume=9 |issue=6 |pages=485–498 |doi=10.1002/cb.334 |issn=1472-0817}}</ref> by focusing on the temporary usage of the products, consumers are able to express sustainable attitudes with the intent of reducing natural resources by reducing direct consumption of a product or brand.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chatzidakis |first1=Andreas |last2=Lee |first2=Michael S. W. |date=September 2013 |title=Anti-Consumption as the Study of Reasons against |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0276146712462892 |journal=Journal of Macromarketing |language=en |volume=33 |issue=3 |pages=190–203 |doi=10.1177/0276146712462892 |s2cid=3850581 |issn=0276-1467}}</ref>
Modern day creative destruction culture causes sustainability issues, and in order to mitigate them, a more collaborative mindset is necessary when it comes to consumption.<ref>George Loewenstein, The Creative Destruction of Decision Research, Journal of Consumer Research, Volume 28, Issue 3, December 2001, Pages 499–505, https://doi.org/10.1086/323738</ref>


== Advertising ==
===Consumerism and advertising===
Anti-consumerists believe [[advertising]] plays a huge role in human life by informing values and assumptions of the cultural system, deeming what is acceptable, and determining social standards.<ref name="World. Dir 1997">[ Advertising and the End of the World. Dir. Sut Jhally. Perf. [[Sut Jhally]]. DVD. Media Education Foundation, 1997.]</ref> They declare that ads create a hyper-real world where commodities appear as the key to securing happiness. Anti-consumerists cite studies that find that individuals believe their [[quality of life]] improves in relation to social values that lie outside the capability of the marketplace. Therefore, advertising attempts to equate the social with the material by utilizing images and slogans to link commodities with the real sources of human happiness, such as meaningful relationships. Ads are then a detriment to society because they tell consumers that accumulating more and more possessions will bring them closer to self-actualization, or the concept of a complete and secure being. "The underlying message is that owning these products will enhance our image and ensure our popularity with others."<ref>[Tim Kasser, "The High Price of Materialism", 2002, p.9, Achorn Graphic Services]</ref> And while advertising promises that a product will make the consumer happy, advertising simultaneously depends upon the consumer never being truly happy, as then the consumer would no longer feel the need to consume needless products.
Anti-consumerists believe [[advertising]] plays a huge role in human life by informing values and assumptions of the cultural system, deeming what is acceptable, and determining social standards.<ref name="World. Dir 1997">[ Advertising and the End of the World. Dir. Sut Jhally. Perf. [[Sut Jhally]]. DVD. Media Education Foundation, 1997.]</ref> They declare that ads create a hyper-real world where commodities appear as the key to securing happiness. Anti-consumerists cite studies that find that individuals believe their [[quality of life]] improves in relation to social values that lie outside the capability of the marketplace. Therefore, advertising attempts to equate the social with the material by utilizing images and slogans to link commodities with the real sources of human happiness, such as meaningful relationships. Ads are then a detriment to society because they tell consumers that accumulating more and more possessions will bring them closer to self-actualization, or the concept of a complete and secure being. "The underlying message is that owning these products will enhance our image and ensure our popularity with others."<ref>[Tim Kasser, "The High Price of Materialism", 2002, p.9, Achorn Graphic Services]</ref> And while advertising promises that a product will make the consumer happy, advertising simultaneously depends upon the consumer never being truly happy, as then the consumer would no longer feel the need to consume needless products.


Anti-consumerists claim that in a consumerist society, advertisement images disempower and objectify the consumer.<ref name="Rumbo">Joseph D. Rumbo, "Consumer Resistance in a World of Advertising Clutter: The Case of Adbusters", Psychology and Marketing, Vol.19(2), February 2002</ref> By stressing individual power, choice and desire, advertising falsely implies the control lies with the consumer. Because anti-consumerists believe commodities supply only short-term gratification, they detract from a sustainably happy society. Further, advertisers have resorted to new techniques of capturing attention, such as the increased speed of ads and [[product placement]]s.<ref name="World. Dir 1997"/> In this way, commercials infiltrate the consumerist society and become an inextricable part of the culture. Anti-consumerists condemn advertising because it constructs a simulated world that offers fantastical [[escapism]] to consumers, rather than reflecting actual reality. They further argue that ads depict the interests and lifestyles of the elite as natural; cultivating a deep sense of inadequacy among viewers.<ref name="Rumbo" /> They denounce the use of beautiful models because they glamorize the commodity beyond the reach of the average individual.
Anti-consumerists claim that in a consumerist society, advertisement images disempower and objectify the consumer.<ref name="Rumbo">{{cite journal|first=Joseph D.|last= Rumbo|title=Consumer Resistance in a World of Advertising Clutter: The Case of Adbusters|journal= Psychology and Marketing|volume=19|issue=2|date= February 2002|pages= 127–148|doi= 10.1002/mar.10006}}</ref> By stressing individual power, choice and desire, advertising falsely implies the control lies with the consumer. Because anti-consumerists believe commodities supply only short-term gratification, they detract from a sustainably happy society. Further, advertisers have resorted to new techniques of capturing attention, such as the increased speed of ads and [[product placement]]s.<ref name="World. Dir 1997"/> In this way, commercials infiltrate the consumerist society and become an inextricable part of the culture. In a review of research on materialistic values and goals, [[Tim Kasser]] (2016) argues that the pursuit of material possessions can lead to short-term gratification at the expense of long-term well-being.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kasser |first=Tim |date=2016-01-04 |title=Materialistic Values and Goals |journal=Annual Review of Psychology |language=en |volume=67 |issue=1 |pages=489–514 |doi=10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033344 |pmid=26273896 |issn=0066-4308|doi-access=free }}</ref> Anti-consumerists condemn advertising because it constructs a simulated world that offers fantastical [[escapism]] to consumers, rather than reflecting actual reality. They further argue that ads depict the interests and lifestyles of the elite as natural; cultivating a deep sense of inadequacy among viewers.<ref name="Rumbo" /> They denounce the use of beautiful models because they glamorize the commodity beyond the reach of the average individual.


In an opinion segment of ''[[New Scientist]]'' magazine published in August 2009, reporter Andy Coghlan cited [[William E. Rees (academic)|William Rees]] of the [[University of British Columbia]] and [[Epidemiology|epidemiologist]] [[Warren Hern]] of the [[University of Colorado at Boulder]], saying that human beings, despite considering themselves civilized thinkers, are "subconsciously still driven by an impulse for survival, domination and expansion... an impulse which now finds expression in the idea that inexorable economic growth is the answer to everything, and, given time, will redress all the world's existing inequalities." He argues that consumerism is making these tendencies worse by encouraging consumption without limit.<ref>{{cite news |title=Consumerism is 'eating the future' |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17569-consumerism-is-eating-the-future/ |access-date=3 January 2022 |work=New Scientist |date=7 August 2009}}</ref>
In an opinion segment of ''[[New Scientist]]'' magazine published in August 2009, reporter Andy Coghlan cited [[William E. Rees (academic)|William Rees]] of the [[University of British Columbia]] and [[Epidemiology|epidemiologist]] [[Warren Hern]] of the [[University of Colorado at Boulder]], saying that human beings, despite considering themselves civilized thinkers, are "subconsciously still driven by an impulse for survival, domination and expansion... an impulse which now finds expression in the idea that inexorable economic growth is the answer to everything, and, given time, will redress all the world's existing inequalities." He argues that consumerism is making these tendencies worse by encouraging consumption without limit.<ref>{{cite news |title=Consumerism is 'eating the future' |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17569-consumerism-is-eating-the-future/ |access-date=3 January 2022 |work=New Scientist |date=7 August 2009}}</ref>
Line 70: Line 52:
Supporters of anti-consumerism often accuse advertising of [[attention theft]], i.e. they believe it unjustifiably invades public areas, thereby imposing itself on people who consider its presence unwanted. American graphic designer [[Sean Tejaratchi]] expresses his resentment of this "[[ad creep]]" in a 1999 issue of his [[clip art]] [[zine]] ''Crap Hound'': "Advertising increasingly invades my environment instead of letting me come to it on my own terms when I need it... The most powerful and well-funded methods of mass communication in history have been used to create a one-way, unending flow of shit into my life... In the twenty-eight years since I was born, I've been subjected to a stunning amount of advertising, and I don't recall anyone ever asking me if I minded."<ref>{{Citation|title=Banksy and Tejaratchi on Advertising & Going Viral|date=11 October 2018|url=https://www.yatesweb.com/banksy-and-tejaratchi-on-advertising/|language=en|access-date=September 29, 2021}}</ref>
Supporters of anti-consumerism often accuse advertising of [[attention theft]], i.e. they believe it unjustifiably invades public areas, thereby imposing itself on people who consider its presence unwanted. American graphic designer [[Sean Tejaratchi]] expresses his resentment of this "[[ad creep]]" in a 1999 issue of his [[clip art]] [[zine]] ''Crap Hound'': "Advertising increasingly invades my environment instead of letting me come to it on my own terms when I need it... The most powerful and well-funded methods of mass communication in history have been used to create a one-way, unending flow of shit into my life... In the twenty-eight years since I was born, I've been subjected to a stunning amount of advertising, and I don't recall anyone ever asking me if I minded."<ref>{{Citation|title=Banksy and Tejaratchi on Advertising & Going Viral|date=11 October 2018|url=https://www.yatesweb.com/banksy-and-tejaratchi-on-advertising/|language=en|access-date=September 29, 2021}}</ref>


Anti-consumerism has paved the way for a "[[subvertising]]" (also known as culture jamming) movement, which uses artistic and political strategies to protest modern forms of publicity; acts of "subvertising" include "removing advertising from public spaces, tweeting to inform the city's mayor of illicit advertising practices, recuperating posters from bus stop advertising panels, producing critical advertising guides, documentaries or organising public workshops."<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Lekakis |first=Eleftheria J. |date=2021-11-02 |title=Adversaries of advertising: anti-consumerism and subvertisers' critique and practice |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1837102 |journal=Social Movement Studies |volume=20 |issue=6 |pages=740–757 |doi=10.1080/14742837.2020.1837102 |s2cid=226375476 |issn=1474-2837}}</ref>
==Austrian economics==


== In Economic Theory ==
Austrian economic advocates focus on the entrepreneur, promoting a productive lifestyle rather than a materialistic one wherein the individual is defined by things and not their self.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://mises.org/library/consumerism-defense|title=Consumerism: A Defense - Tibor R. Machan|last=kanopiadmin|date=27 October 2000}}</ref>

=== Austrian economics ===
{{See also|Austrian school of economics|Austrian business cycle theory#Government policy error|Subjective theory of value}}
[[File:Abct.webp|thumb|[[Austrian business cycle theory]], formulated by [[Friedrich Hayek]], before and during the [[Great Depression]]]]
As a classical defence pertinent in this context, [[Austrian Economic|Austrian economic]] advocates focus on the entrepreneur, promoting a productive lifestyle rather than a materialistic one wherein the individual is defined by things and not their self.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://mises.org/library/consumerism-defense|title=Consumerism: A Defense - Tibor R. Machan|last=kanopiadmin|date=27 October 2000}}</ref> Certain economists have further rendered Keynesian notions of propagating increased consumption - in order to mitigate [[inverted yield curve|recessive impacts]] when the populace refuse to spend - as obsolete,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Austrian school of economics |url=https://www.britannica.com/money/Austrian-school-of-economics |access-date=2 August 2024 |website=Britannica. |language=en-GB}}</ref> since numerous founding principles presume that minor adjustments are implemented via [[Austrian business cycle theory#Mechanism|expansions and contractions]], at least monetarily, are the reason behind business cycles,<ref>{{Cite journal |title=The Austrian School and the Theory of Value |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2955844 |access-date=2 August 2024 |journal=The Economic Journal |jstor=2955844 |language=en-GB |last1=Wieser |first1=F. |date=1891 |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=108–121 |doi=10.2307/2955844 }}</ref> given the distinct outcome from resulting interest rate changes on distinguished points within the structure of production, a theory [[Tom Woods|Woods]] would endorse.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Austrian School of Economics |url=https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/AustrianSchoolofEconomics.html |access-date=2 August 2024 |website=www.econlib.org |language=en-GB}}</ref>

Furthermore, this is emphasised by the trend that a nation is unable to obtain wealth via consumption, which inevitably translates to [[Overconsumption#Effects|entire resource absorption]]; Production is therefore what grants consumption as a possibility to begin with, given that a producer would not be working towards revenue, if not one's [[Consumer behaviour|consumptive desires]] in their own expenditure discretion.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Six lesson from the Austrian School of Economics |url=https://iea.org.uk/six-lessons-from-the-austrian-school-of-economics/ |access-date=2 August 2024 |website=www.iea.org |date=18 April 2024 |language=en-GB}}</ref> Moreover, the [[Austrian School]] dictates that the [[Subjective theory of value|determinative estimate]] of goods and services motivate the demand for these [[commodities]] in order for their prices to be [[Supply and demand|influenced by consumers]].<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Austrian School and the Theory of Markets |url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-16-7255-2_6?error=cookies_not_supported&code=87574d84-ca11-423d-8631-37ba1fdb2d17 |access-date=2 August 2024 |website=www.link.springer.com | date=2022 | doi=10.1007/978-981-16-7255-2_6 |language=en-GB | last1=Andersson | first1=David Emanuel | last2=Hudik | first2=Marek | pages=1541–1562 | isbn=978-981-16-7254-5 }}</ref>

Others have often hinted towards [[rivalry (economics)|rivalry amongst consumers]], in that all parties, producer and consumer alike, behave in an entrepreneurial manner; The latter's market process interpretation is assumed to have provided the entrepreneurial role only to the producer. This is further emphasised upon when the consumer's absence is highlighted, whereby the sparse knowledge available, likewise with the producer's ability to calculate in gathering information as opposed to the government doing so - a direct ''[[laissez-faire]]'' correlation - the consumer becomes indecisive, and thus astray. This was subject to heavy debate during the [[Interwar period|Interwar era]], in what was known as the socialist-calculation debate. The status of the consumer has rarely been of any discussion in Austrian economics since. However, it has drawn attention to some limited degree in relation to production, with practitioners in the field having abused [[consumer rationality]], as well as recognising their abstinence from market elucidation.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Consumer in Austrian Economics and the Austrian Perspective on Consumer Policy
|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40141980 |access-date=2024-05-17 |website=www.researchgate.net |language=en-US}}</ref>

=== Neoclassical synthesis ===
{{See also|Neoclassical synthesis|New neoclassical synthesis}}

Despite its revised instances of [[Market intervention|state interventionism]], adherence to the [[consumer theory]] remained abundant via the [[supply and demand]] model of Keynesianism. [[Paul Samuelson]] stated that neoclassical synthesis should have been utilised towards the extent of fiscal and monetary interventions in order for economic stabilisation and maintaining full employment, albeit emphasising that the [[market economy]] cannot solely ensure full employment. The IS-LM-Philips [[unit of analysis]] model correlated the [[IS-LM model]] with the [[Phillips curve]], which placed sums on quantities such as the [[marginal propensity to consume]], invest, if not the [[Sensitivity analysis|volatility]] of [[Demand for money|money demand]] towards interest rates, in order for macroeconomic predictions to be forecast or the stimulations of economic policy consolidations. These are often in similar bearing with the main fundamentals of [[New neoclassical synthesis|NNE]], a revised edition of Neoclassical synthesis.

Developments within [[Consumption (economics)#Behavioural economics, Keynesian consumption function|consumption theory]] of the movement were published in specialized journals.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=TESTS OF THE LIFE CYCLE HYPOTHESIS OF SAVINGS: COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS† |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1957.mp19002002.x |access-date=2024-09-29 |journal=Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Economics & Statistics|date=1957 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-0084.1957.mp19002002.x |language=en-GB |last1=Modigliani |first1=Franco |last2=Ando |first2=Albert K. |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=99–124 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=1: Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-Section Data |url=https://direct.mit.edu/books/edited-volume/2669/chapter-abstract/72277/Utility-Analysis-and-the-Consumption-Function-An?redirectedFrom=fulltext |access-date=2024-09-29 |website=www.direct.mit.edu |language=en-GB}}</ref> Most of the expenditures area was addressed by consumer choice adaptations within the markets field against Keynesianism. Incentives and prices were represented in playing a prevalent role that determined decision making, directly pointing against individual demand, discerning how prices as regards to costs and income affect [[Demand|demand quantity]]

[[Labour markets]] are often focused upon two features, [[opportunity cost]] of leisure as well as [[wage rate]]; When wage rate increases, it hints that labourers are willing to work more and it concludes with them entering the [[labour force]]. Irrespective of the presumed incentivisation, the contrary is entirely possible, whereby workers work less and consume further leisure. Because of these interrelations, it is reasonable to determine that wage rates and labour supply both relate positively, albeit negative for opportunity of leisure. Nevertheless, the theory argues for gradual wage increase over time within a competitive labour market.{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}}

{{Expand section|date=October 2024}}


==Criticism==
==Criticism==
{{expand section|date=April 2024}}
Critics of anti-consumerism have accused anti-consumerists of opposing [[modernity]] or [[utilitarianism]], arguing that it can lead to elitism, primarily among libertarian viewpoints, who argue that every person should decide their level of consumption independent of outside influence.<ref>https://www.setthings.com/en/criticism-anti-consumerism/ {{Bare URL inline|date=June 2022}}</ref> Right-wing critics see anti-consumerism as rooted in socialism. In 1999, the [[Right-libertarianism|right-libertarian]] magazine [[Reason (magazine)|''Reason'']] attacked anti-consumerism, claiming [[marxism|Marxist]] academics were repackaging themselves as anti-consumerists. [[James B. Twitchell]], a professor at the [[University of Florida]] and popular writer, referred to anti-consumerist arguments as "Marxism Lite".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://reason.com/news/show/27795.html|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080207201008/https://reason.com/news/show/27795.html|archive-date = 2008-02-07|title = In Praise of Consumerism|date = August 2000}}</ref>
Critics of anti-consumerism have accused anti-consumerists of opposing [[modernity]] or [[utilitarianism]], arguing that it can lead to [[elitism]], primarily among libertarian viewpoints, who argue that every person should decide their level of consumption independent of outside influence.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.setthings.com/en/criticism-anti-consumerism/|title=Anti-consumerism}} {{dead link|date=June 2023}}</ref> Right-wing critics see anti-consumerism as rooted in socialism. Consumerism tends to be associated with capitalism, so modern socialists tend to be anti-consumerist, with anti-consumerism described as having become "left wing common sense".<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |last=Leonard |first=Ralph |date=2019-08-18 |title=A Marxist Defence of Consumerism |url=https://buffsoldier-96.medium.com/a-marxist-defence-of-consumerism-c307f9186921 |access-date=2024-05-22 |website=Medium |language=en}}</ref> In 1999, the [[Right-libertarianism|right-libertarian]] magazine [[Reason (magazine)|''Reason'']] attacked anti-consumerism, claiming [[marxism|Marxist]] academics were repackaging themselves as anti-consumerists. [[James B. Twitchell]], a professor at the [[University of Florida]] and popular writer, referred to anti-consumerist arguments as "Marxism Lite".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://reason.com/news/show/27795.html|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080207201008/https://reason.com/news/show/27795.html|archive-date = 2008-02-07|title = In Praise of Consumerism|date = August 2000}}</ref>


There have also been socialist critics of anti-consumerism who see it as a form of anti-modern "reactionary socialism", and state that anti-consumerism has also been adopted by ultra-conservatives and [[fascism|fascists]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Varul |first1=Matthias Zick |title=Towards a consumerist critique of capitalism: A socialist defence of consumer culture |journal=Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization |volume=13 |issue=2 |pages=293–315 |date=May 2013 |url=http://www.ephemerajournal.org/contribution/towards-consumerist-critique-capitalism-socialist-defence-consumer-culture |issn=1473-2866 |isbn=9781906948177 }} {{open access}}</ref>
There have also been socialist critics of anti-consumerism who see it as a form of anti-modern "reactionary socialism", and state that anti-consumerism has also been adopted by ultra-conservatives and [[fascism|fascists]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Varul |first1=Matthias Zick |title=Towards a consumerist critique of capitalism: A socialist defence of consumer culture |journal=Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization |volume=13 |issue=2 |pages=293–315 |date=May 2013 |url=http://www.ephemerajournal.org/contribution/towards-consumerist-critique-capitalism-socialist-defence-consumer-culture |issn=1473-2866 |isbn=9781906948177 }} {{open access}}</ref><ref name=":2" /> Anti-consumerist stances, which strictly focus on criticising the forceful expansion of unnecessary needs in place of genuine desires under capitalism, have been criticised by Marxists as being ignorant of the historical and social nature of needs and a deviation from Marx's own point of view concerning consumerism.<ref>{{cite web| url =https://marxisthumanistinitiative.org/the-left-and-the-masses-the-question-of-consumerism | title = The Left and the Masses : The Question of Consumerism | last = Landa | first = Ishay | website = aninitiative.org | quote = }}</ref> Rather than being incompatible with left-wing political ideologies, it has been argued that "it is not the working class that needs to be liberated from consumerism, or in other words their own material desires, but that consumerism should be liberated from capitalism".<ref name=":2" />


In her book "Authenticity Guaranteed", Sally Robinson provides a feminist critique of anti-consumerism. She articulates that the stances of anti-consumerists reflect a hierarchical gendered framework which concerns preservation of masculinity in its purest form from the feminine social mechanisms of consumerism that curtails masculine agency and authenticity. Citations of films such as ''[[Fight Club]]'' as an often anti-consumerist exemplary, according to her, presents consumerism as a crisis of masculinity in general.<ref>{{cite web | url= https://www.umasspress.com/9781625343536/authenticity-guaranteed/|title = Authenticity Guaranteed : Masculinity and the Rhetoric of Anti-Consumerism in American Culture| last = Robinson |first = Sally| year = 2018| website = umasspress.com|publisher = University of Massachusetts Press| quote=}}</ref> An anti-consumerist critique relies on the assumption that consumer culture is inauthentic and de-individualizing; therefore, it must also identify and delineate what constitutes the authentic and the individual.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Robinson |first=Sally |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv3s8tk8 |title=Authenticity Guaranteed: Masculinity and the Rhetoric of Anti-Consumerism in American Culture |date=2018 |publisher=University of Massachusetts Press |isbn=978-1-62534-352-9}}</ref>
==In popular media==
In ''[[Fight Club]]'', the protagonist finds himself participating in terroristic acts against corporate society and consumer culture.


==In popular media==
In ''[[Mr. Robot]]'', Elliot Alderson, a young cybersecurity engineer, joins a hacker group known as society, which aims to crash the U.S. economy, eliminating all debt.
In ''[[Fight Club]]'', the protagonist finds himself participating in terroristic acts against corporate society and consumer culture. The film is widely regarded as the most widely recognizeable piece of anti-consumerist media.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/edward-norton-discusses-political-impact-fight-club/ |title= Edward Norton Discusses the Political Impact of 'Fight Club'|last= Russell |first= Calum |date= August 18, 2022 |website= Far Out Magazine |publisher= |access-date= 2024-02-29|quote=}}</ref> The success of the book and the film comes despite the author [[Chuck Palahniuk]] publicly stating that the story is both anticonsumerist and anticommericialist.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://edition.cnn.com/books/news/9910/29/fight.club.author/ |title= Palahniuk: Marketing 'Fight Club' is 'the ultimate absurd joke' |author=<!--Not stated--> |date= |website= CNN |publisher= |access-date= 2024-02-29|quote=}}</ref>


In the novel ''[[American Psycho]]'' by [[Bret Easton Ellis]], the protagonist [[Patrick Bateman]] criticizes the consumerist society of America in the 1980s of which he is a personification. Later on he goes on a killing spree without any consequences, suggesting that the people around him are so self-absorbed and focused on consuming that they either do not see or do not care about his acts.
In the novel ''[[American Psycho]]'' by [[Bret Easton Ellis]], the protagonist [[Patrick Bateman]] criticizes the consumerist society of America in the 1980s of which he is a personification. Later on he goes on a killing spree without any consequences, suggesting that the people around him are so self-absorbed and focused on consuming that they either do not see or do not care about his acts.


In the ''[[Pixar]]'' movie, ''[[WALL-E]]'', earth is depicted in an apocalyptic state caused by the negative effects of human consumerism.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Van Oosterwjik |first1=Iris |last2=McCartney |first2=William |title=Once upon a Dystopian Time… the Portrayal and Perception of Environmentalism in Pixar's Finding Nemo and WALL-E |journal=Quarterly Review of Film and Video |date=17 March 2022 |pages=1–26 |doi=10.1080/10509208.2022.2049181 |s2cid=247545305 |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2022.2049181 |access-date=22 October 2022}}</ref>
In the ''[[Pixar]]'' movie, ''[[WALL-E]]'', earth is depicted in an apocalyptic state caused by the negative effects of human consumerism.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Van Oosterwjik |first1=Iris |last2=McCartney |first2=William |title=Once upon a Dystopian Time… the Portrayal and Perception of Environmentalism in Pixar's Finding Nemo and WALL-E |journal=Quarterly Review of Film and Video |date=17 March 2022 |volume=40 |issue=7 |pages=848–873 |doi=10.1080/10509208.2022.2049181 |s2cid=247545305 |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2022.2049181 |access-date=22 October 2022}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 95: Line 99:
* [[Brandalism]]
* [[Brandalism]]
* [[Buy Nothing Day]]
* [[Buy Nothing Day]]
* [[Collaborative consumption]]
* [[Critical consumerism]]
* [[Shopping cart#Conceptual detours of the shopping cart in art, design and consumerism|Conceptual detours of the shopping cart in art, design and consumerism]]
* [[Shopping cart#Conceptual detours of the shopping cart in art, design and consumerism|Conceptual detours of the shopping cart in art, design and consumerism]]
* [[Degrowth]]
* [[Degrowth]]
Line 111: Line 117:
* [[Steady-state economy]]
* [[Steady-state economy]]
* [[Waste picker]]
* [[Waste picker]]
* [[The Zeitgeist Movement]]
* [[The Zeitgeist Movement]]{{colend}}
{{colend}}


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 23:45, 23 December 2024

Photograph of Times Square, showing the prevalence of advertisements

Anti-consumerism is a sociopolitical ideology.[1] It has been described as "intentionally and meaningfully excluding or cutting goods from one's consumption routine or reusing once-acquired goods with the goal of avoiding consumption".[2] The ideology is opposed to consumerism, being a social and economic order in which the aspirations of many individuals include the acquisition of goods and services beyond those necessary for survival or traditional displays of status.[3]

Anti-consumerism is concerned with the actions of individuals, as well as businesses where they act in pursuit of financial and economic goals at the expense of the perceived public good. Commonly, anti-consumerism is connected with concern for environmental protection, anti-globalization, and animal-rights. Post-consumerism, the prioritization of well-being over material prosperity, is a related ideology.[4]

Background

[edit]

Anti-consumerism originated from criticism of consumption, arguably starting with Thorstein Veblen, who, in the book The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (1899), suggested that consumerism dates from the cradle of civilization. The term consumerism also denotes economic policies associated with Keynesian economics, and the belief that the free choice of consumers should dictate the economic structure of a society (cf. producerism). Modern political anti-consumerism developed in the 2000's.[2]

Anti-consumerism can be seen as an extension of postmodern society, supporting a "decentralized culture", rejecting a hegemonic cultural imperialism of globalisation and consumption, and responding to negative impacts of consumption on the environment.[5] Further, it has been observed that: "While almost all contemporary critics [of consumerism] and activists talk of the need for an environmentally sustainable mode of living, many also focus intently on how the consumerism driving overconsumption undermines our sense of well being and happiness; contributes to a culture of overwork, haste and instantaneous gratification; underscores a bland cultural homogenization of life; and fragments communities and social relationships."[6]

Predictors of anti-consumerist attitudes and behaviors at an individual level include concerns about environmental pollution or disruption of ecological balance, a desire to live a simple life, and a belief that a search for happiness should come from internal factors.[5]

Development and expression

[edit]
A Portuguese anti-consumerist stencil graffiti saying "Consuming consumes you"

Significant works

[edit]

An important contribution to the critique of consumerism has been made by French philosopher Bernard Stiegler, arguing modern capitalism is governed by consumption rather than production, and the advertising techniques used to create consumer behaviour amount to the destruction of psychic and collective individuation.[7] The diversion of libidinal energy toward the consumption of consumer products, he argues, results in an addictive cycle of consumption, leading to hyper-consumption, the exhaustion of desire, and the reign of symbolic misery.[8]

Examples of anti-consumerist works include the book No Logo (2000) by Naomi Klein, and documentary films such as The Corporation (2003), by Mark Achbar and Jennifer Abbott, and Surplus: Terrorized into Being Consumers (2003), by Erik Gandini.

Religion

[edit]

Anti-consumerist beliefs are in some cases connected with religious beliefs. A religious criticism asserts that materialist consumerism interferes with the connection between the individual and God, and so is an inherently immoral style of life; thus the German historian Oswald Spengler (1880–1936) said that, "Life in America is exclusively economic in structure, and lacks depth."[3] From the Roman Catholic perspective, Thomas Aquinas said that, "Greed is a sin against God, just as all mortal sins, in as much as man condemns things eternal for the sake of temporal things";[9] in that vein, Francis of Assisi, Ammon Hennacy, and Mohandas Gandhi said that spiritual inspiration guided them towards simple living.

Protest

[edit]

Anti-consumerist messages are often raised in protests, including in the broader context of environmentalism and anti-corporate activism. A notable anti-consumerist protest community is Reverend Billy and the Church of Stop Shopping.

In the context of protest art, Banksy, an influential British graffitist, painter, activist and filmmaker,[10] has created satirical and provocative works about the consumerist society. Examples include "Napalm", an attack on Walt Disney Pictures and McDonald's, and "Show Me the Monet", among many others.[11] In his 2004 book Cut It Out, Banksy writes, "You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don't owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don't even start asking for theirs."[12]

Individual and community responses

[edit]

Practicing anti-consumerism can mean voluntarily simplifying and minimizing one's lifestyle; this can be in efforts to exist more sustainably in a consumer culture.[13] These lifestyle changes, which include choosing paper bags over plastic bags when shopping, are also in line with anti-corporate activism and green consumerism—both large contributors to the ethical market.[14] Degrowth, commoning and other movements aim to collectively address sustainability issues through practices and approaches that radically reduce consumption and replace consumer culture with new ethics and values.[15][16]

Modern Development

[edit]

The modern development of anti-consumerism is closely tied to the global environmental crisis, particularly the urgency surrounding climate change. As the world faces environmental degradation and the depletion of natural resources, anti-consumerist movements have gained momentum. These movements advocate for reducing overconsumption, promoting conscious consumption, and addressing waste, especially the growing plastic problem.

A key argument for these movements is the need for both personal and systemic changes. Many activists, such as George Monbiot, emphasize that overconsumption is a root cause of global crises like climate change, biodiversity loss, and environmental degradation[17] Efforts like upcycling and reducing plastic waste are part of broader campaigns aimed at creating sustainable consumption patterns. Moreover, critics of unchecked consumerism argue that solving these issues requires more than individual action; it also necessitates economic restructuring to lessen dependence on constant consumer spending[17] One crucial aspect of this movement is the call for "voluntary simplicity," which advocates for reducing material needs to reduce environmental impact. This is reflected in policies from international bodies like the United Nations, which has highlighted the importance of sustainable consumption in its development goals[18] By embracing a mindset of reducing consumption, both individuals and institutions can significantly lower emissions and resource use, addressing environmental challenges more effectively than through green technologies alone.[18]

To sum up, the modern anti-consumerism movement is driven by the urgent need to address the environmental crisis and the recognition that true sustainability requires changes at both the individual and systemic levels.

Advertising

[edit]

Anti-consumerists believe advertising plays a huge role in human life by informing values and assumptions of the cultural system, deeming what is acceptable, and determining social standards.[19] They declare that ads create a hyper-real world where commodities appear as the key to securing happiness. Anti-consumerists cite studies that find that individuals believe their quality of life improves in relation to social values that lie outside the capability of the marketplace. Therefore, advertising attempts to equate the social with the material by utilizing images and slogans to link commodities with the real sources of human happiness, such as meaningful relationships. Ads are then a detriment to society because they tell consumers that accumulating more and more possessions will bring them closer to self-actualization, or the concept of a complete and secure being. "The underlying message is that owning these products will enhance our image and ensure our popularity with others."[20] And while advertising promises that a product will make the consumer happy, advertising simultaneously depends upon the consumer never being truly happy, as then the consumer would no longer feel the need to consume needless products.

Anti-consumerists claim that in a consumerist society, advertisement images disempower and objectify the consumer.[21] By stressing individual power, choice and desire, advertising falsely implies the control lies with the consumer. Because anti-consumerists believe commodities supply only short-term gratification, they detract from a sustainably happy society. Further, advertisers have resorted to new techniques of capturing attention, such as the increased speed of ads and product placements.[19] In this way, commercials infiltrate the consumerist society and become an inextricable part of the culture. In a review of research on materialistic values and goals, Tim Kasser (2016) argues that the pursuit of material possessions can lead to short-term gratification at the expense of long-term well-being.[22] Anti-consumerists condemn advertising because it constructs a simulated world that offers fantastical escapism to consumers, rather than reflecting actual reality. They further argue that ads depict the interests and lifestyles of the elite as natural; cultivating a deep sense of inadequacy among viewers.[21] They denounce the use of beautiful models because they glamorize the commodity beyond the reach of the average individual.

In an opinion segment of New Scientist magazine published in August 2009, reporter Andy Coghlan cited William Rees of the University of British Columbia and epidemiologist Warren Hern of the University of Colorado at Boulder, saying that human beings, despite considering themselves civilized thinkers, are "subconsciously still driven by an impulse for survival, domination and expansion... an impulse which now finds expression in the idea that inexorable economic growth is the answer to everything, and, given time, will redress all the world's existing inequalities." He argues that consumerism is making these tendencies worse by encouraging consumption without limit.[23]

Supporters of anti-consumerism often accuse advertising of attention theft, i.e. they believe it unjustifiably invades public areas, thereby imposing itself on people who consider its presence unwanted. American graphic designer Sean Tejaratchi expresses his resentment of this "ad creep" in a 1999 issue of his clip art zine Crap Hound: "Advertising increasingly invades my environment instead of letting me come to it on my own terms when I need it... The most powerful and well-funded methods of mass communication in history have been used to create a one-way, unending flow of shit into my life... In the twenty-eight years since I was born, I've been subjected to a stunning amount of advertising, and I don't recall anyone ever asking me if I minded."[24]

Anti-consumerism has paved the way for a "subvertising" (also known as culture jamming) movement, which uses artistic and political strategies to protest modern forms of publicity; acts of "subvertising" include "removing advertising from public spaces, tweeting to inform the city's mayor of illicit advertising practices, recuperating posters from bus stop advertising panels, producing critical advertising guides, documentaries or organising public workshops."[25]

In Economic Theory

[edit]

Austrian economics

[edit]
Austrian business cycle theory, formulated by Friedrich Hayek, before and during the Great Depression

As a classical defence pertinent in this context, Austrian economic advocates focus on the entrepreneur, promoting a productive lifestyle rather than a materialistic one wherein the individual is defined by things and not their self.[26] Certain economists have further rendered Keynesian notions of propagating increased consumption - in order to mitigate recessive impacts when the populace refuse to spend - as obsolete,[27] since numerous founding principles presume that minor adjustments are implemented via expansions and contractions, at least monetarily, are the reason behind business cycles,[28] given the distinct outcome from resulting interest rate changes on distinguished points within the structure of production, a theory Woods would endorse.[29]

Furthermore, this is emphasised by the trend that a nation is unable to obtain wealth via consumption, which inevitably translates to entire resource absorption; Production is therefore what grants consumption as a possibility to begin with, given that a producer would not be working towards revenue, if not one's consumptive desires in their own expenditure discretion.[30] Moreover, the Austrian School dictates that the determinative estimate of goods and services motivate the demand for these commodities in order for their prices to be influenced by consumers.[31]

Others have often hinted towards rivalry amongst consumers, in that all parties, producer and consumer alike, behave in an entrepreneurial manner; The latter's market process interpretation is assumed to have provided the entrepreneurial role only to the producer. This is further emphasised upon when the consumer's absence is highlighted, whereby the sparse knowledge available, likewise with the producer's ability to calculate in gathering information as opposed to the government doing so - a direct laissez-faire correlation - the consumer becomes indecisive, and thus astray. This was subject to heavy debate during the Interwar era, in what was known as the socialist-calculation debate. The status of the consumer has rarely been of any discussion in Austrian economics since. However, it has drawn attention to some limited degree in relation to production, with practitioners in the field having abused consumer rationality, as well as recognising their abstinence from market elucidation.[32]

Neoclassical synthesis

[edit]

Despite its revised instances of state interventionism, adherence to the consumer theory remained abundant via the supply and demand model of Keynesianism. Paul Samuelson stated that neoclassical synthesis should have been utilised towards the extent of fiscal and monetary interventions in order for economic stabilisation and maintaining full employment, albeit emphasising that the market economy cannot solely ensure full employment. The IS-LM-Philips unit of analysis model correlated the IS-LM model with the Phillips curve, which placed sums on quantities such as the marginal propensity to consume, invest, if not the volatility of money demand towards interest rates, in order for macroeconomic predictions to be forecast or the stimulations of economic policy consolidations. These are often in similar bearing with the main fundamentals of NNE, a revised edition of Neoclassical synthesis.

Developments within consumption theory of the movement were published in specialized journals.[33][34] Most of the expenditures area was addressed by consumer choice adaptations within the markets field against Keynesianism. Incentives and prices were represented in playing a prevalent role that determined decision making, directly pointing against individual demand, discerning how prices as regards to costs and income affect demand quantity

Labour markets are often focused upon two features, opportunity cost of leisure as well as wage rate; When wage rate increases, it hints that labourers are willing to work more and it concludes with them entering the labour force. Irrespective of the presumed incentivisation, the contrary is entirely possible, whereby workers work less and consume further leisure. Because of these interrelations, it is reasonable to determine that wage rates and labour supply both relate positively, albeit negative for opportunity of leisure. Nevertheless, the theory argues for gradual wage increase over time within a competitive labour market.[citation needed]

Criticism

[edit]

Critics of anti-consumerism have accused anti-consumerists of opposing modernity or utilitarianism, arguing that it can lead to elitism, primarily among libertarian viewpoints, who argue that every person should decide their level of consumption independent of outside influence.[35] Right-wing critics see anti-consumerism as rooted in socialism. Consumerism tends to be associated with capitalism, so modern socialists tend to be anti-consumerist, with anti-consumerism described as having become "left wing common sense".[36] In 1999, the right-libertarian magazine Reason attacked anti-consumerism, claiming Marxist academics were repackaging themselves as anti-consumerists. James B. Twitchell, a professor at the University of Florida and popular writer, referred to anti-consumerist arguments as "Marxism Lite".[37]

There have also been socialist critics of anti-consumerism who see it as a form of anti-modern "reactionary socialism", and state that anti-consumerism has also been adopted by ultra-conservatives and fascists.[38][36] Anti-consumerist stances, which strictly focus on criticising the forceful expansion of unnecessary needs in place of genuine desires under capitalism, have been criticised by Marxists as being ignorant of the historical and social nature of needs and a deviation from Marx's own point of view concerning consumerism.[39] Rather than being incompatible with left-wing political ideologies, it has been argued that "it is not the working class that needs to be liberated from consumerism, or in other words their own material desires, but that consumerism should be liberated from capitalism".[36]

In her book "Authenticity Guaranteed", Sally Robinson provides a feminist critique of anti-consumerism. She articulates that the stances of anti-consumerists reflect a hierarchical gendered framework which concerns preservation of masculinity in its purest form from the feminine social mechanisms of consumerism that curtails masculine agency and authenticity. Citations of films such as Fight Club as an often anti-consumerist exemplary, according to her, presents consumerism as a crisis of masculinity in general.[40] An anti-consumerist critique relies on the assumption that consumer culture is inauthentic and de-individualizing; therefore, it must also identify and delineate what constitutes the authentic and the individual.[41]

[edit]

In Fight Club, the protagonist finds himself participating in terroristic acts against corporate society and consumer culture. The film is widely regarded as the most widely recognizeable piece of anti-consumerist media.[42] The success of the book and the film comes despite the author Chuck Palahniuk publicly stating that the story is both anticonsumerist and anticommericialist.[43]

In the novel American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis, the protagonist Patrick Bateman criticizes the consumerist society of America in the 1980s of which he is a personification. Later on he goes on a killing spree without any consequences, suggesting that the people around him are so self-absorbed and focused on consuming that they either do not see or do not care about his acts.

In the Pixar movie, WALL-E, earth is depicted in an apocalyptic state caused by the negative effects of human consumerism.[44]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Anticomsumerism movement". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2024-10-03.
  2. ^ a b Makri, Katerina (February 28, 2020). "What we know about anticonsumption: An attempt to nail jelly to the wall (Section 2.1: The concept of anticonsumption)". Wiley Online Library. Retrieved 2024-02-29.
  3. ^ a b Stearns, Peter (2001). Consumerism in World History. Routledge. ISBN 9780415244091.
  4. ^ "Postconsumers". Postconsumers. 2018-06-13. Retrieved 2018-10-18.
  5. ^ a b Yaldır, Hülya; Ashraf, Mirza Iqbal, eds. (2019). "Illusion and Awareness in Consumption Culture from the Perspective of Anti-Consumerism". Human existence and identity in modern age: a socio-philosophical reflection. Berlin Bern Bruxelles New York Oxford Warszawa Wien: Peter Lang. ISBN 978-3-631-78260-6.
  6. ^ Humphery, Kim (2010). Excess: anti-consumerism in the West. Cambridge ; Malden, MA: Polity. ISBN 978-0-7456-4540-7. OCLC 320316172.
  7. ^ Stiegler, B. (2011a) Interviewed by Lemmens, P. ‘”This System Does Not Produce PleasureAnymore”: An Interview with Bernard Stiegler’ in Krisis Journal, 1:33-42
  8. ^ Stiegler, B. (2011) "Pharmacology of Desire Drive Based Capitalism And Libidinal Dis-Economy" https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/9114/1/s12.pdf
  9. ^ Aquinas, Saint Thomas (1981). Summa Theologica: Complete English in Five Volumes. Vol. 3. Ave Maria Press. p. 1680. ISBN 9780870610639.
  10. ^ Kakutani, Michiko (2013-02-17). "'Banksy: The Man Behind the Wall,' by Will Ellsworth-Jones". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
  11. ^ "Graffiti, Consumerism and Capitalism - Banksy Explained". 2021-06-20. Retrieved 2024-05-19.
  12. ^ "Banksy: Quotes". GoodReads. Retrieved 2024-02-29.
  13. ^ SEEGEBARTH, BARBARA (Spring 2016). "The Sustainability Roots of Anti-Consumption Lifestyles and Initial Insights Regarding Their Effects on Consumers' Well-Being" (PDF). The Journal of Consumer Affairs. 50: 68. doi:10.1111/joca.12077.
  14. ^ Gunkel, Christian (December 23, 2014). Politicizing consumer choice : ethical dimensions of consumerism in the United States. Peter Lang. ISBN 978-3-631-65475-0. OCLC 919201704.
  15. ^ Nelson, Anitra (2024-01-31). "Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction". The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 2024-02-20.
  16. ^ Smith, E. T. (2024-01-23). "Practising Commoning". The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 2024-02-20.
  17. ^ a b "Consumerism is global crisis". theecologist.org. 2021-05-17. Retrieved 2024-12-13.
  18. ^ a b "Anti-Consumption in a World in Crisis | AACSB". www.aacsb.edu. Retrieved 2024-12-13.
  19. ^ a b [ Advertising and the End of the World. Dir. Sut Jhally. Perf. Sut Jhally. DVD. Media Education Foundation, 1997.]
  20. ^ [Tim Kasser, "The High Price of Materialism", 2002, p.9, Achorn Graphic Services]
  21. ^ a b Rumbo, Joseph D. (February 2002). "Consumer Resistance in a World of Advertising Clutter: The Case of Adbusters". Psychology and Marketing. 19 (2): 127–148. doi:10.1002/mar.10006.
  22. ^ Kasser, Tim (2016-01-04). "Materialistic Values and Goals". Annual Review of Psychology. 67 (1): 489–514. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033344. ISSN 0066-4308. PMID 26273896.
  23. ^ "Consumerism is 'eating the future'". New Scientist. 7 August 2009. Retrieved 3 January 2022.
  24. ^ Banksy and Tejaratchi on Advertising & Going Viral, 11 October 2018, retrieved September 29, 2021
  25. ^ Lekakis, Eleftheria J. (2021-11-02). "Adversaries of advertising: anti-consumerism and subvertisers' critique and practice". Social Movement Studies. 20 (6): 740–757. doi:10.1080/14742837.2020.1837102. ISSN 1474-2837. S2CID 226375476.
  26. ^ kanopiadmin (27 October 2000). "Consumerism: A Defense - Tibor R. Machan".
  27. ^ "Austrian school of economics". Britannica. Retrieved 2 August 2024.
  28. ^ Wieser, F. (1891). "The Austrian School and the Theory of Value". The Economic Journal. 1 (1): 108–121. doi:10.2307/2955844. JSTOR 2955844. Retrieved 2 August 2024.
  29. ^ "Austrian School of Economics". www.econlib.org. Retrieved 2 August 2024.
  30. ^ "Six lesson from the Austrian School of Economics". www.iea.org. 18 April 2024. Retrieved 2 August 2024.
  31. ^ Andersson, David Emanuel; Hudik, Marek (2022). The Austrian School and the Theory of Markets. pp. 1541–1562. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7255-2_6. ISBN 978-981-16-7254-5. Retrieved 2 August 2024. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  32. ^ "The Consumer in Austrian Economics and the Austrian Perspective on Consumer Policy". www.researchgate.net. Retrieved 2024-05-17.
  33. ^ Modigliani, Franco; Ando, Albert K. (1957). "TESTS OF THE LIFE CYCLE HYPOTHESIS OF SAVINGS: COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS†". Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Economics & Statistics. 19 (2): 99–124. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.1957.mp19002002.x. Retrieved 2024-09-29.
  34. ^ "1: Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-Section Data". www.direct.mit.edu. Retrieved 2024-09-29.
  35. ^ "Anti-consumerism". [dead link]
  36. ^ a b c Leonard, Ralph (2019-08-18). "A Marxist Defence of Consumerism". Medium. Retrieved 2024-05-22.
  37. ^ "In Praise of Consumerism". August 2000. Archived from the original on 2008-02-07.
  38. ^ Varul, Matthias Zick (May 2013). "Towards a consumerist critique of capitalism: A socialist defence of consumer culture". Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization. 13 (2): 293–315. ISBN 9781906948177. ISSN 1473-2866. Open access icon
  39. ^ Landa, Ishay. "The Left and the Masses : The Question of Consumerism". aninitiative.org.
  40. ^ Robinson, Sally (2018). "Authenticity Guaranteed : Masculinity and the Rhetoric of Anti-Consumerism in American Culture". umasspress.com. University of Massachusetts Press.
  41. ^ Robinson, Sally (2018). Authenticity Guaranteed: Masculinity and the Rhetoric of Anti-Consumerism in American Culture. University of Massachusetts Press. ISBN 978-1-62534-352-9.
  42. ^ Russell, Calum (August 18, 2022). "Edward Norton Discusses the Political Impact of 'Fight Club'". Far Out Magazine. Retrieved 2024-02-29.
  43. ^ "Palahniuk: Marketing 'Fight Club' is 'the ultimate absurd joke'". CNN. Retrieved 2024-02-29.
  44. ^ Van Oosterwjik, Iris; McCartney, William (17 March 2022). "Once upon a Dystopian Time… the Portrayal and Perception of Environmentalism in Pixar's Finding Nemo and WALL-E". Quarterly Review of Film and Video. 40 (7): 848–873. doi:10.1080/10509208.2022.2049181. S2CID 247545305. Retrieved 22 October 2022.

Sources

[edit]
[edit]