User talk:Donny Frost: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 13:29, 28 November 2022

Edit warring at Fertility and intelligence

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Fertility and intelligence. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Generalrelative (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Fertility and intelligence) for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked only from the article to allow you to discuss on the talk page. When you've made a change that has been reverted you should discuss it seek dispute resolution, not continue to revert multiple editors to restore your preferred version. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Doug Weller talk 17:37, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 | image = [[File:Sock block.svg|55px]]
 | text  = '''''This account has been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''''' as a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet]]&#32;that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but using them for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|''illegitimate'']] reasons '''is not''', and that all edits made while evading a block or ban [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Evasion of blocks|may be reverted or deleted]].  If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code> below. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 17:37, 25 November 2022 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}}
- {{unblock|And there he is, the personification of bias on Wikipedia. What is the reason this half-witted left wing activist is allowed to censor actual scholarship from Wikipedia? What an embarrassment this place is. I remember it before it was infested by these permanently online antifa losers. Can we trace the rot to the pornographer who funded the project, the one with no intellectual competence? [[User:Donny Frost|Donny Frost]] ([[User talk:Donny Frost#top|talk]]) 13:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)