Jump to content

Cathay Pacific Flight 780: Difference between revisions

Coordinates: 22°18′32″N 113°54′52″E / 22.30889°N 113.91444°E / 22.30889; 113.91444
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m clean up spacing around commas and other punctuation, replaced: ,t → , t, , → , , inline, title → inline,title
Changing short description from "2010 non-fatal aircraft incident" to "2010 non-fatal aircraft accident"
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|2010 non-fatal aircraft incident}}
{{Short description|2010 non-fatal aircraft accident}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2019}}
{{EngvarB|date=July 2014}}
{{EngvarB|date=July 2014}}
Line 5: Line 5:
| name = Cathay Pacific Flight 780
| name = Cathay Pacific Flight 780
| image = Cathay Pacific Airbus A330-300; B-HLL@HKG;31.07.2011 614ud (6053502502).jpg
| image = Cathay Pacific Airbus A330-300; B-HLL@HKG;31.07.2011 614ud (6053502502).jpg
| image_upright = 1.15
| alt =
| alt =
| caption = B-HLL, the A330 involved in the accident, photographed in July 2011 after it had been returned to service
| caption = B-HLL, the A330 involved in the accident, photographed in 2011 after it had been returned to service.
| occurrence_type = Occurrence
| occurrence_type = Accident
| Date = 13 April 2010
| Date = {{start date|2010|04|13|df=y}}
| Type = [[Engine failure]] due to fuel contamination<ref name="AugBulletin"/>
| Type = [[Engine failure]] due to fuel contamination<ref name="AugBulletin"/>
| Site = [[Hong Kong International Airport]], after landing on runway 07L
| Site = [[Hong Kong International Airport]], after landing on runway 07L
| coordinates = {{coord|22|18|32|N|113|54|52|E|source:kolossus-plwiki|display=inline,title}}
| coordinates = {{coord|22|18|32|N|113|54|52|E|source:kolossus-plwiki|display=inline,title}}
| Injuries = 63<ref name="cad"/><ref name="bulletin"/>
| Injuries = 63<ref name="cad"/><ref name="bulletin"/>
| aircraft_type = [[Airbus A330|Airbus A330-342]]
| aircraft_type = [[Airbus A330#A330-300|Airbus A330-342]]
| aircraft_name =
| Operator = [[Cathay Pacific]]
| Operator = [[Cathay Pacific]]
| IATA = CX780
| IATA = CX780
| ICAO = CPA780
| ICAO = CPA780
| callsign = CATHAY 780
| callsign = CATHAY 780
| tail_number = B-HLL
| tail_number = B-HLL
| occupants = 322
| occupants = 322
Line 24: Line 24:
| Crew = 13
| Crew = 13
| Fatalities = 0
| Fatalities = 0
| missing =
| Survivors = 322
| Survivors = 322 (all)
| Origin = [[Juanda International Airport]], Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
| Origin = [[Juanda International Airport]], Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
| Destination = [[Hong Kong International Airport]], New Territories, Hong Kong
| stopover =
| stopover0 =
| last_stopover =
| Destination = [[Hong Kong International Airport]]
}}
}}


'''Cathay Pacific Flight 780''' was a flight from [[Juanda International Airport]] in Surabaya, Indonesia to [[Hong Kong International Airport]]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.flightr.net/cx780|title=CX780 Flight, Cathay Pacific, Surabaya to Hong Kong|website=www.flightr.net|access-date=2016-12-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220101720/https://www.flightr.net/cx780|archive-date=20 December 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> on 13 April 2010. On board were 309 passengers and a crew of 13. As Flight 780 neared Hong Kong, the crew were unable to change the thrust output of the engines. The aircraft, an [[Airbus A330|Airbus A330-342]], landed at almost twice the speed of a normal landing, suffering minor damage. The 57 passengers who sustained injuries were hurt in the ensuing slide evacuation; one of them received serious injuries.<ref name="bulletin"/><ref name="cad">{{cite web |url=http://www.cad.gov.hk/reports/2%20Final%20Report%20-%20CX%20780%202013%2007%20web%20access%20compliant.pdf |title=AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT 2/2013 : Report on the accident to Airbus A330-342 B-HLL operated by Cathay Pacific Airways Limited at Hong Kong International Airport, Hong Kong on 13 April 2010 |publisher=[[Civil Aviation Department (Hong Kong)|Civil Aviation Department]] |date=3 July 2013 |accessdate=24 May 2014 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140525195840/http://www.cad.gov.hk/reports/2%20Final%20Report%20-%20CX%20780%202013%2007%20web%20access%20compliant.pdf |archivedate=25 May 2014 }}</ref>
'''Cathay Pacific Flight 780''' was a flight from [[Juanda International Airport]] in Surabaya, Indonesia, to [[Hong Kong International Airport]]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.flightr.net/cx780|title=CX780 Flight, Cathay Pacific, Surabaya to Hong Kong|website=www.flightr.net|access-date=2016-12-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220101720/https://www.flightr.net/cx780|archive-date=20 December 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> on 13 April 2010. On board were 309 passengers and a crew of 13. As Flight 780 neared Hong Kong, the crew were unable to change the thrust output of the engines. The aircraft, an [[Airbus A330|Airbus A330-300]], landed at almost twice the speed of a normal landing, suffering minor damage. The 57 passengers who sustained injuries were hurt in the ensuing slide evacuation; one of them received serious injuries.<ref name="bulletin"/><ref name="cad">{{cite web |url=http://www.cad.gov.hk/reports/2%20Final%20Report%20-%20CX%20780%202013%2007%20web%20access%20compliant.pdf |title=AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT 2/2013 : Report on the accident to Airbus A330-342 B-HLL operated by Cathay Pacific Airways Limited at Hong Kong International Airport, Hong Kong on 13 April 2010 |publisher=[[Civil Aviation Department (Hong Kong)|Civil Aviation Department]] |date=3 July 2013 |accessdate=24 May 2014 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140525195840/http://www.cad.gov.hk/reports/2%20Final%20Report%20-%20CX%20780%202013%2007%20web%20access%20compliant.pdf |archivedate=25 May 2014 }}</ref>


The cause of the accident was contamination of the fuel taken on board at Surabaya, which gradually damaged both engines of the aircraft.<ref name=scmp>{{cite news |title=Pilots reveal death-defying ordeal as engines failed on approach to Chek Lap Kok |url=http://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/article/1491534/pilots-reveal-death-defying-ordeal-engines-failed-approach |accessdate=21 April 2014 |newspaper=South China Morning Post |date=20 April 2014 |archive-date=21 April 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421055435/http://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/article/1491534/pilots-reveal-death-defying-ordeal-engines-failed-approach |url-status=live }}</ref>
The cause of the accident was contamination of the fuel taken on board at Surabaya, which gradually damaged both engines of the aircraft.<ref name=scmp>{{cite news |title=Pilots reveal death-defying ordeal as engines failed on approach to Chek Lap Kok |url=http://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/article/1491534/pilots-reveal-death-defying-ordeal-engines-failed-approach |accessdate=21 April 2014 |newspaper=South China Morning Post |date=20 April 2014 |archive-date=21 April 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421055435/http://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/article/1491534/pilots-reveal-death-defying-ordeal-engines-failed-approach |url-status=live }}</ref>
Line 39: Line 35:
The flight's two Australian pilots, Captain Malcolm Waters and First Officer David Hayhoe, who safely landed the aircraft despite the extraordinary challenge, have been compared to pilots [[Chesley Sullenberger]] and [[Jeffrey Skiles]] of [[US Airways Flight 1549]] the previous year (January 2009). In March 2014, the two Flight 780 pilots were awarded the [[Polaris Award]] by the [[International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations]] for their heroism and airmanship.<ref name=scmp/>
The flight's two Australian pilots, Captain Malcolm Waters and First Officer David Hayhoe, who safely landed the aircraft despite the extraordinary challenge, have been compared to pilots [[Chesley Sullenberger]] and [[Jeffrey Skiles]] of [[US Airways Flight 1549]] the previous year (January 2009). In March 2014, the two Flight 780 pilots were awarded the [[Polaris Award]] by the [[International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations]] for their heroism and airmanship.<ref name=scmp/>


Captain Waters, who was 35 years old, had been working for Cathay Pacific for 12 years, while 37-year-old Hayhoe had been working for Cathay Pacific for 3 years and had previously served with the [[Royal Australian Air Force]] for 11 years.
Captain Waters, who was 35 years old, had been working for Cathay Pacific for 12 years, while 37-year-old First Officer Hayhoe had been working for Cathay Pacific for 3 years and had previously served with the [[Royal Australian Air Force]] for 11 years.


==Aircraft==
==Aircraft==
{{More citations needed section|date=October 2024}}
The aircraft involved in the accident was an Airbus A330-342, registration B-HLL, manufacturer's serial number 244, fitted with [[Rolls-Royce Trent 700|Rolls-Royce Trent 772-60]] engines. It first flew on 4 November 1998 and was delivered to Cathay Pacific three weeks later on 25 November 1998.<ref name="bulletin"/> This aircraft was configured for a capacity of 311 passengers and 13 crew, with 44 business-class seats and 267 economy-class seats.
The aircraft involved was an Airbus A330-300, [[Aircraft registration|registered]] as B-HLL with [[serial number]] 244, fitted with two [[Rolls-Royce Trent 700]] engines. It [[Maiden flight|first flew]] on 4 November 1998 and was delivered to Cathay Pacific three weeks later on 25 November.<ref name="bulletin" /> This aircraft was configured for a capacity of 311 passengers and 13 crew, with 44 business-class seats and 267 economy-class seats.


After the incident, it was bought by DVB Bank in July 2011 (Arena Aviation Capital since March 2017) and was transferred to Dragonair ([[Cathay Dragon]]) since 23 April 2012 and was reconfigured for a capacity of 307 passengers, with 42 business-class seats and 265 economy-class seats in 2013. It was also repainted into the new Cathay Dragon livery on 3 November 2017. The aircraft had another incident 6 years later as flight KA691 from Hong Kong to Penang on 8 September 2016, with 295 passengers and crew on board, when an airport delivery van crashed into the aircraft's left engine.
After the accident, it was bought by DVB Bank in July 2011 (Arena Aviation Capital since March 2017) and was transferred to Dragonair ([[Cathay Dragon]]) since 23 April 2012 and was reconfigured for a capacity of 307 passengers, with 42 business-class seats and 265 economy-class seats in 2013. It was also repainted into the new Cathay Dragon livery on 3 November 2017. The aircraft was involved in another incident six years later as Flight 691 from Hong Kong to Penang on 8 September 2016, with 295 passengers and crew on board, when an airport delivery van crashed into the aircraft's left engine.


The aircraft was withdrawn from service on August 13, 2020, in the expiration of its lease, after its last commercial flight from [[Beijing Capital International Airport|Beijing]] to Hong Kong as KA993 and its final flight was on October 14, 2020, to [[Pinal Airpark]] in [[Marana, Arizona]], via [[Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport|Anchorage]] as KA3496. The aircraft was scrapped on site in November 2021.
The aircraft was withdrawn from service on 13 August 2020, at the expiration of its lease, after its last commercial flight from [[Beijing Capital International Airport|Beijing]] to Hong Kong as KA993. The aircraft's final flight was on 14 October 2020, to [[Pinal Airpark]] in [[Marana, Arizona]], via [[Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport|Anchorage]] as KA3496. The aircraft was scrapped on site in November 2021.


==Accident==
==Accident==
Cathay Pacific Flight 780 departed from stand 8 at Juanda International Airport in Indonesia. It took off from runway 28 at 08:24 local time (01:24 UTC). During the climb, both engines experienced small [[engine pressure ratio]] fluctuations, with No. 2 engine fluctuating over a greater range than No. 1.<ref name="bulletin"/> Just over half an hour after takeoff, cruising at [[flight level]] 390 (about {{convert|39000|ft|m|abbr=on}} above sea level), the [[Electronic Flight Instrument System|electronic centralized aircraft monitoring]] (ECAM) system displayed an "ENG 2 CTL SYS FAULT" error message.<ref name="bulletin"/> The crew contacted maintenance control (MC) to discuss the fluctuations. As other engine operating parameters on both engines were normal, continuing the flight was determined to be safe.<ref name="bulletin"/>
Cathay Pacific Flight 780 departed from stand 8 at [[Juanda International Airport]] in [[Indonesia]]. It took off from runway 28 at 08:24 local time (01:24 UTC). During the climb, both engines experienced small [[engine pressure ratio]] fluctuations, with No. 2 engine fluctuating over a greater range than No. 1.<ref name="bulletin"/> Just over half an hour after takeoff, cruising at [[flight level]] 390 (about {{convert|39000|ft|m|abbr=on}} above sea level), the [[Electronic Flight Instrument System|electronic centralized aircraft monitoring]] (ECAM) system displayed an "ENG 2 CTL SYS FAULT" error message.<ref name="bulletin"/> The crew contacted maintenance control to discuss the fluctuations. As other engine operating parameters on both engines were normal, continuing the flight was determined to be safe.<ref name="bulletin"/>


Almost two hours after departure, at 03:16 UTC, the "ENG 2 CTL SYS FAULT" ECAM message reappeared. The crew contacted MC to review the issue. As all other engine parameters remained normal, continuing on to Hong Kong was again deemed safe.
Almost two hours after departure, at 03:16 UTC, the "ENG 2 CTL SYS FAULT" ECAM message reappeared. The crew contacted maintenance control to review the issue. As all other engine parameters remained normal, continuing on to Hong Kong was again deemed safe.


After another two hours elapsed, the aircraft was on descent to Hong Kong when, at 05:19 UTC, about {{convert|203|km|mi nmi}} southeast of Hong Kong International Airport, the aircraft's ECAM displayed "ENG 1 CTL SYS FAULT" and "ENG 2 STALL" within a short period.<ref name="bulletin"/> The second message signified an engine [[compressor stall]], a potentially serious engine problem. The flight crew accordingly carried out the necessary ECAM actions with No. 2 engine's thrust lever moved to the idle (or minimum-thrust setting) position. The crew set No. 1 engine to maximum continuous thrust to compensate for the low thrust of No. 2 engine. Following these actions, the crew declared a "[[pan-pan]]" with Hong Kong [[air traffic control]], requesting the shortest possible route to the airport and priority landing.<ref name="bulletin"/>
After another two hours elapsed, the aircraft was on descent to Hong Kong when, at 05:19 UTC, about {{convert|203|km|mi nmi}} southeast of Hong Kong International Airport, the aircraft's ECAM displayed "ENG 1 CTL SYS FAULT" and "ENG 2 STALL" within a short period.<ref name="bulletin"/> The second message signified an engine [[compressor stall]], a potentially serious engine problem. The flight crew accordingly carried out the necessary ECAM actions with No. 2 engine's thrust lever moved to the idle (or minimum-thrust setting) position. The crew set No. 1 engine to maximum continuous thrust to compensate for the low thrust of No. 2 engine. Following these actions, the crew declared a "[[pan-pan]]" with Hong Kong [[air traffic control]], requesting the shortest possible route to the airport and priority landing.<ref name="bulletin"/>


A few minutes later, about {{convert|83|km|mi nmi|abbr=on}} southeast of Hong Kong International Airport, the aircraft was in a [[Descent (aeronautics)|descent]] and approaching an altitude of {{convert|8000|ft|0|abbr=on}} when an "ENG 1 STALL" ECAM message was annunciated. The flight crew carried out the actions for a No. 1 engine compressor stall and declared a "[[Mayday (distress signal)|mayday]]". The captain then moved the thrust levers to test engine responses. No. 1 engine's rotational fan speed slowly spooled up to about 74% [[Airbreathing jet engine#Terminology|N<sub>1</sub>]], while No. 2 engine remained running below idle speed, about 17% N<sub>1</sub>, providing sufficient thrust to level off at 5,500&nbsp;ft and reach Hong Kong. As the flight approached the airport, the crew found that movement of the thrust levers failed to reduce thrust below 74% N<sub>1</sub> on No. 1 engine.<ref name="bulletin"/>
A few minutes later, about {{convert|83|km|mi nmi|abbr=on}} southeast of Hong Kong International Airport, the aircraft was in a [[Descent (aeronautics)|descent]] and approaching an altitude of {{convert|8000|ft|0|abbr=on}} when an "ENG 1 STALL" ECAM message appeared. The flight crew carried out the actions for a No. 1 engine compressor stall and declared a "[[Mayday (distress signal)|mayday]]". The captain then moved the thrust levers to test engine responses. No. 1 engine's rotational fan speed slowly spooled up to about 74% [[Airbreathing jet engine#Terminology|N<sub>1</sub>]], while No. 2 engine remained running below idle speed, about 17% N<sub>1</sub>, providing sufficient thrust to level off at 5,500&nbsp;ft and reach Hong Kong. As the flight approached the airport, the crew found that movement of the thrust levers failed to reduce thrust below 74% N<sub>1</sub> on No. 1 engine.<ref name="bulletin"/>


At 13:43 hours local time (05:43 UTC), 11 minutes after declaring the "mayday", the aircraft touched down hard on runway 07L (length 3800 m; 12,470&nbsp;ft) at a groundspeed of {{convert|426|km/h|mph knot|abbr=on}},<ref name="bulletin"/> {{convert|176|km/h|mph knot|abbr=on}} over the normal touchdown speed for an A330<ref name="FG"/><ref name="Aust"/> and above both the maximum allowable flap-extension speed and the speed rating of the tyres.<ref name="Aust"/><ref name="Limits"/> The plane bounced and briefly became airborne again until it slammed down hard while banking left, causing the left engine to scrape against the runway surface. Both wing spoilers deployed automatically. Only No. 1 engine's thrust reverser deployed and activated with the right engine’s thrust reverser unresponsive due to a technical snag, forcing the crew to bring the aircraft to a stop using manual braking. {{nowrap|No. 1 engine}} remained between 70 and 80% N<sub>1</sub> until the crew shut down both engines upon coming to a stop.
At 13:43 hours local time (05:43 UTC), 11 minutes after declaring the "mayday", the aircraft touched down hard on runway 07L (length 3800 m; 12,470&nbsp;ft) at a groundspeed of {{convert|426|km/h|mph knot|abbr=on}},<ref name="bulletin"/> {{convert|176|km/h|mph knot|abbr=on}} over the normal touchdown speed for an A330<ref name="FG"/><ref name="Aust"/> and above both the maximum allowable flap-extension speed and the speed rating of the tyres.<ref name="Aust"/><ref name="Limits"/> The plane bounced and briefly became airborne again until it slammed down hard while banking left, causing the left engine to scrape against the runway surface. Both wing spoilers deployed automatically. Only No. 1 engine's thrust reverser deployed and activated with the right engine's thrust reverser made unresponsive by a technical snag, forcing the crew to bring the aircraft to a stop using manual braking. {{nowrap|No. 1 engine}} remained between 70% and 80% N<sub>1</sub> until the crew shut down both engines upon coming to a stop.


Five of the aircraft's eight main wheel tires deflated. Airport firefighters reported that smoke and flames were emanating from the landing gear.<ref name="bulletin"/> The captain ordered an [[emergency evacuation#Small scale evacuations|emergency evacuation]], during which 57 passengers were injured, of whom 10 were transported to the hospital.<ref name="bulletin"/>
Five of the aircraft's eight main wheel tires deflated. Airport firefighters reported that smoke and flames were emanating from the landing gear.<ref name="bulletin"/> The captain ordered an [[emergency evacuation#Small scale evacuations|emergency evacuation]], during which 57 passengers were injured, of whom 10 were transported to hospital.<ref name="bulletin"/>


==Investigations==
==Investigations==
Investigators from the [[Civil Aviation Department (Hong Kong)|Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department]], the [[Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses pour la Sécurité de l'Aviation Civile]] (BEA) of France and the [[Air Accidents Investigation Branch]] (AAIB) of the United Kingdom formed a team to investigate the accident. The [[National Transportation Safety Committee]] (NTSC) of [[Indonesia]] and the [[National Transportation Safety Board]] (NTSB) of the United States of America were also involved in the investigation, as were representatives of [[Airbus]], [[Rolls-Royce plc|Rolls-Royce]] and Cathay Pacific.<ref name="bulletin"/>
Investigators from the [[Civil Aviation Department (Hong Kong)|Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department]], the French [[Bureau of Enquiry and Analysis for Civil Aviation Safety]], and the British [[Air Accidents Investigation Branch]] formed a team to investigate the accident. The [[National Transportation Safety Committee]] of Indonesia and the [[National Transportation Safety Board]] of the United States were also involved in the investigation, as were representatives of [[Airbus]], [[Rolls-Royce plc|Rolls-Royce]] and Cathay Pacific.<ref name="bulletin"/>


Data from the [[Flight Data Recorder|digital flight data recorder]], [[cockpit voice recorder]] and [[quick access recorder]] were downloaded for analysis. The investigation concentrated on the engines, the engine control systems and the fuel system.<ref name="bulletin"/>
Data from the [[Flight Data Recorder|digital flight data recorder]], [[cockpit voice recorder]], and [[quick access recorder]] were downloaded for analysis. The investigation concentrated on the engines, the engine control systems and the fuel system.<ref name="bulletin"/>


Analysis of the engines found that their fuel systems were contaminated with spherical particles. The Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department Accident Investigation Division concluded that the accident was caused by these spherical particles.<ref>{{cite web |last=Ranter |first=Harro |url=https://news.aviation-safety.net/2013/09/17/report-contaminated-fuel-causes-a330-engine-problems-and-emergency-landing-at-hong-kong/ |title=Report: contaminated fuel causes A330 engine control problems and emergency landing at Hong Kong |work=[[Aviation Safety Network]] |date=17 September 2013 |access-date=2 April 2021 |archive-date=21 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210421025720/https://news.aviation-safety.net/2013/09/17/report-contaminated-fuel-causes-a330-engine-problems-and-emergency-landing-at-hong-kong/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The contaminated fuel, which contained particles of [[superabsorbent polymer]] (SAP) introduced into the fuel system when the aircraft was fueled at Surabaya, subsequently caused the loss of thrust control on both engines of the aircraft during approach to Hong Kong.
Analysis of the engines found that their fuel systems were contaminated with spherical particles. The Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department's Accident Investigation Division concluded that the accident was caused by these spherical particles.<ref>{{cite web |last=Ranter |first=Harro |url=https://news.aviation-safety.net/2013/09/17/report-contaminated-fuel-causes-a330-engine-problems-and-emergency-landing-at-hong-kong/ |title=Report: contaminated fuel causes A330 engine control problems and emergency landing at Hong Kong |work=[[Aviation Safety Network]] |date=17 September 2013 |access-date=2 April 2021 |archive-date=21 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210421025720/https://news.aviation-safety.net/2013/09/17/report-contaminated-fuel-causes-a330-engine-problems-and-emergency-landing-at-hong-kong/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The contaminated fuel, which contained particles of [[superabsorbent polymer]] (SAP) introduced into the fuel system when the aircraft was fueled at Surabaya, subsequently caused the loss of thrust control on both engines of the aircraft during approach to Hong Kong.


The SAP particles, a component of the filter monitors installed in a fueling dispenser at Juanda Airport, had caused the main metering valves of the [[Fuel control unit|fuel metering unit]] to seize. The valves were found to be stuck in positions corresponding to the recorded thrust output of each engine as it approached Hong Kong.<ref name="AugBulletin"/> Other engine components were found to be contaminated with the particles, while the variable stator vane controller of engine No. 2 was found to be seized. The entire fuel system, including the fuel tanks, was found to be contaminated with spherical particles.<ref name="AugBulletin"/>
The polymer particles, a component of the filter monitors installed in a fueling dispenser at Juanda Airport, had caused the main metering valves of the [[Fuel control unit|fuel metering unit]] to seize. The valves were found to be stuck in positions corresponding to the recorded thrust output of each engine as it approached Hong Kong.<ref name="AugBulletin"/> Other engine components were found to be contaminated with the particles, while the variable stator vane controller of engine No. 2 was found to be seized. The entire fuel system, including the fuel tanks, was found to be contaminated with spherical particles.<ref name="AugBulletin"/>


Fuel samples collected at Juanda International Airport were contaminated with the particles.<ref name="AugBulletin"/> The fuel supply pipeline system used to refuel aircraft at Juanda International Airport had been recently extended during construction of new aircraft parking bays. The investigation discovered that not all procedures had been followed when the system was brought back into service,<ref name="AugBulletin"/> and that [[salt water]] had inadvertently entered the fuel supply. The presence of salt water compromised the filter monitors in the pipeline system, releasing the SAP particles into the fuel.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cad.gov.hk/reports/2%20Final%20Report%20-%20CX%20780%202013%2007%20web%20access%20compliant.pdf |title=Final Report - CX 780 Accident on 13 April 2010 |work=[[Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department]] |pages=138–143 |date=July 2013 |access-date=2 April 2021 |archive-date=13 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413133034/https://www.cad.gov.hk/reports/2%20Final%20Report%20-%20CX%20780%202013%2007%20web%20access%20compliant.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
Fuel samples collected at Juanda International Airport were contaminated with the particles.<ref name="AugBulletin"/> The fuel supply pipeline system used to refuel aircraft at Juanda International Airport had been recently extended during construction of new aircraft parking bays. The investigation discovered that not all procedures had been followed when the system was brought back into service,<ref name="AugBulletin"/> and that [[salt water]] had inadvertently entered the fuel supply. The presence of salt water compromised the filter monitors in the pipeline system, releasing the SAP particles into the fuel.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cad.gov.hk/reports/2%20Final%20Report%20-%20CX%20780%202013%2007%20web%20access%20compliant.pdf |title=Final Report - CX 780 Accident on 13 April 2010 |work=[[Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department]] |pages=138–143 |date=July 2013 |access-date=2 April 2021 |archive-date=13 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413133034/https://www.cad.gov.hk/reports/2%20Final%20Report%20-%20CX%20780%202013%2007%20web%20access%20compliant.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>


== Dramatization ==
== Dramatization ==
The incident was featured in the first episode of [[List of Mayday episodes|season 19]] of the Canadian TV series ''[[Mayday (Canadian TV series)|Mayday]]'' labeled "Deadly Descent".
The accident was featured in the first episode of [[List of Mayday episodes|season 19]] of the Canadian TV series ''[[Mayday (Canadian TV series)|Mayday]]'' labeled "Deadly Descent".<ref>{{Citation |title=Mayday - Air Crash Investigation (S01-S22) |url=http://archive.org/details/mayday-aci |access-date=2024-01-13}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 80: Line 77:
* [[Air Transat Flight 236]], an [[Airbus A330-200]] that had fuel starvation before landing safely at [[Lajes Air Base]] in the [[Azores]]
* [[Air Transat Flight 236]], an [[Airbus A330-200]] that had fuel starvation before landing safely at [[Lajes Air Base]] in the [[Azores]]
* [[British Airways Flight 009]], a [[Boeing 747|Boeing 747-200]] that lost power on all four engines after flying through a cloud of [[volcanic ash]]
* [[British Airways Flight 009]], a [[Boeing 747|Boeing 747-200]] that lost power on all four engines after flying through a cloud of [[volcanic ash]]
* [[Qantas Flight 72]], a Airbus A330-300 incident over the Pacific Ocean that presented conflicting information to the flight crew
* [[Qantas Flight 72]], an Airbus A330-300 accident over the Indian Ocean that presented conflicting information to the flight crew


==References==
==References==
Line 115: Line 112:
==External links==
==External links==
{{external media
{{external media
| align = right
| float = right
| width =
| width =
| image1 = [http://www.alexhoffordphotography.com/node/2312 Photos of B-HLL after the accident]
| image1 = [http://www.alexhoffordphotography.com/node/2312 Photos of B-HLL after the accident]
| video1 = {{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ikq0iP4F_vE |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190912230529/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ikq0iP4F_vE |archive-date=2019-09-12 |url-status=dead|title=Air Disasters: Deadly Descent (Full Episode)|publisher=[[Smithsonian Channel]]|date=2019-09-01}}
| video1 = {{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ikq0iP4F_vE |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190912230529/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ikq0iP4F_vE |archive-date=2019-09-12 |url-status=dead|title=Air Disasters: Deadly Descent (Full Episode)|publisher=[[Smithsonian Channel]]|date=2019-09-01}}
| video2 = {{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqQH0IkFQPw |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211215/wqQH0IkFQPw |archive-date=2021-12-15 |url-status=live|title=Engines Fail on Approach to Hong Kong|publisher=[[Smithsonian Channel]]|date=2019-09-07}}{{cbignore}}
| video2 = {{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqQH0IkFQPw |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211215/wqQH0IkFQPw |archive-date=2021-12-15 |url-status=live|title=Engines Fail on Approach to Hong Kong|publisher=[[Smithsonian Channel]]|date=2019-09-07}}{{cbignore}}
| video3 = {{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7x0QcPZfl8 |title= ZERO Engine Control! The Nightmare of Cathay flight 780 |publisher=Mentour Pilot|date=2023-09-30}}
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 22:05, 25 December 2024

Cathay Pacific Flight 780
B-HLL, the A330 involved in the accident, photographed in 2011 after it had been returned to service.
Accident
Date13 April 2010 (2010-04-13)
SummaryEngine failure due to fuel contamination[1]
SiteHong Kong International Airport, after landing on runway 07L
22°18′32″N 113°54′52″E / 22.30889°N 113.91444°E / 22.30889; 113.91444
Aircraft
Aircraft typeAirbus A330-342
OperatorCathay Pacific
IATA flight No.CX780
ICAO flight No.CPA780
Call signCATHAY 780
RegistrationB-HLL
Flight originJuanda International Airport, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
DestinationHong Kong International Airport, New Territories, Hong Kong
Occupants322
Passengers309
Crew13
Fatalities0
Injuries63[2][3]
Survivors322

Cathay Pacific Flight 780 was a flight from Juanda International Airport in Surabaya, Indonesia, to Hong Kong International Airport[4] on 13 April 2010. On board were 309 passengers and a crew of 13. As Flight 780 neared Hong Kong, the crew were unable to change the thrust output of the engines. The aircraft, an Airbus A330-300, landed at almost twice the speed of a normal landing, suffering minor damage. The 57 passengers who sustained injuries were hurt in the ensuing slide evacuation; one of them received serious injuries.[3][2]

The cause of the accident was contamination of the fuel taken on board at Surabaya, which gradually damaged both engines of the aircraft.[5]

The flight's two Australian pilots, Captain Malcolm Waters and First Officer David Hayhoe, who safely landed the aircraft despite the extraordinary challenge, have been compared to pilots Chesley Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles of US Airways Flight 1549 the previous year (January 2009). In March 2014, the two Flight 780 pilots were awarded the Polaris Award by the International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations for their heroism and airmanship.[5]

Captain Waters, who was 35 years old, had been working for Cathay Pacific for 12 years, while 37-year-old First Officer Hayhoe had been working for Cathay Pacific for 3 years and had previously served with the Royal Australian Air Force for 11 years.

Aircraft

[edit]

The aircraft involved was an Airbus A330-300, registered as B-HLL with serial number 244, fitted with two Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines. It first flew on 4 November 1998 and was delivered to Cathay Pacific three weeks later on 25 November.[3] This aircraft was configured for a capacity of 311 passengers and 13 crew, with 44 business-class seats and 267 economy-class seats.

After the accident, it was bought by DVB Bank in July 2011 (Arena Aviation Capital since March 2017) and was transferred to Dragonair (Cathay Dragon) since 23 April 2012 and was reconfigured for a capacity of 307 passengers, with 42 business-class seats and 265 economy-class seats in 2013. It was also repainted into the new Cathay Dragon livery on 3 November 2017. The aircraft was involved in another incident six years later as Flight 691 from Hong Kong to Penang on 8 September 2016, with 295 passengers and crew on board, when an airport delivery van crashed into the aircraft's left engine.

The aircraft was withdrawn from service on 13 August 2020, at the expiration of its lease, after its last commercial flight from Beijing to Hong Kong as KA993. The aircraft's final flight was on 14 October 2020, to Pinal Airpark in Marana, Arizona, via Anchorage as KA3496. The aircraft was scrapped on site in November 2021.

Accident

[edit]

Cathay Pacific Flight 780 departed from stand 8 at Juanda International Airport in Indonesia. It took off from runway 28 at 08:24 local time (01:24 UTC). During the climb, both engines experienced small engine pressure ratio fluctuations, with No. 2 engine fluctuating over a greater range than No. 1.[3] Just over half an hour after takeoff, cruising at flight level 390 (about 39,000 ft (12,000 m) above sea level), the electronic centralized aircraft monitoring (ECAM) system displayed an "ENG 2 CTL SYS FAULT" error message.[3] The crew contacted maintenance control to discuss the fluctuations. As other engine operating parameters on both engines were normal, continuing the flight was determined to be safe.[3]

Almost two hours after departure, at 03:16 UTC, the "ENG 2 CTL SYS FAULT" ECAM message reappeared. The crew contacted maintenance control to review the issue. As all other engine parameters remained normal, continuing on to Hong Kong was again deemed safe.

After another two hours elapsed, the aircraft was on descent to Hong Kong when, at 05:19 UTC, about 203 kilometres (126 mi; 110 nmi) southeast of Hong Kong International Airport, the aircraft's ECAM displayed "ENG 1 CTL SYS FAULT" and "ENG 2 STALL" within a short period.[3] The second message signified an engine compressor stall, a potentially serious engine problem. The flight crew accordingly carried out the necessary ECAM actions with No. 2 engine's thrust lever moved to the idle (or minimum-thrust setting) position. The crew set No. 1 engine to maximum continuous thrust to compensate for the low thrust of No. 2 engine. Following these actions, the crew declared a "pan-pan" with Hong Kong air traffic control, requesting the shortest possible route to the airport and priority landing.[3]

A few minutes later, about 83 km (52 mi; 45 nmi) southeast of Hong Kong International Airport, the aircraft was in a descent and approaching an altitude of 8,000 ft (2,438 m) when an "ENG 1 STALL" ECAM message appeared. The flight crew carried out the actions for a No. 1 engine compressor stall and declared a "mayday". The captain then moved the thrust levers to test engine responses. No. 1 engine's rotational fan speed slowly spooled up to about 74% N1, while No. 2 engine remained running below idle speed, about 17% N1, providing sufficient thrust to level off at 5,500 ft and reach Hong Kong. As the flight approached the airport, the crew found that movement of the thrust levers failed to reduce thrust below 74% N1 on No. 1 engine.[3]

At 13:43 hours local time (05:43 UTC), 11 minutes after declaring the "mayday", the aircraft touched down hard on runway 07L (length 3800 m; 12,470 ft) at a groundspeed of 426 km/h (265 mph; 230 kn),[3] 176 km/h (109 mph; 95 kn) over the normal touchdown speed for an A330[6][7] and above both the maximum allowable flap-extension speed and the speed rating of the tyres.[7][8] The plane bounced and briefly became airborne again until it slammed down hard while banking left, causing the left engine to scrape against the runway surface. Both wing spoilers deployed automatically. Only No. 1 engine's thrust reverser deployed and activated with the right engine's thrust reverser made unresponsive by a technical snag, forcing the crew to bring the aircraft to a stop using manual braking. No. 1 engine remained between 70% and 80% N1 until the crew shut down both engines upon coming to a stop.

Five of the aircraft's eight main wheel tires deflated. Airport firefighters reported that smoke and flames were emanating from the landing gear.[3] The captain ordered an emergency evacuation, during which 57 passengers were injured, of whom 10 were transported to hospital.[3]

Investigations

[edit]

Investigators from the Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department, the French Bureau of Enquiry and Analysis for Civil Aviation Safety, and the British Air Accidents Investigation Branch formed a team to investigate the accident. The National Transportation Safety Committee of Indonesia and the National Transportation Safety Board of the United States were also involved in the investigation, as were representatives of Airbus, Rolls-Royce and Cathay Pacific.[3]

Data from the digital flight data recorder, cockpit voice recorder, and quick access recorder were downloaded for analysis. The investigation concentrated on the engines, the engine control systems and the fuel system.[3]

Analysis of the engines found that their fuel systems were contaminated with spherical particles. The Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department's Accident Investigation Division concluded that the accident was caused by these spherical particles.[9] The contaminated fuel, which contained particles of superabsorbent polymer (SAP) introduced into the fuel system when the aircraft was fueled at Surabaya, subsequently caused the loss of thrust control on both engines of the aircraft during approach to Hong Kong.

The polymer particles, a component of the filter monitors installed in a fueling dispenser at Juanda Airport, had caused the main metering valves of the fuel metering unit to seize. The valves were found to be stuck in positions corresponding to the recorded thrust output of each engine as it approached Hong Kong.[1] Other engine components were found to be contaminated with the particles, while the variable stator vane controller of engine No. 2 was found to be seized. The entire fuel system, including the fuel tanks, was found to be contaminated with spherical particles.[1]

Fuel samples collected at Juanda International Airport were contaminated with the particles.[1] The fuel supply pipeline system used to refuel aircraft at Juanda International Airport had been recently extended during construction of new aircraft parking bays. The investigation discovered that not all procedures had been followed when the system was brought back into service,[1] and that salt water had inadvertently entered the fuel supply. The presence of salt water compromised the filter monitors in the pipeline system, releasing the SAP particles into the fuel.[10]

Dramatization

[edit]

The accident was featured in the first episode of season 19 of the Canadian TV series Mayday labeled "Deadly Descent".[11]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department Accident Bulletin Number 3/2010 Archived 20 October 2020 at the Wayback Machine retrieved 31 August 2010
  2. ^ a b "AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT 2/2013 : Report on the accident to Airbus A330-342 B-HLL operated by Cathay Pacific Airways Limited at Hong Kong International Airport, Hong Kong on 13 April 2010" (PDF). Civil Aviation Department. 3 July 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 May 2014. Retrieved 24 May 2014.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department Accident Bulletin Number 1/2010" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 October 2020. Retrieved 8 September 2018.
  4. ^ "CX780 Flight, Cathay Pacific, Surabaya to Hong Kong". www.flightr.net. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 6 December 2016.
  5. ^ a b "Pilots reveal death-defying ordeal as engines failed on approach to Chek Lap Kok". South China Morning Post. 20 April 2014. Archived from the original on 21 April 2014. Retrieved 21 April 2014.
  6. ^ Kaminski-Morrow, David (14 April 2010). "Cathay A330 in high-energy landing had dual engine problem". Flight International. Archived from the original on 20 April 2010. Retrieved 24 May 2010.
  7. ^ a b Creedy, Steve (16 April 2010). "Cathay Pacific pilots hailed as heroes". The Australian. Archived from the original on 19 June 2014. Retrieved 24 May 2010.
  8. ^ list of Airbus A330 speed and other limits[permanent dead link] retrieved 24 May 2010
  9. ^ Ranter, Harro (17 September 2013). "Report: contaminated fuel causes A330 engine control problems and emergency landing at Hong Kong". Aviation Safety Network. Archived from the original on 21 April 2021. Retrieved 2 April 2021.
  10. ^ "Final Report - CX 780 Accident on 13 April 2010" (PDF). Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department. July 2013. pp. 138–143. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 2 April 2021.
  11. ^ Mayday - Air Crash Investigation (S01-S22), retrieved 13 January 2024
[edit]
External media
Images
image icon Photos of B-HLL after the accident
Video
video icon "Air Disasters: Deadly Descent (Full Episode)". Smithsonian Channel. 1 September 2019. Archived from the original on 12 September 2019.
video icon "Engines Fail on Approach to Hong Kong". Smithsonian Channel. 7 September 2019. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021.
video icon "ZERO Engine Control! The Nightmare of Cathay flight 780". Mentour Pilot. 30 September 2023.