Talk:Carlile House: Difference between revisions
B class |
Alexeyevitch (talk | contribs) promote Carlile House to good article (GANReviewTool) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA|12:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC)|topic=Art and architecture|page=1|oldid=1266175643}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell |1= |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=GA|1= |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|ts=20221227134716|reviewer=Schwede66|oldid=1129784552}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Architecture |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Auckland |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject New Zealand |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Historic sites |importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Talk:Carlile House/GA1}} |
Latest revision as of 12:29, 30 December 2024
Carlile House has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 30, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Carlile House/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Ewhite31 (talk · contribs) 11:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 11:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Greetings from Christchurch! I will begin this review soon. New Zealand topics are a personal area of interest for me! If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask them here. Alexeyevitch(talk) 11:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
Great article! I would like to know that the user responded on my talk page and I have fixed some issues on my end (I've also scanned thru for any copyvio issues yesterday). Congrats! Alexeyevitch(talk) 12:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
- Wikipedia good articles
- Art and architecture good articles
- GA-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/27 December 2022
- Accepted AfC submissions
- GA-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Auckland articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Auckland articles
- GA-Class New Zealand articles
- Low-importance New Zealand articles
- WikiProject New Zealand articles
- GA-Class Historic sites articles
- Low-importance Historic sites articles
- WikiProject Historic sites articles