Jump to content

Near-Earth object: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Added pmid. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_toolbar
 
(208 intermediate revisions by 39 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Small Solar System body whose orbit brings it close to the Earth}}
{{short description|Small Solar System body with an orbit that can bring it close to Earth}}
{{Good article}}
{{Good article}}
{{Infobox astronomical formation
{{Multiple image
|name=Near-Earth object
|image={{Multiple image
| perrow = 2/1
| perrow = 2/1
| total_width = 300
| total_width = 300
| align = center
| image1 = Asteroid2006DP14.jpg
| image1 = Asteroid2006DP14.jpg
| caption1 = Radar-imaging of {{mp|(388188) 2006 DP|14}} by a [[NASA Deep Space Network|DSN]] antenna
| caption1 = Radar image of {{mpl|(388188) 2006 DP|14}} recorded by a [[NASA Deep Space Network|DSN]] antenna
| image2 = The VLT images the very faint Near-Earth Object 2009 FD.jpg
| image2 = The VLT images the very faint Near-Earth Object 2009 FD.jpg
| caption2 = Very Large Telescope image of the very faint near-Earth asteroid {{mpl|2009 FD}} as seen by the [[Very Large Telescope|VLT]] telescope
| caption2 = Very faint near-Earth asteroid {{mpl|2009 FD}} as seen by the [[Very Large Telescope|VLT]] telescope
| image3 = Comet Hartley 2.jpg
| image3 = Comet Hartley 2.jpg
| caption3 = Near-Earth comet [[103P/Hartley]] as seen by NASA's ''[[Deep Impact (spacecraft)|Deep Impact]]'' probe
| caption3 = Nucleus of near-Earth comet [[103P/Hartley]] as seen by NASA's ''[[Deep Impact (spacecraft)|Deep Impact]]'' probe
}}
|where=within 1.3 [[Astronomical unit|AU]] from the [[Sun]]
|thing=[[Small Solar System body]]
|commonscat=Near-Earth objects
|qid=Q265392
|head=
}}
}}
{{Pie chart
{{Pie chart
| caption = 27,000+ known NEOs, divided into several orbital subgroups<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />
| caption = 34,000+ known NEOs, divided into several orbital subgroups<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />
| label1 = [[Apollo asteroid|Apollos]]: 15142
| label1 = [[Apollo asteroid|Apollos]]: 19,613
| value1 = 55.35
| value1 = 56.48
| color1 = #009a39
| color1 = #009a39
| label2 = [[Amor asteroid|Amors]]: 9963
| label2 = [[Amor asteroid|Amors]]: 12,213
| value2 = 36.42
| value2 = 35.17
| color2 = #66CCFF
| color2 = #66CCFF
| label3 = [[Aten asteroid|Atens]]: 2107
| label3 = [[Aten asteroid|Atens]]: 2,744
| value3 = 7.70
| value3 = 7.90
| color3 = #f7c35a
| color3 = #f7c35a
| label4 = [[Comet]]s: 117
| label4 = [[Comet]]s: 122
| value4 = 0.43
| value4 = 0.35
| color4 = #de2821
| color4 = #de2821
| label5 = [[Atira asteroid|Atiras]]: 27
| label5 = [[Atira asteroid|Atiras]]: 33
| value5 = 0.099
| value5 = 0.10
| color5 = black
| color5 = black
| label6 = [[ꞌAylóꞌchaxnim asteroid|ꞌAylóꞌchaxnims]]: [[594913 ꞌAylóꞌchaxnim|1]]
| value6 = 0.004
| color6 = #808000
}}
}}


A '''near-Earth object''' ('''NEO''') is any [[small Solar System body]] whose orbit brings it into proximity with [[Earth]]. By convention, a Solar System body is a NEO if its closest approach to the Sun ([[Apsis|perihelion]]) is less than 1.3&nbsp;[[astronomical unit]]s (AU).<ref name="NEO-groups"/> If a NEO's orbit crosses the Earth's orbit, and the object is larger than {{convert|140|meter|ft}} across, it is considered a [[potentially hazardous object]] (PHO).<ref name="CHAPMAN04"/> Most known PHOs and NEOs are [[asteroid]]s, but a small fraction are [[comet]]s.<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />
A '''near-Earth object''' ('''NEO''') is any [[small Solar System body]] orbiting the [[Sun]] whose closest approach to the Sun ([[Apsis|perihelion]]) is less than 1.3 times the Earth–Sun distance ([[astronomical unit]], AU).<ref name="CNEOS-NEO-groups"/> This definition applies to the object's orbit around the Sun, rather than its current position, thus an object with such an orbit is considered an NEO even at times when it is far from making a close approach of [[Earth]]. If an NEO's orbit crosses the Earth's orbit, and the object is larger than {{convert|140|meter|ft}} across, it is considered a [[potentially hazardous object]] (PHO).<ref name="CHAPMAN04"/> Most known PHOs and NEOs are [[asteroid]]s, but about 0.35% are [[comet]]s.<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />


There are over 30,503 known [[#Near-Earth asteroids|near-Earth asteroids]] (NEAs) and over a hundred known short-period [[#Near-Earth comets|near-Earth comets]] (NECs).<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" /> A number of solar-orbiting [[meteoroid]]s were large enough to be tracked in space before striking the Earth. It is now widely accepted that collisions in the past have had a significant role in shaping the geological and biological history of the Earth.<ref name="BROWN02">{{cite news |url=http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/sn_arc97/75th/rm_essay.htm
There are over 34,000 known [[#Near-Earth asteroids|near-Earth asteroids]] (NEAs) and over 120 known short-period [[#Near-Earth comets|near-Earth comets]] (NECs).<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" /> A number of solar-orbiting [[meteoroid]]s were large enough to be tracked in space before striking Earth. It is now widely accepted that collisions in the past have had a significant role in shaping the geological and biological history of Earth.<ref name="BROWN02">{{cite news |first=Richard |last=Monastersky |title=The Call of Catastrophes |work=Science News Online |date=March 1, 1997 |url=https://www.sciencenews.org/archive/call-catastrophes|access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040313165341/http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/sn_arc97/75th/rm_essay.htm |archive-date=March 13, 2004 }}</ref> Asteroids as small as {{convert|20|m|ft}} in diameter can cause significant damage to the local environment and human populations.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Rumpf |first1=Clemens M.|last2=Lewis |first2=Hugh G.|last3=Atkinson |first3=Peter M. |date=March 23, 2017 |title=Asteroid impact effects and their immediate hazards for human populations |journal=[[Geophysical Research Letters]] |language=en |volume=44 |issue=8 |pages=3433–3440 |doi=10.1002/2017gl073191 |issn=0094-8276 |arxiv=1703.07592 |bibcode=2017GeoRL..44.3433R |s2cid=34867206}}</ref> Larger asteroids penetrate the atmosphere to the surface of the Earth, producing craters if they impact a continent or [[tsunami]]s if they impact the sea. Interest in NEOs has increased since the 1980s because of greater awareness of this risk. [[Asteroid impact avoidance]] by deflection is possible in principle, and methods of mitigation are being researched.<ref name="tsr20120514"/>
|title=The Call of Catastrophes
|author=Richard Monastersky
|work=Science News Online
|date=March 1, 1997 |access-date=2017-11-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040313165341/http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/sn_arc97/75th/rm_essay.htm |archive-date=2004-03-13}}</ref> Asteroids as small as {{convert|20|m|ft}} in diameter can cause significant damage to the local environment and human populations.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Rumpf|first1=Clemens M.|last2=Lewis|first2=Hugh G.|last3=Atkinson|first3=Peter M.
|date=2017-04-19
|title=Asteroid impact effects and their immediate hazards for human populations
|journal=Geophysical Research Letters|language=en|volume=44|issue=8|pages=3433–3440
|doi=10.1002/2017gl073191|issn=0094-8276|arxiv=1703.07592|bibcode=2017GeoRL..44.3433R|s2cid=34867206}}</ref> Larger asteroids penetrate the atmosphere to the surface of the Earth, producing craters if they impact a continent or [[tsunami]]s if they impact the sea. Interest in NEOs has increased since the 1980s because of greater awareness of this potential danger. [[Asteroid impact avoidance]] by deflection is possible in principle, and methods of mitigation are being researched.<ref name="tsr20120514"/>


Two scales, the simple [[Torino scale]] and the more complex [[Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale|Palermo scale]], rate the risk presented by an identified NEO based on the probability of it impacting the Earth and on how severe the consequences of such an impact would be. Some NEOs have had temporarily positive Torino or Palermo scale ratings after their discovery.
Two scales, the simple [[Torino scale]] and the more complex [[Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale|Palermo scale]], rate the risk presented by an identified NEO based on the probability of it impacting the Earth and on how severe the consequences of such an impact would be. Some NEOs have had temporarily positive Torino or Palermo scale ratings after their discovery. Since 1998, the United States, the European Union, and other nations have been scanning the sky for NEOs in an effort called [[Spaceguard]].<ref name="spaceguard-2004" /> The initial US Congress mandate to [[NASA]] to catalog at least 90% of NEOs that are at least {{convert|1|km|mi}} in diameter, sufficient to cause a global catastrophe, was met by 2011.<ref name="pia14734" /> In later years, the survey effort was expanded<ref name="law-109-155"/> to include smaller objects<ref name="ETech"/> which have the potential for large-scale, though not global, damage.


NEOs have low surface gravity, and many have Earth-like orbits that make them easy targets for spacecraft.<ref name="USAToday-NEA"/><ref name="wired20130323"/> {{As of|2024|04}}, five near-Earth comets<ref name="TaskForceReport"/><ref name="DeepImpactHartley"/><ref name="newsci20160930"/> and six near-Earth asteroids,<ref name="Eros-NEAR"/><ref name="Toutatis-Change"/><ref name="Spacecom-Hayabusa2-2019"/><ref name="space-osiris-overview"/><ref name="NASA220927"/> one of them with a moon,<ref name="NASA220927"/> have been visited by spacecraft. Samples of three have been returned to Earth,<ref name="BBC-Hayabusa2"/><ref name="space-osiris-sample"/> and one successful deflection test was conducted.<ref name="NASA221215"/> Similar missions are in progress. Preliminary plans for commercial [[asteroid mining]] have been drafted by private startup companies, but few of these plans were pursued.<ref name="Forbes210831"/>
Since 1998, the United States, the European Union, and other nations are scanning the sky for NEOs in an effort called [[Spaceguard]].<ref name="spaceguard-2004" /> The initial US Congress mandate to [[NASA]] to catalog at least 90% of NEOs that are at least {{convert|1|km|ft}} in diameter, sufficient to cause a global catastrophe, was met by 2011.<ref name="pia14734" /> In later years, the survey effort was expanded<ref name="law-109-155"/> to include smaller objects<ref name="ETech"/> which have the potential for large-scale, though not global, damage.

NEOs have low surface gravity, and many have Earth-like orbits that make them easy targets for spacecraft.<ref name="USAToday-NEA"/><ref name="wired20130323"/> {{As of|2019|01}}, five near-Earth comets<ref name="TaskForceReport"/><ref name="DeepImpactHartley"/><ref name="newsci20160930"/> and five near-Earth asteroids have been visited by spacecraft.<ref name="Eros-NEAR"/><ref name="Itokawa-hayabusa"/><ref name="Toutatis-Change"/><ref name="SFN-Hayabusa2"/><ref name="space-osiris"/> A small sample of one NEO [[Hayabusa 1|was returned]] to Earth in 2010, and similar missions are in progress.<ref name="SFN-Hayabusa2"/><ref name="space-osiris"/> Preliminary plans for commercial [[asteroid mining]] have been drafted by private startup companies, either through the use of robots or even by sending private commercial astronauts to act as space miners.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Dorminey|first=Bruce|title=Does Commercial Asteroid Mining Still Have A Future?|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucedorminey/2021/08/31/does-commercial-asteroid-mining-still-have-a-future/|access-date=2021-10-11|website=Forbes|language=en}}</ref>


== Definitions ==
== Definitions ==
[[File:Potentially Hazardous Asteroids 2013.png|thumb|Plot of orbits of known potentially hazardous asteroids (size over {{convert|460|ft|m|order=flip|abbr=on}} and passing within {{convert|4.7|e6mi|e6km|order=flip|abbr=on}} of Earth's orbit) as of early 2013 ([[:File:PIA17041-Orbits-PotentiallyHazardousAsteroids-Early2013.jpg|alternate image]])]]
[[File:Potentially Hazardous Asteroids 2013.png|thumb|Plot of orbits of known [[Potentially hazardous object|potentially hazardous asteroids]] (size over {{convert|460|ft|m|order=flip|abbr=on}} and passing within {{convert|4.7|e6mi|e6km|order=flip|abbr=on}} of Earth's orbit) as of early 2013 ([[:File:PIA17041-Orbits-PotentiallyHazardousAsteroids-Early2013.jpg|alternate image]])]]


Near-Earth objects (NEOs) are by convention technically defined as all small Solar System bodies with orbits around the Sun that lie partly between 0.983 and 1.3 [[astronomical unit]]s (AU; Sun–Earth distance) away from the Sun.<ref name = "MorbidelliAstIII" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Waszczak|first1=Adam|last2=Prince|first2=Thomas A.|last3=Laher|first3=Russ|last4=Masci|first4=Frank|last5=Bue|first5=Brian|last6=Rebbapragada|first6=Umaa|last7=Barlow|first7=Tom|last8=Jason Surace|last9=Helou|first9=George|date=2017|title=Small Near-Earth Asteroids in the Palomar Transient Factory Survey: A Real-Time Streak-detection System|journal=Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific|language=en|volume=129|issue=973|pages=034402|doi=10.1088/1538-3873/129/973/034402|issn=1538-3873|arxiv=1609.08018|bibcode=2017PASP..129c4402W|s2cid=43606524}}</ref> NEOs are thus not necessarily currently near the Earth, but they can potentially approach the Earth relatively closely. The term is also sometimes used more flexibly, for example for objects in orbit around the Earth or for [[quasi-satellite]]s,<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://uanews.arizona.edu/story/earths-new-buddy-asteroid-not-space-junk | title=Earth's New Buddy is Asteroid, Not Space Junk| date=16 October 2017}}</ref> which have a more complex orbital relationship with the Earth.
Near-Earth objects (NEOs) are formally defined by the [[International Astronomical Union]] (IAU) as all [[Small Solar System body|small Solar System bodies]] with orbits around the Sun that are at least partially closer than 1.3 [[astronomical unit]]s (AU; Sun–Earth distance) from the Sun.<ref name="IAU-NEOs"/> This definition excludes larger bodies such as [[planet|planets]], like [[Venus]]; [[natural satellite|natural satellites]] which orbit bodies other than the Sun, like Earth's [[Moon]]; and artificial bodies orbiting the Sun. A small Solar System body can be an [[asteroid]] or a [[comet]], thus an NEO is either a near-Earth asteroid (NEA) or a near-Earth comet (NEC). The organisations cataloging NEOs further limit their definition of NEO to objects with an orbital period under 200 years, a restriction that applies to comets in particular,<ref name="CNEOS-NEO-groups">{{cite web |title=NEO Basics. NEO Groups |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/about/neo_groups.html |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref><ref name="NEOCC-DA">{{cite web |title=Definitions & Assumptions |publisher=ESA NEOCC |url=https://neo.ssa.esa.int/definitions-assumptions |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref> but this approach is not universal.<ref name="IAU-NEOs"/> Some authors further restrict the definition to orbits that are at least partly further than 0.983 AU away from the Sun.<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Waszczak |first1=Adam |last2=Prince |first2=Thomas A. |last3=Laher |first3=Russ |last4=Masci |first4=Frank |last5=Bue |first5=Brian |last6=Rebbapragada |first6=Umaa |last7=Barlow |first7=Tom |last8=Jason Surace |last9=Helou |first9=George |display-authors=2 |date=2017 |title=Small Near-Earth Asteroids in the Palomar Transient Factory Survey: A Real-Time Streak-detection System |journal=[[Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific]] |language=en |volume=129 |issue=973 |at=part 034402 |doi=10.1088/1538-3873/129/973/034402 |issn=1538-3873 |arxiv=1609.08018|bibcode=2017PASP..129c4402W |s2cid=43606524}}</ref> NEOs are thus not necessarily currently near the Earth, but they can potentially approach the Earth relatively closely. Many NEOs have complex orbits due to constant perturbation by the Earth's gravity, and some of them can temporarily change from an orbit around the Sun to one around the Earth, but the term is applied flexibly for these objects, too.<ref name="ST111230"/>


When a NEO is detected, like all other small Solar System bodies, its positions and brightness are submitted to the [[International Astronomical Union]]'s (IAU's) [[Minor Planet Center]] (MPC) for cataloging. The MPC maintains separate lists of confirmed NEOs and potential NEOs.<ref name="MPC-NEO-confirm">{{cite web<!--Citation bot --> |title=The NEO Confirmation Page |publisher=IAU/MPC |url=http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/NEO/toconfirm_tabular.html |access-date=2017-11-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=The NEO Confirmation Page |journal=Planetary and Space Science |volume=46 |issue=2 |pages=299 |bibcode=1998P&SS...46..299M |last1=Marsden |first1=B. G. |last2=Williams |first2=G. V. |year=1998 |doi=10.1016/S0032-0633(96)00153-5 }}</ref> The orbits of some NEOs intersect that of the Earth, so they pose a collision danger.<ref name="CHAPMAN04">{{cite journal |title=The hazard of near-Earth asteroid impacts on earth |author=Clark R. Chapman |journal=Earth and Planetary Science Letters |volume=222 |issue=1 |pages=1–15 |date=May 2004 |doi=10.1016/j.epsl.2004.03.004 |bibcode=2004E&PSL.222....1C}}</ref> These are considered [[potentially hazardous object]]s (PHOs) if their estimated diameter is above 140 meters. The MPC maintains a separate list for the asteroids among PHOs, the potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs).<ref name="MPC-PHA-list">{{cite web |title=List Of The Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHAs) |publisher=IAU/MPC |url=https://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/lists/t_phas.html |access-date=2018-01-19}}</ref> NEOs are also catalogued by two separate units of the [[Jet Propulsion Laboratory]] (JPL) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration ([[NASA]]): the Center for Near Earth Object Studies (CNEOS)<ref name="neo-jpl-intro" /> and the Solar System Dynamics Group.<ref name="JPL-SSD-NEA"/>
The orbits of some NEOs intersect that of the Earth, so they pose a collision danger.<ref name="CHAPMAN04">{{cite journal |first=Clark R. |last=Chapman |title=The hazard of near-Earth asteroid impacts on earth |journal=[[Earth and Planetary Science Letters]] |volume=222 |issue=1 |pages=1–15 |date=May 2004 |doi=10.1016/j.epsl.2004.03.004 |bibcode=2004E&PSL.222....1C}}</ref> These are considered [[potentially hazardous object]]s (PHOs) if their estimated diameter is above 140 meters. PHOs include potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs).<ref name="MPC-PHA-list"/> PHAs are defined based on two parameters relating to respectively their potential to approach the Earth dangerously closely and the estimated consequences that an impact would have if it occurs.<ref name="CNEOS-NEO-groups"/> Objects with both an Earth [[minimum orbit intersection distance]] (MOID) of 0.05&nbsp;AU or less and an [[Absolute magnitude#Solar System bodies (H)|absolute magnitude]] of 22.0 or brighter (a rough indicator of large size) are considered PHAs. Objects that either cannot approach closer to the Earth than {{convert |0.05 |AU |km mi |abbr=on |lk=in}}, or which are fainter than H = 22.0 (about {{convert|140|m|ft|abbr=on|lk=off}} in diameter with assumed [[albedo]] of 14%), are not considered PHAs.<ref name="CNEOS-NEO-groups"/>

PHAs are defined based on two parameters relating to respectively their potential to approach the Earth dangerously closely and the estimated consequences that an impact would have if it occurs.<ref name="NEO-groups"/> Objects with both an Earth [[minimum orbit intersection distance]] (MOID) of 0.05&nbsp;AU or less and an [[Absolute magnitude#Solar System bodies (H)|absolute magnitude]] of 22.0 or brighter (a rough indicator of large size) are considered PHAs. Objects that either cannot approach closer to the Earth i.e. MOID greater than {{convert |0.05 |AU |km mi |abbr=on |lk=in}}, or which are fainter than H = 22.0 (about {{convert|140|m|ft|abbr=on|lk=off}} in diameter with assumed [[albedo]] of 14%), are not considered PHAs.<ref name="NEO-groups">{{cite web |title=NEO Basics. NEO Groups |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |url=http://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/neo/groups.html |access-date=2017-11-09}}</ref> NASA's catalog of near-Earth objects includes the approach distances of asteroids and comets (expressed in [[Lunar distance (astronomy)|lunar distances]]).<ref name="NEO-close">{{citation-attribution|1={{cite web |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/ |title=NEO Earth Close Approaches |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |access-date=2017-11-09 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171019211133/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/ |archive-date=2017-10-19 }} }}</ref>


== History of human awareness of NEOs ==
== History of human awareness of NEOs ==
[[File:PSM V76 D020 Path of halley comet.png|thumb|1910 drawing of the path of Halley's Comet]]
[[File:PSM V76 D020 Path of halley comet.png|thumb|1910 drawing of the path of [[Halley's Comet]]]]
[[File:Eros - PIA02923 (color).jpg|thumb|The near Earth asteroid 433 Eros was visited by a probe in the 1990s]]
[[File:Eros - PIA02923 (color).jpg|thumb|The near-Earth asteroid [[433 Eros]] as seen by the probe [[NEAR Shoemaker]]]]
The first near-Earth objects to be observed by humans were comets. Their extraterrestrial nature was recognised and confirmed only after [[Tycho Brahe]] tried to measure the distance of a comet through its [[parallax]] in 1577 and the lower limit he obtained was well above the Earth diameter; the periodicity of some comets was first recognised in 1705, when [[Edmond Halley]] published his orbit calculations for the returning object now known as [[Halley's Comet]].<ref name="Halley-synopsis">{{cite book |last=Halley |first=Edmund |date=1705 |title=A synopsis of the astronomy of comets |url=https://library.si.edu/digital-library/book/synopsisofastron00hall |location=London |publisher=John Senex |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201055040/https://library.si.edu/digital-library/book/synopsisofastron00hall |archive-date=2017-12-01 }}</ref> The 1758–1759 return of Halley's Comet was the first comet appearance predicted.<ref>{{cite book |last=Stoyan |first=Ronald |title=Atlas of Great Comets |date=2015 |location=Cambridge |publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WAZEBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA101 |pages=101–103 |isbn=978-1-107-09349-2 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180301114413/https://books.google.com/books?id=WAZEBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA101&lpg=PA101 |archive-date=2018-03-01 }}</ref> It has been said that [[Lexell's Comet|Lexell's comet]] of 1770 was the first discovered Near-Earth object.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ye|first1=Quan-Zhi|last2=Wiegert|first2=Paul A.|last3=Hui|first3=Man-To|date=2018-03-21|title=Finding Long Lost Lexell's Comet: The Fate of the First Discovered Near-Earth Object|journal=The Astronomical Journal|volume=155|issue=4|pages=163|doi=10.3847/1538-3881/aab1f6|issn=1538-3881|arxiv=1802.08904|bibcode=2018AJ....155..163Y|s2cid=118895688}}</ref>
The first near-Earth objects to be observed by humans were comets. Their extraterrestrial nature was recognised and confirmed only after [[Tycho Brahe]] tried to measure the distance of a comet through its [[parallax]] in 1577 and the lower limit he obtained was well above the Earth diameter; the periodicity of some comets was first recognised in 1705, when [[Edmond Halley]] published his orbit calculations for the returning object now known as [[Halley's Comet]].<ref name="Halley-synopsis">{{cite book |last=Halley |first=Edmund |date=1705 |title=A synopsis of the astronomy of comets |location=London |publisher=John Senex |url=https://library.si.edu/digital-library/book/synopsisofastron00hall |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201055040/https://library.si.edu/digital-library/book/synopsisofastron00hall |archive-date=December 1, 2017 }}</ref> The 1758–1759 return of Halley's Comet was the first comet appearance predicted.<ref>{{cite book |last=Stoyan |first=Ronald |title=Atlas of Great Comets |date=2015 |location=Cambridge |publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WAZEBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA101 |access-date=January 26, 2024 |pages=101–103 |isbn=978-1-107-09349-2 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180301114413/https://books.google.com/books?id=WAZEBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA101&lpg=PA101 |archive-date=March 1, 2018 }}</ref>


The extraterrestrial origin of [[Meteoroid|meteors]] (shooting stars) was only recognised on the basis of the analysis of the 1833 [[Leonids|Leonid meteor shower]] by astronomer [[Denison Olmsted]]. The 33-year period of the Leonids led astronomers to suspect that they originate from a comet that would today be classified as an NEO, which was confirmed in 1867, when astronomers found that the newly discovered comet [[55P/Tempel–Tuttle]] has the same orbit as the Leonids.<ref>{{cite journal |first=S. J. |last=Dick |title=Observation and interpretation of the Leonid meteors over the last millennium |journal=[[Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage]] |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=1–20 |date=June 1998 |doi=10.3724/SP.J.1440-2807.1998.01.01 |url=https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1998JAHH....1....1D |access-date=February 21, 2024 |bibcode=1998JAHH....1....1D }}</ref>
The first near-Earth asteroid to be discovered was [[433 Eros]] in 1898.<ref name=Scholl>{{Cite journal |last1=Scholl |first1=Hans |author-link=Hans Scholl (astronomer) |last2=Schmadel |first2=Lutz D. |title=Discovery Circumstances of the First Near-Earth Asteroid (433) Eros |journal=Acta Historica Astronomiae |bibcode=2002AcHA...15..210S |volume=15 |pages=210–220 |date=2002}}</ref> The asteroid was subject to several extensive observation campaigns, primarily because measurements of its orbit enabled a precise determination of the then imperfectly known distance of the Earth from the Sun.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://near.jhuapl.edu/eros/history/eros_useful.html |title=Eros comes on stage, finally a useful asteroid |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory |access-date=2017-11-14}}</ref>


The first near-Earth asteroid to be discovered was [[433 Eros]] in 1898.<ref name=Scholl>{{Cite journal |last1=Scholl |first1=Hans |author-link=Hans Scholl (astronomer) |last2=Schmadel |first2=Lutz D. |title=Discovery Circumstances of the First Near-Earth Asteroid (433) Eros |journal=Acta Historica Astronomiae |bibcode=2002AcHA...15..210S |volume=15 |pages=210–220 |date=2002}}</ref> The asteroid was subject to several extensive observation campaigns, primarily because measurements of its orbit enabled a precise determination of the then imperfectly known distance of the Earth from the Sun.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://near.jhuapl.edu/eros/history/eros_useful.html |title=Eros comes on stage, finally a useful asteroid |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref>
In 1937, asteroid [[69230 Hermes]] was discovered when it passed the Earth at twice the [[Lunar distance (astronomy)|distance of the Moon]].<ref name="RadarHermes">{{cite web |title=Radar observations of long-lost asteroid 1937 UB (Hermes) |work=Cornell University, Arecibo Observatory |url=http://www.astro.cornell.edu/~jlm/NEAs/Hermes/ |access-date=2017-11-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170524082001/http://www.astro.cornell.edu/~jlm/NEAs/Hermes/ |archive-date=2017-05-24 }}</ref> Hermes was considered a threat because it was lost after its discovery; thus its orbit and potential for collision with Earth were not known precisely.<ref name="Marsden1998"/> Hermes was only re-discovered in 2003, and it is now known to be no threat for at least the next century.<ref name="RadarHermes"/>


=== Encounters with Earth ===
On June 14, 1968, the 1.4&nbsp;km diameter asteroid [[1566 Icarus]] passed Earth at a distance of {{convert |0.042 |AU |km |abbr=on |lk=off}}, or 16 times the distance of the Moon.<ref name=jpl-close>{{cite web |url=http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=1566;cad=1#cad |title=1566 Icarus (1949 MA). Close-Approach Data |publisher=NASA/JPL |date=June 13, 2017 |access-date=2017-11-10 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180301114413/https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=1566;cad=1#cad |archive-date=2018-03-01 }}</ref> During this approach, Icarus became the first minor planet to be observed using [[radar]], with measurements obtained at the [[Haystack Observatory]]<ref name="Pettengill-1969">{{Cite journal |display-authors=6 |first1=G. H. |last1=Pettengill |first2=I. I. |last2=Shapiro |first3=M. E. |last3=Ash |first4=R. P. |last4=Ingalls |first5=L. P. |last5=Rainville |first6=W. B. |last6=Smith |first7=M. L. |last7=Stone |date=May 1969 |title=Radar observations of Icarus |journal=Icarus |volume=10 |issue=3 |pages=432–435 |bibcode=1969Icar...10..432P |doi= 10.1016/0019-1035(69)90101-8 |issn=0019-1035}}</ref> and the [[Goldstone Tracking Station]].<ref name="Goldstein-1968">{{Cite journal |last=Goldstein |first= R. M. |date=November 1968 |title=Radar Observations of Icarus |journal=Science |volume=162 |issue=3856 |pages=903–904(SciHomepage) |bibcode=1968Sci...162..903G |doi=10.1126/science.162.3856.903 |pmid=17769079|s2cid=129644095 }}</ref> This was the first close approach predicted years in advance (Icarus had been discovered in 1949), and also earned significant public attention, due to alarmist news reports.<ref name="Marsden1998"/> A year before the approach, MIT students launched Project Icarus, devising a plan to deflect the asteroid with rockets in case it was found to be on a collision course with Earth.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/175/1 |title=Giant bombs on giant rockets: Project Icarus |author=Dwayne A. Day |work=The Space Review |date=July 5, 2004 |access-date=2017-11-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160415041026/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/175/1 |archive-date=2016-04-15 }}</ref> Project Icarus received wide media coverage, and inspired the 1979 disaster movie ''[[Meteor (film)|Meteor]]'', in which the US and the USSR join forces to blow up an Earth-bound fragment of an asteroid hit by a comet.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://tech.mit.edu/V99/PDF/V99-N43.pdf |title=MIT Course precept for movie |work=The Tech |publisher=MIT |date=October 30, 1979 |access-date=2017-11-15 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140811005933/http://tech.mit.edu/V99/PDF/V99-N43.pdf |archive-date=2014-08-11 }}</ref>


If a near-Earth object is near the part of its orbit closest to Earth's at the same time Earth is at the part of its orbit closest to the near-Earth object's orbit, the object has a close approach, or, if the orbits intersect, could even impact the Earth or its atmosphere.
On March 23, 1989, the {{convert|300|m|ft|abbr=on}} diameter Apollo asteroid [[4581 Asclepius]] (1989 FC) missed the Earth by {{convert|700,000|km|mi|abbr=on}}. If the asteroid had impacted it would have created the largest explosion in recorded history, equivalent to 20,000 [[TNT equivalent|megatons of TNT]]. It attracted widespread attention because it was discovered only after the closest approach.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/20/us/big-asteroid-passes-near-earth-unseen-in-a-rare-close-call.html |title=Big Asteroid Passes Near Earth Unseen In a Rare Close Call |author=Warren E. Leary |work=The New York Times |date=April 20, 1989 |access-date=2017-11-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171109191344/http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/20/us/big-asteroid-passes-near-earth-unseen-in-a-rare-close-call.html |archive-date=2017-11-09 }}</ref>


==== Close approaches ====
In March 1998, early orbit calculations for recently discovered asteroid {{mpl|(35396) 1997 XF|11}} showed a potential 2028 close approach {{convert |0.00031 |AU |km |abbr=on |lk=off}} from the Earth, well within the orbit of the Moon, but with a large error margin allowing for a direct hit. Further data allowed a revision of the 2028 approach distance to {{convert |0.0064 |AU |km |abbr=on |lk=off}}, with no chance of collision. By that time, inaccurate reports of a potential impact had caused a media storm.<ref name="Marsden1998">{{cite news |date=March 29, 1998 |title=How the Asteroid Story Hit: An Astronomer Reveals How a Discovery Spun Out of Control |work=Boston Globe |author=Brian G. Marsden |author-link=Brian G. Marsden |url=http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/pressinfo/1997XF11Globe.html |access-date=2017-11-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120617210302/http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/pressinfo/1997XF11Globe.html |archive-date=June 17, 2012 }}</ref>
{{main|List of asteroid close approaches to Earth}}


{{As of|2019|5}}, only 23 comets have been observed to pass within {{convert|0.1|AU|km mi|abbr=on|lk=off}} of Earth, including 10 which are or have been short-period comets.<ref name="closest-NEC"/> Two of these near-Earth comets, Halley's Comet and [[73P/Schwassmann–Wachmann]], have been observed during multiple close approaches.<ref name="closest-NEC"/> The closest observed approach was 0.0151&nbsp;AU (5.88&nbsp;LD) for [[Lexell's Comet]] on July 1, 1770.<ref name="closest-NEC" /> After an orbit change due to a close approach of Jupiter in 1779, this object is no longer an NEC. The closest approach ever observed for a current short-period NEC is 0.0229&nbsp;AU (8.92&nbsp;LD) for [[55P/Tempel–Tuttle|Comet Tempel–Tuttle]] in 1366.<ref name="closest-NEC"/> Orbital calculations show that [[P/1999 J6 (SOHO)]], a faint [[sungrazing comet]] and confirmed short-period NEC observed only during its close approaches to the Sun,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sekanina |first1=Zdenek |last2=Chodas |first2=Paul W. |title=Origin of the Marsden and Kracht Groups of Sunskirting Comets. I. Association with Comet 96P/Machholz and Its Interplanetary Complex |journal=The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series |volume=151 |issue=2 |pages=551–586 |date=December 2005 |doi=10.1086/497374 |url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2005ApJS..161..551S/PUB_PDF |access-date=January 27, 2024 |bibcode=2005ApJS..161..551S |s2cid=85442034 }}</ref> passed Earth undetected at a distance of 0.0120&nbsp;AU (4.65&nbsp;LD) on June 12, 1999.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_lookup.html#/?sstr=1999%20J6&view=OPC |title=Small-Body Database Lookup. P/1999 J6 (SOHO) |publisher=NASA/JPL |date=April 16, 2021 |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref>
[[File:Asteroids-KnownNearEarthObjects-Animation-UpTo20180101.gif|thumb|center|600px|{{center|1=Known asteroids – as of January 2018<br />[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfvo-Ujb_qk Video (0:55; July 23, 2018)]}}]]


In 1937, {{convert|800|m|ft|abbr=on}} asteroid [[69230 Hermes]] was discovered when it passed the Earth at twice the [[Lunar distance|distance of the Moon]].<ref name="RadarHermes">{{cite web |title=Radar observations of long-lost asteroid 1937 UB (Hermes) |publisher=[[University of California, Los Angeles|UCLA]] |url=http://www2.ess.ucla.edu/~jlm/research/NEAs/Hermes/ |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230123110938/http://www2.ess.ucla.edu/~jlm/research/NEAs/Hermes/ |archive-date=January 23, 2023 }}</ref> On June 14, 1968, the {{convert|1.4|km|mi|abbr=on}} diameter asteroid [[1566 Icarus]] passed Earth at a distance of {{convert |0.042 |AU |km |abbr=on |lk=off}}, or 16 times the distance of the Moon.<ref name=jpl-close>{{cite web |url=https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_lookup.html#/?sstr=1566&view=OPC |title=Small-Body Database Lookup. 1566 Icarus (1949 MA) |publisher=NASA/JPL |date=January 20, 2024 |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> During this approach, Icarus became the first minor planet to be observed using [[radar]].<ref name="Pettengill-1969">{{Cite journal |display-authors=6 |first1=G. H. |last1=Pettengill |first2=I. I. |last2=Shapiro |first3=M. E. |last3=Ash |first4=R. P. |last4=Ingalls |first5=L. P. |last5=Rainville |first6=W. B. |last6=Smith |first7=M. L. |last7=Stone |date=May 1969 |title=Radar observations of Icarus |journal=[[Icarus (journal)|Icarus]] |volume=10 |issue=3 |pages=432–435 |bibcode=1969Icar...10..432P |doi= 10.1016/0019-1035(69)90101-8 |issn=0019-1035}}</ref><ref name="Goldstein-1968">{{Cite journal |last=Goldstein |first= R. M. |date=November 1968 |title=Radar Observations of Icarus |journal=[[Science (journal)|Science]] |volume=162 |issue=3856 |pages=903–904 |bibcode=1968Sci...162..903G |doi=10.1126/science.162.3856.903 |pmid=17769079|s2cid=129644095 }}</ref> This was the first close approach predicted years in advance, since Icarus had been discovered in 1949.<ref name="Marsden1998"/> The first near-Earth asteroid known to have passed Earth closer than the distance of the Moon was {{mpl|1991 BA|}}, a {{convert|5|-|10|m|ft|abbr=on}} body which passed at a distance of {{convert|170,000|km|mi|abbr=on}}.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=J. V. |last1=Scotti |first2=D. L. |last2=Rabinowitz |first3=B. G. |last3=Marsden |title=Near miss of the Earth by a small asteroid |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=354 |pages=287–289 |date=November 28, 1991 |issue=6351 |doi=10.1038/354287a0|bibcode=1991Natur.354..287S }}</ref> By the 2010s, each year, several mostly small NEOs pass Earth closer than the distance of the Moon.<ref name="closest-NEA"/>
=== Risk ===
[[File:Toutatis.jpg|thumb|Asteroid [[4179 Toutatis]] is a [[potentially hazardous object]] that passed within 4 [[lunar distance (astronomy)|lunar distances]] in September 2004 and currently has a minimum possible distance of 2.5 [[lunar distance (astronomy)|lunar distances]].]]


As astronomers became able to discover ever smaller and fainter and ever more numerous near-Earth objects, they began to routinely observe and catalogue close approaches.<ref name="closest-NEA"/> {{As of|2024|4}}, the closest approach without impact ever detected, other than [[meteor]]s or [[fireball (meteor)|fireballs]] that went through the atmosphere (see [[#Earth-grazers]] below), was an encounter with asteroid {{mpl|2020 VT|4}} on November 14, 2020.<ref name="NEO-close"/> The {{convert|5|-|11|m|ft|abbr=on}} NEA was detected receding from Earth; calculations showed that on the day before, it had a close approach at about {{convert|6750|km|mi|abbr=on}} from the Earth's centre, or about {{convert|380|km|mi|abbr=on}} above its surface.<ref name="EarthSky">{{cite news |title=This asteroid just skimmed Earth's atmosphere |url=https://earthsky.org/space/asteroid-2020-vt4-skimmed-atmosphere-fri-nov-13-2020 |first=Eddie |last=Irizarry |work=[[Earth & Sky|EarthSky]] |date= November 16, 2020 |access-date=January 25, 2024 }}</ref>
From the late 1990s, a typical frame of reference in searches for NEOs has been the scientific concept of [[risk]]. The risk that any near-Earth object poses is viewed having regard to both the [[culture]] and the [[technology]] of [[human society]]. Through history, humans have associated NEOs with changing risks, based on religious, philosophical or scientific views, as well as humanity's technological or economical capability to deal with such risks.<ref name="tsr20120514">
{{cite journal |last=Fernández Carril |first=Luis |title=The evolution of near Earth objects risk perception |journal=The Space Review |date=May 14, 2012 |url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2080/1 |access-date=2017-11-15 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170629205156/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2080/1 |archive-date=2017-06-29 }}</ref> Thus, NEOs have been seen as [[omen]]s of natural disasters or wars; harmless spectacles in an unchanging universe; the source of era-changing cataclysms<ref name="tsr20120514"/> or potentially poisonous fumes (during Earth's passage through the tail of Halley's Comet in 1910);<ref>{{cite news |author=Stuart Clark |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/across-the-universe/2012/dec/20/apocalypse-postponed-halley-comet |title=Apocalypse postponed: how Earth survived Halley's comet in 1910 |date=December 20, 2012 |work=The Guardian |access-date=2017-11-18 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171222021944/https://www.theguardian.com/science/across-the-universe/2012/dec/20/apocalypse-postponed-halley-comet |archive-date=2017-12-22 }}</ref> and finally as a possible cause of a crater-forming impact that could even cause [[extinction]] of humans and other life on Earth.<ref name="tsr20120514"/>


On November 8, 2011, asteroid {{mpl|(308635) 2005 YU|55}}, relatively large at about {{convert|400|m|ft|abbr=on}} in diameter, passed within {{convert|324930|km|mi|abbr=on}} (0.845 [[lunar distance|lunar distances]]) of Earth.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_lookup.html#/?sstr=2005YU55&view=OPC |title=Small-Body Database Lookup. 308635 (2005 YU55) |date=January 7, 2022 |publisher=NASA/JPL |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref>
The potential of catastrophic impacts by near-Earth comets was recognised as soon as the first orbit calculations provided an understanding of their orbits: in 1694, Edmond Halley presented a theory that [[Genesis flood narrative|Noah's flood]] in the [[Bible]] was caused by a comet impact.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jasoncolavito.com/halley-on-noahs-comet.html |title=Noah's Comet. Edmond Halley 1694 |author=Jason Colavito |access-date=2017-11-16 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171001192755/http://www.jasoncolavito.com/halley-on-noahs-comet.html |archive-date=2017-10-01 }}</ref> Human [[perception]] of near-Earth asteroids as benign objects of fascination or killer objects with high risk to [[human society]] has ebbed and flowed during the short time that NEAs have been scientifically observed.<ref name="wired20130323">{{cite news |last=Portree |first=David S. |title=Earth-Approaching Asteroids as Targets for Exploration (1978) |url=https://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/03/earth-approaching-asteroids-as-targets-for-exploration-1978/ |access-date=2017-11-09 |magazine=Wired |date=March 23, 2013 |quote=People in the early 21st century have been encouraged to see asteroids as the interplanetary equivalent of sea monsters. We often hear talk of “killer asteroids,” when in fact there exists no conclusive evidence that any asteroid has killed anyone in all of human history. … In the 1970s, asteroids had yet to gain their present fearsome reputation … most astronomers and planetary scientists who made a career of studying asteroids rightfully saw them as sources of fascination, not of worry. |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140112133317/http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/03/earth-approaching-asteroids-as-targets-for-exploration-1978/ |archive-date=2014-01-12 }}</ref> Scientists have recognised the threat of impacts that create craters much bigger than the impacting bodies and have indirect effects on an even wider area since the 1980s, after the confirmation of a theory that the [[Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event]] (in which the non-avian dinosaurs died out) 65 million years ago was caused by a [[Chicxulub crater|large asteroid impact]].<ref name="tsr20120514"/><ref name="Chapman1998">{{cite web |author=Clark R. Chapman |title=History of The Asteroid/Comet Impact Hazard |publisher=Southwest Research Institute |date=October 7, 1998 |url=http://www.boulder.swri.edu/clark/ncarhist.html |access-date=2018-03-18}}</ref>


On February 15, 2013, the {{convert|30|m|ft|abbr=on}} asteroid [[367943 Duende]] ({{mp|2012 DA|14}}) passed approximately {{convert|27700|km|mi|abbr=on}} above the surface of Earth, closer than satellites in geosynchronous orbit.<ref name="Duende-BBC">{{cite news |first=Jason |last=Palmer |title=Asteroid 2012 DA14 in record-breaking Earth pass |work=BBC News |publisher=[[BBC]] |date=February 15, 2013 |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-21442863 |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180217085054/http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-21442863 |archive-date=February 17, 2018 }}</ref> The asteroid was not visible to the unaided eye. This was the first sub-lunar close passage of an object discovered during a previous passage, and was thus the first to be predicted well in advance.<ref name="Duende-predict">{{cite news |title=Near-Earth Asteroid {{mp|2012 DA|14}} to Miss Earth on February 15, 2013 |work=News |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |first1=Paul |last1=Chodas |first2=Jon |last2=Giorgini |first3=Don |last3=Yeomans |name-list-style=amp |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news174.html |date=March 6, 2012 |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171222113153/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news174.html |archive-date=December 22, 2017 }}</ref>
The awareness of the wider public of the impact risk rose after the observation of the impact of the fragments of [[Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9]] into Jupiter in July 1994.<ref name="tsr20120514"/><ref name="Chapman1998"/> In 1998, the movies ''[[Deep Impact (film)|Deep Impact]]'' and ''[[Armageddon (1998 film)|Armageddon]]'' popularised the notion that near-Earth objects could cause catastrophic impacts.<ref name="Chapman1998"/> Also at that time, a [[conspiracy theory]] arose about the supposed 2003 impact of the fictitious [[Nibiru cataclysm|planet Nibiru]], which persisted on the internet as the predicted impact date was moved to 2012 and then 2017.<ref name="Molloy2017">{{cite news |last=Molloy |first=Mark |title=Nibiru: How the nonsense Planet X Armageddon and Nasa fake news theories spread globally |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/21/nibiru-nonsense-planet-x-armageddon-nasa-fake-news-theories/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/21/nibiru-nonsense-planet-x-armageddon-nasa-fake-news-theories/ |archive-date=2022-01-11 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |work=The Daily Telegraph |date=September 22, 2017 |access-date=2018-03-18}}{{cbignore}}</ref>


{{wide image|File:Objects_between_earth_and_moon.jpg|2250px|Diagram showing spacecraft and asteroids (past and future) between the Earth and the Moon}}
==== Risk scales ====


==== Earth-grazers ====
There are two schemes for the scientific classification of impact hazards from NEOs:
* the simple [[Torino scale]], which rates the risks of impacts in the next 100 years according to impact energy and impact probability, using integer numbers between 0 and 10;<ref name="torino">{{cite web <!-- Citation bot-->|url=http://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/torino_scale.html |title=Torino Impact Hazard Scale |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |access-date=2017-11-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|title=Torino Impact Hazard Scale |journal=Planetary and Space Science |volume=48 |issue=4 |pages=297–303 |bibcode=2000P&SS...48..297B |last1=Binzel |first1=Richard P. |year=2000 |doi=10.1016/S0032-0633(00)00006-4 }}</ref> and
* the more complex [[Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale]], which ascribes ratings that can be any positive or negative real number; these ratings depend on the background impact frequency, impact probability and time until possible impact.<ref name="palermo"/>


Some small asteroids that enter the upper atmosphere of Earth at a shallow angle remain intact and leave the atmosphere again, continuing on a solar orbit. During the passage through the atmosphere, due to the burning of its surface, such an object can be observed as an [[Earth-grazing fireball]].
On both scales, risks of any concern are indicated by values above zero.<ref name="torino"/><ref name="palermo"/>


On August 10, 1972, a meteor that became known as the [[1972 Great Daylight Fireball]] was witnessed by many people and even filmed as it moved north over the [[Rocky Mountains]] from the U.S. Southwest to Canada.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M8LQ7_hWtE |title=Grand Teton Meteor (video) |work=[[YouTube]] |date=10 November 2007 |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170214110154/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M8LQ7_hWtE |archive-date=February 14, 2017 }}</ref> It passed within {{convert|58|km|mi|abbr=on}} of the Earth's surface.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Z. |last=Ceplecha |title=Earth-grazing daylight fireball of August 10, 1972 |date=March 1994 |journal=[[Astronomy & Astrophysics]] |volume=283 |issue=1 |pages=287−288 |url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/1994A%26A...283..287C/ADS_PDF |access-date=February 18, 2024 |bibcode=1994A&A...283..287C }}</ref>
==== Magnitude of risk ====
The annual background frequency used in the Palermo scale for impacts of energy greater than ''E'' [[megatonne]]s is estimated as:<ref name="palermo"/>


On October 13, 1990, [[Earth-grazing meteoroid of 13 October 1990|Earth-grazing meteoroid EN131090]] was observed above Czechoslovakia and Poland, moving at {{convert|41.74|km/s|mi/s|abbr=on}} along a {{convert|409|km|mi|adj=on|abbr=on}} trajectory from south to north. The closest approach to the Earth was {{convert|98.67|km|mi|abbr=on}} above the surface. It was captured by two all-sky cameras of the [[European Fireball Network]], which for the first time enabled geometric calculations of the orbit of such a body.<ref name="AA">{{cite journal |last1=Borovička |first1=J. |last2=Ceplecha |first2=Z. |title=Earth-grazing fireball of October 13, 1990 |journal=Astronomy & Astrophysics |volume=257 |issue=1 |pages=323–328 |url=https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1992A%26A...257..323B |access-date=January 27, 2024 |date=April 1992 |bibcode=1992A&A...257..323B |issn=0004-6361 }}</ref>
:<math>f_B = 0.03E^{-0.8} \;</math>


==== Impacts ====
For instance, this formula implies that the [[expected value]] of the time from now until the next impact greater than 1 megatonne is 33 years, and that when it occurs, there is a 50% chance that it will be above 2.4 megatonnes. This formula is only valid over a certain range of ''E''.
{{main|Impact event}}
{{see also|List of predicted asteroid impacts on Earth}}


When a near-Earth object impacts Earth, objects up to a few tens of metres across ordinarily explode in the [[Mesosphere|upper atmosphere]] (usually harmlessly), with most or all of the solids [[Evaporation|vaporized]] and only small amounts of meteorites arriving to the Earth surface, while larger objects hit the water surface, forming [[tsunami]] waves, or the solid surface, forming [[impact crater]]s.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chapman |first1= Clark R. |last2=Morrison |first2= David |name-list-style=amp |title=Impacts on the Earth by asteroids and comets: Assessing the hazard |journal=Nature |volume=367 |issue=6458 |pages=33–40 |date=January 6, 1994 |bibcode=1994Natur.367...33C |doi=10.1038/367033a0|s2cid=4305299 |url=https://zenodo.org/records/1233151/files/article.pdf |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref>
However, another paper<ref>{{cite journal |title=The flux of small near-Earth objects colliding with the Earth |author=P. Brown|display-authors=etal|journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=420 |issue=6913 |pages=294–296 |date=November 2002|bibcode=2002Natur.420..294B |doi=10.1038/nature01238 |pmid=12447433 |s2cid=4380864}}</ref> published in 2002 – the same year as the paper on that the Palermo scale is based – found a power law with different constants:

The frequency of impacts of objects of various sizes is estimated on the basis of orbit simulations of NEO populations, the frequency of impact craters on the Earth and the Moon, and the frequency of close encounters.<ref name="Collins2005">{{cite journal |last1=Collins |first1=Gareth S. |last2=Melosh |first2=H. Jay |last3=Marcus |first3=Robert A. |title=Earth Impact Effects Program: A Web-based computer program for calculating the regional environmental consequences of a meteoroid impact on Earth |journal=[[Meteoritics & Planetary Science]] |volume=40 |number=6 |pages=817–840 |date=June 2005 |doi=10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00157.x |url=https://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEarth/ImpactEffects/effects.pdf |access-date=January 27, 2024 |bibcode=2005M&PS...40..817C |hdl=10044/1/11554 |s2cid=13891988 |hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Asher2005">{{cite journal |last1=Asher |first1=D. J. |last2=Bailey |first2=M. |last3=Emel'Yanenko |first3=V. |last4=Napier |first4=W. |title=Earth in the Cosmic Shooting Gallery |journal=[[The Observatory (journal)|The Observatory]] |volume=125 |issue=2 |pages=319–322 |date=October 2005 |url=https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2005Obs...125..319A |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220214090951/https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2005Obs...125..319A |archive-date=February 14, 2022 |bibcode=2005Obs...125..319A }}</ref> The study of impact craters indicates that impact frequency has been more or less steady for the past 3.5&nbsp;billion years, which requires a steady replenishment of the NEO population from the [[asteroid main belt]].<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/> One impact model based on widely accepted NEO population models estimates the average time between the impact of two stony asteroids with a diameter of at least {{convert|4|m|ft|abbr=on}} at about one year; for asteroids {{convert|7|m|ft|abbr=on}} across (which impacts with as much energy as the atomic bomb dropped on [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima]], approximately 15 kilotonnes of TNT) at five years, for asteroids {{convert|60|m|ft|abbr=on}} across (an impact energy of 10 [[megatons]], comparable to the [[Tunguska event]] in 1908) at 1,300 years, for asteroids {{convert|1|km|mi|abbr=on}} across at 440 thousand years, and for asteroids {{convert|5|km|mi|abbr=on}} across at 18 million years.<ref name="Earth-impact"/> Some other models estimate similar impact frequencies,<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/> while others calculate higher frequencies.<ref name="Asher2005"/> For Tunguska-sized (10 megaton) impacts, the estimates range from one event every 2,000–3,000 years to one event every 300 years.<ref name="Asher2005"/>

{{wide image|SmallAsteroidImpacts-Frequency-Bolide-20141114.jpg|600px|align-cap=center|Location and impact energy of small asteroids impacting Earth's atmosphere}}

The second-largest observed event after the Tunguska meteor was a 1.1 megaton air blast in 1963 near the [[Prince Edward Islands]] between South Africa and Antarctica, which was detected only by [[infrasound]] sensors.<ref name="David_spacecom"/> However this may have been a [[nuclear test]].<ref name=Allen>{{cite journal |title=Antarctic Explosion Could Have Been Nuclear Detonation |journal=The San Bernardino Sun |issue=Dec 4|year=1963 |pages=40 column f|url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=SBS19631204.1.40&e=-------en--20--1--txt-txIN--------1|last1=Allen|first1=Robert S.}}</ref><ref name=silber>{{cite journal |first1=Elizabeth A. |last1=Silber |first2=Douglas O. |last2=Revelle |first3=Peter G. |last3=Brown |first4=Wayne N. |last4=Edwards |title=An estimate of the terrestrial influx of large meteoroids from infrasonic measurements |journal=[[Journal of Geophysical Research]] |volume=114 |issue=E8 |year=2009 |doi=10.1029/2009JE003334 |doi-access=free |bibcode=2009JGRE..114.8006S}}</ref> The third-largest, but by far best-observed impact, was the [[Chelyabinsk meteor]] of 15 February 2013. A previously unknown {{convert|20|m|ft|abbr=on}} asteroid exploded above this Russian city with an equivalent blast yield of 400–500 kilotons.<ref name="David_spacecom">{{cite news |url=http://www.space.com/23423-russian-fireball-meteor-airburst-risk.html |title=Russian fireball explosion shows meteor risk greater than thought |last=David |first=Leonard |date=November 1, 2013 |work=Space.com |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170819031019/https://www.space.com/23423-russian-fireball-meteor-airburst-risk.html |archive-date=August 19, 2017 }}</ref> The calculated orbit of the pre-impact asteroid is similar to that of Apollo asteroid {{mpl|2011 EO|40}}, making the latter the meteor's possible parent body.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Reconstructing the Chelyabinsk event: Pre-impact orbital evolution |first1=C. |last1=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |first2=R. |last2=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |date=September 1, 2014 |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters |volume=443 |issue=1 |pages=L39–L43 |arxiv=1405.7202 |bibcode=2014MNRAS.443L..39D |doi=10.1093/mnrasl/slu078 |doi-access=free |s2cid=118417667 }}</ref>

[[File:Sar2667 as it entered Earth's atmosphere over the north of France.jpg|thumb|Seven hours after discovery, {{mpl|2023 CX|1}} burns up as a meteor over northern France]]
On October 7, 2008, 20 hours after it was first observed and 11 hours after its trajectory has been calculated and announced, {{convert|4|m|ft|abbr=on}} asteroid {{mpl|2008 TC|3}} blew up {{convert|37|km|sigfig=2|abbr=on}} above the [[Nubian Desert]] in Sudan. It was the first time that an asteroid was observed and its impact was predicted prior to its entry into the atmosphere as a [[meteor]]. 10.7&nbsp;kg of meteorites were recovered after the impact.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Shaddad |first1=Muawia H. |display-authors=etal |title=The recovery of asteroid {{mp|2008 TC|3}} |journal=Meteoritics & Planetary Science |volume=45 |issue=10–11 |pages=1557–1589 |date=October 2010 |doi=10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01116.x |bibcode=2010M&PS...45.1557S |url=http://asima.seti.org/2008TC3/papers/maps1116-1296.pdf |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304185539/http://asima.seti.org/2008TC3/papers/maps1116-1296.pdf |archive-date=March 4, 2016 |doi-access=free }}</ref> {{As of|2024|09}}, nine impacts have been predicted, all of them small bodies that produced meteor explosions,<ref name="Spacecom240904">{{cite news |title=Tiny asteroid burns up over Philippines. 'Discovered this morning,' ESA says |work=Space.com |first1=Brett |last1=Tingley |date=September 4, 2024 |url=https://www.space.com/asteroid-earth-impact-september-2024-rw1 |access-date=2024-09-05}}</ref> with some impacts in remote areas only detected by the [[Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization]]'s [[Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization#International Monitoring System (IMS)|International Monitoring System (IMS)]], a network of infrasound sensors designed to detect the detonation of nuclear devices.<ref name="S&T140102">{{cite news |title=Small asteroid 2014&nbsp;AA hits Earth |magazine=[[Sky & Telescope]] |first1=Kelly |last1=Beatty |date=January 2, 2014 |url=http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/small-asteroid-2014-aa-hitsearth/ |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref> [[Asteroid impact prediction]] remains in its infancy and successfully predicted asteroid impacts are rare. The vast majority of impacts recorded by IMS are not predicted.<ref>{{cite web |title=Fireballs. Fireball and Bolide Data |date=December 30, 2023 |publisher=NASA/JPL |url=http://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/fireballs/ |access-date=January 25, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240120155455/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/fireballs/ |archive-date=January 20, 2024 }}</ref>

Observed impacts aren't restricted to the surface and atmosphere of Earth. Dust-sized NEOs have impacted man-made spacecraft, including the space probe [[Long Duration Exposure Facility]], which collected [[interplanetary dust cloud|interplanetary dust]] in low Earth orbit for six years from 1984.<ref name="Rubin2010"/> Impacts on the Moon can be observed as flashes of light with a typical duration of a fraction of a second.<ref name="NASA-lunar-impacts"/> The first lunar impacts were recorded during the 1999 Leonid storm.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Rubio |first1=Luis R. Bellot |last2=Ortiz |first2=Jose L. |last3=Sada |first3=Pedro V. |title=Observation and Interpretation of Meteoroid Impact Flashes on the Moon |editor1-last=Jenniskens |editor1-first=P. |editor2-last=Rietmeijer |editor2-first=F. |editor3-last=Brosch |editor3-first=N. |editor4-last=Fonda |editor4-first=M. |display-editors=1 |encyclopedia=Leonid Storm Research |publisher=Springer |location=Dordrecht |year=2000 |pages=575–598 |isbn=978-90-481-5624-5 |doi=10.1007/978-94-017-2071-7_42 |bibcode=2000lsr..book..575B |s2cid=118392496 }}</ref> Subsequently, several continuous monitoring programs were launched.<ref name="NASA-lunar-impacts">{{cite web |title=Lunar Impact Monitoring Program |publisher=NASA |url=https://www.nasa.gov/meteoroid-environment-office/about-lunar-impact-monitoring/ |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240127144250/https://www.nasa.gov/meteoroid-environment-office/about-lunar-impact-monitoring/ |archive-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref><ref name="2013-lunar-impact"/><ref name="ESA-lunar-impacts">{{cite web |title=About the NELIOTA project |publisher=ESA |url=https://neliota.astro.noa.gr/About/Project |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref> A lunar impact that was observed on September 11, 2013, lasted 8 seconds, was likely caused by an object {{convert|0.6–1.4|m|ft|abbr=on}} in diameter,<ref name="2013-lunar-impact">{{cite news |first=Michele |last=Catanzaro |title=Largest lunar impact caught by astronomers |date=February 24, 2014 |journal=Nature |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2014.14773 |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211004133116/https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2014.14773 |archive-date=October 4, 2021 }}</ref> and created a new crater {{convert|40|m|ft|abbr=on}} across, was the largest ever observed {{as of|lc=y|2019|07}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=MIDAS: Moon Impacts Detection and Analysis System. Main Results |work=Meteoroides.NET |url=http://www.meteoroides.net/e_midas_results.html |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref>

=== Risk ===
{{seealso|Asteroid impact prediction}}
[[File:Toutatis.jpg|thumb|Asteroid [[4179 Toutatis]], a [[potentially hazardous object]] that passed within 4 [[lunar distance (astronomy)|lunar distances]] in September 2004 and currently has a minimum possible distance of 2.5 lunar distances]]

Through human history, the [[risk]] that any near-Earth object poses has been viewed having regard to both the [[culture]] and the [[technology]] of [[human society]]. Through history, humans have associated NEOs with changing risks, based on religious, philosophical or scientific views, as well as humanity's technological or economical capability to deal with such risks.<ref name="tsr20120514">
{{cite journal |last=Fernández Carril |first=Luis |title=The evolution of near Earth objects risk perception |journal=[[The Space Review]] |date=May 14, 2012 |url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2080/1 |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170629205156/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2080/1 |archive-date=June 29, 2017 }}</ref> Thus, NEOs have been seen as [[omen]]s of natural disasters or wars; harmless spectacles in an unchanging universe; the source of era-changing cataclysms<ref name="tsr20120514"/> or potentially poisonous fumes (during Earth's passage through the tail of Halley's Comet in 1910);<ref>{{cite news |first=Stuart |last=Clark |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/across-the-universe/2012/dec/20/apocalypse-postponed-halley-comet |title=Apocalypse postponed: how Earth survived Halley's comet in 1910 |date=December 20, 2012 |work=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171222021944/https://www.theguardian.com/science/across-the-universe/2012/dec/20/apocalypse-postponed-halley-comet |archive-date=December 22, 2017 }}</ref> and finally as a possible cause of a crater-forming impact that could even cause [[extinction]] of humans and other life on Earth.<ref name="tsr20120514"/>

The potential of catastrophic impacts by near-Earth comets was recognised as soon as the first orbit calculations provided an understanding of their orbits: in 1694, Edmond Halley presented a theory that [[Genesis flood narrative|Noah's flood]] in the [[Bible]] was caused by a comet impact.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jasoncolavito.com/halley-on-noahs-comet.html |title=Noah's Comet. Edmond Halley 1694 |first=Jason |last=Colavito |work=Jasoncolavito.com |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171001192755/http://www.jasoncolavito.com/halley-on-noahs-comet.html |archive-date=October 1, 2017 }}</ref>

Human [[perception]] of near-Earth asteroids as benign objects of fascination or killer objects with high risk to [[human society]] has ebbed and flowed during the short time that NEAs have been scientifically observed.<ref name="wired20130323">{{cite news |last=Portree |first=David S. |title=Earth-Approaching Asteroids as Targets for Exploration (1978) |url=https://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/03/earth-approaching-asteroids-as-targets-for-exploration-1978/ |access-date=January 26, 2023 |magazine=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]] |date=March 23, 2013 |quote=People in the early 21st century have been encouraged to see asteroids as the interplanetary equivalent of sea monsters. We often hear talk of “killer asteroids,” when in fact there exists no conclusive evidence that any asteroid has killed anyone in all of human history. … In the 1970s, asteroids had yet to gain their present fearsome reputation … most astronomers and planetary scientists who made a career of studying asteroids rightfully saw them as sources of fascination, not of worry. |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140112133317/http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/03/earth-approaching-asteroids-as-targets-for-exploration-1978/ |archive-date=January 12, 2014 }}</ref> The 1937 close approach of Hermes and the 1968 close approach of Icarus first raised impact concerns among scientists. Icarus earned significant public attention due to alarmist news reports. while Hermes was considered a threat because it was lost after its discovery; thus its orbit and potential for collision with Earth were not known precisely.<ref name="Marsden1998"/> Hermes, having a period of 2.13 years, was only re-discovered in 2003, and it is now known to be no threat for at least the next century.<ref name="RadarHermes"/>

Scientists have recognised the threat of impacts that create craters much bigger than the impacting bodies and have indirect effects on an even wider area since the 1980s, with mounting evidence for the theory that the [[Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event]] (in which the non-avian dinosaurs died out) 65 million years ago was caused by a [[Chicxulub crater|large asteroid impact]].<ref name="tsr20120514"/><ref name="Chapman1998">{{cite web |first=Clark R. |last=Chapman |title=History of The Asteroid/Comet Impact Hazard |publisher=Southwest Research Institute |date=October 7, 1998 |url=http://www.boulder.swri.edu/clark/ncarhist.html |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> On March 23, 1989, the {{convert|300|m|ft|abbr=on}} diameter Apollo asteroid [[4581 Asclepius]] (1989 FC) missed the Earth by {{convert|700,000|km|mi|abbr=on}}. If the asteroid had impacted it would have created the largest explosion in recorded history, equivalent to 20,000 [[TNT equivalent|megatons of TNT]]. It attracted widespread attention because it was discovered only after the closest approach.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/20/us/big-asteroid-passes-near-earth-unseen-in-a-rare-close-call.html |title=Big Asteroid Passes Near Earth Unseen In a Rare Close Call |first=Warren E. |last=Leary |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=April 20, 1989 |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171109191344/http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/20/us/big-asteroid-passes-near-earth-unseen-in-a-rare-close-call.html |archive-date=November 9, 2017 }}</ref>

From the 1990s, a typical frame of reference in searches for NEOs has been the scientific concept of [[risk]]. The awareness of the wider public of the impact risk rose after the observation of the impact of the fragments of [[Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9]] into Jupiter in July 1994.<ref name="tsr20120514"/><ref name="Chapman1998"/> In March 1998, early orbit calculations for recently discovered asteroid {{mpl|(35396) 1997 XF|11}} showed a potential 2028 close approach {{convert |0.00031 |AU |km |abbr=on |lk=off}} from the Earth, well within the orbit of the Moon, but with a large error margin allowing for a direct hit. Further data allowed a revision of the 2028 approach distance to {{convert |0.0064 |AU |km |abbr=on |lk=off}}, with no chance of collision. By that time, inaccurate reports of a potential impact had caused a media storm.<ref name="Marsden1998">{{cite news |date=March 29, 1998 |title=How the Asteroid Story Hit: An Astronomer Reveals How a Discovery Spun Out of Control |work=[[The Boston Globe]] |first=Brian G. |last=Marsden |author-link=Brian G. Marsden |url=http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/pressinfo/1997XF11Globe.html |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120617210302/http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/pressinfo/1997XF11Globe.html |archive-date=June 17, 2012 }}</ref>

In 1998, the movies ''[[Deep Impact (film)|Deep Impact]]'' and ''[[Armageddon (1998 film)|Armageddon]]'' popularised the notion that near-Earth objects could cause catastrophic impacts.<ref name="Chapman1998"/> Also at that time, a scare arose about a supposed 2003 impact of a planet called [[Nibiru cataclysm|Nibiru]] with Earth, which persisted on the internet as the predicted impact date was moved to 2012 and then 2017.<ref name="Molloy2017">{{cite news |last=Molloy |first=Mark |title=Nibiru: How the nonsense Planet X Armageddon and Nasa fake news theories spread globally |date=September 24, 2017 |work=[[The Daily Telegraph]] |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/21/nibiru-nonsense-planet-x-armageddon-nasa-fake-news-theories/ |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/21/nibiru-nonsense-planet-x-armageddon-nasa-fake-news-theories/ |archive-date=January 11, 2022 }}{{cbignore}}</ref>

==== Risk scales ====


There are two schemes for the scientific classification of impact hazards from NEOs, as a way to communicate the risk of impacts to the general public.
:<math>f_B = 0.00737 E^{-0.9} \;</math>
[[Image:Torino scale.svg|right|thumb|300px|The [[Torino scale]]. The scale in metres is the approximate diameter of an asteroid with a typical collision velocity. The x-axis is probability of an impact in the next 100 years.]]
The simple [[Torino scale]] was established at an IAU workshop in Torino in June 1999, in the wake of the public confusion about the impact risk of {{mpl|1997 XF|11}}.<ref name="NEO-IAU">{{cite conference |first=Hans |last=Rickman |date=2001 |title=NEO Research and the IAU |pages=97–102 |conference=International Workshop on Collaboration and Coordination among NEO Observers and Orbital Computers |location=Kurshiki City Art Museum, Japan |publisher=IAU |editor-first1=Syuzo |editor-last1=Isobe |editor-first2=Yoshifusa |editor-last2=Asakuro |url=https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2001ccno.conf...97Rs |access-date=February 22, 2024 |bibcode=2001ccno.conf...97R }}</ref> It rates the risks of impacts in the next 100 years according to impact energy and impact probability, using integer numbers between 0 and 10:<ref name="torino">{{cite web |url=http://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/torino_scale.html |title=Torino Impact Hazard Scale |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |access-date=February 21, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240103160751/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/torino_scale.html |archive-date=January 3, 2024 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Torino Impact Hazard Scale |journal=Planetary and Space Science |volume=48 |issue=4 |pages=297–303 |bibcode=2000P&SS...48..297B |last1=Binzel |first1=Richard P. |year=2000 |doi=10.1016/S0032-0633(00)00006-4 }}</ref>
* ratings of 0 and 1 are of little concern, with a probability less than 1% of an impact in the next 100 years,
* ratings of 2 to 4 are used for events with increasing magnitude of concern to astronomers trying to make more precise orbit calculations,
* ratings of 5 to 7 are meant for impacts of increasing magnitude which are not certain but warrant public concern and governmental contingency planning,
* 8 to 10 would be used for certain collisions of increasing severity.


The more complex [[Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale]], established in 2002, compares the likelihood of an impact at a certain date to the probable number of impacts of a similar energy or greater until the possible impact, and takes the [[logarithm]] of this ratio. Thus, a Palermo scale rating can be any positive or negative real number, and risks of any concern are indicated by values above zero. Unlike the Torino scale, the Palermo scale is not sensitive to newly discovered small objects with an orbit known with low confidence.<ref name="palermo">{{cite web |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/palermo_scale.html |title=Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |access-date=February 21, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231001191140/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/palermo_scale.html |archive-date=October 1, 2023 }}</ref>
This formula gives considerably lower rates for a given ''E''. For instance, it gives the rate for [[bolide]]s of 10 megatonnes or more (like the [[Tunguska explosion]]) as 1 per thousand years, rather than 1 per 210 years as in the Palermo formula. However, the authors give a rather large uncertainty (once in 400 to 1800 years for 10 megatonnes), due in part to uncertainties in determining the energies of the atmospheric impacts that they used in their determination.


==== Highly rated risks ====
==== Highly rated risks ====


[[NASA]] maintains an automated system to evaluate the threat from known NEOs over the next 100 years, which generates the continuously updated [[Sentry Risk Table]].<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks" /> All or nearly all of the objects are highly likely to drop off the list eventually as more observations come in, reducing the uncertainties and enabling more accurate orbital predictions.<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/><ref name="2006HZ51">{{cite news |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9095-big-new-asteroid-has-slim-chance-of-hitting-earth.html |title=Big new asteroid has slim chance of hitting Earth |author=David Chandler |work=New Scientist |date=May 2, 2006 |access-date=2017-11-10 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150531181008/http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9095-big-new-asteroid-has-slim-chance-of-hitting-earth.html |archive-date=2015-05-31 }}</ref>
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration [[NASA]] maintains an automated system to evaluate the threat from known NEOs over the next 100 years, which generates the continuously updated [[Sentry Risk Table]].<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks" /> All or nearly all of the objects are highly likely to drop off the list eventually as more observations come in, reducing the uncertainties and enabling more accurate orbital predictions.<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/><ref name="2006HZ51">{{cite news |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9095-big-new-asteroid-has-slim-chance-of-hitting-earth.html |title=Big new asteroid has slim chance of hitting Earth |first=David |last=Chandler |work=New Scientist |date=May 2, 2006 |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150531181008/http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9095-big-new-asteroid-has-slim-chance-of-hitting-earth.html |archive-date=May 31, 2015 }}</ref> A similar table is maintained on [[NEODyS]] (Near Earth Objects Dynamic Site) by the [[European Space Agency]] (ESA).<ref>{{cite web |title=NEODyS-2 Risk List |url=https://newton.spacedys.com/neodys/index.php?pc=4.1 |website=NEODyS-2 |publisher=ESA |access-date=February 18, 2024 }}</ref>


In March 2002, {{mpl|(163132) 2002 CU|11}} became the first asteroid with a temporarily positive rating on the Torino Scale, with about a 1 in 9,300 chance of an impact in 2049.<ref>{{cite news |author1=Andrea Milani |author2=Giovanni Valsecchi |author3=Maria Eugenia Sansaturio |title=The problem with 2002 CU11 |work=Tumbling Stone |volume=12 |publisher=[[NEODyS]] |date=March 12, 2002 |url=http://spaceguard.rm.iasf.cnr.it/tumblingstone/issues/num12/eng/2002cu11.htm |access-date=2018-01-29 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304023838/http://spaceguard.rm.iasf.cnr.it/tumblingstone/issues/num12/eng/2002cu11.htm |archive-date=2016-03-04 }}</ref> Additional observations reduced the estimated risk to zero, and the asteroid was removed from the Sentry Risk Table in April 2002.<ref name="removed">{{cite web |title=Date/Time Removed |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/removed.html |access-date=2018-02-26 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171017180942/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/removed.html |archive-date=2017-10-17 }}</ref> It is now known that within the next two centuries, {{mp|2002 CU|11}} will pass the Earth at a safe closest distance (perigee) of {{convert|0.00425|AU|km mi|abbr=on|lk=off}} on August 31, 2080.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=2002CU11;cad=1#cad |title=163132 (2002 CU11). Close-Approach Data |publisher=NASA/JPL |date=April 6, 2017 |access-date=2018-01-29}}</ref>
In March 2002, {{mpl|(163132) 2002 CU|11}} became the first asteroid with a temporarily positive rating on the Torino Scale, with about a 1 in 9,300 chance of an impact in 2049.<ref>{{cite news |first1=Andrea |last1=Milani |first2=Giovanni |last2=Valsecchi |first3=Maria Eugenia |last3=Sansaturio |title=The problem with 2002 CU11 |work=Tumbling Stone |volume=12 |publisher=[[NEODyS]] |date=March 12, 2002 |url=http://spaceguard.rm.iasf.cnr.it/tumblingstone/issues/num12/eng/2002cu11.htm |access-date=January 29, 2018 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304023838/http://spaceguard.rm.iasf.cnr.it/tumblingstone/issues/num12/eng/2002cu11.htm |archive-date=March 4, 2016 }}</ref> Additional observations reduced the estimated risk to zero, and the asteroid was removed from the Sentry Risk Table in April 2002.<ref name="removed">{{cite web |title=Date/Time Removed |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/removed.html |date=January 24, 2024 |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240126214410/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/removed.html |archive-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> It is now known that within the next two centuries, {{mp|2002 CU|11}} will pass the Earth at a safe closest distance (perigee) of {{convert|0.00425|AU|km mi|abbr=on|lk=off}} on August 31, 2080.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_lookup.html#/?sstr=2002CU11&view=OPC |title=Small-Body Database Lookup. 163132 (2002 CU11) |publisher=NASA/JPL |date=September 13, 2023 |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref>


[[File:1950 DA (color).png|thumb|Radar image of asteroid {{mpl-|29075|1950 DA}}]]
[[File:1950 DA (color).png|thumb|Radar image of asteroid {{mpl|29075|1950 DA}}]]
Asteroid {{mpl-|29075|1950 DA}} was lost after its 1950 discovery, since its observations over just 17 days were insufficient to precisely determine its orbit; it was rediscovered on December 31, 2000. It has a diameter of about a kilometer (0.6 miles), and an impact would therefore be globally catastrophic. It was observed by radar during its close 2001 approach, allowing much more precise orbit calculations. Although this asteroid will not strike for at least 800 years and thus has no Torino scale rating, it was added to the Sentry list in April 2002 as the first object with a Palermo scale value greater than zero.<ref name="IAU-NEOs"/><ref name="NEO-1950DA">{{cite web |title=Asteroid 1950 DA |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |url=http://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/1950da/ |access-date=2017-11-09}}</ref> The then-calculated 1 in 300 maximum chance of impact and +0.17 Palermo scale value was roughly 50% greater than the background risk of impact by all similarly large objects until 2880.<ref name=Giorgini2002>{{cite journal |last1=Giorgini |first1=J. D. |last2=Ostro |first2=S. J. |last3=Benner |first3=L. A. M. |last4=Chodas |first4=P. W. |last5=Chesley |first5=S. R. |last6=Hudson |first6=R. S. |last7=Nolan |first7=M. C. |last8=Klemola |first8=A. R. |last9=Standish |first9=E. M. |last10=Jurgens |first10=R. F. |last11=Rose |first11=R |last12=Chamberlin |first12=A. B. |last13=Yeomans |first13=D. K. |last14=Margot |first14=J. L. |date=April 5, 2002 |title=Asteroid 1950 DA's Encounter with Earth in 2880: Physical Limits of Collision Probability Prediction |journal=[[Science (journal)|Science]] |volume=296 |pages=132–136 |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/doc/1950da/1950da_published.pdf |access-date=2017-11-09 |doi=10.1126/science.1068191 |pmid=11935024 |issue=5565|bibcode = 2002Sci...296..132G |s2cid=8689246 |display-authors=8 }}</ref> Uncertainties in the orbit calculations were further reduced using additional radar observations in 2012, and this decreased the odds of an impact.<ref name=Farnocchia2013>{{Cite journal |last1=Farnocchia |first1=Davide |last2=Chesley |first2=Steven R. |title=Assessment of the 2880 impact threat from asteroid (29075) 1950 DA |date=2013 |arxiv=1310.0861 |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2013.09.022 |bibcode=2014Icar..229..321F |volume=229 |journal=Icarus |pages=321–327|s2cid=56453734 }}</ref> Taking all radar and optical observations through 2021 into account, the probability of impact in March 2880 is, {{As of|2022|06|lc=y}}, assessed at 1 in 34,000.<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/> The corresponding Palermo scale value of −2.05 is still among the highest for all objects on the Sentry List Table.<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/>
Asteroid {{mpl|29075|1950 DA}} was lost after its 1950 discovery, since its observations over just 17 days were insufficient to precisely determine its orbit. It was rediscovered in December 2000 prior to a close approach the next year, when new observations, including radar imaging, allowed much more precise orbit calculations. It has a diameter of about a kilometer (0.6 miles), and an impact would therefore be globally catastrophic. Although this asteroid will not strike for at least 800 years and thus has no Torino scale rating, it was added to the Sentry list in April 2002 as the first object with a Palermo scale value greater than zero.<ref name="IAU-NEOs"/><ref name="NEO-1950DA">{{cite web |title=29075 (1950 DA) Analyses, 2001-2007 |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |url=http://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/doc/1950da/ |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> The then-calculated 1 in 300 maximum chance of impact and +0.17 Palermo scale value was roughly 50% greater than the background risk of impact by all similarly large objects until 2880.<ref name="NEO-1950DA"/><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Giorgini |first1=J. D. |last2=Ostro |first2=S. J. |last3=Benner |first3=L. A. M. |last4=Chodas |first4=P. W. |last5=Chesley |first5=S. R. |last6=Hudson |first6=R. S. |last7=Nolan |first7=M. C. |last8=Klemola |first8=A. R. |last9=Standish |first9=E. M. |last10=Jurgens |first10=R. F. |last11=Rose |first11=R |last12=Chamberlin |first12=A. B. |last13=Yeomans |first13=D. K. |last14=Margot |first14=J. L. |display-authors=2 |date=April 5, 2002 |title=Asteroid 1950 DA's Encounter with Earth in 2880: Physical Limits of Collision Probability Prediction |journal=Science |volume=296 |pages=132–136 |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/doc/1950da/1950da_published.pdf |access-date=January 26, 2024 |doi=10.1126/science.1068191 |pmid=11935024 |issue=5565|bibcode = 2002Sci...296..132G |s2cid=8689246 }}</ref> After additional radar<ref name=Farnocchia2013>{{Cite journal |last1=Farnocchia |first1=Davide |last2=Chesley |first2=Steven R. |title=Assessment of the 2880 impact threat from asteroid (29075) 1950 DA |date=2013 |arxiv=1310.0861 |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2013.09.022 |bibcode=2014Icar..229..321F |volume=229 |journal=Icarus |pages=321–327|s2cid=56453734 }}</ref> and optical observations, {{As of|2024|04|lc=y}}, the probability of this impact is assessed at 1 in 34,000.<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/> The corresponding Palermo scale value of −2.05 is still the second highest for all objects on the Sentry List Table.<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/>


On December 24, 2004, {{convert|370|m|ft|abbr=on}} asteroid [[99942 Apophis]] (at the time known only by its provisional designation {{mp|2004 MN|4}}) was assigned a 4 on the Torino scale, the highest rating given to date, as the information available at the time translated to a 2.7% chance of Earth impact on Friday, April 13, 2029. By December 28, 2004, additional observations had significantly reduced the uncertainty zone for the 2029 approach and it no longer included the Earth. The 2029 risk of impact consequently dropped to zero, but later potential impact dates were still rated 1 on the Torino scale. Further observations lowered the 2036 risk to a Torino rating of 0 in August 2006. In 2021 Apophis was removed from the Sentry Risk Table.
On December 24, 2004, {{convert|370|m|ft|abbr=on}} asteroid [[99942 Apophis]] (at the time known only by its provisional designation {{mp|2004 MN|4}}) was assigned a 4 on the Torino scale, the highest rating given to date, as the information available at the time translated to a 1.6% chance of Earth impact in April 2029.<ref>{{cite news |first1=D. |last1=Yeomans |first2=S. |last2=Chesley |first3=P. |last3=Chodas |title=Near-Earth Asteroid 2004 MN4 Reaches Highest Score To Date On Hazard Scale |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |date=December 23, 2004 |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news146.html |access-date=January 31, 2024 }}</ref> As observations were collected over the next three days, the calculated chance of impact increased to as high as 2.7%,<ref name="cneosnews164">{{cite news |first1=Dwayne |last1=Brown |first2=DC |last2=Agle |title=NASA Refines Asteroid Apophis' Path Toward Earth |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |date=October 7, 2009 |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news164.html |access-date=January 31, 2024 }}</ref> then fell back to zero, as the uncertainty zone for this close approach no longer included the Earth.<ref>{{cite news |first1=D. |last1=Yeomans |first2=S. |last2=Chesley |first3=P. |last3=Chodas |title=Possibility of an Earth Impact in 2029 Ruled Out for Asteroid 2004 MN4 |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |date=December 27, 2004 |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news148.html |access-date=January 31, 2024 }}</ref> There was still some uncertainty about potential impacts during later close approaches, however, as the precision of orbital calculations improved due to additional observations, the risk of impact at any date was completely eliminated by 2021.<ref>{{cite news |title=NASA Analysis: Earth Is Safe From Asteroid Apophis for 100-Plus Years |date=March 25, 2021 |work=News |publisher=NASA/JPL |url=https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-analysis-earth-is-safe-from-asteroid-apophis-for-100-plus-years |access-date=January 31, 2024 }}</ref> Consequently, Apophis was removed from the Sentry Risk Table.<ref name="removed"/>


In February 2006, {{mpl|(144898) 2004 VD|17}} was assigned a Torino Scale rating of 2 due to a close encounter predicted for May 4, 2102.<ref name="Morrison-VD17">{{cite news |date=March 1, 2006 |title=Asteroid 2004 VD17 classed as Torino Scale 2 |work=Asteroid and Comet Impact Hazards |publisher=NASA |author=David Morrison |author-link=David Morrison (astrophysicist) |url=http://impact.arc.nasa.gov/news_detail.cfm?ID=167 |access-date=2017-11-10 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111014235559/https://impact.arc.nasa.gov/news_detail.cfm?ID=167 |archive-date=2011-10-14}}</ref> After additional observations allowed increasingly precise predictions, the Torino rating was lowered first to 1 in May 2006, then to 0 in October 2006, and the asteroid was removed from the Sentry Risk Table entirely in February 2008.<ref name=removed/>
In February 2006, {{mpl|(144898) 2004 VD|17}}, having a diameter around 300 metres, was assigned a Torino Scale rating of 2 due to a close encounter predicted for May 4, 2102.<ref name="Morrison-VD17">{{cite news |date=March 1, 2006 |title=Asteroid 2004 VD17 classed as Torino Scale 2 |work=Asteroid and Comet Impact Hazards |publisher=NASA |first=David |last=Morrison |author-link=David Morrison (astrophysicist) |url=http://impact.arc.nasa.gov/news_detail.cfm?ID=167 |access-date=November 10, 2017 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111014235559/https://impact.arc.nasa.gov/news_detail.cfm?ID=167 |archive-date=October 14, 2011 }}</ref> After additional observations allowed increasingly precise predictions, the Torino rating was lowered first to 1 in May 2006, then to 0 in October 2006, and the asteroid was removed from the Sentry Risk Table entirely in February 2008.<ref name=removed/>


{{As of|2021}}, {{mpl|2010 RF|12}} is listed with the highest chance of impacting Earth, at 1 in 22 on September 5, 2095. At only {{convert|7|m|ft|abbr=on}} across, the asteroid however is much too small to be considered a [[potentially hazardous asteroid]] and it poses no serious threat: the possible 2095 impact therefore rates only −3.32 on the Palermo Scale.<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/> Observations during the August 2022 close approach are expected to ascertain whether the asteroid will impact or miss Earth in 2095.<ref name="2022recovery">{{cite web|last1=Deen|first1=Sam|title=2022 recovery of 2010 RF12?|url=https://groups.io/g/mpml/message/32792|website=Minor Planet Mailing List|date=17 October 2017|access-date=19 October 2017}}</ref>
In 2021, {{mpl|2010 RF|12}} was listed with the highest chance of impacting Earth, at 1 in 22 on September 5, 2095. At only {{convert|7|m|ft|abbr=on}} across, the asteroid however is much too small to be considered a [[potentially hazardous asteroid]] and it poses no serious threat: the possible 2095 impact therefore rated only −3.32 on the Palermo Scale.<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/> Observations during the August 2022 close approach were expected to ascertain whether the asteroid will impact or miss Earth in 2095.<ref name="2022recovery">{{cite web |last1=Deen |first1=Sam |title=2022 recovery of 2010 RF12? |url=https://groups.io/g/mpml/message/32792 |website=Minor Planet Mailing List |date=October 17, 2017 |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> {{As of|2024|4}}, the risk of the 2095 impact was put at 1 in 10, still the highest, with a Palermo Scale rating of −2.98.<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/>


=== Projects to minimize the threat ===
=== Projects to minimize the threat ===
Line 131: Line 159:
|width1 = 350
|width1 = 350
|width2 = 350
|width2 = 350
|image1 = Neo-chart.png
|image1 = NEA by survey.svg
|image2 = NEA 1 km or more.png
|image2 = NEA 1 km or more.svg
|footer = Annual NEA discoveries by survey: all NEAs ''(top)'' and NEAs &gt; 1&nbsp;km ''(bottom)''
|footer = Annual NEA discoveries by survey: all NEAs ''(top)'' and NEAs &gt; 1&nbsp;km ''(bottom)''
}}
}}
A year before the 1968 close approach of asteroid Icarus, [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] students launched Project Icarus, devising a plan to deflect the asteroid with rockets in case it was found to be on a collision course with Earth.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/175/1 |title=Giant bombs on giant rockets: Project Icarus |first=Dwayne A. |last=Day |work=The Space Review |date=July 5, 2004 |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160415041026/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/175/1 |archive-date=April 15, 2016 }}</ref> Project Icarus received wide media coverage, and inspired the 1979 disaster movie ''[[Meteor (film)|Meteor]]'', in which the US and the USSR join forces to blow up an Earth-bound fragment of an asteroid hit by a comet.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://tech.mit.edu/V99/PDF/V99-N43.pdf |title=MIT Course precept for movie |work=[[The Tech (newspaper)|The Tech]] |publisher=MIT |date=October 30, 1979 |access-date=November 15, 2017 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140811005933/http://tech.mit.edu/V99/PDF/V99-N43.pdf |archive-date=August 11, 2014 }}</ref>
[[File:PIA22419-Neowise-1stFourYearsDataFromDec2013-20180420.gif|thumb|300px|left|{{center|NEOWISE – first four years of data starting in December 2013 (animated; April 20, 2018)}}]]
The first astronomical program dedicated to the discovery of near-Earth asteroids was the [[Palomar Planet-Crossing Asteroid Survey]]. The link to impact hazard, the need for dedicated survey telescopes and options to head off an eventual impact were first discussed at a 1981 [[interdisciplinary]] conference in [[Snowmass, Colorado]].<ref name="Chapman1998"/> Plans for a more comprehensive survey, named the Spaceguard Survey, were developed by NASA from 1992, under a mandate from the [[United States Congress]].<ref name="Vulcano1995"/><ref name="spaceguard-1998" /> To promote the survey on an international level, the [[International Astronomical Union]] (IAU) organised a workshop at [[Vulcano]], Italy in 1995,<ref name="Vulcano1995">{{cite book |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Vulcano Workshop. Beginning the Spaceguard Survey |location=Vulcano, Italy |publisher=IAU |date=September 1995 |url=http://spaceguard.rm.iasf.cnr.it/SGF/Vulcano/booklet.ps |access-date=2018-03-13}}</ref> and set up the Spaceguard Foundation also in Italy a year later.<ref name="spaceguard-2004" /> In 1998, the [[United States Congress]] gave NASA a mandate to detect 90% of near-earth asteroids over {{convert|1|km|mi|abbr=on}} diameter (that threaten global devastation) by 2008.<ref name="spaceguard-1998">{{cite web |author=Clark R. Chapman |title=Statement on The Threat of Impact by Near-Earth Asteroids before the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics of the Committee on Science of the U.S. House of Representatives at its hearings on "Asteroids: Perils and Opportunities" |publisher=Southwest Research Institute |date=May 21, 1998 |url=http://www.boulder.swri.edu/clark/hr.html |access-date=2018-03-06}}</ref><ref name="shigad" />


The first astronomical program dedicated to the discovery of near-Earth asteroids was the [[Palomar Planet-Crossing Asteroid Survey]]. The link to impact hazard, the need for dedicated survey telescopes and options to head off an eventual impact were first discussed at a 1981 [[interdisciplinary]] conference in [[Snowmass, Colorado]].<ref name="Chapman1998"/> Plans for a more comprehensive survey, named the Spaceguard Survey, were developed by NASA from 1992, under a mandate from the [[United States Congress]].<ref name="Vulcano1995"/><ref name="spaceguard-1998" /> To promote the survey on an international level, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) organised a workshop at [[Vulcano]], Italy in 1995,<ref name="Vulcano1995">{{cite conference |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Vulcano Workshop. Beginning the Spaceguard Survey |location=Vulcano, Italy |publisher=IAU |date=September 1995 |url=http://spaceguard.rm.iasf.cnr.it/SGF/Vulcano/booklet.ps |access-date=March 13, 2018 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131031042442/http://spaceguard.rm.iasf.cnr.it/SGF/Vulcano/booklet.ps |archive-date=October 31, 2013 }}</ref> and set up [[The Spaceguard Foundation]] also in Italy a year later.<ref name="spaceguard-2004" /> In 1998, the [[United States Congress]] gave NASA a mandate to detect 90% of near-earth asteroids over {{convert|1|km|mi|abbr=on}} diameter (that threaten global devastation) by 2008.<ref name="spaceguard-1998">{{cite web |first=Clark R. |last=Chapman |title=Statement on The Threat of Impact by Near-Earth Asteroids before the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics of the Committee on Science of the U.S. House of Representatives at its hearings on "Asteroids: Perils and Opportunities" |publisher=Southwest Research Institute |date=May 21, 1998 |url=http://www.boulder.swri.edu/clark/hr.html |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref><ref name="shigad" />
Several [[astronomical surveys|surveys]] have undertaken "[[Spaceguard]]" activities (an umbrella term), including [[Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research]] (LINEAR), [[Spacewatch]], [[Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking]] (NEAT), [[Lowell Observatory Near-Earth-Object Search]] (LONEOS), [[Catalina Sky Survey]] (CSS), [[Campo Imperatore Near-Earth Object Survey]] (CINEOS), [[Japanese Spaceguard Association]], [[Asiago-DLR Asteroid Survey]] (ADAS) and [[Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer#NEOWISE (pre-hibernation)|Near-Earth Object WISE]] (NEOWISE). As a result, the ratio of the known and the estimated total number of near-Earth asteroids larger than 1&nbsp;km in diameter rose from about 20% in 1998 to 65% in 2004,<ref name="spaceguard-2004">{{cite web |title=NASA on the Prowl for Near-Earth Objects |publisher=NASA/JPL |date=May 26, 2004 |url=https://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/watchtheskies/near_earth052104.html |access-date=2018-03-06}}</ref> 80% in 2006,<ref name="shigad">{{cite news |last=Shiga |first=David |title=New telescope will hunt dangerous asteroids |work=New Scientist |date=June 27, 2006 |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9403 |access-date=2018-03-06 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150626133029/http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9403 |archive-date=2015-06-26 }}</ref> and 93% in 2011. The original Spaceguard goal has thus been met, only three years late.<ref name="pia14734"/><ref name="WISE-asteroid-census"/> {{As of|2021|11}}, 891 NEAs larger than 1&nbsp;km have been discovered,<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" /> or 97% of an estimated total of about 920.<ref name="NEA1km-est-2017"/>
[[File:PIA22419-Neowise-1stFourYearsDataFromDec2013-20180420.gif|thumb|300px|{{center|Asteroids discovered in the first three years of the [[Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer#NEOWISE (pre-hibernation)|Near-Earth Object WISE]] program, starting in December 2013, with green dots showing NEAs}}]]
Several [[astronomical surveys|surveys]] have undertaken "[[Spaceguard]]" activities (an umbrella term), including [[Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research]] (LINEAR), [[Spacewatch]], [[Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking]] (NEAT), [[Lowell Observatory Near-Earth-Object Search]] (LONEOS), [[Catalina Sky Survey]] (CSS), [[Campo Imperatore Near-Earth Object Survey]] (CINEOS), [[Japanese Spaceguard Association]], [[Asiago-DLR Asteroid Survey]] (ADAS) and [[Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer#NEOWISE (pre-hibernation)|Near-Earth Object WISE]] (NEOWISE). As a result, the ratio of the known and the estimated total number of near-Earth asteroids larger than 1&nbsp;km in diameter rose from about 20% in 1998 to 65% in 2004,<ref name="spaceguard-2004">{{cite web |title=NASA on the Prowl for Near-Earth Objects |publisher=NASA/JPL |date=May 26, 2004 |url=https://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/watchtheskies/near_earth052104.html |access-date=March 6, 2018 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220813164957/https://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/watchtheskies/near_earth052104.html |archive-date=August 13, 2022 }}</ref> 80% in 2006,<ref name="shigad">{{cite news |last=Shiga |first=David |title=New telescope will hunt dangerous asteroids |work=New Scientist |date=June 27, 2006 |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9403 |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150626133029/http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9403 |archive-date=June 26, 2015 }}</ref> and 93% in 2011. The original Spaceguard goal has thus been met, only three years late.<ref name="pia14734"/><ref name="WISE-asteroid-census"/> {{As of|2024|3}}, 861 NEAs larger than 1&nbsp;km have been discovered.<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />


In 2005, the original USA Spaceguard mandate was extended by the [[George E. Brown, Jr.]] Near-Earth Object Survey Act, which calls for NASA to detect 90% of NEOs with diameters of {{convert|140|m|ft|abbr=on}} or greater, by 2020.<ref name="law-109-155">{{cite web |url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ155/pdf/PLAW-109publ155.pdf |title=Public Law 109–155–DEC.30, 2005 |access-date=2017-11-09 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201223922/https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ155/pdf/PLAW-109publ155.pdf |archive-date=2017-12-01 }}</ref> {{As of|2020|01}}, it is estimated that less than half of these have been found, but objects of this size hit the earth only about once in 2000 years.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Leah Crane |title=Inside the mission to stop killer asteroids from smashing into Earth |journal=New Scientist |date=Jan 25, 2020 |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24532661-800-inside-the-mission-to-stop-killer-asteroids-from-smashing-into-earth/}} See especially [https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/22111519/g_asteroids_realweb2.jpg?width=800 this figure].</ref> In January 2016, NASA announced the creation of the [[Planetary Defense Coordination Office]] (PDCO) to track NEOs larger than about {{convert|30–50|m|ft|abbr=on}} in diameter and coordinate an effective threat response and mitigation effort.<ref name="ETech">{{cite news |title=NASA is opening a new office for planetary defense |url=http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/220745-nasa-is-opening-a-new-office-for-planetary-defense |author=Graham Templeton |date=January 12, 2016 |access-date=2017-11-10 |work=ExtremeTech |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170706223602/https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/220745-nasa-is-opening-a-new-office-for-planetary-defense |archive-date=July 6, 2017 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Planetary Defense Coordination Office |publisher=NASA |url=https://www.nasa.gov/planetarydefense/overview |access-date=2018-03-09|date=2015-12-22 }}</ref>
In 2005, the original USA Spaceguard mandate was extended by the [[George E. Brown, Jr.]] Near-Earth Object Survey Act, which calls for NASA to detect 90% of NEOs with diameters of {{convert|140|m|ft|abbr=on}} or greater, by 2020.<ref name="law-109-155">{{cite web |url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ155/pdf/PLAW-109publ155.pdf |title=Public Law 109–155–DEC.30, 2005 |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201223922/https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ155/pdf/PLAW-109publ155.pdf |archive-date=December 1, 2017 }}</ref> In January 2020, it was estimated that less than half of these have been found, but objects of this size hit the earth only about once in 2000 years.<ref>{{cite news |first=Leah |last=Crane |title=Inside the mission to stop killer asteroids from smashing into Earth |work=New Scientist |date=Jan 22, 2020 |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24532661-800-inside-the-mission-to-stop-killer-asteroids-from-smashing-into-earth/ |access-date=January 24, 2024 }} See especially [https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/22111519/g_asteroids_realweb2.jpg?width=800 this figure].</ref> In December 2023, the ratio of discovered NEOs with diameters of {{convert|140|m|ft|abbr=on}} or greater was estimated at 38%.<ref name="Grav2023"/> The Chile-based [[Vera C. Rubin Observatory]], which will survey the southern sky for transient events from 2025, is expected to increase the number of known asteroids by a factor of 10 to 100 and increase the ratio of known NEOs with diameters of {{convert|140|m|ft|abbr=on}} or greater to at least 60%,<ref>{{cite web |title=Science Goals. What's in our Solar System? |publisher=Vera C. Rubin Observatory |url=https://rubinobservatory.org/explore/science-goals/solar-system |access-date=January 24, 2024 }}</ref> while the [[NEO Surveyor]] satellite, to be launched in 2027, is expected to push the ratio to 76%.<ref name="Grav2023">{{cite journal |last1=Grav |first1=Tommy |last2=Mainzer |first2=Amy K. |title=The NEO Surveyor Near-Earth Asteroid Known Object Model |journal=[[The Planetary Science Journal]] |volume=4 |issue=12 |at=part 228 |date=December 5, 2023 |doi=10.3847/PSJ/ad072e|doi-access=free |arxiv=2310.20149 |bibcode=2023PSJ.....4..228G }}</ref> Given the rarity of impacts by objects this big mentioned above, there are probably no objects of 140 metres or larger that will hit the earth in the next few centuries.

In January 2016, NASA announced the creation of the [[Planetary Defense Coordination Office]] (PDCO) to track NEOs larger than about {{convert|30–50|m|ft|abbr=on}} in diameter and coordinate an effective threat response and mitigation effort.<ref name="ETech">{{cite news |title=NASA is opening a new office for planetary defense |url=http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/220745-nasa-is-opening-a-new-office-for-planetary-defense |first=Graham |last=Templeton |date=January 12, 2016 |access-date=January 26, 2024 |work=[[ExtremeTech]] |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170706223602/https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/220745-nasa-is-opening-a-new-office-for-planetary-defense |archive-date=July 6, 2017 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Planetary Defense Coordination Office |publisher=NASA |url=https://science.nasa.gov/planetary-defense-overview |access-date=January 25, 2024 }}</ref>


Survey programs aim to identify threats years in advance, giving humanity time to prepare a space mission to avert the threat.
Survey programs aim to identify threats years in advance, giving humanity time to prepare a space mission to avert the threat.


{{blockquote|REP. STEWART: ... are we technologically capable of launching something that could intercept [an asteroid]? ...<br /> DR. A'HEARN: No. If we had spacecraft plans on the books already, that would take a year ... I mean a typical small mission ... takes four years from approval to start to launch ...|author=[[Chris Stewart (politician)|Rep. Chris Stewart (R, UT)]] and [[Michael A'Hearn|Dr. Michael F. A'Hearn]], April 10, 2013 |source=[[United States Congress]]<ref name="US-Congress-20130410">{{cite web |author=U.S.Congress |title=Threats From Space: a Review of U.S. Government Efforts to Track and mitigate Asteroids and Meteors (Part I and Part II) – Hearing Before the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives One Hundred Thirteenth Congress First Session |url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-113hhrg80552/pdf/CHRG-113hhrg80552.pdf |date=March 19, 2013 |page=147 |work=[[United States Congress]] |access-date=2017-11-09 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170310212940/https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-113hhrg80552/pdf/CHRG-113hhrg80552.pdf |archive-date=2017-03-10 }}</ref>}}
{{blockquote|REP. STEWART: ... are we technologically capable of launching something that could intercept [an asteroid]? ...<br /> DR. A'HEARN: No. If we had spacecraft plans on the books already, that would take a year ... I mean a typical small mission ... takes four years from approval to start to launch ...|author=[[Chris Stewart (politician)|Rep. Chris Stewart (R, UT)]] and [[Michael A'Hearn|Dr. Michael F. A'Hearn]], April 10, 2013 |source=[[United States Congress]]<ref name="US-Congress-20130410">{{cite web |author=U.S.Congress |title=Threats From Space: a Review of U.S. Government Efforts to Track and mitigate Asteroids and Meteors (Part I and Part II) – Hearing Before the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives One Hundred Thirteenth Congress First Session |url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-113hhrg80552/pdf/CHRG-113hhrg80552.pdf |date=March 19, 2013 |page=147 |publisher=United States Congress |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170310212940/https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-113hhrg80552/pdf/CHRG-113hhrg80552.pdf |archive-date=March 10, 2017 }}</ref>}}


The [[Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System|ATLAS]] project, by contrast, aims to find impacting asteroids shortly before impact, much too late for deflection maneuvers but still in time to evacuate and otherwise prepare the affected Earth region.<ref>{{cite news |author=University of Hawaii at Manoa's Institute for Astronomy |title=ATLAS: The Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System |date=February 18, 2013 |url=http://www.astronomy.com/News-Observing/News/2013/02/ATLAS%20-%20The%20Asteroid%20Terrestrial-Impact%20Last%20Alert%20System.aspx |work=Astronomy Magazine |access-date=2017-11-18 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170802165254/http://www.astronomy.com/News-Observing/News/2013/02/ATLAS%20-%20The%20Asteroid%20Terrestrial-Impact%20Last%20Alert%20System.aspx |archive-date=2017-08-02 }}</ref> Another project, the [[Zwicky Transient Facility]] (ZTF), which surveys for objects that change their brightness rapidly,<ref name="AT-20180207">{{cite news |last=Kulkarni |first= S.R.|display-authors=etal|title=The Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) begins |url=http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=11266 |date=February 7, 2018 |work=[[The Astronomer's Telegram]] |number=11266 |access-date=2018-02-08 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180209062936/http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=11266 |archive-date=February 9, 2018 }}</ref> also detects asteroids passing close to Earth.<ref name="AT-20180208">{{cite news |last=Ye |first= Quan-Zhi|display-authors=etal|title=First Discovery of a Small Near Earth Asteroid with ZTF (2018 CL) |url=http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=11274 |date=February 8, 2018 |work=The Astronomer's Telegram |number=11274 |access-date=2018-02-08 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180209002703/http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=11274 |archive-date=February 9, 2018 }}</ref>
The [[Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System|ATLAS]] project, by contrast, aims to find impacting asteroids shortly before impact, much too late for deflection maneuvers but still in time to evacuate and otherwise prepare the affected Earth region.<ref>{{cite news |author=University of Hawaii at Manoa's Institute for Astronomy |title=ATLAS: The Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System |date=February 18, 2013 |url=https://www.astronomy.com/science/atlas-the-asteroid-terrestrial-impact-last-alert-system/ |work=[[Astronomy (magazine)|Astronomy]] |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230604015435/https://www.astronomy.com/science/atlas-the-asteroid-terrestrial-impact-last-alert-system/ |archive-date=June 4, 2023 }}</ref> Another project, the [[Zwicky Transient Facility]] (ZTF), which surveys for objects that change their brightness rapidly,<ref name="AT-20180207">{{cite news |last=Kulkarni |first= S.R. |display-authors=etal |title=The Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) begins |url=http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=11266 |date=February 7, 2018 |work=[[The Astronomer's Telegram]] |number=11266 |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180209062936/http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=11266 |archive-date=February 9, 2018 }}</ref> also detects asteroids passing close to Earth.<ref name="AT-20180208">{{cite news |last=Ye |first= Quan-Zhi|display-authors=etal|title=First Discovery of a Small Near Earth Asteroid with ZTF (2018 CL) |url=http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=11274 |date=February 8, 2018 |work=The Astronomer's Telegram |number=11274 |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180209002703/http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=11274 |archive-date=February 9, 2018 }}</ref>


{{further|List of near-Earth object observation projects}}
{{further|List of near-Earth object observation projects}}


Scientists involved in NEO research have also considered options for actively averting the threat if an object is found to be on a collision course with Earth.<ref name="Chapman1998"/> All viable methods aim to deflect rather than destroy the threatening NEO, because the fragments would still cause widespread destruction.<ref name="TaskForceReport"/> Deflection, which means a change in the object's orbit months to years prior to the [[Asteroid impact prediction|predicted impact]], also requires orders of magnitude less energy.<ref name="TaskForceReport"/>
Scientists involved in NEO research have also considered options for actively averting the threat if an object is found to be on a collision course with Earth.<ref name="Chapman1998"/> All viable methods aim to deflect rather than destroy the threatening NEO, because the fragments would still cause widespread destruction.<ref name="TaskForceReport"/> Deflection, which means a change in the object's orbit months to years prior to the [[Asteroid impact prediction|predicted impact]], also requires orders of magnitude less energy.<ref name="TaskForceReport"/> For a given amount of energy, a greater effect on the momentum of the object can be had by causing some of it to be blasted off it, as was done in the ''[[Double Asteroid Redirection Test]]'' (see below).


== Number and classification ==
== Number and classification ==
[[File:Known NEAs.svg|thumb|Cumulative discoveries of near-Earth asteroids known by size, 1980–{{#time:Y}}|400px]]
<!---[[File:NearEarthAsteroids-Discovered-19980701-20180525.gif|thumb|Near-Earth asteroids discovered by size, 1998–2018]]-- GIF too large to animate? sometimes gifs at non-native size don't run--->

[[File:Known NEAs.png|thumb|Cumulative discoveries of near-Earth asteroids known by size, 1980–{{#time:Y}}|400px]]
When an NEO is detected, like all other small Solar System bodies, its positions and brightness are submitted to the (IAU's) [[Minor Planet Center]] (MPC) for cataloging. The MPC maintains separate lists of confirmed NEOs and potential NEOs.<ref name="MPC-NEO-confirm">{{cite web |title=The NEO Confirmation Page |publisher=IAU/MPC |url=http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/NEO/toconfirm_tabular.html |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Marsden |first1=B. G. |last2=Williams |first2=G. V. |title=The NEO Confirmation Page |journal=[[Planetary and Space Science]] |volume=46 |issue=2 |pages=299 |bibcode=1998P&SS...46..299M |year=1998 |doi=10.1016/S0032-0633(96)00153-5 }}</ref> The MPC maintains a separate list for the potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs).<ref name="MPC-PHA-list">{{cite web |title=List Of Potentially Hazardous Minor Planets (by designation) |publisher=IAU/MPC |url=https://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/lists/t_phas.html |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> NEOs are also catalogued by two separate units of the [[Jet Propulsion Laboratory]] (JPL) of [[NASA]]: the Center for Near Earth Object Studies (CNEOS)<ref name="neo-jpl-intro" /> and the Solar System Dynamics Group.<ref name="JPL-SSD-NEA"/> CNEOS's catalog of near-Earth objects includes the approach distances of asteroids and comets.<ref name="NEO-close">{{cite web |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/ |title=NEO Earth Close Approaches |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |access-date=January 25, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240124004749/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/ |archive-date=January 24, 2024 }}</ref> NEOs are also catalogued by a unit of [[European Space Agency|ESA]], the Near-Earth Objects Coordination Centre (NEOCC).<ref name="NEOCC-about">{{cite web |title=About NEOCC |publisher=ESA NEOCC |url=https://neo.ssa.esa.int/about-neocc |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref>

Near-Earth objects are classified as [[meteoroid]]s, [[asteroid]]s, or [[comet]]s depending on size, composition, and orbit. Those which are asteroids can additionally be members of an [[asteroid family]], and comets create meteoroid streams that can generate [[meteor shower]]s.
Near-Earth objects are classified as [[meteoroid]]s, [[asteroid]]s, or [[comet]]s depending on size, composition, and orbit. Those which are asteroids can additionally be members of an [[asteroid family]], and comets create meteoroid streams that can generate [[meteor shower]]s.


{{As of|2021|11|04|df=US}} and according to statistics maintained by CNEOS, 27,440 NEOs have been discovered. Only 117 (0.43%) of them are comets, whilst 27,323 (99.57%) are asteroids. 2,224 of those NEOs are classified as potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs).<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />
{{As of|2024|3|30|df=US}} and according to statistics maintained by CNEOS, 34,725 NEOs have been discovered. Only 122 (0.35%) of them are comets, whilst 34,603 (99.65%) are asteroids. 2,406 of those NEOs are classified as potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs).<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />


{{As of|2021|11|df=US}}, over 1,200 NEAs appear on the [[Sentry (monitoring system)|Sentry impact risk page]] at the [[NASA]] website.<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/> Over 1,000 of these NEAs are less than 50 meters in diameter and none of the listed objects are placed even in the "green zone" (Torino Scale 1), meaning that none warrant the attention of the general public.<ref name="torino"/>
{{As of|2024|4|5|df=US}}, 1,712 NEAs appear on the [[Sentry (monitoring system)|Sentry impact risk page]] at the [[NASA]] website.<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/> All but 95 of these NEAs are less than 50 meters in diameter and none of the listed objects are placed even in the "green zone" (Torino Scale 1), meaning that none warrant the attention of the general public.<ref name="torino"/>


=== Observational biases ===
=== Observational biases ===
The main problem with estimating the number of NEOs is that the probability of detecting one is influenced by a number of aspects of the NEO, starting naturally with its size but also including the characteristics of its orbit and the reflectivity of its surface.<ref name="science.sciencemag.org">{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1126/science.288.5474.2190|title = Understanding the Distribution of Near-Earth Asteroids|journal = Science|volume = 288|issue = 5474|pages = 2190–2194|year = 2000|last1 = Bottke|first1 = W. F. Jr.|pmid = 10864864|bibcode = 2000Sci...288.2190B}}</ref> What is easily detected will be more counted,<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://www.permanent.com/asteroids-discovering.html
The main problem with estimating the number of NEOs is that the probability of detecting one is influenced by a number of aspects of the NEO, starting naturally with its size but also including the characteristics of its orbit and the reflectivity of its surface.<ref name="science.sciencemag.org">{{Cite journal |last1=Bottke |first1=W. F. Jr. |title=Understanding the Distribution of Near-Earth Asteroids |journal=Science |volume=288 |issue=5474 |pages=2190–2194 |year=2000 |pmid=10864864 |doi=10.1126/science.288.5474.2190 |bibcode=2000Sci...288.2190B}}</ref> What is easily detected will be more counted, and these [[observational bias]]es need to be compensated when trying to calculate the number of bodies in a population from the list of its detected members.<ref name="science.sciencemag.org"/>
[[File:Artist%E2%80%99s_impression_of_an_asteroid_that_orbits_closer_to_the_Sun_than_Earth%E2%80%99s_orbit.jpg|thumb|right|Artist's impression of an asteroid that orbits closer to the Sun than Earth's orbit, showing its dark side]]
|title=Discovering Asteroids and NEOs by Telescopes
|website=permanent.com|access-date=2018-11-16}}</ref>
and these [[observational bias]]es need to be compensated when trying to calculate the number of bodies in a population from the list of its detected members.<ref name="science.sciencemag.org"/>


Bigger asteroids reflect more light,<ref name=":0" /> and the two biggest Near-Earth objects, [[433 Eros]] and [[1036 Ganymed]], were naturally also among the first to be detected.<ref name="Browne">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/25/us/mathematicians-say-asteroid-may-hit-earth-in-a-million-years.html|title=Mathematicians Say Asteroid May Hit Earth in a Million Years|last=Browne|first=Malcolm W.|work=The New York Times |date=25 April 1996 |access-date=2018-11-16|language=en}}</ref> 1036 Ganymed is about {{convert|35|km|mi|abbr=on}} in diameter and 433 Eros is about {{convert|17|km|mi|abbr=on}} in diameter .<ref name="Browne"/>
Bigger asteroids reflect more light, and the two biggest near-Earth objects, [[433 Eros]] and [[1036 Ganymed]], were naturally also among the first to be detected.<ref name="Browne">{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/25/us/mathematicians-say-asteroid-may-hit-earth-in-a-million-years.html |title=Mathematicians Say Asteroid May Hit Earth in a Million Years |last=Browne |first=Malcolm W. |work=The New York Times |date=April 25, 1996 |access-date=January 26, 2024 |language=en}}</ref> 1036 Ganymed is about {{convert|35|km|mi|abbr=on}} in diameter and 433 Eros is about {{convert|17|km|mi|abbr=on}} in diameter.<ref name="Browne"/> Meanwhile, the apparent brightness of objects that are closer is higher, introducing a bias that favours the discovery of NEOs of a given size that get closer to Earth.<ref name="LuuJewitt1989"/>


Earth-based astronomy requires dark skies and hence nighttime observations, and even space-based telescopes avoid looking into directions close to the Sun, thus most NEO surveys are blind towards objects passing Earth on the side of the Sun.<ref name="LuuJewitt1989"/><ref name="NEOS-orbit"/> This bias is further enhanced by the effect of [[planetary phase|phase]]: the narrower the angle of the asteroid and the Sun from the observer, the lesser part of the observed side of the asteroid will be illuminated.<ref name="LuuJewitt1989"/> Another bias results from the different surface brightness or albedo of the objects, which can make a large but low-albedo object as bright as a small but high-albedo object.<ref name="LuuJewitt1989"/><ref name="NEOS-why-infrared"/> In addition, the reflexivity of asteroid surfaces is not uniform but increases towards the direction opposite of illumination, resulting in the phenomenon of phase darkening, which makes asteroids even brighter when the Earth is close to the axis of sunlight.<ref name="LuuJewitt1989"/> An asteroid's observed albedo usually has a strong peak or [[opposition surge]] very close to the direction opposite of the Sun.<ref name="LuuJewitt1989"/> Different surfaces display different levels of phase darkening, and research showed that, on top of albedo bias, this favours the discovery of silicon-rich [[S-type asteroid|S-type asteroids]] over carbon-rich [[C-type asteroid|C types]], for example.<ref name="LuuJewitt1989">{{cite journal |first1=Jane |last1=Luu |first2=David |last2=Jewitt |title=On the Relative Numbers of C Types and S Types among Near-Earth Asteroids |journal=[[The Astronomical Journal]] |volume=98 |issue=5 |pages=1905–1911 |date=November 1989 |url=https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/1989AJ.....98.1905L |access-date=January 26, 2024 |doi=10.1086/115267 |bibcode=1989AJ.....98.1905L}}</ref> As a result of these observational biases, in Earth-based surveys, NEOs tended to be discovered when they were in opposition, that is, opposite from the Sun when viewed from the Earth.<ref name="Grav2023"/>
The other major detection bias is that it is much easier to spot objects on the night-side of Earth. The day sky near the Sun is much brighter than the night sky, and there is therefore much better contrast in the night sky.<ref name=":0" /> The night-side searcher is also looking at the sunlit side of the asteroids, while in the daytime sky a searcher looks towards the sun and sees the unlit backside of the object. In addition, [[opposition surge]] makes asteroids even brighter when the Earth is close to the axis of sunlight. The combined effect is equivalent to the comparison of a [[Full moon]] at night to a [[New Moon]] in daytime, and the light of the Sun-lit asteroids has been called "full asteroid" similar to a "full moon".<ref name=":0" />
Evidencing this bias and as depicted in the diagram below, over half (53%) of the known Near Earth objects were discovered in just 3.8% of the sky, in a 22.5° [[Spherical cap|cone]] facing directly away from the Sun, and the vast majority (87%) were first found in only 15% of the sky, in the 45° [[Spherical cap|cone]] facing away from the Sun.<ref name="NASA-NEO-Close-Approach-Data">{{cite web |title=NEO Earth Close Approach data
|url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/ |website=NASA JPL
|publisher=NASA |access-date=7 July 2018}}</ref> The most practical way around this opposition bias is to use [[thermal infrared]] telescopes in space that observe their heat emissions instead of the light they reflect, with a sensitivity that is almost independent of the illumination.<ref name=":0" />


The most practical way around many of these biases is to use [[thermal infrared]] telescopes in space that observe their thermal emissions instead of the light they reflect, with a sensitivity that is almost independent of the illumination.<ref name="Grav2023"/><ref name="NEOS-why-infrared">{{cite web |title=Why Infrared? |url=https://neos.arizona.edu/mission/why-infrared |publisher=[[Lunar and Planetary Laboratory|UA LPL]] |access-date=January 25, 2024 }}</ref> In addition, space-based telescopes in an orbit around the Sun in the shadow of the Earth can make observations as close as 45 degrees to the direction of the Sun.<ref name="NEOS-orbit">{{cite web |title=Mission Orbit and Timeline |url=https://neos.arizona.edu/mission/orbit |publisher=UA LPL |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref>
Asteroids with orbits that make them spend more time on the day-side of the Earth are therefore less likely to be discovered than those that spend most of their time beyond the orbit of the Earth. For example, one study noted that detection of bodies in low-eccentricity Earth-crossing orbits is favored, making [[Aten asteroid|Atens]] more likely to be detected than [[Apollo asteroid|Apollos]].<ref>https://www.boulder.swri.edu/~bottke/Reprints/Bottke_1996_Icarus_122_406_Origin_Spacewatch_NEOs.pdf (Page 414)</ref>


Further observational biases favour objects that have more frequent encounters with the Earth, which makes the detection of [[Aten asteroid|Atens]] more likely than that of [[Apollo asteroid|Apollos]]; and objects that move slower when encountering the Earth, which makes the detection of NEAs with low eccentricities more likely.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=William F. Jr. |last1=Bottke |first2=Michale C. |last2=Nolan |first3= H. Jay |last3=Melosh |first4=Ann M. |last4=Vickery |first5=Richard |last5=Greenberg |title=Origin of the Spacewatch Small Earth-Approaching Asteroids |journal=Icarus |date=August 1996 |volume=122 |issue=2 |pages=406–427 |url=https://www.boulder.swri.edu/~bottke/Reprints/Bottke_1996_Icarus_122_406_Origin_Spacewatch_NEOs.pdf |access-date=January 25, 2024 |doi=10.1006/icar.1996.0133 |bibcode=1996Icar..122..406B }}</ref>
Such observational biases must be identified and quantified to determine NEO populations, as studies of asteroid populations then take those known observational selection biases into account to make a more accurate assessment.<ref>{{cite journal|author1=B. Zellner|author2=E. Bowell |title=Asteroid Compositional Types and their Distributions|journal=International Astronomical Union Colloquium|year=1977|volume=39 |pages=185–197 |doi=10.1017/S0252921100070093|s2cid=128650102 }}</ref> In the year 2000 and taking into account all known observational biases, it was estimated that there are approximately 900 near-Earth asteroids of at least kilometer size, or technically and more accurately, with an [[Absolute magnitude#Solar System bodies (H)|absolute magnitude]] brighter than 17.75.<ref name="science.sciencemag.org"/>


Such observational biases must be identified and quantified to determine NEO populations, as studies of asteroid populations then take those known observational selection biases into account to make a more accurate assessment.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=B. |last1=Zellner |first2=E. |last2=Bowell |title=2. Asteroid Compositional Types and their Distributions |journal=International Astronomical Union Colloquium |year=1977 |volume=39 |pages=185–197 |doi=10.1017/S0252921100070093 |s2cid=128650102 |doi-access=free}}</ref> In the year 2000 and taking into account all known observational biases, it was estimated that there are approximately 900 near-Earth asteroids of at least kilometer size, or technically and more accurately, with an [[Absolute magnitude#Solar System bodies (H)|absolute magnitude]] brighter than 17.75.<ref name="science.sciencemag.org"/>
=== Near-Earth asteroids (NEAs){{anchor|Near-Earth_asteroids}}<!--'Near-Earth asteroid' and 'Near-Earth asteroids' redirect here--> ===
[[File:ESO-Asteroid Toutatis-phot-28c-04-normal.jpg|thumb|Asteroid Toutatis from [[Paranal Observatory|Paranal]]]]


=== Near-Earth asteroids{{anchor|Near-Earth_asteroids}}<!--'Near-Earth asteroid' and 'Near-Earth asteroids' redirect here--> ===
These are asteroids in a near-Earth orbit without the tail or coma of a comet. {{As of|2022|11}}, 30,503 '''near-Earth asteroids'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA--> are known, 2,304 of which are both sufficiently large and may come sufficiently close to Earth to be classified as potentially hazardous.<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />
[[File:ESO-Asteroid Toutatis-phot-28c-04-normal.jpg|thumb|One-minute path of asteroid [[4179 Toutatis]] in the sky during its September 2004 close approach ([[Paranal Observatory]])]]


These are asteroids in a near-Earth orbit without the tail or coma of a comet. {{As of|2024|3}}, 34,603 '''near-Earth asteroids'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA--> (NEAs) are known, 2,406 of which are both sufficiently large and may come sufficiently close to Earth to be classified as potentially hazardous.<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />
NEAs survive in their orbits for just a few million years.<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII">{{cite journal |url=http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~bottke/Reprints/Morbidelli-etal_2002_AstIII_NEOs.pdf |title=Origin and Evolution of Near-Earth Objects |first1=Alessandro |last1=Morbidelli |first2=William F. Jr. |last2=Bottke |first3=Christiane |last3=Froeschlé |first4=Patrick |last4=Michel |journal=Asteroids III |editor=W. F. Bottke Jr. |editor2=A. Cellino |editor3=P. Paolicchi |editor4=R. P. Binzel |pages=409–422 |date=January 2002 |doi=10.2307/j.ctv1v7zdn4.33 |bibcode=2002aste.book..409M |access-date=2017-11-09 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809014123/http://www.boulder.swri.edu/%7Ebottke/Reprints/Morbidelli-etal_2002_AstIII_NEOs.pdf |archive-date=2017-08-09 }}</ref> They are eventually eliminated by planetary [[Perturbation (astronomy)|perturbations]], causing ejection from the Solar System or a [[Impact event|collision]] with the Sun, a planet, or other celestial body.<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/> With orbital lifetimes short compared to the age of the Solar System, new asteroids must be constantly moved into near-Earth orbits to explain the observed asteroids. The accepted origin of these asteroids is that [[Asteroid belt|main-belt asteroids]] are moved into the inner Solar System through [[orbital resonance]]s with [[Jupiter]].<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/> The interaction with Jupiter through the resonance [[Perturbation (astronomy)|perturb]]s the asteroid's orbit and it comes into the inner Solar System. The asteroid belt has gaps, known as [[Kirkwood gap]]s, where these resonances occur as the asteroids in these resonances have been moved onto other orbits. New asteroids migrate into these resonances, due to the [[Yarkovsky effect]] that provides a continuing supply of near-Earth asteroids.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The Yarkovsky-driven origin of near-Earth asteroids |author=A. Morbidelli |author2=D. Vokrouhlický |journal=Icarus |volume=163 |issue=1 |pages=120–134 |date=May 2003 |doi=10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00047-2 |bibcode=2003Icar..163..120M |citeseerx=10.1.1.603.7624}}</ref> Compared to the entire mass of the asteroid belt, the mass loss necessary to sustain the NEA population is relatively small; totalling less than 6% over the past 3.5 billion years.<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/> The composition of near-Earth asteroids is comparable to that of asteroids from the asteroid belt, reflecting a variety of [[asteroid spectral types]].<ref>{{cite journal |title=On the Origins of Earth-Approaching Asteroids |author=D.F. Lupishko |author2=T.A. Lupishko |name-list-style=amp |journal=Solar System Research|volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=227–233 |date=May 2001 |doi=10.1023/A:1010431023010 |bibcode = 2001SoSyR..35..227L|s2cid=117912062 }}</ref>


NEAs survive in their orbits for just a few million years.<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII">{{cite book |url=http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~bottke/Reprints/Morbidelli-etal_2002_AstIII_NEOs.pdf |title=Origin and Evolution of Near-Earth Objects |first1=Alessandro |last1=Morbidelli |first2=William F. Jr. |last2=Bottke |first3=Christiane |last3=Froeschlé |first4=Patrick |last4=Michel |journal=Asteroids III |editor=W. F. Bottke Jr. |editor2=A. Cellino |editor3=P. Paolicchi |editor4=R. P. Binzel |display-editors=1 |pages=409–422 |date=January 2002 |doi=10.2307/j.ctv1v7zdn4.33 |bibcode=2002aste.book..409M |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809014123/http://www.boulder.swri.edu/%7Ebottke/Reprints/Morbidelli-etal_2002_AstIII_NEOs.pdf |archive-date=August 9, 2017 }}</ref> They are eventually eliminated by planetary [[Perturbation (astronomy)|perturbations]], causing ejection from the Solar System or a [[Impact event|collision]] with the Sun, a planet, or other celestial body.<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/> With orbital lifetimes short compared to the age of the Solar System, new asteroids must be constantly moved into near-Earth orbits to explain the observed asteroids. The accepted origin of these asteroids is that [[Asteroid belt|main-belt asteroids]] are moved into the inner Solar System through [[orbital resonance]]s with [[Jupiter]].<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/> The interaction with Jupiter through the resonance [[Perturbation (astronomy)|perturb]]s the asteroid's orbit and it comes into the inner Solar System. The asteroid belt has gaps, known as [[Kirkwood gap]]s, where these resonances occur as the asteroids in these resonances have been moved onto other orbits. New asteroids migrate into these resonances, due to the [[Yarkovsky effect]] that provides a continuing supply of near-Earth asteroids.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The Yarkovsky-driven origin of near-Earth asteroids |first1=A. |last1=Morbidelli |first2=D. |last2=Vokrouhlický |journal=Icarus |volume=163 |issue=1 |pages=120–134 |date=May 2003 |doi=10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00047-2 |bibcode=2003Icar..163..120M |citeseerx=10.1.1.603.7624}}</ref> Compared to the entire mass of the asteroid belt, the mass loss necessary to sustain the NEA population is relatively small; totalling less than 6% over the past 3.5 billion years.<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/> The composition of near-Earth asteroids is comparable to that of asteroids from the asteroid belt, reflecting a variety of [[asteroid spectral types]].<ref>{{cite journal |title=On the Origins of Earth-Approaching Asteroids |first1=D.F. |last1=Lupishko |first2=T.A. |last2=Lupishko |name-list-style=amp |journal=[[Solar System Research]] |volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=227–233 |date=May 2001 |doi=10.1023/A:1010431023010 |bibcode = 2001SoSyR..35..227L|s2cid=117912062 }}</ref>
A small number of NEAs are [[extinct comets]] that have lost their volatile surface materials, although having a faint or intermittent comet-like tail does not necessarily result in a classification as a near-Earth comet, making the boundaries somewhat fuzzy. The rest of the near-Earth asteroids are driven out of the asteroid belt by gravitational interactions with [[Jupiter]].<ref name = "MorbidelliAstIII" /><ref>{{cite journal |title=What the physical properties of near-Earth asteroids tell us about sources of their origin? |author=D.F. Lupishko |author2=M. di Martino |author3=T.A. Lupishko |name-list-style=amp |journal=Kinematika I Fizika Nebesnykh Tel Supplimen |volume=3 |issue=3 |pages=213–216 |date=September 2000 |bibcode=2000KFNTS...3..213L}}</ref>


A small number of NEAs are [[extinct comets]] that have lost their volatile surface materials, although having a faint or intermittent comet-like tail does not necessarily result in a classification as a near-Earth comet, making the boundaries somewhat fuzzy. The rest of the near-Earth asteroids are driven out of the asteroid belt by gravitational interactions with [[Jupiter]].<ref name = "MorbidelliAstIII" /><ref>{{cite journal |title=What the physical properties of near-Earth asteroids tell us about sources of their origin? |first1=D.F. |last1=Lupishko |first22=M. |last2=di Martino |first3=T.A. |last3=Lupishko |name-list-style=amp |journal=Kinematika I Fizika Nebesnykh Tel Supplimen |volume=3 |issue=3 |pages=213–216 |date=September 2000 |bibcode=2000KFNTS...3..213L}}</ref>
Many asteroids have [[natural satellite]]s ([[minor-planet moon]]s). {{As of|2021|10|df=US}}, 85 NEAs were known to have at least one moon, including three known to have two moons.<ref>{{cite web |title=Asteroids with Satellites |publisher=Johnston's Archive |url=http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/asteroidmoons.html |access-date=2018-03-17}}</ref> The asteroid [[3122 Florence]], one of the largest PHAs<ref name="MPC-PHA-list"/> with a diameter of {{convert|4.5|km|mi|abbr=on}}, has two moons measuring {{convert|100–300|m|ft|abbr=on}} across, which were discovered by radar imaging during the asteroid's 2017 approach to Earth.<ref name="Florence-moons">{{cite news |author1=Lance Benner |author2=Shantanu Naidu |author3=Marina Brozovic |author4=Paul Chodas |title=Radar Reveals Two Moons Orbiting Asteroid Florence |work=News |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |date=September 1, 2017 |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news199.html |access-date=2018-01-19 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170903060914/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news199.html |archive-date=2017-09-03 }}</ref>


Many asteroids have [[natural satellite]]s ([[minor-planet moon]]s). {{As of|2024|04|df=US}}, 97 NEAs were known to have at least one moon, including three known to have two moons.<ref>{{cite web |title=Asteroids with Satellites |publisher=Johnston's Archive |date=April 5, 2024 |url=http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/asteroidmoons.html |access-date=April 6, 2024 }}</ref> The asteroid [[3122 Florence]], one of the largest PHAs<ref name="MPC-PHA-list"/> with a diameter of {{convert|4.5|km|mi|abbr=on}}, has two moons measuring {{convert|100–300|m|ft|abbr=on}} across, which were discovered by radar imaging during the asteroid's 2017 approach to Earth.<ref name="Florence-moons">{{cite news |first1=Lance |last1=Benner |first2=Shantanu |last2=Naidu |first3=Marina |last3=Brozovic |first4=Paul |last4=Chodas |title=Radar Reveals Two Moons Orbiting Asteroid Florence |work=News |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |date=September 1, 2017 |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news199.html |access-date=January 26, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170903060914/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news199.html |archive-date=September 3, 2017 }}</ref>
In May 2022, an algorithm known as Tracklet-less Heliocentric Orbit Recovery or THOR and developed by University of Washington researchers to discover asteroids in the solar system was announced as a success.<ref>{{Cite web |title=UW-developed, cloud-based astrodynamics platform to discover and track asteroids |url=https://www.washington.edu/news/2022/05/31/asteroid-discovery/ |access-date=2022-06-01 |website=UW News |language=en}}</ref> The International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center confirmed a series of first candidate asteroids identified by the algorithm.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Foundation |first=B612 |title=Asteroid Institute Uses Revolutionary Cloud-Based Astrodynamics Platform to Discover and Track Asteroids |url=https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/asteroid-institute-uses-revolutionary-cloud-based-astrodynamics-platform-to-discover-and-track-asteroids-301557487.html |access-date=2022-06-01 |website=www.prnewswire.com |language=en}}</ref>

In May 2022, an algorithm known as Tracklet-less Heliocentric Orbit Recovery or THOR and developed by University of Washington researchers to discover asteroids in the solar system was announced as a success.<ref>{{Cite news |title=UW-developed, cloud-based astrodynamics platform to discover and track asteroids |date=May 31, 2022 |publisher=University of Washington |work=UW News |url=https://www.washington.edu/news/2022/05/31/asteroid-discovery/ |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> The International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center confirmed a series of first candidate asteroids identified by the algorithm.<ref>{{Cite press release |title=Asteroid Institute Uses Revolutionary Cloud-Based Astrodynamics Platform to Discover and Track Asteroids |date=May 31, 2022 |publisher=B612 Foundation |work=PR Newswire |url=https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/asteroid-institute-uses-revolutionary-cloud-based-astrodynamics-platform-to-discover-and-track-asteroids-301557487.html |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref>


==== Size distribution ====
==== Size distribution ====
[[File:NEO by size.png|400px|thumb|Known near-Earth asteroids by size]]
[[File:NEA by size.svg|400px|thumb|Known near-Earth asteroids by size]]


While the size of a very small fraction of these asteroids is known to better than 1%, from [[radar]] observations, from images of the asteroid surface, or from [[Occultation#Occultations by asteroids|stellar occultations]], the diameter of the vast majority of near Earth asteroids has only been estimated on the basis of their brightness and a representative asteroid surface reflectivity or [[albedo]], which is commonly assumed to be 14%.<ref name="neo-jpl-intro">{{cite web |title=Discovery Statistics. Introduction |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/stats/ |date=January 5, 2018 |access-date=2018-02-08 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180206174102/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/stats/ |archive-date=2018-02-06 }}</ref> Such indirect size estimates are uncertain by over a factor of 2 for individual asteroids, since asteroid albedos can range at least as low as 5% and as high as 30%. This makes the volume of those asteroids uncertain by a factor of 8, and their mass by at least as much, since their assumed density also has its own uncertainty. Using this crude method, an [[Absolute magnitude#Solar System bodies (H)|absolute magnitude]] of 17.75 roughly corresponds to a diameter of {{convert|1|km|mi|abbr=on|lk=off}}<ref name="neo-jpl-intro"/> and an absolute magnitude of 22.0 to a diameter of {{convert|140|m|ft|abbr=on|lk=off}}.<ref name="NEO-groups"/> Diameters of intermediate precision, better than from an assumed albedo but not nearly as precise as good direct measurements, can be obtained from the combination of reflected light and thermal infrared emission, using a thermal model of the asteroid to estimate both its diameter and its albedo. In May 2016, technologist [[Nathan Myhrvold]] questioned the precision of such asteroid diameter estimates arising from thermal modeling of measurements by the [[Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer]] and NEOWISE missions.<ref name="NYT-20160523">{{cite news |last=Chang |first=Kenneth |title=How Big Are Those Killer Asteroids? A Critic Says NASA Doesn't Know. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/science/asteroids-nathan-myhrvold-nasa.html |date=May 23, 2016 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=2017-11-09 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170828235110/https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/science/asteroids-nathan-myhrvold-nasa.html |archive-date=2017-08-28 }}</ref><ref name="ARX-20160523">{{cite journal |last=Myhrvold |first=Nathan |author-link=Nathan Myhrvold |title=Asteroid thermal modeling in the presence of reflected sunlight with an application to WISE/NEOWISE observational data |journal=Icarus |volume=303 |pages=91–113 |date=May 23, 2016 |arxiv=1605.06490 |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2017.12.024 |bibcode=2018Icar..303...91M |s2cid=118511665 }}</ref><ref name="SA-20160527">{{cite news |last=Billings |first=Lee |title=For Asteroid-Hunting Astronomers, Nathan Myhrvold Says the Sky Is Falling |url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/for-asteroid-hunting-astronomers-nathan-myhrvold-says-the-sky-is-falling1/ |date=May 27, 2016 |work=[[Scientific American]] |access-date=2017-11-09 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170829043702/https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/for-asteroid-hunting-astronomers-nathan-myhrvold-says-the-sky-is-falling1/ |archive-date=2017-08-29 }}</ref> The original version of his criticism itself faced criticism for its methodology<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2016/05/27/nathan_myhrvold_claims_nasa_scientists_asteroid_calculations_are_all_wrong.html |author=Phil Plait |title=A Physics Outsider Says NASA Asteroid Scientists Are All Wrong. Is He Right? (Spoiler: No) |date=May 27, 2016 |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |access-date=2017-11-09 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170814110232/http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2016/05/27/nathan_myhrvold_claims_nasa_scientists_asteroid_calculations_are_all_wrong.html |archive-date=2017-08-14 }}</ref> and did not pass [[peer review]],<ref name="ARX-20160523"/><ref name="NASA-20160525">{{cite news |author=NASA Content Administrator |title=NASA Response to Recent Paper on NEOWISE Asteroid Size Results |url=https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-response-to-recent-paper-on-neowise-asteroid-size-results |date=May 25, 2016 |work=News |publisher=NASA |access-date=2017-11-10 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161111194820/http://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-response-to-recent-paper-on-neowise-asteroid-size-results/ |archive-date=2016-11-11 }}</ref> but a revised version was subsequently published.<ref name="ICARUS-220180522">{{cite journal |last=Myhrvold |first=Nathan |author-link=Nathan Myhrvold |title=An empirical examination of WISE/NEOWISE asteroid analysis and results |date=May 22, 2018 |journal=[[Icarus (journal)|Icarus]] |volume=314 |pages=64–97 |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2018.05.004 |bibcode=2018Icar..314...64M |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="NYT-20180614">{{cite news |last=Chang |first=Kenneth |title=Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks - Two years ago, NASA dismissed and mocked an amateur's criticisms of its asteroids database. Now Nathan Myhrvold is back, and his papers have passed peer review. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/science/asteroids-nasa-nathan-myhrvold.html |date=June 14, 2018 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=June 14, 2018 }}</ref>
While the size of a very small fraction of these asteroids is known to better than 1%, from [[radar]] observations, from images of the asteroid surface, or from [[Occultation#Occultations by asteroids|stellar occultations]], the diameter of the vast majority of near-Earth asteroids has only been estimated on the basis of their brightness and a representative asteroid surface reflectivity or [[albedo]], which is commonly assumed to be 14%.<ref name="neo-jpl-intro">{{cite web |title=Discovery Statistics. Introduction |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/stats/ |date=2012 |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240126214444/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/stats/ |archive-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> Such indirect size estimates are uncertain by over a factor of 2 for individual asteroids, since asteroid albedos can range at least as low as 5% and as high as 30%. This makes the volume of those asteroids uncertain by a factor of 8, and their mass by at least as much, since their assumed density also has its own uncertainty. Using this crude method, an [[Absolute magnitude#Solar System bodies (H)|absolute magnitude]] of 17.75 roughly corresponds to a diameter of {{convert|1|km|mi|abbr=on|lk=off}}<ref name="neo-jpl-intro"/> and an absolute magnitude of 22.0 to a diameter of {{convert|140|m|ft|abbr=on|lk=off}}.<ref name="CNEOS-NEO-groups"/> Diameters of intermediate precision, better than from an assumed albedo but not nearly as precise as good direct measurements, can be obtained from the combination of reflected light and thermal infrared emission, using a thermal model of the asteroid to estimate both its diameter and its albedo. The reliability of this method, as applied by the [[Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer]] and NEOWISE missions, has been the subject of a dispute between experts, with the 2018 publication of two independent analyses, one criticising and another giving results consistent with the WISE method.<ref name="NYT-20180614">{{cite news |last=Chang |first=Kenneth |title=Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/science/asteroids-nasa-nathan-myhrvold.html |date=June 14, 2018 |work=The New York Times |access-date=February 21, 2024 }}</ref>


In 2000, NASA reduced from 1,000–2,000 to 500–1,000 its estimate of the number of existing near-Earth asteroids over one kilometer in diameter, or more exactly brighter than an absolute magnitude of 17.75.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2000/neat.html |title=Asteroid Population Count Slashed |date=January 12, 2000 |author=Jane Platt |work=Press Releases |publisher=NASA/JPL |access-date=2017-11-10 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170509013100/https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2000/neat.html |archive-date=May 9, 2017 }}</ref><ref name="Rabinowitzetal00">{{cite journal |title=A reduced estimate of the number of kilometer-sized near-Earth asteroids |journal=Nature |author=David Rabinowitz |author2=Eleanor Helin |author3=Kenneth Lawrence |author4=Steven Pravdo |name-list-style=amp |date=January 13, 2000 |volume=403 |pages=165–166 |doi=10.1038/35003128 |pmid=10646594|issue = 6766 |bibcode=2000Natur.403..165R|s2cid=4303533 }}</ref> Shortly thereafter, the [[LINEAR]] survey provided an alternative estimate of {{val|1227|+170|-90|fmt=commas}}.<ref name="LINEAR-asteroid-census">{{cite journal |title=A Near-Earth Asteroid Population Estimate from the LINEAR Survey |journal=Science |author=J. S. Stuart |date=November 23, 2001 |volume=294 |issue=5547 |pages=1691–1693 |doi=10.1126/science.1065318 |pmid=11721048 |bibcode=2001Sci...294.1691S |s2cid=37849062 }}</ref> In 2011, on the basis of NEOWISE observations, the estimated number of one-kilometer NEAs was narrowed to {{val|981|19}} (of which 93% had been discovered at the time), while the number of NEAs larger than 140 meters across was estimated at {{val|13200|1900|fmt=commas}}.<ref name="pia14734"/><ref name="WISE-asteroid-census">{{cite journal |title=NEOWISE Observations of Near-Earth Objects: Preliminary Results |display-authors=3|journal=The Astrophysical Journal |author=A. Mainzer |author2=T. Grav |author3=J. Bauer |author4=J. Masiero |author5=R. S. McMillan |author6=R. M. Cutri |author7=R. Walker |author8=E. Wright |author9=P. Eisenhardt |author10=D. J. Tholen |author11=T. Spahr |author12=R. Jedicke |author13=L. Denneau |author14=E. DeBaun |author15=D. Elsbury |author16=T. Gautier |author17=S. Gomillion |author18=E. Hand |author19=W. Mo |author20=J. Watkins |author21=A. Wilkins |author22=G. L. Bryngelson |author23=A. Del Pino Molina |author24=S. Desai |author25=M. Go'mez Camus |author26=S. L. Hidalgo |author27=I. Konstantopoulos |author28=J. A. Larsen |author29=C. Maleszewski |author30=M. A. Malkan |author31=J.-C. Mauduit |author32=B. L. Mullan |author33=E. W. Olszewski |author34=J. Pforr |author35=A. Saro |author36=J. V. Scotti |author37=L. H. Wasserman |date=December 20, 2011 |volume=743 |issue=2 |page=156 |arxiv = 1109.6400 |bibcode = 2011ApJ...743..156M |doi = 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/156 |s2cid=239991}}</ref> The NEOWISE estimate differed from other estimates primarily in assuming a slightly lower average asteroid albedo, which produces larger estimated diameters for the same asteroid brightness. This resulted in 911 then known asteroids at least 1&nbsp;km across, as opposed to the 830 then listed by CNEOS from the same inputs but assuming a slightly higher albedo.<ref>{{cite news |author=Kelly Beatty |title=WISE's Survey of Near-Earth Asteroids |work=Sky & Telescope |date=September 30, 2011 |url=http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/wises-survey-of-near-earth-asteroids/ |access-date=2018-02-08}}</ref> In 2017, two studies using an improved statistical method reduced the estimated number of NEAs brighter than absolute magnitude 17.75 (approximately over one kilometer in diameter) slightly to {{val|921|20}}.<ref name="NEA1km-est-2017">{{cite news |url=https://www.universetoday.com/137583/good-news-everyone-less-deadly-undiscovered-asteroids-thought/ |title=Good News Everyone! There are Fewer Deadly Undiscovered Asteroids than we Thought |author=Matt Williams |work=Universe Today |date=October 20, 2017 |access-date=2017-11-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171104064609/https://www.universetoday.com/137583/good-news-everyone-less-deadly-undiscovered-asteroids-thought/ |archive-date=2017-11-04 }}</ref><ref name="Tricario"/> The estimated number of near-Earth asteroids brighter than absolute magnitude of 22.0 (approximately over 140&nbsp;m across) rose to {{val|27100|2200|fmt=commas}}, double the WISE estimate,<ref name="Tricario">{{cite journal |last=Tricarico |first=Pasquale |title=The near-Earth asteroid population from two decades of observations |journal=Icarus |volume=284 |pages=416–423 |date=March 1, 2017 |url=http://orbit.psi.edu/~tricaric/pdf/Tricarico_NEA_population_Icarus_2017.pdf |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2016.12.008 |access-date=2018-03-09 |arxiv=1604.06328 |bibcode=2017Icar..284..416T |s2cid=85440139 |archive-date=2018-03-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180310073945/http://orbit.psi.edu/~tricaric/pdf/Tricarico_NEA_population_Icarus_2017.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> of which about a third were known as of 2018.
In 2000, NASA reduced from 1,000–2,000 to 500–1,000 its estimate of the number of existing near-Earth asteroids over one kilometer in diameter, or more exactly brighter than an absolute magnitude of 17.75.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/asteroid-population-count-slashed |title=Asteroid Population Count Slashed |date=January 12, 2000 |first=Jane |last=Platt |work=Press Releases |publisher=NASA/JPL |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240127123244/https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/asteroid-population-count-slashed |archive-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref><ref name="Rabinowitzetal00">{{cite journal |title=A reduced estimate of the number of kilometer-sized near-Earth asteroids |journal=Nature |first1=David |last1=Rabinowitz |first2=Eleanor |last2=Helin |first3=Kenneth |last3=Lawrence |first4=Steven |last4=Pravdo |name-list-style=amp |date=January 13, 2000 |volume=403 |pages=165–166 |doi=10.1038/35003128 |pmid=10646594 |issue= 6766 |bibcode=2000Natur.403..165R |s2cid=4303533 }}</ref> Shortly thereafter, the [[LINEAR]] survey provided an alternative estimate of {{val|1227|+170|-90|fmt=commas}}.<ref name="LINEAR-asteroid-census">{{cite journal |title=A Near-Earth Asteroid Population Estimate from the LINEAR Survey |journal=Science |first=J. S. |last=Stuart |date=November 23, 2001 |volume=294 |issue=5547 |pages=1691–1693 |doi=10.1126/science.1065318 |pmid=11721048 |bibcode=2001Sci...294.1691S |s2cid=37849062 }}</ref> In 2011, on the basis of NEOWISE observations, the estimated number of one-kilometer NEAs was narrowed to {{val|981|19}} (of which 93% had been discovered at the time), while the number of NEAs larger than 140 meters across was estimated at {{val|13200|1900|fmt=commas}}.<ref name="pia14734"/><ref name="WISE-asteroid-census">{{cite journal |title=NEOWISE Observations of Near-Earth Objects: Preliminary Results |display-authors=3|journal=[[The Astrophysical Journal]] |first1=A. |last1=Mainzer |first2=T. |last2=Grav |first3=J. |last3=Bauer |first4=J. |last4=Masiero |first5=R. S. |last5=McMillan |first6=R. M. |last6=Cutri |first7=R. |last7=Walker |first8=E. |last8=Wright |first9=P. |last9=Eisenhardt |first10=D. J. |last10=Tholen |first11=T. |last11=Spahr |first12=R. |last12=Jedicke |first13=L. |last13=Denneau |first14=E. |last14=DeBaun |first15=D. |last15=Elsbury |first16=T. |last16=Gautier |first17=S. |last17=Gomillion |first18=E. |last18=Hand |first19=W. |last19=Mo |first20=J. |last20=Watkins |first21=A. |last21=Wilkins |first22=G. L. |last22=Bryngelson |first23=A. |last23=Del Pino Molina |first24=S. |last24=Desai |first25=M. |last25=Go'mez Camus |first26=S. L. |last26=Hidalgo |first27=I. |last27=Konstantopoulos |first28=J. A. |last28=Larsen |first29=C. |last29=Maleszewski |first30=M. A. |last30=Malkan |first31=J.-C. |last31=Mauduit |first32=B. L. |last32=Mullan |first33=E. W. |last33=Olszewski |first34=J. |last34=Pforr |first35=A. |last35=Saro |first36=J. V. |last36=Scotti |first37=L. H. |last37=Wasserman |date=December 20, 2011 |volume=743 |issue=2 |page=156 |arxiv = 1109.6400 |bibcode = 2011ApJ...743..156M |doi = 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/156 |s2cid=239991}}</ref> The NEOWISE estimate differed from other estimates primarily in assuming a slightly lower average asteroid albedo, which produces larger estimated diameters for the same asteroid brightness. This resulted in 911 then known asteroids at least 1&nbsp;km across, as opposed to the 830 then listed by CNEOS from the same inputs but assuming a slightly higher albedo.<ref>{{cite news |first=Kelly |last=Beatty |title=WISE's Survey of Near-Earth Asteroids |work=Sky & Telescope |date=September 30, 2011 |url=http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/wises-survey-of-near-earth-asteroids/ |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref> In 2017, two studies using an improved statistical method reduced the estimated number of NEAs brighter than absolute magnitude 17.75 (approximately over one kilometer in diameter) slightly to {{val|921|20}}.<ref name="NEA1km-est-2017">{{cite news |url=https://www.universetoday.com/137583/good-news-everyone-less-deadly-undiscovered-asteroids-thought/ |title=Good News Everyone! There are Fewer Deadly Undiscovered Asteroids than we Thought |first=Matt |last=Williams |work=[[Universe Today]] |date=October 20, 2017 |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171104064609/https://www.universetoday.com/137583/good-news-everyone-less-deadly-undiscovered-asteroids-thought/ |archive-date=November 4, 2017 }}</ref><ref name="Tricario"/> The estimated number of near-Earth asteroids brighter than absolute magnitude of 22.0 (approximately over 140&nbsp;m across) rose to {{val|27100|2200|fmt=commas}}, double the WISE estimate, of which about a fourth were known at the time.<ref name="Tricario">{{cite journal |last=Tricarico |first=Pasquale |title=The near-Earth asteroid population from two decades of observations |journal=Icarus |volume=284 |pages=416–423 |date=March 1, 2017 |url=http://orbit.psi.edu/~tricaric/pdf/Tricarico_NEA_population_Icarus_2017.pdf |access-date=March 10, 2018 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180310073945/http://orbit.psi.edu/~tricaric/pdf/Tricarico_NEA_population_Icarus_2017.pdf |archive-date=March 10, 2018 |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2016.12.008 |arxiv=1604.06328 |bibcode=2017Icar..284..416T |s2cid=85440139 }}</ref> The number of asteroids brighter than {{nowrap|H {{=}} 25}}, which corresponds to about {{convert|40|m|ft|abbr=on}} in diameter, is estimated at {{val|840000|23000|fmt=commas}}—of which about 1.3 percent had been discovered by February 2016; the number of asteroids brighter than {{nowrap|H {{=}} 30}} (larger than {{convert|3.5|m|ft|abbr=on}}) is estimated at {{val|400|100}} million—of which about 0.003 percent had been discovered by February 2016.<ref name="Tricario"/>
The number of asteroids brighter than {{nowrap|H {{=}} 25}}, which corresponds to about {{convert|40|m|ft|abbr=on}} in diameter, is estimated at {{val|840000|23000|fmt=commas}}—of which about 1.3 percent had been discovered by February 2016; the number of asteroids brighter than {{nowrap|H {{=}} 30}} (larger than {{convert|3.5|m|ft|abbr=on}}) is estimated at {{val|400|100}} million—of which about 0.003 percent had been discovered by February 2016.<ref name="Tricario"/>


{{As of|2024|3|30|df=US}}, and using diameters mostly estimated crudely from a measured absolute magnitude and an assumed albedo, 861 NEAs listed by CNEOS, including 152 PHAs, measure at least 1&nbsp;km in diameter, and 10,832 known NEAs, including 2,406 PHAs, are larger than 140&nbsp;m in diameter.<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />


The smallest known near-Earth asteroid is {{mp|2022 WJ|1}} with an absolute magnitude of 33.58,<ref name="JPL-SSD-NEA"/> corresponding to an estimated diameter of about {{convert|0.7|m|ft|abbr=on}}.<ref name="h" /> The largest such object is [[1036 Ganymed]],<ref name="JPL-SSD-NEA"/> with an absolute magnitude of 9.26 and directly measured irregular dimensions which are equivalent to a diameter of about {{convert|38|km|mi|abbr=on}}.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=1036 |title=1036 Ganymed (A924 UB) |publisher=NASA/JPL |date=January 23, 2024 |access-date=January 25, 2024 }}</ref>
{{As of|2023|01|12|df=US}}, and using diameters mostly estimated crudely from a measured absolute magnitude and an assumed albedo, 859 NEAs listed by CNEOS, including 152 PHAs, measure at least 1&nbsp;km in diameter, and 10,362 known NEAs, including 2322 PHAs, are larger than 140&nbsp;m in diameter.<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />
The smallest known near-Earth asteroid is {{mp|2008 TS|26}} with an absolute magnitude of 33.2,<ref name="JPL-SSD-NEA"/> corresponding to an estimated diameter of about {{convert|1|m|ft|abbr=on}}.<ref name="h" /> The largest such object is [[1036 Ganymed]],<ref name="JPL-SSD-NEA"/> with an absolute magnitude of 9.45 and directly measured irregular dimensions which are equivalent to a diameter of about {{convert|38|km|mi|abbr=on}}.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=1036 |title=1036 Ganymed (1924 TD) |publisher=NASA/JPL |date=March 9, 2018 |access-date=2018-03-09}}</ref>


==== Orbital classification ====
==== Orbital classification ====
[[File:Neas.svg|thumb|Types of near-Earth asteroid orbits]]
[[File:Neo orbit types.jpg|thumb|upright=1.4|NEA orbital groups (NASA/JPL)]]
Near-Earth asteroids are divided into groups based on their [[semi-major axis]] (a), [[Apsis|perihelion]] distance (q), and [[Apsis|aphelion]] distance (Q):<ref name="NEO-groups"/><ref name="MorbidelliAstIII" />
Near-Earth asteroids are divided into groups based on their [[semi-major axis]] (a), [[Apsis|perihelion]] distance (q), and [[Apsis|aphelion]] distance (Q):<ref name="CNEOS-NEO-groups"/><ref name="NEOCC-DA"/>
* The ''[[Atira asteroid|Atiras]]'' or ''Apoheles'' have orbits strictly inside Earth's orbit: an Atira asteroid's aphelion distance (Q) is smaller than Earth's perihelion distance (0.983&nbsp;AU). That is, {{nowrap|Q < 0.983 AU}}, which implies that the asteroid's semi-major axis is also less than 0.983 AU.<ref name="atiras">{{cite journal |last1=de la Fuente Marcos |first1=Carlos |last2=de la Fuente Marcos |first2=Raúl |date=August 1, 2019 |title=Understanding the evolution of Atira-class asteroid 2019 AQ<sub>3</sub>, a major step towards the future discovery of the Vatira population |journal=[[Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society]] |volume= 487 |issue= 2 |pages= 2742–2752 |arxiv=1905.08695 |bibcode=2019MNRAS.487.2742D |doi=10.1093/mnras/stz1437 |doi-access=free |s2cid=160009327 }}</ref> This group includes asteroids on orbits that never get close to Earth, including the sub-group of [[Atira asteroid#ꞌAylóꞌchaxnim asteroids|ꞌAylóꞌchaxnims]], which orbit the Sun entirely within the orbit of [[Venus (planet)|Venus]]<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bolin |first1=Bryce T. |display-authors=et al |date=November 2022 |title=The discovery and characterization of (594913) 'Ayló'chaxnim, a kilometre sized asteroid inside the orbit of Venus |url=https://authors.library.caltech.edu/records/4fewd-rff56/files/slac089.pdf?download=1 |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters |volume=517 |issue=1 |pages=L49–L54 |doi=10.1093/mnrasl/slac089 |access-date=January 25, 2024 |doi-access=free }}</ref> and which include the hypothetical sub-group of [[Vulcanoid|Vulcanoids]], which have orbits entirely within the orbit of [[Mercury (planet)|Mercury]].<ref>{{cite news |first=David |last=Dickinson |title=Astronomers Discover Asteroid that Flies Close to the Sun |work=Sky & Telescope |date=August 25, 2021 |url=https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-blogs/astronomy-space-david-dickinson/astronomers-discover-asteroid-that-flies-close-to-the-sun/ |access-date=February 14, 2024 }}</ref>
* The ''[[Atira asteroid|Atiras]]'' or ''Apoheles'' have orbits strictly inside Earth's orbit: an Atira asteroid's aphelion distance (Q) is smaller than Earth's perihelion distance (0.983&nbsp;AU). That is, {{nowrap|Q < 0.983 AU}}, which implies that the asteroid's semi-major axis is also less than 0.983 AU.<ref name="atiras">{{cite journal
|last1=de la Fuente Marcos |first1=Carlos
|last2=de la Fuente Marcos |first2=Raúl
|date=1 August 2019
|title=Understanding the evolution of Atira-class asteroid 2019 AQ<sub>3</sub>, a major step towards the future discovery of the Vatira population
|journal=[[Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society]]
|volume= 487
|issue= 2
|pages= 2742–2752
|arxiv=1905.08695
|bibcode=2019MNRAS.487.2742D
|doi=10.1093/mnras/stz1437|s2cid=160009327
}}</ref>
[[File:Minor Planets - Atira.svg|thumb|200px|The group of ''Atira (Apohele) asteroids'' compared to the orbits of the [[terrestrial planet]]s of the [[Solar System]].]]


* The ''[[Aten asteroid|Atens]]'' have a semi-major axis of less than 1&nbsp;AU and cross Earth's orbit. Mathematically, {{nowrap|a < 1.0 AU}} and {{nowrap|Q > 0.983 AU}}. (0.983 AU is Earth's perihelion distance.)
* The ''[[Aten asteroid|Atens]]'' have a semi-major axis of less than 1&nbsp;AU and cross Earth's orbit. Mathematically, {{nowrap|a < 1.0 AU}} and {{nowrap|Q > 0.983 AU}}. (0.983 AU is Earth's perihelion distance.)
[[Image:Minor Planets - Aten.svg|thumb|200px|The ''Aten group'' compared to the orbits of the [[terrestrial planet]]s of the [[Solar System]].]]


* The ''[[Apollo asteroid|Apollos]]'' have a semi-major axis of more than 1&nbsp;AU and cross Earth's orbit. Mathematically, {{nowrap|a > 1.0 AU}} and {{nowrap|q < 1.017 AU}}. (1.017&nbsp;AU is Earth's aphelion distance.)
* The ''[[Apollo asteroid|Apollos]]'' have a semi-major axis of more than 1&nbsp;AU and cross Earth's orbit. Mathematically, {{nowrap|a > 1.0 AU}} and {{nowrap|q < 1.017 AU}}. (1.017&nbsp;AU is Earth's aphelion distance.)
[[File:Minor Planets - Apollo.svg|thumb|200px|Location of the ''Apollo asteroids'' compared to the orbits of the [[terrestrial planet]]s of the [[Solar System]].]]


* The ''[[Amor asteroid|Amors]]'' have orbits strictly outside Earth's orbit: an Amor asteroid's perihelion distance (q) is greater than Earth's aphelion distance (1.017&nbsp;AU). Amor asteroids are also near-earth objects so {{nowrap|q < 1.3 AU}}. In summary, {{nowrap|1.017 AU < q < 1.3 AU}}. (This implies that the asteroid's semi-major axis (a) is also larger than 1.017&nbsp;AU.) Some Amor asteroid orbits cross the orbit of Mars.
* The ''[[Amor asteroid|Amors]]'' have orbits strictly outside Earth's orbit: an Amor asteroid's perihelion distance (q) is greater than Earth's aphelion distance (1.017&nbsp;AU). Amor asteroids are also near-earth objects so {{nowrap|q < 1.3 AU}}. In summary, {{nowrap|1.017 AU < q < 1.3 AU}}. (This implies that the asteroid's semi-major axis (a) is also larger than 1.017&nbsp;AU.) Some Amor asteroid orbits cross the orbit of Mars.
[[Image:Minor Planets - Amor.svg|thumb|right|200px|The ''Amor asteroid'' group compared to the orbits of the [[terrestrial planet]]s of the [[Solar System]].]]


(Note: Some authors define Atens differently: they define it as being all the asteroids with a semi-major axis of less than 1&nbsp;AU.<ref>{{cite web |title=Unusual Minor Planets |publisher=IAU/MPC |date=March 8, 2018 |url=https://minorplanetcenter.net/iau/Unusual.html |access-date=2018-03-09}}</ref><ref name="galache"/> That is, they consider the Atiras to be part of the Atens.<ref name="galache">{{cite web |author=J. L. Galache |title=Asteroid Classification I – Dynamics |publisher=IAU/MPC |date=March 5, 2011 |url=http://minorplanetcenter.net/blog/asteroid-classification-i-dynamics/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303235814/http://minorplanetcenter.net/blog/asteroid-classification-i-dynamics/ |access-date=2018-03-09 |archive-date=2016-03-03}}</ref> Historically, until 1998, there were no known or suspected Atiras, so the distinction wasn't necessary.)
Some authors define Atens differently: they define it as being all the asteroids with a semi-major axis of less than 1&nbsp;AU.<ref>{{cite web |title=Unusual Minor Planets |publisher=IAU/MPC |url=https://minorplanetcenter.net/iau/Unusual.html |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref><ref name="galache"/> That is, they consider the Atiras to be part of the Atens.<ref name="galache">{{cite web |first=J. L. |last=Galache |title=Asteroid Classification I – Dynamics |publisher=IAU/MPC |date=March 5, 2011 |url=http://minorplanetcenter.net/blog/asteroid-classification-i-dynamics/ |access-date=March 9, 2018 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303235814/http://minorplanetcenter.net/blog/asteroid-classification-i-dynamics/ |archive-date=March 3, 2016 }}</ref> Historically, until 1998, there were no known or suspected Atiras, so the distinction wasn't necessary.


Atiras and Amors do not cross the Earth's orbit and are not immediate impact threats, but their orbits may change to become Earth-crossing orbits in the future.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ribeiro|first1=A. O.|last2=Roig|first2=F.|last3=De Prá|first3=M. N.|last4=Carvano|first4=J. M.|last5=DeSouza|first5=S. R.|date=2016-06-01|title=Dynamical study of the Atira group of asteroids|url=https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/458/4/4471/2613877|journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society|language=en|volume=458|issue=4|pages=4471–4476|doi=10.1093/mnras/stw642|issn=0035-8711|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/>
Atiras and Amors do not cross the Earth's orbit and are not immediate impact threats, but their orbits may change to become Earth-crossing orbits in the future.<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ribeiro |first1=A. O. |last2=Roig |first2=F.|last3=De Prá |first3=M. N. |last4=Carvano |first4=J. M. |last5=DeSouza |first5=S. R. |date=March 17, 2016 |title=Dynamical study of the Atira group of asteroids |url=https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/458/4/4471/8143283/stw642.pdf |access-date=January 27, 2024 |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |volume=458 |issue=4 |pages=4471–4476 |doi=10.1093/mnras/stw642 |issn=0035-8711 |doi-access=free}}</ref>


{{As of|2021|11|04|df=US}}, 26 Atiras, 2,113 Atens, 15,186 Apollos and 9,998 Amors have been discovered and cataloged.<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />
{{As of|2024|3|30|df=US}}, 33 Atiras, 2,744 Atens, 19,613 Apollos and 12,213 Amors have been discovered and cataloged.<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />


==== Co-orbital asteroids ====
==== Co-orbital asteroids ====
[[File:Lagrange Horseshoe Orbit.jpg|400px|thumb|The five Lagrangian points relative to Earth and possible orbits along gravitational contours]]
[[File:Lagrange Horseshoe Orbit.jpg|thumb|The five Lagrangian points relative to the Sun and Earth and possible orbits along gravitational contours]]


Most NEAs have orbits that are significantly more [[Orbital eccentricity|eccentric]] than that of the Earth and the other major planets and their orbital planes can [[Orbital inclination|tilt]] several degrees relative to that of the Earth. NEAs which have orbits that do resemble the Earth's in eccentricity, inclination and semi-major axis are grouped as [[Arjuna asteroid|Arjuna asteroids]].<ref name="2023FY3_2024"/> Within this group are NEAs that have the same orbital period as the Earth, or a [[co-orbital configuration]], which corresponds to an [[orbital resonance]] at a ratio of 1:1. All co-orbital asteroids have special orbits that are relatively stable and, paradoxically, can prevent them from getting close to Earth:
[[File:Inner solar system objects top view for wiki.png|thumb|300px|Overview of the Inner Solar System with different co-orbital bodies.]]
* ''[[Trojan (astronomy)|Trojans]]'': Near the orbit of a planet, there are five gravitational equilibrium points, the [[Lagrangian point]]s, in which an asteroid would orbit the Sun in fixed formation with the planet. Two of these, 60 degrees ahead and behind the planet along its orbit (designated L4 and L5 respectively) are stable; that is, an asteroid near these points would stay there for millions of years even if lightly perturbed by other planets and by non-gravitational forces. Trojans circle around L4 or L5 on paths resembing a [[tadpole]].<ref name="Fuentes-horseshoe"/> {{As of|2023|10}}, Earth has two confirmed Trojans:<ref name="CastroCisneros2023"/> {{mpl|(706765) 2010 TK|7}} and {{mpl|(614689) 2020 XL|5}}, both circling Earth's L4 point.<ref name="WISE">{{cite press release |url=https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nasas-wise-mission-finds-first-trojan-asteroid-sharing-earths-orbit-126277963.html |title=NASA's WISE mission finds first Trojan asteroid sharing Earth's orbit |date=July 27, 2011 |work=PR Newswire |publisher=[[NASA]] |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240127131203/https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nasas-wise-mission-finds-first-trojan-asteroid-sharing-earths-orbit-126277963.html |archive-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref><ref name="Trojan2">{{cite news |first=Chelsea |last=Gohd |title=Earth has an extra companion, a Trojan asteroid that will hang around for 4,000 years |date=February 1, 2022 |work=Space.com |url=https://www.space.com/earth-extra-moon-trojan-asteroid-2020-xl5-discovery |access-date=April 24, 2024 }}</ref>
* ''[[Horseshoe orbit|Horseshoe librators]]'': The region of stability around L4 and L5 also includes orbits for co-orbital asteroids that run around both L4 and L5. Relative to the Earth and Sun, the orbit can resemble the circumference of a horseshoe, or may consist of annual loops that wander back and forth ([[Libration|librate]]) in a horseshoe-shaped area. In both cases, the Sun is at the horseshoe's center of gravity, Earth is in the gap of the horseshoe, and L4 and L5 are inside the ends of the horseshoe. This orbital type is less stable than a <ref name="Fuentes-horseshoe">{{cite journal |last1=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |first1=C. |last2=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |first2=R. |title=A trio of horseshoes: Past, present, and future dynamical evolution of Earth co-orbital asteroids {{mp|2015 XX|169}}, {{mp|2015 YA}} and {{mp|2015 YQ|1}} |journal=[[Astrophysics and Space Science]] |volume=361 |issue=4 |pages=121–133 |date=April 2016 |url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2016Ap%26SS.361..121D/EPRINT_PDF |access-date=February 3, 2024 |doi=10.1007/s10509-016-2711-6 |arxiv=1603.02415 |bibcode=2016Ap&SS.361..121D |s2cid=119222384 }}</ref> {{As of|2023|10}}, at least 13 horseshoe librators of Earth have been discovered.<ref name="CastroCisneros2023"/> The most-studied and, at about {{convert|5|km|mi|abbr=on}}, largest is [[3753 Cruithne]], which travels along bean-shaped annual loops and completes its horseshoe libration cycle every 770–780 years.<ref>{{cite journal |title=An asteroidal companion to the Earth |type=letter |last1=Wiegert |first1=Paul A. |last2=Innanen |first2=Kimmo A. |last3=Mikkola |first3=Seppo |journal=Nature |date=June 12, 1997 |volume=387 |issue=6634 |pages=685–686 |doi=10.1038/42662 |bibcode=1997Natur.387..685W |s2cid=4305272 |url=http://www.astro.uwo.ca/~wiegert/papers/1997Nature.387.685.pdf |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160626032239/http://www.astro.uwo.ca/~wiegert/papers/1997Nature.387.685.pdf |archive-date=June 26, 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://astro101.wwu.edu/a101_cruithne.html |first=Brad |last=Snowder |title=Cruithne |publisher=Western Washington University Planetarium |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240101150817/https://astro101.wwu.edu/a101_cruithne.html |archive-date=January 1, 2024 }}</ref> {{mpl|419624|2010 SO|16}} is an asteroid on a relatively stable circumference-of-a-horseshoe orbit, with a horseshoe [[libration]] period of about 350 years.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Christou |first1=A.A. |last2=Asher |first2=D.J. |title=A long-lived horseshoe companion to the Earth |date=July 11, 2011 |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |volume=414 |issue=4 |pages=2965–2969 |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18595.x |doi-access=free |arxiv=1104.0036 |bibcode=2011MNRAS.414.2965C |s2cid=13832179 |url=https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/414/4/2965/18700374/mnras0414-2965.pdf |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref>
* ''[[Quasi-satellite]]s'': Quasi-satellites are co-orbital asteroids on a normal elliptic orbit with a higher eccentricity than Earth's, which they travel in a way synchronised with Earth's motion. Since the asteroid orbits the Sun slower than Earth when further away and faster than Earth when closer to the Sun, when observed in a rotating frame of reference fixed to the Sun and the Earth, the quasi-satellite appears to orbit Earth in a [[retrograde motion|retrograde]] direction in one year, even though it is not bound gravitationally. {{As of|2023|10}}, six asteroids were known to be a quasi-satellite of Earth.<ref name="CastroCisneros2023"/> [[469219 Kamoʻoalewa]] is Earth's closest quasi-satellite, in an orbit that has been stable for almost a century.<ref name="Fuentes-2016HO3">{{cite journal |last1=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |first1=C. |last2=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |first2=R. |title=Asteroid {{mp|469219|2016 HO|3}}, the smallest and closest Earth quasi-satellite |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |volume=462 |issue=4 |pages=3441–3456 |date=November 11, 2016 |doi=10.1093/mnras/stw1972 |doi-access=free |arxiv=1608.01518 |bibcode=2016MNRAS.462.3441D |s2cid=118580771 }}</ref> This asteroid is thought to be a piece of the Moon ejected during an impact.<ref name="CastroCisneros2023">{{cite journal |first1=Jose Daniel |last1=Castro-Cisneros |first2=Renu |last2=Malhotra |first3=Aaron J. |last3=Rosengren |title=Lunar ejecta origin of near-Earth asteroid Kamo'oalewa is compatible with rare orbital pathways |date=October 23, 2023 |journal=[[Communications Earth & Environment]] |volume=4 |issue=1 |at=section 372 |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-023-01031-w.pdf |access-date=February 3, 2024 |doi=10.1038/s43247-023-01031-w |pmid=39524985 |arxiv=2304.14136 |bibcode=2023ComEE...4..372C }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Robert |last=Lea |title=Earth's weird 'quasi-moon' Kamo'oalewa is a fragment blasted out of big moon crater |date=April 23, 2024 |work=Space.com |url=https://www.space.com/quasi-moon-kamooalewa-giant-lunar-impact |access-date=April 24, 2024 }}</ref> Orbit calculations show that almost all quasi-satellites and many horseshoe librators repeatedly transfer between horseshoe and quasi-satellite orbits.<ref name="Fuentes-2016HO3"/><ref name="DiRuzza2023">{{cite journal |first1=Sara |last1=Di Ruzza |first2=Alexandre |last2=Pousse |first3=Elisa Maria |last3=Alessi |title=On the co-orbital asteroids in the solar system: medium-term timescale analysis of the quasi-coplanar objects |date=January 15, 2023 |journal=Icarus |volume=390 |at=section 115330 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103522004225/pdfft?md5=ba199ccd98b4cc9b9f5cd6e69761ba56&pid=1-s2.0-S0019103522004225-main.pdf |access-date=February 7, 2024 |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115330 |arxiv=2209.05219 |bibcode=2023Icar..39015330D }}</ref> One of these objects, {{mpl|2003 YN|107}}, was observed during its transition from a quasi-satellite orbit to a horseshoe orbit in 2006; it is expected to transfer back to a quasi-satellite orbit sometime around year 2066.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/09jun_moonlets.htm |title=Corkscrew asteroid |first=Tony |last=Phillips |date=June 9, 2006 |work=Science@NASA |publisher=[[NASA]] |access-date=November 13, 2017 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060929155325/http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/09jun_moonlets.htm |archive-date=September 29, 2006 }}</ref> A quasi-satellite discovered in 2023 but then found in old photographs back to 2012, {{mpl|2023 FW|13}}, was found to have an orbit that is stable for about 4,000 years, from 100 BC to AD 3700.<ref>{{cite news |title=Astronomers have discovered an asteroid that orbits the Sun with Earth, earning it the moniker "quasi-moon." |work=Sky & Telescope |first=David L. |last=Chandler |date=April 7, 2023 |url=https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/does-earth-have-new-quasi-moon/ |access-date=January 24, 2024 }}</ref>
* Asteroids on ''compound orbits'': orbital calculations show that some co-orbital asteroids transit between horseshoe and quasi-satellite orbits during every horseshoe resp. quasi-satellite cycle. Theoretically, similar continuous transitions between Trojan and horseshoe orbits are possible, too. {{As of|2023|1}}, at least 20 Earth co-orbital NEAs are thought to be in the horseshoe-like phase of compound orbits.<ref name="DiRuzza2023"/>
[[File:Animation of 2020 CD3's orbit around Earth.gif|thumb|Animation of {{mpl|2020 CD|3}}'s orbit around Earth<br />{{legend2|Magenta|{{mp|2020 CD|3}}}}{{·}}{{legend2|DarkKhaki|Moon}}{{·}}{{legend2|RoyalBlue|Earth}}]]
* ''[[Temporary satellite]]s'': NEAs can also transfer between solar orbits and distant Earth orbits, becoming gravitationally bound temporary satellites. According to simulations, temporary satellites are typically caught when they pass Earth's L1 or L2 Lagrangian points at the time Earth is either at the point in its orbit closest or farthest from the Sun, complete a couple of orbits around Earth, and then return to a heliocentric orbit due to perturbations from the Moon.<ref name="ST111230">{{cite news |first=Camille M. |last=Carlisle |title=Pseudo-moons orbit Earth |work=Sky & Telescope |date=December 30, 2011 |url=https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/pseudo-moons-orbit-earth/ |access-date=February 3, 2024 }}</ref> Strictly speaking, temporary satellites aren't co-orbital asteroids, and they can have orbits of the broader Arjuna type before and after capture by Earth, but simulations show that they can be captured from, or transfer to, horseshoe orbits.<ref name="2023FY3_2024"/> The simulations also indicate that Earth typically has at least one temporary satellite {{convert|1|m|ft|abbr=on}} across at any given time, but they are too faint to be detected by current surveys.<ref name="ST111230"/> {{As of|2023|8}}, four temporary satellites have been observed:<ref name="2023FY3_2024"/> {{mpl|1991 VG|}},<ref name="Fuente-Marcos-2018">{{Cite journal |first1=Carlos |last1=de la Fuente Marcos |first2=Raúl |last2=de la Fuente Marcos |date= January 2018 |title=Dynamical evolution of near-Earth asteroid 1991 VG |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |volume=473 |issue=3 |pages=2939–2948 |bibcode=2018MNRAS.473.2939D |doi=10.1093/mnras/stx2545 |doi-access=free |arxiv=1709.09533}}</ref> {{mpl|2006 RH|120}}, {{mpl|2020 CD|3}}<ref>{{cite news |title=Earth's "other moon" |work=Sky & Telescope |first=Roger W. |last=Sinnott |date=April 17, 2007 |url=https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/earths-other-moon/ |access-date=January 25, 2024 }}</ref><ref name="Naidu2020">{{cite news |first1=Shantanu |last1=Naidu |title=Tiny Object Discovered in Distant Orbit Around the Earth |date=February 27, 2020 |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news205.html |last2=Farnocchia |first2=Davide |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |access-date=February 3, 2024 }}</ref> and {{mpl|2022 NX|1}}.<ref name="2023FY3_2024"/> Calculations for the {{convert|5|m|ft|abbr=on}} asteroid {{mpl|2023 FY|3}} showed repeated transitions into temporary satellite orbits both in the past and the future 10,000 years.<ref name="2023FY3_2024">{{cite journal |first1=R. |last1=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |first2=C. |last2=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |display-authors=etal |title=When the horseshoe fits: Characterizing {{mp|2023 FY|3}} with the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias and the Two-meter Twin Telescope |date=January 2024 |journal=Astronomy & Astrophysics |volume=681 |at=section A4 |url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2024A%26A...681A...4D/PUB_PDF |access-date=February 3, 2024 |doi=10.1051/0004-6361/202347663 |arxiv=2310.08724 |bibcode=2024A&A...681A...4D }}</ref>


Near-Earth asteroids also include the co-orbitals of Venus. {{As of|2023|1}}, all known co-orbitals of Venus have orbits with high eccentricity, also crossing Earth's orbit.<ref name="DiRuzza2023"/><ref>{{cite journal |first1=Petr |last1=Pokorý |first2=Marc |last2=Kuchner |title=Threat from Within: Excitation of Venus's Co-orbital Asteroids to Earth-crossing Orbits |date=October 2021 |journal=The Planetary Science Journal |volume=2 |issue=5 |at=part 193 |doi=10.3847/PSJ/ac1e9b |doi-access=free |bibcode=2021PSJ.....2..193P }}</ref>
NEAs on a [[co-orbital configuration]] have the same orbital period as the Earth. All co-orbital asteroids have special orbits that are relatively stable and, paradoxically, can prevent them from getting close to Earth:
* ''[[Trojan (astronomy)|Trojans]]'': Near the orbit of a planet, there are five gravitational equilibrium points, the [[Lagrangian point]]s, in which an asteroid would orbit the Sun in fixed formation with the planet. Two of these, 60&nbsp;degrees ahead and behind the planet along its orbit (designated L4 and L5 respectively) are stable; that is, an asteroid near these points would stay there for millions of years even if lightly perturbed by other planets and by non-gravitational forces. {{As of|2018|03}}, Earth's only confirmed Trojan is {{mpl|2010 TK|7}}, circling Earth's L4 point.<ref name="WISE">{{cite news |url=http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/WISE/news/wise20110727.html |title=NASA's WISE mission finds first Trojan asteroid sharing Earth's orbit |date=July 27, 2011 |work=News |publisher=[[NASA]] |access-date=2017-11-13 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171220100503/https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/WISE/news/wise20110727.html |archive-date=2017-12-20 }}</ref>
* ''[[Horseshoe orbit|Horseshoe librators]]'': The region of stability around L4 and L5 also includes orbits for co-orbital asteroids that run around both L4 and L5. Relative to the Earth and Sun, the orbit can resemble the circumference of a horseshoe, or may consist of annual loops that wander back and forth ([[Libration|librate]]) in a horseshoe-shaped area. In both cases, the Sun is at the horseshoe's center of gravity, Earth is in the gap of the horseshoe, and L4 and L5 are inside the ends of the horseshoe. By 2016, 12&nbsp;horseshoe librators of Earth have been discovered.<ref name="Fuentes-horseshoe">{{cite journal |last1=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |first1=C. |last2=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |first2=R. |title=A trio of horseshoes: Past, present, and future dynamical evolution of Earth co-orbital asteroids {{mp|2015 XX|169}}, {{mpl|2015 YA}} and {{mp|2015 YQ|1}} |journal=Astrophysics and Space Science |volume=361 |issue=4 |pages=121–133 |date=April 2016 |doi=10.1007/s10509-016-2711-6 |arxiv=1603.02415 |bibcode=2016Ap&SS.361..121D |s2cid=119222384 }}</ref> The most-studied and, at about {{convert|5|km|mi|abbr=on}}, largest is [[3753 Cruithne]], which travels along bean-shaped annual loops and completes its horseshoe libration cycle every 770–780&nbsp;years.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.astro.uwo.ca/~wiegert/papers/1997Nature.387.685.pdf |title=An asteroidal companion to the Earth |type=letter |last1=Wiegert |first1=Paul A. |last2=Innanen |first2=Kimmo A. |last3=Mikkola |first3=Seppo |journal=Nature |date=June 12, 1997 |volume=387 |issue=6634 |pages=685–686 |access-date=2017-11-13 |doi=10.1038/42662 |bibcode=1997Natur.387..685W |s2cid=4305272 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160626032239/http://www.astro.uwo.ca/~wiegert/papers/1997Nature.387.685.pdf |archive-date=2016-06-26 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wwu.edu/depts/skywise/a101_cruithne.html |title=Cruithne: Asteroid&nbsp;3753 |publisher=Western Washington University Planetarium |access-date=2017-11-13 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302001141/http://www.wwu.edu/depts/skywise/a101_cruithne.html |archive-date=2012-03-02 }}</ref> {{mpl|419624|2010 SO|16}} is an asteroid on a relatively stable circumference-of-a-horseshoe orbit, with a horseshoe [[libration]] period of about 350&nbsp;years.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Christou |first1=A.A. |last2=Asher |first2=D.J. |title=A long-lived horseshoe companion to the Earth |url=http://star.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2011/574.pdf |date=July 11, 2011 |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |volume=414 |issue=4 |pages=2965–2969 |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18595.x |arxiv=1104.0036 |bibcode=2011MNRAS.414.2965C |s2cid=13832179 |access-date=2017-11-13 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808205805/http://star.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2011/574.pdf |archive-date=August 8, 2017 }}</ref>
* ''[[Quasi-satellite]]s'': Quasi-satellites are co-orbital asteroids on a normal elliptic orbit with a higher eccentricity than Earth's, which they travel in a way synchronised with Earth's motion. Since the asteroid orbits the Sun slower than Earth when further away and faster than Earth when closer to the Sun, when observed from Earth, the quasi-satellite appears to orbit Earth in a [[retrograde motion|retrograde]] direction in one year, even though it is not bound gravitationally. By 2016, five asteroids were known to be a quasi-satellite of Earth. [[469219 Kamoʻoalewa]] is Earth's closest quasi-satellite, in an orbit that has been stable for almost a century.<ref name="Fuentes-2016HO3">{{cite journal |last1=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |first1=C. |last2=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |first2=R. |title=Asteroid&nbsp;(469219) {{mp|469219|2016 HO|3}}, the smallest and closest Earth quasi-satellite |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |volume=462 |issue=4 |pages=3441–3456 |date=November 11, 2016 |doi=10.1093/mnras/stw1972 |arxiv=1608.01518 |bibcode=2016MNRAS.462.3441D |s2cid=118580771 }}</ref> Orbit calculations until 2016 showed that all quasi-satellites and four of the horseshoe librators then known repeatedly transfer between horseshoe and quasi-satellite orbits.<ref name="Fuentes-2016HO3"/> One of these objects, {{mpl|2003 YN|107}}, was observed during its transition from a quasi-satellite orbit to a horseshoe orbit in 2006; it is expected to transfer back to a quasi-satellite orbit sometime around year 2066.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/09jun_moonlets.htm |title=Corkscrew asteroid |first=Tony |last=Phillips |date=June 9, 2006 |work=Science@NASA |publisher=[[NASA]] |access-date=2017-11-13 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060929155325/http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/09jun_moonlets.htm |archive-date=2006-09-29}}</ref>
* ''[[Temporary satellite]]s'': NEAs can also transfer between solar orbits and distant Earth orbits, becoming gravitationally bound temporary satellites. According to simulations, temporary satellites are typically caught when they pass the L1 or L2 Lagrangian points, and Earth typically has at least one temporary satellite {{convert|1|m|ft|abbr=on}} across at any given time, but they are too faint to detect by current surveys.<ref>{{cite news |first=Camille M. |last=Carlisle |title=Pseudo-moons orbit Earth |work=Sky & Telescope |date=December 30, 2011 }}</ref> {{As of|2021|11}}, the only observed transitions were those of asteroids {{mpl|2006 RH|120}} and {{mpl|2020 CD|3}}, which were temporary satellites of Earth for at least a year since their capture dates.<ref>{{cite news |title=Earth's "other moon" |work=Sky & Telescope |first=Roger W. |last=Sinnott |date=April 17, 2007 |url=http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/7067527.html |access-date=2017-11-13 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120402120646/http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/7067527.html |archive-date=April 2, 2012 }}</ref><ref name="Naidu2020">{{cite news |title = Tiny Object Discovered in Distant Orbit Around the Earth |url = https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news205.html |last1 = Naidu |first1 = Shantanu |last2 = Farnocchia |first2 = Davide |work = Center for Near Earth Object Studies |publisher = Jet Propulsion Laboratory |access-date = 3 March 2020}}</ref>


=== Meteoroids ===
=== Meteoroids ===


In 1961, the IAU defined [[meteoroid]]s as a class of solid interplanetary objects distinct from asteroids by their considerably smaller size.<ref name="Rubin2010"/> This definition was useful at the time because, with the exception of the [[Tunguska event]], all historically observed meteors were produced by objects significantly smaller than the smallest asteroids then observable by telescopes.<ref name="Rubin2010"/> As the distinction began to blur with the discovery of ever smaller asteroids and a greater variety of observed NEO impacts, revised definitions with size limits have been proposed from the 1990s.<ref name="Rubin2010">{{cite journal |last1=Rubin |first1=Alan E. |last2=Grossman |first2=Jeffrey N. |title=Meteorite and meteoroid: New comprehensive definitions |journal=Meteoritics & Planetary Science |volume=45 |issue=1 |pages=114–122 |date=January 2010 |doi=10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.01009.x |bibcode=2010M&PS...45..114R |s2cid=129972426 }}</ref> In April 2017, the IAU adopted a revised definition that generally limits meteoroids to a size between 30&nbsp;µm and 1&nbsp;m in diameter, but permits the use of the term for any object of any size that caused a meteor, thus leaving the distinction between asteroid and meteoroid blurred.<ref name="met-def-2017">{{cite news |author=Vincent Perlerin |title=Definitions of terms in meteor astronomy (IAU) |date=September 26, 2017 |work=News |publisher=[[International Meteor Organization]] |url=https://www.imo.net/definitions-of-terms-in-meteor-astronomy-iau/ |access-date=2018-01-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180123072313/https://www.imo.net/definitions-of-terms-in-meteor-astronomy-iau/ |archive-date=2018-01-23 }}</ref>
In 1961, the IAU defined [[meteoroid]]s as a class of solid interplanetary objects distinct from asteroids by their considerably smaller size.<ref name="Rubin2010"/> This definition was useful at the time because, with the exception of the [[Tunguska event]], all historically observed meteors were produced by objects significantly smaller than the smallest asteroids then observable by telescopes.<ref name="Rubin2010"/> As the distinction began to blur with the discovery of ever smaller asteroids and a greater variety of observed NEO impacts, revised definitions with size limits have been proposed from the 1990s.<ref name="Rubin2010">{{cite journal |last1=Rubin |first1=Alan E. |last2=Grossman |first2=Jeffrey N. |title=Meteorite and meteoroid: New comprehensive definitions |journal=Meteoritics & Planetary Science |volume=45 |issue=1 |pages=114–122 |date=January 2010 |doi=10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.01009.x |bibcode=2010M&PS...45..114R |s2cid=129972426 }}</ref> In April 2017, the IAU adopted a revised definition that generally limits meteoroids to a size between 30&nbsp;μm and 1&nbsp;m in diameter, but permits the use of the term for any object of any size that caused a meteor, thus leaving the distinction between asteroid and meteoroid blurred.<ref name="met-def-2017">{{cite news |first=Vincent |last=Perlerin |title=Definitions of terms in meteor astronomy (IAU) |date=September 26, 2017 |work=News |publisher=[[International Meteor Organization]] |url=https://www.imo.net/definitions-of-terms-in-meteor-astronomy-iau/ |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180123072313/https://www.imo.net/definitions-of-terms-in-meteor-astronomy-iau/ |archive-date=January 23, 2018 }}</ref>


=== Near-Earth comets<!--'Near-Earth comet' and 'Near-Earth comets' redirect here--> ===
=== Near-Earth comets<!--'Near-Earth comet' and 'Near-Earth comets' redirect here--> ===


[[File:Halley's Comet - May 29 1910.jpg|thumb|[[Halley's Comet]] during its 0.10&nbsp;AU<ref>{{cite web |author=Donald K. Yeomans |title=Great Comets in History |date=April 2007 |publisher=JPL/NASA |url=https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?great_comets |access-date=2018-01-11 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170706202333/https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?great_comets |archive-date=2017-07-06 }}</ref> approach of Earth in May 1910]]
[[File:Halley's Comet - May 29 1910.jpg|thumb|[[Halley's Comet]] during its 0.10&nbsp;AU<ref>{{cite web |first=Donald K. |last=Yeomans |title=Great Comets in History |date=April 2007 |publisher=NASA/JPL |url=https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sb/great_comets.html |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240126111145/https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sb/great_comets.html |archive-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> approach of Earth in May 1910]]


'''Near-Earth comets'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA--> (NECs) are objects in a near-Earth orbit with a tail or coma. Comet nuclei are typically less dense than asteroids but they pass Earth at higher relative speeds, thus the impact energy of a comet nucleus is slightly larger than that of a similar-sized asteroid.<ref name="NEOSDT2003"/> NECs may pose an additional hazard due to fragmentation: the meteoroid streams which produce meteor showers may include large inactive fragments, effectively NEAs.<ref name="Jenniksens2005">{{Cite journal |last=Jenniksens |first=Peter |title=Meteor Showers from Broken Comets |date=September 2005 |journal=Workshop on Dust in Planetary Systems (ESA SP-643) |volume=643 |pages=3–6 |bibcode=2007ESASP.643....3J}}</ref> Although no impact of a comet in Earth's history has been conclusively confirmed, the [[Tunguska event]] may have been caused by a fragment of [[Comet Encke]].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Kresak| first=L'.l |title=The Tunguska object – A fragment of Comet Encke |bibcode=1978BAICz..29..129K |volume=29 |date=1978 |pages=129 |journal=Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia}}</ref>
'''Near-Earth comets'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA--> (NECs) are objects in a near-Earth orbit with a tail or coma made up of dust, gas or ionized particles emitted by a solid nucleus. Comet nuclei are typically less dense than asteroids but they pass Earth at higher relative speeds, thus the impact energy of a comet nucleus is slightly larger than that of a similar-sized asteroid.<ref name="NEOSDT2003"/> NECs may pose an additional hazard due to fragmentation: the meteoroid streams which produce meteor showers may include large inactive fragments, effectively NEAs.<ref name="Jenniksens2005">{{Cite conference |last=Jenniksens |first=Peter |title=Meteor Showers from Broken Comets |date=September 2005 |conference=Workshop on Dust in Planetary Systems (ESA SP-643) |volume=643 |pages=3–6 |bibcode=2007ESASP.643....3J}}</ref> Although no impact of a comet in Earth's history has been conclusively confirmed, the [[Tunguska event]] may have been caused by a fragment of [[Comet Encke]].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Kresak| first=L'.l |title=The Tunguska object – A fragment of Comet Encke |bibcode=1978BAICz..29..129K |volume=29 |date=1978 |pages=129 |journal=Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia}}</ref>


Comets are commonly divided between short-period and long-period comets. Short-period comets, with an orbital period of less than 200 years, originate in the [[Kuiper belt]], beyond the orbit of [[Neptune]]; while long-period comets originate in the [[Oort Cloud]], in the outer reaches of the Solar System.<ref name="TaskForceReport"/> The orbital period distinction is of importance in the evaluation of the risk from near-Earth comets because short-period NECs are likely to have been observed during multiple apparitions and thus their orbits can be determined with some precision, while long-period NECs can be assumed to have been seen for the first and last time when they appeared during the Age of Science, thus their approaches cannot be predicted well in advance.<ref name="TaskForceReport">{{cite book |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Report of the Task Force on potentially hazardous Near Earth Objects |location=London |publisher=British National Space Centre |date=September 2000 |url=https://spaceguardcentre.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/full_report.pdf |access-date=2018-03-13}}</ref> Since the threat from long-period NECs is estimated to be at most 1% of the threat from NEAs, and long-period comets are very faint and thus difficult to detect at large distances from the Sun, Spaceguard efforts have consistently focused on asteroids and short-period comets.<ref name="Vulcano1995"/><ref name="NEOSDT2003">{{cite book |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Study to Determine the Feasibility of Extending the Search for Near-Earth Objects to Smaller Limiting Diameters |publisher=NASA |date=August 22, 2003 |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/doc/neoreport030825.pdf |access-date=2018-03-13}}</ref> CNEOS even restricts its definition of NECs to short-period comets<ref name="NEO-groups"/>—{{As of|2021|11|04|df=US|lc=y}}, 117 such objects have been discovered.<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />
Comets are commonly divided between short-period and long-period comets. Short-period comets, with an orbital period of less than 200 years, originate in the [[Kuiper belt]], beyond the orbit of [[Neptune]]; while long-period comets originate in the [[Oort Cloud]], in the outer reaches of the Solar System.<ref name="TaskForceReport"/> The orbital period distinction is of importance in the evaluation of the risk from near-Earth comets because short-period NECs are likely to have been observed during multiple apparitions and thus their orbits can be determined with some precision, while long-period NECs can be assumed to have been seen for the first and last time when they appeared since the start of precise observations, thus their approaches cannot be predicted well in advance.<ref name="TaskForceReport">{{cite book |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Report of the Task Force on potentially hazardous Near Earth Objects |location=London |publisher=British National Space Centre |date=September 2000 |url=https://spaceguardcentre.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/full_report.pdf |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref> Since the threat from long-period NECs is estimated to be at most 1% of the threat from NEAs, and long-period comets are very faint and thus difficult to detect at large distances from the Sun, Spaceguard efforts have consistently focused on asteroids and short-period comets.<ref name="Vulcano1995"/><ref name="NEOSDT2003">{{cite book |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Study to Determine the Feasibility of Extending the Search for Near-Earth Objects to Smaller Limiting Diameters |publisher=NASA |date=August 22, 2003 |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/doc/neoreport030825.pdf |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref> Both NASA's CNEOS<ref name="CNEOS-NEO-groups"/> and ESA's NEOCC<ref name="NEOCC-DA"/> restrict their definition of NECs to short-period comets. {{As of|2024|3|30|df=US}}, 122 such objects have been discovered.<ref name="neo-jpl-stats" />


[[Comet Swift-Tuttle|Comet 109P/Swift–Tuttle]], which is also the source of the [[Perseids|Perseid meteor shower]] every year in August, has a roughly 130-year orbit that passes close to the Earth. During the comet's September 1992 recovery, when only the two previous returns in 1862 and 1737 had been identified, calculations showed that the comet would pass close to Earth during its next return in 2126, with an impact within the range of uncertainty. By 1993, even earlier returns (back to at least 188 AD) had been identified, and the longer observation arc eliminated the impact risk. The comet will pass Earth in 2126 at a distance of 23 million kilometers. In 3044, the comet is expected to pass Earth at less than 1.6 million kilometers.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://astrosociety.org/file_download/inline/245c66de-59dd-49e9-8773-16ef08de09ff |title=What about the comet that's supposed to hit the Earth in 130 years? |first=Sally | last=Stephens |work=Cosmic Collisions |publisher=[[Astronomical Society of the Pacific]] |date=1993 |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231003194758/https://www.astrosociety.org/file_download/inline/245c66de-59dd-49e9-8773-16ef08de09ff |archive-date=October 3, 2023 }}</ref>
{{As of|2021|11}}, only 23 comets have been observed to pass within {{convert|0.1|AU|km mi|abbr=on|lk=off}} of Earth, including 10 which are or have been short-period comets.<ref name="closest-NEC"/> Two of these comets, Halley's Comet and [[73P/Schwassmann–Wachmann]], have been observed during multiple close approaches.<ref name="closest-NEC"/> The closest observed approach was 0.0151&nbsp;AU (5.88&nbsp;LD) for [[Lexell's Comet]] on July 1, 1770.<ref name="closest-NEC" /> After an orbit change due to a close approach of Jupiter in 1779, this object is no longer a NEC. The closest approach ever observed for a current short-period NEC is 0.0229&nbsp;AU (8.92&nbsp;LD) for [[55P/Tempel–Tuttle|Comet Tempel–Tuttle]] in 1366.<ref name="closest-NEC"/> This comet is the parent body of the [[Leonids|Leonid meteor shower]], which also produced the Great Meteor Storm of 1833.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Mason |first=John W. |title=The Leonid meteors and comet 55P/Tempel-Tuttle |journal=Journal of the British Astronomical Association |volume=105 |issue=5 |pages=219–235 |date=1995 |bibcode=1995JBAA..105..219M }}</ref> Orbital calculations show that [[P/1999 J6 (SOHO)]], a faint [[sungrazing comet]] and confirmed short-period NEC observed only during its close approaches to the Sun,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sekanina |first1=Zdenek |last2=Chodas |first2=Paul W. |title=Origin of the Marsden and Kracht Groups of Sunskirting Comets. I. Association with Comet 96P/Machholz and Its Interplanetary Complex |journal=The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series |volume=151 |issue=2 |pages=551–586 |date=December 2005 |doi=10.1086/497374 |url=https://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/bitstream/handle/2014/39217/05-0507.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181216011418/https://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/bitstream/handle/2014/39217/05-0507.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y |url-status=dead |archive-date=2018-12-16 |access-date=2018-01-11|bibcode=2005ApJS..161..551S |s2cid=85442034 }}</ref> passed Earth undetected at a distance of 0.0121&nbsp;AU (4.70&nbsp;LD) on June 12, 1999.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=1999%20J6;old=0;orb=0;cov=0;log=0;cad=1#cad|title=P/1999 J6 (SOHO). Close-Approach Data |publisher=NASA/JPL |date=May 7, 2012 |access-date=2017-11-10}}</ref>

[[Comet Swift-Tuttle|Comet 109P/Swift–Tuttle]], which is also the source of the [[Perseids|Perseid meteor shower]] every year in August, has a roughly 130-year orbit that passes close to the Earth. During the comet's September 1992 recovery, when only the two previous returns in 1862 and 1737 had been identified, calculations showed that the comet would pass close to Earth during its next return in 2126, with an impact within the range of uncertainty. By 1993, even earlier returns (back to at least 188 AD) have been identified, and the longer observation arc eliminated the impact risk. The comet will pass Earth in 2126 at a distance of 23 million kilometers. In 3044, the comet is expected to pass Earth at less than 1.6 million kilometers.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://astrosociety.org/edu/publications/tnl/23/23.html#swifttuttle |title=What about the comet that's supposed to hit the Earth in 130 years? |author=Sally Stephens |work=Cosmic Collisions |publisher=Astronomical Society of the Pacific |date=1993 |access-date=2017-11-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170824003728/http://astrosociety.org/edu/publications/tnl/23/23.html#swifttuttle |archive-date=2017-08-24 }}</ref>


=== Artificial near-Earth objects ===
=== Artificial near-Earth objects ===
[[Image:J002e3 animated.gif|thumb|J002E3 discovery images taken on September 3, 2002. J002E3 is in the circle]]
[[Image:J002e3 animated.gif|thumb|[[J002E3]] discovery images taken on September 3, 2002. J002E3 is in the circle]]
Defunct space probes and [[Multistage rocket|final stages of rockets]] can end up in near-Earth orbits around the Sun, and be re-discovered by NEO surveys when they return to Earth's vicinity.
Defunct [[Uncrewed spacecraft|space probes]] and [[Multistage rocket|final stages of rockets]] can end up in near-Earth orbits around the Sun, and be re-discovered by NEO surveys when they return to Earth's vicinity.


An object classified as asteroid [[1991 VG]] was discovered during its transition from a temporary satellite orbit around Earth to a solar orbit in November 1991, and could only be observed until April 1992. Some scientists suspected it to be a returning piece of man-made space debris. After new observations in 2017 provided better data on its orbit and surface characteristics, a new study found the artificial origin unlikely.<ref name="Fuente-Marcos-2018"/>
In September 2002, astronomers found an object designated [[J002E3]]. The object was on a temporary satellite orbit around Earth, leaving for a solar orbit in June 2003. Calculations showed that it was also on a solar orbit before 2002, but was close to Earth in 1971. J002E3 was identified as the third stage of the [[Saturn V]] rocket that carried [[Apollo 12]] to the Moon.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news136.html |title=J002E3: An Update |work=News |publisher=NASA |date=October 9, 2002 |access-date=2017-11-14 |first1=Steve |last1=Chesley |first2=Paul |last2=Chodas |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030503111617/http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news136.html |archive-date=2003-05-03}}</ref><ref name="rocket-or-rock"/> In 2006, two more apparent temporary satellites were discovered which were suspected of being artificial.<ref name="rocket-or-rock"/> One of them was eventually confirmed as an asteroid and classified as the temporary satellite {{mp|2006 RH|120}}.<ref name="rocket-or-rock"/> The other, [[6Q0B44E]], was confirmed as an artificial object, but its identity is unknown.<ref name="rocket-or-rock"/> Another temporary satellite was discovered in 2013, and was designated {{mp|2013 QW|1}} as a suspected asteroid. It was later found to be an artificial object of unknown origin. {{mp|2013 QW|1}} is no longer listed as an asteroid by the Minor Planet Center.<ref name="rocket-or-rock">{{cite news |last=Azriel |first=Merryl |title=Rocket or Rock? NEO Confusion Abounds |url=http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/space-debris/satellite-tracking/rocket-or-rock/ |date=September 25, 2013 |work=Space Safety Magazine |access-date=2017-11-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171115143536/http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/space-debris/satellite-tracking/rocket-or-rock/ |archive-date=2017-11-15 }}</ref><ref name="MPC_QW1">{{Cite web|url=https://minorplanetcenter.net/db_search/show_object?utf8=✓&object_id=2013+QW1|title=Unknown object: 2013 QW1|access-date=2019-04-19|publisher=Minor Planet Center}}</ref>


In September 2002, astronomers found an object designated [[J002E3]]. The object was on a temporary satellite orbit around Earth, leaving for a solar orbit in June 2003. Calculations showed that it was also on a solar orbit before 2002, but was close to Earth in 1971. J002E3 was identified as the third stage of the [[Saturn V]] rocket that carried [[Apollo 12]] to the Moon.<ref>{{cite news |first1=Steve |last1=Chesley |first2=Paul |last2=Chodas |title=J002E3: An Update |work=News |publisher=NASA/JPL |date=October 9, 2002 |url=http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news136.html |access-date=November 14, 2017 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030503111617/http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news136.html |archive-date=May 3, 2003 }}</ref><ref name="rocket-or-rock"/> In 2006, two more apparent temporary satellites were discovered which were suspected of being artificial.<ref name="rocket-or-rock"/> One of them was eventually confirmed as an asteroid and classified as the temporary satellite {{mp|2006 RH|120}}.<ref name="rocket-or-rock"/> The other, [[6Q0B44E]], was confirmed as an artificial object, but its identity is unknown.<ref name="rocket-or-rock"/> Another temporary satellite was discovered in 2013, and was designated {{mp|2013 QW|1}} as a suspected asteroid. It was later found to be an artificial object of unknown origin. {{mp|2013 QW|1}} is no longer listed as an asteroid by the Minor Planet Center.<ref name="rocket-or-rock">{{cite news |last=Azriel |first=Merryl |title=Rocket or Rock? NEO Confusion Abounds |url=http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/space-debris/satellite-tracking/rocket-or-rock/ |date=September 25, 2013 |work=[[International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety#Space Safety Magazine|Space Safety Magazine]] |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171115143536/http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/space-debris/satellite-tracking/rocket-or-rock/ |archive-date=November 15, 2017 }}</ref><ref name="MPC_QW1">{{Cite web |url=https://minorplanetcenter.net/db_search/show_object?utf8=✓&object_id=2013+QW1 |title=MPC Database Search. Unknown object: 2013 QW1 |publisher=IAU/MPC |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref> In September 2020, an object detected on an orbit very similar to that of the Earth was temporarily designated {{mpl|2020 SO|}}. However, orbital calculations and spectral observations confirmed that the object was the [[Centaur (rocket stage)|Centaur rocket booster]] of the 1966 [[Surveyor 2]] uncrewed lunar lander.<ref>{{cite news |title=Earth May Have Captured a 1960s-Era Rocket Booster |date=November 12, 2020 |work=News |publisher=NASA/JPL |url=https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/earth-may-have-captured-a-1960s-era-rocket-booster |access-date=January 31, 2024 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=New Data Confirm 2020 SO to Be the Upper Centaur Rocket Booster From the 1960's |date=December 2, 2020 |work=News |publisher=NASA/JPL |url=https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/new-data-confirm-2020-so-to-be-the-upper-centaur-rocket-booster-from-the-1960s |access-date=January 31, 2024 }}</ref>
In some cases, active space probes on solar orbits have been observed by NEO surveys and erroneously catalogued as asteroids before identification. During its 2007 flyby of Earth on its route to a comet, [[European Space Agency|ESA]]'s space probe ''[[Rosetta (spacecraft)|Rosetta]]'' was detected unidentified and classified as asteroid {{mp|2007 VN|84}}, with an alert issued due to its close approach.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12914-astronomers-defend-asteroid-warning-mix-up/ |title=Astronomers defend asteroid warning mix-up |author=Justin Mullins |date=November 13, 2007 |work=New Scientist |access-date=2017-11-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170307062102/https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12914-astronomers-defend-asteroid-warning-mix-up/ |archive-date=2017-03-07 }}</ref> The designation {{mp|2015 HP|116}} was similarly removed from asteroid catalogues when the observed object was identified with ''[[Gaia (spacecraft)|Gaia]]'', ESA's [[space observatory]] for [[astrometry]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/mpec/K15/K15HC5.html |title=MPEC 2015-H125: Deletion Of 2015 HP116 |date=April 27, 2015 |work=Minor Planet Electronic Circular |access-date=2017-11-14}}</ref>


In some cases, active space probes on solar orbits have been observed by NEO surveys and erroneously catalogued as asteroids before identification. During its 2007 flyby of Earth on its route to a comet, ESA's space probe ''[[Rosetta (spacecraft)|Rosetta]]'' was detected unidentified and classified as asteroid {{mp|2007 VN|84}}, with an alert issued due to its close approach.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12914-astronomers-defend-asteroid-warning-mix-up/ |title=Astronomers defend asteroid warning mix-up |first=Justin |last= Mullins |date=November 13, 2007 |work=New Scientist |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170307062102/https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12914-astronomers-defend-asteroid-warning-mix-up/ |archive-date=March 7, 2017 }}</ref> The designation {{mp|2015 HP|116}} was similarly removed from asteroid catalogues when the observed object was identified with ''[[Gaia (spacecraft)|Gaia]]'', ESA's [[space observatory]] for [[astrometry]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/mpec/K15/K15HC5.html |title=MPEC 2015-H125: Deletion Of 2015 HP116 |date=April 27, 2015 |work=Minor Planet Electronic Circular |publisher=IAU/MPC |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref>
== Impacts ==
{{main|Impact event}}


Other artificial near-Earth objects include [[Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster]] and the [[Kepler space telescope]].
When a near-Earth object impacts Earth, objects up to a few tens of metres across ordinarily explode in the [[Mesosphere|upper atmosphere]] (usually harmlessly), with most or all of the solids [[Evaporation|vaporized]] and only small amounts of meteorites arriving to the Earth surface, while larger objects hit the water surface, forming [[tsunami]] waves, or the solid surface, forming [[impact crater]]s.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chapman |first1= Clark R. |last2=Morrison |first2= David |name-list-style=amp |title=Impacts on the Earth by asteroids and comets: Assessing the hazard |journal=Nature |volume=367 |issue=6458 |pages=33–40 |date=January 6, 1994 |bibcode=1994Natur.367...33C |doi=10.1038/367033a0|s2cid=4305299 |url=https://zenodo.org/record/1233151}}</ref>


== Exploratory missions ==
The frequency of impacts of objects of various sizes is estimated on the basis of orbit simulations of NEO populations, the frequency of impact craters on the Earth and the Moon, and the frequency of close encounters.<ref name="Collins2005">{{cite journal |last1=Collins |first1=Gareth S. |last2=Melosh |first2=H. Jay |last3=Marcus |first3=Robert A. |title=Earth Impact Effects Program: A Web-based computer program for calculating the regional environmental consequences of a meteoroid impact on Earth |journal=Meteoritics & Planetary Science |volume=40 |number=6 |pages=817–840 |date=June 2005 |doi=10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00157.x |url=https://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEarth/ImpactEffects/effects.pdf |access-date=2018-03-19|bibcode=2005M&PS...40..817C |hdl=10044/1/11554 |s2cid=13891988 |hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Asher2005">{{cite journal |last1=Asher |first1=D. J. |last2=Bailey |first2=M. |last3=Emel'Yanenko |first3=V. |last4=Napier |first4=W. |title=Earth in the Cosmic Shooting Gallery |journal=The Observatory |volume=125 |issue=2 |pages=319–322 |date=2005 |url=http://www.arm.ac.uk/preprints/455.pdf |access-date=2018-03-19 |bibcode=2005Obs...125..319A |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150725072739/http://www.arm.ac.uk/preprints/455.pdf |archive-date=2015-07-25 }}</ref> The study of impact craters indicates that impact frequency has been more or less steady for the past 3.5&nbsp;billion years, which requires a steady replenishment of the NEO population from the [[asteroid main belt]].<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/> One impact model based on widely accepted NEO population models estimates the average time between the impact of two stony asteroids with a diameter of at least {{convert|4|m|ft|abbr=on}} at about one year; for asteroids {{convert|7|m|ft|abbr=on}} across (which impacts with as much energy as the atomic bomb dropped on [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima]], approximately 15&nbsp;kilotonnes of TNT) at five years, for asteroids {{convert|60|m|ft|abbr=on}} across (an impact energy of 10 [[megatons]], comparable to the [[Tunguska event]] in 1908) at 1,300&nbsp;years, for asteroids {{convert|1|km|mi|abbr=on}} across at half a million years, and for asteroids {{convert|5|km|mi|abbr=on}} across at 18&nbsp;million years.<ref name="Earth-impact"/> Some other models estimate similar impact frequencies,<ref name="MorbidelliAstIII"/> while others calculate higher frequencies.<ref name="Asher2005"/> For Tunguska-sized (10&nbsp;megaton) impacts, the estimates range from one event every 2,000–3,000&nbsp;years to one event every 300&nbsp;years.<ref name="Asher2005"/>
{{Further|List of minor planets and comets visited by spacecraft}}


Some NEOs are of special interest because the [[Delta-v budget|sum total of changes in orbital speed]] required to send a spacecraft on a mission to physically explore an NEO – and thus the amount of rocket fuel required for the mission – is lower than what is necessary for even lunar missions, due to their combination of low velocity with respect to Earth and weak gravity. They may present interesting scientific opportunities both for direct geochemical and astronomical investigation, and as potentially economical sources of extraterrestrial materials for human exploitation.<ref name="USAToday-NEA">{{cite news |url=https://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2007-02-12-asteroid_x.htm |title=Near-Earth asteroids could be 'steppingstones to Mars' |first=Dan |last=Vergano |work=[[USA Today]] |date=February 2, 2007 |access-date=November 18, 2017 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120417034648/http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2007-02-12-asteroid_x.htm |archive-date=April 17, 2012 }}</ref> This makes them an attractive target for exploration.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Design and optimization of trajectory to Near-Earth asteroid for sample return mission using gravity assists |first1=Rui |last1=Xu |first2=Pingyuan |last2=Cui |first3=Dong |last3=Qiao |first4=Enjie |last4=Luan |name-list-style=amp |journal=Advances in Space Research |volume=40 |issue=2 |pages=200–225 |date=March 18, 2007 |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.025 |bibcode=2007AdSpR..40..220X}}</ref>
{{wide image|SmallAsteroidImpacts-Frequency-Bolide-20141114.jpg|600px|align-cap=center|Location and impact energy of small asteroids impacting Earth's atmosphere}}


=== Missions to NEAs ===
The second-largest observed event after the Tunguska meteor was a 1.1&nbsp;megaton air blast in 1963 near the [[Prince Edward Islands]] between South Africa and Antarctica, which was detected only by [[infrasound]] sensors.<ref name="David_spacecom"/> However this may not have been a meteor.<ref name=silber>{{cite journal |doi=10.1029/2009JE003334 |title=An estimate of the terrestrial influx of large meteoroids from infrasonic measurements|journal=Journal of Geophysical Research |volume=114 |issue=E8|year=2009 |url=https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2009JE003334|last1=Silber|first1=Elizabeth A.|last2=Revelle|first2=Douglas O.|last3=Brown|first3=Peter G.|last4=Edwards|first4=Wayne N.|bibcode=2009JGRE..114.8006S}}</ref> The third-largest, but by far best-observed impact, was the [[Chelyabinsk meteor]] of 15&nbsp;February 2013. A previously unknown {{convert|20|m|ft|abbr=on}} asteroid exploded above this Russian city with an equivalent blast yield of 400–500 kilotons.<ref name="David_spacecom">{{cite news |url=http://www.space.com/23423-russian-fireball-meteor-airburst-risk.html |title=Russian fireball explosion shows meteor risk greater than thought |last=David |first=Leonard |date=October 7, 2013 |work=Space.com |access-date=2017-11-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170819031019/https://www.space.com/23423-russian-fireball-meteor-airburst-risk.html |archive-date=2017-08-19 }}</ref> The calculated orbit of the pre-impact asteroid is similar to that of Apollo asteroid {{mpl|2011 EO|40}}, making the latter the meteor's possible parent body.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Reconstructing the Chelyabinsk event: Pre-impact orbital evolution |first1=C. |last1=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |first2=R. |last2=de&nbsp;la&nbsp;Fuente Marcos |date=September 1, 2014 |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters |volume=443 |issue=1 |pages=L39–L43 |arxiv=1405.7202 |bibcode=2014MNRAS.443L..39D |doi=10.1093/mnrasl/slu078 |s2cid=118417667 }}</ref>
[[File:PIA02475 Eros' Bland Butterscotch Colors.jpg|thumb|Different views of [[433 Eros]] as seen by NASA's ''[[NEAR Shoemaker]]'' probe]]
[[File:Bennu mosaic OSIRIS-REx (square).png|thumb|Image mosaic of asteroid [[101955 Bennu]], target of NASA's ''[[OSIRIS-REx]]'' probe]]


The IAU held a minor planets workshop in [[Tucson, Arizona]], in March 1971. At that point, launching a spacecraft to asteroids was considered premature; the workshop only inspired the first astronomical survey specifically aiming for NEAs.<ref name="wired20130323"/> Missions to asteroids were considered again during a workshop at the [[University of Chicago]] held by NASA's Office of Space Science in January 1978. Of all of the near-Earth asteroids (NEA) that had been discovered by mid-1977, it was estimated that spacecraft could [[Space rendezvous|rendezvous]] with and return from only about 1 in 10 using less [[Spacecraft propulsion|propulsive energy]] than is necessary to reach [[Mars]]. It was recognised that due to the low surface gravity of all NEAs, moving around on the surface of an NEA would cost very little energy, and thus space probes could gather multiple samples.<ref name="wired20130323"/> Overall, it was estimated that about one percent of all NEAs might provide opportunities for [[human spaceflight|human-crewed]] missions, or no more than about ten NEAs known at the time. A five-fold increase in the NEA discovery rate was deemed necessary to make a crewed mission within ten years worthwhile.<ref name="wired20130323"/>
On 7&nbsp;October 2008, 19&nbsp;hours after it was first observed, {{convert|4|m|ft|abbr=on}} asteroid {{mpl|2008 TC|3}} blew up {{convert|37|km|sigfig=2|abbr=on}} above the [[Nubian Desert]] in Sudan. It was the first time that an asteroid was observed and its impact was predicted prior to its entry into the atmosphere as a [[meteor]].<ref name="Roylance2008">{{cite news |last=Roylance |first=Frank |date=October 7, 2008 |title=Predicted meteor may have been sighted |url=http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2008/10/predicted_meteor_may_have_been.html |work=Maryland Weather |access-date=2017-11-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081010045620/http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2008/10/predicted_meteor_may_have_been.html |archive-date=2008-10-10}}</ref> 10.7&nbsp;kg of meteorites were recovered after the impact.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Shaddad |first1=Muawia H. |display-authors=etal |title=The recovery of asteroid {{mp|2008 TC|3}} |journal=Meteoritics & Planetary Science |volume=45 |issue=10–11 |pages=1557–1589 |date=October 2010 |doi=10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01116.x |bibcode=2010M&PS...45.1557S |url=http://asima.seti.org/2008TC3/papers/maps1116-1296.pdf |access-date=2018-01-19 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304185539/http://asima.seti.org/2008TC3/papers/maps1116-1296.pdf |archive-date=2016-03-04 |doi-access=free }}</ref>


The first near-Earth asteroid to be visited by a spacecraft was [[433 Eros]] when [[NASA]]'s ''[[NEAR Shoemaker]]'' probe orbited it from February 2000, landing on the surface of the {{convert|17|km|mi|abbr=on}} asteroid in February 2001.<ref name="Eros-NEAR">{{cite news |url=http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/news/near_descent_pr_20010131.html |title=NEAR Mission Completes Main Task, Now Will Go Where No Spacecraft Has Gone Before |first1=Donald |last1=Savage |first2=Michael |last2=Buckley |name-list-style=amp |work=Press Releases |publisher=NASA |date=January 31, 2001 |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160617001709/http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/news/near_descent_pr_20010131.html |archive-date=June 17, 2016 }}</ref> A second NEA, the {{convert|535|m|ft|abbr=on}} long peanut-shaped [[25143 Itokawa]], was explored from September 2005 to April 2007 by [[JAXA]]'s ''[[Hayabusa (spacecraft)|Hayabusa]]'' mission, which succeeded in taking material samples back to Earth.<ref name="Itokawa-hayabusa">{{cite web |url=https://hayabusa.jaxa.jp/e/index.html |title=Hayabusa. The Final Approach. Overview |publisher=JAXA |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230602050007/https://hayabusa.jaxa.jp/e/index.html |archive-date=June 2, 2023 }}</ref> A third NEA, the {{convert|2.26|km|mi|abbr=on}} long elongated [[4179 Toutatis]], was explored by [[China National Space Administration|CNSA]]'s ''[[Chang'e 2]]'' spacecraft during a flyby in December 2012.<ref name="Toutatis-Change">{{cite news |url=http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2012/12141551-change-2-imaging-of-toutatis.html |title=Chang'e 2 imaging of Toutatis |first=Emily |last=Lakdawalla |work=Blog |publisher=The Planetary Society |date=December 14, 2012 |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170707021230/http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2012/12141551-change-2-imaging-of-toutatis.html |archive-date=July 7, 2017 }}</ref><ref name="IAU-NEOs"/>
On 2&nbsp;January 2014, just 21&nbsp;hours after it was the first asteroid to be discovered in 2014, 2–4&nbsp;m {{mpl|2014 AA|}} blew up in Earth's atmosphere above the Atlantic Ocean. Far from any land, the meteor explosion was only observed by three infrasound detectors of the [[Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization]]. This impact was the second to be predicted.<ref name="S&T140102">{{cite news |title=Small asteroid 2014&nbsp;AA hits Earth |magazine=[[Sky & Telescope]] |first1=Kelly |last1=Beatty |date=January 2, 2014 |url=http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/small-asteroid-2014-aa-hitsearth/ |access-date=2017-11-14}}</ref>


The {{convert|980|m|ft|abbr=on}} Apollo asteroid [[162173 Ryugu]] was explored from June 2018<ref name="arrival">{{Cite news |first=Stephen |last=Clark |title=Japanese spacecraft reaches asteroid after three-and-a-half-year journey |date=June 28, 2018 |work=Spaceflight Now |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/06/28/japanese-spacecraft-reaches-asteroid-after-three-and-a-half-year-journey/ |access-date=May 2, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231024060128/https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/06/28/japanese-spacecraft-reaches-asteroid-after-three-and-a-half-year-journey/ |archive-date=October 24, 2023 }}</ref> until November 2019<ref name="Spacecom-Hayabusa2-2019">{{Cite news |first=Meghan |last=Bartels |title=Farewell, Ryugu! Japan's Hayabusa2 Probe Leaves Asteroid for Journey Home |date=November 13, 2019 |work=Space.com |url=https://www.space.com/hayabusa2-spacecraft-leaves-asteroid-ryugu.html |access-date=May 2, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231024064540/https://www.space.com/hayabusa2-spacecraft-leaves-asteroid-ryugu.html |archive-date=October 24, 2023 }}</ref> by JAXA's ''[[Hayabusa2]]'' space probe, which returned a sample to Earth.<ref name="BBC-Hayabusa2">{{Cite news |first=Paul |last=Rincon |title=Hayabusa-2: Capsule with asteroid samples in 'perfect' shape |date=December 6, 2020 |work=BBC News |publisher=BBC |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-55201662 |access-date=May 2, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231024064457/https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-55201662 |archive-date=October 24, 2023 }}</ref> A second sample-return mission, NASA's ''[[OSIRIS-REx]]'' probe, targeted the {{convert|500|m|ft|abbr=on}} Apollo asteroid [[101955 Bennu]],<ref name="space-osiris-launch">{{cite news |first=Mike |last=Wall |title='Exactly Perfect'! NASA Hails Asteroid Sample-Return Mission's Launch |url=https://www.space.com/34020-nasa-hails-osiris-rex-asteroid-mission-launch.html |date=September 9, 2016 |work=Space.com |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231006005439/https://www.space.com/34020-nasa-hails-osiris-rex-asteroid-mission-launch.html |archive-date=October 6, 2023 }}</ref> which, {{As of|2024|4|lc=y}}, has the highest cumulative Palermo scale rating (−1.59 for several close encounters between 2178 and 2290).<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/> On its journey to Bennu, the probe had searched unsuccessfully for Earth's Trojan asteroids,<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/osiris-rex-begins-earth-trojan-asteroid-search |title=NASA's OSIRIS-REx Begins Earth-Trojan Asteroid Search |work=News |publisher=NASA |first1=Erin |last1=Morton |first2=Nancy |last2=Neal-Jones |date=February 9, 2017 |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180207092541/https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/osiris-rex-begins-earth-trojan-asteroid-search/ |archive-date=February 7, 2018 }}</ref> entered into orbit around Bennu in December 2018, touched down on its surface in October 2020,<ref name="space-osiris-overview">{{cite news |first=Nola |last=Taylor Tillman |title=OSIRIS-REx: A complete guide to the asteroid-sampling mission |url=https://www.space.com/33776-osiris-rex.html |date=September 25, 2023 |work=[[Space.com]] |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240125154614/https://www.space.com/33776-osiris-rex.html |archive-date=January 25, 2024 }}</ref> and was successful in returning samples to Earth three years later.<ref name="space-osiris-sample">{{cite news |first=John |last=Loeffer |title=NASA finally opens OSIRIS-REx asteroid sample canister after freeing stuck lid |url=https://www.space.com/nasa-osiris-rex-asteroid-sample-canister-open |date=January 23, 2024 |work=Space.com |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240125183741/https://www.space.com/nasa-osiris-rex-asteroid-sample-canister-open |archive-date=January 25, 2024 }}</ref> China plans to launch its own sample-return mission, ''[[Tianwen-2]]'', in May 2025, targeting Earth quasi-satellite {{mp|469219 Kamoʻoalewa|}} and returning samples to Earth in late 2027.<ref>{{cite news |first=Andrew |last=Jones |url=https://spacenews.com/china-conducts-parachute-tests-for-asteroid-sample-return-mission/ |title=China conducts parachute tests for asteroid sample return mission |work=[[SpaceNews]] |date=June 26, 2023 |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref>
Further predicted impacts include [[2018 LA]] around the border between [[Botswana]] and [[South Africa]] and [[2019 MO]] off [[Puerto Rico]], but [[asteroid impact prediction]] remains in its infancy and successfully predicted asteroid impacts are rare. The vast majority of impacts recorded by [[Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization#International Monitoring System (IMS)|infrasound sensors designed to detect detonation of nuclear devices]] are not predicted.<ref name="NASA JPL Impact Reports">{{cite web |title=JPL - Fireball and bolide reports |url=http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/fireballs/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130306210754/http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/fireballs/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=6 March 2013 |website=Jet Propulsion Laboratory |publisher=NASA |access-date=22 August 2018}}</ref>


After completing its mission to Bennu, the probe ''OSIRIS-REx'' was redirected towards 99942 Apophis, which it is planned to orbit from April 2029.<ref name="space-osiris-overview"/> After completing its exploration of 162173 Ryugu, the mission of the ''Hayabusa2'' space probe was extended, to include flybys of S-type Apollo asteroid [[98943 Torifune]] in July 2026 and fast-rotating Apollo asteroid {{mpl|1998 KY|26}} in July 2031.<ref>{{Cite conference |last1=Hirabayashi |first1=Masatoshi |last2=Yoshikawa |first2=Makoto |last3=Mimasu |first3=Yuya |last4=Tanaka |first4=Satoshi |last5=Saiki |first5=Takanao |last6=Nakazawa |first6=Satoru |last7=Tsuda |first7=Yuichi |last8=Tatsumi |first8=Eri |last9=Popescu |first9=Marcel |last10=Pravec |first10=Petr |last11=Urakawa |first11=Seitaro |last12=Yoshida |first12=Fumi |last13=Hirata |first13=Naru |last14=Kamata |first14=Shunichi |last15=Kitazato |first15=Kohei |display-authors=2 |date=February 15, 2023 |title=Hayabusa2#'s Exploration to Asteroids 2001 CC21 and 1998 KY26 Provides Key Insights Into Planetary Defense |url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20230002153 |conference=8th IAA Planetary Defense Conference |location=Vienna, Austria |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240123201919/https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20230002153 |archive-date=January 23, 2024 |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2025, JAXA plans to launch another probe, ''[[DESTINY+]]'', to explore Apollo asteroid {{mpl|3200 Phaethon|}}, the parent body of the [[Geminids|Geminid meteor shower]], during a flyby.<ref name="space-20231106">{{cite news |first=Andrew |last=Jones |url=https://www.space.com/japan-destiny-mission-asteroid-phaethon-launch-delay |title=Japan's mission to bizarre asteroid Phaethon delayed to 2025 |work=Space.com |date=November 6, 2023 |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref>
Observed impacts aren't restricted to the surface and atmosphere of Earth. Dust-sized NEOs have impacted man-made spacecraft, including NASA's [[Long Duration Exposure Facility]], which collected [[interplanetary dust cloud|interplanetary dust]] in low Earth orbit for six years from 1984.<ref name="Rubin2010"/> Impacts on the Moon can be observed as flashes of light with a typical duration of a fraction of a second.<ref name="NASA-lunar-impacts"/> The first lunar impacts were recorded during the 1999 Leonid storm.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Rubio |first1=Luis R. Bellot |last2=Ortiz |first2=Jose L. |last3=Sada |first3=Pedro V. |editor1-last=Jenniskens |editor1-first=P. |editor2-last=Rietmeijer |editor2-first=F. |editor3-last=Brosch |editor3-first=N. |editor4-last=Fonda |editor4-first=M. |encyclopedia=Leonid Storm Research |publisher=Springer |location=Dordrecht |year=2000 |pages=575–598 |isbn=978-90-481-5624-5 |doi=10.1007/978-94-017-2071-7_42 |chapter=Observation and Interpretation of Meteoroid Impact Flashes on the Moon |bibcode=2000lsr..book..575B |s2cid=118392496 }}</ref> Subsequently, several continuous monitoring programs were launched.<ref name="NASA-lunar-impacts">{{cite web |title=About lunar impact monitoring |publisher=NASA |date=August 4, 2017 |url=https://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/news/lunar/overview.html |access-date=2018-01-22 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170713194543/https://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/news/lunar/overview.html |archive-date=2017-07-13 }}</ref><ref name="2013-lunar-impact"/><ref name="ESA-lunar-impacts">{{cite web |title=About the NELIOTA project |publisher=ESA |url=https://neliota.astro.noa.gr/About/Project |access-date=2018-01-22}}</ref> {{As of|2018|03}}, the largest observed lunar impact occurred on 11&nbsp;September 2013, lasted 8&nbsp;seconds, and was likely caused by an object {{convert|0.6–1.4|m|ft|abbr=on}} in diameter.<ref name="2013-lunar-impact">{{cite news |first1=Robert |last1=Massey |first2=José Maria |last2=Madiedo |title=Astronomers spot record-breaking lunar impact |date=February 24, 2014 |work=News |publisher=[[Royal Astronomical Society]] |url=https://www.ras.org.uk/news-and-press/news-archive/254-news-2014/2406-astronomers-spot-record-breaking-lunar-impact |access-date=2018-01-22 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180122235024/https://www.ras.org.uk/news-and-press/news-archive/254-news-2014/2406-astronomers-spot-record-breaking-lunar-impact |archive-date=2018-01-22 }}</ref>


==== Asteroid deflection tests ====
== Close approaches ==
[[File:DART-impact-SAAO-Lesedi-Mookodi.gif|thumb|Spread of the plume from the impact of the [[Double Asteroid Redirection Test|DART]] space probe on asteroid moon [[Dimorphos]] ([[SAAO]])]]
{{main|List of asteroid close approaches to Earth}}


On September 26, 2022, NASA's ''[[Double Asteroid Redirection Test|DART]]'' spacecraft reached the system of {{mpl|65803 Didymos|}} and impacted the Apollo asteroid's moon [[Dimorphos]], in a test of a method of [[Asteroid impact avoidance|planetary defense]] against near-Earth objects.<ref name="NASA220927">{{cite news |first=Roxana |last=Bardan |title=NASA's DART Mission Hits Asteroid in First-Ever Planetary Defense Test |date=September 27, 2022 |url=https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasas-dart-mission-hits-asteroid-in-first-ever-planetary-defense-test/ |work=Press Releases |publisher=NASA |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> In addition to telescopes on or in orbit around the Earth, the impact was observed by the Italian mini-spacecraft or [[CubeSat]] ''LICIACube'', which separated from ''DART'' 15 days before impact.<ref name="NASA220927"/> The impact shortened the orbital period of Dimorphos around Didymos by 33 minutes, indicating that the moon's momentum change was 3.6 times the momentum of the impacting spacecraft, thus most of the change was due to the ejected material of the moon itself.<ref name="NASA221215">{{cite news |first=Jessica |last=Merzdorf |title=Early Results from NASA's DART Mission |date=December 15, 2022 |url=http://www.nasa.gov/feature/early-results-from-nasa-s-dart-mission |work=Press Releases |publisher=NASA |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref>
[[File:Asteroid 2004 FH.gif|framed|right|Flyby of asteroid [[2004 FH]] (centre dot being followed by the sequence). The other object that flashes by is an artificial satellite]]
Each year, several mostly small NEOs pass Earth closer than the distance of the Moon.<ref name="closest-NEA"/>


In October 2024, ESA launched the spacecraft ''[[Hera (space mission)|Hera]]'', which is to enter orbit around Didymos in December 2026, to study the consequences of the DART impact.<ref>{{cite web |title=Hera |url=https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Hera |publisher=ESA |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> China plans to launch its own asteroid deflection probe, targeting {{convert|30|m|ft|abbr=on}} Aten asteroid {{mpl|2019 VL|5}}, in 2025.<ref>{{cite news |first=Andrew |last=Jones |url=https://spacenews.com/china-to-target-asteroid-2019-vl5-for-2025-planetary-defense-test/ |title=China to target asteroid 2019 VL5 for 2025 planetary defense test |work=SpaceNews |date=April 11, 2023 |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref>
On August 10, 1972, a meteor that became known as the [[1972 Great Daylight Fireball]] was witnessed by many people; it moved north over the [[Rocky Mountains]] from the U.S. Southwest to Canada. It was an Earth-grazing meteoroid that passed within {{convert|57|km|mi|abbr=on}} of the Earth's surface, and was filmed by a tourist at the [[Grand Teton National Park]] in [[Wyoming]] with an 8-millimeter color movie camera.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M8LQ7_hWtE |title=Grand Teton Meteor Video |publisher=[[YouTube]] |access-date=2017-11-09 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170214110154/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M8LQ7_hWtE |archive-date=2017-02-14 }}</ref>


==== Space mining ====
On October 13, 1990, [[Earth-grazing meteoroid of 13 October 1990|Earth-grazing meteoroid EN131090]] was observed above Czechoslovakia and Poland, moving at {{convert|41.74|km/s|mi/s|abbr=on}} along a {{convert|409|km|mi|adj=on|abbr=on}} trajectory from south to north. The closest approach to the Earth was {{convert|98.67|km|mi|abbr=on}} above the surface. It was captured by two all-sky cameras of the [[European Fireball Network]], which for the first time enabled geometric calculations of the orbit of such a body.<ref name="AA">{{cite journal |last1=Borovička |first1=J. |last2=Ceplecha |first2=Z. |title=Earth-grazing fireball of October 13, 1990 |journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics |volume=257 |issue=1 |pages=323–328 |date=April 1992 |bibcode=1992A&A...257..323B |issn=0004-6361 }}</ref>


From the 2000s, there were plans for the commercial exploitation of near-Earth asteroids, either through the use of robots or even by sending private commercial astronauts to act as space miners, but few of these plans were pursued.<ref name="Forbes210831">{{Cite web |last=Dorminey |first=Bruce |title=Does Commercial Asteroid Mining Still Have A Future? |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucedorminey/2021/08/31/does-commercial-asteroid-mining-still-have-a-future/ |date=August 31, 2021 |website=[[Forbes]] |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref>
On March 18, 2004, [[LINEAR]] announced that a {{convert|30|m|ft|abbr=on}} asteroid, [[2004 FH]], would pass the Earth that day at only {{convert|42,600|km|mi|abbr=on}}, about one-tenth the distance to the Moon, and the closest miss ever noticed until then. They estimated that similar-sized asteroids come as close about every two years.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news142.html |title=Recently Discovered Near-Earth Asteroid Makes Record-breaking Approach to Earth |author=Steven R. Chesley |author2=Paul W. Chodas |name-list-style=amp |work=News |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |date=March 17, 2004 |access-date=2017-11-09}}</ref>


In April 2012, the company [[Planetary Resources]] announced its plans to [[Asteroid mining|mine asteroids]] commercially. In a first phase, the company reviewed data and selected potential targets among NEAs. In a second phase, space probes would be sent to the selected NEAs; mining spacecraft would be sent in a third phase.<ref name="ST-AsteroidMining">{{cite news |first=Kelly |last=Beatty |url=http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/asteroid-mining-forfunandprofit/ |title=Asteroid Mining for Fun and Profit |date=April 24, 2012 |work=Sky & Telescope |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref> Planetary Resources launched two testbed satellites in April 2015<ref name="Arkyd6LeftBuilding"/> and January 2018,<ref>{{cite news |title=Planetary Resources Launches Latest Spacecraft in Advance of Space Resource Exploration Mission |work=News |publisher=Planetary Resources |date=January 12, 2018 |url=https://www.planetaryresources.com/2018/01/planetary-resources-launches-latest-spacecraft-in-advance-of-space-resource-exploration-mission/ |access-date=January 13, 2018 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180113093243/https://www.planetaryresources.com/2018/01/planetary-resources-launches-latest-spacecraft-in-advance-of-space-resource-exploration-mission/ |archive-date=January 13, 2018 }}</ref> and the first prospecting satellite for the second phase was planned for a 2020 launch prior to the company closing and its assets purchased by ConsenSys Space in 2018.<ref name="Arkyd6LeftBuilding">{{cite news |first=Alan |last=Boyle |url=https://www.geekwire.com/2017/planetary-resources-arkyd-6-prototype-imaging-satellite-left-building/ |title=Planetary Resources' Arkyd-6 prototype imaging satellite has left the building |date=November 13, 2017 |work=[[GeekWire]] |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171114080201/https://www.geekwire.com/2017/planetary-resources-arkyd-6-prototype-imaging-satellite-left-building/ |archive-date=November 14, 2017 }}</ref><ref name="oneyearsinceplanetaryresources">{{cite news |first=Alan |last=Boyle |url=https://www.geekwire.com/2019/one-year-planetary-resources-faded-history-space-mining-retains-appeal/ |title=One year after Planetary Resource faded into history, space mining retails its appeal |date=November 4, 2019 |work=GeekWire |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref>
On March 31, 2004, two weeks after 2004 FH, {{mpl|2004 FU|162}} set a new record for closest recorded approach above the atmosphere, passing Earth's surface only {{convert|6,500|km|mi|abbr=on}} away (about one Earth radius or one-sixtieth of the distance to the Moon). Because it was very small (6 meters/20 feet), FU<sub>162</sub> was detected only hours before its closest approach. If it had collided with Earth, it probably would have disintegrated harmlessly in the atmosphere.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.hohmanntransfer.com/mn/0408/22.htm#04fu162 |title=Closest by far |author=W. A. Allen |work=The Asteroid/Comet Connection |date=August 22, 2004 |access-date=2017-11-10 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161105153448/http://www.hohmanntransfer.com/mn/0408/22.htm#04fu162 |archive-date=2016-11-05 }}</ref>


Another American company established with the goal of space mining, [[AstroForge]], plans to launch the probe ''Odin'' (formerly ''Brokkr-2'')<ref>{{cite news |first1=Matt |last1=Gialich |first2=Jose |last2=Acain |url=https://www.astroforge.io/updates/2023-update |title=An update on our progress towards mining in space |work=AstroForge |date=December 11, 2023 |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> in December 2024,<ref>{{cite web |title=Falcon 9 Block 5 - PRIME-1 (IM-2) |work=[[NASASpaceFlight.com|Next Spaceflight]] |url=https://nextspaceflight.com/launches/details/6828 |access-date=August 26, 2024 }}</ref> with the goal of performing a flyby of an as yet undisclosed asteroid to confirm if it is a metal-rich [[M-type asteroid]],<ref>{{cite news |first=Jeff |last=Foust |url=https://spacenews.com/asteroid-mining-startup-astroforge-to-launch-first-missions-this-year-2/ |title=Asteroid mining startup AstroForge to launch first missions this year |work=SpaceNews |date=January 30, 2023 |access-date=January 26, 2024 }}</ref> and then follow it up in 2025 with the probe ''Vestri'', which is to land on the same asteroid.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.space.com/asteroid-mining-astroforge-docking-mission-2025 |title=Space mining startup AstroForge aims to launch historic asteroid-landing mission in 2025 |first=Mike |last=Wall |date=August 21, 2024 |work=Space.com |access-date=August 24, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240824113619/https://www.space.com/asteroid-mining-astroforge-docking-mission-2025 |archive-date=August 24, 2024 }}</ref>
On February 4, 2011, an asteroid designated {{mpl|2011 CQ|1}}, estimated at {{convert|0.8|-|2.6|m|ft|abbr=on}} in diameter, passed within {{convert|5,500|km|mi|abbr=on}} of the Earth, setting a new record for closest approach without impact,<ref name=2011cq1>{{cite news |title=Very Small Asteroid Makes Close Earth Approach on February 4, 2011 |url=http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news170.html |work=News |publisher=NASA/JPL Near-Earth Object Program Office |author=Don Yeomans |author2=Paul Chodas |name-list-style=amp |date=February 4, 2011 |access-date=2017-11-09 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110902004227/http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news170.html |archive-date=2011-09-02}}</ref> which still stands {{As of|2018|09|lc=y}}.<ref name="closest-NEA"/>

On November 8, 2011, asteroid {{mpl|(308635) 2005 YU|55}}, relatively large at about {{convert|360|m|ft|abbr=on}} in diameter, passed within {{convert|324600|km|mi|abbr=on}} (0.85 lunar distances) of Earth.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=2005YU55;cad=1#cad |title=308635 (2005 YU55). Close-Approach Data |date=September 11, 2017 |publisher=NASA/JPL |access-date=2017-11-10 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120201021911/http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=2005YU55;cad=1#cad |archive-date=February 1, 2012 }}</ref>

On February 15, 2013, the {{convert|30|m|ft|abbr=on}} asteroid [[367943 Duende]] ({{mp|2012 DA|14}}) passed approximately {{convert|27700|km|mi|abbr=on}} above the surface of Earth, closer than satellites in geosynchronous orbit.<ref name="Duende-BBC">{{cite news |author=Jason Palmer |title=Asteroid 2012 DA14 in record-breaking Earth pass |work=BBC News |date=February 15, 2013 |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-21442863 |access-date=2018-01-29 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180217085054/http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-21442863 |archive-date=2018-02-17 }}</ref> The asteroid was not visible to the unaided eye. This was the first close passage of an object discovered during a previous passage, and was thus the first to be predicted well in advance.<ref name="Duende-predict">{{cite news |title=Near-Earth Asteroid {{mp|2012 DA|14}} to Miss Earth on February 15, 2013 |work=News |publisher=NASA/JPL CNEOS |author1=Paul Chodas |author2=Jon Giorgini |author3=Don Yeomans |name-list-style=amp |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news174.html |date=March 6, 2012 |access-date=2018-01-29 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171222113153/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news174.html |archive-date=2017-12-22 }}</ref>

{{wide image|File:Objects_between_earth_and_moon.jpg|2250px|Diagram showing spacecraft and asteroids (past and future) between the Earth and the Moon.}}

== Exploratory missions ==

Some NEOs are of special interest because they can be physically explored with lower [[mission velocity]] than is necessary for even the Moon, due to their combination of low velocity with respect to Earth and weak gravity. They may present interesting scientific opportunities both for direct geochemical and astronomical investigation, and as potentially economical sources of extraterrestrial materials for human exploitation.<ref name="USAToday-NEA">{{cite news |url=https://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2007-02-12-asteroid_x.htm |title=Near-Earth asteroids could be 'steppingstones to Mars' |author=Dan Vergano |work=USA Today |date=February 2, 2007 |access-date=2017-11-18 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120417034648/http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2007-02-12-asteroid_x.htm |archive-date=2012-04-17 }}</ref> This makes them an attractive target for exploration.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Design and optimization of trajectory to Near-Earth asteroid for sample return mission using gravity assists |author=Rui Xu |author2=Pingyuan Cui |author3=Dong Qiao |author4=Enjie Luan |name-list-style=amp |journal=Advances in Space Research |volume=40 |issue=2 |pages=200–225 |date=March 18, 2007 |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.025 |bibcode=2007AdSpR..40..220X}}</ref>

=== Missions to NEAs ===
[[File:PIA02475 Eros' Bland Butterscotch Colors.jpg|thumb|433 Eros as seen by NASA's ''NEAR'' probe]]
[[File:BennuAsteroid.jpg|thumb|Image mosaic of asteroid [[101955 Bennu]], target of NASA's ''OSIRIS-REx'' probe]]

{{Further|List of minor planets and comets visited by spacecraft}}

The IAU held a minor planets workshop in [[Tucson, Arizona]], in March 1971. At that point, launching a spacecraft to asteroids was considered premature; the workshop only inspired the first astronomical survey specifically aiming for NEAs.<ref name="wired20130323"/> Missions to asteroids were considered again during a workshop at the [[University of Chicago]] held by NASA's Office of Space Science in January 1978. Of all of the near-Earth asteroids (NEA) that had been discovered by mid-1977, it was estimated that spacecraft could [[Space rendezvous|rendezvous]] with and return from only about 1 in 10 using less [[Spacecraft propulsion|propulsive energy]] than is necessary to reach [[Mars]]. It was recognised that due to the low surface gravity of all NEAs, moving around on the surface of an NEA would cost very little energy, and thus space probes could gather multiple samples.<ref name="wired20130323"/> Overall, it was estimated that about one percent of all NEAs might provide opportunities for [[human spaceflight|human-crewed]] missions, or no more than about ten NEAs known at the time. A five-fold increase in the NEA discovery rate was deemed necessary to make a crewed mission within ten years worthwhile.<ref name="wired20130323"/>

The first near-Earth asteroid to be visited by a spacecraft was {{convert|17|km|mi|abbr=on}} asteroid [[433 Eros]] when [[NASA]]'s ''[[NEAR Shoemaker|Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous]]'' (''NEAR'') probe orbited it from February 2001, landing on the asteroid surface in February 2002.<ref name="Eros-NEAR">{{cite news |url=http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/news/near_descent_pr_20010131.html |title=NEAR Mission Completes Main Task, Now Will Go Where No Spacecraft Has Gone Before |author=Donald Savage |author2=Michael Buckley |name-list-style=amp |work=Press Releases |publisher=NASA |date=January 31, 2001 |access-date=2017-11-09 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160617001709/http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/news/near_descent_pr_20010131.html |archive-date=2016-06-17 }}</ref> A second near-Earth asteroid, the {{convert|535|m|ft|abbr=on}} long peanut-shaped [[25143 Itokawa]], was visited in September 2005 by [[JAXA]]'s ''[[Hayabusa (spacecraft)|Hayabusa]]'' mission,<ref name="Itokawa-hayabusa">{{cite web |url=http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/hayabusa.html |title=Hayabusa's Contributions Toward Understanding the Earth's Neighborhood |author=Don Yeomans |date=August 11, 2005 |publisher=NASA/JPL Near Earth Object Program |access-date=2017-11-07 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050905132305/http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/hayabusa.html |archive-date=2005-09-05}}</ref> which succeeded in taking material samples back to Earth. A third near-Earth asteroid, the {{convert|2.26|km|mi|abbr=on}} long elongated [[4179 Toutatis]], was explored by [[China National Space Administration|CNSA]]'s ''[[Chang'e 2]]'' spacecraft during a flyby in December 2012.<ref name="Toutatis-Change">{{cite news |url=http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2012/12141551-change-2-imaging-of-toutatis.html |title=Chang'e 2 imaging of Toutatis |author=Emily Lakdawalla |work=Blog |publisher=The Planetary Society |date=December 14, 2012 |access-date=2017-11-10 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170707021230/http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2012/12141551-change-2-imaging-of-toutatis.html |archive-date=2017-07-07 }}</ref><ref name="IAU-NEOs"/>

The {{convert|980|m|ft|abbr=on}} Apollo asteroid [[162173 Ryugu]] is the target of JAXA's ''[[Hayabusa2]]'' mission. The space probe was launched in December 2014, arrived at the asteroid in June 2018, and returned a sample to Earth in December 2020.<ref name="SFN-Hayabusa2">{{cite news |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2014/12/03/hayabusa-2-launches-on-audacious-asteroid-adventure/ |title=Hayabusa 2 launches on audacious asteroid adventure |author=Stephen Clark |work=Spaceflight Now |date=December 3, 2014 |access-date=2017-11-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160722120740/http://spaceflightnow.com/2014/12/03/hayabusa-2-launches-on-audacious-asteroid-adventure/ |archive-date=2016-07-22 }}</ref> The {{convert|500|m|ft|abbr=on}} Apollo asteroid [[101955 Bennu]], which, {{As of|2021|11|lc=y}}, has the highest cumulative Palermo scale rating (−1.41 for several close encounters between 2178 and 2290),<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks"/> is the target of NASA's ''[[OSIRIS-REx]]'' probe. The [[New Frontiers program]] mission was launched in September 2016.<ref name="space-osiris"/> On its two-year journey to Bennu, the probe had searched for Earth's Trojan asteroids,<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/osiris-rex-begins-earth-trojan-asteroid-search |title=NASA's OSIRIS-REx Begins Earth-Trojan Asteroid Search |work=News |publisher=NASA |first1=Erin |last1=Morton |first2=Nancy |last2=Neal-Jones |date=February 9, 2017 |access-date=2017-11-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180207092541/https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/osiris-rex-begins-earth-trojan-asteroid-search/ |archive-date=2018-02-07 }}</ref> rendezvoused with Bennu in August 2018, and had entered into orbit around the asteroid in December 2018. ''OSIRIS-REx'' will return samples from the asteroid in September 2023.<ref name="space-osiris">{{cite news |last1=Wall |first1=Mike |title='Exactly Perfect'! NASA Hails Asteroid Sample-Return Mission's Launch |url=http://www.space.com/34020-nasa-hails-osiris-rex-asteroid-mission-launch.html |date=September 9, 2016 |work=Space.com |access-date=2017-11-14 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171026213733/https://www.space.com/34020-nasa-hails-osiris-rex-asteroid-mission-launch.html |archive-date=2017-10-26 }}</ref>

In April 2012, the company [[Planetary Resources]] announced its plans to [[Asteroid mining|mine asteroids]] commercially. In a first phase, the company reviewed data and selected potential targets among NEAs. In a second phase, space probes would be sent to the selected NEAs; mining spacecraft would be sent in a third phase.<ref name="ST-AsteroidMining">{{cite news |author=Kelly Beatty |url=http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/asteroid-mining-forfunandprofit/ |title=Asteroid Mining for Fun and Profit |date=April 24, 2012 |work=Sky & Telescope |access-date=2017-11-18}}</ref> Planetary Resources launched two testbed satellites in April 2015<ref name="Arkyd6LeftBuilding"/> and January 2018,<ref>{{cite news |title=Planetary Resources Launches Latest Spacecraft in Advance of Space Resource Exploration Mission |work=News |publisher=Planetary Resources |date=January 12, 2018 |url=https://www.planetaryresources.com/2018/01/planetary-resources-launches-latest-spacecraft-in-advance-of-space-resource-exploration-mission/ |access-date=2018-01-13 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180113093243/https://www.planetaryresources.com/2018/01/planetary-resources-launches-latest-spacecraft-in-advance-of-space-resource-exploration-mission/ |archive-date=January 13, 2018 }}</ref> and the first prospecting satellite for the second phase was planned for a 2020 launch prior to the company closing and its assets purchased by ConsnSys Space in 2018.<ref name="Arkyd6LeftBuilding">{{cite news |author=Alan Boyle |url=https://www.geekwire.com/2017/planetary-resources-arkyd-6-prototype-imaging-satellite-left-building/ |title=Planetary Resources' Arkyd-6 prototype imaging satellite has left the building |date=November 13, 2017 |work=GeekWire |access-date=2017-11-18 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171114080201/https://www.geekwire.com/2017/planetary-resources-arkyd-6-prototype-imaging-satellite-left-building/ |archive-date=November 14, 2017}}</ref><ref name="oneyearsinceplanetaryresources">{{cite news |author=Alan Boyle |url=https://www.geekwire.com/2019/one-year-planetary-resources-faded-history-space-mining-retains-appeal/ |title=One year after Planetary Resource faded into history, space mining retails its appeal |date=November 4, 2019 |work=GeekWire |access-date=2019-11-04 }}</ref>

The [[Near-Earth Object Surveillance Mission]] (NEOSM) is planned for launch no earlier than 2025 to discover and characterize the orbit of most of the [[potentially hazardous object|potentially hazardous asteroids]] larger than {{convert|140|m|ft|abbr=on}} over the course of its mission.<ref name='SN Sept2019'>[https://spacenews.com/nasa-to-develop-mission-to-search-for-near-earth-asteroids/ NASA to develop mission to search for near-Earth asteroids.] Jeff Foust, ''Space News''. 23 September 2019</ref>

On September 26, 2022, the [[Double Asteroid Redirection Test|DART]] spacecraft impacted [[Dimorphos]], in a test of a method of [[Asteroid impact avoidance|planetary defense]] against near-Earth objects.


=== Missions to NECs ===
=== Missions to NECs ===
[[File:67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko - Rosetta (32755885495).png|thumb|67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko as seen by ESA's ''Rosetta'' probe]]
[[File:67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko - Rosetta (32755885495).png|thumb|Nucleus of comet [[67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko]] as seen by ESA's ''[[Rosetta (spacecraft)|Rosetta]]'' probe]]


The first near-Earth comet visited by a space probe was [[21P/Giacobini–Zinner]] in 1985, when the NASA/ESA probe ''[[International Cometary Explorer]]'' (''ICE'') passed through its coma. In March 1986, ICE, along with [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] probes ''[[Vega 1]]'' and ''[[Vega 2]]'', [[Institute of Space and Astronautical Science|ISAS]] probes ''[[Sakigake]]'' and ''[[Suisei (spacecraft)|Suisei]]'' and ESA probe ''[[Giotto (spacecraft)|Giotto]]'' flew by the nucleus of Halley's Comet. In 1992, ''Giotto'' also visited another NEC, [[26P/Grigg–Skjellerup]].<ref name="TaskForceReport"/>
The first near-Earth comet visited by a space probe was [[21P/Giacobini–Zinner]] in 1985, when the NASA/ESA probe ''[[International Cometary Explorer]]'' (''ICE'') passed through its coma. In March 1986, ICE, along with [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] probes ''[[Vega 1]]'' and ''[[Vega 2]]'', [[Institute of Space and Astronautical Science|ISAS]] probes ''[[Sakigake]]'' and ''[[Suisei (spacecraft)|Suisei]]'' and ESA probe ''[[Giotto (spacecraft)|Giotto]]'' flew by the nucleus of Halley's Comet. In 1992, ''Giotto'' also visited another NEC, [[26P/Grigg–Skjellerup]].<ref name="TaskForceReport"/>


In November 2010, the NASA probe ''[[Deep Impact (spacecraft)|Deep Impact]]'' flew by the near-Earth comet [[103P/Hartley]]. Earlier, in July 2005, this probe flew by the non-near-Earth comet [[Tempel 1]], hitting it with a large copper mass.<ref name="DeepImpactHartley">{{Cite news |title=Mr. Hartley's Amazing Comet |first=Kelly |last=Beatty |date=November 4, 2010 |work=Sky & Telescope |url=http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/106720468.html |access-date=2018-03-19 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20101107194918/http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/106720468.html |archive-date=November 7, 2010 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }}</ref>
In November 2010, after completing its primary mission to non-near-Earth comet [[Tempel 1]], the NASA probe ''[[Deep Impact (spacecraft)|Deep Impact]]'' flew by the near-Earth comet [[103P/Hartley]].<ref name="DeepImpactHartley">{{Cite news |title=Mr. Hartley's Amazing Comet |first=Kelly |last=Beatty |date=November 4, 2010 |work=[[Sky & Telescope]] |url=https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/mr-hartleys-amazing-comet/ |access-date=January 27, 2024 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231020025244/https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/mr-hartleys-amazing-comet/ |archive-date=October 20, 2023 }}</ref>


In August 2014, ESA probe ''Rosetta'' began orbiting near-Earth comet [[67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko]], while its lander ''[[Philae (spacecraft)|Philae]]'' landed on its surface in November 2014. After the end of its mission, Rosetta was crashed into the comet's surface in 2016.<ref name="newsci20160930">{{cite news |first=Jacob |last=Aron |title=Rosetta lands on 67P in grand finale to two year comet mission |work=New Scientist |date=September 30, 2016 |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/2107585-rosetta-lands-on-67p-in-grand-finale-to-two-year-comet-mission/ |access-date=2018-03-19}}</ref>
In August 2014, ESA probe ''Rosetta'' began orbiting near-Earth comet [[67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko]], while its lander ''[[Philae (spacecraft)|Philae]]'' landed on its surface in November 2014. After the end of its mission, Rosetta was crashed into the comet's surface in 2016.<ref name="newsci20160930">{{cite news |first=Jacob |last=Aron |title=Rosetta lands on 67P in grand finale to two year comet mission |work=[[New Scientist]] |date=September 30, 2016 |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/2107585-rosetta-lands-on-67p-in-grand-finale-to-two-year-comet-mission/ |access-date=January 27, 2024 }}</ref>
{{clear}}
{{clear}}


Line 348: Line 334:
* [[Asteroid capture]]
* [[Asteroid capture]]
* [[Asteroid Day]]
* [[Asteroid Day]]
* [[Asteroid impact prediction]]
* [[Asteroid Redirect Mission]]
* [[Asteroid Redirect Mission]]
* [[Claimed moons of Earth]]
* [[Claimed moons of Earth]]
* [[EURONEAR]]
* [[Double Asteroid Redirection Test]]
* [[Interstellar object|Interstellar interpoler]]
* [[Earth-grazing fireball]]
* [[List of Earth-crossing asteroids]]
* [[Euronear]]
* [[List of Earth-crossing minor planets]]
* [[List of impact craters on Earth]]
* [[List of impact craters on Earth]]
* [[Near Earth Object Camera]]
* [[NEOShield]]
* [[NEOShield]]
* [[NEODyS]]
* [[Orbit@home]]
* [[Orbit@home]]
{{div col end}}
{{div col end}}
Line 364: Line 346:
== References ==
== References ==
{{reflist|25em|refs=
{{reflist|25em|refs=

<ref name="palermo">{{cite web
|title = Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale
|publisher = NASA/JPL CNEOS
|url = https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/palermo_scale.html
|access-date = 2017-11-09
|url-status = live
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171114131924/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/palermo_scale.html
|archive-date = 2017-11-14}}</ref>


<ref name="pia14734">{{cite web
<ref name="pia14734">{{cite web
Line 378: Line 351:
|title = WISE Revises Numbers of Asteroids Near Earth
|title = WISE Revises Numbers of Asteroids Near Earth
|publisher = NASA/JPL
|publisher = NASA/JPL
|url = http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/WISE/multimedia/gallery/neowise/pia14734.html
|url = https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia14734-wise-revises-numbers-of-asteroids-near-earth
|access-date = 2017-11-09
|access-date = January 27, 2024
|url-status = live
|url-status = live
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171205154449/https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/WISE/multimedia/gallery/neowise/pia14734.html
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240127112654/https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia14734-wise-revises-numbers-of-asteroids-near-earth
|archive-date= 2017-12-05}}</ref>
|archive-date= January 27, 2024}}</ref>


<ref name="JPL-SSD-NEA">{{cite web
<ref name="JPL-SSD-NEA">{{cite web
|title = JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine. Constraints: asteroids and NEOs
|title = JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine. Constraints: asteroids and NEOs
|publisher = [[JPL Small-Body Database]]
|publisher = [[JPL Small-Body Database]]
|date = March 8, 2018
|date = April 6, 2024
|url = https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_query.html
|url = http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb_query.cgi?obj_group=neo;obj_kind=ast;obj_numbered=all;OBJ_field=0;ORB_field=0;table_format=HTML;max_rows=100;format_option=comp;c_fields=AcBhBgBjBiBnBsCkCqAi;.cgifields=format_option;.cgifields=ast_orbit_class;.cgifields=table_format;.cgifields=obj_kind;.cgifields=obj_group;.cgifields=obj_numbered;.cgifields=com_orbit_class&query=1&c_sort=AiD
|access-date = 2018-03-09
|access-date = April 6, 2024
|url-status = live
|url-status = live
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240406084946/https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_query.html
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180309150339/https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb_query.cgi?obj_group=neo;obj_kind=ast;obj_numbered=all;OBJ_field=0;ORB_field=0;c1_group=OBJ;c1_item=Ai;c1_op=%3E;c1_value=;table_format=HTML;max_rows=50;format_option=comp;c_fields=AcBhBgBjBiBnBsCkCqAi;.cgifields=format_option;.cgifields=ast_orbit_class;.cgifields=table_format;.cgifields=obj_kind;.cgifields=obj_group;.cgifields=obj_numbered;.cgifields=com_orbit_class&query=1&c_sort=AiD
|archive-date = 2018-03-09}}</ref>
|archive-date = April 6, 2024}}</ref>


<ref name="closest-NEA">{{cite web
<ref name="closest-NEA">{{cite web
|title = Closest Approaches to the Earth by Minor Planets
|title = Closest Approaches to the Earth by Minor Planets
|publisher = IAU/MPC
|publisher = IAU/MPC
|date = May 16, 2019
|url = http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/Closest.html
|url = http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/Closest.html
|access-date = 2018-03-09}}</ref>
|access-date = January 24, 2024}}</ref>


<ref name="closest-NEC">{{cite web
<ref name="closest-NEC">{{cite web
|title = Closest Approaches to the Earth by Comets
|title = Closest Approaches to the Earth by Comets
|publisher = IAU/MPC
|publisher = IAU/MPC
|date = May 16, 2019
|url = https://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/lists/ClosestComets.html
|url = https://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/lists/ClosestComets.html
|access-date = 2018-03-09}}</ref>
|access-date = January 24, 2024}}</ref>


<ref name="Earth-impact">{{cite web
<ref name="Earth-impact">{{cite web
Line 417: Line 392:
|last3 = Collins
|last3 = Collins
|name-list-style = amp
|name-list-style = amp
|url = http://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEffects/
|url = https://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEarth/ImpactEffects/
|access-date = 2017-11-09
|access-date = January 25, 2024
|url-status = live
|url-status = live
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171001034523/http://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEffects/
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240124034305/https://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEarth/ImpactEffects/
|archive-date= 2017-10-01}} (solution using 2600kg/m^3, 17km/s, 45 degrees)</ref>
|archive-date= January 24, 2024 }} (solution using 2600&nbsp;kg/m^3, 17&nbsp;km/s, 45 degrees)</ref>


<ref name="IAU-NEOs">{{cite web
<ref name="IAU-NEOs">{{cite web
|title = The IAU and Near Earth Objects
|title = Near Earth Objects
|date = February 2010
|url = https://www.iau.org/public/themes/neo/
|url = https://www.iau.org/public/themes/neo/
|publisher = [[International Astronomical Union|IAU]]
|access-date = May 14, 2018}}</ref>
|access-date = January 27, 2024 }}</ref>


<ref name="neo-jpl-stats">{{cite web
<ref name="neo-jpl-stats">{{cite web
Line 433: Line 408:
|publisher = NASA/JPL CNEOS
|publisher = NASA/JPL CNEOS
|url = https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/stats/totals.html
|url = https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/stats/totals.html
|date = January 6, 2019
|date = March 30, 2024
|access-date = January 8, 2019}}</ref>
|access-date = April 6, 2024 }}</ref>


<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks">{{cite web
<ref name="Current_Impact_Risks">{{cite web
Line 440: Line 415:
|url = https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/
|url = https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/
|publisher = NASA/JPL CNEOS
|publisher = NASA/JPL CNEOS
|access-date = 2018-03-09
|access-date = April 6, 2024
|url-status = live
|url-status = live
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180309082528/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240405013956/https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/
|archive-date= 2018-03-09}}</ref>
|archive-date= April 5, 2024 }}</ref>


<ref name="h">{{cite web
<ref name="h">{{cite web
|title = Asteroid Size Estimator
|title = Asteroid Size Estimator
|publisher = CNEOS NASA/JPL
|publisher = NASA/JPL CNEOS
|url = https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/ast_size_est.html
|url = https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/ast_size_est.html
|access-date = May 14, 2018}}</ref>
|access-date = January 25, 2024 }}</ref>


}} <!-- end of reflist -->
}} <!-- end of reflist -->
Line 457: Line 432:
* [http://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/ Center for Near Earth Object Studies (CNEOS)] – [[Jet Propulsion Laboratory]], [[NASA]]
* [http://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/ Center for Near Earth Object Studies (CNEOS)] – [[Jet Propulsion Laboratory]], [[NASA]]
* [http://www.brera.mi.astro.it/sormano/teca.html Table of Asteroids Next Closest Approaches to the Earth] – Sormano Astronomical Observatory
* [http://www.brera.mi.astro.it/sormano/teca.html Table of Asteroids Next Closest Approaches to the Earth] – Sormano Astronomical Observatory
* [http://www.arm.ac.uk/preprints/455.pdf Earth In The Cosmic Shooting] – D.J. Asher, The Observatory, 2005
* [http://smallbodies.ru/en/ Catalogue of the Solar System Small Bodies Orbital Evolution] – Samara State Technical University
* [http://smallbodies.ru/en/ Catalogue of the Solar System Small Bodies Orbital Evolution] – Samara State Technical University
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20170513205505/http://szyzyg.arm.ac.uk/~spm/neo_map.html Current Map Of The Solar System] – [[Armagh Observatory]]


; Minor Planet Center
; Minor Planet Center

Latest revision as of 06:55, 24 November 2024

Near-Earth object
Radar image of (388188) 2006 DP14 recorded by a DSN antenna
Very faint near-Earth asteroid 2009 FD as seen by the VLT telescope
Nucleus of near-Earth comet 103P/Hartley as seen by NASA's Deep Impact probe
Characteristics
TypeSmall Solar System body
Foundwithin 1.3 AU from the Sun
External links
inline Media category
inline Q265392

34,000+ known NEOs, divided into several orbital subgroups[1]

  Apollos: 19,613 (56.48%)
  Amors: 12,213 (35.17%)
  Atens: 2,744 (7.90%)
  Comets: 122 (0.35%)
  Atiras: 33 (0.10%)

A near-Earth object (NEO) is any small Solar System body orbiting the Sun whose closest approach to the Sun (perihelion) is less than 1.3 times the Earth–Sun distance (astronomical unit, AU).[2] This definition applies to the object's orbit around the Sun, rather than its current position, thus an object with such an orbit is considered an NEO even at times when it is far from making a close approach of Earth. If an NEO's orbit crosses the Earth's orbit, and the object is larger than 140 meters (460 ft) across, it is considered a potentially hazardous object (PHO).[3] Most known PHOs and NEOs are asteroids, but about 0.35% are comets.[1]

There are over 34,000 known near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) and over 120 known short-period near-Earth comets (NECs).[1] A number of solar-orbiting meteoroids were large enough to be tracked in space before striking Earth. It is now widely accepted that collisions in the past have had a significant role in shaping the geological and biological history of Earth.[4] Asteroids as small as 20 metres (66 ft) in diameter can cause significant damage to the local environment and human populations.[5] Larger asteroids penetrate the atmosphere to the surface of the Earth, producing craters if they impact a continent or tsunamis if they impact the sea. Interest in NEOs has increased since the 1980s because of greater awareness of this risk. Asteroid impact avoidance by deflection is possible in principle, and methods of mitigation are being researched.[6]

Two scales, the simple Torino scale and the more complex Palermo scale, rate the risk presented by an identified NEO based on the probability of it impacting the Earth and on how severe the consequences of such an impact would be. Some NEOs have had temporarily positive Torino or Palermo scale ratings after their discovery. Since 1998, the United States, the European Union, and other nations have been scanning the sky for NEOs in an effort called Spaceguard.[7] The initial US Congress mandate to NASA to catalog at least 90% of NEOs that are at least 1 kilometre (0.62 mi) in diameter, sufficient to cause a global catastrophe, was met by 2011.[8] In later years, the survey effort was expanded[9] to include smaller objects[10] which have the potential for large-scale, though not global, damage.

NEOs have low surface gravity, and many have Earth-like orbits that make them easy targets for spacecraft.[11][12] As of April 2024, five near-Earth comets[13][14][15] and six near-Earth asteroids,[16][17][18][19][20] one of them with a moon,[20] have been visited by spacecraft. Samples of three have been returned to Earth,[21][22] and one successful deflection test was conducted.[23] Similar missions are in progress. Preliminary plans for commercial asteroid mining have been drafted by private startup companies, but few of these plans were pursued.[24]

Definitions

[edit]
Plot of orbits of known potentially hazardous asteroids (size over 140 m (460 ft) and passing within 7.6×10^6 km (4.7×10^6 mi) of Earth's orbit) as of early 2013 (alternate image)

Near-Earth objects (NEOs) are formally defined by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) as all small Solar System bodies with orbits around the Sun that are at least partially closer than 1.3 astronomical units (AU; Sun–Earth distance) from the Sun.[25] This definition excludes larger bodies such as planets, like Venus; natural satellites which orbit bodies other than the Sun, like Earth's Moon; and artificial bodies orbiting the Sun. A small Solar System body can be an asteroid or a comet, thus an NEO is either a near-Earth asteroid (NEA) or a near-Earth comet (NEC). The organisations cataloging NEOs further limit their definition of NEO to objects with an orbital period under 200 years, a restriction that applies to comets in particular,[2][26] but this approach is not universal.[25] Some authors further restrict the definition to orbits that are at least partly further than 0.983 AU away from the Sun.[27][28] NEOs are thus not necessarily currently near the Earth, but they can potentially approach the Earth relatively closely. Many NEOs have complex orbits due to constant perturbation by the Earth's gravity, and some of them can temporarily change from an orbit around the Sun to one around the Earth, but the term is applied flexibly for these objects, too.[29]

The orbits of some NEOs intersect that of the Earth, so they pose a collision danger.[3] These are considered potentially hazardous objects (PHOs) if their estimated diameter is above 140 meters. PHOs include potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs).[30] PHAs are defined based on two parameters relating to respectively their potential to approach the Earth dangerously closely and the estimated consequences that an impact would have if it occurs.[2] Objects with both an Earth minimum orbit intersection distance (MOID) of 0.05 AU or less and an absolute magnitude of 22.0 or brighter (a rough indicator of large size) are considered PHAs. Objects that either cannot approach closer to the Earth than 0.05 AU (7,500,000 km; 4,600,000 mi), or which are fainter than H = 22.0 (about 140 m (460 ft) in diameter with assumed albedo of 14%), are not considered PHAs.[2]

History of human awareness of NEOs

[edit]
1910 drawing of the path of Halley's Comet
The near-Earth asteroid 433 Eros as seen by the probe NEAR Shoemaker

The first near-Earth objects to be observed by humans were comets. Their extraterrestrial nature was recognised and confirmed only after Tycho Brahe tried to measure the distance of a comet through its parallax in 1577 and the lower limit he obtained was well above the Earth diameter; the periodicity of some comets was first recognised in 1705, when Edmond Halley published his orbit calculations for the returning object now known as Halley's Comet.[31] The 1758–1759 return of Halley's Comet was the first comet appearance predicted.[32]

The extraterrestrial origin of meteors (shooting stars) was only recognised on the basis of the analysis of the 1833 Leonid meteor shower by astronomer Denison Olmsted. The 33-year period of the Leonids led astronomers to suspect that they originate from a comet that would today be classified as an NEO, which was confirmed in 1867, when astronomers found that the newly discovered comet 55P/Tempel–Tuttle has the same orbit as the Leonids.[33]

The first near-Earth asteroid to be discovered was 433 Eros in 1898.[34] The asteroid was subject to several extensive observation campaigns, primarily because measurements of its orbit enabled a precise determination of the then imperfectly known distance of the Earth from the Sun.[35]

Encounters with Earth

[edit]

If a near-Earth object is near the part of its orbit closest to Earth's at the same time Earth is at the part of its orbit closest to the near-Earth object's orbit, the object has a close approach, or, if the orbits intersect, could even impact the Earth or its atmosphere.

Close approaches

[edit]

As of May 2019, only 23 comets have been observed to pass within 0.1 AU (15,000,000 km; 9,300,000 mi) of Earth, including 10 which are or have been short-period comets.[36] Two of these near-Earth comets, Halley's Comet and 73P/Schwassmann–Wachmann, have been observed during multiple close approaches.[36] The closest observed approach was 0.0151 AU (5.88 LD) for Lexell's Comet on July 1, 1770.[36] After an orbit change due to a close approach of Jupiter in 1779, this object is no longer an NEC. The closest approach ever observed for a current short-period NEC is 0.0229 AU (8.92 LD) for Comet Tempel–Tuttle in 1366.[36] Orbital calculations show that P/1999 J6 (SOHO), a faint sungrazing comet and confirmed short-period NEC observed only during its close approaches to the Sun,[37] passed Earth undetected at a distance of 0.0120 AU (4.65 LD) on June 12, 1999.[38]

In 1937, 800 m (2,600 ft) asteroid 69230 Hermes was discovered when it passed the Earth at twice the distance of the Moon.[39] On June 14, 1968, the 1.4 km (0.87 mi) diameter asteroid 1566 Icarus passed Earth at a distance of 0.042 AU (6,300,000 km), or 16 times the distance of the Moon.[40] During this approach, Icarus became the first minor planet to be observed using radar.[41][42] This was the first close approach predicted years in advance, since Icarus had been discovered in 1949.[43] The first near-Earth asteroid known to have passed Earth closer than the distance of the Moon was 1991 BA, a 5–10 m (16–33 ft) body which passed at a distance of 170,000 km (110,000 mi).[44] By the 2010s, each year, several mostly small NEOs pass Earth closer than the distance of the Moon.[45]

As astronomers became able to discover ever smaller and fainter and ever more numerous near-Earth objects, they began to routinely observe and catalogue close approaches.[45] As of April 2024, the closest approach without impact ever detected, other than meteors or fireballs that went through the atmosphere (see #Earth-grazers below), was an encounter with asteroid 2020 VT4 on November 14, 2020.[46] The 5–11 m (16–36 ft) NEA was detected receding from Earth; calculations showed that on the day before, it had a close approach at about 6,750 km (4,190 mi) from the Earth's centre, or about 380 km (240 mi) above its surface.[47]

On November 8, 2011, asteroid (308635) 2005 YU55, relatively large at about 400 m (1,300 ft) in diameter, passed within 324,930 km (201,900 mi) (0.845 lunar distances) of Earth.[48]

On February 15, 2013, the 30 m (98 ft) asteroid 367943 Duende (2012 DA14) passed approximately 27,700 km (17,200 mi) above the surface of Earth, closer than satellites in geosynchronous orbit.[49] The asteroid was not visible to the unaided eye. This was the first sub-lunar close passage of an object discovered during a previous passage, and was thus the first to be predicted well in advance.[50]

Diagram showing spacecraft and asteroids (past and future) between the Earth and the Moon

Earth-grazers

[edit]

Some small asteroids that enter the upper atmosphere of Earth at a shallow angle remain intact and leave the atmosphere again, continuing on a solar orbit. During the passage through the atmosphere, due to the burning of its surface, such an object can be observed as an Earth-grazing fireball.

On August 10, 1972, a meteor that became known as the 1972 Great Daylight Fireball was witnessed by many people and even filmed as it moved north over the Rocky Mountains from the U.S. Southwest to Canada.[51] It passed within 58 km (36 mi) of the Earth's surface.[52]

On October 13, 1990, Earth-grazing meteoroid EN131090 was observed above Czechoslovakia and Poland, moving at 41.74 km/s (25.94 mi/s) along a 409 km (254 mi) trajectory from south to north. The closest approach to the Earth was 98.67 km (61.31 mi) above the surface. It was captured by two all-sky cameras of the European Fireball Network, which for the first time enabled geometric calculations of the orbit of such a body.[53]

Impacts

[edit]

When a near-Earth object impacts Earth, objects up to a few tens of metres across ordinarily explode in the upper atmosphere (usually harmlessly), with most or all of the solids vaporized and only small amounts of meteorites arriving to the Earth surface, while larger objects hit the water surface, forming tsunami waves, or the solid surface, forming impact craters.[54]

The frequency of impacts of objects of various sizes is estimated on the basis of orbit simulations of NEO populations, the frequency of impact craters on the Earth and the Moon, and the frequency of close encounters.[55][56] The study of impact craters indicates that impact frequency has been more or less steady for the past 3.5 billion years, which requires a steady replenishment of the NEO population from the asteroid main belt.[27] One impact model based on widely accepted NEO population models estimates the average time between the impact of two stony asteroids with a diameter of at least 4 m (13 ft) at about one year; for asteroids 7 m (23 ft) across (which impacts with as much energy as the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, approximately 15 kilotonnes of TNT) at five years, for asteroids 60 m (200 ft) across (an impact energy of 10 megatons, comparable to the Tunguska event in 1908) at 1,300 years, for asteroids 1 km (0.62 mi) across at 440 thousand years, and for asteroids 5 km (3.1 mi) across at 18 million years.[57] Some other models estimate similar impact frequencies,[27] while others calculate higher frequencies.[56] For Tunguska-sized (10 megaton) impacts, the estimates range from one event every 2,000–3,000 years to one event every 300 years.[56]

Location and impact energy of small asteroids impacting Earth's atmosphere

The second-largest observed event after the Tunguska meteor was a 1.1 megaton air blast in 1963 near the Prince Edward Islands between South Africa and Antarctica, which was detected only by infrasound sensors.[58] However this may have been a nuclear test.[59][60] The third-largest, but by far best-observed impact, was the Chelyabinsk meteor of 15 February 2013. A previously unknown 20 m (66 ft) asteroid exploded above this Russian city with an equivalent blast yield of 400–500 kilotons.[58] The calculated orbit of the pre-impact asteroid is similar to that of Apollo asteroid 2011 EO40, making the latter the meteor's possible parent body.[61]

Seven hours after discovery, 2023 CX1 burns up as a meteor over northern France

On October 7, 2008, 20 hours after it was first observed and 11 hours after its trajectory has been calculated and announced, 4 m (13 ft) asteroid 2008 TC3 blew up 37 km (23 mi) above the Nubian Desert in Sudan. It was the first time that an asteroid was observed and its impact was predicted prior to its entry into the atmosphere as a meteor. 10.7 kg of meteorites were recovered after the impact.[62] As of September 2024, nine impacts have been predicted, all of them small bodies that produced meteor explosions,[63] with some impacts in remote areas only detected by the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization's International Monitoring System (IMS), a network of infrasound sensors designed to detect the detonation of nuclear devices.[64] Asteroid impact prediction remains in its infancy and successfully predicted asteroid impacts are rare. The vast majority of impacts recorded by IMS are not predicted.[65]

Observed impacts aren't restricted to the surface and atmosphere of Earth. Dust-sized NEOs have impacted man-made spacecraft, including the space probe Long Duration Exposure Facility, which collected interplanetary dust in low Earth orbit for six years from 1984.[66] Impacts on the Moon can be observed as flashes of light with a typical duration of a fraction of a second.[67] The first lunar impacts were recorded during the 1999 Leonid storm.[68] Subsequently, several continuous monitoring programs were launched.[67][69][70] A lunar impact that was observed on September 11, 2013, lasted 8 seconds, was likely caused by an object 0.6–1.4 m (2.0–4.6 ft) in diameter,[69] and created a new crater 40 m (130 ft) across, was the largest ever observed as of July 2019.[71]

Risk

[edit]
Asteroid 4179 Toutatis, a potentially hazardous object that passed within 4 lunar distances in September 2004 and currently has a minimum possible distance of 2.5 lunar distances

Through human history, the risk that any near-Earth object poses has been viewed having regard to both the culture and the technology of human society. Through history, humans have associated NEOs with changing risks, based on religious, philosophical or scientific views, as well as humanity's technological or economical capability to deal with such risks.[6] Thus, NEOs have been seen as omens of natural disasters or wars; harmless spectacles in an unchanging universe; the source of era-changing cataclysms[6] or potentially poisonous fumes (during Earth's passage through the tail of Halley's Comet in 1910);[72] and finally as a possible cause of a crater-forming impact that could even cause extinction of humans and other life on Earth.[6]

The potential of catastrophic impacts by near-Earth comets was recognised as soon as the first orbit calculations provided an understanding of their orbits: in 1694, Edmond Halley presented a theory that Noah's flood in the Bible was caused by a comet impact.[73]

Human perception of near-Earth asteroids as benign objects of fascination or killer objects with high risk to human society has ebbed and flowed during the short time that NEAs have been scientifically observed.[12] The 1937 close approach of Hermes and the 1968 close approach of Icarus first raised impact concerns among scientists. Icarus earned significant public attention due to alarmist news reports. while Hermes was considered a threat because it was lost after its discovery; thus its orbit and potential for collision with Earth were not known precisely.[43] Hermes, having a period of 2.13 years, was only re-discovered in 2003, and it is now known to be no threat for at least the next century.[39]

Scientists have recognised the threat of impacts that create craters much bigger than the impacting bodies and have indirect effects on an even wider area since the 1980s, with mounting evidence for the theory that the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (in which the non-avian dinosaurs died out) 65 million years ago was caused by a large asteroid impact.[6][74] On March 23, 1989, the 300 m (980 ft) diameter Apollo asteroid 4581 Asclepius (1989 FC) missed the Earth by 700,000 km (430,000 mi). If the asteroid had impacted it would have created the largest explosion in recorded history, equivalent to 20,000 megatons of TNT. It attracted widespread attention because it was discovered only after the closest approach.[75]

From the 1990s, a typical frame of reference in searches for NEOs has been the scientific concept of risk. The awareness of the wider public of the impact risk rose after the observation of the impact of the fragments of Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 into Jupiter in July 1994.[6][74] In March 1998, early orbit calculations for recently discovered asteroid (35396) 1997 XF11 showed a potential 2028 close approach 0.00031 AU (46,000 km) from the Earth, well within the orbit of the Moon, but with a large error margin allowing for a direct hit. Further data allowed a revision of the 2028 approach distance to 0.0064 AU (960,000 km), with no chance of collision. By that time, inaccurate reports of a potential impact had caused a media storm.[43]

In 1998, the movies Deep Impact and Armageddon popularised the notion that near-Earth objects could cause catastrophic impacts.[74] Also at that time, a scare arose about a supposed 2003 impact of a planet called Nibiru with Earth, which persisted on the internet as the predicted impact date was moved to 2012 and then 2017.[76]

Risk scales

[edit]

There are two schemes for the scientific classification of impact hazards from NEOs, as a way to communicate the risk of impacts to the general public.

The Torino scale. The scale in metres is the approximate diameter of an asteroid with a typical collision velocity. The x-axis is probability of an impact in the next 100 years.

The simple Torino scale was established at an IAU workshop in Torino in June 1999, in the wake of the public confusion about the impact risk of 1997 XF11.[77] It rates the risks of impacts in the next 100 years according to impact energy and impact probability, using integer numbers between 0 and 10:[78][79]

  • ratings of 0 and 1 are of little concern, with a probability less than 1% of an impact in the next 100 years,
  • ratings of 2 to 4 are used for events with increasing magnitude of concern to astronomers trying to make more precise orbit calculations,
  • ratings of 5 to 7 are meant for impacts of increasing magnitude which are not certain but warrant public concern and governmental contingency planning,
  • 8 to 10 would be used for certain collisions of increasing severity.

The more complex Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale, established in 2002, compares the likelihood of an impact at a certain date to the probable number of impacts of a similar energy or greater until the possible impact, and takes the logarithm of this ratio. Thus, a Palermo scale rating can be any positive or negative real number, and risks of any concern are indicated by values above zero. Unlike the Torino scale, the Palermo scale is not sensitive to newly discovered small objects with an orbit known with low confidence.[80]

Highly rated risks

[edit]

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA maintains an automated system to evaluate the threat from known NEOs over the next 100 years, which generates the continuously updated Sentry Risk Table.[81] All or nearly all of the objects are highly likely to drop off the list eventually as more observations come in, reducing the uncertainties and enabling more accurate orbital predictions.[81][82] A similar table is maintained on NEODyS (Near Earth Objects Dynamic Site) by the European Space Agency (ESA).[83]

In March 2002, (163132) 2002 CU11 became the first asteroid with a temporarily positive rating on the Torino Scale, with about a 1 in 9,300 chance of an impact in 2049.[84] Additional observations reduced the estimated risk to zero, and the asteroid was removed from the Sentry Risk Table in April 2002.[85] It is now known that within the next two centuries, 2002 CU11 will pass the Earth at a safe closest distance (perigee) of 0.00425 AU (636,000 km; 395,000 mi) on August 31, 2080.[86]

Radar image of asteroid (29075) 1950 DA

Asteroid (29075) 1950 DA was lost after its 1950 discovery, since its observations over just 17 days were insufficient to precisely determine its orbit. It was rediscovered in December 2000 prior to a close approach the next year, when new observations, including radar imaging, allowed much more precise orbit calculations. It has a diameter of about a kilometer (0.6 miles), and an impact would therefore be globally catastrophic. Although this asteroid will not strike for at least 800 years and thus has no Torino scale rating, it was added to the Sentry list in April 2002 as the first object with a Palermo scale value greater than zero.[25][87] The then-calculated 1 in 300 maximum chance of impact and +0.17 Palermo scale value was roughly 50% greater than the background risk of impact by all similarly large objects until 2880.[87][88] After additional radar[89] and optical observations, as of April 2024, the probability of this impact is assessed at 1 in 34,000.[81] The corresponding Palermo scale value of −2.05 is still the second highest for all objects on the Sentry List Table.[81]

On December 24, 2004, 370 m (1,210 ft) asteroid 99942 Apophis (at the time known only by its provisional designation 2004 MN4) was assigned a 4 on the Torino scale, the highest rating given to date, as the information available at the time translated to a 1.6% chance of Earth impact in April 2029.[90] As observations were collected over the next three days, the calculated chance of impact increased to as high as 2.7%,[91] then fell back to zero, as the uncertainty zone for this close approach no longer included the Earth.[92] There was still some uncertainty about potential impacts during later close approaches, however, as the precision of orbital calculations improved due to additional observations, the risk of impact at any date was completely eliminated by 2021.[93] Consequently, Apophis was removed from the Sentry Risk Table.[85]

In February 2006, (144898) 2004 VD17, having a diameter around 300 metres, was assigned a Torino Scale rating of 2 due to a close encounter predicted for May 4, 2102.[94] After additional observations allowed increasingly precise predictions, the Torino rating was lowered first to 1 in May 2006, then to 0 in October 2006, and the asteroid was removed from the Sentry Risk Table entirely in February 2008.[85]

In 2021, 2010 RF12 was listed with the highest chance of impacting Earth, at 1 in 22 on September 5, 2095. At only 7 m (23 ft) across, the asteroid however is much too small to be considered a potentially hazardous asteroid and it poses no serious threat: the possible 2095 impact therefore rated only −3.32 on the Palermo Scale.[81] Observations during the August 2022 close approach were expected to ascertain whether the asteroid will impact or miss Earth in 2095.[95] As of April 2024, the risk of the 2095 impact was put at 1 in 10, still the highest, with a Palermo Scale rating of −2.98.[81]

Projects to minimize the threat

[edit]
Annual NEA discoveries by survey: all NEAs (top) and NEAs > 1 km (bottom)

A year before the 1968 close approach of asteroid Icarus, Massachusetts Institute of Technology students launched Project Icarus, devising a plan to deflect the asteroid with rockets in case it was found to be on a collision course with Earth.[96] Project Icarus received wide media coverage, and inspired the 1979 disaster movie Meteor, in which the US and the USSR join forces to blow up an Earth-bound fragment of an asteroid hit by a comet.[97]

The first astronomical program dedicated to the discovery of near-Earth asteroids was the Palomar Planet-Crossing Asteroid Survey. The link to impact hazard, the need for dedicated survey telescopes and options to head off an eventual impact were first discussed at a 1981 interdisciplinary conference in Snowmass, Colorado.[74] Plans for a more comprehensive survey, named the Spaceguard Survey, were developed by NASA from 1992, under a mandate from the United States Congress.[98][99] To promote the survey on an international level, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) organised a workshop at Vulcano, Italy in 1995,[98] and set up The Spaceguard Foundation also in Italy a year later.[7] In 1998, the United States Congress gave NASA a mandate to detect 90% of near-earth asteroids over 1 km (0.62 mi) diameter (that threaten global devastation) by 2008.[99][100]

Asteroids discovered in the first three years of the Near-Earth Object WISE program, starting in December 2013, with green dots showing NEAs

Several surveys have undertaken "Spaceguard" activities (an umbrella term), including Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research (LINEAR), Spacewatch, Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking (NEAT), Lowell Observatory Near-Earth-Object Search (LONEOS), Catalina Sky Survey (CSS), Campo Imperatore Near-Earth Object Survey (CINEOS), Japanese Spaceguard Association, Asiago-DLR Asteroid Survey (ADAS) and Near-Earth Object WISE (NEOWISE). As a result, the ratio of the known and the estimated total number of near-Earth asteroids larger than 1 km in diameter rose from about 20% in 1998 to 65% in 2004,[7] 80% in 2006,[100] and 93% in 2011. The original Spaceguard goal has thus been met, only three years late.[8][101] As of March 2024, 861 NEAs larger than 1 km have been discovered.[1]

In 2005, the original USA Spaceguard mandate was extended by the George E. Brown, Jr. Near-Earth Object Survey Act, which calls for NASA to detect 90% of NEOs with diameters of 140 m (460 ft) or greater, by 2020.[9] In January 2020, it was estimated that less than half of these have been found, but objects of this size hit the earth only about once in 2000 years.[102] In December 2023, the ratio of discovered NEOs with diameters of 140 m (460 ft) or greater was estimated at 38%.[103] The Chile-based Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which will survey the southern sky for transient events from 2025, is expected to increase the number of known asteroids by a factor of 10 to 100 and increase the ratio of known NEOs with diameters of 140 m (460 ft) or greater to at least 60%,[104] while the NEO Surveyor satellite, to be launched in 2027, is expected to push the ratio to 76%.[103] Given the rarity of impacts by objects this big mentioned above, there are probably no objects of 140 metres or larger that will hit the earth in the next few centuries.

In January 2016, NASA announced the creation of the Planetary Defense Coordination Office (PDCO) to track NEOs larger than about 30–50 m (98–164 ft) in diameter and coordinate an effective threat response and mitigation effort.[10][105]

Survey programs aim to identify threats years in advance, giving humanity time to prepare a space mission to avert the threat.

REP. STEWART: ... are we technologically capable of launching something that could intercept [an asteroid]? ...
DR. A'HEARN: No. If we had spacecraft plans on the books already, that would take a year ... I mean a typical small mission ... takes four years from approval to start to launch ...

The ATLAS project, by contrast, aims to find impacting asteroids shortly before impact, much too late for deflection maneuvers but still in time to evacuate and otherwise prepare the affected Earth region.[107] Another project, the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), which surveys for objects that change their brightness rapidly,[108] also detects asteroids passing close to Earth.[109]

Scientists involved in NEO research have also considered options for actively averting the threat if an object is found to be on a collision course with Earth.[74] All viable methods aim to deflect rather than destroy the threatening NEO, because the fragments would still cause widespread destruction.[13] Deflection, which means a change in the object's orbit months to years prior to the predicted impact, also requires orders of magnitude less energy.[13] For a given amount of energy, a greater effect on the momentum of the object can be had by causing some of it to be blasted off it, as was done in the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (see below).

Number and classification

[edit]
Cumulative discoveries of near-Earth asteroids known by size, 1980–2024

When an NEO is detected, like all other small Solar System bodies, its positions and brightness are submitted to the (IAU's) Minor Planet Center (MPC) for cataloging. The MPC maintains separate lists of confirmed NEOs and potential NEOs.[110][111] The MPC maintains a separate list for the potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs).[30] NEOs are also catalogued by two separate units of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) of NASA: the Center for Near Earth Object Studies (CNEOS)[112] and the Solar System Dynamics Group.[113] CNEOS's catalog of near-Earth objects includes the approach distances of asteroids and comets.[46] NEOs are also catalogued by a unit of ESA, the Near-Earth Objects Coordination Centre (NEOCC).[114]

Near-Earth objects are classified as meteoroids, asteroids, or comets depending on size, composition, and orbit. Those which are asteroids can additionally be members of an asteroid family, and comets create meteoroid streams that can generate meteor showers.

As of March 30, 2024 and according to statistics maintained by CNEOS, 34,725 NEOs have been discovered. Only 122 (0.35%) of them are comets, whilst 34,603 (99.65%) are asteroids. 2,406 of those NEOs are classified as potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs).[1]

As of April 5, 2024, 1,712 NEAs appear on the Sentry impact risk page at the NASA website.[81] All but 95 of these NEAs are less than 50 meters in diameter and none of the listed objects are placed even in the "green zone" (Torino Scale 1), meaning that none warrant the attention of the general public.[78]

Observational biases

[edit]

The main problem with estimating the number of NEOs is that the probability of detecting one is influenced by a number of aspects of the NEO, starting naturally with its size but also including the characteristics of its orbit and the reflectivity of its surface.[115] What is easily detected will be more counted, and these observational biases need to be compensated when trying to calculate the number of bodies in a population from the list of its detected members.[115]

Artist's impression of an asteroid that orbits closer to the Sun than Earth's orbit, showing its dark side

Bigger asteroids reflect more light, and the two biggest near-Earth objects, 433 Eros and 1036 Ganymed, were naturally also among the first to be detected.[116] 1036 Ganymed is about 35 km (22 mi) in diameter and 433 Eros is about 17 km (11 mi) in diameter.[116] Meanwhile, the apparent brightness of objects that are closer is higher, introducing a bias that favours the discovery of NEOs of a given size that get closer to Earth.[117]

Earth-based astronomy requires dark skies and hence nighttime observations, and even space-based telescopes avoid looking into directions close to the Sun, thus most NEO surveys are blind towards objects passing Earth on the side of the Sun.[117][118] This bias is further enhanced by the effect of phase: the narrower the angle of the asteroid and the Sun from the observer, the lesser part of the observed side of the asteroid will be illuminated.[117] Another bias results from the different surface brightness or albedo of the objects, which can make a large but low-albedo object as bright as a small but high-albedo object.[117][119] In addition, the reflexivity of asteroid surfaces is not uniform but increases towards the direction opposite of illumination, resulting in the phenomenon of phase darkening, which makes asteroids even brighter when the Earth is close to the axis of sunlight.[117] An asteroid's observed albedo usually has a strong peak or opposition surge very close to the direction opposite of the Sun.[117] Different surfaces display different levels of phase darkening, and research showed that, on top of albedo bias, this favours the discovery of silicon-rich S-type asteroids over carbon-rich C types, for example.[117] As a result of these observational biases, in Earth-based surveys, NEOs tended to be discovered when they were in opposition, that is, opposite from the Sun when viewed from the Earth.[103]

The most practical way around many of these biases is to use thermal infrared telescopes in space that observe their thermal emissions instead of the light they reflect, with a sensitivity that is almost independent of the illumination.[103][119] In addition, space-based telescopes in an orbit around the Sun in the shadow of the Earth can make observations as close as 45 degrees to the direction of the Sun.[118]

Further observational biases favour objects that have more frequent encounters with the Earth, which makes the detection of Atens more likely than that of Apollos; and objects that move slower when encountering the Earth, which makes the detection of NEAs with low eccentricities more likely.[120]

Such observational biases must be identified and quantified to determine NEO populations, as studies of asteroid populations then take those known observational selection biases into account to make a more accurate assessment.[121] In the year 2000 and taking into account all known observational biases, it was estimated that there are approximately 900 near-Earth asteroids of at least kilometer size, or technically and more accurately, with an absolute magnitude brighter than 17.75.[115]

Near-Earth asteroids

[edit]
One-minute path of asteroid 4179 Toutatis in the sky during its September 2004 close approach (Paranal Observatory)

These are asteroids in a near-Earth orbit without the tail or coma of a comet. As of March 2024, 34,603 near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) are known, 2,406 of which are both sufficiently large and may come sufficiently close to Earth to be classified as potentially hazardous.[1]

NEAs survive in their orbits for just a few million years.[27] They are eventually eliminated by planetary perturbations, causing ejection from the Solar System or a collision with the Sun, a planet, or other celestial body.[27] With orbital lifetimes short compared to the age of the Solar System, new asteroids must be constantly moved into near-Earth orbits to explain the observed asteroids. The accepted origin of these asteroids is that main-belt asteroids are moved into the inner Solar System through orbital resonances with Jupiter.[27] The interaction with Jupiter through the resonance perturbs the asteroid's orbit and it comes into the inner Solar System. The asteroid belt has gaps, known as Kirkwood gaps, where these resonances occur as the asteroids in these resonances have been moved onto other orbits. New asteroids migrate into these resonances, due to the Yarkovsky effect that provides a continuing supply of near-Earth asteroids.[122] Compared to the entire mass of the asteroid belt, the mass loss necessary to sustain the NEA population is relatively small; totalling less than 6% over the past 3.5 billion years.[27] The composition of near-Earth asteroids is comparable to that of asteroids from the asteroid belt, reflecting a variety of asteroid spectral types.[123]

A small number of NEAs are extinct comets that have lost their volatile surface materials, although having a faint or intermittent comet-like tail does not necessarily result in a classification as a near-Earth comet, making the boundaries somewhat fuzzy. The rest of the near-Earth asteroids are driven out of the asteroid belt by gravitational interactions with Jupiter.[27][124]

Many asteroids have natural satellites (minor-planet moons). As of April 2024, 97 NEAs were known to have at least one moon, including three known to have two moons.[125] The asteroid 3122 Florence, one of the largest PHAs[30] with a diameter of 4.5 km (2.8 mi), has two moons measuring 100–300 m (330–980 ft) across, which were discovered by radar imaging during the asteroid's 2017 approach to Earth.[126]

In May 2022, an algorithm known as Tracklet-less Heliocentric Orbit Recovery or THOR and developed by University of Washington researchers to discover asteroids in the solar system was announced as a success.[127] The International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center confirmed a series of first candidate asteroids identified by the algorithm.[128]

Size distribution

[edit]
Known near-Earth asteroids by size

While the size of a very small fraction of these asteroids is known to better than 1%, from radar observations, from images of the asteroid surface, or from stellar occultations, the diameter of the vast majority of near-Earth asteroids has only been estimated on the basis of their brightness and a representative asteroid surface reflectivity or albedo, which is commonly assumed to be 14%.[112] Such indirect size estimates are uncertain by over a factor of 2 for individual asteroids, since asteroid albedos can range at least as low as 5% and as high as 30%. This makes the volume of those asteroids uncertain by a factor of 8, and their mass by at least as much, since their assumed density also has its own uncertainty. Using this crude method, an absolute magnitude of 17.75 roughly corresponds to a diameter of 1 km (0.62 mi)[112] and an absolute magnitude of 22.0 to a diameter of 140 m (460 ft).[2] Diameters of intermediate precision, better than from an assumed albedo but not nearly as precise as good direct measurements, can be obtained from the combination of reflected light and thermal infrared emission, using a thermal model of the asteroid to estimate both its diameter and its albedo. The reliability of this method, as applied by the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer and NEOWISE missions, has been the subject of a dispute between experts, with the 2018 publication of two independent analyses, one criticising and another giving results consistent with the WISE method.[129]

In 2000, NASA reduced from 1,000–2,000 to 500–1,000 its estimate of the number of existing near-Earth asteroids over one kilometer in diameter, or more exactly brighter than an absolute magnitude of 17.75.[130][131] Shortly thereafter, the LINEAR survey provided an alternative estimate of 1,227+170
−90
.[132] In 2011, on the basis of NEOWISE observations, the estimated number of one-kilometer NEAs was narrowed to 981±19 (of which 93% had been discovered at the time), while the number of NEAs larger than 140 meters across was estimated at 13,200±1,900.[8][101] The NEOWISE estimate differed from other estimates primarily in assuming a slightly lower average asteroid albedo, which produces larger estimated diameters for the same asteroid brightness. This resulted in 911 then known asteroids at least 1 km across, as opposed to the 830 then listed by CNEOS from the same inputs but assuming a slightly higher albedo.[133] In 2017, two studies using an improved statistical method reduced the estimated number of NEAs brighter than absolute magnitude 17.75 (approximately over one kilometer in diameter) slightly to 921±20.[134][135] The estimated number of near-Earth asteroids brighter than absolute magnitude of 22.0 (approximately over 140 m across) rose to 27,100±2,200, double the WISE estimate, of which about a fourth were known at the time.[135] The number of asteroids brighter than H = 25, which corresponds to about 40 m (130 ft) in diameter, is estimated at 840,000±23,000—of which about 1.3 percent had been discovered by February 2016; the number of asteroids brighter than H = 30 (larger than 3.5 m (11 ft)) is estimated at 400±100 million—of which about 0.003 percent had been discovered by February 2016.[135]

As of March 30, 2024, and using diameters mostly estimated crudely from a measured absolute magnitude and an assumed albedo, 861 NEAs listed by CNEOS, including 152 PHAs, measure at least 1 km in diameter, and 10,832 known NEAs, including 2,406 PHAs, are larger than 140 m in diameter.[1]

The smallest known near-Earth asteroid is 2022 WJ1 with an absolute magnitude of 33.58,[113] corresponding to an estimated diameter of about 0.7 m (2.3 ft).[136] The largest such object is 1036 Ganymed,[113] with an absolute magnitude of 9.26 and directly measured irregular dimensions which are equivalent to a diameter of about 38 km (24 mi).[137]

Orbital classification

[edit]
NEA orbital groups (NASA/JPL)

Near-Earth asteroids are divided into groups based on their semi-major axis (a), perihelion distance (q), and aphelion distance (Q):[2][26]

  • The Atiras or Apoheles have orbits strictly inside Earth's orbit: an Atira asteroid's aphelion distance (Q) is smaller than Earth's perihelion distance (0.983 AU). That is, Q < 0.983 AU, which implies that the asteroid's semi-major axis is also less than 0.983 AU.[138] This group includes asteroids on orbits that never get close to Earth, including the sub-group of ꞌAylóꞌchaxnims, which orbit the Sun entirely within the orbit of Venus[139] and which include the hypothetical sub-group of Vulcanoids, which have orbits entirely within the orbit of Mercury.[140]
  • The Atens have a semi-major axis of less than 1 AU and cross Earth's orbit. Mathematically, a < 1.0 AU and Q > 0.983 AU. (0.983 AU is Earth's perihelion distance.)
  • The Apollos have a semi-major axis of more than 1 AU and cross Earth's orbit. Mathematically, a > 1.0 AU and q < 1.017 AU. (1.017 AU is Earth's aphelion distance.)
  • The Amors have orbits strictly outside Earth's orbit: an Amor asteroid's perihelion distance (q) is greater than Earth's aphelion distance (1.017 AU). Amor asteroids are also near-earth objects so q < 1.3 AU. In summary, 1.017 AU < q < 1.3 AU. (This implies that the asteroid's semi-major axis (a) is also larger than 1.017 AU.) Some Amor asteroid orbits cross the orbit of Mars.

Some authors define Atens differently: they define it as being all the asteroids with a semi-major axis of less than 1 AU.[141][142] That is, they consider the Atiras to be part of the Atens.[142] Historically, until 1998, there were no known or suspected Atiras, so the distinction wasn't necessary.

Atiras and Amors do not cross the Earth's orbit and are not immediate impact threats, but their orbits may change to become Earth-crossing orbits in the future.[27][143]

As of March 30, 2024, 33 Atiras, 2,744 Atens, 19,613 Apollos and 12,213 Amors have been discovered and cataloged.[1]

Co-orbital asteroids

[edit]
The five Lagrangian points relative to the Sun and Earth and possible orbits along gravitational contours

Most NEAs have orbits that are significantly more eccentric than that of the Earth and the other major planets and their orbital planes can tilt several degrees relative to that of the Earth. NEAs which have orbits that do resemble the Earth's in eccentricity, inclination and semi-major axis are grouped as Arjuna asteroids.[144] Within this group are NEAs that have the same orbital period as the Earth, or a co-orbital configuration, which corresponds to an orbital resonance at a ratio of 1:1. All co-orbital asteroids have special orbits that are relatively stable and, paradoxically, can prevent them from getting close to Earth:

  • Trojans: Near the orbit of a planet, there are five gravitational equilibrium points, the Lagrangian points, in which an asteroid would orbit the Sun in fixed formation with the planet. Two of these, 60 degrees ahead and behind the planet along its orbit (designated L4 and L5 respectively) are stable; that is, an asteroid near these points would stay there for millions of years even if lightly perturbed by other planets and by non-gravitational forces. Trojans circle around L4 or L5 on paths resembing a tadpole.[145] As of October 2023, Earth has two confirmed Trojans:[146] (706765) 2010 TK7 and (614689) 2020 XL5, both circling Earth's L4 point.[147][148]
  • Horseshoe librators: The region of stability around L4 and L5 also includes orbits for co-orbital asteroids that run around both L4 and L5. Relative to the Earth and Sun, the orbit can resemble the circumference of a horseshoe, or may consist of annual loops that wander back and forth (librate) in a horseshoe-shaped area. In both cases, the Sun is at the horseshoe's center of gravity, Earth is in the gap of the horseshoe, and L4 and L5 are inside the ends of the horseshoe. This orbital type is less stable than a [145] As of October 2023, at least 13 horseshoe librators of Earth have been discovered.[146] The most-studied and, at about 5 km (3.1 mi), largest is 3753 Cruithne, which travels along bean-shaped annual loops and completes its horseshoe libration cycle every 770–780 years.[149][150] (419624) 2010 SO16 is an asteroid on a relatively stable circumference-of-a-horseshoe orbit, with a horseshoe libration period of about 350 years.[151]
  • Quasi-satellites: Quasi-satellites are co-orbital asteroids on a normal elliptic orbit with a higher eccentricity than Earth's, which they travel in a way synchronised with Earth's motion. Since the asteroid orbits the Sun slower than Earth when further away and faster than Earth when closer to the Sun, when observed in a rotating frame of reference fixed to the Sun and the Earth, the quasi-satellite appears to orbit Earth in a retrograde direction in one year, even though it is not bound gravitationally. As of October 2023, six asteroids were known to be a quasi-satellite of Earth.[146] 469219 Kamoʻoalewa is Earth's closest quasi-satellite, in an orbit that has been stable for almost a century.[152] This asteroid is thought to be a piece of the Moon ejected during an impact.[146][153] Orbit calculations show that almost all quasi-satellites and many horseshoe librators repeatedly transfer between horseshoe and quasi-satellite orbits.[152][154] One of these objects, 2003 YN107, was observed during its transition from a quasi-satellite orbit to a horseshoe orbit in 2006; it is expected to transfer back to a quasi-satellite orbit sometime around year 2066.[155] A quasi-satellite discovered in 2023 but then found in old photographs back to 2012, 2023 FW13, was found to have an orbit that is stable for about 4,000 years, from 100 BC to AD 3700.[156]
  • Asteroids on compound orbits: orbital calculations show that some co-orbital asteroids transit between horseshoe and quasi-satellite orbits during every horseshoe resp. quasi-satellite cycle. Theoretically, similar continuous transitions between Trojan and horseshoe orbits are possible, too. As of January 2023, at least 20 Earth co-orbital NEAs are thought to be in the horseshoe-like phase of compound orbits.[154]
Animation of 2020 CD3's orbit around Earth
  2020 CD3 ·   Moon ·   Earth
  • Temporary satellites: NEAs can also transfer between solar orbits and distant Earth orbits, becoming gravitationally bound temporary satellites. According to simulations, temporary satellites are typically caught when they pass Earth's L1 or L2 Lagrangian points at the time Earth is either at the point in its orbit closest or farthest from the Sun, complete a couple of orbits around Earth, and then return to a heliocentric orbit due to perturbations from the Moon.[29] Strictly speaking, temporary satellites aren't co-orbital asteroids, and they can have orbits of the broader Arjuna type before and after capture by Earth, but simulations show that they can be captured from, or transfer to, horseshoe orbits.[144] The simulations also indicate that Earth typically has at least one temporary satellite 1 m (3.3 ft) across at any given time, but they are too faint to be detected by current surveys.[29] As of August 2023, four temporary satellites have been observed:[144] 1991 VG,[157] 2006 RH120, 2020 CD3[158][159] and 2022 NX1.[144] Calculations for the 5 m (16 ft) asteroid 2023 FY3 showed repeated transitions into temporary satellite orbits both in the past and the future 10,000 years.[144]

Near-Earth asteroids also include the co-orbitals of Venus. As of January 2023, all known co-orbitals of Venus have orbits with high eccentricity, also crossing Earth's orbit.[154][160]

Meteoroids

[edit]

In 1961, the IAU defined meteoroids as a class of solid interplanetary objects distinct from asteroids by their considerably smaller size.[66] This definition was useful at the time because, with the exception of the Tunguska event, all historically observed meteors were produced by objects significantly smaller than the smallest asteroids then observable by telescopes.[66] As the distinction began to blur with the discovery of ever smaller asteroids and a greater variety of observed NEO impacts, revised definitions with size limits have been proposed from the 1990s.[66] In April 2017, the IAU adopted a revised definition that generally limits meteoroids to a size between 30 μm and 1 m in diameter, but permits the use of the term for any object of any size that caused a meteor, thus leaving the distinction between asteroid and meteoroid blurred.[161]

Near-Earth comets

[edit]
Halley's Comet during its 0.10 AU[162] approach of Earth in May 1910

Near-Earth comets (NECs) are objects in a near-Earth orbit with a tail or coma made up of dust, gas or ionized particles emitted by a solid nucleus. Comet nuclei are typically less dense than asteroids but they pass Earth at higher relative speeds, thus the impact energy of a comet nucleus is slightly larger than that of a similar-sized asteroid.[163] NECs may pose an additional hazard due to fragmentation: the meteoroid streams which produce meteor showers may include large inactive fragments, effectively NEAs.[164] Although no impact of a comet in Earth's history has been conclusively confirmed, the Tunguska event may have been caused by a fragment of Comet Encke.[165]

Comets are commonly divided between short-period and long-period comets. Short-period comets, with an orbital period of less than 200 years, originate in the Kuiper belt, beyond the orbit of Neptune; while long-period comets originate in the Oort Cloud, in the outer reaches of the Solar System.[13] The orbital period distinction is of importance in the evaluation of the risk from near-Earth comets because short-period NECs are likely to have been observed during multiple apparitions and thus their orbits can be determined with some precision, while long-period NECs can be assumed to have been seen for the first and last time when they appeared since the start of precise observations, thus their approaches cannot be predicted well in advance.[13] Since the threat from long-period NECs is estimated to be at most 1% of the threat from NEAs, and long-period comets are very faint and thus difficult to detect at large distances from the Sun, Spaceguard efforts have consistently focused on asteroids and short-period comets.[98][163] Both NASA's CNEOS[2] and ESA's NEOCC[26] restrict their definition of NECs to short-period comets. As of March 30, 2024, 122 such objects have been discovered.[1]

Comet 109P/Swift–Tuttle, which is also the source of the Perseid meteor shower every year in August, has a roughly 130-year orbit that passes close to the Earth. During the comet's September 1992 recovery, when only the two previous returns in 1862 and 1737 had been identified, calculations showed that the comet would pass close to Earth during its next return in 2126, with an impact within the range of uncertainty. By 1993, even earlier returns (back to at least 188 AD) had been identified, and the longer observation arc eliminated the impact risk. The comet will pass Earth in 2126 at a distance of 23 million kilometers. In 3044, the comet is expected to pass Earth at less than 1.6 million kilometers.[166]

Artificial near-Earth objects

[edit]
J002E3 discovery images taken on September 3, 2002. J002E3 is in the circle

Defunct space probes and final stages of rockets can end up in near-Earth orbits around the Sun, and be re-discovered by NEO surveys when they return to Earth's vicinity.

An object classified as asteroid 1991 VG was discovered during its transition from a temporary satellite orbit around Earth to a solar orbit in November 1991, and could only be observed until April 1992. Some scientists suspected it to be a returning piece of man-made space debris. After new observations in 2017 provided better data on its orbit and surface characteristics, a new study found the artificial origin unlikely.[157]

In September 2002, astronomers found an object designated J002E3. The object was on a temporary satellite orbit around Earth, leaving for a solar orbit in June 2003. Calculations showed that it was also on a solar orbit before 2002, but was close to Earth in 1971. J002E3 was identified as the third stage of the Saturn V rocket that carried Apollo 12 to the Moon.[167][168] In 2006, two more apparent temporary satellites were discovered which were suspected of being artificial.[168] One of them was eventually confirmed as an asteroid and classified as the temporary satellite 2006 RH120.[168] The other, 6Q0B44E, was confirmed as an artificial object, but its identity is unknown.[168] Another temporary satellite was discovered in 2013, and was designated 2013 QW1 as a suspected asteroid. It was later found to be an artificial object of unknown origin. 2013 QW1 is no longer listed as an asteroid by the Minor Planet Center.[168][169] In September 2020, an object detected on an orbit very similar to that of the Earth was temporarily designated 2020 SO. However, orbital calculations and spectral observations confirmed that the object was the Centaur rocket booster of the 1966 Surveyor 2 uncrewed lunar lander.[170][171]

In some cases, active space probes on solar orbits have been observed by NEO surveys and erroneously catalogued as asteroids before identification. During its 2007 flyby of Earth on its route to a comet, ESA's space probe Rosetta was detected unidentified and classified as asteroid 2007 VN84, with an alert issued due to its close approach.[172] The designation 2015 HP116 was similarly removed from asteroid catalogues when the observed object was identified with Gaia, ESA's space observatory for astrometry.[173]

Other artificial near-Earth objects include Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster and the Kepler space telescope.

Exploratory missions

[edit]

Some NEOs are of special interest because the sum total of changes in orbital speed required to send a spacecraft on a mission to physically explore an NEO – and thus the amount of rocket fuel required for the mission – is lower than what is necessary for even lunar missions, due to their combination of low velocity with respect to Earth and weak gravity. They may present interesting scientific opportunities both for direct geochemical and astronomical investigation, and as potentially economical sources of extraterrestrial materials for human exploitation.[11] This makes them an attractive target for exploration.[174]

Missions to NEAs

[edit]
Different views of 433 Eros as seen by NASA's NEAR Shoemaker probe
Image mosaic of asteroid 101955 Bennu, target of NASA's OSIRIS-REx probe

The IAU held a minor planets workshop in Tucson, Arizona, in March 1971. At that point, launching a spacecraft to asteroids was considered premature; the workshop only inspired the first astronomical survey specifically aiming for NEAs.[12] Missions to asteroids were considered again during a workshop at the University of Chicago held by NASA's Office of Space Science in January 1978. Of all of the near-Earth asteroids (NEA) that had been discovered by mid-1977, it was estimated that spacecraft could rendezvous with and return from only about 1 in 10 using less propulsive energy than is necessary to reach Mars. It was recognised that due to the low surface gravity of all NEAs, moving around on the surface of an NEA would cost very little energy, and thus space probes could gather multiple samples.[12] Overall, it was estimated that about one percent of all NEAs might provide opportunities for human-crewed missions, or no more than about ten NEAs known at the time. A five-fold increase in the NEA discovery rate was deemed necessary to make a crewed mission within ten years worthwhile.[12]

The first near-Earth asteroid to be visited by a spacecraft was 433 Eros when NASA's NEAR Shoemaker probe orbited it from February 2000, landing on the surface of the 17 km (11 mi) asteroid in February 2001.[16] A second NEA, the 535 m (1,755 ft) long peanut-shaped 25143 Itokawa, was explored from September 2005 to April 2007 by JAXA's Hayabusa mission, which succeeded in taking material samples back to Earth.[175] A third NEA, the 2.26 km (1.40 mi) long elongated 4179 Toutatis, was explored by CNSA's Chang'e 2 spacecraft during a flyby in December 2012.[17][25]

The 980 m (3,220 ft) Apollo asteroid 162173 Ryugu was explored from June 2018[176] until November 2019[18] by JAXA's Hayabusa2 space probe, which returned a sample to Earth.[21] A second sample-return mission, NASA's OSIRIS-REx probe, targeted the 500 m (1,600 ft) Apollo asteroid 101955 Bennu,[177] which, as of April 2024, has the highest cumulative Palermo scale rating (−1.59 for several close encounters between 2178 and 2290).[81] On its journey to Bennu, the probe had searched unsuccessfully for Earth's Trojan asteroids,[178] entered into orbit around Bennu in December 2018, touched down on its surface in October 2020,[19] and was successful in returning samples to Earth three years later.[22] China plans to launch its own sample-return mission, Tianwen-2, in May 2025, targeting Earth quasi-satellite 469219 Kamoʻoalewa and returning samples to Earth in late 2027.[179]

After completing its mission to Bennu, the probe OSIRIS-REx was redirected towards 99942 Apophis, which it is planned to orbit from April 2029.[19] After completing its exploration of 162173 Ryugu, the mission of the Hayabusa2 space probe was extended, to include flybys of S-type Apollo asteroid 98943 Torifune in July 2026 and fast-rotating Apollo asteroid 1998 KY26 in July 2031.[180] In 2025, JAXA plans to launch another probe, DESTINY+, to explore Apollo asteroid 3200 Phaethon, the parent body of the Geminid meteor shower, during a flyby.[181]

Asteroid deflection tests

[edit]
Spread of the plume from the impact of the DART space probe on asteroid moon Dimorphos (SAAO)

On September 26, 2022, NASA's DART spacecraft reached the system of 65803 Didymos and impacted the Apollo asteroid's moon Dimorphos, in a test of a method of planetary defense against near-Earth objects.[20] In addition to telescopes on or in orbit around the Earth, the impact was observed by the Italian mini-spacecraft or CubeSat LICIACube, which separated from DART 15 days before impact.[20] The impact shortened the orbital period of Dimorphos around Didymos by 33 minutes, indicating that the moon's momentum change was 3.6 times the momentum of the impacting spacecraft, thus most of the change was due to the ejected material of the moon itself.[23]

In October 2024, ESA launched the spacecraft Hera, which is to enter orbit around Didymos in December 2026, to study the consequences of the DART impact.[182] China plans to launch its own asteroid deflection probe, targeting 30 m (98 ft) Aten asteroid 2019 VL5, in 2025.[183]

Space mining

[edit]

From the 2000s, there were plans for the commercial exploitation of near-Earth asteroids, either through the use of robots or even by sending private commercial astronauts to act as space miners, but few of these plans were pursued.[24]

In April 2012, the company Planetary Resources announced its plans to mine asteroids commercially. In a first phase, the company reviewed data and selected potential targets among NEAs. In a second phase, space probes would be sent to the selected NEAs; mining spacecraft would be sent in a third phase.[184] Planetary Resources launched two testbed satellites in April 2015[185] and January 2018,[186] and the first prospecting satellite for the second phase was planned for a 2020 launch prior to the company closing and its assets purchased by ConsenSys Space in 2018.[185][187]

Another American company established with the goal of space mining, AstroForge, plans to launch the probe Odin (formerly Brokkr-2)[188] in December 2024,[189] with the goal of performing a flyby of an as yet undisclosed asteroid to confirm if it is a metal-rich M-type asteroid,[190] and then follow it up in 2025 with the probe Vestri, which is to land on the same asteroid.[191]

Missions to NECs

[edit]
Nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko as seen by ESA's Rosetta probe

The first near-Earth comet visited by a space probe was 21P/Giacobini–Zinner in 1985, when the NASA/ESA probe International Cometary Explorer (ICE) passed through its coma. In March 1986, ICE, along with Soviet probes Vega 1 and Vega 2, ISAS probes Sakigake and Suisei and ESA probe Giotto flew by the nucleus of Halley's Comet. In 1992, Giotto also visited another NEC, 26P/Grigg–Skjellerup.[13]

In November 2010, after completing its primary mission to non-near-Earth comet Tempel 1, the NASA probe Deep Impact flew by the near-Earth comet 103P/Hartley.[14]

In August 2014, ESA probe Rosetta began orbiting near-Earth comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko, while its lander Philae landed on its surface in November 2014. After the end of its mission, Rosetta was crashed into the comet's surface in 2016.[15]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i "Discovery Statistics – Cumulative Totals". NASA/JPL CNEOS. March 30, 2024. Retrieved April 6, 2024.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g "NEO Basics. NEO Groups". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  3. ^ a b Chapman, Clark R. (May 2004). "The hazard of near-Earth asteroid impacts on earth". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 222 (1): 1–15. Bibcode:2004E&PSL.222....1C. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2004.03.004.
  4. ^ Monastersky, Richard (March 1, 1997). "The Call of Catastrophes". Science News Online. Archived from the original on March 13, 2004. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  5. ^ Rumpf, Clemens M.; Lewis, Hugh G.; Atkinson, Peter M. (March 23, 2017). "Asteroid impact effects and their immediate hazards for human populations". Geophysical Research Letters. 44 (8): 3433–3440. arXiv:1703.07592. Bibcode:2017GeoRL..44.3433R. doi:10.1002/2017gl073191. ISSN 0094-8276. S2CID 34867206.
  6. ^ a b c d e f Fernández Carril, Luis (May 14, 2012). "The evolution of near Earth objects risk perception". The Space Review. Archived from the original on June 29, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  7. ^ a b c "NASA on the Prowl for Near-Earth Objects". NASA/JPL. May 26, 2004. Archived from the original on August 13, 2022. Retrieved March 6, 2018.
  8. ^ a b c "WISE Revises Numbers of Asteroids Near Earth". NASA/JPL. September 29, 2011. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  9. ^ a b "Public Law 109–155–DEC.30, 2005" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 1, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  10. ^ a b Templeton, Graham (January 12, 2016). "NASA is opening a new office for planetary defense". ExtremeTech. Archived from the original on July 6, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  11. ^ a b Vergano, Dan (February 2, 2007). "Near-Earth asteroids could be 'steppingstones to Mars'". USA Today. Archived from the original on April 17, 2012. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
  12. ^ a b c d e Portree, David S. (March 23, 2013). "Earth-Approaching Asteroids as Targets for Exploration (1978)". Wired. Archived from the original on January 12, 2014. Retrieved January 26, 2023. People in the early 21st century have been encouraged to see asteroids as the interplanetary equivalent of sea monsters. We often hear talk of "killer asteroids," when in fact there exists no conclusive evidence that any asteroid has killed anyone in all of human history. … In the 1970s, asteroids had yet to gain their present fearsome reputation … most astronomers and planetary scientists who made a career of studying asteroids rightfully saw them as sources of fascination, not of worry.
  13. ^ a b c d e f Report of the Task Force on potentially hazardous Near Earth Objects (PDF). London: British National Space Centre. September 2000. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  14. ^ a b Beatty, Kelly (November 4, 2010). "Mr. Hartley's Amazing Comet". Sky & Telescope. Archived from the original on October 20, 2023. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  15. ^ a b Aron, Jacob (September 30, 2016). "Rosetta lands on 67P in grand finale to two year comet mission". New Scientist. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  16. ^ a b Savage, Donald & Buckley, Michael (January 31, 2001). "NEAR Mission Completes Main Task, Now Will Go Where No Spacecraft Has Gone Before". Press Releases. NASA. Archived from the original on June 17, 2016. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  17. ^ a b Lakdawalla, Emily (December 14, 2012). "Chang'e 2 imaging of Toutatis". Blog. The Planetary Society. Archived from the original on July 7, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  18. ^ a b Bartels, Meghan (November 13, 2019). "Farewell, Ryugu! Japan's Hayabusa2 Probe Leaves Asteroid for Journey Home". Space.com. Archived from the original on October 24, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
  19. ^ a b c Taylor Tillman, Nola (September 25, 2023). "OSIRIS-REx: A complete guide to the asteroid-sampling mission". Space.com. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  20. ^ a b c d Bardan, Roxana (September 27, 2022). "NASA's DART Mission Hits Asteroid in First-Ever Planetary Defense Test". Press Releases. NASA. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  21. ^ a b Rincon, Paul (December 6, 2020). "Hayabusa-2: Capsule with asteroid samples in 'perfect' shape". BBC News. BBC. Archived from the original on October 24, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
  22. ^ a b Loeffer, John (January 23, 2024). "NASA finally opens OSIRIS-REx asteroid sample canister after freeing stuck lid". Space.com. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  23. ^ a b Merzdorf, Jessica (December 15, 2022). "Early Results from NASA's DART Mission". Press Releases. NASA. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  24. ^ a b Dorminey, Bruce (August 31, 2021). "Does Commercial Asteroid Mining Still Have A Future?". Forbes. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  25. ^ a b c d "Near Earth Objects". IAU. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  26. ^ a b c "Definitions & Assumptions". ESA NEOCC. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  27. ^ a b c d e f g h i Morbidelli, Alessandro; Bottke, William F. Jr.; Froeschlé, Christiane; Michel, Patrick (January 2002). W. F. Bottke Jr.; et al. (eds.). Origin and Evolution of Near-Earth Objects (PDF). pp. 409–422. Bibcode:2002aste.book..409M. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1v7zdn4.33. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 9, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2024. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  28. ^ Waszczak, Adam; Prince, Thomas A.; et al. (2017). "Small Near-Earth Asteroids in the Palomar Transient Factory Survey: A Real-Time Streak-detection System". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 129 (973). part 034402. arXiv:1609.08018. Bibcode:2017PASP..129c4402W. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/129/973/034402. ISSN 1538-3873. S2CID 43606524.
  29. ^ a b c Carlisle, Camille M. (December 30, 2011). "Pseudo-moons orbit Earth". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
  30. ^ a b c "List Of Potentially Hazardous Minor Planets (by designation)". IAU/MPC. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  31. ^ Halley, Edmund (1705). A synopsis of the astronomy of comets. London: John Senex. Archived from the original on December 1, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  32. ^ Stoyan, Ronald (2015). Atlas of Great Comets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 101–103. ISBN 978-1-107-09349-2. Archived from the original on March 1, 2018. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  33. ^ Dick, S. J. (June 1998). "Observation and interpretation of the Leonid meteors over the last millennium". Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage. 1 (1): 1–20. Bibcode:1998JAHH....1....1D. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1440-2807.1998.01.01. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
  34. ^ Scholl, Hans; Schmadel, Lutz D. (2002). "Discovery Circumstances of the First Near-Earth Asteroid (433) Eros". Acta Historica Astronomiae. 15: 210–220. Bibcode:2002AcHA...15..210S.
  35. ^ "Eros comes on stage, finally a useful asteroid". Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  36. ^ a b c d "Closest Approaches to the Earth by Comets". IAU/MPC. May 16, 2019. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
  37. ^ Sekanina, Zdenek; Chodas, Paul W. (December 2005). "Origin of the Marsden and Kracht Groups of Sunskirting Comets. I. Association with Comet 96P/Machholz and Its Interplanetary Complex". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 151 (2): 551–586. Bibcode:2005ApJS..161..551S. doi:10.1086/497374. S2CID 85442034. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  38. ^ "Small-Body Database Lookup. P/1999 J6 (SOHO)". NASA/JPL. April 16, 2021. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  39. ^ a b "Radar observations of long-lost asteroid 1937 UB (Hermes)". UCLA. Archived from the original on January 23, 2023. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  40. ^ "Small-Body Database Lookup. 1566 Icarus (1949 MA)". NASA/JPL. January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  41. ^ Pettengill, G. H.; Shapiro, I. I.; Ash, M. E.; Ingalls, R. P.; Rainville, L. P.; Smith, W. B.; et al. (May 1969). "Radar observations of Icarus". Icarus. 10 (3): 432–435. Bibcode:1969Icar...10..432P. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(69)90101-8. ISSN 0019-1035.
  42. ^ Goldstein, R. M. (November 1968). "Radar Observations of Icarus". Science. 162 (3856): 903–904. Bibcode:1968Sci...162..903G. doi:10.1126/science.162.3856.903. PMID 17769079. S2CID 129644095.
  43. ^ a b c Marsden, Brian G. (March 29, 1998). "How the Asteroid Story Hit: An Astronomer Reveals How a Discovery Spun Out of Control". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on June 17, 2012. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  44. ^ Scotti, J. V.; Rabinowitz, D. L.; Marsden, B. G. (November 28, 1991). "Near miss of the Earth by a small asteroid". Nature. 354 (6351): 287–289. Bibcode:1991Natur.354..287S. doi:10.1038/354287a0.
  45. ^ a b "Closest Approaches to the Earth by Minor Planets". IAU/MPC. May 16, 2019. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
  46. ^ a b "NEO Earth Close Approaches". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  47. ^ Irizarry, Eddie (November 16, 2020). "This asteroid just skimmed Earth's atmosphere". EarthSky. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  48. ^ "Small-Body Database Lookup. 308635 (2005 YU55)". NASA/JPL. January 7, 2022. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  49. ^ Palmer, Jason (February 15, 2013). "Asteroid 2012 DA14 in record-breaking Earth pass". BBC News. BBC. Archived from the original on February 17, 2018. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  50. ^ Chodas, Paul; Giorgini, Jon & Yeomans, Don (March 6, 2012). "Near-Earth Asteroid 2012 DA14 to Miss Earth on February 15, 2013". News. NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on December 22, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  51. ^ "Grand Teton Meteor (video)". YouTube. 10 November 2007. Archived from the original on February 14, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  52. ^ Ceplecha, Z. (March 1994). "Earth-grazing daylight fireball of August 10, 1972". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 283 (1): 287−288. Bibcode:1994A&A...283..287C. Retrieved February 18, 2024.
  53. ^ Borovička, J.; Ceplecha, Z. (April 1992). "Earth-grazing fireball of October 13, 1990". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 257 (1): 323–328. Bibcode:1992A&A...257..323B. ISSN 0004-6361. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  54. ^ Chapman, Clark R. & Morrison, David (January 6, 1994). "Impacts on the Earth by asteroids and comets: Assessing the hazard" (PDF). Nature. 367 (6458): 33–40. Bibcode:1994Natur.367...33C. doi:10.1038/367033a0. S2CID 4305299. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  55. ^ Collins, Gareth S.; Melosh, H. Jay; Marcus, Robert A. (June 2005). "Earth Impact Effects Program: A Web-based computer program for calculating the regional environmental consequences of a meteoroid impact on Earth" (PDF). Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 40 (6): 817–840. Bibcode:2005M&PS...40..817C. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00157.x. hdl:10044/1/11554. S2CID 13891988. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  56. ^ a b c Asher, D. J.; Bailey, M.; Emel'Yanenko, V.; Napier, W. (October 2005). "Earth in the Cosmic Shooting Gallery". The Observatory. 125 (2): 319–322. Bibcode:2005Obs...125..319A. Archived from the original on February 14, 2022. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  57. ^ Marcus, Robert; Melosh, H. Jay & Collins, Gareth (2010). "Earth Impact Effects Program". Imperial College London / Purdue University. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024. (solution using 2600 kg/m^3, 17 km/s, 45 degrees)
  58. ^ a b David, Leonard (November 1, 2013). "Russian fireball explosion shows meteor risk greater than thought". Space.com. Archived from the original on August 19, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  59. ^ Allen, Robert S. (1963). "Antarctic Explosion Could Have Been Nuclear Detonation". The San Bernardino Sun (Dec 4): 40 column f.
  60. ^ Silber, Elizabeth A.; Revelle, Douglas O.; Brown, Peter G.; Edwards, Wayne N. (2009). "An estimate of the terrestrial influx of large meteoroids from infrasonic measurements". Journal of Geophysical Research. 114 (E8). Bibcode:2009JGRE..114.8006S. doi:10.1029/2009JE003334.
  61. ^ de la Fuente Marcos, C.; de la Fuente Marcos, R. (September 1, 2014). "Reconstructing the Chelyabinsk event: Pre-impact orbital evolution". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. 443 (1): L39–L43. arXiv:1405.7202. Bibcode:2014MNRAS.443L..39D. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu078. S2CID 118417667.
  62. ^ Shaddad, Muawia H.; et al. (October 2010). "The recovery of asteroid 2008 TC3" (PDF). Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 45 (10–11): 1557–1589. Bibcode:2010M&PS...45.1557S. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01116.x. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  63. ^ Tingley, Brett (September 4, 2024). "Tiny asteroid burns up over Philippines. 'Discovered this morning,' ESA says". Space.com. Retrieved 2024-09-05.
  64. ^ Beatty, Kelly (January 2, 2014). "Small asteroid 2014 AA hits Earth". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  65. ^ "Fireballs. Fireball and Bolide Data". NASA/JPL. December 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  66. ^ a b c d Rubin, Alan E.; Grossman, Jeffrey N. (January 2010). "Meteorite and meteoroid: New comprehensive definitions". Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 45 (1): 114–122. Bibcode:2010M&PS...45..114R. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.01009.x. S2CID 129972426.
  67. ^ a b "Lunar Impact Monitoring Program". NASA. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  68. ^ Rubio, Luis R. Bellot; Ortiz, Jose L.; Sada, Pedro V. (2000). "Observation and Interpretation of Meteoroid Impact Flashes on the Moon". In Jenniskens, P.; et al. (eds.). Leonid Storm Research. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 575–598. Bibcode:2000lsr..book..575B. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2071-7_42. ISBN 978-90-481-5624-5. S2CID 118392496.
  69. ^ a b Catanzaro, Michele (February 24, 2014). "Largest lunar impact caught by astronomers". Nature. Archived from the original on October 4, 2021. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  70. ^ "About the NELIOTA project". ESA. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  71. ^ "MIDAS: Moon Impacts Detection and Analysis System. Main Results". Meteoroides.NET. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  72. ^ Clark, Stuart (December 20, 2012). "Apocalypse postponed: how Earth survived Halley's comet in 1910". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 22, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  73. ^ Colavito, Jason. "Noah's Comet. Edmond Halley 1694". Jasoncolavito.com. Archived from the original on October 1, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  74. ^ a b c d e Chapman, Clark R. (October 7, 1998). "History of The Asteroid/Comet Impact Hazard". Southwest Research Institute. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  75. ^ Leary, Warren E. (April 20, 1989). "Big Asteroid Passes Near Earth Unseen In a Rare Close Call". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 9, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  76. ^ Molloy, Mark (September 24, 2017). "Nibiru: How the nonsense Planet X Armageddon and Nasa fake news theories spread globally". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  77. ^ Rickman, Hans (2001). Isobe, Syuzo; Asakuro, Yoshifusa (eds.). NEO Research and the IAU. International Workshop on Collaboration and Coordination among NEO Observers and Orbital Computers. Kurshiki City Art Museum, Japan: IAU. pp. 97–102. Bibcode:2001ccno.conf...97R. Retrieved February 22, 2024.
  78. ^ a b "Torino Impact Hazard Scale". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
  79. ^ Binzel, Richard P. (2000). "Torino Impact Hazard Scale". Planetary and Space Science. 48 (4): 297–303. Bibcode:2000P&SS...48..297B. doi:10.1016/S0032-0633(00)00006-4.
  80. ^ "Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on October 1, 2023. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
  81. ^ a b c d e f g h "Sentry Risk Table". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on April 5, 2024. Retrieved April 6, 2024.
  82. ^ Chandler, David (May 2, 2006). "Big new asteroid has slim chance of hitting Earth". New Scientist. Archived from the original on May 31, 2015. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  83. ^ "NEODyS-2 Risk List". NEODyS-2. ESA. Retrieved February 18, 2024.
  84. ^ Milani, Andrea; Valsecchi, Giovanni; Sansaturio, Maria Eugenia (March 12, 2002). "The problem with 2002 CU11". Tumbling Stone. Vol. 12. NEODyS. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved January 29, 2018.
  85. ^ a b c "Date/Time Removed". NASA/JPL CNEOS. January 24, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  86. ^ "Small-Body Database Lookup. 163132 (2002 CU11)". NASA/JPL. September 13, 2023. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  87. ^ a b "29075 (1950 DA) Analyses, 2001-2007". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  88. ^ Giorgini, J. D.; Ostro, S. J.; et al. (April 5, 2002). "Asteroid 1950 DA's Encounter with Earth in 2880: Physical Limits of Collision Probability Prediction" (PDF). Science. 296 (5565): 132–136. Bibcode:2002Sci...296..132G. doi:10.1126/science.1068191. PMID 11935024. S2CID 8689246. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  89. ^ Farnocchia, Davide; Chesley, Steven R. (2013). "Assessment of the 2880 impact threat from asteroid (29075) 1950 DA". Icarus. 229: 321–327. arXiv:1310.0861. Bibcode:2014Icar..229..321F. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.09.022. S2CID 56453734.
  90. ^ Yeomans, D.; Chesley, S.; Chodas, P. (December 23, 2004). "Near-Earth Asteroid 2004 MN4 Reaches Highest Score To Date On Hazard Scale". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
  91. ^ Brown, Dwayne; Agle, DC (October 7, 2009). "NASA Refines Asteroid Apophis' Path Toward Earth". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
  92. ^ Yeomans, D.; Chesley, S.; Chodas, P. (December 27, 2004). "Possibility of an Earth Impact in 2029 Ruled Out for Asteroid 2004 MN4". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
  93. ^ "NASA Analysis: Earth Is Safe From Asteroid Apophis for 100-Plus Years". News. NASA/JPL. March 25, 2021. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
  94. ^ Morrison, David (March 1, 2006). "Asteroid 2004 VD17 classed as Torino Scale 2". Asteroid and Comet Impact Hazards. NASA. Archived from the original on October 14, 2011. Retrieved November 10, 2017.
  95. ^ Deen, Sam (October 17, 2017). "2022 recovery of 2010 RF12?". Minor Planet Mailing List. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  96. ^ Day, Dwayne A. (July 5, 2004). "Giant bombs on giant rockets: Project Icarus". The Space Review. Archived from the original on April 15, 2016. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  97. ^ "MIT Course precept for movie" (PDF). The Tech. MIT. October 30, 1979. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 11, 2014. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
  98. ^ a b c Vulcano Workshop. Beginning the Spaceguard Survey. Vulcano, Italy: IAU. September 1995. Archived from the original on October 31, 2013. Retrieved March 13, 2018.
  99. ^ a b Chapman, Clark R. (May 21, 1998). "Statement on The Threat of Impact by Near-Earth Asteroids before the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics of the Committee on Science of the U.S. House of Representatives at its hearings on "Asteroids: Perils and Opportunities"". Southwest Research Institute. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  100. ^ a b Shiga, David (June 27, 2006). "New telescope will hunt dangerous asteroids". New Scientist. Archived from the original on June 26, 2015. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  101. ^ a b Mainzer, A.; Grav, T.; Bauer, J.; et al. (December 20, 2011). "NEOWISE Observations of Near-Earth Objects: Preliminary Results". The Astrophysical Journal. 743 (2): 156. arXiv:1109.6400. Bibcode:2011ApJ...743..156M. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/156. S2CID 239991.
  102. ^ Crane, Leah (Jan 22, 2020). "Inside the mission to stop killer asteroids from smashing into Earth". New Scientist. Retrieved January 24, 2024. See especially this figure.
  103. ^ a b c d Grav, Tommy; Mainzer, Amy K. (December 5, 2023). "The NEO Surveyor Near-Earth Asteroid Known Object Model". The Planetary Science Journal. 4 (12). part 228. arXiv:2310.20149. Bibcode:2023PSJ.....4..228G. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ad072e.
  104. ^ "Science Goals. What's in our Solar System?". Vera C. Rubin Observatory. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
  105. ^ "Planetary Defense Coordination Office". NASA. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  106. ^ U.S.Congress (March 19, 2013). "Threats From Space: a Review of U.S. Government Efforts to Track and mitigate Asteroids and Meteors (Part I and Part II) – Hearing Before the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives One Hundred Thirteenth Congress First Session" (PDF). United States Congress. p. 147. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 10, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  107. ^ University of Hawaii at Manoa's Institute for Astronomy (February 18, 2013). "ATLAS: The Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System". Astronomy. Archived from the original on June 4, 2023. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  108. ^ Kulkarni, S.R.; et al. (February 7, 2018). "The Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) begins". The Astronomer's Telegram. No. 11266. Archived from the original on February 9, 2018. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  109. ^ Ye, Quan-Zhi; et al. (February 8, 2018). "First Discovery of a Small Near Earth Asteroid with ZTF (2018 CL)". The Astronomer's Telegram. No. 11274. Archived from the original on February 9, 2018. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  110. ^ "The NEO Confirmation Page". IAU/MPC. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  111. ^ Marsden, B. G.; Williams, G. V. (1998). "The NEO Confirmation Page". Planetary and Space Science. 46 (2): 299. Bibcode:1998P&SS...46..299M. doi:10.1016/S0032-0633(96)00153-5.
  112. ^ a b c "Discovery Statistics. Introduction". NASA/JPL CNEOS. 2012. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  113. ^ a b c "JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine. Constraints: asteroids and NEOs". JPL Small-Body Database. April 6, 2024. Archived from the original on April 6, 2024. Retrieved April 6, 2024.
  114. ^ "About NEOCC". ESA NEOCC. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  115. ^ a b c Bottke, W. F. Jr. (2000). "Understanding the Distribution of Near-Earth Asteroids". Science. 288 (5474): 2190–2194. Bibcode:2000Sci...288.2190B. doi:10.1126/science.288.5474.2190. PMID 10864864.
  116. ^ a b Browne, Malcolm W. (April 25, 1996). "Mathematicians Say Asteroid May Hit Earth in a Million Years". The New York Times. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  117. ^ a b c d e f g Luu, Jane; Jewitt, David (November 1989). "On the Relative Numbers of C Types and S Types among Near-Earth Asteroids". The Astronomical Journal. 98 (5): 1905–1911. Bibcode:1989AJ.....98.1905L. doi:10.1086/115267. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  118. ^ a b "Mission Orbit and Timeline". UA LPL. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  119. ^ a b "Why Infrared?". UA LPL. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  120. ^ Bottke, William F. Jr.; Nolan, Michale C.; Melosh, H. Jay; Vickery, Ann M.; Greenberg, Richard (August 1996). "Origin of the Spacewatch Small Earth-Approaching Asteroids" (PDF). Icarus. 122 (2): 406–427. Bibcode:1996Icar..122..406B. doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0133. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  121. ^ Zellner, B.; Bowell, E. (1977). "2. Asteroid Compositional Types and their Distributions". International Astronomical Union Colloquium. 39: 185–197. doi:10.1017/S0252921100070093. S2CID 128650102.
  122. ^ Morbidelli, A.; Vokrouhlický, D. (May 2003). "The Yarkovsky-driven origin of near-Earth asteroids". Icarus. 163 (1): 120–134. Bibcode:2003Icar..163..120M. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.603.7624. doi:10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00047-2.
  123. ^ Lupishko, D.F. & Lupishko, T.A. (May 2001). "On the Origins of Earth-Approaching Asteroids". Solar System Research. 35 (3): 227–233. Bibcode:2001SoSyR..35..227L. doi:10.1023/A:1010431023010. S2CID 117912062.
  124. ^ Lupishko, D.F.; di Martino & Lupishko, T.A. (September 2000). "What the physical properties of near-Earth asteroids tell us about sources of their origin?". Kinematika I Fizika Nebesnykh Tel Supplimen. 3 (3): 213–216. Bibcode:2000KFNTS...3..213L.
  125. ^ "Asteroids with Satellites". Johnston's Archive. April 5, 2024. Retrieved April 6, 2024.
  126. ^ Benner, Lance; Naidu, Shantanu; Brozovic, Marina; Chodas, Paul (September 1, 2017). "Radar Reveals Two Moons Orbiting Asteroid Florence". News. NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on September 3, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  127. ^ "UW-developed, cloud-based astrodynamics platform to discover and track asteroids". UW News. University of Washington. May 31, 2022. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  128. ^ "Asteroid Institute Uses Revolutionary Cloud-Based Astrodynamics Platform to Discover and Track Asteroids". PR Newswire (Press release). B612 Foundation. May 31, 2022. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  129. ^ Chang, Kenneth (June 14, 2018). "Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks". The New York Times. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
  130. ^ Platt, Jane (January 12, 2000). "Asteroid Population Count Slashed". Press Releases. NASA/JPL. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  131. ^ Rabinowitz, David; Helin, Eleanor; Lawrence, Kenneth & Pravdo, Steven (January 13, 2000). "A reduced estimate of the number of kilometer-sized near-Earth asteroids". Nature. 403 (6766): 165–166. Bibcode:2000Natur.403..165R. doi:10.1038/35003128. PMID 10646594. S2CID 4303533.
  132. ^ Stuart, J. S. (November 23, 2001). "A Near-Earth Asteroid Population Estimate from the LINEAR Survey". Science. 294 (5547): 1691–1693. Bibcode:2001Sci...294.1691S. doi:10.1126/science.1065318. PMID 11721048. S2CID 37849062.
  133. ^ Beatty, Kelly (September 30, 2011). "WISE's Survey of Near-Earth Asteroids". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  134. ^ Williams, Matt (October 20, 2017). "Good News Everyone! There are Fewer Deadly Undiscovered Asteroids than we Thought". Universe Today. Archived from the original on November 4, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  135. ^ a b c Tricarico, Pasquale (March 1, 2017). "The near-Earth asteroid population from two decades of observations" (PDF). Icarus. 284: 416–423. arXiv:1604.06328. Bibcode:2017Icar..284..416T. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016.12.008. S2CID 85440139. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 10, 2018. Retrieved March 10, 2018.
  136. ^ "Asteroid Size Estimator". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  137. ^ "1036 Ganymed (A924 UB)". NASA/JPL. January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  138. ^ de la Fuente Marcos, Carlos; de la Fuente Marcos, Raúl (August 1, 2019). "Understanding the evolution of Atira-class asteroid 2019 AQ3, a major step towards the future discovery of the Vatira population". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 487 (2): 2742–2752. arXiv:1905.08695. Bibcode:2019MNRAS.487.2742D. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1437. S2CID 160009327.
  139. ^ Bolin, Bryce T.; et al. (November 2022). "The discovery and characterization of (594913) 'Ayló'chaxnim, a kilometre sized asteroid inside the orbit of Venus" (PDF). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. 517 (1): L49–L54. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slac089. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  140. ^ Dickinson, David (August 25, 2021). "Astronomers Discover Asteroid that Flies Close to the Sun". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  141. ^ "Unusual Minor Planets". IAU/MPC. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  142. ^ a b Galache, J. L. (March 5, 2011). "Asteroid Classification I – Dynamics". IAU/MPC. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved March 9, 2018.
  143. ^ Ribeiro, A. O.; Roig, F.; De Prá, M. N.; Carvano, J. M.; DeSouza, S. R. (March 17, 2016). "Dynamical study of the Atira group of asteroids" (PDF). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 458 (4): 4471–4476. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw642. ISSN 0035-8711. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  144. ^ a b c d e de la Fuente Marcos, R.; de la Fuente Marcos, C.; et al. (January 2024). "When the horseshoe fits: Characterizing 2023 FY3 with the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias and the Two-meter Twin Telescope". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 681. section A4. arXiv:2310.08724. Bibcode:2024A&A...681A...4D. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347663. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
  145. ^ a b de la Fuente Marcos, C.; de la Fuente Marcos, R. (April 2016). "A trio of horseshoes: Past, present, and future dynamical evolution of Earth co-orbital asteroids 2015 XX169, 2015 YA and 2015 YQ1". Astrophysics and Space Science. 361 (4): 121–133. arXiv:1603.02415. Bibcode:2016Ap&SS.361..121D. doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2711-6. S2CID 119222384. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
  146. ^ a b c d Castro-Cisneros, Jose Daniel; Malhotra, Renu; Rosengren, Aaron J. (October 23, 2023). "Lunar ejecta origin of near-Earth asteroid Kamo'oalewa is compatible with rare orbital pathways" (PDF). Communications Earth & Environment. 4 (1). section 372. arXiv:2304.14136. Bibcode:2023ComEE...4..372C. doi:10.1038/s43247-023-01031-w. PMID 39524985. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
  147. ^ "NASA's WISE mission finds first Trojan asteroid sharing Earth's orbit". PR Newswire (Press release). NASA. July 27, 2011. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  148. ^ Gohd, Chelsea (February 1, 2022). "Earth has an extra companion, a Trojan asteroid that will hang around for 4,000 years". Space.com. Retrieved April 24, 2024.
  149. ^ Wiegert, Paul A.; Innanen, Kimmo A.; Mikkola, Seppo (June 12, 1997). "An asteroidal companion to the Earth" (PDF). Nature (letter). 387 (6634): 685–686. Bibcode:1997Natur.387..685W. doi:10.1038/42662. S2CID 4305272. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 26, 2016. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  150. ^ Snowder, Brad. "Cruithne". Western Washington University Planetarium. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  151. ^ Christou, A.A.; Asher, D.J. (July 11, 2011). "A long-lived horseshoe companion to the Earth" (PDF). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 414 (4): 2965–2969. arXiv:1104.0036. Bibcode:2011MNRAS.414.2965C. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18595.x. S2CID 13832179. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  152. ^ a b de la Fuente Marcos, C.; de la Fuente Marcos, R. (November 11, 2016). "Asteroid (469219) 2016 HO3, the smallest and closest Earth quasi-satellite". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 462 (4): 3441–3456. arXiv:1608.01518. Bibcode:2016MNRAS.462.3441D. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1972. S2CID 118580771.
  153. ^ Lea, Robert (April 23, 2024). "Earth's weird 'quasi-moon' Kamo'oalewa is a fragment blasted out of big moon crater". Space.com. Retrieved April 24, 2024.
  154. ^ a b c Di Ruzza, Sara; Pousse, Alexandre; Alessi, Elisa Maria (January 15, 2023). "On the co-orbital asteroids in the solar system: medium-term timescale analysis of the quasi-coplanar objects" (PDF). Icarus. 390. section 115330. arXiv:2209.05219. Bibcode:2023Icar..39015330D. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115330. Retrieved February 7, 2024.
  155. ^ Phillips, Tony (June 9, 2006). "Corkscrew asteroid". Science@NASA. NASA. Archived from the original on September 29, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2017.
  156. ^ Chandler, David L. (April 7, 2023). "Astronomers have discovered an asteroid that orbits the Sun with Earth, earning it the moniker "quasi-moon."". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
  157. ^ a b de la Fuente Marcos, Carlos; de la Fuente Marcos, Raúl (January 2018). "Dynamical evolution of near-Earth asteroid 1991 VG". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 473 (3): 2939–2948. arXiv:1709.09533. Bibcode:2018MNRAS.473.2939D. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2545.
  158. ^ Sinnott, Roger W. (April 17, 2007). "Earth's "other moon"". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  159. ^ Naidu, Shantanu; Farnocchia, Davide (February 27, 2020). "Tiny Object Discovered in Distant Orbit Around the Earth". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
  160. ^ Pokorý, Petr; Kuchner, Marc (October 2021). "Threat from Within: Excitation of Venus's Co-orbital Asteroids to Earth-crossing Orbits". The Planetary Science Journal. 2 (5). part 193. Bibcode:2021PSJ.....2..193P. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ac1e9b.
  161. ^ Perlerin, Vincent (September 26, 2017). "Definitions of terms in meteor astronomy (IAU)". News. International Meteor Organization. Archived from the original on January 23, 2018. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  162. ^ Yeomans, Donald K. (April 2007). "Great Comets in History". NASA/JPL. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  163. ^ a b Study to Determine the Feasibility of Extending the Search for Near-Earth Objects to Smaller Limiting Diameters (PDF). NASA. August 22, 2003. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  164. ^ Jenniksens, Peter (September 2005). Meteor Showers from Broken Comets. Workshop on Dust in Planetary Systems (ESA SP-643). Vol. 643. pp. 3–6. Bibcode:2007ESASP.643....3J.
  165. ^ Kresak, L'.l (1978). "The Tunguska object – A fragment of Comet Encke". Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia. 29: 129. Bibcode:1978BAICz..29..129K.
  166. ^ Stephens, Sally (1993). "What about the comet that's supposed to hit the Earth in 130 years?". Cosmic Collisions. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  167. ^ Chesley, Steve; Chodas, Paul (October 9, 2002). "J002E3: An Update". News. NASA/JPL. Archived from the original on May 3, 2003. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
  168. ^ a b c d e Azriel, Merryl (September 25, 2013). "Rocket or Rock? NEO Confusion Abounds". Space Safety Magazine. Archived from the original on November 15, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  169. ^ "MPC Database Search. Unknown object: 2013 QW1". IAU/MPC. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  170. ^ "Earth May Have Captured a 1960s-Era Rocket Booster". News. NASA/JPL. November 12, 2020. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
  171. ^ "New Data Confirm 2020 SO to Be the Upper Centaur Rocket Booster From the 1960's". News. NASA/JPL. December 2, 2020. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
  172. ^ Mullins, Justin (November 13, 2007). "Astronomers defend asteroid warning mix-up". New Scientist. Archived from the original on March 7, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  173. ^ "MPEC 2015-H125: Deletion Of 2015 HP116". Minor Planet Electronic Circular. IAU/MPC. April 27, 2015. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  174. ^ Xu, Rui; Cui, Pingyuan; Qiao, Dong & Luan, Enjie (March 18, 2007). "Design and optimization of trajectory to Near-Earth asteroid for sample return mission using gravity assists". Advances in Space Research. 40 (2): 200–225. Bibcode:2007AdSpR..40..220X. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.025.
  175. ^ "Hayabusa. The Final Approach. Overview". JAXA. Archived from the original on June 2, 2023. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  176. ^ Clark, Stephen (June 28, 2018). "Japanese spacecraft reaches asteroid after three-and-a-half-year journey". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on October 24, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
  177. ^ Wall, Mike (September 9, 2016). "'Exactly Perfect'! NASA Hails Asteroid Sample-Return Mission's Launch". Space.com. Archived from the original on October 6, 2023. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  178. ^ Morton, Erin; Neal-Jones, Nancy (February 9, 2017). "NASA's OSIRIS-REx Begins Earth-Trojan Asteroid Search". News. NASA. Archived from the original on February 7, 2018. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  179. ^ Jones, Andrew (June 26, 2023). "China conducts parachute tests for asteroid sample return mission". SpaceNews. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  180. ^ Hirabayashi, Masatoshi; Yoshikawa, Makoto; et al. (February 15, 2023). Hayabusa2#'s Exploration to Asteroids 2001 CC21 and 1998 KY26 Provides Key Insights Into Planetary Defense. 8th IAA Planetary Defense Conference. Vienna, Austria. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024.
  181. ^ Jones, Andrew (November 6, 2023). "Japan's mission to bizarre asteroid Phaethon delayed to 2025". Space.com. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  182. ^ "Hera". ESA. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  183. ^ Jones, Andrew (April 11, 2023). "China to target asteroid 2019 VL5 for 2025 planetary defense test". SpaceNews. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  184. ^ Beatty, Kelly (April 24, 2012). "Asteroid Mining for Fun and Profit". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  185. ^ a b Boyle, Alan (November 13, 2017). "Planetary Resources' Arkyd-6 prototype imaging satellite has left the building". GeekWire. Archived from the original on November 14, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  186. ^ "Planetary Resources Launches Latest Spacecraft in Advance of Space Resource Exploration Mission". News. Planetary Resources. January 12, 2018. Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018.
  187. ^ Boyle, Alan (November 4, 2019). "One year after Planetary Resource faded into history, space mining retails its appeal". GeekWire. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  188. ^ Gialich, Matt; Acain, Jose (December 11, 2023). "An update on our progress towards mining in space". AstroForge. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  189. ^ "Falcon 9 Block 5 - PRIME-1 (IM-2)". Next Spaceflight. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
  190. ^ Foust, Jeff (January 30, 2023). "Asteroid mining startup AstroForge to launch first missions this year". SpaceNews. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  191. ^ Wall, Mike (August 21, 2024). "Space mining startup AstroForge aims to launch historic asteroid-landing mission in 2025". Space.com. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 24, 2024.
[edit]
Minor Planet Center