Jump to content

Quotient rule: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
top: Added links
Tags: canned edit summary references removed Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App section source
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Calculus |Differential}}
{{short description|Formula for the derivative of a ratio of functions}}
{{short description|Formula for the derivative of a ratio of functions}}
{{Calculus |Differential}}
In [[calculus]], the '''quotient rule''' is a method of finding the [[derivative]] of a [[function (mathematics)|function]] that is the ratio of two differentiable functions.<ref>{{cite book | last=Stewart | first=James | author-link=James Stewart (mathematician) | title=Calculus: Early Transcendentals | publisher=[[Brooks/Cole]] | edition=6th | year=2008 | isbn=978-0-495-01166-8 | url-access=registration | url=https://archive.org/details/calculusearlytra00stew_1 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last1=Larson | first1=Ron | author-link=Ron Larson (mathematician)| last2=Edwards | first2=Bruce H. | title=Calculus | publisher=[[Brooks/Cole]] | edition=9th | year=2009 | isbn=978-0-547-16702-2}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last1 = Thomas | first1 = George B. | last2=Weir | first2= Maurice D. | last3=Hass | first3=Joel | author3-link = Joel Hass | author-link=George B. Thomas | title=Thomas' Calculus: Early Transcendentals | publisher=[[Addison-Wesley]] | year=2010 | edition=12th | isbn=978-0-321-58876-0}}</ref> Let <math>h(x)=f(x)/g(x),</math> where both {{mvar|f}} and {{mvar|g}} are differentiable and <math>g(x)\neq 0.</math> The quotient rule states that the derivative of {{math|''h''(''x'')}} is
In [[calculus]], the '''quotient rule''' is a method of finding the [[derivative]] of a [[function (mathematics)|function]] that is the ratio of two differentiable functions. Let <math>h(x)=\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}</math>, where both {{mvar|f}} and {{mvar|g}} are differentiable and <math>g(x)\neq 0.</math> The quotient rule states that the derivative of {{math|''h''(''x'')}} is
:<math>h'(x) = \frac{f'(x)g(x) - f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}.</math>
:<math>h'(x) = \frac{f'(x)g(x) - f(x)g'(x)}{(g(x))^2}.</math>


It is provable in many ways by using other [[Differentiation rules|derivative rules]].
It is provable in many ways by using other [[Differentiation rules|derivative rules]].
Line 32: Line 32:
{{Main|Reciprocal rule}}
{{Main|Reciprocal rule}}
The reciprocal rule is a special case of the quotient rule in which the numerator <math>f(x)=1</math>. Applying the quotient rule gives<math display="block">h'(x)=\frac{d}{dx}\left[\frac{1}{g(x)}\right]=\frac{0 \cdot g(x) - 1 \cdot g'(x)}{g(x)^2}=\frac{-g'(x)}{g(x)^2}.</math>
The reciprocal rule is a special case of the quotient rule in which the numerator <math>f(x)=1</math>. Applying the quotient rule gives<math display="block">h'(x)=\frac{d}{dx}\left[\frac{1}{g(x)}\right]=\frac{0 \cdot g(x) - 1 \cdot g'(x)}{g(x)^2}=\frac{-g'(x)}{g(x)^2}.</math>

Utilizing the [[chain rule]] yields the same result.


==Proofs==
==Proofs==
Line 40: Line 42:
&= \lim_{k\to 0} \frac{f(x+k)g(x) - f(x)g(x+k)}{k \cdot g(x)g(x+k)} \\
&= \lim_{k\to 0} \frac{f(x+k)g(x) - f(x)g(x+k)}{k \cdot g(x)g(x+k)} \\
&= \lim_{k\to 0} \frac{f(x+k)g(x) - f(x)g(x+k)}{k} \cdot \lim_{k\to 0}\frac{1}{g(x)g(x+k)} \\
&= \lim_{k\to 0} \frac{f(x+k)g(x) - f(x)g(x+k)}{k} \cdot \lim_{k\to 0}\frac{1}{g(x)g(x+k)} \\
&= \lim_{k\to 0} \left[\frac{f(x+k)g(x) - f(x)g(x) + f(x)g(x) - f(x)g(x+k)}{k} \right] \cdot \frac{1}{g(x)^2} \\
&= \lim_{k\to 0} \left[\frac{f(x+k)g(x) - f(x)g(x) + f(x)g(x) - f(x)g(x+k)}{k} \right] \cdot \frac{1}{[g(x)]^2} \\
&= \left[\lim_{k\to 0} \frac{f(x+k)g(x) - f(x)g(x)}{k} - \lim_{k\to 0}\frac{f(x)g(x+k) - f(x)g(x)}{k} \right] \cdot \frac{1}{g(x)^2} \\
&= \left[\lim_{k\to 0} \frac{f(x+k)g(x) - f(x)g(x)}{k} - \lim_{k\to 0}\frac{f(x)g(x+k) - f(x)g(x)}{k} \right] \cdot \frac{1}{[g(x)]^2} \\
&= \left[\lim_{k\to 0} \frac{f(x+k) - f(x)}{k} \cdot g(x) - f(x) \cdot \lim_{k\to 0}\frac{g(x+k) - g(x)}{k} \right] \cdot \frac{1}{g(x)^2} \\
&= \left[\lim_{k\to 0} \frac{f(x+k) - f(x)}{k} \cdot g(x) - f(x) \cdot \lim_{k\to 0}\frac{g(x+k) - g(x)}{k} \right] \cdot \frac{1}{[g(x)]^2} \\
&= \frac{f'(x)g(x) - f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}.
&= \frac{f'(x)g(x) - f(x)g'(x)}{[g(x)]^2}.
\end{align}</math>The limit evaluation <math>\lim_{k \to 0}\frac{1}{g(x+k)g(x)}=\frac{1}{g(x)^2}</math> is justified by the differentiability of <math>g(x)</math>, implying continuity, which can be expressed as <math>\lim_{k \to 0}g(x+k) = g(x)</math>.
\end{align}</math>The limit evaluation <math>\lim_{k \to 0}\frac{1}{g(x+k)g(x)}=\frac{1}{[g(x)]^2}</math> is justified by the differentiability of <math>g(x)</math>, implying continuity, which can be expressed as <math>\lim_{k \to 0}g(x+k) = g(x)</math>.


===Proof using implicit differentiation===
===Proof using implicit differentiation===
Let <math>h(x) = \frac{f(x)}{g(x)},</math> so <math>f(x) = g(x)h(x).</math> The [[product rule]] then gives <math>f'(x)=g'(x)h(x) + g(x)h'(x).</math> Solving for <math>h'(x)</math> and substituting back for <math>h(x)</math> gives:
Let <math>h(x) = \frac{f(x)}{g(x)},</math> so that <math>f(x) = g(x)h(x).</math>
The [[product rule]] then gives <math>f'(x)=g'(x)h(x) + g(x)h'(x).</math>
Solving for <math>h'(x)</math> and substituting back for <math>h(x)</math> gives:
<math display="block">\begin{align}
<math display="block">\begin{align}
h'(x) &= \frac{f'(x) -g'(x)h(x)}{g(x)} \\
h'(x) &= \frac{f'(x) -g'(x)h(x)}{g(x)} \\
&= \frac{f'(x) - g'(x)\cdot\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}}{g(x)} \\
&= \frac{f'(x) - g'(x)\cdot\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}}{g(x)} \\
&= \frac{f'(x)g(x) - f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}.
&= \frac{f'(x)g(x) - f(x)g'(x)}{[g(x)]^2}.
\end{align}</math>
\end{align}</math>


===Proof using the reciprocal rule or chain rule===
===Proof using the reciprocal rule or chain rule===
Let <math>h(x) = \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = f(x) \cdot \frac{1}{g(x)}.</math> Then the product rule gives<math display="block">h'(x) = f'(x)\cdot\frac{1}{g(x)} + f(x) \cdot \frac{d}{dx}\left[\frac{1}{g(x)}\right].</math>To evaluate the derivative in the second term, apply the [[reciprocal rule]], or the [[power rule]] along with the [[chain rule]]: <math>\frac{d}{dx}\left[\frac{1}{g(x)}\right] = -\frac{1}{g(x)^2} \cdot g'(x) = \frac{-g'(x)}{g(x)^2}.</math>
Let <math>h(x) = \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = f(x) \cdot \frac{1}{g(x)}.</math>
Then the product rule gives <math>h'(x) = f'(x)\cdot\frac{1}{g(x)} + f(x) \cdot \frac{d}{dx}\left[\frac{1}{g(x)}\right].</math>
To evaluate the derivative in the second term, apply the [[reciprocal rule]], or the [[power rule]] along with the [[chain rule]]:
<math display="block">\frac{d}{dx}\left[\frac{1}{g(x)}\right] = -\frac{1}{g(x)^2} \cdot g'(x) = \frac{-g'(x)}{g(x)^2}.</math>


Substituting the result into the expression gives<math display="block">\begin{align}
Substituting the result into the expression gives<math display="block">\begin{align}
Line 68: Line 79:


=== Proof by logarithmic differentiation ===
=== Proof by logarithmic differentiation ===
Let <math>h(x)=\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}.</math> Taking the absolute value and [[natural logarithm]] of both sides of the equation gives<math display="block">\ln|h(x)|=\ln\left|\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}\right|</math>Applying properties of the absolute value and logarithms,<math display="block">\ln|h(x)|=\ln|f(x)|-\ln|g(x)|</math>Taking the [[logarithmic derivative]] of both sides, <math display="block">\frac{h'(x)}{h(x)}=\frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}-\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}</math>Solving for <math>h'(x)</math> and substituting back <math>f(x)/g(x)</math> for <math>h(x)</math> gives:<math display="block">\begin{align}
Let <math>h(x)=\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}.</math> Taking the [[absolute value]] and [[natural logarithm]] of both sides of the equation gives
<math display="block">\ln|h(x)|=\ln\left|\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}\right|</math>
Applying properties of the absolute value and logarithms,
<math display="block">\ln|h(x)|=\ln|f(x)|-\ln|g(x)|</math>
Taking the [[logarithmic derivative]] of both sides,
<math display="block">\frac{h'(x)}{h(x)}=\frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}-\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}</math>
Solving for <math>h'(x)</math> and substituting back <math>\tfrac{f(x)}{g(x)}</math> for <math>h(x)</math> gives:
<math display="block">\begin{align}
h'(x)&=h(x)\left[\frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}-\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}\right]\\
h'(x)&=h(x)\left[\frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}-\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}\right]\\
&=\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}\left[\frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}-\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}\right]\\
&=\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}\left[\frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}-\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}\right]\\
&=\frac{f'(x)}{g(x)}-\frac{f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}\\
&=\frac{f'(x)}{g(x)}-\frac{f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}\\
&=\frac{f'(x)g(x)-f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}.
&=\frac{f'(x)g(x)-f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}.
\end{align}</math>
\end{align}</math>Note: Taking the absolute value of the functions is necessary to allow [[logarithmic differentiation]] of functions that can have negative values, as logarithms are only defined for positive arguments. This works because <math>\tfrac{d}{dx}(\ln|u|)=\tfrac{u'}{u}</math>, which justifies taking the absolute value of the functions for logarithmic differentiation.

Taking the absolute value of the functions is necessary for the [[logarithmic differentiation]] of functions that may have negative values, as logarithms are only [[Real-valued function|real-valued]] for positive arguments. This works because <math>\tfrac{d}{dx}(\ln|u|)=\tfrac{u'}{u}</math>, which justifies taking the absolute value of the functions for logarithmic differentiation.


==Higher order derivatives==
==Higher order derivatives==

Latest revision as of 11:38, 27 November 2024

In calculus, the quotient rule is a method of finding the derivative of a function that is the ratio of two differentiable functions. Let , where both f and g are differentiable and The quotient rule states that the derivative of h(x) is

It is provable in many ways by using other derivative rules.

Examples

[edit]

Example 1: Basic example

[edit]

Given , let , then using the quotient rule:

Example 2: Derivative of tangent function

[edit]

The quotient rule can be used to find the derivative of as follows:

Reciprocal rule

[edit]

The reciprocal rule is a special case of the quotient rule in which the numerator . Applying the quotient rule gives

Utilizing the chain rule yields the same result.

Proofs

[edit]

Proof from derivative definition and limit properties

[edit]

Let Applying the definition of the derivative and properties of limits gives the following proof, with the term added and subtracted to allow splitting and factoring in subsequent steps without affecting the value:The limit evaluation is justified by the differentiability of , implying continuity, which can be expressed as .

Proof using implicit differentiation

[edit]

Let so that

The product rule then gives

Solving for and substituting back for gives:

Proof using the reciprocal rule or chain rule

[edit]

Let

Then the product rule gives

To evaluate the derivative in the second term, apply the reciprocal rule, or the power rule along with the chain rule:

Substituting the result into the expression gives

Proof by logarithmic differentiation

[edit]

Let Taking the absolute value and natural logarithm of both sides of the equation gives

Applying properties of the absolute value and logarithms,

Taking the logarithmic derivative of both sides,

Solving for and substituting back for gives:

Taking the absolute value of the functions is necessary for the logarithmic differentiation of functions that may have negative values, as logarithms are only real-valued for positive arguments. This works because , which justifies taking the absolute value of the functions for logarithmic differentiation.

Higher order derivatives

[edit]

Implicit differentiation can be used to compute the nth derivative of a quotient (partially in terms of its first n − 1 derivatives). For example, differentiating twice (resulting in ) and then solving for yields

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]