Crusades: Difference between revisions
Crusades continued after Acre. |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Religious wars of the High Middle Ages}} |
|||
{{dablink| This article is about the [[medieval]] crusades. For other uses, see [[Crusade (disambiguation)]] and [[wiktionary:Crusade|Crusade (definition)]].}}'' |
|||
{{Other uses}} |
|||
[[Image:SiegeofAntioch.jpeg|thumb|right|300px|The Siege of [[Antioch]], from a medieval miniature painting, during the [[First Crusade]].]]{{Crusade}} |
|||
{{Pp|small=yes}} |
|||
The '''Crusades''' were a series of military conflicts of a [[religious war|religious character]] waged by [[Christianity|Christians]] from [[1095]]-[[1291]], usually sanctioned by the [[Pope]] in the name of [[Christendom]],<ref> This term refers to a particular polity of the [[Medieval]] world.</ref> with the goal of recapturing [[Jerusalem]] and the [[sacred]] "[[Holy Land]]" from [[Muslim]] rule and originally launched in response to a call from the [[Eastern Orthodox]] [[Byzantine Empire]] for help against the expansion of the Muslim [[Seljuq dynasty]] into [[Anatolia]].<ref name="CathEnc">''Crusades'' in ''The New Catholic Encyclopedia'', New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1966, Vol. IV, p. 504.</ref><ref> The Seljuk were a dynasty who ruled a [[Turkic peoples|Turkic]] branch of the [[Central Asia]]n [[Oghuz]] and had recently overrun the [[Ghaznavid]]s, [[Buyid]]s and other dynasties contesting the authority of the [[Abbassid]] [[caliphate]]. They converted to [[Islam]] and established themselves as [[de facto]] rulers who only formally acknowledged the caliph's suzerainty. The "''[[ghazw]]at''" into Anatolia of the various [[Turcoman]] tribes nominally under their banner led to the Byzantine Emperor's call for assistance from the Christian West.</ref> |
|||
{{Good article}} |
|||
{{Use British English|date=October 2015}} |
|||
[[File:Combat deuxième croisade.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|14th-century miniature of the [[Battle of Dorylaeum (1147)]], a [[Second Crusade]] battle, from the ''[[Estoire d'Eracles]]''|alt=Medieval illustration of a battle during the Second Crusade]] |
|||
{{Campaignbox Crusades|state=expanded}} |
|||
The '''Crusades''' were a series of [[Religious war#Crusades|religious wars]] initiated, supported, and sometimes directed by the Christian [[Latin Church]] in the [[Middle Ages|medieval period]]. The best known of these military expeditions are those to the [[Holy Land]] between 1095 and 1291 that had the objective of reconquering [[Jerusalem]] and [[Levant|its surrounding area]] from Muslim rule after the region had been [[Siege of Jerusalem (636–637)|conquered]] by the [[Rashidun Caliphate]] centuries earlier. Beginning with the [[First Crusade]], which resulted in the [[Siege of Jerusalem (1099)|conquest of Jerusalem in 1099]], dozens of military campaigns were organised, providing a focal point of European history for centuries. Crusading declined rapidly after the 15th century with the [[fall of Constantinople]] to the [[Ottoman Turks|Ottomans]]. |
|||
In 1095, after a [[Byzantine]] request for aid,<ref name="Nicholson6">Helen J. Nicholson, ''The Crusades'', (Greenwood Publishing, 2004), 6.</ref> [[Pope Urban II]] proclaimed the first expedition at the [[Council of Clermont]]. He encouraged military support for [[List of Byzantine emperors|Byzantine emperor]] [[Alexios I Komnenos|Alexios{{nbsp}}I Komnenos]] and called for an armed pilgrimage to Jerusalem. Across all social strata in Western Europe, there was an enthusiastic response. Participants came from all over Europe and had a variety of motivations. These included religious salvation, satisfying feudal obligations, opportunities for renown, and economic or political advantage. Later expeditions were conducted by generally more organised armies, sometimes led by a king. All were granted papal [[Indulgence#Early and medieval beliefs|indulgences]]. Initial successes established four [[Crusader states]]: the [[County of Edessa]]; the [[Principality of Antioch]]; the [[Kingdom of Jerusalem]]; and the [[County of Tripoli]]. A European presence remained in the region in some form until the [[Siege of Acre (1291)|fall of Acre]] in 1291. After this, no further large military campaigns were organised. |
|||
The term is also used to describe contemporaneous and subsequent campaigns conducted through the 16th century in territories outside [[the Levant]]<ref>such as Muslim territories in [[Al Andalus]], [[Ifriqiya]], and [[Egypt]], as well as in [[Eastern Europe]]</ref>, usually against [[pagan]]s{{Fact|date=February 2007}} and those considered by the [[Catholic Church]] to be [[heretic]]s, for a mixture of religious, economic, and political reasons.<ref>''e.g.'' the [[Albigensian Crusade]], the [[Aragonese Crusade]], the [[Reconquista]] and the [[Northern Crusades]].</ref> Rivalries among both Christian and Muslim powers led also to alliances between religious factions against their opponents, such as the Christian alliance with the [[Sultanate of Rum]] during the [[Fifth Crusade]]. The traditional numbering scheme for the Crusades includes the nine major expeditions to the Holy Land during the 11th to 13th centuries. Other unnumbered "crusades" continued into the 16th century, lasting until the political and religious climate of Europe was significantly changed during the [[Renaissance]] and [[Reformation]]. |
|||
Other church-sanctioned campaigns include crusades against Christians not obeying papal rulings and [[Heresy in the Catholic Church|heretics]], those against the [[Ottoman Empire]], and ones for political reasons. The struggle against the [[Moors]] in the Iberian Peninsula–the ''[[Reconquista]]–''ended in 1492 with the [[Granada War#Last stand at Granada|Fall of Granada]]. From 1147, the [[Northern Crusades]] were fought against [[pagan]] tribes in Northern Europe. [[Crusades against Christians]] began with the [[Albigensian Crusade]] in the 13th century and continued through the [[Hussite Wars]] in the early 15th century. [[Ottoman wars in Europe#Crusades against the Ottoman Empire|Crusades against the Ottomans]] began in the late 14th century and include the [[Crusade of Varna]]. [[Popular crusades]], including the [[Children's Crusade]] of 1212, were generated by the masses and were unsanctioned by the Church. |
|||
The [[Children's Crusade]] was not a military campaign but probably a popular uprising in [[France]] and/or [[Germany]], possibly with the intention of reaching the Holy Land in order to convert Muslims there peacefully to Christianity. |
|||
==Terminology== |
|||
The Crusades had far-reaching political, economic, and social impacts, some of which have lasted into contemporary times. Because of internal conflicts among Christian kingdoms and political powers, some of the crusade expeditions (such as the [[Fourth Crusade]]) were diverted from their original aim and resulted in the sack of Christian cities, including the Byzantine capital, [[Constantinople]]. The [[Sixth Crusade]] was the first crusade to set sail without the official blessing of the Church, establishing the precedent that rulers other than the Pope could initiate a crusade. |
|||
[[File:Siege of Damascus, second crusade.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|The [[Siege of Damascus (1148)]] as depicted in the ''[[Passages d'outremer]]'', {{circa|1490}}]] |
|||
The term "crusade" first referred to military expeditions undertaken by European Christians in the 11th, 12th, and 13th{{nbsp}}centuries to the [[Holy Land]]. The conflicts to which the term is applied have been extended to include other campaigns initiated, supported and sometimes directed by the Latin Church with varying objectives, mostly religious, sometimes political. These differed from previous Christian religious wars in that they were considered a penitential exercise, and so earned participants remittance from penalties for all confessed sins.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=1}} What constituted a crusade has been understood in diverse ways, particularly regarding the early Crusades, and the precise definition remains a matter of debate among contemporary historians.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|p=40}}{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|pp=225–226}} |
|||
At the time of the [[First Crusade]], {{lang|la|iter}}, "journey", and {{lang|la|peregrinatio}}, "pilgrimage" were used for the campaign. Crusader terminology remained largely indistinguishable from that of Christian pilgrimage during the 12th{{nbsp}}century. A specific term for a crusader in the form of {{lang|la|crucesignatus}}{{mdash}}"one signed by the cross"{{mdash}}emerged in the early 12th century. This led to the French term {{lang|fr|croisade}}{{mdash}}the way of the cross.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|p=40}} By the mid 13th{{nbsp}}century the cross became the major descriptor of the crusades with {{lang|la|crux transmarina}}{{mdash}}"the cross overseas"{{mdash}}used for crusades in the eastern Mediterranean, and {{lang|la|crux cismarina}}{{mdash}}"the cross this side of the sea"{{mdash}}for those in Europe.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=5}} The use of {{lang|enm|croiserie}}, "crusade" in Middle English can be dated to {{circa|1300}}, but the modern English "crusade" dates to the early 1700s.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=77}} The [[Crusader states]] of Syria and Palestine were known as the "[[Outremer]]" from the French ''outre-mer'', or "the land beyond the sea".{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=105}} |
|||
== Historical context == |
|||
{{Quote box |
|||
|align=right |
|||
|width=35% |
|||
|quote=It is necessary to look for the origin of a crusading ideal in the struggle between Christians and Muslims in Spain and consider how the idea of a holy war emerged from this background. |
|||
|source=[[Norman F. Cantor]] |
|||
|}} |
|||
==Crusades and the Holy Land, 1095–1291== |
|||
=== Western European origins === |
|||
{{see also|Timeline of the Kingdom of Jerusalem}} |
|||
The origins of the crusades lie in developments in [[Western Europe]] earlier in the [[Middle Ages]], as well as the deteriorating situation of the [[Byzantine Empire]] in the east caused by a new wave of Turkish Muslim attacks. The breakdown of the [[Carolingian Empire]] in the late 9th century, combined with the relative stabilisation of local European borders after the Christianization of the [[Vikings]], [[Slavs]], and [[Magyars]], had produced a large class of armed warriors whose energies were misplaced fighting one another and terrorizing the local populace. The Church tried to stem this violence with the [[Peace and Truce of God]] movements, which was somewhat successful, but trained warriors always sought an outlet for their violence, and opportunities for territorial expansion were becoming less attractive for large segments of the nobility. One exception was the ''[[Reconquista]]'' in [[Spain]] and [[Portugal]], which at times occupied Iberian [[knights]] and some [[mercenaries]] from elsewhere in Europe in the fight against the Islamic [[Moors]], who had attacked and successfully overrun most of the [[Iberian Peninsula]] over the preceding two centuries. |
|||
{{Campaignbox Crusades Battles|state=collapsed}} |
|||
[[File:The Church of the Holy Sepulchre-Jerusalem.JPG|thumb|right|upright=1.35|The [[Church of the Holy Sepulchre]] in Jerusalem. In 1071, Jerusalem was conquered by the Seljuk Turks.]] |
|||
===Background=== |
|||
In 1063, [[Pope Alexander II]] had given papal blessing to Iberian Christians in their wars against the Muslims, granting both a papal standard (the ''vexillum sancti Petri'') and an [[indulgence]] to those who were killed in battle. Pleas from the Byzantine Emperors, now threatened under by the [[Seljuks]], thus fell on ready ears. These occurred in 1074, from Emperor [[Michael VII]] to [[Pope Gregory VII]] and in 1095, from Emperor [[Alexius I Comnenus]] to [[Pope Urban II]]. |
|||
By the end of the 11th{{nbsp}}century, the period of [[Early Muslim conquests|Islamic Arab territorial expansion]] had been over for centuries. The Holy Land's remoteness from focus of Islamic power struggles enabled relative peace and prosperity in Syria and Palestine. Muslim-Western European contact was only more than minimal in the conflict in the [[Iberian Peninsula]].{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|p=40}} The Byzantine Empire and the Islamic world were long standing centres of wealth, culture and military power. The Arab-Islamic world tended to view Western Europe as a backwater that presented little organised threat.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|p=8}} By 1025, the Byzantine Emperor [[Basil II]] had extended territorial recovery to its furthest extent. The frontiers stretched east to Iran. Bulgaria and much of southern Italy were under control, and piracy was suppressed in the Mediterranean Sea. The empire's relationships with its Islamic neighbours were no more quarrelsome than its relationships with the [[Slavs]] or the Western Christians. The [[Italo-Normans|Normans]] in Italy; to the north [[Pechenegs]], [[Serbs]] and [[Cumans]]; and [[Seljuk dynasty|Seljuk Turks]] in the east all competed with the Empire and the emperors recruited mercenaries{{mdash}}even on occasions from their enemies{{mdash}}to meet this challenge.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=42–46}} |
|||
The political situation in Western Asia was changed by later waves of [[Turkic migration]], in particular the arrival of the [[Seljuk dynasty|Seljuk Turks]] in the 10th{{nbsp}}century. Previously a minor ruling clan from [[Transoxania]], they had recently converted to Islam and migrated into Iran. In two decades following their arrival they conquered Iran, Iraq and the Near East. The Seljuks and their followers were from the [[Sunni]] tradition. This brought them into conflict in Palestine and Syria with the [[Fatimid Caliphate|Fatimids]] who were [[Shia Islam|Shi'ite]].{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=39–41}} The Seljuks were nomadic, [[Turkic languages|Turkic]] speaking and occasionally shamanistic, very different from their sedentary, Arabic speaking subjects. This difference and the governance of territory based on political preference, and competition between independent princes rather than geography, weakened existing power structures.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=43–44}} In 1071, Byzantine Emperor [[Romanos IV Diogenes]] attempted confrontation to suppress the [[Byzantine–Seljuk wars|Seljuks' sporadic raiding]], leading to his defeat at the [[battle of Manzikert]]. Historians once considered this a pivotal event but now Manzikert is regarded as only one further step in the expansion of the [[Great Seljuk Empire]].{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|p=27}} |
|||
[[Image:Almoravid map reconquest loc.jpg|thumb|250px|Map of the Iberian Peninsula at the time of the Almoravid arrival in the 11th Century- Christian Kingdoms included '''A'''ragón, '''C'''astile, '''L'''eon, '''N'''avarre, and '''P'''ortugal]] |
|||
The evolution of a Christian theology of war developed from the link of [[Roman citizenship]] to Christianity, according to which citizens were required to fight the empire's enemies. This doctrine of [[holy war]] dated from the 4th-century theologian [[Augustine of Hippo|Saint Augustine]]. He maintained that aggressive war was sinful, but acknowledged a "[[Just war theory|just war]]" could be rationalised if it was proclaimed by a legitimate authority, was defensive or for the recovery of lands, and without an excessive degree of violence.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=14–15}}{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=14–15}} Violent acts were commonly used for dispute resolution in Western Europe, and the papacy attempted to mitigate this.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=30–31}} Historians have thought that the [[Peace and Truce of God]] movements restricted conflict between Christians from the 10th{{nbsp}}century; the influence is apparent in Urban II's speeches. Other historians assert that the effectiveness was limited and it had died out by the time of the crusades.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=30–38}} [[Pope Alexander II]] developed a system of recruitment via oaths for military resourcing that his successor [[Pope Gregory VII]] extended across Europe.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|p=31}} In the 11th{{nbsp}}century, Christian conflict with Muslims on the southern peripheries of Christendom was sponsored by the Church, including the [[Crusade of Barbastro|siege of Barbastro]] and the [[Norman conquest of Sicily]].{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=18–19, 289}} In 1074, Gregory{{nbsp}}VII planned a display of military power to reinforce the principle of papal sovereignty. His vision of a holy war supporting Byzantium against the Seljuks was the first crusade prototype, but lacked support.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|p=16}} |
|||
The Crusades were, in part, an outlet for an intense religious piety which rose up in the late 11th century among the lay public. A crusader would, after pronouncing a solemn vow, receive a cross from the hands of the pope or his [[papal legate|legate]]s, and was thenceforth considered a "soldier of the Church". This was partly because of the [[Investiture Controversy]], which had started around 1075 and was still on-going during the First Crusade. As both sides of the Investiture Controversy tried to marshal public opinion in their favor, people became personally engaged in a dramatic religious controversy. The result was an awakening of intense Christian piety and public interest in religious affairs. This was further strengthened by religious propaganda, advocating [[Just War]] in order to retake the Holy Land—which included Jerusalem (where the [[Death of Jesus|death]], [[Resurrection of Jesus|resurrection]] and [[ascension]] into [[heaven]] of [[Jesus]] took place according to Christian theology) and [[Antioch]] (the first Christian city)—from the Muslims. Further, the remission of sin was a driving factor. This provided any god-fearing men, who had committed sin, as an irresistible way out of eternal damnation in hell. It was a hotly debated issue throughout the crusades as what exactly "remission of sin" meant. Most believed that by retaking Jerusalem they would go straight to heaven after death. However, much controversy goes to what exactly was promised by the popes of the time. One theory was that you had to die fighting for Jerusalem for the remission to apply. This is closer to what pope Urban II said in his speeches. This meant that if the crusaders were successful, and retook Jerusalem, the survivors would not be given remission. Another theory was that if you reached Jerusalem, you would be relieved of the sins you had committed before the crusade. Therefore you could still be sentenced to hell for sins committed after the crusades. |
|||
The First Crusade was an unexpected event for contemporary chroniclers, but historical analysis demonstrates it had its roots in earlier developments with both clerics and laity recognising [[Jerusalem in Christianity#First Crusade|Jerusalem's role in Christianity]] as worthy of penitential [[Christian pilgrimage|pilgrimage]]. In 1071, Jerusalem was captured by the Turkish warlord [[Atsiz ibn Uvaq|Atsiz]], who seized most of Syria and Palestine as part of the expansion of the [[Seljuk Turks|Seljuks]] throughout the Middle East. The Seljuk hold on the city was weak and returning pilgrims reported difficulties and the oppression of Christians. Byzantine desire for military aid converged with increasing willingness of the western nobility to accept papal military direction.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|p=28}}{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|p=46}} |
|||
All of these factors were manifested in the overwhelming popular support for the First Crusade and the religious vitality of the 12th century. |
|||
===First Crusade=== |
|||
=== Middle Eastern situation === |
|||
{{main|First Crusade}} |
|||
Muslim presence in the Holy Land goes back to the initial [[Arab]] conquest of [[Palestine (region)|Palestine]] in the 7th century. This did not interfere much with [[pilgrimage]well hello there =] to Christian holy sites or the security of monasteries and Christian communities in the Holy Land, and western Europeans were less concerned with the loss of far-away Jerusalem than, in the ensuing decades and centuries, the invasions by Muslims and other hostile non-Christians, such as the Vikings, heathen Slavs and Magyars. However, the Muslim armies' successes were putting strong pressure on the [[Eastern Orthodox]] Byzantine Empire. |
|||
[[File:Peter the Hermit.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|250px|right|Miniature of [[Peter the Hermit]] leading the [[People's Crusade]] (''[[Abreujamen de las estorias]]'', MS [[Egerton Collection|Egerton]] 1500, Avignon, 14th{{nbsp}}century)|alt=14th-century miniature of Peter the Hermit leading the People's Crusade]] |
|||
In 1095, Byzantine Emperor [[Alexios I Komnenos]] requested military aid from [[Pope Urban II]] at the [[Council of Piacenza]]. He was probably expecting a small number of mercenaries he could direct. Alexios had restored the Empire's finances and authority but still faced numerous foreign enemies. Later that year at the [[Council of Clermont]], Urban raised the issue again and preached a crusade.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|p=34}}</ref> Almost immediately, the French priest [[Peter the Hermit]] gathered thousands of mostly poor in the [[People's Crusade]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Hindley|2004|pp=20–21}}</ref> Traveling through Germany, German bands massacred Jewish communities in the [[Rhineland massacres]] during wide-ranging anti-Jewish activities.<ref>{{Harvnb|Chazan|1996|pp=28–34}}</ref> Jews were perceived to be as much an enemy as Muslims. They were held responsible for the [[Crucifixion of Jesus|Crucifixion]], and were more immediately visible. People wondered why they should travel thousands of miles to fight non-believers when there were many closer to home.<ref>{{Harvnb|Tyerman|2006|pp=99–100}}</ref> Quickly after leaving Byzantine-controlled territory on their journey to [[Nicaea]], these crusaders were annihilated in a Turkish ambush at the [[Battle of Civetot]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|p=41}}</ref> |
|||
Another turning point attributed to the change in western attitudes towards the east came in the year 1009, when the [[Fatimids|Fatimid]] caliph, [[al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah]] ordered the [[Church of the Holy Sepulchre]] destroyed.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} His successor permitted the Byzantine Empire to rebuild it under stringent circumstances, and pilgrimage was again permitted, but many reports began to circulate in the [[Western countries|West]] about the cruelty of Muslims toward Christian pilgrims; these accounts from returning pilgrims then played an important role in the development of the crusades later in the century.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} |
|||
Conflict with Urban II meant that King [[Philip I of France]] and [[Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor|Holy Roman Emperor Henry{{nbsp}}IV]] declined to participate. Aristocrats from France, western Germany, the [[Low Countries]], [[Languedoc]] and Italy led independent contingents in loose, fluid arrangements based on bonds of lordship, family, ethnicity and language. The elder statesman [[Raymond IV, Count of Toulouse]] was foremost, rivaled by the relatively poor but martial [[Italo-Norman]] [[Bohemond I of Antioch|Bohemond of Taranto]] and his nephew [[Tancred, Prince of Galilee|Tancred]]. [[Godfrey of Bouillon]] and his brother [[Baldwin I of Jerusalem|Baldwin]] also joined with forces from [[Lorraine]], [[Lotharingia]], and [[Kingdom of Germany|Germany]]. These five princes were pivotal to the campaign, which was augmented by a northern French army led by [[Robert Curthose]], Count [[Stephen, Count of Blois|Stephen II of Blois]], and Count [[Robert II, Count of Flanders|Robert II of Flanders]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=43–47}}</ref> The total number may have reached as many as 100,000 people including non-combatants. They traveled eastward by land to Constantinople where they were cautiously welcomed by the emperor.<ref>{{Harvnb|Hindley|2004|pp=30–31}}</ref> Alexios persuaded many of the princes to pledge allegiance to him and that their first objective should be Nicaea, the capital of the [[Sultanate of Rum]]. Sultan [[Kilij Arslan I|Kilij Arslan]] left the city to resolve a territorial dispute, enabling its capture after the [[siege of Nicaea]] and a Byzantine naval assault in the high point of Latin and Greek co-operation.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=52–56}}</ref> |
|||
=== Immediate cause === |
|||
[[Image:CouncilofClermont.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Pope [[Urban II]] at the [[Council of Clermont]], where he preached an impassioned sermon to take back the Holy Land.]] |
|||
The immediate cause of the First Crusade was [[Alexios I Komnenos|Alexius I]]'s appeal to [[Pope Urban II]] for mercenaries to help him resist Muslim advances into territory of the Byzantine Empire. In [[1071]], at the [[Battle of Manzikert]], the Byzantine Empire had been defeated, and this defeat led to the loss of all but the coastlands of Asia Minor (modern [[Turkey]]). Although the [[East-West Schism]] was already beginning to brew between the Catholic Western church and the [[Eastern Orthodox church]], Alexius I hoped for a positive response. However, the response was much larger, and less helpful, than Alexius I desired. The Pope called for a large invasion force to not merely defend the Byzantine Empire, but also to retake Jerusalem. |
|||
[[File:Byzantium1081ADlightpurple-1-+Antioch.png|thumb|250px|Southeastern Europe, Asia Minor and Syria before the First Crusade]]The first experience of Turkish tactics, using lightly armoured mounted archers, occurred when an advanced party led by Bohemond and Robert was ambushed at the [[Battle of Dorylaeum (1097)|battle of Dorylaeum]]. The Normans resisted for hours before the arrival of the main army caused a Turkish withdrawal.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=57–59}}</ref> The army marched for three months to the former Byzantine city [[Antioch]], that had been in Muslim control since 1084. Starvation, thirst and disease reduced numbers, combined with Baldwin's decision to leave with 100 knights and their followers to carve out [[County of Edessa|his own territory in Edessa]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=59–61}}</ref> The [[siege of Antioch]] lasted eight months. The crusaders lacked the resources to fully invest the city; the residents lacked the means to repel the invaders. Then Bohemond persuaded a guard in the city to open a gate. The crusaders entered, massacring the Muslim inhabitants and many Christians amongst the Greek Orthodox, Syrian and Armenian communities.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=72–73}}</ref> A force to recapture the city was raised by [[Kerbogha]], the effective ruler of [[Mosul]]. The Byzantines did not march to the assistance of the crusaders after the deserting Stephen of Blois told them the cause was lost. Alexius retreated from [[Philomelium]], where he received Stephen's report, to Constantinople. The Greeks were never truly forgiven for this perceived betrayal and Stephen was branded a coward.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=74–75}}</ref> Losing numbers through desertion and starvation in the besieged city, the crusaders attempted to negotiate surrender but were rejected. Bohemond recognised that the only option was open combat and launched a counterattack. Despite superior numbers, Kerbogha's army{{mdash}}which was divided into factions and surprised by the Crusaders' commitment{{mdash}}retreated and abandoned the siege.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge |2012|pp=72–82}}</ref> Raymond [[Arqa#Crusades period|besieged Arqa]] in February 1099 and sent an embassy to [[al-Afdal Shahanshah]], the vizier of [[Fatimid dynasty|Fatimid Egypt]], seeking a treaty. The Pope's representative [[Adhemar of Le Puy|Adhemar]] died, leaving the crusade without a spiritual leader. Raymond failed to capture Arqa and in May led the remaining army south along the coast. Bohemond retained Antioch and remained, despite his pledge to return it to the Byzantines. Local rulers offered little resistance, opting for peace in return for provisions. The Frankish envoys returned accompanied by Fatimid representatives. This brought the information that the Fatimids had recaptured Jerusalem. The Franks offered to partition conquered territory in return for the city. Refusal of the offer made it imperative that the crusade reach Jerusalem before the Fatimids made it defensible.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=82–83, 87, 89}} |
|||
When the First Crusade was preached in 1095, the Christian princes of northern Iberia had been fighting their way out of the mountains of [[Galicia (Spain)|Galicia]] and [[Asturias]], the [[Basque Country (historical territory)|Basque Country]] and [[Navarre]], with increasing success, for about a hundred years. The fall of Moorish [[Toledo, Spain|Toledo]] to the [[Kingdom of León]] in 1085 was a major victory, but the turning points of the ''[[Reconquista]]'' still lay in the future. The disunity of the Muslim emirs was an essential factor, and the Christians, whose wives remained safely behind, were hard to beat: they knew nothing except fighting, they had no gardens or libraries to defend, and they worked their way forward through alien territory populated by [[infidel]]s, where the Christian fighters felt they could afford to wreak havoc. All these factors were soon to be replayed in the fighting grounds of the East. Spanish historians have traditionally seen the ''Reconquista'' as the molding force in the [[Castile (historical region)|Castilian]] character, with its sense that the highest good was to die fighting for the Christian cause of one's country. |
|||
The first attack on the city, launched on 7 June 1099, failed, and the [[Siege of Jerusalem (1099)|siege of Jerusalem]] became a stalemate, before the arrival of craftsmen and supplies transported by the [[Republic of Genoa|Genoese]] to [[Jaffa]] tilted the balance. Two large siege engines were constructed and the one commanded by Godfrey breached the walls on 15 July. For two days the crusaders massacred the inhabitants and pillaged the city. Historians now believe the accounts of the numbers killed have been exaggerated, but this narrative of massacre did much to cement the crusaders' reputation for barbarism.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=96–103}}</ref> Godfrey secured the Frankish position by defeating an Egyptian force at the [[Battle of Ascalon]] on 12 August.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=104–106}}</ref> Most of the crusaders considered their pilgrimage complete and returned to Europe. When it came to the future governance of the city it was Godfrey who took leadership and the title of ''[[Title of Godfrey of Bouillon#Advocate, or Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri|Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri]],'' Defender of the Holy Sepulchre. The presence of troops from Lorraine ended the possibility that Jerusalem would be an ecclesiastical domain and the claims of Raymond.<ref>{{Harvnb|Jotischky|2004|p=62}}</ref> Godfrey was left with a mere 300 knights and 2,000 infantry. Tancred also remained with the ambition to gain a princedom of his own.<ref name="Asbridge 2012 106">{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|p=106}}</ref> |
|||
While the ''[[Reconquista]]'' was the most prominent example of Christian reaction against Muslim conquests, it is not the only such example. The [[Normans|Norman]] adventurer [[Robert Guiscard]] had conquered the "toe of Italy," Calabria, in 1057 and was holding what had traditionally been Byzantine territory against the Muslims of [[Sicily]]. The maritime states of [[Pisa]], [[Genoa]] and [[Catalonia]] were all actively fighting Islamic strongholds in [[Majorca]] and [[Sardinia]], freeing the coasts of Italy and Catalonia from Muslim raids. Much earlier, the Christian homelands of [[Syria]], [[Lebanon]], Palestine, [[Egypt]], and so on had been conquered by Muslim armies. This long history of losing territories to a religious enemy created a powerful motive to respond to Byzantine emperor Alexius I's call for holy war to defend Christendom, and to recapture the lost lands, starting at Jerusalem. |
|||
The Islamic world seems to have barely registered the crusade; certainly, there is limited written evidence before 1130. This may be in part due to a reluctance to relate Muslim failure, but it is more likely to be the result of cultural misunderstanding. Al-Afdal Shahanshah and the Muslim world mistook the crusaders for the latest in a long line of Byzantine mercenaries, not religiously motivated warriors intent on conquest and settlement.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=111–113}}</ref> The Muslim world was divided between the Sunnis of Syria and Iraq and the Shi'ite Fatimids of Egypt. The Turks had found unity unachievable since the death of Sultan Malik-Shah in 1092, with rival rulers in [[Damascus]] and [[Aleppo]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=21–22}}</ref> In addition, in Baghdad, Seljuk sultan [[Barkiyaruq]] and Abbasid caliph [[al-Mustazhir]] were engaged in a power struggle. This gave the Crusaders a crucial opportunity to consolidate without any pan-Islamic counter-attack.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|p=114}}</ref> |
|||
The papacy of [[Pope Gregory VII]] had struggled with reservations about the doctrinal validity of a holy war and the shedding of blood for the Lord and had, with difficulty, resolved the question in favour of justified violence. More importantly to the Pope, the Christians who made pilgrimages to the Holy Land were being persecuted. Actions against [[Arianism|Arians]] and other heretics offered historical precedents in a society where violence against nonbelievers—and indeed against other Christians—was acceptable and common. Saint [[Augustine of Hippo]], Gregory's intellectual model, had justified the use of force in the service of Christ in ''[[The City of God]]'', and a Christian "[[just war]]" might enhance the wider standing of an aggressively ambitious leader of Europe, as Gregory saw himself. The northerners would be cemented to [[Rome]], and their troublesome knights could see the only kind of action that suited them. Previous attempts by the church to stem such violence, such as the concept of the "Peace of God", were not as successful as hoped. To the south of Rome, Normans were showing how such energies might be unleashed against both Arabs (in Sicily) and Byzantines (on the mainland). A Latin hegemony in the Levant would provide leverage in resolving the Papacy's claims of supremacy over the [[Patriarch of Constantinople]], which had resulted in the [[Great Schism]] of 1054, a rift that might yet be resolved through the force of Frankish arms. |
|||
=== Early 12th century === |
|||
In the Byzantine homelands, the Eastern Emperor's weakness was revealed by the disastrous defeat at the [[Battle of Manzikert]] in 1071, which reduced the Empire's Asian territory to a region in western Anatolia and around Constantinople. A sure sign of Byzantine desperation was the appeal of Alexius I Comnenus to his enemy, the Pope, for aid. But Gregory was occupied with the [[Investiture Controversy]] and could not call on the German emperor, so a crusade never took shape. |
|||
[[File:The Crusader States in 1135.svg|thumb|280px |alt=map of the Crusader States (1135) |The Crusader states in 1135]] |
|||
Urban II died on 29 July 1099, fourteen days after the capture of Jerusalem by the Crusaders, but before news of the event had reached Rome. He was succeeded by [[Pope Paschal II]] who continued the policies of his predecessors in regard to the Holy Land.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=106-107}} Godfrey died in 1100. [[Dagobert of Pisa]], [[Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem|Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem]] and Tancred looked to Bohemond to come south, but he was captured by the [[Danishmends]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Tyerman|2006|pp=178}}</ref> The Lorrainers foiled the attempt to seize power and enabled Godfrey's brother, [[Baldwin I of Jerusalem|Baldwin I]], to take the crown.<ref>{{Harvnb|Jotischky|2004|pp=62–63}}</ref> |
|||
For Gregory's more moderate successor, Pope Urban II, a crusade would serve to reunite Christendom, bolster the Papacy, and perhaps bring the East under his control. The disaffected Germans and the Normans were not to be counted on, but the heart and backbone of a crusade could be found in Urban's own homeland among the northern French. |
|||
Paschal II promoted the large-scale [[Crusade of 1101]] in support of the remaining Franks. This new crusade was a similar size to the First Crusade and joined in Byzantium by [[Raymond IV, Count of Toulouse|Raymond of Saint-Gilles]]. Command was fragmented and the force split in three:{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=106-107}} |
|||
=== After the First Crusade === |
|||
* A largely Lombard force was harried by Kilij Arslan's forces and finally destroyed in three days at the [[battle of Mersivan]] in August 1101. Some of the leadership, including Raymond, [[Stephen, Count of Blois|Stephen of Blois]] and [[Anselm IV (archbishop of Milan)|Anselm IV of Milan]], survived to retreat to Constantinople. |
|||
* A force led by [[William II, Count of Nevers|William II of Nevers]] attempted catch up with the Lombards but was caught and routed at [[Heraclea Cybistra|Heraclea]]. The destitute leaders eventually reached Antioch. |
|||
* [[William IX, Duke of Aquitaine|William IX of Aquitaine]], [[Welf II, Duke of Bavaria|Welf IV of Bavaria]], [[Ida of Formbach-Ratelnberg]] and [[Hugh, Count of Vermandois]] reached Heraclea later and were also defeated. Again the leaders fled the field and survived, although Hugh died of his wounds at [[Tarsus, Mersin|Tarsus]] and Ida disappeared. The remnants of the army helped Raymond capture [[Tartus|Tortosa]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Tyerman|2006|pp=170–175}}</ref> |
|||
The defeat of the crusaders proved to the Muslim world that the crusaders were not invincible, as they appeared to be during the First Crusade. Within months of the defeat, the Franks and Fatimid Egypt began fighting in three battles at Ramla, and one at [[Jaffa]]: |
|||
On a popular level, the first crusades unleashed a wave of impassioned, personally felt pious Christian fury that was expressed in the massacres of [[Jew]]s that accompanied the movement of the Crusader mobs through Europe, as well as the violent treatment of "[[schism]]atic" Orthodox Christians of the east. The violence against the Orthodox Christians culminated in the sack of Constantinople in 1204, in which most of the crusading armies took part. During many of the attacks on Jews, local Bishops and Christians made attempts to protect Jews from the mobs that were passing through. Jews were often offered sanctuary in churches and other Christian buildings, but the mobs broke in and killed them anyway. |
|||
* In the [[Battle of Ramla (1101)|first]] on 7 September 1101, Baldwin I and 300 knights narrowly defeated the Fatimid vizier al-Afdal Shahanshah.{{sfn|Lock|2006|p=27}} |
|||
* In the [[Battle of Ramla (1102)|second]] on 17 May 1102, al-Afdal's son [[Sharaf al-Ma'ali]] and a superior force inflicted a major defeat on the Franks. Stephen of Blois and Stephen of Burgundy from the Crusade of 1101 were among those killed. Baldwin I fled to Arsuf.{{sfn|Lock|2006|p=27}} |
|||
* Victory at the [[Battle of Ramla (1102)#Siege of Jaffa and Aftermath|battle of Jaffa]] on 27 May 1102 saved the kingdom from virtual collapse.{{sfn|Lock|2006|p=27}} |
|||
* In the [[Battle of Ramla (1105)|third]] at Ramla on 28 August 1102, a coalition of Fatimid and Damescene forces were defeated again by Baldwin I and 500 knights.{{sfn|Lock|2006|p=28}} |
|||
[[Baldwin II of Jerusalem|Baldwin of Edessa]], later king of Jerusalem as Baldwin II, and Patriarch [[Bernard of Valence]] ransomed Bohemond for 100,000 gold pieces.{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|p=138}} Baldwin and Bohemond then jointly campaigned to secure Edessa's southern front. On 7 May 1104, the Frankish army was defeated by the Seljuk rulers of [[Mosul]] and [[Mardin]] at the [[battle of Harran]].{{sfn|Lock|2006|p=28}} Baldwin II and his cousin, [[Joscelin I, Count of Edessa|Joscelin of Courtenay]], were captured. Bohemond and Tancred retreated to Edessa where Tancred assumed command. Bohemond returned to Italy, taking with him much of Antioch's wealth and manpower. Tancred revitalised the beleaguered principality with victory at the [[battle of Artah]] on 20 April 1105 over a larger force, led by the Seljuk [[Fakhr al-Mulk Ridwan|Ridwan of Aleppo]]. He was then able to secure Antioch's borders and push back his Greek and Muslim enemies.{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|pp=138-142}} Under Paschal's sponsorship, Bohemond launched a version of a crusade in 1107 against the Byzantines, crossing the [[Adriatic]] and [[Siege of Dyrrhachium (1107–1108)|besieging Durrës]]. The siege failed; Alexius hit his supply lines, forcing his surrender. The terms laid out in the [[Treaty of Devol]] were never enacted because Bohemond remained in Apulia and died in 1111, leaving Tancred as notional regent for his son [[Bohemond II of Antioch|Bohemond II]].{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|pp=142-145}} In 1007, the people of [[Gündoğan, Oğuzeli|Tell Bashir]] ransomed Joscelin and he negotiated Baldwin's release from [[Jawali Saqawa]], atabeg of Mosul, in return for money, hostages and military support. Tancred and Baldwin, supported by their respective Muslim allies, entered violent conflict over the return of Edessa leaving 2,000 Franks dead before Bernard of Valence, patriarch of both Antioch and Edessa, adjudicated in Baldwin's favour.{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|pp=146-147}} |
|||
In the 13th century, crusades never expressed such a popular fever, and after Acre fell for the last time in 1291, and after the extermination of the Occitan [[Cathar]]s in the [[Albigensian Crusade]], the crusading ideal became devalued by Papal justifications of political and territorial aggressions within Catholic Europe. |
|||
On 13 May 1110, Baldwin II and a Genoese fleet [[Siege of Beirut (1110)|captured Beirut]].{{sfn|Lock|2006|p=31}}{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|p=125}} In the same month, [[Muhammad I Tapar]], sultan of the Seljuk Empire, sent an army to recover Syria, but a Frankish defensive force arrived at Edessa, ending the short siege of the city.{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|p=150}} On 4 December, Baldwin [[siege of Sidon|captured Sidon]], aided by a flotilla of [[Norwegian Crusade|Norwegian pilgrims]] led by [[Sigurd the Crusader]].{{sfn|Lock|2006|p=31}}{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|p=125}} Next year, Tancred's extortion from Antioch's Muslim neighbours provoked the inconclusive [[battle of Shaizar]] between the Franks and an [[Abbasid]] army led by the governor of Mosul, [[Mawdud]]. Tancred died in 1112 and power passed to his nephew [[Roger of Salerno]].{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|p=153}} In May 1113, Mawdud invaded Galilee with [[Toghtekin]], [[List of rulers of Damascus#Burid emirs|atabeg of Damascus]]. On 28 June this force surprised Baldwin, chasing the Franks from the field at the [[battle of al-Sannabra]]. Mawdud was killed by [[Order of Assassins|Assassins]]. [[Bursuq II|Bursuq ibn Bursuq]] led the Seljuk army in 1115 against an alliance of the Franks, Toghtekin, his son-in-law [[Ilghazi]] and the Muslims of Aleppo. Bursuq feigned retreat and the coalition disbanded. Only the forces of Roger and Baldwin of Edessa remained, but, heavily outnumbered, they were victorious on 14 September at the [[Battle of Sarmin|first battle of Tell Danith]].{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|pp=155-159}} |
|||
The last crusading order of knights to hold territory were the [[Knights Hospitaller]]. After the final fall of Acre, they took control of the island of [[Rhodes]], and in the sixteenth century, were driven to [[Malta]]. These last crusaders were finally unseated by [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon Bonaparte]] in 1798. |
|||
[[File:Battle-of-Ager-Sanguinis.jpg|right|thumb|The [[Battle of Ager Sanguinis]] known as the Battle of the Field of Blood, medieval miniature]] |
|||
In April 1118, Baldwin I died of illness while raiding in Egypt.{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|p=160}} His cousin, Baldwin of Edessa, was unanimously elected his successor. {{sfn|Lock|2006|p=33}} In June 1119, Ilghazi, now [[List of monarchs of Aleppo#Artuqid Dynasty|emir of Aleppo]], attacked Antioch with more than 10,000 men. [[Roger of Salerno]]'s army of 700 knights, 3,000 foot soldiers and a corps of [[Turcopole]]s was defeated at the [[battle of Ager Sanguinis]], or "field of blood". Roger was among the many killed.{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|pp=163-165}} Baldwin II's counter-attack forced the offensive's end, after an inconclusive [[Battle of Hab|second battle of Tell Danith]].{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|pp=163-165}} |
|||
In January 1120 the secular and ecclesiastical leaders of the Outremer gathered at the [[Council of Nablus]]. The council laid a foundation of a law code for the kingdom of Jerusalem that replaced common law.{{sfn|Kedar|1999}} The council also heard the first direct appeals for support made to the Papacy and [[Republic of Venice]]. They responded with the [[Venetian Crusade]], sending a large fleet that supported the [[History of Tyre, Lebanon#Crusader period (1124–1291)|capture of Tyre]] in 1124.{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|p=172}} In April 1123, Baldwin II was ambushed and captured by [[Belek Ghazi]] while campaigning north of Edessa, along with [[Joscelin I, Count of Edessa]]. He was released in August 1024 in return for 80,000 gold pieces and the city of [[Azaz]].{{sfn|Lock|2006|pp=36-37}} In 1129, the [[Council of Troyes]] approved the rule of the [[Knights Templar]] for [[Hugues de Payens]]. He returned to the East with a major force including [[Fulk, King of Jerusalem|Fulk V of Anjou]]. This allowed the Franks to capture the town of [[Banias#Crusader/Ayyubid period|Banias]] during the [[Crusade of 1129]]. Defeat at [[Crusade of 1129#Damascus|Damascus]] and [[Marj al-Saffar]] ended the campaign and Frankish influence on Damascus for years.{{sfn|Lock|2006|p=40}} |
|||
==List of crusades == |
|||
The Levantine Franks sought alliances with the Latin West through the marriage of heiresses to wealthy martial aristocrats. [[Constance of Antioch]] was married to [[Raymond of Poitiers]], son of [[William IX, Duke of Aquitaine]]. Baldwin II's eldest daughter [[Melisende of Jerusalem]] was married to Fulk of Anjou in 1129. When Baldwin II died on 21 August 1131, Fulk and Melisende were consecrated joint rulers of Jerusalem. Despite conflict caused by the new king appointing his own supporters and the Jerusalemite nobles attempting to curb his rule, the couple were reconciled and Melisende exercised significant influence. When Fulk died in 1143, she became joint ruler with their son, [[Baldwin III of Jerusalem]].{{sfn|Asbridge|2000|pp=172-174}} At the same time, the advent of [[Imad ad-Din Zengi]] saw the Crusaders threatened by a Muslim ruler who would introduce ''[[jihad]]'' to the conflict, joining the powerful Syrian emirates in a combined effort against the Franks.<ref>Christie, Naill (2006). "Zengi (d. 1146)". In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 1293–1295.</ref> He became [[List of rulers of Mosul#Zengid emirs|atabeg of Mosul]] in September 1127 and used this to expand his control to [[List of rulers of Aleppo#Zengid Dynasty|Aleppo]] in June 1128.{{sfn|El-Azhari|2016|pp=10–23|loc=The Early Career of Zengi, 1084–1127: the Turkmen influence}} In 1135, Zengi moved against Antioch and, when the Crusaders failed to put an army into the field to oppose him, he captured several important Syrian towns. He defeated Fulk at the [[battle of Ba'rin]] of 1137, seizing [[Baarin#Medieval period|Ba'rin Castle]].{{sfn|Maalouf|2006|pp=123–142|loc=An Emir among Barbarians}} |
|||
A traditional numbering scheme for the crusades totals nine during the 11th to 13th centuries, as well as other smaller crusades that are mostly contemporaneous and are unnumbered. There were frequent "minor" crusades throughout this period, not only in Palestine but also in the Iberian Peninsula and central Europe, against Muslims and also Christian heretics and personal enemies of the Papacy or other powerful monarchs. Such "crusades" continued into the 16th century, until the Renaissance and Reformation when the political and religious climate of Europe was significantly different to that of the Middle Ages. |
|||
In 1137, Zengi invaded [[County of Tripoli|Tripoli]], killing the count [[Pons, Count of Tripoli|Pons of Tripoli]].{{sfn|Maalouf|2006|pp=109–122|loc=The Damascus Conspiracies}} Fulk intervened, but Zengi's troops captured Pons' successor [[Raymond II, Count of Tripoli|Raymond II of Tripoli]], and besieged Fulk in the border castle of [[Montferrand (crusader castle)|Montferrand]]. Fulk surrendered the castle and paid Zengi a ransom for his and Raymond's freedom. [[John II Komnenos]], emperor since 1118, reasserted Byzantine claims to [[John II Komnenos#Campaigning in Cilicia and Syria (1137–1138)|Cilicia and Antioch]], compelling [[Raymond of Poitiers]] to give homage. In April 1138, the Byzantines and Franks jointly besieged [[Aleppo#Seljuq and Ayyubid periods|Aleppo]] and, with no success, began the [[Siege of Shaizar]], abandoning it a month later.{{sfn|Runciman|1952|pp=214–216|loc=The Christians lay siege to Shaizar (1138)}} |
|||
===First Crusade 1095–1099=== |
|||
{{main|First Crusade}} |
|||
On 13 November 1143, while the royal couple were in Acre, Fulk was killed in a hunting accident. On Christmas Day 1143, their son [[Baldwin III of Jerusalem]] was crowned co-ruler with his mother.<ref>Barker, Ernest (1911). "[[s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Baldwin III.|Baldwin III]]". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. '''3.''' (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press. p. 246–247.</ref> That same year, having prepared his army for a renewed attack on Antioch, John II Komnenos cut himself with a poisoned arrow while hunting wild boar. He died on 8 April 1143 and was succeeded as emperor by his son [[Manuel I Komnenos]].<ref name="images.library.wisc.edu">Baldwin, Marshall W. (1969). "[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0001/reference/history.crusone.i0032.pdf Chapter XVII. The Latin States under Baldwin III and Amalric I, 1143–1174]{{Dead link|date=August 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Baldwin, Marshall W. (eds.). ''A History of the Crusades: Volume One. The First Hundred Years''. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 528–563.</ref> |
|||
In March 1095 at the [[Council of Piacenza]], ambassadors sent by Byzantine emperor Alexius I called for help with defending his empire against the [[Seljuk Turks]]. Later that year, at the [[Council of Clermont]], Pope Urban II called upon all Christians to join a war against the Turks, promising those who died in the endeavor immediate remission of their sins<ref>[http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/urban2-5vers.html#Fulcher Fulcher of Chartres], Medieval Sourcebook.</ref>. Crusader armies managed to defeat two substantial Turkish forces at [[Battle of Dorylaeum|Dorylaeum]] and at [[Siege of Antioch|Antioch]], finally marching to Jerusalem with only a fraction of their original forces. In 1099, they [[Siege of Jerusalem (1099)|took Jerusalem by assault]] and massacred the population. As a result of the First Crusade, several small [[Crusader states]] were created, notably the [[Kingdom of Jerusalem]]. |
|||
Following John's death, the Byzantine army withdrew, leaving Zengi unopposed. Fulk's death later in the year left [[Joscelin II, Count of Edessa|Joscelin II of Edessa]] with no powerful allies to help defend Edessa. Zengi came north to begin the first [[Siege of Edessa (1144)|siege of Edessa]], arriving on 28 November 1144.<ref>[[H. A. R. Gibb|Gibb, Hamilton A. R.]] (1969). "[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0001/reference/history.crusone.i0029.pdf Zengi and the Fall of Edessa]". In Setton, K. ''A History of the Crusades: Volume I''. pp. 449–462.</ref> The city had been warned of his arrival and was prepared for a siege, but there was little they could do. Zengi realised there was no defending force and surrounded the city. The walls collapsed on 24 December 1144. Zengi's troops rushed into the city, killing all those who were unable to flee. All the Frankish prisoners were executed, but the native Christians were allowed to live. The Crusaders were dealt their first major defeat.{{sfn|Runciman|1952|pp=225–246|loc=The Fall of Edessa}} |
|||
====Crusade of 1101==== |
|||
{{main|Crusade of 1101}} |
|||
Zengi was assassinated by a slave on 14 September 1146 and was succeeded in the [[Zengid dynasty]] by his son [[Nur ad-Din (died 1174)|Nūr-ad-Din]]. The Franks recaptured the city during the [[Siege of Edessa (1146)|Second Siege of Edessa]] of 1146 by stealth but could not take or even properly besiege the citadel.<ref>MacEvitt, Christopher (2006). "Edessa, City of". In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 378–379.</ref> After a brief counter-siege, Nūr-ad-Din took the city. The men were massacred, with the women and children enslaved, and the walls razed.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=225–232|loc=Zangi – Champion of Islam, The Advent of Nūr-ad-Din}} |
|||
Following this crusade there was a second, less successful wave of crusaders. This is known as the crusade of 1101 and may be considered an adjunct of the First Crusade. |
|||
===Second Crusade |
===Second Crusade=== |
||
{{Main|Second Crusade}} |
|||
[[image:Europe 1142.jpg|thumb|right|300px|The state of Europe in 1142]] |
|||
[[File:Route of the Second Crusade.png|thumb|280px|Routes of the Second Crusade]] |
|||
{{main|Second Crusade}} |
|||
The fall of Edessa caused great consternation in Jerusalem and Western Europe, tempering the enthusiastic success of the First Crusade. Calls for a new crusade{{snd}}the [[Second Crusade]]{{snd}}were immediate, and was the first to be led by European kings. Concurrent campaigns as part of the ''[[Reconquista]]'' and [[Northern Crusades]] are also sometimes associated with this Crusade.<ref name=":1">Berry, Virginia G. (1969). "[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0001/reference/history.crusone.i0030.pdf Chapter XV. The Second Crusade] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709182119/http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0001/reference/history.crusone.i0030.pdf |date=2021-07-09 }}". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Baldwin, Marshall W. (eds.). ''A History of the Crusades: Volume One. The First Hundred Years''. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 463–512.</ref> The aftermath of the Crusade saw the Muslim world united around [[Saladin]], leading to the [[Siege of Jerusalem (1187)|fall of Jerusalem]].<ref name=":02">[[H. A. R. Gibb|Gibb, Hamilton A. R.]] (1969). "[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0001/reference/history.crusone.i0033.pdf Chapter XVIII. The Rise of Saladin, 1169–1189]". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Baldwin, Marshall W. (eds.). ''A History of the Crusades: Volume One. The First Hundred Years''. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 563–589.</ref> |
|||
After a period of relative peace in which Christians and Muslims co-existed in the Holy Land, Muslims conquered the town of [[County of Edessa|Edessa]]. A new crusade was called for by various preachers, most notably by [[Bernard of Clairvaux]]. French and German armies, under the Kings [[Louis VII of France|Louis VII]] and [[Conrad III of Germany|Conrad III]] respectively, marched to Jerusalem in 1147 but failed to accomplish any major successes, and indeed endangered the survival of the Crusader states with a strategically foolish attack on [[Damascus]]. By 1150, both leaders had returned to their countries without any result. St. Bernard of Clairvaux, who in his preachings had encouraged the Second Crusade, was upset with the amount of misdirected violence and slaughter of innocent people, especially the Jewish population of the Rhineland.<ref>''Crusades'' in ''The New Catholic Encyclopedia'', New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1966, Vol. IV, p. 508.</ref> |
|||
[[Pope Eugene III|Eugene III]], recently elected pope, issued the bull ''[[Quantum praedecessores]]'' in December 1145 calling for a new crusade, one that would be more organized and centrally controlled than the First. The armies would be led by the strongest kings of Europe and a route that would be pre-planned. The pope called on [[Bernard of Clairvaux]] to preach the Second Crusade, granting the same indulgences which had been accorded to the First Crusaders. Among those answering the call were two European kings, [[Louis VII of France]] and [[Conrad III of Germany]]. Louis, his wife, [[Eleanor of Aquitaine]], and many princes and lords prostrated themselves at the feet of Bernard in order to take the cross. Conrad and his nephew [[Frederick I, Holy Roman Emperor|Frederick Barbarossa]] also received the cross from the hand of Bernard.<ref>Beverly Mayne Kienzle and James Calder Walton (2006). Second Crusade (1147–1149). In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 1083–1090.</ref> |
|||
===Third Crusade 1189–1192=== |
|||
{{main|Third Crusade}} |
|||
In 1187, [[Saladin]], Sultan of Egypt, recaptured Jerusalem. [[Pope Gregory VIII]] called for a crusade, which was led by several of Europe's most important leaders: [[Philip II of France]], [[Richard I of England]] and [[Frederick I, Holy Roman Emperor]]. Frederick drowned in [[Cilicia]] in 1190, leaving an unstable alliance between the English and the French. Philip left, in 1191, after the Crusaders had recaptured Acre from the Muslims. The crusader army headed down the coast of the [[Mediterranean Sea]]. They defeated the Muslims near Arsuf and were in sight of Jerusalem. However, the inability of the crusaders to thrive in the locale because of inadequate food and water resulted in an empty victory. Richard left the following year after establishing a truce with Saladin. |
|||
Conrad III and the German contingent planned to leave for the Holy Land at Easter, but did not depart until May 1147. When the German army began to cross Byzantine territory, emperor Manuel I had his troops posted to ensure against trouble. A brief [[Battle of Constantinople (1147)|Battle of Constantinople]] in September ensued, and their defeat at the emperor's hand convinced the Germans to move quickly to Asia Minor. Without waiting for the French contingent, Conrad III engaged the [[Sultanate of Rum|Seljuks of Rûm]] under sultan [[Mesud I]], son and successor of [[Kilij Arslan I|Kilij Arslan]], the nemesis of the First Crusade. Mesud and his forces almost totally destroyed Conrad's contingent at the [[Battle of Dorylaeum (1147)|Second Battle of Dorylaeum]] on 25 October 1147.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006|pp=268–303|loc=God's Bargain: Summoning the Second Crusade}} |
|||
On Richard's way home, his ship was wrecked and he ended up in [[Austria]], where his enemy, Duke Leopold, captured him. The Duke delivered Richard to the Emperor [[Henry VI, Holy Roman Emperor|Henry VI]], who held the King for ransom. By 1197, Henry felt ready for a crusade, but he died in the same year of [[malaria]]. Richard I died during fighting in Europe and never returned to the Holy Land. The Third Crusade is sometimes referred to as the Kings' Crusade. |
|||
The French contingent departed in June 1147. In the meantime, [[Roger II of Sicily]], an enemy of Conrad's, had invaded Byzantine territory. Manuel I needed all his army to counter this force, and, unlike the armies of the First Crusade, the Germans and French entered Asia with no Byzantine assistance. The French met the remnants of Conrad's army in northern Turkey, and Conrad joined Louis's force. They fended off a Seljuk attack at the [[Battle of Ephesus (1147)|Battle of Ephesus]] on 24 December 1147. A few days later, they were again victorious at the [[Battle of the Meander]]. Louis was not as lucky at the [[Battle of Mount Cadmus]] on 6 January 1148 when the army of Mesud inflicted heavy losses on the Crusaders. Shortly thereafter, they sailed for Antioch, almost totally destroyed by battle and sickness.{{sfn|Runciman|1952|pp=268–274|loc=The French in Asia Minor, 1147–1148}} |
|||
===Fourth Crusade 1201–1204=== |
|||
{{main|Fourth Crusade}} |
|||
The Crusader army arrived at Antioch on 19 March 1148 with the intent on moving to retake Edessa, but Baldwin III of Jerusalem and the Knights Templar had other ideas. The [[Council of Acre]] was held on 24 June 1148, changing the objective of the Second Crusade to Damascus, a former ally of the kingdom that had shifted its allegiance to that of the Zengids. The Crusaders fought the [[Battle of Bosra (1147)|Battle of Bosra]] with the Damascenes in the summer of 1147, with no clear winner.<ref>[[H. A. R. Gibb|Gibb, Hamilton A. R.]] (1969). "[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0001/reference/history.crusone.i0031.pdf Chapter XVI. The Career of Nūr-ad-Din]". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Baldwin, Marshall W. (eds.). ''A History of the Crusades: Volume One. The First Hundred Years''. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 513–528.</ref> Bad luck and poor tactics of the Crusaders led to the disastrous five-day [[Siege of Damascus (1148)|siege of Damascus]] from 24 to 28 July 1148.{{sfn|Maalouf|2006|pp=143–158|loc=Nūr-ad-Din, the Saint King}} The barons of Jerusalem withdrew support and the Crusaders retreated before the arrival of a relief army led by Nūr-ad-Din. Morale fell, hostility to the Byzantines grew and distrust developed between the newly arrived Crusaders and those that had made the region their home after the earlier crusades. The French and German forces felt betrayed by the other, lingering for a generation due to the defeat, to the ruin of the Christian kingdoms in the Holy Land.{{sfn|Runciman|1952|pp=278–288|loc=Fiasco}} |
|||
The Fourth Crusade was initiated in 1202 by [[Pope Innocent III]], with the intention of invading the Holy Land through Egypt. Because the Crusaders lacked the funds to pay for the fleet and provisions that they had contracted from the [[Venice|Venetians]], [[Doge of Venice|Doge]] [[Enrico Dandolo]], enlisted them to restore to obedience the Christian city of Zara ([[Zadar]]). Because they subsequently lacked provisions and time on their vessel lease the leaders decided to go to [[Constantinople]], where they attempted to place a Byzantine exile on the throne. After a series of misunderstandings and outbreaks of violence, the crusaders sacked the city in 1204. |
|||
In the spring of 1147, Eugene III authorised the expansion of his mission into the Iberian Peninsula, equating these campaigns against the [[Moors]] with the rest of the Second Crusade. The successful [[Siege of Lisbon]], from 1 July to 25 October 1147, was followed by the six-month [[Siege of Tortosa (1148)|siege of Tortosa]], ending on 30 December 1148 with a defeat for the Moors.<ref>Jaspert, Nikolas (2006). Tortosa (Spain). In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. p. 1186.</ref> In the north, some Germans were reluctant to fight in the Holy Land while the pagan [[Wends]] were a more immediate problem. The resulting [[Wendish Crusade]] of 1147 was partially successful but failed to convert the pagans to Christianity.<ref>Lind, John H. (2006). Wendish Crusade (1147). In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 1265–1268.</ref> |
|||
===Albigensian Crusade=== |
|||
{{main|Albigensian Crusade}} |
|||
The disastrous performance of this campaign in the Holy Land damaged the standing of the papacy, soured relations between the Christians of the kingdom and the West for many years, and encouraged the Muslims of Syria to even greater efforts to defeat the Franks. The dismal failures of this Crusade then set the stage for the fall of Jerusalem, leading to the Third Crusade.{{sfn|Runciman|1952|pp=278–288|loc=Fiasco}} |
|||
The [[Albigensian]] Crusade was launched in 1209 to eliminate the [[heresy|heretical]] [[Cathars]] of [[Occitania]] (the south of modern-day [[France]]). It was a decades-long struggle that had as much to do with the concerns of northern France to extend its control southwards as it did with heresy. In the end, both the Cathars and the independence of southern France were exterminated. |
|||
==== Nūr-ad-Din and the rise of Saladin ==== |
|||
===Children's Crusade=== |
|||
In the first major encounter after the Second Crusade, Nūr-ad-Din's forces then destroyed the Crusader army at the [[Battle of Inab]] on 29 June 1149. [[Raymond of Poitiers]], as prince of Antioch, came to the aid of the besieged city. Raymond was killed and his head was presented to Nūr-ad-Din, who forwarded it to the caliph [[al-Muqtafi]] in Baghdad.<ref>Barker, Ernest (1911). "[[s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Raymund of Antioch|Raymund of Antioch]]". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. '''22.''' (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press. p. 934.</ref> In 1150, Nūr-ad-Din defeated [[Joscelin II, Count of Edessa|Joscelin II of Edessa]] for a final time, resulting in Joscelin being publicly blinded, dying in prison in Aleppo in 1159. Later that year, at the [[Battle of Aintab]], he tried but failed to prevent Baldwin III's evacuation of the residents of [[Turbessel#Byzantine Period|Turbessel]].{{sfn|Runciman|1952|pp=329–330|loc=Turbessel ceded to Byzantium (1150)}} The unconquered portions of the County of Edessa would nevertheless fall to the Zengids within a few years. In 1152, [[Raymond II, Count of Tripoli|Raymond II of Tripoli]] became the first Frankish victim of the [[Order of Assassins|Assassins]].{{sfn|Lewis|2017|p=167|loc=Military Decline and Matrimonial Discord: Count Raymond II (1137–1152)}} Later that year, Nūr-ad-Din captured and burned [[Tartus#Crusades|Tortosa]], briefly occupying the town before it was taken by the Knights Templar as a military headquarters.{{sfn|Runciman|1952|p=333|loc=Murder of Raymond II (1152)}} |
|||
{{main|Children's Crusade}} |
|||
[[File:BattleOfInab.jpg|thumb|[[Nur ad-Din (died 1174)|Nūr-ad-Din's]] victory at the [[Battle of Inab]], 1149. Illustration from the ''[[Passages d'outremer]]'', {{circa|1490}}.]] |
|||
The Children's Crusade is a series of possibly fictitious or misinterpreted events of [[1212]]. The story is that an outburst of the old popular enthusiasm led a gathering of children in France and Germany, which [[Pope Innocent III]] interpreted as a reproof from heaven to their unworthy elders. The leader of the French army, Stephen, led 30,000 children. The leader of the German army, Nicholas, led 7,000 children. None of the children actually reached the Holy Land; they were either sold as slaves, settled along the route to Jerusalem, or died of hunger during the journey. |
|||
After the [[Siege of Ascalon]] ended on 22 August 1153 with a Crusader victory, Damascus was taken by Nūr-ad-Din the next year, uniting all of Syria under Zengid rule. In 1156, Baldwin III was forced into a treaty with Nūr-ad-Din, and later entered into an alliance with the [[Baldwin III of Jerusalem#Byzantine alliance|Byzantine Empire]]. On 18 May 1157, Nūr-ad-Din began a siege on the Knights Hospitaller contingent at [[Banias#Crusader/Ayyubid period|Banias]], with the Grand Master [[Bertrand de Blanquefort]] captured. Baldwin III was able to break the siege, only to be ambushed at [[Daughters of Jacob Bridge#Crusader and Ayyubid period|Jacob's Ford]] in June. Reinforcements from Antioch and Tripoli were able to relieve the besieged Crusaders, but they were defeated again that month at the [[Battle of Lake Huleh (1157)|Battle of Lake Huleh]]. In July 1158, the Crusaders were victorious at the [[Battle of Butaiha]]. Bertrand's captivity lasted until 1159, when emperor Manuel I negotiated an alliance with Nūr-ad-Din against the Seljuks.{{sfn|Runciman|1952|pp=338–342|loc=The Rise of Nur ed-Din: The Capture of Ascalon, 1153}} |
|||
===Fifth Crusade 1217–1221=== |
|||
{{main|Fifth Crusade}} |
|||
Baldwin III died on 10 February 1163, and [[Amalric of Jerusalem]] was crowned as king of Jerusalem eight days later.<ref>Barker, Ernest (1911). "[[s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Amalric|Amalric]]". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. '''1.''' (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press. pp. 778–779.</ref> Later that year, he defeated the Zengids at the [[Battle of al-Buqaia]]. Amalric then undertook a series of four [[Crusader invasions of Egypt|invasions of Egypt]] from 1163 to 1169, taking advantage of weaknesses of the Fatimids.<ref name="images.library.wisc.edu"/> Nūr-ad-Din's intervention in the first invasion allowed his general [[Shirkuh]], accompanied by his nephew [[Saladin]], to enter Egypt.<ref>Winifred Frances Peck (1911). "[[s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Saladin|Saladin]]". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. '''24.''' (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press.</ref> [[Shawar]], the deposed vizier to the Fatimid caliph [[al-Adid]], allied with Amalric I, attacking Shirkuh at the second [[Bilbeis|Siege of Bilbeis]] beginning in August 1164, following Amalric's unsuccessful first siege in September 1163.{{sfn|Runciman|1952|pp=380–382|loc=Amalric advances on Cairo}} This action left the Holy Land lacking in defenses, and Nūr-ad-Din defeated a Crusader force at the [[Battle of Harim]] in August 1164, capturing most of the Franks' leaders.{{sfn|Barber|2012|p=240|loc=The Zengid Threat}} |
|||
By processions, prayers, and preaching, the Church attempted to set another crusade on foot, and the [[Fourth Council of the Lateran]] (1215) formulated a plan for the recovery of the Holy Land. In the first phase, a crusading force from [[Hungary]], [[Austria]] joined the forces of the king of Jerusalem and the prince of Antioch to take back Jerusalem. In the second phase, crusader forces achieved a remarkable feat in the capture of [[Damietta]] in Egypt in 1219, but under the urgent insistence of the [[papal legate]], Pelagius, they proceeded to a foolhardy attack on [[Cairo]], and an [[inundation]] of the [[Nile]] compelled them to choose between surrender and destruction. |
|||
After the sacking of Bilbeis, the Crusader-Fatimid force was to meet Shirkuh's army in the indecisive [[Battle of al-Babein]] on 18 March 1167. In 1169, both Shawar and Shirkuh died, and al-Adid appointed Saladin as vizier. Saladin, with reinforcements from Nūr-ad-Din, defeated a massive Crusader-Byzantine force at the [[Crusader invasions of Egypt#Siege of Damietta|Siege of Damietta]] in late October.<ref>Bird, Jessalynn (2006). Damietta. In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 343–344.</ref> This gained Saladin the attention of the Assassins, with attempts on his life in January 1175 and again on 22 May 1176.{{sfn|Lewis|2003|pp=113–117|loc=The Old Man of the Mountain}} |
|||
===Sixth Crusade 1228–1229=== |
|||
{{main|Sixth Crusade}} |
|||
[[Baldwin IV of Jerusalem]]<ref>Barker, Ernest (1911). "[[s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Baldwin IV.|Baldwin IV]]". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. '''3.''' (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press. p. 247.</ref> became king on 5 July 1174 at the age of 13.<ref name=":22"/> As a leper he was not expected to live long, and served with a number of regents, and served as co-ruler with his nephew [[Baldwin V of Jerusalem]] beginning in 1183. Baldwin IV, [[Raynald of Châtillon]] and the Knights Templar defeated Saladin at the celebrated [[Battle of Montgisard]] on 25 November 1177. In June 1179, the Crusaders were defeated at the [[Battle of Marj Ayyun|Battle of Marj Ayyub]], and in August the unfinished castle at [[Siege of Jacob's Ford|Jacob's Ford]] fell to Saladin, with the slaughter of half its Templar garrison. However, the kingdom repelled his attacks at the [[Battle of Belvoir Castle (1182)|Battle of Belvoir Castle]] in 1182 and later in the [[Siege of Kerak]] of 1183.<ref>Barker, Ernest (1911). "[[s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Raynald of Châtillon|Raynald of Châtillon]]". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. '''22.''' (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press. p. 936.</ref> |
|||
[[Emperor Frederick II]] had repeatedly vowed a crusade but failed to live up to his words, for which he was [[excommunication|excommunicated]] by the Pope in 1228. He nonetheless set sail from [[Brindisi]], landed in Palestine, and through diplomacy he achieved unexpected success: Jerusalem, [[Nazareth]], and [[Bethlehem]] were delivered to the crusaders for a period of ten years. |
|||
[[Image:Crusade damietta.jpg|right|frame|[[Louis IX of France|Louis IX]] attacks [[Damietta]]]] |
|||
=== |
==== Fall of Jerusalem ==== |
||
Baldwin V became sole king upon the death of his uncle in 1185 under the regency of [[Raymond III of Tripoli]]. Raymond negotiated a truce with Saladin which went awry when the king died in the summer of 1186.<ref>Barker, Ernest (1911). "[[s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Raymund of Tripoli|Raymund of Tripoli]]". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. '''22.''' (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press. p. 935.</ref> His mother [[Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem|Sibylla of Jerusalem]] and her husband [[Guy of Lusignan]] were crowned as queen and king of Jerusalem in the summer of 1186, shortly thereafter. They immediately had to deal with the threat posed by Saladin.<ref>Gerish, Deborah (2006). Guy of Lusignan (d. 1194). In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 549–551.</ref> |
|||
{{main|Seventh Crusade}} |
|||
Despite his defeat at the [[Battle of al-Fule]] in the fall of 1183, Saladin increased his attacks against the Franks, leading to their defeat at the [[Battle of Cresson]] on 1 May 1187. Guy of Lusignan responded by raising the largest army that Jerusalem had ever put into the field. Saladin lured this force into inhospitable terrain without water supplies and routed them at the [[Battle of Hattin]] on 4 July 1187. One of the major commanders was [[Raymond III, Count of Tripoli#Hattin and its consequences|Raymond III of Tripoli]] who saw his force slaughtered, with some knights deserting to the enemy, and narrowly escaping, only to be regarded as a traitor and coward.{{sfn|Lewis|2017|pp=233–284|loc=The Regent Thwarted: Count Raymond III (1174–1187)}} Guy of Lusignan was one of the few captives of Saladin's after the battle, along with Raynald of Châtillon and [[Humphrey IV of Toron]]. Raynald was beheaded, settling an old score. Guy and Humphrey were imprisoned in Damascus and later released in 1188.<ref>Hoch, Martin (2006). Hattin, Battle of (1187). In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 559–561.</ref> |
|||
The papal interests represented by the [[Knights Templar|Templars]] brought on a conflict with Egypt in 1243, and in the following year a [[Khwarezmian]] force summoned by the latter stormed Jerusalem. The crusaders were drawn into battle at [[Battle of La Forbie|La Forbie]] in [[Gaza]]. The crusader army and its Bedouin mercenaries were outnumbered by [[Baibars]]' force of [[Khwarezmian]] tribesmen and were completely defeated within forty-eight hours. This battle is considered by many historians to have been the death knell to the Kingdom of Outremer. Although this provoked no widespread outrage in Europe as the fall of Jerusalem in 1187 had done, [[Louis IX of France]] organized a crusade against Egypt from 1248 to 1254, leaving from the newly constructed port of [[Aigues-Mortes]] in southern France. It was a failure, and Louis spent much of the crusade living at the court of the crusader kingdom in Acre. In the midst of this crusade was the first [[Shepherds' Crusade]] in 1251. |
|||
As a result of his victory, much of Palestine quickly fell to Saladin. The [[Siege of Jerusalem (1187)|siege of Jerusalem]] began on 20 September 1187 and the Holy City was surrendered to Saladin by [[Balian of Ibelin]] on 2 October. According to some, on 19{{nbsp}}October 1187, [[Pope Urban III|Urban III]] died upon of hearing of the defeat.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|p=367|loc=Called to Crusade}} Jerusalem was once again in Muslim hands. Many in the kingdom fled to Tyre, and Saladin's subsequent attack at the [[Siege of Tyre (1187)|siege of Tyre]] beginning in November 1187 was unsuccessful. The [[siege of Belvoir Castle]] began the next month and the Hospitaller stronghold finally fell a year later. The [[Siege of Laodicea (1188)|sieges of Laodicea]] and [[siege of Sahyun Castle|Sahyun Castle]] in July 1188 and the [[Siege of Al-Shughur|sieges of al-Shughur]] and [[Siege of Bourzey Castle|Bourzey Castle]] in August 1188 further solidified Saladin's gains. The [[Siege of Safed (1188)|siege of Safed]] in late 1188 then completed Saladin's conquest of the Holy Land.<ref name=":22">Baldwin, Marshall W. (1969). "[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0001/reference/history.crusone.i0034.pdf Chapter XIX. The Decline and Fall of Jerusalem, 1174–1189] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230601084304/http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0001/reference/history.crusone.i0034.pdf |date=2023-06-01 }}". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Baldwin, Marshall W. (eds.). ''A History of the Crusades: Volume One. The First Hundred Years''. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 590–621.</ref> |
|||
===Eighth Crusade 1270=== |
|||
{{main|Eighth Crusade}} |
|||
[[File:Crusader States 1190.svg|thumb|upright=1.35|The Near East, {{circa|1190}}, at the inception of the Third Crusade]] |
|||
The eighth Crusade was organized by [[Louis IX of France|Louis IX]] in 1270, again sailing from Aigues-Mortes, initially to come to the aid of the remnants of the crusader states in [[Syria]]. However, the crusade was diverted to [[Tunis]], where Louis spent only two months before dying. The Eighth Crusade is sometimes counted as the Seventh, if the Fifth and Sixth Crusades are counted as a single crusade. The Ninth Crusade is sometimes also counted as part of the Eighth. |
|||
=== |
===Third Crusade=== |
||
{{main| |
{{main|Third Crusade}} |
||
The years following the founding of the Kingdom of Jerusalem were met with multiple disasters. The [[Second Crusade]] did not achieve its goals, and left the Muslim East in a stronger position with the rise of [[Saladin]]. A united Egypt–Syria led to the loss of Jerusalem itself, and Western Europe had no choice but to launch the [[Third Crusade]], this time led by the kings of Europe.<ref>Nicholson, Helen (2006). "Third Crusade (1189–1192)". In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 1174–1181.</ref> |
|||
The future [[Edward I of England]] undertook another expedition in 1271, after having accompanied Louis on the Eighth Crusade. He accomplished very little in Syria and retired the following year after a truce. With the fall of [[Principality of Antioch|Antioch]] (1268), [[County of Tripoli|Tripoli]] (1289), and [[Siege of Acre (1291)|Acre]] (1291), the last traces of the Christian rule in Syria disappeared. |
|||
The news of the disastrous defeat at the [[battle of Hattin]] and subsequent fall of Jerusalem gradually reached Western Europe. [[Pope Urban III|Urban III]] died shortly after hearing the news, and his successor [[Pope Gregory VIII|Gregory VIII]] issued the bull ''[[Audita tremendi]]'' on 29 October 1187 describing the events in the East and urging all Christians to take up arms and go to the aid of those in the Kingdom of Jerusalem, calling for a new crusade to the Holy Land{{snd}}the [[Third Crusade]]{{snd}}to be led by [[Frederick I, Holy Roman Emperor|Frederick Barbarossa]] and [[Richard I of England]].{{sfn|Tyerman|2006|pp=375–401|loc=The Call of the Cross}} |
|||
===Northern Crusades (Baltic and Germany) === |
|||
[[Image:nevsky2.jpg|thumb|275px|The [[Teutonic knights]] in [[Pskov]] in 1240 as depicted in [[Sergei Eisenstein]]'s ''[[Alexander Nevsky (film)|Alexander Nevsky]]'' (1938).]] |
|||
{{main|Northern Crusades}} |
|||
[[File:Richard-Coeur-de-Lion-on-his-way-to-Jerusalem.JPG|thumb|upright=1.35|right|Richard the Lionheart on his way to Jerusalem, James William Glass (1850)]] |
|||
The Crusades in the [[Baltic Sea]] area and in [[Central Europe]] were efforts by (mostly German) Christians to subjugate and convert the peoples of these areas to Christianity. These Crusades ranged from the 12th century, contemporaneous with the Second Crusade, to the 16th century. |
|||
Frederick took the cross in March 1188.<ref name=":4">Johnson, Edgar N. (1977). "[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0017.pdf The Crusades of Frederick Barbarossa and Henry VI].". In Setton, K., ''A History of the Crusades: Volume II.'' pp. 87–122.</ref> Frederick sent an ultimatum to Saladin, demanding the return of Palestine and challenging him to battle and in May 1189, Frederick's host departed for Byzantium. In March 1190, Frederick embarked to Asia Minor. The armies coming from western Europe pushed on through Anatolia, defeating the Turks and reaching as far as [[Cilician Armenia]]. On 10 June 1190, Frederick drowned near [[Silifke Castle]]. His death caused several thousand German soldiers to leave the force and return home. The remaining German army moved under the command of the English and French forces that arrived shortly thereafter.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=420–422|loc=The Fate of the German Crusade}} |
|||
Between 1232 and 1234, there was a crusade against the [[Stedingen|Stedingers]]. This crusade was special, because the Stedingers were not heathens or heretics, but fellow Roman Catholics. They were free [[Frisians|Frisian]] farmers who resented attempts of the count of [[Oldenburg (state)|Oldenburg]] and the archbishop [[Archbishopric of Bremen|Bremen-Hamburg]] to make an end to their freedoms. The archbishop excommunicated them, and the pope declared a crusade in 1232. The Stedingers were defeated in 1234. |
|||
[[Richard I of England|Richard the Lionheart]] had already taken the cross as the [[Count of Poitiers|Count of Poitou]] in 1187. His father [[Henry II of England]] and [[Philip II of France]] had done so on 21 January 1188 after receiving news of the fall of Jerusalem to Saladin.<ref>Painter, Sidney (1977). "[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0016.pdf The Third Crusade: Richard the Lionhearted and Philip Augustus] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304000907/http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0016.pdf |date=2016-03-04 }}.". In Setton, K. ''A History of the Crusades: Volume II.'' pp. 45–86.</ref>{{sfn|Murray|2009}} Richard I and [[Philip II of France]] agreed to go on the Crusade in January 1188. Arriving in the Holy Land, Richard led his support to the stalemated [[Siege of Acre (1189–1191)#The kings at Acre|siege of Acre]]. The Muslim defenders surrendered on 12 July 1191. Richard remained in sole command of the Crusader force after the departure of Philip II on 31 July 1191. On 20 August 1191, Richard had more than 2000 prisoners beheaded at the [[Massacre at Ayyadieh|massacre of Ayyadieh]]. Saladin subsequently ordered the execution of his Christian prisoners in retaliation.{{sfn|Norgate|1924|pp=152–175|loc=The Fall of Acre, 1191}} |
|||
===Other crusades=== |
|||
====Crusade against the Tartars==== |
|||
Richard moved south, defeating Saladin's forces at the [[battle of Arsuf]] on 7 September 1191. Three days later, Richard took [[Jaffa#Crusader/Ayyubid period|Jaffa]], held by Saladin since 1187, and advanced inland towards Jerusalem.{{sfn|Oman|1924|pp=306–319|loc=Tactics of the Crusades: Battles of Arsouf and Jaffa (Volume I)}} On 12 December 1191 Saladin disbanded the greater part of his army. Learning this, Richard pushed his army forward, to within 12 miles from Jerusalem before retreating back to the coast. The Crusaders made another advance on Jerusalem, coming within sight of the city in June before being forced to retreat again. [[Hugh III, Duke of Burgundy|Hugh III of Burgundy]], leader of the Franks, was adamant that a direct attack on Jerusalem should be made. This split the Crusader army into two factions, and neither was strong enough to achieve its objective. Without a united command the army had little choice but to retreat back to the coast. |
|||
In the 14th century, Khan [[Tokhtamysh]] combined the Blue and White Hordes forming the [[Golden Horde]]. It seemed that the power of the Golden Horde had begun to rise, but in 1389, Tokhtamysh made the disastrous decision of waging war on his former master, the great [[Tamerlane]]. Tamerlane's hordes rampaged through southern [[Russia]], crippling the Golden Horde's economy and practically wiping out its defenses in those lands. |
|||
On 27 July 1192, Saladin's army began the [[Battle of Jaffa (1192)|battle of Jaffa]], capturing the city. Richard's forces stormed Jaffa from the sea and the Muslims were driven from the city. Attempts to retake Jaffa failed and Saladin was forced to retreat.{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=70–72|loc=Richard's Last Victory (1192)}} On 2 September 1192 Richard and Saladin entered into the [[Treaty of Jaffa (1192)|Treaty of Jaffa]], providing that Jerusalem would remain under Muslim control, while allowing unarmed Christian pilgrims and traders to freely visit the city. This treaty ended the Third Crusade.{{sfn|von Sybel|1861|pp=89–91|loc=Treaty with Saladin}} |
|||
After losing the war, Tokhtamysh was then dethroned by the party of Khan Temur Kutlugh and Emir Edigu, supported by Tamerlane. When Tokhtamysh asked [[Vytautas the Great]] for assistance in retaking the Horde, the latter readily gathered a huge army which included [[Lithuania]]ns, Ruthenians, Russians, [[Mongol]]s, [[Moldavia]]ns, Poles, Romanians and [[Teutonic knights]]. |
|||
===Crusade of 1197=== |
|||
In 1398, the huge army moved from Moldavia and conquered the southern steppe all the way to the [[Dnieper River]] and northern [[Crimea]]. Inspired by their great successes, Vytautas declared a 'Crusade against the Tatars' with Papal backing. Thus, in 1399, the army of Vytautas once again moved on the Horde. His army met the Horde's at the [[Vorskla River]], slightly inside Lithuanian territory. |
|||
{{main|Crusade of 1197}} |
|||
Three years later, [[Henry VI, Holy Roman Emperor|Henry VI]] launched the [[Crusade of 1197]]. While his forces were en route to the Holy Land, Henry VI died in Messina on 28 September 1197. The nobles that remained captured the Levant coast between Tyre and Tripoli before returning to Germany. The Crusade ended on 1 July 1198 after capturing [[Sidon#Crusader-Ayyubid period|Sidon]] and [[Beirut#Middle Ages|Beirut]].{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=97–98|loc=The German Crusade of 1197}} |
|||
Although the Lithuanian army was well equipped with [[cannon]], it could not resist a rear attack from Edigu's reserve units. Vytautas hardly escaped alive. Many princes of his kin—possibly as many as 20—were killed (for example, [[Stefan Musat]], Prince of [[Principality of Moldavia|Moldavia]] and two of his brothers, while a fourth was badly injured {{Fact|date=February 2007}}), and the victorious Tatars besieged [[Kiev]]. "And the Christian blood flowed like water, up to the Kievan walls," as one chronicler put it. Meanwhile, Temur Kutlugh died from the wounds received in the battle, and Tokhtamysh was killed by one of his own men. |
|||
=== |
===Fourth Crusade=== |
||
{{main|Fourth Crusade|Sack of Constantinople}} |
|||
[[File:ConquestOfConstantinopleByTheCrusadersIn1204.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|[[Siege of Constantinople (1204)|Conquest]] of the [[Eastern Orthodox|Orthodox]] city of [[Constantinople]] by the Crusaders in 1204 (BNF [[Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal|Arsenal MS]] 5090, 15th century)|alt=Image of siege of Constantinople]] |
|||
[[File:LatinEmpire2.png|thumb|290px|alt=Multi-coloured map of [[Latin Empire|Latin]] and [[Byzantine Empire]]s|[[Latin Empire]] and Byzantine states in 1205. Green marks Venetian acquisitions; pink the Byzantine states; purple the Latin Empire and its vassals]] |
|||
In 1198, the recently elected Pope Innocent III announced a new crusade, organised by three Frenchmen: [[Theobald III, Count of Champagne|Theobald of Champagne]]; [[Louis I, Count of Blois|Louis of Blois]]; and [[Baldwin I, Latin Emperor|Baldwin of Flanders]]. After Theobald's premature death, the Italian [[Boniface I, Marquess of Montferrat|Boniface of Montferrat]] replaced him as the new commander of the campaign. They contracted with the [[Republic of Venice]] for the transportation of 30,000 crusaders at a cost of 85,000 marks. However, many chose other embarkation ports and only around 15,000 arrived in Venice. The [[Doge of Venice]] [[Enrico Dandolo]] proposed that Venice would be compensated with the profits of future conquests beginning with the [[Siege of Zara|seizure]] of the Christian city of [[Zadar|Zara]]. Pope Innocent III's role was ambivalent. He only condemned the attack when the siege started. He withdrew his legate to disassociate from the attack but seemed to have accepted it as inevitable. Historians question whether for him, the papal desire to salvage the crusade may have outweighed the moral consideration of shedding Christian blood.<ref>{{Harvnb|Jotischky|2004|p=168}}</ref> The crusade was joined by King [[Philip of Swabia]], who intended to use the Crusade to install his exiled brother-in-law, [[Alexios IV Angelos]], as Emperor. This required the overthrow of [[Alexios III Angelos]], the uncle of Alexios{{nbsp}}IV. Alexios IV offered the crusade 10,000 troops, 200,000 marks and the reunion of the Greek Church with Rome if they toppled his uncle [[Alexios III Angelos|Emperor Alexios III]].{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=240–242}} When the crusade entered [[Siege of Constantinople (1203)|Constantinople]], Alexios{{nbsp}}III fled and was replaced by his nephew. The Greek resistance prompted Alexios{{nbsp}}IV to seek continued support from the crusade until he could fulfil his commitments. This ended with his murder in a violent anti-Latin revolt. The crusaders were without seaworthy ships, supplies or food. Their only escape route was through the city, taking by force what Alexios had promised and the new anti-westerner Byzantine ruler{{snd}}[[Alexios V Doukas]]{{snd}}denied them. The [[Sack of Constantinople (1204)|Sack of Constantinople]] involved three days of pillaging churches and killing much of the Greek Orthodox Christian populace. This sack was not unusual considering the violent military standards of the time, but contemporaries such as Innocent III and [[Ali ibn al-Athir]] saw it as an atrocity against centuries of classical and Christian civilisation.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=249–250}} |
|||
===Fifth Crusade=== |
|||
To counter the expanding [[Ottoman Empire]], several crusades were launched in the 15th century. |
|||
{{main|Fifth Crusade}} |
|||
The most notable are: |
|||
The [[Fifth Crusade]] (1217–1221) was a campaign by Western Europeans to reacquire Jerusalem and the rest of the Holy Land by first conquering Egypt, ruled by the sultan [[Al-Adil I|al-Adil]], brother of [[Saladin]]. In 1213, [[Pope Innocent III|Innocent III]] called for another Crusade at the [[Fourth Council of the Lateran|Fourth Lateran Council]], and in the papal bull ''[[Quia maior]]''.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia|title=Summons to a Crusade, 1215|encyclopedia=Internet Medieval Sourcebook|publisher=Fordham University|url=https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/inn3-cdesummons.asp|access-date=|first=|pages=337–344}}</ref> Innocent died in 1216 and was succeeded by [[Pope Honorius III|Honorius III]] who immediately called on [[Andrew II of Hungary]] and [[Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor|Frederick II of Germany]] to lead a Crusade.<ref>Michael Ott (1910). "[[s:Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Pope Honorius III|Pope Honorius III]]". In ''Catholic Encyclopedia''. '''7.''' New York.</ref> Frederick had taken the cross in 1215, but hung back, with his crown still in contention, and Honorius delayed the expedition.<ref name=":23">Van Cleve, Thomas C. (1977). "[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0025.pdf The Fifth Crusade] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230326032639/http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0025.pdf |date=2023-03-26 }}". In Setton, K., ''A History of the Crusades: Volume II''. pp. 343–376.</ref> |
|||
[[File:Capturing_Damiate.jpg|thumb|Crusaders attack the tower of Damietta during the [[Siege of Damietta (1218–1219)|siege of Damietta]] in a painting by [[Cornelis Claesz van Wieringen]].]] |
|||
* the '''Crusade of Nicopolis''' (1396) organized by [[Sigismund of Luxemburg]] king of Hungary culminated in the [[Battle of Nicopolis]]. It is often called the last of the crusades. |
|||
* the '''Crusade of Varna''' (1444) led by the Polish-Hungarian king [[Władysław III of Poland|Władysław Warneńczyk]] ended in the [[Battle of Varna]] |
|||
* and the '''Crusade of 1456''' organized to lift the [[Siege of Belgrade]] led by [[John Hunyadi]] and [[Giovanni da Capistrano]] |
|||
Andrew II left for Acre in August 1217, joining [[John of Brienne]], king of Jerusalem. The initial plan of a two-prong attack in Syria and in Egypt was abandoned and instead the objective became limited operations in Syria. After accomplishing little, the ailing Andrew returned to Hungary early in 1218. As it became clear that Frederick II was not coming to the east, the remaining commanders began the planning to attack the Egyptian port of [[Damietta]].<ref>Powell, James M. (2006). "The Fifth Crusade". In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 427–432.</ref> |
|||
====Aragonese Crusade==== |
|||
The fortifications of Damietta included the ''Burj al-Silsilah''{{snd}}the chain tower{{snd}}with massive chains that could stretch across the Nile. The [[Siege of Damietta (1218–19)|siege of Damietta]] began in June 1218 with a successful assault on the tower. The loss of the tower was a great shock to the [[Ayyubid dynasty|Ayyubids]], and the sultan al-Adil died soon thereafter.{{sfn|Gibb|pp=697–700|loc=The Ayyubids through 1221|1969}} He was succeeded as sultan by his son [[al-Kamil]]. Further offensive action by the Crusaders would have to wait until the arrival of additional forces, including legate [[Pelagius Galvani|Pelagius]] with a contingent of Romans.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006|pp=626–649|loc=The Fifth Crusade, 1213–1221}} A group from England arrived shortly thereafter.{{sfn|Tyerman|1996|p=97|loc=The Fifth Crusade}} |
|||
The '''[[Aragonese Crusade]]''', or Crusade of Aragón, was declared by Pope Martin IV against the King of Aragón, Peter III the Great, in 1284 and 1285. |
|||
By February 1219, the Crusaders now had Damietta surrounded, and al-Kamil opened negotiations with the Crusaders, asking for envoys to come to his camp. He offered to surrender the kingdom of Jerusalem, less the fortresses of [[al-Karak]] and [[Montreal (castle)|Krak de Montréal]], guarding the road to Egypt, in exchange for the evacuation of Egypt. John of Brienne and the other secular leaders were in favor of the offer, as the original objective of the Crusade was the recovery of Jerusalem. But Pelagius and the leaders of the Templars and Hospitallers refused.{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=132–179|loc=The Fifth Crusade}} Later, [[Francis of Assisi]] arrived to negotiate unsuccessfully with the sultan.<ref>Paschal Robinson (1909). "[[s:Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/St. Francis of Assisi|St. Francis of Assisi]]". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). ''Catholic Encyclopedia''. '''6'''. New York: Robert Appleton Company.</ref> |
|||
====Alexandrian Crusade==== |
|||
In November 1219, the Crusaders entered Damietta and found it abandoned, al-Kamil having moved his army south. In the captured city, Pelagius was unable to prod the Crusaders from their inactivity, and many returned home, their vow fulfilled. Al-Kamil took advantage of this lull to reinforce his new camp at [[Mansoura, Egypt|Mansurah]], renewing his peace offering to the Crusaders, which was again refused. Frederick II sent troops and word that he would soon follow, but they were under orders not to begin offensive operations until he had arrived.{{sfn|Maalouf|2006|pp=218–226|loc=The Perfect and the Just}} |
|||
The '''[[Alexandrian Crusade]]''' of October 1365 was a minor seaborne crusade against Muslim [[Alexandria]] led by Peter I of Cyprus. His motivation was at least as commercial as religious. It had limited success. |
|||
In July 1221, Pelagius began to advance to the south. John of Brienne argued against the move, but was powerless to stop it. Already deemed a traitor for opposing the plans and threatened with excommunication, John joined the force under the command of the legate. In the ensuing [[Battle of Mansurah (1221)|Battle of Mansurah]] in late August, al-Kamil had the sluices along the right bank of the Nile opened, flooding the area and rendering battle impossible.{{sfn|Christie|2014|loc=Document 16: Al-Kamil Muhammad and the Fifth Crusade}} Pelagius had no choice but to surrender.{{sfn|Perry|2013|loc=The Fifth Crusade|pp=89–121}} |
|||
====Hussite Crusade==== |
|||
The Crusaders still had some leverage as Damietta was well-garrisoned. They offered the sultan a withdrawal from Damietta and an eight-year truce in exchange for allowing the Crusader army to pass, the release of all prisoners, and the return of the relic of the [[True Cross]]. Prior to the formal surrender of Damietta, the two sides would maintain hostages, among them John of Brienne and [[Hermann von Salza|Hermann of Salza]] for the Franks side and a son of al-Kamil for Egypt.{{sfn|Richard|1999|pp=299–307|loc=The Egyptian Campaign of the Legate Pelagius}} The masters of the military orders were dispatched to Damietta, where the forces were resistant to giving up, with the news of the surrender, which happened on 8 September 1221. The Fifth Crusade was over, a dismal failure, unable to even gain the return of the piece of the True Cross.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=551–562|loc=The Fifth Crusade}} |
|||
The Hussite Crusade(s), also known as the "[[Hussite Wars]]," or the "Bohemian Wars," involved the military actions against and amongst the followers of Jan Hus in Bohemia in the period 1420 to circa 1434. The Hussite Wars were arguably the first European war in which hand-held gunpowder weapons such as [[musket]]s made a decisive contribution. The Hussite warriors were basically infantry, and their many defeats of larger armies with heavily armoured knights helped affect the infantry revolution. In the end, it was an inconclusive war. |
|||
=== |
===Sixth Crusade=== |
||
{{main|Sixth Crusade}} |
|||
[[File:Friedrich II. mit Sultan al-Kamil.jpg|left|thumb|upright=1.35|alt=Manuscript illumination of five men outside a fortress|[[Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor|Holy Roman Emperor Frederick{{nbsp}}II]] (left) meets [[al-Kamil]] (right), illumination from [[Giovanni Villani]]'s ''[[Nuova Cronica]]'' ([[Vatican Library]] ms. Chigiano L VIII 296, 14th{{nbsp}}century).]] |
|||
The [[Sixth Crusade]] (1228–1229) was a military expedition to recapture the city of Jerusalem. It began seven years after the failure of the Fifth Crusade and involved very little actual fighting. The diplomatic maneuvering of [[Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor|Frederick II]]<ref name=":25">Franz Kampers (1909). "[[s:Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Frederick II|Frederick II]]". In ''Catholic Encyclopedia''. '''6'''. New York: Robert Appleton Company.</ref> resulted in the Kingdom of Jerusalem regaining some control over Jerusalem for much of the ensuing fifteen years. The Sixth Crusade is also known as the Crusade of Frederick II.<ref name=":232">Van Cleve, Thomas C. (1977). "[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0026.pdf The Crusade of Frederick II] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240113040112/http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0026.pdf |date=2024-01-13 }}". In Setton, K. ''A History of the Crusades: Volume II''. pp. 377–448.</ref> |
|||
The [[Sweden|Swedish]] conquest of [[Finland]] in the [[Middle Ages]] has traditionally been divided into three "crusades": the [[First Swedish Crusade]] around 1155 CE, the [[Second Swedish Crusade]] about 1249 CE and the [[Third Swedish Crusade]] in 1293 CE. |
|||
Of all the European sovereigns, only Frederick II, the Holy Roman Emperor, was in a position to regain Jerusalem. Frederick was, like many of the 13th-century rulers, a serial ''crucesignatus'',<ref>Markowski, Michael. "[https://www.academia.edu/33305983/Crucesignatus_its_origins_and_early_usage Crucesignatus: its origins and early usage]". ''Journal of Medieval History'' (1984), pp. 157–165.</ref> having taken the cross multiple times since 1215.<ref>Weiler, Björn K. (2006). "Crusade of Emperor Frederick II (1227–1229)". In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 313–315.</ref> After much wrangling, an onerous agreement between the emperor and Pope [[Honorius III]] was signed on 25 July 1225 at San Germano. Frederick promised to depart on the Crusade by August 1227 and remain for two years. During this period, he was to maintain and support forces in Syria and deposit escrow funds at Rome in gold. These funds would be returned to the emperor once he arrived at Acre. If he did not arrive, the money would be employed for the needs of the Holy Land.{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=171–205|loc=The Emperor Frederick}} Frederick II would go on the Crusade as king of Jerusalem. He married John of Brienne's daughter [[Isabella II of Jerusalem#Marriage with Frederick II|Isabella II]] by proxy in August 1225 and they were formally married on 9 November 1227. Frederick claimed the kingship of Jerusalem despite John having been given assurances that he would remain as king. Frederick took the crown in December 1225. Frederick's first royal decree was to grant new privileges on the Teutonic Knights, placing them on equal footing as the Templars and Hospitallers.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006|pp=739–780|loc=The Crusade of Frederick II, 1227–1229}} |
|||
The first crusade is purely legendary, and according to most historians today, never took place as described in the legend and did not result in any ties between Finland and Sweden. For the most part, it was made up in the late 13th century to date the Swedish rule in Finland further back in time. No historical record has also survived describing the second one, but it probably did take place and ended up in the concrete conquest of southwestern Finland. The third one was against [[Novgorod]], and is properly documented by both parties of the conflict. |
|||
After the Fifth Crusade, the Ayyubid sultan [[al-Kamil]] became involved in civil war in Syria and, having unsuccessfully tried negotiations with the West beginning in 1219, again tried this approach,{{sfn|Gibb|1969|pp=700–702|loc=The Ayyubids from 1221–1229}} offering return of much of the Holy Land in exchange for military support.{{sfn|Maalouf|2006|pp=226–227|loc=Fakhr ad-Din}} Becoming pope in 1227, [[Pope Gregory IX|Gregory IX]] was determined to proceed with the Crusade.<ref>Michael Ott (1909). "[[s:Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Pope Gregory IX|Pope Gregory IX]]". In ''Catholic Encyclopedia''. '''6'''. New York: Robert Appleton Company.</ref> The first contingents of Crusaders then sailed in August 1227, joining with forces of the kingdom and fortifying the coastal towns. The emperor was delayed while his ships were refitted. He sailed on 8 September 1227, but before they reached their first stop, Frederick was struck with the plague and disembarked to secure medical attention. Resolved to keep his oath, he sent his fleet on to Acre. He sent his emissaries to inform Gregory IX of the situation, but the pope did not care about Frederick's illness, just that he had not lived up to his agreement. Frederick was excommunicated on 29 September 1227, branded a wanton violator of his sacred oath taken many times.<ref name=":232" /> |
|||
According to archaeological finds, Finland was largely Christian already before the said crusades. Thus the "crusades" can rather be seen as ordinary expeditions of conquest whose main target was territorial gain. The expeditions were dubbed as actual crusades only in the 19th century by the national-romanticist Swedish and Finnish historians. |
|||
Frederick made his last effort to be reconciled with Gregory. It had no effect and Frederick sailed from [[Brindisi]] in June 1228. After a stop at Cyprus, Frederick II arrived in Acre on 7 September 1228 and was received warmly by the military orders, despite his excommunication. Frederick's army was not large, mostly German, Sicilian and English.{{sfn|Tyerman|1996|pp=99–101|loc=The Crusade of 1227–1229}} Of the troops he had sent in 1227 had mostly returned home. He could neither afford nor mount a lengthening campaign in the Holy Land given the ongoing [[War of the Keys]] with Rome. The Sixth Crusade would be one of negotiation.{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=183–184|loc=Frederick at Acre (1228)}} |
|||
==Historical perspective== |
|||
=== Western and other interpretations === |
|||
After resolving the internecine struggles in Syria, al-Kamil's position was stronger than it was a year before when he made his original offer to Frederick. For unknown reasons, the two sides came to an agreement. The resultant [[Treaty of Jaffa (1229)|Treaty of Jaffa]] was concluded on 18 February 1229, with al-Kamil surrendering Jerusalem, with the exception of some Muslim holy sites, and agreeing to a ten-year truce.{{sfn|Richard|1999|pp=312–318|loc=The Sixth Crusade and the Treaty of Jaffa}} Frederick entered Jerusalem on 17 March 1229 and received the formal surrender of the city by al-Kamil's agent and the next day, crowned himself.{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=189–190|loc=Frederick at Jerusalem (1229)}} On 1 May 1229, Frederick departed from Acre and arrived in Sicily a month before the pope knew that he had left the Holy Land. Frederick obtained from the pope relief from his excommunication on 28 August 1230 at the [[Treaty of Ceprano (1230)|Treaty of Ceprano]].{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=562–571|loc=Frederick II's Crusade}} |
|||
Western and Eastern [[historiography]] present variously different views on the crusades, in large part because "crusade" invokes dramatically opposed sets of associations - "crusade" as a valiant struggle for a supreme cause, and "crusade" as a byword for barbarism and aggression. This contrasting view is not recent since Christians have in the past struggled with the tension of military activity and teachings of Christ to "love one's enemies" and to "turn the other cheek". For these reasons, the crusades have been controversial even among contemporaries. |
|||
The results of the Sixth Crusade were not universally acclaimed. Two letters from the Christian side tell differing stories,{{sfn|Munro|1902|pp=24–30|loc=Letters of the Sixth Crusade}} with Frederick touting the great success of the endeavor and the Latin patriarch painting a darker picture of the emperor and his accomplishments. On the Muslim side, al-Kamil himself was pleased with the accord, but others regarded the treaty as a disastrous event.{{sfn|Christie|2014|loc=Document 17: Two sources on the Handover of Jerusalem to Frederick II}} In the end, the Sixth Crusade successfully returned Jerusalem to Christian rule and had set a precedent, in having achieved success on crusade without papal involvement. |
|||
Western sources speak of both heroism, faith and honour (emphasized in [[Romance (genre)|chivalric romance]]), but also of acts of brutality. Islamic and Orthodox Christian chroniclers tell stories of barbarian savagery and brutality<ref>ISBN 0-8052-0898-4. Crusades Through Arab Eyes, Amin Maalouf</ref>. |
|||
===The Crusades of 1239–1241=== |
|||
Likewise, some modern historians in the west express moral outrage—for example [[Steven Runciman]], the leading western historian of the crusades for much of the 20th century, ended his history with a resounding condemnation: |
|||
{{main|Barons' Crusade}} |
|||
The Crusades of 1239–1241, also known as the [[Barons' Crusade]], were a series of crusades to the Holy Land that, in territorial terms, were the most successful since the First Crusade.<ref>Burgturf, Jochen. "Crusade of 1239–1241". ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 309–311.</ref> The major expeditions were led separately by [[Theobald I of Navarre]] and [[Richard of Cornwall]].<ref>[[Sidney Painter|Painter, Sidney]] (1977). "[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0027.pdf The Crusade of Theobald of Champagne and Richard of Cornwall, 1239–1241] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230601083652/http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0027.pdf |date=2023-06-01 }}.". In Setton, K., ''A History of the Crusades: Volume II''. pp. 463–486.</ref> These crusades are sometimes discussed along with that of [[Baldwin II, Latin Emperor|Baldwin of Courtenay]] to Constantinople.<ref>Hendrickx, Benjamin. "Baldwin II of Constantinople". ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 133–135.</ref> |
|||
:"High ideals were besmirched by cruelty and greed.. the Holy War was nothing more than a long act of intolerance in the name of God". |
|||
[[File:Beit_hanun_1239.jpg|thumb|The defeat of the Crusaders at Gaza, depicted in the ''Chronica majora'' of [[Matthew Paris]], 13th century]] |
|||
===Eastern Orthodoxy=== |
|||
Like Muslims, Eastern Orthodox Christians also see the Crusades as attacks by "the barbarian West", but centered on the sack of Constantinople in 1204. Many relics and artifacts taken from Constantinople are still in the West, in the [[Vatican City|Vatican]] and elsewhere. Disagreement currently exists between modern Turks and Greeks over the claimant rights to the [[Horses of Saint Mark|Greek Horses]] on the facade of [[San Marco di Venezia|St. Mark's]] in [[Venice]]. The Greeks argue that the frieze is inherently part of Greek culture and identity, similar to the [[Elgin Marbles|"Elgin" Marbles]]; the Turks counter that the freize originated from what is now modern-day [[Istanbul]]. A picture of Turkish popular history of the Crusades can be assembled by compiling text of official Turkish brochures on Crusader fortifications in the Aegean coast and coastal islands. |
|||
In 1229, [[Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor|Frederick II]] and the Ayyubid sultan [[al-Kamil]], had agreed to a ten-year truce. Nevertheless, [[Pope Gregory IX|Gregory IX]], who had condemned this truce from the beginning, issued the papal bull ''[[Rachel suum videns]]'' in 1234 calling for a new crusade once the truce expired. A number of English and French nobles took the cross, but the crusade's departure was delayed because Frederick, whose lands the crusaders had planned to cross, opposed any crusading activity before the expiration of this truce. Frederick was again excommunicated in 1239, causing most crusaders to avoid his territories on their way to the Holy Land.{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=205–220|loc=Legalized Anarchy}} |
|||
Countries of Central Europe, despite the fact that they also belonged to [[Western Christianity]], were the most skeptical about the idea of Crusades{{Fact|date=February 2007}}. Many cities in Hungary were sacked by passing bands of Crusaders; [[Poland|Polish]] Prince [[Leszek I the White]] refused to join a Crusade, allegedly because of the lack of [[mead]] in Palestine. Later on, Poles were themselves subject to [[Teutonic Order|conquest from the Crusaders]] and therefore championed the notion that [[Paganism|pagans]] have the right to live in peace and have property rights to their lands{{Fact|date=February 2007}}. |
|||
The French expedition was led by [[Theobald I of Navarre]] and [[Hugh IV, Duke of Burgundy|Hugh of Burgundy]], joined by [[Amaury de Montfort (died 1241)|Amaury of Montfort]] and [[Peter I, Duke of Brittany|Peter of Dreux]].<ref name=":252">[[Peter Jackson (historian)|Jackson, Peter]]. "[https://www.jstor.org/stable/616893 The Crusades of 1239–1241 and Their Aftermath]". ''Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies'', Vol. 50, No. 1 (1987). pp. 32–60.</ref> On 1 September 1239, Theobald arrived in Acre, and was soon drawn into the [[Ayyubid dynasty#Syro-Egyptian divide|Ayyubid civil war]], which had been raging since the death of al-Kamil in 1238.{{sfn|Gibb|1969|pp=703–709|loc=The Ayyubids from 1229–1244}} At the end of September, al-Kamil's brother [[As-Salih Ismail, Emir of Damascus|as-Salih Ismail]] seized Damascus from his nephew, [[as-Salih Ayyub]], and recognised [[al-Adil II]] as sultan of Egypt. Theobald decided to fortify [[Ashkelon|Ascalon]] to protect the southern border of the kingdom and to move against Damascus later. While the Crusaders were marching from Acre to Jaffa, Egyptian troops moved to secure the border in what became the [[Battle at Gaza (1239)|Battle at Gaza]].<ref name=":233">Burgturf, Jochen. "Gaza, Battle of (1239)". ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 498–499.</ref> Contrary to Theobald's instructions and the advice of the military orders, a group decided to move against the enemy without further delay, but they were surprised by the Muslims who inflicted a devastating defeat on the Franks. The masters of the military orders then convinced Theobald to retreat to Acre rather than pursue the Egyptians and their Frankish prisoners. A month after the battle at Gaza, [[An-Nasir Dawud|an-Nasir Dā'ūd]], emir of [[Al-Karak|Kerak]], seized Jerusalem, virtually unguarded. The internal strife among the Ayyubids allowed Theobald to negotiate the return of Jerusalem. In September 1240, Theobald departed for Europe, while Hugh of Burgundy remained to help fortify Ascalon.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006|pp=755–780|loc=The Crusades of 1239–1241}} |
|||
=== Popular reputation in Western Europe=== |
|||
[[Image:Crusade.JPG|thumb|right|150px|[[Cecil B. DeMille]]'s ''[[The Crusades (film)|The Crusades]]'' (1935)]] |
|||
On 8 October 1240, the English expedition arrived, led by Richard of Cornwall.{{sfn|Tyerman|1996|pp=101–107|loc=The Crusade of Richard of Cornwall}} The force marched to Jaffa, where they completed the negotiations for a truce with Ayyubid leaders begun by Theobald just a few months prior. Richard consented, the new agreement was ratified by Ayyub by 8 February 1241, and prisoners from both sides were released on 13 April. Meanwhile, Richard's forces helped to work on Ascalon's fortifications, which were completed by mid-March 1241. Richard entrusted the new fortress to an imperial representative, and departed for England on 3 May 1241.{{sfn|Richard|1999|pp=319–324|loc=The Barons' Crusade}} |
|||
In Western Europe, the Crusades have traditionally been regarded by laypeople as heroic adventures, though the mass enthusiasm of common people was largely expended in the First Crusade, from which so few of their class returned. Today, the "[[Saracen]]" adversary is crystallized in the lone figure of Saladin; his adversary Richard the Lionheart is, in the [[English language|English]]-speaking world, the archetypical crusader king, while Frederick Barbarossa and Louis IX fill the same symbolic niche in German and French culture. Even in contemporary areas, the crusades and their leaders were romanticized in popular literature; the ''[[Chanson d'Antioche]]'' was a [[chanson de geste]] dealing with the First Crusade, and the [[Song of Roland]], dealing with the era of the similarly romanticized [[Charlemagne]], was directly influenced by the experience of the crusades, going so far as to replace Charlemagne's historic [[Basque people|Basque]] opponents with Muslims. A popular theme for [[troubadour]]s was the knight winning the love of his lady by going on crusade in the east. |
|||
In July 1239, Baldwin of Courtenay, the young heir to the Latin Empire, travelled to Constantinople with a small army. In the winter of 1239, Baldwin finally returned to Constantinople, where he was crowned emperor around Easter of 1240, after which he launched his crusade. Baldwin then besieged and captured [[Tzurulum]], a Nicaean stronghold seventy-five miles west of Constantinople.<ref>[[J. B. Bury]] (1911). "[[s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Bury, John Bagnell|Baldwin II (emperor of Romania)]]" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. '''3.''' (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 867.</ref> |
|||
[[Image:Barbarossa01.jpg|thumb|left|180px|The ever-living [[Frederick I, Holy Roman Emperor|Frederick Barbarossa]], in his mountain cave: a late 19th century German woodcut]] |
|||
In the 14th century, [[Godfrey of Bouillon]] was united with the [[Trojan War]] and the adventures of [[Alexander the Great]] against a backdrop for military and courtly heroics of the [[Nine Worthies]] who stood as popular secular [[culture hero]]es into the 16th century, when more critical literary tastes ran instead to [[Torquato Tasso]] and Rinaldo and Armida, Roger and Angelica. Later, the rise of a more authentic sense of history among literate people brought the Crusades into a new focus for the Romantic generation in the romances of Sir [[Walter Scott]] in the early 19th century. Crusading imagery could be found even in the Crimean War, in which the United Kingdom and France were allied with the Muslim Ottoman Empire, and in [[World War I]], especially [[Edmund Henry Hynman Allenby, 1st Viscount Allenby|Allenby's]] capture of Jerusalem in 1917. |
|||
Although the Barons' Crusade returned the kingdom to its largest size since 1187, the gains would be dramatically reversed a few years later. On 15 July 1244, the city was reduced to ruins during the [[Siege of Jerusalem (1244)|siege of Jerusalem]] and its Christians massacred by the [[Khwarazmian army between 1231 and 1246|Khwarazmian army]]. A few months later, the [[Battle of La Forbie]] permanently crippled Christian military power in the Holy Land. The sack of the city and the massacre which accompanied it encouraged [[Louis IX|Louis IX of France]] to organise the [[Seventh Crusade]].{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=574–576|loc=The Bane of Palestine}} |
|||
In Spain, the popular reputation of the Crusades is outshone by the particularly Spanish history of the ''Reconquista''. [[El Cid]] is the central figure. |
|||
===The Seventh Crusade=== |
|||
{{Main|Seventh Crusade}} |
|||
[[File:Seventh crusade.jpg|thumb|300px|Louis IX during the Seventh Crusade]] |
|||
The [[Seventh Crusade]] (1248–1254) was the first of the two Crusades led by [[Louis IX of France]]. Also known as the Crusade of Louis IX to the Holy Land, its objective was to reclaim the Holy Land by attacking Egypt, the main seat of Muslim power in the Middle East, then under [[as-Salih Ayyub]], son of al-Kamil. The Crusade was conducted in response to setbacks in the Kingdom of Jerusalem, beginning with the loss of the Holy City in 1244, and was preached by [[Pope Innocent IV|Innocent IV]] in conjunction with a crusade against emperor [[Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor|Frederick II]], the [[Prussian Crusade|Prussian crusades]] and Mongol incursions.<ref name=":0">Strayer, Joseph R. (1977). "[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0028.pdf Chapter XIV. The Crusades of Louis IX] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211207190824/https://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0028.pdf |date=2021-12-07 }}". In Wolff, Robert L. and Hazard, H. W. (eds.). ''A History of the Crusades: Volume II, The Later Crusades 1187–1311''. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 487–521.</ref> |
|||
==Legacy== |
|||
===Europe=== |
|||
The Crusades have been remembered relatively favourably in western Europe (countries which were, at the time of the Crusades, Roman Catholic countries). Nonetheless, there have certainly been many vocal critics of the Crusades in Western Europe since the Renaissance. |
|||
At the end of 1244, Louis was stricken with a severe malarial infection and he vowed that if he recovered he would set out for a Crusade. His life was spared, and as soon as his health permitted him, he took the cross and immediately began preparations.<ref name=":7">James Thomson Shotwell (1911). "[[s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Louis IX. of France|Louis IX. of France]]". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. '''17.''' (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 37–38.</ref> The next year, the pope presided over [[First Council of Lyon]], directing a new Crusade under the command of Louis. With Rome under siege by Frederick, the pope also issued his ''[[Ad Apostolicae Dignitatis Apicem]]'', formally renewing the sentence of excommunication on the emperor, and declared him deposed from the imperial throne and that of Naples.<ref name=":42">Michael Ott (1910). "[[s:Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Pope Innocent IV|Pope Innocent IV]]". In ''Catholic Encyclopedia''. '''8.''' New York.</ref> |
|||
====Politics and culture==== |
|||
The Crusades had an enormous influence on the European [[Middle Ages]]. At times, much of the continent was united under a powerful [[Papacy]], but by the 14th century, the development of centralized bureaucracies (the foundation of the modern [[nation-state]]) was well on its way in France, England, [[Burgundy]], [[Portugal]], [[Crown of Castile|Castile]], and [[Aragon]] partly because of the dominance of the church at the beginning of the crusading era. |
|||
The recruiting effort under cardinal [[Odo of Châteauroux]] was difficult, and the Crusade finally began on 12 August 1248 when Louis IX left Paris under the insignia of a pilgrim, the ''[[Oriflamme]]''.<ref name=":6">Goldsmith, Linda (2006). ''Crusade of Louis IX to the East (1248–1254)''. In The Crusades – An Encyclopedia. pp. 321–324.</ref> With him were queen [[Margaret of Provence]] and two of Louis' brothers, [[Charles I of Anjou]] and [[Robert I, Count of Artois|Robert I of Artois]]. Their youngest brother [[Alfonso, Count of Poitou|Alphonse of Poitiers]] departed the next year. They were followed by [[Hugh IV, Duke of Burgundy|Hugh IV of Burgundy]], [[Peter I, Duke of Brittany|Peter Maulcerc]], [[Hugh X of Lusignan|Hugh XI of Lusignan]], royal companion and chronicler [[Jean de Joinville]], and an English detachment under [[William Longespée the Younger|William Longespée]], grandson of [[Henry II of England]].{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=256–257|loc=King Louis sails from Agues-Mortes (1248}} |
|||
Although Europe had been exposed to [[Islamic culture]] for centuries through contacts in Iberian Peninsula and [[Sicily]], much knowledge in areas such as science, medicine, and architecture was transferred from the Islamic to the western world during the crusade era. |
|||
The first stop was Cyprus, arriving in September 1248 where they experienced a long wait for the forces to assemble. Many of the men were lost ''en route'' or to disease.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=580–584|loc=The preparation for war}} The Franks were soon met by those from Acre including the masters of the Orders [[Jean de Ronay]] and [[Guillaume de Sonnac]]. The two eldest sons of John of Brienne, [[Alfonso of Brienne|Alsonso of Brienne]] and [[Louis of Brienne]], would also join as would [[John of Ibelin (jurist)|John of Ibelin]], nephew to the [[John of Ibelin, the Old Lord of Beirut|Old Lord of Beirut]].{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1973|pp=21–39|loc=Lords, Lordships and Vavasours}} [[William of Villehardouin]] also arrived with ships and Frankish soldiers from the [[Morea]]. It was agreed that Egypt was the objective and many remembered how the sultan's father had been willing to exchange Jerusalem itself for Damietta in the Fifth Crusade. Louis was not willing to negotiate with the infidel Muslims, but he did unsuccessfully seek a [[Franco-Mongol alliance]], reflecting what the pope had sought in 1245.{{sfn|Runciman|1954|p=259–260|loc=Negotiations with the Mongols}} |
|||
The military experiences of the crusades also had their effects in Europe; for example, European [[castle]]s became massive stone structures as they were in the east, rather than smaller wooden buildings as they had typically been in the past. |
|||
As-Salih Ayyub was conducting a campaign in Damascus when the Franks invaded as he had expected the Crusaders to land in Syria. Hurrying his forces back to Cairo, he turned to his vizier [[Fakhr ad-Din ibn as-Shaikh]] to command the army that fortified [[Damietta]] in anticipation of the invasion. On 5 June 1249 the Crusader fleet began the landing and subsequent [[Siege of Damietta (1249)|siege of Damietta]]. After a short battle, the Egyptian commander decided to evacuate the city.{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=262–263|loc=Louis at Damietta (1249)}} Remarkably, Damietta had been seized with only one Crusader casualty.{{sfn|Barber|1994|pp=148–151|loc=The last years of the Templars in Palestine and Syria}} The city became a Frankish city and Louis waited until the Nile floods abated before advancing, remembering the lessons of the Fifth Crusade. The loss of Damietta was a shock to the Muslim world, and as-Salih Ayyub offered to trade Damietta for Jerusalem as his father had thirty years before. The offer was rejected. By the end of October 1249 the Nile had receded and reinforcements had arrived. It was time to advance, and the Frankish army set out towards [[Mansoura, Egypt|Mansurah]].{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=264–265|loc=The Crusaders Advance towards Mansourah}} |
|||
In addition, the Crusades are seen as having opened up European culture to the world, especially Asia: |
|||
The sultan died in November 1249, his widow [[Shajar al-Durr]] concealing the news of her husband's death. She forged a document which appointed his son [[al-Muazzam Turanshah]], then in Syria, as heir and Fakhr ad-Din as viceroy.{{sfn|Gibb|1969|p=712|loc=as-Salih Ayyub}} But the Crusade continued, and by December 1249, Louis was encamped on the river banks opposite to Mansurah.{{sfn|Barber|1994|pp=148–151|loc=The last years of the Templars in Palestine and Syria}} For six weeks, the armies of the West and Egypt faced each other on opposite sides of the canal, leading to the [[Battle of Mansurah (1250)|Battle of Mansurah]] that would end on 11 February 1250 with an Egyptian defeat. Louis had his victory, but a cost of the loss of much of his force and their commanders. Among the survivors were the Templar master Guillaume de Sonnac, losing an eye, [[Humbert V de Beaujeu]], constable of France, [[John II, Count of Soissons|John II of Soissons]], and the duke of Brittany, Peter Maulcerc. Counted with the dead were the king's brother [[Robert I, Count of Artois|Robert I of Artois]], [[William Longespée the Younger|William Longespée]] and most of his English followers, [[Peter of Courtenay, Lord of Conches|Peter of Courtenay]], and [[Raoul II, Lord of Coucy|Raoul II of Coucy]]. But the victory would be short-lived.<ref>Nicolle, David (2006). ''Mansurah''. In The Crusades – An Encyclopedia. pp. 794–795.</ref> On 11 February 1250, the Egyptians attacked again. Templar master Guillaume de Sonnac and acting Hospitaller master Jean de Ronay were killed. [[Alphonse, Count of Poitiers|Alphonse of Poitiers]], guarding the camp, was encircled and was rescued by the camp followers. At nightfall, the Muslims gave up the assault.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006|pp=793_802|loc=Defeat, February–March 1250}} |
|||
{{cquote|The Crusades brought about results of which the popes had never dreamed, and which were perhaps the most, important of all. They re-established traffic between the East and West, which, after having been suspended for several centuries, was then resumed with even greater energy; they were the means of bringing from the depths of their respective provinces and introducing into the most civilized Asiatic countries Western knights, to whom a new world was thus revealed, and who returned to their native land filled with novel ideas... If, indeed, the Christian civilization of Europe has become universal culture, in the highest sense, the glory redounds, in no small measure, to the Crusades." |
|||
[[File:C_croisade7_prisonnier1.jpg|thumb|Louis IX being taken prisoner at the Battle of Fariskur ([[Gustave Doré]])]] |
|||
[''Catholic Encyclopedia'' <ref> Catholic Encyclopedia, "Crusades" (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04543c.htm) </ref>]}} |
|||
On 28 February 1250, Turanshah arrived from Damascus and began an Egyptian offensive, intercepting the boats that brought food from Damietta. The Franks were quickly beset by famine and disease.{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=268–269|loc=Turanshah takes Command of the Moslems (1250)}} The [[Battle of Fariskur (1250)|Battle of Fariskur]] fought on 6 April 1250 would be the decisive defeat of Louis' army. Louis knew that the army must be extricated to Damietta and they departed on the morning of 5 April, with the king in the rear and the Egyptians in pursuit. The next day, the Muslims surrounded the army and attacked in full force. On 6 April, Louis' surrender was negotiated directly with the sultan by [[Philip of Montfort, Lord of Tyre|Philip of Montfort]]. The king and his entourage were taken in chains to Mansurah and the whole of the army was rounded up and led into captivity.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006|pp=793_802|loc=Defeat, February–March 1250}} |
|||
Along with trade, new scientific discoveries and inventions made their way east or west. Arabic advances (including the development of [[algebra]], optics, and refinement of engineering) made their way west and sped the course of advancement in European universities that led to the Renaissance in later centuries. |
|||
The Egyptians were unprepared for the large number of prisoners taken, comprising most of Louis' force. The infirm were executed immediately and several hundred were decapitated daily. Louis and his commanders were moved to Mansurah, and negotiations for their release commenced. The terms agreed to were harsh. Louis was to ransom himself by the surrender of Damietta and his army by the payment of a million [[bezant]]s (later reduced to 800,000).{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=270–271|loc=Louis in Prison (1250)}} Latin patriarch [[Robert of Nantes]] went under safe-conduct to complete the arrangements for the ransom. Arriving in Cairo, he found Turanshah dead, murdered in a coup instigated by his stepmother Shajar al-Durr. On 6 May, [[Geoffrey of Sergines]] handed Damietta over to the Moslem vanguard. Many wounded soldiers had been left behind at Damietta, and contrary to their promise, the Muslims massacred them all. In 1251, the [[Shepherds' Crusade (1251)|Shepherds' Crusade]], a popular crusade formed with the objective to free Louis, engulfed France.<ref>{{Cite CE1913|wstitle=Crusade of the Pastoureaux}}</ref> After his release, Louis went to Acre where he remained until 1254. This is regarded as the end of the Seventh Crusade.<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
The invasions of German crusaders prevented formation of the large Lithuanian state incorporating all Baltic nations and tribes. Lithuania was destined to become small country and forced to expand to the East looking for resources for wars with crusaders. <ref>{{lt icon}} [http://www.omni.lt/?i$9359_70693$z_373522 Tomas Baranauskas. ''Prūsų sukilimas—prarasta galimybė sukurti kitokią Lietuvą'' (Prussian rebellion—the lost chance of creating different Lithuania). 20 September, 2006]</ref> |
|||
=== |
===The final crusades=== |
||
{{main|Eighth Crusade|Lord Edward's Crusade}} |
|||
The need to raise, transport and supply large armies led to a flourishing of trade throughout Europe. Roads largely unused since the days of [[Roman Empire|Rome]] saw significant increases in traffic as local merchants began to expand their horizons. This was not only because the Crusades ''prepared'' Europe for travel, but rather that many ''wanted'' to travel after being reacquainted with the products of the Middle East. This also aided in the beginning of the Renaissance in Italy, as various Italian [[city-states]] from the very beginning had important and profitable trading colonies in the crusader states, both in the Holy Land and later in captured Byzantine territory. |
|||
After the defeat of the Crusaders in Egypt, Louis remained in Syria until 1254 to consolidate the crusader states.<ref>{{harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=606–608}}</ref> A brutal power struggle developed in Egypt between various [[Mamluk Sultanate (Cairo)|Mamluk]] leaders and the remaining weak Ayyubid rulers. The threat presented by an invasion by the Mongols led to one of the competing Mamluk leaders, [[Qutuz]], seizing the sultanate in 1259 and uniting with another faction led by [[Baibars]] to defeat the Mongols at [[Battle of Ain Jalut|Ain Jalut]]. The Mamluks then quickly gained control of Damascus and Aleppo before Qutuz was assassinated and Baibers assumed control.<ref>{{harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=616–621}}</ref> |
|||
Between 1265 and 1271, Baibars drove the Franks to a few small coastal outposts.<ref>{{Harvnb|Tyerman|2006|pp=816–817}}</ref> Baibars had three key objectives: to prevent an alliance between the Latins and the Mongols, to cause dissension among the Mongols (particularly between the [[Golden Horde]] and the Persian [[Ilkhanate]]), and to maintain access to a supply of slave recruits from the Russian steppes. He supported [[Manfred, King of Sicily|Manfred of Sicily's]] failed resistance to the attack of Charles and the papacy. Dissension in the crusader states led to conflicts such as the [[War of Saint Sabas]]. Venice drove the Genoese from Acre to Tyre where they continued to trade with Egypt. Indeed, Baibars negotiated free passage for the Genoese with [[Michael VIII Palaiologos|Michael{{nbsp}}VIII Palaiologos]], [[Empire of Nicaea|Emperor of Nicaea]], the newly restored ruler of Constantinople.<ref>{{harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=628–630}}</ref> In 1270 Charles turned his brother King Louis{{nbsp}}IX's crusade, known as the [[Eighth Crusade]], to his own advantage by persuading him to attack [[Tunis]]. The crusader army was devastated by disease, and Louis himself died at Tunis on 25{{nbsp}}August. The fleet returned to France. [[Edward I of England|Prince Edward]], the future king of England, and a small retinue arrived too late for the conflict but continued to the Holy Land in what is known as [[Lord Edward's crusade|Lord Edward's Crusade]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Summerson|2005|}}</ref> Edward survived an assassination attempt, negotiated a ten-year truce, and then returned to manage his affairs in England. This ended the last significant crusading effort in the eastern Mediterranean.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=643–644}}</ref> |
|||
Increased trade brought many things to Europeans that were once unknown or extremely rare and costly. These goods included a variety of spices, ivory, jade, diamonds, improved glass-manufacturing techniques, early forms of gun powder, oranges, apples, and other Asian crops, and many other products. |
|||
===Decline and fall of the Crusader States=== |
|||
<!--UNCITED====Wider geo-political effects==== |
|||
[[Image:1291 siège d'Acre.jpg|thumb|250px|The [[Siege of Acre (1291)|Siege of Acre]] depicted in ''[[Matthew of Clermont|Matthieu de Clermont]] défend [[Ptolemais in Phoenicia|Ptolémaïs]] en 1291'', by [[Dominique Papety]] at [[Salles des Croisades]] in [[Palace of Versailles|Versailles]]]] |
|||
{{original research}} |
|||
{{main|Fall of Outremer}} |
|||
Despite the ultimate defeat in the Middle East, the Crusaders were successful in regaining the Iberian Peninsula permanently and slowed down the military expansion of Islam. |
|||
The years 1272–1302 include numerous conflicts throughout the Levant as well as the Mediterranean and Western European regions, and many crusades were proposed to free the Holy Land from [[Mamluk Sultanate|Mamluk]] control. These include ones of [[Pope Gregory X|Gregory X]], [[Charles I of Anjou]] and [[Pope Nicholas IV|Nicholas IV]], none of which came to fruition. The major players fighting the Muslims included the kings of England and France, the kingdoms of [[Kingdom of Cyprus|Cyprus]] and [[Kingdom of Sicily|Sicily]], the three [[Military orders of the Crusades|Military Orders]] and [[Ilkhanate|Mongol Ilkhanate]]. The end of Western European presence in the Holy Land was sealed with the [[Fall of Tripoli (1289)|fall of Tripoli]] and their subsequent defeat at the [[Siege of Acre (1291)|siege of Acre]] in 1291. The Christian forces managed to survive until the final [[fall of Ruad]] in 1302.{{sfn|Runciman|1954|pp=387–426|loc=The Fall of Acre}} |
|||
The Holy Land would no longer be the focus of the West even though various crusades were proposed in the early years of the fourteenth century. The Knights Hospitaller would [[Hospitaller conquest of Rhodes|conquer Rhodes]] from Byzantium, making it the center of their activity for a hundred years. The Knights Templar, the elite fighting force in the kingdom, was disbanded. The Mongols converted to Islam, but [[Ilkhanate#Disintegration (1316–1357)|disintegrated]] as a fighting force. The Mamluk sultanate would continue for another century. The Crusades to liberate Jerusalem and the Holy Land were over.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=638–656|loc=The Holy Land Reclaimed}} |
|||
The successful international coordination of Crusading forces from different countries, and the reduction (not cessation) in fighting between Christian monarchs that the crusading ideal encouraged, allowed Christian Europe to remain strong in the face of Muslim military expansionism. It is therefore likely that a considerable part of modern Christian Europe (particularly Spain, Portugal, and the Balkans) would be Muslim today had the Crusades not occurred, and it is furthermore possible that Christianity might have been largely replaced by Islam throughout Europe. <!--improper citation-nor does it work... (This is one traditional Roman Catholic perspective: [[#Catholic Encyclopedia perspective|See below]].)--> |
|||
==Other crusades== |
|||
The achievement of preserving Christian Europe must not, however, ignore the eventual fall of the Christian Byzantine Empire, which was mostly caused by Fourth Crusade's extreme aggression against Eastern Orthodox Christianity, largely at the instigation of the infamous [[Enrico Dandolo]], the [[Doge of Venice|Doge]] of Venice and financial backer of the Fourth Crusade. The Byzantine lands had been a stable Christian state since the 4th century. After the Crusaders took Constantinople in 1204, the Byzantines never again had as large or strong a state and finally fell in 1453. |
|||
{{see also|Chronologies of the Crusades}} |
|||
[[File:Deutscher Orden in Europa 1300.png|thumb|upright=1.35|left|Map of the branches of the [[Teutonic Order]] in Europe {{circa|1300}}. Shaded area is sovereign territory.]] |
|||
The military expeditions undertaken by European Christians in the 11th, 12th, and 13th{{nbsp}}centuries to recover the Holy Land from Muslims provided a template for warfare in other areas that also interested the Latin Church. These included the 12th and 13th{{nbsp}}century [[Reconquista|conquest of]] Muslim [[Al-Andalus]] by Spanish Christian kingdoms; 12th to 15th{{nbsp}}century German [[Northern Crusades]] expansion into the pagan [[Baltic region]]; the suppression of non-conformity, particularly in [[Languedoc]] during what has become called the [[Albigensian Crusade]] and for the Papacy's temporal advantage in Italy and Germany that are now known as political crusades. In the 13th and 14th centuries there were also unsanctioned, but related popular uprisings to recover Jerusalem known variously as Shepherds' or Children's crusades.{{sfn|Housley|1992}} |
|||
Taking into account the fall of the Byzantines, the Crusades could be portrayed as the defence of Roman Catholicism against the violent expansion of Islam, rather than the defence of Christianity as a whole against Islamic expansion. On the other hand, the Fourth Crusade could be presented as an anomaly. It is also possible to find a compromise between these two points of view, specifically that the Crusades were Roman Catholic campaigns which primarily sought to fight Islam to preserve Catholicism, and secondarily sought to thereby protect the rest of Christianity; in this context, the Fourth Crusade's crusaders could have felt compelled to abandon the secondary aim in order to retain Dandolo's logistical support in achieving the primary aim. Even so, the Fourth Crusade was condemned by the Pope of the time and is now generally remembered throughout Europe as a disgraceful failure.--> |
|||
Urban II equated the crusades for Jerusalem with the ongoing Catholic invasion of the [[Iberian Peninsula]] and crusades were preached in 1114 and 1118, but it was [[Pope Callixtus II]] who proposed dual fronts in Spain and the [[Middle East]] in 1122. In the spring of 1147, Eugene authorised the expansion of his mission into the Iberian peninsula, equating these campaigns against the [[Moors]] with the rest of the Second Crusade. The successful [[siege of Lisbon]], from 1 July to 25 October 1147, was followed by the six-month [[Siege of Tortosa (1148)|siege of Tortosa]], ending on 30 December 1148 with a defeat for the Moors.<ref>Jaspert, Nikolas (2006). "Tortosa (Spain)". In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. p. 1186.</ref> In the north, some Germans were reluctant to fight in the Holy Land while the pagan [[Wends]] were a more immediate problem. The resulting [[Wendish Crusade]] of 1147 was partially successful but failed to convert the pagans to Christianity.<ref>Lind, John H. (2006). " Wendish Crusade (1147)". In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 1265–1268.</ref> By the time of the Second Crusade the three Spanish kingdoms were powerful enough to conquer Islamic territory{{snd}}[[Crown of Castile|Castile]], [[Crown of Aragon|Aragon]], and [[Kingdom of Portugal|Portugal]].{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|p=188}} In 1212 the Spanish were victorious at the [[Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa]] with the support of foreign fighters responding to the preaching of Innocent III. Many of these deserted because of the Spanish tolerance of the defeated Muslims, for whom the Reconquista was a war of domination rather than extermination.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|p=191}} In contrast the Christians formerly living under Muslim rule called [[Mozarabs]] had the [[Roman Rite]] relentlessly imposed on them and were absorbed into mainstream Catholicism.<ref name="Jotischky 2004 131">{{Harvnb|Jotischky|2004|p=131}}</ref> Al-Andalus, Islamic Spain, was completely suppressed in 1492 when the [[Emirate of Granada]] surrendered.{{sfn|Lock|2006|pp=212–213}} |
|||
===Islamic world=== |
|||
The crusades had profound but localized effects upon the Islamic world, where the equivalents of "Franks" and "Crusaders" remained expressions of disdain. Muslims traditionally celebrate Saladin, the [[Kurdish people|Kurdish]] warrior, as a hero against the Crusaders. In the 21st century, some in the Arab world, such as the [[Arab independence movement]] and [[Pan-Islamism]] movement, continue to call Western involvement in the Middle East a "crusade". The Crusades were regarded by the Islamic world as cruel and savage onslaughts by European Christians. |
|||
In 1147, [[Pope Eugene III]] extended Calixtus's idea by authorising a crusade on the German north-eastern frontier against the pagan [[Wends]] from what was primarily economic conflict.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|2001|p=2}}{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=199–205}} From the early 13th{{nbsp}}century, there was significant involvement of military orders, such as the [[Livonian Brothers of the Sword]] and the [[Order of Dobrzyń]]. The Teutonic Knights diverted efforts from the Holy Land, absorbed these orders and established the [[State of the Teutonic Order]].{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=202–203}}{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=315–327}} This evolved the [[Duchy of Prussia]] and [[Duchy of Courland and Semigallia]] in 1525 and 1562, respectively.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=328–333}} |
|||
The most devastating long term consequence of the crusades, according to historian [[Peter Mansfield (historian)|Peter Mansfield]], was the creation of an Islamic mentality that sought a retreat into isolation. He says "Assaulted from all quarters, the Muslim world turned in on itself. It became oversensitive [and] defensive… attitudes that grew steadily worse as world-wide evolution, a process from which the Muslim world felt excluded, continued." <ref name="Peter Mansfield">A History of the Middle East, Second Edition, London: Penguin Books, 2003, p 21.</ref>. |
|||
[[File:Albigensian Crusade 01.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|alt=Two illuminations: the pope admonishing a group of people and mounted knights attacking unarmed people with swords|Miniatures showing [[Pope Innocent III]] excommunicating, and the crusaders massacring, Cathars (BL Royal 16 G VI, fol. 374v, 14th{{nbsp}}century)]] |
|||
===Jewish community=== |
|||
By the beginning of the 13th{{nbsp}}century papal reticence in applying crusades against the papacy's political opponents and those considered heretics had abated. Innocent III proclaimed [[Albigensian Crusade|a crusade]] against Catharism that failed to suppress the heresy itself but ruined the culture of the [[Languedoc]].{{sfn|Riley-Smith|2001|pp=42–43}} This set a precedent that was followed in 1212 with pressure exerted on the city of [[History of Milan#Middle Ages|Milan]] for tolerating Catharism,{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|p=193}} in 1234 [[Stedinger Crusade|against]] the [[Stedingen|Stedinger]] peasants of north-western Germany, in 1234 and 1241 Hungarian crusades against [[Banate of Bosnia|Bosnian heretics]].{{sfn|Riley-Smith|2001|pp=42–43}} The historian [[Norman Housley]] notes the connection between [[heterodoxy]] and anti-papalism in Italy.{{sfn|Housley|1982}} [[Indulgence]] was offered to anti-heretical groups such as the [[Militia of Jesus Christ]] and the [[Order of the Blessed Virgin Mary]].{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=193–196}} Innocent III declared the first political crusade against Frederick II's regent, [[Markward von Annweiler]], and when Frederick later threatened Rome in 1240, Gregory IX used crusading terminology to raise support against him. On Frederick II's death the focus moved to Sicily. In 1263, [[Pope Urban IV]] offered crusading indulgences to Charles of Anjou in return for Sicily's conquest. However, these wars had no clear objectives or limitations, making them unsuitable for crusading.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=195–198}} The [[Papal election, 1280–81|1281 election]] of a French pope, [[Pope Martin IV|Martin{{nbsp}}IV]], brought the power of the papacy behind Charles. Charles's preparations for a crusade against Constantinople were foiled by the Byzantine Emperor [[Michael VIII Palaiologos]], who instigated an uprising called the [[Sicilian Vespers]]. Instead, [[Peter III of Aragon]] was proclaimed king of Sicily, despite his excommunication and an unsuccessful [[Aragonese Crusade]].{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|p=198}} Political crusading continued against Venice over [[Ferrara]]; [[Louis IV, Holy Roman Emperor|Louis IV, King of Germany]] when he [[Romzug|marched to Rome]] for his imperial coronation; and the [[Free company|free companies]] of mercenaries.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=353–354}} |
|||
{{main|History of the Jews and the Crusades}} |
|||
The Latin states established were a fragile patchwork of petty realms threatened by Byzantine successor states{{snd}}the [[Despotate of Epirus]], the [[Empire of Nicaea]] and the [[Empire of Trebizond]]. [[Thessaloniki]] fell to Epirus in 1224, and Constantinople to Nicaea in 1261. Achaea and Athens survived under the [[Capetian House of Anjou|French]] after the [[Treaty of Viterbo]].{{sfn|Lock|2006|pp=125, 133, 337, 436–437}} The Venetians endured a long-standing conflict with the Ottoman Empire until the final possessions were lost in the [[Ottoman–Venetian War (1714–1718)|Seventh Ottoman–Venetian War]] in the 18th{{nbsp}}century. This period of [[History of Greece|Greek history]] is known as the ''[[Frankokratia]]'' or ''Latinokratia'' ("Frankish or Latin rule") and designates a period when western European Catholics ruled [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Orthodox]] [[Byzantine Greeks]].<ref>Hendrickx, Benjamin (2006). "Constantinople, Latin Empire of". In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 279–286.</ref> |
|||
[[Image:FirstCrusade.jpg|thumb|200px|Right|1250 French Bible illustration depicts Jews (identifiable by [[Judenhut]]) being massacred by Crusaders]] |
|||
The Crusaders' atrocities against Jews in the German and Hungarian towns, later also in those of France and England, and in the massacres of Jews in Palestine and Syria have become a significant part of the [[history of anti-Semitism]], although no Crusade was ever declared against Jews. These attacks left behind for centuries strong feelings of ill will on both sides. The social position of the Jews in western Europe was distinctly worsened, and legal restrictions increased during and after the Crusades. They prepared the way for the anti-Jewish legislation of [[Pope Innocent III]] and formed the turning-point in medieval [[anti-Semitism]]. |
|||
The major [[Crusades after Acre, 1291–1399|crusades of the 14th century]] include: the [[Fra Dolcino|Crusade against the Dulcinians]]; the [[Crusade of the Poor]]; the [[Walter VI, Count of Brienne#Anti-Catalan crusade of 1331–1332|Anti-Catalan Crusade]]; the [[Shepherds' Crusade (1320)|Shepherds' Crusade]]; the [[Smyrniote crusades|Smyrniote Crusades]]; the [[Magnus IV of Sweden#Crusade against Novgorod|Crusade against Novgorod]]; the [[Savoyard Crusade]]; the [[Alexandrian Crusade]]; the [[Despenser's Crusade]]; the [[Barbary Crusade|Mahdia]], [[Crusade of Tedelis|Tedelis]], and [[Bona crusade|Bona Crusades]]; and the [[Battle of Nicopolis|Crusade of Nicopolis]]. |
|||
The crusading period brought with it many narratives from Jewish sources. Among the better-known Jewish narratives are the chronicles of Solomon Bar Simson and Rabbi Eliezer bar Nathan, "The Narrative of the Old Persecutions," by Mainz Anonymous, and "Sefer Zekhirah," and "The Book of Remembrance," by Rabbi Ephraim of Bonn. |
|||
The threat of the expanding [[Ottoman Empire]] prompted further [[Crusades of the 15th Century|crusades of the 15th century]]. In 1389, the Ottomans defeated the Serbs at the [[Battle of Kosovo]], won [[Ottoman conquest of the Balkans|control of the Balkans]] from the [[Danube]] to the [[Gulf of Corinth]], in 1396 defeated French crusaders and [[Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor|King Sigismund of Hungary]] at the [[Battle of Nicopolis|Nicopolis]], in 1444 destroyed a crusading Polish and Hungarian force at [[Crusade of Varna|Varna]], four years later again defeated the Hungarians at [[Battle of Kosovo (1448)|Kosovo]] and in 1453 captured Constantinople. The 16th{{nbsp}}century saw growing rapprochement. The [[Habsburgs]], French, Spanish and Venetians and Ottomans all signed treaties. [[Francis I of France]] allied with all quarters, including from German Protestant princes and Sultan [[Suleiman the Magnificent]].{{sfn|Tyerman |2019|pp=406–408}} |
|||
===Caucasus=== |
|||
Anti-Christian crusading declined in the 15th{{nbsp}}century, the exceptions were the [[Hussite Wars|six failed crusades]] against the religiously radical [[Hussites]] in [[Kingdom of Bohemia|Bohemia]] and attacks on the [[Waldensians]] in Savoy.{{sfn|Tyerman |2019|pp=358–359}} Crusading became a financial exercise; precedence was given to the commercial and political objectives. The military threat presented by the Ottoman Turks diminished, making anti-Ottoman crusading obsolete in 1699 with the final [[Holy League (1684)|Holy League]].{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|p=257}}{{sfn|Tyerman |2019|pp=9, 257, 420–421}} |
|||
In the [[Caucasus Mountains]] of [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]], in the remote highland region of [[Khevsureti]], a tribe called the [[Khevsurs]] are thought to possibly be direct descendants of a party of crusaders who got separated from a larger army and have remained in isolation with some of the crusader culture intact. Into the 20th century, relics of armor, weaponry and chain mail were still being used and passed down in such communities. Russian serviceman and ethnographer [[Arnold Zisserman]] who spent 25 years (1842–67) in the Caucasus, believed the exotic group of Georgian highlanders were descendants of the last Crusaders based on their customs, language, art and other evidence.<ref>''[http://hearstmuseum.berkeley.edu/exhibitions/photo2/photo2_intro.html Images from the Georgia-Chechneya Border, 1970-1980]'', Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology.</ref> American traveler [[Richard Halliburton]] saw and recorded the customs of the tribe in 1935<ref>[http://www.swordhistory.com/excerpts/crusaders.html Sword and Buckler Fighting among the Lost Crusaders]. Excerpts of Halliburton's observations</ref>. |
|||
==Crusading movement== |
|||
{{Main|Crusading movement}} |
|||
Prior to the 11th{{nbsp}}century, the [[Latin Church]] had developed a system for the remission and absolution of sin in return for contrition, confession, and penitential acts. Reparation through abstinence from martial activity still presented a difficulty to the noble warrior class. It was revolutionary when Gregory VII offered absolution of sin earned through the Church-sponsored violence in support of his causes, if selflessly given at the end of the century.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=61}}{{sfn|Latham|2012|p=123}} This was developed by subsequent Popes into the granting of plenary indulgences that reduced all God-imposed temporal penalties.{{sfn|Maier|2006a|pp=627–629}} The papacy developed "Political [[Augustinianism]]" into attempts to remove the Church from secular control by asserting ecclesiastical supremacy over temporal polities and the Orthodox Church. This was associated with the idea that the Church should actively intervene in the world to impose "justice".{{sfn|Latham|2012|p=118}} |
|||
A distinct ideology promoting and regulating crusading is evidenced in surviving texts. The Church defined this in legal and theological terms based on the theory of holy war and the concept of pilgrimage. Theology merged the Old Testament Israelite wars instigated and assisted by God with New Testament Christocentric views. Holy war was based on ancient ideas of just war. The fourth-century theologian [[Augustine of Hippo]] had Christianised this, and it eventually became the [[paradigm]] of Christian holy war. Theologians widely accepted the justification that holy war against pagans was good, because of their opposition to Christianity.{{sfn|Maier|2006a|pp=627–629}} The Holy Land was the patrimony of Christ; its recovery was on behalf of God. The Albigensian Crusade was a defence of the French Church, the Northern Crusades were campaigns conquering lands beloved of Christ's mother [[Mary, mother of Jesus|Mary]] for Christianity.{{sfn|Maier|2006a|pp=629–630}} |
|||
==Legacy== |
|||
Despite the failure of the Ninth Crusade to leave a permanent Western civilization of states controlling the region, over 600 years later, the European powers returned in a war against the [[Ottoman Empire]]. This time however, it was not a religious war that was the subject of the conflict but instead the interests of the individual nation-states in [[World War I]]. |
|||
Inspired by the First Crusade, the crusading movement went on to define late medieval western culture and impacted the history of the western Islamic world.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|pp=4–5, 36}} Christendom was geopolitical, and this underpinned the practice of the medieval Church. Reformists of the 11th{{nbsp}}century urged these ideas which declined following the Reformation. The ideology continued after the 16th{{nbsp}}century with the military orders but dwindled in competition with other forms of religious war and new ideologies.{{sfn|Maier|2006a|pp=630–631}} |
|||
With the destruction of the Ottoman Empire, Lebanon and Syria ended up under the control of France. The French also occupied [[Morocco]], [[Algeria]], and [[Tunisia]], at various times during the early part of the 20th century. [[Italy]] took control of the areas that made up [[Libya]]. The [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland|British]] took control of the areas that became [[Iraq]], [[Palestine]], and [[Trans-Jordan]]. |
|||
==Military orders== |
|||
{{Main|Military order (religious society)|l1=Military orders}}[[Image:Baldwin II ceeding the Temple of Salomon to Ugo dei Pagani and Gaudefroy de Saint-Homer.jpg|thumb|13th-century miniature of [[Baldwin II of Jerusalem]] granting the captured [[Al-Aqsa|Al Aqsa Mosque]] to [[Hugues de Payns]]|alt=13th-century miniature of King Baldwin II granting the Al Aqsa Mosque to Hugues de Payens]] The military orders were forms of a religious order first established early in the twelfth century with the function of defending Christians, as well as observing monastic vows. The [[Knights Hospitaller]] had a medical mission in Jerusalem since before the [[First Crusade]], later becoming a formidable military force supporting the crusades in the Holy Land and Mediterranean. The [[Knights Templar]] were founded in 1119 by a band of knights who dedicated themselves to protecting pilgrims en{{nbsp}}route to Jerusalem.<ref>{{harvnb| Asbridge|2012| p= 168}}</ref> The [[Teutonic Order|Teutonic Knights]] were formed in 1190 to protect pilgrims in both the Holy Land and Baltic region.''<ref>Barker, Ernest (1911). "[[s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Teutonic Order, The|Teutonic Order, The]]". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). ''Encyclopædia Britannica'' '''26''' (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 676–679.</ref>'' |
|||
The Hospitallers and the Templars became supranational organisations as papal support led to rich donations of land and revenue across Europe. This, in turn, led to a steady flow of new recruits and the wealth to maintain multiple fortifications in the crusader states. In time, they developed into autonomous powers in the region.<ref>{{harvnb| Asbridge|2012|pp=169–170}}</ref> After the fall of Acre the Hospitallers relocated to Cyprus, then ruled [[Rhodes]] until the island was taken by the Ottomans in 1522. While there was talk of merging the Templars and Hospitallers in 1305 by [[Pope Clement V|Clement V]], ultimately the Templars were charged with heresy and disbanded. The Teutonic Knights supported the later Prussian campaigns into the fifteenth century. |
|||
==Art and architecture== |
|||
{{Main|Art of the Crusades}} |
|||
[[File:Crac des chevaliers syria.jpeg|thumb|12th-century [[Knights Hospitaller]] castle of [[Krak des Chevaliers]] in Syria, one of the first castles to use concentric fortification, i.e. concentric rings of defence that could all operate at the same time. It has two curtain walls and sits on a promontory.|alt=Photograph of 12th-century Hospitaller castle of Krak des Chevaliers in Syria showing concentric rings of defence, curtain walls and location sitting on a promontory.]]According to the historian Joshua Prawer no major European poet, theologian, scholar or historian settled in the crusader states. Some went on pilgrimage, and this is seen in new imagery and ideas in western poetry. Although they did not migrate east themselves, their output often encouraged others to journey there on pilgrimage.{{sfn|Prawer|1972|p=468}} |
|||
Historians consider the crusader military architecture of the Middle East to demonstrate a synthesis of the European, Byzantine and Muslim traditions and to be the most original and impressive artistic achievement of the crusades. Castles were a tangible symbol of the dominance of a Latin Christian minority over a largely hostile majority population. They also acted as centres of administration.{{sfn|Prawer|1972|pp=280–281}} Modern historiography rejects the 19th-century consensus that Westerners learnt the basis of military architecture from the Near East, as Europe had already experienced rapid development in defensive technology before the First Crusade. Direct contact with Arab fortifications originally constructed by the Byzantines did influence developments in the east, but the lack of documentary evidence means that it remains difficult to differentiate between the importance of this design culture and the constraints of situation. The latter led to the inclusion of oriental design features such as large water reservoirs and the exclusion of occidental features such as moats.{{sfn|Prawer|1972|pp=295–296}} |
|||
[[File:Egerton ms 1139!1 fse005r.jpg|thumb|The ivory front [[bookcover]] of the [[Melisende Psalter]]]] |
|||
Typically, crusader church design was in the [[French Romanesque architecture|French Romanesque]] style. This can be seen in the 12th-century rebuilding of the Holy Sepulchre. It retained some of the Byzantine details, but new arches and chapels were built to northern French, Aquitanian, and Provençal patterns. There is little trace of any surviving indigenous influence in sculpture, although in the Holy Sepulchre the [[Capital (architecture)|column capitals]] of the south facade follow classical Syrian patterns.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|p=146}} |
|||
In contrast to architecture and sculpture, it is in the area of visual culture that the assimilated nature of the society was demonstrated. Throughout the 12th{{nbsp}}and 13th{{nbsp}}centuries the influence of indigenous artists was demonstrated in the decoration of shrines, paintings and the production of illuminated manuscripts. Frankish practitioners borrowed methods from the Byzantines and indigenous artists and iconographical practice leading to a cultural synthesis, illustrated by the [[Church of the Nativity]]. Wall mosaics were unknown in the west but in widespread use in the crusader states. Whether this was by indigenous craftsmen or learnt by Frankish ones is unknown, but a distinctive original artistic style evolved.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=145–146}} |
|||
Manuscripts were produced and illustrated in workshops housing Italian, French, English and local craftsmen leading to a cross-fertilisation of ideas and techniques. An example of this is the [[Melisende Psalter]], created by several hands in a workshop attached to the Holy Sepulchre. This style could have both reflected and influenced the taste of patrons of the arts. But what is seen is an increase in stylised, Byzantine-influenced content. This extended to the production of [[icons]], unknown at the time to the Franks, sometimes in a Frankish style and even of western saints. This is seen as the origin of Italian panel painting.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=147–149}} While it is difficult to track illumination of manuscripts and castle design back to their origins, textual sources are simpler. The translations made in Antioch are notable, but they are considered of secondary importance to the works emanating from Muslim Spain and from the hybrid culture of Sicily.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=667–668}} |
|||
==Financing== |
|||
{{main|Papal income tax}} |
|||
Crusade finance and taxation left a legacy of social, financial, and legal institutions. Property became available while coinage and precious materials circulated more readily within Europe. Crusading expeditions created immense demands for food supplies, weapons, and shipping that benefited merchants and artisans. Levies for crusades contributed to the development of centralised financial administrations and the growth of papal and royal taxation. This aided development of representative bodies whose consent was required for many forms of taxation.<ref name=":3">Bird, Jessalynn (2006). "Finance of Crusades". In ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 432–436.</ref> |
|||
The Crusades strengthened exchanges between [[Orient]]al and [[Occident]]al economic spheres. The transport of pilgrims and crusaders notably benefitted Italian maritime cities, such as the trio of Venice, Pisa, and Genoa. Having obtained commercial privileges in the fortified places of Syria, they became the favoured intermediaries for trade in goods such as silk, spices, as well as other raw alimentary goods and mineral products. Trade with the Muslim world was thus extended beyond existing limits. Merchants were further advantaged by technological improvements, and long-distance trade as a whole expanded.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Cartwright |first1=Mark |title=Trade in Medieval Europe |url=https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1301/trade-in-medieval-europe/ |website=World History Encyclopedia |access-date=30 April 2021 |language=en |date=8 January 2019}}</ref> The increased volume of goods being traded through ports of the Latin Levant and the Muslim world made this the cornerstone of a wider Middle Eastern economy, as manifested in important cities along the trade routes, such as Aleppo, Damascus, and Acre. It became increasingly common for European merchants to venture farther east, and business was conducted fairly despite religious differences, and continued even in times of political and military tensions.<ref name=":3" /> |
|||
==Legacy== |
|||
{{See also|Crusading movement#Legacy}} |
|||
[[File:Saladin and Guy.jpg|thumb|''Saladin and Guy de{{nbsp}}Lusignan after the Battle of Hattin in 1187'', by Said Tahsine (1904–1985) |alt=Image of five knights paying homage to Saladin]] |
|||
The Crusades created national mythologies, tales of heroism, and a few place names.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=468}} Historical parallelism and the tradition of drawing inspiration from the Middle Ages have become keystones of [[political Islam]] encouraging ideas of a modern jihad and a centuries-long struggle against Christian states, while secular [[Arab nationalism]] highlights the role of western imperialism.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=675–680}} Modern Muslim thinkers, politicians and historians have drawn parallels between the crusades and political developments such as the [[Israeli Declaration of Independence|establishment of Israel]] in 1948.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=674–675}} |
|||
Right-wing circles in the [[western world]] have drawn opposing parallels, considering Christianity to be under an Islamic religious and demographic threat that is analogous to the situation at the time of the crusades. Crusader symbols and [[Criticism of Islam|anti-Islamic]] rhetoric are presented as an appropriate response. These symbols and rhetoric are used to provide a religious justification and inspiration for a struggle against a religious enemy.<ref>{{Harvnb|Koch|2017|p=1}}</ref> |
|||
==Etymology and use of the term "crusade"== |
|||
:''For other uses of the term "crusade", see [[Crusade (disambiguation)]].'' |
|||
{{wiktionarypar|Crusade}} |
|||
==Historiography== |
|||
The crusades were never referred to as such by their participants. The original crusaders were known by various terms, including ''fideles Sancti Petri'' (the faithful of [[Saint Peter]]) or ''milites Christi'' (knights of Christ). They saw themselves as undertaking an ''iter'', a journey, or a ''peregrinatio'', a pilgrimage, though pilgrims were usually forbidden from carrying arms. Like pilgrims, each crusader swore a vow (a ''votus''), to be fulfilled on successfully reaching Jerusalem, and they were granted a cloth cross (''crux'') to be sewn into their clothes. This "taking of the cross", the ''crux'', eventually became associated with the entire journey; the word "crusade" (coming into English from the [[French language|French]] ''croisade'', the [[Italian language|Italian]] ''crociata'', the [[Portuguese language|Portuguese]] ''cruzada'', or the German ''Kreuzzug'') developed from this. |
|||
{{main|Historiography of the Crusades}}The [[historiography of the Crusades]] is concerned with their "history of the histories" during the Crusader period. The subject is a complex one, with overviews provided in ''Select Bibliography of the Crusades,<ref>Zacour, N. P.; Hazard, H. W., Editor. [http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0006/reference/history.crussix.i0029.pdf Select Bibliography of the Crusades] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200620044204/http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0006/reference/history.crussix.i0029.pdf |date=2020-06-20 }}. (A History of the Crusades, volume, VI) Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989, pp. 511–664.</ref> Modern Historiography'',<ref name=":65">Tyerman, Christopher (2006). "Historiography, Modern". ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. pp. 582–588.</ref> and ''Crusades (Bibliography and Sources'').<ref name=":332">Bréhier, Louis René (1908). "[[s:Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Crusades (Bibliography and Sources)|Crusades (Sources and Bibliography)]]". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). ''Catholic Encyclopedia''. '''4'''. New York: Robert Appleton Company.</ref> The histories describing the Crusades are broadly of three types: (1) The [[primary source]]s of the Crusades,{{sfn|Slack|2013|p=111|loc=Historians}} which include works written in the medieval period, generally by participants in the Crusade or written contemporaneously with the event, letters and documents in archives, and archaeological studies; (2) [[secondary source]]s, beginning with early consolidated works in the 16th century and continuing to modern times; and (3) [[tertiary source]]s, primarily encyclopedias, bibliographies and genealogies. |
|||
[[File:William_of_tyre.jpg|alt=A miniature painting from a medieval manuscript, showing a man sitting at a desk writing a book.|right|thumb|William of Tyre writing his history, from a 13th-century [[Old French language|Old French]] translation, [[Bibliothèque Nationale]], Paris, MS 2631, f.1r]] |
|||
Since the 17th century, the term "crusade" has carried a connotation in the [[Western world|West]] of being a righteous campaign, usually to "root out [[evil]]", or to fight for a just cause. In a non-historical common or theological use, "crusade" has come to have a much broader emphatic or religious meaning —substantially removed from "armed struggle." |
|||
===Primary sources=== |
|||
In a broader sense, "crusade" can be used, always in a [[rhetoric]]al and [[metaphor]]ical sense, to identify as righteous any war that is given a [[religion|religious]] or [[morality|moral]] justification. |
|||
The primary sources for the Crusades are generally presented in the individual articles on each Crusade and summarised in the [[list of sources for the Crusades]].<ref>Halsall, Paul (ed.). "[https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/sbook1k.asp Selected Sources{{snd}}The Crusades]". ''[[Internet History Sourcebooks Project]]''. Fordham University.</ref> For the First Crusade, this includes the [[List of sources for the Crusades#Original Latin chronicles of the First Crusade|original Latin chronicles]], including the ''[[Gesta Francorum]]'', works by [[Albert of Aix|Albert of Aachen]] and [[Fulcher of Chartres]], the ''[[Alexiad]]'' by Byzantine princess [[Anna Komnene]], the [[The Complete History|''Complete Work of History'']] by Muslim historian [[Ali ibn al-Athir]], and the ''Chronicle'' of Armenian historian [[Matthew of Edessa]]. Many of these and related texts are found in the collections [[Recueil des historiens des croisades|''Recueil des historiens des croisades'' (RHC)]] and [[Crusade Texts in Translation]]. The work of [[William of Tyre]], ''Historia Rerum in Partibus Transmarinis Gestarum,'' and its continuations by later historians complete the foundational work of the traditional Crusade.<ref>Primary Bibliography. In Phillips, J., Holy Warriors (2009).</ref> Some of these works also provide insight into the later Crusades and Crusader states. Other works include: |
|||
* Eyewitness accounts of the Second Crusade by [[Odo of Deuil]] and [[Otto of Freising]]. The Arab view from Damascus is provided by [[ibn al-Qalanisi]]. |
|||
* Works on the Third Crusade such as [[Libellus de expugnatione Terrae Sanctae per Saladinum|''Libellus de Expugnatione Terrae Sanctae per Saladinum expeditione'']], the ''[[Itinerarium Regis Ricardi]],'' and the works of Crusaders [[Tageno]] and [[Roger of Howden]], and the narratives of [[Richard of Devizes]], [[Ralph de Diceto]], [[Ralph of Coggeshall]] and [[Arnold of Lübeck]]. The Arabic works by [[Imad ad-Din al-Isfahani|al-Isfahani]] and [[Diya al-Din al-Maqdisi|al-Maqdisi]] as well as the biography of Saladin by [[Baha ad-Din ibn Shaddad]] are also of interest. |
|||
* The Fourth Crusade is described in the ''[[Devastatio Constantinopolitana]]'' and works of [[Geoffrey of Villehardouin]], in his chronicle ''[[De la Conquête de Constantinople]],'' [[Robert de Clari]] and [[Gunther of Pairis]]. The view of Byzantium is provided by [[Niketas Choniates]] and the Arab perspective is given by [[Abū Shāma]] and [[Abu'l-Fida]]. |
|||
* The history of the Fifth and Sixth Crusades is well represented in the works of [[Jacques de Vitry]], [[Oliver of Paderborn]] and [[Roger of Wendover]], and the Arabic works of [[Badr al-Din al-Ayni]]. |
|||
* Key sources for the later Crusades include ''[[Templar of Tyre|Gestes des Chiprois]]'', [[Jean de Joinville]]'s ''Life of Saint Louis,'' as well as works by [[Guillaume de Nangis]], [[Matthew Paris]], [[Fidentius of Padua]] and [[Al-Maqrizi|al-Makrizi]]. |
|||
After the fall of Acre, the crusades continued through the 16th century. Principal references on this subject are the [[Wisconsin Collaborative History of the Crusades]]<ref name=":142">Setton, K. M. (Kenneth Meyer). (1969). [https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000328114/Home A history of the Crusades]. [2d ed.] Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.</ref> and [[Norman Housley]]'s ''The Later Crusades, 1274–1580: From Lyons to Alcazar.''<ref>Housley, Norman (1992). ''The Later Crusades, 1274–1580: From Lyons to Alcazar.'' Oxford University Press.</ref> Complete bibliographies are also given in these works. |
|||
Ardent activists may also refer to their causes as "crusades," as in the "Crusade against Adult Illiteracy," or a "Crusade against Littering." In recent years, however, the use of "crusade" as a positive term has become less frequent in order to avoid giving offense to Muslims or others offended by the term. The term may also sarcastically or pejoratively characterize the [[zealotry]] of agenda promoters, for example with the monicker "Public Crusader" or the campaigns "Crusade against abortion," and the "Crusade for prayer in public schools." |
|||
== |
===Secondary sources=== |
||
The secondary sources of the Crusades began in the 16th century, with one of the first uses of the term ''crusades'' by 17th century French historian [[Louis Maimbourg]] in his ''Histoire des Croisades pour la délivrance de la Terre Sainte.''<ref>Maimbourg, L. (1677). [https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/011820873/Home ''Histoire des croisades pour la délivrance de la Terre Sainte'']. 2d ed. Paris.</ref>{{sfn|Lock|2006|p=258|loc=Historiography}} Other works of the 18th century include [[Voltaire]]'s ''Histoire des Croisades'',<ref>Voltaire (1751). [https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008428814/Home ''Histoire des croisades'']. Berlin.</ref> and Edward Gibbon's [[The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire|Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire]], excerpted as ''The Crusades, A.D. 1095–1261''.<ref name=":12">Gibbon, E., Kaye, J., Scott, W., Caoursin, G. (1870). [https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/005859904/Home The crusades]. London.</ref> This edition also includes an essay on [[chivalry]] by [[Walter Scott]], whose works helped popularize the Crusades. Early in the 19th century, the monumental ''Histoire des Croisades'' was published by the French historian [[Joseph François Michaud]], a major new narrative based on original sources.<ref name=":82">Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.). (1841). [https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008232607/Home ''Histoire des croisades'']. 6. éd. Paris.</ref><ref name=":311">Michaud, J. Fr., Robson, W. (1881). [https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/006664455/Home The history of the crusades]. New ed. London.</ref> |
|||
{{commonscat|Crusades}} |
|||
{{Portalpar | Christianity | Heart2.jpg | 35}} |
|||
* [[Bull of the Crusade]] |
|||
* [[Art of the Crusades|Crusade art]] |
|||
* [[Crusade cycle]] |
|||
* [[Crusader states]] |
|||
* [[List of principal Crusaders|Crusaders, list of principal]] |
|||
* [[List of Crusader castles]] |
|||
* [[Military orders]] |
|||
* [[Religious war]] |
|||
* [[Jihad]] |
|||
* [[Shepherds' Crusade]] |
|||
* [[Tenth Crusade]] |
|||
* [[Kingdom of Heaven (film)]] |
|||
These histories have provided evolving views of the Crusades as discussed in detail in the [[Crusading movement#Historiography|Historiography]] writeup in [[Crusading movement]]. Modern works that serve as secondary source material are listed in the Bibliography section below and need no further discussion here.<ref>Secondary Bibliography. In Phillips, J. Holy Warriors (2009).</ref> |
|||
==Notes== |
|||
{{reflist}} |
|||
===Tertiary sources=== |
|||
==References and further reading== |
|||
Three such works are: [[Louis Bréhier|Louis Bréhier's]] multiple works on the Crusades<ref>''[[s:Author:Louis René Bréhier|Louis René Bréhier (1868–1951)]]'' (1913). In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). ''Catholic Encyclopedia''. '''4'''. New York: Robert Appleton Company.</ref> in the [[Catholic Encyclopedia]]; the works of [[Ernest Barker]]<ref>[[s:Author:Ernest Barker|Ernest Barker (1874–1960)]] (1911). In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. Index (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press.</ref> in the [[Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition|Encyclopædia Britannica]] (11th edition), later expanded into a separate publication;{{sfn|Barker|1923|pp=1–122|loc=The Crusades}} and ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia'' (2006), edited by historian Alan V. Murray.{{sfn|Murray|2006}} |
|||
* Andrea, Alfred J. ''Encyclopedia of the Crusades''. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2003 (ISBN 0-313-31659-7). |
|||
* Asbridge, Thomas S. ''The First Crusade: A New History''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 (hardcover, ISBN 0-19-517823-8); New York: Free Press, 2005 (paperback, ISBN 0-7432-2084-6). |
|||
* Boas, Adrian J. ''Archaeology of the Military Orders: A Survey of the Urban Centres, Rural Settlements and Castles of the Military Orders in the Latin East (c. 1120–1291). Oxford: Routledge, 2006 (ISBN 0-415-29980-2). |
|||
* Cahen, Claude. "An Introduction to the First Crusade", ''Past and Present'', No. 6. (Nov., 1954), pp. 6–30. |
|||
* Christiansen, Eric. ''The Northern Crusades'' (2nd ed.). London: Penguin, 1998 (paperback, ISBN 0-14-026653-4). |
|||
* Clark, Victoria. ''The Far-Farers: A Journey from Viking Iceland to Crusader Jerusalem''. MacMillan, 2003 (hardcover, ISBN 0-333-90219-X); New York: Walker & Company, 2003 (hardcover, ISBN 0-8027-1422-6); London: Pan Macmillan, 2005 (paperback, ISBN 0-330-48976-3). |
|||
* ''The Experience of Crusading. 1. Western Approaches.'' Edited by Marcus Bull and Norman Housley. Cambridge, MA; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003 (hardcover, ISBN 0-521-81168-6). |
|||
* ''The Experience of Crusading. 2. Defining the Crusader Kingdom.'' Edited by Peter Edbury and Jonathan Phillips. Cambridge, MA; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003 (hardcover, ISBN 0-521-78151-5). |
|||
* Fonnesberg-Schmidt, Iben. ''The Popes and the Baltic Crusades 1147–1254 (The Northern World; 26)''. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2006 (hardcover, ISBN 90-04-15502-3). |
|||
* France, John. ''Victory in the East: A Military History of the First Crusade''. Cambridge, MA; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994 (hardcover, ISBN 0-521-41969-7); 1997 (paperback, ISBN 0-521-58987-8). |
|||
* Gabrieli, Francesco (editor and translator). ''Arab Historians of the Crusades''. New York: Dorset Press, 1989 (hardcover, ISBN 0-88029-452-3); Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press, 1984 (paperback, ISBN 0-520-05224-2). |
|||
* Harris, Jonathan. ''Byzantium and the Crusades''. London, Hambledon Continuum, 2003 (hardcover, ISBN 1-85285-298-4); 2006 (paperback, ISBN 1-85285-501-0). |
|||
* Hillenbrand, Carole. ''The Crusades: Islamic Perspectives''. Chicago, IL: Fitzroy Dearborn, 1999 (hardcover, ISBN 1-57958-210-9); New York: Routledge, 2000 (paperback, ISBN 0-415-92914-8). |
|||
* Holt, P.M. (Peter Malcolm), ''The Age of the Crusades: The Near East from the Eleventh Century to 1517''. Boston, MA: Longman, 1986 (paperback, ISBN 0-582-49303-X); 1989 (texbook, ISBN 0-582-49302-1). |
|||
* Housley, Norman. ''Contesting the Crusades (Contesting the Past)''. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006 (hardcover, ISBN 1-4051-1188-7; paperback, ISBN 1-4051-1189-5). |
|||
* Jaspert, Nikolas. ''The Crusades''. Oxford: Routledge, 2006 (hardcover, ISBN 0-415-35967-8; paperback, ISBN 0-415-35968-6). |
|||
* Jotischky, Andrew. ''Crusading and Crusader States''. Edinburgh: Pearson Publishing, 2004 (paperback, ISBN 0-582-41851-8). |
|||
* ''Knights of the Holy Land: The Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem''. Jerusalem: The Israel Museum, 1999 (paperback, ISBN 965-278-234-3). |
|||
* [[Amin Maalouf|Maalouf, Amin]], ''The Crusades Through Arab Eyes''. London: Saqi Books, 1984 (hardcover, ISBN 0-86356-113-6); 1985 (paperback, ISBN 0-86356-023-7); 2001 (paperback reprint, ISBN 0-86356-023-7); New York: Schocken Books, 1989 (paperback reissue, ISBN 0-8052-0898-4). |
|||
* Laiou, Angeliki E. ''The Crusades from the Perspective of Byzantium and the Muslim World'', ([http://www.doaks.org/LACR.html e-book online]), includes chapter on Historiography of the crusades. |
|||
* Madden, Thomas F. ''The New Concise History of the Crusades''. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005 (hardcover, updated edition, ISBN 0-7425-3822-2). |
|||
* Marshall, Christopher. ''Warfare in the Latin East, 1192–1291''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992 (hardcover, ISBN 0-521-39428-7); 1994 (paperback, ISBN 0-521-47742-5). |
|||
* Mayer, Hans Eberhard. ''The Crusades'' (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, 1988 (hardcover, ISBN 0-19-873098-5; paperback, ISBN 0-19-873097-7). |
|||
* Murray, Alan V. (ed.) ''The Crusades: An Encyclopedia''. Oxford: ABC-CLIO, 2006 (hardcover, ISBN 1-57607-862-0). |
|||
* [[Zoé Oldenbourg|Oldenbourg, Zoé]]. ''The Crusades''. 1965; London: Phoenix Press, 2001 (paperback, ISBN 1-84212-223-1). |
|||
* [[Zoé Oldenbourg|Oldenbourg, Zoé]]. ''Massacre at Montségur: A History of the Albigensian Crusade''. New York: Pantheon Books, 1962. |
|||
* Payne, Robert. ''The Dream and the Tomb, a History of the Crusades''. New York: Cooper Square Press, 2000 (paperback, ISBN 0-8154-1086-7). |
|||
* Phillips, Jonathan. ''The Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople''. London: Jonathan Cape, 2004 (hardcover, ISBN 0-224-06986-1); Pimlico, 2005 (paperback, ISBN 1-84413-080-0). |
|||
* Regan, Geoffrey. ''Lionhearts: Richard I, Saladin, and the Era of the Third Crusade''. New York: Walker & Company, 1999 (hardcover, ISBN 0-8027-1354-8). |
|||
* Riley-Smith, Jonathan. ''The Crusades: A History'' (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005 (paperback, ISBN 0-300-10128-7). |
|||
* Riley-Smith, Jonathan. ''The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading''. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1986 (hardcover, ISBN 0-8122-8026-1; paperback, ISBN 0-8122-1363-7). |
|||
* Riley-Smith, Jonathan. ''The First Crusaders, 1095–1131''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (New ed.), 1997 (hardcover, ISBN 0-521-59005-1); 1998 (paperback, ISBN 0-521-64603-0). |
|||
* Riley-Smith, Jonathan (ed.). ''The Oxford Illustrated History of the Crusades''. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995 (hardcover, ISBN 0-19-820435-3); New ed., 2001 (paperback, ISBN 0-19-285428-3). As ''The Oxford History of the Crusades''. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002 (paperback, ISBN 0-19-280312-3). |
|||
* Riley-Smith, Jonathan. ''What were the Crusades?'' Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1977 (hardcover, ISBN 0-87471-944-5); Ft. Collins, CO: Ignatius Press, 2002 (paperback, ISBN 0-89870-954-7); New York: Palgrave MacMillan (3rd rev. ed.), 2002 (paperback, ISBN 0-333-94904-8). |
|||
* [[Steven Runciman|Runciman, Steven]], ''A History of the Crusades'' (3 vols.). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1951 (hardcover, ISBN 0-521-20554-9; hardcover, ISBN 0-521-35997-X); 1987 (paperback reprint, ISBN 0-521-34772-6, ISBN 0-521-34770-X) |
|||
* Schein, Sylvia. ''Gateway to the Heavenly City: Crusader Jerusalem and the Catholic West, 1099–1187 (Church, Faith and Culture in the Medieval West)''. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2005 (hardcover, ISBN 075460649X). |
|||
* Setton, Kenneth. ed., ''A History of the Crusades''. Madison, 1969–1989 ([http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/History/subcollections/HistCrusadesAbout.shtml e-book online]) |
|||
* Smail, R.C. ''Crusading Warfare, 1097–1193 (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought: New Series)''. Cambridge, MA; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995 (paperback, ISBN 0-521-45838-2). |
|||
* Tyerman, Christopher. [http://www.historytoday.com/dt_main_allatonce.asp?gid=31808&aid=&tgid=&amid=30233441&g31808=x&g31800=x&g30026=x&g20991=x&g21010=x&g19965=x&g19963=x "The Cross and the State"], [http://www.historytoday.com/ ''History Today''], September 2006, Volume 56, Issue 9, pp. 28–30. |
|||
* Tyerman, Christopher. ''Fighting for Christendom: Holy War and the Crusades''. New York: Oxford University Press (USA), 2005 (hardcover, ISBN 0-19-280325-5). |
|||
* Tyerman, Christopher. ''God's War: A New History of the Crusades''. London: Allen Lane, 2006 (ISBN 0-7139-9220-4). |
|||
** [http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-magazine/books/24787/the-christian-drang-nach-osten.thtml Reviewed] by Jonathan Sumption in [http://www.spectator.co.uk/ ''The Spectator''], August 26, 2006. |
|||
** [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2006/09/24/botye10.xml Reviewed] by Jonathan Phillips in the [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ ''Telegraph''], September 17, 2006. |
|||
* Urban, William L. ''The Baltic Crusade''. Chicago: Lithuanian Research and Studies Center, 1994 (hardcover, ISBN 0-929700-10-4). |
|||
* Urban, William L. ''The Livonian Crusade''. Chicago: Lithuanian Research and Studies Center, 2004 (hardcover, ISBN 0-929700-45-7). |
|||
* Urban, William L. ''The Prussian Crusade''. Chicago: Lithuanian Research and Studies Center, 2000 (paperback, ISBN 0-929700-28-7). |
|||
* Urban, William L. ''The Samogitian Crusade''. Chicago: Lithuanian Research and Studies Center, 1989 (hardcover, ISBN 0-929700-03-1). |
|||
== |
==See also== |
||
* [[A History of the Crusades: list of contributions|''A History of the Crusades'': list of contributions]] |
|||
*E.L. Skip Knox, [http://crusades.boisestate.edu/ The Crusades], a virtual college course through [[Boise State University]]. |
|||
* [[Bibliography of the Crusades: modern works]] |
|||
*[[Paul Crawford]], [http://www.the-orb.net/encyclop/religion/crusades/crusade.html Crusades: A Guide to Online Resources], 1999. |
|||
* [[Criticism of crusading]] |
|||
*Thomas F. Madden, [http://www.godspy.com/issues/Real-History-of-Crusades-by-Thomas-Madden.cfm The Real History of the Crusades], an essay by the distinguished American historian of the Crusades. |
|||
* [[Historians and histories of the Crusades]] |
|||
*[http://www.staff.u-szeged.hu/~capitul/sscle/ The Society for the Study of the Crusades and the Latin East] - an international organization of professional Crusade scholars |
|||
* [[History of Christianity]] |
|||
*[http://www.deremilitari.org De Re Militari: The Society for Medieval Military History] - contains articles and primary sources related to the Crusades |
|||
* [[History of the Knights Hospitaller in the Levant]] |
|||
* [[History of the Knights Templar]] |
|||
* [[Military history of the Crusader states]] |
|||
* [[Women in the Crusades]] |
|||
==References== |
|||
[[Category:Crusades|*]] |
|||
{{Reflist|20em}} |
|||
[[Category:Islam and other religions]] |
|||
[[Category:Islam]] |
|||
[[Category:Jerusalem]] |
|||
[[Category:Warfare of the Medieval era]] |
|||
[[Category:Religion and violence]] |
|||
==Bibliography== |
|||
{{Link FA|no}} |
|||
{{ |
{{refbegin|30em}} |
||
* {{Cite book|last=Asbridge|first=Thomas|author-link=Thomas Asbridge|title=The Creation of the Principality of Antioch, 1098–1130|publisher=Boydell & Brewer|year=2000|isbn=978-0-85115-661-3}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Asbridge|first=Thomas|title=The Crusades: The War for the Holy Land|year=2012|publisher=Simon & Schuster|isbn=978-1-84983-688-3|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rK8nA9U0OE4C}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Barber|first=Malcolm|author-link=Malcolm Barber|title=The New Knighthood. A History of the Order of the Temple|year=1994|publisher=Cambridge University Press|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=B0h6zgEACAAJ|isbn=978-1-107-60473-5}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Barber|first=Malcolm|title=The Crusader States|year=2012|publisher=Yale University Press|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Bz_O7-Lb_CsC|isbn=978-0-300-18931-5}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Barker|first=Ernest|author-link=Ernest Barker|title=The Crusades|series=World's manuals|year=1923|publisher=Oxford University Press, London|url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000630938/Home}} |
|||
* {{cite book|first=Robert|last=Chazan|author-link=Robert Chazan|title=In The Year 1096... European Jewry and the First Crusade|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sndVK_foqI4C|year=1996|publisher=[[University of California Press]]|isbn=978-0-520-91776-7}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Christie|first=Niall|title=Muslims and Crusaders: Christianity's Wars in the Middle East, 1095–1382, from the Islamic Sources|year=2014|publisher=Routledge|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0d_pAwAAQBAJ|isbn=978-1-138-54310-2}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=El-Azhari|first=Taef|title=Zengi and the Muslim response to the Crusades: The politics of Jihad|year=2016|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-367-87073-7|url=https://www.routledge.com/Zengi-and-the-Muslim-Response-to-the-Crusades-The-politics-of-Jihad/El-Azhari/p/book/9780367870737}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Gibb|first=H. A. R.|author-link=H. A. R. Gibb|title=The Aiyūbids|year=1969|publisher=A History of the Crusades (Setton), Volume II|url=http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0034.pdf|access-date=2021-10-10|archive-date=2023-03-26|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230326025110/http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/HistCrus/0001/0002/reference/history.crustwo.i0034.pdf|url-status=dead}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Hindley|first=Geoffrey|year=2004|title=The Crusades: Islam and Christianity in the Struggle for World Supremacy |publisher=[[Carroll & Graf Publishers]] |isbn=978-0-7867-1344-8}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Housley|first=Norman|author-link=Norman Housley|title=The Italian Crusades: The Papal-Angevin Alliance and the Crusades Against Christian Lay Powers, 1254–1343|year=1982|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-821925-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QRhWU5YJyMcC}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Housley|first=Norman|title=The Later Crusades, 1274–1580: From Lyons to Alcazar|year=1992|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-822136-4|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UrhmAAAAMAAJ}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Jotischky|first=Andrew|title=Crusading and the Crusader States|publisher=Pearson Longman|year=2004|isbn=978-1-351-98392-1|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rTUlDwAAQBAJ}} |
|||
* {{cite journal|last=Kedar|first=Benjamin Z.|author-link=Benjamin Z. Kedar|title=On the Origins of the Earliest Laws of Frankish Jerusalem: The Canons of the Council of Nablus|journal=Speculum|volume=74|issue=2|date=1999|pages=310–35|doi=10.2307/2887049|jstor=2887049|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2887049|issn=0038-7134}} |
|||
* {{cite journal |last=Koch |first=Ariel |title=The New Crusaders: Contemporary Extreme Right Symbolism and Rhetoric |journal=[[Perspectives on Terrorism]] |volume=11 |issue=5 |date=2017 |pages=13–24 |jstor=26297928 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26297928 }} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Latham|first=Andrew A.|title=Theorizing Medieval Geopolitics – War and World Order in the Age of the Crusades|year=2012|publisher=Routledge|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=o9h7PgAACAAJ|isbn=978-0-415-87184-6}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Lewis|first=Bernard|author-link=Bernard Lewis|title=The Assassins: A Radical Sect in Islam|publisher=Phoenix|year=2003|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rRZAPgAACAAJ|isbn=978-1-84212-451-2}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Lewis|first=Kevin James|year=2017|title=The Counts of Tripoli and Lebanon in the Twelfth Century: Sons of Saint-Gilles|publisher=Routledge|url=https://www.routledge.com/The-Counts-of-Tripoli-and-Lebanon-in-the-Twelfth-Century-Sons-of-Saint-Gilles/Lewis/p/book/9780367880552|isbn=978-1-4724-5890-2}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Lock|first=Peter|title=The Routledge Companion to the Crusades|publisher=Routledge|year=2006|doi=10.4324/9780203389638|isbn=978-0-415-39312-6|url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203389638/routledge-companion-crusades-peter-lock}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Maalouf|first=Amin|title=The Crusades through Arab Eyes|publisher=Saqi Books|year=2006|isbn=978-0-86356-023-1|url=https://saqibooks.com/books/saqi/the-crusades-through-arab-eyes/}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Maier|first=Christoph T.|chapter=Ideology|pages=627–631|editor-last=Murray|editor-first=Alan V.|volume=II: D–J|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|url=https://archive.org/details/crusadesencyclop0002unse/page/n5/mode/2up|url-access=registration|year=2006a|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-57607-862-4}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Munro|first=Dana Carleton|author-link=Dana Carleton Munro|title=Letters of the Crusaders|series=Translations and reprints from the original sources of European history|year=1902|publisher=University of Pennsylvania|url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/007135585/Home}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Murray|first=Alan V.|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|year=2006|url=https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-crusades-an-encyclopedia-e38126580.html|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-57607-862-4}} |
|||
* {{cite ODNB|last= Murray|first=Alan V.|year=2009|title= Participants in the Third Crusade|doi=10.1093/ref:odnb/98218 |url=https://www.oxforddnb.com/display/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-98218}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Norgate|first=Kate|author-link=Kate Norgate|title=Richard the Lion Heart|publisher=Macmillan and Co.|year=1924|url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000311544?type%5B%5D=author&lookfor%5B%5D=kate%20norgate&ft=ft}} |
|||
* {{Cite book|last=Oman|first=Charles|author-link=Charles Oman|title=A History of the Art of War in the Middle Ages|publisher=Metheun|year=1924|url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/102022749/Home}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Perry|first=Guy|year=2013|title=John of Brienne: King of Jerusalem, Emperor of Constantinople, c. 1175–1237|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-107-04310-7|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4XhaAQAAQBAJ}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Prawer|first=Joshua|author-link=Joshua Prawer|title=The Crusaders' Kingdom|publisher=[[Phoenix Books|Phoenix Press]]|year=1972|isbn=978-1-84212-224-2|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AMxmAAAAMAAJ}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Richard|first=Jean C.|author-link=Jean Richard (historian)|title=The Crusades, c. 1071 – c. 1291|year=1999|publisher=Cambridge University Press|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=a0LO9u6xKvcC|isbn=978-0-521-62566-1}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Riley-Smith|first=Jonathan|author-link=Jonathan Riley-Smith|title=The Feudal Nobility and the Kingdom of Jerusalem, 1174–1277|year=1973|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YKLxAAAAMAAJ|publisher=Macmillan|isbn=978-0-333-06379-8}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Riley-Smith|first=Jonathan|chapter=The Crusading Movement and Historians|pages=1–12|editor-last=Riley-Smith|editor-first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordillustrate0000unse_q0x8/page/n5/mode/2up|url-access=registration|year=1995|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-285428-5}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Riley-Smith|first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades|year=2001|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-285428-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CuepyJIHXuEC}} |
|||
* {{Cite book|last=Runciman|first=Steven|title=A History of the Crusades, Volume Two: The Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Frankish East, 1100–1187|year=1952|publisher=Cambridge University Press|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QL88AAAAIAAJ|isbn=978-0-521-34771-6}} |
|||
* {{Cite book|last=Runciman|first=Steven|title=A History of the Crusades, Volume Three: The Kingdom of Acre and the Later Crusades|year=1954|publisher=Cambridge University Press|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mrw8AAAAIAAJ|isbn=978-0-521-34772-3}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Slack|first=Corliss K.|title=Historical Dictionary of the Crusades|year=2013|publisher=Scarecrow Press|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uX8e2zU_TG0C|isbn=978-0-8108-7830-3}} |
|||
* {{cite ODNB|last=Summerson|first=Henry|date=2005|title=Lord Edward's crusade|doi=10.1093/ref:odnb/94804 |url=https://www.oxforddnb.com/display/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-94804}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|first=Christopher|author-link=Christopher Tyerman|title=England and the Crusades, 1095–1588|publisher=University of Chicago Press|year=1996|isbn=978-0-226-82012-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=215JWFCeSOsC}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|first=Christopher|title=God's War: A New History of the Crusades|publisher=Belknap Press|year=2006|isbn=978-0-674-02387-1|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ULDUopVCVPoC}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|first=Christopher|title=The Debate on the Crusades, 1099–2010|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t_DEyAEACAAJ|year=2011|publisher=Manchester University Press|isbn=978-0-7190-7320-5}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|first=Christopher|title=The World of the Crusades|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GIOVDwAAQBAJ|year=2019|publisher=Yale University Press|isbn=978-0-300-21739-1}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=von Sybel|first=Heinrich|author-link=Heinrich von Sybel|title=The History and Literature of the Crusades|publisher=G. Routledge & Son, Limited|year=1861|url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/012476975/Home}} |
|||
{{refend}} |
|||
{{Crusader States}} |
|||
<!-- The below are interlanguage links. --> |
|||
{{Crusader sites}} |
|||
{{Middle Ages}} |
|||
{{History of Europe}} |
|||
{{History of the Catholic Church}} |
|||
{{Christian History}} |
|||
{{Christianity footer}} |
|||
{{Subject bar |
|||
|book1 = Crusades |
|||
|portal1 = Christianity |
|||
|portal3 = Islam |
|||
|portal4 = Middle Ages |
|||
|portal5 = History |
|||
|portal6 = Religion |
|||
|commons = y |
|||
|commons-search = Category:Crusades |
|||
|wikt = y |
|||
|wikt-search = Crusade |
|||
|b = y |
|||
|b-search = Crusades |
|||
|q = y |
|||
|q-search = Crusades |
|||
|s = y |
|||
|s-search = Category:Crusades |
|||
|spoken = |
|||
|v = y |
|||
|v-search = Crusades |
|||
|d = y |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[ |
[[Category:Crusades| ]] |
||
[[Category:Catholicism and Islam]] |
|||
[[als:Kreuzzug]] |
|||
[[Category:Catholicism-related controversies]] |
|||
[[ar:حملات صليبية]] |
|||
[[Category:Christianity-related controversies]] |
|||
[[be:Крыжовыя паходы]] |
|||
[[Category:Islam-related controversies]] |
|||
[[bs:Križarski ratovi]] |
|||
[[Category:Judaism-related controversies]] |
|||
[[bg:Кръстоносен поход]] |
|||
[[Category:Medieval Asia]] |
|||
[[ca:Croades]] |
|||
[[Category:Medieval Africa]] |
|||
[[cs:Křížové výpravy]] |
|||
[[Category:Medieval history of the Middle East]] |
|||
[[da:Korstog]] |
|||
[[de:Kreuzzug]] |
|||
[[et:Ristisõjad]] |
|||
[[el:Σταυροφορίες]] |
|||
[[es:Cruzadas]] |
|||
[[eo:Krucmilito]] |
|||
[[eu:Gurutzadak]] |
|||
[[fa:جنگهای صلیبی]] |
|||
[[fr:Croisade]] |
|||
[[gl:Cruzadas]] |
|||
[[ko:십자군]] |
|||
[[hr:Križarski ratovi]] |
|||
[[io:Kruco-milito]] |
|||
[[id:Perang Salib]] |
|||
[[it:Crociata]] |
|||
[[he:מסעי הצלב]] |
|||
[[la:Expeditio sacra]] |
|||
[[lv:Krusta kari]] |
|||
[[lt:Kryžiaus žygiai]] |
|||
[[hu:Keresztes háborúk]] |
|||
[[mk:Крстоносни војни]] |
|||
[[mt:Kruċjata]] |
|||
[[ms:Perang Salib]] |
|||
[[nl:Kruistocht]] |
|||
[[ja:十字軍]] |
|||
[[no:Korstog]] |
|||
[[nn:Krosstog]] |
|||
[[nds:Krüüztog]] |
|||
[[pl:Krucjata]] |
|||
[[pt:Cruzada]] |
|||
[[ro:Cruciadă]] |
|||
[[ru:Крестовые походы]] |
|||
[[sq:Kryqëzata]] |
|||
[[ru-sib:Хрестовы походы]] |
|||
[[scn:Cruciati]] |
|||
[[simple:Crusade]] |
|||
[[sk:Križiacka výprava]] |
|||
[[sl:Križarske vojne]] |
|||
[[sr:Крсташки ратови]] |
|||
[[sh:Križarski ratovi]] |
|||
[[fi:Ristiretki]] |
|||
[[sv:Korståg]] |
|||
[[tl:Krusada]] |
|||
[[th:สงครามครูเสด]] |
|||
[[vi:Thập tự chinh]] |
|||
[[tr:Haçlı seferleri]] |
|||
[[uk:Хрестові походи]] |
|||
[[ur:صلیبی جنگیں]] |
|||
[[yi:קרייצצוג]] |
|||
[[zh:十字軍東征]] |
Latest revision as of 19:21, 27 December 2024
The Crusades were a series of religious wars initiated, supported, and sometimes directed by the Christian Latin Church in the medieval period. The best known of these military expeditions are those to the Holy Land between 1095 and 1291 that had the objective of reconquering Jerusalem and its surrounding area from Muslim rule after the region had been conquered by the Rashidun Caliphate centuries earlier. Beginning with the First Crusade, which resulted in the conquest of Jerusalem in 1099, dozens of military campaigns were organised, providing a focal point of European history for centuries. Crusading declined rapidly after the 15th century with the fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans.
In 1095, after a Byzantine request for aid,[1] Pope Urban II proclaimed the first expedition at the Council of Clermont. He encouraged military support for Byzantine emperor Alexios I Komnenos and called for an armed pilgrimage to Jerusalem. Across all social strata in Western Europe, there was an enthusiastic response. Participants came from all over Europe and had a variety of motivations. These included religious salvation, satisfying feudal obligations, opportunities for renown, and economic or political advantage. Later expeditions were conducted by generally more organised armies, sometimes led by a king. All were granted papal indulgences. Initial successes established four Crusader states: the County of Edessa; the Principality of Antioch; the Kingdom of Jerusalem; and the County of Tripoli. A European presence remained in the region in some form until the fall of Acre in 1291. After this, no further large military campaigns were organised.
Other church-sanctioned campaigns include crusades against Christians not obeying papal rulings and heretics, those against the Ottoman Empire, and ones for political reasons. The struggle against the Moors in the Iberian Peninsula–the Reconquista–ended in 1492 with the Fall of Granada. From 1147, the Northern Crusades were fought against pagan tribes in Northern Europe. Crusades against Christians began with the Albigensian Crusade in the 13th century and continued through the Hussite Wars in the early 15th century. Crusades against the Ottomans began in the late 14th century and include the Crusade of Varna. Popular crusades, including the Children's Crusade of 1212, were generated by the masses and were unsanctioned by the Church.
Terminology
The term "crusade" first referred to military expeditions undertaken by European Christians in the 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries to the Holy Land. The conflicts to which the term is applied have been extended to include other campaigns initiated, supported and sometimes directed by the Latin Church with varying objectives, mostly religious, sometimes political. These differed from previous Christian religious wars in that they were considered a penitential exercise, and so earned participants remittance from penalties for all confessed sins.[2] What constituted a crusade has been understood in diverse ways, particularly regarding the early Crusades, and the precise definition remains a matter of debate among contemporary historians.[3][4]
At the time of the First Crusade, iter, "journey", and peregrinatio, "pilgrimage" were used for the campaign. Crusader terminology remained largely indistinguishable from that of Christian pilgrimage during the 12th century. A specific term for a crusader in the form of crucesignatus—"one signed by the cross"—emerged in the early 12th century. This led to the French term croisade—the way of the cross.[3] By the mid 13th century the cross became the major descriptor of the crusades with crux transmarina—"the cross overseas"—used for crusades in the eastern Mediterranean, and crux cismarina—"the cross this side of the sea"—for those in Europe.[5] The use of croiserie, "crusade" in Middle English can be dated to c. 1300, but the modern English "crusade" dates to the early 1700s.[6] The Crusader states of Syria and Palestine were known as the "Outremer" from the French outre-mer, or "the land beyond the sea".[7]
Crusades and the Holy Land, 1095–1291
Background
By the end of the 11th century, the period of Islamic Arab territorial expansion had been over for centuries. The Holy Land's remoteness from focus of Islamic power struggles enabled relative peace and prosperity in Syria and Palestine. Muslim-Western European contact was only more than minimal in the conflict in the Iberian Peninsula.[8] The Byzantine Empire and the Islamic world were long standing centres of wealth, culture and military power. The Arab-Islamic world tended to view Western Europe as a backwater that presented little organised threat.[9] By 1025, the Byzantine Emperor Basil II had extended territorial recovery to its furthest extent. The frontiers stretched east to Iran. Bulgaria and much of southern Italy were under control, and piracy was suppressed in the Mediterranean Sea. The empire's relationships with its Islamic neighbours were no more quarrelsome than its relationships with the Slavs or the Western Christians. The Normans in Italy; to the north Pechenegs, Serbs and Cumans; and Seljuk Turks in the east all competed with the Empire and the emperors recruited mercenaries—even on occasions from their enemies—to meet this challenge.[10]
The political situation in Western Asia was changed by later waves of Turkic migration, in particular the arrival of the Seljuk Turks in the 10th century. Previously a minor ruling clan from Transoxania, they had recently converted to Islam and migrated into Iran. In two decades following their arrival they conquered Iran, Iraq and the Near East. The Seljuks and their followers were from the Sunni tradition. This brought them into conflict in Palestine and Syria with the Fatimids who were Shi'ite.[11] The Seljuks were nomadic, Turkic speaking and occasionally shamanistic, very different from their sedentary, Arabic speaking subjects. This difference and the governance of territory based on political preference, and competition between independent princes rather than geography, weakened existing power structures.[12] In 1071, Byzantine Emperor Romanos IV Diogenes attempted confrontation to suppress the Seljuks' sporadic raiding, leading to his defeat at the battle of Manzikert. Historians once considered this a pivotal event but now Manzikert is regarded as only one further step in the expansion of the Great Seljuk Empire.[13]
The evolution of a Christian theology of war developed from the link of Roman citizenship to Christianity, according to which citizens were required to fight the empire's enemies. This doctrine of holy war dated from the 4th-century theologian Saint Augustine. He maintained that aggressive war was sinful, but acknowledged a "just war" could be rationalised if it was proclaimed by a legitimate authority, was defensive or for the recovery of lands, and without an excessive degree of violence.[14][15] Violent acts were commonly used for dispute resolution in Western Europe, and the papacy attempted to mitigate this.[16] Historians have thought that the Peace and Truce of God movements restricted conflict between Christians from the 10th century; the influence is apparent in Urban II's speeches. Other historians assert that the effectiveness was limited and it had died out by the time of the crusades.[17] Pope Alexander II developed a system of recruitment via oaths for military resourcing that his successor Pope Gregory VII extended across Europe.[18] In the 11th century, Christian conflict with Muslims on the southern peripheries of Christendom was sponsored by the Church, including the siege of Barbastro and the Norman conquest of Sicily.[19] In 1074, Gregory VII planned a display of military power to reinforce the principle of papal sovereignty. His vision of a holy war supporting Byzantium against the Seljuks was the first crusade prototype, but lacked support.[20]
The First Crusade was an unexpected event for contemporary chroniclers, but historical analysis demonstrates it had its roots in earlier developments with both clerics and laity recognising Jerusalem's role in Christianity as worthy of penitential pilgrimage. In 1071, Jerusalem was captured by the Turkish warlord Atsiz, who seized most of Syria and Palestine as part of the expansion of the Seljuks throughout the Middle East. The Seljuk hold on the city was weak and returning pilgrims reported difficulties and the oppression of Christians. Byzantine desire for military aid converged with increasing willingness of the western nobility to accept papal military direction.[21][22]
First Crusade
In 1095, Byzantine Emperor Alexios I Komnenos requested military aid from Pope Urban II at the Council of Piacenza. He was probably expecting a small number of mercenaries he could direct. Alexios had restored the Empire's finances and authority but still faced numerous foreign enemies. Later that year at the Council of Clermont, Urban raised the issue again and preached a crusade.[23] Almost immediately, the French priest Peter the Hermit gathered thousands of mostly poor in the People's Crusade.[24] Traveling through Germany, German bands massacred Jewish communities in the Rhineland massacres during wide-ranging anti-Jewish activities.[25] Jews were perceived to be as much an enemy as Muslims. They were held responsible for the Crucifixion, and were more immediately visible. People wondered why they should travel thousands of miles to fight non-believers when there were many closer to home.[26] Quickly after leaving Byzantine-controlled territory on their journey to Nicaea, these crusaders were annihilated in a Turkish ambush at the Battle of Civetot.[27]
Conflict with Urban II meant that King Philip I of France and Holy Roman Emperor Henry IV declined to participate. Aristocrats from France, western Germany, the Low Countries, Languedoc and Italy led independent contingents in loose, fluid arrangements based on bonds of lordship, family, ethnicity and language. The elder statesman Raymond IV, Count of Toulouse was foremost, rivaled by the relatively poor but martial Italo-Norman Bohemond of Taranto and his nephew Tancred. Godfrey of Bouillon and his brother Baldwin also joined with forces from Lorraine, Lotharingia, and Germany. These five princes were pivotal to the campaign, which was augmented by a northern French army led by Robert Curthose, Count Stephen II of Blois, and Count Robert II of Flanders.[28] The total number may have reached as many as 100,000 people including non-combatants. They traveled eastward by land to Constantinople where they were cautiously welcomed by the emperor.[29] Alexios persuaded many of the princes to pledge allegiance to him and that their first objective should be Nicaea, the capital of the Sultanate of Rum. Sultan Kilij Arslan left the city to resolve a territorial dispute, enabling its capture after the siege of Nicaea and a Byzantine naval assault in the high point of Latin and Greek co-operation.[30]
The first experience of Turkish tactics, using lightly armoured mounted archers, occurred when an advanced party led by Bohemond and Robert was ambushed at the battle of Dorylaeum. The Normans resisted for hours before the arrival of the main army caused a Turkish withdrawal.[31] The army marched for three months to the former Byzantine city Antioch, that had been in Muslim control since 1084. Starvation, thirst and disease reduced numbers, combined with Baldwin's decision to leave with 100 knights and their followers to carve out his own territory in Edessa.[32] The siege of Antioch lasted eight months. The crusaders lacked the resources to fully invest the city; the residents lacked the means to repel the invaders. Then Bohemond persuaded a guard in the city to open a gate. The crusaders entered, massacring the Muslim inhabitants and many Christians amongst the Greek Orthodox, Syrian and Armenian communities.[33] A force to recapture the city was raised by Kerbogha, the effective ruler of Mosul. The Byzantines did not march to the assistance of the crusaders after the deserting Stephen of Blois told them the cause was lost. Alexius retreated from Philomelium, where he received Stephen's report, to Constantinople. The Greeks were never truly forgiven for this perceived betrayal and Stephen was branded a coward.[34] Losing numbers through desertion and starvation in the besieged city, the crusaders attempted to negotiate surrender but were rejected. Bohemond recognised that the only option was open combat and launched a counterattack. Despite superior numbers, Kerbogha's army—which was divided into factions and surprised by the Crusaders' commitment—retreated and abandoned the siege.[35] Raymond besieged Arqa in February 1099 and sent an embassy to al-Afdal Shahanshah, the vizier of Fatimid Egypt, seeking a treaty. The Pope's representative Adhemar died, leaving the crusade without a spiritual leader. Raymond failed to capture Arqa and in May led the remaining army south along the coast. Bohemond retained Antioch and remained, despite his pledge to return it to the Byzantines. Local rulers offered little resistance, opting for peace in return for provisions. The Frankish envoys returned accompanied by Fatimid representatives. This brought the information that the Fatimids had recaptured Jerusalem. The Franks offered to partition conquered territory in return for the city. Refusal of the offer made it imperative that the crusade reach Jerusalem before the Fatimids made it defensible.[36]
The first attack on the city, launched on 7 June 1099, failed, and the siege of Jerusalem became a stalemate, before the arrival of craftsmen and supplies transported by the Genoese to Jaffa tilted the balance. Two large siege engines were constructed and the one commanded by Godfrey breached the walls on 15 July. For two days the crusaders massacred the inhabitants and pillaged the city. Historians now believe the accounts of the numbers killed have been exaggerated, but this narrative of massacre did much to cement the crusaders' reputation for barbarism.[37] Godfrey secured the Frankish position by defeating an Egyptian force at the Battle of Ascalon on 12 August.[38] Most of the crusaders considered their pilgrimage complete and returned to Europe. When it came to the future governance of the city it was Godfrey who took leadership and the title of Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri, Defender of the Holy Sepulchre. The presence of troops from Lorraine ended the possibility that Jerusalem would be an ecclesiastical domain and the claims of Raymond.[39] Godfrey was left with a mere 300 knights and 2,000 infantry. Tancred also remained with the ambition to gain a princedom of his own.[40]
The Islamic world seems to have barely registered the crusade; certainly, there is limited written evidence before 1130. This may be in part due to a reluctance to relate Muslim failure, but it is more likely to be the result of cultural misunderstanding. Al-Afdal Shahanshah and the Muslim world mistook the crusaders for the latest in a long line of Byzantine mercenaries, not religiously motivated warriors intent on conquest and settlement.[41] The Muslim world was divided between the Sunnis of Syria and Iraq and the Shi'ite Fatimids of Egypt. The Turks had found unity unachievable since the death of Sultan Malik-Shah in 1092, with rival rulers in Damascus and Aleppo.[42] In addition, in Baghdad, Seljuk sultan Barkiyaruq and Abbasid caliph al-Mustazhir were engaged in a power struggle. This gave the Crusaders a crucial opportunity to consolidate without any pan-Islamic counter-attack.[43]
Early 12th century
Urban II died on 29 July 1099, fourteen days after the capture of Jerusalem by the Crusaders, but before news of the event had reached Rome. He was succeeded by Pope Paschal II who continued the policies of his predecessors in regard to the Holy Land.[44] Godfrey died in 1100. Dagobert of Pisa, Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem and Tancred looked to Bohemond to come south, but he was captured by the Danishmends.[45] The Lorrainers foiled the attempt to seize power and enabled Godfrey's brother, Baldwin I, to take the crown.[46]
Paschal II promoted the large-scale Crusade of 1101 in support of the remaining Franks. This new crusade was a similar size to the First Crusade and joined in Byzantium by Raymond of Saint-Gilles. Command was fragmented and the force split in three:[44]
- A largely Lombard force was harried by Kilij Arslan's forces and finally destroyed in three days at the battle of Mersivan in August 1101. Some of the leadership, including Raymond, Stephen of Blois and Anselm IV of Milan, survived to retreat to Constantinople.
- A force led by William II of Nevers attempted catch up with the Lombards but was caught and routed at Heraclea. The destitute leaders eventually reached Antioch.
- William IX of Aquitaine, Welf IV of Bavaria, Ida of Formbach-Ratelnberg and Hugh, Count of Vermandois reached Heraclea later and were also defeated. Again the leaders fled the field and survived, although Hugh died of his wounds at Tarsus and Ida disappeared. The remnants of the army helped Raymond capture Tortosa.[47]
The defeat of the crusaders proved to the Muslim world that the crusaders were not invincible, as they appeared to be during the First Crusade. Within months of the defeat, the Franks and Fatimid Egypt began fighting in three battles at Ramla, and one at Jaffa:
- In the first on 7 September 1101, Baldwin I and 300 knights narrowly defeated the Fatimid vizier al-Afdal Shahanshah.[48]
- In the second on 17 May 1102, al-Afdal's son Sharaf al-Ma'ali and a superior force inflicted a major defeat on the Franks. Stephen of Blois and Stephen of Burgundy from the Crusade of 1101 were among those killed. Baldwin I fled to Arsuf.[48]
- Victory at the battle of Jaffa on 27 May 1102 saved the kingdom from virtual collapse.[48]
- In the third at Ramla on 28 August 1102, a coalition of Fatimid and Damescene forces were defeated again by Baldwin I and 500 knights.[49]
Baldwin of Edessa, later king of Jerusalem as Baldwin II, and Patriarch Bernard of Valence ransomed Bohemond for 100,000 gold pieces.[50] Baldwin and Bohemond then jointly campaigned to secure Edessa's southern front. On 7 May 1104, the Frankish army was defeated by the Seljuk rulers of Mosul and Mardin at the battle of Harran.[49] Baldwin II and his cousin, Joscelin of Courtenay, were captured. Bohemond and Tancred retreated to Edessa where Tancred assumed command. Bohemond returned to Italy, taking with him much of Antioch's wealth and manpower. Tancred revitalised the beleaguered principality with victory at the battle of Artah on 20 April 1105 over a larger force, led by the Seljuk Ridwan of Aleppo. He was then able to secure Antioch's borders and push back his Greek and Muslim enemies.[51] Under Paschal's sponsorship, Bohemond launched a version of a crusade in 1107 against the Byzantines, crossing the Adriatic and besieging Durrës. The siege failed; Alexius hit his supply lines, forcing his surrender. The terms laid out in the Treaty of Devol were never enacted because Bohemond remained in Apulia and died in 1111, leaving Tancred as notional regent for his son Bohemond II.[52] In 1007, the people of Tell Bashir ransomed Joscelin and he negotiated Baldwin's release from Jawali Saqawa, atabeg of Mosul, in return for money, hostages and military support. Tancred and Baldwin, supported by their respective Muslim allies, entered violent conflict over the return of Edessa leaving 2,000 Franks dead before Bernard of Valence, patriarch of both Antioch and Edessa, adjudicated in Baldwin's favour.[53]
On 13 May 1110, Baldwin II and a Genoese fleet captured Beirut.[54][55] In the same month, Muhammad I Tapar, sultan of the Seljuk Empire, sent an army to recover Syria, but a Frankish defensive force arrived at Edessa, ending the short siege of the city.[56] On 4 December, Baldwin captured Sidon, aided by a flotilla of Norwegian pilgrims led by Sigurd the Crusader.[54][55] Next year, Tancred's extortion from Antioch's Muslim neighbours provoked the inconclusive battle of Shaizar between the Franks and an Abbasid army led by the governor of Mosul, Mawdud. Tancred died in 1112 and power passed to his nephew Roger of Salerno.[57] In May 1113, Mawdud invaded Galilee with Toghtekin, atabeg of Damascus. On 28 June this force surprised Baldwin, chasing the Franks from the field at the battle of al-Sannabra. Mawdud was killed by Assassins. Bursuq ibn Bursuq led the Seljuk army in 1115 against an alliance of the Franks, Toghtekin, his son-in-law Ilghazi and the Muslims of Aleppo. Bursuq feigned retreat and the coalition disbanded. Only the forces of Roger and Baldwin of Edessa remained, but, heavily outnumbered, they were victorious on 14 September at the first battle of Tell Danith.[58]
In April 1118, Baldwin I died of illness while raiding in Egypt.[59] His cousin, Baldwin of Edessa, was unanimously elected his successor. [60] In June 1119, Ilghazi, now emir of Aleppo, attacked Antioch with more than 10,000 men. Roger of Salerno's army of 700 knights, 3,000 foot soldiers and a corps of Turcopoles was defeated at the battle of Ager Sanguinis, or "field of blood". Roger was among the many killed.[61] Baldwin II's counter-attack forced the offensive's end, after an inconclusive second battle of Tell Danith.[61]
In January 1120 the secular and ecclesiastical leaders of the Outremer gathered at the Council of Nablus. The council laid a foundation of a law code for the kingdom of Jerusalem that replaced common law.[62] The council also heard the first direct appeals for support made to the Papacy and Republic of Venice. They responded with the Venetian Crusade, sending a large fleet that supported the capture of Tyre in 1124.[63] In April 1123, Baldwin II was ambushed and captured by Belek Ghazi while campaigning north of Edessa, along with Joscelin I, Count of Edessa. He was released in August 1024 in return for 80,000 gold pieces and the city of Azaz.[64] In 1129, the Council of Troyes approved the rule of the Knights Templar for Hugues de Payens. He returned to the East with a major force including Fulk V of Anjou. This allowed the Franks to capture the town of Banias during the Crusade of 1129. Defeat at Damascus and Marj al-Saffar ended the campaign and Frankish influence on Damascus for years.[65]
The Levantine Franks sought alliances with the Latin West through the marriage of heiresses to wealthy martial aristocrats. Constance of Antioch was married to Raymond of Poitiers, son of William IX, Duke of Aquitaine. Baldwin II's eldest daughter Melisende of Jerusalem was married to Fulk of Anjou in 1129. When Baldwin II died on 21 August 1131, Fulk and Melisende were consecrated joint rulers of Jerusalem. Despite conflict caused by the new king appointing his own supporters and the Jerusalemite nobles attempting to curb his rule, the couple were reconciled and Melisende exercised significant influence. When Fulk died in 1143, she became joint ruler with their son, Baldwin III of Jerusalem.[66] At the same time, the advent of Imad ad-Din Zengi saw the Crusaders threatened by a Muslim ruler who would introduce jihad to the conflict, joining the powerful Syrian emirates in a combined effort against the Franks.[67] He became atabeg of Mosul in September 1127 and used this to expand his control to Aleppo in June 1128.[68] In 1135, Zengi moved against Antioch and, when the Crusaders failed to put an army into the field to oppose him, he captured several important Syrian towns. He defeated Fulk at the battle of Ba'rin of 1137, seizing Ba'rin Castle.[69]
In 1137, Zengi invaded Tripoli, killing the count Pons of Tripoli.[70] Fulk intervened, but Zengi's troops captured Pons' successor Raymond II of Tripoli, and besieged Fulk in the border castle of Montferrand. Fulk surrendered the castle and paid Zengi a ransom for his and Raymond's freedom. John II Komnenos, emperor since 1118, reasserted Byzantine claims to Cilicia and Antioch, compelling Raymond of Poitiers to give homage. In April 1138, the Byzantines and Franks jointly besieged Aleppo and, with no success, began the Siege of Shaizar, abandoning it a month later.[71]
On 13 November 1143, while the royal couple were in Acre, Fulk was killed in a hunting accident. On Christmas Day 1143, their son Baldwin III of Jerusalem was crowned co-ruler with his mother.[72] That same year, having prepared his army for a renewed attack on Antioch, John II Komnenos cut himself with a poisoned arrow while hunting wild boar. He died on 8 April 1143 and was succeeded as emperor by his son Manuel I Komnenos.[73]
Following John's death, the Byzantine army withdrew, leaving Zengi unopposed. Fulk's death later in the year left Joscelin II of Edessa with no powerful allies to help defend Edessa. Zengi came north to begin the first siege of Edessa, arriving on 28 November 1144.[74] The city had been warned of his arrival and was prepared for a siege, but there was little they could do. Zengi realised there was no defending force and surrounded the city. The walls collapsed on 24 December 1144. Zengi's troops rushed into the city, killing all those who were unable to flee. All the Frankish prisoners were executed, but the native Christians were allowed to live. The Crusaders were dealt their first major defeat.[75]
Zengi was assassinated by a slave on 14 September 1146 and was succeeded in the Zengid dynasty by his son Nūr-ad-Din. The Franks recaptured the city during the Second Siege of Edessa of 1146 by stealth but could not take or even properly besiege the citadel.[76] After a brief counter-siege, Nūr-ad-Din took the city. The men were massacred, with the women and children enslaved, and the walls razed.[77]
Second Crusade
The fall of Edessa caused great consternation in Jerusalem and Western Europe, tempering the enthusiastic success of the First Crusade. Calls for a new crusade – the Second Crusade – were immediate, and was the first to be led by European kings. Concurrent campaigns as part of the Reconquista and Northern Crusades are also sometimes associated with this Crusade.[78] The aftermath of the Crusade saw the Muslim world united around Saladin, leading to the fall of Jerusalem.[79]
Eugene III, recently elected pope, issued the bull Quantum praedecessores in December 1145 calling for a new crusade, one that would be more organized and centrally controlled than the First. The armies would be led by the strongest kings of Europe and a route that would be pre-planned. The pope called on Bernard of Clairvaux to preach the Second Crusade, granting the same indulgences which had been accorded to the First Crusaders. Among those answering the call were two European kings, Louis VII of France and Conrad III of Germany. Louis, his wife, Eleanor of Aquitaine, and many princes and lords prostrated themselves at the feet of Bernard in order to take the cross. Conrad and his nephew Frederick Barbarossa also received the cross from the hand of Bernard.[80]
Conrad III and the German contingent planned to leave for the Holy Land at Easter, but did not depart until May 1147. When the German army began to cross Byzantine territory, emperor Manuel I had his troops posted to ensure against trouble. A brief Battle of Constantinople in September ensued, and their defeat at the emperor's hand convinced the Germans to move quickly to Asia Minor. Without waiting for the French contingent, Conrad III engaged the Seljuks of Rûm under sultan Mesud I, son and successor of Kilij Arslan, the nemesis of the First Crusade. Mesud and his forces almost totally destroyed Conrad's contingent at the Second Battle of Dorylaeum on 25 October 1147.[81]
The French contingent departed in June 1147. In the meantime, Roger II of Sicily, an enemy of Conrad's, had invaded Byzantine territory. Manuel I needed all his army to counter this force, and, unlike the armies of the First Crusade, the Germans and French entered Asia with no Byzantine assistance. The French met the remnants of Conrad's army in northern Turkey, and Conrad joined Louis's force. They fended off a Seljuk attack at the Battle of Ephesus on 24 December 1147. A few days later, they were again victorious at the Battle of the Meander. Louis was not as lucky at the Battle of Mount Cadmus on 6 January 1148 when the army of Mesud inflicted heavy losses on the Crusaders. Shortly thereafter, they sailed for Antioch, almost totally destroyed by battle and sickness.[82]
The Crusader army arrived at Antioch on 19 March 1148 with the intent on moving to retake Edessa, but Baldwin III of Jerusalem and the Knights Templar had other ideas. The Council of Acre was held on 24 June 1148, changing the objective of the Second Crusade to Damascus, a former ally of the kingdom that had shifted its allegiance to that of the Zengids. The Crusaders fought the Battle of Bosra with the Damascenes in the summer of 1147, with no clear winner.[83] Bad luck and poor tactics of the Crusaders led to the disastrous five-day siege of Damascus from 24 to 28 July 1148.[84] The barons of Jerusalem withdrew support and the Crusaders retreated before the arrival of a relief army led by Nūr-ad-Din. Morale fell, hostility to the Byzantines grew and distrust developed between the newly arrived Crusaders and those that had made the region their home after the earlier crusades. The French and German forces felt betrayed by the other, lingering for a generation due to the defeat, to the ruin of the Christian kingdoms in the Holy Land.[85]
In the spring of 1147, Eugene III authorised the expansion of his mission into the Iberian Peninsula, equating these campaigns against the Moors with the rest of the Second Crusade. The successful Siege of Lisbon, from 1 July to 25 October 1147, was followed by the six-month siege of Tortosa, ending on 30 December 1148 with a defeat for the Moors.[86] In the north, some Germans were reluctant to fight in the Holy Land while the pagan Wends were a more immediate problem. The resulting Wendish Crusade of 1147 was partially successful but failed to convert the pagans to Christianity.[87]
The disastrous performance of this campaign in the Holy Land damaged the standing of the papacy, soured relations between the Christians of the kingdom and the West for many years, and encouraged the Muslims of Syria to even greater efforts to defeat the Franks. The dismal failures of this Crusade then set the stage for the fall of Jerusalem, leading to the Third Crusade.[85]
Nūr-ad-Din and the rise of Saladin
In the first major encounter after the Second Crusade, Nūr-ad-Din's forces then destroyed the Crusader army at the Battle of Inab on 29 June 1149. Raymond of Poitiers, as prince of Antioch, came to the aid of the besieged city. Raymond was killed and his head was presented to Nūr-ad-Din, who forwarded it to the caliph al-Muqtafi in Baghdad.[88] In 1150, Nūr-ad-Din defeated Joscelin II of Edessa for a final time, resulting in Joscelin being publicly blinded, dying in prison in Aleppo in 1159. Later that year, at the Battle of Aintab, he tried but failed to prevent Baldwin III's evacuation of the residents of Turbessel.[89] The unconquered portions of the County of Edessa would nevertheless fall to the Zengids within a few years. In 1152, Raymond II of Tripoli became the first Frankish victim of the Assassins.[90] Later that year, Nūr-ad-Din captured and burned Tortosa, briefly occupying the town before it was taken by the Knights Templar as a military headquarters.[91]
After the Siege of Ascalon ended on 22 August 1153 with a Crusader victory, Damascus was taken by Nūr-ad-Din the next year, uniting all of Syria under Zengid rule. In 1156, Baldwin III was forced into a treaty with Nūr-ad-Din, and later entered into an alliance with the Byzantine Empire. On 18 May 1157, Nūr-ad-Din began a siege on the Knights Hospitaller contingent at Banias, with the Grand Master Bertrand de Blanquefort captured. Baldwin III was able to break the siege, only to be ambushed at Jacob's Ford in June. Reinforcements from Antioch and Tripoli were able to relieve the besieged Crusaders, but they were defeated again that month at the Battle of Lake Huleh. In July 1158, the Crusaders were victorious at the Battle of Butaiha. Bertrand's captivity lasted until 1159, when emperor Manuel I negotiated an alliance with Nūr-ad-Din against the Seljuks.[92]
Baldwin III died on 10 February 1163, and Amalric of Jerusalem was crowned as king of Jerusalem eight days later.[93] Later that year, he defeated the Zengids at the Battle of al-Buqaia. Amalric then undertook a series of four invasions of Egypt from 1163 to 1169, taking advantage of weaknesses of the Fatimids.[73] Nūr-ad-Din's intervention in the first invasion allowed his general Shirkuh, accompanied by his nephew Saladin, to enter Egypt.[94] Shawar, the deposed vizier to the Fatimid caliph al-Adid, allied with Amalric I, attacking Shirkuh at the second Siege of Bilbeis beginning in August 1164, following Amalric's unsuccessful first siege in September 1163.[95] This action left the Holy Land lacking in defenses, and Nūr-ad-Din defeated a Crusader force at the Battle of Harim in August 1164, capturing most of the Franks' leaders.[96]
After the sacking of Bilbeis, the Crusader-Fatimid force was to meet Shirkuh's army in the indecisive Battle of al-Babein on 18 March 1167. In 1169, both Shawar and Shirkuh died, and al-Adid appointed Saladin as vizier. Saladin, with reinforcements from Nūr-ad-Din, defeated a massive Crusader-Byzantine force at the Siege of Damietta in late October.[97] This gained Saladin the attention of the Assassins, with attempts on his life in January 1175 and again on 22 May 1176.[98]
Baldwin IV of Jerusalem[99] became king on 5 July 1174 at the age of 13.[100] As a leper he was not expected to live long, and served with a number of regents, and served as co-ruler with his nephew Baldwin V of Jerusalem beginning in 1183. Baldwin IV, Raynald of Châtillon and the Knights Templar defeated Saladin at the celebrated Battle of Montgisard on 25 November 1177. In June 1179, the Crusaders were defeated at the Battle of Marj Ayyub, and in August the unfinished castle at Jacob's Ford fell to Saladin, with the slaughter of half its Templar garrison. However, the kingdom repelled his attacks at the Battle of Belvoir Castle in 1182 and later in the Siege of Kerak of 1183.[101]
Fall of Jerusalem
Baldwin V became sole king upon the death of his uncle in 1185 under the regency of Raymond III of Tripoli. Raymond negotiated a truce with Saladin which went awry when the king died in the summer of 1186.[102] His mother Sibylla of Jerusalem and her husband Guy of Lusignan were crowned as queen and king of Jerusalem in the summer of 1186, shortly thereafter. They immediately had to deal with the threat posed by Saladin.[103]
Despite his defeat at the Battle of al-Fule in the fall of 1183, Saladin increased his attacks against the Franks, leading to their defeat at the Battle of Cresson on 1 May 1187. Guy of Lusignan responded by raising the largest army that Jerusalem had ever put into the field. Saladin lured this force into inhospitable terrain without water supplies and routed them at the Battle of Hattin on 4 July 1187. One of the major commanders was Raymond III of Tripoli who saw his force slaughtered, with some knights deserting to the enemy, and narrowly escaping, only to be regarded as a traitor and coward.[104] Guy of Lusignan was one of the few captives of Saladin's after the battle, along with Raynald of Châtillon and Humphrey IV of Toron. Raynald was beheaded, settling an old score. Guy and Humphrey were imprisoned in Damascus and later released in 1188.[105]
As a result of his victory, much of Palestine quickly fell to Saladin. The siege of Jerusalem began on 20 September 1187 and the Holy City was surrendered to Saladin by Balian of Ibelin on 2 October. According to some, on 19 October 1187, Urban III died upon of hearing of the defeat.[106] Jerusalem was once again in Muslim hands. Many in the kingdom fled to Tyre, and Saladin's subsequent attack at the siege of Tyre beginning in November 1187 was unsuccessful. The siege of Belvoir Castle began the next month and the Hospitaller stronghold finally fell a year later. The sieges of Laodicea and Sahyun Castle in July 1188 and the sieges of al-Shughur and Bourzey Castle in August 1188 further solidified Saladin's gains. The siege of Safed in late 1188 then completed Saladin's conquest of the Holy Land.[100]
Third Crusade
The years following the founding of the Kingdom of Jerusalem were met with multiple disasters. The Second Crusade did not achieve its goals, and left the Muslim East in a stronger position with the rise of Saladin. A united Egypt–Syria led to the loss of Jerusalem itself, and Western Europe had no choice but to launch the Third Crusade, this time led by the kings of Europe.[107]
The news of the disastrous defeat at the battle of Hattin and subsequent fall of Jerusalem gradually reached Western Europe. Urban III died shortly after hearing the news, and his successor Gregory VIII issued the bull Audita tremendi on 29 October 1187 describing the events in the East and urging all Christians to take up arms and go to the aid of those in the Kingdom of Jerusalem, calling for a new crusade to the Holy Land – the Third Crusade – to be led by Frederick Barbarossa and Richard I of England.[108]
Frederick took the cross in March 1188.[109] Frederick sent an ultimatum to Saladin, demanding the return of Palestine and challenging him to battle and in May 1189, Frederick's host departed for Byzantium. In March 1190, Frederick embarked to Asia Minor. The armies coming from western Europe pushed on through Anatolia, defeating the Turks and reaching as far as Cilician Armenia. On 10 June 1190, Frederick drowned near Silifke Castle. His death caused several thousand German soldiers to leave the force and return home. The remaining German army moved under the command of the English and French forces that arrived shortly thereafter.[110]
Richard the Lionheart had already taken the cross as the Count of Poitou in 1187. His father Henry II of England and Philip II of France had done so on 21 January 1188 after receiving news of the fall of Jerusalem to Saladin.[111][112] Richard I and Philip II of France agreed to go on the Crusade in January 1188. Arriving in the Holy Land, Richard led his support to the stalemated siege of Acre. The Muslim defenders surrendered on 12 July 1191. Richard remained in sole command of the Crusader force after the departure of Philip II on 31 July 1191. On 20 August 1191, Richard had more than 2000 prisoners beheaded at the massacre of Ayyadieh. Saladin subsequently ordered the execution of his Christian prisoners in retaliation.[113]
Richard moved south, defeating Saladin's forces at the battle of Arsuf on 7 September 1191. Three days later, Richard took Jaffa, held by Saladin since 1187, and advanced inland towards Jerusalem.[114] On 12 December 1191 Saladin disbanded the greater part of his army. Learning this, Richard pushed his army forward, to within 12 miles from Jerusalem before retreating back to the coast. The Crusaders made another advance on Jerusalem, coming within sight of the city in June before being forced to retreat again. Hugh III of Burgundy, leader of the Franks, was adamant that a direct attack on Jerusalem should be made. This split the Crusader army into two factions, and neither was strong enough to achieve its objective. Without a united command the army had little choice but to retreat back to the coast.
On 27 July 1192, Saladin's army began the battle of Jaffa, capturing the city. Richard's forces stormed Jaffa from the sea and the Muslims were driven from the city. Attempts to retake Jaffa failed and Saladin was forced to retreat.[115] On 2 September 1192 Richard and Saladin entered into the Treaty of Jaffa, providing that Jerusalem would remain under Muslim control, while allowing unarmed Christian pilgrims and traders to freely visit the city. This treaty ended the Third Crusade.[116]
Crusade of 1197
Three years later, Henry VI launched the Crusade of 1197. While his forces were en route to the Holy Land, Henry VI died in Messina on 28 September 1197. The nobles that remained captured the Levant coast between Tyre and Tripoli before returning to Germany. The Crusade ended on 1 July 1198 after capturing Sidon and Beirut.[117]
Fourth Crusade
In 1198, the recently elected Pope Innocent III announced a new crusade, organised by three Frenchmen: Theobald of Champagne; Louis of Blois; and Baldwin of Flanders. After Theobald's premature death, the Italian Boniface of Montferrat replaced him as the new commander of the campaign. They contracted with the Republic of Venice for the transportation of 30,000 crusaders at a cost of 85,000 marks. However, many chose other embarkation ports and only around 15,000 arrived in Venice. The Doge of Venice Enrico Dandolo proposed that Venice would be compensated with the profits of future conquests beginning with the seizure of the Christian city of Zara. Pope Innocent III's role was ambivalent. He only condemned the attack when the siege started. He withdrew his legate to disassociate from the attack but seemed to have accepted it as inevitable. Historians question whether for him, the papal desire to salvage the crusade may have outweighed the moral consideration of shedding Christian blood.[118] The crusade was joined by King Philip of Swabia, who intended to use the Crusade to install his exiled brother-in-law, Alexios IV Angelos, as Emperor. This required the overthrow of Alexios III Angelos, the uncle of Alexios IV. Alexios IV offered the crusade 10,000 troops, 200,000 marks and the reunion of the Greek Church with Rome if they toppled his uncle Emperor Alexios III.[119] When the crusade entered Constantinople, Alexios III fled and was replaced by his nephew. The Greek resistance prompted Alexios IV to seek continued support from the crusade until he could fulfil his commitments. This ended with his murder in a violent anti-Latin revolt. The crusaders were without seaworthy ships, supplies or food. Their only escape route was through the city, taking by force what Alexios had promised and the new anti-westerner Byzantine ruler – Alexios V Doukas – denied them. The Sack of Constantinople involved three days of pillaging churches and killing much of the Greek Orthodox Christian populace. This sack was not unusual considering the violent military standards of the time, but contemporaries such as Innocent III and Ali ibn al-Athir saw it as an atrocity against centuries of classical and Christian civilisation.[120]
Fifth Crusade
The Fifth Crusade (1217–1221) was a campaign by Western Europeans to reacquire Jerusalem and the rest of the Holy Land by first conquering Egypt, ruled by the sultan al-Adil, brother of Saladin. In 1213, Innocent III called for another Crusade at the Fourth Lateran Council, and in the papal bull Quia maior.[121] Innocent died in 1216 and was succeeded by Honorius III who immediately called on Andrew II of Hungary and Frederick II of Germany to lead a Crusade.[122] Frederick had taken the cross in 1215, but hung back, with his crown still in contention, and Honorius delayed the expedition.[123]
Andrew II left for Acre in August 1217, joining John of Brienne, king of Jerusalem. The initial plan of a two-prong attack in Syria and in Egypt was abandoned and instead the objective became limited operations in Syria. After accomplishing little, the ailing Andrew returned to Hungary early in 1218. As it became clear that Frederick II was not coming to the east, the remaining commanders began the planning to attack the Egyptian port of Damietta.[124]
The fortifications of Damietta included the Burj al-Silsilah – the chain tower – with massive chains that could stretch across the Nile. The siege of Damietta began in June 1218 with a successful assault on the tower. The loss of the tower was a great shock to the Ayyubids, and the sultan al-Adil died soon thereafter.[125] He was succeeded as sultan by his son al-Kamil. Further offensive action by the Crusaders would have to wait until the arrival of additional forces, including legate Pelagius with a contingent of Romans.[126] A group from England arrived shortly thereafter.[127]
By February 1219, the Crusaders now had Damietta surrounded, and al-Kamil opened negotiations with the Crusaders, asking for envoys to come to his camp. He offered to surrender the kingdom of Jerusalem, less the fortresses of al-Karak and Krak de Montréal, guarding the road to Egypt, in exchange for the evacuation of Egypt. John of Brienne and the other secular leaders were in favor of the offer, as the original objective of the Crusade was the recovery of Jerusalem. But Pelagius and the leaders of the Templars and Hospitallers refused.[128] Later, Francis of Assisi arrived to negotiate unsuccessfully with the sultan.[129]
In November 1219, the Crusaders entered Damietta and found it abandoned, al-Kamil having moved his army south. In the captured city, Pelagius was unable to prod the Crusaders from their inactivity, and many returned home, their vow fulfilled. Al-Kamil took advantage of this lull to reinforce his new camp at Mansurah, renewing his peace offering to the Crusaders, which was again refused. Frederick II sent troops and word that he would soon follow, but they were under orders not to begin offensive operations until he had arrived.[130]
In July 1221, Pelagius began to advance to the south. John of Brienne argued against the move, but was powerless to stop it. Already deemed a traitor for opposing the plans and threatened with excommunication, John joined the force under the command of the legate. In the ensuing Battle of Mansurah in late August, al-Kamil had the sluices along the right bank of the Nile opened, flooding the area and rendering battle impossible.[131] Pelagius had no choice but to surrender.[132]
The Crusaders still had some leverage as Damietta was well-garrisoned. They offered the sultan a withdrawal from Damietta and an eight-year truce in exchange for allowing the Crusader army to pass, the release of all prisoners, and the return of the relic of the True Cross. Prior to the formal surrender of Damietta, the two sides would maintain hostages, among them John of Brienne and Hermann of Salza for the Franks side and a son of al-Kamil for Egypt.[133] The masters of the military orders were dispatched to Damietta, where the forces were resistant to giving up, with the news of the surrender, which happened on 8 September 1221. The Fifth Crusade was over, a dismal failure, unable to even gain the return of the piece of the True Cross.[134]
Sixth Crusade
The Sixth Crusade (1228–1229) was a military expedition to recapture the city of Jerusalem. It began seven years after the failure of the Fifth Crusade and involved very little actual fighting. The diplomatic maneuvering of Frederick II[135] resulted in the Kingdom of Jerusalem regaining some control over Jerusalem for much of the ensuing fifteen years. The Sixth Crusade is also known as the Crusade of Frederick II.[136]
Of all the European sovereigns, only Frederick II, the Holy Roman Emperor, was in a position to regain Jerusalem. Frederick was, like many of the 13th-century rulers, a serial crucesignatus,[137] having taken the cross multiple times since 1215.[138] After much wrangling, an onerous agreement between the emperor and Pope Honorius III was signed on 25 July 1225 at San Germano. Frederick promised to depart on the Crusade by August 1227 and remain for two years. During this period, he was to maintain and support forces in Syria and deposit escrow funds at Rome in gold. These funds would be returned to the emperor once he arrived at Acre. If he did not arrive, the money would be employed for the needs of the Holy Land.[139] Frederick II would go on the Crusade as king of Jerusalem. He married John of Brienne's daughter Isabella II by proxy in August 1225 and they were formally married on 9 November 1227. Frederick claimed the kingship of Jerusalem despite John having been given assurances that he would remain as king. Frederick took the crown in December 1225. Frederick's first royal decree was to grant new privileges on the Teutonic Knights, placing them on equal footing as the Templars and Hospitallers.[140]
After the Fifth Crusade, the Ayyubid sultan al-Kamil became involved in civil war in Syria and, having unsuccessfully tried negotiations with the West beginning in 1219, again tried this approach,[141] offering return of much of the Holy Land in exchange for military support.[142] Becoming pope in 1227, Gregory IX was determined to proceed with the Crusade.[143] The first contingents of Crusaders then sailed in August 1227, joining with forces of the kingdom and fortifying the coastal towns. The emperor was delayed while his ships were refitted. He sailed on 8 September 1227, but before they reached their first stop, Frederick was struck with the plague and disembarked to secure medical attention. Resolved to keep his oath, he sent his fleet on to Acre. He sent his emissaries to inform Gregory IX of the situation, but the pope did not care about Frederick's illness, just that he had not lived up to his agreement. Frederick was excommunicated on 29 September 1227, branded a wanton violator of his sacred oath taken many times.[136]
Frederick made his last effort to be reconciled with Gregory. It had no effect and Frederick sailed from Brindisi in June 1228. After a stop at Cyprus, Frederick II arrived in Acre on 7 September 1228 and was received warmly by the military orders, despite his excommunication. Frederick's army was not large, mostly German, Sicilian and English.[144] Of the troops he had sent in 1227 had mostly returned home. He could neither afford nor mount a lengthening campaign in the Holy Land given the ongoing War of the Keys with Rome. The Sixth Crusade would be one of negotiation.[145]
After resolving the internecine struggles in Syria, al-Kamil's position was stronger than it was a year before when he made his original offer to Frederick. For unknown reasons, the two sides came to an agreement. The resultant Treaty of Jaffa was concluded on 18 February 1229, with al-Kamil surrendering Jerusalem, with the exception of some Muslim holy sites, and agreeing to a ten-year truce.[146] Frederick entered Jerusalem on 17 March 1229 and received the formal surrender of the city by al-Kamil's agent and the next day, crowned himself.[147] On 1 May 1229, Frederick departed from Acre and arrived in Sicily a month before the pope knew that he had left the Holy Land. Frederick obtained from the pope relief from his excommunication on 28 August 1230 at the Treaty of Ceprano.[148]
The results of the Sixth Crusade were not universally acclaimed. Two letters from the Christian side tell differing stories,[149] with Frederick touting the great success of the endeavor and the Latin patriarch painting a darker picture of the emperor and his accomplishments. On the Muslim side, al-Kamil himself was pleased with the accord, but others regarded the treaty as a disastrous event.[150] In the end, the Sixth Crusade successfully returned Jerusalem to Christian rule and had set a precedent, in having achieved success on crusade without papal involvement.
The Crusades of 1239–1241
The Crusades of 1239–1241, also known as the Barons' Crusade, were a series of crusades to the Holy Land that, in territorial terms, were the most successful since the First Crusade.[151] The major expeditions were led separately by Theobald I of Navarre and Richard of Cornwall.[152] These crusades are sometimes discussed along with that of Baldwin of Courtenay to Constantinople.[153]
In 1229, Frederick II and the Ayyubid sultan al-Kamil, had agreed to a ten-year truce. Nevertheless, Gregory IX, who had condemned this truce from the beginning, issued the papal bull Rachel suum videns in 1234 calling for a new crusade once the truce expired. A number of English and French nobles took the cross, but the crusade's departure was delayed because Frederick, whose lands the crusaders had planned to cross, opposed any crusading activity before the expiration of this truce. Frederick was again excommunicated in 1239, causing most crusaders to avoid his territories on their way to the Holy Land.[154]
The French expedition was led by Theobald I of Navarre and Hugh of Burgundy, joined by Amaury of Montfort and Peter of Dreux.[155] On 1 September 1239, Theobald arrived in Acre, and was soon drawn into the Ayyubid civil war, which had been raging since the death of al-Kamil in 1238.[156] At the end of September, al-Kamil's brother as-Salih Ismail seized Damascus from his nephew, as-Salih Ayyub, and recognised al-Adil II as sultan of Egypt. Theobald decided to fortify Ascalon to protect the southern border of the kingdom and to move against Damascus later. While the Crusaders were marching from Acre to Jaffa, Egyptian troops moved to secure the border in what became the Battle at Gaza.[157] Contrary to Theobald's instructions and the advice of the military orders, a group decided to move against the enemy without further delay, but they were surprised by the Muslims who inflicted a devastating defeat on the Franks. The masters of the military orders then convinced Theobald to retreat to Acre rather than pursue the Egyptians and their Frankish prisoners. A month after the battle at Gaza, an-Nasir Dā'ūd, emir of Kerak, seized Jerusalem, virtually unguarded. The internal strife among the Ayyubids allowed Theobald to negotiate the return of Jerusalem. In September 1240, Theobald departed for Europe, while Hugh of Burgundy remained to help fortify Ascalon.[158]
On 8 October 1240, the English expedition arrived, led by Richard of Cornwall.[159] The force marched to Jaffa, where they completed the negotiations for a truce with Ayyubid leaders begun by Theobald just a few months prior. Richard consented, the new agreement was ratified by Ayyub by 8 February 1241, and prisoners from both sides were released on 13 April. Meanwhile, Richard's forces helped to work on Ascalon's fortifications, which were completed by mid-March 1241. Richard entrusted the new fortress to an imperial representative, and departed for England on 3 May 1241.[160]
In July 1239, Baldwin of Courtenay, the young heir to the Latin Empire, travelled to Constantinople with a small army. In the winter of 1239, Baldwin finally returned to Constantinople, where he was crowned emperor around Easter of 1240, after which he launched his crusade. Baldwin then besieged and captured Tzurulum, a Nicaean stronghold seventy-five miles west of Constantinople.[161]
Although the Barons' Crusade returned the kingdom to its largest size since 1187, the gains would be dramatically reversed a few years later. On 15 July 1244, the city was reduced to ruins during the siege of Jerusalem and its Christians massacred by the Khwarazmian army. A few months later, the Battle of La Forbie permanently crippled Christian military power in the Holy Land. The sack of the city and the massacre which accompanied it encouraged Louis IX of France to organise the Seventh Crusade.[162]
The Seventh Crusade
The Seventh Crusade (1248–1254) was the first of the two Crusades led by Louis IX of France. Also known as the Crusade of Louis IX to the Holy Land, its objective was to reclaim the Holy Land by attacking Egypt, the main seat of Muslim power in the Middle East, then under as-Salih Ayyub, son of al-Kamil. The Crusade was conducted in response to setbacks in the Kingdom of Jerusalem, beginning with the loss of the Holy City in 1244, and was preached by Innocent IV in conjunction with a crusade against emperor Frederick II, the Prussian crusades and Mongol incursions.[163]
At the end of 1244, Louis was stricken with a severe malarial infection and he vowed that if he recovered he would set out for a Crusade. His life was spared, and as soon as his health permitted him, he took the cross and immediately began preparations.[164] The next year, the pope presided over First Council of Lyon, directing a new Crusade under the command of Louis. With Rome under siege by Frederick, the pope also issued his Ad Apostolicae Dignitatis Apicem, formally renewing the sentence of excommunication on the emperor, and declared him deposed from the imperial throne and that of Naples.[165]
The recruiting effort under cardinal Odo of Châteauroux was difficult, and the Crusade finally began on 12 August 1248 when Louis IX left Paris under the insignia of a pilgrim, the Oriflamme.[166] With him were queen Margaret of Provence and two of Louis' brothers, Charles I of Anjou and Robert I of Artois. Their youngest brother Alphonse of Poitiers departed the next year. They were followed by Hugh IV of Burgundy, Peter Maulcerc, Hugh XI of Lusignan, royal companion and chronicler Jean de Joinville, and an English detachment under William Longespée, grandson of Henry II of England.[167]
The first stop was Cyprus, arriving in September 1248 where they experienced a long wait for the forces to assemble. Many of the men were lost en route or to disease.[168] The Franks were soon met by those from Acre including the masters of the Orders Jean de Ronay and Guillaume de Sonnac. The two eldest sons of John of Brienne, Alsonso of Brienne and Louis of Brienne, would also join as would John of Ibelin, nephew to the Old Lord of Beirut.[169] William of Villehardouin also arrived with ships and Frankish soldiers from the Morea. It was agreed that Egypt was the objective and many remembered how the sultan's father had been willing to exchange Jerusalem itself for Damietta in the Fifth Crusade. Louis was not willing to negotiate with the infidel Muslims, but he did unsuccessfully seek a Franco-Mongol alliance, reflecting what the pope had sought in 1245.[170]
As-Salih Ayyub was conducting a campaign in Damascus when the Franks invaded as he had expected the Crusaders to land in Syria. Hurrying his forces back to Cairo, he turned to his vizier Fakhr ad-Din ibn as-Shaikh to command the army that fortified Damietta in anticipation of the invasion. On 5 June 1249 the Crusader fleet began the landing and subsequent siege of Damietta. After a short battle, the Egyptian commander decided to evacuate the city.[171] Remarkably, Damietta had been seized with only one Crusader casualty.[172] The city became a Frankish city and Louis waited until the Nile floods abated before advancing, remembering the lessons of the Fifth Crusade. The loss of Damietta was a shock to the Muslim world, and as-Salih Ayyub offered to trade Damietta for Jerusalem as his father had thirty years before. The offer was rejected. By the end of October 1249 the Nile had receded and reinforcements had arrived. It was time to advance, and the Frankish army set out towards Mansurah.[173]
The sultan died in November 1249, his widow Shajar al-Durr concealing the news of her husband's death. She forged a document which appointed his son al-Muazzam Turanshah, then in Syria, as heir and Fakhr ad-Din as viceroy.[174] But the Crusade continued, and by December 1249, Louis was encamped on the river banks opposite to Mansurah.[172] For six weeks, the armies of the West and Egypt faced each other on opposite sides of the canal, leading to the Battle of Mansurah that would end on 11 February 1250 with an Egyptian defeat. Louis had his victory, but a cost of the loss of much of his force and their commanders. Among the survivors were the Templar master Guillaume de Sonnac, losing an eye, Humbert V de Beaujeu, constable of France, John II of Soissons, and the duke of Brittany, Peter Maulcerc. Counted with the dead were the king's brother Robert I of Artois, William Longespée and most of his English followers, Peter of Courtenay, and Raoul II of Coucy. But the victory would be short-lived.[175] On 11 February 1250, the Egyptians attacked again. Templar master Guillaume de Sonnac and acting Hospitaller master Jean de Ronay were killed. Alphonse of Poitiers, guarding the camp, was encircled and was rescued by the camp followers. At nightfall, the Muslims gave up the assault.[176]
On 28 February 1250, Turanshah arrived from Damascus and began an Egyptian offensive, intercepting the boats that brought food from Damietta. The Franks were quickly beset by famine and disease.[177] The Battle of Fariskur fought on 6 April 1250 would be the decisive defeat of Louis' army. Louis knew that the army must be extricated to Damietta and they departed on the morning of 5 April, with the king in the rear and the Egyptians in pursuit. The next day, the Muslims surrounded the army and attacked in full force. On 6 April, Louis' surrender was negotiated directly with the sultan by Philip of Montfort. The king and his entourage were taken in chains to Mansurah and the whole of the army was rounded up and led into captivity.[176]
The Egyptians were unprepared for the large number of prisoners taken, comprising most of Louis' force. The infirm were executed immediately and several hundred were decapitated daily. Louis and his commanders were moved to Mansurah, and negotiations for their release commenced. The terms agreed to were harsh. Louis was to ransom himself by the surrender of Damietta and his army by the payment of a million bezants (later reduced to 800,000).[178] Latin patriarch Robert of Nantes went under safe-conduct to complete the arrangements for the ransom. Arriving in Cairo, he found Turanshah dead, murdered in a coup instigated by his stepmother Shajar al-Durr. On 6 May, Geoffrey of Sergines handed Damietta over to the Moslem vanguard. Many wounded soldiers had been left behind at Damietta, and contrary to their promise, the Muslims massacred them all. In 1251, the Shepherds' Crusade, a popular crusade formed with the objective to free Louis, engulfed France.[179] After his release, Louis went to Acre where he remained until 1254. This is regarded as the end of the Seventh Crusade.[163]
The final crusades
After the defeat of the Crusaders in Egypt, Louis remained in Syria until 1254 to consolidate the crusader states.[180] A brutal power struggle developed in Egypt between various Mamluk leaders and the remaining weak Ayyubid rulers. The threat presented by an invasion by the Mongols led to one of the competing Mamluk leaders, Qutuz, seizing the sultanate in 1259 and uniting with another faction led by Baibars to defeat the Mongols at Ain Jalut. The Mamluks then quickly gained control of Damascus and Aleppo before Qutuz was assassinated and Baibers assumed control.[181]
Between 1265 and 1271, Baibars drove the Franks to a few small coastal outposts.[182] Baibars had three key objectives: to prevent an alliance between the Latins and the Mongols, to cause dissension among the Mongols (particularly between the Golden Horde and the Persian Ilkhanate), and to maintain access to a supply of slave recruits from the Russian steppes. He supported Manfred of Sicily's failed resistance to the attack of Charles and the papacy. Dissension in the crusader states led to conflicts such as the War of Saint Sabas. Venice drove the Genoese from Acre to Tyre where they continued to trade with Egypt. Indeed, Baibars negotiated free passage for the Genoese with Michael VIII Palaiologos, Emperor of Nicaea, the newly restored ruler of Constantinople.[183] In 1270 Charles turned his brother King Louis IX's crusade, known as the Eighth Crusade, to his own advantage by persuading him to attack Tunis. The crusader army was devastated by disease, and Louis himself died at Tunis on 25 August. The fleet returned to France. Prince Edward, the future king of England, and a small retinue arrived too late for the conflict but continued to the Holy Land in what is known as Lord Edward's Crusade.[184] Edward survived an assassination attempt, negotiated a ten-year truce, and then returned to manage his affairs in England. This ended the last significant crusading effort in the eastern Mediterranean.[185]
Decline and fall of the Crusader States
The years 1272–1302 include numerous conflicts throughout the Levant as well as the Mediterranean and Western European regions, and many crusades were proposed to free the Holy Land from Mamluk control. These include ones of Gregory X, Charles I of Anjou and Nicholas IV, none of which came to fruition. The major players fighting the Muslims included the kings of England and France, the kingdoms of Cyprus and Sicily, the three Military Orders and Mongol Ilkhanate. The end of Western European presence in the Holy Land was sealed with the fall of Tripoli and their subsequent defeat at the siege of Acre in 1291. The Christian forces managed to survive until the final fall of Ruad in 1302.[186]
The Holy Land would no longer be the focus of the West even though various crusades were proposed in the early years of the fourteenth century. The Knights Hospitaller would conquer Rhodes from Byzantium, making it the center of their activity for a hundred years. The Knights Templar, the elite fighting force in the kingdom, was disbanded. The Mongols converted to Islam, but disintegrated as a fighting force. The Mamluk sultanate would continue for another century. The Crusades to liberate Jerusalem and the Holy Land were over.[187]
Other crusades
The military expeditions undertaken by European Christians in the 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries to recover the Holy Land from Muslims provided a template for warfare in other areas that also interested the Latin Church. These included the 12th and 13th century conquest of Muslim Al-Andalus by Spanish Christian kingdoms; 12th to 15th century German Northern Crusades expansion into the pagan Baltic region; the suppression of non-conformity, particularly in Languedoc during what has become called the Albigensian Crusade and for the Papacy's temporal advantage in Italy and Germany that are now known as political crusades. In the 13th and 14th centuries there were also unsanctioned, but related popular uprisings to recover Jerusalem known variously as Shepherds' or Children's crusades.[188]
Urban II equated the crusades for Jerusalem with the ongoing Catholic invasion of the Iberian Peninsula and crusades were preached in 1114 and 1118, but it was Pope Callixtus II who proposed dual fronts in Spain and the Middle East in 1122. In the spring of 1147, Eugene authorised the expansion of his mission into the Iberian peninsula, equating these campaigns against the Moors with the rest of the Second Crusade. The successful siege of Lisbon, from 1 July to 25 October 1147, was followed by the six-month siege of Tortosa, ending on 30 December 1148 with a defeat for the Moors.[189] In the north, some Germans were reluctant to fight in the Holy Land while the pagan Wends were a more immediate problem. The resulting Wendish Crusade of 1147 was partially successful but failed to convert the pagans to Christianity.[190] By the time of the Second Crusade the three Spanish kingdoms were powerful enough to conquer Islamic territory – Castile, Aragon, and Portugal.[191] In 1212 the Spanish were victorious at the Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa with the support of foreign fighters responding to the preaching of Innocent III. Many of these deserted because of the Spanish tolerance of the defeated Muslims, for whom the Reconquista was a war of domination rather than extermination.[192] In contrast the Christians formerly living under Muslim rule called Mozarabs had the Roman Rite relentlessly imposed on them and were absorbed into mainstream Catholicism.[193] Al-Andalus, Islamic Spain, was completely suppressed in 1492 when the Emirate of Granada surrendered.[194]
In 1147, Pope Eugene III extended Calixtus's idea by authorising a crusade on the German north-eastern frontier against the pagan Wends from what was primarily economic conflict.[195][196] From the early 13th century, there was significant involvement of military orders, such as the Livonian Brothers of the Sword and the Order of Dobrzyń. The Teutonic Knights diverted efforts from the Holy Land, absorbed these orders and established the State of the Teutonic Order.[197][198] This evolved the Duchy of Prussia and Duchy of Courland and Semigallia in 1525 and 1562, respectively.[199]
By the beginning of the 13th century papal reticence in applying crusades against the papacy's political opponents and those considered heretics had abated. Innocent III proclaimed a crusade against Catharism that failed to suppress the heresy itself but ruined the culture of the Languedoc.[200] This set a precedent that was followed in 1212 with pressure exerted on the city of Milan for tolerating Catharism,[201] in 1234 against the Stedinger peasants of north-western Germany, in 1234 and 1241 Hungarian crusades against Bosnian heretics.[200] The historian Norman Housley notes the connection between heterodoxy and anti-papalism in Italy.[202] Indulgence was offered to anti-heretical groups such as the Militia of Jesus Christ and the Order of the Blessed Virgin Mary.[203] Innocent III declared the first political crusade against Frederick II's regent, Markward von Annweiler, and when Frederick later threatened Rome in 1240, Gregory IX used crusading terminology to raise support against him. On Frederick II's death the focus moved to Sicily. In 1263, Pope Urban IV offered crusading indulgences to Charles of Anjou in return for Sicily's conquest. However, these wars had no clear objectives or limitations, making them unsuitable for crusading.[204] The 1281 election of a French pope, Martin IV, brought the power of the papacy behind Charles. Charles's preparations for a crusade against Constantinople were foiled by the Byzantine Emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos, who instigated an uprising called the Sicilian Vespers. Instead, Peter III of Aragon was proclaimed king of Sicily, despite his excommunication and an unsuccessful Aragonese Crusade.[205] Political crusading continued against Venice over Ferrara; Louis IV, King of Germany when he marched to Rome for his imperial coronation; and the free companies of mercenaries.[206]
The Latin states established were a fragile patchwork of petty realms threatened by Byzantine successor states – the Despotate of Epirus, the Empire of Nicaea and the Empire of Trebizond. Thessaloniki fell to Epirus in 1224, and Constantinople to Nicaea in 1261. Achaea and Athens survived under the French after the Treaty of Viterbo.[207] The Venetians endured a long-standing conflict with the Ottoman Empire until the final possessions were lost in the Seventh Ottoman–Venetian War in the 18th century. This period of Greek history is known as the Frankokratia or Latinokratia ("Frankish or Latin rule") and designates a period when western European Catholics ruled Orthodox Byzantine Greeks.[208]
The major crusades of the 14th century include: the Crusade against the Dulcinians; the Crusade of the Poor; the Anti-Catalan Crusade; the Shepherds' Crusade; the Smyrniote Crusades; the Crusade against Novgorod; the Savoyard Crusade; the Alexandrian Crusade; the Despenser's Crusade; the Mahdia, Tedelis, and Bona Crusades; and the Crusade of Nicopolis.
The threat of the expanding Ottoman Empire prompted further crusades of the 15th century. In 1389, the Ottomans defeated the Serbs at the Battle of Kosovo, won control of the Balkans from the Danube to the Gulf of Corinth, in 1396 defeated French crusaders and King Sigismund of Hungary at the Nicopolis, in 1444 destroyed a crusading Polish and Hungarian force at Varna, four years later again defeated the Hungarians at Kosovo and in 1453 captured Constantinople. The 16th century saw growing rapprochement. The Habsburgs, French, Spanish and Venetians and Ottomans all signed treaties. Francis I of France allied with all quarters, including from German Protestant princes and Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent.[209]
Anti-Christian crusading declined in the 15th century, the exceptions were the six failed crusades against the religiously radical Hussites in Bohemia and attacks on the Waldensians in Savoy.[210] Crusading became a financial exercise; precedence was given to the commercial and political objectives. The military threat presented by the Ottoman Turks diminished, making anti-Ottoman crusading obsolete in 1699 with the final Holy League.[211][212]
Crusading movement
Prior to the 11th century, the Latin Church had developed a system for the remission and absolution of sin in return for contrition, confession, and penitential acts. Reparation through abstinence from martial activity still presented a difficulty to the noble warrior class. It was revolutionary when Gregory VII offered absolution of sin earned through the Church-sponsored violence in support of his causes, if selflessly given at the end of the century.[213][214] This was developed by subsequent Popes into the granting of plenary indulgences that reduced all God-imposed temporal penalties.[215] The papacy developed "Political Augustinianism" into attempts to remove the Church from secular control by asserting ecclesiastical supremacy over temporal polities and the Orthodox Church. This was associated with the idea that the Church should actively intervene in the world to impose "justice".[216]
A distinct ideology promoting and regulating crusading is evidenced in surviving texts. The Church defined this in legal and theological terms based on the theory of holy war and the concept of pilgrimage. Theology merged the Old Testament Israelite wars instigated and assisted by God with New Testament Christocentric views. Holy war was based on ancient ideas of just war. The fourth-century theologian Augustine of Hippo had Christianised this, and it eventually became the paradigm of Christian holy war. Theologians widely accepted the justification that holy war against pagans was good, because of their opposition to Christianity.[215] The Holy Land was the patrimony of Christ; its recovery was on behalf of God. The Albigensian Crusade was a defence of the French Church, the Northern Crusades were campaigns conquering lands beloved of Christ's mother Mary for Christianity.[217]
Inspired by the First Crusade, the crusading movement went on to define late medieval western culture and impacted the history of the western Islamic world.[218] Christendom was geopolitical, and this underpinned the practice of the medieval Church. Reformists of the 11th century urged these ideas which declined following the Reformation. The ideology continued after the 16th century with the military orders but dwindled in competition with other forms of religious war and new ideologies.[219]
Military orders
The military orders were forms of a religious order first established early in the twelfth century with the function of defending Christians, as well as observing monastic vows. The Knights Hospitaller had a medical mission in Jerusalem since before the First Crusade, later becoming a formidable military force supporting the crusades in the Holy Land and Mediterranean. The Knights Templar were founded in 1119 by a band of knights who dedicated themselves to protecting pilgrims en route to Jerusalem.[220] The Teutonic Knights were formed in 1190 to protect pilgrims in both the Holy Land and Baltic region.[221]
The Hospitallers and the Templars became supranational organisations as papal support led to rich donations of land and revenue across Europe. This, in turn, led to a steady flow of new recruits and the wealth to maintain multiple fortifications in the crusader states. In time, they developed into autonomous powers in the region.[222] After the fall of Acre the Hospitallers relocated to Cyprus, then ruled Rhodes until the island was taken by the Ottomans in 1522. While there was talk of merging the Templars and Hospitallers in 1305 by Clement V, ultimately the Templars were charged with heresy and disbanded. The Teutonic Knights supported the later Prussian campaigns into the fifteenth century.
Art and architecture
According to the historian Joshua Prawer no major European poet, theologian, scholar or historian settled in the crusader states. Some went on pilgrimage, and this is seen in new imagery and ideas in western poetry. Although they did not migrate east themselves, their output often encouraged others to journey there on pilgrimage.[223]
Historians consider the crusader military architecture of the Middle East to demonstrate a synthesis of the European, Byzantine and Muslim traditions and to be the most original and impressive artistic achievement of the crusades. Castles were a tangible symbol of the dominance of a Latin Christian minority over a largely hostile majority population. They also acted as centres of administration.[224] Modern historiography rejects the 19th-century consensus that Westerners learnt the basis of military architecture from the Near East, as Europe had already experienced rapid development in defensive technology before the First Crusade. Direct contact with Arab fortifications originally constructed by the Byzantines did influence developments in the east, but the lack of documentary evidence means that it remains difficult to differentiate between the importance of this design culture and the constraints of situation. The latter led to the inclusion of oriental design features such as large water reservoirs and the exclusion of occidental features such as moats.[225]
Typically, crusader church design was in the French Romanesque style. This can be seen in the 12th-century rebuilding of the Holy Sepulchre. It retained some of the Byzantine details, but new arches and chapels were built to northern French, Aquitanian, and Provençal patterns. There is little trace of any surviving indigenous influence in sculpture, although in the Holy Sepulchre the column capitals of the south facade follow classical Syrian patterns.[226]
In contrast to architecture and sculpture, it is in the area of visual culture that the assimilated nature of the society was demonstrated. Throughout the 12th and 13th centuries the influence of indigenous artists was demonstrated in the decoration of shrines, paintings and the production of illuminated manuscripts. Frankish practitioners borrowed methods from the Byzantines and indigenous artists and iconographical practice leading to a cultural synthesis, illustrated by the Church of the Nativity. Wall mosaics were unknown in the west but in widespread use in the crusader states. Whether this was by indigenous craftsmen or learnt by Frankish ones is unknown, but a distinctive original artistic style evolved.[227]
Manuscripts were produced and illustrated in workshops housing Italian, French, English and local craftsmen leading to a cross-fertilisation of ideas and techniques. An example of this is the Melisende Psalter, created by several hands in a workshop attached to the Holy Sepulchre. This style could have both reflected and influenced the taste of patrons of the arts. But what is seen is an increase in stylised, Byzantine-influenced content. This extended to the production of icons, unknown at the time to the Franks, sometimes in a Frankish style and even of western saints. This is seen as the origin of Italian panel painting.[228] While it is difficult to track illumination of manuscripts and castle design back to their origins, textual sources are simpler. The translations made in Antioch are notable, but they are considered of secondary importance to the works emanating from Muslim Spain and from the hybrid culture of Sicily.[229]
Financing
Crusade finance and taxation left a legacy of social, financial, and legal institutions. Property became available while coinage and precious materials circulated more readily within Europe. Crusading expeditions created immense demands for food supplies, weapons, and shipping that benefited merchants and artisans. Levies for crusades contributed to the development of centralised financial administrations and the growth of papal and royal taxation. This aided development of representative bodies whose consent was required for many forms of taxation.[230]
The Crusades strengthened exchanges between Oriental and Occidental economic spheres. The transport of pilgrims and crusaders notably benefitted Italian maritime cities, such as the trio of Venice, Pisa, and Genoa. Having obtained commercial privileges in the fortified places of Syria, they became the favoured intermediaries for trade in goods such as silk, spices, as well as other raw alimentary goods and mineral products. Trade with the Muslim world was thus extended beyond existing limits. Merchants were further advantaged by technological improvements, and long-distance trade as a whole expanded.[231] The increased volume of goods being traded through ports of the Latin Levant and the Muslim world made this the cornerstone of a wider Middle Eastern economy, as manifested in important cities along the trade routes, such as Aleppo, Damascus, and Acre. It became increasingly common for European merchants to venture farther east, and business was conducted fairly despite religious differences, and continued even in times of political and military tensions.[230]
Legacy
The Crusades created national mythologies, tales of heroism, and a few place names.[232] Historical parallelism and the tradition of drawing inspiration from the Middle Ages have become keystones of political Islam encouraging ideas of a modern jihad and a centuries-long struggle against Christian states, while secular Arab nationalism highlights the role of western imperialism.[233] Modern Muslim thinkers, politicians and historians have drawn parallels between the crusades and political developments such as the establishment of Israel in 1948.[234]
Right-wing circles in the western world have drawn opposing parallels, considering Christianity to be under an Islamic religious and demographic threat that is analogous to the situation at the time of the crusades. Crusader symbols and anti-Islamic rhetoric are presented as an appropriate response. These symbols and rhetoric are used to provide a religious justification and inspiration for a struggle against a religious enemy.[235]
Historiography
The historiography of the Crusades is concerned with their "history of the histories" during the Crusader period. The subject is a complex one, with overviews provided in Select Bibliography of the Crusades,[236] Modern Historiography,[237] and Crusades (Bibliography and Sources).[238] The histories describing the Crusades are broadly of three types: (1) The primary sources of the Crusades,[239] which include works written in the medieval period, generally by participants in the Crusade or written contemporaneously with the event, letters and documents in archives, and archaeological studies; (2) secondary sources, beginning with early consolidated works in the 16th century and continuing to modern times; and (3) tertiary sources, primarily encyclopedias, bibliographies and genealogies.
Primary sources
The primary sources for the Crusades are generally presented in the individual articles on each Crusade and summarised in the list of sources for the Crusades.[240] For the First Crusade, this includes the original Latin chronicles, including the Gesta Francorum, works by Albert of Aachen and Fulcher of Chartres, the Alexiad by Byzantine princess Anna Komnene, the Complete Work of History by Muslim historian Ali ibn al-Athir, and the Chronicle of Armenian historian Matthew of Edessa. Many of these and related texts are found in the collections Recueil des historiens des croisades (RHC) and Crusade Texts in Translation. The work of William of Tyre, Historia Rerum in Partibus Transmarinis Gestarum, and its continuations by later historians complete the foundational work of the traditional Crusade.[241] Some of these works also provide insight into the later Crusades and Crusader states. Other works include:
- Eyewitness accounts of the Second Crusade by Odo of Deuil and Otto of Freising. The Arab view from Damascus is provided by ibn al-Qalanisi.
- Works on the Third Crusade such as Libellus de Expugnatione Terrae Sanctae per Saladinum expeditione, the Itinerarium Regis Ricardi, and the works of Crusaders Tageno and Roger of Howden, and the narratives of Richard of Devizes, Ralph de Diceto, Ralph of Coggeshall and Arnold of Lübeck. The Arabic works by al-Isfahani and al-Maqdisi as well as the biography of Saladin by Baha ad-Din ibn Shaddad are also of interest.
- The Fourth Crusade is described in the Devastatio Constantinopolitana and works of Geoffrey of Villehardouin, in his chronicle De la Conquête de Constantinople, Robert de Clari and Gunther of Pairis. The view of Byzantium is provided by Niketas Choniates and the Arab perspective is given by Abū Shāma and Abu'l-Fida.
- The history of the Fifth and Sixth Crusades is well represented in the works of Jacques de Vitry, Oliver of Paderborn and Roger of Wendover, and the Arabic works of Badr al-Din al-Ayni.
- Key sources for the later Crusades include Gestes des Chiprois, Jean de Joinville's Life of Saint Louis, as well as works by Guillaume de Nangis, Matthew Paris, Fidentius of Padua and al-Makrizi.
After the fall of Acre, the crusades continued through the 16th century. Principal references on this subject are the Wisconsin Collaborative History of the Crusades[242] and Norman Housley's The Later Crusades, 1274–1580: From Lyons to Alcazar.[243] Complete bibliographies are also given in these works.
Secondary sources
The secondary sources of the Crusades began in the 16th century, with one of the first uses of the term crusades by 17th century French historian Louis Maimbourg in his Histoire des Croisades pour la délivrance de la Terre Sainte.[244][245] Other works of the 18th century include Voltaire's Histoire des Croisades,[246] and Edward Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, excerpted as The Crusades, A.D. 1095–1261.[247] This edition also includes an essay on chivalry by Walter Scott, whose works helped popularize the Crusades. Early in the 19th century, the monumental Histoire des Croisades was published by the French historian Joseph François Michaud, a major new narrative based on original sources.[248][249]
These histories have provided evolving views of the Crusades as discussed in detail in the Historiography writeup in Crusading movement. Modern works that serve as secondary source material are listed in the Bibliography section below and need no further discussion here.[250]
Tertiary sources
Three such works are: Louis Bréhier's multiple works on the Crusades[251] in the Catholic Encyclopedia; the works of Ernest Barker[252] in the Encyclopædia Britannica (11th edition), later expanded into a separate publication;[253] and The Crusades: An Encyclopedia (2006), edited by historian Alan V. Murray.[254]
See also
- A History of the Crusades: list of contributions
- Bibliography of the Crusades: modern works
- Criticism of crusading
- Historians and histories of the Crusades
- History of Christianity
- History of the Knights Hospitaller in the Levant
- History of the Knights Templar
- Military history of the Crusader states
- Women in the Crusades
References
- ^ Helen J. Nicholson, The Crusades, (Greenwood Publishing, 2004), 6.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 1.
- ^ a b Asbridge 2012, p. 40.
- ^ Tyerman 2011, pp. 225–226.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 5.
- ^ Tyerman 2011, p. 77.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 105.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 40.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, p. 8.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 42–46.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 39–41.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 43–44.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, p. 27.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 14–15.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 14–15.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 30–31.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 30–38.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 31.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 18–19, 289.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, p. 16.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, p. 28.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 46.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, p. 34
- ^ Hindley 2004, pp. 20–21
- ^ Chazan 1996, pp. 28–34
- ^ Tyerman 2006, pp. 99–100
- ^ Asbridge 2012, p. 41
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 43–47
- ^ Hindley 2004, pp. 30–31
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 52–56
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 57–59
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 59–61
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 72–73
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 74–75
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 72–82
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 82–83, 87, 89.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 96–103
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 104–106
- ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 62
- ^ Asbridge 2012, p. 106
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 111–113
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 21–22
- ^ Asbridge 2012, p. 114
- ^ a b Asbridge 2012, pp. 106–107.
- ^ Tyerman 2006, pp. 178
- ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 62–63
- ^ Tyerman 2006, pp. 170–175
- ^ a b c Lock 2006, p. 27.
- ^ a b Lock 2006, p. 28.
- ^ Asbridge 2000, p. 138.
- ^ Asbridge 2000, pp. 138–142.
- ^ Asbridge 2000, pp. 142–145.
- ^ Asbridge 2000, pp. 146–147.
- ^ a b Lock 2006, p. 31.
- ^ a b Asbridge 2000, p. 125.
- ^ Asbridge 2000, p. 150.
- ^ Asbridge 2000, p. 153.
- ^ Asbridge 2000, pp. 155–159.
- ^ Asbridge 2000, p. 160.
- ^ Lock 2006, p. 33.
- ^ a b Asbridge 2000, pp. 163–165.
- ^ Kedar 1999.
- ^ Asbridge 2000, p. 172.
- ^ Lock 2006, pp. 36–37.
- ^ Lock 2006, p. 40.
- ^ Asbridge 2000, pp. 172–174.
- ^ Christie, Naill (2006). "Zengi (d. 1146)". In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 1293–1295.
- ^ El-Azhari 2016, pp. 10–23, The Early Career of Zengi, 1084–1127: the Turkmen influence.
- ^ Maalouf 2006, pp. 123–142, An Emir among Barbarians.
- ^ Maalouf 2006, pp. 109–122, The Damascus Conspiracies.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 214–216, The Christians lay siege to Shaizar (1138).
- ^ Barker, Ernest (1911). "Baldwin III". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 3. (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press. p. 246–247.
- ^ a b Baldwin, Marshall W. (1969). "Chapter XVII. The Latin States under Baldwin III and Amalric I, 1143–1174[permanent dead link ]". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Baldwin, Marshall W. (eds.). A History of the Crusades: Volume One. The First Hundred Years. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 528–563.
- ^ Gibb, Hamilton A. R. (1969). "Zengi and the Fall of Edessa". In Setton, K. A History of the Crusades: Volume I. pp. 449–462.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 225–246, The Fall of Edessa.
- ^ MacEvitt, Christopher (2006). "Edessa, City of". In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 378–379.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 225–232, Zangi – Champion of Islam, The Advent of Nūr-ad-Din.
- ^ Berry, Virginia G. (1969). "Chapter XV. The Second Crusade Archived 2021-07-09 at the Wayback Machine". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Baldwin, Marshall W. (eds.). A History of the Crusades: Volume One. The First Hundred Years. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 463–512.
- ^ Gibb, Hamilton A. R. (1969). "Chapter XVIII. The Rise of Saladin, 1169–1189". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Baldwin, Marshall W. (eds.). A History of the Crusades: Volume One. The First Hundred Years. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 563–589.
- ^ Beverly Mayne Kienzle and James Calder Walton (2006). Second Crusade (1147–1149). In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 1083–1090.
- ^ Tyerman 2006, pp. 268–303, God's Bargain: Summoning the Second Crusade.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 268–274, The French in Asia Minor, 1147–1148.
- ^ Gibb, Hamilton A. R. (1969). "Chapter XVI. The Career of Nūr-ad-Din". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Baldwin, Marshall W. (eds.). A History of the Crusades: Volume One. The First Hundred Years. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 513–528.
- ^ Maalouf 2006, pp. 143–158, Nūr-ad-Din, the Saint King.
- ^ a b Runciman 1952, pp. 278–288, Fiasco.
- ^ Jaspert, Nikolas (2006). Tortosa (Spain). In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. p. 1186.
- ^ Lind, John H. (2006). Wendish Crusade (1147). In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 1265–1268.
- ^ Barker, Ernest (1911). "Raymund of Antioch". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 22. (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press. p. 934.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 329–330, Turbessel ceded to Byzantium (1150).
- ^ Lewis 2017, p. 167, Military Decline and Matrimonial Discord: Count Raymond II (1137–1152).
- ^ Runciman 1952, p. 333, Murder of Raymond II (1152).
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 338–342, The Rise of Nur ed-Din: The Capture of Ascalon, 1153.
- ^ Barker, Ernest (1911). "Amalric". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 1. (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press. pp. 778–779.
- ^ Winifred Frances Peck (1911). "Saladin". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 24. (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 380–382, Amalric advances on Cairo.
- ^ Barber 2012, p. 240, The Zengid Threat.
- ^ Bird, Jessalynn (2006). Damietta. In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 343–344.
- ^ Lewis 2003, pp. 113–117, The Old Man of the Mountain.
- ^ Barker, Ernest (1911). "Baldwin IV". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 3. (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press. p. 247.
- ^ a b Baldwin, Marshall W. (1969). "Chapter XIX. The Decline and Fall of Jerusalem, 1174–1189 Archived 2023-06-01 at the Wayback Machine". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Baldwin, Marshall W. (eds.). A History of the Crusades: Volume One. The First Hundred Years. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 590–621.
- ^ Barker, Ernest (1911). "Raynald of Châtillon". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 22. (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press. p. 936.
- ^ Barker, Ernest (1911). "Raymund of Tripoli". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 22. (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press. p. 935.
- ^ Gerish, Deborah (2006). Guy of Lusignan (d. 1194). In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 549–551.
- ^ Lewis 2017, pp. 233–284, The Regent Thwarted: Count Raymond III (1174–1187).
- ^ Hoch, Martin (2006). Hattin, Battle of (1187). In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 559–561.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, p. 367, Called to Crusade.
- ^ Nicholson, Helen (2006). "Third Crusade (1189–1192)". In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 1174–1181.
- ^ Tyerman 2006, pp. 375–401, The Call of the Cross.
- ^ Johnson, Edgar N. (1977). "The Crusades of Frederick Barbarossa and Henry VI.". In Setton, K., A History of the Crusades: Volume II. pp. 87–122.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 420–422, The Fate of the German Crusade.
- ^ Painter, Sidney (1977). "The Third Crusade: Richard the Lionhearted and Philip Augustus Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine.". In Setton, K. A History of the Crusades: Volume II. pp. 45–86.
- ^ Murray 2009.
- ^ Norgate 1924, pp. 152–175, The Fall of Acre, 1191.
- ^ Oman 1924, pp. 306–319, Tactics of the Crusades: Battles of Arsouf and Jaffa (Volume I).
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 70–72, Richard's Last Victory (1192).
- ^ von Sybel 1861, pp. 89–91, Treaty with Saladin.
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 97–98, The German Crusade of 1197.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 168
- ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 240–242.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 249–250.
- ^ "Summons to a Crusade, 1215". Internet Medieval Sourcebook. Fordham University. pp. 337–344.
- ^ Michael Ott (1910). "Pope Honorius III". In Catholic Encyclopedia. 7. New York.
- ^ Van Cleve, Thomas C. (1977). "The Fifth Crusade Archived 2023-03-26 at the Wayback Machine". In Setton, K., A History of the Crusades: Volume II. pp. 343–376.
- ^ Powell, James M. (2006). "The Fifth Crusade". In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 427–432.
- ^ Gibb 1969, pp. 697–700, The Ayyubids through 1221.
- ^ Tyerman 2006, pp. 626–649, The Fifth Crusade, 1213–1221.
- ^ Tyerman 1996, p. 97, The Fifth Crusade.
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 132–179, The Fifth Crusade.
- ^ Paschal Robinson (1909). "St. Francis of Assisi". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. 6. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
- ^ Maalouf 2006, pp. 218–226, The Perfect and the Just.
- ^ Christie 2014, Document 16: Al-Kamil Muhammad and the Fifth Crusade.
- ^ Perry 2013, pp. 89–121, The Fifth Crusade.
- ^ Richard 1999, pp. 299–307, The Egyptian Campaign of the Legate Pelagius.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 551–562, The Fifth Crusade.
- ^ Franz Kampers (1909). "Frederick II". In Catholic Encyclopedia. 6. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
- ^ a b Van Cleve, Thomas C. (1977). "The Crusade of Frederick II Archived 2024-01-13 at the Wayback Machine". In Setton, K. A History of the Crusades: Volume II. pp. 377–448.
- ^ Markowski, Michael. "Crucesignatus: its origins and early usage". Journal of Medieval History (1984), pp. 157–165.
- ^ Weiler, Björn K. (2006). "Crusade of Emperor Frederick II (1227–1229)". In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 313–315.
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 171–205, The Emperor Frederick.
- ^ Tyerman 2006, pp. 739–780, The Crusade of Frederick II, 1227–1229.
- ^ Gibb 1969, pp. 700–702, The Ayyubids from 1221–1229.
- ^ Maalouf 2006, pp. 226–227, Fakhr ad-Din.
- ^ Michael Ott (1909). "Pope Gregory IX". In Catholic Encyclopedia. 6. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
- ^ Tyerman 1996, pp. 99–101, The Crusade of 1227–1229.
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 183–184, Frederick at Acre (1228).
- ^ Richard 1999, pp. 312–318, The Sixth Crusade and the Treaty of Jaffa.
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 189–190, Frederick at Jerusalem (1229).
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 562–571, Frederick II's Crusade.
- ^ Munro 1902, pp. 24–30, Letters of the Sixth Crusade.
- ^ Christie 2014, Document 17: Two sources on the Handover of Jerusalem to Frederick II.
- ^ Burgturf, Jochen. "Crusade of 1239–1241". The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 309–311.
- ^ Painter, Sidney (1977). "The Crusade of Theobald of Champagne and Richard of Cornwall, 1239–1241 Archived 2023-06-01 at the Wayback Machine.". In Setton, K., A History of the Crusades: Volume II. pp. 463–486.
- ^ Hendrickx, Benjamin. "Baldwin II of Constantinople". The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 133–135.
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 205–220, Legalized Anarchy.
- ^ Jackson, Peter. "The Crusades of 1239–1241 and Their Aftermath". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol. 50, No. 1 (1987). pp. 32–60.
- ^ Gibb 1969, pp. 703–709, The Ayyubids from 1229–1244.
- ^ Burgturf, Jochen. "Gaza, Battle of (1239)". The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 498–499.
- ^ Tyerman 2006, pp. 755–780, The Crusades of 1239–1241.
- ^ Tyerman 1996, pp. 101–107, The Crusade of Richard of Cornwall.
- ^ Richard 1999, pp. 319–324, The Barons' Crusade.
- ^ J. B. Bury (1911). "Baldwin II (emperor of Romania)" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 3. (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 867.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 574–576, The Bane of Palestine.
- ^ a b Strayer, Joseph R. (1977). "Chapter XIV. The Crusades of Louis IX Archived 2021-12-07 at the Wayback Machine". In Wolff, Robert L. and Hazard, H. W. (eds.). A History of the Crusades: Volume II, The Later Crusades 1187–1311. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 487–521.
- ^ James Thomson Shotwell (1911). "Louis IX. of France". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 17. (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 37–38.
- ^ Michael Ott (1910). "Pope Innocent IV". In Catholic Encyclopedia. 8. New York.
- ^ Goldsmith, Linda (2006). Crusade of Louis IX to the East (1248–1254). In The Crusades – An Encyclopedia. pp. 321–324.
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 256–257, King Louis sails from Agues-Mortes (1248.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 580–584, The preparation for war.
- ^ Riley-Smith 1973, pp. 21–39, Lords, Lordships and Vavasours.
- ^ Runciman 1954, p. 259–260, Negotiations with the Mongols.
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 262–263, Louis at Damietta (1249).
- ^ a b Barber 1994, pp. 148–151, The last years of the Templars in Palestine and Syria.
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 264–265, The Crusaders Advance towards Mansourah.
- ^ Gibb 1969, p. 712, as-Salih Ayyub.
- ^ Nicolle, David (2006). Mansurah. In The Crusades – An Encyclopedia. pp. 794–795.
- ^ a b Tyerman 2006, pp. 793_802, Defeat, February–March 1250.
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 268–269, Turanshah takes Command of the Moslems (1250).
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 270–271, Louis in Prison (1250).
- ^ Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. .
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 606–608
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 616–621
- ^ Tyerman 2006, pp. 816–817
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 628–630
- ^ Summerson 2005
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 643–644
- ^ Runciman 1954, pp. 387–426, The Fall of Acre.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 638–656, The Holy Land Reclaimed.
- ^ Housley 1992.
- ^ Jaspert, Nikolas (2006). "Tortosa (Spain)". In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. p. 1186.
- ^ Lind, John H. (2006). " Wendish Crusade (1147)". In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 1265–1268.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 188.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 191.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 131
- ^ Lock 2006, pp. 212–213.
- ^ Riley-Smith 2001, p. 2.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 199–205.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 202–203.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 315–327.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 328–333.
- ^ a b Riley-Smith 2001, pp. 42–43.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 193.
- ^ Housley 1982.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 193–196.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 195–198.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 198.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 353–354.
- ^ Lock 2006, pp. 125, 133, 337, 436–437.
- ^ Hendrickx, Benjamin (2006). "Constantinople, Latin Empire of". In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 279–286.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 406–408.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 358–359.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 257.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 9, 257, 420–421.
- ^ Tyerman 2011, p. 61.
- ^ Latham 2012, p. 123.
- ^ a b Maier 2006a, pp. 627–629.
- ^ Latham 2012, p. 118.
- ^ Maier 2006a, pp. 629–630.
- ^ Riley-Smith 1995, pp. 4–5, 36.
- ^ Maier 2006a, pp. 630–631.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, p. 168
- ^ Barker, Ernest (1911). "Teutonic Order, The". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica 26 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 676–679.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 169–170
- ^ Prawer 1972, p. 468.
- ^ Prawer 1972, pp. 280–281.
- ^ Prawer 1972, pp. 295–296.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 146.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 145–146.
- ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 147–149.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 667–668.
- ^ a b Bird, Jessalynn (2006). "Finance of Crusades". In The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 432–436.
- ^ Cartwright, Mark (8 January 2019). "Trade in Medieval Europe". World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 30 April 2021.
- ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 468.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 675–680.
- ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 674–675.
- ^ Koch 2017, p. 1
- ^ Zacour, N. P.; Hazard, H. W., Editor. Select Bibliography of the Crusades Archived 2020-06-20 at the Wayback Machine. (A History of the Crusades, volume, VI) Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989, pp. 511–664.
- ^ Tyerman, Christopher (2006). "Historiography, Modern". The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. pp. 582–588.
- ^ Bréhier, Louis René (1908). "Crusades (Sources and Bibliography)". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. 4. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
- ^ Slack 2013, p. 111, Historians.
- ^ Halsall, Paul (ed.). "Selected Sources – The Crusades". Internet History Sourcebooks Project. Fordham University.
- ^ Primary Bibliography. In Phillips, J., Holy Warriors (2009).
- ^ Setton, K. M. (Kenneth Meyer). (1969). A history of the Crusades. [2d ed.] Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- ^ Housley, Norman (1992). The Later Crusades, 1274–1580: From Lyons to Alcazar. Oxford University Press.
- ^ Maimbourg, L. (1677). Histoire des croisades pour la délivrance de la Terre Sainte. 2d ed. Paris.
- ^ Lock 2006, p. 258, Historiography.
- ^ Voltaire (1751). Histoire des croisades. Berlin.
- ^ Gibbon, E., Kaye, J., Scott, W., Caoursin, G. (1870). The crusades. London.
- ^ Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.). (1841). Histoire des croisades. 6. éd. Paris.
- ^ Michaud, J. Fr., Robson, W. (1881). The history of the crusades. New ed. London.
- ^ Secondary Bibliography. In Phillips, J. Holy Warriors (2009).
- ^ Louis René Bréhier (1868–1951) (1913). In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. 4. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
- ^ Ernest Barker (1874–1960) (1911). In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Index (11th ed.), Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Barker 1923, pp. 1–122, The Crusades.
- ^ Murray 2006.
Bibliography
- Asbridge, Thomas (2000). The Creation of the Principality of Antioch, 1098–1130. Boydell & Brewer. ISBN 978-0-85115-661-3.
- Asbridge, Thomas (2012). The Crusades: The War for the Holy Land. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-1-84983-688-3.
- Barber, Malcolm (1994). The New Knighthood. A History of the Order of the Temple. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-60473-5.
- Barber, Malcolm (2012). The Crusader States. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-18931-5.
- Barker, Ernest (1923). The Crusades. World's manuals. Oxford University Press, London.
- Chazan, Robert (1996). In The Year 1096... European Jewry and the First Crusade. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-91776-7.
- Christie, Niall (2014). Muslims and Crusaders: Christianity's Wars in the Middle East, 1095–1382, from the Islamic Sources. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-54310-2.
- El-Azhari, Taef (2016). Zengi and the Muslim response to the Crusades: The politics of Jihad. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-367-87073-7.
- Gibb, H. A. R. (1969). The Aiyūbids (PDF). A History of the Crusades (Setton), Volume II. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2023-03-26. Retrieved 2021-10-10.
- Hindley, Geoffrey (2004). The Crusades: Islam and Christianity in the Struggle for World Supremacy. Carroll & Graf Publishers. ISBN 978-0-7867-1344-8.
- Housley, Norman (1982). The Italian Crusades: The Papal-Angevin Alliance and the Crusades Against Christian Lay Powers, 1254–1343. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-821925-5.
- Housley, Norman (1992). The Later Crusades, 1274–1580: From Lyons to Alcazar. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-822136-4.
- Jotischky, Andrew (2004). Crusading and the Crusader States. Pearson Longman. ISBN 978-1-351-98392-1.
- Kedar, Benjamin Z. (1999). "On the Origins of the Earliest Laws of Frankish Jerusalem: The Canons of the Council of Nablus". Speculum. 74 (2): 310–35. doi:10.2307/2887049. ISSN 0038-7134. JSTOR 2887049.
- Koch, Ariel (2017). "The New Crusaders: Contemporary Extreme Right Symbolism and Rhetoric". Perspectives on Terrorism. 11 (5): 13–24. JSTOR 26297928.
- Latham, Andrew A. (2012). Theorizing Medieval Geopolitics – War and World Order in the Age of the Crusades. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-87184-6.
- Lewis, Bernard (2003). The Assassins: A Radical Sect in Islam. Phoenix. ISBN 978-1-84212-451-2.
- Lewis, Kevin James (2017). The Counts of Tripoli and Lebanon in the Twelfth Century: Sons of Saint-Gilles. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-5890-2.
- Lock, Peter (2006). The Routledge Companion to the Crusades. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203389638. ISBN 978-0-415-39312-6.
- Maalouf, Amin (2006). The Crusades through Arab Eyes. Saqi Books. ISBN 978-0-86356-023-1.
- Maier, Christoph T. (2006a). "Ideology". In Murray, Alan V. (ed.). The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. Vol. II: D–J. ABC-CLIO. pp. 627–631. ISBN 978-1-57607-862-4.
- Munro, Dana Carleton (1902). Letters of the Crusaders. Translations and reprints from the original sources of European history. University of Pennsylvania.
- Murray, Alan V. (2006). The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-862-4.
- Murray, Alan V. (2009). "Participants in the Third Crusade". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/98218. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- Norgate, Kate (1924). Richard the Lion Heart. Macmillan and Co.
- Oman, Charles (1924). A History of the Art of War in the Middle Ages. Metheun.
- Perry, Guy (2013). John of Brienne: King of Jerusalem, Emperor of Constantinople, c. 1175–1237. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-04310-7.
- Prawer, Joshua (1972). The Crusaders' Kingdom. Phoenix Press. ISBN 978-1-84212-224-2.
- Richard, Jean C. (1999). The Crusades, c. 1071 – c. 1291. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-62566-1.
- Riley-Smith, Jonathan (1973). The Feudal Nobility and the Kingdom of Jerusalem, 1174–1277. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-06379-8.
- Riley-Smith, Jonathan (1995). "The Crusading Movement and Historians". In Riley-Smith, Jonathan (ed.). The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades. Oxford University Press. pp. 1–12. ISBN 978-0-19-285428-5.
- Riley-Smith, Jonathan (2001). The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-285428-5.
- Runciman, Steven (1952). A History of the Crusades, Volume Two: The Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Frankish East, 1100–1187. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-34771-6.
- Runciman, Steven (1954). A History of the Crusades, Volume Three: The Kingdom of Acre and the Later Crusades. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-34772-3.
- Slack, Corliss K. (2013). Historical Dictionary of the Crusades. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-7830-3.
- Summerson, Henry (2005). "Lord Edward's crusade". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/94804. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- Tyerman, Christopher (1996). England and the Crusades, 1095–1588. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-82012-5.
- Tyerman, Christopher (2006). God's War: A New History of the Crusades. Belknap Press. ISBN 978-0-674-02387-1.
- Tyerman, Christopher (2011). The Debate on the Crusades, 1099–2010. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-7320-5.
- Tyerman, Christopher (2019). The World of the Crusades. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-21739-1.
- von Sybel, Heinrich (1861). The History and Literature of the Crusades. G. Routledge & Son, Limited.