Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poorly built rocket bus: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 18:23, 8 February 2023

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete - Mailer Diablo 07:01, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Poorly built rocket bus

Delete. This close to being a speedy delete, but it doesn't quite meet the criteria, IMO. Not notable, band vanity, near-nonsense, not encyclopedic... take your pick. android↔talk 00:18, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)

Delete, I agree. -Deadcorpse 00:21, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. I would use {speedy}}. Pavel Vozenilek 00:44, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy under which criterion? It's not quite patent nonsense, and IMO the article provides just enough context for criterion 1 under "Articles" to not apply, though that's debateable, I suppose. android↔talk 03:29, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
Keep Because I'm not a knowledge hating fascist! — (This edit by 69.162.158.161, who, surprisingly, appears to have nothing to do with the article in question.)
Delete. vanity... along with its passionate defense by a humble, unknown IP addy. Feco 04:47, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Poorly built rocket buses are dangerous. Slac speak up! 07:35, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete. So many reasons, all listed. Jayjg ^(talk) 10:13, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete for not being a genuine species of Pokemon (that being the one criterion that it doesn't yet fail). Chris 20:39, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, band vanity. Megan1967 05:40, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Damn, this is too funny. BJAODN. Grue 17:35, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
If "their lyrical themes are ghosts, monsters, fish, sea monsters and all kinds of waterfowl", I wonder what a song called "Improbable Love Story" could be about. Anyway, Delete, vanity. VladMV ٭ ^talk 18:16, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete patent in my opinion. Fawcett5 21:08, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. <br >The result of the debate was '''delete''' - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 07:01, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 ===[[Poorly built rocket bus]]===
 '''Delete'''. ''This'' close to being a speedy delete, but it doesn't quite meet the criteria, IMO. Not notable, band vanity, near-nonsense, not encyclopedic... take your pick. [[User:Android79|android]]&harr;[[User talk:Android79|talk]] 00:18, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
@@ Line 4: / Line 7: @@
 *'''Delete'''. I would use {speedy}}. [[User:Pavel Vozenilek|Pavel Vozenilek]] 00:44, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 **Speedy under which [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criterion]]? It's not ''quite'' patent nonsense, and IMO the article provides ''just enough'' context for criterion 1 under "Articles" to not apply, though that's debateable, I suppose. [[User:Android79|android]]&harr;[[User talk:Android79|talk]] 03:29, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
-*'''Keep''' Because I'm not a knowledge hating fascist!
+*'''Keep''' Because I'm not a knowledge hating fascist! &mdash; ''(This edit by [[User:69.162.158.161|69.162.158.161]], who, surprisingly, appears to have nothing to do with the article in question.)''
+*'''Delete'''. vanity... along with its passionate defense by a humble, unknown IP addy. [[User:Feco|Feco]] 04:47, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
+*'''Delete.''' Poorly built rocket buses are dangerous. [[User:Lacrimosus|Slac]] [[User talk:Lacrimosus|<small>speak up!</small>]] 07:35, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
+*'''Delete'''. So many reasons, all listed. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]][[User_talk:Jayjg|<sup style="color:darkgreen;">(talk)</sup>]] 10:13, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' for not being a genuine species of Pokemon (that being the one criterion that it doesn't yet fail). [[User:Chriscf|Chris]] 20:39, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''', not notable, band vanity. [[User:Megan1967|Megan1967]] 05:40, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
+*Damn, this is too funny. '''BJAODN'''. [[User:Grue|Grue]] 17:35, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
+*If "their lyrical themes are ghosts, monsters, fish, sea monsters and all kinds of waterfowl", I wonder what a song called "Improbable Love Story" could be about. Anyway, '''Delete''', vanity. [[User:Vmv|<span style="color:#0000C0;">Vlad</span><span style="color:#989ACC;">M</span><span style="color:#0000C0;">V</span>]]<span style="color:#6F078D;"> &#1645; </span><sup>[[User_talk:Vmv|<span style="color:#0000C0;">talk</span>]]</sup> 18:16, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' patent in my opinion. [[User:Fawcett5|Fawcett5]] 21:08, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
+This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''.
+</div >