User:Samhastings/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Samhastings (talk | contribs) The third millenium started on January 1, 2000, not 200l as stated in the summary for the third millenium |
No edit summary |
||
| (70 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Under the heading "Numerical explanation" in the above discussion, the explanations of the ordinal and cardinal numbering systems are excellently portrayed. The following paragraph points out the ambiguity raised by the use of "one" to represent both "year one" or the "first" year. It goes on to say that there is no way to tell which "one" is intended. I offer the following table as a direct way to eliminate the ambiguity. Let M represent a millenium, C a century, D a decade, Y a year and H an hour: |
<nowiki><nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>Under the heading "Numerical explanation" in the above discussion, the explanations of the ordinal and cardinal numbering systems are excellently portrayed. The following paragraph points out the ambiguity raised by the use of "one" to represent both "year one" or the "first" year. It goes on to say that there is no way to tell which "one" is intended. I offer the following table as a direct way to eliminate the ambiguity. Let M represent a millenium, C a century, D a decade, Y a year and H an hour: |
||
-M- -C- -D- -Y- -H- |
-M- -C- -D- -Y- -H- |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Cardinal 2nd 0 0 0 0 Starting point for measuring the passage of time |
Cardinal 2nd 0 0 0 0 Starting point for measuring the passage of time |
||
It stands to reason that the beginning of the first hour is also the beginning of millenia, centuries, decades and years. I offer the sundial as |
It stands to reason that the beginning of the first hour is also the beginning of millenia, centuries, decades and years. I offer the sundial as proof that the first hour started at zero. The off-quoted reason presented for the belief in a so-called "missing year zero" is that Dionysius Exiguus didn't know of the symbol 0. The ancients established the highest point of the sun in the sky as their 0 (the meridian). The first hour on the sundial started at XII (their sundial 0) and ended at I(1). |
||
<nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki> |
|||
If you believe this (as I certainly do) then the start of the third millenium truly was January 1, 2000. |
|||
[[[| 2nd yr BC | 1st yr BC | 1st yr AD | 2nd yr AD | |
|||
| Year 3757 | Year 3758 | Year 0 AD | Year 1 AD | |
|||
| Year 1 BC | Year 0 AD | Year 1 AD | Year 2 AD | |
|||
|-2 |-1 |0 |+1 |+2 |
|||
[[[|-2 |-1 | 0 |+1 |+2 | |
|||
| 2nd yrBC|1st yrBC|1sy yrAD|year 0 AD|2nd yrAD |
|||
[|-2..........|-1..........|0.........|+1...........|+2] |
|||
Don't you see? Cassini marked the year Christ was born 0 whereas the chronologists that year as -1. |
|||
Latest revision as of 23:17, 12 February 2010
<nowiki>Insert non-formatted text hereUnder the heading "Numerical explanation" in the above discussion, the explanations of the ordinal and cardinal numbering systems are excellently portrayed. The following paragraph points out the ambiguity raised by the use of "one" to represent both "year one" or the "first" year. It goes on to say that there is no way to tell which "one" is intended. I offer the following table as a direct way to eliminate the ambiguity. Let M represent a millenium, C a century, D a decade, Y a year and H an hour:
-M- -C- -D- -Y- -H-
Ordinal 3rd 1st 1st 1st 1st Placing things in order
Cardinal 2nd 0 0 0 0 Starting point for measuring the passage of time
It stands to reason that the beginning of the first hour is also the beginning of millenia, centuries, decades and years. I offer the sundial as proof that the first hour started at zero. The off-quoted reason presented for the belief in a so-called "missing year zero" is that Dionysius Exiguus didn't know of the symbol 0. The ancients established the highest point of the sun in the sky as their 0 (the meridian). The first hour on the sundial started at XII (their sundial 0) and ended at I(1).
Insert non-formatted text here
[[[| 2nd yr BC | 1st yr BC | 1st yr AD | 2nd yr AD |
| Year 3757 | Year 3758 | Year 0 AD | Year 1 AD |
| Year 1 BC | Year 0 AD | Year 1 AD | Year 2 AD |
|-2 |-1 |0 |+1 |+2
[[[|-2 |-1 | 0 |+1 |+2 |
| 2nd yrBC|1st yrBC|1sy yrAD|year 0 AD|2nd yrAD
[|-2..........|-1..........|0.........|+1...........|+2]
Don't you see? Cassini marked the year Christ was born 0 whereas the chronologists that year as -1.